Bug#994613: nodejs salsa ci fail

[Jérémy Lal]

Package: nodejs
Followup-For: Bug #994613


Hi,

in master-14.x branch the two tests are allowed to fail now.

I also noticed some problem with too big artifacts, so i disabled
the generation of dbgsym package for ci.

Also i'm not in favor of uncontrolled rebuilding of nodejs for each commit.
It would take a lot of resources.
I've tried to setup debian/salsa-ci.yml on master-14.x branch to skip untagged 
commits.

Jérémy

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers stable-security
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.16.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages nodejs depends on:
ii  libc6  2.33-7
ii  libnode83  14.19.0~dfsg-1

Versions of packages nodejs recommends:
ii  ca-certificates  20211016
ii  nodejs-doc   14.19.0~dfsg-1

Versions of packages nodejs suggests:
ii  npm  8.5.4~ds1-1

-- no debconf information

Bug#994613: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#994613: nodejs salsa ci fail

[Jérémy Lal]

Le sam. 18 sept. 2021 à 16:33, Bastien Roucariès <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Package: nodejs
> Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Nodejs salsa ci fail. It seems they are difference between debci and salsa.
>
> Therefore some test should be disabled on salsa
>

The two failing tests are both expecting binding to a privileged port
raises a EACCES error,
which does not happen in salsa ci. Which is odd !

Jérémy

Bug#994613: nodejs salsa ci fail

[Bastien Roucariès]

Package: nodejs
Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

Nodejs salsa ci fail. It seems they are difference between debci and salsa.

Therefore some test should be disabled on salsa

Bastien