On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:11:53 -0800 Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=nonessentiale2fsprogs;users=helm...@debian.org > shows that people are already adding explicit dependencies on it, > which means that > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954794;msg=111 is > the de facto policy / what people believe policy to say.
So, should policy change? Currently, it says that packages "should not" declare essential dependencies, which is more permissive than "must not". Is the workflow with e2fsprogs the path to follow?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
