Bug#295751: marked as done (webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295751: fixed in webmin-optional 1.180-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Feb 2005 21:25:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 17 13:25:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1t9U-00010d-00; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:25:36 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ceh.gotadsl.co.uk [62.3.225.201]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D32BB05B; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:25:26 + (GMT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:25:26 + From: Nicolas Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: webmin-ldap-useradmin Version: 1.160-3 Distribution: testing Parent package installed: webmin 1.180-1 Symptom: When trying to add user account to LDAP directory, following error occurs: Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database : objectClass: value #0 provided more than once Workaround: I upgraded ldap users and groups module from webmin.com to the current version (ldap-useradmin-1.180-1.wbm). Other info: $ dpkg --status webmin-ldap-useradmin Package: webmin-ldap-useradmin Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: admin Installed-Size: 252 Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Source: webmin-optional Version: 1.160-3 Depends: webmin (= 1.140), webmin-core, libnss-ldap, perl, libnet-ldap-perl, libnet-imap-perl Conffiles: /etc/webmin/ldap-useradmin/config 32d1c00134b8678e1901237cdc4702a5 /etc/webmin/ldap-useradmin/admin.acl d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Description: LDAP user administration module for webmin This module allows webmin (a web-based interface for system administration for Unix) to manage users in an LDAP database. --- Received: (at 295751-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 07:54:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 23:54:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGBY5-0005mf-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:54:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGBSg-0008WD-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295751: fixed in webmin-optional 1.180-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: webmin-optional Source-Version: 1.180-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of webmin-optional, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: webmin-adsl_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-adsl_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-apache_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-apache_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-bandwidth_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-bandwidth_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-burner_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-burner_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-cfengine_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-cfengine_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-cpan_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-cpan_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-dhcpd_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-dhcpd_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-exports_1.180-2_all.deb to
Bug#296494: marked as done (webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user(no structural object class))
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295751: fixed in webmin-optional 1.180-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 20:05:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 12:05:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from web30509.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.122] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D3gIA-0005U4-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:05:58 -0800 Received: (qmail 60725 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Feb 2005 20:05:27 - Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=jvGoiRglMnBNM6Kyby9EpVZUt6AjPer+4mCU11fqrPjEc3F4Z2wGW/2YHUBKEB+dinIsYqW5URhHC+9MyB5SzSIXRwBFaq7HEg/UTXzU0aDbQypnknfNnUab3BYKujeVFgWtRpiuuQ4ylDB6YJd9Yngvp9ri5buDeyBS7kypa/o= ; Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from [24.83.199.181] by web30509.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:05:27 PST Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:05:27 -0800 (PST) From: gary ng [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: webmin-ldap-useradmin cannot create new user(no structural object class) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: webmin-ldap-useradmin Version: 1.160-3 Distribution: testing Severity: grave The webmin module(both this and the latest one from webmin.com) is just not compatible with debian's ldap schema setup making this module not usable, thus the grave severity. The problem is that inetOrgPerson is not included in the class which is a must for the ldap scheme to work. In order to make this module work in debian, the following change is needed (in /usr/share/webmin/save_user.cgi) : add inetOrgPerson to the object class needed add 'sn' attribute as that is a must for inetOrgPerson After the above changes, this module can create users as expected. Though it is still not compatible with debian's standard behaviour of each user has its own group. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --- Received: (at 295751-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 07:54:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 28 23:54:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGBY5-0005mf-00; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:54:05 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGBSg-0008WD-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#295751: fixed in webmin-optional 1.180-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: webmin-optional Source-Version: 1.180-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of webmin-optional, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: webmin-adsl_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-adsl_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-apache_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-apache_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-bandwidth_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-bandwidth_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-burner_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-burner_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-cfengine_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-cfengine_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-cpan_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-cpan_1.180-2_all.deb webmin-dhcpd_1.180-2_all.deb to pool/main/w/webmin-optional/webmin-dhcpd_1.180-2_all.deb
Bug#299102: marked as done (webmin-wvdial does not work. Missing semicolon in ppp-client-lib.pl)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#299102: fixed in webmin-optional 1.180-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2005 19:40:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 11 11:40:43 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9q03-0001YR-00; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:40:43 -0800
Received: from rzstud4.stud.uni-karlsruhe.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.196.41.40])
by smtp2.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1)
id 1D9q01-0002oN-Lp; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:40:41 +0100
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:40:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Hans-Juergen Tappe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: webmin-wvdial does not work. Missing semicolon in ppp-client-lib.pl
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED;
BOUNDARY=-993974231-1960401352-1110570041=:18201
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
---993974231-1960401352-1110570041=:18201
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: webmin-wvdial
Version: 1.160-3
https://localhost:1/wvdial/index.cgi
Error - Perl execution failed
syntax error at ./ppp-client-lib.pl line 286, near )
unlink
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/webmin/wvdial/index.cgi line
5.
Problem: missing semicolon.
Patch (also attached):
--- /tmp/ppp-client-lib.pl.orig 2005-03-11 20:09:40.874048312 +0100
+++ /usr/share/webmin/wvdial/ppp-client-lib.pl 2005-03-11
20:11:16.301541128 +0100
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ if ($connected $autodns) {
}
if ($pst[9] = $stime) {
# A PPP DNS config has been created .. use it
- system_logged(cp $resolv_conf
$save_resolv_conf)
+ system_logged(cp $resolv_conf
$save_resolv_conf);
unlink($resolv_conf);
system_logged(cp $ppp_resolv_conf
$resolv_conf);
if ($_[1] == 0) {
---993974231-1960401352-1110570041=:18201
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=ppc-client-lib.pl.patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ppc-client-lib.pl.patch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---993974231-1960401352-1110570041=:18201--
---
Received: (at 299102-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 08:01:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 00:01:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGBfM-0006Df-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:01:36 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGBSg-0008WH-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:48:30 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299102: fixed in
Bug#289182: kino endianness issues on powerpc
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:38:27AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 08:36:01PM +, Paul Brossier wrote: there is probably a better mean to do so though, ie checking what type of conversion is needed according to libavcodec, but it does effectively fixes the XV Display of kino. Actually, we should probably check the value of component_order[] in the struct returned by XvListImageFormats() and shuffle components as appropriate, but from the feedback so far, apparently nowadays it is sufficient to keep the order of YUV components fixed, independent of host arch. I've attached a patch to this effect, and would welcome feedback from testers. it works perfectly on powerpc, a much nicer solution indeed. and the first patch was wrong, the image was slightly more redish. Entirely possible; I hacked the original patch based on my limited understanding of YUV encoding, using a perhaps flawed piece of code from a yet earlier patch. It was enough to convice me there's some missing endianness adjustment, and to make the display bearable. audio seems to work better now. there are a few glitches but at least it's not white noise. oh and export to mpeg2 and wav bot work. Great. We're getting closer, it seems. Does the video part of mpeg2 export also work correctly now? oh yes, very well. and the video filters too. Great, thanks for testing this (and sorry I didn't report any test results - simply didn't get around to do more video editing yet). Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296514: Cervisia licensing: moving forward?
Am Samstag 26 März 2005 09:15 schrieb Ben Burton: Coolo, do you have any specific requests or instructions for KDE_3_4_BRANCH? If possible don't try experimental cervisia ;-)) Greetings, Stephan
Bug#247542: marked as done (Causes FTBFS due to accidental openjade runtime dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:02:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#247542: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 18:37:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 11:37:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BLRGh-ac-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 11:37:19 -0700 Received: from outpost.dnsalias.org ([65.49.88.87]) by fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 5 May 2004 14:35:49 -0400 Received: from outpost.dnsalias.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outpost.dnsalias.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i45IaeWo004909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 May 2004 14:36:41 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by outpost.dnsalias.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i45Iadju004908; Wed, 5 May 2004 14:36:39 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Missing dependancy on openjade X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58 Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 14:36:39 -0400 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [65.49.88.87] using ID [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed, 5 May 2004 14:35:49 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: librsvg2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental mkdir ./html cd ./html gtkdoc-mkhtml rsvg ../rsvg-docs.sgml /usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkhtml: line 42: /usr/bin/openjade: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [html-build.stamp] Error 127 Tks, Jeff Bailey -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 --- Received: (at 247542-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 09:18:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 01:18:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGCs3-OQ-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:18:47 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGCcF-0005Ui-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:02:27 -0500 From: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#247542: fixed in gtk-doc 1.3-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:02:27 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: gtk-doc Source-Version: 1.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gtk-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gtk-doc-tools_1.3-4_all.deb to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc-tools_1.3-4_all.deb gtk-doc_1.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.3-4.diff.gz gtk-doc_1.3-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.3-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gtk-doc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators
Bug#301836: pearpc: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29-03-2005 03:41, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Robert, There are seven new RC bugs in the BTS today about packages in testing that have a build-dependency on the newest version of type-handling. That version of type-handling is being held out of sarge because of lessdisks, which produces a binary package that depends on things like not+alpha and not+i386. There doesn't seem to be any equivalent Provides: in the current version of type-handling. Can you offer a solution for Jonas so that type-handling can be updated in testing without having to drop lessdisks? Also, there are other packages in testing which have build-dependencies on type-handling (= 0.2.1). Are these build-dependencies really going to be satisfied by type-handling 0.2.7, or has the package changed too much? I wouldn't mind updating the lessdisks package if it is easier to help me out than preserving backwards compatibility. I just haven't had time yet to figure out myself what exactly has changed, so help is much appreciated. And in worst case, I can possibly even drop the clever (ab)use of type-handling, and instead hardcode the archs with known dependencies (but that would make it harder to try out lessdisks with new archs). Regards, - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCSR6an7DbMsAkQLgRAm2IAJ9ug271qcv1LD2UjzwhSxxtp3ux6QCgqNPC iMXuHwta/t3arjLj8TKfBAc= =OWHr -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#291559: analysis
Hello Matthias, I don't have a patch, because I don't know enough about backage building and the available make variables. But I think I found where a change is needed. I tried to build capi4hylafax from source package on my fax server (dual Pentium pro) using apt-get source, apt-get build-dep, dpkg- buildpackage -rfakeroot -b. I noticed some compiler warnings ../standard/osmem.h: In function `void* getPtr(tUByte*)': ../standard/osmem.h:98: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size ../standard/osmem.h: In function `void setPtr(tUByte*, void*)': ../standard/osmem.h:218: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size I extracted the binaries c2faxsend and c2faxrecv from the package and copied them to /usr/bin. c2faxrecv crashed when receiving a fax. It looks as if C_PLATFORM_64 was defined on my non-64-bit system. To check this I commented out these lines in debian/rules: ifeq ($(DEB_TARGET_ARCH), $(findstring $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH),amd64 ia64 ppc64)) CXXFLAGS += -DC_PLATFORM_64 endif Now I don't get the warnings and c2faxrecv works as expected. (I did not check c2faxsend.) The condition for -DC_PLATFORM_64 seems to be wrong. As a further check I inserted a command for debugging at the dependency build: in debian/rules build: build-stamp echo DEB_TARGET_ARCH = $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH) When making the package it shows that DEB_TARGET_ARCH is empty. Obviously an empty value $(DEB_TARGET_ARCH) must be handled specifically. (Or it's not the right variable to check.) Bodo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 300979
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 300979 sid Bug#300979: rebuild without libhowl0 dep There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301038, closing 301038
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301038 - sarge Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup Tags were: sarge confirmed Tags removed: sarge close 301038 Bug#301038: imagefs: segfaults on startup 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301957: community string mismatch
Package: tinysnmp-tools Version: 0.8.4 Severity: grave tinysnmpwalk and tinysnmpget don't work. # snmpget -v1 -c public localhost 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 SNMPv2-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 #1 Tue Mar 15 01:45:16 CET 2005 x86_64 # tinysnmpget localhost public 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 community string mismatch # tinysnmpwalk localhost public 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 community string mismatch -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tinysnmp-tools depends on: ii libabz00.5.1 Miscellaneous useful routines ii libber00.4.1 A Basic Encoding Rules (ITU X.690) ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdebug0 0.4.2 Memory leak detection system and l -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#265021: Regarding blosxom and the flavour files
* Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-03-19 20:09]: One relatively easy way to deal with that in _user space_ is via dpkg-divert(8) and --local diversion: Just for the record, I don't call that _user_ space. That's admin area. On the other hand it's admin area anyway to configure blosxom for multiple user accounts. Though still dpkg-divert should be rarely used by a system's administrator, its intention were others. Programmatically, and from the _package point of view_, the obvious solution is to make these conffiles in /etc and link them back to where blosxom expect them --- or patch blosxom like we did with the Debian patch for /etc/blosxom/blosxom.conf. Not only programmatically (what a word ;)), but also from a sane point of view. This is going to be addressed. nitpickAnd, it's link them _from_ where blosxom expects them. :)/nitpick It's not that rapid upstream development will overwrite this That's not a point for a clean solution, I wonder why you bring it up... -- there hasn't been any upstream work on blosxom itself in quite some time (as opposed to plugins etc where user still contribute, AFAIK). Well, there was, but you don't seem to be hanging out on the list. But blosxom3 isn't really ready yet, unfortunately. Dirk, a former blosxom maintainer I can understand why you give up on it, with the current strange setup... It's always easier to leave the fixing to others. *sigh* So long, Alfie -- Where do you want to go today? Somewhere, somewhere you could never take me -- Chumbawamba, Pass It Along signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301117: [jwm@horde.net: libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir upload]
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:48:44AM -0500, John Morrissey wrote: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:47:00 -0500 From: John Morrissey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir upload Hi Fabio-- You had done the initial upload for my libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir package. I've released a new version and fixed an RC bug that was filed against it; would you please upload the new version (lintian(1) runs clean on it)? The files are up at: http://horde.net/~jwm/debian/ I've done this sponsored upload. Note that there's a stray .la file in the diff; you might want to make some clean rule remove that, at some point (I didn't worry about it for this upload because the build always seems to regenerate it). Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 294404, tagging 301560
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 294404 patch Bug#294404: udev does not create /dev/md* devices at boot-up Tags were: help Tags added: patch tags 301560 patch Bug#301560: mounts original /dev under udev /dev: breaks raid systems (others?) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301560: udev and mdadm
Hi Mario,
I've banged on this patch a bit more; one remaining problem I found was that
the mdrun script was checking for /.dev as a sign of udev's presence, but
newer versions of udev mount the static dev at /dev/.static/dev instead.
