Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging, ITP and owner considered OK
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:10:49PM -0300, Pablo Mestre wrote: > El 7/5/20, Geert Stappers escribió: > > Control: retitle -1 ITP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of > > the Language Server Protocol > > Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre > Hi > > Thanks for the update. I had problems sending the email. > Acknowledge ITP and owner considered OK (and it and is OK to ask for reverting :-) Regards Geert Stappers DD
Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging
Hi Thanks for the update. I had problems sending the email. El 7/5/20 a las 12:55 PM, Geert Stappers escribió: > Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of > the Language Server Protocol > Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre > Control: subscribe -1 > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! >>> [.] If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". >>> Yes, I committed to packaging If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks relationship between the two bugs. >>> You mean >>> >>> Control: block 946035 by -1 >>> Control: block #[newcode] by -1 >>> >>> Something like this? >>> >> yes go ahead. >> >> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help? >> > I felt the need to show how to do it. > > > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and "reportbug" for filing the ITP. IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with Postfix, Exim, etc. If you'd like to do it manually for now, see: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control >>> Ok >>> >>> Thanks for all >>> >>> P. >>> > @Pablo > > My intension is to help. > I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did. > > Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605 > can be easily updated again. > > > Regards > Geert Stappers
Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging
Control: retitle -1 ITP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 05:55:58PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of > the Language Server Protocol Oops. Copy and paste error now fixed.
Bug#963605: Offer to help with packaging
Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of the Language Server Protocol Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre Control: subscribe -1 On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre wrote: > > > Hi > > > > El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: > > > Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! > > [.] > > > If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the > > > owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". > > Yes, I committed to packaging > > > If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for > > > #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for > > > python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks > > > relationship between the two bugs. > > > > You mean > > > > Control: block 946035 by -1 > > Control: block #[newcode] by -1 > > > > Something like this? > > > > yes go ahead. > > I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help? > I felt the need to show how to do it. > > > > > > Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and > > > "reportbug" for filing the ITP. IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail > > > transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most > > > people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with > > > Postfix, Exim, etc. > > > > > > If you'd like to do it manually for now, see: > > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control > > > > Ok > > > > Thanks for all > > > > P. > > @Pablo My intension is to help. I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did. Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605 can be easily updated again. Regards Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse
