Bug#304124: FTBFS: missing build-depends

2005-04-11 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hello,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:38:50AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
 Package: unison
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sid
 Justification: no longer builds from source
 
 Hi,
 
 unison still build-depends on ocaml-nox-3.08, and thus is not buildable
 anymore in sid. Please update the build-depends to ocaml-nox-3.08.3.
 
 Bye,
 Aurelien
 
 

Off course, i know.

I will try to fix this, but i will also need to upgrade to the latest
version before.

Regard
Sylvain Le Gall


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 303323, closing 303323

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 303323 - sarge
Bug#303323: file conflicts in synce-dccm dcc-milter
Tags were: sarge
Tags removed: sarge

 close 303323
Bug#303323: file conflicts in synce-dccm dcc-milter
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#303896: openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

2005-04-11 Thread Loic Dachary

I've fixed the problem and the new package will be uploaded within
the next 48 hours. Thanks for your help.

Cheers,

-- 
Donate to FSF France online : http://rate.affero.net/fsffrance/
Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 1 42 45 07 97  
http://www.fsffrance.org/   http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X

2005-04-11 Thread Leszek Koltunski
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Steve Langasek wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:19:28 -0700
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#302685: After removing gdm 'startx' wont start X
Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:33:01 UTC
Resent-From: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-To: Leszek Koltunski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Leszek,
You wrote in your report that
I added gdm back in - it was complaining that /var/lib/gdm already exists,
and it gave some other warning, and voilla, once again I could log onto X
as 'leszek'.
It's not clear to me whether log onto X here means running startx, or
logging in using gdm.  Can you please clarify?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
I meant 'log in using gdm'
L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#303218: We are working on it

2005-04-11 Thread Wolfgang Baer
This is just for the record, that we are working on a new revision.
There are interferences between the configure and ant build method
available in this package - which does no harm on my i386 system
but prevents building on powerpc by Arnaud.
We have to figure some things out and are currently both a bit
in time problems - but be sure it will be worked out in the next
days.
Wolfgang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#303896: marked as done (openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:47:25 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303896: fixed in openscenegraph 0.9.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2005 14:19:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 09 07:19:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKGoV-0004mw-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 07:19:55 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1DKGoU-0003Qw-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:19:54 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DKGoP-0007OJ-FP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 07:19:53 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openscenegraph: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 07:19:45 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openscenegraph
Severity: serious
Version: 0.9.8-2

From my pbuilder build log:

...
 - Considering  libjpegg-dev
   - Trying libjpegg-dev
   - Cannot install libjpegg-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
E: Couldn't find package libjpegg-dev
W: Unable to locate package libjpegg-dev
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

It seems the libjpegg-dev provides was dropped from libjpeg62-dev
recently.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 303896-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 08:53:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 01:53:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKufI-0005H6-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:53:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKuZp-0004Gw-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:47:25 -0400
From: Loic Dachary (OuoU) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#303896: fixed in openscenegraph 0.9.8-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:47:25 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openscenegraph
Source-Version: 0.9.8-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openscenegraph, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libopenscenegraph-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libopenscenegraph-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
libopenscenegraph_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libopenscenegraph_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
libopenthreads-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libopenthreads-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
libopenthreads_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libopenthreads_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
libproducer-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libproducer-dev_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
libproducer_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/libproducer_0.9.8-3_i386.deb
openscenegraph-doc_0.9.8-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/openscenegraph-doc_0.9.8-3_all.deb
openscenegraph_0.9.8-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openscenegraph/openscenegraph_0.9.8-3.diff.gz
openscenegraph_0.9.8-3.dsc
  to 

Processed: Re: Bug#304107: /usr/bin/openoffice: Installation for user fails

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 304107 openoffice.org
Bug#304107: /usr/bin/openoffice: Installation for user fails
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-debian-files' to `openoffice.org'.

 retitle 304107 [experimental] Depends too lax
Bug#304107: /usr/bin/openoffice: Installation for user fails
Changed Bug title.

 tag 304107 + experimental
Bug#304107: [experimental] Depends too lax
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304107: /usr/bin/openoffice: Installation for user fails

2005-04-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign 304107 openoffice.org
retitle 304107 [experimental] Depends too lax
tag 304107 + experimental
thanks

Am Montag, 11. April 2005 00:54 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
 $ oowriter
 OpenOffice.org for Debian - see
 /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
 running openoffice.org setup...
 Setup complete.  Running openoffice.org...

 ERROR: - An exception occurred: 'Cannot open Configuration:
 MultiStratumBackend: Could not create Backend Strata Service:  Not a
 Valid File URL: /user/uno_packages/cache/registry'
[ snip ]
 Versions of packages openoffice.org-debian-files depends on:
 ii  debianutils   2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities
 specific t ii  openoffice.org1.1.4-1high-quality office
 productivity s ii  openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-8OpenOffice.org
 office suite binary

This looks like your problem. Looks like 1.1.4's deps are too lax. The version 
is hardcoded several places, so

I don't think this is a bug in ooo-d-f. Reassigning and tagging appropriately.

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73



Bug#293974: Claim about icewm cannot be reproduced

2005-04-11 Thread Stefan Rink
severity 293974 normal
thanks

Hi,

the claim that icewm doesn't use ~/.icewm/preferences
is not true.
icewm 1.2.20+21pre1-3 (on a 'unstable' machine here, the same version is
in testing) very well respects ~/.icewm/preferences in its default
configuration.


Please substantiate your claim, i will close the bug otherwise.
A Bug report against icewm should be the more correct way.

Even if your claim substantiates, this is no justification for 'grave'
severity. Even if icewm wouldn't respect ~/.icewm/preferences, this
doesn't render the package unusable.



n'cu
Stefan Rink


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#303897: Bug #303897: python-imaging: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends

2005-04-11 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello Matthias,

Given I feel slightly responsible of this bug, I offer to do a NMU to
fix it, if you like.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304157: ruby1.8: FTBFS: lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to load -- syck (LoadError)

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'ruby1.8' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Generating RI...
./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to load 
-- syck (LoadError)
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml/syck.rb:5
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml.rb:9:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml.rb:9
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:1:in 
`require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:1
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:1:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:1
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/generators/ri_generator.rb:46:in 
`require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/generators/ri_generator.rb:46
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:250:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:250:in `document'
from build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/bin/rdoc:63
make: *** [install-ri-stamp] Error 1

This could be fixed by adding a Build-Depends on 'libruby1.8'
to debian/control. However, this would make the 'ruby1.8' package
depend on itself, which does not seem to be a good idea. 
Please don't do that.

The previous version 1.8.2-3 did not have this problem.

The FTBFS problem can be fixed by removing the new '103_cvs_updates.patch'
from debian/patches.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: your mail

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 package icepref
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: icepref

 severity 293974 normal
Bug#293974: icewm is not using the configuration created by icepref
Severity set to `normal'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 304157

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 304157 sid
Bug#304157: ruby1.8: FTBFS: lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to 
load -- syck (LoadError)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304161: planets uninstallable in sid

2005-04-11 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Package: planets
Version: 0.1.12-3
Severity: grave

Planets is currently not installable in sid:

  # apt-get install planets
  Reading Package Lists... Done
  Building Dependency Tree... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.

  Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
  the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
  that package should be filed.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
planets: Depends: ocaml-base-3.08 but it is not installable
  E: Broken packages

Package dependencies (both Depends and Build-Depends) need to be ported
to ocaml 3.08.3.

Cheers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages planets depends on:
pn  ocaml-base-3.08  Not found.
ii  tk8.4 8.4.9-1Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: tagging 304161

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 304161 sid
Bug#304161: planets uninstallable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304107: marked as done ([experimental] Depends too lax)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:54:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line The unfortunate mix caused the bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2005 22:54:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 10 15:54:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from clever.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.4] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKlK9-0005e0-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:54:37 -0700
Received: from pd9eb0c46.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.235.12.70] 
helo=shawarma.dyndns.org)
by clever.eusc.inter.net with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #4)
id 1DKlK7-0006pM-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:54:35 +0200
Received: from pD9EB0C46.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (debian [127.0.0.1])
by shawarma.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9664270052;
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:54:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /usr/bin/openoffice: Installation for user fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:54:40 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.3-8+1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/openoffice
Justification: program doesn't work at all


When startin oowriter for the first time:

$ rm -Rf .openoffice/
$ rm -Rf .sversionrc 
$ oowriter
OpenOffice.org for Debian - see
/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
running openoffice.org setup...
Setup complete.  Running openoffice.org...

ERROR: - An exception occurred: 'Cannot open Configuration:
MultiStratumBackend: Could not create Backend Strata Service:  Not a
Valid File URL: /user/uno_packages/cache/registry'

And then I'm back to the prompt.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac6
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-debian-files depends on:
ii  debianutils   2.13.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  openoffice.org1.1.4-1high-quality office productivity s
ii  openoffice.org-bin1.1.3-8OpenOffice.org office suite binary

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 304107-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 10:54:35 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 03:54:35 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.charite.de [160.45.207.131] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKwYt-0006sm-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 03:54:35 -0700
Received: from postamt.charite.de (postamt.charite.de [160.45.207.132])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mail.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BA42206E2
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by postamt.charite.de (Postfix, from userid 7945)
id 12ADD22073C; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:54:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:54:32 +0200
From: Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The unfortunate mix caused the bug
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at charite.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

The unfortunate mix of unstable and experimental caused the bug.
I installed all from experimental and the bug disappeared.

Sorry for the turmoil.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304164: Loose CD to install the basesystem

2005-04-11 Thread Ralf Springwald
Package: debian-installer
severity: grave

Debian-installer-version: rc3, 24.03.2005 
uname -a: Linux huba 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 11.04.2005
Method: sarge-i386-netinst.iso

  Machine: noname workstation
  Processor: P4 2.8 GHz
  Memory: 512 MByte
  Root Device: /dev/hda1
  Root Size/partition table: 
  /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
  proc on /proc type proc (rw)
  devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
  tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
  /dev/hda3 on /home type ext3 (rw)
  /dev/hda4 on /usr/local type ext3 (rw)
  usbfs on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
  
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
lspci
:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub 
Interface (rev 02)
:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82865G Integrated 
Graphics Device (rev 02)
:00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82865G/PE/P PCI to CSA Bridge (rev 02)
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI 
#1 (rev 02)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI 
#2 (rev 02)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI 
#3 (rev 02)
:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI 
#4 (rev 02)
:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI 
Controller (rev 02)
:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev  c2)
:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Bridge 
(rev 02)
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) Ultra ATA 
100 Storage Controller (rev 02)
:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R)  SMBus Controller 
(rev 02)
:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801EB/ER 
(ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02)
:01:01.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82547EI Gigabit Ethernet 
Controller (LOM)
lspci -n
:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2570 (rev 02)
:00:02.0 0300: 8086:2572 (rev 02)
:00:03.0 0604: 8086:2573 (rev 02)
:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:24d2 (rev 02)
:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:24d4 (rev 02)
:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:24d7 (rev 02)
:00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:24de (rev 02)
:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:24dd (rev 02)
:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev c2)
:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:24d0 (rev 02)
:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:24db (rev 02)
:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:24d3 (rev 02)
:00:1f.5 0401: 8086:24d5 (rev 02)
:01:01.0 0200: 8086:1019


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't
try it

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]

Comments/Problems:
All seems to go well, until the system can't install the Basesystem
from the CD. I check the mountpoint, and see that the CD was well
mounted on /cdrom. 
I install with a net-iso from last september and all looks good.
The hardware I use is normal, no raid, sata or anything else.
Wy the Installer loose the CD? 

-- 
Regards
Ralf Springwald
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304147: kiconedit: crashes with SIGSEGV on start-up

2005-04-11 Thread Riku Voipio
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
 Loading kiconedit from the menu causes a SIGSEGV as soon
 as the window tries to display. The window then closes
 and the KDE crash handler appears.

unreproducible on sarge. same version of package in sid too. 
Try moving ./.kde/share/config/kiconeditrc somewhere else, or
try using kiconedit with a fresh new user account.

 Versions of packages kiconedit depends on:
 ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-4.0.2   KDE core libraries

Where is that version from? debian does not have such version of kdelibs

 ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
 ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session 
 Management
 ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client 
 li
 ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous 
 exte
 ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) 
 configu

Ditto for your X version.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#304107: marked as done ([experimental] Depends too lax)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 304107
Bug#304107: [experimental] Depends too lax
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304166: ocamlsdl: Need a rebuild with ocaml 3.08.3, is blocking the ocaml 3.08.3 transition.

2005-04-11 Thread Sven Luther
Package: ocamlsdl
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable


Please rebuild ocamlsdl with ocaml 3.08.3, since the package is uninstalable
in sid, and is thus blocking the ocaml 3.08.3 transition to enter sarge. We
discussed this already, but i now fill this bug on the recomendation of Steve
Langasek acting as Release Manager.

If there is problems with the package, i am sure we can find someone from the
ocaml team to do the adaptation and upload if needed.

Friendy,

Sven Luther

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: package javax.mail does not exist

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: xml-soap
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious

I tried to build 'xml-soap' in a clean chroot on i386/unstable 
with sun-j2sdk1.4, but the compilation fails with the following error:

compile:
[mkdir] Created dir: /sdb1/x/xml-soap-2.3.1/build/classes
[javac] Compiling 108 source files to /sdb1/x/xml-soap-2.3.1/build/classes
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/xml-soap-2.3.1/src/org/apache/soap/rpc/SOAPContext.java:67:package 
javax.mail does not exist
[javac] import javax.mail.*;
[javac] ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/xml-soap-2.3.1/src/org/apache/soap/rpc/SOAPContext.java:68:package 
javax.mail.internet does not exist
[javac] import javax.mail.internet.*;
[javac] ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/xml-soap-2.3.1/src/org/apache/soap/rpc/SOAPContext.java:69:package 
javax.activation does not exist
[javac] import javax.activation.*;
[javac] ^

I tried to change several settings in debian/rules and also several 
other j2sdk versions from sun/blackdown/ibm, but I was not able to 
build the package.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304147: kiconedit: crashes with SIGSEGV on start-up

2005-04-11 Thread Josh Metzler
On Monday 11 April 2005 07:08 am, Riku Voipio wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
  Loading kiconedit from the menu causes a SIGSEGV as soon
  as the window tries to display. The window then closes
  and the KDE crash handler appears.

 unreproducible on sarge. same version of package in sid too.
 Try moving ./.kde/share/config/kiconeditrc somewhere else, or
 try using kiconedit with a fresh new user account.

Unreproducible on sid, with the same versions (including of kdelibs4 and 
various xlibs packages).

  Versions of packages kiconedit depends on:
  ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-4.0.2   KDE core libraries

 Where is that version from? debian does not have such version of kdelibs

Sid does, as the result of two binary NMU's on i386.


  ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange
  library ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System
  Session Management ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window
  System protocol client li ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X
  Window System miscellaneous exte ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

 Ditto for your X version.

Again, sid does, as the result of a binray NMU.

Josh


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304164: Loose CD to install the basesystem

2005-04-11 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Ralf Springwald said:
 Initial boot worked:[O]
 Configure network HW:   [O]
 Config network: [O]
 Detect CD:  [O]
 Load installer modules: [O]
 Detect hard drives: [O]
 Partition hard drives:  [O]
 Create file systems:[O]
 Mount partitions:   [O]
 Install base system:[E]
 Install boot loader:[ ]
 Reboot: [ ]
 
 Comments/Problems:
 All seems to go well, until the system can't install the Basesystem
 from the CD. I check the mountpoint, and see that the CD was well
 mounted on /cdrom. 
 I install with a net-iso from last september and all looks good.
 The hardware I use is normal, no raid, sata or anything else.
 Wy the Installer loose the CD? 

Just as an extra factoid, the same happened to me recently, althugh
in a slightly different way.  The installer hung trying to mount the
cdrom (state D according to ps).  At the time, there were 2 cdroms in
the machine.  Removing one resolved the issue, so I never bothered to
report it.  I have no idea if this is somehow related, but it struck me
since we got stuck at the same point.
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpOin2sdnJOw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#301671: apt-listbugs: cron.daily destroys the contents of symlinked /etc/apt/preferences

2005-04-11 Thread paddy
Thanks for the quick reply, Steve.
I didn't mean to imply that it wasn't a good reason.
I take it that all such removals are documented by the RC bugs.

The contents of the preferences file seem to get destroyed by the
line:

  /usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup  /etc/apt/preferences.apt-listbugs.$$

when it is writing to the same file it is reading from.

Perhaps something more like:
(stealing shamelessly from /etc/cron.monthly/acct)

  #!/bin/sh -e
  
  prefclean() {
  
test -x /usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup || return 0
test -x /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs || return 0
test -f /etc/apt/preferences || return 0
  
PTMP=$(tempfile)
/usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup  $PTMP
if ! diff $PTMP /etc/apt/preferences  /dev/null; then
  savelog /etc/apt/preferences
  mv $PTMP /etc/apt/preferences
fi
/bin/rm -f $PTMP
  
  }
  
  prefclean
  
savelog doesn't seem to handle the symlink either.

better options might be something along the lines of

  cp -aH /etc/apt/preferences /etc/apt/preferences.0

or resolving the symlink and rotating in the parent directory of the file.

(the difference between making the backup at the client or the server
in Zed's configuration where preferences is mounted shared from a server)

or perhaps savelog should.

Regards,
Paddy
-- 
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#301671: apt-listbugs: cron.daily destroys the contents of symlinked /etc/apt/preferences

2005-04-11 Thread paddy
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:33:16PM +0100, paddy wrote:
 PTMP=$(tempfile)
 /usr/share/apt-listbugs/aptcleanup  $PTMP
 if ! diff $PTMP /etc/apt/preferences  /dev/null; then
   savelog /etc/apt/preferences
   mv $PTMP /etc/apt/preferences
 fi

D'oh!

s/mv/cp/

Regards,
Paddy
-- 
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#302378: logrotate killall -q -HUP smbd crashes samba servers

2005-04-11 Thread Olivier Sessink
Hi all,
same problem here, last morning all our servers did a logrotate, and 
they all went down... This is quite a severe problem, how severe was the 
security issue this fix was supposed to fix? worse or less? (should I 
downgrade?)

regards,
Olivier Sessink


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Processed: xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 304167 +patch
Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: package javax.mail does not exist
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 retitle 304167 xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing
Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: package javax.mail does not exist
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304174: exim4: Patch for 296492 introduced remotely exploitable infinite loop (DOS)

2005-04-11 Thread Marc Sherman
Package: exim4
Version: 4.50-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security sid patch
Justification: remote exploitable DOS

The patch for 296492, which is currently in sid's 4.50-5, introduced an
infinite loop which could be triggered by a remote site with
(intentionally?) misconfigured DNS.

It is discussed in:
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20050404/msg00062.html

The patch to fix this is in:
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20050404/msg00152.html

I'm not certain, but I think that this patch _replaces_ the patch
applied to fix 296492, rather than patching it.

I hope I've set the tags and severity for this bug correctly to indicate
that it's an RC bug that should keep 4.50-5 out of sarge, but does not
apply to 4.50-4 which is currently in sarge.

- Marc


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304167: xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
tags 304167 +patch
retitle 304167 xml-soap: FTBFS: 'activation.jar' missing
thanks

I finally found a patch which allows to build the package with
dpkg-buildpackage.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/README.Debian ./debian/README.Debian
--- ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/README.Debian 2005-04-11 
15:11:20.833537531 +0200
+++ ./debian/README.Debian  2005-04-11 15:11:18.964887885 +0200
@@ -4,8 +4,13 @@
 - Currently, SOAP is compiled with BSF and EJB, POP3, SMTP, SSL.
   XMI are disabled. 
 
-- You must set CLASSPATH to mailapi.jar which is gotten from 
-  http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/.
+- To build the package you must obtain the files
+
+   mailapi.jar(http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/) and
+   activation.jar (http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/jaf/)
+
+   and install those files in /usr/local/share/java.
+
 
-- soap.war is placesed at /usr/share/java/webapps/soap.war
+- soap.war is placed at /usr/share/java/webapps/soap.war
 
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/control   2005-04-11 15:11:20.831537905 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-04-11 15:08:29.106815731 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: contrib/libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Takashi Okamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: 
debhelper(3.0.0),ant,junit,libxerces-java,libbsf-java,libservlet2.2-java,j2sdk1.3
 | j2sdk1.2
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, j2sdk1.4, ant, junit, libxerces-java, 
libbsf-java, libservlet2.2-java
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
 
 Package: libsoap-java
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/xml-soap-2.3.1/debian/rules 2005-04-11 15:11:20.832537718 
+0200
+++ ./debian/rules  2005-04-11 15:08:29.107815542 +0200
@@ -11,22 +11,17 @@
 
 version=2.2
 
-# Uncomment the next line to build a Java 2 version
-export JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0_01
-export JAVA=${JAVA_HOME}/bin/java
-export JAR=${JAVA_HOME}/bin/jar
-# write about optional jar here.
+JAVA_HOME_DIRS=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm 
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown
+export JAVA_HOME ?= $(shell for j in $(JAVA_HOME_DIRS); do if [ -d $$j ]; 
then echo $$j; exit 0; fi; done)
 export 
CLASSPATH=${JAVA_HOME}/jre/lib/rt.jar:/usr/share/java/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar:/usr/share/java/servlet-2.2.jar:/usr/share/java/bsf.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/local/share/java/activation.jar:/usr/local/share/java/mail.jar:/usr/local/share/java/mailapi.jar:/usr/local/share/java/pop3.jar:/usr/local/share/java/smtp.jar:/usr/local/share/java/ejb.jar:/usr/local/share/java/jsse.jar:/usr/local/share/java/jnet.jar:/usr/local/share/java/jsse.jar:${JAVA_HOME}/lib/tools.jar:.
 