I've updated mdrun to turn on autostart if *either* directory is found.
At this point, I think the attached patch shakes out as many of the
udev-related problems as it can. You mentioned that you don't use udev; do
you want to test this patch yourself, or should I go ahead and NMU?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/config.c mdadm-1.9.0/config.c
--- mdadm-1.9.0/config.c
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/config.c
@@ -213,16 +213,35 @@
}
while (fgets(buf, 1024, f)) {
int major, minor;
- char *name, *mp;
+ char buf2[512];
+ char buf3[512];
+ char *name = NULL, *mp, *np;
buf[1023] = '\0';
if (buf[0] != ' ')
continue;
major = strtoul(buf, mp, 10);
if (mp == buf || *mp != ' ')
continue;
- minor = strtoul(mp, NULL, 10);
+ minor = strtoul(mp, np, 10);
+ if (np == mp)
+ continue;
+
+ if (sscanf(np, %*u %s, buf2)) {
+ struct stat buf;
+ if (*buf2 == '/') {
+ name = buf2;
+ } else {
+ strncpy(buf3,/dev/,6);
+ strncat(buf3, buf2, sizeof(buf3)-6);
+ name = buf3;
+ }
+ if (stat(name, buf) || is_standard(name, NULL))
+ name = NULL;
+ }
+
+ if (!name)
+ name = map_dev(major, minor);
- name = map_dev(major, minor);
if (name) {
mddev_dev_t d;
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
--- mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+mdadm (1.9.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * High-urgency upload for sarge targetted RC bugfix.
+ * Start mdadm-raid before udev on boot-up, so that mdadm device node
+creation is honored (closes: #294404).
+ * Fix mdadm --scan to prefer the values contained in /proc/partitions,
+instead of picking up device node names at random from /dev.
+ * Teach mdrun to look at /dev/.static/dev instead of /.dev for udev
+mounts requiring autostart (closes: #301560).
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 27 Mar 2005 21:59:12 -0800
+
mdadm (1.9.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Patched is_standard() to accept /dev/md/* names as standard.
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/debian/rules mdadm-1.9.0/debian/rules
--- mdadm-1.9.0/debian/rules
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/debian/rules
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
# dh_installemacsen
# dh_installpam
# dh_installmime
- dh_installinit --init-script=mdadm-raid -- start 25 S . start 50 0 6 .
+ dh_installinit --init-script=mdadm-raid -- start 4 S . start 50 0 6 .
dh_installinit -- defaults 25
# dh_installcron
dh_installman
diff -u mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdrun mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdrun
--- mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdrun
+++ mdadm-1.9.0/debian/mdrun
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
shift
fi
-if [ -d /.dev ] ; then
+if [ -d /dev/.static/dev ] || [ -d /.dev ] ; then
AUTOCREATE=true
fi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#277308: marked as done (kernel-patch-debianlogo: support for newer versions of kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255339: fixed in kernel-patch-debianlogo 1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2004 10:47:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 19 03:47:11 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pd18.leszno.sdi.tpnet.pl (janc.int.pl) [213.77.153.18] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CJrWI-0001Ng-00; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 03:47:11 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (dns.6th.pl [217.97.131.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by janc.int.pl with ESMTP id i9JAksGT024566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO)$ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:47:01 +0200 From: Szymon Janc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-patch-debianlogo: support for newer versions of kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:46:47 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-patch-debianlogo Version: 1.0-9 Severity: important Tags: patch This adds support for new kernel version: for 2.4.x up to 2.4.27 and for 2.6.x up to 2.6.9. Patch for debianlogo script is available at http://janc.int.pl/debianlogo.diff This patch shoul also allow You to close #255339 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1-cko8 Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL) Versions of packages kernel-patch-debianlogo depends on: ii bash 3.0-8 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii grep-dctrl2.1.7 Grep Debian package information ii patch 2.5.9-2Apply a diff file to an original -- no debconf information -- Szymon Janc szymon#janc.int.pl // GG: 1383435 --- Received: (at 255339-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 11:53:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 03:53:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFHe-0007Hb-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:53:22 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFED-0008Ot-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 From: Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#255339: fixed in kernel-patch-debianlogo 1.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: kernel-patch-debianlogo Source-Version: 1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-patch-debianlogo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.dsc kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.tar.gz kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kernel-patch-debianlogo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there
Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
I notice in your patch for this bug you left the following section of the
postinst intact:
if [ ! -f /etc/texmf/jadetex/$fmt.ini ]; then
warn /etc/texmf/jadetex/$fmt.ini not found, skipping $fmt memory
dump
warn If you wish to use JadeTeX, you will have to create the dump
manually
warn or else purge then reinstall this package to restore default
configuration.
return 0
elif [ ! -f ${FMTCNF} ]; then
warn $FMTCNF is missing but should be there; report this bug please
return 1
[...]
fi
This means that if /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf has been removed, which is
a valid state for a conffile to be in, upgrades of the package will fail.
Is this the desired behavior?
No, it isn't - I missed that.
If not, should this elif also be removed
from the script, or should 40jadetex.cnf be restored IFF it's missing (in
which case, it should not be a conffile)?
I think it should be an ordinary conffile. The update-fmtutil mechanism
that uses the files in /etc/texmf/fmt.d/NNpackage.cnf was exactly
developed to allow files to be treated as conffiles.
So the elif part should be removed, too.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Bug#255339: marked as done (kernel-patch-debianlogo: Would like an updated version for 2.4.26 and 2.6.6)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#255339: fixed in kernel-patch-debianlogo 1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2004 12:19:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 20 05:19:48 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bc1Ia-0004EP-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 05:19:48 -0700 Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette (ADijon-107-1-23-252.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.251.153.252]) by mwinf0901.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B2771180019B; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bc1Hz-0008N4-5M; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:19:11 +0200 Received: from tangerine.coulon.evette ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tangerine [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18599-10; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:19:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tangerine.coulon.evette) by tangerine.coulon.evette with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bc1Hx-0008Mr-M8; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:19:09 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debianlogo: Would like an updated version for 2.4.26 and 2.6.6 X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61 Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:19:09 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p9 (Debian) at coulon.evette Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-patch-debianlogo Version: 1.0-9 Severity: wishlist File: debianlogo Tags: sid Hello, I would like a vesion of theis package for 2.4.26 (and 2.4.27 as it will be released soon) and for 2.6.6 (and 2.6.7 as it was released). ;-) It is difficult for me to survive without them. -- Regards - Jean-Luc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-k6-16 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages kernel-patch-debianlogo depends on: ii bash 2.05b-15 The GNU Bourne Again SHell ii grep-dctrl2.1.4 Grep Debian package information ii patch 2.5.9-1Apply a diff file to an original -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 255339-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 11:53:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 03:53:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFHe-0007Hb-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:53:22 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFED-0008Ot-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 From: Emanuele Rocca [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#255339: fixed in kernel-patch-debianlogo 1.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:49 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: kernel-patch-debianlogo Source-Version: 1.1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-patch-debianlogo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.dsc kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1.tar.gz kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-debianlogo/kernel-patch-debianlogo_1.1_all.deb
Bug#301117: marked as done (libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir: FTBFS: mod_ldap_userdir.so not found where expected)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:50:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301117: fixed in libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir 1.1.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 21:11:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 23 13:11:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DED8f-0001JD-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:11:41 -0800 Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FB468CA; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:11:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-62-245-162-134.mnet-online.de [62.245.162.134]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA0F6185A; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:11:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A109C100BAC15; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:11:34 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir: FTBFS: mod_ldap_userdir.so not found where expected Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:11:34 +0100 (CET) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir Version: 1.1.4-3 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir in a clean build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking lber.h usability... yes checking lber.h presence... yes checking for lber.h... yes checking for ldap.h... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir-1.1.4' /usr/bin/apxs2 -c -o mod_ldap_userdir.so -DTLS=1 -lldap -llber mod_ldap_userdir.c -shared /usr/bin/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -prefer-pic -pipe -I/usr/include/xmltok -I/usr/include/openssl -Wall -O2 -DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -pipe -I/usr/include/xmltok -I/usr/include/openssl -Wall -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/apache2 -I/usr/include/apr-0 -I/usr/include/apr-0 -I/usr/include -DTLS=1 -c -o mod_ldap_userdir.lo mod_ldap_userdir.c touch mod_ldap_userdir.slo mod_ldap_userdir.c:246: warning: `init_ldap_userdir' defined but not used mod_ldap_userdir.c:325: warning: `child_init_ldap_userdir' defined but not used mod_ldap_userdir.c:336: warning: `child_exit_ldap_userdir' defined but not used /usr/bin/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -o mod_ldap_userdir.la -lldap -llber -rpath /usr/lib/apache2/modules -module -avoid-versionmod_ldap_userdir.lo -shared make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libapache2-mod-ldap-userdir-1.1.4' chrpath -d mod_ldap_userdir.so open: No such file or directory elf_open: Invalid argument make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 = mod_ldap_userdir.so nowadays seems to be located in .libs/ Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. --- Received: (at 301117-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 12:02:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 04:02:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFQP-0008DB-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:02:25 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGFES-0008Ph-00;
Bug#301968: lsh-server fails to create the hostkey
Package: lsh-server Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, lsh-server fails to create the hostkey, possibly because the lsh-keygen options are changed. --nist-level now is the length in bit of the rsa key. So this happens: --- snip --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/lsh-server start Creating lsh host key (this only needs to be done once): /etc/lsh_host_keylsh-keygen: RSA keys should be at least 512 bits. Try `lsh-keygen --help' or `lsh-keygen --usage' for more information. lsh-writekey: Empty key on input, giving up. --- snap --- Simply use: lsh-keygen --server --nist-level 2048 or: lsh-keygen --server --nist-level 4096 in the lsh-server initscript. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5-x Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages lsh-server depends on: ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii libasn1-6-heimdal 0.6.3-8 Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libkrb5-17-heimdal 0.6.3-8 Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos ii libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand ii liboop4 1.0-3Event loop management library ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libreadline44.3-15 GNU readline and history libraries ii libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.1 Roken Libraries for Kerberos4 From ii libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii lsh-utils 2.0.1-2 Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol ut ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 301968
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10 tags 301968 sid Bug#301968: lsh-server fails to create the hostkey There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301973: geda-gattrib: segmentation fault
Package: geda-gattrib Version: 20050313-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable here what i get simply running gattrib with an example: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gattrib geda-examples/examples/lightning_detector/lightning.sch gEDA/gattrib version 20050313 gEDA/gattrib comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details. Probably parenthesis mismatch in /etc/gEDA/system-gschemrc Most recently read form: (gschem-version 20050313) Loading file [/usr/share/doc/geda-examples/examples/lightning_detector/lightning.sch] (gattrib:9357): Gtk-WARNING **: gtkwidget.c:7100: widget class `GtkSheet' has no property named `default_border' (gattrib:9357): Gtk-WARNING **: gtkwidget.c:7100: widget class `GtkSheet' has no property named `default_outside_border' (gattrib:9357): Gtk-CRITICAL **: _gtk_style_peek_property_value: assertion `GTK_IS_STYLE (style)' failed Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10n Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages geda-gattrib depends on: ii geda-symbols20050313-1 Symbols for GNU EDA -- Electronics ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1 Main Guile libraries ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgdgeda6 2.0.15-3 GNU EDA -- Electronics design soft ii libgeda20 [libgeda-23] 20050313-1 GNU EDA -- Electronics design soft ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1 Guile's patched version of libtool ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqthreads-12 1.6.7-1 QuickThreads library for Guile ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301968: lsh-server fails to create the hostkey
Stefan Pfetzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: lsh-server fails to create the hostkey, possibly because the lsh-keygen options are changed. --nist-level now is the length in bit of the rsa key. I think it's because lsh-keygen defaults to RSA keys now; in earlier versions DSA keys were the default (and before that, DSA was the only supported type). The DSA specific long option --nist-level seemed like a good idea at the time, but I'm sorry it's poor user interface now. Anyway, if you don't want to use the default key size, I think it's best to use *both* type and length options, e.g. lsh-keygen --server -a rsa -l 2048 or lsh-keygen --server -a dsa --nist-level 8 Regards, /Niels
Bug#301977: geda-gattrib: seg fault
Package: geda-gattrib Version: 20050313-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable symply try gattrib with an example i get segfault: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gattrib /usr/share/doc/geda-examples/examples/lightning_detector/lightning.sch gEDA/gattrib version 20050313 gEDA/gattrib comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details. Probably parenthesis mismatch in /etc/gEDA/system-gschemrc Most recently read form: (gschem-version 20050313) Loading file [/usr/share/doc/geda-examples/examples/lightning_detector/lightning.sch] (gattrib:9139): Gtk-WARNING **: gtkwidget.c:7100: widget class `GtkSheet' has no property named `default_border' (gattrib:9139): Gtk-WARNING **: gtkwidget.c:7100: widget class `GtkSheet' has no property named `default_outside_border' (gattrib:9139): Gtk-CRITICAL **: _gtk_style_peek_property_value: assertion `GTK_IS_STYLE (style)' failed Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10n Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages geda-gattrib depends on: ii geda-symbols20050313-1 Symbols for GNU EDA -- Electronics ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1 Main Guile libraries ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgdgeda6 2.0.15-3 GNU EDA -- Electronics design soft ii libgeda20 [libgeda-23] 20050313-1 GNU EDA -- Electronics design soft ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1 Guile's patched version of libtool ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqthreads-12 1.6.7-1 QuickThreads library for Guile ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301598: bootcd: cd cannot boot -- /sbin/init cannot open dev/console
Hi, thanks for your bugreport. 1. do you use initrd ? if yes, 2.1 can you send me a tar of the directory /etc/mkinitrd ? 2.2 does the CDDEV definition in bootcdwrite.conf start with CDDEV=auto ? Regards Bernd -Original Message- From: Rob Ristroph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sonntag, 27. März 2005 03:48 To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: Bug#301598: bootcd: cd cannot boot -- /sbin/init cannot open dev/console Package: bootcd Version: 2.47 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Note that I have previously successfully created working CDs using bootcd on this installation; the following started happening after an apt-get upgrade a couple of weeks ago. When the created ISO is booted, it freezes up, and these are the last messages on the screen: pivot_root: No such file or directory /sbin/init: 426: cannot open dev/console: No such file Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! I have the kernel and initrd set correctly in bootcdwrite.conf. Let me know if I can help by sending you my bootcdwrite.conf file or the created ISO or parts of it. Thanks in advance for any attention you can give this, and thanks for writing bootcd -- I have found it to be an extremely useful utility. --Rob Ristroph -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bootcd depends on: ii bootcd-i386 2.47 bootcd extension to create images ii cpio 2.5-1.2GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii dosfstools2.10-1 Utilities to create and check MS-D ii fdutils 5.4-20040228-1 Linux floppy utilities ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using magic ii mkisofs 4:2.01+01a01-2 Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem ii realpath 1.9.16 Return the canonicalized absolute -- no debconf information
Bug#300182: marked as done (tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206))
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:25:37 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line tetex-bin not vulnerable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 09:16:52 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 01:16:52 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCDbA-0001gh-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:16:52 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.104 #268)
id 1DCDac-0003Do-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:16:18 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Mar 2005
10:16:20 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:16:19 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tetex-bin still vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888 (CAN-2005-0206)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.13(0.122/4/2) i686
X-www.distributed.net: OGR-P2: 4 packets (55.05 stats units) [3.04 Mnodes/s]
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnzgLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+UP!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH
Content-Disposition: inline
--i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-26
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Hi all,
As recently discovered the patch, which fixed CAN-2004-0888, seems to
be broken on all 64bit platforms (tested only on ia64 though).[1]
Attched are two patches, which should fix that. They are simply
stolen from the RedHat BTS.[2]
H.
[1] e.g.: http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=3D4887
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D135393
--=20
sigmentation fault
--i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=CAN-2005-0206-1.diff
@@ -186,6 +192,11 @@
}
if (start = pagesSize) {
pagesSize += 32;
+if (pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Page *)/sizeof(Page *) != pagesSize ||
+pagesSize*(int)sizeof(Ref)/sizeof(Ref) != pagesSize) {
+ error(-1, Invalid 'pagesSize' parameter.);
+ goto err3;
+}
--i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=CAN-2005-0206.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--- XRef.cc.orig2004-09-17 23:54:38.0 -0700
+++ XRef.cc 2004-09-25 17:59:36.0 -0700
@@ -76,6 +76,12 @@
=20
// trailer is ok - read the xref table
} else {
+if (size*(int)sizeof(XRefEntry)/sizeof(XRefEntry) !=3D size) {
+ error(-1, Invalid 'size' inside xref table.);
+ ok =3D gFalse;
+ errCode =3D errDamaged;
+ return;
+}
entries =3D (XRefEntry *)gmalloc(size * sizeof(XRefEntry));
for (i =3D 0; i size; ++i) {
entries[i].offset =3D 0x;
@@ -267,6 +273,10 @@
// table size
if (first + n size) {
newSize =3D size + 256;
+ if (newSize*(int)sizeof(XRefEntry)/sizeof(XRefEntry) !=3D newSize) {
+error(-1, Invalid 'newSize');
+goto err2;
+ }
entries =3D (XRefEntry *)grealloc(entries, newSize * sizeof(XRefEntr=
y));
for (i =3D size; i newSize; ++i) {
entries[i].offset =3D 0x;
@@ -410,6 +420,10 @@
if (!strncmp(p, obj, 3)) {
if (num =3D size) {
newSize =3D (num + 1 + 255) ~255;
+ if (newSize*(int)sizeof(XRefEntry)/sizeof(XRefEntry) !=3D
newSize=
) {
+ error(-1, Invalid 'obj' parameters.);
+ return gFalse;
+ }
entries =3D
Bug#301985: bacula: cannot open /dev/nst0 after upgrade
Package: bacula Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have upgraded to the latest version by doing an apt-get upgrade, I now get the following errors: server1:/usr/sbin# ./btape -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0 Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes. btape: butil.c:258 Using device: /dev/nst0 for writing. test 29-Mar 14:36 btape: Fatal Error at dev.c:295 because: dev.c:289 stored: unable to open device /dev/nst0: ERR=Input/output error 29-Mar 14:36 btape: Fatal Error at device.c:288 because: dev open failed: dev.c:289 stored: unable to open device /dev/nst0: ERR=Input/output error 29-Mar 14:36 btape: btape Fatal error: butil.c:167 Cannot open /dev/nst0 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.3-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#246943: marked as done (mc: Last letter in command name completion)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:04 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug fixed by the lastest security upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 May 2004 13:00:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 02 06:00:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from service.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.127.214] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BKGZv-0004o2-00; Sun, 02 May 2004 06:00:19 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by service.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B2363257 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 2 May 2004 15:00:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from service.sh.cvut.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (service [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02764-07; Sun, 2 May 2004 15:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from klokan.sh.cvut.cz (klokan.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.118.2]) by service.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6B63241; Sun, 2 May 2004 15:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from medon.sh.cvut.cz (medon.sh.cvut.cz [147.32.118.35]) by klokan.sh.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A3AC6701; Sun, 2 May 2004 15:00:14 +0200 (CEST) From: MeDon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mc: Last letter in command name completion X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 15:00:13 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sh.cvut.cz Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: mc Version: 4.5.55-1.2woody3 Severity: normal Hi, after upgrade to the mc 4.5.55-1.2woody3 the command name completion on the command line stopped working correctly. There appera space instead of the last leter. Just try to type 'mozil' and then M+Tab (or ESC and then Tab), 'mozill ' will appear instead of 'mozilla'. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux medon 2.4.24-medon.1 #1 Po bøe 1 00:05:31 CET 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ Versions of packages mc depends on: ii e2fsprogs 1.27-2 The EXT2 file system utilities and ii e2fsprogs [libcomerr2] 1.27-2 The EXT2 file system utilities and ii e2fsprogs [libext2fs2] 1.27-2 The EXT2 file system utilities and ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an pn libcomerr2 Not found. pn libext2fs2 Not found. ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-4 The GLib library of C routines ii libgpmg11.19.6-12General Purpose Mouse Library [lib ii mc-common 4.5.55-1.2woody3 Common files for mc and gmc --- Received: (at 246943-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 13:57:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 05:57:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (xiii.metz) [81.56.128.63] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGHDi-00028Y-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:57:26 -0800 Received: from joebar.metz ([192.168.0.4] ident=ludo) by xiii.metz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DGHDN-0004XB-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:05 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:04 +0200 From: Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug fixed by the lastest security upload Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi ! Thanks to the security team, this bug is now closed by mc 4.5.55-1.2woody6. Cheers, Ludovic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249366: marked as done (Completion doesn't work as expected)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:04 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug fixed by the lastest security upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2004 22:21:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 15:21:42 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from d19.brno.mistral.cz (triturus.borg.cz) [62.245.99.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BPU0r-WG-00; Sun, 16 May 2004 15:21:42 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (helo=varanea.godhic.cz)
by triturus.borg.cz with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BPU0K-Um-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:21:08 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 00:21:14 +0200
From: Zdik Kudrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Completion doesn't work as expected
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Borg Solutions
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Face:
%cGr\/v-C*Z{fWpj'qJ!iS,4X)@K%TrBF[jcP`Xn7Mf9On~8Ia7dA[a%(nugyxau~l@)qJ){PaafO-bb`Gmr1DGN}P2(q:#Nu%]Q^.Uzy!bGO}?#U!}%|Reah:p|0OGZ!q,uz59Rs4|_0LsWf[N4Efo#;[0D4K%(sNP}-:d#IDc}qy'Hz/QT847d3WWz;1Nq2Q,FQ1xx+X,
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mc
Version: 4.5.55-1.2woody3
After upgrading to woody3, the command completion (with M-Tab) doesn't
work as expected:
Stuff in [brackets] are my keypresses, stuff in {brackets} is
description what is going on the screen, the rest is mc's command line.
