Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6
Hi Sebastian, >>> coyim is not in bookworm. Did you want request removal from unstable? >> >> Correct. Just wanting to clean up my packages as at least coyim would >> surely just be accumulating bug reports from now :) > > Removals from unstable are handled by the FTP team. Reassigning. Oh, I see. Sorry for the noise! Cheers Sascha
Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6 -- ROM; missed buster and bullseye On 2021-09-13 22:07:10 +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > [...] > >> Coyim has not made it into buster and bullseye and I as the maintainer do > >> not > >> intend to invest more work into it. A RFA has been without response since > >> January 2021 [1]. > >> > >> Hence I suggest to remove it and, once it is gone, also get rid of the > >> obsolete > >> dependencies that coyim currently is the only reverse dependency of in > >> unstable. > > > > coyim is not in bookworm. Did you want request removal from unstable? > > Correct. Just wanting to clean up my packages as at least coyim would > surely just be accumulating bug reports from now :) Removals from unstable are handled by the FTP team. Reassigning. Cheers > > Cheers > Sascha > -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6
Hi Sebastian, [...] >> Coyim has not made it into buster and bullseye and I as the maintainer do not >> intend to invest more work into it. A RFA has been without response since >> January 2021 [1]. >> >> Hence I suggest to remove it and, once it is gone, also get rid of the >> obsolete >> dependencies that coyim currently is the only reverse dependency of in >> unstable. > > coyim is not in bookworm. Did you want request removal from unstable? Correct. Just wanting to clean up my packages as at least coyim would surely just be accumulating bug reports from now :) Cheers Sascha
Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6
On 2021-09-13 16:55:53, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > Please remove coyim. It has an RC bug [0] that will require various new > dependencies and transitive dependencies, as upstream moved repositories and > requires new versions. Some dependencies also do not build anymore when > updated > to newer upstream versions (e.g. gotk3). > > Coyim has not made it into buster and bullseye and I as the maintainer do not > intend to invest more work into it. A RFA has been without response since > January 2021 [1]. > > Hence I suggest to remove it and, once it is gone, also get rid of the > obsolete > dependencies that coyim currently is the only reverse dependency of in > unstable. coyim is not in bookworm. Did you want request removal from unstable? Cheers > > Cheers > Sascha > > [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930332 > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979755 > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#994195: RM: coyim/0.3.8+ds-6
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove coyim. It has an RC bug [0] that will require various new dependencies and transitive dependencies, as upstream moved repositories and requires new versions. Some dependencies also do not build anymore when updated to newer upstream versions (e.g. gotk3). Coyim has not made it into buster and bullseye and I as the maintainer do not intend to invest more work into it. A RFA has been without response since January 2021 [1]. Hence I suggest to remove it and, once it is gone, also get rid of the obsolete dependencies that coyim currently is the only reverse dependency of in unstable. Cheers Sascha [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=930332 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979755