 
-
-
 build: build-stamp
 build-stamp:
dh_testdir
 
# Add here commands to compile the package.
-   ${JAVA} org.apache.tools.ant.Main compile buildwar javadocs
+   ant compile buildwar javadocs
 
touch build-stamp
 
@@ -36,8 +31,7 @@
rm -f build-stamp
rm -f TEST-test.encoding.soapenc.PackageTests.txt 
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
-   ${JAVA} org.apache.tools.ant.Main clean
-#  ant clean
+   ant clean
 
dh_clean
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304182: apt-proxy-v1tov2 generates empty timeout value

2005-04-11 Thread Christophe Boyanique
Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.28
Severity: serious

The apt-proxy-v1tov2 script seems broken as it creates in the
v2 configuration file something like:

;; Network timeout when retrieving from backend servers
timeout =

which prevent apt-proxy to start:

~# /etc/init.d/apt-proxy start
Starting apt-proxy
Failed to load application: string index out of range
.

apt-proxy-v1tov2 seems to use the RSYNC_TIMEOUT value from
apt-proxy.conf which is set in the old format preference file:

#   Number of seconds for rsync to wait before timing out.
RSYNC_TIMEOUT=30

By changing the timeout value in the v2 configuration file, apt-proxy
starts and works correctly.

I don't think that stopping because a value is defined to empty in a
configuration file is normal. This should be catched by the program,
shourdn't it ?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-plusat.4
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

# dpkg -l debconf python python2.3 python-twisted python-apt
# python-bsddb3 bzip2 logrotate rsync 
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  debconf1.4.30.11  Debian configuration management system
ii  python 2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-oriented la
ii  python2.3  2.3.5-1An interactive high-level object-oriented la
ii  python-twisted 1.3.0-8Event-based framework for internet applicati
ii  python-apt 0.5.10 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  python-bsddb3  3.3.0-6Python interface to libdb3
ii  bzip2  1.0.2-5high-quality block-sorting file compressor -
ii  logrotate  3.7-2  Log rotation utility
un  rsync  none (no description available)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#302269: fontconfig: Segmentation fault with certain bdf fonts

2005-04-11 Thread Lars Wirzenius
The attached patch to libfreetype6 seems to fix the fontconfig segfault
for me. I don't understand fonts, of fontconfig, however, so I might be
completely wrong. I just traced the problem in gdb and read the code
until I found something that seemed like the likely culprit.

Jason, this is just for your information, if you don't want to (or don't
know how to) apply the patch to the libfreetype6 sources.

Anthony, this seems to be a bug in your package? I understand you've
been busy with other things (which is fine, I'm not complaining); do you
have time to check this out?

Keith, according to my analysis, the problem is in libfreetype6, but
Anthony Fok, who maintains it, seems to not have been active for a
while. Assuming you understand font stuff better than I do, could you
have a quick look and check that my fix is correct?

If I can be convinced that this patch is right, and Anthony does not
have the time to do an upload of libfreetype6, I can do a non-maintainer
upload.

Hopefully this has been useful. Happy hacking.

diff -ruN freetype-2.1.7/debian/changelog fixed/debian/changelog
--- freetype-2.1.7/debian/changelog	2005-04-11 17:38:28.480523264 +0300
+++ fixed/debian/changelog	2005-04-11 17:40:41.852247680 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+freetype (2.1.7-2.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/patches/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff: Patch to make BDF
+files with zero width or height glyphs work.
+  
+ -- Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:40:00 +0300
+
 freetype (2.1.7-2.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * NMU
diff -ruN freetype-2.1.7/debian/patches/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff fixed/debian/patches/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff
--- freetype-2.1.7/debian/patches/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff	1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ fixed/debian/patches/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff	2005-04-11 17:11:46.862006000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- freetype-2.1.7/src/bdf/bdflib.c.borken	2005-04-11 17:10:17.114649960 +0300
 freetype-2.1.7/src/bdf/bdflib.c	2005-04-11 17:10:53.098179632 +0300
+@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@
+   glyph-bpr   = ( glyph-bbx.width * p-font-bpp + 7 )  3;
+   glyph-bytes = (unsigned short)( glyph-bpr * glyph-bbx.height );
+ 
+-  if ( FT_NEW_ARRAY( glyph-bitmap, glyph-bytes ) )
++  if ( FT_NEW_ARRAY( glyph-bitmap, glyph-bytes + 1) )
+ goto Exit;
+ 
+   p-row= 0;
diff -ruN freetype-2.1.7/debian/rules fixed/debian/rules
--- freetype-2.1.7/debian/rules	2005-04-11 17:38:28.478523568 +0300
+++ fixed/debian/rules	2005-04-11 17:17:31.137668000 +0300
@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@
 	# backport of normalization fix (#259875)
 	patch -p0 -i $(patchdir)/090-freetype-2.1.7-normalize-fix.diff
 
+	# Fix for bdf fonts with zero sized glyphs
+	patch -p0 -i $(patchdir)/300-bdf-zero-width-glyph-fix.diff
+
 	cd $(freetype_u)  ./configure --prefix=/usr CFLAGS=\$(CFLAGS)\
 #	cd $(freetype_u)  ./configure --prefix=/usr
 	$(MAKE) -C $(freetype_u)


Bug#304187: avalon-excalibur: FTBFS: package org.apache.log does not exist

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: avalon-excalibur
Version: 4.1-1
Severity: serious

When trying to build 'avalon-excalibur' on i386/unstable with sun-j2sdk1.4,
I get the following error:

[javac] Compiling 153 source files to 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/build/classes
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:23:
 package org.apache.log does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.Logger;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:29:
 package org.apache.log does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.Hierarchy;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:30:
 package org.apache.log does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.LogTarget;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:31:
 package org.apache.log does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.Priority;
[javac]   ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:32:
 package org.apache.log.format does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.format.PatternFormatter;
[javac]  ^
[javac] 
/sdb1/x/avalon-excalibur-4.1/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/testcase/ExcaliburTestCase.java:33:
 package org.apache.log.output.io does not exist
[javac] import org.apache.log.output.io.StreamTarget;
[javac] ^

I used the attached patch to debian/control and debian/rules to make
the package use sun-j2sdk1.4 - which is available through 'java-package' -
instead of j2sdk1.3.

I do not know how to fix the compilation error.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/avalon-excalibur-4.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/avalon-excalibur-4.1/debian/control 2005-03-24 
13:41:03.626124366 +0100
+++ ./debian/control2005-03-24 12:29:31.0 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: contrib/libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Takashi Okamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 3.0.0), ant (1.3), j2sdk1.3, 
libavalon-framework-java, libjunitperf-java, libservlet2.3-java, liblog4j
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, ant, j2sdk1.4, libavalon-framework-java, 
libjunitperf-java, libservlet2.3-java, liblog4j
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
 
 Package: libavalon-excalibur-java
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/avalon-excalibur-4.1/debian/rules ./debian/rules
--- ../tmp-orig/avalon-excalibur-4.1/debian/rules   2005-03-24 
13:41:03.627124190 +0100
+++ ./debian/rules  2005-03-24 13:40:13.714981872 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 # This is the debhelper compatability version to use.
 export DH_COMPAT=3
 
-jdk_dirs:=/usr/lib/j2se/1.3 /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3
+jdk_dirs:=/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-blackdown 
/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm
 export JAVA_HOME=$(shell for jdir in $(jdk_dirs); do if [ -d $$jdir ]; then 
echo $$jdir; exit 0; fi; done)
 
 export 
CLASSPATH=/usr/share/java/avalon-framework.jar:/usr/share/java/logkit.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/share/java/junitperf.jar:/usr/share/java/xerces.jar:/usr/share/java/log4j.jar:/usr/share/servlet-2.3.jar:.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304188: /etc/init.d/ifupdown startup script fails when /usr is NFS mounted

2005-04-11 Thread Benoit Dubertret
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.6.6
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

The /etc/init.d/ifupdown script relies on basename and dirname being available 
on bootup.
This is however not the case if /usr is NFS mounted, as basename and dirname 
both are in
/usr/bin. As NFS mounts obviously require network interfaces to be up, 

/etc/init.d/ifupdown start

loops because neither basename nor dirname can be found. Thus the whole system 
is unusable.

A (temporary ?) fix for this situation is to copy /usr/bin/basename and 
/usr/bin/dirname to
/bin.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ifupdown depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.47   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  net-tools   1.60-10  The NET-3 networking toolkit

-- debconf information:
  ifupdown/convert-interfaces: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#296935: marked as done (Setting up of webcalendar fails)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:07:59 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#296935: fixed in webcalendar 0.9.45-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 20:43:14 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 12:43:14 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4mIr-0005Fg-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:43:13 -0800
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0708.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 66DA81C00094
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:42:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from biophypfr (AMontsouris-151-1-51-120.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[82.123.0.120])
by mwinf0708.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 23F7F1C00092
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:42:42 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by biophypfr (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 388723A9A3; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:42:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Filippo Rusconi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setting up of webcalendar fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:42:43 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: webcalendar
Version: 0.9.45-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The Setting up of webcalendar fails with following output:

Setting up webcalendar (0.9.45-3) ...
Search pattern not terminated at -e line 1.
dpkg: error processing webcalendar (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 255
Errors were encountered while processing:
 webcalendar
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Note that when I did apt-get install webcalendar, the following
dependencies were successfully resolved :

The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apache apache-common apache-utils libapache-mod-php4 libedit2 php4
php4-cli php4-common php4-mysql webcalendar

And then the packages were configured:

Setting up apache-utils (1.3.33-3) ...
Setting up apache-common (1.3.33-3) ...

Setting up apache (1.3.33-3) ...

Creating config file /etc/apache/httpd.conf with new version

Creating config file /etc/apache/srm.conf with new version

Creating config file /etc/apache/access.conf with new version

Creating config file /etc/apache/modules.conf with new version
Starting web server: apache.

Setting up php4-common (4.3.10-2) ...
Setting up libapache-mod-php4 (4.3.10-2) ...
Replacing config file /etc/apache/modules.conf with new version

Setting up libedit2 (2.9.cvs.20040827-1) ...

Setting up php4 (4.3.10-2) ...

Setting up php4-cli (4.3.10-2) ...

Setting up php4-mysql (4.3.10-2) ...

It is after this setting up that webcalendar failed to be setup (see above)

Cheers,

Filippo Rusconi


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-fr8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages webcalendar depends on:
ii  apache [httpd]1.3.33-3   versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.40 Debian configuration management sy
ii  php4  4:4.3.10-2 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli  4:4.3.10-2 command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql4:4.3.10-2 MySQL module for php4

-- debconf information:
* webcalendar/conf/db_host: localhost
* webcalendar/note/sql_install:
  webcalendar/status/db_installed: false
* webcalendar/note/admin_user:
  webcalendar/conf/db_persistent: true
  webcalendar/conf/single_user_login:
* webcalendar/conf/single_user_mode: false
* webcalendar/conf/db_database: webcalname
* webcalendar/conf/db_type: mysql
* webcalendar/conf/db_login: webcalsqlusername
* webcalendar/conf/db_password: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  webcalendar/conf/use_http_auth: false
* webcalendar/status/debconf_managed: true


---

Bug#303687: marked as done (gnucash must depend on libgconf11 (= 1.0.9-7))

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:17:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line correct number
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 05:24:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 07 22:24:48 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJlz5-0001Ub-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:24:48 -0700
Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com 
([2001:470:1f00:907:20d:87ff:fe3c:98c8])
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DJlz4-0007TJ-9b; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:24:46 -0500
Received: from adamm by mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DJlz4-0003iD-Ut; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:24:46 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam M. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dumps core on start
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:24:46 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.10-11
Severity: grave

gnucash dumps core on startup after the latest update.


open(/home/adamm/.gconfd/lock/ior, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en_CA.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en_CA.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en.UTF-8/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en.utf8/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/gconf1.mo, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT
(No such file or directory)
close(10)   = 0
close(11)   = 0
write(2, \n, 1
)   = 1
write(2, gtkhtml, 7gtkhtml)  = 7
write(2, -, 1-)= 1
write(2, ERROR **: , 10ERROR **: )  = 10
write(2, gconf error: Failed to contact c..., 276gconf error: Failed
to contact configuration server (a likely cause of this is that you have
an existing configuration server (gconfd) running, but it isn't
reachable from here - if you're logged in from two machines at once, you
may need to enable TCP networking for ORBit)

) = 276
write(2, \naborting...\n, 13
aborting...
) = 13
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [ABRT], NULL, 8) = 0
tgkill(14241, 14241, SIGABRT)   = 0
--- SIGABRT (Aborted) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGABRT (core dumped) +++



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages gnucash depends on:
ii  bonobo   1.0.22-2.2  The GNOME Bonobo System.
ii  gdk-imlib1   1.9.14-16.2 imaging library for use with gtk (
ii  gnucash-common   1.8.10-11   A personal finance tracking progra
ii  guile-1.6-libs   1.6.7-1 Main Guile libraries
ii  guile-1.6-slib   1.6.7-1 Guile SLIB support
ii  libart2  1.4.2-19The GNOME canvas widget - runtime 
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2   1.0.22-2.2  The GNOME Bonobo library.
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdate-manip-perl   5.42a-3 a perl library for manipulating da
ii  libdb3   3.2.9-22Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfinance-quote-per 1.08-1  Perl module for retrieving stock q
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgal23 0.24-1.4G App Libs (run time 

Bug#297769: patch

2005-04-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:13:49 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
  At Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:56 +0200,
  Bastian Blank wrote:
   Also GLIBC_PRIVATE is only used by glibc itself, so the only source of
   problems may the different glibc packages. But I currently see nothing
   which may really cause problems here as ld.so is not effected. (See this
   as a small part of the upgrade to 2.3.4, with the exception that you
   don't break the compatiblity between ld.so and libc.so.6.)
  
  Yes, exactly, thinking about upgrade to 2.3.4, it should not make a
  problem.
  
  I'm rathar a bit nervous of supporting this special situation (ex:
  distro compatibility and so on) because -21 should be the last call
  for sarge stuff...
 
 Could you explain what it is you're worried about?  We absolutely
 ought to have this patch...

OK, I put the patch.  Currently I found the problem about schedutils.

Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
sched_setaffinity interface (which has GLIBC_2.3.4), schedutils has to
depend on glibc = 2.3.2.ds1-21.
I'm currently searching how to set Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) or
libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [ia64, alpha] for schedutils.

BTW, if we change the library exported symbol version, GLIBC_2.3.4, we
should always bump up our shlibs from 2.3.2.ds1-4 to 2.3.2.ds1-21.
However, such change affects almost all binaries.  Is this acceptable?
IMHO, changing shlibs affects a lot of packages, so I would like to
take the workaround fix - schedutils and fakeroot just have special
Depends: = 2.3.2.ds1-21, because I guess sched_{get,set}affinity is
not used widely.

Regards,
-- gotom



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#289856: howl (old bugs and non-free bug #289856)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 302462 moreinfo
Bug#302462: RM: howl/main -- license issues (APSL 2.0)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297769: patch

2005-04-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
I forgot to say that if we use schedutils compiled with glibc
2.3.2.ds1-21 (using new sched_{get,set}affinity) + glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21
runtime libraries:

bash-2.05b# ./taskset
taskset version 1.3.4
...

But if we use schedutils compiled with glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 + glibc
2.3.2.ds1-20 runtime libraries:

./taskset: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not 
found (required by ./taskset)

Because 2.3.2.ds1-20 does not have symbol version GLIBC_2.3.4.

Regards,
-- gotom



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#297769: patch

2005-04-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:30:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
 OK, I put the patch.  Currently I found the problem about schedutils.
 
 Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
 sched_setaffinity interface (which has GLIBC_2.3.4), schedutils has to
 depend on glibc = 2.3.2.ds1-21.
 I'm currently searching how to set Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) or
 libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [ia64, alpha] for schedutils.
 
 BTW, if we change the library exported symbol version, GLIBC_2.3.4, we
 should always bump up our shlibs from 2.3.2.ds1-4 to 2.3.2.ds1-21.
 However, such change affects almost all binaries.  Is this acceptable?
 IMHO, changing shlibs affects a lot of packages, so I would like to
 take the workaround fix - schedutils and fakeroot just have special
 Depends: = 2.3.2.ds1-21, because I guess sched_{get,set}affinity is
 not used widely.

I think that we should just be bumping the shlibdeps; the release team
has already agreed that we need a glibc update for sarge.

In any case, the best way to do what you want in schedutils mightb be:
Depends: ${shlib:Depends}
Conflicts: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21)

I think that'll work... but make sure apt can cope.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#302462: Bug#289856: howl (old bugs and non-free bug #289856)

2005-04-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
tags 302462 moreinfo
thanks

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:22:09PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
 clone 289856 -1
 reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
 retitle -1 please remove howl as it is non-free (APSL 2.0)
 thanks

 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Jeff Waugh wrote:
  quote who=Don Armstrong
   2) When do you expect to clone this bug and reassign to ftp-master
   to request removal?
  
  That has been done AFAIK.
 
 Hrm... I can't find the bug. Going ahead and cloning and reassigning a
 clone now. If I've missed something, go ahead and merge them. If you
 concur, feel free to retitle the bug RoM yada yada yada (for request
 of maintainer).

First, removal requests should be filed by the maintainer. But, anyway,
afaics this is about moving from main to non-free, not about removing
the package altogether.

Please instead just proceed and upload a new howl package with corrected
component (non-free instead of main), by changing the section from net
to non-free/net.

If the maintainer really wants to remove howl instead, please supply a
reason and confirmation to this bug.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Note: Some standard packages are _large_ applications

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 301138 normal
Bug#301138: Development packages should be priority 'optional' (not 'standard')
Severity set to `normal'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#291757: evolution: Upgrade from 1.4.6 to 2.0.3 fails and Evolution is *UNUSABLE*

2005-04-11 Thread Tore Anderson
* Onno Benschop

 The bug basically states that during migration from 1.4.x to 2.x, the
 conversion of the mailbox data fails.

  Does this affect upgrades from Evolution 1.0.5 as well?  If not, it
 simply /cannot/ be considered release critical, as 1.0.5 is the version
 currently found in Woody.

-- 
Tore Anderson



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#301138: Note: Some standard packages are _large_ applications

2005-04-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
severity 301138 normal
thanks

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:45:57AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
 severity 301138 serious
 thanks
 
 Actually, reviewing this bug severity and policy I believe the current 
 priority for the packages stated in the bug report is plain wrong as 
 current policy says:

Right, but this is not a release critical issue, and now isn't the best
time to look at this. I'll bring this up on some appropriate mailinglist
after Sarge is released.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#304174: exim4: Patch for 296492 introduced remotely exploitable infinite loop (DOS)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 304174 pending
Bug#304174: exim4: Patch for 296492 introduced remotely exploitable infinite 
loop (DOS)
Tags were: patch security sid
Tags added: pending

 # fixed in SVN
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304174: exim4: Patch for 296492 introduced remotely exploitable infinite loop (DOS)

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
tags 304174 pending
# fixed in SVN
thanks
On 2005-04-11 Marc Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Package: exim4
 Version: 4.50-5
[...]
 The patch for 296492, which is currently in sid's 4.50-5, introduced an
 infinite loop which could be triggered by a remote site with
 (intentionally?) misconfigured DNS.

 It is discussed in:
 http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20050404/msg00062.html
[...]

This is already applied in SVN and there'll probably be an upload on
wednesday, latest.

 I hope I've set the tags and severity for this bug correctly to indicate
 that it's an RC bug that should keep 4.50-5 out of sarge, but does not
 apply to 4.50-4 which is currently in sarge.

I think so.

FWIW there is actually no danger of 4.50-4 propagating to sarge
_automatically_, exim4 is frozen and can only go in if one of the
release managers kicks it. ;-)
 cu andreas
-- 
See, I told you they'd listen to Reason, [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in Snow Crash
   http://downhill.aus.cc/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304208: usermin-contrib: FTBFS: FileManager.java:6: package netscape.javascript does not exist

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: usermin-contrib
Version: 1.110-1
Severity: serious

When building 'usermin-contrib' on i386/unstable with sun-j2sdk1.4,
I get the following error:

# Add here commands to compile the package.
cd filemanager  \
javac -classpath /usr/lib/j2se/1.4/jre/lib/plugin.jar @sources
FileManager.java:6: package netscape.javascript does not exist
import netscape.javascript.JSObject;
   ^
FileManager.java:598: cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : class JSObject 
location: class FileManager
JSObject win = JSObject.getWindow(this);
^
FileManager.java:598: cannot resolve symbol
symbol  : variable JSObject 
location: class FileManager
JSObject win = JSObject.getWindow(this);
   

Something seems to be missing here.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304213: argouml: FTBFS: taskdef class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask cannot be found

2005-04-11 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: argouml
Version: 0.14-7
Severity: serious

When trying to build 'argouml' on i386/unstable with sun-j2sdk1.4,
I get the following error:

cd .  /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun/bin/java -classpath 
/usr/share/ant1.5/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/java/log4j-1.2.jar:/usr/share/java/xercesImpl.jar:/usr/share/java/antlrall.jar:/usr/share/java/gef.jar:/usr/share/java/nsuml.jar:/usr/share/java/ocl-argo.jar:/usr/share/java/jdepend.jar:/usr/share/java/junit.jar:/usr/share/java/i18n.jar:/usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-sun/lib/tools.jar
  -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant1.5 org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true 
-Dcompile.optimize=true  -Dbuild.compiler=jikes  -propertyfile 
/sdb1/x/argouml-0.14/debian/ant.properties jar prepare-docs
Buildfile: build.xml

init:

BUILD FAILED
file:/sdb1/x/argouml-0.14/build.xml:277: taskdef class 
org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask cannot be found

Total time: 0 seconds
make: *** [debian/stamp-ant-build] Error 1


I have no idea how to fix this.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304089: [PPC] Enable -mvrsave=yes by default

2005-04-11 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On  10  2005 23:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
 Konstantinos Margaritis writes:
  Package: gcc-3.4
  Version: 3.4.3-12
  Severity: grave
 
  Apparently latest packages of gcc-3.4 have disabled -mvrsave=yes
  for powerpc. This breaks existing software which uses Altivec and
  it's also wrong. Even worse, it's not documented in the changelog
  (Debian or normal). The code that is produced is unstable. Please
  enable it by default.

 which Debian version did have the old behaviour?

Well, gcc 3.3 has -mvrsave=yes by default and also _I think_ the 
previous version of gcc i used (3.4.3-6) . It was after the upgrade 
to -12 that I noticed some strange behaviour in my programs and it 
was just then that I checked and found after a lot of frustration 
that it's turned off. I have discussed this with other powerpc 
developers (though on irc only, i don't have anything in email, and 
not only Debian developers) and they all confirm that this is a wrong 
and confusing move. At the very least it should post a warning when 
it finds altivec code, that -mvrsave is disabled. I don't deny that 
there are a few cases where the developer might want to leave it 
disabled, but these are the exceptions not the norm.

Please, reenable it, or at the very least put a warning and some entry 
in the changelog about this. It's truly too dangerous to leave it 
like that.

Konstantinos



Bug#303144: marked as done (openmsx: Uninstalable in sid, package was built against experimental version of gcc)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:03:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#303144: fixed in openmsx 0.5.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2005 02:57:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 19:57:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIeG0-0007oX-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:57:36 -0700
Received: from rcm-200-220-132-60.nipnet.net.br (khazad-dum.debian.net) 
[200.220.132.60] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIeFp-0003GX-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 21:57:26 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost.khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6180A208BA4;
Mon,  4 Apr 2005 23:57:34 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from khazad-dum.debian.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (khazad-dum [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 27489-03; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:57:32 -0300 (BRT)
Received: by khazad-dum.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E6CC1200359; Mon,  4 Apr 2005 23:57:32 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:57:32 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openmsx: Uninstalable in sid, package was built against experimental 
version of gcc
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/1CDB0FE3 5422 5C61 F6B7 06FB 7E04  3738 EE25 DE3F 1CDB 
0FE3
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at khazad-dum.debian.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openmsx
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

openmsx depends on libgcc1 (= 1:4.0) which is NOT in sid.

Please build it using gcc 3.4 in a sid chroot.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-debian6+libata9dev1+bluesmoke
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- 
  One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

---
Received: (at 303144-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 18:21:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 11:21:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL3Wv-0008An-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:21:01 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL3Fb-DP-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:03:07 -0400
From: Joost Yervante Damad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#303144: fixed in openmsx 0.5.1-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 14:03:07 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openmsx
Source-Version: 0.5.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openmsx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openmsx_0.5.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.5.1-2.diff.gz
openmsx_0.5.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.5.1-2.dsc
openmsx_0.5.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.5.1-2_i386.deb
openmsx_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/openmsx/openmsx_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer 

Bug#295221: twiki conflicts with libtext-diff-perl

2005-04-11 Thread Jay Bonci
reassign 303664 twiki
retitle 303664 twiki conflicts with libtext-diff-perl
merge 303664 295221
thanks

The correct fix with this bug is for twiki to no longer provide the
modules in libtext-diff-perl.  If I were to make a Conflicts:, it would
prevent the installation of twiki once this bug is fixed in that
package.

There is already a bug filed for this over in twiki, and so I am merging
the two.

--Jay Bonci
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#303269: marked as done (openmsx: Missing build dependency.)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:56:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line openmsx: Missing build dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2005 17:45:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 05 10:45:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIs79-0002bO-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 10:45:24 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 13380224145
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 19:45:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE25422413D
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue,  5 Apr 2005 19:45:19 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9448F26136; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 19:45:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:45:19 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openmsx: Missing build dependency.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openmsx
Version: 0.5.0-10
Severity: serious

Your package is failing to build.  This is the error I get:
Probing target system...

Found libraries:
  libpng:  no
  libxml2: no
  OpenGL:  no
  SDL: no
  SDL_image:   no
  TCL: no
  zlib:no

Found headers:
  libpng:  no
  libxml2: no
  OpenGL:  no
  SDL: no
  SDL_image:   no
  TCL: no
  zlib:no

Components overview:
  Emulation core:  no
  SDLGL renderer:  no

Customisable options:
  Install to:  /opt/openMSX
  (you can edit these in build/custom.mk)

Please install missing libraries and headers and rerun configure.


This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on ccache.


PS: I think installing to /opt isn't a good thing.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 303269-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 18:57:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 11:57:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from lmail01.edpnet.be (edpnet.org) [212.71.0.16] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL45v-00037K-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:57:11 -0700
Received: from rhudaur.qahwah.net (unverified [213.219.186.147]) 
by EDPnet Mailserver (EDPnet Mailserver www.edpnet.be) with ESMTP id 
8482175 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:56:31 +0200
Received: by rhudaur.qahwah.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 68D7E2B80CE; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:56:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Joost Yervante Damad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openmsx: Missing build dependency
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:56:32 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 0, First 195, in=181, out=0, spam=0
X-External-IP: 213.219.186.147
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Hello,

this version no longer depends on ccache for building.

Greetings, Joost Damad


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 302169 is wishlist

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 severity 302169 wishlist
Bug#302169: clearlook: release 0.5 broken
Severity set to `wishlist'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tags sid

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 304188 sid
Bug#304188: /etc/init.d/ifupdown startup script fails when /usr is NFS mounted
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304219: pppoeconf produces broken 0clampmss

2005-04-11 Thread Wolfram Tomalla
Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/0clampmss
created by pppoeconf is broken:
[..]
iptables -p $PPP_IFACE [..]

the -p option is for protocol it probably should be -i for interface


This results in all kind of strange errors on the mashines behind, if
the computer is used as a router.

CU

Wolfram Tomalla


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages pppoeconf depends on:
ii  gettext-base0.14.1-10GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  ppp 2.4.2+20040428-6 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daem
ii  pppoe   3.5-4PPP over Ethernet driver
ii  sed 4.1.2-8  The GNU sed stream editor
ii  whiptail [whiptail-prov 0.51.6-20Displays user-friendly dialog boxe

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304188: Does 0.6.4-4.12 work properly?

2005-04-11 Thread Thomas Hood
Does 0.6.4-4.12 work properly?

-- 
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 304164 is normal, reassign 304164 to installation-reports

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 severity 304164 normal
Bug#304164: Loose CD to install the basesystem
Severity set to `normal'.

 reassign 304164 installation-reports
Bug#304164: Loose CD to install the basesystem
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reopen and tag sarge

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reopen 302519
Bug#302519: ifupdown: postinst fails if /dev/shm/network/ does not exist
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

 retitle 302519 ifupdown: missing versioned Dependency on initscripts (= 
 2.85-15)
Bug#302519: ifupdown: postinst fails if /dev/shm/network/ does not exist
Changed Bug title.

 tags 302519 sarge
Bug#302519: ifupdown: missing versioned Dependency on initscripts (= 2.85-15)
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: sarge

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with Parse error in default web.xml after upgrade

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 300209 serious
Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with Parse error in default web.xml after 
upgrade
Severity set to `serious'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304147: kiconedit: crashes with SIGSEGV on start-up

2005-04-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 11 April 2005 12:08 pm, Riku Voipio wrote:
 On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:48:26AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
  Loading kiconedit from the menu causes a SIGSEGV as soon
  as the window tries to display. The window then closes
  and the KDE crash handler appears.

 unreproducible on sarge. same version of package in sid too.
 Try moving ./.kde/share/config/kiconeditrc somewhere else, or
 try using kiconedit with a fresh new user account.

Moving the RC file did the trick for console opening but NOT the menu! That 
still seg faults. Even after logging out and back in, it still seg faults from 
the menu! (And once it HAS seg faulted from the menu, it no longer works from 
the console!)

This is the diff of the new vs old:

--- /home/neil/kiconeditrc  2004-09-12 19:43:26.0 +0100
+++ /home/neil/.kde/share/config/kiconeditrc2005-04-11 14:40:43.0 
+0100
@@ -14,16 +14,6 @@ ShowRulers=true
 TransparencyDisplayType=Checkerboard
 TransparencySolidColor=255,255,255

-[KFileDialog Settings]
-Automatic Preview=true
-Preview Size=60
-Recent Files=/usr/share/icons/kdeclassic/16x16/actions/colorize.png
-ShowPreviews=false
-ViewMode=SmallColumns
-
-[KFileDialog Speedbar]
-Speedbar IconSize=22
-
 [MainWindowSettings Toolbar mainToolBar]
 Index=0

@@ -37,7 +27,3 @@ Position=Right
 [MainWindowSettings Toolbar toolsToolBar]
 IconText=IconOnly
 Index=0
-
-[RecentFiles]
-File1=file:/usr/share/apps/kiconedit/pics/standard.png
-File2=file:/usr/share/icons/kdeclassic/16x16/actions/colorize.png


  Versions of packages kiconedit depends on:
  ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-4.0.2   KDE core libraries

 Where is that version from? debian does not have such version of kdelibs

?? Debian unstable does:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/libs/kdelibs4
4:3.3.2-4.0.2 [i386]

Are you comparing against a different architecture?

  ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange
  library ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System
  Session Management ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window
  System protocol client li ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X
  Window System miscellaneous exte ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

 Ditto for your X version.

All standard Debian unstable (sid). I don't use any non-standard mirrors.

-- 

Neil Williams
=
http://www.dcglug.org.uk/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/



pgpTX9xRRnJoj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#300560: mldonkey-server: downloads.ini writable by group users, world-readable

2005-04-11 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hello,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:09:53PM +0200, Gerardo Di Giacomo wrote:
 I think that the best solution is to put a chmod after:
 
 /usr/bin/touch $new_mldonkey_dir/downloads.ini
 
 in mldonkey-server.postinst.
 

Ok, thanks, i will consider this in the next version.

Regard
Sylvain Le Gall


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: cyrus-sasl: FTBFS with libtool 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 212307 - fixed
Bug#212307: cyrus-sasl: FTBFS with libtool 1.5
Tags were: fixed
Tags removed: fixed

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with Parse error in default web.xml after upgrade

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 300209 + pending
Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with Parse error in default web.xml after 
upgrade
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304219: marked as done (pppoeconf produces broken 0clampmss)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:47:48 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#304219: fixed in pppoeconf 1.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 19:02:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 12:02:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL4Ay-0003Of-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:02:24 -0700
Received: from Wasserstoff.reagenzglas.org (p5089FF98.dip.t-dialin.net 
[80.137.255.152])
by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3BJ2KZk024780
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:02:21 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from wolfram by Wasserstoff.reagenzglas.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DL4Iu-000550-2V
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:10:36 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wolfram Tomalla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pppoeconf produces broken 0clampmss
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:10:35 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: pppoeconf
Version: 1.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


The /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/0clampmss
created by pppoeconf is broken:
[..]
iptables -p $PPP_IFACE [..]

the -p option is for protocol it probably should be -i for interface


This results in all kind of strange errors on the mashines behind, if
the computer is used as a router.

CU

Wolfram Tomalla


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages pppoeconf depends on:
ii  gettext-base0.14.1-10GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  ppp 2.4.2+20040428-6 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daem
ii  pppoe   3.5-4PPP over Ethernet driver
ii  sed 4.1.2-8  The GNU sed stream editor
ii  whiptail [whiptail-prov 0.51.6-20Displays user-friendly dialog boxe

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 304219-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 20:53:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 13:53:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL5u2-0004YE-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:53:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL5oy-0005wY-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:47:48 -0400
From: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304219: fixed in pppoeconf 1.6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:47:48 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: pppoeconf
Source-Version: 1.6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pppoeconf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pppoeconf_1.6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pppoeconf/pppoeconf_1.6.dsc
pppoeconf_1.6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pppoeconf/pppoeconf_1.6.tar.gz
pppoeconf_1.6_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/pppoeconf/pppoeconf_1.6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pppoeconf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if 

Bug#300209: tomcat4: tomcat dies with Parse error in default web.xml after upgrade

2005-04-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
tags 300209 + pending
thanks

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 07:06:28AM -0400, Barry Hawkins wrote:
 Thanks for the information.  I was afraid it was something of that
 nature.  Since Blackdown 1.3 and IBM 1.4 are what's available for
 PowerPC right now, I am not able to build this package without altering
 DBCP.  The Tomcat 4 source requires the JDK to have some Sun security
 classes that IBM does not have.  So, if Arnaud or Stefan could build
 tomcat4 with what I have checked in and sponsor an upload, we will
 likely have resolved this issue and gotten tomcat4 back into Sarge.

The issue is supposed to be fixed in CVS, I succesfully built a new
version of the package with it, after having reviewed the diff and found
the current CVS to be okay. Barry Hawkins will soonishly test my builds,
and when the tests turn out to be succesful, I'll sign  upload.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#212307: cyrus-sasl: FTBFS with libtool 1.5

2005-04-11 Thread Roland Stigge
tag 212307 - fixed
thanks

This problem now also occurs with libtool1.4. I tried with pbuilder in a
current sid chroot.
-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304089: [PPC] Enable -mvrsave=yes by default

2005-04-11 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:59:38PM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
 On ?? 10  2005 23:32, Matthias Klose wrote:
  Konstantinos Margaritis writes:
   Package: gcc-3.4
   Version: 3.4.3-12
   Severity: grave
  
   Apparently latest packages of gcc-3.4 have disabled -mvrsave=yes
   for powerpc. This breaks existing software which uses Altivec and
   it's also wrong. Even worse, it's not documented in the changelog
   (Debian or normal). The code that is produced is unstable. Please
   enable it by default.
 
  which Debian version did have the old behaviour?
 
 Well, gcc 3.3 has -mvrsave=yes by default and also _I think_ the 
 previous version of gcc i used (3.4.3-6) . It was after the upgrade 
 to -12 that I noticed some strange behaviour in my programs and it 
 was just then that I checked and found after a lot of frustration 
 that it's turned off. I have discussed this with other powerpc 
 developers (though on irc only, i don't have anything in email, and 
 not only Debian developers) and they all confirm that this is a wrong 
 and confusing move. At the very least it should post a warning when 
 it finds altivec code, that -mvrsave is disabled. I don't deny that 
 there are a few cases where the developer might want to leave it 
 disabled, but these are the exceptions not the norm.
 
 Please, reenable it, or at the very least put a warning and some entry 
 in the changelog about this. It's truly too dangerous to leave it 
 like that.

How odd.  Matthias, I can reproduce this in 3.3.4-13, but not in
3.4.3-7.  Compile this (crappy) testcase with -O2 -maltivec
-mabi=altivec, and with -mvrsave=yes/-mvrsave=no:

#include altivec.h

void bar();
vector int ret();
void arg(vector int, ...);

int foo()
{
  vector int q = ret(), t = ret(), z, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h;
  z = vec_add (q, t);
  a = vec_add (z, t);
  b = vec_add (a, t);
  c = vec_add (b, t);
  d = vec_add (c, t);
  e = vec_add (d, t);
  f = vec_add (e, c);
  g = vec_add (f, t);
  h = vec_add (g, z);
  bar ();
  z = vec_add (h, vec_add (z, t));
  arg (z, a, b, d, h);
}


Konstantinos, I strongly suspect this was a bug in GCC 3.3.  The Linux
kernel does not pay attention to vrsave in 32-bit mode:

 * If the previous thread used altivec in the last quantum
 * (thus changing altivec regs) then save them.
 * We used to check the VRSAVE register but not all apps
 * set it, so we don't rely on it now (and in fact we need
 * to save  restore VSCR even if VRSAVE == 0).  -- paulus

So if you insist that GCC needs to fiddle the register, when nothing is
looking at it, you'll need some better reason why.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 303057 is serious

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 303057 serious
Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop
Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops
Bug#302992: slapd gets in endless loop with sched_yield
Severity set to `serious'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304252: gnue-appserver: does not create /var/run/gnue

2005-04-11 Thread Niklas Rydberg
Package: gnue-appserver
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
/var/run/gnue should be created on appserver install
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
 APT prefers testing
 APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.4
Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gnue-appserver depends on:
ii  gnue-common   0.5.14-1   GNU Enterprise Common 
Library for
ii  python2.3.5-1An interactive high-level 
object-o

-- no debconf information

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#300848: marked as done (doesn't work anymore: fatal error)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300848: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-4+sarge0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 09:11:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 01:11:17 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail2.mclink.it [195.110.128.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDfPx-00028p-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:11:17 -0800
Received: from kgb.debian.net (adsl203-153-141.mclink.it [213.203.153.141])
by mail2.mclink.it (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j2M9BEiJ084593;
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:11:14 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: by kgb.debian.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7B6A737EA5; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:11:13 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Christian Surchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: doesn't work anymore: fatal error
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:11:13 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: polygen
Version: 1.0.6-4
Severity: grave

$ polygen
Fatal error: cannot load shared library dllunix
Reason: dllunix.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory

thanks
Christian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages polygen depends on:
ii  ocaml-base-nox3.08.3-1   Runtime system for ocaml bytecode 

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 300848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 22:26:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 15:26:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL7MX-0002IY-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:26:33 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL7DR-000480-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:17:09 -0400
From: Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300848: fixed in polygen 1.0.6-4+sarge0
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:17:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: polygen
Source-Version: 1.0.6-4+sarge0

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
polygen, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

polygen-data_1.0.6-4+sarge0_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen-data_1.0.6-4+sarge0_all.deb
polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0.diff.gz
polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0.dsc
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0.dsc
polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/polygen/polygen_1.0.6-4+sarge0_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Maurizio Lemmo (Tannoiser) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated polygen 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  9 Apr 2005 18:55:40 +0200
Source: polygen
Binary: polygen-data polygen
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.6-4+sarge0
Distribution: 

Processed: retitle 302462 to RM: howl -- license issues (APSL 2.0)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 302462 RM: howl -- license issues (APSL 2.0)
Bug#302462: RM: howl/main -- license issues (APSL 2.0)
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#291757: evolution: Upgrade from 1.4.6 to 2.0.3 fails and Evolution is *UNUSABLE*

2005-04-11 Thread Onno Benschop
Tore Anderson wrote:
* Onno Benschop
 

The bug basically states that during migration from 1.4.x to 2.x, the
conversion of the mailbox data fails.
   

Does this affect upgrades from Evolution 1.0.5 as well?  If not, it
simply /cannot/ be considered release critical, as 1.0.5 is the version
currently found in Woody.
The short answer, Yes, I strongly *suspect* it does.
The long answer:
I don't have Evolution 1.0.5 installed, so I have not been able to test 
this, and I'm not confident that installing an older version of 
Evolution would actually migrate my mail data back, but the original bug 
report showed this URL:

   http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=69566
Which has been moved to here:
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269566
This bug is now marked Major and is slated for 2.2, and it has many 
reports associated with it.

On 22 February, 2005, JP Rosevear stated: (Comment #27 in the bug report)
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269566#c27
   So we've prevented the crash now. It seems to happen when e-d-s
   can't load for some reason. We'll see what happens with new reports.
This makes me suspect that the bug has been resolved in their CVS, but I 
suspect that Debian isn't using that fixed version at this stage. 
*However*, I note that v2.2.1 is now in Unstable, which if I'm reading 
correctly from the Gnome Bugzilla does not have this problem.

So, I would propose that this bug stay open until v2.2.1 is in Testing, 
then I'll do another migration using the backed up mail data from 1.4.6 
and test again.

If you've gotten to here wondering if I'm ever actually going to answer 
your question about v1.0.5, here it is:

While I understand and completely agree with your sentiment about 
upgrading from Woody, Evolution 1.0.5, to 2.0.3, I strongly suspect that 
v1.0.5 is affected, though I do not have any actual proof of that.

Kind regards,
--
Onno Benschop
Connected via Optus B3 at S25°34'41 - E152°35'34 (Graham's Creek, QLD)
--
()/)/)()..ASCII for Onno..
|?..EBCDIC for Onno..
--- -. -. ---   ..Morse for Onno..
Proudly supported by Skipper Trucks, Highway1, Concept AV, Sony Central, Dalcon
ITmaze   -   ABN: 56 178 057 063   -  ph: 04 1219    -   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304258: yate: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory

2005-04-11 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: yate
Version: 0.8.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

yate fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on
sparc pbuilder.  Same error expeced on i386 pbuilder.

T_CHECK  -export-dynamic -shared -Wl,--retain-symbols-file,/dev/null -L.. -lyate
 -o zapchan.yate -lpri zapchan.cpp 
zapchan.cpp:27:44: /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory
zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_get_event(int)':
zapchan.cpp:70: error: `ZT_GETEVENT' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:70: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for 
   each function it appears in.)
zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_open(int, bool, unsigned int)':
zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_CHANNO' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_SPECIFY' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:104: error: `ZT_SET_BLOCKSIZE' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp: In function `bool zt_set_law(int, int)':
zapchan.cpp:117: error: `ZT_SETLINEAR' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:120: error: `ZT_SETLAW' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp: At global scope:
zapchan.cpp:317: error: `ZT_LAW_DEFAULT' was not declared in this scope
zapchan.cpp:318: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' was not declared in this scope
zapchan.cpp:319: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' was not declared in this scope
zapchan.cpp: In static member function `static pri* PriSpan::makePri(int, int, 
   int, int, bool, int)':
zapchan.cpp:555: error: `ZT_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:555: error: parse error before `;' token
zapchan.cpp:556: error: `ZT_GET_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:556: error: `par' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:561: error: `ZT_SIG_HDLCFCS' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:565: error: `ZT_BUFFERINFO' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:565: error: parse error before `;' token
zapchan.cpp:566: error: `bi' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:566: error: `ZT_POLICY_IMMEDIATE' undeclared (first use this 
   function)
zapchan.cpp:570: error: `ZT_SET_BUFINFO' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp: In member function `void PriSpan::ringChan(int, pri_event_ring)':
zapchan.cpp:816: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' undeclared (first use this function)
zapchan.cpp:819: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' undeclared (first use this function)
make[2]: *** [zapchan.yate] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7/modules'
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#243007: New download application

2005-04-11 Thread Josiah Wiley
How have you been,

Wanna download anything you want?

http://bicone.destingan.com/?a=409

See you later,
Jo Lewis

Jack is not missing singing near the station.. Toren came to me at age 32 months. He had 2 words: Ma Ma and Bye Bye. He could not focus, but ran around the room. His mother was convinced I was going to have him cured by his third birthday. I told her I was no miracle worker, but we'd do what we could during the next 4 months. Immediately we started structuring Toren's day. I went home and worked up a program called 'Toren's Nouns'. The first day I showed Toren the program, he looked at it for 10-15 seconds and then left the computer. The next day he stayed about 30 seconds. Each day he built up more time at the computer. By the second week, he would sit on my lap for 10 minutes pressing whichever word he wanted to hear. But he spoke no sounds, no words. Three weeks passed. I began berating myself. 'See, Jo, you thought this noun program was so great. Look at Toren, he's not learning anything.' The fourth week Toren walked over to the computer, picked up the overlay from the Intel
 liKeys keyboard, pointed to 10 different words and approximated each word. That day, I cried..
green grape yellow banana orange banana orange peach cyan peach purple mango 
Then I started 'teaching'. You know, I'm a good teacher. (Well, maybe just an average teacher, but you get the jist). I know what good teachers do. Or I thought I did. I sat with the children at the computer. When they pressed the IntelliKeys' keyboard or the Touch Window' and the computer said the word, I repeated the word and then expanded on the word. After they had pressed the same word several times, I said, "That's right, that's a cat, can you find the dog?? Suddenly, I would see the child's back get stiff, and before you knew it, he got up and left the computer. I didn't understand. Just a few seconds ago, he loved it. What happened?. That computer programmer isn't enjoying swimming behind the post office right at this time.



Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop

2005-04-11 Thread Sven Hartge
Um 23:56 Uhr am 11.04.05 schrieb Sven Hartge:

[Sorry for spamming this bug report, but I _really_ need to get this going 
*fast*.]

 My last change is
 
   set_lk_max_lockers  10
 
 which was still default and seems to be to _real_ culprit, as per 
 ITS#2030:
 
 http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=2030;selectid=2030;usearchives=1
 (Note how old this bug report to the OpenLDAP ITS is.)

After torturing my setup with different scripts and trying to to rebuild 
the normal workload, I am confident, after having run

  watch -n1 -d db4.2_stat -c

for some time in parallel, the sched_yield() loop occurs, because the 
bdb-backend runs out of lockers. At least this is what I get from ITS#2030 
and from various other resources (mostly documentation from Sleepycat).

So I suggest for the package to create a DB_CONFIG with _at least_ 5000 
lockers, locks and lock objects. The default of 1000 is just to low and 
will get exploitet in no time by even a little database.

(Don't close this bug yet, further observation has to happen.)

Grüße,
Sven.


-- 
Sven Hartge -- professioneller Unix-Geek und alltime Nerd
Meine Gedanken im Netz: http://sven.formvision.de/blog/



Bug#283381: marked as done (RM: mono:mono-mint [!s390] -- RoM; ANAIS; unsupported upstream / unneed workaround package on i386/powerpc)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:46:59 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Mono won't enter testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 22:47:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 15:47:07 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 205-200-74-130.static.mts.net (Zimmer) [205.200.74.130] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsh-00058h-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:47:07 -0700
Received: from ddaniels by Zimmer with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C2dsg-EH-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500
From: Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mono won't enter testing
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mono
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs on arm

-
There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org.

The mono (1.0-4) unstable; changelog entry says:
* Eduard Bloch
  + disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish

According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint
there's still 1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]. Why did upstream only request
that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha,
arm, s390, sparc)?

Also:
mono hasn't been tried on arm since 20040610-1450 (0.91-1).
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/arm-all.txt says:
interpreters/mono_1.0.1-1: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-elara
[optional:out-of-date]
  Dependencies: libicu28-dev
  Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 26 08:45:53
and:
devel/monodevelop_0.5-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa
[optional:uncompiled]
  Dependencies: gtk-sharp-gapi
  Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 09 18:23:07
[...]
web/mod-mono_1.0-1: Needs-Build [optional:uncompiled]
  Previous state was Building until 2004 Aug 13 18:10:26

libicu28-dev doesn't exist on arm! Therefore there's a ftbfs on arm.
Perhaps there's another icu development package?

Also:
mono-assemblies-arch (source mcs) is out of date on s390. mcs also
requires that s390 builds mono-jay.

Also:
easy mono mcs from debian-release (Release Managers) is needed when
the packages are ready?


  Drew Daniels

---
Received: (at 283381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 22:47:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 15:47:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] 
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DL7gL-0006Ig-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:47:01 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DL7gJ-0008HO-Sp; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:47:00 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:46:59 +0200
To: Drew Scott Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mono won't enter testing
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:47:06PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
 Package: mono
 Severity: serious
 Justification: ftbfs on arm
 
 -
 There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org.
 
 The mono (1.0-4) unstable; changelog entry says:
 * Eduard Bloch
   + disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish
 
 According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint
 there's still 1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]. Why did upstream only request
 that a few 

Bug#304258: yate: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory

2005-04-11 Thread Diana Cionoiu
Try to compile either Yate without Zaptel, either first install Zaptel.

Diana


 Package: yate
 Version: 0.8.7-2
 Severity: serious
 Tags: sid
 Justification: fails to build from source
 
 yate fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on
 sparc pbuilder.  Same error expeced on i386 pbuilder.
 
 T_CHECK  -export-dynamic -shared -Wl,--retain-symbols-file,/dev/null -L.. 
 -lyate
  -o zapchan.yate -lpri zapchan.cpp 
 zapchan.cpp:27:44: /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory
 zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_get_event(int)':
 zapchan.cpp:70: error: `ZT_GETEVENT' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:70: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for 
each function it appears in.)
 zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_open(int, bool, unsigned int)':
 zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_CHANNO' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_SPECIFY' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:104: error: `ZT_SET_BLOCKSIZE' undeclared (first use this 
 function)
 zapchan.cpp: In function `bool zt_set_law(int, int)':
 zapchan.cpp:117: error: `ZT_SETLINEAR' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:120: error: `ZT_SETLAW' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp: At global scope:
 zapchan.cpp:317: error: `ZT_LAW_DEFAULT' was not declared in this scope
 zapchan.cpp:318: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' was not declared in this scope
 zapchan.cpp:319: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' was not declared in this scope
 zapchan.cpp: In static member function `static pri* PriSpan::makePri(int, 
 int, 
int, int, bool, int)':
 zapchan.cpp:555: error: `ZT_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:555: error: parse error before `;' token
 zapchan.cpp:556: error: `ZT_GET_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:556: error: `par' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:561: error: `ZT_SIG_HDLCFCS' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:565: error: `ZT_BUFFERINFO' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:565: error: parse error before `;' token
 zapchan.cpp:566: error: `bi' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:566: error: `ZT_POLICY_IMMEDIATE' undeclared (first use this 
function)
 zapchan.cpp:570: error: `ZT_SET_BUFINFO' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp: In member function `void PriSpan::ringChan(int, 
 pri_event_ring)':
 zapchan.cpp:816: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' undeclared (first use this function)
 zapchan.cpp:819: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' undeclared (first use this function)
 make[2]: *** [zapchan.yate] Error 1
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7/modules'
 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7'
 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
 
 
 
 ___
 Pkg-voip-maintainers mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-voip-maintainers
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304258: yate: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory

2005-04-11 Thread Blars Blarson
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:18AM +0300, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
 Try to compile either Yate without Zaptel, either first install Zaptel.
 
 Diana

Fix your build dependancies or build rules.

Debian packages need to be buildable with just the build dependancies
installed in order to make security updates and auto-building sane.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#304258: yate: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or directory

2005-04-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:07:18AM +0300, Diana Cionoiu wrote:
 Try to compile either Yate without Zaptel, either first install Zaptel.

No, this is a package bug.  Fix the package.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


  Package: yate
  Version: 0.8.7-2
  Severity: serious
  Tags: sid
  Justification: fails to build from source
  
  yate fails to build from source on sparc and other buildds, duplicated on
  sparc pbuilder.  Same error expeced on i386 pbuilder.
  
  T_CHECK  -export-dynamic -shared -Wl,--retain-symbols-file,/dev/null -L.. 
  -lyate
   -o zapchan.yate -lpri zapchan.cpp 
  zapchan.cpp:27:44: /usr/src/modules/zaptel/zaptel.h: No such file or 
  directory
  zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_get_event(int)':
  zapchan.cpp:70: error: `ZT_GETEVENT' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:70: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once 
  for 
 each function it appears in.)
  zapchan.cpp: In function `int zt_open(int, bool, unsigned int)':
  zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_CHANNO' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:97: error: `ZT_SPECIFY' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:104: error: `ZT_SET_BLOCKSIZE' undeclared (first use this 
  function)
  zapchan.cpp: In function `bool zt_set_law(int, int)':
  zapchan.cpp:117: error: `ZT_SETLINEAR' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:120: error: `ZT_SETLAW' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp: At global scope:
  zapchan.cpp:317: error: `ZT_LAW_DEFAULT' was not declared in this scope
  zapchan.cpp:318: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' was not declared in this scope
  zapchan.cpp:319: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' was not declared in this scope
  zapchan.cpp: In static member function `static pri* PriSpan::makePri(int, 
  int, 
 int, int, bool, int)':
  zapchan.cpp:555: error: `ZT_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:555: error: parse error before `;' token
  zapchan.cpp:556: error: `ZT_GET_PARAMS' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:556: error: `par' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:561: error: `ZT_SIG_HDLCFCS' undeclared (first use this 
  function)
  zapchan.cpp:565: error: `ZT_BUFFERINFO' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:565: error: parse error before `;' token
  zapchan.cpp:566: error: `bi' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:566: error: `ZT_POLICY_IMMEDIATE' undeclared (first use this 
 function)
  zapchan.cpp:570: error: `ZT_SET_BUFINFO' undeclared (first use this 
  function)
  zapchan.cpp: In member function `void PriSpan::ringChan(int, 
  pri_event_ring)':
  zapchan.cpp:816: error: `ZT_LAW_ALAW' undeclared (first use this function)
  zapchan.cpp:819: error: `ZT_LAW_MULAW' undeclared (first use this function)
  make[2]: *** [zapchan.yate] Error 1
  make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7/modules'
  make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
  make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/yate-0.8.7'
  make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#297769: patch

2005-04-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:35:29 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 
 On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:30:08AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
  OK, I put the patch.  Currently I found the problem about schedutils.
  
  Once schedutils `taskset' command uses new sched_getaffinity and
  sched_setaffinity interface (which has GLIBC_2.3.4), schedutils has to
  depend on glibc = 2.3.2.ds1-21.
  I'm currently searching how to set Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) or
  libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [ia64, alpha] for schedutils.
  
  BTW, if we change the library exported symbol version, GLIBC_2.3.4, we
  should always bump up our shlibs from 2.3.2.ds1-4 to 2.3.2.ds1-21.
  However, such change affects almost all binaries.  Is this acceptable?
  IMHO, changing shlibs affects a lot of packages, so I would like to
  take the workaround fix - schedutils and fakeroot just have special
  Depends: = 2.3.2.ds1-21, because I guess sched_{get,set}affinity is
  not used widely.
 
 I think that we should just be bumping the shlibdeps; the release team
 has already agreed that we need a glibc update for sarge.

I think it's not same issue; bumping shlib version is not glibc bug
fix update.

