Bug#1061487: bookworm-pu: package rpm/4.18.0+dfsg-1+deb12u1

2024-01-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:39:03PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> [ Impact ]
> Users who upgrade from RPM 4.16.0 or earlier to 4.18.0 cannot use
> their database of packages already installed via RPM.

IOW, qubes 4.x users:

https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/8482
"Dom0 updates fail when update qube is based on Debian 12 or Whonix 17"


-- 
cheers,
Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Bananas are berries.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1061526: astroidmail: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: astroidmail
Version: 0.16-2
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie sid
User: pkg-webkit-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: webkit-4.0

The webkit2gtk maintainers intend to stop building the 4.0 API soon.
Please switch to using the 4.1 API which is the same as the 4.0 API
except that it uses libsoup3 instead of libsoup2.4.

Unfortunately, astroidmail uses libsoup directly so it is necessary to
port it from libsopu2.4 to libsoup3 to fix this issue.

There is some documentation and many examples at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/218

On behalf of the webkit2gtk maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#995399: bluez: bluetooth disable after few seconds

2024-01-25 Thread Martin Tonusoo
Package: bluez
Version: 5.71-1
Followup-For: Bug #995399
X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@tonusoo.ee

I observed pretty much the identical behavior described by Flavio Amieiro after
upgrading to 5.71-1. The bluetooth speaker connected for ~5 seconds,
after which the bluetoothd segfaulted:

[Thu Jan 25 23:37:29 2024] input: Bedroom speaker (AVRCP) as 
/devices/virtual/input/input36
[Thu Jan 25 23:37:36 2024] bluetoothd[8904]: segfault at 5621e0155f79 ip 
562480a64375 sp 7ffd9e9c66e0 error 4 in bluetoothd[562480a42000+ec000] 
likely on CPU 0 (core 0, socket 0)
[Thu Jan 25 23:37:36 2024] Code: 00 31 c0 e9 54 ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 
00 00 00 00 66 90 f3 0f 1e fa 41 55 41 54 55 53 48 83 ec 08 48 8b 2a 48 8b 7a 
08 <48> 8b 45 20 4c 8b ad 88 00 00 00 4c 8b 20 48 85 ff 74 19 c7 47 08


Upgrading to 5.72 from the upstream fixed this issue.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.6.13-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages bluez depends on:
ii  dbus [default-dbus-system-bus]  1.14.10-4
ii  init-system-helpers 1.66
ii  kmod31-1
ii  libasound2  1.2.10-3
ii  libc6   2.37-14
ii  libdbus-1-3 1.14.10-4
ii  libdw1  0.190-1+b1
ii  libglib2.0-02.78.3-2
ii  libreadline88.2-3
ii  libudev1255.3-1
ii  udev255.3-1

bluez recommends no packages.

Versions of packages bluez suggests:
ii  pulseaudio-module-bluetooth  16.1+dfsg1-3

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/bluetooth/main.conf changed [not included]

-- no debconf information



Bug#1061527: elogind: install files into /usr

2024-01-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Source: elogind
Version: 252.9-1debian3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2

We want to finalize the /usr-merge via DEP17 by moving all files to
/usr. elogind installs files into /lib and /bin; these should be moved
into the respective canonical locations in /usr/.

Please find a patch attached. It has been build-tested.

Note: this should not be backported to bookworm. If you intend to
backport, please use dh_movetousr instead.

If your package will change for the t64 transition or otherwise
rename/split/move its binaries (packages) during trixie, please
then upload to experimental and get in touch with the UsrMerge
driver, please see the wiki [1].

Michael

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/changelog elogind-252.9/debian/changelog
--- elogind-252.9/debian/changelog  2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 +0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/changelog  2024-01-25 23:27:16.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+elogind (252.9-1debian3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Install files into their canonical location in /usr. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl   Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:27:16 +0100
+
 elogind (252.9-1debian3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * d/control: add Build-Depends: libmount-dev to fix nocheck build.
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/elogind.install 
elogind-252.9/debian/elogind.install
--- elogind-252.9/debian/elogind.install2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 
+0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/elogind.install2024-01-25 23:27:16.0 
+0100
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
-bin/
 usr/bin
 etc/elogind/*.conf
-lib/elogind/
-lib/*/elogind/
-lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules
-lib/udev/rules.d/71-seat.rules
-lib/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules
+usr/lib/elogind/
+usr/lib/*/elogind/
+usr/lib/udev/rules.d/70-uaccess.rules
+usr/lib/udev/rules.d/71-seat.rules
+usr/lib/udev/rules.d/73-seat-late.rules
 usr/share/bash-completion/
 usr/share/dbus-1/
 usr/share/locale/
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.install 
elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.install
--- elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.install2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 
+0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.install2024-01-25 23:23:29.0 
+0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-lib/*/libelogind.so.*
+usr/lib/*/libelogind.so.*
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.links 
elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.links
--- elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.links  2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 
+0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind0.links  2024-01-25 23:23:53.0 
+0100
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 #! /usr/bin/dh-exec
-lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libelogind.so.0 
lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libsystemd.so.0
+usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libelogind.so.0 
usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libsystemd.so.0
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev-doc.install 
elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev-doc.install
--- elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev-doc.install 2023-12-26 
18:26:30.0 +0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev-doc.install 2024-01-25 
23:26:26.0 +0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 usr/share/doc/elogind/ usr/share/doc/libelogind-dev-doc/
 usr/share/man/man3/*
+usr/lib/*/libelogind.so
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev.links 
elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev.links
--- elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev.links   2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 
+0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/libelogind-dev.links   1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-#! /usr/bin/dh-exec
-lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libelogind.so.0 
usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/libelogind.so
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/libpam-elogind.install 
elogind-252.9/debian/libpam-elogind.install
--- elogind-252.9/debian/libpam-elogind.install 2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 
+0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/libpam-elogind.install 2024-01-25 23:23:39.0 
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
 debian/extra/pam.d/ /etc
-lib/*/security/pam_elogind.so
+usr/lib/*/security/pam_elogind.so
 usr/share/man/man8/pam_elogind.8
 debian/extra/pam-configs/ /usr/share/
diff -Nru elogind-252.9/debian/rules elogind-252.9/debian/rules
--- elogind-252.9/debian/rules  2023-12-26 18:26:30.0 +0100
+++ elogind-252.9/debian/rules  2024-01-25 23:27:16.0 +0100
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@
 #   behaviour
 
 CONFFLAGS = \
-  -Dpamlibdir=/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/security \
-  -Drootlibdir=/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
-  -Dsplit-usr=true \
+  -Dpamlibdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/security \
+  -Drootlibdir=/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH) \
+  -Dsplit-usr=false \
   -Ddocdir=/usr/share/doc/elogind \
   -Dman=true \
-  -Dudevrulesdir=/lib/udev/rules.d \
+  -Dudevrulesdir=/usr/lib/udev/rules.d \
   -Ddefault-kill-user-processes=false \
   -Dtests=true \
   -Dmode=release


Bug#1061528: libpam-encfs: install PAM module into /usr

2024-01-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Source: libpam-encfs
Version: 0.1.4.4-15
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17m2

We want to finalize the /usr-merge via DEP17 by moving all files to
/usr. libpam-encfs installs files into /lib; these should be moved into
the respective canonical locations in /usr/.

Please find a patch attached. It has been build-tested.

Note: this should not be backported to bookworm. If you intend to
backport, please use dh_movetousr instead.

If your package will change for the t64 transition or otherwise
rename/split/move its binaries (packages) during trixie, please
then upload to experimental and get in touch with the UsrMerge
driver, please see the wiki [1].

Michael

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge
diff -Nru libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/changelog 
libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/changelog
--- libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/changelog   2023-01-19 18:43:33.0 
+0100
+++ libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/changelog   2024-01-25 23:37:36.0 
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libpam-encfs (0.1.4.4-15.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Install PAM module into /usr. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl   Thu, 25 Jan 2024 23:37:36 +0100
+
 libpam-encfs (0.1.4.4-15) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Debian Janitor ]
diff -Nru libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/03_install_into_usr.patch 
libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/03_install_into_usr.patch
--- libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/03_install_into_usr.patch   
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/03_install_into_usr.patch   
2024-01-25 23:37:34.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+Index: libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/Makefile
+===
+--- libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4.orig/Makefile 2024-01-25 23:36:19.0 +0100
 libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/Makefile  2024-01-25 23:37:32.673299975 +0100
+@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
+-PAM_LIB_DIR = $(DESTDIR)/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/security
++PAM_LIB_DIR = $(DESTDIR)/usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/security
+ CC = gcc
+ LD = ld
+ INSTALL = /usr/bin/install
diff -Nru libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/series 
libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/series
--- libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/series  2021-02-24 23:08:46.0 
+0100
+++ libpam-encfs-0.1.4.4/debian/patches/series  2024-01-25 23:37:20.0 
+0100
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 01_pam_encfs.c_hint-console-login-on-error.patch
 02_Makefile_Debian-build-stuff.diff
+03_install_into_usr.patch


Bug#1057511: Additional information

2024-01-25 Thread Vladimir Petko
Dear Maintainers,

  Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jtreg/-/merge_requests/3



Bug#764684: ITA: splash -- Visualisation tool for Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics simulation

2024-01-25 Thread Phil Wyett
retitle 764684 ITA: splash -- Visualisation tool for Smoothed Particle 
Hydrodynamics
simulation
owner 764684 !
thanks

Hi all,

I am interested in 'splash' and would like to adopt it.

I am the Debian Maintainer (DM) of rednotebook, filezilla and libfilezilla, 
bglibs,
librepfunc, w-scan-cpp, compton, so maintaining similar package types is 
familiar to me.

Regards

Phil

-- 
Playing the game for the games sake.

