Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not found

[Kurt Roeckx]

severity 310884 serious
thanks

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:54:46AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> severity 310884 important
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
> (buildd utility).
> I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrade at now.

It's not because you can't reproduce this that you should lower
the severity.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not found

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310884 serious
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not 
found
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#255276: Patch to run database recovery on startup

[Florian Weimer]

The patch is risky.  After it's been applied, invoking
"/etc/init.d/slapd start" while slapd is running can (and most
probably will) result in data loss.

"db4.2_recover -e" will pick up new DB_CONFIG settings, so there's no
need to special-case it for updates.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310936: oregano fixes for ia64

[David Mosberger-Tang]

 >> Third, part-property.c passed a pointer to an unitialized size_t-typed
 >> variable to get_macro_name(), which was expecting only an int pointer.
 >> Thus, the top 32-bits remained unitialized and on ia64 this caused a
 >> crash when attempting to insert any part.

 > this was fixed in 0.40.3

The problem is still present in 0.40.4.  The attached patch fixes the
problem.

The other problems appear to have been fixed in 0.40.4.

Thanks,

--david

--- src/part-property.c~2005-05-26 21:04:45.0 -0700
+++ src/part-property.c 2005-05-26 23:18:09.0 -0700
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
  * @return the name of a macro variable
  */
 static char *get_macro_name (const char *str, char **cls1,
-   char **cls2, unsigned int *sz)
+   char **cls2, size_t *sz)
 {
char separators[] = { ",.;/|()" };
GString *out;


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gal2 1.99.11-1.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310903 + fixed
Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still refence libhowl.la.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still reference libhowl.la.

[Steve Langasek]

tags 310903 patch
thanks

Hello,

I've prepared a 0-day NMU to get this bug fixed ASAP for the sarge release.
Of course, only a recompile is needed, so the change is very short. :)
Please find the patch attached.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u gal2-1.99.11/debian/changelog gal2-1.99.11/debian/changelog
--- gal2-1.99.11/debian/changelog
+++ gal2-1.99.11/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+gal2 (1.99.11-1.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix.
+  * Simple rebuild against current libs, to drop the dependency on the
+no-longer-available libhowl.la which made this package unusable with
+libtool.  Closes: #310903.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 26 May 2005 19:10:49 -0700
+
 gal2 (1.99.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still reference libhowl.la.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310903 patch
Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still refence libhowl.la.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310678: AW: Bug#310678 acknowledged by developer

[Michael Setzer]

> Also, did you rebuild your initrd after upgrading ?

That's what I forgot. Sorry!

After rebuilding the initrd the system works perfect again.

Thanks for your help!

Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310822: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong PHP version?

[Robert Sander]

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:16:02AM +0200, Carsten Wolff wrote:
> 
> Is there something special about the upgrade-path of your system? Is the 
> package-version on that machine really 0.4-7, or did you run reportbug on 
> another machine?

Hi!

The machine was upgraded from Debian stable to Debian testing a couple
of weeks ago. reportbug has been run on this machine. We have no other
machine with php4-auth-pam installed.

Greetings
-- 
Robert Sander Senior Manager Information Systems
Epigenomics AGKleine Praesidentenstr. 110178 Berlin, Germany
phone:+49-30-24345-330  fax:+49-30-24345-555
http://www.epigenomics.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310936: oregano fixes for ia64

[Ricardo Markiewicz]

> Oregano defines GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED which has the effect that
> gnome_menu_item_new() does NOT get declared.  As a result, the
> function gets implicitly defined to return an "int", which is a
> problem on 64-bit architectures since the pointer cannot fit in an
> int.  In particular, this is guaranteed to cause a SIGSEGV on ia64
> since the top 32 bits would get truncated to zero.

Fixed in the new upstream release 0.40.4

> Second, node_store_get_type() attempted to use guint to store a GTK
> type when GType is needed.  This caused an immediate segfault on ia64
> at startup.

Fixed in the new upstream release 0.40.4

> Third, part-property.c passed a pointer to an unitialized size_t-typed
> variable to get_macro_name(), which was expecting only an int pointer.
> Thus, the top 32-bits remained unitialized and on ia64 this caused a
> crash when attempting to insert any part.

this was fixed in 0.40.3

> Patch below fixes all three problems.  Please apply (and forward to
> upstream if appropriate).

please, test this new version on ia64 and report if this fix the problem.

Thx.
-- 
Ricardo Markiewicz // http://www.fi.uba.ar/~rmarkie/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sary-ruby 1.1.0.1-1sarge1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 305909 + fixed
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by 
`builder.o'.  Stop.
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by `builder.o'. Stop.

[Hidetaka Iwai]

Hello, 

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> The sary-ruby binaries in unstable are not suitable for sarge because they
> depend on a newer version of ruby.  Would you please prepare a sary-ruby
> 1.1.0.1-1sarge1 upload to testing-proposed-updates fixing this bug ASAP, so
> that it's not necessary to drop sary-ruby and prime from the sarge release?

I've prepared sary-ruby 1.1.0.1-1sarge1 at following URIs.  But my
sponsor, Masahito Omote, seems to be busy and I need a sponsor.  Could
anyone please upload this package for me?

  http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/sary/libsary-ruby1.8_1.1.0.1-1sarge1_i386.deb
  http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/sary/sary-ruby_1.1.0.1-1sarge1.diff.gz
  http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/sary/sary-ruby_1.1.0.1-1sarge1.dsc
  http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/sary/sary-ruby_1.1.0.1-1sarge1_i386.changes

regards,
--
 Hidetaka Iwai
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpi1cpLkCYUw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#246801: marked as done (mrtg has too loose versioned depency on libsnmp-session-perl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledge the NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2004 09:56:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 01 02:56:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from xdsl-177-5.nblnetworks.fi (watergate.kos.to) [217.30.177.5] 
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJrEp-0002Bl-00; Sat, 01 May 2004 02:56:51 -0700
Received: from nchip by watergate.kos.to with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1BJrEU-H6-N3; Sat, 01 May 2004 12:56:30 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mrtg has too loose versioned depency on libsnmp-session-perl
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 12:56:30 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: mrtg
Version: 2.10.13-1
Severity: important

When running cfgmaker with libsnmp-session-perl 0.94 installed, it
spits the following error:

SNMP_util version 0.97 required--this is only version 0.94 at
/usr/share/perl/5.8/Exporter/Heavy.pm line 107.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/MRTG_lib.pm line 20.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/cfgmaker line 44.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/cfgmaker line 44.

upgrading to latest libsnmp-session-perl fixes this problem. Currently
mrtg depends on 

libsnmp-session-perl (>= 0.93) 

Which is incorrect atlest for cfgmaker

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux watergate 2.6.0-test11 #2 Tue Dec 9 20:02:17 EET 2003 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.ISO8859-1

Versions of packages mrtg depends on:
ii  debconf 1.2.23   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libsnmp-session-perl1.00-1   Perl support for accessing SNMP-aw
ii  perl5.8.3-3  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-modules5.8.3-3  Core Perl modules.

-- debconf information:
  mrtg/own_user: true
* mrtg/conf_mods: false


---
Received: (at 246801-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2005 04:23:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 21:23:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from polaris.galacticasoftware.com [206.45.95.222] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbWNn-0002e8-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:23:39 -0700
Received: from mira.lan.galacticasoftware.com 
([2001:470:1f00:907:20d:87ff:fe3c:98c8] helo=ip6-localhost)
by polaris.galacticasoftware.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DbWNm-0006Xx-Qf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:38 -0500
Received: from ip6-localhost ([::1] helo=[IPv6:::1])
by ip6-localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DbWNp-0001dW-0X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:41 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:23:40 -0500
From: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Acknowledge the NMU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is an acknowledgment of the NMU. It was incorporated as part of the
last upload, 2.12.1-1, just forgot to include it in the changelog. I've
done that now.

- Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307720: "Minor" bug rationale

[Paul TBBle Hampson]

OK, here's the deal.

I missed the SQL injection vulnerability until I was applying the patch, by
which point it didn't seem to matter. However, this is not a huge risk since
the main piece of user-supplied data that is used in the SQL queries is the
username, and that gets passed through the sql-escaping procedure elsewhere, as
I recall. In fact, there is an optimisation to the patch that fixed this
problem which I chose not to apply, which removes the specific username
escaping after this change was made to escape _all_ queries.

So unless someone's rewritten the SQL queries to use User-Password, this is
only exploitable by the NAS, whom we trust enough to let them write accounting
information to the database anyway.

Otherwise, to exploit this bug, you'd need details from two files in
/etc/freeradius, which should only be readable by root and the freerad
user. (To get the SQL query, and the NAS shared secret)

The buffer overflow is _very_ hard to exploit as the buffer the output is being
written to is 4096 bytes, and a single RADIUS attribute may only be up to 253
bytes. The longest query in the system is the stop_alt query (used when a stop
is received without a start record) at about 1k, which contains 23 radius
substitutions, so it may indeed be pushed out to a total length of 6k.

However, only an accepted NAS may send data into this query (or in
fact any module) so it's only a problem for people who're using FreeRADIUS
in a situation where a NAS may try and break into the system. None of the
buffers being written to are the first declared in their functions, so
unless C is free to reorder stack-local variables (maybe it is?) this can't
push into the return address of the stack.

So this buffer overflow doesn't render the package unusable, cause data loss or
introduce a security hole in the account of the users of this package.
(Although that last may depend on what you mean by 'users'. People do not _run_
FreeRADIUS, they query it. It has its own user by default just in case
something like this slips through.)

And just to remind people, I _upgraded_ this report from wishlist to minor,
on the grounds that it is trivial to fix and doesn't affect the usefulness
of the package. On further reflection, maybe it should have been 'normal',
since it only affects one particular option (rlm_sql) rather than the core
server.

I certainly don't consider it grave, criticial, or release-critical, but I'm
gonna let this sit for a bit before I consider changing the severity, since
it's fixed now so it's much less important now.

(BTW, I loved the Security Focus comment "No exploit is required.". ^_^) [1]

[1] http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13540/exploit/

-- 
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7th year CompSci/Asian Studies student, ANU

Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.


pgpR0yKAXFIhG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not found

[Kenshi Muto]

severity 310884 important
thanks

Hi,
As terry said, I couldn't find any problem with pbuilder and sbuild
(buildd utility).
I think this bug may beclosed, but just do downgrade at now.

