Bug#970410: src:html5lib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regressions
Hi, On 25-09-2020 20:44, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> Both packages are key packages [1], so will not be removed >>> automatically. Please align how to fix the situation. >> >> bleach needs to be upgraded to 3.2.1 > > But is it possible that this new version of bleach must have a versioned > dependency on html5lib? I see multiple regressions that all look the > same (with the old html5lib, which is the one in testing): > cannot import name 'attributeMap' from 'html5lib._tokenizer' So far it seems that in testing the regressions seems to be fixed, hinting very strongly at a missing versioning in the (test) relations. If the correct version would be there, britney would take the right packages combined from unstable and the test wouldn't fail in the way it currently does. Does anybody know if this is "just" a test issue, or this shows that the versioning should be done at the package level? Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966985: Bug#970410: src:html5lib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regressions
Hi Sandro, On 24-09-2020 17:21, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Thank you for the recent upload. Unfortunately, your package still can't >> migrate because it causes a FTBFS/autopkgtest regression in >> python-bleach (hence in CC). >> >>> This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new >>> bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. >> >> Both packages are key packages [1], so will not be removed >> automatically. Please align how to fix the situation. > > bleach needs to be upgraded to 3.2.1 But is it possible that this new version of bleach must have a versioned dependency on html5lib? I see multiple regressions that all look the same (with the old html5lib, which is the one in testing): cannot import name 'attributeMap' from 'html5lib._tokenizer' Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#966985: Bug#970410: src:html5lib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regressions
> Thank you for the recent upload. Unfortunately, your package still can't > migrate because it causes a FTBFS/autopkgtest regression in > python-bleach (hence in CC). > > > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new > > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. > > Both packages are key packages [1], so will not be removed > automatically. Please align how to fix the situation. bleach needs to be upgraded to 3.2.1 -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
Bug#970410: src:html5lib: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest regressions
Source: html5lib Version: 1.0.1-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.1-1 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 968630 Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:html5lib in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug. If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult. Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner. This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed. I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so it doesn't affect (old-)stable. If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. Paul [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html [2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=html5lib signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
