Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:01:28AM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> 
> > there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose
> > is to provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel.  It does this
> > whether or not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.
> >...
> 
> Did Debian change it's mind recently?

The part above is my gut feeling, not the work of -legal.  However, I feel
that it is the only sane interpretation.  If you write a free library that
is not yet used by any programs, it is free.  If the first program using
your library is non-free, is your library suddenly non-free?  That would
be nonsense.  However, this is only my opinion, and I am sure that the
good people on -legal will happily tell me if they think I'm wrong.

Since there are free drivers, however, the whole discussion is moot.

Take care,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgp5IW52a3UGr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib

[Andres Salomon]

On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:52 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:01:28AM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> > > Package: ndiswrapper
> > > Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
> > > non-free software?
> > > 
> > > If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.
> > 
> > This was just recently discussed, and I believe the consensus was that
> > there are free drivers, so there is no problem.  And frankly, even if
> 
> I didn't know about this and this makes my bug void.
> 
> Where can I find DFSG-free drivers using ndiswrapper?
> 

I believe the ndiswrapper page itself has links to GPL'd drivers.


> > there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose is to
> > provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel.  It does this whether or
> > not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.
> >...
> 
> Did Debian change it's mind recently?
> 
> It used to be consensus on debian-legal that software that is currently 
> unusable without non-free software has to go to contrib.
> 

It's not unusable without non-free software; it will happily load into
the kernel and provide an ndis interface in the linux kernel.  Please
see the various other threads that were on this same topic.


-- 
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#294008: marked as done (php4-sqlite: phpapi revision requires a new upload in sid)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:13 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294008: fixed in php4-sqlite 1.0.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Feb 2005 13:05:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 07 05:05:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s010600e029962405.cg.shawcable.net (lucifer.0c3.net) 
[68.147.203.152] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cy8a0-0005AX-00; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 05:05:28 -0800
Received: from adconrad by lucifer.0c3.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Cy8Zz-0006rd-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 06:05:27 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: php4-sqlite: phpapi revision requires a new upload in sid
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 06:05:27 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: php4-sqlite
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Due to recent changes in the php4 packages, your package has become 
uninstallable
in sid (as of today's dinstall run, installing php4_4:4.3.10-3).  We are now
building php4 with "Zend Thread Safety" which both changes the ABI and changes
the directory that extensions should be installed into.

To build a new package, you need to do three things:

1) build-dep on "php4-dev (>= 4:4.3.10-3)" (you can pull it from incoming to get
   a head start.  The buildds already do)
2) ensure that your phpapi dependency has "-zts" tacked to the end of it.
   for examples on how to do so, see the debian/rules in php4-pgsql_3:4.3.10-1
3) Make sure that your extension installs to the correct directory
   (you do use `php-config --extension-dir`, don't you?)

That should be it.

Due to the simplicity and non-intrusiveness of these changes, if I don't see
uploads in the next 24 hours, I will happily NMU to fix the affected packages.

... Adam Conrad

(PS: Yes, this does have the blessing of at least one Release Manager)

---
Received: (at 294008-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 04:23:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 20:23:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4X1A-0001bX-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:23:56 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Wuf-0001jB-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:13 -0500
From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#294008: fixed in php4-sqlite 1.0.2-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:17:13 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: php4-sqlite
Source-Version: 1.0.2-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
php4-sqlite, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6.diff.gz
php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6.dsc
php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated php4-sqlite package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:30:07 +1100
Source: php4-sq

Processed: severity of 296840 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 296840 important
Bug#296840: armagetron server DOS by fake players (CAN-2005-0371)
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296845: phpmyadmin: new upstream release addresses several security problems

[Andre Tomt]

Package: phpmyadmin
Version: 3:2.6.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security

New upstream version addresses several file include and XSS issues; see
http://securityreason.com/adv/phpmyadmin_2.6.1_remote_file_inclusion_and_xss_cxib8o3.4.txt

Also it may be worth considering switching register_globals to Off in
/usr/share/phpmyadmin/.htaccess - it should have been safe for phpmyadmin for
1-2 years already. This would also have stopped some of the XSS issues that
popped up this time..

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-s0p2-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages phpmyadmin depends on:
ii  apache2   2.0.53-4   next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd]   2.0.53-4   traditional model for Apache2
ii  debconf   1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management sy
ii  php4  4:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-mysql4:4.3.10-7 MySQL module for php4
ii  ucf   1.14   Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information:
* phpmyadmin/reconfigure-webserver: apache, apache-ssl, apache-perl, apache2
* phpmyadmin/restart-webserver: false


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296514: Cervisia license issues

[Ben Burton]

Hi.

Currently cervisia is licensed under the QPL.  As the maintainer of
kdesdk in debian, I am unfortunately faced with having to remove
cervisia from the debian distribution since the QPL does not meet with
debian's free software guidelies.  Of course this is debian's decision,
but nevertheless it seems worth bringing up the two specific issues that
concern us:

  Choice of Law:

  The "Choice of Law" section states that disputes will be settled by
  Oslo City Court.  This is problematic since it requires recipients of
  the software to travel to Oslo if a dispute should arise.

  6c:

  Clause 6c requires that the recipient provide any modifications or
  linked applications to the original software developer upon request.
  This is problematic for a number of reasons, including requiring
  recipients to identify themselves and to keep archives of their own
  software for an indefinite amount of time in case the cervisia authors
  should make such a request.

For a somewhat better summary of the issues that make these two clauses
problematic, see the draft overview at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/07/msg00157.html
and the subsequent thread.

Given these issues, is it possible to consider altering the licensing
for cervisia in any way?  Possibilities are as follows:

1. Make exceptions that deal with these two clauses.  This was done by
the ocaml developers for similar reasons.  Their changes were as
follows:

- Replace "choice of law" with "choice of venue".  Specifically, they
  replaced that clause with "This license is governed by the Laws of
  France", without requiring any specific venue for resolving disputes.

- Add the following exception:

  "As a special exception to the Q Public Licence, you may develop
  application programs, reusable components and other software items
  that link with the original or modified versions of the Compiler and
  are not made available to the general public, without any of the
  additional requirements listed in clause 6c of the Q Public licence."

2. Alternatively it might be worth considering a dual license for cervisia,
similar to what Trolltech has done with Qt.


I'm CCing this message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is the bug that
was filed requesting the removal of cervisia from debian.  If this CC
could be preserved it would be appreciated.  I have also CCed the three
primary authors for cervisia; apologies if you get this twice.

Thanks,

Ben.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#263331: marked as done (armagetron-server: does not start)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#263331: fixed in armagetron 0.2.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 20:35:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 13:35:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from irc.kennmer.net (localhost) [217.160.181.141] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bs60Q-0002YX-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:35:30 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6869FE6A9B; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 22:40:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jan Huelsbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: armagetron-server: does not start
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 22:40:15 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: armagetron-server
Version: 0.2.5.2-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Trying to start armagetron-dedicated results in the following error
message:

Error in int main(int, char**) in ../../../src/tron/gArmagetron.cpp:335
:
Data files not found. You have to run Armagetron from its own
directory or use the wrapper script installed in /usr/local/bin

I am not able to determine this Armagetron directory, I tried
/usr/share/games/armagetron and /etc/armagetron.

The mentioned wrapper script is not supplied as well.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-grsec.lsec
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages armagetron-server depends on:
ii  armagetron-common   0.2.5.2-3Common files for the Armagetron pa
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.3.4-3GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.4-3The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 263331-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 01:53:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 17:53:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Ufy-0007RI-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:53:54 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4UZP-0007WG-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
From: Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#263331: fixed in armagetron 0.2.7.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: armagetron
Source-Version: 0.2.7.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
armagetron, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

armagetron-common_0.2.7.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron-common_0.2.7.0-1_all.deb
armagetron-server_0.2.7.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron-server_0.2.7.0-1_i386.deb
armagetron_0.2.7.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron_0.2.7.0-1.diff.gz
armagetron_0.2.7.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron_0.2.7.0-1.dsc
armagetron_0.2.7.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron_0.2.7.0-1_i386.deb
armagetron_0.2.7.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron_0.2.7.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reope

Bug#295294: marked as done (multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295294: fixed in armagetron 0.2.7.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2005 21:29:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 13:29:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0nmN-0006O9-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:29:15 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FAC181FA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:29:14 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 18B4C6E20E; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:31:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:31:34 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0371 CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: armagetron
Version: 0.2.5.2-3.1
Severity: grave
Tags: security

This message describes multiple security holes in armagetron:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraq&m=3D110811699206052&w=3D2
Bugs: A] crash caused by big descriptor ID (CAN-2005-0369)
  B] crash caused by big claim_id (CAN-2005-0369)
  C] socket unreacheable through empty packet (CAN-2005-0370)
  D] fake players temporary freeze (CAN-2005-0371)

It's not clear whether the crashes allow for executing arbetrary code or
whether this is limited to a denial of service attack. Also, if it's right
that upstream is no longer supporting it, we may need to patch it ourselves
or drop the package.

Please reference the CAN numbers in any changelog entries fixing these hole=
s.

--=20
see shy jo

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCERi1d8HHehbQuO8RAnvQAJ9q+G51srYoA9B72adEgKG9NnZA1gCeJ1EL
rxfg4klxs+x3+DKFv6KcGRQ=
=RaZc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--

---
Received: (at 295294-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 01:55:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 17:55:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4UhH-00085h-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:55:15 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4UZP-0007WM-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
From: Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295294: fixed in armagetron 0.2.7.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 20:47:07 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6

Source: armagetron
Source-Version: 0.2.7.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
armagetron, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

armagetron-common_0.2.7.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armagetron-common_0.2.7.0-1_all.deb
armagetron-server_0.2.7.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/armagetron/armage

Bug#188448: Dealing with RC bug 188448

[Steve Langasek]

Helge,

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:49:21PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> a week ago I outlined a procedure I suggest for dealing with RC bug
> 188448 reported by me. In brief:

> a) Remove abuse-* from testing
> b) Wait for an upload to the 32bit archs only
> c) Downgrade 188448 to important (maybe only wishlist),
>hence abuse-* can re-enter testing

> Since the change to debian/control is trivial, I assume you can do an
> NMU to achieve b) (the maintainer has not replied to the plan outlined
> last week, his last email for this bug is dated September 2004). But
> if you want, I can provide a patch for a NMU, just that I cannot test
> it.

The abuse-sdl package (along with dependent packages) has already been
removed from testing as a result of this bug.

Uploading a package that will FTBFS on 64-bit archs instead of building
broken packages is a reasonable fix for the release-criticality of this bug;
it also requires the approval/intervention of an ftp-master to remove the 

Once this is done the bug should be downgraded to important, which is the
normal severity for non-RC portability bugs.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 296824

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 296824 + moreinfo
Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295294: splitting different security issues for armagetron

[Andreas Bombe]

clone 295294 -1
retitle -1 armagetron server DOS by fake players (CAN-2005-0371)
retitle 295294 multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
thanks

I'm splitting this security bug report as the crashes as everything is
fixed except for the last DOS attack so that I can put that in the
changelog.  And maybe the pure DOS bug can be reduced in severity.