Before + Complete: show all switched on:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/eEscTab]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/
{+ list of all files+dirs in /etc appears}
[in]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/init.d/
{that's exactly what I wanted}
After + Complete: show all switched on:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/eEscTab]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etcSpace
{+ list of all files+dirs in my $PATH, but _without_ stuff in /etc -
I actually stopped here - I don't want to complete something from my
$PATH, I want to complete stuff from /etc (also notice nonexistence of
trailing slash after /etc)}
Before + Complete: show all switched off:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/eEscTab]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/
After + Complete: show all switched off:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[/eEscTab]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /etcSpace
Result:
The problem seems to be in adding Space after completed path instead of
slash '/'.
Tested in rxvt 2.6.4-6.
--ZK
- - ---[ BORG SOLUTIONS ]-- - -
Zdik Kudrle
GSM: +420 604 781 414
HTTP: www.borg.cz
SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Received: (at 246943-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 13:57:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 05:57:27 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from (xiii.metz) [81.56.128.63]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGHDi-00028Y-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 05:57:26 -0800
Received: from joebar.metz ([192.168.0.4] ident=ludo)
by xiii.metz with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DGHDN-0004XB-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:05 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:57:04 +0200
From: Ludovic Drolez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug fixed by the lastest security upload
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hi !
Thanks to the security team, this bug is now closed by mc 4.5.55-1.2woody6.
Cheers,
Ludovic.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: freebsd5-buildutils Version: 5.3+2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on type-handling (= 0.2.5) can't be fulfilled in sarge. So why did it migrate to sarge in first place? CCing debian-release. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301839: freebsd5-buildutils: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
* Robert Millan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 16:35]: On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 08:32:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: freebsd5-buildutils Version: 5.3+2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on type-handling (= 0.2.5) can't be fulfilled in sarge. So why did it migrate to sarge in first place? Because for sanity reasons, build-dependencies are not automatically checked. If you want to keep your package out of testing, you need to create an RC-bug for it. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301994: capi4hylafax: latest version looses faxes without warning
Package: capi4hylafax Version: 1:01.02.03-9 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi, I have been hit by the latest problems with capi4hylafax (blank pages sent except for header line, temporarily solved by use2D: no, and endless resent of a well receptionned fax). To solve the latter, I have upgraded to the unstable version, namely 1:01.02.03-9, but with that one the faxes are not sent (not event the header line), and hylafax behaves like they are sent ok !!! This results in potential loss of information, hence the severity. Thanks for your work, -- Rémi Letot -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages capi4hylafax depends on: ii isdnactivecards 1:3.6.2005-01-03-4 Support utilities for active ISDN ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcapi20-2 1:3.6.2005-01-03-4 libraries for CAPI support ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.7.1-4Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#299762: marked as done (jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:47:18 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299762: fixed in jadetex 3.13-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 08:18:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 00:18:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DBTjv-0001Kz-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:18:51 -0800 Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DBTjs-Ra-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:48 +0100 Received: from [84.72.90.246] (helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1DBTjr-0007vR-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:48 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.kuesterei.ch) by alhambra.kuesterei.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DBTjy-0002vH-6O for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:54 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade X-Debbugs-CC: Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (=?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?=) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:18:52 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-=-= X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:3fc7da83a58b7314ee3070631872032d Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-=-= Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Violates policy 10.7.3 Every time the postinst is called with configure, be it upon upgrade, install after remove, or dpkg-reconfigure, the file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf is restored. If the file is deleted or renamed by adding an additional suffix, it is restored. This violates Policy 10.7.3, , | Configuration file handling must conform to the following behavior: | | * local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade, ` The attached patch fixes this behavior. 40jadetex.cnf is made a conffile, and just left on the system when jadetex is removed, but not purged. fmtutil has no problem with this, it simply ignores formats in fmtutil.cnf for which the ini files cannot be found. I have added one additional feature in the patch: It uses fmtutil-sys if it is available, fmtutil otherwise. This is the script to be used with teTeX-3.0, now in experimental, but it's not important at all, because I've patched fmtutil in teTeX-3.0 to do the right thing. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages jadetex depends on: ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii tetex-bin 3.0-2 The teTeX binary files ii tetex-extra 3.0-2 Additional library files of teTeX -- no debconf information --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=jadetex-preserveconf.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -Nur jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/changelog jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog --- jadetex-3.13.orig/debian/changelog 2005-03-16 08:10:47.0 +0100 +++ jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog 2005-03-15 22:30:33.0 +0100 @@ -1,11 +1,12 @@ -jadetex (3.13-3) unstable; urgency=3Dlow +jadetex (3.13-3.2) unstable; urgency=3Dlow =20 + * NMU version number for local testing * New Maintainer. (Closes: #288204) * debian/control: Update Standards-Version. * Acknowledge NMU. (Closes: #266630). * debian/control: Drop Build-Dependency to openjade1.3, use openjade. =20 - -- OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301994: capi4hylafax: latest version looses faxes without warning
Hello Remi, since the current maintainer indends to orphan the package, I'm trying to find some bugs and to supply patches. On my system versions 01.02.03-8 and 01.02.03-9 segfault (bug #291559). You wrote hylafax behaves like they are sent ok Do you get a notification that the fax has been successfully sent? What's the state of the send and done queue? Please, send more information and a logfile (syslog) excerpt which shows an attempt to send a fax to the bug tracking system ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Bodo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301994: additionnal info
I downgraded to 1:01.02.03-7 and used the wrapper script found in 293808 for c2faxsend, and now it seems to behave correctly. Yet this is only a temporary solution :-) Thanks, -- Rémi Letot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#265021: marked as done (New package overwrites /var/www/blosxom/flavour files w/o asking)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#265021: fixed in blosxom 2.0-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2004 12:33:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 11 05:33:12 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from spc1-horn1-4-0-cust108.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (Apu.exley.net) [80.3.187.108] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BusI4-0002VS-00; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:33:12 -0700 Received: from exleym by Apu.exley.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BusHM-0003xL-00; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:32:28 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthew Exley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New package overwrites /var/www/blosxom/flavour files w/o asking X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:32:28 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Matthew Exley [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-apu-MailScanner-Information: Customised by [EMAIL PROTECTED]; please ask Matthew for help with these headers X-apu-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-apu-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.357, required 5, AWL 2.23, BAYES_00 -4.90, MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT 3.03) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: blosxom Version: 2.0-8 Severity: important In installing the latest blosxom package, I found my /var/www/blosxom/flavour files (which I'd heavily customised) had been overwritten with package-supplied default ones. Either I'm a cretin for not using an installation-specific directory/form, or these files need to get marked as configuration files. I *really* wasn't expecting this... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7.11070401 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Versions of packages blosxom depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30 Debian configuration management sy ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- debconf information: blosxom/old_cgi_file: false --- Received: (at 265021-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 17:30:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 09:30:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGKYG-0002GG-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:30:52 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGKL0-0008Cy-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500 From: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#265021: fixed in blosxom 2.0-10 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:10 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: blosxom Source-Version: 2.0-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of blosxom, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: blosxom_2.0-10.diff.gz to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10.diff.gz blosxom_2.0-10.dsc to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10.dsc blosxom_2.0-10_all.deb to pool/main/b/blosxom/blosxom_2.0-10_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated blosxom package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that
Processed: merging 301973 301977
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 merge 301973 301977 Bug#301973: geda-gattrib: segmentation fault Bug#301977: geda-gattrib: seg fault Merged 301973 301977. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302028: sip-tester: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev'
Package: sip-tester Version: 1.1rc1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'sip-tester' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' make OSNAME=`uname|sed -e s/CYGWIN.*/CYGWIN/` MODELNAME=`uname -m` sipp make[2]: Entering directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' cc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o xp_parser.o xp_parser.c gcc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o scenario.o scenario.cpp gcc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o screen.o screen.cpp screen.cpp:26:20: error: curses.h: No such file or directory screen.cpp: In function 'int screen_readkey()': screen.cpp:61: error: 'getch' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp: In function 'void screen_exit(int)': screen.cpp:80: error: 'endwin' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp: In function 'void screen_init(char*, void (*)())': screen.cpp:163: error: 'initscr' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp:165: error: 'noecho' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [screen.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sip-tester-1.1rc1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/sip-tester-1.1rc1/debian/control2005-03-29 21:02:48.518033146 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-29 21:02:38.989819638 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libncurses5-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: sip-tester -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302030: gtk2-engines-magicchicken: memory leaks using CortlandChicken theme
Package: gtk2-engines-magicchicken Version: 1.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have been experiencing memory leaks in Gaim, so I ran valgrind on it and found the following: ==11907== 282332 (17028 direct, 265304 indirect) bytes in 388 blocks are definely lost in loss record 105 of 175 ==11907==at 0x1B904F75: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:175) ==11907==by 0x1BE97ACE: g_malloc0 (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE4DB75: g_type_create_instance (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0 o.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE3A8FE: (within /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE3A0CD: g_object_newv (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600 ) ==11907==by 0x1BE3A74F: g_object_new_valist (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so ..600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE39DBA: g_object_new (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600. ==11907==by 0x1BDAAA99: gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data (in /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbu 2.0.so.0.600.2) ==11907==by 0x1BDA8F9B: gdk_pixbuf_copy (in /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so. 600.2) ==11907==by 0x1C63719B: mgicchikn_render_icon (in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/e ines/libmgicchikn.so) ==11907==by 0x1BBAC12B: gtk_style_render_icon (in /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0. ..0.600.2) ==11907==by 0x1BB38BCA: (within /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.600.2) as well as ==11907== 3600 bytes in 4 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 159 of 175 ==11907==at 0x1B90459D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:130) ==11907==by 0x1BE97C15: g_try_malloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BDA8F30: gdk_pixbuf_copy (in /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so. 600.2) ==11907==by 0x1C63719B: mgicchikn_render_icon (in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/e ines/libmgicchikn.so) ==11907==by 0x1BBAC12B: gtk_style_render_icon (in /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0. ..0.600.2) ==11907==by 0x1BB38BCA: (within /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.600.2) ==11907==by 0x1BB586DD: _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED (in /usr/lib/libgtk-x1 2.0.so.0.600.2) ==11907==by 0x1BE37948: (within /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE376B5: g_closure_invoke (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0. 0.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE48924: (within /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE47D39: g_signal_emit_valist (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.s 0.600.3) ==11907==by 0x1BE481E5: g_signal_emit (in /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0.600 The leak results in a loss of about 60 MB of RAM and 80 MB of swap over the course of a day, which causes lots of thrashing on my system (128 MB of RAM). Thank you for your time. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gtk2-engines-magicchicken depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-02.6.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.2-4 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301684: userv: FTBFS: debiandoc2ps: unknown option `1'
Kurt Roeckx writes (Bug#301684: userv: FTBFS: debiandoc2ps: unknown option `1'): Your package is failing to build with the following error: sed -e '/version\/version/ s//1.0.3-2/' \ spec.sgml.in spec.sgml.new mv -f spec.sgml.new spec.sgml debiandoc2ps -1 -O spec.sgml spec.ps.new mv spec.ps.new spec.ps debiandoc2ps: unknown option `1' make[1]: *** [spec.ps] Error 2 Ahm. The manpage of debiandoc2ps says: -1 Generate 1 page per page (default) for PostScript output. Gen- erate one page for HTML output. So this looks like it this option atleast used to exist. Since it is the default, it's probably easy to just remove the -1. I would like to do this, but then it doesn't do the right thing with older versions of debiandoc2ps where -1 isn't the default. I think debiandoc2sgml should continue to support the -1 option for at least one release cycle after it's deprecated. Since it's still in the manual, it's not clear that the removal of the option is (yet) intentional. I will reassign this bug to debiandoc-sgml. I'd be grateful if the debiandoc-sgml author would let me know how long 1-up output has been the default; if it's sufficiently long then I will remove the option from my build script. There probably ought to be a separate bug in debiandoc-sgml regarding the documentation inconsistency. Have you filed one ? Thanks, Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301684: userv: FTBFS: debiandoc2ps: unknown option `1'
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:05:58PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: There probably ought to be a separate bug in debiandoc-sgml regarding the documentation inconsistency. Have you filed one ? No, I haven't. Please do. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302032: arpack++: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev'
Package: arpack++ Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'arpack++' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for log in -lm... yes checking for s_copy in -lg2c... no you need g2c. make: *** [build] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/arpack++-2.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/arpack++-2.2/debian/control 2005-03-29 21:08:53.569587855 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-29 21:08:51.403993892 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: arpack++ Section: math Priority: optional -Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), g++ ( 2.95 ) +Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev Maintainer: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294404: (no subject)
On Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:57:27 -0800 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted: mdadm-294404.diff Almost there, I think. However, it didn't fix my broken md+udev+2.6.8-2-686-smp system. After installing mdadm_1.9.0-2.1_i386.deb built using the patch, the system startup link still had S25mdadm-raid - ../init.d/mdadm-raid Doing by hand: update-rc.d -f mdadm-raid start 4 S . start 50 0 6 . System startup links for /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid already exist. So somehow the package should do a update-rc.d -f mdadm-raid remove before the update-rc.d mdadm-raid start 4 S . start 50 0 6 . on upgrade to take care of this situation. -Maitland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302036: FWD: [SECURITY] [DSA 699-1] New netkit-telnet-ssl packages fix arbitrary code execution
Package: netkit-telnet-ssl Tags: security Severity: grave Version: 0.17.24+0.1-7 According to the DSA below, netkit-telnet-ssl is vulnerable to a security hole involving LINEMODE that allows remote code execution on the client. The DSA also says that the version in unstable will be fixed soon. If you've already prepared a fix, please feel free to close this bug with my apologies. Otherwise, I'm filing this bug to make sure we don't forget to fix it. - Forwarded message from Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:22:55 +0200 (CEST) To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 699-1] New netkit-telnet-ssl packages fix arbitrary code execution User-Agent: dsa-launch $Revision: 1.17 $ Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -- Debian Security Advisory DSA 699-1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/security/ Martin Schulze March 29th, 2005http://www.debian.org/security/faq - -- Package: netkit-telnet-ssl Vulnerability : buffer overflow Problem-Type : remote Debian-specific: no CVE ID : CAN-2005-0469 iDEFENSE researchers discovered a buffer overflow in the handling of the LINEMODE suboptions in telnet clients. This can lead to the execution of arbitrary code when connected to a malicious server. For the stable distribution (woody) this problem has been fixed in version 0.17.17+0.1-2woody4. For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem will be fixed soon. We recommend that you upgrade your telnet-ssl package. Upgrade Instructions - wget url will fetch the file for you dpkg -i file.deb will install the referenced file. If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for sources.list as given below: apt-get update will update the internal database apt-get upgrade will install corrected packages You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the footer to the proper configuration. Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 alias woody - Source archives: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/netkit-telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4.dsc Size/MD5 checksum: 669 edcae9a56571c23861cc772d116f6d9b http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/netkit-telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4.diff.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 9099 0c6a68a7522269cb7c7f18e08e9f3228 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/netkit-telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1.orig.tar.gz Size/MD5 checksum: 167658 faf2d112bc4d44f522bad3bc73da8d6d Alpha architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_alpha.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 101196 46f45337d4a60eb738b00e3aa2a4 http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnetd-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_alpha.deb Size/MD5 checksum:57024 b2a33f4b5143da8a36ee78b75850c6c2 ARM architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody3_arm.deb Size/MD5 checksum:85194 1db7e7432d8025531b869ae5c737014b http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnetd-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody3_arm.deb Size/MD5 checksum:48596 ad29db7a35ad3ee4e3d2c5c411b0edb9 Intel IA-32 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_i386.deb Size/MD5 checksum:85608 6b9e94d7acf3274a62a78e98b069060b http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnetd-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_i386.deb Size/MD5 checksum:46730 09bf8699c1af6a5f4f9e913d7ef92759 Intel IA-64 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_ia64.deb Size/MD5 checksum: 123272 d81d94ec52c655bb8496bf126c9077aa http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnetd-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_ia64.deb Size/MD5 checksum:66728 e1879d40f611846bb7f787245feb8fee HP Precision architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_hppa.deb Size/MD5 checksum:86624 677730710e0adac9cb6cbe1d1cca742b http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnetd-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_hppa.deb Size/MD5 checksum:54054 df3349ebb866ada9bc08a3dabf681bcc Motorola 680x0 architecture: http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/n/netkit-telnet-ssl/telnet-ssl_0.17.17+0.1-2woody4_m68k.deb Size/MD5 checksum:81534
Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 297661 important Bug#297661: iso-codes: cus and mal codes are duplicate Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#301970: missing symbol with valgrind/callgrind
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 301970 grave Bug#301970: missing symbol with valgrind/callgrind Severity set to `grave'. tags 301970 + sid Bug#301970: missing symbol with valgrind/callgrind There were no tags set. Tags added: sid merge 301970 299498 Bug#299498: valgrind-callgrind: undefined symbol: vgPlain_register_compact_helper Bug#301970: missing symbol with valgrind/callgrind Merged 299498 301970. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302006: marked as done (libpam-mount doesn't work after update)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:52:30 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302006: fixed in libpam-mount 0.9.22-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 16:52:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 08:52:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from p54833e70.dip.t-dialin.net (x101.hackers.homelinux.com) [84.131.62.112] (foobar) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGJx6-0004Un-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:52:29 -0800 Received: from kiro by x101.hackers.homelinux.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGJx1-0003Q6-TM; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:52:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kiro Zimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libpam-mount doesn't work after update X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:52:23 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: libpam-mount Version: 0.9.22-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the encrypted partition is not mounted (and decrypted) on login. Up to version 0.9.22-4 there was no such problem. I attached my config and the (hopefully correct copy-n-wasted) debug output. Kiro - --- /etc/security/pam_mount.conf --- # i cutted the standard-statements volume kiro crypt - /dev/hdb5 /home/kiro cipher=aes,exec,nodev,nosuid aes-256-ecb /mnt/usb/kiro.key - --- login --- pam_mount: reading options_allow... pam_mount: reading options_require... pam_mount: back from global readconfig pam_mount: per-user configurations not allowed by pam_mount.conf pam_mount: real and effective user ID are 0 and 0. pam_mount: checking sanity of volume record (/dev/hdb5) pam_mount: about to perform mount operations pam_mount: information for mount: pam_mount: pam_mount: (defined by globalconf) pam_mount: user: kiro pam_mount: server: pam_mount: volume:/dev/hdb5 pam_mount: mountpoint:/home/kiro pam_mount: options: cipher=aes,exec,nodev,nosuid pam_mount: fs_key_cipher: aes-256-ecb pam_mount: fs_key_path: /mnt/usb/kiro.key pam_mount: use_fstab: 0 pam_mount: pam_mount: checking to see if /dev/mapper/_dev_hdb5 is already mounted at /home/kiro pam_mount: checking for encrypted filesystem key configuration pam_mount: decrypting FS key using system auth. token and aes-256-ecb pam_mount: about to start building mount command pam_mount: command: /bin/mount -t crypt -ocipher=aes,exec,nodev,nosuid /dev/hdb5 /home/kiro pam_mount: mount errors (should be empty): pam_mount: pam_mount: setting uid to 0 pam_mount: pam_mount: real and effective user ID are 0 and 0. pam_mount: pam_mount: real and effective group ID are 1000 and 1000. pam_mount: /sbin/mount.crypt: line 141: /sbi: No such file or directory pam_mount: mount.crypt: error creating _dev_hdb5 pam_mount: waiting for mount pam_mount: mount of /dev/hdb5 failed pam_mount: clean system authtok (0) pam_mount: command: /usr/sbin/pmvarrun -u kiro -d -o 1 pam_mount: setting uid to 0 pam_mount: real and effective user ID are 0 and 0. pam_mount: real and effective group ID are 1000 and 1000. pam_mount: pmvarrun says login count is 1 pam_mount: done opening session - --- logout --- pam_mount: received order to close things pam_mount: real and effective user ID are 0 and 0. pam_mount: user is kiro pam_mount: command: /usr/sbin/pmvarrun -u kiro -d -o -1 pam_mount: setting uid to 0 pam_mount: real and effective user ID are 0 and 0. pam_mount: real and effective group ID are 1000 and 1000. pam_mount: pmvarrun says login count is 0 pam_mount: going to unmount pam_mount: information for mount: pam_mount: pam_mount: (defined by globalconf) pam_mount: user: kiro pam_mount: server: pam_mount: volume:/dev/hdb5 pam_mount: mountpoint:/home/kiro pam_mount: options: cipher=aes,exec,nodev,nosuid pam_mount: fs_key_cipher: aes-256-ecb pam_mount: fs_key_path: /mnt/usb/kiro.key pam_mount: use_fstab: 0 pam_mount: pam_mount: command: /usr/sbin/lsof /home/kiro pam_mount:
Bug#301994: capi4hylafax: latest version looses faxes without warning
Hello Remi, I really need some more information about this problem. The fact that you downgraded does not help me finding the bug. Can you remember some details? What do you mean with hylafax behaves like they are sent ok? Did you get a notification e-mail that the fax was successfully sent? Did the job appear in the done queue? The first thing to find out: Is the problem you reported different from #291559 Capi4hylafax segfaults during send and receive? Bodo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302074: rsplib_0.8.0-1: FTBFS: byteswap64: 'value' undeclared
Package: rsplib Severity: serious Version: 0.8.0-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of rsplib_0.8.0-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 17 Build started at 20050329-1328 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: automake1.6, libglib1.2-dev, sctplib-dev (= 1:1.0.3-1), socketapi-dev (= 1.3.2-1) [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c -o netutilities.lo `test -f 'netutilities.c' || echo './'`netutilities.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -O2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -DINCLUDE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -DUSE_LEAFLINKEDREDBLACKTREE -Wall -g -DLINUX -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -O0 -g -c netutilities.c -MT netutilities.lo -MF .deps/netutilities.TPlo -MD -MP -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/netutilities.o netutilities.c: In function `byteswap64': netutilities.c:1929: error: `value' undeclared (first use in this function) netutilities.c:1929: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once netutilities.c:1929: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [netutilities.lo] Error 1 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=rsplibver=0.8.0-1arch=hppastamp=1112099686file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294404: (no subject)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 02:58:17PM -0500, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote: On Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:57:27 -0800 Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted: mdadm-294404.diff Almost there, I think. However, it didn't fix my broken md+udev+2.6.8-2-686-smp system. After installing mdadm_1.9.0-2.1_i386.deb built using the patch, the system startup link still had S25mdadm-raid - ../init.d/mdadm-raid Doing by hand: update-rc.d -f mdadm-raid start 4 S . start 50 0 6 . System startup links for /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid already exist. So somehow the package should do a update-rc.d -f mdadm-raid remove before the update-rc.d mdadm-raid start 4 S . start 50 0 6 . on upgrade to take care of this situation. Yes, this should only be done on upgrade; something like the following in the postinst should suffice: if [ -n $2 ] dpkg --compare-versions $2 le 1.9.0-2; then update-rc.d -f mdadm remove fi Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#241764: marked as done (libepplet-dev: should depend on imlib1(1)-dev)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:32:20 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#241764: fixed in epplets 0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 20:33:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 12:33:55 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9VMR-0005YR-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 12:33:55 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 339FF3880A9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:33:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from folk.grep.be (D5E02C4B.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.44.75]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7EC38800F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 22:33:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from worldmusic.grep.be ([192.168.119.10]) by folk.grep.be with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9VMN-0001ym-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 22:33:51 +0200 Received: from wouter by worldmusic.grep.be with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B9UNQ-JZ-Fz; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:30:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libepplet-dev: should depend on imlib1(1)-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:30:52 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libepplet-dev Version: 0.6.cvs.2003091001-1 Severity: serious subject says it all. epplet.h, the only header file in libepplet-dev, contains an unconditional line #include Imlib.h but it does not list a dependency on that library. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.4 Locale: LANG=nl_BE, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE Versions of packages libepplet-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libepplet0 0.6.cvs.2003091001-1 The Epplet Shared Libraries -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 241764-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 00:44:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 16:44:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGRJS-0001kO-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:44:02 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGR88-0006EO-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:32:20 -0500 From: Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#241764: fixed in epplets 0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:32:20 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: epplets Source-Version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of epplets, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2.diff.gz to pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2.diff.gz epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2.dsc to pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2.dsc epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb libepplet-dev_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/epplets/libepplet-dev_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb libepplet0_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb to pool/main/e/epplets/libepplet0_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug,
Bug#302028: marked as done (sip-tester: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev')
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:47:19 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302028: fixed in sip-tester 1.1rc1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 19:05:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 11:05:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c129020.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGM1k-0003o8-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:05:24 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGM1h-ih-7b; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:05:21 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sip-tester: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:05:21 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: sip-tester Version: 1.1rc1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'sip-tester' in a clean chroot, I get the following error: /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' make OSNAME=`uname|sed -e s/CYGWIN.*/CYGWIN/` MODELNAME=`uname -m` sipp make[2]: Entering directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' cc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o xp_parser.o xp_parser.c gcc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o scenario.o scenario.cpp gcc -D__LINUX -pthread -D__3PCC__-I. -I/opt/openssl/include -c -o screen.o screen.cpp screen.cpp:26:20: error: curses.h: No such file or directory screen.cpp: In function 'int screen_readkey()': screen.cpp:61: error: 'getch' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp: In function 'void screen_exit(int)': screen.cpp:80: error: 'endwin' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp: In function 'void screen_init(char*, void (*)())': screen.cpp:163: error: 'initscr' was not declared in this scope screen.cpp:165: error: 'noecho' was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [screen.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sip-tester-1.1rc1' Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libncurses5-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sip-tester-1.1rc1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/sip-tester-1.1rc1/debian/control2005-03-29 21:02:48.518033146 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-29 21:02:38.989819638 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libncurses5-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: sip-tester --- Received: (at 302028-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 00:54:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 16:54:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGRTI-0002hm-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:54:12 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGRMd-0006b5-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:47:19 -0500 From: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302028: fixed in sip-tester 1.1rc1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:47:19 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: sip-tester Source-Version: 1.1rc1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sip-tester, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sip-tester_1.1rc1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sip-tester/sip-tester_1.1rc1-2.diff.gz sip-tester_1.1rc1-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sip-tester/sip-tester_1.1rc1-2.dsc sip-tester_1.1rc1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sip-tester/sip-tester_1.1rc1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one
Bug#302080: uninstallable in sid: kazehakase Conflicts: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.6)
Package: kazehakase Version: 0.2.5-2 Severity: grave The version of kazehakase in unstable is uninstallable, because it depends on a version of mozilla-browser which is no longer available. Please update kazehakase for use with mozilla 1.7.6. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302039: marked as done (unionfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2')
Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:29:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302039: unionfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 20:17:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 12:17:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c211127.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.211.127] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGN9F-9l-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:17:14 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGN9F-0002pw-Os; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:17:13 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unionfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:17:13 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: unionfs Version: 1.0.9-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'unionfs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: ./build-indep-stamp cp -a debian/compat debian/*modules.in debian/rules debian/copyright debian/changelog debian/unionfs-source/usr/src/modules/unionfs/debian cd debian/unionfs-source/usr/src tar c modules | bzip2 -9 unionfs.tar.bz2 rm -rf modules /bin/sh: bzip2: command not found make: *** [install] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/unionfs-1.0.9/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/unionfs-1.0.9/debian/control2005-03-29 22:13:11.626222049 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-29 22:13:09.199677013 +0200 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: misc Priority: optional Maintainer: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), bzip2 Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: unionfs-utils --- Received: (at 302039-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 01:29:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 17:29:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGS16-0005a5-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:29:08 -0800 Received: from debian.localnet (vpn-80-002.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.80.2]) by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2U1T5WY032408; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:29:05 +0200 Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGS14-0001N5-AW; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:29:06 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:29:06 +0200 From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#302039: unionfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mailgate1.uni-kl.de id j2U1T5WY032408 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Moin Andreas! Andreas Jochens schrieb am Dienstag, den 29. M=E4rz 2005: Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'bzip2' to debian/control. Please use reportbug or look at incoming.debian.org to see a fixed version beeing already accepted. Regards, Eduard. --=20 Everything is illusion. Constructs of language, light, metaphor; nothing is real. -- Babylon 5, Season 4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301328: php4-imagick: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Hi Bruno, I have prepared an NMU for this bug. Please find the diff attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/control php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/control --- php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/control +++ php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Bruno Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), dpatch, bison, flex, php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-3), libmagick6-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), dpatch, bison, flex, php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), libmagick6-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: php4-imagick diff -u php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/rules php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/rules --- php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/rules +++ php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/rules @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ #php4devver=$(shell dpkg -s php4-dev | grep ^Version | cut -d\ -f2 | cut -d- -f1) #php4ver=$(shell head -1 debian/changelog | cut -d\ -f 2 | sed 's/[()]//g') zendapiver=$(shell egrep '\#define ZEND_MODULE_API_NO ' /usr/include/php4/Zend/zend_modules.h|sed 's/\#define ZEND_MODULE_API_NO //') -phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //')-zts +phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //') build: build-stamp build-stamp: patch-stamp configure-stamp diff -u php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.postinst php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.postinst --- php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.postinst +++ php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.postinst @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ exit 0 fi -for SAPI in apache apache2 cgi cli caudium +for SAPI in apache apache2 cgi cli do if [ -f /etc/php4/$SAPI/php.ini ]; then db_get php4/extension_imagick_$SAPI diff -u php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/changelog php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/changelog --- php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/changelog +++ php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +php4-imagick (0.9.11-0.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * NMU + * Bump the php4-dev build-dependency again, and switch back to +non-threaded phpapi since ZTS isn't happening for sarge +(closes: #301328). + * Drop support for caudium SAPI again, now that it's also been dropped + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:07:17 -0800 + php4-imagick (0.9.11-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium * NMU diff -u php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.config php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.config --- php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.config +++ php4-imagick-0.9.11/debian/php4-imagick.config @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ db_title PHP -for SAPI in apache apache2 cgi cli caudium +for SAPI in apache apache2 cgi cli do # Skip this loop if the config file isn't there (yet). if [ -f /etc/php4/$SAPI/php.ini ]; then signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 301328
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 301328 patch Bug#301328: php4-imagick: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301325 patch Bug#301325: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of php4-imagick 0.9.11-0.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301328 + fixed Bug#301328: php4-imagick: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301325: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
tags 301325 patch thanks Hi Daniel, I have prepared an NMU for this bug. Please find the diff attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/control dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/control --- dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/control +++ dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-3), libdbi-perl, libreadline4-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), libdbi-perl, libreadline4-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 Package: dbtcp diff -u dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/rules dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/rules --- dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/rules +++ dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/rules @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ PERL=/usr/bin/perl endif -phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //')-zts +phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //') configure: configure-stamp configure-stamp: diff -u dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/changelog dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/changelog --- dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/changelog +++ dbtcp-0.1.17/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +dbtcp (0.1.17-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * NMU + * debian/rules: ++ Bump php4-dev build-dep again, and revert the references to zts, + as this change has been backed out for sarge (closes: #301325). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:57:38 -0800 + dbtcp (0.1.17-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium * NMU signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302087: epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2: FTBFS: libtoolize: command not found
Package: epplets Severity: serious Version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 on voltaire by sbuild/powerpc 17 Build started at 20050329-2026 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: freetype2-dev, libesd0-dev, libfnlib-dev, imlib11-dev, gettext, xlibs-dev, debhelper (=2.0), cdbs [...] /bin/sh: libtoolize: command not found make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools-files] Error 127 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=eppletsver=0.8.cvs.2005032801-2arch=powerpcstamp=1112146076file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of dbtcp 0.1.17-4.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301325 + fixed Bug#301325: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302088: hf: ftbfs [sparc] sys/io.h: No such file or directory
Package: hf Version: 0.7.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source hf fails to build from source on sparc and some other architectures. Problem duplicated on sparc pbuilder. if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../hfkernel -I../../hfkernel/fsk -I../../hfkernel/l1 -I../../hfkernel/mt63-O2 -g -Wall -MT rtty.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/rtty.Tpo -c -o rtty.o rtty.c; \ then mv -f .deps/rtty.Tpo .deps/rtty.Po; else rm -f .deps/rtty.Tpo; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../hfkernel -I../../hfkernel/fsk -I../../hfkernel/l1 -I../../hfkernel/mt63-O2 -g -Wall -MT standby.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/standby.Tpo -c -o standby.o standby.c; \ then mv -f .deps/standby.Tpo .deps/standby.Po; else rm -f .deps/standby.Tpo; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../hfkernel -I../../hfkernel/fsk -I../../hfkernel/l1 -I../../hfkernel/mt63-O2 -g -Wall -MT cw.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/cw.Tpo -c -o cw.o cw.c; \ then mv -f .deps/cw.Tpo .deps/cw.Po; else rm -f .deps/cw.Tpo; exit 1; fi cw.c:38:20: sys/io.h: No such file or directory cw.c: In function `cw_getcharbits': cw.c:179: warning: implicit declaration of function `inb' cw.c: In function `mode_cw_tx': cw.c:267: warning: implicit declaration of function `ioperm' make[4]: *** [cw.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hf-0.7.3/hfkernel/fsk' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302093: CAN-2005-0762: buffer overflow, code execution
Package: imagemagick Version: 6:6.0.6.2-2.2 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole See http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12873 for more information. In summary: ImageMagick is prone to a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability. This vulnerability exists in the SGI image file parser. Successful exploitation may result in execution of arbitrary code. This issue may potentially be exploited through the ImageMagick application or in other applications that import the SGI image file parser component. It is noted that the SGI codec is enabled by default in ImageMagick. Seems Sid and Sarge with their newer versions are not affected. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages imagemagick depends on: ii libmagick6 6:6.0.6.2-2.2 Image manipulation library -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 302088
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 302088 sid Bug#302088: hf: ftbfs [sparc] sys/io.h: No such file or directory Tags were: sid Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301327 patch Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 302093
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 302093 woody Bug#302093: CAN-2005-0762: buffer overflow, code execution There were no tags set. Tags added: woody End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
tags 301327 patch thanks Hi Turbo, I've prepared an NMU for this bug. Please find the patch attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -Nru /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/changelog /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/changelog --- /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/changelog 2005-02-13 20:21:17.0 -0800 +++ /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/changelog 2005-03-29 18:42:26.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +php4-idn (1.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * NMU + * Bump php4-dev build-dep to (= 4:4.3.10-10) + * Back out the dependency on the threaded phpapi, as this has been +dropped for sarge (closes: #301327). + * Also drop support for the caudium SAPI, which has been dropped. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:39:05 -0800 + php4-idn (1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * NMU diff -Nru /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/control /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/control --- /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/control 2005-02-13 20:04:19.0 -0800 +++ /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/control 2005-03-29 18:42:34.0 -0800 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Turbo Fredriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), binutils, php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-3), libidn11-dev | libidn9-dev (= 0.2.1) +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), binutils, php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), libidn11-dev | libidn9-dev (= 0.2.1) Standards-Version: 3.5.8 Package: php4-idn diff -Nru /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/postinst /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/postinst --- /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/postinst2005-02-13 20:20:54.0 -0800 +++ /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/postinst2005-03-29 18:43:06.0 -0800 @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ exit 0 fi -for pkg in apache cli cgi apache2 caudium; do +for pkg in apache cli cgi apache2; do if [ -f /etc/php4/$pkg/php.ini ]; then if ! grep -q ^[[:space:]]*extension[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*idn.so /etc/php4/$pkg/php.ini; then echo You are installing IDN support for php4, but it's not diff -Nru /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/prerm /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/prerm --- /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/prerm 2005-02-13 20:20:42.0 -0800 +++ /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/prerm 2005-03-29 18:43:15.0 -0800 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ exit 0 fi -for pkg in apache cli cgi apache2 caudium; do +for pkg in apache cli cgi apache2; do if [ -f /etc/php4/$pkg/php.ini ]; then if grep -q ^[[:space:]]*extension[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*idn.so /etc/php4/$pkg/php.ini; then echo You are removing IDN support for php4, but it is still diff -Nru /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/rules /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/rules --- /var/tmp/4T0fOTFm9r/php4-idn-1.1/debian/rules 2005-02-13 20:04:29.0 -0800 +++ /var/tmp/AXucc0hXh1/php4-idn-1.1/debian/rules 2005-03-29 18:42:42.0 -0800 @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ # Find PHP4 API version - this should probably used in php4devver=$(shell dpkg -s php4-dev | grep ^Version | cut -d\ -f2) zendapiver=$(shell egrep '\#define ZEND_MODULE_API_NO ' /usr/include/php4/Zend/zend_modules.h|sed 's/\#define ZEND_MODULE_API_NO //') -phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //')-zts +phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //') configure: configure-stamp configure-stamp: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302094: arpack++_2.2-2: FTBFS: you need blas
Package: arpack++ Severity: serious Version: 2.2-2 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of arpack++_2.2-2 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 17 Build started at 20050329-2343 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), g++(2.95), g77, libg2c0-dev [...] checking for daxpy_ in -lblas... no you need blas. make: *** [build] Error 1 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=arpack%2B%2Bver=2.2-2arch=mipselstamp=1112136299file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302087: marked as done (epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2: FTBFS: libtoolize: command not found)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:47:18 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302087: fixed in epplets 0.8.cvs.2005032801-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 02:12:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 18:12:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGSh5-00047I-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:12:32 -0800 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D87067B6CD; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:12:29 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:12:29 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2: FTBFS: libtoolize: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=/F2XdnRjS8y2HUtp Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --/F2XdnRjS8y2HUtp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: epplets Severity: serious Version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-2 on voltaire by sbuild/powerpc 17 Build started at 20050329-2026 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: freetype2-dev, libesd0-dev, libfnlib-dev, imlib11-dev, gettext, xlibs-dev, debhelper (=2.0), cdbs [...] /bin/sh: libtoolize: command not found make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools-files] Error 127 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=eppletsver=0.8.cvs.2005032801-2arch=powerpcstamp=1112146076file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --/F2XdnRjS8y2HUtp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSgsNipBneRiAKDwRArA3AKCxXY8lwNH16bTGk/YD/3iWJNBWxACdEcmJ obSmdOdkR9jQVwL4XmWZLHM= =aHNa -END PGP SIGNATURE- --/F2XdnRjS8y2HUtp-- --- Received: (at 302087-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 02:56:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 18:56:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGTNm-0007MI-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:56:38 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGTEk-0006VK-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:47:18 -0500 From: Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302087: fixed in epplets 0.8.cvs.2005032801-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:47:18 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: epplets Source-Version: 0.8.cvs.2005032801-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of epplets, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/epplets/epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-3.diff.gz epplets_0.8.cvs.2005032801-3.dsc
Processed: severity of 301430 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 301430 grave Bug#301430: Multiple exploitable race conditions in openmosixview Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopen 301428
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 301428 Bug#301428: smail: Remote and local vulnerabilities can be exploited to obtain root access Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301428: reopen 301428
reopen 301428 thanks I'm reopening this bug report because it consisted of two problems. The patch provided fixed the heap overflow, which has now been assigned CVE id CAN-2005-0892. However, that leaves smail still vulnerale to CAN-2005-0893, described as modes.c in smail 3.2.0.120 implements signal handlers with certain unsafe library calls, which may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via signal handler race conditions, possibly using xmalloc. Some details here: URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=77045217717w=2 No patch known at present. There also seems to be some confusion on bugtraq over whether we have a real security hole at all. NOTE: The (upstream) smail maintainer claims both vulnerabilities to be not NOTE: exploitable. The bugreporter has presented valid claims, though, NOTE: but the smail maintainer blocks the reporter's mail domain on NOTE: SMTP level, so there's some kind of communication problem :-) NOTE: The patch applied by the maintainer addresses the heap overflow, NOTE: but doesn't touch the sighandler issues. This deserves a second NOTE: deeper analysis. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of php4-idn 1.1-1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301327 + fixed Bug#301327: php4-idn: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301678: gnomebaker: Should depend on mpg123
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:18:53 -0800 (PST), Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: gnomebaker Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious If mpg123 is not installed, gnomebaker hangs while trying to burn an MP3 file to an audio CD. We cannot depend on mpg123, since it is non-free. I'm preparing a package using and depending on mpg321. Thank you for the bug report. -- Goedson Teixeira Paixao -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301678: marked as done (gnomebaker: Should depend on mpg123)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:32:23 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301678: fixed in gnomebaker 0.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 17:19:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 27 09:19:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DFbPc-0003gW-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:18:56 -0800 Received: by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix, from userid 20007) id 5FDB453256; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.cs.hmc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6B95A961 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:18:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:18:53 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Brubeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnomebaker: Should depend on mpg123 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnomebaker Version: 0.3-2 Severity: serious If mpg123 is not installed, gnomebaker hangs while trying to burn an MP3 file to an audio CD. I think that oggdec and sox might be also required for some file types, but I haven't tested this. --- Received: (at 301678-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 03:40:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 19:40:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGU4A-0007Ro-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:40:26 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGTwN-0001WF-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:32:23 -0500 From: Goedson Teixeira Paixao [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301678: fixed in gnomebaker 0.3-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:32:23 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gnomebaker Source-Version: 0.3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnomebaker, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnomebaker_0.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnomebaker/gnomebaker_0.3-3.diff.gz gnomebaker_0.3-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gnomebaker/gnomebaker_0.3-3.dsc gnomebaker_0.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnomebaker/gnomebaker_0.3-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Goedson Teixeira Paixao [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnomebaker package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:15:00 -0300 Source: gnomebaker Binary: gnomebaker Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Goedson Teixeira Paixao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Goedson Teixeira Paixao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gnomebaker - application for CD/DVD creation in the GNOME desktop Closes: 301620 301678 Changes: gnomebaker (0.3-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Made menu entry more HIG compliant, thanks to Jaap Haitsma for the suggestion (Closes: #301620). * Added mpg321, vorbis-tools and sox as dependencies to make sure we have all the tools needed to make audio CDs. (Closes: #301678). * Changed code to use mpg321 instead of
Processed: Re: php4-ps: PHP hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301332 patch Bug#301332: php4-ps: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301332: php4-ps: PHP hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
tags 301332 patch thanks Hi Uwe, I've prepared an NMU for this bug. Please find the diff attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/changelog php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/changelog --- php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/changelog +++ php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +php4-ps (1.3.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Build-depend on php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), as ZTS support is being +dropped again for sarge (closes: #301332). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:55:05 -0800 + php4-ps (1.3.1-5) unstable; urgency=low * made regular expression to match extension in php.ini more robust diff -u php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/control php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/control --- php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/control +++ php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Uwe Steinmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), po-debconf, libjpeg62-dev, pslib-dev (= 0.2.3), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-3) +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), po-debconf, libjpeg62-dev, pslib-dev (= 0.2.3), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10) Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: php4-ps diff -u php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/rules php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/rules --- php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/rules +++ php4-ps-1.3.1/debian/rules @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ PHPIZE=/usr/bin/phpize PHPCONFIG=/usr/bin/php-config -phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //')-zts +phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //') configure: configure-stamp configure-stamp: signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: php4-tclink: PHP hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 301338 patch Bug#301338: php4-tclink: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: sid Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302105: Superseeded by kernel-patch-vserver
Package: kernel-patch-ctx Severity: serious This package has been superseeded by kernel-patch-ctx and it has been asked for removal. So it should not be used anymore. Regards, // Ola -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301338: php4-tclink: PHP hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support
tags 301338 patch thanks Hi Dan, I have prepared an NMU for this bug. Please find the diff attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/changelog php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/changelog --- php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/changelog +++ php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +php4-tclink (3.4.0-3.3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Bump php4-dev build-dep to (= 4:4.3.10-10). + * Switch the dependency back to *non*-threaded phpapi, since ZTS has +been dropped for sarge (closes: #301338). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:57:43 -0800 + php4-tclink (3.4.0-3.2) unstable; urgency=low * NMU diff -u php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/control php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/control --- php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/control +++ php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Dan Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.9), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-3), automake, autoconf, libssl-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.9), php4-dev (= 4:4.3.10-10), automake, autoconf, libssl-dev Standards-Version: 3.5.8 Package: php4-tclink diff -u php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/rules php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/rules --- php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/rules +++ php4-tclink-3.4.0/debian/rules @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ modules=tclink php4devver=$(shell dpkg -s php4-dev | grep ^Version | cut -d\ -f2) -phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //')-zts +phpapiver=$(shell grep '\#define PHP_API_VERSION ' /usr/include/php4/main/php.h |sed 's/\#define PHP_API_VERSION //') build: build-stamp build-stamp: configure-stamp signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of php4-ps 1.3.1-5.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301332 + fixed Bug#301332: php4-ps: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301335: marked as done (php4-sqlite: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:02:27 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#301335: fixed in php4-sqlite 1.0.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 08:54:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 00:54:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DEka7-0001iX-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:54:15 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 621EC171D21; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:54:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 00:54:15 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-sqlite: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: php4-sqlite Version: 1.0.2-6 Severity: grave Tags: sid After a good deal of soul searching, discussion with upstream, and various bug reports about the subject (#299820, #297223, #297679), the PHP team has made the hard decision to revert support for the ZTS ABI in the the Debian packages. Please rebuild php4-sqlite to match with a build-dependency on php4-dev (=3D 4:4.3.10-10) and a dependency on phpapi-20020918, and please accept our apologies for the inconvenience. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCQ9G0KN6ufymYLloRAjw/AKCFu5G6Pb5qmBIZGU+PXwaSk3Ym/QCbBqV6 0vDJnYuDJAgXlePxNRGUPBo= =lr0v -END PGP SIGNATURE- --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY-- --- Received: (at 301335-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 05:21:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 21:21:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGVeF-0003ov-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:21:47 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGVLX-000671-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:02:27 -0500 From: Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#301335: fixed in php4-sqlite 1.0.2-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:02:27 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: php4-sqlite Source-Version: 1.0.2-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of php4-sqlite, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7.diff.gz to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7.diff.gz php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7.dsc to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7.dsc php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7_i386.deb to pool/main/p/php4-sqlite/php4-sqlite_1.0.2-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated php4-sqlite package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Processed: Fixed in NMU of php4-tclink 3.4.0-3.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 301338 + fixed Bug#301338: php4-tclink: PHP4 hokey pokey: please rebuild *without* ZTS support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#232810: removal suggestion for openmosix from testing
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: i am not sure if i overlooked your answer to my last mail. Is there anything we can help on #232810? As we are going to freeze realy soon now (looks like both ends of the toolchain are fixed by now), i fear that openmosix will be dropped from sarge. You could try to get OpenMosix upstream to release a patch for a 2.6 kernel... Unfortunately I don't tend to use OpenMosix any more since basically all of my systems run 2.6 now. There's a 2.6 patch that's been coming along but it's still missing some important parts (some of which are userspace) to be useable, along with proper testing and whatnot. If someone's interested in OpenMosix for 2.4 and want to see it in sarge I'd encourage them to hijack the package or contact me about getting the issues fixed and be able to provide proper testing for .debs I build. I don't like uploading .debs I havn't been able to test decently. Sorry about not addressing this sooner. Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#302114: mapserver: Depends on libgcc1 from experimental
Package: mapserver Severity: serious Hi, it seems the build system of the uploaded mapserver binary (i386) used the libgcc1 from experimental. cgi-mapserver: Depends: libgcc1 (= 1:4.0) but 1:3.4.3-12 is to be installed Regards, Wolfgang -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300460: Test case
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 12:41:49PM +, Mark Hymers wrote: Hi, Could you please attach a test case to this bug because I can't reproduce it using the testsuite (after converting the .jpg file to .png and changing the relevant reference). Hello, I've attached a testcase: (print view of a MoinMoin WikiPage) $ tar xvzf htmldoc-segfault.html.tgz $ htmldoc --webpage -f Debian.pdf Debian.html Thanks, Gerald -- --- Gerald Hochegger Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer CenterVoice :(++43 463) 2700/9613 University of Klagenfurt Fax :(++43 463) 2700/9699 Universitaetsstrasse 65-67 A-9020 Klagenfurt, Austria, Europe --- htmldoc-segfault.html.tgz Description: GNU Unix tar archive
Bug#302094: marked as done (arpack++_2.2-2: FTBFS: you need blas)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302094: fixed in arpack++ 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 02:54:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 18:54:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGTLo-0007DB-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:54:36 -0800 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B2597B6CD; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:54:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:54:34 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arpack++_2.2-2: FTBFS: you need blas Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+1aBKeCoRrxtQ74y Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --+1aBKeCoRrxtQ74y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: arpack++ Severity: serious Version: 2.2-2 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of arpack++_2.2-2 on solitude by sbuild/mipsel 17 Build started at 20050329-2343 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), g++(2.95), g77, libg2c0-dev [...] checking for daxpy_ in -lblas... no you need blas. make: *** [build] Error 1 Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=arpack%2B%2Bver=2.2-2arch=mipselstamp=1112136299file=logas=raw If this problem has been reported already, please merge it with the appropiate bug report. If you believe this bug should be reassigned to one or more packages, you must clone it and then reassign it to the other packages, like so: clone bug# -1 clone bug# -2 clone bug# -3 reassign -1 package1 reassign -2 package2 reassign -3 package3 thanks Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --+1aBKeCoRrxtQ74y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCShTpipBneRiAKDwRAo1bAJ9nnvWCWFVjBapJVD1SKz/+PR/rMACgqjPs npkLiA9HWAHRfnIgP51sDuA= =4QuM -END PGP SIGNATURE- --+1aBKeCoRrxtQ74y-- --- Received: (at 302094-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 06:56:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 22:56:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGX8B-000675-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:56:47 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGWyq-0004Cw-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 From: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302094: fixed in arpack++ 2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: arpack++ Source-Version: 2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of arpack++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: arpack++_2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.2-3.diff.gz arpack++_2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.2-3.dsc libarpack++2-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/arpack++/libarpack++2-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb libarpack++2_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main
Bug#302032: marked as done (arpack++: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev')
Your message dated Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#302032: fixed in arpack++ 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 19:25:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 11:25:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c129020.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.20] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGMKs-0004si-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:25:10 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DGMKt-0006VC-Oi; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:25:11 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arpack++: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:25:11 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: arpack++ Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'arpack++' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking for log in -lm... yes checking for s_copy in -lg2c... no you need g2c. make: *** [build] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/arpack++-2.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/arpack++-2.2/debian/control 2005-03-29 21:08:53.569587855 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-03-29 21:08:51.403993892 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: arpack++ Section: math Priority: optional -Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), g++ ( 2.95 ) +Build-Depends: debhelper ( = 4 ), libg2c0-dev, blas-dev, lapack3-dev, libarpack2-dev Maintainer: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 --- Received: (at 302032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 06:55:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 22:55:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGX6l-0005uS-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:55:19 -0800 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGWyq-0004Cu-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 From: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#302032: fixed in arpack++ 2.2-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 01:47:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: arpack++ Source-Version: 2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of arpack++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: arpack++_2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.2-3.diff.gz arpack++_2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/a/arpack++/arpack++_2.2-3.dsc libarpack++2-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/arpack++/libarpack++2-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb libarpack++2_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/arpack++/libarpack++2_2.2-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated arpack++ package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:19:00 +0200 Source: arpack++ Binary: libarpack++2-dev libarpack++2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2-3
Bug#302117: kaffe-jthreads: dependency on gjdoc is not satisfiable on mips, mipsel
Package: kaffe-jthreads Version: 2:1.1.4.PRECVS12-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Ok, so we're not out of the woods yet. The latest version of kaffe-jthreads has a dependency on gjdoc on all architectures; gjdoc is not installable on mips and mipsel, because it (indirectly) depends on libgnujaxp-jni, which build-depends on gcj which is not built for these architectures. Is it possible for kaffe-jthreads (and kaffe-pthreads) to not depend on gjdoc on these two architectures? Since the dependency is new, I'm hoping it's expendable. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging, etc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags #301823 +wontfix Bug#301823: bindgraph: PID is stored in an strange directory There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix tags #301985 +moreinfo Bug#301985: bacula: cannot open /dev/nst0 after upgrade There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo severity #301985 normal Bug#301985: bacula: cannot open /dev/nst0 after upgrade Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302080: marked as done (uninstallable in sid: kazehakase Conflicts: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.6))
Your message dated Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:11:19 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line uninstallable in sid: kazehakase Conflicts: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.6) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 01:26:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 17:26:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGRyv-0005NC-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:26:53 -0800 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 00955171E11; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:26:52 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uninstallable in sid: kazehakase Conflicts: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.6) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:26:52 -0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kazehakase Version: 0.2.5-2 Severity: grave The version of kazehakase in unstable is uninstallable, because it depends on a version of mozilla-browser which is no longer available. Please update kazehakase for use with mozilla 1.7.6. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --- Received: (at 302080-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 07:11:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 23:11:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DGXMG-0007L5-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:11:20 -0800 Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8ACF33C02; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:11:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:11:19 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: uninstallable in sid: kazehakase Conflicts: mozilla-browser (= 2:1.7.6) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh, I see the new version of kazehakase has already been uploaded... nevermind then. :) Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCSlETKN6ufymYLloRAh0PAKC5NabLYNjZUuAEZ2lgPXRaWIwYnwCeNuY1 a6qjzKmkThOlCM7zgKR18kY= =WoeR -END PGP SIGNATURE- --KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
