Bug#309733: marked as done (exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 23:41:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 06:12:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 23:12:47 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dobias.info (edc) [80.188.182.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYeH1-00086d-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 23:12:47 -0700 Received: from xdobiasl by edc with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DYeGi-0003qB-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 08:12:28 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ladislav Dobias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:12:28 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: exim Version: 3.36-17 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Exit cannot be started, it says: exim: error while loading shared libraries: libsasl.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It breaks everything that uses mail, and moreover, mail cannot be delivered to the system (data loss after few days). # ldd `which exim` libident.so.0 => /usr/lib/libident.so.0 (0xb7fc9000) libpcre.so.3 => /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3 (0xb7fa1000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7f8d000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7f6) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0xb7f58000) libdb3.so.3 => /usr/lib/libdb3.so.3 (0xb7eae000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7e9c000) libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0xb7e68000) liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0xb7e5b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d26000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d23000) libsasl.so.7 => not found libssl.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.6 (0xb7cf4000) libcrypto.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 (0xb7c32000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fea000) It seems there is a missing dependency to libsasl7, which was removed. The exim package should be probably rebuilt with libsasl2 or so. Regards, Lada Dobias -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac2-050313 Locale: LANG=czech, LC_CTYPE=czech (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages exim depends on: ii cron3.0pl1-87management of regular background p ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libident0.22-3 simple RFC1413 client library - ru ii libldap22.1.30-7 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcre35.0-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 309733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 06:41:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 23:41:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYej9-0007BI-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 23:41:51 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1676E245066; Wed, 18 May 2005 23:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:41:49 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ladislav Dobias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JI+G0+
Bug#309733: exim: Missing library libsasl.so.7
Package: exim Version: 3.36-17 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Exit cannot be started, it says: exim: error while loading shared libraries: libsasl.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It breaks everything that uses mail, and moreover, mail cannot be delivered to the system (data loss after few days). # ldd `which exim` libident.so.0 => /usr/lib/libident.so.0 (0xb7fc9000) libpcre.so.3 => /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3 (0xb7fa1000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0xb7f8d000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7f6) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0xb7f58000) libdb3.so.3 => /usr/lib/libdb3.so.3 (0xb7eae000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0xb7e9c000) libldap.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap.so.2 (0xb7e68000) liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0xb7e5b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d26000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d23000) libsasl.so.7 => not found libssl.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.6 (0xb7cf4000) libcrypto.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 (0xb7c32000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fea000) It seems there is a missing dependency to libsasl7, which was removed. The exim package should be probably rebuilt with libsasl2 or so. Regards, Lada Dobias -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac2-050313 Locale: LANG=czech, LC_CTYPE=czech (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages exim depends on: ii cron3.0pl1-87management of regular background p ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libident0.22-3 simple RFC1413 client library - ru ii libldap22.1.30-7 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpcre35.0-1Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308401: marked as done (Missing dependency)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 22:58:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uw-imapd: Missing dependency has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 May 2005 01:07:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 18:07:39 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVJDn-00041t-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 18:07:39 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVJFr-0001EQ-Ci for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:09:47 +0200 Received: from p54a3bb62.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.187.98] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DVJGg-00079w-8D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:10:38 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DVJDF-0003dz-8e for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 May 2005 03:07:05 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Missing dependency X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:07:05 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: uw-imapd Severity: serious Installing the package in a clean chroot leads to the following error: Setting up uw-imapd (2002edebian1-9) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/uw-imapd.postinst: line 21: update-inetd: command not found dpkg: error processing uw-imapd (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: uw-imapd E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This also affects the postrm. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308401-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 05:58:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 22:58:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYe37-0005YO-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 22:58:25 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C06624522C; Wed, 18 May 2005 22:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 22:58:24 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: uw-imapd: Missing dependency Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nqkreNcslJAfgyzk" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version 7:2002edebian1-11 has been accepted into testing, so this bug no longer applies. Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCjCsAKN6ufymYLloRAuNzAJ4oeqCGgUj/PGKzypqoRdWlfiR3PACg0wLC 0Qp7uaD+avCziyNNRKYUKLo= =dguG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --nqkreNcslJAfgyzk-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns
Processed: tagging 309728
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309728 sid Bug#309728: gnumeric crashes when ctrl+1 is pressed There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308783: RFC: Bug#308783: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)
Could I get a second opinion (or more than one) from you guys as to whether
this is actually an exploitable security problem?
I have been talking to Steve Langasek in his capacity as a Release Manager
about this, and he says if it's not an exploitable problem, then it's not
really a security issue, not really RC, and therefore not deserving of
excepting from the freeze.
Note that I cloned this bug for stable as #309143, and whatever conclusions
are reached here will probably map to that as well.
I asked Matej to follow-up with more information about this, and to contact
freedesktop.org and/or MITRE for a CAN allocation, but haven't heard
anything back from him yet.
If there's any more information I can provide, please let me know.
- Forwarded message from Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#308783: libxpm4: problems with s_popen (CAN-2004-0914)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:59:04 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id:
X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/26382
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libxpm4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12
Severity: grave
Justification: may allow access to the accounts of users who use the package
The CAN-2004-0914 patch introduced a s_popen() function as a safe
replacement for popen(). Instead of invoking a shell, it splits
arguments on whitespace and passes the command directly to execvp(3).
However, it doesn't handle quoting or redirection, so code like
WrFFrI.c:339: snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "gzip -q > \"%s\"", filename);
WrFFrI.c:340: if (!(mdata->stream.file = s_popen(buf, "w")))
results in a ">" argument and superfluous quotes:
execve("/bin/gzip", ["gzip", ">", "\"foo.gz\""], [/* 19 vars */])
This completely breaks the transparent compression and decompression.
Furthermore, since gzip processes all arguments regardless of errors, an
attacker can use filenames with whitespace to compress arbitrary files:
(xpmtest taken from )
# ./xpmtest crab.xpm 'fnord -v /etc/hosts.deny fnord.gz'
w=28, h=28, cpp=2, cols=6, vmask=, hotspot=0,0
gzip: >: No such file or directory
gzip: "fnord: No such file or directory
/etc/hosts.deny: -50.0% -- replaced with /etc/hosts.deny.gz
gzip: fnord.gz": No such file or directory
The above would effectively disable TCP wrappers. The -r option can be
used to compress whole directory trees.
s_popen() also has issues with error handling, signals, and runaway
child processes. All of this has been fixed in X11R6.8.2, though I
don't think they're aware of the security implications (patches at
Bug#309728: gnumeric crashes when ctrl+1 is pressed
Package: gnumeric Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Trying to change cell format via right-click drop down menu, or via Format->Cells, or by pressing ctrl+1 makes gnumeric crash. (The names could be wrong, since I use translated gnumeric version). Steps to reproduce: 1. Launch gnumeric, or open any existing spreadsheet file with gnumeric. 2. Press ctrl+1 (or try to change cell format) 3. Observe the crash. This makes gnumeric unusable for editing, so I marked this bug as grave. Vaidotas Zemlys -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27.050426 Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnumeric depends on: ii gconf22.8.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii gnumeric-common 1.5.1-1common files for Gnumeric, the GNO ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.8.1-2The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.8.4-4The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgoffice-1 0.0.1-1Document centric objects library - ii libgsf-1 1.12.0-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgsf-gnome-11.12.0-1 Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309429: kernel-source-2.6.8: Local privilege escalation in pktcdvd und raw ioctl handling
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:06:16AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: kernel-source-2.6.8 > Severity: grave > Justification: user security hole > > > Two new local privilege escalations have been found in the 2.6 kernels; > input to the pktcdvd and raw ioctls is passed unchecked. Both issues > have been fixed in 2.6.11.10. 2.4 does not seem to be affected. > At least one of the issues is CAN-2005-1264. Thanks, I will get this into SVN asap. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309720: libmatheval: BBPFS: Missing Build-Depends
Package: libmatheval Severity: serious Version: 1.1.2-1 Tags: patch (BBPFS = Builds Broken Package From Source) >From my pbuilder build log (reproduced in an i386 chroot): ... if /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/libmatheval-1.1.2/config/missing --run makeinfo -I . \ -o libmatheval.info libmatheval.texi; \ then \ rc=0; \ cd .; \ else \ rc=$?; \ cd . && \ $restore $backupdir/* `echo "./libmatheval.info" | sed 's|[^/]*$||'`; \ fi; \ rm -rf $backupdir; exit $rc /tmp/buildd/libmatheval-1.1.2/config/missing: line 52: makeinfo: command not found WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. ... The resulting libmatheval1-dev package contains a gzipped empty file in place of /usr/share/info/libmatheval.info.gz, which causes the postinst to fail: ... Setting up libmatheval1-dev (1.1.2-1) ... No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'. install-info(/usr/share/info/libmatheval.info): unable to determine description for `dir' entry - giving up dpkg: error processing libmatheval1-dev (--install): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: libmatheval1-dev Looking at the buildd logs for libmatheval, it appears the autobuilt packages for non-i386 architectures in the archive also have gzipped empty files for /usr/share/info/libmatheval.info.gz. Adding texinfo to the Build-Depends fixes this problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309307: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc in sarge lacks security fixes from kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9)
