Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi, On 03-01-2020 07:56, Paul Gevers wrote: > We currently have a bit much transitions going on (and some backslash > from a piuparts bug), so I'd like to get a bit of those transitions off > the table before starting this one. > > I'll let you know, probably in a week or so. Please go ahead. Paul
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi, > They build-depend on llvm/clang, not sure whether they are actually part > of the transition. I worked a bit on the tracker page and I think it has a better view of what is involved (basically limiting "Affected" to the -dev packages from llvm-defaults). We currently have a bit much transitions going on (and some backslash from a piuparts bug), so I'd like to get a bit of those transitions off the table before starting this one. I'll let you know, probably in a week or so. Paul
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:43:11AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >... > > Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust. > > But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried > about. rustc hardcodes the llvm version (and already uses 9), so rustc is not part of this transition. > Also, do you understand why rust-bindgen and rust-clang-sys are > mentioned in the tracker? I looked *briefly* but didn't spot the > connection yet. >... They build-depend on llvm/clang, not sure whether they are actually part of the transition. According to dak they are leaf packages in bullseye, so potential rust related issues with this transition could be handled with removal hints. > Paul cu Adrian
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Hi Sylvestre, On 27-12-2019 10:46, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried >> about. Also, do you understand why rust-bindgen and rust-clang-sys are >> mentioned in the tracker? I looked *briefly* but didn't spot the >> connection yet. > > They depends on llvm/clang packages. A rebuild should fix them. But rebuilding isn't enough, they need to migrate to testing. rust-bindgen hasn't migrated since 2019-10-23, it's currently blocked by rustc (but that can't have been the problem in the beginning). rustc isn't migrating since 2019-11-28, although it might just make it tomorrow, if not blocked by e.g. *rust-clang-sys*. rust-clang-sys needs a fix for a failing autopkgtest, otherwise it won't migrate (already in that state for 30 days). Packages like rust-glob haven't migrated for 163 days, so it seems to me the whole rust stack is interwoven and it needs more coordination by the rust maintainers to get it moving to testing. A bit of elaboration on how this is all supposed to work might help us understanding the situation such that we can help if needed. Paul
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Le 27/12/2019 à 10:43, Paul Gevers a écrit : What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm seeing rust package in the picture Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust. But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried about. Also, do you understand why rust-bindgen and rust-clang-sys are mentioned in the tracker? I looked *briefly* but didn't spot the connection yet. They depends on llvm/clang packages. A rebuild should fix them. Build-Depends: [...] libclang-dev , llvm, clang Build-Depends: [...] clang https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916837 How is the support for -6.0? Could be serious in my book. yeah. I bump the deps, not this one. Doing it now :) About 7: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947438 S
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Hi Sylvestre, On 26-12-2019 22:18, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Just to get it clear, this is only switching the default from 8 to 9, >> right? > And rebuild packages to depend on -9. Sure; for those that don't hard-code the version. >> What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm >> seeing rust package in the picture > Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust. But rustc is having issues migrating, so this is something I am worried about. Also, do you understand why rust-bindgen and rust-clang-sys are mentioned in the tracker? I looked *briefly* but didn't spot the connection yet. > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916837 How is the support for -6.0? Could be serious in my book. Paul
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Le 26/12/2019 à 21:40, Paul Gevers a écrit : Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sylvestre, On 22-12-2019 11:57, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time on the -8 branch. It is therefor time to move to the version 9 Just to get it clear, this is only switching the default from 8 to 9, right? And rebuild packages to depend on -9. What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm seeing rust package in the picture Besides rustc, it should not have an impact on rust. and it seems to me that those need some coordination that I am currently not seeing in order to migrate. Side question, will you be taking care of *removing* some branches from unstable/testing as well? It seems to me that we are have a bit too many currently: llvm-toolchain-6.0, llvm-toolchain-7, llvm-toolchain-8 and llvm-toolchain-9 are the ones I know about. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916837 Good point for -7, I forgot to fill it :) Thanks S
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sylvestre, On 22-12-2019 11:57, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant > time on the -8 branch. > It is therefor time to move to the version 9 Just to get it clear, this is only switching the default from 8 to 9, right? What happens if rebuilt packages don't migrate to testing? I'm seeing rust package in the picture and it seems to me that those need some coordination that I am currently not seeing in order to migrate. Side question, will you be taking care of *removing* some branches from unstable/testing as well? It seems to me that we are have a bit too many currently: llvm-toolchain-6.0, llvm-toolchain-7, llvm-toolchain-8 and llvm-toolchain-9 are the ones I know about. Paul
Bug#947165: transition: llvm-defaults to 9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, LLVM 9.0.1 has just been released. I am not planning to spend significant time on the -8 branch. It is therefor time to move to the version 9 Thanks, Sylvestre Ben file: title = "llvm-defaults"; Affected: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[3456789]/ Good: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[9]/ Bad: .depends ~ /(clang|llvm)1?-?[345678]/
