Bug#987759: RFS: color-picker/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

2021-05-16 Thread Hugo Torres
debian/tests/control has been removed because it does not provide any
useful tests, avoiding errors with autopkgtest.


--
Hugo Torres de Lima
GPG: 4AF1 1173 DCAD 0380 CC43 A5C6 365C 8CEF 4233 E3D8

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, May 16, 2021 3:14 AM, Adam Borowski  wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Hugo Torres de Lima wrote:
> 

> > -   Package name : color-picker
> > Version : 1.0.1-1
> > 

> 

> > color-picker (1.0.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
> > .
> > 

> > -   Initial release (Closes: #987756)
> 

> Hi!
> The autopkgtest sometimes fails:
> autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: xvfb-run -a color-picker &
> autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: [---
> QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
> autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: ---]
> autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - 
> - - - - -
> command1 FAIL stderr: QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to 
> '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
> autopkgtest [22:06:31]: test command1: - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - 
> - - - -
> QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
> autopkgtest [22:06:31]:  summary
> command1 FAIL stderr: QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to 
> '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
> 

> But, what it is even supposed to do?
> Save from racey stderr messages from very early startup, this won't fail
> even if the package is completely broken, due to '&':
> Test-Command: false &
> succeeds. I see where you copied this from -- a bunch of GUI packages
> also have such bogus autopkgtests, but they do nothing useful. Eg.
> Test-Command: xvfb-run -a /usr/bin/gcrytsal &
> (package gnome-chemistry-utils) doesn't catch even the obvious typo.
> 

> Meow!
> 

> --
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The oldest dated printed book includes the following license grant:
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Reverently made for universal free distribution by Wang Jie
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ on behalf of his two parents on the 15th of the 4th moon of
> ⠈⠳⣄ the 9th year of Xiantong [11 May 868].



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#987759: RFS: color-picker/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

2021-05-16 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 01:02:08AM -0300, Hugo Torres de Lima wrote:
>  * Package name: color-picker
>Version : 1.0.1-1

>  color-picker (1.0.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
>  .
>* Initial release (Closes: #987756)

Hi!
The autopkgtest sometimes fails:
autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: xvfb-run -a color-picker &
autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: [---
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1: ---]
autopkgtest [22:06:30]: test command1:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - 
- - - -
command1 FAIL stderr: QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, 
defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
autopkgtest [22:06:31]: test command1:  - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - 
- - - -
QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'
autopkgtest [22:06:31]:  summary
command1 FAIL stderr: QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, 
defaulting to '/tmp/runtime-kilobyte'

But, what it is even supposed to do?
Save from racey stderr messages from very early startup, this won't fail
even if the package is completely broken, due to '&':
Test-Command: false &
succeeds.  I see where you copied this from -- a bunch of GUI packages
also have such bogus autopkgtests, but they do nothing useful.  Eg.
Test-Command: xvfb-run -a /usr/bin/gcrytsal &
(package gnome-chemistry-utils) doesn't catch even the obvious typo.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The oldest dated printed book includes the following license grant:
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Reverently made for universal free distribution by Wang Jie
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   on behalf of his two parents on the 15th of the 4th moon of
⠈⠳⣄   the 9th year of Xiantong [11 May 868].



Bug#987759: RFS: color-picker/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

2021-04-30 Thread Hugo Torres
Necessary the creation of the Debian repository in Salsa.

I created the repository in my account to make the migration: 
https://salsa.debian.org/f9kill/colorpicker

--
Hugo Torres de Lima
GPG: 4AF1 1173 DCAD 0380 CC43 A5C6 365C 8CEF 4233 E3D8

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#987759: RFS: color-picker/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

2021-04-29 Thread Hugo Torres de Lima
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "color-picker":

 * Package name: color-picker
   Version : 1.0.1-1
   Upstream Author : https://github.com/keshavbhatt/ColorPicker/issues
 * URL : https://github.com/keshavbhatt/ColorPicker
 * License : MIT
 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/color-picker
   Section : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

  color-picker - Powerful screen color picker based on Qt

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/color-picker/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/color-picker/color-picker_1.0.1-1.dsc

Changes for the initial release:

 color-picker (1.0.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #987756)

Regards,
--
  Hugo Torres de Lima