Bug#310565: 'kernel-patch-cryptoloop' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Juergen,

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 07:13:20AM +0200, Juergen Strobel wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:05:15PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
> > kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
> > apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
> > useful at least with
> > an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
> > document this in the 
> > package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will 
> > be hinted for 
> > removing in sarge.

> > See also this ML thread about the issue:

> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

> I have fixes for this, but I lost contact to my mentor long ago and
> gave up on it, therefore I cannot upload them.

> Very few people are using this (~10-30 maybe), and they can get it 
> from my site directly. This is only useful for 2.4 kernels, 2.6 has
> something better integrated. Upstream is dead.

> Maybe it is best to drop this package, even if just to drop
> another responsibility of the security team.

Ok, I'll go ahead and remove it from testing.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310669: krusader: [m68k, mipsel] FTBFS: autoconf: command not found

[Christian T. Steigies]

Package: krusader
Version: 1.60.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of krusader_1.60.0-2 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 33
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, 
libqt3-mt-dev, kdelibs4-dev
** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps:
libfreetype6-dev (>= 2.1.5-1), libpcre3-dev (>= 4.0)
[...]
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0'
cd . && /bin/sh /build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing --run aclocal-1.6 
/build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.6: command not 
found
WARNING: `aclocal-1.6' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.  You might want
 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.  Grab them from
 any GNU archive site.
cd . && \
  /bin/sh /build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing --run automake-1.6 
--foreign  Makefile
/build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing: line 46: automake-1.6: command not 
found
WARNING: `automake-1.6' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'.
 You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages.
 Grab them from any GNU archive site.
cd . && perl admin/am_edit Makefile.in
cd . && rm -f configure
cd . && /usr/bin/make -f admin/Makefile.common configure
make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/krusader-1.60.0'
./admin/cvs.sh: line 11: autoconf: command not found
make[2]: *** [configure] Error 1

See full log, ie

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=krusader&ver=1.60.0-2&arch=mipsel&stamp=1116968392&file=log&as=raw

This looks like a timestampskew problem to me:

http://crest.debian.org/problems.html
Timestamp skew of the auto* files that are patched from diff.gz
hits m68k more than the other arches.  The problem is described
fully in /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz.

Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310668: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp: aha152x module hangs system when attempting to use scanner

[Karl O. Pinc]

Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hi,

I have an old HP ScanJet 6100C scanner.  Either the
lamp is dim, the mirrors or dirty, or the scanner
is broken.  It once worked with more or less the current
hardware configuration on a RedHat 7.2 system but
gradually took longer and longer to initiate a
scan.  (I've since removed a zip drive from the
scsi bus with the scanner attached and added
some drives to a different scsi bus on another
controller.)  When I switched to Debian and went
to the 3.6 kernel it seemed the module would not
take the combination ioport and irq jumper settings
I've configured, although I could have been
doing something wong.  So, the Adaptec card
has been unused for a while.  I've now tried to get
the scanner, and hence the Adaptec card, to work again
and it hangs my system.  After a delay the system does
not respond to mouse, keyboard, or ping.

The Adaptec 1524 card has an odd jumpering,
and is scsi bus 1, not zero, (see below)
but it used to work in this configuration
and the scanner scanned then too.

Sequence of events:

cold boot system

# cat /etc/sane.d/hp.conf | head
# Commented out of default and added next two lines.
#scsi HP
/dev/sg4
scsi HP C2520A * * * * *
# Uncomment the following if you have "Error during device I/O" on SCSI
#   option dumb-read
#
# The usual place for a SCSI-scanner on Linux
/dev/scanner
(remainder of file is all comments)

# cat /proc/ioports
-001f : dma1
0020-0021 : pic1
0040-005f : timer
0060-006f : keyboard
0070-0077 : rtc
0080-008f : dma page reg
00a0-00a1 : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : fpu
0218-021f : es1371
0290-0297 : pnp 00:09
02f8-02ff : serial
0378-037a : parport0
0398-0399 : pnp 00:09
03c0-03df : vga+
03f8-03ff : serial
0400-043f : :00:07.3
0440-045f : :00:07.3
04d0-04d1 : pnp 00:08
0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1
d000-dfff : PCI Bus #01
e800-e8ff : :00:10.0
ee80-eebf : :00:14.0
  ee80-eebf : e100
ef00-ef3f : :00:12.0
  ef00-ef3f : es1371
ef80-ef9f : :00:07.2
ffa0-ffaf : :00:07.1

# cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0   CPU1
  0: 983093 977615IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:   1809   1702IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:  0  0  XT-PIC  cascade
  3: 76 72IO-APIC-edge  serial
  5:  0  0   IO-APIC-level  es1371
  7:  0  0IO-APIC-edge  parport0
  8:  1  0IO-APIC-edge  rtc
 11: 185540  19763   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx, eth0, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]:1:0:0
 12:  16432  10098IO-APIC-edge  i8042
NMI:  0  0
LOC:19604631960458
ERR:  0
MIS:  0

Now, because I don't know how to configure modules
in 2.6 I manually install the aha152x module.

# modprobe aha152x io=0x340 irq=10 sync=0

This works.  (Note: problem still occurs if "sync=0"
is left off.)  The scanner hums a bit as it
is detected on the bus.

# dmesg | tail -n 18
aha152x: BIOS test: passed, 1 controller(s) configured
aha152x: resetting bus...
aha152x1: vital data: rev=1, io=0x340 (0x340/0x340), irq=10, scsiid=7, 
reconnect=enabled, parity=enabled, synchronous=disabled, delay=1000, extended 
translation=disabled
aha152x1: trying software interrupt, ok.
scsi1 : Adaptec 152x SCSI driver; $Revision: 2.7 $
  Vendor: HPModel: C2520ARev: 3644
  Type:   Processor  ANSI SCSI revision: 02
  Vendor: YAMAHAModel: CRW6416S  Rev: 1.0d
  Type:   CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 16x/16x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 6, lun 0
Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 0
Attached scsi generic sg1 at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0,  type 0
Attached scsi generic sg2 at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0,  type 0
Attached scsi generic sg3 at scsi0, channel 0, id 3, lun 0,  type 1
Attached scsi generic sg4 at scsi1, channel 0, id 4, lun 0,  type 3
Attached scsi generic sg5 at scsi1, channel 0, id 6, lun 0,  type 5

# cat /proc/ioports
-001f : dma1
0020-0021 : pic1
0040-005f : timer
0060-006f : keyboard
0070-0077 : rtc
0080-008f : dma page reg
00a0-00a1 : pic2
00c0-00df : dma2
00f0-00ff : fpu
0218-021f : es1371
0290-0297 : pnp 00:09
02f8-02ff : serial
0340-035f : aha152x
0378-037a : parport0
0398-0399 : pnp 00:09
03c0-03df : vga+
03f8-03ff : serial
0400-043f : :00:07.3
0440-045f : :00:07.3
04d0-04d1 : pnp 00:08
0cf8-0cff : PCI conf1
d000-dfff : PCI Bus #01
e800-e8ff : :00:10.0
ee80-eebf : :00:14.0
  ee80-eebf : e100
ef00-ef3f : :00:12.0
  ef00-ef3f : es1371
ef80-ef9f : :00:07.2
ffa0-ffaf : :00:07.1

# cat /proc/interrupts
   CPU0   CPU1
  0:11590181149111IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:   2162   2119IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:  0  0  XT-PIC  cascade
  3: 86  

Bug#310621: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults

[Ian Eure]

On Tuesday 24 May 2005 09:36 pm, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Could you send this si.xml?
>
Here you go.

http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/si.dtd";>

http://atomized.org/wp-content/themes/atomized/images/Logo.png";>Test

Bug#310565: 'kernel-patch-cryptoloop' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Juergen Strobel]

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:05:15PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop
> Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1
> Severity: grave
>   
> Dear Juergen Strobel (private) 
> 
> As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
> kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
> apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
> useful at least with
> an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
> document this in the 
> package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will 
> be hinted for 
> removing in sarge.
> 
> See also this ML thread about the issue:
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html
> 

Hello,

I have fixes for this, but I lost contact to my mentor long ago and
gave up on it, therefore I cannot upload them.

Very few people are using this (~10-30 maybe), and they can get it 
from my site directly. This is only useful for 2.4 kernels, 2.6 has
something better integrated. Upstream is dead.

Maybe it is best to drop this package, even if just to drop
another responsibility of the security team.

I will be on vacation for a week now, afterwards I can help resolve any
problems if it is in my limited power as non-DD package owner.

regards,
Jürgen Strobel

-- 
 The box said it requires Windows 95 or better so I installed Linux


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 310621

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310621 - moreinfo
Bug#310621: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310621: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults

[Kenshi Muto]

tags 310621 moreinfo
thanks

> $ xml2wbxml -o test.xml si.xml
> Segmentation fault

Could you send this si.xml?

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310621 moreinfo
Bug#310621: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 310662

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310662 sid
Bug#310662: star: missing most of bin/*
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310637: kde does not start

[Kenshi Muto]

Hi,

At Tue, 24 May 2005 18:17:02 -0500,
rick bradshaw wrote:
> I am posting some better troubleshooting information that I have
> gathered.
> 
> I ran a failsafe session and then did
> 
> sh -xv /usr/bin/startkde
> 
> It hangs at the following part.
> 
> LD_BIND_NOW=true kdeinit +kcminit +knotify
> + LD_BIND_NOW=true
> + kdeinit +kcminit +knotify
> 
> that is it.. totally hung at that point.

I experienced same situation.
In my case, I noticed KDE files in /tmp are owned by root instead of user by 
something
accident.
And how about trying to move ~/.kde* and ~/.qt* to somewhere and restart?