 In any case, the best way to do what you want in schedutils mightb be:
 Depends: ${shlib:Depends}

Back to the original suggestion by David Mosberger was: the recent
sources (ex: Lmbench3) use new sched_{set,get}affinity syscalls, so
such programs will need to consider debian's old syscalls interfaces
in future.

Thus, this change does _NOT_ affect any current debian archives.
These old syscalls are used by only fakeroot and schedutils, and the
current fakeroot/schedutils .debs do not use new syscalls.  When we
think only for debian, this change is not useful at all.  In other
words, this modification focuses on only unknown unbounded NON-DEBIAN
sources or binaries (even if old interfaces are incorrect).

I concern to bump up shlib version - I don't know why I'm worrying,
but at least when we discussed about this issue, we didn't anticipate
that adding new symbols makes additional consideration - I still think
bumping up shlib version needs incidental affection and it's large
change at this time.

 Conflicts: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libc6.1 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21)
 
 I think that'll work... but make sure apt can cope.

We don't need any additional Conflicts because:

 (1) the current schedutils has Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-4), and
 it works finely with libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 because -21 also has old
 GLIBC_2.3.3 sched_{get,set}affinity symbols.

 (2) new schedutils has Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) and
 Build-Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21).  It needs new libc6 -21,
 and it uses GLIBC_2.3.4 sched_{get,set}affinity.


So I would like to change as follows:

 (1) glibc -21 has new sched_{get,set}affinity at last.

 (2) New schedutils should be released until sarge release with the
 attached patch.

 (3) fakeroot does not need to be modified because it does not have
 any explicit sched_*affinity.  It seems schedutils is the only
 affected package.

I put new -21 and schedutils at:

http://www.gotom.jp/~gotom/debian/glibc/2.3.2.ds1-21_i386.sched/

Steve, how about this thought?  Do you want to bump up glibc shlib
version rathar than my small hack?  I would like to hear your opinion
from the RM point of view.  Any comments are welcome.


--- schedutils-1.3.4/taskset.c.gotom2005-04-12 00:13:07.0 +0900
+++ schedutils-1.3.4/taskset.c  2005-04-12 00:14:04.0 +0900
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
if (pid) {
unsigned long mask = 0;
 
-   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, cur_mask)  0) {
+   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, sizeof (cur_mask), cur_mask)  0) {
perror(sched_getaffinity);
fprintf(stderr, failed to get pid %d's affinity\n,
pid);
@@ -152,13 +152,13 @@
 
ulong_to_cpu_set(the_mask, new_mask);
 
-   if (sched_setaffinity(pid, new_mask)) {
+   if (sched_setaffinity(pid, sizeof (new_mask), new_mask)) {
perror(sched_setaffinity);
fprintf(stderr, failed to set pid %d's affinity.\n, pid);
return 1;
}
 
-   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, cur_mask)  0) {
+   if (sched_getaffinity(pid, sizeof (cur_mask), cur_mask)  0) {
perror(sched_setaffinity);
fprintf(stderr, failed to get pid %d's affinity.\n, pid);
return 1;
--- schedutils-1.3.4/debian/control.gotom   2005-04-11 15:33:36.0 
+
+++ schedutils-1.3.4/debian/control 2005-04-11 23:54:06.0 +
@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libc6-dev (= 2.3) [!ia64 !alpha], 
libc6.1-dev (= 2.3) [ia64 alpha]
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libc6-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [!ia64 
!alpha], libc6.1-dev (= 2.3.2.ds1-21) [ia64 alpha]
 

Bug#304157: marked as done (ruby1.8: FTBFS: lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to load -- syck (LoadError))

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#304157: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 10:14:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 03:14:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c158084.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.158.84] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKvvb-0003E0-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 03:14:00 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DKvvZ-0001BP-DA; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:13:57 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ruby1.8: FTBFS: lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to load 
-- syck (LoadError)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:13:57 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'ruby1.8' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

Generating RI...
./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml/syck.rb:5:in `require': no such file to load 
-- syck (LoadError)
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml/syck.rb:5
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml.rb:9:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/yaml.rb:9
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:1:in 
`require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:1
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:1:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:1
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/generators/ri_generator.rb:46:in 
`require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/generators/ri_generator.rb:46
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:250:in `require'
from ./build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/lib/rdoc/rdoc.rb:250:in `document'
from build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/bin/rdoc:63
make: *** [install-ri-stamp] Error 1

This could be fixed by adding a Build-Depends on 'libruby1.8'
to debian/control. However, this would make the 'ruby1.8' package
depend on itself, which does not seem to be a good idea. 
Please don't do that.

The previous version 1.8.2-3 did not have this problem.

The FTBFS problem can be fixed by removing the new '103_cvs_updates.patch'
from debian/patches.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 304157-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 02:26:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 19:26:13 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLB6T-0004TY-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:26:13 -0700
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLB6S-Ui-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:26:13 -0600
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLAj7-0007q4-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:02:05 -0400
From: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#304157: fixed in ruby1.8 1.8.2-5
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:02:05 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: ruby1.8
Source-Version: 1.8.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ruby1.8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

irb1.8_1.8.2-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/ruby1.8/irb1.8_1.8.2-5_all.deb
libdbm-ruby1.8_1.8.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/ruby1.8/libdbm-ruby1.8_1.8.2-5_i386.deb
libgdbm-ruby1.8_1.8.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/ruby1.8/libgdbm-ruby1.8_1.8.2-5_i386.deb
libopenssl-ruby1.8_1.8.2-5_i386.deb
  to 

Bug#304182: patch

2005-04-11 Thread Patrick B. Carlisle
--- apt-proxy-v1tov2.old2005-04-11 19:28:42.0 -0700
+++ apt-proxy-v1tov2  2005-04-11 19:30:21.0 -0700
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
 if [ -n ${WGET_TIMEOUT} ]  [ ${RSYNC_TIMEOUT} != ${WGET_TIMEOUT} ]; 
then
warn WGET_TIMEOUT differs from RSYNC_TIMEOUT, using RSYNC_TIMEOUT
 fi
-timeout=timeout = ${RSYNC_TIMEOUT:30}
+timeout=timeout = ${RSYNC_TIMEOUT:-30}

 cache_dir=cache_dir = ${APT_PROXY_CACHE}



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#303335: patch

2005-04-11 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG

The following patch allows python-gnome to build apparently correctly.



foo
Description: Binary data


Bug#302124: marked as done (qtorrent crash because of python)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:02:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#302124: fixed in qtorrent 0.9.6.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2005 07:37:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 23:37:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGXlF-0001w0-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:37:09 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so135548wri
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:36:38 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from;

b=MThakYzhh+I80QFdjrt/MkCtGe2eMExXWPL9IDdNWVsm30Cl/Pqv19wyHh1uS6WUGr86qj7Mbc7mtsxxuKG2WJBe/tiRKgCSdK1kNFvQKadEGYTrLpYvO8/H2mbKz4ke3FbPzXFqOHFRPyUXtxbTHyplGTpq/i3duUtVsIvMENY=
Received: by 10.54.56.50 with SMTP id e50mr142273wra;
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zvonpc ([82.77.172.121])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id g2sm264327wra.2005.03.29.23.36.37;
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Organization: de jmekri
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qtorrent crash because of python
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:36:34 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
  boundary=Boundary-00=_DclSCfwQ5YviMA0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: zvonsully [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_10_20,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--Boundary-00=_DclSCfwQ5YviMA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: qtorrent
Version: 0.9.6.1-2

When I invoke `qtorrent' without arguments from an ordinary shell
prompt it prints crashes.
Here is a transcript:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ qtorrent
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/qtorrent, line 39, in ?
w = TorrentWindow()
  File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentmain.py, line 437, 
in __init__
torrentwindow.TorrentWindow.__init__(self, parent)
  File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentwindow.py, line 
55, in __init__

self.setSizePolicy(QSizePolicy(3,3,0,0,self.sizePolicy().hasHeightForWidth()))
TypeError: argument 1 of QSizePolicy() has an invalid type

--Boundary-00=_DclSCfwQ5YviMA0
Content-Type: text/html;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

htmlheadmeta name=qrichtext content=1 //headbody 
style=font-size:15pt;font-family:Arial
pPackage: qtorrent/p
pVersion: 0.9.6.1-2/p
p/p
pWhen I invoke `qtorrent' without arguments from an ordinary shell/p
pprompt it prints crashes./p
pHere is a transcript:/p
p/p
p[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ qtorrent/p
pTraceback (most recent call last):/p
p  File quot;/usr/bin/qtorrentquot;, line 39, in ?/p
pw = TorrentWindow()/p
p  File 
quot;/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentmain.pyquot;, line 
437, in __init__/p
ptorrentwindow.TorrentWindow.__init__(self, parent)/p
p  File 
quot;/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentwindow.pyquot;, line 
55, in __init__/p
p
self.setSizePolicy(QSizePolicy(3,3,0,0,self.sizePolicy().hasHeightForWidth()))/p
pTypeError: argument 1 of QSizePolicy() has an invalid type/p
p/p
/body/html
--Boundary-00=_DclSCfwQ5YviMA0--

---
Received: (at 302124-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 04:18:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 21:18:41 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLCrJ-0001uA-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:18:41 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLCbb-0006az-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:02:27 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley J. Landaker)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#302124: fixed in qtorrent 0.9.6.1-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator 

Bug#304063: marked as done (qtorrent will not start)

2005-04-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:02:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#302124: fixed in qtorrent 0.9.6.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2005 16:38:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 10 09:38:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKfDX-0007cX-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 09:23:23 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (12-217-97-30.client.mchsi.com[12.217.97.30])
  by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with ESMTP
  id 20050410162248m9200gdvube; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:22:52 +
From: Brian Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qtorrent will not start
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 10:22:47 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qtorrent
Version: 0.9.6.1-2

I installed qtorrent using aptitude on 10 April 2005.  When I attempt to run 
qtorrent I got the following error message...

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/qtorrent, line 39, in ?
w = TorrentWindow()
  File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentmain.py, line 437, 
in __init__
torrentwindow.TorrentWindow.__init__(self, parent)
  File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent/torrentwindow.py, line 55, 
in __init__

self.setSizePolicy(QSizePolicy(3,3,0,0,self.sizePolicy().hasHeightForWidth()))
TypeError: argument 1 of QSizePolicy() has an invalid type

uname -a...
Linux legionWorld 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Wed Dec 1 19:43:08 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux

ls -l /lib/libc.so.6...
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 13 2005-01-05 18:27 /lib/libc.so.6 - libc-2.3.2.so

/usr/bin/python -V...
Python 2.3.5

I use debian unstable.

If there is some piece of information that I have forgotten to include just 
drop me a line.  Thanks for the help.

-- Brian

---
Received: (at 302124-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 04:18:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 21:18:41 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLCrJ-0001uA-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:18:41 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLCbb-0006az-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:02:27 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley J. Landaker)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#302124: fixed in qtorrent 0.9.6.1-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:02:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: qtorrent
Source-Version: 0.9.6.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
qtorrent, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3.diff.gz
qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3.dsc
qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_0.9.6.1-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qtorrent package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Apr