Processed: severity of 308428 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 308428 grave
Bug#308428: New rsync completely breaks systemimager-server
Severity set to `grave'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.

[Horms]

reassign 307900 kernel-source-2.6.8
tag 307900 + pending
tag 307900 + security
thanks

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 12:02:44PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> 
> 
> Proof of consept: http://www.frsirt.com/exploits/20050322.k-rad.c.php
> This would work on other NON-SMP kernels too. Makes kernel images
> unusable for multiuser system.

The fix for this is in SVN and will be made available in the next release.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

[Christian Perrier]

> The bug is in slapd for including this text in its debconf template:
> 
>   "The default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION"
> 
> This comes under the heading of not referring to debconf UI in a
> template. Just as you don't know how debconf will choose to present a
> yes/no question and thus "say yes" constructions should be avoided, you
> don't know how or if a given debconf frontend handles default values[1].
> Indeed a static template such as this one doesn't even know for sure
> what the default value _is_; it could have been overriden.


Interesting to know.

I indeed just nagged the openldap package maintainers (especially
Torsten who kindly followed all my suggestions) to have the debconf
templates more DTSG-compliant (and, for instance, remove a few "say
yes" instances).

However, I didn't knew about that specific argument to avoid
mentioning default values in static templates. This is a very
interesting argument to have when requesting for templates changes.

I have already felt that templates mentioning the default values is
absolutely useless anyway, as everyone is capable of figuring WHAT
default values are by just looking at what is currently in the
field..:-). So, most of the time, templates saying "The default value
is." is just useless verbosity (and annoyance to translators).

I should write some additionnal recommendations about this in the
chapter about debconf templates in the DR manual. I suppose you agree
with me stealing your own words for that, Joey?




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 307900 kernel-source-2.6.8
Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are 
easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'.

> tag 307900 + pending
Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are 
easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> tag 307900 + security
Bug#307900: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386: This image, and maybe some others are 
easiably locally rootable. Exploit included.
Tags were: pending
Tags added: security

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308428: New rsync completely breaks systemimager-server

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.4-5
Severity: critical

I am filing this bug as critical for 2 reasons: 1) the package in
question breaks the systemimager-server package and 2) it causes
data loss (in my case, a nightly backup scheduled by cron failed to
complete).

The new rsync package causes the systemimager 'getimage' command to
fail with this error:

rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(420)
  the recommended version of rsync.
Failed to retrieve /etc/systemimager/mounted_filesystems from 127.0.0.1.
getimage: Have you run "prepareclient" on 127.0.0.1?
  If you see the message "unrecognised option" above, check
  http://systemimager.org/download/ to be sure that you are running

Reverting to 2.6.4-2 causes normal behavior to resume.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: severity of 308417 is normal

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 308417 normal
Bug#308417: freefem3d: ..was kickedout on a libopts9 dep conflict with "a" 
libopts...
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 306141

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 306141 - sarge
Bug#306141: CAN-2005-0468/CAN-2005-0469: Buffer overflows in slc_add_reply() 
and env_opt_add()
Tags were: sarge woody security patch
Tags removed: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

[Steve Langasek]

severity 308420 important
thanks

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:41:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Upon upgrade, I receive the following message in Synaptic's terminal
> window:
> --
> (Reading database ... 132666 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace libwxgtk2.4-python 2.4.2.6 (using
> .../libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement libwxgtk2.4-python ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/helpviewer', which is also in package
> wxpython2.5.3
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  /var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb
> --

This is a conflict with a package that's not in Debian (it was removed due
to multiple release-critical bugs), and is therefore not of serious
severity.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 308420 important
Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with 
wxpython2.5.3
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308421: Ten-song submissions limit loses data

[Anthony DeRobertis]

Package: xmms-scrobbler
Version: 0.3.8.1asd1
Severity: grave

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Upstream's attempt to work around the 'not all request variables set'
bug by limiting song submissions to ten items[0] has the very
unfortunate side effect of losing a lot of data.

The right answer is probably to attempt to submit in large blocks, then
binary-search out the one (or more) lines that fail, and just junk that
line. Or, alternatively, fix the real bug.

However, as it stands now: After the recent audioscrobbler downtime, I
had hundreds of tracks in the scrobblerqueue file. Then, xmms-scrobbler
managed to reconnect to audioscrobler (when it finally came back) and
promptly through away the vast majority of my data.

As xmms-scrobbler currently stands, it throws out the user's data
arbitrarily, often hangs xmms, apparently can crash xmms [and, look at
the crap on the stack in that backtrace --- PGAT --- plain old ASCII.
Looks exploitable], etc. For all these reasons, I really doubt we should
ship xmms-scrobbler as-is in Sarge.

[BTW: Don't worry about the asd1 at the end of version; only change is
to make it prefer ARTIST over PERFORMER]

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (130, 'unstable'), (120, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-bohr
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xmms-scrobbler depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcurl37.13.2-2 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libidn110.5.13-1.0   GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libmusicbrainz4 2.1.1-3  Second generation incarnation of t
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.5-12   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  xmms1.2.10+cvs20050209-2 Versatile X audio player that look
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCgD1r+z+IwlXqWf4RAl4/AJ9p/pp9kHCZse93h+EFox0PqfeZjQCghz27
i1kfHZD3VHBm0A7mLBUWfTE=
=1Dcj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308420: libwxgtk2.4-python: File '/usr/bin/helpviewer' conflicts with wxpython2.5.3

[debian]

Package: libwxgtk2.4-python
Version: 2.4.2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.3

Upon upgrade, I receive the following message in Synaptic's terminal
window:
--
(Reading database ... 132666 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libwxgtk2.4-python 2.4.2.6 (using
.../libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libwxgtk2.4-python ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/helpviewer', which is also in package
wxpython2.5.3
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libwxgtk2.4-python_2.4.2.6.1_i386.deb
--

Hopefully, this is a simple matter of declaring additional
relationships in the control file.

Keep up the great work!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7+phil1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libwxgtk2.4-python depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-13  GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.6-4   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwxgtk2.4  2.4.2.6.1   wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t
ii  python2.32.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa-glu [libglu 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree

Additionally:
ii  wxpython2.5.3  2.5.3.2

-- no debconf information

Bug#307574: marked as done (Built with wrong OCaml version)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:17:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307574: fixed in perl4caml 0.3.15-2sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 00:13:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 03 17:13:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcp0010743271pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net 
(pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) [69.243.84.108] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DT7W7-0006bs-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 17:13:31 -0700
Received: from orthrus ([192.168.0.2])
by pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 
(Debian))
id 1DT7YS-00020M-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 20:15:56 -0400
Received: from furrm by orthrus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DT7W5-00044e-00; Tue, 03 May 2005 20:13:29 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Built with wrong OCaml version
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 20:13:29 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: perl4caml
Severity: grave

This package is built from the wrong OCaml version(it slipped in with a
bad dependency) and thus is completely useless in Debian.  I'm uploading
a new version now, but since Sarge is frozen, if it doesn't get built in
time or some such, this package shouldn't be shipped in sarge.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 307574-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 04:23:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 21:23:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVMH4-0003Nt-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 21:23:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVMBZ-0003NH-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:17:33 -0400
From: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307574: fixed in perl4caml 0.3.15-2sarge1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:17:33 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: perl4caml
Source-Version: 0.3.15-2sarge1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
perl4caml, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libperl4caml-ocaml-dev_0.3.15-2sarge1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/perl4caml/libperl4caml-ocaml-dev_0.3.15-2sarge1_i386.deb
libperl4caml-ocaml-doc_0.3.15-2sarge1_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/perl4caml/libperl4caml-ocaml-doc_0.3.15-2sarge1_all.deb
libperl4caml-ocaml_0.3.15-2sarge1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/perl4caml/libperl4caml-ocaml_0.3.15-2sarge1_i386.deb
perl4caml_0.3.15-2sarge1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/perl4caml/perl4caml_0.3.15-2sarge1.diff.gz
perl4caml_0.3.15-2sarge1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/perl4caml/perl4caml_0.3.15-2sarge1.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated perl4caml package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Forma

Bug#308417: freefem3d: ..was kickedout on a libopts9 dep conflict with "a" libopts...

