Bug#979352: r-cran-pander_0.6.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2021-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thorsten,

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 05:10:08PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> 
> I don't see that the license is "AGPL or OSL" and according to
>  https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Open_Software_License_.28OSL.29_v1.1
> the OSL is not compatible with DFSG.
> 
> But I just had a short look and you can try to convice me :-).

OK, OSL is just an alternative option for the license.  As the DESCRIPTION
file of the package specifies, the license for the code is

  License: AGPL-3 | file LICENSE

So for Debian we simply provde the code AGPL-3 licensed.  The intention
of the authors becomes clear when reading the file NEWS:

dual licensing the package with AGPLv3 and OSL based on user request

I hope this clarifies the license situation and re-uploaded to new.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#979352: r-cran-pander_0.6.3+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2021-01-22 Thread Thorsten Alteholz

Hi Andreas,

there are several lintian warnings about privacy breach. Maybe you can take 
care of them.
For example the script mentioned in pander/inst/includes/html/header.html is no 
longer available, so the software might not even work ...

  Thorsten



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


___
R-pkg-team mailing list
r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r-pkg-team