Thanks -- I'm uploading a NMU now with debdiff below.
It would be nice to have gnunet in Debian, and I believe that having a
less-than-ideal package remain in testing is more likely to attract
volunters to maintain it in Debian than if it would be removed, but I
understand if you want to remove it to reduce the responsibility for
it. Isn't there a Debian QA group packages can be assigned to if a
maintainer wants to let go? I don't remember, and I have been in your
situation as well with with some packages so I know the feeling.
/Simon
diff -Nru gnunet-0.13.1/debian/changelog gnunet-0.13.1/debian/changelog
--- gnunet-0.13.1/debian/changelog 2020-07-14 18:17:17.0
+0200
+++ gnunet-0.13.1/debian/changelog 2020-11-24 09:17:37.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gnunet (0.13.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * B-D on libidn2-dev instead of obsolete libidn2-0-dev. Closes:
#974995.
+
+ -- Simon Josefsson Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:17:37
+0100
+
gnunet (0.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Update debian/watch to version 4, add a rule deal with pre and rc
diff -Nru gnunet-0.13.1/debian/control gnunet-0.13.1/debian/control
--- gnunet-0.13.1/debian/control2020-07-14 18:16:54.0
+0200
+++ gnunet-0.13.1/debian/control2020-11-24 09:17:37.0
+0100
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
libextractor-dev (>=1:0.6.3),
libgcrypt20-dev (>=1.6),
libgnutls28-dev (>=3.2.12),
- libidn2-0-dev,
+ libidn2-dev,
libjansson-dev,
libltdl-dev (>=2.2),
libmicrohttpd-dev (>=0.9.63),
tis 2020-11-24 klockan 07:51 +0100 skrev Bertrand Marc:
> Dear Simon,
>
> If you can find the time, please do. Otherwise, I'll probably remove
> GNUnet from testing myself (it is currently RFA).
>
> Cheers,
> Bertrand
>
> Le 23/11/2020 à 20:15, Simon Josefsson a écrit :
> > severity 975030 serious
> > severity 974997 serious
> > severity 974996 serious
> > severity 974995 serious
> > severity 974994 serious
> > severity 974993 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > It was suggested to me on IRC that the severity of this could be
> > serious because the build-dependency libidn2-0-dev is going to be
> > removed from Debian. I'm volunteering to do NMU these packages to
> > fix
> > the bug, and could look into that in a couple of weeks -- if you
> > give
> > me permission to do it before, I'd start directly. If I'm mistaken
> > that this is not a valid justification for a serious bug, downgrade
> > the
> > bug and let me know, as I'm not sure what the best way to get an
> > obsolete deprecated transition package removed from Debian when
> > build-
> > deps remain.
> >
> > /Simon
> >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