[Arnt Karlsen]

Package: freefem3d
Version: ..the latest one for Sid.
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



...the looong story below sys info, but first the short story: 
On standard apt-get -u update, freefem3d and 2 depends 
(libopts9 libopts9-dev) was kicked out, so after I was done, 
I did:" apt-get install freefem3d
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 freefem3d: Depends: libopts9 but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
"



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-386

Versions of packages freefem3d depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13   GCC support library
pn  libopts9 Not found.
ii  libstdc++5  1:3.3.6-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libvtk4 4.4.2-6  Visualization Toolkit - A high lev

...the looong story:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # w ;apt-get update ;apt-get -u upgrade ;apt-get clean ;w
03:53:17 up 1 day,  9:14,  2 users,  load average: 0.07, 0.24, 0.24
USER TTY  FROM  LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
arnt :0   -Sun18   ?xdm?   5:16m  0.02s -:0
root pts/21   a45  Sun180.00s  0.96s  0.05s w
Get:1 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/main Packages [3539kB]
Get:2 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages [235kB]
Get:3 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Release [110B]
Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/contrib Packages
Get:4 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/contrib Release [113B]
Hit http://security.debian.org stable/updates/non-free Packages
Get:5 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/non-free Release [114B]
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Packages
Get:6 http://security.debian.org testing/updates/main Release [111B]
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Packages
Get:7 http://security.debian.org testing/updates/contrib Release [114B]
Hit http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Packages
Get:8 http://security.debian.org testing/updates/non-free Release
 [115B]
Get:9 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/main Release [82B]
Get:10 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/contrib Packages [70.1kB]
Get:11 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/contrib Release [85B]
Get:12 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-free Packages [67.9kB]
Get:13 http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-free Release [86B]
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/main Packages
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/main Release
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/contrib Packages
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/contrib Release
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/non-free Packages
Hit http://192.168.2.222 unstable/non-US/non-free Release
Get:14 http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/main Packages
 [152kB]
Get:15 http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/main Release [104B]
Hit http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/contrib Packages
Get:16 http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/contrib Release
 [107B]
Hit http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/non-free Packages
Get:17 http://192.168.2.222 ../project/experimental/non-free Release
 [108B]
Fetched 4065kB in 6s (637kB/s)
Reading Package Lists... Done
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 autogen: Depends: libopts25 but it is not installed
Depends: libopts25-dev (>= 1:5.7-1) but it is not installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
03:53:38 up 1 day,  9:15,  2 users,  load average: 0.67, 0.37, 0.29
USER TTY  FROM  LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU  PCPU WHAT
arnt :0   -Sun18   ?xdm?   5:16m  0.02s -:0
root pts/21   a45  Sun18   21.00s  0.97s  0.05s w
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
 libopts25 libopts25-dev
The following packages will be REMOVED:
 freefem3d libopts9 libopts9-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
 libopts25 libopts25-dev
0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 3 to remove and 70 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 12

Processed: tagging 308408

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308408 sarge
Bug#308408: missing dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reopening 308408

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 308408
Bug#308408: missing dependency
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308408: marked as done (missing dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308408: fixed in sident 3.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 01:58:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 18:58:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVK19-0005xs-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 18:58:39 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DVK3D-0001l2-PI
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:00:47 +0200
Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DVK43-0007Td-3m
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:01:39 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DVK0b-0006Ws-2x
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:58:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: missing dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:58:04 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: sidentd
Severity: normal

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem
Setting up sidentd (3.4-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/sidentd.postinst: line 10: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing sidentd (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 sidentd
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Seems a recommends on netbase is not enough.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 308408-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 04:13:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 21:13:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVM7O-0001C0-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 21:13:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVLwa-m7-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:04 -0400
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308408: fixed in sident 3.4-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: sident
Source-Version: 3.4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sident, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libnet-sident-perl_3.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sident/libnet-sident-perl_3.4-3_i386.deb
libsident0-dev_3.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sident/libsident0-dev_3.4-3_i386.deb
libsident0_3.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sident/libsident0_3.4-3_i386.deb
sident_3.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/sident/sident_3.4-3.diff.gz
sident_3.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/s/sident/sident_3.4-3.dsc
sidentd_3.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/sident/sidentd_3.4-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EM

Bug#308402: marked as done (missing dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308402: fixed in node 0.3.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 01:17:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 18:17:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVJNj-0008EN-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 18:17:55 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DVJPn-0001HX-Mu
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:20:03 +0200
Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DVJQd-0007D6-0d
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:20:55 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DVJNC-0007M0-74
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:17:22 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: missing dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:17:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: node
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error:
Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing node (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 node
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 308402-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 04:13:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 21:13:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVM7U-0001CD-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 21:13:20 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVLwZ-ko-00; Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308402: fixed in node 0.3.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 00:02:03 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: node
Source-Version: 0.3.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
node, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

node_0.3.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4.diff.gz
node_0.3.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4.dsc
node_0.3.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/n/node/node_0.3.2-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated node package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact th

Bug#308408: missing dependency

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Russ,

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:31:46PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Package: sidentd
> > Severity: normal

> > Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem
> > Setting up sidentd (3.4-2) ...
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/sidentd.postinst: line 10: update-inetd: command not 
> > found
> > dpkg: error processing sidentd (--configure):
> >  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  sidentd
> > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

> > Seems a recommends on netbase is not enough.

> D'oh.  Yes.  I was intending to add a Depends (the changelog even says
> that), and must have experienced brain fade when I did it.

> New package ready, and I'll drop my sponsor a line.  Once it gets
> uploaded, I'll send a note to debian-release to get it approved for sarge.

Should you have any trouble getting your sponsor to upload for you (which is
known to happen to people from time to time), please put the source package
on-line somewhere and link it from the BTS: there are generally a fair
number of people willing to sponsor uploads for RC bugfixes.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#308402: missing dependency

[Hamish Moffatt]

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 03:17:22AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: node
> Severity: serious
> 
> Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error:
> Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found
> dpkg: error processing node (--configure):
>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  node
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Thanks. I just uploaded 0.3.2-4 to fix this. I'll email debian-release
to request thawing.

I think the chroot environment is a bit artificial though. In practice,
when would netbase ever not be installed? It's in section base and it's
priority: important. 149 packages rdepend on it.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308408: missing dependency

[Russ Allbery]

Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: sidentd
> Severity: normal

> Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem
> Setting up sidentd (3.4-2) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/sidentd.postinst: line 10: update-inetd: command not found
> dpkg: error processing sidentd (--configure):
>  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>  sidentd
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

> Seems a recommends on netbase is not enough.

D'oh.  Yes.  I was intending to add a Depends (the changelog even says
that), and must have experienced brain fade when I did it.

New package ready, and I'll drop my sponsor a line.  Once it gets
uploaded, I'll send a note to debian-release to get it approved for sarge.

Thank you *very* much for the testing and for catching this stupid
mistake.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 308408

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308408 pending
Bug#308408: missing dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306851: marked as done (postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 21:12:50 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306851: postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 22:18:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 15:18:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213.237.76.236.adsl.oebr.worldonline.dk (martin.z3n.dk) 
[213.237.76.236] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRHL1-0004Pb-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:18:28 -0700
Received: by martin.z3n.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7C23C804DAE9; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:18:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:18:28 +0200
From: Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sk=F8tt?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: postfix: pid files doesnt get removed when stopping
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.10
X-Operating-System: 2.6.12-rc2 GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: postfix
Version: 2.2.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I discovered today that Postfix wasnt running on my laptop and
discovered the following lines in /var/log/syslog:

Apr 28 20:58:49 martin ifplugd(eth1)[1905]: client: DHCPACK from 192.168.=
42.1
Apr 28 20:58:50 martin postfix/postfix-script: fatal: the Postfix mail sy=
stem is not running
Apr 28 20:58:50 martin dhclient: bound to 192.168.42.3 -- renewal in
129600 seconds.

This was when booting my laptop with my wireless card inserted so
postfix shouldn't be running at this time, but
/etc/network/if-up.d/postfix still tries to restart postfix.

I discovered that stopping postfix (/etc/init.d/postfix stop) didn't
result in /var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid being removed. This
explains why the if-up script thought postfix was running.

I have set severity to grave since this bugs causes postfix not to be run=
.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc2
Locale: LANG=3Den_DK, LC_CTYPE=3Dda_DK (charmap=3DISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and gro=
ups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.48   Debian configuration managem=
ent sy
ii  dpkg1.10.27  Package maintenance system f=
or Deb
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared librar=
ies an
ii  libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libra=
ries [
ii  libsasl22.1.19-1.5   Authentication abstraction l=
ibrary
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking syst=
em

-- debconf information:
* postfix/master_upgrade_warning: true
  postfix/db_upgrade_warning: true
* postfix/mailname: martin.z3n.dk
  postfix/tlsmgr_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/dynamicmaps_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/recipient_delim: +
* postfix/main_mailer_type: Internet Site
  postfix/transport_map_warning:
* postfix/append_dot_mydomain: false
  postfix/relayhost:
  postfix/procmail: true
  postfix/bad_recipient_delimiter:
* postfix/chattr: false
* postfix/root_address: martin
  postfix/rfc1035_violation: false
  postfix/mynetworks: 127.0.0.0/8
* postfix/destinations: martin.z3n.dk, martin, localhost.localdomain, loc=
alhost
  postfix/nqmgr_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/not_configured:
  postfix/mailbox_limit: 0

--=20
Med venlig hilsen
Martin Sk=F8tt

---
Received: (at 306851-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 03:12:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 20:12:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVLAx-0002s8-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 20:12:51 -0700
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP i

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

[Matt Kraai]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:50:05AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> I still don't see how your uploading libopts25 for powerpc fixes a 
> bug on i386.  packages.debian.org is probably out of date, and I 
> guess will soon have powerpc on its list of architectures that 
> libopts25 is available for due to your upload.  buildd.debian.org 
> as near as I can tell, doesn't have libopts25 for unstable (or 
> libopts or libopts9 or libopts*), or for any architecture.  So 
> for the 3 people who submitted bug reports on libopts25, and 
> myself, there is currently nothing by the way of a fix for the 
> installation problem in the works?

I uploaded the source package, autogen 1:5.7-2, and the PowerPC binary
packages autogen 1:5.7-2, libopts25 1:5.7-2, and libopts25-dev
1:5.7-2.  The libopts25 and libopts25-dev binary packages conflict
with and replace libopts9 and libopts9-dev, respectively, which fixes
the bug on PowerPC.

The build daemons then use the source package to build binary packages
for the other architectures (including i386).  These binary packages
fix the bug on the other architectures.

Once the build daemons build the binary packages for i386, the problem
will be fixed on that architecture.

-- 
Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 308408 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # uups
> severity 308408 serious
Bug#308408: missing dependency
Severity set to `serious'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308410: fails to uninstall

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: pdns-backend-mysql
Severity: serious

When installing and then deinstalling the package in a clean chroot
I get the following error:
Removing pdns-backend-mysql ...
sed: can't read -: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing pdns-backend-mysql (--purge):
 subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 pdns-backend-mysql
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308411: fails to uninstall

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: ttf-tmuni
Severity: serious

If installing the package in a clean chroot and then immediatly
uninstalling it, the following problem occours:
Removing ttf-tmuni ...
W: truetype: Category not found.
dpkg: error processing ttf-tmuni (--purge):
 subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 ttf-tmuni
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308409: missing dependency

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: pdns-server
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem:
Selecting previously deselected package pdns-server.
Unpacking pdns-server (from .../pdns-server_2.9.17-11_i386.deb) ...
Creating user and group pdns.../var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 23: addgroup: 
command not found
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/pdns-server_2.9.17-11_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308254: londonlaw: Depends on non-existent package: wxpython

[Micah Anderson]

This sounds like you need a sponsor to upload? Do you have a regularly
scheduled sponsor? Have you checked to see if the package works with
the libwxgtk2.4-python dependency? If so, I may be able to upload.

Micah


Reinhard Tartler schrieb am Monday, den 09. May 2005:

> 
> wxwidgets2.5 has been removed from debian and no other package is
> providing wxpython. I've created an updated package at
> http://siretart.tauware.de/debian/londonlaw, which depends on
> libwxgtk2.4-python, as you suggested.
> 
> Gruesse,
>   Reinhard
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308406: missing dependency

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: musixtex-slurps
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following problem:
Setting up musixtex-slurps (92a-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/musixtex-slurps.postinst: line 22: /usr/bin/mktexlsr: No 
such file or directory
dpkg: error processing musixtex-slurps (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308405: missing dependency

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following
error:
Setting up mozilla-firefox-locale-ar (0.2-1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-locale-ar.postinst: line 11: 
update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found
dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-locale-ar (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 mozilla-firefox-locale-ar
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 301370 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 301370 serious
Bug#301370: quota postrm fails due to missing dependency
Severity set to `serious'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

[Philip Clark]

Hi Russ, 

Thanks for this. I don't think it should be grave. sorry about this. Any
decent sys admin would make sure eveyrthing was shutdown before doing a
hard reboot. Perhaps important or serious in sid, is the best level?

-Phil

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Philip J Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Package: openafs-client
>> Version: 1.3.81-5
>> Severity: grave
>> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>> Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and
>> openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5.
>
> Also, for Philip and for those reading the bug log, I'm not quite sure how
> best to handle the tagging and severity here.  I tagged this bug sid even
> though the bug also affects the package in sarge, but I believe that it
> requires a newer 2.6 kernel than the one in sarge to trigger.  So in other
> words, it's still a sarge bug but the severity is less in sarge because I
> believe the module will work properly with the sarge kernel.
>
> There are unfortunately several issues like that and the upstream diff
> between 1.3.81 and 1.3.82 is extensive, making a backport for sarge
> somewhat less than appealing.
>
> There isn't a really good solution for sarge, although I may start trying
> to cherry-pick patches from upstream.  (But testing is going to be a
> serious issue.)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

[Russ Allbery]

Philip J Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: openafs-client
> Version: 1.3.81-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and
> openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5.

Also, for Philip and for those reading the bug log, I'm not quite sure how
best to handle the tagging and severity here.  I tagged this bug sid even
though the bug also affects the package in sarge, but I believe that it
requires a newer 2.6 kernel than the one in sarge to trigger.  So in other
words, it's still a sarge bug but the severity is less in sarge because I
believe the module will work properly with the sarge kernel.

There are unfortunately several issues like that and the upstream diff
between 1.3.81 and 1.3.82 is extensive, making a backport for sarge
somewhat less than appealing.

There isn't a really good solution for sarge, although I may start trying
to cherry-pick patches from upstream.  (But testing is going to be a
serious issue.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308402: missing dependency

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: node
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error:
Setting up node (0.3.2-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/node.postinst: line 27: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing node (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 node
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Debian Kerberosish: r1880 - openafs/trunk/openafs/debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308399 pending
Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending

> tags 304040 pending
Bug#304040: openafs-client: fails to stop afs-client
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 308400 to kftgt

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 308400 kftgt
Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd
Warning: Unknown package 'kfgtd'
Bug reassigned from package `kfgtd' to `kftgt'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

[Russ Allbery]

tags 308399 sid
thanks

Philip J Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Package: openafs-client
> Version: 1.3.81-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and
> openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5.

Is your kernel built with preempt enabled?  I believe this problem is
specific to that configuration.

I'm working on packaging 1.3.82 right now, which has a fix for this.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308234: upgrading from 2.1.23 failed because of not setting slapd/dump_database_destdir

[Joey Hess]

Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 308234 debconf
> thanks
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:20:23AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:21:32AM +0200, Ferenc Engard wrote:
> 
> > > While I have upgraded my system, slapd upgrade asked some questions, 
> > > including directory to dump databases. The text said the default is
> > > /var/backups/slapd-VERSION. Reading that, I simply pushed enter. After
> > > that, the preinst script have failed, rendering slapd unconfigured.
> > > Meanwhile, apt has upgraded my libldap2 package.
> 
> > Which debconf frontend to you use? I hit the same problem with the
> > readline frontend which does not seem to use the default value if you
> > just push enter but instead the empty value. Maybe the configuration
> > script should just replace the empty value by the default value again.
> 
> I really think this is a bug that needs to be dealt with from the debconf
> side of things.  Torsten, if you want to add a workaround to slapd, that
> should be ok, but the real bug appears to be that the readline frontend is
> somehow defaulting to an empty string for text values (although, not in my
> testing here...).  It may be that slapd is one of the more severely affected
> packages, but I'm sure it's not the only place this causes problems.

