Bug#949102: eclipse-titan: FTBFS: fails to resolve the local hostname
Got it, thanks! Then the change will come with the next release. Mattia Rizzolo ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jan. 21., K 17:50): > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Pilisi Gergely wrote: > > Upstream has modified the script, so if the nslookup fails, then it will > > try to communicate on 127.0.0.1. The nightly tests are running right now, > > if everything is green, then I'll patch the package. > > ACK, in the meantime I also patched pbuilder so it addds the local > hostname to /etc/hosts; though as I said I don't think that's something > good to rely on. > > So, it can also wait on whenever the next release will happen naturally. > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- >
Bug#949102: eclipse-titan: FTBFS: fails to resolve the local hostname
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:48:42PM +0100, Pilisi Gergely wrote: > Upstream has modified the script, so if the nslookup fails, then it will > try to communicate on 127.0.0.1. The nightly tests are running right now, > if everything is green, then I'll patch the package. ACK, in the meantime I also patched pbuilder so it addds the local hostname to /etc/hosts; though as I said I don't think that's something good to rely on. So, it can also wait on whenever the next release will happen naturally. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#949102: eclipse-titan: FTBFS: fails to resolve the local hostname
Hi, Upstream has modified the script, so if the nslookup fails, then it will try to communicate on 127.0.0.1. The nightly tests are running right now, if everything is green, then I'll patch the package. BR, Gergely Pilisi Mattia Rizzolo ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jan. 17., P 12:12): > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Pilisi Gergely wrote: > > I'll contact upstream first, they should know about this. Will be back > soon > > with the solution. > > Thanks. Just a note on the urgency: it isn't at all. > The official buildds seems able to resolve their hostname, but I'm > saying it not agreed upon because just a few days ago there was a > conversation in #debian-mentors exactly about this. > > Also, I'm probably going to patch my builders so it puts the hostname in > /etc/hosts, so it will at least work, regardless of what is the project > consensus. > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- >
Bug#949102: eclipse-titan: FTBFS: fails to resolve the local hostname
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:33:23AM +0100, Pilisi Gergely wrote: > I'll contact upstream first, they should know about this. Will be back soon > with the solution. Thanks. Just a note on the urgency: it isn't at all. The official buildds seems able to resolve their hostname, but I'm saying it not agreed upon because just a few days ago there was a conversation in #debian-mentors exactly about this. Also, I'm probably going to patch my builders so it puts the hostname in /etc/hosts, so it will at least work, regardless of what is the project consensus. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#949102: eclipse-titan: FTBFS: fails to resolve the local hostname
Hi, Mattia Rizzolo ezt írta (időpont: 2020. jan. 16., Cs, 23:30): > > your package failed to rebuild in a standard sid/amd64 chroot. > > It seems it's trying to resolve the hostname of the box (i.e. > `nslookup $HOSTNAME`) and failing. Alas, I don't think there is a > consensus of whether that's acceptable. The only think I can suggest > you, is to try to patch your code so that it uses `localhost` directly, > instead of trying to be clever and use the hostname. I'll contact upstream first, they should know about this. Will be back soon with the solution. BR, Gergely Pilisi
