Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-04-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: reassign -1 libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.067-1
Control: severity -1 important

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 08:40:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-03-31 21:49:51 [+0200], Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Kurt,
> Hi Salvatore,
> 
> > I see, but then I prefer to loop in Steffen Ullrich into the loop
> > (upstream of IO::Socket::SSL). Steffen, see the above comment from
> > Kurt in the Debian bug, so it looks we cannot close
> > https://github.com/noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl/issues/93 by marking 1.1.1e
> > as broken only. What do you think?
> 
> we have openssl f in unstable so the visibile problem is gone for now.
> Can this bug be assigned back to libio-socket-ssl-perl?

Okay let's do that.

Steffen Any comment on Kurt's hints in
https://bugs.debian.org/954371#42?

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#954371: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#954371: Bug#954371: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS since openssl 1.1.1e

2020-04-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-03-31 21:49:51 [+0200], Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
Hi Salvatore,

> I see, but then I prefer to loop in Steffen Ullrich into the loop
> (upstream of IO::Socket::SSL). Steffen, see the above comment from
> Kurt in the Debian bug, so it looks we cannot close
> https://github.com/noxxi/p5-io-socket-ssl/issues/93 by marking 1.1.1e
> as broken only. What do you think?

we have openssl f in unstable so the visibile problem is gone for now.
Can this bug be assigned back to libio-socket-ssl-perl?

> Regards,
> Salvatore

Sebastian