The bug is in slapd for including this text in its debconf template:

  "The default is /var/backups/slapd-VERSION"

This comes under the heading of not referring to debconf UI in a
template. Just as you don't know how debconf will choose to present a
yes/no question and thus "say yes" constructions should be avoided, you
don't know how or if a given debconf frontend handles default values[1].
Indeed a static template such as this one doesn't even know for sure
what the default value _is_; it could have been overriden.

The technical details of why debconf is not able to present a default
value with the readline frontend, when the recommended
literm-readline-gnu-perl is not installed, or with the teletype
frontend, are already explained in bug #183970. I know of no better
solution than what debconf already does, aside from perhaps refusing to
run the readline frontend without literm-readline-gnu-perl (but this
wouldn't fix the teletype frontend anyway).

I'll reassign this back to slapd if it's agreeable.

-- 
see shy jo

[1] For example, the white mice debconf frontend[2] cannot offer a default
value to the mice as they decide which tunnel to run down in the
debconf maze. They have to choose right or left, and any debconf
template telling them there is a default is obviously wrong.
[2] Cheezy, I know, but I'm running out of useful hypothetical debconf
frontends. Besides, doom is passe and HHGTTG is back in.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#308401: Missing dependency

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: uw-imapd
Severity: serious

Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following
error:
Setting up uw-imapd (2002edebian1-9) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/uw-imapd.postinst: line 21: update-inetd: command not found
dpkg: error processing uw-imapd (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
 uw-imapd
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

This also affects the postrm.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308399 sid
Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I do not want to see it release with sarge in this state of
> > maintainership.
> 
> Hinted for removal from testing.

Thank you for keeping an eye - I was planning to contact you tomorrow if
nothing happened.

Take care,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


pgpw7Q6XLDQq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: kfgtd
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious

You use update-inetd in your maintainer scripts but you don't depend
on any of the packages providing this script.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308399: openafs-client: openafs wont shutdown in kernel 2.6.12-rc3

[Philip J. Clark]

Package: openafs-client
Version: 1.3.81-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Openafs wont shutdown. Using Debian unstable, kernel 2.6.12-rc3 and 
openafs-modules-source 1.3.81-5. There is a thread on the openafs-devel list 
about it:-
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2005-April/011994.html
Essentially, this is grave because you are unable to shutdown Linux after this
has occurred. This makes the package unusable since it requires a hard reboot 
and possible loss of data. There is apparently a fix by enabling CONFIG_SMP in 
the kernel, but for single processor machines this may result in a significant 
slow down.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc3
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages openafs-client depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2 1.4.49Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-21  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses55.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  openafs-modules-2. 1.3.81-5+2.6.12-rc3-8 The AFS distributed filesystem- Ke
ii  openafs-modules-so 1.3.81-5  The AFS distributed filesystem- Mo

-- debconf information:
* openafs-client/fakestat: true
* openafs-client/afsdb: true
* openafs-client/run-client: false
* openafs-client/dynroot: true
* openafs-client/crypt: true
* openafs-client/thiscell: slac.stanford.edu
* openafs-client/cachesize: 5
  openafs-client/cell-info:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308398: missing dependency on adduser and wrong assumptions in postrm

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: irmp3
Severity: serious

1.) You don't depend on adduser even though you use it in the postinst.
Since adduser is not essential, this is an serious bug
2.) You unconditionally call deluser in postrm, however
"the postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present
during the purge phase" (policy 7.2), so even if you add a dependency
on adduser this remains a serious bug

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 307655, closing 307655

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 307655 - fixed
Bug#307655: gtodo: Segmentation fault
Tags were: fixed pending
Tags removed: fixed

> close 307655
Bug#307655: gtodo: Segmentation fault
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Nicolò Wojewoda <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Removed pending tag.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 308395 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 308395 important
Bug#308395: smbldap-groupmod does not correctly handle adding users to new 
groups
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Upgrading bug severity

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 307571 grave
Bug#307571: gnomebaker: Gnomebaker fails to start
Severity set to `grave'.

> tags 307571 +sarge
Bug#307571: gnomebaker: Gnomebaker fails to start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308233: marked as done (file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 20:02:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308233: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 May 2005 22:02:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 15:02:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUtr1-0004SX-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 15:02:27 -0700
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DUtt2-qk-HZ
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 09 May 2005 00:04:32 +0200
Received: from p54a3edb9.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.237.185] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1DUtts-0004Kw-RG
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 09 May 2005 00:05:25 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DUtqP-0005uc-GW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 00:01:49 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 00:01:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lsh-utils,nettle-bin
Severity: grave

Unpacking nettle-bin (from .../nettle-bin_1.12-2_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package lsh-utils.
Unpacking lsh-utils (from .../lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/lsh-utils_2.0.1-2.1_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/nettle-lfib-stream', which is also in package 
nettle-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 308233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 00:14:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 17:14:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVIOn-00074Q-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 17:14:57 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVICg-00013v-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 20:02:26 -0400
From: Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#308233: fixed in lsh-utils 2.0.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 20:02:26 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: lsh-utils
Source-Version: 2.0.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lsh-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lsh-client_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-client_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
lsh-server_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-server_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils-doc_2.0.1-3_all.deb
lsh-utils_2.0.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-3.diff.gz
lsh-utils_2.0.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-3.dsc
lsh-utils_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/lsh-utils/lsh-utils_2.0.1-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If 

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:31:25AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> > I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along
> > with some minor issues.  Patch attached.
> 
> Approved

Hmm, seems I missed the reopening of the RC bug...

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308395: smbldap-groupmod does not correctly handle adding users to new groups

[Daniel Dickinson]

Package: smbldap-tools
Version: 0.8.7-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Since updating smbldap-tools I have been unable to add more than one user to
newly created groups user smbldap-modify.  Adding to existing groups succeeds 
as does adding to the group by using ldapmodify and adding the appropriate 
'memberUid: xxx' line to the group. 

This used to work on this system, and as mentioned manually modifying the 
group works.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages smbldap-tools depends on:
ii  libcrypt-smbhash-perl 0.02-6 generate LM/NT hash of a password 
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl   2.10-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii  libio-socket-ssl-perl 0.96-1 Class implementing an object orien
ii  libnet-ldap-perl  0.3202-2   A Client interface to LDAP servers
ii  perl  5.8.4-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#301968: marked as done (lsh-server fails to create the hostkey)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 9 May 2005 19:55:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line lsh-server fails to create the hostkey
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Mar 2005 12:08:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 29 04:08:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zenon.ls-hosting.de [213.239.207.20] (foobar)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGFVv-0001Ck-00; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:08:07 -0800
Received: from c2107.campino.wh.tu-darmstadt.de ([130.83.142.7] 
helo=x.dreamind.de)
by zenon.ls-hosting.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DGFVp-0002jL-J1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:08:02 +0200
Received: from dreamind by x.dreamind.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DGFVq-0005Zs-9j; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:08:02 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:08:02 +0200
From: Stefan Pfetzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lsh-server fails to create the hostkey
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9
Organization: private
X-PGP-Algorithms: RSA and DSA/EG keys are available
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (Kernel 2.6.11.5-x)
X-Cool: http://dreamind.de
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: lsh-server
Version: 2.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

lsh-server fails to create the hostkey, possibly because the lsh-keygen
options are changed. --nist-level now is the length in bit of the rsa
key.