Thanks,
-- 
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not found

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310884 important
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not 
found
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 310882 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # others can...
> severity 310882 serious
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Severity set to `serious'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310927: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps'

[Blars Blarson]

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 02:25:07AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > # create the locale:
> > mkdir -p debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale
> > localedef -i "en_US" -f "UTF-8" "debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8"
> > cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such 
> > file or directory
> 
> That looks suspiciously like a broken build system. What's the output of:
> 
>  dpkg --status locales
> 
> And, iff you have apt installed:
> 
>  apt-cache show locales
> 
> Is it possible that the 'locales' package isn't installed?  But that's not 
> likely since
> the locale-gen application seems to be present.
> 
> Note for Peter: 'locales' should be in the list of build-depends. 
> 
> 
> HTH Ralf Mattes
> 
> > make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1
> > 
> > 

If it isn't a build dependancy, build-esential, or a required package
you can't count on it.

sundry:/home/blarson/src# pbuilder login
W: /root/.pbuilderrc does not exist
Building the build Environment
 -> extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/base.tgz]
 -> creating local configuration
 -> copying local configuration
 -> mounting /proc filesystem
 -> mounting /dev/pts filesystem
 -> policy-rc.d already exists
Obtaining the cached apt archive contents
 -> entering the shell
File extracted to: /var/cache/pbuilder/build//21867

]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /sundry:/# dpkg --status locales
Package `locales' is not installed and no info is available.

Use dpkg --info (= dpkg-deb --info) to examine archive files,
and dpkg --contents (= dpkg-deb --contents) to list their contents.
]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /sundry:/# apt-cache show locales
Package: locales
Priority: standard
Section: base
Installed-Size: 10372
Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers 
Architecture: all
Source: glibc
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22
Replaces: localebin, wg15-locale, libc6-bin, i18ndata, glibc2, locale-ja, 
locale-ko, locale-vi, locale-zh
Provides: i18ndata
Depends: glibc-2.3.2.ds1-22, debconf (>= 0.2.26)
Conflicts: localebin, wg15-locale, i18ndata, locale-ja, locale-ko, locale-vi, 
locale-zh
Filename: pool/main/g/glibc/locales_2.3.2.ds1-22_all.deb
Size: 3984744
MD5sum: 766a005c36ff3829d74249e528577d55
Description: GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support]
 Machine-readable data files, shared objects and programs used by the
 C library for localization (l10n) and internationalization (i18n) support.
 .
 This package contains the libc.mo i18n files, plus tools to generate
 locale definitions from source files (included in this package). It allows
 you to customize which definitions actually get generated. This is a
 savings over how this package used to be, where all locales were generated
 by default. This created a package that unpacked to an excess of 30 megs.
Task: norwegian, swedish, turkish

]0;[EMAIL PROTECTED]: /sundry:/# exit
Copying back the cached apt archive contents
 -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
 -> unmounting proc filesystem
 -> cleaning the build env 
-> removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//21867 and its 
subdirectories
sundry:/home/blarson/src# exit

Script done on Thu May 26 19:37:24 2005


-- 
Blars Blarson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.

Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400
> > from reaching testing.  Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
> > testing-proposed-updates, so we can get this fix into sarge?

> Ack, I'm sorry about that, I completely forgot to check that the builds
> had been done.  I'll get a new upload prepared today.

> Actually, in preparing the new upload, I think I also found that the
> dependency should have been on kftgtd instead of on kftgt, so maybe this
> is for the best.

> Out of curiousity, does the verison number need to / should contain sarge,
> or can one just upload 1.6-4 to testing-proposed-updates (a version that
> hadn't previously been seen by katie)?

It probably /should/ contain sarge, but the only hard requirement is that it
be a version not previously seen by katie and that the version number sort
between the version in testing and that in unstable.

Thansk,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by `builder.o'. Stop.

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Hidetaka (and Kenshi),

The sary-ruby binaries in unstable are not suitable for sarge because they
depend on a newer version of ruby.  Would you please prepare a sary-ruby
1.1.0.1-1sarge1 upload to testing-proposed-updates fixing this bug ASAP, so
that it's not necessary to drop sary-ruby and prime from the sarge release?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310936: oregano fixes for ia64

[David Mosberger-Tang]

Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Oregano defines GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED which has the effect that
gnome_menu_item_new() does NOT get declared.  As a result, the
function gets implicitly defined to return an "int", which is a
problem on 64-bit architectures since the pointer cannot fit in an
int.  In particular, this is guaranteed to cause a SIGSEGV on ia64
since the top 32 bits would get truncated to zero.

Second, node_store_get_type() attempted to use guint to store a GTK
type when GType is needed.  This caused an immediate segfault on ia64
at startup.

Third, part-property.c passed a pointer to an unitialized size_t-typed
variable to get_macro_name(), which was expecting only an int pointer.
Thus, the top 32-bits remained unitialized and on ia64 this caused a
crash when attempting to insert any part.

Patch below fixes all three problems.  Please apply (and forward to
upstream if appropriate).

Thanks!

--david

diff -urN oregano-0.40.0/src/Makefile.am oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/Makefile.am
--- oregano-0.40.0/src/Makefile.am  2005-05-26 18:23:27.0 -0700
+++ oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/Makefile.am   2005-05-26 18:05:19.0 
-0700
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
-DDATADIR=\""$(datadir)"\" \
$(OREGANO_CFLAGS)   \
   -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1 \
-  -DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1 \
-  -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1
+  -DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1
+#  -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1
 #  -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1 
 
 bin_SCRIPTS = oregano_parser
diff -urN oregano-0.40.0/src/Makefile.in oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/Makefile.in
--- oregano-0.40.0/src/Makefile.in  2005-05-26 18:23:27.0 -0700
+++ oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/Makefile.in   2005-05-26 18:06:47.0 
-0700
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
 
 oreganodir = $(datadir)/oregano
 
-INCLUDES = -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""$(datadir)/locale"\"
-I$(includedir) $(GNOME_INCLUDEDIR)   
-DOREGANO_GLADEDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/glade"\"
-DOREGANO_LIBRARYDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/libraries"\"
-DOREGANO_MODELDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/models"\"   -DDATADIR=\""$(datadir)"\"  
$(OREGANO_CFLAGS) -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1   
-DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1   -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1
+INCLUDES = -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""$(datadir)/locale"\"
-I$(includedir) $(GNOME_INCLUDEDIR)   
-DOREGANO_GLADEDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/glade"\"
-DOREGANO_LIBRARYDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/libraries"\"
-DOREGANO_MODELDIR=\""$(oreganodir)/models"\"   -DDATADIR=\""$(datadir)"\"  
$(OREGANO_CFLAGS) -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1   
-DGLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1
 
 #  -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED=1 
 
diff -urN oregano-0.40.0/src/node-store.c oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/node-store.c
--- oregano-0.40.0/src/node-store.c 2004-10-11 12:04:27.0 -0700
+++ oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/node-store.c  2005-05-26 18:12:45.0 
-0700
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 GType
 node_store_get_type (void)
 {
-   static guint node_store_type = 0;
+   static GType node_store_type = 0;
 
if (!node_store_type) {
static const GTypeInfo node_store_info = {
diff -urN oregano-0.40.0/src/part-property.c 
oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/part-property.c
--- oregano-0.40.0/src/part-property.c  2004-10-10 11:20:28.0 -0700
+++ oregano-0.40.0-davidm/src/part-property.c   2005-05-26 18:17:38.0 
-0700
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
  * @return the name of a macro variable
  */
 static char *get_macro_name (const char *str, char **cls1,
-   char **cls2, int *sz)
+   char **cls2, size_t *sz)
 {
char tmp[512], separators[] = { ",.;/|()" };
char *id;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
}
}
 
-   *sz = (int) (q - str);
+   *sz = (q - str);
return id;
 
  error:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307720: marked as done (freeradius: Few possible security problems)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 22:59:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 15:59:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTSqA-ZU-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 15:59:38 -0700
Received: from bsn-77-143-219.dsl.siol.net [193.77.143.219] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTSq9-0005oc-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 17:59:37 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Primoz Bratanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: freeradius: Few possible security problems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 00:59:45 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

In /src/modules/rlm_sql/rlm_sql.c there are few possible problems (IMHO).
Please disregard the message if you disagree.

In sql_escape_func (line 406) there is a loop with special break condition
in line 414 ("if (outlen <= 1)"), which is fine unless we have three (3) or
less characters available and input character needs escaping (with =XX). In
this case this loop causes minor buffer overflow (few characters). As output
buffer is huge, this should not be easily exploitable problem.

The other three problems are in lines 520, 1152, 1196 where radius_xlat is
called for generation of sql query for execution. It's called without escape
function (NULL), which is afterwards replaced with simple copy. As this
queries may contain reference to user supplied data (username ...), this may
result in SQL injection. This is also hard to exploit as user has to be
authenticated already before any of these sql statements can get executed.

Primoz Bratanic

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages freeradius depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgdbm31.8.3-2  GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  libltdl31.5.6-6  A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCeVPhHOuqnSwJthERAvvhAKCS917GnwK+t9W6mqUCznfxeuKEygCffDbT
S9UM07PrA9Sfl1OPq2vsVb4=
=HaZ7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 307720-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2005 01:26:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 18:26:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTcS-00036W-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 18:26:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTTJ-0008FS-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
From: Paul Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: freeradius
Source-Version: 1.0.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freera

Bug#310841: marked as done (freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 11:04:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 04:03:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail01.pironet-ndh.com (mail02.pironet-ndh.com) [194.64.31.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbG9f-0001GW-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 04:03:59 -0700
Received: from mail.fbn-dd.de (mail.fbn-dd.de [195.227.105.178])
by mail02.pironet-ndh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198184D92BA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de 
(192-168-0-1.transfer-000.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1])
by mail.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5504262DD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA641F747
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.1.16) id 08642-35393EF0;
Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:28 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de 
[10.28.130.200])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8791F737
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 31570945D; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:03:30 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.16; AVE: 6.30.0.15; 
VDF: 6.30.0.202; host: sonne)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security

freeradius seems to be vulnerable against a buffer overflow:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=3DCAN-2005-1455
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13541

Thanks in advance for checking,

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org

--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCla0CDecnbV4Fd/IRAjl1AKC4B3bYnP2ZErYedrCq6MHegLHB3QCdHudj
QsNhtvh/hDhaTaJrAQdqU28=
=Chpo
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--HCdXmnRlPgeNBad2--

---
Received: (at 307720-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2005 01:26:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 18:26:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTcS-00036W-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 18:26:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTTJ-0008FS-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
From: Paul Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: freeradiu

Bug#310840: marked as done ([CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat function)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 11:03:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 04:03:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail01.pironet-ndh.com (mail02.pironet-ndh.com) [194.64.31.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbG8r-00010E-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 04:03:09 -0700
Received: from mail.fbn-dd.de (mail.fbn-dd.de [195.227.105.178])
by mail02.pironet-ndh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D348B4A091
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de 
(192-168-0-1.transfer-000.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1])
by mail.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16A7262DD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A4D1F747
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.1.16) id 07683-15D520B3;
Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de 
[10.28.130.200])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF541F737
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 59501945D; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:40 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:02:40 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat function
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.16; AVE: 6.30.0.15; 
VDF: 6.30.0.202; host: sonne)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security

freeradius seems to be vulnerable against an SQL injection:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=3DCAN-2005-1454
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13540

Thanks in advance for checking,

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org

--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFClazQDecnbV4Fd/IRAiDtAJ90TjXep+CWe9kjkwkaBMIHUnG7TQCgyAYx
G9FpZGx0WJVRZkrV9pp85Tk=
=t57I
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--jKBxcB1XkHIR0Eqt--

---
Received: (at 307720-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2005 01:26:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 18:26:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTcS-00036W-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 18:26:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbTTJ-0008FS-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
From: Paul Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#307720: fixed in freeradius 1.0.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:17:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

[Eugene Konev]

Hello Torsten.

 On Thu, 26 May 2005 16:53:17 +0200
 you wrote:

 >> +# Find out slapd db directories
 >> +SLAPD_DBDIRS=`sed -ne 's/^directory[[:space:]]\+"*\([^"]\+\).*/\1/p' \
 >> +"$SLAPD_CONF" `
 >> +

 TL> I'd rather gather this list at the time when it is needed. Apart from
 TL> that I don't really grok that sed expression :)

It has only possible failure if path contains double quotes in it, which
is very unlikely situation. And this:

 TL> +# Find bdb environment dirs
 TL> +find_bdb_envs() {
 TL> +local d
 TL> +for d in `awk '/directory/ {print $2}' < "$SLAPD_CONF"`; do
 TL> +if [ -d "$d" -a -f "$d/objectClass.bdb" ]; then
 TL> +echo $d
 TL> +fi
 TL> +done
 TL> +}

will happily skip entries like:
directory"/var/lib/ldap"
(note the quotes), which are by default in sarge install.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310933: llvm: ftbfs [sparc] execvp: ./build.sh: Permission denied

[Blars Blarson]

Package: llvm
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

llvm fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds,
duplicated on sparc pbuilder.


touch ./stamp/patch-stamp
#-- run the build script
./build.sh
make[1]: execvp: ./build.sh: Permission denied
make[1]: *** [stamp/build-stamp] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/llvm-1.4'



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310927: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps'

[rm]

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Package: sbcl
> Version: 1:0.9.0.39-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Justification: Fails to build from source
> 
> 
> sbcl fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on a sparc
> pbuilder.  It appears you are making assumptions about the locales
> installed on the building system.

Actually, the whole magic here is supposed to work locale-agnostic ...

> 
> dh_testdir
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
>   LANGUAGE = (unset),
>   LC_ALL = "en_US.UTF-8",
>   LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
> touch configure-stamp
> dh_testdir
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
>   LANGUAGE = (unset),
>   LC_ALL = "en_US.UTF-8",
>   LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").

That's just brain-dead perl. 

> # create the locale:
> mkdir -p debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale
> localedef -i "en_US" -f "UTF-8" "debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8"
> cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such file 
> or directory

That looks suspiciously like a broken build system. What's the output of:

 dpkg --status locales

And, iff you have apt installed:

 apt-cache show locales

Is it possible that the 'locales' package isn't installed?  But that's not 
likely since
the locale-gen application seems to be present.

Note for Peter: 'locales' should be in the list of build-depends. 


HTH Ralf Mattes

> make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310884: I cannot reproduce this bug

[Don Armstrong]

tag 310884 unreproducible
thanks

I'm unable to reproduce this bug on unstable with pike7.2 7.2.580-3
building in a pbuilder chroot.

Are you building these using pbuilder or something else? If something
else, could you provide the output of 

dpkg-depcheck -b fakeroot debian/rules binary;

Also, the entire build log will be useful as well.

[I'm leaning towards downgrading this bug as well, as it seems to
likely be a user specific issue.]


Don Armstrong

-- 
It was said that life was cheap in Ankh-Morpork. This was, of course,
completely wrong. Life was often very expensive; you could get death
for free.
 -- Terry Pratchet _Pyramids_ p25

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310822: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong PHP version?

[Carsten Wolff]

Hi,

I don't know, what went wrong in your installation, but as you can see here, 
there's no such "-zts" folder in the package anymore:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=php4-auth-pam&version=testing&arch=i386

Is there something special about the upgrade-path of your system? Is the 
package-version on that machine really 0.4-7, or did you run reportbug on 
another machine?

Cheers,
Carsten


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309645: marked as done (oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 20:02:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309645: fixed in oregano 0.40.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 May 2005 14:08:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 07:08:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from maildcarg5.dc-host.net.ar [200.55.6.130] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DYPDS-0002r9-00; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:08:06 -0700
Received: from maildcarg4.dc-host.net.ar ([200.55.6.135])
 by maildcarg5.dc-host.net.ar
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.11 (built Jan 28 2005))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:48:29 -0300 (GMT)
Received: from freak.amadeus ([200.115.206.87]) by maildcarg4.dc-host.net.ar
 (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:06:22 -0300 (ART)
Received: from ulises.home (ulises.amadeus [192.168.21.15])
by freak.amadeus (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6CF848   for
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:07:39 -0300 (ART)
Received: by ulises.home (Postfix, from userid 1001)id 40B34461EB8; Wed,
 18 May 2005 11:07:06 -0300 (ART)
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:07:06 -0300
From: Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable

Due to an incompatibility problem with the current libcairo, the plot
window in Oregano causes a total freeze of the program.

This is to say, you are not able to simulate any circuit, because the
program freezes when reaching the plot part.  Therefore the program is
practically useless (you can draw a circuit and generate the netlist, but
not simulate it).

The bug is actually in the cairo library, but the buggy function has been 
dropped in the CVS version, and there's noone wishing to fix the old one.

Upstream is already aware of the problem and is now trying to find a
workaround.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages oregano depends on:
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcairo10.4.0-1 Multi-platform 2D graphics library
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgconf2-4  2.8.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.4.2-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeprint2.2-0   2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii  libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User 
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-2 The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtksourceview1.0- 1.2.0-1 shared libraries for the GTK+ synt
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  liborbit

Processed: I cannot reproduce this bug

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310884 unreproducible
Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not 
found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.81.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 290329 + fixed
Bug#290329: initrd-tools: please default to modules=dep, at least on powerpc.
Tags were: patch d-i
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310927: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps'

[Blars Blarson]

Package: sbcl
Version: 1:0.9.0.39-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: Fails to build from source


sbcl fails to build from source on sparc, duplicated on a sparc
pbuilder.  It appears you are making assumptions about the locales
installed on the building system.


dh_testdir
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = "en_US.UTF-8",
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
touch configure-stamp
dh_testdir
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = "en_US.UTF-8",
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
# create the locale:
mkdir -p debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale
localedef -i "en_US" -f "UTF-8" "debian/tmpdir/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8"
cannot read character map directory `/usr/share/i18n/charmaps': No such file or 
directory
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310564: marked as done ('kernel-patch-badram' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:32:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310564: fixed in kernel-patch-badram 2.6.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 11:06:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 04:06:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from egg.area.ba.cnr.it [150.145.80.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaXFD-0004dy-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 04:06:44 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by egg.area.ba.cnr.it (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id 
j4OB6ftv009061
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:06:41 +0200
Received: from klecker (klecker.ba.issia.cnr.it [150.145.84.32])
by egg.area.ba.cnr.it (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id 
j4OB4MU2008875
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04:22 +0200
Received: from [150.145.84.201] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by klecker with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaXCv-0005QC-P2
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04:21 +0200
Received: from frankie by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaXDG-0002XZ-Li
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04:43 +0200
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'kernel-patch-badram' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
X-Mailer: debmassmailer(0.2)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:04:42 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20041102+Sophos at egg.area.ba.cnr.it
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-patch-badram
Version: 2.6.5.2-1
Severity: grave

Dear Yann Dirson 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-badram does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it apply properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

---
Received: (at 310564-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 23:48:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 16:48:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbS5t-iw-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:48:53 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbRqD-00089W-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:32:41 -0400
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310564: fixed in kernel-patch-badram 2.6.5.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:32:41 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: kernel-patch-badram
Source-Version: 2.6.5.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-patch-badram, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-badram/kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2.dsc
kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-badram/kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2.tar.gz
kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-badram/kernel-patch-badram_2.6.5.2-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance softwa

Bug#290329: fixing this bug

[Jeroen van Wolffelaar]

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:17:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> What a mess.
> 
> Looks to me like the only real options for dealing with with bug for
> sarge are:
> 
> - revert the powerpc change in debian/rules, downgrade bug as not RC
> or
> - re-upload initrd tools as an arch any package