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2005 11:46:44 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309307: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc in sarge lacks security fixes from kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2005 09:26:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 02:26:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DXbrn-0002mH-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 02:26:27 -0700 Received: (qmail 19049 invoked from network); 16 May 2005 09:25:55 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailout.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 16 May 2005 09:25:55 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3FC00BBE3B; Mon, 16 May 2005 11:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc in sarge lacks security fixes from kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:25:54 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc Version: 2.4.27-2 Severity: critical Tags: security, sarge The package in sarge lacks the security fixes from kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 . --- Received: (at 309307-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 03:12:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 20:12:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from koto.vergenet.net [210.128.90.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYbS4-0002nf-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 20:12:01 -0700 Received: by koto.vergenet.net (Postfix, from userid 7100) id 23CBE34038; Thu, 19 May 2005 11:45:03 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:46:44 +0900 From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#309307: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc in sarge lacks security fixes from kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Cluestick: seven User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:25:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-sparc > Version: 2.4.27-2 > Severity: critical > Tags: security, sarge > > > The package in sarge lacks the security fixes from > kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-9 . Almost all of the kernels in sarge are built against 2.4.27-8. Actually, I think all of them. This is a known problem. All of the security bugs are being tracked in the BTS and they have all been marked as pending, which they are. I don't think there is any need for this meta-bug, I am closing it accordingly. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309719: Acknowledgement (python2.3: "'import site' failed, use -v for traceback" reported on every invocation)
severity 309719 normal thanks I had installed python2.2 explicitly before installing python; when purging all python packages (python2.2, python, python2.3, python2.3-iconvcodec) and reinstalling python alone then site.py existed. So this isn't RC, but it was annoying. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#280864: [Fwd: RFS: eaccelerator - PHP script cacher]
Jonathan Oxer wrote: > [CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers] > > Hi Roberto, > > Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator: > I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!) > and provided him with a brief history of the two projects, and asked him > to provide legal advice on how to proceed. I'm happy to pay for his time > to help sort it out, especially if it results in Debian being able to > distribute eAccelerator. > > After an informal chat with him I'm hopeful that given the demise of > TurckSoft it will be possible to relicense the Turck-MMCache code in > eAccelerator to allow it to be linked against PHP, but I'll let you know > the outcome in any case. > > Cheers :-) > > Jonathan Oxer Thanks for the update. I was this close, -> <-, to whipping up a -src package that just included the source and a script to crank out a .deb from it. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#309719: Acknowledgement (python2.3: "'import site' failed, use -v for traceback" reported on every invocation)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309719 normal Bug#309719: python2.3: "'import site' failed, use -v for traceback" reported on every invocation Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#280864: [Fwd: RFS: eaccelerator - PHP script cacher]
[CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers] Hi Roberto, Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator: I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!) and provided him with a brief history of the two projects, and asked him to provide legal advice on how to proceed. I'm happy to pay for his time to help sort it out, especially if it results in Debian being able to distribute eAccelerator. After an informal chat with him I'm hopeful that given the demise of TurckSoft it will be possible to relicense the Turck-MMCache code in eAccelerator to allow it to be linked against PHP, but I'll let you know the outcome in any case. Cheers :-) Jonathan Oxer -- The Debian Universe: Installing, managing and using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debianuniverse.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 309708
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309708 sid Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302771: Bug unreproducible
El sÃb, 14-05-2005 a las 13:33 -0400, Justin Pryzby escribiÃ: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 05:24:30PM +0200, Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias wrote: > > El sÃb, 14-05-2005 a las 11:34 +0200, Christian Perrier escribiÃ: > > > Against a Win XP Pro with SP2 and a local libsmbclient 3.0.14a-1 > > > package, both konqueror and smbclient give a proper file listing of a > > > directory with 47 files in it. > > > > > > Could you please give details about the target OS and confirm if you > > > can STILL reproduce this bug. > > > > Hello!, > > > > Yes, effectively this bug is fixed in the 3.0.14a-1, I can reproduce it > > anymore. > I think you meant "I cannot reproduce it anymore". Correct? Yes, sorry. > > I thougth you had closed the bug in the package's changelog, sorry. > > > > I think I can close the bug now because I've tested the new packages in > > various machines and they work OK. > > > > > Anyway, I hardly see why it should be considered as RC. It maybe > > > deserves an important severity, but certainly not serious, given the > > > description. > > > > > > In short : we won't throw away samba from sarge for that, will we? > The point is that Sarge should not release with samba/smbclient/kernel > or whatever giving "data loss" directory listings. If necessary, > Sarge could wait another day while 100 developers anxiously awaiting > release all pounce on the bug. I've done extensive testing and I think this bug is gone, I've not seen truncated directory listings never again. I'm experiencing #309689 (unexpected hangs), but it's not a release critical bug. > Justin
Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer
Hi! * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050518 22:20]: > Package: tuxracer > Version: 0.61-6.4 > Severity: serious > Tags: sarge > > This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it: > > I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete > package in sarge instead of the transition package in unstable. I would agree (specialy, since I asked -release for it [1] and fucked up the transition when getting sick and missing freeze), but: One day the transition package, tuxracer 0.61-7, hit sid, I got several mails (Uh... four I think), asking, why they can't stay with tuxracer. Three of them pointed out, that ppracer, the inofficial successor of tuxracer, runs quite slow on their hardware, while tuxracer still runs fine. And since tuxracer still compiles and runs, I tend to close this bugreport, but it would be okay for me, to move tuxracer 0.61-7 to sarge, if a release manger agrees to remove old software with dead upstream. But please note, that you then should push tuxracer-extras 0.5-2 into sarge, too. Yours sincerely, Alexander Links: 1: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/04/msg00131.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 309708 scite Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental Bug reassigned from package `libgcc1' to `scite'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific
retitle 309708 scite built with packages from experimental tags 309708 - experimental severity 309708 serious thanks Roger Leigh writes: > Package: libgcc1 > Version: 1:4.0.0-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: experimental > Justification: renders package unusable in Debian > > $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs > libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4) > > I noticed this when checking a package I NMU'd: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/scite.html > # scite/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4) > > This is the unstable version: > $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs > libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3) > > The ubuntu-specific version should not be in Debian. they are not. the dependency can easily be resolved with the gcc-4.0 packages from experimental. To avoid confusion the shlibs already has been tightened to libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.0-7) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309710: kdenetwork: uninstallable on sparc in sarge/sid
Package: kdenetwork Version: 4:3.3.2-3 Severity: grave Tags: sarge sid Justification: renders package unusable This is the usual arch all/any mismatch, but this has been propigated into testing. The sparc build appears to have succeeded on May 14, but has not yet been uploaded. It also built fine on my sparc pbuilder. sundry:/home/blarson/src# apt-get install kdenetwork Reading Package Lists... 0% Reading Package Lists... 100% Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... 0% Building Dependency Tree... 0% Building Dependency Tree... 50% Building Dependency Tree... 50% Building Dependency Tree... 67% Building Dependency Tree... 90% Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: kdenetwork: Depends: dcoprss (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kdenetwork-filesharing (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kdict (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kget (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: knewsticker (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kopete (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kpf (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kppp (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: krdc (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: krfb (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: ksirc (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: kwifimanager (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: librss1 (>= 4:3.3.2-3) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages sundry:/home/blarson/src# exit Script done on Wed May 18 16:54:50 2005 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 309708 scite built with packages from experimental Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific Changed Bug title. > tags 309708 - experimental Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental > severity 309708 serious Bug#309708: scite built with packages from experimental Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309401: marked as done (zynaddsubfx: Segmentation faults when launching, exiting and accessing settings)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 19:32:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309401: fixed in zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 00:05:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 17:05:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from wang.choosehosting.com [212.42.1.230] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DXpaP-00034v-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 17:05:25 -0700 Received: from 82-32-57-57.cable.ubr08.azte.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.32.57.57] helo=xerces) by wang.choosehosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DXpae-0002tj-Tc for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 May 2005 01:05:42 +0100 Received: from sam by xerces with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DXpaJ-0004nl-67 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 May 2005 01:05:19 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0354906994==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: zynaddsubfx: Segmentation faults when launching, exiting and accessing settings X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 01:05:18 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanner: Exiscan on wang.choosehosting.com at 2005-05-17 01:05:41 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Bars: / Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0354906994== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: zynaddsubfx Version: 2.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I get a segmentation fault when exiting the program. Subsequently, it dies on startup. File -> Settings... also causes a segfault. Having rebuilt with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt,nostrip, I am unable to reproduce the startup segfault; however I have attached backtraces of the other segfaults: * bt.1 from the Debian-supplied package, when exiting * bt.2 original package, when accessing File -> Settings... * bt.3 rebuilt with noopt,nostrip, when exiting * bt.4 rebuilt package, when accessing File -> Settings... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (550, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages zynaddsubfx depends on: ii fftw33.0.1-11Library for computing Fast Fourier ii libasound2 1.0.8-3 ALSA library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfltk1.1c102 1.1.6-2 Fast Light Toolkit shared librarie ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libjack0.80.0-0 0.99.0-6JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii libmxml1 2.2-1 development files for libmlxml ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --===0354906994== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bt.1" (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/debug/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 17622)] ZynAddSubFX - Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Nasca Octavian Paul Compiled: May 2 2005 09:58:39 This program is free software (GNU GPL v.2) and it c
Bug#309708: libgcc1 shlibs are Ubuntu-specific
Package: libgcc1 Version: 1:4.0.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable in Debian $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4) I noticed this when checking a package I NMU'd: http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/scite.html # scite/powerpc unsatisfiable Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu4) This is the unstable version: $ cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgcc1.shlibs libgcc_s 1 libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3) The ubuntu-specific version should not be in Debian. Regards, Roger -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc4 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libgcc1 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 307981, tagging 307981 and retitling 307981
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 307981 Bug#307981: Correction of typo Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 307981 sarge Bug#307981: Correction of typo There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > retitle 307981 Correction of typo in control Bug#307981: Correction of typo Changed Bug title. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307981: marked as done (Correction of typo)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307981: fixed in anthy 6300d-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 00:30:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 06 17:30:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mtoichi02e.ns.itscom.net (ns.itscom.net) [219.110.2.32]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUDDW-0002CO-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 17:30:50 -0700
Received: (qmail 23689 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO ns.itscom.net) (192.168.1.134)
by mtoichi02e with SMTP; 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: (qmail 1007 invoked from network); 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO debian) (210.253.212.160)
by mtiichi04e with SMTP; 7 May 2005 09:30:18 +0900
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 09:30:28 +0900
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Correction of typo
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.9 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: anthy
Version: 6300d-1
--- debian/control.orig
+++ debian/control
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
Package: anthy
Architecture: any
Replaces: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Coflicts: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Conflicts: anthy-cannadic, anthy-cannadic-2ch
Description: A Japanese input method (backend, dictionary and utility)
Anthy is a Japanese input method working on X11 and emacs. It converts
Hiragana text to Kana Kanji mixed text. It is implemented as a library
---
Received: (at 307981-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 23:08:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 16:08:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYXe7-0005c2-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 16:08:11 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYXYU-0005uu-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
From: Masahito Omote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307981: fixed in anthy 6300d-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:02:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: anthy
Source-Version: 6300d-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
anthy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
anthy-el_6300d-2_all.deb
to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy-el_6300d-2_all.deb
anthy_6300d-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2.diff.gz
anthy_6300d-2.dsc
to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2.dsc
anthy_6300d-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/anthy/anthy_6300d-2_i386.deb
libanthy-dev_6300d-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/anthy/libanthy-dev_6300d-2_i386.deb
libanthy0_6300d-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/anthy/libanthy0_6300d-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Masahito Omote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated anthy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 07:18:20 +0900
Source: anthy
Binary: libanthy-dev libanthy0 anthy-el anthy
Architecture: source i386
Bug#309707: postrm script might delete user data
Package: fai Version: 2.8.2 Severity: grave In postrm, FAI does rm -rf /etc/fai ... dpkg installs four files into /etc/fai. It is possible that the maintainer drops additional files into this directory -- there is nothing preventing him/her from doing so, the policy makes /etc the "space of the administrator". If FAI gets purged, these files also get deleted, which may cause fits of raving madness and suicide attempts. Please remove /etc/fai from the list of directories to delete recursively in postrm. It is okay for postrm to remove files from other parts of the filesystem, just not /etc. In fact, since all four official files in /etc/fai are handled by dpkg, it needs not be handled explicitly at all: dpkg will remove those files on a purge, and also remove the directory if and only if it is then empty. Thanks for your consideration. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-cirrus Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fai depends on: ii debootstrap 0.2.45-0.2 Bootstrap a basic Debian system pn nfs-server Not found. ii perl [perl5] 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! on the other hand, you have different fingers. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi! > > Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 4:38 -0700]: > > > I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default > > > from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the > > > --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy > > > flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the > > > disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount > > > their drives) IMHO. > > > > > I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the > > > meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge? > > > > If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug, > > then yes. > > Alright, I uploaded > > pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge. >* Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch: > - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid >physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT >structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side >this makes it much less safe to remove devices without proper > umounting. > - Replace option "--async" with option "--sync". > - Document change in the manpages. > - Closes: #309591 >* debian/control: Correct package priority to optional, to match the katie > overrides. > > The applied patch can be seen at [1], it's pretty trivial. > > I also talked with Sjoerd Simons (hal maintainer). Above pmount upload > will fix the issue for command line users of pmount, but for Utopia users > (i. e. who use gnome-volume-manager and hal) the policy needs to be > fixed in hal; this means nothing more than removing the sync/async > policy stanza from the policy XML file, so I kindly ask to approve > this as well (Sjoerd will prepare an update soon). Just uploaded hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 to testing-proposed-updates. This removes the sync option from the default setup and adds a warning to the example fdi config file. Please approve for Sarge. Thanks, Sjoerd -- One monk said to the other, "The fish has flopped out of the net! How will it live?" The other said, "When you have gotten out of the net, I'll tell you." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291274: openswan in sarge
severity 291274 important thanks I have just confirmed that the openswan package in sid works just fine out of the box on a sarge system running a prebuilt 2.6.8-2-686 kernel. It therefore seems completely inappropriate for this bug to be release-critical. Release team, please allow openswan back into sarge. We had freeswan in woody, and it's still in sarge. Unfortunately, freeswan is no longer maintained upstream, openswan is where development continues. See www.freeswan.org for confirmation of this. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309625: marked as done (pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync))
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309625: fixed in hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:51:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:51:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de [129.143.116.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYIPA-0003L0-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:51:44 -0700 Received: by rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix, from userid 102) id CDBF8236A6; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 From: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Priority: none Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pmount Version: 0.8-1 Severity: grave Hi, apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by default: http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async default, and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page (and README?) (eikke: JFYI) Andreas Mohr --- Received: (at 309625-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 22:20:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 15:20:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYWtl-0006sT-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 15:20:18 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYWrR-0003gL-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400 From: Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#309625: fixed in hal 0.4.7-3sarge1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 18:17:53 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: hal Source-Version: 0.4.7-3sarge1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hal-device-manager_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb to pool/main/h/hal/hal-device-manager_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb hal-doc_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb to pool/main/h/hal/hal-doc_0.4.7-3sarge1_all.deb hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.diff.gz hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.dsc to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1.dsc hal_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb libhal-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb libhal-storage-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage-dev_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb libhal-storage0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb libhal0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/h/hal/libhal0_0.4.7-3sarge1_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hal package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:03:39 +0200 Source: hal Binary: libhal-dev hal-doc libhal-storage-dev
Processed: openswan in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 291274 important Bug#291274: Fails to build with 2.4.29: missing Makefile Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 307981 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 307981 serious Bug#307981: Correction of typo Severity set to `serious'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnome-pim 1.4.9-2.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 247192 + fixed Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303233: njbtools: Uninstallable in sid
Hello, I think I have figured out a solution, as it seems to build fine against libnjb1. Seems some API has changed upstream since 1.1 I will investigate further. If my solution works, I will try to get an upload sponsored ASAP. Thanks! Lars Wirzenius wrote: Furthermore, njbtools FTBFS with the current libnjb-dev: Indeed. njbtools requires libnjb-dev version 1.0.1-2 (or thereabouts), from May 2004. libnjb has had source-incompatible changes since then: functions have changed names and require different arguments now (or so a quick read of the upstream changelog indicates). This means that njbtools needs to be ported to the newer libnjb. I tried to find the upstream home page so as to see if there is a newer version, but I failed to find one. debian/copyright does not say anything about it. Google showed me endless numbers of Debian web page mirrors, but nothing useful. Lawrence, do you have an address to the upstream home page for njbtools? I think that unless someone can find a newer version, or port the one in Debian to the libnjb-dev in sarge, that njbtools may have to be removed from sarge. . -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295657: EXT3 on RAID problems in all 2.6-smp
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Jeroen van Disseldorp wrote: > 2 months ago I bought 4 new hard drives, which I configured as follows: > > - > | Linux | Swap | RAIDSET-1 disk 1 | > - > | RAIDSET-0 disk 1 | RAIDSET-1 disk 2 | > - > | RAIDSET-0 disk 2 | RAIDSET-1 disk 3 | > - > | RAIDSET-0 disk 3 | RAIDSET-1 disk 4 | > - > > RAIDSET-0 is 20G, RAIDSET-1 is 709G. > > On top of both raid devices I use the device mapper to encrypt those > disks, so data travels to the disk through the following layers: > > vfs -> ext3 -> device mapper -> raid -> physical disks > > Since the beginning I have been having problems with heavy disk usage > on RAIDSET-1. It seems that under normal circumstances the system is > stable, but under heavy load the following error occurs: > > Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: EXT3-fs error (device dm-2): ext3_readdir: > bad entry in directory #84509561: rec_len %% 4 != 0 - offset=0, > inode=1629516644, rec_len=29795, name_len=117 > Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: Aborting journal on device dm-2. > Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: ext3_abort called. > Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: EXT3-fs abort (device dm-2): > ext3_journal_start: Detected aborted journal > Feb 12 06:27:25 einstein kernel: Remounting filesystem read-only > > As I do some spam-learning and backups at night, requiring some heavy > disk use, this happens just about every day. Running fsck after the > error is useless, as it finds no errors at all. So there is little > else to do then remount and hope for the best for another day. > > My system is a dual Pentium II 400MHz with 384MB memory. All four > disks are Hitachi/IBM Deskstar 250G. The problem occurs with every > 2.6 kernel I have tried so far, starting from 2.6.7. > > Typical thing is that it only seems to occur on -smp kernels. I've > been running some UP-kernels as well and (although slower) they do > not thrash the ext3 journal. Could this be an SMP race? > > More system information can be found in the attached kern.log. > can you try to reproduce it with more recent 2.6.11 from unstable? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 305937 is grave, tagging 305937, reopening 305937, merging 305937 309691
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > severity 305937 grave Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler' Severity set to `grave'. > tags 305937 sarge Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler' There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge > reopen 305937 Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler' Bug reopened, originator not changed. > merge 305937 309691 Bug#305937: error in ztc_common.py, cannot import 'profiler' Bug#309691: zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module Merged 305937 309691. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Sid only
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 309681 + sid Bug#309681: util-vserver: Does not install on Sid There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309691: zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module
Package: zope-testcase Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: sarge zope-testcase in sarge still uses the non-free profile module. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303200: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
severity 303200 important
thanks
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005, Pau Capdevila wrote:
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> When the following occurs:
>
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 {
> DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x40 {
> UncorrectableError }, LBAsect=57642412, sector=57642408
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev hda,
> sector 57642408
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [ cut here ]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/file.c:534!
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: invalid operand: [#1]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: PREEMPT
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Modules linked in: tdfx lp ipv6 floppy
> parport_pc parport pcspkr rtc snd_ens1371 snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device
> snd_ac97_codec snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore
> snd_page_alloc gameport 8139cp 8139too mii i2c_piix4 i2c_core joydev
> tsdev usbhid uhci_hcd usbcore pci_hotplug intel_agp agpgart
> nls_iso8859_1 vfat fat nls_cp437 ntfs capability commoncap evdev apm
> ide_cd cdrom mousedev psmouse reiserfs ext2 ext3 jbd mbcache ide_generic
> siimage aec62xx trm290 alim15x3 hpt34x hpt366 ide_disk cmd64x piix
> rz1000 slc90e66 generic cs5530 cs5520 sc1200 triflex atiixp pdc202xx_old
> pdc202xx_new opti621 ns87415 cy82c693 amd74xx sis5513 via82cxxx
> serverworks ide_core unix fbcon font bitblit vesafb cfbcopyarea
> cfbimgblt cfbfillrect
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: CPU:0
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EIP:
> 0060:[pg0+341663470/1069863936]Not tainted VLI
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EFLAGS: 00210256 (2.6.10-1-686)
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: EIP is at
> reiserfs_allocate_blocks_for_region+0xb6e/0x1620 [reiserfs]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: eax: 2000 ebx: c2709ad8 ecx:
> edx: c1028d20
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: esi: 0001 edi: cbb4fedc ebp:
> cf5a6018 esp: cbb4fcb0
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Process amule (pid: 4705,
> threadinfo=cbb4e000 task=cb8c0570)
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Stack: cbb4feac c8850bfc cbb4fdb4
> fffb 000f 0003 c02a343e c1280ca8
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:cbb4fd24 cbb4fd2c
> c02a3651 c24b3fb8 c0157100 cbb4fd38 cb8c0570
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel:cbb4fd20 c0157100 00200296
> 0002 c1280ca8 c8850bb0
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [io_schedule+14/32]
> io_schedule+0xe/0x20
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [__wait_on_bit+81/112]
> __wait_on_bit+0x51/0x70
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [sync_buffer+0/80]
> sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [sync_buffer+0/80]
> sync_buffer+0x0/0x50
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [free_buffer_head+57/112]
> free_buffer_head+0x39/0x70
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [pg0+341666258/1069863936]
> reiserfs_unprepare_pages+0x32/0x70 [reiserfs]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [pg0+341669618/1069863936]
> reiserfs_prepare_file_region_for_write+0x562/0x990 [reiserfs]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [pg0+341672407/1069863936]
> reiserfs_file_write+0x6b7/0x6d0 [reiserfs]
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [vfs_statfs+100/128]
> vfs_statfs+0x64/0x80
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [vfs_statfs64+64/80]
> vfs_statfs64+0x40/0x50
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [path_release+21/80]
> path_release+0x15/0x50
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [sys_statfs64+143/208]
> sys_statfs64+0x8f/0xd0
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [vfs_write+237/352]
> vfs_write+0xed/0x160
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [sys_write+81/128]
> sys_write+0x51/0x80
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: [syscall_call+7/11]
> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> Apr 3 21:59:31 localhost kernel: Code: 24 e8 c7 9e 00 00 8b 94 24 8c 01
> 00 00 b8 60 5d 9a d4 89 44 24 04 8b 82 8c 00 00 00 eb e0 0f 0b 19 02 20
> a6 9a d4 e9 00 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 16 02 20 a6 9a d4 e9 e5 fe ff ff 89 7c
> 24 04 8b 84 24 88
>
> The system doesn't panic but X fall down and you must reset the machine.
>
well reiserfs doesn't work well with preempt,
could you please try the 2.6.11 kernel-iamge.
there preempt is disabled afair.
also aboves looks like an hardware error of your harddisc,
is it still alive?
can you reproduce the dma error with ext3?
thanks for your reply.
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Christian Hammers wrote: Hi Stefan On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the server is distributed, too. The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I can get back to you in time. Ok, thanks. (please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of "the Debian distribution" but rather a part of the archive that is maintained for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so "on the same medium" is also not valid... complicated... If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager might have no pardon as this is "only" a non-free package and the archive is "frozen" for release.. Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package? Everything under Docs/ is split away to the mysql-doc package and part of the "non-free" area. The rest (mysql-server, mysql-client, libs) is also in separate packages but all belongs to the "main" area. The only thing I removed was the benchmark tests but that doesn't matter, I guess. Hi Christian, phew! :) I'm happy to see that issues with the Manual don't keep you from putting MySQL where it belongs -- in the main area. However, I'll keep trying to resolve unclarities about the MySQL Manual once and for all -- so thanks for taking your time to discuss this with me! Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MySQL AB, Documentation Team Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941 Mobile: +49 177 7841069 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309685: Unused library while zorp is not in testing
Package: libzorpll Severity: serious This package has been tagged for removal because it is not used in testing at the moment, while zorp is held out by an RC bug. Having an unused library in Sarge benefits basicly noone. --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libzorpll depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libglib2.0-02.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309686: tuxracer in sarge should really be replaced by the transition package to planetpenguin-racer
Package: tuxracer Version: 0.61-6.4 Severity: serious Tags: sarge This might technically not be a RC bug, but for not forgetting it: I don't see any reason for shipping sarge with the obsolete package in sarge instead of the transition package in unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309681: util-vserver: Does not install on Sid
Package: util-vserver Version: 0.30.204-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable util-vserver does not install on unstable due to dependency on beecrypt2 which seems to have been removed from the debian system (it exists on woody and on sarge). -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-deepspace-swsusp2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages util-vserver depends on: ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-7GCC support library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii net-tools 1.60-10 The NET-3 networking toolkit -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 309591, tagging 309591
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reopen 309591 Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 309591 - sid Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Tags were: sarge sid Tags removed: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data
Hi Luk, Luk Claes writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > > > Package: libdbd-mysql > > Do you experience this bug on a i386 system? > Yep. > > Building libdbi and libdbi-drivers from CVS source cures both problems. > > Is the CVS source of a different version? > Yes, there were a couple of changes to both libdbi and the libdbd-xx drivers. But I'm quite sure that it is not these source code changes that somehow fixed the problem on Debian. The library and the drivers were tested on various systems at release time, among them David Parker's Debian box. The driver did work for sure at release time. I rather suspect that the driver is incompatible with the current version of libmysqlclient. > > I suggest rebuilding the package using recent versions of libmysqlclient. > > What version do you mean: of the libmysqlclient12 or the > libmysqlclient14 package? > I've been testing things on a box that ran MySQL 4.1, therefore I used the libmysqlclient14 package. The current CVS code contains a lot of functionality related to character encodings. I guess that libmysqlclient12 would not work anyway. I've fixed the stuff in the debian subdirs of both libdbi and libdbi-drivers. If you check out the current CVS version you should be able to build the packages without any hassles on a Debian testing box. However, I did not change the package version numbers as I simply don't know how to do this. Remember that you will need the CVS versions of both libdbi and libdbi-drivers. The current CVS version drivers won't work with the packaged library and vice versa. Please see my orignal post for the relevant package versions. If you have any further questions, please contact me anytime. However, I can access my Debian box only on weekends as it is located elsewhere. regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Hi Stefan On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: > > It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies > > to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like > > > > In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants > > permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered > > form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the > > server is distributed, too. > > The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon > with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I > can get back to you in time. Ok, thanks. > > (please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is > > distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of "the > > Debian distribution" but rather a part of the archive that is maintained > > for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so "on the > > same medium" is also not valid... complicated... > > > > If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager > > might have no pardon as this is "only" a non-free package and the archive > > is "frozen" for release.. > > Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the > Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package? Everything under Docs/ is split away to the mysql-doc package and part of the "non-free" area. The rest (mysql-server, mysql-client, libs) is also in separate packages but all belongs to the "main" area. The only thing I removed was the benchmark tests but that doesn't matter, I guess. > Stefan bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309677: Dumps core on Alpha
Package: asc Version: 1.16.0.0-1 Severity: grave When I start asc, I get a screen with some aircrafts for a second or so, and then: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% asc open /dev/sequencer: No such device zsh: abort (core dumped) asc -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.3 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages asc depends on: ii aalib11.4p5-22 ascii art library ii asc-data 1.16.0.0-1 data files for the Advanced Strate ii libartsc0 1.3.2-3aRts Sound system C support librar ii libasound21.0.8-3ALSA library ii libaudio2 1.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd0 0.2.35-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre9GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1The GLib library of C routines ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libogg0 1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library ii libparagui1.0 1.0.4-8a real crossplatform widget set ba ii libphysfs-1.0 1.0.0-4filesystem abstraction library for ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsdl-image1 1.2.4-1image loading library for Simple D ii libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsigc++-1.2 1.2.5-4type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libsmpeg0 0.4.5+cvs20030824-1SDL MPEG Player Library - shared l ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtiff4 3.7.2-2Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libvorbis0a 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxt64.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Toolkit Intrinsics ii slang11.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309313: mysql driver cannot retrieve data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi > Package: libdbd-mysql Do you experience this bug on a i386 system? > Building libdbi and libdbi-drivers from CVS source cures both problems. Is the CVS source of a different version? > I suggest rebuilding the package using recent versions of libmysqlclient. What version do you mean: of the libmysqlclient12 or the libmysqlclient14 package? Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCi3TF5UTeB5t8Mo0RAjgDAKDBqzjBaB6lF7vEVWfGu2bFvvM//gCdHfx8 URIvQpMY62abgXZTKtbZAlg= =oLmI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309401: more debugging for zynaddsubfx
I think I reproduced this bug. 2 backtraces attached. One normal and one with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip. src/Makefile is using -O6 as optimization options, which is stupid. (-O3 is maximum). Note that I'm using amd64 in 64-bit mode. -- Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 182922426656 (LWP 26448)] ZynAddSubFX - Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Nasca Octavian Paul Compiled: May 18 2005 19:44:38 This program is free software (GNU GPL v.2) and it comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. Try 'zynaddsubfx --help' for command-line options. Sound Buffer Size = 256 samples Internal latency = 5.8 ms ADsynth Oscil.Size =512 samples ERROR: Cannot make a jack client (possible reasons: JACK server is not running or jackd is launched by root and zynaddsubfx by another user.). ALSA lib seq_hw.c:446:(snd_seq_hw_open) open /dev/snd/seq failed: No such file or directory [New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 26451)] [New Thread 1090517360 (LWP 26452)] [New Thread 1098905968 (LWP 26453)] [New Thread 1107294576 (LWP 26454)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1098905968 (LWP 26453)] 0x00457cd0 in MasterUI::cb_Beginner () (gdb) q The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux"...(no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 182922426656 (LWP 24599)] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) ZynAddSubFX - Copyright (c) 2002-2005 Nasca Octavian Paul Compiled: May 3 2005 12:23:39 This program is free software (GNU GPL v.2) and it comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. Try 'zynaddsubfx --help' for command-line options. Sound Buffer Size = 256 samples Internal latency = 5.8 ms ADsynth Oscil.Size =512 samples ERROR: Cannot make a jack client (possible reasons: JACK server is not running or jackd is launched by root and zynaddsubfx by another user.). ALSA lib seq_hw.c:446:(snd_seq_hw_open) open /dev/snd/seq failed: No such file or directory (no debugging symbols found) [New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 24602)] [New Thread 1090517360 (LWP 24603)] [New Thread 1098905968 (LWP 24604)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1098905968 (LWP 24604)] 0x0045ba62 in ?? () (gdb) q The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#309670: gabber: FTBFS: Missing build dependency.
Package: gabber Version: 1.9.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Gabber is failing to build in experimental with the following error: checking for intltool >= 0.23... 0.30 found checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool make: *** [config.status] Error 1 Adding a bulid dependency on libxml-parser-perl could fix this. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309367: non-bug
Whatever, he's right, it's ugly. I'll do some sanity checking, it's not a big deal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309401: more debugging
Maybe you could use a system trace to further debug this problem: strace -f /usr/bin/zynaddsubfx 2> zynaddsubfx.trace -- Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Bug#309419: marked as done (libquantlib0 no longer contains libQuantLib.so.0)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309419: fixed in quantlib 0.3.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 04:25:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 16 21:25:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DXtdr-00059L-00; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:15 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B130BA32BD; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:25:14 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libquantlib0 no longer contains libQuantLib.so.0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libquantlib0 Version: 0.3.9-1 Severity: serious Hi Dirk, Reviewing the changes in quantlib 0.3.9-2 has brought this fact to my attention: $ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.2.1.cvs20020322-1_i386.deb |grep libQua= ntLib -rw-r--r-- root/root 2815996 2002-03-23 14:49:03 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so= =2E0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2002-03-23 14:48:43 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so= =2E0 -> libQuantLib.so.0.0.0 $ dpkg -c q/quantlib/libquantlib0_0.3.9-1_i386.deb |grep libQuantLib -rw-r--r-- root/root 5192416 2005-05-02 22:22:23 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.= 3.9.so -rw-r--r-- root/root208464 2005-05-02 22:22:23 ./usr/lib/libQuantLibFun= ctions-0.3.9.so lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-02 22:21:47 ./usr/lib/libQuantLib.so= -> libQuantLib-0.3.9.so lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-05-02 22:21:57 ./usr/lib/libQuantLibFun= ctions.so -> libQuantLibFunctions-0.3.9.so The soname of the quantlib library has been changed, but the package name has not. Since there are packages in woody which have a Depends: libquantlib0, this is a release-critical bug because it invalidates the shlibs from libquantlib0 in woody and breaks partial upgrades between stable releases. E.g., consider a user who has quantlib and quantlib-python installed on woody, begins transitioning to sarge, and pulls in quantlib-ruby -- the quantlib-python package will be silently broken by the new libquantlib0 package that is pulled in. Please rename libquantlib0 so that the package name reflects the soname of the library it contains (e.g., libquantlib-0.3.9). Thanks, --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiXInKN6ufymYLloRAulLAJ9OZwKXeNTuEg4sdq2a7ds595QzQQCgsF59 j2V2ThtRX9+MNx377WnpUFI= =uxUv -END PGP SIGNATURE- --PyMzGVE0NRonI6bs-- --- Received: (at 309419-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 17:08:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 10:08:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYS1e-nS-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:08:06 -0700 Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYRuG-0001iF-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#309419: fixed in quantlib 0.3.9-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:00:28 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no vers
Bug#309201: osgcal - uses ccache but does not clean up the cache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I will disable ccache in the next build. Thanks for your help. Hopefully soon as this is an RC bug for sarge? Do you need any help? Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCi3Nu5UTeB5t8Mo0RAnHeAKCLfCZM5I52dBXhsW3ifKvrtBj+bACghbYG gc0/QrjESACNIv+dx32tmPM= =rs/Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Christian, you make me phone with American lawyers; frightening. ;-) Please see below. Christian Hammers wrote: Hi On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me to remove the mysql manual from Debian? I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL software. Does this sound clearer? Ok. If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I need a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file of the package to make the ftp master happy again. OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to? It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the server is distributed, too. The lawyer I just phoned to is telling me she'll get back to me soon with an assessment whether or not we can give that permission. I hope I can get back to you in time. (please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of "the Debian distribution" but rather a part of the archive that is maintained for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so "on the same medium" is also not valid... complicated... If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager might have no pardon as this is "only" a non-free package and the archive is "frozen" for release.. Argh. Are you referring to the whole MySQL package, or just to the Reference Manual, when you're talking about the non-free package? Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MySQL AB, Documentation Team Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941 Mobile: +49 177 7841069 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
also sprach Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.18.1732 +0200]: > - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This > will avoid physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated > updating of inode/FAT structures and greatly speed up the > write throughput. On the bad side this makes it much less > safe to remove devices without proper umounting. Ouch!! What I am wondering is whether Linux provides a way to decrease the flush interval on a per-filesystem level. I can see the problem with synchronous updates and flash technology, but async is just calling for trouble. If it were possible to cause flushing every 10 seconds or so, this would be good. I did not research this further. Thanks for your work (and pmount!) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "alle menschen zerfallen, wie zu allen zeiten so auch jetzt noch, in sklaven und freie; denn wer von seinem tag nicht zwei drittel für sich hat, ist ein sklave, er sei übrigens wer er wolle: staatsmann, kaufmann, beamter, gelehrter." - friedrich nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 307989 to cdebconf, severity of 307989 is normal ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 307989 cdebconf Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken Bug reassigned from package `choose-mirror' to `cdebconf'. > severity 307989 normal Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 307989 choose-mirror question is skipped if there are Indices- fields > in it Bug#307989: does not prompt for country/manual entry, and backup broken Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309591: marked as done (pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync))
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309591: fixed in pmount 0.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 06:51:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 23:51:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de [129.143.116.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYIPA-0003L0-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:51:44 -0700 Received: by rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de (Postfix, from userid 102) id CDBF8236A6; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:51:42 +0200 From: Andreas Mohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Priority: none Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pmount Version: 0.8-1 Severity: grave Hi, apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by default: http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html Probably the best way is to get rid of the sync default in favour of an async default, and also make sure to warn against using sync on flash media in the man page (and README?) (eikke: JFYI) Andreas Mohr --- Received: (at 309591-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 15:45:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 08:45:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYQk0-0001N1-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 08:45:48 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYQWw-0004U8-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400 From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#309591: fixed in pmount 0.8-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: pmount Source-Version: 0.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pmount, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pmount_0.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2.diff.gz pmount_0.8-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2.dsc pmount_0.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pmount/pmount_0.8-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pmount package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:41:13 +0200 Source: pmount Binary: pmount Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: pmount - mount removable devices as normal user Closes: 309591 Changes: pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge. * Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch: - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Hi! Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 4:38 -0700]: > > I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default > > from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the > > --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy > > flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the > > disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount > > their drives) IMHO. > > > I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the > > meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge? > > If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug, > then yes. Alright, I uploaded pmount (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=high . * Urgency high since this fixes an RC bug, the fix should reach Sarge. * Added debian/patches/02-async_by_default.patch: - Mount devices 'async' by default instead of 'sync'. This will avoid physical damage of flash chips due to exaggerated updating of inode/FAT structures and greatly speed up the write throughput. On the bad side this makes it much less safe to remove devices without proper umounting. - Replace option "--async" with option "--sync". - Document change in the manpages. - Closes: #309591 * debian/control: Correct package priority to optional, to match the katie overrides. The applied patch can be seen at [1], it's pretty trivial. I also talked with Sjoerd Simons (hal maintainer). Above pmount upload will fix the issue for command line users of pmount, but for Utopia users (i. e. who use gnome-volume-manager and hal) the policy needs to be fixed in hal; this means nothing more than removing the sync/async policy stanza from the policy XML file, so I kindly ask to approve this as well (Sjoerd will prepare an update soon). Thanks a lot for your hard work and have a nice day! Martin [1] http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/02-async_by_default.patch -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309367: non-bug
(Please cc submitter when updating a bug) On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:27:37PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi, > > I have verified that gnome-applets debian/control file is correct. > The broken lines you pasted are the result of running the clean target > without satisfying the build dependencies (which is not correct as > exlained in Policy 7.6). Well, the bug I discovered because some ftp-master script puking on the Sources.gz file of upstream, which comes from the .dsc of gnome-applets. In whatever way that has become, is not relevant to this being an question of Build-Depends syntax error. The problem with the package is then that the .dsc can have different Build-Depends depending on what packages were installed during clean run, something that's very awkward and, as this bugs shows, will introduce bugs. If you're doing akward things like control rebuilding in clean, please make sure you have proper tests in place to get it right, that is, error out if something is missing, and/or even better, don't autoupdate control, but only do so on a specific, non-automaticly invoked, debian/rules target. > Josselin, however, if you want to use type-handling's Provides > feature, you'll be happy to know I had to bring it back. > > Otherwise you may just close this bug. No, please don't, the bug is present in this version. This also applies to the elinks bug. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Hi On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: > > So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me > > to remove the mysql manual from Debian? > > I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of > putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. > E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL > software. Does this sound clearer? Ok. > > If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that > > also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I > > need > > a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file > > of the package to make the ftp master happy again. > > OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get > this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal > stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to? It's enough if you write it per email and state that this addition applies to 4.0.x, 4.1.x and will appear in the next release. Something like In addition to the current MySQL manual licence, MySQL grants permission to everyone to distribute the manual in unaltered form (regarding to the content not the format) as long as the server is distributed, too. (please be careful with the definition of how exactly the server is distributed as e.g. in Debian non-free is not considered part of "the Debian distribution" but rather a part of the archive that is maintained for convinience only... and also it maybe on a different CD-ROM so "on the same medium" is also not valid... complicated... If I have it in the next days that would be nice, else the release manager might have no pardon as this is "only" a non-free package and the archive is "frozen" for release.. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309486: libc6 upgrade failed leaving system unusable
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:51:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:42:08AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:34:58AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > If you dare, could you try to reproduce the problem? > > > > I can try that, as the system isn't too critical. Installing the -22 deb > > now works. Should I install -21 and then -22 again? > > That worked. Do you mean "worked OK" or "successfully reproduced the problem"? If it worked OK, let's close this; there's nothing we can do about it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Christian, Christian Hammers wrote: Hello Stefan On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week, if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out. Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like? ... What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software *but not separately*. The manual cannot be shipped with the software in a "strict sense" as a) at least in Debian it does not comply the Debian Free Software Guidelines (because it may not be altered) and thus must reside in it's own mysql-doc package in the non-free part of the ftp archive. b) (minor point: for convinience, it is in it's own package due to it's size) So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me to remove the mysql manual from Debian? I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL software. Does this sound clearer? If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I need a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file of the package to make the ftp master happy again. OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to? Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MySQL AB, Documentation Team Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941 Mobile: +49 177 7841069 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309648: Cheetah loads arbitrary code from /tmp
Package: cheetah Severity: grave Tags: security Cheetah loads arbitrary module code from /tmp, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7070332&forum_id=1542 for a detailed discussion. It's fixed in CVS and 0.9.17rc1, but since Sarge is in freeze an upload with only the security fix would surely be appreciated by the release managers. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-vs1.2.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309645: oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug
Package: oregano Version: 0.40.0-3 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Due to an incompatibility problem with the current libcairo, the plot window in Oregano causes a total freeze of the program. This is to say, you are not able to simulate any circuit, because the program freezes when reaching the plot part. Therefore the program is practically useless (you can draw a circuit and generate the netlist, but not simulate it). The bug is actually in the cairo library, but the buggy function has been dropped in the CVS version, and there's noone wishing to fix the old one. Upstream is already aware of the problem and is now trying to find a workaround. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages oregano depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo10.4.0-1 Multi-platform 2D graphics library ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtksourceview1.0- 1.2.0-1 shared libraries for the GTK+ synt ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpixman1 0.1.4-1 Cairo pixel manipulation library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Hello Stefan On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote: > > As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week, > > if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out. > > Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like? ... > What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this > discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software > *but not separately*. The manual cannot be shipped with the software in a "strict sense" as a) at least in Debian it does not comply the Debian Free Software Guidelines (because it may not be altered) and thus must reside in it's own mysql-doc package in the non-free part of the ftp archive. b) (minor point: for convinience, it is in it's own package due to it's size) So was your above sentence just not exact and you really require me to remove the mysql manual from Debian? If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I need a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file of the package to make the ftp master happy again. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309321: approx: Approx stops processing TCP rx queue
Hi Eric, I may have a clue on reproducing the problem: Try aborting apt-get or aptitude midway through a download and then re-try. This is seems to trigger the problem here. Tim # CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this email is confidential and may also be privileged. It is intended to be for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not the addressee please note that you must not distribute, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. If you have received this email in error please notify us by phone (+44 (0)870 445 1445) and then destroy the email and any copies of it. ##
Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: | On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: | |>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before doing so, |>| would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it fixes |>| your problem? | | | | Does this mean you only upgraded to 2.1.30-6? You need 2.1.30-7 from | unstable to check whether it's the bug we fixed. Oops, my mistake. Our local repository hasnt been updated since we started running into problems. However, still no change with these versions: ldap-utils 2.1.30-3 libldap-2.2-7 2.2.23-1 libldap2 2.1.30-7 libldap2 2.1.30-7 libnss-ldap238-1 libpam-ldap178-1 gdm2.6.0.8-1 Jay - -- Jay Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 612.337.3517 c: 612.384.1568 - -- "This message (including any attachments) may contain proprietary or privileged information, the use and disclosure of which is legally restricted. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender by reply message, do not otherwise distribute it, and delete this message, with all of its contents, from your files." -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCi0PHDxbn5aHZgBgRAmrxAKCQZhlqUScWHZRrWEYDhCz5zbxZRwCgjV2b sgRQ5Qq+yJaczWwHoyBdBtk= =sIg4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297196: marked as done (Dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2005 21:08:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 13:08:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de [213.178.77.226] (UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D5VeX-00062t-00; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:08:37 -0800 Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1RL8T7G017058; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:29 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1RL8S2Y017057; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:28 +0100 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:08:28 +0100 From: Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable package: kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 = = =20 version: 2.6.10-2 = = =20 severity: grave= = =20 justification: please keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge = = =20 = = =20 This is a dummy bug to keep kernel-image-2.6.10-amd64 out of sarge.= = =20 = = =20 Kind regards = = =20 Frederik Schueler = = =20 --=20 ENOSIG --9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCIjbM6n7So0GVSSARAiNUAJ94uOS9WD7RhC6oWdChoxkzzVSaeQCfemkX 0KzQiNteu7hnLMCDzvwLluE= =SYhT -END PGP SIGNATURE- --9DptZICXTlJ7FQ09-- --- Received: (at 297196-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 13:33:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 06:33:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYOfV-0007fG-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 06:33:01 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 692DC64D50; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:33:01 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DCDC4F35C; Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:32:53 +0100 From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: removed Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Vers
Processed: tagging 309591
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 309591 pending Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Tags were: sarge sid Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: kernel bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 292868 kernel Bug#292868: DVB headers not included in kernel-headers Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.6.10-1' to `kernel'. > reassign 294186 kernel Bug#294186: Kernel Version Specific scripts/ is required Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.6.10-1' to `kernel'. > reassign 302317 kernel Bug#302317: module-assistant: failed to build ipw2100-source with gcc-version.sh: No such file or directory Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 306355 kernel Bug#306355: linux-image-2.6.10-5-k7-smp: fails to boot on udev system Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-k7-smp' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-k7-smp' to `kernel'. > reassign 294164 kernel Bug#294164: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386: kernel oops when launching jvm Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386' to `kernel'. > reassign 296360 kernel Bug#296360: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386: panic on esssolo1 /dev/audio read Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-386' to `kernel'. > reassign 289770 kernel Bug#289770: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: 2.6.10 fails to set up DMA on my IBM thinkpad Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 289900 kernel Bug#289900: Installation seems to clash with kernel-headers-2.6.10-1-686 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 290295 kernel Bug#290295: rmmod vesafb error Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 290827 kernel Bug#290827: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: Module saa7134 still broken Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 291653 kernel Bug#291653: Battery monitor broken with 2.6.10 + VAIO Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 292038 kernel Bug#292038: Cannot boot from SATA-drives Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 292159 kernel Bug#292159: kernel does not detect IDE-DVD burner Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 292318 kernel Bug#292318: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: Disappearing header line in /proc/swaps Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 292328 kernel Bug#292328: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: kernel freezes for about 30 sec. during the boot process Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 292665 kernel Bug#292665: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: intensive usage of usb-storage causes high iowait Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 293057 kernel Bug#293057: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: Intel e100 network card stop to work Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 294982 kernel Bug#294982: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: usb audio device stopped working since about 2.6.8 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 295003 kernel Bug#295003: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: sound card model Creative Labs [SB Live! Value] EMU10k1X is theoretically supported by snd-emu10k1 but does not work Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 297882 kernel Bug#297882: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686 : Unable to mount usb flash disk Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 298184 kernel Bug#298184: usb-storage: usb storage drive LaCie Big Disk 250GB stopped working after upgrading to 2.6.10 Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 298334 kernel Bug#298334: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: volume being listed as an input not an output for CS4299 rev6 (I440MX) Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686' to `kernel'. > reassign 300575 kernel Bug#300575: kernel-image-2.6.10-1-686: acpi interface d
Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: > | Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before doing so, > | would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it fixes > | your problem? > That did not change anything. libldap.so.2.0.15 did not exist before I > upgraded to libldap2 2.1.30-6, though. Here are relevant package versions: > ldap-utils 2.1.30-3 > libldap-2.2-7 2.2.23-1 > libldap2 2.1.30-6 > libnss-ldap238-1 > libpam-ldap178-1 > gdm2.6.0.8-1 > Did I miss something? Does this mean you only upgraded to 2.1.30-6? You need 2.1.30-7 from unstable to check whether it's the bug we fixed. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: | On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:41:01AM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: | |>On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:49:30PM -0500, Jay Kline wrote: |> |>>Alexander Sack wrote: |>>| I did not found any hints on this in the bug report, so maybe it's |>>worth asking: |>>| |>>| You see any unexpected messages in dmesg or any system logs? Are there any |>>| errors in /var/log/XFree86.0.log? |>> |>>No, nothing of the sort. However, I am starting to lean towrads |>>libnss-ldap being the issue. Bug #302296 | | |>Ahh, you didn't mention this! There is/was an ABI conflict between the two, |>which would cause this. I can't find the bug atm, but this will be the problem. |>Either two libdbs, two libgnutls's, or something of that nature which then |>causes the gdm process to segfault. Last time I followed up on it, the |>maintainer of the conflicting package didn't want to change ABI before sarge, |>so this combination just won't work. | | | We are, thankfully, down to one gnutls, one gcrypt, and one sasl in sarge; | and AFAIK libdbs have been fixed long ago not to conflict. | | There is still one outstanding issue in sarge with the fact that libldap2 | currently provides both libldap.so.2 and libldap_r.so.2 with identical | exported symbols, differing only in the claim that one is thread-safe. This | is fixed in libldap2 2.1.30-7 in unstable by making one a symlink to the | other, but bug #309485 is keeping this out of testing for the moment. | | Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before doing so, | would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it fixes | your problem? That did not change anything. libldap.so.2.0.15 did not exist before I upgraded to libldap2 2.1.30-6, though. Here are relevant package versions: ldap-utils 2.1.30-3 libldap-2.2-7 2.2.23-1 libldap2 2.1.30-6 libnss-ldap238-1 libpam-ldap178-1 gdm2.6.0.8-1 Did I miss something? Jay - -- Jay Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 612.337.3517 c: 612.384.1568 - -- "This message (including any attachments) may contain proprietary or privileged information, the use and disclosure of which is legally restricted. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender by reply message, do not otherwise distribute it, and delete this message, with all of its contents, from your files." -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCizo5Dxbn5aHZgBgRAkdZAJ4/fQJcF/3F9/ahQCr0jZ0cs3TU8wCggAHi JXGzJzzuyKJYZKo7cJObJtI= =2yLK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?
Hi Christian, Christian Hammers wrote: Hello On 2005-05-13 Stefan Hinz wrote: Christian Hammers wrote: I maintain the MySQL packages for the Debian distribution and are facing some licence issues here. I'm working with our contracts dept. to change that copyright note so it doesn't confuse our users. I'll get back to you soon. As our next release is in preparation I would have to know this week, if the docs may be distributed or not, else they get thrown out. Can you already tell me what the outcome will be like? The outcome will not be any different from how we've been handling this for the last ten years. ;-) That is, MySQL software has always been shipped with the Manual, and we won't change that. We'll try to phrase the copyright note more user-friendly, or easier to interpret correctly. But let's have a look of what's in manual.texi now, with a few comments of mine. @c This manual is NOT distributed under a GPL style license. If it were, then you could just do with it whatever you want, as long as what you do complies to the restrictions imposed by the GPL. For our Manual, this is not the case: It's "regular" copyright, and the note above doesn't change anything regarding "regular" copyright, it just emphasises that fact. Now what are you allowed to do with regularly copyrighted material? You may make a copy for personal use, but you're not allowed to distribute it, unless the copyright owner grants you permission to do that. (This is true for most countries in the world since copyright laws are very similar.) This is what one of the following clauses is for; see below. @c Use of the manual is subject to the following terms: @c - Conversion to other formats is allowed, but the actual @c content may not be altered or edited in any way. The previous sentence actually states two different things: 1. You may not fork the Manual (why else would anyone want to "alter or edit" it if not for forking?). This is just an emphasis of what's regular copyright: You're not allowed to fork copyrighted material without the owner's permission. 2. Since TexInfo isn't the most readable format there is we allow to convert it into other formats. (In the near future, after we've switched from TexInfo to DocBook XML we'll ship other formats, anyway, so that note will probably be removed.) @c - You may create a printed copy for your own personal use. As said above, this is what copyright laws grant you, anyway. @c - For all other uses, such as selling printed copies or @c using (parts of) the manual in another publication, @c prior written agreement from MySQL AB is required. The things explicitly mentioned here are what we're really after: We don't want anyone to sell printed copies (since we're doing this ourselves :-), and we don't want parts of the Manual to be copied to training materials etc. What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software *but not separately*. I hope this clarifies our reasoning. Let me know if you have further questions! Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MySQL AB, Documentation Team Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941 Mobile: +49 177 7841069 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 309591 -1 Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Bug 309591 cloned as bug 309625. > reassign -1 hal Bug#309625: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Bug reassigned from package `pmount' to `hal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#305277: marked as done (gnbd: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Package not it sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2005 23:58:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 18 16:58:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNg8o-0003r7-00; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:58:58 -0700 Received: (qmail 4146 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2005 23:58:26 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 23:58:26 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6110BB586; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:58:21 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnbd: Can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:58:20 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: gnbd Version: 0.trunk20050206-1 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on libmagma-dev can't be fulfilled in sarge. --- Received: (at 305277-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:58:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:58:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYNCG-0006ui-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:58:44 -0700 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DYNCF-0006R5-EH for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:58:43 +0200 From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package not it sarge Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: The bug is specific to sarge but the package is not in sarge anymore so it can be closed Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308664 important Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper Severity set to `important'. > tags 308664 - sid Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309615: marked as done (libapache2-svn: missing Depends)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309615: libapache2-svn: missing Depends has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:01:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:01:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMIq-0002ct-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:01:29 -0700 Received: from [203.129.41.236] (helo=democritus.tekno.house) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DYMIK-0007fi-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:56 +1000 Received: from yosamite (yosamite.tekno.house [10.1.75.21]) by democritus.tekno.house (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B10D19385 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:56 +1000 (EST) Received: by yosamite (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:55 +1000 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 21:00:55 +1000 From: Sam Couter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libapache2-svn: missing Depends Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7 on a i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libapache2-svn Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Breaks apache The libapache2-svn package needs a few extra Depends: on SASL and SSL libraries. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# /etc/init.d/apache2 start Starting web server: Apache2/usr/sbin/apache2: error while loading shared l= ibraries: libsasl.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or dir= ectory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# ldd /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_authz_svn= =2Eso | grep "not found" libsasl.so.7 =3D> not found libssl.so.0.9.6 =3D> not found libcrypto.so.0.9.6 =3D> not found --=20 Sam "Eddie" Couter | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCiyBnhTADrt6Jx1wRAkH6AJ0WoPdTLpqBnYTQU92SPssS8ArA1ACg44aC weuXF7+sHde+mU0ODrjE18w= =ApYE -END PGP SIGNATURE- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI-- --- Received: (at 309615-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:36:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:36:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMqV-0001rI-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:15 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25423A3B3D; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 04:36:14 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sam Couter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#309615: libapache2-svn: missing Depends Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encodin
Bug#308664: marked as done (cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308664: fixed in cdbs 0.4.29 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:02:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:02:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVxPW-yj-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:02:26 -0700 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92A316DF7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A436F906A4; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:02:25 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.28-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of cdbs_0.4.28-1 on mix by sbuild/i386 1.170.5 > Build started at 20050511-1353 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-xsl, xsltproc, springgraph, > ocaml-native-compilers | ocaml, realpath, fakeroot, python-dev [...] > -e "s/$/\"/g" \ > < debian/control.in | /bin/sh > debian/control > dpkg-checkbuilddeps -B > test -x debian/rules > test "`id -u`" = 0 > if test -n "" && test "" != "."; then rmdir ""; fi > if test "." != "."; then rmdir .; fi > for i in ./test/autotools/config.guess ./test/autotools/config.sub ; do \ > if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \ > mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \ > fi ; \ > done > dh_clean > make: dh_clean: Command not found > make: *** [clean] Error 127 --- Received: (at 308664-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:38:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:38:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMsH-0002Q0-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:38:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMmf-0002JA-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400 From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308664: fixed in cdbs 0.4.29 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:17 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: cdbs Source-Version: 0.4.29 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of cdbs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: cdbs_0.4.29.dsc to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29.dsc cdbs_0.4.29.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29.tar.gz cdbs_0.4.29_all.deb to pool/main/c/cdbs/cdbs_0.4.29_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cdbs package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:52:21 +0200 Source: cdbs Binary: cdbs Architecture: source
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]: > > > apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by > > > default: > > > > > http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html > > > > This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to sarge > > because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT. > That's not entirely true. Older kernels indeed do not completely > implement sync on vfat, but at least to a certain degree; there is > still a small amount of data that does get written after calling > "sync", but it is by no way the same amount of data that gets written > when mounting async. > I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default > from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the > --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy > flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the > disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount > their drives) IMHO. > I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the > meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge? If you think that's the correct course of action for addressing this bug, then yes. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309321: approx: Approx stops processing TCP rx queue
Hi Eric, Yep, no problem: Just to help here's a diagram of the initial setup +-+ +--++--+ +---+ |uk.debian.org|<|server01 |<---|server02 |<|client01 | +-+ |(approx & ||(approx & | |(client of | +---+ |client of ||client of | |server02) | |security.debian.org|<--|localhost)||localhost)| | | +---+ +--++--+ +---+ I should also point out that server02 is shared by a number of other clients, not just client01. Is it possible that approx somehow marks a file as pending from upstream, when in fact the download has failed, or been interrupted? It could then permanently believe the file is not yet available, when it never will be. Syslog on server02 only thing that looks odd is a few "utimes: Operation not permitted" on Packages.gz files When I checked the perms the file is rw for user approx which seems right to me. Can fail at any point, sometimes in the download of packages files, sometimes in the fetch of the package.dpkg files. It may not be related, but even when things are working fairly ok, I do seem to get quite a few "Error reading from server - read (104 Connection reset by peer)" messages in aptitude/apt-get which I don't get if I switch back to apt-proxy. Each time it leaves a bunch of connections to it's upstream in the CLOSE_WAIT state. There remains, however only one connection in the ESTABLISHED state with a high value rx q. If I then repeat the run it will be all or most of the same downloads that fail. If I connect apt directly to the upstream, and the upstream is the remote debian mirror, that always works fine. Otherwise the same thing happens but not quite so regularly, I guess the problem can occur in any of the approx instances in the chain. For each instance you take out of the chain the lower the chance of bumping into a problem. Different remote? - see above, the debian mirror never fails. Wget seems to work ok on the files that are getting "Error reading from server - read (104 Connection reset by peer)" from aptitude/apt-get which is interesting. Hope this helps rather than confuses the issue, anything else you'd like me to try just let me know. Cheers, Tim # CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE The information contained in this email is confidential and may also be privileged. It is intended to be for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. If you are not the addressee please note that you must not distribute, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this email. If you have received this email in error please notify us by phone (+44 (0)870 445 1445) and then destroy the email and any copies of it. ##
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
tag 309591 sarge thanks Steve Langasek [2005-05-18 1:05 -0700]: > > apparently the sync option really should *NOT* be used, especially not by > > default: > > > http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/111748.html > > This may or may not be a grave bug, but AFAIK it doesn't apply to sarge > because the kernels in sarge do not support sync on FAT/VFAT. That's not entirely true. Older kernels indeed do not completely implement sync on vfat, but at least to a certain degree; there is still a small amount of data that does get written after calling "sync", but it is by no way the same amount of data that gets written when mounting async. I read the thread and it convinced me to change the pmount default from sync to async (which would be a trivial change) and replace the --async option with a --sync option. The advantages (don't destroy flash hardware and greatly speed up the writing process) outweigh the disadvantages (protect users from corruption if they don't unmount their drives) IMHO. I will prepare the patch ASAP and send it to this bug. In the meantime, would you accept this change for Sarge? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup)
severity 309605 wishlist thanks On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:50:49AM +0200, Frederic LEHOBEY wrote: > Package: a2ps > Version: 1:4.13b-4.3 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > I found a2ps to be missing dependency on psutils (currently it is only > a `recommends'). > $ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps > sh: line 1: psnup: command not found > [/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): failed. Ignored] > [No output produced] This doesn't look like a bug at all to me. The a2ps package is usable without psutils, it just can't handle postscript input files. I believe this is a perfectly correct use of Recommends: under policy. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309605 wishlist Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup) Severity set to `wishlist'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 308664 sid Bug#308664: cdbs_0.4.28-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends: debhelper There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 309591 sarge Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync) Tags were: sid Tags added: sarge > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308846: marked as done (file conflict in pimppa, parmetis-test)
Your message dated Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308846: fixed in parmetis 3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2005 17:10:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 10:10:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DWHCc-00075S-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:10:26 -0700 Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net ([217.160.134.107] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.lenk.info with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DWHEo-0008HF-DH for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:12:42 +0200 Received: from p54a3d80a.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.216.10] helo=feynman.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1DWHFZ-0006ta-Di for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:13:31 +0200 Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DWHBq-0003rP-HO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 May 2005 19:09:38 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: file conflict in pimppa, parmetis-test X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:09:37 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: pimppa,parmetis-test Severity: grave Unpacking parmetis-test (from .../parmetis-test_3.1-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/parmetis-test_3.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/ptest', which is also in package pimppa dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 308846-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 11:15:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 04:15:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMWS-00066F-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 04:15:32 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DYMJp-0006ve-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Powell, IV) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $ Subject: Bug#308846: fixed in parmetis 3.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:02:29 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: parmetis Source-Version: 3.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of parmetis, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libparmetis-dev_3.1-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/libparmetis-dev_3.1-2_i386.deb libparmetis3.1_3.1-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/libparmetis3.1_3.1-2_i386.deb parmetis-doc_3.1-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis-doc_3.1-2_all.deb parmetis-test_3.1-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis-test_3.1-2_i386.deb parmetis_3.1-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis_3.1-2.diff.gz parmetis_3.1-2.dsc to pool/non-free/p/parmetis/parmetis_3.1-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#309367: non-bug
Hi, I have verified that elinks debian/control file is correct. The broken lines you pasted are the result of running the clean target without satisfying the build dependencies (which is not correct as exlained in Policy 7.6). Please close this bug. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309615: libapache2-svn: missing Depends
Package: libapache2-svn Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Breaks apache The libapache2-svn package needs a few extra Depends: on SASL and SSL libraries. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# /etc/init.d/apache2 start Starting web server: Apache2/usr/sbin/apache2: error while loading shared libraries: libsasl.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/apache2# ldd /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_authz_svn.so | grep "not found" libsasl.so.7 => not found libssl.so.0.9.6 => not found libcrypto.so.0.9.6 => not found -- Sam "Eddie" Couter | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: I'm too stupid to use control@bugs.debian.org :/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 309583 minor Bug#309583: hangs the system Severity set to `minor'. > retitle 309583 Package description should mention hardware requirements Bug#309583: hangs the system Changed Bug title. > thanks, mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309583: Unreproducible on system with real OpenGL support
severity minor retitle Package description should mention hardware requirements thanks, mate On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:00:34AM +0300, Petri Latvala wrote: > I cannot reproduce this on my system, which is fast enough and has > real OpenGL drivers. It handles SIGTERM, it shows graphics, shows > window title. > > It grabs the mouse, yes. But here it also has focus when it does > that. You can escape it with pressing esc (if your system is juicy > enough to run the game and the window is visible and handles input). Thank you for your additional information. I will prepare an upload with a fixed manpage and package description. Gruesse, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309209: patch contains CVS files
I will not use your patch, since it contains patches for the CVS files, which would corrupt my CVS tree. Instead I will apply these changes by hand and will also add some changes that are missing in your patch. -- regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#255276: Fixed in upstream CVS
See this message below. Recent OpenLDAP versions will recover automatically, as needed. Rumor has it that Berkeley DB 4.4 will offer similar functionality, too. From: Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Force single thread of control during recovery Newsgroups: comp.databases.berkeley-db Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:42:07 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> oleksandr kalinin wrote: > Hello All, > In my environment, there is a command-line database maintenance tool > for > users to display, add, modify records etc. During recovery, I would have to > make sure this tool does not attempt to open the environment so that there > is only single thread of control accessing it. Seems like I have to > implement own locking mechanism to handle this, or is there some "smarter" > way, e.g. in the library? Locking is easy in this case, but just to make > sure I haven't missed something important in documentation... Many thanks > for your help. The current releases of the BDB library don't offer any support here. We wrote our own locking mechanism for OpenLDAP to mediate access to the environment. We record the process IDs of all processes with a valid handle to the environment, so we can detect unclean exits and force a recovery only when needed. And of course, only one process can trigger a recovery. The code is in OpenLDAP's CVS if you're interested, servers/slapd/back-bdb/alock.c -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun http://www.symas.com http://highlandsun.com/hyc Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309605: Reference to an earlier bug
Hi, This bug already showed up before (seems the fix at that time was not enough): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234861 >From reading this previous bug it seems the severity I have put might be too much, but I do not see clearly why (the a2ps command fails everywhere). Best regards, Frederic Lehobey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#247192: NMU waiting for upload
tags 247192 +pending thanks. Hi, there. Package are ready, and checked by my AM. My sponsor will upload as soon as possible. Bye. -- Maurizio - Tannoiser - Lemmo Founder Member of ERLUG http://erlug.linux.it --- BOFH excuse #50: Change in Earth's rotational speed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: NMU waiting for upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 247192 +pending Bug#247192: gnome-pim: uninstallable due to conflict with gnome-pim-conduits Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > thanks. Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309606: [ia64] FTBFS: testsuite failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: pcre3 Severity: serious Version: 5.0-1 Tags: sid Relevant snippet of the build log [1]: ./RunTest: line 111: 25459 Bus error ./pcretest -i $testdata/testinput2 testtry make[1]: *** [runtest] Error 1 Cheers Luk [1]http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=pcre3&ver=5.0-1&arch=ia64&stamp=1116338491&file=log -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCixC05UTeB5t8Mo0RAp4zAJ491F2bxyP3Q+zK+0HGUuARlllJKQCfVDCm DbLw8SITY449N/gyUxFXLig= =iNky -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309605: a2ps: missing dependency on psutils (for psnup)
Package: a2ps Version: 1:4.13b-4.3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I found a2ps to be missing dependency on psutils (currently it is only a `recommends'). $ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps sh: line 1: psnup: command not found [/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): failed. Ignored] [No output produced] # apt-get install psutils solves it: $ LANG=C a2ps -2 /tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps [/tmp/developers-reference.fr.ps (ps, delegated to PsNup): 121 pages on 61 sheets] request id is HL-1430-551 (1 file(s)) [Total: 122 pages on 61 sheets] sent to the default printer $ apt-cache show a2ps Package: a2ps Priority: optional Section: text Installed-Size: 3096 Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 1:4.13b-4.3 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libpaper1 Pre-Depends: emacsen-common Recommends: bzip2, lpr | cupsys-client, psutils, wdiff By the way it may not be the only problem as the previous command only printed blank pages (but they are properly seen on screen by gv). I have not yet tracked down the roots of this second problem. Best regards, Frederic Lehobey -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages a2ps depends on: ii emacsen-common 1.4.16 Common facilities for all emacsen ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308846: file conflict in pimppa, parmetis-test
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:26 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:09:18PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Thanks, I'll declare a conflict and re-upload in the next few days. > > Any specific reason that this hasn't happened yet? Anything one can > be of assistance with? Just a time issue. Had to write and give a final exam the other day, since then I've made three uploads to fix important bugs. I'm about to upload this one in a few minutes. Thanks, -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext
mesag3: 5.0.0-5.1 libgl1-mesa-glide3: is not installed. > -Original Message- > From: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:41 PM > To: Greg Hazel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Bug#309585: libGL.so.1: SIGFPE in glxCreateNewContext > > reassign 309585 mesag3 > thanks > > Greg, > > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 10:47:08PM -0700, Greg Hazel wrote: > > Package: xlibmesa-gl > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 > > Severity: grave > > File: libGL.so.1 > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. > > [Switching to Thread -1241085008 (LWP 32440)] 0xb77a811c in > > _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > (gdb) up > > #1 0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > (gdb) bt > > #0 0xb77a811c in _mesa_test_os_sse_exception_support () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #1 0xb77a7b71 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #2 0xb77a76c8 in _mesa_init_all_x86_transform_asm () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #3 0xb76fc204 in _math_init_transformation () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #4 0xb76fc229 in _math_init () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #5 0xb765d1f5 in _mesa_Flush () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #6 0xb765c1c7 in _mesa_initialize_context () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #7 0xb77b9907 in XMesaCreateContext () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #8 0xb77b64c9 in _mesa_GetGLXDispatchTable () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > #9 0xb77b36c6 in glXCreateNewContext () from > > /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1 > > This file does not come from xlibmesa-gl; it comes from > either mesag3 or from libgl1-mesa-glide3. Please indicate > the versions of those packages that you have installed on your system. > > -- > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308664: reopen
reopen 308664 thanks This is really a bug, and will be fixed soon. I'm reopening. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `'http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)
Indeed, "grave" may have been too high, but then the Severity description forgot to include the possibility of actually killing hardware, which should be rated rather high IMHO. I didn't know about the Sid tagging (Sid here, with a custom 2.6.11-ck8 kernel), sorry. The LKML thread indicates that FAT sync behaviour has been changed by Colin Leroy (http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/112590.html). The discussion thread for this patch is at http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0411.3/.html For the record, I'd like to publicly state here: - pmount should get rid of default sync ASAP for the moment, in order to avoid too many killed USB sticks - contrary to the strange belief of certain people: "we don't need a new sync mode", http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/22/112509.html) , I do think we want a special mount mode (if possible), to indicate that we want fast, but not ultra-immediate (sync) writeout of dirty buffers. The usual caching in async mode will take too long for people to notice that things aren't fully written yet (the USB flash LED will switch off again!), thus we need faster processing (almost constant writing without many dropouts would be desireable, yet not as crazy as updates on every single-byte change as with the sync flag). Plus, thinking of *manually* using "umount" or even something esoteric as "sync" is absolutely unthinkable for "less educated" (ahem) people who unplug things on a whim. Such a new mount flag could be called "nowritecache" or "nowritebuffer" to indicate that we don't want any write caching in the OS. But this is not a very accurate description of what we really want to have with USB sticks, so maybe "fastwrite" (preferred) or "instantwrite" or "immediatewrite" (hmm) are better. Thanks, Andreas Mohr -- No programming skills!? Why not help translate many Linux applications! https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/rosetta -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