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 310073, tagging 310073, tagging 310231, tagging 310231

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310073 fixed
Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.
Tags were: sarge confirmed patch
Tags added: fixed

> tags 310073 - sarge
Bug#310073: clearsilver: FTBFS: fails to apply patch.
Tags were: fixed sarge confirmed patch
Tags removed: sarge

> tags 310231 fixed
Bug#310231: build result depends on availability of packages not specified in 
build depends
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: fixed

> tags 310231 - sarge
Bug#310231: build result depends on availability of packages not specified in 
build depends
Tags were: fixed sarge patch
Tags removed: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310662: star: missing most of bin/*

[Andrew Lau]

Package: star
Version: 1.5a60-1
Severity: grave

Hi Pawel,

It seems like half the binaries in the star package have disappeared.

% dpkg --contents star_1.5a60-1_i386.deb | grep /bin
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-23 17:41:03 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 31244 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/mt-star
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 39404 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/star_sym
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 24300 2005-05-23 17:41:02 ./bin/tartest

Star in testing:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=star&version=testing&arch=i386

bin/gnutar  utils/star
bin/mt-star utils/star
bin/scpio   utils/star
bin/spaxutils/star
bin/starutils/star
bin/star_symutils/star
bin/suntar  utils/star
bin/tartest utils/star
sbin/rmt-star   utils/star

Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages star depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

-- 
---
 Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau  
 Debian GNU/Linux Maintainer & Computer Science, UNSW
 -
  "Nobody expects the Debian Inquisition!
 Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency!"
---


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310660: [Fwd: Log for successful build of gwget2_0.95-1 (dist=unstable)]

[dann frazier]

Package: gwget2
Version: 0.95-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

gwget2 is missing an include which results in a return pointer being
implicitly converted to an int.  On some systems such as ia64 this will
result in a segfault if this return pointer is accessed.

Filing as serious, because this also fixes a FTBFS problem I ran into
when testing my build in pbuilder.  This is fixed by the additional
build-dep in this patch.

I'm sure a better fix is to make configure somehow add
-I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-module-2.0 to GNOME_CFLAGS and just
#include , but I don't know how to do
that :(

diff -urN gwget2-0.95.orig/debian/control gwget2-0.95/debian/control
--- gwget2-0.95.orig/debian/control 2005-05-24 21:26:16.0 -0600
+++ gwget2-0.95/debian/control  2005-05-24 21:02:48.0 -0600
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), pkg-config, libgnomeui-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev, libglade2-dev, libxml-parser-perl, libgcrypt11-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), pkg-config, libgnomeui-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev, libglade2-dev, libxml-parser-perl, libgcrypt11-dev, 
libgnomevfs2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1
 
 Package: gwget
diff -urN gwget2-0.95.orig/src/main_window_cb.c gwget2-0.95/src/main_window_cb.c
--- gwget2-0.95.orig/src/main_window_cb.c   2005-05-08 12:15:25.0 
-0600
+++ gwget2-0.95/src/main_window_cb.c2005-05-24 21:19:51.0 -0600
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include "main_window.h"
 #include "main_window_cb.h"
 #include "new_window.h"

-- 
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Function `gnome_vfs_mime_type_from_name' implicitly converted to pointer at 
main_window_cb.c:232
--- End Message ---

Bug#310661: FTBFS: steam_1.6.2-4 (testing-proposed-updates/arm): No such file or directory

[Steve Langasek]

Package: steam
Version: 1.6.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

The steam package failed to build on both arm and m68k in the most recent
upload to testing.

[...]

mypwd=$PWD; cd /build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam && tar 
-xpf $mypwd/__tmp.tar 
cd /build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam; find . -type d 
-name CVS -exec rm -fr {} \;
ln -f -s /usr/bin/pike7.4 
/build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/steam || true
#remove old libs
rm 
/build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/server/libraries/xslt.pmod.so
 ||truerm: cannot remove 
/build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/server/libraries/xslt.pmod.so':
 No such file or directory
test -d /build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/server/dev || 
mkdir -p /build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/server/dev
#-test -f /var/lib/mysql/mysqld.sock && cp -R /var/lib/mysql/mysqld.sock 
/build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/mysqld.sock
#-test -f /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock && cp -R /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock 
/build/buildd/steam-1.6.2/debian/steam//usr//share/steam/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock
cd 
/bin/sh: line 1: cd: /org/buildd: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [install] Error 1

[...]

A full build log can be found at
.

This bug is caused by an incorrectly variable, which results in attempting to
cd to the home directory, which is not guaranteed to exist as a valid
directory on buildds.  It is also not the correct directory to be cd'ing to
in any case, and results in failing to remove __tmp.tar from the real
directory -- which means debian/rules clean also does not correctly clean up
after a build.

Unfortunately, this affects not only the version in
testing-proposed-updates, but also the existing versions in testing and
unstable.  Please fix this bug ASAP so that steam can be considered for
sarge.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: more bug munging

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package lbreakout2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lbreakout2

> reopen 310468
Bug#310468: lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 310468 - sid
Bug#310468: lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout
Tags were: sid sarge patch security
Tags removed: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310629: kaffeine: Crashes X server when playing some wmv

[Kenshi Muto]

severity 310629 important
thanks

Hi,

I noticed you use a dll file (win32 codec) is Debian don't provide
officially, and such dll triggers a crash.
It's better to fix in the future, but is not release critical for
Sarge.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: kaffeine: Crashes X server when playing some wmv

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310629 important
Bug#310629: kaffeine: Crashes X server when playing some wmv
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310479: Severe breakage of root-on-lvm2 with lvm-common 1.5.18

[Christian Weeks]

Patrick,
I've verified my recreation of the problem.

You can find working and non-working initrd images in 
http://weeksfamily.ca/lvmproblem/

There's also a package report showing the status of relevant packages.

The only difference between the working and the non-working is the
upgrade (well, downgrade- I built a non-working one first, then
downgraded to a working one) from lvm-common 1.5.17 to 1.5.18

I built the initrd images by running:
apt-get --reinstall install kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686, which I figure is
the easiest way to build these things.

I shall try this on another piece of equipment that also has an lvm root
partition in the morning and let you know if the problem also exists
there.

Have fun and thanks for looking at this.
-- 
Christian Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 310645
Bug#310645: Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 310645 +sarge
Bug#310645: Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Please look at bug #279965

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 279965 serious
Bug#279965: logrotate cannot run postrotate script when /tmp is mounted noexec
Severity set to `serious'.

> tags 279965 sarge-ignore
Bug#279965: logrotate cannot run postrotate script when /tmp is mounted noexec
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge-ignore

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310468: marked as done (lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:32:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310468: fixed in lbreakout2 2.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 19:43:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 12:43:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) 
[193.22.164.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaIpa-0007KT-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 12:43:18 -0700
Received: from p548957a6.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.137.87.166] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DaInW-0004qB-5M
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 21:41:11 +0200
Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaIpK-0001hW-Aq; Mon, 23 May 2005 21:43:02 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1670380155=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:43:01 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.137.87.166
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond 
expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1670380155==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: lbreakout2
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Justification: user security hole

[ Details are sparse about this one, if you come to the conclusion that
  this is not RC, then please lower severity, but I assume it is. ]
[ Woody might be affected as well, I haven't checked that yet ]

>From the 2.6beta changelog:
- security issue fixed: bad sprintf/scanf calls could lead to crashes
  or potential security problems (05/02/14 U.H.)
 
There is no further information and upstream's website is very sparse
and there's no mailing list or anything like that, so I had a look
at the rather largish diff between 2.5.2 and 2.6beta and reviewed it
for possibly security relevant changes, which you can find attached.

At least a buffer overflow in highscore handling (should be writable by
arbitrary users) and the missing format strings in network multiplayer
handling code seem exploitable as lbreakout runs as setgid games.

Please review the diff and upload a fixed package to t-p-u, if you agree.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

--===1670380155==
Content-Type: text/x-c; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lbreakout2-security.diff"

diff -Naur lbreakout2-2.5.2/client/chart.c lbreakout2-2.6beta/client/chart.c
--- lbreakout2-2.5.2/client/chart.c 2003-05-25 11:37:05.0 +0200
+++ lbreakout2-2.5.2/client/chart.c 2005-03-28 20:07:30.0 +0200
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
if ( aux[0] != '>' ) break;
chart = calloc( 1, sizeof( Set_Chart ) );
/* get name: >>>name */
-   fscanf( file, ">>>%s\n", setname );
+   fscanf( file, ">>>%1023s\n", setname );
chart->name = strdup( setname );
/* entries */
chart_read_entries( file, file_name, chart );
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
 /* open file */
 file = fopen( file_name, "w" );
 if ( !file ) {
-fprintf( stderr, "??? Highscore chart loaded properly but cannot 
save?\n" );
+fprintf( stderr, "??? Highscore chart loaded properly but cannot save? 
(

Bug#310198: marked as done (rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers 
for R 2.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 12:09:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 05:09:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZpGt-0006jP-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 05:09:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id F25AF44EFE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E296544ED0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id CD62026136; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rpy
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge

Hi,

This package is failing to build in sarge but it seems to have
been fixed in sid. (-3 or -4 version?)

It's failing with the following error:
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall" python2.2 setup.py build
Building for R version 2.1.0 ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 136, in ?
RSRC = get_R_SRC()
  File "setup.py", line 57, in get_R_SRC
raise DistutilsExecError( \
distutils.errors.DistutilsExecError:

The path

/root/build/rpy-0.4.1/R-2.1.0

which should contain header files for R version 2.1.0
does not exist!

Please see the rpy README file for instructions.

make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1



Kurt


---
Received: (at 310198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 01:46:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 18:46:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daky9-00059E-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:46:01 -0700
Received: from basebud.nulle.part 
(c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185])
  by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
  id <2005052501453101300elnjqe>; Wed, 25 May 2005 01:45:31 +
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dakxd-0001kh-QW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:45:27 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 
2.1.0
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


On 24 May 2005 at 19:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| reopen 310198
| thanks
| 
| There must have been a race condition as the bug was /not/ open.
| 
| This bug will be fixed by moving unstable's 0.4.1-4 into testing.

Someone please wake me up ... as 0.4.1-4 *is* in testing, which closes the
bug that was closed a good hour ago. Ahh well never mind.

Dirk

| 
| Dirk
| 
| On 23 May 2005 at 17:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
| | Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| | 
| | > reopen 310198
| | Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0

Processed: trying my luck

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package lbreakout2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lbreakout2

> tags 310468 + sarge sid
Bug#310468: lbreakout2: Multiple security problems in lbreakout
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: sarge, sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310645: marked as done (Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 21:02:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310645: fixed in drscheme 1:209-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 23:28:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 16:28:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-199-32.adsl.proxad.net (yellowpig.yi.org) 
[82.254.199.32] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daiop-0003PK-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 16:28:16 -0700
Received: from seventeen
([127.0.0.1] helo=yellowpig.yi.org ident=mail)
by yellowpig.yi.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Daion-0003VU-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 01:28:13 +0200
Received: (nullmailer pid 13482 invoked by uid 1000);
Tue, 24 May 2005 23:28:11 -
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 01:28:11 +0200
From: Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: drscheme
Version: 1:209-3
Severity: serious
Justificatiob: Breaks upgrade from woody.

Hello drscheme maintainers,

from drscheme control file:

Replaces: drscheme (>> 207)
Depends: debconf (>= 0.4.00)
Pre-Depends: mzscheme (>= 207)
Suggests: menu (>= 1.5)
Conflicts: mzscheme (<< 207), drscheme-extradoc

from mzscheme control file:

Replaces: mzscheme-dev, mzscheme (>> 207)
Depends: gcc | c-compiler, debconf (>= 0.4.00), debianutils (>= 2.8.0),
libreadline5-dev, libssl-dev, libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1), libc6 (>=
2.3.2.ds1-4), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.2.1), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1),
libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libjpeg62,
libncurses5 (>= 5.4-1), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel),
libreadline5, libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libssl0.9.7, libstdc++5 (>=
1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 |
xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxft2 (>> 2.1.1), libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0),
libxrender1, libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, zlib1g (>=
1:1.2.1)
Suggests: menu (>= 1.5), slib
Conflicts: libc6 (<< 2.3.1), drscheme (<< 207), drscheme-extradoc, slib
(<< 2d4-2)

I am not sure what all these was supposed to achieve, but that
cause a woody-to-sarge upgrade failure (bug #310493) with:

 E: Couldn't configure pre-depend mzscheme for drscheme, probably a
 dependency cycle.
 Ack!  Something bad happened while installing packages.  Trying to
 recover:

1) Why a package is Replacing itself ?
2) I don't think versioned Replaces exist ?
3) What the versionned Pre-Depends is supposed to achieve ?
4) What the point of conflicting with mzscheme (<<207), if you are going to
depend on mzscheme (>= 207) ?
5) The same with libc6 (<< 2.3.1) and (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

---
Received: (at 310645-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 01:09:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 18:09:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DakOf-00073n-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:09:21 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DakI6-nt-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:02:34 -0400
From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310645: fixed in drscheme 1:209-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 21:02:34 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: drscheme
Source-Version: 1:209-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
drscheme, w

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 310198
Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#76918: eSecure Online Pharmacies

[Morgan]

Top 10 popular pharmacy drugs
http://hhacou.528gr65g2f5d965.pictilpict4.com




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310606: marked as done (ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 20:04:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310606: fixed in ximian-connector 2.2.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 15:59:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 08:59:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) 
[24.80.164.222] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dabor-0003Pk-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 08:59:49 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C432116007
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 08:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 27487-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 24 May 2005 08:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 161F1E006; Tue, 24 May 2005 08:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:59:48 -0700
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible 
build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ximian-connector
Version: 2.2.2-6
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of ximian-connector_2.2.2-6 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 33
> Build started at 20050524-0618

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), intltool, evolution-dev (>= 2.2), 
> evolution-data-server1.2-dev (>= 1.2), libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libldap2-dev, 
> libkrb5-dev, libdb3-dev, libldap2-dev (>= 2.1.30-2), libedata-book1.2-dev, 
> libedata-cal1.2-dev, libecal1.2-dev, libedataserverui1.2-dev, libcamel1.2-dev

[...]


A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=ximian-connector&ver=2.2.2-6

ximian-connector build-depends on libdb3-dev, and evolution-data-server1.2-dev
which depends on libedataserver1.2-dev, which depends on libdb4.1-dev, which
conflicts with libdb3-dev.

---
Received: (at 310606-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 00:10:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 17:10:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DajTo-00022o-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 17:10:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DajO4-0005rV-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:04:40 -0400
From: Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310606: fixed in ximian-connector 2.2.2-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:04:40 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: ximian-connector
Source-Version: 2.2.2-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ximian-connector, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

evolution-exchange_2.2.2-7_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/ximian-connector/evolution-exchange_2.2.2-7_powerpc.deb
ximian-connector_2.2.2-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/ximian-connector/ximian-connector_2.2.2-7.diff.gz
ximian-connector_2.2.2-7.dsc
  to pool/main/x/ximian-connector/ximian-connector_2.2.2-7.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be clo

Bug#310645: Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 01:28:11AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: drscheme
> Version: 1:209-3
> Severity: serious
> Justificatiob: Breaks upgrade from woody.

>  E: Couldn't configure pre-depend mzscheme for drscheme, probably a
>  dependency cycle.
>  Ack!  Something bad happened while installing packages.  Trying to
>  recover:

> 1) Why a package is Replacing itself ?
> 2) I don't think versioned Replaces exist ?

They do, FWIW; but a package Replacing itself only makes sense if there are
other packages in the archive which Provide the same package.

> 3) What the versionned Pre-Depends is supposed to achieve ?

Let's be a little more explicit here:  There is no justification for the use
of Pre-Depends in this package, which does not have a preinst script at all;
and the use of this Pre-Depends was not discussed on debian-devel, as
demanded by policy (in which case someone would have told you this was
inappropriate).  It breaks things.  Please remove it.

> 4) What the point of conflicting with mzscheme (<<207), if you are going to
> depend on mzscheme (>= 207) ?
> 5) The same with libc6 (<< 2.3.1) and (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)

There may or may not be a valid reason to conflict with old versions of
mzscheme, but conflicting with old versions of libc6 is certainly wrong.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310577: 'kernel-patch-grsecurity2' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 23:32 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> About that specific patch, the nice thing is that the nude patch applies
> nicely to debian kernel source, but kernel-patch fails :-?
 To which debian kernel source version? Please be more specific.
It won't apply to *any* 2.6.8 version as there were no upstream
release from that; major changes to the VM(?) forced them to rewrite
their patch magnificaly which took time (next upstream version was
for 2.6.10 if I am not mistaken).

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#310637: kde does not start

[rick bradshaw]

I am posting some better troubleshooting information that I have
gathered.

I ran a failsafe session and then did

sh -xv /usr/bin/startkde

It hangs at the following part.

LD_BIND_NOW=true kdeinit +kcminit +knotify
+ LD_BIND_NOW=true
+ kdeinit +kcminit +knotify

that is it.. totally hung at that point.


Rick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#274507: Patch

[Gunnar Wolf]

tag 310191 + patch
tag 274507 + patch
thanks

Here is the diff between 0.4-9 and 0.4-9.3 - It closes bugs #310191
and #274507. I am sending them together as they are (somehow) related
- Fixing one made me fall into the other and fix it.

Greetings,

-- 
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)1451-2244 / 5623-0154
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
diff -ur ultrapoint-0.4-9/config.guess ultrapoint-0.4-9.3/config.guess
--- ultrapoint-0.4-9/config.guess   2005-05-24 16:29:08.0 -0500
+++ ultrapoint-0.4-9.3/config.guess 2000-06-13 00:53:50.0 -0500
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
 #! /bin/sh
 # Attempt to guess a canonical system name.
-#   Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
+#   Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000
 #   Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
-timestamp='2001-11-08'
-
+#
 # This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 # under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 # the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
@@ -24,111 +22,53 @@
 # configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
 # the same distribution terms that you use for the rest of that program.
 
-# Originally written by Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-# Please send patches to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.  Submit a context
-# diff and a properly formatted ChangeLog entry.
+# Written by Per Bothner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
+# Please send patches to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
 #
 # This script attempts to guess a canonical system name similar to
 # config.sub.  If it succeeds, it prints the system name on stdout, and
 # exits with 0.  Otherwise, it exits with 1.
 #
 # The plan is that this can be called by configure scripts if you
-# don't specify an explicit build system type.
-
-me=`echo "$0" | sed -e 's,.*/,,'`
-
-usage="\
-Usage: $0 [OPTION]
-
-Output the configuration name of the system \`$me' is run on.
+# don't specify an explicit system type (host/target name).
+#
+# Only a few systems have been added to this list; please add others
+# (but try to keep the structure clean).
+#
 
-Operation modes:
-  -h, --help print this help, then exit
-  -t, --time-stamp   print date of last modification, then exit
-  -v, --version  print version number, then exit
-
-Report bugs and patches to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>."
-
-version="\
-GNU config.guess ($timestamp)
-
-Originally written by Per Bothner.
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
-Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
-This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
-warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE."
-
-help="
-Try \`$me --help' for more information."
-
-# Parse command line
-while test $# -gt 0 ; do
-  case $1 in
---time-stamp | --time* | -t )
-   echo "$timestamp" ; exit 0 ;;
---version | -v )
-   echo "$version" ; exit 0 ;;
---help | --h* | -h )
-   echo "$usage"; exit 0 ;;
--- ) # Stop option processing
-   shift; break ;;
-- )# Use stdin as input.
-   break ;;
--* )
-   echo "$me: invalid option $1$help" >&2
-   exit 1 ;;
-* )
-   break ;;
-  esac
-done
-
-if test $# != 0; then
-  echo "$me: too many arguments$help" >&2
-  exit 1
+# Use $HOST_CC if defined. $CC may point to a cross-compiler
+if test x"$CC_FOR_BUILD" = x; then
+  if test x"$HOST_CC" != x; then
+CC_FOR_BUILD="$HOST_CC"
+  else
+if test x"$CC" != x; then
+  CC_FOR_BUILD="$CC"
+else
+  CC_FOR_BUILD=cc
+fi
+  fi
 fi
 
 
-dummy=dummy-$$
-trap 'rm -f $dummy.c $dummy.o $dummy.rel $dummy; exit 1' 1 2 15
-
-# CC_FOR_BUILD -- compiler used by this script.
-# Historically, `CC_FOR_BUILD' used to be named `HOST_CC'. We still
-# use `HOST_CC' if defined, but it is deprecated.
-
-set_cc_for_build='case $CC_FOR_BUILD,$HOST_CC,$CC in
- ,,)echo "int dummy(){}" > $dummy.c ;
-   for c in cc gcc c89 ; do
- ($c $dummy.c -c -o $dummy.o) >/dev/null 2>&1 ;
- if test $? = 0 ; then
-CC_FOR_BUILD="$c"; break ;
- fi ;
-   done ;
-   rm -f $dummy.c $dummy.o $dummy.rel ;
-   if test x"$CC_FOR_BUILD" = x ; then
- CC_FOR_BUILD=no_compiler_found ;
-   fi
-   ;;
- ,,*)   CC_FOR_BUILD=$CC ;;
- ,*,*)  CC_FOR_BUILD=$HOST_CC ;;
-esac'
-
 # This is needed to find uname on a Pyramid OSx when run in the BSD universe.
-# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1994-08-24)
+# ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/24/94.)
 if (test -f /.attbin/uname) >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then
PATH=$PATH:/.attbin ; export PATH
 fi
 
 UNAME_MACHINE=`(uname -m) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME_MACHINE=unknown
 UNAME_RELEASE=`(uname -r) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME_RELEASE=unknown
-UNAME_SYSTEM=`(uname -s) 2>/dev/null`  || UNAME_SYSTEM=unknown
+UNAME_SYSTEM=`(uname -s) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME_SYSTEM=unknown
 UNAME_VERSION=`(uname -v) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME

Bug#310645: Pre-Depends/Replaces abuse prevents upgrade from woody

[Bill Allombert]

Package: drscheme
Version: 1:209-3
Severity: serious
Justificatiob: Breaks upgrade from woody.

Hello drscheme maintainers,

from drscheme control file:

Replaces: drscheme (>> 207)
Depends: debconf (>= 0.4.00)
Pre-Depends: mzscheme (>= 207)
Suggests: menu (>= 1.5)
Conflicts: mzscheme (<< 207), drscheme-extradoc

from mzscheme control file:

Replaces: mzscheme-dev, mzscheme (>> 207)
Depends: gcc | c-compiler, debconf (>= 0.4.00), debianutils (>= 2.8.0),
libreadline5-dev, libssl-dev, libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1), libc6 (>=
2.3.2.ds1-4), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.2.1), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1),
libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libjpeg62,
libncurses5 (>= 5.4-1), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel),
libreadline5, libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libssl0.9.7, libstdc++5 (>=
1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 |
xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxft2 (>> 2.1.1), libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0),
libxrender1, libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, zlib1g (>=
1:1.2.1)
Suggests: menu (>= 1.5), slib
Conflicts: libc6 (<< 2.3.1), drscheme (<< 207), drscheme-extradoc, slib
(<< 2d4-2)

I am not sure what all these was supposed to achieve, but that
cause a woody-to-sarge upgrade failure (bug #310493) with:

 E: Couldn't configure pre-depend mzscheme for drscheme, probably a
 dependency cycle.
 Ack!  Something bad happened while installing packages.  Trying to
 recover:

1) Why a package is Replacing itself ?
2) I don't think versioned Replaces exist ?
3) What the versionned Pre-Depends is supposed to achieve ?
4) What the point of conflicting with mzscheme (<<207), if you are going to
depend on mzscheme (>= 207) ?
5) The same with libc6 (<< 2.3.1) and (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310191 + patch
Bug#310191: ultrapoint: FTBFS: dpkg-deb: conffile 
`/etc/vflib3/vflibcap-ultrapoint' does not appear in package
Tags were: fixed sid
Tags added: patch

> tag 274507 + patch
Bug#274507: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: outdated config.guess/config.sub
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign to correct new package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 304647 libgdamm1.3
Bug#304647: libgdamm1.3-1: Uninstallable in sid
Warning: Unknown package 'libgdamm1.3-1'
Bug reassigned from package `libgdamm1.3-1' to `libgdamm1.3'.

> reassign 253525 libgda
Bug#253525: libgda2-1: copyright file is not correctly encoded
Warning: Unknown package 'libgda2-1'
Bug reassigned from package `libgda2-1' to `libgda'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310606: "Does not affect sarge"

[Lawrence Walton]

Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please note that even though this bug has been tagged sid, it does affect
> sarge because the lack of up-to-date binaries in unstable makes it
> impossible to install 2.0.4-1 in t-p-u for these architectures.
> 
> -- 
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer

Yep! I've fixed the bug.

I'm waiting on my sponsor to upload. 



-- 
*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence
--
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - - 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 310638

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310638 sid
Bug#310638: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ultrapoint 0.4-9.3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 215928 + fixed
Bug#215928: ultrapoint: relative conffile
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 310191 + fixed
Bug#310191: ultrapoint: FTBFS: dpkg-deb: conffile 
`/etc/vflib3/vflibcap-ultrapoint' does not appear in package
Tags were: fixed sid
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310638: marked as done (Unable to use apt-build; exits with error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 00:11:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310638: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 21:56:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 14:56:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (kolon.wtf.dk) [81.161.143.116] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DahNl-0007Yk-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:56:13 -0700
Received: by kolon.wtf.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3EB09834E0; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:56:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 23:56:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

With the latest apt-build, building packages always fails:

$ apt-build install mozilla-firefox
sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unable to find binary candidate for mozilla-firefox at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 462.

I don't know what that "policy" command is. Perhaps a missing dependency?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.5.28.6   APT utility programs
ii  debconf   1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.10.27Package building tools for Debian
ii  g++   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
* apt-build/options:
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium4
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true

---
Received: (at 310638-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 22:11:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 15:11:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from othala.naquadah.org (mx2.naquadah.org) [81.56.144.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DahcG-0001yy-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:11:13 -0700
Received: from abydos.adm.naquadah.org ([192.168.2.13])
by mx2.naquadah.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DahcF-0004li-4z; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:11:11 +0200
Received: from acid by abydos.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DahcE-qE-Fq; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:11:10 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 00:11:10 +0200
From: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310638: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVYOjVWOcH+Ezkzp"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: N

Bug#310606: "Does not affect sarge"

[Steve Langasek]

Please note that even though this bug has been tagged sid, it does affect
sarge because the lack of up-to-date binaries in unstable makes it
impossible to install 2.0.4-1 in t-p-u for these architectures.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 310628 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 310628 important
Bug#310628: package not installable
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 310628 is grave, tagging 310628

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 310628 grave
Bug#310628: package not installable
Severity set to `grave'.

> tags 310628 experimental
Bug#310628: package not installable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310638: Unable to use apt-build; exits with error

[Morten Brix Pedersen]

Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

With the latest apt-build, building packages always fails:

$ apt-build install mozilla-firefox
sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unable to find binary candidate for mozilla-firefox at /usr/bin/apt-build
line 462.

I don't know what that "policy" command is. Perhaps a missing dependency?


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.10
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.5.28.6   APT utility programs
ii  debconf   1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy
ii  devscripts2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.10.27Package building tools for Debian
ii  g++   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
  apt-build/arch_amd: k6
* apt-build/options:
* apt-build/arch_intel: pentium4
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310637: kdelibs-bin: kde will not start

[Richard Bradshaw]

Package: kdelibs-bin
Version: 4:3.3.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


I just noticed that when logining into kde from gdm. the screen turns
all white and hangs. The underlying issue is the following.

from .xsession-errors

startkde: Starting up...
kdeinit: Shutting down running client.

from ps

kdeinit < defunct >

I don't know when this truely started due to the fact that I rarely
restart my session but it certainly is unusable.

Rick


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-rc2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages kdelibs-bin depends on:
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-6   KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.2-6 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls10  1.1.23-10   Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libfam0c102  2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM 
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11 0.5.13-1.0  GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-3   Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxslt1.1   1.1.12-8XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  menu-xdg 0.2 freedesktop.org menu compliant win
ii  netpbm   2:10.0-8Graphics conversion tools
ii  perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  python   2.3.5-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310577: 'kernel-patch-grsecurity2' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:20:06PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi Francesco again,
> 
> On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> > an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly,
>  Yes, but I will test again then just to be 101% sure.
> 
> > feel free to document this in the 
> > package and reduce the severity of this report,
>  Ouch! Somewhere the package installation of the warning is missed,
> but it is in the package itself; see debian/README.* .
> They need update, so I do not reduce the severity now, but maybe
> will reduce it to important only. Anyway, will correct the READMEs.
> The debconf warning is there by the way (debian/po/templates.pot).
> 
> >  else this kernel-patch will be hinted for 
> > removing in sarge.
> Please do not remove it now, will update the READMEs to be
> up-to-date soon.
> 

About that specific patch, the nice thing is that the nude patch applies
nicely to debian kernel source, but kernel-patch fails :-?

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309838: marked as done (gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 17:32:25 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309838: fixed in gcompris 6.5.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 22:00:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 15:00:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYt3r-0006rV-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 15:00:11 -0700
Received: from nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 
(nanterre-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C88C0B9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 20 May 2005 00:00:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gandelf.nowhere.earth ([10.0.0.5] ident=dwitch)
by nanterre-1-81-57-214-146 with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DYt7u-0002w9-2Y
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 20 May 2005 00:04:22 +0200
Received: by gandelf.nowhere.earth (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 20 May 2005 
00:02:45 +0200
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 00:02:45 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcompris
Version: 6.5.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

None of the boards written in python work without python-gnome.  Only
this dependency is missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (90, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gcompris depends on:
ii  gcompris-data 6.5.2-3Data files for GCompris
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.17-1   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0  2.8.1-2Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2- 2.8.1-2The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcompris-1 6.5.2-3Core gcompris functionality - shar
ii  libgconf2-4   2.8.1-6GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.4-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0   2.8.1-2The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanva 2.8.0-1A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.8.1-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2- 2.8.4-3The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.4-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  liborbit2 1:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0  1.7-5  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsdl-mixer1 1.2.6-1mixer library for Simple DirectMed
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-4.1 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1X Window System Session Management
ii  libxml2   2.6.16-7   GNOME XML library
ii  python2.3 2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
ii  vorbis-tools  1.0.1-1.3  Several Ogg Vorbis Tools
ii  xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-4  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 309838-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 21:40:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 14:40:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debia

Bug#279965: create tmp scripts in /var somewhere ?

[Alex Owen]

Would a better solution (longterm) be to have a new config file option
 "scriptsdir" which is a dir where scripts are written. If this does not
exist use TMPDIR environment variable and if that does not exist /tmp.

Also would it not be posible to generate a better error message or test
that the mount point of the specified directory is not mounted noexec ?

The system logrotate config could then specify "scriptsdir" as
/var/spool/logrotate/ (not checked the FHS but somewhere like that?) and
the package could install that empty directory so that the root logrotate
jobs would work.

The README.NEWS (or whatever the documentaiton file is called) could then
suggest that users that get the improved error message place a
"scriptsdir" directive in their logrotate.conf files.

Just some random thougts really but perhaps some of them are useful!
Alex Owen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310577: 'kernel-patch-grsecurity2' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Laszlo Boszormenyi]

Hi Francesco again,

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:20 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> If you think this package is anyway useful at least with
> an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly,
 Yes, but I will test again then just to be 101% sure.

> feel free to document this in the 
> package and reduce the severity of this report,
 Ouch! Somewhere the package installation of the warning is missed,
but it is in the package itself; see debian/README.* .
They need update, so I do not reduce the severity now, but maybe
will reduce it to important only. Anyway, will correct the READMEs.
The debconf warning is there by the way (debian/po/templates.pot).

>  else this kernel-patch will be hinted for 
> removing in sarge.
Please do not remove it now, will update the READMEs to be
up-to-date soon.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#302282: marked as done (gtk-engines-mac2_1.0.3-2(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:11:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 00:55:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 30 16:55:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) 
[24.80.164.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGnyD-00042o-00; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:55:37 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D01123F33
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 10781-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:55:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B404323F32; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:55:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:55:31 -0800
From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gtk-engines-mac2_1.0.3-2(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken 
libtool.m4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gtk-engines-mac2
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of gtk-engines-mac2_1.0.3-2 on remake by sbuild/mipsel 1.170.5
> Build started at 20050320-0824

The version of libtool used to build this source package is too old to
correctly support shared libraries for the Debian mips and mipsel
architectures.  Debian versions 1.5-2 and 1.4.2-7 and higher correctly
support them.  You need to update all of the libtool related files by
running the following on your source tree:

autoreconf --force

You may need to use the --install option as well.  You can also try the
individual commands needed yourself:

libtoolize --force --copy
aclocal
autoheader
automake -a
autoconf

autoheader may not be needed, and you may need to use versioned binaries
(autoconf2.13, automake-1.{4,6,7}, aclocal-1.{4,6,7}, etc)

The correct 'configure' script will have output that looks like this:
linux*)
  lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
  ;;

Older versions of libtool used a file_magic check for the pattern
file_magic ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared object|dynamic lib )

The output of file(1) on a shared library on MIPS does not match this
regular expression, however.  Earlier versions of file had been
modified to match this regular expression, but the latest version uses
the same output as upstream once again.  The file check often causes
problems, and results on a build-dep on file that you might not
otherwise be aware of.  The new method doesn't need file(1) at all,
and is far less fragile, so it is best to upgrade the configure script
with proper mips support.

---
Received: (at 302282-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 21:11:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 14:11:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Daggf-00048g-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:11:41 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3AAF664D44; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:11:41 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 452164FD32; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:11:27 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:11:27 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD au

Bug#136965: marked as done (This package is still not ready to be in our stable distribution)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2002 17:20:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 05 11:20:58 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-96-224-204.uc.nombres.ttd.es (manty.net) [213.96.224.204] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16iIcT-GQ-00; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:20:58 -0600
Received: from man.beta.es (man.beta.es [192.168.1.1])
by manty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 277BD15EC2; Tue,  5 Mar 2002 18:20:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by man.beta.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2C731B92F; Tue,  5 Mar 2002 18:20:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linuxsms: We are not yet sure that we want this package to go into 
Woody
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.44
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:20:50 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: linuxsms
Version: 0.33-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The servers the Package uses change a lot in time, so having this
package into Woody doesn't quite make much sense, at least to me and the
author, thus this bug is just for it not to go into testing and then
into the stable release. Sorry for the inconvenience that this may
cause.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux man 2.4.17 #1 lun dic 24 16:37:07 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages linuxsms depends on:
ii  perl  5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---
Received: (at 136965-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 21:13:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 14:13:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dagi0-0004vM-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:13:04 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7651464D44; Tue, 24 May 2005 21:13:04 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C762D4FD32; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:12:56 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This package has been removed because it is no longer maintained
upstream and because it was never part of a stable release so
releasing it now as part of the new stable release seems like a bad
idea given that it's not maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309838: gcompris: missing dependency on python2.3-gnome2

[Yann Dirson]

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:17:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, please upload to t-p-u and let us know once it's uploaded so we can
> > review it.
> 
> It seems this upload hasn't happened yet.  I guess there's still some
> question about how to fix 309848?  I've looked at this package, and given
> that it took me a while to even *find* a place in gcompris where 309848
> manifests, I don't think there's any reason to consider it RC here.
> 
> Could you upload a fixed package to t-p-u that includes just the fix for
> 309838?

Well, I had not noticed that you had downgraded that bug to important
- I just uploaded 6.5.2-4 with both fixes.  Please let me know if that
is of any concern.

best regards,
-- 
Yann Dirson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
Debian-related: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
|  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
 http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310606: #310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends

[Roger Leigh]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Roger, did you want to do a upload for me?

I can, but not until after the release of sarge (it's not
release-critical).  If you remind me after the release, I'll be happy
to review and upload for you.


Regards,
Roger

- -- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 

iD8DBQFCk5IiVcFcaSW/uEgRAv74AKDmWcDoMlA16QqR+5iL+0H04pMeRgCeOPHF
FfGaJXulDl66xgvya3tULNM=
=4GL5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310628: package not installable

[Bastian Venthur]

Package: kde-devel-extras
Version: 5:45
Severity: grave

I hope this is not a dupplicate bugreport, I *think* I've reported
something similar about kdevelop3 a few weeks ago, but kde-devel-extras
shows no bugreports.

I'm using unsable with kde 3.4 packages from alioth. And it is not
possible to install kde-devel-extras. It seems, that something in
kde-devel disturbes this package.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-laptop
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310407: Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

severity 310406 normal
severity 310407 normal
tags 310406 patch
tags 310407 patch
thanks

Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, of the MySQL AB Documentation Team,
wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[1] and <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[2]
as documented in this bug with regards to the MySQL manual:

| What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this
| discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software
| *but not separately*.
| (...)
| I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of 
| putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
| E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
| software.
 
Including this in debian/copyright ought to be sufficient, seem by
reasoning at [3]. Although it'd be nice to have this statement included
in the package's copyright file itself, as far as I know it's not a
release critical issue for it to not be, as long as such statement
exists, especially for non-free.

Release team, could you please reconsider removing the documentation of
MySQL from Sarge? IMHO proper documentation for important pieces of
software is an important to have.

Thanks,
--Jeroen

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308680&msg=19
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308680&msg=25
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=308680&msg=62

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310406 normal
Bug#310406: License does not permit redistribution
Severity set to `normal'.

> severity 310407 normal
Bug#310407: License does not permit redistribution
Severity set to `normal'.

> tags 310406 patch
Bug#310406: License does not permit redistribution
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tags 310407 patch
Bug#310407: License does not permit redistribution
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310606: #310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends

[Lawrence Walton]

Roger, did you want to do a upload for me?
-- 
*--* Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence
--
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - - 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#290329: fixing this bug

[Joey Hess]

What a mess.

Looks to me like the only real options for dealing with with bug for
sarge are:

- revert the powerpc change in debian/rules, downgrade bug as not RC
or
- re-upload initrd tools as an arch any package

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310606: #310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends

[Roger Leigh]

tags 310606 + patch
thanks

Hi,

The build failure is fixed with this patch:

--- xc.orig/ximian-connector-2.2.2/debian/control   2005-05-24 
18:31:18.293206088 +0100
+++ xc.new/ximian-connector-2.2.2/debian/control2005-05-24 
19:24:30.691887720 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), intltool, evolution-dev (>= 2.2), 
evolution-data-server1.2-dev (>= 1.2), libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libldap2-dev, 
libkrb5-dev, libdb3-dev, libldap2-dev (>= 2.1.30-2), libedata-book1.2-dev, 
libedata-cal1.2-dev, libecal1.2-dev, libedataserverui1.2-dev, libcamel1.2-dev
+Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), intltool, evolution-dev (>= 2.2), 
evolution-data-server1.2-dev (>= 1.2), libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libldap2-dev, 
libkrb5-dev, libdb4.1-dev, libldap2-dev (>= 2.1.30-2), libedata-book1.2-dev, 
libedata-cal1.2-dev, libecal1.2-dev, libedataserverui1.2-dev, libcamel1.2-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: evolution-exchange


The package is not lintian clean:

W: evolution-exchange: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: evolution-exchange: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: evolution-exchange: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/lib/evolution-data-server-1.2/camel-providers/libcamelexchange.so 
/usr/lib/evolution/2.2
W: evolution-exchange: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/lib/evolution/2.2/evolution-exchange-storage /usr/lib/evolution/2.2
W: evolution-exchange: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath 
./usr/bin/ximian-connector-setup-2.2 /usr/lib/evolution/2.2

You should also fix the rpath warnings with chrpath, and build-depend
on chrpath.  The postinst/rm script also need tweaking, if only to
make them lintian-clean.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: #310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310606 + patch
Bug#310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible 
build-depends
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 308825 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 308825 important
Bug#308825: gdm logins fail to start sessions
Severity set to `important'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#279965: Patch: run postrotate script via /bin/sh again

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 279965 grave
Bug#279965: logrotate cannot run postrotate script when /tmp is mounted noexec
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310621: libwbxml2-utils: Segfaults

[Ian Eure]

Package: libwbxml2-utils
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

xml2wbxml segfaults whenever I try to convert XML -> WBXML.

$ xml2wbxml -o test.xml si.xml
Segmentation fault
$

LTrace output:

22452 __libc_start_main(0x80488e0, 4, 0xb894, 0x8049280, 0x80492e0

22452 strchr("nkh?o:v:", 'o')= "o:v:"
22452 fopen("si.xml", "r")   = 0x804b008
22452 feof(0x804b008)= 0
22452 fread(0xb400, 1, 1000, 0x804b008)  = 259
22452 ferror(0x804b008)  = 0
22452 wbxml_realloc(0, 260, 1000, 0x804b008, 259) = 0x804b170
22452 memcpy(0x804b170, "
22452 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
22452 +++ killed by SIGSEGV +++

Seems to be a problem with the library.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libwbxml2-utils depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libwbxml2   0.9.0-3  WBXML parsing and encoding library
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310593: marked as done (openswan_1:2.2.0-7(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310593: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 13:45:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 06:45:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaZiV-00079F-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 06:45:07 -0700
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC7F16E85
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 07:45:06 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 09E14906D8; Tue, 24 May 2005 07:45:05 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:45:04 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: openswan_1:2.2.0-7(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of openswan_1:2.2.0-7 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 33
> Build started at 20050524-1055

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libgmp3-dev, libssl-dev, htmldoc, 
> man2html, gawk, libcurl2-dev | libcurl3-dev, libopensc1-dev, libldap2-dev, 
> bison, flex, lynx

[...]


A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=openswan&ver=1:2.2.0-7

libcurl2-dev no longer exists in sid.  Hence the order in debian/control
needs to be changed to:
libcurl3-dev | libcurl2-dev

or the libcurl2-dev alternative dropped completely.

lamont

---
Received: (at 310593-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 17:54:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 10:54:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DadbN-0002C3-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 10:54:01 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DadV4-0007lI-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:30 -0400
From: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310593: fixed in openswan 1:2.2.0-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:47:30 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openswan
Source-Version: 1:2.2.0-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openswan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kernel-patch-openswan_2.2.0-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/kernel-patch-openswan_2.2.0-8_all.deb
openswan-modules-source_2.2.0-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan-modules-source_2.2.0-8_all.deb
openswan_2.2.0-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.2.0-8.diff.gz
openswan_2.2.0-8.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.2.0-8.dsc
openswan_2.2.0-8_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.2.0-8_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openswan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it

Bug#309798: Narrowing the test case for this bug

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Guillaume Filion ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bug seems to be triggered as soon as the remote directory has 27
> > entries.
> 
> Here's the behavior that I'm seeing here with 3.0.14a-1.
> 
> I have 12 Windows PCs on my network (8 WinXP Pro SP2, 1 Win2K Pro and 3 
> Win2K Server) and the only ones showing this behavior are running WinXP 
> Pro SP2 that has been "upgraded" from Win98 using WinXP's installer.
> 
> The first one is crashing when listing a directory of more than 32 
> entries and the other one at 28 entries.

Same for mine. I previously reported crashing with 27 entries, but
this is indeed 28 : there was a hidden file in the directory (but this
is NOT related to it).

My "test case" (named "DRIS-GD" in the output files I sent today) is
maybe also a machine which was upgraded from Win98 to WinXP (though
I'm unsure...this may also be a former W2K machine, we don't really
have the history of that machine)

Processed: Does not affect sarge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310606 + sid
Bug#310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible 
build-depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#292339: marked as done (mssstest: License does not permit modification, but source is modified)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:03 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292339: fixed in mssstest 2.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2005 13:27:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 26 05:27:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mnemosyne.csbnet.se [193.11.254.193] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtnDB-0006mL-00; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:27:57 -0800
Received: from kallisti.csbnet.se ([193.11.254.194] helo=kallisti)
by mnemosyne.csbnet.se with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1CtnDA-0006lF-1l
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:27:56 +0100
Received: from weinholt by kallisti with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1CtnD9-0003fc-RP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:27:55 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:27:55 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=F6ran?= Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mssstest: License does not permit modification, but source is modified
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: mssstest
Version: 2.0-1
Severity: serious

This package's license does not permit modification, but
mssstest-2.0/makefile and mssstest-2.0/roxburgh.cpp have been modified
anyway. I suggest you either revert the modifications or obtain the
required permission.

Quoting debian/copyright:

---
This software is downloaded at the user's risk.  Anyone may copy it but
no one may sell it.

We make no representation or warranties with respect to the MSSStest
software and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of
merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.  We reserve the
right to revise the MSSStest software and to make changes therein from
time to time without obligation to notify any person or organisation of
such revision or changes.  While we make every effort to ensure the
reliability of the MSSStest software we may not be held responsible for
errors, omissions or other inaccuracies or any consequences thereof.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN
NO EVENT SHALL SHAUN SEAMAN OR RICHARD ROXBURGH OR THEIR EMPLOYERS BE
LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR
OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF
ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
---

Regards,

--=20
G=F6ran Weinholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer, sysadmin, netadmin

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFB95rbjfWLtkqIVOYRAnYiAKCXQdNsLXx6xdfxl1nsnARzhgJgJwCgjbj5
hGpwwdbYHyL2MfenyNxqwSA=
=ZH7Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--

---
Received: (at 292339-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 17:23:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 10:23:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dad7Q-0001tk-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 10:23:04 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dad1b-0006hD-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:17:03 -0400
From: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#310522: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686: Confirmed

[Matthieu Moy]

Package: kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686
Version: 2.6.11-5
Followup-For: Bug #310522

Just to confirm the bug with an up-to-date, slightly different configuration.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.11-1-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  initrd-tools  0.1.81 tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of kdevelop3 4:3.2.0-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 299522 + fixed
Bug#299522: kdevelop3: Icon not shown properly
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 304419 + fixed
Bug#304419: kdevelop3: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the attached debconf 
template translation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 305276 + fixed
Bug#305276: kdevelop3: French debconf templates translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: fixed

> tag 308198 + fixed
Bug#308198: kdevelop3: package suggested (kpaint) is obsolete
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 309379 + fixed
Bug#309379: yesterday's packageupgrade wants to remove kdevelop3
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309544: marked as done (evolution2.2: FTBFS: Conflicting build dependends.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug #309544 - evolution2.2: FTBFS: Conflicting build 
dependends.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 2005 21:21:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 17 14:21:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DY9Vm-0006Oj-00; Tue, 17 May 2005 14:21:58 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 4741C1984A9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:21:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20276198462
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:21:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id CFAE626136; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:21:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 23:21:51 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: evolution2.2: FTBFS: Conflicting build dependends.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: evolution2.2
Version: 2.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package is failing to build because the build dependencies
can't be satisfied.  You build depend on libdb4.2-dev and
evolution-data-server1.2-dev.  evolution-data-server1.2-dev
depends on libdb4.1-dev and 4.1 and 4.2 conflict.

Does evolution2.2 itself talk to libdb or can the build
dependency on libdb4.2-dev dropped?

If not, I suggest you changed them both to the same version,
maybe 4.3.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 309544-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 16:42:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 09:42:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DacTh-0007NI-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 09:42:01 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id E74593BC0DC; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9664B3BC0BC; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 7935026136; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:41:58 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug #309544 - evolution2.2: FTBFS: Conflicting build dependends.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:22:13AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You reported an FTBS of evolution2.2 version 2.1.6-1.
> 
> This package no longer exists and have been renamed evolution
> which is at version 2.2.2-4.
> 
> Should i close the report or wait for the source to be removed
> from the buildd ?

Since the source is removed, I'll close this bug.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306756: marked as done (krusader: 1.60.0-1 FTBFS on all arches (including unofficial amd64))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 12:02:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306756: fixed in krusader 1.60.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 10:42:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 28 03:42:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.skynet.lt (jim.skynet.lt) [212.122.68.77] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR6TC-m1-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 03:42:10 -0700
Received: (qmail 84882 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2005 10:36:43 -
Received: from unknown (HELO MDXDebian.ozas.sytes.net) (212.122.71.78)
  by jim.skynet.lt with SMTP; 28 Apr 2005 10:36:43 -
Received: from modax by MDXDebian.ozas.sytes.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DR6Nt-0008EW-3N; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:36:41 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===3059824558606377548=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: krusader: 1.60.0-1 FTBFS on all arches (including unofficial amd64)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.10
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:36:40 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===3059824558606377548==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: krusader
Version: 1.51-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source

I don't know if you're aware or not but krusader 1.60-1 fails to build
from source on all arches including unofficial amd64. Check build logs
at http://buildd.debian.org for details.

I have prepared a patch (attached), which fixes the problem. Patch was
generated with following commands:

dpkg-source -x krusader_1.60.0-1.dsc
cp -R krusader-1.60.0 krusader-1.60.0.old
cd krusader-1.60.0
make -f Makefile.cvs
rm -rf autom4te.cache
cd ..
diff -uNr krusader-1.60.0.old krusader-1.60.0 | gzip -c > krusader-ftbfs.diff.gz

Thus The patch is against denianized 1.60.0-1. Then krusader builds fine with
pbuilder except a warning about missing autoheader:
-
  kde_locale:   /usr/share/locale
  qt_libraries: /usr/lib
  qt_includes:  /usr/include/qt3
  KDEDIR:   /usr
  QTDIR:/usr
  Install path: /usr/bin
  krusader version: 1.60.0
  krusader binary:  /usr/bin/krusader (after 'make install')


Good - your configure finished. Start make now

dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
/usr/bin/make
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/krusader-1.60.0'
cd . && /bin/sh /tmp/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing --run autoheader
/tmp/buildd/krusader-1.60.0/admin/missing: line 46: autoheader: command not 
found
WARNING: `autoheader' is missing on your system.  You should only need it if
 you modified `acconfig.h' or `configure.in'.  You might want
 to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages.  Grab them
 from any GNU archive site.
rm -f stamp-h1
touch config.h.in
cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status config.h
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged
---

It is harmless because krusader builds fine afterwards. To avoid it, you need
to `touch config.h.in` to update its date. The date can't be updated if there
are no changes to the file itself (at least I haven't managed) with the help of
`diff`, so you need to do this in debian/rules if you consider this warning to
be a problem.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-mdx
Locale: LANG=lt_LT, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT (charmap=ISO-8859-13)

Versions of packages krusader depends on:
ii  kdelibs4 4:3.4.0-0pre3   core libraries for all KDE applica
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libaudio21.7-2   The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfam0c102  

Bug#310606: ximian-connector_2.2.2-6(mipsel/unstable): FTBFS: impossible build-depends

[Ryan Murray]

Package: ximian-connector
Version: 2.2.2-6
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of ximian-connector_2.2.2-6 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 33
> Build started at 20050524-0618

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0), intltool, evolution-dev (>= 2.2), 
> evolution-data-server1.2-dev (>= 1.2), libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libldap2-dev, 
> libkrb5-dev, libdb3-dev, libldap2-dev (>= 2.1.30-2), libedata-book1.2-dev, 
> libedata-cal1.2-dev, libecal1.2-dev, libedataserverui1.2-dev, libcamel1.2-dev

[...]


A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=mipsel&pkg=ximian-connector&ver=2.2.2-6

ximian-connector build-depends on libdb3-dev, and evolution-data-server1.2-dev
which depends on libedataserver1.2-dev, which depends on libdb4.1-dev, which
conflicts with libdb3-dev.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar -- Debian FTP]

Hi Stefan, hi all,

Let me first introduce myself, I'm member of the Debian FTP team, and
Christian Hammers assigned this issue to us.

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:13:01PM +0200, Stefan Hinz wrote:
> >On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:
> >>What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this
> >>discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software
> >>*but not separately*.
>(...)
> I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of 
> putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
> E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
> software. Does this sound clearer?

In my opinion yes, as I interpret this as that it's (for example) okay
to ship the manual on Debian's FTP mirror network, all of which are
shipping the MySQL server and client software alongside the manual.
Debian's non-free section already cannot in general be distributed in
any other way than via the Debian FTP-server network, so additional
restrictions do not affect packages in non-free, including the MySQL
manual -- it's the responsability of those redistributors to check the
legal issues of doing so.
 
> >If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that
> >also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I 
> >need
> >a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
> >of the package to make the ftp master happy again.
> 
> OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get 
> this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal 
> stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to?

You do not need to commit such a statement to dead-tree paper, that's
not needed as far as Debian is concerned. An 'authorative' statement
from the copyright holder by email or via website will do. As far as I'm
concerned, your statement above (the 3+4 lines) suffices -- you're
saying 'We want (...)' mailing from an @mysql.com address.

Christian, Stefan, anyone else: any more questions/remarks?

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Member of the Debian FTP team


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308680: Please remove source packages mysql-nonfree and mysql-nonfree-4.1

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

tags 308680 = moreinfo
thanks

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> reassign 308680 ftp.debian.org
> severity 308680 serious
> justification: licence problem
> retitle 308680 "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM"
> thanks
> 
> Hello FTP-maintainers
> 
> Please remove the following source and binary packages from all releases
> due to a licence that makes it undistributionable for us. The problem has
> been discussed and confirmed with the upstream author.
> 
>   source:binary:
>   mysql-nonfree   -> mysql-doc(woody, sarge, sid)
>   mysql-nonfree-4.1   -> mysql-doc-4.1(   sarge, sid)

Reading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, that doesn't really read as the
intention and how it might end up with upstream. The attached statement
only mentions that Stefan Hinz misunderstood in his last mail, but
doesn't imply as far as I can see that MySQL really intends to forbid
distribution of the manual is something like Debian. I'll be replying to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> shortly.

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309798: Narrowing the test case for this bug

[Guillaume Filion]

Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug seems to be triggered as soon as the remote directory has 27
> entries.

Here's the behavior that I'm seeing here with 3.0.14a-1.

I have 12 Windows PCs on my network (8 WinXP Pro SP2, 1 Win2K Pro and 3 
Win2K Server) and the only ones showing this behavior are running WinXP 
Pro SP2 that has been "upgraded" from Win98 using WinXP's installer.


The first one is crashing when listing a directory of more than 32 
entries and the other one at 28 entries.


On others PCs, I can list directories of more than 50 entries with not 
problem.


Hope this helps,
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Please remove source packages mysql-nonfree and mysql-nonfree-4.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 308680 = moreinfo
Bug#308680: "Please remove mysql-nonfree(-4.1) -- RoM"
Tags were: sid
Tags set to: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298176: rhdb-admin: crashes on selection of tree nodes

[Roberto Mello]

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:22:18PM +, Lee Braiden wrote:
> Package: rhdb-admin
> Version: 1.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> rhdb-admin crashes for me if I click a line from the tree node (ie, a 
> database, a table, etc).  It's
> fine if I only right-click on the expander to show the list of tables in a 
> database though.

Do you get a stack trace or any other error information that could help me
in tracking down the bug?

-Roberto


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310593: openswan_1:2.2.0-7(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: bad build-depends

[lamont]

Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.2.0-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of openswan_1:2.2.0-7 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 33
> Build started at 20050524-1055

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libgmp3-dev, libssl-dev, htmldoc, 
> man2html, gawk, libcurl2-dev | libcurl3-dev, libopensc1-dev, libldap2-dev, 
> bison, flex, lynx

[...]


A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=openswan&ver=1:2.2.0-7

libcurl2-dev no longer exists in sid.  Hence the order in debian/control
needs to be changed to:
libcurl3-dev | libcurl2-dev

or the libcurl2-dev alternative dropped completely.

lamont


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: openntpd: segfaults with "listen on *" in the config when a ppp interface is present

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310412 +patch
Bug#310412: mdadm refuses to start up on boot due to config file version problem
Tags were: patch help moreinfo
Bug#274859: mdadm: Fails to start if auto=yes and /dev/md? is a symlink to 
/dev/md/?
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308825: This bug isn't RC, in my humble opinion

[Tore Anderson]

  For what it's worth, I think the severity of this bug is exaggerated.
 GDM is certainly not "unusable or mostly so" for any of the systems
 I've touched lately - indeed, this bug doesn't affect them at all.

  In fact, this bug seems to be a perfect match for the "important"
 severity:  «a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a
 package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.»

  But then again, I'm no release manager..

Regards,
-- 
Tore Anderson

Bug#310585: 'kernel-patch-ttl' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-ttl
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave

Dear Pawel Wiecek 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-ttl does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: closing 310584

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  #another dupe, Frankie
> close 310584
Bug#310584: 'kernel-patch-quota' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310581: 'kernel-patch-quota' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave

Dear Pawel Wiecek 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310574: 'kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: grave

Dear Brandt Dusthimer 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-2.4-kgdb does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310575: 'kernel-patch-relayfs' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Version: 2.6.9-1
Severity: grave

Dear Yann Dirson 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-relayfs does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310577: 'kernel-patch-grsecurity2' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-grsecurity2
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: grave

Dear Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-grsecurity2 does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310580: 'kernel-patch-psd' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-psd
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave

Dear Pawel Wiecek 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-psd does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310479: Severe breakage of root-on-lvm2 with lvm-common 1.5.18

[Patrick Caulfield]

Christian Weeks wrote:
> Hmm, I've regenerated a working one now... When I was examining it, it
> did have vgchange contained within it, and also another vgchange under
> /lib/lvm-200/ (or something similar)... I figured that one of the
> scripts was somehow choking when it tried to execute the vgchange
> executable in the initrd environment.

the new lvm-common looks for vgchange in the preferred /lib/lvm-XXX directory
(200 for lvm2, 10 for lvm10) to determine which LVM usertools are installed, 
then
looks in that directory for the command you wanted (in this case also vgchange,
judging by the message!). Previously it just looked for the requested command
which caused problems when LVM1 and LVM2 were both installed and you wanted a 
command
that only existed for one version (e2fsadm was the actual culprit at the time).

So, provided there is a vgscan in /lib/lvm-200, things /should/ work fine. ahem.


> After I finish work this evening (about 10 hours from now) I'll build
> and test that it's broken a broken one, for your perusal.. Is that OK?
> 

That's fine by me. I'll look at it tomorrow morning my (UK) time.

-- 

patrick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310584: 'kernel-patch-quota' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-quota
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave

Dear Pawel Wiecek 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-quota does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310583: 'kernel-patch-time' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-time
Version: 2.4.24-1
Severity: grave

Dear Pawel Wiecek 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-time does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308825: ,gdm logins fail to start sessions

[Jay Kline]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:42:33AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|
|>Steve Langasek wrote:
|>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 08:31:51AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|>|
|>|>Steve Langasek wrote:
|>|>| On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:51:05AM -0500, Jay Kline wrote:
|>|>|
|>|>|>| Jay, taking care to run rm -f /usr/lib/libldap.so.2.0.15 before
|>|>doing so,
|>|>|>| would you mind upgrading to the libldap2 from unstable to see if it
|>|>fixes
|>|>|>| your problem?
|>|
|>|
|>|>| Does this mean you only upgraded to 2.1.30-6?  You need 2.1.30-7 from
|>|>| unstable to check whether it's the bug we fixed.
|>|
|>|
|>|>Oops, my mistake.  Our local repository hasnt been updated since we
|>|>started running into problems.  However, still no change with these
|>|>versions:
|>|
|>|
|>|>ldap-utils 2.1.30-3
|>|>libldap-2.2-7  2.2.23-1
|>|>libldap2   2.1.30-7
|>|>libldap2   2.1.30-7
|>|>libnss-ldap238-1
|>|>libpam-ldap178-1
|>|>gdm2.6.0.8-1
|>|
|>|
|>| Are you running nscd on this system?  (That package enjoys frequent
|>mention
|>| in the log of bug #302296.)  If so, can you please restart it and see if
|>| that makes a difference?
|
|
|>Heh- no, we avoid that like the plague.  Being a DoD site we rather not
|>deal
|>with software with a track record like that. :-) We have libnss-ldap
|>going directly to the ldap server.
|
|
| Ok... :)
|
| How about restarting gdm itself?
|

Restarting gdm also had no effect.

Jay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCkxsJDxbn5aHZgBgRAsgxAJ93n0KXorjzGpDdf1hP4LT48qX9pwCgwIlA
vDCEg1rcjB8SftVx8vkW7FI=
=Uwb8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 310219

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310219 + experimental
Bug#310219: tagcoll: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental experimental
Tags added: experimental

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310479: Severe breakage of root-on-lvm2 with lvm-common 1.5.18

[Christian Weeks]

Hmm, I've regenerated a working one now... When I was examining it, it did have vgchange contained within it, and also another vgchange under /lib/lvm-200/ (or something similar)... I figured that one of the scripts was somehow choking when it tried to execute the vgchange executable in the initrd environment.

After I finish work this evening (about 10 hours from now) I'll build and test that it's broken a broken one, for your perusal.. Is that OK?

Thanks,
Christian

On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 07:54 +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:


Christian Weeks wrote:
> Package: lvm-common
> Version: 1.5.18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
> 
> 
> I ran an upgrade this morning and picked up this package, among others, 
> including a new kernel image. This generated a new initrd which rendered 
> my "Root on LVM" system unbootable into the new kernel. Fortunately, I 
> had a recovery kernel on hand that still worked.
> 
> After some frantic recovery work, I have determined that rolling back 
> lvm-common to 1.5.17 enables the generation of an unbroken initrd that 
> can be booted.
> 
> The error reported during the boot process is "No program "vgchange" 
> exists for your LVM version". Root is unmountable and the kernel panics 
> shortly afterward.
> 
> Frankly, this is a bit of a surprise- I didn't think this particular 
> package would be the problem cause.
> 
> Sorry to create an RC bug, but this almost hosed my system completely 
> and my guess is it will break anyone who uses lvm on root after a kernel 
> upgrade.
> 

So your initrd doesn't contain vgchange! hmmm. How ws the initrd generated and
can you send me it please ?






-- 
Christian Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#310127: icu-doc is built by the icu and the icu28 source package

[Steve Langasek]

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:17:03AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the
> > icu-doc package built from the icu source.

> To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a current
> version, icu28 should be removed.  Therefore, either icu28's doc
> package should be renamed or both should, but I would disagree with
> the solution of renaming icu-doc from icu and keeping the one from
> icu28.  There's most likely no good reason to have multiple icu
> versions in debian.  icu28 was required by mono, which was the only
> reason that it was packaged.  (ivo is current icu maintainer and
> previous xerces maintainer; xerces depends upon icu.  blade is current
> icu28 and mono maintainer.  As new xerces maintainer, I would offer to
> take over icu maintenance as well.)  Anyway, these are just my
> suggestions. :-)

FWIW, icu28 is also used (in testing) by mail-notification; if it wasn't,
it's likely that icu28 would have been pulled from sarge.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310220: marked as done (tagcolledit: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 07:17:44 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310220: fixed in tagcolledit 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 14:10:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 07:10:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZr9k-0004tX-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 07:10:16 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 816863BC3BE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 16:10:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAA33BC381
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 16:10:15 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 1A58526136; Sun, 22 May 2005 16:10:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 16:10:15 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tagcolledit: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tagcolledit
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package is failing to build in experimental with the
following error:
g++  -g -Wall -O2 -Wall   -o tagcolledit  Environment.o
CommandlineParser.o Tag.o TagSet.o TagcollDocument.o TagMenu.o
TagSelector.o ItemList.o TagPanel.o TagcollEditor.o tagcolledit.o
instantiations.o -ltagcoll1 -ltdb -lz   -Wl,--export-dynamic
-lgtkmm-2.4 -lgdkmm-2.4 -latkmm-1.6 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lpangomm-1.4
-lglibmm-2.4 -lsigc-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0
-lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ltdb
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [tagcolledit] Error 1


Kurt


---
Received: (at 310220-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 11:21:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 04:21:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaXTu-0003ba-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 04:21:54 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaXPs-0003XC-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 07:17:44 -0400
From: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310220: fixed in tagcolledit 0.11-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 07:17:44 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tagcolledit
Source-Version: 0.11-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tagcolledit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tagcolledit_0.11-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tagcolledit/tagcolledit_0.11-1.diff.gz
tagcolledit_0.11-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tagcolledit/tagcolledit_0.11-1.dsc
tagcolledit_0.11-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tagcolledit/tagcolledit_0.11-1_i386.deb
tagcolledit_0.11.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tagcolledit/tagcolledit_0.11.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tagcolledit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
admin

Processed: closing 310558, closing 310559, closing 310560

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> close 310558
Bug#310558: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310559
Bug#310559: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

>  #duplicates again
> close 310560
Bug#310560: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in upload of tagcoll 0.101-1 to experimental

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310219 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#310219: tagcoll: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -ltdb
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310564: 'kernel-patch-badram' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-badram
Version: 2.6.5.2-1
Severity: grave

Dear Yann Dirson 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-badram does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310565: 'kernel-patch-cryptoloop' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-cryptoloop
Version: 2.4.22.0-25.1
Severity: grave

Dear Juergen Strobel (private) 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-cryptoloop does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310127: icu-doc is built by the icu and the icu28 source package

[Matthias Klose]

Jay Berkenbilt writes:
> 
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > new uploads of the icu source are rejected, proposing to rename the
> > icu-doc package built from the icu source.
> 
> To clarify my previous response, once icu gets uploaded with a current
> version, icu28 should be removed.  Therefore, either icu28's doc
> package should be renamed or both should, but I would disagree with
> the solution of renaming icu-doc from icu and keeping the one from
> icu28.  There's most likely no good reason to have multiple icu
> versions in debian.  icu28 was required by mono, which was the only
> reason that it was packaged.  (ivo is current icu maintainer and
> previous xerces maintainer; xerces depends upon icu.  blade is current
> icu28 and mono maintainer.  As new xerces maintainer, I would offer to
> take over icu maintenance as well.)  Anyway, these are just my
> suggestions. :-)

keeping the icu-doc package name in the icu source would mean to
introduce an epoch, because the version from the icu28 icu-doc package
is higher. That's not revertable, but package renaming is. So do what
you/the maintainer wants ;)

Matthias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: sigh :-(

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> close 310553
Bug#310553: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310554
Bug#310554: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310555
Bug#310555: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310556
Bug#310556: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310557
Bug#310557: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310561
Bug#310561: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> close 310562
Bug#310562: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310561: 'kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel

[Francesco Paolo Lovergine]

Package: kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt
Version: 13
Severity: grave

Dear Russell Coker 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]