Choosen for the latter, as discussed with Steve Langasek, NMU diff:

diff -Nru /tmp/6LSwoku0LT/initrd-tools-0.1.81/debian/changelog 
/tmp/P0VA6FOYHW/initrd-tools-0.1.81.1/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/6LSwoku0LT/initrd-tools-0.1.81/debian/changelog2005-05-23 
10:30:59.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/P0VA6FOYHW/initrd-tools-0.1.81.1/debian/changelog  2005-05-27 
01:35:31.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+initrd-tools (0.1.81.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * NMU as discussed with Steve Langasek
+  * Make this package architecture any to cope with a different conffile for
+powerpc than for any other architecture (Closes: #290329)
+
+ -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 25 May 2005 14:09:03 +0200
+
 initrd-tools (0.1.81) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Revert changes to root device handling in 0.1.80 (bugs #307471 and
diff -Nru /tmp/6LSwoku0LT/initrd-tools-0.1.81/debian/control 
/tmp/P0VA6FOYHW/initrd-tools-0.1.81.1/debian/control
--- /tmp/6LSwoku0LT/initrd-tools-0.1.81/debian/control  2005-05-14 
11:21:07.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/P0VA6FOYHW/initrd-tools-0.1.81.1/debian/control2005-05-27 
01:39:03.0 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3)
 
 Package: initrd-tools
-Architecture: all
+Architecture: any
 Depends: coreutils | fileutils (>= 4.1.9) | stat (>= 3.0), cpio, cramfsprogs 
(>= 1.1-4), dash, util-linux (>= 2.11b-3)
 Description: tools to create initrd image for prepackaged Linux kernel
  This package contains tools needed to generate an initrd image suitable for

Thanks,
--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310929: smart: ftbfs [sparc] attempts to install into build system /usr/share

[Blars Blarson]

Package: smart
Version: 0.30.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

smart fails to build on the sparc buildd when it is unable to copy a file
into /usr/share:

byte-compiling 
/build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/smart/util/elementtree/HTMLTreeBuilder.py
 to HTMLTreeBuilder.pyc
running install_scripts
copying build/scripts-2.3/smart.py -> 
/build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart
changing mode of /build/buildd/smart-0.30.2/debian/smartpm/usr/bin/smart to 755
running install_data
copying locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/smart.mo -> /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES
error: /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/smart.mo: Permission denied



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310838: marked as done ([CAN-2005-1177] erroneously changes permissions and ownership of configuration files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:45:59 -0400 (EDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Webmin-maintainers] Bug#310838: [CAN-2005-1177] erroneously 
changes permissions and ownership of configuration files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 10:29:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 03:29:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail01.pironet-ndh.com (mail02.pironet-ndh.com) [194.64.31.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbFch-Yz-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 03:29:56 -0700
Received: from mail.fbn-dd.de (mail.fbn-dd.de [195.227.105.178])
by mail02.pironet-ndh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D616C487A5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de 
(192-168-0-1.transfer-000.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1])
by mail.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B34B15119
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB7F1F72D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.1.16) id 30862-7F064FB5;
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:24 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de 
[10.28.130.200])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422EE1F4FF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9C21294A2; Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 12:29:25 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CAN-2005-1177] erroneously changes permissions and ownership of 
configuration files
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.16; AVE: 6.30.0.15; 
VDF: 6.30.0.202; host: sonne)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: webmin
Version: 1.180-3
Severity: critical
Tags: security

Hi!

CAN-2005-1177 describes a bug in webmin that can cause the permissions
and ownerships of configuration files to be changed when the file is
modified. This is fixed in 1.200, see

  http://www.webmin.com/changes.html

Can you please backport this fix?

Thanks,

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org

--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFClaUFDecnbV4Fd/IRAkoFAJ4kAY2XcjsA5O0AjpuXso86TT2XzgCeJkAn
7tHP637mbAz5HzCIedXYV/c=
=GEVr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--V88s5gaDVPzZ0KCq--

---
Received: (at 310838-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 23:46:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 16:46:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com (bastet.signetmail.com) [69.61.70.25] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbS3k-Xy-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:46:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by bastet.signetmail.com (RXG Elite Mail Server) with ESMTP
id D4F42A879E; Thu, 26 May 2005 18:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bastet.signetmail.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (atlmail.prod.rxgsys.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 03542-07; Thu, 26 May 2005 18:26:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.braincells.com (unknown [63.115.148.100])
by bastet.signetmail.com (RXG Elite Mail Server) 

Processed: I cannot reproduce this bug, probably local setup dependent

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310882 unreproducible
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Tags were: confirmed
Tags added: unreproducible

> severity 310882 important
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Roger Leigh]

The build definitely fails outside the chroot.  A full build log is
here:

http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/emacs21_21.4a-1.build-nochroot-log

and a complete list of installed packages is here:

http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/hardknott-packages


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310575: marked as done ('kernel-patch-relayfs' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 19:02:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310575: fixed in kernel-patch-relayfs 2.6.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 12:22:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 05:22:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from egg.area.ba.cnr.it [150.145.80.53] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaYQd-0004IV-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 05:22:36 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by egg.area.ba.cnr.it (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id 
j4OCMXl8014464
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:22:33 +0200
Received: from klecker (klecker.ba.issia.cnr.it [150.145.84.32])
by egg.area.ba.cnr.it (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id 
j4OCLtqm014435
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:21:55 +0200
Received: from [150.145.84.201] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by klecker with esmtpa (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaYPz-0005m7-Ac
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:21:55 +0200
Received: from frankie by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaYQL-0002bd-DM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 24 May 2005 14:22:17 +0200
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 'kernel-patch-relayfs' does not apply to any current sarge kernel
X-Mailer: debmassmailer(0.2)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:22:17 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20041102+Sophos at egg.area.ba.cnr.it
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Version: 2.6.9-1
Severity: grave

Dear Yann Dirson 

As reported in http://people.debian.org/~frankie/kernel-patches-checks.txt, 
kernel-patch-relayfs does not
apply clean to a current kernel-source. If you think this package is anyway 
useful at least with
an up-to-date vanilla kernel and sure that it applies properly, feel free to 
document this in the 
package and reduce the severity of this report, else this kernel-patch will be 
hinted for 
removing in sarge.

See also this ML thread about the issue:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/05/msg01325.html

--
Francesco P. Lovergine

---
Received: (at 310575-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 23:08:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 16:08:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbRSM-0004mx-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:08:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbRMw-000534-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:02:26 -0400
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310575: fixed in kernel-patch-relayfs 2.6.9-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:02:26 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: kernel-patch-relayfs
Source-Version: 2.6.9-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kernel-patch-relayfs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-relayfs/kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2.dsc
kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-relayfs/kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2.tar.gz
kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-patch-relayfs/kernel-patch-relayfs_2.6.9-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software

Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Roger Leigh]

I've repeated the emacs build on powerpc, this time using an sbuild
chroot, rather than on the main system.  It worked.  The log is here:

http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/emacs21_21.4a-1.build-log

So there must be some sort of discrepancy between the live system and
the chroot, but both are up-to-date.  Perhaps there's a missing
Build-Conflicts?


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Roger Leigh]

Here's a partial patch:

--- emacs.orig/emacs21-21.4a/debian/rules   2005-05-26 21:37:38.118986232 
+0100
+++ emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/rules2005-05-26 22:52:02.916233880 
+0100
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@
test -f debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs
-   cd debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/lib/emacs/${runtime_ver}/${target}/ \
+   -cd debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/lib/emacs/${runtime_ver}/${target}/ \
  && test `ls fns-*.el | wc -l | cut -d ' ' -f 1` -eq 1 \
  && rm fns-*.el
 

However, the build fails shortly after:


pkgname=emacs21-nox \
pkgdir=pkg-nox \
tmppkgdir=pkg-nox.tmp \
runver="21.4" \
majorver="21" \
minorver="4" \
target="powerpc-linux-gnu" \
xsupport="nox" \
  debian/build-binary-pkg
+ test emacs21-nox
+ test pkg-nox
+ test pkg-nox.tmp
+ test 21.4
+ test 21
+ test 4
+ test powerpc-linux-gnu
+ test nox
+ install -d debian/pkg-nox
+ install -d debian/pkg-nox/usr/bin/
+ mv debian/pkg-nox.tmp/usr/bin/emacs-21.4
debian/pkg-nox/usr/bin/emacs21-nox
+ cd debian/pkg-nox/usr/bin/
+ ln -s emacs21-nox emacs21
+ install -d debian/pkg-nox/usr/share/emacs/21.4/etc/
+ mv debian/pkg-nox.tmp/usr/share/emacs/21.4/etc/DOC-21.4.1
debian/pkg-nox/usr/share/emacs/21.4/etc/
+ install -d debian/pkg-nox/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/powerpc-linux-gnu/
+ mv
'debian/pkg-nox.tmp/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/powerpc-linux-gnu/fns-*.el'
debian/pkg-nox/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/powerpc-linux-gnu/
mv: cannot stat
`debian/pkg-nox.tmp/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/powerpc-linux-gnu/fns-*.el': No
such file or directory
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1



Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310882: I cannot reproduce this bug, probably local setup dependent

[Don Armstrong]

tag 310882 unreproducible
severity 310882 important
thanks

I just rebuilt this package (emacs21-21.4a) on i386 using pbuilder,
and the package built fine, so this is most likely local setup
dependent.

Downgrading and tagging unreproducible as appropriate.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Do not handicap your children by making their lives easy.
 -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p251

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Roger Leigh]

tags 310882 + confirmed
thanks

Hi,

This bug is reproducible on powerpc (current unstable):


make[2]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x/lib-src'make[1]: Leaving
directory `/tmp/emacs.new/emacs21-21.4a/debian/build-x'
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common/usr
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/bin debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/lib debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/
rm -rf debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp
test -f debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs
cd debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/powerpc-linux/ \
  && test `ls fns-*.el | wc -l | cut -d ' ' -f 1` -eq 1 \
  && rm fns-*.el
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1


Regards,
Roger

-- 
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux?  http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848.  Please sign and encrypt your mail.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 310882 + confirmed
Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310903: libgal2.0-dev: .la files still refence libhowl.la.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: libgal2.0-dev
Version: 1.99.11-1.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is has 2 .la files which still mention the
libhowl.la file and libhowl was removed from main.  You probably
picked that up by linking to something to used to be linked
against this and just rebuilding will probably fix this on a
current system should fix this.

The 2 .la files in questions are: libgal-a11y-2.0.la and
libgal-2.0.la.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310170: marked as done (openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 16:02:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310170: fixed in openduke 0.0.1alpha+20040408-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 08:55:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 01:55:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.29] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZmEv-0003h4-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 01:55:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 38422151C; Sun, 22 May 2005 10:54:46 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx4 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 19532-01; Sun, 22 May 2005 10:54:45 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De 
[134.2.15.66])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E539A151A; Sun, 22 May 2005 10:54:44 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from mrvn by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DZmEK-0005Yv-Nm; Sun, 22 May 2005 10:54:40 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4: Use of AC_PREREQ(2.50) breaks existing
 sources
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 10:54:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gettext
Version: 0.14.4-2
Severity: important
File: /usr/share/aclocal/lib-link.m4

Hi,

Updating gettext from 0.14.1-10 to 0.14.4-2 introduces AC_PREREQ(2.50) in 
lib-link.m4 and requires sources to use autoconf 2.50. Sources that
use autoconf2.13 fail to build.

Namely this affects gcc-3.3 which now FTBFS in sarge.

If you don't think this is a "bug" in gettext then please notify all
gettext and autoconf2.13 using packages of this change. But to me it
seems kind of late in the release to require a change in autoconf
versions.

MfG
Goswin


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gettext depends on:
ii  gettext-base0.14.4-2 GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 310170-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 20:08:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 13:08:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbOeQ-0005BY-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 13:08:18 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbOZ5-0008B7-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 16:02:47 -0400
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#310170: fixed in openduke 0.0.1alpha+20040408-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:02:47 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: openduke
Source-Version: 0.0.1alpha+20040408-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openduke, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/o/openduke/openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2.diff.gz
openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2.dsc
  to pool/contrib/o/openduke/openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2.dsc
openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/o/openduke/openduke_0.0.1alpha+20040408-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this ver

Bug#306184: aegis: FTBFS: failed test

[Roland Stigge]

Hi,

I get the same test failure on "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot".

bye,
  Roland
-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#309645: Patch

[Maximiliano Curia]

Reportbug seems to have ignored the patch, so I'm sending it again.

-- 
"I'd rather listen to [Isaac] Newton than to [MicroSoft's] Mundie. He may
have been dead for almost three hundred years, but despite that he stinks
up the room less."  --- (Linus Torvalds)
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/

diff -ru src/gtkcairoplotitems.c 
/home/users/marga/sources/debian/packages/oregano-0.40.0/src/gtkcairoplotitems.c
--- src/gtkcairoplotitems.c 2004-11-23 02:15:14.0 -0300
+++ 
/home/users/marga/sources/debian/packages/oregano-0.40.0/src/gtkcairoplotitems.c
2005-05-26 13:25:00.0 -0300
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 /* Fill cairo surface with transparent color */
 static void cr_clear(cairo_t *cr, guint w, guint h)
 {
+   return;
cairo_save (cr);
cairo_set_operator (cr, CAIRO_OPERATOR_SRC);
cairo_set_rgb_color (cr, 1, 1, 1);
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@
 
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_class_init (GtkCairoPlotItemDrawClass 
*class);
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_init (GtkCairoPlotItemDraw *view);
-static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model);
+static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model, cairo_t *cr);
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_get_point (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model, gdouble x, gdouble y, gdouble *x1, gdouble *y1);
 
 static GtkCairoPlotViewItem *draw_parent_class;
@@ -187,10 +188,9 @@
  *
  */
 static void
-gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, GtkCairoPlotModel 
*model)
+gtk_cairo_plot_item_draw_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, GtkCairoPlotModel 
*model, cairo_t *cr)
 {
GtkCairoPlotItemDraw *draw;
-   cairo_t *cr;
int i;
guint points;
Point *p;
@@ -224,14 +224,6 @@
NULL);
 
if (funcs == NULL) {
-   cr = cairo_create ();  
-   cairo_set_target_surface (cr, surface);
-
-   cairo_save (cr);
-   cairo_rectangle (cr, 0, 0, w, h);
-   cairo_fill (cr);
-   cairo_stroke (cr);
-   cairo_destroy (cr);
return;
}
 
@@ -266,15 +258,8 @@
sy = 1.0;
}
 
-   cr = cairo_create ();  
-   cairo_set_target_surface (cr, surface);
-
cairo_save (cr);
 
-   cairo_rectangle (cr, 0, 0, w, h);
-   cairo_fill (cr);
-   cairo_stroke (cr);
-   
/* Y Axis */
cairo_set_rgb_color (cr, 1, 0, 0);
cairo_move_to (cr, X(0), Y(ymin));
@@ -429,7 +414,6 @@
}
cairo_stroke (cr);
cairo_restore (cr); /* Draw Lines */
-   cairo_destroy(cr);
 }
 
 #undef X
@@ -438,7 +422,7 @@
 /* == Title Item == */
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_class_init (GtkCairoPlotItemTitleClass 
*class);
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_init (GtkCairoPlotItemTitle *view);
-static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model);
+static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model, cairo_t *cr);
 
 static GtkCairoPlotViewItem *title_parent_class;
 
@@ -490,9 +474,8 @@
 }
 
 static void
-gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model)
+gtk_cairo_plot_item_title_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model, cairo_t *cr)
 {
-   cairo_t *cr;
char *title;
cairo_text_extents_t extend;
cairo_surface_t *surface;
@@ -500,9 +483,6 @@
 
g_object_get (G_OBJECT (item), "width", &w, "height", &h, "surface", 
&surface, NULL);
 
-   cr = cairo_create ();  
-   cairo_set_target_surface (cr, surface);
-
cr_clear (cr, w, h);
 
g_object_get (G_OBJECT (model), "title", &title, NULL);
@@ -523,14 +503,13 @@
}
 
cairo_stroke (cr);
-   cairo_destroy (cr);
 }
 
 
 /*  Rectangle  */
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_class_init (GtkCairoPlotItemRectClass 
*class);
 static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_init (GtkCairoPlotItemRect *view);
-static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model);
+static void gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, 
GtkCairoPlotModel *model, cairo_t *cr);
 
 static GtkCairoPlotViewItem *rect_parent_class;
 
@@ -581,22 +560,16 @@
 }
 
 static void
-gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, GtkCairoPlotModel 
*model)
+gtk_cairo_plot_item_rect_update (GtkCairoPlotViewItem *item, GtkCairoPlotModel 
*model, cairo_t *cr)
 {
cairo_surface_t *surface;
guint w, h;
-   cairo_t *cr;

g_object_get (G_OBJECT (item), "width", &w, "height", &h, "surface", 
&surface, NULL);
 
/* Redimensionar (es decir, eliminar y volver a crear) la surface para
 * este item no es util. Hay que reveer como hacerlo de mejor man

Bug#309645: oregano: Patch

[Maximiliano Curia]

Tags 309645 +patch
thanks,

Package: oregano
Version: 0.40.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #309645

I'm attaching that fixes the problem (thanks to upstream).

-- 
" Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when
it is bad, it is better than nothing. " -- (Dick Brandon)
Saludos /\/\ /\ >< `/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: oregano: Patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Tags 309645 +patch
Bug#309645: oregano: Plot window freezes due to a libcairo bug
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch

> thanks,
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 292951 to ddetect

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 292951 ddetect
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `ddetect'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#307720: not "minor"!

[Nicolas Baradakis]

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  - No rationalle was given for sweeping the sql injection vulnerbility
>under the rug as a minor hole.

This bug is unlikely to be exploitable because you have to get
authorized successfully by correctly escaped SQL requests before
running any of the unescaped requests.

>  - Even single character buffer overruns have been successfully
>exploited before.

A remote attacker doesn't know what SQL query the administrator wrote
in the config file. He can't figure out easily which character is the
4096th in the string. Moreover the rest of the string has been encoded
and there are only safe characters. On top of that, the buffer overflow
allows to write only two characters beyond the limit: one in [0-9A-F]
and a '\0'.

>  - If you want to get the fix into sarge, which you apparently do, then
>your use of the "minor" severity would tend to undermine that.

If you think you are the person who knows more about the issue then
chose the severity as you like.

People are making a lot of publicity about this issue which is
unimportant indeed. To my mind, fixing this into sarge is only useful
to relieve Debian users who read the exagerated security announcements.

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310420: tried initrd-tools-0.1.81 from US and still the same error

[Sven Luther]

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:20:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Marius,
> 
> On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> > strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
> > and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of 
> > initrd-tools is installed. 
> > shall I also reinstall kernel-image-2.6.11 with initrd-tools-0.1.81 ?
> > simple reboot does not help.
> 
> You need to rebuild your initrd after installing the initrd-tools package;
> the easiest way to do this is by re-installing the kernel-image package.

Na, i believe the easiest way is doing :

  dpkg-reconfigure kernel-image-2.6.11-

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310884: pike7.2: FTBFS: ../../precompile.sh: line 151: pike: command not found

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: pike7.2
Version: 7.2.580-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory 
`/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/modules/Kerberos'
../../precompile.sh precompile.pike 
>"/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modules/Kerberos/kerberos.c" 
"/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modules/Kerberos/kerberos.cmod" || { rm 
"/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modules/Kerberos/kerberos.c"; exit
1; }
precompile: /usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/pike 
-DNOT_INSTALLED 
-m/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/master.pike  
./precompile.pike 
/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modules/Kerberos/kerberos.cmod (method=Q)
../../precompile.sh: line 151: 
/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/pike: No such file or 
directory
precompile: /usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/tpike 
-DNOT_INSTALLED 
-m/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/master.pike  
./precompile.pike 
/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/src/modules/Kerberos/kerberos.cmod (method=QQ)
../../precompile.sh: line 151: 
/usr/src/build/pike7.2-7.2.580/build/linux-2.6.9-i686/tpike: No such file or 
directory


It would also be nice if it actually failed on the first error.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310882: emacs21: FTBFS: fails to install during build.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common
install -d debian/pkg-bin-common/usr
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/bin debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/
mv debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp/usr/lib debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/
rm -rf debian/pkg-bin-common.tmp
test -f debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs-*
rm debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/bin/emacs
cd debian/pkg-bin-common/usr/lib/emacs/21.4/i386-linux/ \
  && test `ls fns-*.el | wc -l | cut -d ' ' -f 1` -eq 1 \
  && rm fns-*.el
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 308783

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff 
> -r 2269:2271 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 308783 + pending
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Tags were: fixed-upstream security
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of imagemagick 6:6.0.6.2-2.4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310812 + fixed
Bug#310812: imagemagick: [CAN-2005-1739] infinite loop with crafted XWD files
Tags were: security patch
Bug#310690: xwd handling DoS
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: owner 308783

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # Taking this, as I'm working on it now.
> owner 308783 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#308783: libxpm4: new s_popen() function is insecure garbage
Owner changed from David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Branden Robinson 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by `builder.o'.

[Kurt Roeckx]

reopen 305909
tags 305909 + sarge
thanks

This is still affecting the version in sarge.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by `builder.o'.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 305909
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by 
`builder.o'.  Stop.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 305909 + sarge
Bug#305909: sary-ruby: FTBFS: *** No rule to make target `ruby.h', needed by 
`builder.o'.  Stop.
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310637: kde does not start

[Christopher Martin]

severity 310637 important
stop

Since this problem doesn't break the system for the vast majority of people, 
the severity level of important seems best here.

Cheers,
Christopher Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#310637: kde does not start

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310637 important
Bug#310637: kde hangs when home directory is over NFS
Severity set to `important'.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310838: [CAN-2005-1177] erroneously changes permissions and ownership of configuration files

[Joey Hess]

Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: webmin
> Version: 1.180-3
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> 
> Hi!
> 
> CAN-2005-1177 describes a bug in webmin that can cause the permissions
> and ownerships of configuration files to be changed when the file is
> modified. This is fixed in 1.200, see
> 
>   http://www.webmin.com/changes.html
> 
> Can you please backport this fix?

According to this mailing list post, it only affects 1.190 and not the
version in sarge.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/04/msg00185.html

I think this bug should be closed.

You may find the testing security team's CAN/list file useful, BTW,
since nearly every bug you filed today already had a note in there about
the same vulnerbility.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310815: gforge: [CAN-2005-0299] path traversal vulnerability

[Joey Hess]

Martin Pitt wrote:
> The changelog shows no trace that this is fixed:
> 
>   http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0299
>   http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12318
> 
> However, I did not actually check the code; if gforge is vulnerable,
> please coordinate with the security team.

gforge (3.1-26) unstable; urgency=high

  * Disabled controller.php and controlleroo.php because of security
risks, hence the high urgency upload (closes: #291718).

 -- Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:59:25 +0100

This bug should be closed, unless we also want to fix the security hole in
the disabled files. Which is probably a good idea on general principles,
but not a reason for the bug to stay RC anyway.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd

[Russ Allbery]

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400
> from reaching testing.  Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
> testing-proposed-updates, so we can get this fix into sarge?

Ack, I'm sorry about that, I completely forgot to check that the builds
had been done.  I'll get a new upload prepared today.

Actually, in preparing the new upload, I think I also found that the
dependency should have been on kftgtd instead of on kftgt, so maybe this
is for the best.

Out of curiousity, does the verison number need to / should contain sarge,
or can one just upload 1.6-4 to testing-proposed-updates (a version that
hadn't previously been seen by katie)?

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize

[Theodore Ts'o]

severity 310823 normal
tags 310823 unreproducible
thanks

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:03:59AM +0200, Jo?o Miguel Neves wrote:
> Subject: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.37+1.38-WIP-0509-1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system

This is hardly a critical bug, as it occurs only in the case of a
filesystem corruption.  It by the way is also something that I can't
reproduce.

> I had problems with the my root filesystem (setup at /dev/hda2).
> Automatic fsck at boot failed.
> fsck -y /dev/hda2 also failed.
> fsck /dev/hda2 reported a signal 11 everytime after reporting (from
> memory):
> 
> i_fsize for inode XXX is YY (...) should be zero.
> Clear?
> 
> Everytime I pushed "y", it would crash.

When you have a problem like this, ***please*** save the full
transcript of the e2fsck run, and ideally, grab an raw e2image dump
(see the e2image man page).  Otherwise there's very little I can do.

The case of clearing i_fsize is something which is already tested in
e2fsck's regression test suite (in the test f_badinode), and I always
test e2fsprogs against the full set of regression tests before I do a
release.  I've tried it again, as well as trying a few other
variations to see if I can trigger a core dump, and I have not been
able to.

> Workaround was to say no to "Clear?", let fsck put them in /lost
> +found, note down the inode numbers and delete the files (mounting the
> filesystem with errors).

... and I assume this means that you didn't capture any further
information before you worked around the problem.  Sigh.   

Please send me any additional information, since without any other way
to work this bug, I may have to close it as undreproducible.

- Ted


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310823 normal
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
Severity set to `normal'.

> tags 310823 unreproducible
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
Tags were: sid
Tags added: unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: setting package to openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7, tagging 255276

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2

> tags 255276 + pending
Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops
Tags were: pending unreproducible
Bug#302992: slapd gets in endless loop with sched_yield
Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: setting package to openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7, tagging 255276

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package openldap2.2 slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libldap-2.2-7 ldap-utils slapd openldap2.2

> tags 255276 + pending
Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops
Tags were: unreproducible
Bug#302992: slapd gets in endless loop with sched_yield
Bug#303057: slapd goes into endless sched_yield() loop
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: not "minor"!

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 307720 grave
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Severity set to `grave'.

> severity 310840 grave
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Severity set to `grave'.

> severity 310841 grave
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#255276: slapd/slapcat hang in endless loops

[Torsten Landschoff]

Hi Eugene, 

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 11:26:03PM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
 
> The attached patch adds calling db4.2_recover to slapd.init on every
> slapd startup.

Thanks again for the patch. I am currently working to apply your
changes. A few remarks while I am working on it:

> diff -Nru openldap2.2-2.2.23/debian/slapd.init 
> openldap2.2-hack/debian/slapd.init
> --- openldap2.2-2.2.23/debian/slapd.init  2005-05-24 19:42:21.0 
> +0800
> +++ openldap2.2-hack/debian/slapd.init2005-05-25 23:15:35.0 
> +0800
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>   "$SLAPD_CONF"`
>  fi
>  
> +# Find out slapd db directories
> +SLAPD_DBDIRS=`sed -ne 's/^directory[[:space:]]\+"*\([^"]\+\).*/\1/p' \
> +"$SLAPD_CONF" `
> + 

I'd rather gather this list at the time when it is needed. Apart from
that I don't really grok that sed expression :)

> +# Try to recover slapd database
> +try_fix_db() {
...
> + if [ "$SLAPD_TRYFIXDB" != yes -o \
That switch makes no sense inside fix_db I'd say. I used to do it like
this but stumbled across it later because I was using that function
later and it did not do anything because it checked some magic variable.
Not going to happen here I'd say, but for consistency I'll move that
check.

> + echo -n " (possibly) fixing db,"
I don't like that message - as a user I am not going to understand
what's going on there. Changed to "running BDB recovery".

> + for DBDIR in $SLAPD_DBDIRS; do
> + if [ -d "$DBDIR" -a -f "$DBDIR/objectClass.bdb" ]; then
Did not see that check at the first glance. Moving it to the point where
the list of BDB directories is collected. 

> + db4.2_recover -eh $DBDIR 2>&1
What is that -e option about? I do not really understand the meaning.
Guess I'll keep it enabled. Perhaps it would be a good idea to install
a DB_CONFIG during upgrade and run db_recover without -e to get the new
settings!?

@Steve: What would you think about such a change?

> + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
That will not work because of the "set -e" up in that file. The script
will bail out if db_recover fails and will never get to that check. It's
better to run 

db4.2_recover ... || do stuff in case of failure

or run db_recover inside an if but that will hide the real functionality
of db_recover as an side effect of the if. 


I attached my current patch (currently building slapd to test it).
Suggestions welcome :)

Greetings

Torsten
=== debian/slapd.default
==
--- debian/slapd.default  (revision 2061)
+++ debian/slapd.default  (revision 2063)
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
 # will try to figure it out from $SLAPD_CONF (/etc/ldap/slapd.conf)
 SLAPD_PIDFILE=
 
+# Confiure if db_recover should be called before starting slapd
+TRY_BDB_RECOVERY=yes
+
 # Configure if the slurpd daemon should be started. Possible values: 
 # - yes:   Always start slurpd
 # - no:Never start slurpd
=== debian/changelog
==
--- debian/changelog  (revision 2061)
+++ debian/changelog  (revision 2063)
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
 (closes: #308234).
   * debian/slapd.postinst: Make sure the debhelper commands are executed 
 in all cases (closes: #310422).
+  * Merged suggested changes by Eugene Konev to automatically run 
+db_recover before starting slapd (closes: #255276).
++ debian/slapd.init: Run db_recover if enabled and available.
++ debian/slapd.default: Add configuration option to disable it.
 
   Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
   * libraries/libldap_r/Makefile.in: make sure the ximian-connector ntlm
@@ -17,7 +21,7 @@
 two versions of this library around is more trouble than it's worth,
 and can cause glorious segfaults down the line
 
- -- 
+ -- Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 23 May 2005 17:03:53 +0200
 
 openldap2.2 (2.2.23-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
=== debian/slapd.init
==
--- debian/slapd.init  (revision 2061)
+++ debian/slapd.init  (revision 2063)
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
 # Stop processing if slapd is not there
 [ -x /usr/sbin/slapd ] || exit 0
 
+# Set default values
+DB_RECOVER_CMD=db4.2_recover
+
 # Source the init script configuration
 if [ -f "/etc/default/slapd" ]; then
. /etc/default/slapd
@@ -106,7 +109,56 @@
fi
 }
 
+# Try to recover slapd database
+try_fix_db() {
+   local dbdir failed bdb_envs
 
+   # db4.2-util is just recommended by slapd, so make sure it is
+   # available before trying to use it
+   if ! command -v $DB_RECOVER_CMD; then
+   echo -n " ($DB_RECOVER_CMD not found), "
+   return 0
+   fi
+
+   bdb_envs=`find_bdb_envs`
+
+   # We care only about BDB environments
+   if [ -z "$bdb_envs" ]; then
+   return 0
+   fi
+
+   echo -n " running BDB recovery,"
+   for dbdir in $bdb_envs; do
+   $DB_

Bug#290329: uname -m not dpkg-architecture

[allomber]

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> 
> Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using
> dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could
> perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is:
> 
> $ apt-cache show coreutils
> Package: coreutils
> Essential: yes
> Priority: required
> Section: base
> .
> 
> Not sure what a powerpc machine outputs for "uname -m" though...

You can use
dpkg --print-installation-architecture
which _does not_ require dpkg-dev.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd

[Steve Langasek]

reopen 308400
tags 308400 sarge
thanks

Hi Russ, Ben,

The new upload of kftgt 1.8-1 has prevented the fix for RC bug #308400 from
reaching testing.  Can someone please upload kftgt 1.6-2sarge1 to
testing-proposed-updates, so we can get this fix into sarge?

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: missing dependency for update-inetd

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 308400
Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> tags 308400 sarge
Bug#308400: missing dependency for update-inetd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310853: marked as done (apt-build)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310853: apt-build
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 12:38:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 05:38:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbHdH-0003pg-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 05:38:40 -0700
Received: (qmail 29781 invoked by uid 85); 26 May 2005 12:36:41 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.bytecamp.net by uid 88 with 
qmail-scanner-1.20 
 (clamscan: 0.85.1  Clear:RC:0(80.146.187.235):. 
 Processed in 2.161313 secs); 26 May 2005 12:36:41 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by mail.bytecamp.net with SMTP; 26 May 2005 12:36:39 -
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-build
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 14:36:25 +0200
From: "Arne Anka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.0 (Linux, build 1095)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


apt-build needs for proper fetching of at least index-file curl -- but
there's no dependency! trying
# apt-build install cupsys
fails with

sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unable to find binary candidate for cupsys at /usr/bin/apt-build line
462.

what is "policy"? which package contains the right one?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.5.28.6   APT utility programs
ii  debconf   1.4.49 Debian configuration  
management sy
ii  devscripts2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a  
Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.10.27Package building tools for  
Debian
ii  g++   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration  
file
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical  
Extraction

-- debconf information:
   apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
   apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
   apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
* apt-build/arch_amd: athlon-xp
* apt-build/options:
   apt-build/arch_intel: pentium
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true

---
Received: (at 310853-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 13:42:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 06:42:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from othala.naquadah.org (mx2.naquadah.org) [81.56.144.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbId2-0007YH-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 06:42:29 -0700
Received: from abydos.adm.naquadah.org ([192.168.2.13])
by mx2.naquadah.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DbIcz-0006bI-Hp; Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:25 +0200
Received: from acid by abydos.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DbIcy-0006QH-Pu; Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:24 +0200
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 15:42:24 +0200
From: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arne Anka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310853: apt-build
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wu6d9FdQ4ohoCGf7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Re

Bug#310420: tried initrd-tools-0.1.81 from US and still the same error

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Marius,

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Marius Mikucionis wrote:
> strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
> and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of 
> initrd-tools is installed. 
> shall I also reinstall kernel-image-2.6.11 with initrd-tools-0.1.81 ?
> simple reboot does not help.

You need to rebuild your initrd after installing the initrd-tools package;
the easiest way to do this is by re-installing the kernel-image package.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310841 minor
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Severity set to `minor'.

> tags 310841 +fixed-upstream
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> merge 307720 310841
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Merged 307720 310840 310841.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat function

[Nicolas Baradakis]

severity 310840 minor
tags 310840 +fixed-upstream
merge 307720 310840
thanks

Thanks for the reports. This problem was already discussed under
bug #307720. There is nothing else to do except merging the
reports.

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310678: AW: Bug#310678 acknowledged by developer (Bug#310479: fixed in lvm-common 1.5.19)

[Patrick Caulfield]

Michael Setzer wrote:
> Patrick,
> 
> I'm not pretty sure if I got you right.
> 
> After upgrading lvm-common to 1.5.19 the error is still there and my system
> is still unbootable (same error message as described already).
> 
> What I've done now to upgrade to 1.5.19 is:
> 
> - booted with the Debian-Installer RC3 CD (linux26 vga=791)
> - switched to a console with CTRL+ALT+F2 when partition screen appeared
> - modprobe dm-mod
> - vgscan
> - vgchange -a y VG
> - mkdir /mnt
> - mount /dev/mapper/VG-root /mnt
> - chroot /mnt
> - mount /proc
> - mount /dev/hda5 /boot
> - apt-get update
> - apt-get install lvm-common
> 


Also, did you rebuild your initrd after upgrading ?


-- 

patrick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat function

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 310840 minor
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Severity set to `minor'.

> tags 310840 +fixed-upstream
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream

> merge 307720 310840
Bug#307720: freeradius: Few possible security problems
Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat 
function
Merged 307720 310840.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310420: initrd-tools: reinstalled the kernel-image -- now it works

[Marius Mikucionis]

Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.81
Followup-For: Bug #310420

it works!
thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  cpio  2.5-1.2GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  cramfsprogs   1.1-6  Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F
ii  dash  0.5.2-5The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  util-linux2.12p-4Miscellaneous system utilities

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310420: tried initrd-tools-0.1.81 from US and still the same error

[Marius Mikucionis]

Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.79
Followup-For: Bug #310420

strangely I still get the very same loop and message.
and message includes initrd-tools-0.1.80 no matter what version of 
initrd-tools is installed. 
shall I also reinstall kernel-image-2.6.11 with initrd-tools-0.1.81 ?
simple reboot does not help.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  cpio  2.5-1.2GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  cramfsprogs   1.1-6  Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F
ii  dash  0.5.2-5The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  util-linux2.12p-4Miscellaneous system utilities

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#290329: uname -m not dpkg-architecture

[Alex Owen]

Just thinking some more about my proposed fix... using
dpkg-architecture would mean "Require: dpkg-dev" but the idea could
perhaps be reworked to use "uname -m" which is in coreutils which is:

$ apt-cache show coreutils
Package: coreutils
Essential: yes
Priority: required
Section: base
.

Not sure what a powerpc machine outputs for "uname -m" though...

Alex Owen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 292951

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
>  # 
> tags 292951 sarge-ignore
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge-ignore

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310853: apt-build

[Arne Anka]

Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


apt-build needs for proper fetching of at least index-file curl -- but
there's no dependency! trying
# apt-build install cupsys
fails with

sh: policy: command not found
sh: policy: command not found
Unable to find binary candidate for cupsys at /usr/bin/apt-build line
462.

what is "policy"? which package contains the right one?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages apt-build depends on:
ii  apt   0.5.28.6   Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  apt-utils 0.5.28.6   APT utility programs
ii  debconf   1.4.49 Debian configuration  
management sy
ii  devscripts2.8.14 Scripts to make the life of a  
Debi
ii  dpkg-dev  1.10.27Package building tools for  
Debian

ii  g++   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc   4:3.3.5-3  The GNU C compiler
ii  libappconfig-perl 1.56-2 Perl module for configuration  
file

ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.13 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  perl  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical  
Extraction


-- debconf information:
  apt-build/arch_alpha: ev4
  apt-build/arch_arm: armv2
* apt-build/olevel: Medium
* apt-build/build_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/build
  apt-build/arch_sparc: sparc
* apt-build/arch_amd: athlon-xp
* apt-build/options:
  apt-build/arch_intel: pentium
* apt-build/make_options:
* apt-build/repository_dir: /var/cache/apt-build/repository
* apt-build/add_to_sourceslist: true


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 292951 serious
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Severity set to `serious'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310170: fix for openduke autoconf trouble

[Bas Zoetekouw]

tag 310170 + patch
tag 310170 + help
thanks

Hi!

Attached is a patch that should fix #310170.  It solves the build
trouble, but I am unable to test the resulting program as I have no duke
data files.
If anyone could verify that the resulting packages work, I'd be happy to
NMU.

-- 
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw  | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
++ 


patch.gz
Description: Binary data

Processed: fix for openduke autoconf trouble

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 310170 + patch
Bug#310170: openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> tag 310170 + help
Bug#310170: openduke FTBFS, requires autoconf 2.50
Tags were: patch
Tags added: help

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310833: [CAN-2005-1040] local root privilege escalation

[Matthew Garrett]

I chatted to rml about this at LCA - it ought to only affect the Suse 
codepath, so I'm not too worried about it. I'll take another look to 
make sure that we're not affected.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310841: freeradius: [CAN-2005-1455] buffer overflow

[Martin Pitt]

Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security

freeradius seems to be vulnerable against a buffer overflow:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1455
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13541

Thanks in advance for checking,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310840: [CAN-2005-1454] SQL injection vulnerability in the radius_xlat function

[Martin Pitt]

Package: freeradius
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security

freeradius seems to be vulnerable against an SQL injection:

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1454
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13540

Thanks in advance for checking,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310822: marked as done (php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong PHP version?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2005 03:37:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310822: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong 
PHP version?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 08:58:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 01:58:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gk.hm.epigenomics.net [212.121.137.90] (qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbECD-0002ic-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 01:58:30 -0700
Received: (qmail 32028 invoked from network); 26 May 2005 08:58:26 -
Received: from raman.epigenomics.epi (192.168.48.2)
  by salam.epigenomics.epi with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 May 2005 08:58:26 
-
Received: (qmail 2332 invoked from network); 26 May 2005 08:58:26 -
Received: (ofmipd 192.168.48.4); 26 May 2005 08:58:04 -
Received: (qmail 26028 invoked by uid 515); 26 May 2005 08:58:26 -
Date: 26 May 2005 10:58:26 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Robert Sander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong PHP version?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
Fnord: +++ath
MSMail-Priority: High
X-Operating-System: Linux perl 2.4.29-xfs-20050121-p6450 
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: php4-auth-pam
Version: 0.4-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi!

pam_auth.so resides in /usr/lib/php4/20020429-zts and not
/usr/lib/php4/20020429 and is obviously compiled against a PHP4 version
that is not the standard in Debian. The module cannot be loaded.

The error message I get when trying to load the module is:

Warning: dl(): pam_auth: Unable to initialize module Module compiled
with module API=20020429, debug=0, thread-safety=1 PHP compiled with
module API=20020429, debug=0, thread-safety=0

So pam_auth.so is compiled with thread-safety, standard Debian PHP not.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-xfs-20050121-p6450
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages php4-auth-pam depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi- 4:4.3.10-13  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
hi  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  php4-cgi [phpapi-20020918]  4:4.3.10-13  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli [phpapi-20020918]  4:4.3.10-13  command-line interpreter for the p
ii  phpapi-20020918 1.0  phpapi dummy package

-- debconf information:
* php4/extension_pam_auth_cgi: true
  php4/add_extension: true
  php4/remove_extension: true
* php4/extension_pam_auth_cli: true
* php4/extension_pam_auth_apache: true

-- 
Robert Sander Senior Manager Information Systems
Epigenomics AGKleine Praesidentenstr. 110178 Berlin, Germany
phone:+49-30-24345-330  fax:+49-30-24345-555
http://www.epigenomics.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 310822-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 May 2005 10:37:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 26 03:37:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DbFjs-0001to-00; Thu, 26 May 2005 03:37:20 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3E494171E30; Thu, 26 May 2005 03:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 03:37:19 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310822: php4-auth-pam: pam_auth.so compiled against wrong PHP 
version?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Versi

Processed: tagging 310823

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 310823 sid
Bug#310823: e2fsprogs: e2fsck gets a signal 11 when clearing a i_fsize
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310838: [CAN-2005-1177] erroneously changes permissions and ownership of configuration files

[Martin Pitt]

Package: webmin
Version: 1.180-3
Severity: critical
Tags: security

Hi!

CAN-2005-1177 describes a bug in webmin that can cause the permissions
and ownerships of configuration files to be changed when the file is
modified. This is fixed in 1.200, see

  http://www.webmin.com/changes.html

Can you please backport this fix?

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310833: [CAN-2005-1040] local root privilege escalation

[Martin Pitt]

Package: netapplet
Severity: critical
Tags: security, patch

Hi Matthew!

The changelog does not show any sign that 

  http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-1040

is fixed. The CAN entry is pretty empty (just points at the SuSE
security announcement), but they posted a patch to vendor-sec
(attached). Can you please review that?

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org
Index: netapplet.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/netapplet/src/netapplet.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -u -r1.11 netapplet.c
--- netapplet.c 13 Mar 2005 23:39:22 -  1.11
+++ netapplet.c 16 Mar 2005 20:50:45 -
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@
 
 static NetApplet *netapplet;
 
+static guint update_id = 0;
+static gboolean window_shown = FALSE;
+
 static void populate_popup_menu (void);
 
 static void
@@ -599,11 +602,24 @@
const char *key;
 
key = gtk_entry_get_text (GTK_ENTRY (entry_key));
+   key = verify_string (key);
+   if (!key) {
+   GtkWidget *error_dialog;
 
-   netapplet_set_essid (old_essid, key);
-
-   if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active (GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON 
(checkbox_keyring)))
+   error_dialog = gtk_message_dialog_new_with_markup (
+   NULL, 0, GTK_MESSAGE_ERROR, GTK_BUTTONS_OK,
+   _(""
+ "Invalid Encryption Key: "
+ "\n\n"
+ "Key contains illegal characters!"));
+   gtk_dialog_run (GTK_DIALOG (error_dialog));
+   gtk_widget_destroy (error_dialog);
+   } else {
+   netapplet_set_essid (old_essid, key);
+   if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active (GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON
+   (checkbox_keyring)))
keyring_save (old_essid, key);
+   }
}
 
g_free (old_essid);
@@ -711,12 +727,43 @@
essid = gtk_entry_get_text (GTK_ENTRY (entry_essid));
key = gtk_entry_get_text (GTK_ENTRY (entry_key));
 
-   if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active (GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON 
(checkbox_keyring)))
-   keyring_save (essid, key);
+   essid = verify_string (essid);
+   if (!essid || *essid == '\0') {
+   GtkWidget *error_dialog;
+
+   error_dialog = gtk_message_dialog_new_with_markup (
+   NULL, 0, GTK_MESSAGE_ERROR, GTK_BUTTONS_OK,
+   _(""
+ "Invalid ESSID: "
+ "\n\n"
+ "ESSID is blank or "
+ "contains illegal characters!"));
+   gtk_dialog_run (GTK_DIALOG (error_dialog));
+   gtk_widget_destroy (error_dialog);
+   goto out;
+   }
 
+   key = verify_string (key);
+   if (!key) {
+   GtkWidget *error_dialog;
+
+   error_dialog = gtk_message_dialog_new_with_markup (
+   NULL, 0, GTK_MESSAGE_ERROR, GTK_BUTTONS_OK,
+   _(""
+   "Invalid Encryption Key:\n\n"
+   "Key contains illegal characters!"));
+   gtk_dialog_run (GTK_DIALOG (error_dialog));
+   gtk_widget_destroy (error_dialog);
+   goto out;
+   }
+
+   if (gtk_toggle_button_get_active (GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON
+   (checkbox_keyring)))
+   keyring_save (essid, key);
netapplet_set_essid (essid, key);
}
 
+out:
gtk_widget_destroy (dialog);
g_object_unref (xml);
 }
@@ -735,9 +782,6 @@
return label;
 }
 
-static guint update_id = 0;
-static gboolean window_shown = FALSE;
-
 static gboolean
 update_info(GladeXML *xml)
 {
@@ -1255,11 +1299,12 @@
*push_in = TRUE;
 }
 
-
 static void
 active_scan_on (void)
 {
netapplet->active_scanning = TRUE;
+   if (!netapplet->active)
+   return;
if (g_str_has_prefix (netapplet->active->interface, "ath")) {
netapplet_get_accesspoints (netapplet->active->interface);
netapplet_get_wireless (netapplet->active->interface);
Index: netcommon.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/netapplet/src/netcommon.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 netcommon.c
--- netcommon.c 4 Oct 2004 18:34:20 -   1.3
+++ netcommon.c 1

Bug#308680: MySQL docs not distributable?

[Stefan Hinz]

Hi Jeroen,

pleased to meet you!

Sorry for keeping you waiting with this, but I'm still in the process of 
sorting this out with our lawyers. I'll let you know as soon as possible.


/Stefan


Jeroen van Wolffelaar -- Debian FTP wrote:

Hi Stefan, hi all,

Let me first introduce myself, I'm member of the Debian FTP team, and
Christian Hammers assigned this issue to us.

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:13:01PM +0200, Stefan Hinz wrote:


On 2005-05-18 Stefan Hinz wrote:


What's not mentioned here is what we *do* allow, and that's what all this
discussion is about: We want the Manual to be shipped with the software
*but not separately*.


(...)
I was imprecise. What I meant to say is "not separately" in the sense of 
putting the Manual somewhere outside the vicinity of the MySQL software. 
E.g. putting the Manual on a book CD that doesn't contain the MySQL 
software. Does this sound clearer?



In my opinion yes, as I interpret this as that it's (for example) okay
to ship the manual on Debian's FTP mirror network, all of which are
shipping the MySQL server and client software alongside the manual.
Debian's non-free section already cannot in general be distributed in
any other way than via the Debian FTP-server network, so additional
restrictions do not affect packages in non-free, including the MySQL
manual -- it's the responsability of those redistributors to check the
legal issues of doing so.
 


If, on the other hand, you want to have it shipped "in a distribution that
also has the mysql server and client binaries in another package" then I 
need

a short and clear copyright addition that I can put into the copyright file
of the package to make the ftp master happy again.


OK, I've asked our contract dept. for such a paper. Not sure if they get 
this done by ... By when do you need to have it? And since it's legal 
stuff, you probably need it on paper; so where should we send that paper to?



You do not need to commit such a statement to dead-tree paper, that's
not needed as far as Debian is concerned. An 'authorative' statement
from the copyright holder by email or via website will do. As far as I'm
concerned, your statement above (the 3+4 lines) suffices -- you're
saying 'We want (...)' mailing from an @mysql.com address.

Christian, Stefan, anyone else: any more questions/remarks?

--Jeroen




Regards,

Stefan
--
Stefan Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MySQL AB, Documentation Team
Taunusstr. 27, 12161 Berlin, Germany
Desk: +49 30 82702940 Fax: +49 30 82702941
Mobile: +49 177 7841069


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 308997

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 308997 pending
Bug#308997: file conflict with remembrance-agent from woody
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310816: releaseforge tries to write to /root/.releaseforge for non-root users

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:39:26AM +0200, Patrick Cornelißen wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez schrieb:
> 
> > pacakge releaseforge
> typo? :-)
> 

I am this close -> <- from swapping the `a' and `k' keys on my keyboard
:-)

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#310816: releaseforge tries to write to /root/.releaseforge for non-root users

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

pacakge releaseforge
tags 310816 + upstream
forwarded 310816 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 310816 important
thanks

Cornelis, 

Thanks for the bug report.  I have already been communicating with the
upstream author about the ptential problems (like this) that might arise
from writing config files on the fly into the current working directory.
I am not convinced that this is grave, though.  You can simply remove
the releaseforge.cfg and releaseforge.log that are written into the
current working directory, and the program will run just fine again.

Phil,

This is another one of those complications that can be easily fixed by
writing the config files to $HOME/.releaseforge/ right away instead of
to $CWD.  That would also fix the case where the user has no permission
to write in $CWD.  Let me know if there is anything I can do to help you
out on that.  (I am by no means a zen master of Python programming, but
if there is anything I can do, I will.)  Also, let me know if you also
want me to submit this via your SF bug tracker.

-Roberto

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 10:41:12AM +0200, Patrick Cornelissen wrote:
> Package: releaseforge
> Version: 0.7.1-4
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> 
> Here is what I got when I started releaseforge:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ releaseforge
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/logging/config.py", line 109, in fileConfig
> h = apply(klass, args)
>   File "/usr/lib/python2.3/logging/__init__.py", line 694, in __init__
> StreamHandler.__init__(self, open(filename, mode))
> IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'releaseforge.log'
> [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/root/.releaseforge'
> 
> 
> I started the -2 release as user and as root, I don't know if 
> releaseforge remembers the user, but i have in /root and in my home no 
> .releaseforge directories and in /etc seems to be not releaseforge 
> config either.
> 
> I have no clue why it tries to write in the root homedir.
> 

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature