Bug#983718: RM: yash [mips64el mipsel] -- RoQA; no longer builds on mips*

[Adrian Bunk]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 07:08:55PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Sean Whitton  [210907 17:06]:
> > On Sun 28 Feb 2021 at 09:58PM +02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 
> > So it's expected that it won't be possible to resolve the build issue on
> > those archs any time soon?  Have you any analysis of the failures?
> 
> No activity on investigating or rectifying the build issues was
> reported for 7 months before your reply. If anything was going to
> happen "soon", this bug would not have existed anymore.

FTR, I did reproduce it on a porterbox before submitting the RM request.

It's some signal weirdness in a low-popcon leaf package,
so I decided it's not worth spending much of my time or
time of a porter on it.

> Chris

cu
Adrian

Bug#983718: RM: yash [mips64el mipsel] -- RoQA; no longer builds on mips*

[Chris Hofstaedtler]

* Sean Whitton  [210907 17:06]:
> On Sun 28 Feb 2021 at 09:58PM +02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> So it's expected that it won't be possible to resolve the build issue on
> those archs any time soon?  Have you any analysis of the failures?

No activity on investigating or rectifying the build issues was
reported for 7 months before your reply. If anything was going to
happen "soon", this bug would not have existed anymore.

Chris

Bug#983718: RM: yash [mips64el mipsel] -- RoQA; no longer builds on mips*

[Sean Whitton]

control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hello,

On Sun 28 Feb 2021 at 09:58PM +02, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> See #982817 for background

So it's expected that it won't be possible to resolve the build issue on
those archs any time soon?  Have you any analysis of the failures?

Thanks.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#983718: RM: yash [mips64el mipsel] -- RoQA; no longer builds on mips*

[Adrian Bunk]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

See #982817 for background