Bug#991419: new upstream (0.7.1)
clone 991419 -1 retitle -1 ITA: ck -- Concurrency Kit reassign -1 wnpp owner -1 Daniel Baumann thanks Hi Robert On 7/23/21 8:20 AM, Robert Edmonds wrote: > Unfortunately I don't have much time to spend on ck these days, and I > don't have any packages that need it as a build dependency. Feel free to > ITA. no problem, thanks! Regards, Daniel
Bug#991419: new upstream (0.7.1)
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Package: ck > > Hi Robert > > Thank you for maintaining "ck" in Debian. > > One of my packages (dnsperf) requires ck which unfortunately is > currently not build on armel. I've locally built and verified the > current "ck" upstream version (0.7.1) on amd64/i386 and all arm* > architectures. > > I saw that your last upload of it was in 2017 and collected some dust > since. Are you still interested in maintaining "ck"? Do you like some help? > > Given it's a build-dependency of dnsperf (and a few other packages of > mine), I'd be happy to take the package over in case you're not > interested anymore. > > Regards, > Daniel Hi, Daniel: Unfortunately I don't have much time to spend on ck these days, and I don't have any packages that need it as a build dependency. Feel free to ITA. Thanks! -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org
Bug#991419: new upstream (0.7.1)
Package: ck Hi Robert Thank you for maintaining "ck" in Debian. One of my packages (dnsperf) requires ck which unfortunately is currently not build on armel. I've locally built and verified the current "ck" upstream version (0.7.1) on amd64/i386 and all arm* architectures. I saw that your last upload of it was in 2017 and collected some dust since. Are you still interested in maintaining "ck"? Do you like some help? Given it's a build-dependency of dnsperf (and a few other packages of mine), I'd be happy to take the package over in case you're not interested anymore. Regards, Daniel
