Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Felix Lechner dixit: >Uploaded, although I am still looking for it on the buildds: First it must be ACCEPTED, then the dak run for incoming must run, then B-Ds are checked, then it gets into Needs-Build status, and only then the buildds pick it up. It’s there now: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=wolfssl (ports will pick it up in a bit) bye, //mirabilos -- „Cool, /usr/share/doc/mksh/examples/uhr.gz ist ja ein Grund, mksh auf jedem System zu installieren.“ -- XTaran auf der OpenRheinRuhr, ganz begeistert (EN: “[…]uhr.gz is a reason to install mksh on every system.”)
Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Dixi quod… >It’s there now: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=wolfssl … and already FTBFSing on s390x: /usr/bin/ld: src/.libs/libwolfssl.so: undefined reference to `ByteReverseWords' bye, //mirabilos -- [16:04:33] bkix: "veni vidi violini" [16:04:45] bkix: "ich kam, sah und vergeigte"...
Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Hi Thorsten, Uploaded, although I am still looking for it on the buildds: > wolfssl_4.5.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost > along with the files: > wolfssl_4.5.0+dfsg-1.dsc > wolfssl_4.5.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz > wolfssl_4.5.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz > wolfssl_4.5.0+dfsg-1_source.buildinfo > > Greetings, > > Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) Kind regards Felix Lechner
Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Felix Lechner dixit: >> Is there anything I can help to ensure it’s not autoremoved? > >I just saw it this morning and plan to upload 4.5.0 later today. From >what I understand, closing #969663 should postpone the autoremoval >process? Thanks! The autoremoval will go on until a version with #969663 fixed enters testing, but that is why such a long advance notice is given (five weeks or so). bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r
Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Hi Thorsten, > Is there anything I can help to ensure it’s not autoremoved? I just saw it this morning and plan to upload 4.5.0 later today. From what I understand, closing #969663 should postpone the autoremoval process? Kind regards Felix
Bug#969663: polyphone is marked for autoremoval from testing
Debian testing autoremoval watch dixit: >polyphone 2.2.0.20200612+dfsg1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on >2020-10-20 > >It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: >969663: wolfssl: CVE-2020-12457 CVE-2020-15309 CVE-2020-24585 CVE-2020-24613 > https://bugs.debian.org/969663 Is there anything I can help to ensure it’s not autoremoved? Thanks, //mirabilos -- “Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.” -- Edward Burr
