Bug#994288: [Debichem-devel] Bug#994288: Bug#994288: libinchi1: feature request, add InChI trust, reference executable
Hi Michael, On 2021-09-18 21:28, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> Thanks for clarification. I have just packaged the executable in a new >> binary package, libinchi-bin, it how has to pass the NEW queue. > > A bit late, but maybe "inchi-bin" or even juust "inchi" would be also > appropriate? I agree, I should have discussed the new binary name with you. I followed conventions of packages such as src:fftw3 and bin:libfftw3-bin, but surely 'inchi' or 'inchi-bin' would have been more evident for the end-user. Should I initiate binary package rename? Best, Andrius
Bug#994288: [Debichem-devel] Bug#994288: Bug#994288: libinchi1: feature request, add InChI trust, reference executable
Hi Norwid, On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 09:03:45PM +, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:28:30 +0200 > Michael Banck wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > > Control: owner -1 ! > > > Control: tags -1 + pending > > > > > > Hi Norwid, > > > > > > On 2021-09-16 09:26, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > > > >> Am I right to assume you are requesting here for the 'inchi_main' > > > >> executable being included in Debian packages for inchi? > > > > > > > > Yes, this is .true. and you are right. If technical possible and > > > > InChI trust's license permitting, I would like to install their .sdf > > > > to InChI conversion packaged for Debian such that this may be run > > > > from the CLI. > > > > > > Thanks for clarification. I have just packaged the executable in a new > > > binary package, libinchi-bin, it how has to pass the NEW queue. > > > > A bit late, but maybe "inchi-bin" or even juust "inchi" would be also > > appropriate? > > > > > > Michael > > I'm not sure if your question is about how to name the eventual > package, or about how to launch the executable the package provides. It was about the package. [...] > On the other hand, I interpret the package tracker's entry > > "NEW/unstable: 1.03+dfsg-4" > > on > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/inchi > > as if the inchi executable is going to be included within the already > existing entry `synaptic` lists as `libinchi1` No, there will (or is, it got manually processed already I think) be a new package "libinchi-bin" which ships the executable. Michael
Bug#994288: [Debichem-devel] Bug#994288: Bug#994288: libinchi1: feature request, add InChI trust, reference executable
Hi, On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 + pending > > Hi Norwid, > > On 2021-09-16 09:26, Norwid Behrnd wrote: > >> Am I right to assume you are requesting here for the 'inchi_main' > >> executable being included in Debian packages for inchi? > > > > Yes, this is .true. and you are right. If technical possible and > > InChI trust's license permitting, I would like to install their .sdf > > to InChI conversion packaged for Debian such that this may be run > > from the CLI. > > Thanks for clarification. I have just packaged the executable in a new > binary package, libinchi-bin, it how has to pass the NEW queue. A bit late, but maybe "inchi-bin" or even juust "inchi" would be also appropriate? Michael
