Bug#965088: Re: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#965088: Waiting for release 2.3

2021-02-23 Thread syster
> That said, we might be able to provide a backport, as this has been > 
> requested multiple times. Nodens could check with Tails if they would > want 
> a backport - which would make it more of a priority for us to > maintain a 
> backport. Quoting a reply by intrigeri from tails-dev MUC: 11:41:35 AM] 
> intrigeri: IMO, there's no rush and it's OK for us to delay the upgrade (and 
> dealing with any Tails-specific integration work) until we upgrade to 
> Bullseye. [11:42:15 AM] intrigeri: If we had any other need/requirement on 
> this front, we would have let nodens know  [11:42:46 AM] intrigeri: Thanks 
> for caring!


Bug#965088: Re: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#965088: Waiting for release 2.3

2021-02-23 Thread Ulrike Uhlig

Hello!


intrigeri: IMO, there's no rush and it's OK for us to delay the upgrade (and 
dealing with any Tails-specific integration work) until we upgrade to Bullseye. 
[11:42:15 AM] intrigeri: If we had any other need/requirement on this front, we 
would have let nodens know  [11:42:46 AM] intrigeri: Thanks for caring!


Thanks for the information.

On a sociological sidenote:
In FLOSS communities, silence (as in: absence of communication) is a 
means of communication which might have many different meanings and 
which exist on very different ends of a spectrum; on the one end there 
could be ignorance, forgetfulness, unavailability (even harder if one of 
the communicating parties is our single contact point, or SPOF), or even 
disagreement, while on the other end we can find agreement, implicit 
consent, the absence of (particular) needs, questions, or concerns.

Specifically on Debian mailing lists silence often means agreement.
I do find this hard to navigate sometimes! :)

Ulrike