-- 
Andreas Bombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG key 0x04880A44


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: splitting different security issues for armagetron

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 295294 -1
Bug#295294: multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0371 CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
Bug 295294 cloned as bug 296840.

> retitle -1 armagetron server DOS by fake players (CAN-2005-0371)
Bug#296840: multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0371 CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
Changed Bug title.

> retitle 295294 multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
Bug#295294: multiple security holes (CAN-2005-0371 CAN-2005-0370 CAN-2005-0369)
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296814: marked as done (snort: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:34:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296814: fixed in snort 2.3.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 20:26:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 12:26:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4PYi-0001ZR-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:26:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C0A198083
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2632D198027
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id D4E3F26136; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:26:02 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: snort: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: snort
Version: 2.3.0-5
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build it's documentation in a clean
chroot.  I get the following error:
! LaTeX Error: File `geometry.sty' not found.

This is because you do not have a Build-Depends(-Indep) for
tetex-extra.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 296814-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 00:42:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 16:42:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4TZ6-0007ja-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:42:44 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4TQj-0002LQ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:34:05 -0500
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#296814: fixed in snort 2.3.0-6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:34:05 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: snort
Source-Version: 2.3.0-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
snort, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

snort-common_2.3.0-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-common_2.3.0-6_all.deb
snort-doc_2.3.0-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-doc_2.3.0-6_all.deb
snort-mysql_2.3.0-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-mysql_2.3.0-6_i386.deb
snort-pgsql_2.3.0-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-pgsql_2.3.0-6_i386.deb
snort-rules-default_2.3.0-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort-rules-default_2.3.0-6_all.deb
snort_2.3.0-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort_2.3.0-6.diff.gz
snort_2.3.0-6.dsc
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort_2.3.0-6.dsc
snort_2.3.0-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/snort/snort_2.3.0-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated snort 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:43:

Bug#281306: marked as done (libapache-mod-backhand: build error: autoconf: command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281306: fixed in libapache-mod-backhand 1.2.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 01:38:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 14 17:38:21 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTVoy-0004Ck-00; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:38:20 -0800
Received: (qmail 10867 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2004 01:23:56 -
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 15 Nov 2004 01:23:56 -
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D2532BBB1F; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:23:23 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libapache-mod-backhand: build error: autoconf: command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 02:23:23 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libapache-mod-backhand
Version: 1.2.2-7
Severity: serious

buildd.debian.org lists the following build error on m68k:

<--  snip  -->

...
checking for Apache module support via DSO through APACI... no
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/libapache-mod-backhand-1.2.2'
cd . && autoconf
/bin/sh: line 1: autoconf: command not found
make[1]: *** [configure] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libapache-mod-backhand-1.2.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

<--  snip  -->

---
Received: (at 281306-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 00:38:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 16:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4TUZ-00079R-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:38:04 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4TQZ-0002KT-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
From: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#281306: fixed in libapache-mod-backhand 1.2.2-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:33:55 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: libapache-mod-backhand
Source-Version: 1.2.2-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libapache-mod-backhand, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
  to 
pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8.dsc
libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8_i386.deb
  to 
pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-backhand/libapache-mod-backhand_1.2.2-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated 
libapache-mod-backhand package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMA

Bug#296839: unace: multiple buffer overflows and directory traversal bugs

[Ulf Härnhammar]

Subject: unace: multiple buffer overflows and directory traversal bugs
Package: unace
Version: 1.2b-2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Tags: security patch

I have found multiple security vulnerabilities in unace.

There are two buffer overflows when extracting, testing or listing
specially prepared ACE archives. They are caused by wrong usage of
strncpy() with the third parameter coming from the archive. In both
cases, the attacker controls the EIP register.

There are also two buffer overflows when (a) dealing with long (>15600
characters) command line arguments for archive names, and (b) when
preparing a string for printing Ready for next volume messages.

Furthermore, there are directory traversal bugs when extracting ACE
archives. They are both of the absolute ("/etc/nologin") and the relative
("../../../../../../../etc/nologin") type.

All buffer overflows have the identifier CAN-2005-0160, and the directory
traversal bugs have the identifier CAN-2005-0161.

I have attached some test archives and a patch.

// Ulf Härnhammar for the Debian Security Audit Project
   http://www.debian.org/security/audit/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages unace depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

--- uac_crt.h.old	1998-07-01 10:29:00.0 +0200
+++ uac_crt.h	2005-02-14 00:48:35.0 +0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 #include "acestruc.h"
 
-CHAR *ace_fname(CHAR * s, thead * head, INT nopath);
+CHAR *ace_fname(CHAR * s, thead * head, INT nopath, unsigned int size);
 INT  create_dest_file(CHAR * file, INT a);
 
 #ifdef UNIX
--- uac_crt.c.old	1998-07-01 10:29:00.0 +0200
+++ uac_crt.c	2005-02-14 02:46:02.0 +0100
@@ -33,12 +33,15 @@
 
 /* gets file name from header
  */
-CHAR *ace_fname(CHAR * s, thead * head, INT nopath)
+CHAR *ace_fname(CHAR * s, thead * head, INT nopath, unsigned int size)
 {
-   INT  i;
+   unsigned int i;
char *cp;
 
-   strncpy(s, (*(tfhead *) head).FNAME, i = (*(tfhead *) head).FNAME_SIZE);
+   i = (*(tfhead *) head).FNAME_SIZE;
+   if (i > (size - 1))
+ i = size - 1;
+   strncpy(s, (*(tfhead *) head).FNAME, i);
s[i] = 0;
 
if (nopath)
@@ -56,22 +59,72 @@ CHAR *ace_fname(CHAR * s, thead * head, 
}
 #endif
 
+   cp = s;
+   while (*cp == '/') cp++;
+   if (cp != s)
+ memmove(s, cp, strlen(cp) + 1);
+
return s;
 }
 
+int is_directory_traversal(char *str)
+{
+  unsigned int mode, countdots;
+  /* mode 0 = fresh, 1 = just dots, 2 = not just dots */
+  char ch;
+
+  mode = countdots = 0;
+
+  while (ch = *str++)
+  {
+if ((ch == '/') && (mode == 1) && (countdots > 1))
+  return 1;
+
+if (ch == '/')
+{
+   mode = countdots = 0;
+   continue;
+}
+
+if (ch == '.')
+{
+  if (mode == 0)
+mode = 1;
+
+  countdots++;
+}
+else
+  mode = 2;
+  }
+
+  if ((mode == 1) && (countdots > 1))
+return 1;
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
 void check_ext_dir(CHAR * f)// checks/creates path of file
 {
CHAR *cp,
 d[PATH_MAX];
-   INT  i;
+   unsigned int i;
 
d[0] = 0;
 
+   if (is_directory_traversal(f))
+   {
+  f_err = ERR_WRITE;
+  printf("\nDirectory traversal attempt:  %s\n", f);
+  return;
+   }
+
for (;;)
{
   if ((cp = (CHAR *) strchr(&f[strlen(d) + 1], DIRSEP))!=NULL)
   {
  i = cp - f;
+ if (i > (PATH_MAX - 1))
+   i = PATH_MAX - 1;
  strncpy(d, f, i);
  d[i] = 0;
   }
--- unace.c.old	1998-07-01 10:29:00.0 +0200
+++ unace.c	2005-02-14 01:43:28.0 +0100
@@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ INT read_arc_head(void) // searc
 INT  open_archive(INT print_err)// opens archive (or volume)
 {
CHAR av_str[80];
+   unsigned int copylen;
 
archan = open(aname, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);   // open file
 
@@ -263,8 +264,11 @@ INT  open_archive(INT print_err)
   sprintf(av_str, "\ncreated on %d.%d.%d by ",
   ts_day(adat.time_cr), ts_month(adat.time_cr), ts_year(adat.time_cr));
   printf(av_str);
-  strncpy(av_str, mhead.AV, mhead.AV_SIZE);
-  av_str[mhead.AV_SIZE] = 0;
+  copylen = mhead.AV_SIZE;
+  if (copylen > 79)
+copylen = 79;
+  strncpy(av_str, mhead.AV, copylen);
+  av_str[copylen] = 0;
   printf("%s\n\n", av_str);
}
comment_out("Main comment:");// print main comment
@@ -300,7 +304,7 @@ void get_next_volname(void) 
 INT  proc_vol(void) // opens volume
 {
INT  i;
-   CHAR s[80];
+   CHAR s[PATH_MAX + 80];
 
// if f_allvol_pr is 2 we have -y and should never ask
if ((!fileexists_insense(aname) && f_allvol_pr != 2) || !f_allvol_pr)
@@ -428,7 +432,7 @@ void extract_files(int nopath, int test)
   if (

Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls

[Kevin Rosenberg]

Alan Shields wrote:
> Package: sbcl
> Version: 1:0.8.19.29-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> According to dan-b on #lisp my problems[1] with Araneida were due to stale
> fasls. Apparently there were some incompatible changes made between
> 0.8.19.0 and current, specifically referenced this patch:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6632358&forum_id=8256
> 
> Deleting fasls made everything work again.

Which stale fasls are you talking about? Fasls distributed with the
sbcl package? It's fairly common for SBCL versions to be incompatible
with previous version fasl's, but I wouldn't consider that a bug with
SBCL unless the sbcl package itself included stale fasls.

-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296662: unverified report

[Matthew Palmer]

tag 296662 unreproducible
thanks

Naturally, you verified that the bug exists in the Debian packaged version
of IRM before you submitted the bug report, in which case you can give me
the recipe you used to exploit it in the Debian environment.

I had no luck in making this bug appear -- for me, there was always a bind
failure and a crash.  When making the patch upstream, I had to go on
second-hand reports from others as to whether the bug was fixed.  I
personally have yet to verify the existence of this bug with my own fingers.

- Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Bug#296662: unverified report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 296662 unreproducible
Bug#296662: security hole in LDAP login code (CAN-2005-0505)
Tags were: security
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296835: openafs-modules-source: Fails to build with kernel-source-2.6.10

[divanov]

Package: openafs-modules-source
Version: 1.3.74-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Justification: no longer builds from source


Module does not build from source with 1.3.74 and kernel 2.6.10 .
(config from kernel-imsage-2.6.10-1-686-smp)

I successfully built upstream 1.3.79 with kernel-source-2.6.10 and am
using it now (client only), so I can confirm that it fixes it at least
for me.

Build log attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (490, 'testing'), (480, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages openafs-modules-source depends on:
ii  bison  1:1.875d-1A parser generator that is compati
ii  debhelper  4.2.31helper programs for debian/rules
ii  e2fslibs-dev   1.36release-1 ext2 filesystem libraries - header
ii  flex   2.5.31-31 A fast lexical analyzer generator.
ii  kernel-package 8.124 A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  libncurses5-dev5.4-4 Developer's libraries and docs for
ii  libpam0g-dev   0.76-22   Development files for PAM

-- no debconf information
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/openafs'
ln -s @sys/dest dest
ln: `dest': File exists
make[1]: [build-modules-stamp] Error 1 (ignored)
ln -s i386_linux26 @sys
ln: [EMAIL PROTECTED]': File exists
make[1]: [build-modules-stamp] Error 1 (ignored)
sh configure --with-afs-sysname=i386_linux26 
--with-linux-kernel-headers=/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.10 
--prefix=`pwd`/debian/tmp
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... none
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for egrep... grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for flex... flex
checking for yywrap in -lfl... yes
checking lex output file root... lex.yy
checking whether yytext is a pointer... yes
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for AIX... no
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking minix/config.h usability... no
checking minix/config.h presence... no
checking for minix/config.h... no
checking for pid_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for __FUNCTION__ and __LINE__ macros... yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for bison... bison -y
checking whether byte order is known at compile time... yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking your OS... linux
checking if gcc accepts -march=pentium... yes
checking if gcc needs -fno-strength-reduce... yes
checking if gcc needs -fno-strict-aliasing... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-common... yes
checking if gcc supports -pipe... yes
checking whether to build osi_vfs.h... nothing to do... src/afs/LINUX/osi_vfs.h 
not changed.
checking for linux/completion.h existance... yes
checking for defined for_each_process... yes
checking for defined prev_task... yes
checking for exported tasklist_lock... no
checking for page_lock in struct address_space... no
checking for gfp_mask in struct address_space... no
checking for i_alloc_sem in struct inode... yes
checking for i_truncate_sem in struct inode... no
checking for i_dirty_data_buffers in struct inode... no
checking for i_devices in struct inode... yes
checking for i_security in struct inode... yes
checking for inode_setattr return type... yes
checking for linux/syscall.h in kernel... no
checking for SELinux kernel... yes
checking for 5th argument in sock_create found in some SELinux kernels... no
checking for redhat kernel configuration... no
checking for recalc_sigpending arg type... yes
checking for parent in struct task_struct... yes
checking for real_parent in struct task_struct... yes
checking for sig in struct task_struct... no
checking for sighand in struct task_struct... yes
checking for sigmask_lock in stru

Bug#294719: WDM bugs fixed in NMU

[Adrian Bunk]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:31:03PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
>...
> No, you are referring to the wrong NMU. I did an NMU early today.
> Please have a look at:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2005/02/msg01603.html

Ah, this is why I didn't see this NMU in unstable.

> I am not used, as policy suggest, to close bug in changelog, so I did
> send an email to every bug submitter, and close all bugs.
>...

Where does your policy suggest that ou shouldn't close bugs in the 
changelog?

Don't you know that bugs closed in the changelog of the NMU are not 
closed but correctly tagged as fixed?

> Bye,
> Giuseppe

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:01:28AM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> > Package: ndiswrapper
> > Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
> > Severity: serious
> > 
> > 
> > Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
> > non-free software?
> > 
> > If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.
> 
> This was just recently discussed, and I believe the consensus was that
> there are free drivers, so there is no problem.  And frankly, even if

I didn't know about this and this makes my bug void.

Where can I find DFSG-free drivers using ndiswrapper?

> there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose is to
> provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel.  It does this whether or
> not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.
>...

Did Debian change it's mind recently?

It used to be consensus on debian-legal that software that is currently 
unusable without non-free software has to go to contrib.

And even on linux-kernel where people are much less dogmatic than on 
debian-legal (e.g. regarding firmware) it's usually agreed that 
interfaces like exported symbols that are not used by any free software 
but only by non-free software aren't OK. It was really a surprise for me 
if debian-legal would agree that interfaces that are currently only used 
by non-free software were suitable for Debian main.

cu
Adrian

-- 

   "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
   "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
   Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295261: marked as done (CAN-2004-1004+CAN-2004-1005: multiple vulnerabilities in mc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:47:10 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295261: fixed in mc 1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2005 19:19:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 14 11:19:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0lkM-CZ-00; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:19:02 -0800
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 95C8E366C63; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:18:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:12:39 +0100 (CET) 
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:12:38 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CAN-2004-1004+CAN-2004-1005: multiple vulnerabilities in mc
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: mc
Version: 4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge sid security patch

I'm awfully sorry but when releasing DSA 639 I was under the impression
that the version of mc was sufficiently new and contained all security
fixes already.  However, Gerardo Di Giacomo denied that, so attached
please find the patch he provided for a Debian fork which also applies
to the version in sarge = sid.  I'm also attaching the patches I've
used for the update in woody.

CAN-2004-1004

Multiple format string vulnerabilities

CAN-2004-1005

Multiple buffer overflows

Linkname: [SECURITY] [DSA 639-1] New mc packages fix several vulnerabilities
 URL: 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2005/msg00017.html

Please correct the package.

Regards,

Joey

-- 
Ten years and still binary compatible.  -- XFree86

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diff.for.joey"

diff -u mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/debian/changelog 
mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/debian/changelog
--- mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/debian/changelog
+++ mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+mc (1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1-3ubuntu0.1) warty-security; urgency=low
+
+  * SECURITY UPDATES: multiple vulnerabilities
+  * src/utilunix.c:
+- Fixed a potential buffer overflow vulnerability
+  * vfs/fish.c:
+- Fixed a potential format string vulnerability
+  * References:
+- CAN-2004-1004
+- CAN-2004-1005
+
+ -- Gerardo Di Giacomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:37:01 +
+
 mc (1:4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Polish documentation fix no longer needed.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1.orig/debian/patches/11_CAN-2004-1004_CAN-2004-1005.patch
+++ mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/debian/patches/11_CAN-2004-1004_CAN-2004-1005.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+diff -Nur mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1.orig/src/utilunix.c 
mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/src/utilunix.c
+--- mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1.orig/src/utilunix.c2005-02-14 12:23:54.358065160 
+
 mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/src/utilunix.c 2005-02-14 12:30:02.910036744 +
+@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@
+   close (2);
+   dup (old_error);
+   close (old_error);
+-  len = read (error_pipe[0], msg, MAX_PIPE_SIZE);
++  len = read (error_pipe[0], msg, MAX_PIPE_SIZE -1 );
+ 
+   if (len >= 0)
+   msg[len] = 0;
+diff -Nur mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1.orig/vfs/fish.c mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/vfs/fish.c
+--- mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1.orig/vfs/fish.c2005-02-14 12:23:54.504042968 
+
 mc-4.6.0-4.6.1-pre1/vfs/fish.c 2005-02-14 12:27:39.723804360 +
+@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
+   print_vfs_message (_("fish: Waiting for initial line..."));
+   if (!vfs_s_get_line (me, SUP.sockr, an

Bug#295428: FTBFS: autoconf bug?

[Martin Orr]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:58:27AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:53:49PM +1000, Adam Conrad wrote:
> > Martin Orr said:
> > >
> > > Could you change configure.in to have AC_PREREQ(2.50) at the top?
> > 
> > That's my planned fix, yes. :)
> 
> That doesn't sound to me like the correct solution to this bug, though.
> The problem is that autoconf gets invoked without making sure the right
> autoconf is invoked.
> 
> Either running autoconf is needed, then somehow autconf2.5 needs to be
> invoked,

That is exactly what AC_PREREQ(2.50) does.  apache2 already Build-Depends on
autoconf which in sid and sarge means 2.50 (actually 2.59) - although
perhaps there should be a versioned Build-Depends.

The problem occurs if you install autoconf2.13 at the same time (which was
what I had but didn't realise).  It diverts /usr/bin/autoconf to
autoconf2.50 and replaces it with a script which does some heuristics to try
to guess which version is required - and most often selects 2.13 (as in the
case of apache2).  One of the checks is to look for an AC_PREREQ line so by
adding that, the wrapper will indeed run autoconf2.50.

-- 
Martin Orr
Linux Administrator,
Methodist College Belfast


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#281306: libapache-mod-backhand: build error: autoconf: command not found

[Frederik Schueler]

tags +patch
thanks

The fix is pretty simple, see attached patch.

Kind regards
Frederik Schueler

-- 
ENOSIG
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: web
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: James Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.6), apache-dev (>=1.3.20-1), autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.6), apache-dev (>=1.3.20-1), autotools-dev, 
automake1.4
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0
 
 Package: libapache-mod-backhand


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#292673: additional info

[David Mosberger]

While there hasn't been any discussion for glibc bugzilla report #685
[1], private communication with one of the glibc maintainers indicates
that this issue is not considered to be a glibc bug because,
officially, glibc supports only one thread library at a time:
LinuxThreads _or_ NPTL, but not both at the same time.  Of course,
every distro I know of ships both NPTL and LinuxThreads and the
apparently accepted workaround appears to be to use the ld.so that was
built for NPTL rather than the one that was built for LinuxThreads
(more precisely, the ld.so should be used which uses larger thread
descriptors).  Thus, I strongly suspect Debian should do the same.
Since this bug results in memory corruption that can be very hard to
track down, I hope this can be fixed quickly.  As a temporary
workaround, just doing:

# mv /lib/tls/ld-2.3.2.so /lib/

should cure the problem.

Thanks,

--david

[1] http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=685


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296824: sbcl: Stale fasls

[Alan Shields]

Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.8.19.29-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

According to dan-b on #lisp my problems[1] with Araneida were due to stale
fasls. Apparently there were some incompatible changes made between
0.8.19.0 and current, specifically referenced this patch:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=6632358&forum_id=8256

Deleting fasls made everything work again.

[1] - read: couldn't load basic araneida, segmentation faults, etc, etc,
etc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages sbcl depends on:
ii  common-lisp-controller  4.12 This is a Common Lisp source and c
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292673: why was the sarge tag removed?

[dann frazier]

Why was the sarge tag removed?  Did I misuse it?





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#288009: CAN-2005-0508

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 288009 [CAN-2005-0508] libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a 
> security issue and lots of bugs/conformance/performance issues
Bug#288009: libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a security issue and lots 
of bugs/conformance/performance issues
Changed Bug title.

> severity 288009 grave
Bug#288009: [CAN-2005-0508] libbatik-java: new upstream release fixes a 
security issue and lots of bugs/conformance/performance issues
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296723: marked as done (ndiswrapper should go to contrib)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:47:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 10:16:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 02:16:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4G37-0004vl-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:16:49 -0800
Received: (qmail 17234 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 10:16:18 -
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 10:16:18 -
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0E8B4BB92A; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:16:17 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:16:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ndiswrapper
Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
Severity: serious


Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
non-free software?

If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.

---
Received: (at 296723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 21:22:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 13:22:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from faye.voxel.net [69.9.164.210] (369396112f31aaac76cb792de46f366f)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4QRj-0005rM-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:22:55 -0800
Received: from localhost (mouth.voxel.net [69.9.180.118])
by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9F337155;
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:22:54 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:47:44 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 10:01 -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> > Package: ndiswrapper
> > Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
> > Severity: serious
> >=20
> >=20
> > Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
> > non-free software?
> >=20
> > If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.
>=20
> This was just recently discussed, and I believe the consensus was that
> there are free drivers, so there is no problem.  And frankly, even if
> there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose is to
> provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel.  It does this whether or
> not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.
>=20
> See also bug #289065
>=20
> Take care.
>=20
> Andres, I have not just closed this bug, as I wanted to give you a
> chance to look it over.

Yep; pretty much what I was going to say.  There are free (gpl'd)
drivers out there.  Closing...



--=20
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--=-EvVY/cK4m/oyduJoN/OQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCHgUw78o9R9NraMQRAjwzAJ4mXuxkYH5QLgTYiKkXPzrXMsp/RwCfSiDF
Kds4k3wfxwIFlYTUZqIx7Lw=
=Jjl0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-EvVY/cK4m/oydu

Bug#295261: CAN-2004-1004+CAN-2004-1005: multiple vulnerabilities in mc

[Joey Hess]

I encourage you guys to hurry up and get a fixed mc out. Normally I'd
have NMUed it already with the patch, except you indicated you were
working on it, but I'm almost out of patience waiting now.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#276964: phpbb2-conf-mysql: I reported same problem

[Gerrit Pape]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:33:14PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I'd like to present a different fix though.  I'd prefer to keep the
> set -e behaviour within the string being evaluated.  In other words,
> 
> set -e
> if eval 'false; echo hi'; then :; fi
> 
> should not execute the echo statement.  Please give this patch a spin.

I ran into one problem while testing it, but didn't have the time to
investigate yet.

A subshell forked in eval or a dot file within an or list does not
return, causing the parent shell to block:

$ ./build-tmp/src/dash -exc 'eval "(false; false)" || echo 1'
+ eval (false; false)
+ false
+ echo 1
1
(does not return)

$ cat >t <<\EOT
(false; false)
EOT
$ ./build-tmp/src/dash -exc '. ./t || echo 1'
+ . ./t
+ false
+ echo 1
1
(does not return)

Regards, Gerrit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296815: marked as done (ImportError: dbus_bindings.so: undefined symbol: None)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:58:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296815: ImportError: dbus_bindings.so: undefined symbol: 
None
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 20:30:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 12:30:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aster.neo-lan.net [81.57.244.52] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Pd0-0001zz-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:30:30 -0800
Received: from aneto (aneto.local.lan [192.168.0.2])
by aster.neo-lan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4CF128C7E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:29:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from nico by aneto with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D4PcR-0001RO-IF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:29:55 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolas STRANSKY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ImportError: dbus_bindings.so: undefined symbol: None
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:29:55 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: python2.3-dbus
Version: 0.23.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

When launching hal-device-manager, I get the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/hal-device-manager", line 15, in ?
from DeviceManager import DeviceManager
  File "/usr/share/hal/device-manager/DeviceManager.py", line 6, in ?
import dbus
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/dbus.py", line 44, in ?
import dbus_bindings
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/dbus_bindings.so:
undefined symbol: None

Please ask me for any additionnal information, if needed.

Thanks in advance,

Regards.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc3-mm2
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to fr_FR)

Versions of packages python2.3-dbus depends on:
ii  dbus-1  0.23.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  dbus-glib-1 0.23.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  python2.3   2.3.5-1  An interactive high-level object-o

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 296815-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 20:58:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 12:58:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from simons.xs4all.nl (fire.luon.net) [80.126.201.244] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Q3r-00077u-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:58:16 -0800
Received: from spring.luon.net (spring-wired.ipv6.luon.net 
[IPv6:2001:888:1d84:0:20a:95ff:fed1:4834])
by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEAA92;
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:58:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0027237D3F; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:58:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:58:04 +0100
To: Nicolas STRANSKY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296815: ImportError: dbus_bindings.so: undefined symbol: None
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Linux spring 2.6.9-spring #1 Wed Dec 8 16:49:28 CET 2004 
ppc GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sjoerd Simons)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:29:55PM +0100, Nicolas STRANSKY wrote:
> Package: python2.3-d

Bug#296815: ImportError: dbus_bindings.so: undefined symbol: None

[Nicolas STRANSKY]

Package: python2.3-dbus
Version: 0.23.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

When launching hal-device-manager, I get the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/hal-device-manager", line 15, in ?
from DeviceManager import DeviceManager
  File "/usr/share/hal/device-manager/DeviceManager.py", line 6, in ?
import dbus
  File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/dbus.py", line 44, in ?
import dbus_bindings
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/dbus_bindings.so:
undefined symbol: None

Please ask me for any additionnal information, if needed.

Thanks in advance,

Regards.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc3-mm2
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to fr_FR)

Versions of packages python2.3-dbus depends on:
ii  dbus-1  0.23.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  dbus-glib-1 0.23.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  python2.3   2.3.5-1  An interactive high-level object-o

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296814: snort: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: snort
Version: 2.3.0-5
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build it's documentation in a clean
chroot.  I get the following error:
! LaTeX Error: File `geometry.sty' not found.

This is because you do not have a Build-Depends(-Indep) for
tetex-extra.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296536: aspell-sl: Needs to be rebuilt for Aspell 0.60

[Jure Cuhalev]

Luk Claes wrote:
 > There is no upstream tarball (aspell-sl_0.60.orig.tar.gz), does this
mean you are looking for a sponsor?
Yes. I would be happy if someone could sponsor the package. I also 
uploaded aspell-sl_0.60.orig.tar.gz now.

regards
Jure Cuhalev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296061: FTBFS: rmdir: No such file or directory

[Kurt Roeckx]

reopen 296061
thanks

With 1.2.5.3-3 we get this instead:
# mpich removal and lib symlinks
rm debian/libmpich1.0-dev/usr/share/doc/libmpich1.0-dev/examples/mpirun
rm: cannot remove `debian/libmpich1.0-dev/usr/share/doc/libmpich1.0-dev/example
s/mpirun': No such file or directory


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: FTBFS: rmdir: No such file or directory

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 296061
Bug#296061: mpich: FTBFS: rmdir: 
`debian/mpich-bin/usr/lib/mpich/share/upshot/sbin': No such file or directory
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296804: libboost-test-dev test/prg_exec_monitor.hpp contains invalid #include'd files

[Christophe Prud'homme]

Package: libboost-test-dev
Version: 1.32.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

test/included/prg_exec_monitor.hpp have the following lines


#include 

#include 

libs/... is obviously not available with boost/debian package

it is the same for the other header files in test

the prg_monitor and test_monitor are then unsuable 

Note that in boost/CVS, this issue is solved.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libboost-test-dev depends on:
ii  libboost-dev  1.32.0-2   Boost.org libraries development fi
ii  libboost-test1.32.0   1.32.0-2   components for writing and executi

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296807: ftp.debian.org: ftp.nz.debian.org inaccessable from majority of nz internet

[Jonathan]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Due to recent policy and routing changes on the New Zealand network 
ftp.nz.debian.org is no longer accessable to the majority of NZ internet users.
Citylink, the company that maintains the mirror have had a policy in place for 
some time which requires ISPs to peer at the Wellington Internet eXchange in 
order for their customers to access the ftp site. Since yesterday, Feb 24th at 
11am (due to peering policy changes at the two major nz carriers) the ftp site 
became inaccessable from the majority of NZ debian users.

Error message is as follows:

sh-2.04$ ftp ftp.nz.debian.org
Connected to ftp.citylink.co.nz.
550- ISP Routing Error
550-
550- Sadly, we can no longer afford to provide this content to
550- entities that do not peer at WIX.  Please contact your ISP
550- and advise them that they may well be able to fix this problem
550- for you by peering with other ISPs at the WIX peering points.
550-
550- For further information, please see .
550-
550- We apologise for any inconvenience.
550
ftp>



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296234: marked as done (cron-apt: manpage under GFDL -> non-free)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:32:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296234: fixed in cron-apt 0.2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 09:28:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 01:28:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from m1925p025.adsl.highway.telekom.at (wmiwilli) [80.121.112.153] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D39rX-0002IO-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:28:19 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 1000)
  by wmiwilli with local; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:27:52 +0100
  id 00078C3C.4219A999.1DF4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Willi Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cron-apt: manpage under GFDL -> non-free
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:27:52 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cron-apt
Version: 0.2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

The manpage of cron-apt is licensed under the the GNU Free Documentation
License. This license fails the DFSG even if you claim 

> with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts and no Back-Cover 
> Texts. 

See:

http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml

As you (Ola Lundqvist) are the author of the manpage, please relicense it 
under a license that conforms to the DFSG.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 296234-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 19:41:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 11:41:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4OrL-0007ry-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:41:15 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4OiR-0004EN-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:32:03 -0500
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#296234: fixed in cron-apt 0.2.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:32:03 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: cron-apt
Source-Version: 0.2.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cron-apt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cron-apt_0.2.2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cron-apt/cron-apt_0.2.2.dsc
cron-apt_0.2.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cron-apt/cron-apt_0.2.2.tar.gz
cron-apt_0.2.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/cron-apt/cron-apt_0.2.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cron-apt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:57:28 +0100
Source: cron-apt
Binary: cron-apt
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cron-apt   - automatic update of packages using apt-get
Closes: 296234
Changes: 
 cron-apt (0.2.2) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#296800: marked as done (Missing library dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:19:17 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296800: Missing library dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 18:54:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 10:54:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4O85-OZ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:54:29 -0800
Received: from ksu-188-116.kennesaw.edu (ksu-188-116.kennesaw.edu 
[130.218.116.188])
by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4704E17D028
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Missing library dependency
From: Stephen Touset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lTsGTG62ovuI8QBomTrN"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:54:02 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-lTsGTG62ovuI8QBomTrN
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: glade-gnome-2
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glade-2
glade-2: error while loading shared libraries: libgnomedb-2.so.3: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$=20

An ls shows two files in /usr/lib:

/usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1 -> libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0
/usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0

=46rom rom apt, glade-gnome-2 depends on libgnomedb2-3, which is installed and
is providing those two libraries. Symlinking libgnomedb-2.so.1 to
libgnomedb-2.so.3 seems to work as a temporary workaround.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages glade-gnome-2 depends on:
ii  glade-common-2   2.6.8-2 Common files for GTK+ 2
User Inter
ii  gnome-common 2.8.0-3 common scripts and macros
to devel
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D
graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility
toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces
library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-1 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration
database syste
ii  libgda2-11.1.99-1GNOME Data Access library
for GNOM
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-1   library to load .glade
files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C
routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library -
runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented
display
ii  libgnomedb2-31.1.99-1Database UI widget library
for GNO
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User
Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-1 The GNOME virtual
file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user
interface=20
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Inter-Client Exchange
library
ii  liborbit21:2.10.5-0.1libraries for ORBit2 - a
CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of
internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline
parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System Session
Management
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol
client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-3GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.12-5XSLT processing library -
runtime=20
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB)
configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library -
runtime

-- no 

Bug#296800: Missing library dependency

[Gustavo Noronha Silva]

Em Qui, 2005-02-24 Ãs 18:54 +, Stephen Touset escreveu:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glade-2
> glade-2: error while loading shared libraries: libgnomedb-2.so.3: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ 
> 
> An ls shows two files in /usr/lib:
> 
> /usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1 -> libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0
> /usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0
> 
> From rom apt, glade-gnome-2 depends on libgnomedb2-3, which is installed and
> is providing those two libraries. Symlinking libgnomedb-2.so.1 to
> libgnomedb-2.so.3 seems to work as a temporary workaround.

Hey!

You are probably using a buggy version of libgnomedb2-3. As you can see
here:

http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=libgnomedb-2.so.3&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=unstable&arch=i386

The libgnomedb2-3 does provide the files you're missing. Make sure
you're not using a version from experimental.

Thanks!

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha 
 Debian:   *  


signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem	assinada digitalmente

Processed: gjdoc fails to parse some xml files with libxmlj

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 285203 sablevm
Bug#285203: gjdoc fails to parse some xml files with libxmlj
Bug reassigned from package `gjdoc' to `sablevm'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 293564

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 293564 - fixed
Bug#293564: strace - miss build-depends against libc6-dev-s390x [s390], 
libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc]
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags removed: fixed

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296539: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: Needing too much space to upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for 
i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 03:37:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 19:37:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br [200.145.203.226] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3nKg-Lj-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:37:02 -0800
Received: by biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 53CCF103025; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:37:13 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: Needing too much space to upgrade
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:37:13 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: important


Hi

# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  lilo
The following packages will be upgraded:
  fortunes-min lbxproxy libdps1 libice-dev libice6 libimlib2 libsigc++-2.0-0 
libsm-dev
  libsm6 libsvn0 libx11-6 libx11-dev libxaw7 libxaw7-dev libxext-dev libxext6 
libxft1
  libxi-dev libxi6 libxmu-dev libxmu6 libxmuu-dev libxmuu1 libxp-dev libxp6 
libxpm-dev
  libxpm4 libxrandr-dev libxrandr2 libxt-dev libxt6 libxtrap-dev libxtrap6 
libxtst-dev
  libxtst6 libxv-dev libxv1 mime-support po-debconf python2.3-subversion 
subversion
  subversion-tools xbase-clients xfs xfwp xlibmesa-gl xlibmesa-gl-dev 
xlibmesa-glu
  xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibs-static-dev xlibs-static-pic xnest xserver-common 
xserver-xfree86
  xterm xutils xvfb
57 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 72.8MB of archives.
After unpacking 111MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

111MB of additional disk space just to upgrade my packages.
So I looked package by package to see wich one was going to use such space.

And I found:

# apt-get install xserver-xfree86
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
  libglide2
The following packages will be upgraded:
  xserver-xfree86
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 57 not upgraded.
Need to get 50.4MB of archives.
After unpacking 113MB of additional disk space will be used.

Right.
My question is. Why is it taking so much space just to upgrade the package? I 
am not installing it. I am just doing an upgrade.

# apt-cache policy xserver-xfree86
xserver-xfree86:
  Installed: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
  Candidate: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
(...)

I have release -10 installed and I am going to upgrade to release -12. Did it 
change so much to use 111MB of additional disk?

Thank you
Nelson

-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86

/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum.

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 20 2003-07-14 15:12 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/X11/XFree86
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 1745740 2004-12-15 17:19 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86

Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster:
xserver-xfree86

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 
440 AGP 8x] (rev a4)

/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 does not match checksum in 
/var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum.

XFree86 X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 4016 2005-01-24 16:57 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4

Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4:

# XFree86 4 configuration created by pyxf86config

#Section "ServerLayout"
#   Identifier "Default Layout"
#   Screen  0  "Screen0" 0 0
#   InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer"
#   InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
#   InputDevice"DevInputMice" "AlwaysCore"
#EndSection

Section "Files"
   FontPath"unix/:7100"# local fo

Bug#296234: cron-apt manpage

[Ola Lundqvist]

Hello

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:06:21PM +0100, Valery Perrin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> There is no problem, I give you all the authorizations on the french 
> manpage.  I had seen the bug-report on debian's bug-tracking and awaited 
> the new english manpage for translate it.  If you want, you can send the 
> new manpage to me and I will modify the translation of it according to new 
> version.

I'll upload a new version. If you want to update the French document,
please send me a patch. I have put the English phrasing there instead
of the French. I think I put it at the correct position.

Regards,

// Ola

> Regards,
> 
> Valery Perrin
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Ola Lundqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Valery Perrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:22 PM
> Subject: cron-apt manpage
> 
> 
> >Hello
> >
> >I have got a bug report about the license on the cron-apt
> >manpage. Obviously I have released the manual under GNU
> >Free Documentation License. What I need from you is the
> >permission to change the license on the translated (into French)
> >manpage to GPL instead.
> >
> >Hope you do not mind.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >// Ola
> >
> >-- 
> >- Ola Lundqvist ---
> >/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
> >|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
> >|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
> >|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
> >\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> >---
> >
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296586: marked as done (xlibmesa-dri: modules in package are not stripped)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for 
i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 12:33:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 04:33:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru [194.190.187.220] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3vhO-0007FT-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:33:03 -0800
Received: from forward.ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru ([10.0.1.2] helo=forward.lab313)
by ufp.appl.sci-nnov.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1D3vhH-0002ra-IC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:33:00 +0300
Received: from jk by forward.lab313 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D3vhH-0007gN-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:32:55 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibmesa-dri: modules in package are not stripped
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:32:55 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Alexander Kogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -5.9
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibmesa-dri
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: normal

Hi!

*.so files in package are not stripped, so size of the package is > 45M.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)

Versions of packages xlibmesa-dri depends on:
ii  xlibmesa-gl  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 296586-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 19:15:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 11:15:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4OSF-0003oW-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:15:19 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E90F768C021; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:15:17 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for i386
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3


--1ccMZA6j1vT5UqiK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

severity 296539 serious
severity 296586 serious
thanks

These bugs were not source-level bugs; they appear to have been artifacts
of the i386 buildd environment.  The packages uploaded for other
architectures (at least so far) do not exhibit this problem.

Joshua Kwan has kindly performed a binary-only NMU to resolve these issues.

Changes:
 xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium
 .
   * Binary non-maintainer upload.
   * The i386 build of -12 appears to not have been stripped at all, so the
 resultant packages are colossal. Rebuild in a clean environment.

Closing these bugs.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson|No executive devotes much effort to
Debian GNU/Linux   |proving himself wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Laurence J. Peter
http:

Processed: bugs fixed in binary-only NMU xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 for i386

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 296539 serious
Bug#296539: xserver-xfree86: Needing too much space to upgrade
Severity set to `serious'.

> severity 296586 serious
Bug#296586: xlibmesa-dri: modules in package are not stripped
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296800: Missing library dependency

[Stephen Touset]

Package: glade-gnome-2
Version: 2.6.8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ glade-2
glade-2: error while loading shared libraries: libgnomedb-2.so.3: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ 

An ls shows two files in /usr/lib:

/usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1 -> libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0
/usr/lib/libgnomedb-2.so.1.1.0

From rom apt, glade-gnome-2 depends on libgnomedb2-3, which is installed and
is providing those two libraries. Symlinking libgnomedb-2.so.1 to
libgnomedb-2.so.3 seems to work as a temporary workaround.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages glade-gnome-2 depends on:
ii  glade-common-2   2.6.8-2 Common files for GTK+ 2
User Inter
ii  gnome-common 2.8.0-3 common scripts and macros
to devel
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D
graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility
toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces
library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-1 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-4 GNOME configuration
database syste
ii  libgda2-11.1.99-1GNOME Data Access library
for GNOM
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-1   library to load .glade
files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.2-1 The GLib library of C
routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.0-6 The GNOME 2 library -
runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented
display
ii  libgnomedb2-31.1.99-1Database UI widget library
for GNO
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.0-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User
Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-1 The GNOME virtual
file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.2-3 The GTK+ graphical user
interface 
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Inter-Client Exchange
library
ii  liborbit21:2.10.5-0.1libraries for ORBit2 - a
CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.0-3 Layout and rendering of
internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline
parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System Session
Management
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System protocol
client li
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-3GNOME XML library
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.12-5XSLT processing library -
runtime 
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB)
configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library -
runtime

-- no debconf information

-- 
Stephen Touset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#247542: marked as done (Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247542: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 18:37:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 11:37:19 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLRGh-ac-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 11:37:19 -0700
Received: from outpost.dnsalias.org ([65.49.88.87])
  by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
  (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
  Wed, 5 May 2004 14:35:49 -0400
Received: from outpost.dnsalias.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by outpost.dnsalias.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id 
i45IaeWo004909
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 5 May 2004 14:36:41 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by outpost.dnsalias.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i45Iadju004908;
Wed, 5 May 2004 14:36:39 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: Missing dependancy on openjade
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:36:39 -0400
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at 
fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> at Wed, 5 May 2004 14:35:49 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: librsvg2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

mkdir ./html
cd ./html && gtkdoc-mkhtml rsvg ../rsvg-docs.sgml
/usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml: line 42: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 127

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8

---
Received: (at 247542-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 18:38:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 10:38:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4NsF-0004oU-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:38:07 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4NmY-0008SZ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#247542: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: gtk-doc
Source-Version: 1.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtk-doc-tools_1.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc-tools_1.3-2_all.deb
gtk-doc_1.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.3-2.diff.gz
gtk-doc_1.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.3-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gtk-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact

Bug#296795: netbase: update-inetd removes wrong entry, more DebianNet.pm problems

[Marco d'Itri]

tag 296795 sarge sid
severity 296795 important
thanks

On Feb 24, Roderick Schertler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Justification: causes serious data loss
Serious? Come on...

update-inetd is supposed to be deep-frozen, but I will consider
anchoring the regexp in the next upload.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#248095: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#248095: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2004 08:20:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 09 01:20:33 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.o2w.nl [213.227.141.209] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BMjY1-xf-00; Sun, 09 May 2004 01:20:33 -0700
Received: from zensunni.xinara.org (unknown [217.22.72.48])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mail.o2w.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAD035913
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  9 May 2004 10:20:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ray by zensunni.xinara.org with local (Exim 4.33)
id 1BMjXx-0006Tv-TL; Sun, 09 May 2004 10:20:29 +0200
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 10:20:29 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: missing build dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.58
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable, kernel 2.4.27-pre2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: gtk-doc-tools
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

gtk-doc-utils misses several build dependencies which cause configure to
fail:
- libxml2-utils for the xmlcatalog program
- docbook-xml for -//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN
- docbook-xsl for 
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl

Please use a tool like pbuilder to test/build your packages; it helps you to
catch this kind of problem immediately.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (750, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-pre2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-1

Versions of packages gtk-doc-tools depends on:
ii  docbook-dsssl   1.78-4   modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  docbook-to-man  1:2.0.0-13   Converter from DocBook SGML into r
ii  docbook-xsl 1.64.1.0-4.2 stylesheets for processing DocBook
ii  gnome-common2.4.0-2  common scripts and macros to devel
ii  jade1.2.1-38 James Clark's DSSSL Engine
ii  perl5.8.4-1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  xsltproc1.1.6-1  XSLT command line processor

-- no debconf information
-- 
Obsig: developing a new sig

---
Received: (at 248095-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 18:38:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 10:38:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Nso-0004sX-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:38:42 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4NmY-0008Sb-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
From: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#248095: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:32:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: gtk-doc
Source-Version: 1.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtk-doc-tools_1.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc-tools_1.3-2_all.deb
gtk-doc_1.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.3-2.diff.gz
gtk-doc_1.3-2.dsc
  to pool/mai

Processed: Re: Bug#296795: netbase: update-inetd removes wrong entry, more DebianNet.pm problems

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 296795 sarge sid
Bug#296795: netbase: update-inetd removes wrong entry, more DebianNet.pm 
problems
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge, sid

> severity 296795 important
Bug#296795: netbase: update-inetd removes wrong entry, more DebianNet.pm 
problems
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296795: netbase: update-inetd removes wrong entry, more DebianNet.pm problems

[Roderick Schertler]

Package: netbase
Version: 4.19
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss

When I upgrade ipopd an unrelated (custom-made) entry in my inetd.conf
is being deleted.  The entry is

pop3 stream tcp nowait nobody /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/stunnel -c -r 
mail.argon.org:995

and it gets deleted when ipopd.postrm runs

update-inetd --remove pop3s

due to a bug in DebianNet.  In tracing this down I found and fixed these
problems in DebianNet.pm:

- add_service(), remove_service(), and scan_entries() weren't properly
  anchoring the service search, so they could all match where they
  shouldn't have.

- There's no need to set the umask before doing a chmod() because
  chmod() isn't affected by the umask.  Additionally, leaving the
  process with a 0 umask is not safe.  I fixed this by removing the
  umask() call.  (A better fix would be to locally set a umask
  before calling open() and not do the chmod() at all, but I wanted
  to keep my changes minimal.)

- The module causes some use of initialized value warnings.

Here's a demonstration of all these problems, and my fix for them.
After that is the patch.  I'll also attach these files so you can get
at them without having to cut/paste them out of the main part of this
message.

---

$ cat do-test
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;

use DebianNet ();
print "using $INC{'DebianNet.pm'}\n";

$DebianNet::inetdcf = "test.conf";
$DebianNet::verbose = 1;

my $base = "stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd";

# There's no need for DebianNet to set the umask because it doesn't affect
# chmod.  (Really it should be setting umask() before the open() instead
# of doing the chmod(), but I wanted to keep my changes minimal.)
umask 0777;

print "various uninit warnings\n";
DebianNet::add_service  "warn-add   $base";
DebianNet::enable_service   "warn-enable";
DebianNet::disable_service  "warn-disable";
DebianNet::remove_service   "warn-rm";

print "scan_entries() doesn't properly anchor search\n";
DebianNet::disable_service  "test-scan";

print "add_service() doesn't properly anchor search\n";
DebianNet::add_service("test-add $base", "TEST");

print "remove_service() doesn't properly anchor search\n";
DebianNet::remove_service("arg");
$ cat test.conf.orig
#:TEST:

## warn-enable stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
warn-disablestream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
warn-rm stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd

# This shouldn't be seen by add_service() because the ## isn't at
# the start of the line.

# x ## test-add stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd

# This shouldn't be removed by remove_service("arg").

test-rm stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg

# These shouldn't be found by scan_entries('test-scan').

test-scan-1 stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg
test-scan-2 stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg
$ cp test.conf.orig test.conf; \
  perl do-test; \
  diff -u test.conf.orig test.conf
using /usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm
various uninit warnings
Use of uninitialized value in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm 
line 25.
Processing service `warn-add' ... added
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 199,  line 3.
Processing service `warn-enable' ... enabled
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 236,  line 4.
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 174,  line 4.
Processing service `warn-disable' ... disabled
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 236,  line 5.
Removing line: `warn-rm stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd'
scan_entries() doesn't properly anchor search
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 236,  line 17.
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at 
/usr/share/perl5/DebianNet.pm line 236,  line 18.

WARNING!! test.conf contains multiple entries for
the `test-scan' service. You're about to disable these entries.
Do you want to continue? [n]

Ok, I'll stop ...
add_service() doesn't properly anchor search
remove_service() doesn't properly anchor search
Removing line: `# This shouldn't be removed by remove_service("arg").'
Removing line: `test-rm stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg'
Removing line: `test-scan-1 stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg'
Removing line: `test-scan-2 stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd arg'
--- test.conf.orig  2005-02-24 12:21:19.0 -0500
+++ test.conf   2005-02-24 12:39:51.0 -0500
@@ -1,19 +1,15 @@
 #:TEST:

-## warn-enable stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
-warn-disablestream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
-warn-rm stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
+warn-enable stream tcp nowait nobody file cmd
+## 

Processed: retitle 296693 to gnucash crashes when ever I open an account ledger

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 296693 gnucash crashes when ever I open an account ledger
Bug#296693: gnucash cashes when ever I open an account ledger
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296282: marked as done (php4-snmp causes apache to segfault on startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296282: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2005 14:21:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 21 06:21:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.eolas.fr (localhost.localdomain) [213.244.23.250] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3ERE-0004BG-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:21:28 -0800
Received: from clement.eolas.loc (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.localdomain (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id 
j1LELTLf005850
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:21:29 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by clement.eolas.loc (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1LELSKI005849;
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:21:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: clement.eolas.loc: nodens set sender to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Clement 'nodens' Hermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-snmp causes apache to segfault on startup
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:21:28 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_A autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: php4-snmp
Version: 4:4.3.10-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi, 

Latest version of php4-snmp causes apache to segfault on startup (undetected by 
apachectl which exit cleanly). Commenting out extension=snmp.so in 
/etc/php4/apache/php.ini is a workaround, but php scripts runned by apache via 
the php4 module won't have snmp support.

Here his an strace -f apachectl (relevant part only) :

open("/usr/lib/libnetsnmp.so.5", O_RDONLY) = 5
read(5, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0`\343\0"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=528848, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 633392, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 5, 0) = 0xb71f7000
old_mmap(0xb7276000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 5, 
0x7f000) = 0xb7276000
old_mmap(0xb7278000, 105008, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7278000
close(5)= 0
access("/etc/ld.so.nohwcap", F_OK)  = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libwrap.so.0", O_RDONLY) = 5
read(5, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\240!\0"..., 512) = 512
fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=28688, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 33700, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 5, 0) = 0xb71ee000
old_mmap(0xb71f5000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, 5, 
0x6000) = 0xb71f5000
old_mmap(0xb71f6000, 932, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb71f6000
close(5)= 0
munmap(0xb7bff000, 73541)   = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
Process 4284 detached



Note that this only happen with apache module, php-cgi and php-cli are both 
working fine with snmp extension : 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo '' | php-cgi | grep -i snmp
snmp
NET-SNMP Support enabled 
NET-SNMP Version 5.1.2 
SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE /dev/null 
_SERVER["SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE"]/dev/null
_ENV["SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE"]/dev/null


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ php -r 'phpinfo();' | grep -i snmp
snmp
NET-SNMP Support => enabled
NET-SNMP Version => 5.1.2
SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE => /dev/null
_SERVER["SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE"] => /dev/null
_ENV["SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE"] => /dev/null

Best Regards,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages php4-snmp depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.45   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-7   server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libsnmp55.1.2-6  NET SNMP (Simple

Bug#295998: marked as done (php4-cli segfaulting)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295998: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2005 16:10:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 08:10:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lneuilly-152_22-2-96.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr 
(g-tt.rd.francetelecom.fr) [82.127.81.96] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2XBP-0007Z2-00; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:10:16 -0800
Received: from bayle by g-tt.rd.francetelecom.fr with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1D2XAv-0006Wt-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:09:45 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-cli segfaulting
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:09:45 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Christian BAYLE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: php4
Version: 4:4.3.10-7
Severity: grave

I get the segfault doing like this:
You need postgresql installed
createdb testdb
run the following script:

#! /usr/bin/php4 -f


I tried to run gdb:

> gdb php4
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1".

(gdb) run -f UNIX.php
Starting program: /usr/bin/php4 -f UNIX.php
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
...
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1211660416 (LWP 2853)]
0xb7a33350 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7a33350 in ?? ()
#1  0x081a5321 in plist_entry_destructor ()
#2  0x081a3c18 in zend_hash_clean ()
#3  0x081a3cbc in zend_hash_graceful_reverse_destroy ()
#4  0x081a546f in zend_destroy_rsrc_list ()
#5  0x0819df6c in zend_shutdown ()
#6  0x08168ba8 in php_module_shutdown ()
#7  0x081c21a2 in main ()
(gdb)

I did this on a today sid.
The problem seems to be localized in php4-pgsql
rebuilding php4-pgsql had no effect.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages php4 depends on:
ii  libapache-mod-php44:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  libapache2-mod-php4   4:4.3.10-7 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-common   4:4.3.10-7 Common files for packages built fr

-- debconf information:
  php4/run_apache_sslconfig: true
  php4/run_apacheconfig: true
  php4/update_apache_php_ini: true

---
Received: (at 295998-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 17:38:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 09:38:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Mw7-0002lR-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:38:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Mqa-0004Bq-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:20 -0500
From: Adam Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295998: fixed in php4 4:4.3.10-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:20 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 

Processed: Downgrading Bug#296289: sarg: Segmantation Fault

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 296289 important
Bug#296289: sarg: Segmantation Fault
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296289: Downgrading Bug#296289: sarg: Segmantation Fault

[Luigi Gangitano]

severity important 296289
tags 296289 +unreproducible
thanks

I'm downgrading severity for this bug as it is not reproducible and thus
depends on logfiles.

Sarg is not perfect and upstream is fixing segmentation faults with
every release (see changelog for 2.0.4), so it's probable that this bug
will stay open for a long time without any deterministic evidence of
what triggered this particular SEGV.

If you see the segmentation fault again, please make a copy of the squid
logfile and mail them with the report.

Regards,

-- 
 Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972  C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26


signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata

Processed: Downgrading Bug#296289: sarg: Segmantation Fault

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity important 296289
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> tags 296289 +unreproducible
Bug#296289: sarg: Segmantation Fault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295065: #295065: xsl compilation error

[Matthew T. Atkinson]

Hello,

On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:33 -0600, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> I'll be uploading a new package later today or tomorrow.

Thank you; it is working again now :-).

best regards,


-- 
Matthew T. Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295060: wwwoffle: ... and should NOT silently change *-port

[Paolo]

Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.8e-1
Followup-For: Bug #295060

hello,

old problem, indeed, upon upgrade it rewrites wwwoffle.conf with those 
default *-port, as if they were carved in stone onece for ever and for all.
Which breaks my setup and need me rush and edit the config.

-- paolo


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux npp 2.4.26-ss-fb-lm287 #1 Fri Jul 16 21:26:09 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages wwwoffle depends on:
ii  debconf   1.2.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii  fileutils 4.1-10 GNU file management utilities
ii  libc6 2.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 296766 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 296766 important
Bug#296766: john: should be clearer on the explanation of passfile directive
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296536: aspell-sl: Needs to be rebuilt for Aspell 0.60

[Luk Claes]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Brian Nelson wrote:
|> Package: aspell-sl
|> Severity: grave
|> Tags: sid
|>
|> This package needs to be rebuilt to support Aspell 0.60.  The maintainer
|> provided a preliminary package here:
|>
|>   http://gand.owca.info/aspell/0.60/
|>
|> But it's broken and he has not replied to my queries.
|
| Hello. At the same location you can find updated version with previous
| problems fixed.
There is no upstream tarball (aspell-sl_0.60.orig.tar.gz), does this
mean you are looking for a sponsor?
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCHf7H5UTeB5t8Mo0RArDsAKCDLmWdOO3c28CKnq+31txYxkwzTQCgrUW8
nJrpomYQ9wto0JrbOgOwvZo=
=KuCV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296744: marked as done (qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb: xandros faild to install citing a dependency libqt2 (>=2:2.3.0-final-5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:18:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 12:44:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 04:44:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4ILu-00046t-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:44:22 -0800
Received: from c-67-180-110-225.client.comcast.net (XANE6RQU99.comcast.net) 
[67.180.110.225] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4ILr-5d-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:44:19 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dburejsza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb: xandros faild to install citing a dependency 
libqt2
 (>=2:2.3.0-final-5
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:44:18 -0800
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2,
HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-x1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
 

I attempted to have Xandros install the deb package qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb 
that I had downloaded from www.debian.org


I received the following error message:

Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
qcad: Depends: libqt2 (>= 2:2.3.0-final-5) but it is not installable
esDone.

---
Received: (at 296744-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 16:19:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 08:19:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ternura.interactors.coop [65.110.56.102] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Lhf-0004Tn-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:19:03 -0800
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [85.136.68.200])
by ternura.interactors.coop (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5354C8E4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:19:02 +0100 (CET)
Subject: This is not a bug
From: Javier Carranza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9R18KOJfnXniya0sb6hs"
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:18:49 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-9R18KOJfnXniya0sb6hs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

If you are using Xandros 2, you have downloaded an incorrect version
for your system. This is the problem you get. Use a tool like Synaptic
or apt-get (under x-terminal, like "konsole") to download and install
packages in your system. But if you are using Xandros 1, your problem is
related to repositories. You need download all qcad dependencies which
you can install in your system through these tools before explained.

--=20
 "Nine for the Mortal Men doomed to die"

 ,''`. Javier Carranza  <"trunks"@"eurodev"."net"> aka trunks
:  =B7,'<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://www.eurodev.net/
 :Debian Linux 3.1 (sid)   Linux 2.6.8 powerpc
  =B7_  Linux Registered User #226685GnuPG KeyID: 1024D/AA6AB5CB

--=-9R18KOJfnXn

Processed: retitle 296766 to john: should be clearer on the explanation of passfile directive

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> retitle 296766 john: should be clearer on the explanation of passfile 
> directive
Bug#296766: Bug John, suppression de /etc/shadow
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 296766

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 296766 pending
Bug#296766: Bug John, suppression de /etc/shadow
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 296766 is critical

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> severity 296766 critical
Bug#296766: Bug John, suppression de /etc/shadow
Severity set to `critical'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Adrian Bunk said:
> Package: ndiswrapper
> Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> 
> Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
> non-free software?
> 
> If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.

This was just recently discussed, and I believe the consensus was that
there are free drivers, so there is no problem.  And frankly, even if
there wasn't a single free driver out there, ndiswrapper's purpose is to
provide an NDIS interface for the linux kernel.  It does this whether or
not there are drivers available, so it's a non-argument.

See also bug #289065

Take care.

Andres, I have not just closed this bug, as I wanted to give you a
chance to look it over.
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpVfiH5COFoG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#295486: marked as done (libavifile-0.7c102: depends on unavailable libxvidcore4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295486: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 03:39:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 19:39:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.64] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D1G2X-0001mE-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:39:49 -0800
Received: from 208-58-77-33.c3-0.grg-ubr3.lnh-grg.md.cable.rcn.com (HELO 
tux.internal.ucko.debian.net) (208.58.77.33)
  by smtp05.mrf.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2005 22:39:46 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,87,1107752400"; 
   d="scan'208"; a="5005436:sNHT10500348564"
Received: from amu by tux.internal.ucko.debian.net with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D1G2S-MF-1L
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:39:44 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libavifile-0.7c102: depends on unavailable libxvidcore4
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:39:43 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libavifile-0.7c102
Version: 1:0.7.38.20030710-1.2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libavifile-0.7c102: Depends: libxvidcore4 (>= 1:1.0.0-0.0) which is a virtual 
package.

This library is not (and cannot be?) available in the main archive;
please properly isolate its use to avifile-xvid-plugin.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libavifile-0.7c102 depends on:
ii  aalib11.4p5-22   ascii art library
ii  libasound21.0.8-1ALSA library
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig 2.2.3-4generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.7-2.3  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:3.4.3-9  GCC support library
ii  libice6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-10Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5   5.4-4  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-10X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.5-8  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libsvga1  1:1.4.3-21 console SVGA display libraries
ii  libx11-6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-10X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.2-6FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi64.3.0.dfsg.1-10X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxrender1   0.8.3-7X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxv14.3.0.dfsg.1-10X Window System video extension li
ii  slang11.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r
ii  xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-4  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 295486-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 14:08:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:08:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Jet-00089I-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:08:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JZ6-0005aZ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04

Bug#259417: marked as done (drip: Fails to install in Sid due to wrong dep.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#259417: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2004 15:06:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 14 08:06:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gehry.upc.es [147.83.2.21] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BklLM-ZM-00; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:06:48 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gehry.upc.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id i6EF4ReX013043
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:04:28 +0200
Received: from raimon.upc.es (upcremot99.upc.es [147.83.112.99])by gehry.upc
.es (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6EF3lte012610;Wed, 14 Jul 2004 
17:03:48 
+0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Orestes Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: drip: Fails to install in Sid due to wrong dep.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:02:05 +0200
X-imss-version: 2.0
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:16.70250 C:20 M:1 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:1 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0. 0.)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: drip
Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Broken package.
drip: Depends on: libavifile-0.7c102 (>= 1:0.7.38.20030710-1.1) but only 
1:0.7.38.20030710-1 is installable in Sid.


---
Received: (at 259417-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 14:08:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:08:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JfM-0008LS-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:08:33 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JZ6-0005aH-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#259417: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-win32-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-win32-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-xvid-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-xvid-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.dsc
avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/

Bug#296623: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box

[Alex Page]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:56:20PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:

> can you please try kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp from sid 

> http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.6.9-amd64/kernel-image-2.6.9-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.9-4_i386.deb

I've tried that, and I have the same problem as I do with
2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp :(

> and if that fails too, could you give kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp

> http://213.178.77.236/kernel/kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-4_i386.deb

I had problems installing this kernel-image package, see the attached
text.

> You should additionally check for a bios update. 

Yep. I've looked at the available BIOS updates, and I need to get in
touch with our supplier and see exactly which CPU revision we have,
since I'm loath to pull off the heatsink and take a look.

> And maybe you should post to debian-amd64@lists.debian.org and look 
> for other people with the very same system setup.

I'll do that if the BIOS update isn't helpful.

Thanks for your advice,

Alex
-- 
Mail: Alex Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Real: Systems/Network Assistant, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Tel:  01865 302 223 (external) / 223 (internal)
PGP:  DDD0 1FE0 340C DC38 190F  AC9F 24B6 7426 88DD D2C8


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#225172: marked as done (avifile-xvid-plugin is uninstallable, dependencies problems)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225172: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2003 02:15:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 20:15:26 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host3-43.pool80181.interbusiness.it (giuseppedj.azzurra.org) 
[80.181.43.3] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aa0y8-00071L-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 17:02:09 -0600
Received: from giuseppe by giuseppedj.azzurra.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1Aa0xW-0001iL-00; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 00:01:30 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Giuseppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile-xvid-plugin is uninstallable, dependencies problems
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 00:01:30 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Giuseppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: avifile-xvid-plugin
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


avifile-xvid-plugin depends on libxvidencore0 that doesn't exist

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux  2.4.22 #1 dom dic 21 23:26:42 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 225172-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 14:08:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:08:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Jev-00089z-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:08:05 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JZ6-0005aD-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#225172: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-win32-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-win32-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-xvid-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-xvid-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.dsc
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.dsc
avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile_0.7.43.20050224-1.tar.gz
libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/libavifile-0.7-dev_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
libavifile-0.7c102_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/libavifile-0.7c102_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version 

Bug#252982: marked as done (avifile-xvid-plugin: Package does not actually include the plugin)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252982: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2004 11:37:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 06 04:37:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip2-238.tvmax-fiber-1.hou.ygnition.net (trystero) 
[24.219.201.238] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BWvyP-00057h-00; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 04:37:57 -0700
Received: by trystero (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 48CA27DFD; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 06:37:56 -0500 (CDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Algis Rudys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile-xvid-plugin: Package does not actually include the plugin
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 06:37:56 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: avifile-xvid-plugin
Version: 1:0.7.38.20030710-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Greetings --

The recent NMU of avifile failed to properly build this package; the
package doesn't include the plugin library file 
(/usr/lib/avifile-0.7/xvid.so).  The same problem is present in 
avifile-divx-plugin vis-a-vis the file /usr/lib/avifile-0.7/divx4.so.

The problems stem from the fact that avifile should build-depend on the 
divx and xvid codec libraries, but no such packages exists in Debian 
(and considering that XviD is GPL, I find this odd (I suppose it's 
some silly patent dispute or other...)).

Thanks,
Algis R.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-trystero-2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages avifile-xvid-plugin depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 252982-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 14:08:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:08:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JfM-0008L1-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:08:32 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JZ6-0005aF-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#252982: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-utils_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-vorbis-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
avifile-win32-plugin_0.7.43.20050224-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile

Bug#260808: marked as done (avifile-player: Crashed X)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260808: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 10:06:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 03:06:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from infofin.com [209.61.158.139] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnaTC-00062a-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 03:06:34 -0700
Received: (qmail 31720 invoked by uid 515); 22 Jul 2004 10:06:33 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by server1.infofin.com by uid 509 with 
qmail-scanner-1.20 
 (clamscan: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.63.  
Clear:RC:0(164.100.41.9):SA:0(-4.9/10.0):. 
 Processed in 2.818995 secs); 22 Jul 2004 10:06:33 -
Received: from unknown (HELO sanna.igidr.ac.in) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 10:06:30 -
Received: from ajayshah by sanna.igidr.ac.in with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1BnaT5-LL-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:36:27 +0530
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:36:27 +0530
From: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile-player: Crashed X
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
Organisation: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Ajay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: avifile-player
Version: 0.7.33.20030314-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Combination of versions which led to crashing X

Folks,

I'm not sure I'm being particularly useful here. However, using a
certain 1.3G .avi file (which I can't attach :-)) when I said

$ aviplay dat.avi

the next thing I knew was that I got thrown back into textmode, and
then after that kdm restarted. I still have the .avi file so I can
answer questions if you wish.

I haven't isolated the bug or anything more beyond knowing that it
crashed my X. If this bug report is not particularly useful, please
feel free to trash it. I apologise if I'm wasting your time. Thanks
much,

-ans.

$ uname -a
Linux sanna 2.4.17 #2 Sun Feb 10 18:45:12 IST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux

$ X --version

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.17
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages avifile-player depends on:
ii  libavifile0.7c102  0.7.33.20030314-1 Shared libraries
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-13  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig1 2.2.2-2   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.7-2.1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc11:3.3.4-3 GCC support library
ii  libqt3c102-mt  3:3.2.3-4 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsdl1.2debian1.2.7-7   Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxft22.1.2-6   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-4X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.1.1-3   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

-- 
Ajay Shah   Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Department of Economic Affairs
http://www.mayin.org/ajayshah   Ministry of Finance, New Delhi

---
Received: (at 260808-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 14:08:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 06:08:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JfN-0008Ln-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:08:33 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4JZ6-0005aJ-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:02:04 -0500
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: 

Bug#288882: blender: FTBFS when using sudo

[Florian Ernst]

Two more weeks have passed without any notice from the maintainer, so
I'm afraid he's currently not available.

2.35-1.1 as previously described now uploaded to DELAYED/7-day, let's
hope all goes well.

Cheers,
Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#296744: qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb: xandros faild to install citing a dependency libqt2 (>=2:2.3.0-final-5

[dburejsza]

Package: qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-x1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
 

I attempted to have Xandros install the deb package qcad_1-1.4.7-2_!386.deb 
that I had downloaded from www.debian.org


I received the following error message:

Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
qcad: Depends: libqt2 (>= 2:2.3.0-final-5) but it is not installable
esDone.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296623: Acknowledgement (kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box)

[Alex Page]

Further information:

The system in question is a Celestica A8440 [1].

If I pass "nomce" to the kernel boot options, to bypass Machine Check
Exceptions, then I can almost get the kernel-image-2.6.8-10-amd64-k8-smp
to a working state. It hangs on loading the "Real Time Clock Driver
v1.12" but I can bypass this with Ctrl-C. It hangs again on "Setting the
System Clock using the Hardware Clock as reference", but again I can
Ctrl-C past this and get to a login prompt.

Unsurprisingly, the machine then hangs on shutdown at "Saving the System
Clock time to the Hardware Clock".

Alex

[1] 
http://portal.atcelestica.com/public/global/suppchman/alpha/alphadw.nsf/downloads/11/$file/A8440%20English%20SCREEN.pdf
-- 
Mail: Alex Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Real: Systems/Network Assistant, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Tel:  01865 302 223 (external) / 223 (internal)
PGP:  DDD0 1FE0 340C DC38 190F  AC9F 24B6 7426 88DD D2C8


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 296678
Bug#296678: libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 296678 + sarge
Bug#296678: libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296623: kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64: 2.6.8 kernel images panic on quad Opteron box

[Alex Page]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:30:23PM +0100, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:

> Arghhh! I've seen the same thing (delay loop hang). It was solved
> (tyan motherboard) just disabling "ACPI v2.0" in the BIOS. But Your
> Mileage May Vary... maybe other ACPI options in bios, or kernel
> options like nolapic, noapic, noacpi or similar can help in your case.

Hmm, the only BIOS option I was able to find that was ACPI related was
"ACPI SRAT Table" and it seemed to make no difference. The kernel
options for nolapic, noapic and noacpi all failed to make a difference
too. Thank you for your suggestions.

Alex
-- 
Mail: Alex Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Real: Systems/Network Assistant, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Tel:  01865 302 223 (external) / 223 (internal)
PGP:  DDD0 1FE0 340C DC38 190F  AC9F 24B6 7426 88DD D2C8


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#296678: marked as done (libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 06:17:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296678: fixed in curl 7.13.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2005 22:22:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 23 14:22:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) 
[193.22.164.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D44te-0004Vk-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:22:18 -0800
Received: from pd9e183b8.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.225.131.184] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1D44tb-0003MK-ML
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:22:16 +0100
Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D44tX-0003sx-Ur
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:22:11 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1253158897=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:22:11 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.225.131.184
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond 
expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1253158897==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: libcurl3
Version: 7.13.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: user security hole

iDefense discovered a buffer overflow in NTLM authentication that may lead
to arbitrary code execution. This is CAN-2005-0490. Woody is not affected,
as it doesn't contain the vulnerable NTLM code. (It's not listed on the
Not-Vulnerable list yet, though)

Upstream's patch to address this issue is attached, I didn't resync it
against the Debian package, because all this internal to-7.11 patching
seems, umm, scary.

The advisory can be found at
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=202&type=vulnerabilities

There's another buffer overflow in Kerberos handling, but I doesn't seems
to be enabled in debian/rules, but please double check this.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libcurl3 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libidn110.5.2-3  GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--===1253158897==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="curl-can-2005-0490.patch"

===
RCS file: /cvsroot/curl/curl/lib/http_ntlm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -r1.36 -r1.37
--- curl/lib/http_ntlm.c2004/12/07 23:09:41 1.36
+++ curl-7.9.5/lib/http_ntlm.c  2005/02/22 07:44:14 1.37
@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@
 header++;
 
   if(checkprefix("NTLM", header)) {
-unsigned char buffer[256];
 header += strlen("NTLM");
 
 while(*header && isspace((int)*header))
@@ -123,8 +122,12 @@
  (40)Target Information  (optional) security buffer(*)
  32 (48) start of data block
   */
+  size_t size;
+  unsigned char *buffer = (unsigned char *)malloc(strlen(header));
+  if (buffer == NULL)
+return CURLNTLM_BAD;
 
-  size_t size = Curl_base64_decode(header, (char *)buffer);
+  size = Curl_base64

Bug#296732: 3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL

[Daniel Schepler]

Package: 3dwm
Severity: serious
Version: 0.3.1-11.3

>From my build log (using pbuilder in an i386 chroot):

...
checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes
checking for main in -lm... yes
checking for OpenGL... yes
configure: error: OpenGL subsystem not found.
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#296723: ndiswrapper should go to contrib

[Adrian Bunk]

Package: ndiswrapper
Version: 0.12+1.0rc2-1
Severity: serious


Is there any way how ndiswrapper is currently useful without
non-free software?

If this is not the case, it has to go to contrib.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#295874: marked as done (sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-1(unstable/arm/smackdown): needs libtool update for arm)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:02:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295874: fixed in sctplib-stable 1.0.1a-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Feb 2005 18:56:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 10:56:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 83-216-141-215.jamest298.adsl.metronet.co.uk 
(shiri.gloaming.local) [83.216.141.215] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D2DJC-0003lN-00; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:56:59 -0800
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1D2DIf-000763-8x
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:56:25 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-1(unstable/arm/smackdown): needs libtool
 update for arm
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:56:25 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sctplib-stable
Version: 1.0.1a-1
Severity: serious

The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correctly support shared libraries for at least arm.  Please see
http://people.debian.org/~keybuk/libtool-pass_all.html for more
information.

| Automatic build of sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-1 on smackdown by sbuild/arm 1.170.5
| Build started at 20050218-1756
| **

[...]

| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev

[...]

| checking how to recognise dependent libraries... file_magic ELF 
[0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib )

[...]

| *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lc.

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=sctplib-stable&ver=1.0.1a-1

-- 
James

---
Received: (at 295874-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 10:08:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 02:08:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Fux-0003eo-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:08:23 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4FpM-0005Yk-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:02:36 -0500
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295874: fixed in sctplib-stable 1.0.1a-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:02:36 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: sctplib-stable
Source-Version: 1.0.1a-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sctplib-stable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

sctplib-stable-dev_1.0.1a-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sctplib-stable/sctplib-stable-dev_1.0.1a-2_i386.deb
sctplib-stable-doc_1.0.1a-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/sctplib-stable/sctplib-stable-doc_1.0.1a-2_all.deb
sctplib-stable1_1.0.1a-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sctplib-stable/sctplib-stable1_1.0.1a-2_i386.deb
sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sctplib-stable/sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-2.diff.gz
sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sctplib-stable/sctplib-stable_1.0.1a-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sctplib-stable 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
beli

Bug#291559: Problem solved for me

[Matthias Haller]

Linking capi4hylafax staticaly against libcapi20 included in the 
isdnutils_3.3.0.20041110-1 package solved the problem for me. So maybe 
it's a bug in the actual libcapi20.
--

Matthias Haller
Diakoniewerkstaetten Rhein-Neckar
Werkstatt Weinheim
CF Bau 196
Hoehnerweg 2-4
69465 Weinheim
Tel.:  06201/804816
Fax.:  06201/884988
eMail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#265399: blah

[Andres Salomon]

Upstream has actually rejected my patch to special-case overquota as
temp errors, and treat the rest as perm errors; instead, they've
included code that always throws a temp error if mail delivery fails..


-- 
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#296678: libcurl3: NTLM Authentication buffer overflow (CAN-2005-0490)

[Domenico Andreoli]

tags 296678 + pending
thanks

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:22:11PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> 
> iDefense discovered a buffer overflow in NTLM authentication that may lead
> to arbitrary code execution. This is CAN-2005-0490. Woody is not affected,
> as it doesn't contain the vulnerable NTLM code. (It's not listed on the
> Not-Vulnerable list yet, though)
> 
> Upstream's patch to address this issue is attached, I didn't resync it
> against the Debian package, because all this internal to-7.11 patching
> seems, umm, scary.

yes, i know and agree about the scary patch. i'm going to remove support
for libcurl2, it was used only by discover. discover now doesn't need
libcurl2 any more.

> There's another buffer overflow in Kerberos handling, but I doesn't seems
> to be enabled in debian/rules, but please double check this.

wildo

cheers
domenico

-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]