Web:

* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/
* Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1061529: jline3 ftbfs with Java 21 due to this-escape warning

2024-01-25 Thread Vladimir Petko
Source: jline3
Version: 3.3.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java21

Dear Maintainers,

The package fails to build with Java 21 default to do this-escape warning:

[WARNING] COMPILATION WARNING :
[INFO] -
[WARNING]
/<>/builtins/src/main/java/org/jline/builtins/Nano.java:[949,16]
[this-escape] possible 'this' escape before subclass is fully initialized
[INFO] 1 warning
[INFO] -
[INFO] -
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO] -
[ERROR] error: warnings found and -Werror specified
[INFO] 1 error
[INFO] ---

Best Regards,
 Vladimir


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers mantic-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'mantic-updates'), (500, 'mantic-security'), (500, 
'mantic'), (100, 'mantic-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled



Bug#1018838: formiko: Switch to webkit2gtk 4.1

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
forwarded 1061526 https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid/issues/744



Bug#1061530: sugar-browse-activity: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: sugar-browse-activity
Version: 207-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch trixie sid
User: pkg-webkit-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: webkit-4.0
Forwarded: 
https://salsa.debian.org/jbicha/sugar-browse-activity/-/commits/webkit

The webkit2gtk maintainers intend to stop building the 4.0 API soon.
Please switch to using the 4.1 API which is the same as the 4.0 API
except that it uses libsoup3 instead of libsoup2.4.

My colleague has submitted a patch for this issue. It works for me
even though Sugar itself is still using libsoup2.4 and webkit2gtk 4.0.
I have cherry-picked the patch to my fork of your repo in the webkit
branch.

https://salsa.debian.org/jbicha/sugar-browse-activity/-/commits/webkit

On behalf of the webkit2gtk maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1061531: sugar: Stop using webkit2gtk 4.0

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: sugar
Version: 0.120-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie sid
User: pkg-webkit-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: webkit-4.0

The webkit2gtk maintainers intend to stop building the 4.0 API soon.
Please switch to using the 4.1 API which is the same as the 4.0 API
except that it uses libsoup3 instead of libsoup2.4.

There is some documentation and many examples of libsoup2.4 porting at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libsoup/-/issues/218

By the way, it is not possible to use libsoup2.4 and libsoup3 in the
same process. I don't think this is a problem in the Debian archive
for Sugar beyond sugar-browse-activity. And in that case,
sugar-browse-activity was ported to libsoup3 first and appears to
still work fine.

On behalf of the webkit2gtk maintainers,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1061532: cinnamon: Update to 6.0

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: cinnamon
Version: 5.8.4-4
Severity: wishlist

Please package cinnamon 6.0.

I am especially interested in seeing Cinnamon switch from libsoup2.4
to libsoup3.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1061533: cmake: CMake doesn't find googletest

2024-01-25 Thread Jonathan Neuschäfer
Package: cmake
Version: 3.28.1-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org, hal...@debian.org


Hello, I have installed cmake 3.28.1-1 and googletest 1.14.0-1 from
Debian testing, and I'm trying to use GTest with CMake as follows:

```
# CMakeLists.txt
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.14)
project(foo)

enable_testing()
find_package(GTest REQUIRED)

add_executable(foo foo.cc)
target_link_libraries(foo GTest::gtest GTest::gtest_main)

add_test(AllTestsInFoo foo)
```


```
// foo.cc
TEST(Foo, foo) {
EXPECT_EQ(1 + 2, 3);
}
```

This is very close to the example provided in 
/usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindGTest.cmake,
but it fails:

```
$ cmake .
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 13.2.0
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 13.2.0
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/lib/ccache/cc - skipped
-- Detecting C compile features
-- Detecting C compile features - done
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/lib/ccache/c++ - skipped
-- Detecting CXX compile features
-- Detecting CXX compile features - done
CMake Error at 
/usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:230 (message):
  Could NOT find GTest (missing: GTEST_LIBRARY GTEST_INCLUDE_DIR
  GTEST_MAIN_LIBRARY)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:600 
(_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake-3.28/Modules/FindGTest.cmake:270 
(FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
  CMakeLists.txt:5 (find_package)


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
```


This usecase doesn't seem to unusual, so I suspect a bug somewhere in
FindGTest.cmake or maybe a missing file somewhere.


Best regards.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages cmake depends on:
ii  cmake-data3.28.1-1
ii  libarchive13  3.7.2-1
ii  libc6 2.37-13
ii  libcurl4  8.5.0-2
ii  libexpat1 2.5.0-2+b2
ii  libgcc-s1 13.2.0-10
ii  libjsoncpp25  1.9.5-6+b2
ii  librhash0 1.4.3-3
ii  libstdc++613.2.0-10
ii  libuv11.46.0-3
ii  procps2:4.0.4-2+b1
ii  zlib1g1:1.3.dfsg-3+b1

Versions of packages cmake recommends:
ii  gcc   4:13.2.0-2
ii  make  4.3-4.1

Versions of packages cmake suggests:
pn  cmake-doc
pn  cmake-format 
pn  elpa-cmake-mode  
ii  ninja-build  1.11.1-2

-- no debconf information



Bug#1061534: mirror submission for mirror.leitecastro.com

2024-01-25 Thread Tomas Leite Castro
Package: mirrors
Severity: wishlist
User: mirr...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: mirror-submission

Submission-Type: new
Site: mirror.leitecastro.com
Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 hurd-amd64 i386 
mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el riscv64 s390x
Archive-http: /debian/
Archive-rsync: debian/
Maintainer: Tomas Leite Castro 
Country: PT Portugal
Location: Lisbon
Comment: I'm hosting /debian and /debian-cd.
 Would it be possible to get push syncs from debian directly? I also have space 
for /debian-backports and /debian-archive.
 Unfortunately I could not find a working mirror here in Portugal that supports 
rsync and has these mirrors. 
 
 Best regards,
 
 Tomás




Trace Url: http://mirror.leitecastro.com/debian/project/trace/
Trace Url: 
http://mirror.leitecastro.com/debian/project/trace/ftp-master.debian.org
Trace Url: 
http://mirror.leitecastro.com/debian/project/trace/mirror.leitecastro.com



Bug#1061535: wayland-protocols: Please update to 1.33

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Bícha
Source: wayland-protocols
Version: 1.32-1
Severity: wishlist

wayland-protocols 1.33 has been released and the next version of
mutter will be using it. Please package the new version.

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha



Bug#1061533: cmake: CMake doesn't find googletest

2024-01-25 Thread J . Neuschäfer
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:20:03AM +0100, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Package: cmake
> Version: 3.28.1-1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@debian.org, hal...@debian.org
>
>
> Hello, I have installed cmake 3.28.1-1 and googletest 1.14.0-1 from
> Debian testing, and I'm trying to use GTest with CMake as follows:

Sorry for the noise, I found the problem:

For this to work, I need to install libgtest-dev.

Perhaps the googletest package could include a hint to that effect in
the description.



Bug#1056764: grub-efi-amd64: can't boot with GRUB 2.12~rc1-12

2024-01-25 Thread Nicolas Haller

Hi Jeremy,

Thanks for the suggestions.
I was able to update my BIOS/UEFI but it didn't solve the issue 
unfortunately.


So I change the type of my UEFI partition to BIOS boot partition, 
install grub-pc 2.12-1, run a grub-install and change the BIOS setting 
to "legacy BIOS only" as you mentioned and I'm able to boot now.


I'm not sure of the consequences of switching from UEFI to BIOS, but at 
least, I have a GRUB I don't need to pin to 2.06. :-)


Thanks again for your help.

--
Nicolas Haller

On 2024-01-24 00:49, Jeremy Davis wrote:

Hi Nicolas,

It might be worth double checking you have the latest BIOS/UEFI? If it's 
not the latest, then updating is worth a try IMO.


FWIW I recently updated mine to resolve some (completely unrelated) 
issues on my Lenovo Gen 1 X1 Carbon on Bookworm. With no optical drive 
and no Windows, it initially seemed like a PITA, but ended up pretty easy.


Process went something like this:

- download relevant BIOS/UEFI update ISO specific to your model from
   Lenovo
- extract IMG from ISO (using 'geteltorito' tool in 'genisoimage' pkg)
- write IMG to USB (e.g. using 'dd')
- boot from USB
- update...! :)

If you are already running latest, updating doesn't help, or you want to 
try a workaround, perhaps try disabling UEFI (i.e. disable secure boot 
and enable "legacy BIOS only" mode) and install the non-uefi grub (i.e. 
'grub-pc')?


Good luck.

Cheers,
Jeremy




Bug#1056764: grub-efi-amd64: can't boot with GRUB 2.12~rc1-12

2024-01-25 Thread Nicolas Haller

Hello Mate,

As per Jeremy suggestion, I switched to BIOS/grub-pc and I'm now able to 
boot my system. I guess this is not super ideal so I'll let you decide 
if you want to keep this bug open or not.


If you need a tester for your idea, I can revert my system to UEFI and 
give it a try whenever it's ready.


Thanks,

--
Nicolas Haller


On 2024-01-25 03:22, Mate Kukri wrote:

Hello all,

An idea for a workaround I have on such machines is to add an
environment variable (or some other option) to GRUB that let's GRUB
use the legacy-x86 kernel entry point even if the EFI stub appears
supported (of course only with UEFI Secure Boot disabled).

Based on previous discussion, it unfortunately seems that this isn't
strictly a GRUB issue, and the problem comes from GRUB switching
to booting the kernel using the method now preferred by upstream.

Mate

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 2:21 AM Nicolas Haller  wrote:


On 2024-01-23 08:15, Julian Andres Klode wrote:

Control: severity -1 important

On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 05:36:41PM -0500, Nicolas Haller wrote:

Package: grub-efi-amd64
Version: 2.06-13
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Dear Maintainer,

My old laptop (Lenovo 11e) runs Sid and all was right before I updated
it the other day (I don't do that very often). After that upgrade, GRUB
wasn't able to load any kernel with the pretty much generic error
"Error: can't load image". The version of GRUB was 2.12~rc1-12.
If I try to boot again, GRUB tells me that I need to load the image
first (I guess it somehow ignores the linux command and sends that when
trying to load the initrd).


I'm downgrading this bug severity, as a single system regressing in
boot ability is not release critical. It is not possible for us to
ensure that grub continues working on every single device out there,
this grub will work for more hardware than previous grubs, and blocking
the transition to testing because it doesn't work on your 11e is not
helping anyone.

We have now also uploaded 2.12-1 and of course we welcome any patches,
but an old Lenovo 11e is not a priority, and we don't have any to test
ourselves.
--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer  i speak de, en



Hello Julian,

I'm not sure why the aggressive tone here, I was asked if this bug
breaks my system and it does. How you want to handle this is up to you.
I think GRUB is a critical piece of a Linux system and I thought it was
worth to report the issue I encounter.

As I mentioned, my Lenovo isn't the newest one but it's not an esoteric
hardware either. It's a pretty regular amd64 laptop.

To be honest, I'm a bit concerned that GRUB failed where it wasn't
before (I would called that a regression) but also that it fails without
giving any error message or any kind of clue that could help to debug this.

I'm not a debian or ubuntu core developer and I don't know the first
thing about how to develop or debug a boot loader. Asking me for patches
isn't helping anyone.

If you have any suggestion in order to fix or just to diagnose the
issue, feel free to share that with me. Meanwhile, I'll try 2.12.1 and
look for an upgrade as Jeremy suggested.

Have a nice day,

--
Nicolas Haller

___
Pkg-grub-devel mailing list
pkg-grub-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grub-devel






Bug#1061529: jline3 ftbfs with Java 21 due to this-escape warning

2024-01-25 Thread Vladimir Petko
Dear Maintainers,

  Would it be possible to consider a merge request[1] that addresses this issue?

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

 [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jline3/-/merge_requests/2



Bug#1061536: php-doctrine-deprecations: FTBFS for PHP 8.3

2024-01-25 Thread Athos Ribeiro
Source: php-doctrine-deprecations
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: athos.ribe...@canonical.com

Dear Maintainer,

This package FTBFS with PHP 8.3 (in experimental) due to the deprecation
mentioned in
https://www.php.net/manual/en/reflectionproperty.setvalue.php.

I am attaching a patch to fix the issue, which was also forwarded
upstream at https://github.com/doctrine/deprecations/pull/64.
Description: adjust tests for PHP 8.3
  As of PHP 8.3.0, calling ReflectionProperty::setValue with a single argument
  is deprecated.
  See https://www.php.net/manual/en/reflectionproperty.setvalue.php for further
  reference.
Author: Athos Ribeiro 
Forwarded: https://github.com/doctrine/deprecations/pull/64
Last-Update: 2024-01-25
---
This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
--- a/tests/Doctrine/Deprecations/DeprecationTest.php
+++ b/tests/Doctrine/Deprecations/DeprecationTest.php
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
 // reset the global state of Deprecation class across tests
 $reflectionProperty = new ReflectionProperty(Deprecation::class, 
'ignoredPackages');
 $reflectionProperty->setAccessible(true);
-$reflectionProperty->setValue([]);
+$reflectionProperty->setValue(null, []);
 
 $reflectionProperty = new ReflectionProperty(Deprecation::class, 
'triggeredDeprecations');
 $reflectionProperty->setAccessible(true);
-$reflectionProperty->setValue([]);
+$reflectionProperty->setValue(null, []);
 
 Deprecation::disable();
 
@@ -277,12 +277,12 @@
 {
 $reflectionProperty = new ReflectionProperty(Deprecation::class, 
'type');
 $reflectionProperty->setAccessible(true);
-$reflectionProperty->setValue(null);
+$reflectionProperty->setValue(null, null);
 
 Deprecation::trigger('Foo', 'link', 'message');
 $this->assertSame(0, 
Deprecation::getUniqueTriggeredDeprecationsCount());
 
-$reflectionProperty->setValue(null);
+$reflectionProperty->setValue(null, null);
 $_SERVER['DOCTRINE_DEPRECATIONS'] = 'track';
 
 Deprecation::trigger('Foo', __METHOD__, 'message');
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
 {
 $reflectionProperty = new ReflectionProperty(Deprecation::class, 
'type');
 $reflectionProperty->setAccessible(true);
-$reflectionProperty->setValue(null);
+$reflectionProperty->setValue(null, null);
 $_ENV['DOCTRINE_DEPRECATIONS'] = 'trigger';
 
 $this->expectErrorHandler(


Bug#1056764: grub-efi-amd64: can't boot with GRUB 2.12~rc1-12

2024-01-25 Thread Jeremy Davis

Hi Nicholas,

On 26/1/24 11:40, Nicolas Haller wrote:

Thanks for the suggestions.
I was able to update my BIOS/UEFI but it didn't solve the issue 
unfortunately.


:(

If you haven't already, it may be worth reporting upstream (i.e. to grub 
devs) - they might have more ideas on troubleshooting, etc?


So I change the type of my UEFI partition to BIOS boot partition, 
install grub-pc 2.12-1, run a grub-install and change the BIOS setting 
to "legacy BIOS only" as you mentioned and I'm able to boot now.


Yay!

I'm not sure of the consequences of switching from UEFI to BIOS, but at 
least, I have a GRUB I don't need to pin to 2.06. :-)


AFAIK, it just means that you aren't using secureboot/UEFI so the risk 
of rootkits is potentially higher. TBH, I'm not sure how much risk there 
really is in practice though?


FWIW, my laptop (a couple of years older than yours AFAIT) first had 
Debian 6/Squeeze installed - about ~11-12 years ago & upgraded since - 
has always been like that. IIRC I had to, to install Debian back then?


It's always been rock solid reliable and I've never had any issues 
(beyond the odd Debian bug - at least to the best of my knowledge). I'm 
always a bit paranoid though, so super careful - daily automated aide 
scans, thunderbird with html disabled for email and firefox locked down 
for web browsing - always careful with what links I click, etc. So YMMV!?




Thanks again for your help.



You're most welcome. Have an awesome day! :)

Cheers,
Jeremy


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1061537: kexec-tools: non-text error output

2024-01-25 Thread наб
Package: kexec-tools
Version: 1:2.0.27-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

  root@chwast:/tmp# zcat /media/Image.gz | kexec -l -t Image /dev/stdin 
--reuse-cmdline --dtb /usr/local/src/mt8173-elm-hana.dtb
  Cannot read /dev/stdinroot@chwast:/tmp#

As evident from this transcript, the output isn't a text file.

(Also, it doesn't say why it couldn't read it; strace disagrees:
   openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/stdin", O_RDONLY) = 4
   lseek(4, 0, SEEK_CUR)   = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
   read(4, 
"MZ@\372\377?\0\24\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\333\33\0\0\0\0\n\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 
8192) = 8192
   close(4)= 0
   openat(AT_FDCWD, "/dev/stdin", O_RDONLY) = 4
   newfstatat(4, "", {st_mode=S_IFIFO|0600, st_size=0, ...}, AT_EMPTY_PATH) = 0
   close(4)= 0
   write(2, "Cannot read /dev/stdin", 22Cannot read /dev/stdin)  = 22
   exit_group(1)   = ?
 it's a bizarre success, but a success nonetheless.)

Best,
наб

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.6.11 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages kexec-tools depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.83
ii  dpkg   1.22.2
ii  libc6  2.37-13
ii  libxenmisc4.17 4.17.2+76-ge1f9cb16e2-1
ii  zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-3+b1

kexec-tools recommends no packages.

kexec-tools suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  kexec-tools/use_grub_config: false


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1041723:

2024-01-25 Thread Charlie Hagedorn
Just a request to bump this bug. While the original submitter's request (at
4.2, requesting an upgrade to 4.4 in July 2023) has been addressed with the
present version (4.4), darktable has moved on to 4.6, as of December 2023.

See: https://www.darktable.org/news/

At maintainers' convenience, please update the package :)!

Thank you!

Charlie


Bug#1061538: Old package separator "'" deprecated

2024-01-25 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: linklint
Version: 2.3.5-7
File: /usr/bin/linklint

Old package separator "'" deprecated at /usr/bin/linklint line 987...



Bug#1061539: wlrctl: missing arm64 version

2024-01-25 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: wlrctl

Please also provide arm64 versions of this package!
Might as well make the other missing versions too.



Bug#1061540: python3-qgis: upgrade warnings: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\s' '\d'

2024-01-25 Thread Paul Wise
Package: python3-qgis
Version: 3.28.15+dfsg-1
Severity: minor
Usertags: warnings

Upgrading python3-qgis gives some syntax warnings:

   Setting up python3-qgis (3.28.15+dfsg-1) ...
   /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/qgis/3d/__init__.py:70: SyntaxWarning: 
invalid escape sequence '\s'
 QgsAbstractMaterialSettings.TrianglesDataDefined.__doc__ = "Triangle based 
rendering with possibility of datadefined color \since QGIS 3.18"
   /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/qgis/core/__init__.py:435: SyntaxWarning: 
invalid escape sequence '\d'
 QgsDataItem.SetCrs.__doc__ = "Can set CRS on layer or group of layers. 
\deprecated since QGIS 3.6 -- no longer used by QGIS and will be removed in 
QGIS 4.0"

Since these are docstrings there is probably no consequence.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (900, 'testing-debug'), (900, 'testing'), (800, 
'unstable-debug'), (800, 'unstable'), (790, 'buildd-unstable'), (700, 
'experimental-debug'), (700, 'experimental'), (690, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.6.11-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages python3-qgis depends on:
hi  libc62.37-12
ii  libgcc-s113.2.0-10
ii  libpython3.113.11.7-2
ii  libqca-qt5-2 2.3.8-1
ii  libqgis-3d3.28.153.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqgis-analysis3.28.15  3.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqgis-core3.28.15  3.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqgis-gui3.28.15   3.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqgis-server3.28.153.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqgispython3.28.15 3.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  libqscintilla2-qt5-152.14.1+dfsg-1
ii  libqt5core5a 5.15.10+dfsg-6
ii  libqt5gui5   5.15.10+dfsg-6
ii  libqt5network5   5.15.10+dfsg-6
ii  libqt5positioning5   5.15.10+dfsg-3
ii  libqt5svg5   5.15.10-2
ii  libqt5webkit55.212.0~alpha4-33
ii  libqt5widgets5   5.15.10+dfsg-6
ii  libqt5xml5   5.15.10+dfsg-6
ii  libsqlite3-mod-spatialite5.1.0-1
ii  libstdc++6   13.2.0-10
ii  python3  3.11.6-1
ii  python3-dateutil 2.8.2-3
ii  python3-httplib2 0.20.4-3
ii  python3-jinja2   3.1.2-1
ii  python3-lxml 5.1.0-1
ii  python3-markupsafe   2.1.3-1+b1
ii  python3-owslib   0.29.3-1
ii  python3-plotly   5.15.0+dfsg1-1
ii  python3-psycopg2 2.9.9-1+b1
ii  python3-pygments 2.15.1+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyproj   3.6.1-2+b1
ii  python3-pyqt55.15.10+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qsci   2.14.1+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtpositioning  5.15.10+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtsql  5.15.10+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtsvg  5.15.10+dfsg-1
ii  python3-pyqt5.qtwebkit   5.15.10+dfsg-1
ii  python3-qgis-common  3.28.15+dfsg-1
ii  python3-requests 2.31.0+dfsg-1
ii  python3-tz   2023.3.post1-2
ii  python3-yaml 6.0.1-2
ii  qgis-providers   3.28.15+dfsg-1

python3-qgis recommends no packages.

python3-qgis suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#1057511: Additional information

2024-01-25 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:48:23AM +1300, Vladimir Petko wrote:
>  [1] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jtreg/-/merge_requests/3

Merged and uploaded.  Thank you for the patch!



Bug#1061541: ITP: ruby-redis-client -- redis-client is a simple, low-level, client for Redis 6+.

2024-01-25 Thread Vivek K J
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vivek K J 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org

* Package name: ruby-redis-client
  Version : 0.19.1
  Upstream Contact: jean.bouss...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/redis-rb/redis-client
* License : Expat
  Programming Lang: Ruby
  Description : redis-client is a simple, low-level, client for Redis 6+.

 Contrary to the redis gem, redis-client doesn't try to map all Redis commands
 to Ruby constructs, it merely is a thin wrapper on top of the RESP3 protocol.

 This package is a dependency of gitlab. This package will be maintained by
 Debian ruby team.



Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:38, Julian Gilbey  wrote:
> We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
> this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will be
> able to migrate to testing.

python3-defaults/3.11.6-1 with Python 3.12 as a supported version is
now in testing [1].

> Yes - please don't upload it to unstable yet.  Uploading to
> experimental is fine.

Uploading to unstable now should be fine, but maybe wait for
pandas/1.5.3+dfsg-12 to migrate first (in about four hours).

Regards
Graham


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055085#29



Bug#1061542: tracker-miners: FTBFS on amd64, arm64, loong64 and so on

2024-01-25 Thread zhangdandan

Source: tracker-miners
Version: 3.4.6-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loong64

Dear maintainers,

The package tracker-miners failed to compile on amd64, arm64, loong64 
and other architectures in the Debian Package Auto-Building environment. 
The error messages are as follows,

```
..
=== 54/54 


test: tracker-miners:examples / query-sync
start time:   21:21:01
duration: 1.68s
result:   exit status 0
command: ASAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/loongarch64-linux-gnu 
TRACKER_EXAMPLES_AUTOMATED_TEST=1 
UBSAN_OPTIONS=halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:print_summary=1:print_stacktrace=1 
TEST_ONTOLOGIES_DIR=/usr/share/tracker3/ontologies/nepomuk 
MALLOC_PERTURB_=224 /usr/bin/python3 
/<>/obj-loongarch64-linux-gnu/run-uninstalled 
--store-tmpdir /<>/examples/python/query-sync.py
--- stdout 
---

Music albums:
--- stderr 
---
(tracker-miner-fs-3:1266574): Tracker-WARNING **: 21:21:01.850: Locale 
'LANG' is not set, defaulting to C locale
(tracker-miner-fs-3:1266574): libupower-glib-WARNING **: 21:21:02.093: 
Couldn't connect to proxy: Could not connect: No such file or directory
(tracker-miner-fs-3:1266574): Tracker-WARNING **: 21:21:02.093: Unable 
to connect to UPower

==


Summary of Failures:

21/54 tracker-miners:extractor+audio / mp3-id3v2.4-1  
FAIL 0.20s   exit status 1
22/54 tracker-miners:extractor+audio / mp3-id3v2.3-empty-artist-album 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
23/54 tracker-miners:extractor+audio / mp3-id3v2.4-2  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
24/54 tracker-miners:extractor+desktop / application  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
25/54 tracker-miners:extractor+desktop / link-wikipedia-tracker   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
26/54 tracker-miners:extractor+audio / flac-musicbrainz   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
27/54 tracker-miners:extractor+audio / vorbis-musicbrainz 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
28/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / jpeg-basic    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
29/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / jpeg-region-of-interest   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
30/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / jpeg-gps-location 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
31/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / jpeg-iptc-tags    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
32/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / jpeg-iptcdata-records 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
33/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / gif-comment-extension-block   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
35/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / gif-xmp   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
36/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / png-basic 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
37/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / png-region-of-interest    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
38/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / raw-cr2   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
39/54 tracker-miners:extractor+images / tiff-basic    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
40/54 tracker-miners:extractor+playlists / playlist-test-1    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
42/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / oasis-doc 
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
43/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / office-doc    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
44/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / powerpoint    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
45/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / pdf-doc   
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
46/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / ps-doc    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
47/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / ps-doc-atend  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
48/54 tracker-miners:extractor+office / psgz-doc  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
49/54 tracker-miners:extractor+video / mkv-basic  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
50/54 tracker-miners:extractor+video / mov-basic  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
51/54 tracker-miners:extractor+video / mp4-basic  
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1
52/54 tracker-miners:extractor+video / mp4-video-without-audio    
FAIL 0.18s   exit status 1


Ok: 24
Expected Fail:  0
Fail:   30
Unexpected Pass:

Bug#1061348: [debian-mysql] Bug#1061348: mariadb: install PAM modules and systemd unit files into /usr

2024-01-25 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
I opened an MR about this one at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-server/-/merge_requests/65
to get CI validation.

I will do some more testing over the weekend and then merge both.
Thanks for your contribution!



Bug#1042858: promod3: unable to install on arm64

2024-01-25 Thread Andrius Merkys

Hi,

On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 23:23:39 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher 
 wrote:

$ apt-get install promod3
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 promod3 : Depends: python3-ost but it is not installable
   Depends: python3-promod3 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


promod3 is arch:all, but it depends on arch:any packages which build on 
amd64 only. Is it necessary to limit the architecture list for promod3? 
I am reluctant to do so as there will be the need to manually update the 
list every time a new architecture becomes supported by its arch:any 
dependencies.


Andrius



Bug#1061511: gedit-source-code-browser-plugin: Upstream unmaintained for over a decade

2024-01-25 Thread Pietro Battiston
Dear Kip,

thanks for your mail and references. I have asked ildar, in the bug you
referred to, additional details on what broke in the last Gedit
versions. If anybody is able to fix his fork, or produce another one
and make some minimal commitment to update it (or accept contributions
for it) over time, I will be happy to switch the Debian package to it.

The best thing would clearly be having an up to date fork owned by a
project, rather than an individual who (legitimately) writes "I
personally don't plan to maintain this regularly". I would be happy to
be in such a project and occasionally contribute - while I would not
want to simply package my personal fork.

Pietro



Bug#1043240: transition: pandas 1.5 -> 2.1

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 08:43:03AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 14:38, Julian Gilbey  wrote:
> > We're nearly there (the transition page says it's 99% done), and when
> > this transition is complete, then python3-defaults 3.11.6+ will be
> > able to migrate to testing.
> 
> python3-defaults/3.11.6-1 with Python 3.12 as a supported version is
> now in testing [1].

Wonderful news!  Congratulations to everyone who helped to make this
happen!

Best wishes,

   Julian



Bug#1061494: [Pkg-xmpp-devel] Bug#1061494: create a prosody-config package that will configure prosody with good xmpp compliance by default with debconf

2024-01-25 Thread Victor Seva
Hi

On 25/1/24 20:59, Martin wrote:
> Hi Praveen,
> 
> IMHO, that's a good idea!

Yes, sounds nice.

> Esp. I like to have a config that is as similar as possible to Snikket,
> for those, who like to selfhost, but want to avoid docker.
> 
> I'm not sure, if that package should be part of prosody itself or if it
> should be a separate source package with a binary package, that depends
> on both prosody and prosody-modules.

another source package sounds too much. It can be included in prosody source.

Cheers

-- 
-
|   ,''`. Victor Seva |
|  : :' :  linuxman...@torreviejawireless.org |
|  `. `'  PGP: 8F19 CADC D42A 42D4 5563  730C 51A0 9B18 CF5A 5068 |
|`-  Debian Developer |
  -


OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


OpenPGP_0x7D7B65C42A0EC8B2.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


Bug#1054574: adminer seems dead upstream, switch to adminerevo ?

2024-01-25 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi,

Status update: the work is done.

src:adminerevo and packaged dependency are awaiting sponsorship.

https://mentors.debian.net/package/libjs-jush/
https://mentors.debian.net/package/adminerevo/

Thanks,

Alex



Bug#1061543: indent: CVE-2024-0911

2024-01-25 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Source: indent
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: security

Hi,

This was assigned CVE-2024-0911:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-indent/2024-01/msg1.html

If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.

For further information see:

[0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-0911
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0911

Please adjust the affected versions in the BTS as needed.



Bug#1055329: Offer of support/assistance

2024-01-25 Thread Alexandre Rossi
Hi,

> My name is Jeremy and I'd like to offer you my support and assistance in
> your efforts to package and maintain AdminerEvo if that's of any use to you?

Many thanks for your offer and your are welcome to help for this.

I had forgotten to post a status update on this particular work item: the
work is essentially done, I'm just seeking a Debian developper (I'm not)
to upload the new package to the Debian archive and grant me access for
further uploads.

Thanks,

Alex



<    1   2