Package: ddcutil
Version: 0.9.8-1
Severity: important

Hello,

ddcutil is not getting built on various ports because it build-depends
on libc6-dev, while some ports have libc6.1-dev, libc0.3-dev or
libc0.1-dev. Since even old-old-stable's libc already meets the >= 2.17
requirement, ddcutil should just drop that problematic build-dep.

Samuel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 
'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates-debug'), (500, 
'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), 
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'buildd-experimental'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages ddcutil depends on:
ii  hwdata        0.290-1
pn  i2c-tools     <none>
ii  libc6         2.29-7
ii  libdrm2       2.4.100-4
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.62.4-1
ii  libudev1      244-3
ii  libusb-1.0-0  2:1.0.23-2
ii  libx11-6      2:1.6.8-1
ii  libxrandr2    2:1.5.1-1

ddcutil recommends no packages.

ddcutil suggests no packages.

-- 
Samuel
<erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it 
works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is.

Reply via email to