So this happens:

--- snip ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/lsh-server start
Creating lsh host key (this only needs to be done once):
/etc/lsh_host_keylsh-keygen: RSA keys should be at least 512 bits.
Try `lsh-keygen --help' or `lsh-keygen --usage' for more information.
lsh-writekey: Empty key on input, giving up.
--- snap ---

Simply use:

lsh-keygen --server --nist-level 2048

or:

lsh-keygen --server --nist-level 4096

in the lsh-server initscript. Thanks.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.5-x
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Versions of packages lsh-server depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.46   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libasn1-6-heimdal   0.6.3-8  Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgmp3 4.1.4-5  Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libkrb5-17-heimdal  0.6.3-8  Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos
ii  libncurses5 5.4-4Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  liboop4 1.0-3Event loop management library
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libreadline44.3-15   GNU readline and history libraries
ii  libroken16-kerberos4kth 1.2.2-11.1   Roken Libraries for Kerberos4 From
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  lsh-utils   2.0.1-2  Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol ut
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 301968-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 23:56:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 16:56:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVI6T-0003Fh-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 16:56:01 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO alps.law.yi.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] with login)
  by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2005 23:55:30 -
Received: from sfllaw by alps.law.yi.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DVI5s-KE-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;

Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

[Steve Langasek]

severity 308391 important
thanks

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:11:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Package: crosshurd
> Version: 1.7.13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: Renders package unusable

> Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following
> error:

> cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/sysvinit/inittab': No such file or directory

> This is before fstab is setup and all. 

From this description, I understand that the bug is specific to the
hurd-i386 port, and therefore not a release-critical bug.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 06:32:54PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> I've uploaded an NMU for doc++ which fixes the FTBFS bug (#292337) along
> with some minor issues.  Patch attached.

Approved

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 308391 important
Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on 
hurd-i386
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

[Simon Law]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with
> > sexp-conv.
> 
> Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at
> all in the lsh package.

Frank,

I'm not able to get at my GPG key right now as my home computer is still
packed away in a box.  (I moved to a new flat.)  Could you remove
/usr/bin/nettle-lfib-stream from debian/lsh-utils.files and do an NMU?

Thanks a bunch!
Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386

[Michael Banck]

Package: crosshurd
Version: 1.7.13
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Renders package unusable

Second stage of native-install on hurd-i386 aborts with the following
error:

cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/sysvinit/inittab': No such file or directory

This is before fstab is setup and all. 

This snippet should work:

# some boot tarballs have a hacked inittab, let's restore it.
if [ -e /usr/share/sysvinit/inittab ] ; then
cp /usr/share/sysvinit/inittab /etc/inittab
fi


Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308282: [phpbb2 #308282] upstream patch

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:11:06PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Find attached a diff made against 2.0.15 and our last sid version.
> 
> | +   $text = preg_replace('#(script|about|applet|activex|chrome):#is', 
> "\\1:", $text);
>
> It looks like this patch can be applied to close the bug.

Ok, based on the patch, whatever is being fixed is definitely suspected
to be a cross-site scripting issue.

It looks like this is about preventing URL's like  to be output. Since browsers are supposed to
parse the html entities before interpreting the resulting URL, this
patch seems wrong to me, it might actually work though if the affected
browsers really do not parse such html entities in advance.

Also, only rewriting specific scheme's would be dangerous as who knows
when a certain browser will actually include yet another such scheme and
start to do funny things with it. A whitelist would also be tricky
though.

I more tend to think it's a browser problem if it allows site-specified
code to be run via  and  and such, that is, outside
of 

Bug#300859: marked as done ([CAN-2005-0366] Minor cryptographic flaw in the OpenPGP protocol)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300859: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 10:45:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 02:45:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDgt7-0007Y6-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:45:29 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DDgt6-00080o-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:28 +0100
Received: from [195.90.9.8] (helo=anton)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1DDgt6-00047c-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:28 +0100
Received: by anton (Postfix, from userid 2028)
id E79C9B6EC9; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:27 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===2015084441=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [CAN-2005-0366] Minor cryptographic flaw in the OpenPGP protocol
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1.1.200308291454
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:45:27 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
auth:4ad79d65ac46f2345c6ef2e856c1d9ef
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===2015084441==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: gnupg
Version: 1.4.0-3
Severity: normal
Tags: security

Serge Mister and Robert Zuccherato have published a paper, which describes
an attack against the symmetric encryption as used in the OpenPGP standard.
It's not exploitable in regular gnupg operation with a human endpoint.

Full details are described at the announce mail at:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-announce/2005q1/000191.html

I've attached upstream's fix that circumvents the problem by disabling the
problematic bits of the OpenPGP standard.

Cheers,
 Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux anton 2.4.29-univention.1 #1 SMP Thu Jan 27 17:08:46 CET 2005 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages gnupg depends on:
ii  libc6  2.3.2-9   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libldap2   2.1.30-3  OpenLDAP libraries
ii  makedev2.3.1-70.3.200407260828   Creates device files in /dev
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.15.200501191530 compression library - runtime

-- debconf-show failed


--===2015084441==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/home/jmm/gpg-can-2005-0366.diff"

Index: include/cipher.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnupg/gnupg/include/cipher.h,v
retrieving revision 1.53.2.6
diff -u -r1.53.2.6 cipher.h
--- include/cipher.h29 Nov 2004 21:07:43 -  1.53.2.6
+++ include/cipher.h8 Feb 2005 04:12:12 -
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
 int keylen;
 int algo_info_printed;
 int use_mdc;
+int symmetric;
 byte key[32]; /* this is the largest used keylen (256 bit) */
 } DEK;
 
Index: g10/mainproc.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnupg/gnupg/g10/mainproc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.112.2.27
diff -u -r1.112.2.27 mainproc.c
--- g10/mainproc.c  27 Jun 2004 18:26:49 -  1.112.2.27
+++ g10/mainproc.c  8 Feb 2005 04:12:13 -
@@ -317,6 +317,8 @@
c->dek = passphrase_to_dek( NULL, 0, algo, &enc->s2k, 0, NULL, NULL );
if(c->dek)
  {
+   c->dek->symmetric=1;
+
/* FIXME: This doesn't work perfectly if a symmetric key
   comes before a public key in the message - if the user
   doesn't know the passphrase, then there is a chance
Index: g10/encr-data.c
===

Bug#299814: marked as done (GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 19:02:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299814: fixed in gnupg 1.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 18:53:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 16 10:53:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.beamnet.de [62.75.155.124] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBde6-0005n2-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:53:30 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (pD956EFAA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.86.239.170])
(sasl authenticated)
by server.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A47231604C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:53:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:53:37 +0100
From: Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: beamNet
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="060809060500010402020308"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060809060500010402020308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: gnupg
Version: 1.2.5-3
Severity: grave
Tags: woody, sarge, patch

Hi.

GnuPG 1.2.5 selects wrong encryption keys (e.g. for my key in the debian 
keyring). Thus, data is encrypted irreversible, i.e. lost.
When discussed on debian-private in February, I was encouraged to file 
this bug.
According to upstream, this is fixed by newer installments of the GnuPG 
(>=1.2.7 IIRC).
Simon Richter pointed out that a fix can be found with

cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg login
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnupg rdiff -u \
   -D'2004/11/29' -D'2004/11/30' gnupg

The attached patch is a version of the above rdiff that cleanly applies 
to debianized source of gnupg 1.2.5-3 and with it applied gnupg packages 
without this bug are build.

Kind regards

T.

P.S.: I really would like to see this bug fixed on db.debian.org (or 
whereever ud-mailgate runs) and would happily try to come up with a 
patch for the appropriate version of gnupg if that means that I can hope 
to be able to read ud-mailgate's encrypted mails.

--060809060500010402020308
Content-Type: text/x-patch;
 name="gnupg.dont_encrypt_to_auth_key.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="gnupg.dont_encrypt_to_auth_key.diff"

diff -urN gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c
--- gnupg-1.2.5~/g10/getkey.c   2004-05-01 11:19:03.0 +0200
+++ gnupg-1.2.5/g10/getkey.c2005-03-16 19:15:52.0 +0100
@@ -1248,6 +1248,51 @@
 }
 }
 
+static int
+parse_key_usage(PKT_signature *sig)
+{
+  int key_usage=0;
+  const byte *p;
+  size_t n;
+  byte flags;
+
+  p=parse_sig_subpkt(sig->hashed,SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS,&n);
+  if(p && n)
+{
+  /* first octet of the keyflags */
+  flags=*p;
+
+  if(flags & 3)
+   {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_SIG;
+ flags&=~3;
+   }
+
+  if(flags & 12)
+   {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_ENC;
+ flags&=~12;
+   }
+
+  if(flags & 0x20)
+   {
+ key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_AUTH;
+ flags&=~0x20;
+   }
+
+  if(flags)
+   key_usage |= PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+  /* We set PUBKEY_USAGE_UNKNOWN to indicate that this key has a
+ capability that we do not handle.  This serves to distinguish
+ between a zero key usage which we handle as the default
+ capabilities for that algorithm, and a usage that we do not
+ handle. */
+
+  return key_usage;
+}
+
 /*
  * Apply information from SIGNODE (which is the valid self-signature
  * associated with that UID) to the UIDNODE:
@@ -1280,17 +1325,7 @@
 uid->expiredate = sig->expiredate;
 
 /* store the key flags in the helper variable for later processing */
-uid->help_key_usage = 0;
-p = parse_sig_subpkt (sig->hashed, SIGSUBPKT_KEY_FLAGS, &n 

Bug#308390: protocol error

[Marc Glisse]

Package: libgimp-perl
Version: 2.0.dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable


any example using libgimp-perl fails with a "protocol error" message, as
shown in 2 other bug reports.

Gimp/Config.pm contains a line:
   GIMP => q[],

Net/Net.pm contains:
 exec $Gimp::Config{GIMP},

Both do not go well together apparently. Either the GIMP line should be
fixed, or the environment should be querried at some point to look for
gimp. The easiest way around I have found is this:

--- debian/rules.orig   2005-05-10 00:18:00.481533507 +0200
+++ debian/rules2005-05-10 00:07:30.315113340 +0200
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
dh_testdir

# Add here commands to compile the package.
-   $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr
+   $(PERL) Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor PREFIX=/usr GIMP=/usr/bin/gimp
$(MAKE) OPTIMIZE="$(CFLAGS)"

touch build-stamp


I must however warn you that I know nothing about either perl or gimp, so
you might want to check it. For me it seems to allow the examples in
/usr/share/doc/libgimp-perl/examples to work properly again (by the way,
these examples should look for perl in /usr/bin and not /opt/bin).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (70, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libgimp-perl depends on:
ii  gimp2.2.6-1  The GNU Image Manipulation Program
ii  libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4  The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgimp2.0  2.2.6-1  Libraries necessary to run the GIM
ii  libglib2.0-02.6.4-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2-perl1:1.081-1Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii  libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1  The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii  libpango1.0-0   1.8.1-1  Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  pdl 1:2.4.2-2perl data language: Perl extension
ii  perl5.8.4-8  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.4]   5.8.4-8  The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

-- no debconf information




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307299: Perl taint error on TWiki diffs page after twiki/apache upgrade

[tristan]

Hello Sven

Thank you for the response. When I click "Diffs" on any topic I 
open a link that looks like:

https://twiki/cgi-bin/twiki/rdiff/Systems/SystemData?rev1=1.29&rev2=1.24

Assuming you have taint checking turned on, this sort of link will
always produce the error with the original RDiff.pm, although I
suppose it might be dependant upon the version of perl or mod_perl.

What errors did you get in your log? Did you make the change for 
both rev1 and rev2?

A diff of the original and fixed files:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/perl5/TWiki/UI# diff RDiff.pm.orig RDiff.pm.works 
410,411c410,411
< $rev1 =~ s/r?1\.//go;  # cut 'r' and major
< $rev2 =~ s/r?1\.//go;  # cut 'r' and major
---
> ($rev1) = $rev1 =~ /r?1\.(\d*)/;  # cut 'r' and major
> ($rev2) = $rev2 =~ /r?1\.(\d*)/;  # cut 'r' and major

Tristan



On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 07:15:29PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I cannot re-produce this. and when testing your suggested
> change, I get other errors in my log.
> 
> is there any more information you can give me?
> 
> (what topics, what kind of changes, which particular diffs link)
> 
> Sven
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308358: fails to install

[Jordi Mallach]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:35:23PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prèviament no seleccionat.
> > S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ...
> > dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar
> > /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> > s'està intentant sobreescriure
> > «/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/wesnoth-ei.mo», que també està en el
> > paquet wesnoth-data
> Please, can you use locale C when sending bugs to the BTS?

Well, you know this bug normally happens once and on subsequent runs apt
finishes alright...

I'm not going to run LANG=C just in case. Besides, what was going on was
totally obvious...

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 308358

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308358 sid
Bug#308358: fails to install
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:08AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good
> enough to take over being upstream.  I do not want to see it release
> with sarge in this state of maintainership.  I have had an offer of
> comaintainership, and if it pans out, we can close this bug.  If not, I
> will ask for removal from sid.

Hinted for removal from testing.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#308385: recommends common-lisp-controller but depends on it

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: cl-cclan
Severity: serious

cl-cclan uncoditionally calls programs from common-lisp-controller
in both its postinst and prerm. It only recommends it though, so
the installation may fail with:
Setting up cl-cclan (1.86-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/cl-cclan.postinst: line 27: 
/usr/sbin/register-common-lisp-source: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing cl-cclan (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 cl-cclan
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

(similar error for the prerm)

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:43:27AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd
> (I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time).

By emailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]  But that isn't going to do any good,
the sparc autobuilder is *not* going to be able to build this package.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#307574: Built with wrong OCaml version

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Mike,

Does fixing this bug actually require the new upstream version?  If so, it
will have to be removed from sarge.  If not, would you like to upload an
0.3.15-3 version of the package to testing-proposed-updates that has the
proper dependencies?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#305530: marked as done (Add dependency to libpt sound plugin)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2005 15:17:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 20 08:17:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from petrel.telecom.mipt.ru [193.125.143.140] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DOGxQ-0004Do-00; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:17:40 -0700
Received: by petrel.telecom.mipt.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3BBEC252B8641; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:38 +0400 (MSD)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olleg Samoylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Add dependency to libpt sound plugin
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:38 +0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ohphone-basic
Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-1
Severity: serious

Add dependency to one of libpt sound plugin.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ohphone-basic depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexpat1 1.95.8-1   XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libgcc1   1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library
ii  libldap2  2.1.30-6   OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libopenh323-1 1.15.3-2   H.323 aka VoIP library
ii  libpt-1.8.3   1.8.4-1Portable Windows Library
ii  libsasl2  2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libssl0.9.7   0.9.7e-3   SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 305530-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 21:20:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 14:20:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVFfi-0008Oy-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 14:20:14 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVFdJ-0007ab-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400
From: Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#305530: fixed in ohphone 1:1.4.3+20050304-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 17:17:45 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: ohphone
Source-Version: 1:1.4.3+20050304-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ohphone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone-basic_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb
ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.diff.gz
ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2.dsc
ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ohphone/ohphone_1.4.3+20050304-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kilian Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ohphone package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a pro

Bug#292337: doc++ 3.4.10-3.1 NMU

[Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo]

El dom, 08-05-2005 a las 20:48 -0700, Rick Younie escribiÃ:
> reopen 292337
> thanks
> 
> doc++ builds ok but segfaults when run
> during libupnp_1.2.1-1 build.

 This bug arises from time to time, depending on the m68k buildd being
used. I am not sure that the problem is in the package itself, or it
using too much memory.

 Anyway, you should ask upstream to use doxygen instead of doc++. The
latter is abandoned upstream and will be dropped as soon as possible.

 Cheers,

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#308374: doesn't clean up properly

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Package: libapache-mod-encoding
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

libapache-mod-encoding.prerm contains the following code:
for i in apache apache-ssl apache-perl; do
if [ -e /etc/$i/httpd.conf ]; then
modules-config $i enable mod_encoding
fi
done

You surely meant "disable" here. This breaks the apache configuration
on removal, hindering apache from restarting correctly.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general

[Thom May]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:53:20PM +0100, Daniel Hulme wrote:
> After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with
> the error:
> [Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC
> contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u
> sr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5
> /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl  .
> /etc/apache2) at (eval 2) line 3.\n
> 
> 

Apache has no knowledge of mod-perl2;
simply remove /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/perl.conf for a quick fix.
-Thom

-- 
That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source?
The Revolution will not be outsourced!
(Slick/Monique - Sinfest)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 297706 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # removal bugs are RC
> severity 297706 serious
Bug#297706: package-removal fails due to failure of post-removal script
Severity set to `serious'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#303352: marked as done (conflicting file: /usr/bin/tea also in package dak)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2005 08:10:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 06 01:10:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg [212.36.1.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJ5cF-0005pH-00; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 01:10:23 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DJ5cC-0003xX-Nf; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300
Received: from fiona.creditreform.bg ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (fiona [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 12874-10; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from pc1.creditreform.bg ([192.168.110.32] helo=pc1)
by fiona.creditreform.bg with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DJ5cC-0003xS-K3; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:20 +0300
Received: from dam by pc1 with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DJ5cA-0004pI-5N; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:18 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Damyan Ivanov \(at work\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: conflicting file: /usr/bin/tea also in package dak
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:10:18 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on pc1); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at creditreform.bg
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tea
Version: 7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1

Hi,

This is excerpt from the aptitude session:

Unpacking tea (from .../archives/tea_7.0-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tea_7.0-1_i386.deb
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/tea', which is also in package dak
 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

The Policy, Section 10.1 says:

Two different packages must not install programs with different
functionality but with the same filenames. .. If this case happens,
one of the programs must be renamed. The maintainers should report this
to the debian-devel mailing list and try to find a consensus about which
program will have to be renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both
programs must be renamed.


Thanks for packaging tea,
dam

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11+dam.1
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages tea depends on:
ii  libaspell150.60.2+20050121-2 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti
ii  libatk1.0-01.9.0-1   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-20  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.3-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-02.6.2-4   The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0  1.8.1-1   Layout and rendering of internatio

---
Received: (at 303352-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 19:54:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 12:54:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVEKH-0006eA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 12:54:01 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVEFg-0007JF-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400
From: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#303352: fixed in tea 9.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 15:49:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
   

Bug#308283: also breaks Apache in general

[Daniel Hulme]

Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 1.999.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

After upgrading to 1.999.23-1, apt tried to restart Apache and died with
the error:
[Mon May 09 17:47:26 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /u
sr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5
/usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl  .
/etc/apache2) at (eval 2) line 3.\n

A quick investigation shows this file has been removed. Downgrading to
1.999.23-1 makes Apache work again. Could this change be put off 'til
Apache is expecting it?

Thanks,
Daniel Hulme

-- 
Now  as he walked by the sea  of Galilee,  he saw  Simon and Andrew  his
brother casting a spam into the net:  for they were phishers.  And Jesus
said unto them, Come ye after me, and I will make you to become phishers
of men.  And  straightway  they forsook  their  nets,  and followed him.


pgpV8JsRwY1kW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#308225: python-id3lib: It seems this still exists

[Micah Anderson]

Package: python-id3lib
Version: 0.5.1-3
Followup-For: Bug #308225

My installation gives this error:

Unpacking replacement python-id3lib ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/python-id3lib_0.5.1-4_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyid3lib.so',
which is also in package python2.3-id3lib
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)

Micah


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages python-id3lib depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o
pn  python2.3-id3lib Not found.

-- debconf-show failed


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reopening 308225

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 308225
Bug#308225: python-id3lib: uninstallable
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308358: fails to install

[Isaac Clerencia]

On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> You probably miss some replaces somewhere.
Yes, it misses a Replaces: wesnoth-data << 0.9.1, I will fix it soon.

-- 
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | Debian: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


pgp6OMZs5jIII.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#308358: fails to install

[Isaac Clerencia]

On Monday, 9 de May de 2005 20:05, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prÃviament no seleccionat.
> S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ...
> dpkg: s'ha produÃt un error en processar
> /net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
> s'està intentant sobreescriure
> Â/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/wesnoth-ei.moÂ, que tambà està en el
> paquet wesnoth-data
Please, can you use locale C when sending bugs to the BTS?


-- 
Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es
Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   | Debian: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


pgpfXq7bGfZdw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.
>>
>
> Still no change:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
> ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   lib32gcc1 libc6-i386
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   ia32-libs lib32gcc1 libc6-i386
> 0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0B/6366kB of archives.
> After unpacking 15.7MB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Selecting previously deselected package lib32gcc1.
> (Reading database ... 63422 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking lib32gcc1 (from .../lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package libc6-i386.
> Unpacking libc6-i386 (from .../libc6-i386_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package ia32-libs.
> Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.4.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ...
> Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-2) ...
> Setting up libc6-i386 (2.3.5-1) ...
>
> Setting up ia32-libs (1.4.0.0.1.gcc4) ...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
> drwxr-xr-x  5 root root 2.2K May  9 19:49 /usr/lib32
>
>
> Regards
>
> Harri

Well, that is the gcc4 repository then.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% dpkg -c 
/mnt/mirror/ivanova/debian/pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/lib32gcc1_3.4.3-12.1_amd64.deb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:03 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:03 ./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 26669 2005-05-04 13:53:56 
./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/copyright
-rw-r--r-- root/root 52516 2005-05-04 13:53:56 
./usr/share/doc/lib32gcc1/changelog.Debian.gz
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-04 17:25:02 ./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/
-rw-r--r-- root/root 31612 2005-05-04 17:25:02 
./emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1

I guess you have /usr/lib32 in the lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb. That
won't work. ia32-libs and lib32gcc1 have to work together on that.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xosd 2.2.14-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 307794 + fixed
Bug#307794: xosd: FTBFS: X11 not threadsafe
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308358: fails to install

[Jordi Mallach]

Package: wesnoth-ei
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious

When I upgraded today:

S'està seleccionant el paquet wesnoth-ei prÃviament no seleccionat.
S'està desempaquetant wesnoth-ei (de .../wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg: s'ha produÃt un error en processar 
/net/debian/pool/main/w/wesnoth/wesnoth-ei_0.9.1-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 s'està intentant sobreescriure 
Â/usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/wesnoth-ei.moÂ, que tambà està en el 
paquet wesnoth-data

You probably miss some replaces somewhere.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages wesnoth-ei depends on:
pn  wesnoth  Not found.

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libcgicc 3.2.3-2.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 302854 + fixed
Bug#302854: libcgicc-doc: Cannot install -doc: cannot create .dhelp file
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

[Harald Dunkel]

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.
>

Still no change:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
ls: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} apt-get install ia32-libs
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  lib32gcc1 libc6-i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  ia32-libs lib32gcc1 libc6-i386
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 14 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/6366kB of archives.
After unpacking 15.7MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Selecting previously deselected package lib32gcc1.
(Reading database ... 63422 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking lib32gcc1 (from .../lib32gcc1_4.0.0-2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libc6-i386.
Unpacking libc6-i386 (from .../libc6-i386_2.3.5-1_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package ia32-libs.
Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.4.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ...
Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-2) ...
Setting up libc6-i386 (2.3.5-1) ...

Setting up ia32-libs (1.4.0.0.1.gcc4) ...

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:harri 1003} ls -lhd /usr/lib32
drwxr-xr-x  5 root root 2.2K May  9 19:49 /usr/lib32


Regards

Harri


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#298294: marked as done (non-free icons)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Mar 2005 13:25:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 06 05:25:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from panthera-systems.net [213.239.209.134] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D7vl3-0008AO-00; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:25:21 -0800
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (217-162-105-2.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.2])
by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4E22DC03B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 14:25:04 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:25:18 +0100
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: non-free icons
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: baghira
Version: 0.6a-1
Severity: serious

The license of the icons are not clearly dfsg-compliant. Please clear 
the situation with upstream and get a proper license statement. 
Otherwise, the package must go to non-free.

Regards,
Daniel

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

---
Received: (at 298294-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 17:42:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 10:42:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVCGl-0001tA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 10:42:15 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVC75-0004lj-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400
From: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#298294: fixed in baghira 0.6f-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 13:32:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: baghira
Source-Version: 0.6f-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
baghira, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

baghira_0.6f-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f-1.diff.gz
baghira_0.6f-1.dsc
  to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f-1.dsc
baghira_0.6f.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/b/baghira/baghira_0.6f.orig.tar.gz
kwin-baghira_0.6f-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/baghira/kwin-baghira_0.6f-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated baghira package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 19:01:17 +0200
Source: baghira
Binary: kwin-baghira
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6f-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 kwin-baghira - KDE theme for Apple junkies :)
Closes: 298294
Changes: 
 baghira (0.6f-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
  

Processed: tag 308282 security

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308282 security
Bug#308282: phpbb2: Security issue in url/bbcode
Tags were: patch
Tags added: security

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of phpdoc 20030911-1.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 282274 + fixed
Bug#282274: phpdoc: FTBFS: openjade keeps running.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

[Simon Law]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:05:32PM +0200, Niels Möller wrote:
> Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with
> > sexp-conv.
> 
> Another alternative is not including the nettle-lfib-stream program at
> all in the lsh package.

Well, that sounds like a marvellous plan.  One that I shall enact
tonight after-work.

Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298939: marked as done (xlibs: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2005 19:01:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 11:01:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cpe-65-26-182-85.indy.res.rr.com (sisyphus.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D9Sug-0006v1-00; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:01:38 -0800
Received: by sisyphus.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 18D7E68C024; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:01:37 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxpm4: new buffer overflow security hole (CAN-2005-0605)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:01:37 -0500
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libxpm4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: grave
Tags: security, upstream, fixed-upstream, patch

CAN-2005-0605 indicates that "scan.c for LibXPM may allow attackers to
execute arbitrary code via a negative bitmap_unit value that leads to a
buffer overflow."

Patch is here:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=1909

Description is here:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1920

Gentoo issued an advisory about this on 4 March.

Ubuntu issued an advisory about this on 7 March.

I learned about this from Linux Weekly News.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libxpm4 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 298939-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 16:19:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 09:19:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVAyt-0004kj-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 09:19:43 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVAiT-0005jS-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#298939: fixed in xfree86 4.1.0-16woody6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:02:45 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: xfree86
Source-Version: 4.1.0-16woody6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfree86, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw6-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw6_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw6_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dbg_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw7-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xfree86/libxaw7-dev_4.1.0-16woody6_powerpc.deb
libxaw7_4

Bug#308246: file conflicts in uniconf-tools, fonty-rg

[Simon Law]

Hi Radovan,

Can you upload fonty-rg's /usr/bin/uni as /usr/bin/utf8 instead?  In
UniConf, the /usr/bin/uni tool queries and manages a database, while in
fonty-rg, it's used just for switching console-fonts.

Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308233: file conflicts in lsh-utils, nettle-bin

[Simon Law]

This looks like I should rename my binary, like I've already done with
sexp-conv.

Simon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308254: londonlaw: Depends on non-existent package: wxpython

[Reinhard Tartler]

wxwidgets2.5 has been removed from debian and no other package is
providing wxpython. I've created an updated package at
http://siretart.tauware.de/debian/londonlaw, which depends on
libwxgtk2.4-python, as you suggested.

Gruesse,
Reinhard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 308257 grave
Bug#308257: doesn't clean up properly due to syntax error in postrm
Severity set to `grave'.

> thank you
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.

[Alexis Sukrieh]

tags 308232 + pending
thanks

Bug closed in the SVN repository:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-bugzilla/trunk/bugzilla-2.18/debian/changelog?op=file&rev=0&sc=0

I now use /var/lib/bugzilla for the root dir of every "data" files,
which is FHS compliant.

Thanks for the report.

Regards.

-- 
  Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   http://www.sukria.net

« Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » 
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.

Bug#308003: FTBFS: cannot find -lc (forwarded from Andreas Jochens)

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Unpacking ia32-libs (from .../ia32-libs_1.3.0.0.1.gcc4_amd64.deb) ...
> Setting up lib32gcc1 (4.0.0-1) ...
> Setting up ia32-libs (1.3.0.0.1.gcc4) ...

Version 1.3 was broken, version 1.4 is fixed. Please upgrade.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306261: #306261 and sarge

[Maximilian Engelhardt]

Hello,

according to bugzilla this bug is fixed in version 2.4.3-20050321+2, but
debian sarge still has version 2.4.3-20050321+1 affected by this bug.
Could you please upload a fixed version to sarge?

Maxi



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: Re: Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308232 + pending
Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share.
Tags were: confirmed sid
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

[Gordon Haverland]

On Monday 09 May 2005 07:32, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland 
wrote:
> > I also have tripped over this bug.  It doesn't really effect
> > anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go
> > to completion.
> >
> > I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to
> > work.  All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from
> > people running i386 architecture (i686) on 2.6 kernels.  Your
> > latest version of autogen which is supposed to fix this,
> > looks like it is powerpc only (*_5.7-2_powerpc.deb) and the
> > description at packages.debian.org for libopts25 only lists
> > packages for alpha and hppa, not even i386 (or the powerpc
> > packages you suggest fix a i386 problem).
> >
> > You have uploaded a bunch of other packages as well,
> > including i386 ones?
>
> No.  I uploaded the PowerPC package, since the system that I
> use for development is an iBook2.  The build daemons for the
> other architectures (including i386) will build packages for
> their respective architectures.  For more information, see
>
>  http://buildd.debian.org/

I still don't see how your uploading libopts25 for powerpc fixes a 
bug on i386.  packages.debian.org is probably out of date, and I 
guess will soon have powerpc on its list of architectures that 
libopts25 is available for due to your upload.  buildd.debian.org 
as near as I can tell, doesn't have libopts25 for unstable (or 
libopts or libopts9 or libopts*), or for any architecture.  So 
for the 3 people who submitted bug reports on libopts25, and 
myself, there is currently nothing by the way of a fix for the 
installation problem in the works?

Gord


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308330: kcdlabel: not fit for release

[Stephen Gran]

Package: kcdlabel
Version: 2.13-KDE3-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sarge

This package has a (mostly) dead upstream, and my c++ is just not good
enough to take over being upstream.  I do not want to see it release
with sarge in this state of maintainership.  I have had an offer of
comaintainership, and if it pans out, we can close this bug.  If not, I
will ask for removal from sid.

Thanks,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to en_US.ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages kcdlabel depends on:
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6   KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-2   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102  2.7.0-7 client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-13  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11 0.5.13-1.0  GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-3   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.6-3.0.1   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrandr2   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#307502: illuminator: ftbfs [sparc] could not find path for libluminate.so.6

[Adam C Powell IV]

Hi,

Can you do me a favor and upload the illuminator package you built?
Otherwise I'll try to figure out how to re-queue it on the sparc buildd
(I've been meaning to learn how to do this for some time).

Thanks.

On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 23:08 -0400, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Blars Blarson wrote:
> 
> > 2.6.8-6 is in sarge, my kernel is/was out of date on that box.  (I just
> > installed 2.6.8-6, it will be active next reboot.)
> 
> Good to know. I've just tested the build with kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64
> (version 2.4.27-9) from sid and even though the warnings are still there, 
> it does not FTBFS anymore:
> 
> [...]
> dh_makeshlibs -a
> dh_compress -a
> dh_fixperms -a
> dh_installdeb -a
> dh_shlibdeps -a
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for libluminate.so.6
> dh_gencontrol -a
> dh_md5sums -a
> dh_builddeb -a
> dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate-dev' in 
> `../libluminate-dev_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `libluminate6' in 
> `../libluminate6_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> dpkg-deb: building package `illuminator-demo' in 
> `../illuminator-demo_0.9.1-1_sparc.deb'.
> 
> For the record, the following (or later) kernel versions (both currently 
> in sarge) are required for the builds to succeed:
> 
> kernel-image-2.4.27-2-sparc64 version 2.4.27-2
> kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64  version 2.6.8-6
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jurij Smakov

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308218: And 308219 and 308261

[Matt Kraai]

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:16:45AM -0600, Gordon Haverland wrote:
> I also have tripped over this bug.  It doesn't really effect 
> anything here, but I noticed my most recent upgrade didn't go to 
> completion.
> 
> I am curious as to how this proposed fix of yours is going to 
> work.  All 3 reports of this bug in the bug system, are from 
> people running i386 architecture (i686) on 2.6 kernels.  Your 
> latest version of autogen which is supposed to fix this, looks 
> like it is powerpc only (*_5.7-2_powerpc.deb) and the description 
> at packages.debian.org for libopts25 only lists packages for 
> alpha and hppa, not even i386 (or the powerpc packages you 
> suggest fix a i386 problem).
> 
> You have uploaded a bunch of other packages as well, including 
> i386 ones?

No.  I uploaded the PowerPC package, since the system that I use for
development is an iBook2.  The build daemons for the other
architectures (including i386) will build packages for their
respective architectures.  For more information, see

 http://buildd.debian.org/

-- 
Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature