Bug#311357: Upgrade of 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel breaks via-rhine
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 08:50:37AM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2005-06-07 17:48+0900 Horms wrote: On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 01:11:54PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: severity 311357 grave thanks * Alan W. Irwin wrote: This is a confirmation of the bad problem with the via-rhine module for the latest version of the 386 version of the 2.6.8 kernel. Sounds like a RC bug, so I'm setting it's severity to grave. I upgraded today from kernel-image-2.6.8.2-386 version 2.6.8-13 to 2.6.8-16, and my network card (D-link 10/100 DFE-530TX) that is controlled by the via-rhine module immediately quit working Too bad this bug didn't get realized when -16 was in unstable... looks like it's too late to fix this for 3.1r0. True, there was some late minute package shiffling which meant that -16 ended up going straight into sarge. Unfortunately now we have this bug. A similar thing seems to have happened with 2.4.27 and some neftilter symbols. It partly my fault (in the sense that I uploaded the packages) and partly a process issue. I do appologise for any inconvenience and I'll try and get updates together over the next few days. But we have clearly missed the boat for 3.1r0. Hi Horms: Thanks for acknowledging the via-rhine problem that has gotten into 3.1r0. For Debian sarge users it sounds like you have plans to fix version 2.6.8-16 which is excellent. But until that happens, and for on-going Debian testing users like me what kernel 2.6 solution do you recommend for all those who require via-rhine for their networking? For example, do you (or anybody else paying attention to this bug thread) know whether the via-rhine problems also occur for kernel-image-2.6.11 (currently in unstable)? I haven't heard any reports that they occur in 2.6.11, and I imagine there are people using that combination, so if I was in your shoes I would try that. I do have a box with a VIA rhine card, I will fire it up and see if I can a) reproduce the problem in 2.6.8-16, b) if it goes away in 2.6.11-5 and c) get some fixes available for 2.6.8. But its not the D Link card in question, so I am not sure if I am in a position to test if a given kernel works. On a brighter note, I have been unable to reproduce the nefilter bug I mumbled about in my previous post, so that appears to have been a false alarm. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241297: marked as done (prboom: Kills display when run in X)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:33:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Only affected Woody has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2004 19:16:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 31 11:16:16 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B8lCC-0001xy-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:16:16 -0800 Received: from [172.16.22.12] (helo=ming.empire.pick.ucam.org ident=mail) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id 1B8lCA-0003gE-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:16:14 +0100 Received: from matthew by ming.empire.pick.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8lC8-Et-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:16:12 +0100 From: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: prboom: Kills display when run in X X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:16:12 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Matthew Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: prboom Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, if I start prboom from a console, I get aa-lib graphics (not very good, but there you go). If I start it from X, then my display goes black (and the monitor light suggests its not getting any signal), and the system is unrecoverable - the only way I get my display back is to reboot the system. I don't consider this acceptable... Matthew -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux ming 2.4.25 #3 Thu Mar 18 16:33:28 GMT 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages prboom depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.1-5mixer library for Simple DirectMed ii libsdl-net1.2 1.2.2-1.1 network library for Simple DirectM ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.4-1Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsmpeg0 0.4.4-8SDL MPEG Player Library - shared l ii xlibs 4.1.0-16woody3 X Window System client libraries --- Received: (at 241297-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 08:33:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 01:33:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfw0S-0005Lm-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:33:49 -0700 Received: from wlan-client-276.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.117.26] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dfvww-0006zr-Pd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:30:10 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dfw0V-0001ey-Ft for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:33:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:33:51 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Only affected Woody Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.117.26 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: With the release of Sarge this bug no longer applies to the stable version of Debian, so I'm closing it. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge
Package: ntpdate Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The clocks on my sarge boxes are drifting because the fix for bug #294636 *still* hasn't found its way into sarge. Any other box without an IPv6 route to the ntp server may have the same problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages ntpdate depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249205: Bug #249205 - gettyps: no right to modify
I found this copyright notice (non free because it forbids commercial usage). Though with previous permission given by the second copyright owner it may become at least distriutable . Hope it helps decipher the issue if one is interested in gettyps (it looks like an interesting getty for dialup). This apply to version 2.1 while the woody package was 2.0 http://prancer.physics.louisville.edu/help/usr/getty-ps-2.1.0/INSTALL Installation instructions for getty-ps Ver 2.1.0 27-Sep-02 Copyright 1989,1990 by Paul Sutcliffe Jr. Portions copyright 2000,2002 by Christine Jamison. Permission is hereby granted to copy, reproduce, redistribute, or otherwise use this software as long as: there is no monetary profit gained specifically from the use or reproduction of this software; it is not sold, rented, traded or otherwise marketed; and this copyright notice is included prominently in any copy made. The authors make no claims as to the fitness or correctness of this software for any use whatsoever, and it is provided as is. Any use of this software is at the user's own risk. This package is distributed as source code, which must be compiled in order to provide runable program(s). Two binaries are the product of this package: getty and uugetty. The only difference between getty and uugetty is that uugetty checks and creates lockfiles. Uugetty should be used on any bidirectional line (modems, for example). Getty should be used on unidirectional lines (virtual consoles, dumb terminals). I have also included binaries of getty and uugetty for Linux; these files were compiled with gcc 2.95.3, and linked with libc.so.2.2.3. If your library is older, you will have to do the compile yourself (or grab the new library). This code should run on the following supported systems: (It is reported to work on linux kernel 0.99.15 and up, but I don't have a 0.99.x system to test it with smile.) Linux Kernel 1.x.x Linux Kernel 2.0.x Linux Kernel 2.2.x (This release was tested on Slackware 4.0) Linux Kernel 2.4.x (This release was tested on Slackware 8.1) If your system is not one of these, you will need to research your system requirements, and perhaps modify the program to get it to run properly on your system. (*Most* systems will only need values [mostly directory names] changed in config.h and changes due to different libraries.) The following are pre-requisites to compiling and installing this package: 1.Being able to log in as root; 2.Understanding how to use compress and tar; 3.Understanding how to use make; 4.Understanding about ANSI compliant C++ compilers; 5.Understanding what is the standard for placing new files on your particular system. Here is the installation synopsis, for those in a hurry: 1.Acquire and unpack the tarball containing this source code (getty_ps-2.1.0.tar.gz); 2.Modify the compile-time configuration files to meet your system's requirements (the only one you should have to change is config.h); 3.Type make to build the executables (Note that the latest compiles were done on gcc 2.95.3, with libc 2.2.3); 4.Type make install to install the newly made executables and updated man pages. Note that with this step, your old getty and uugetty binaries (if present) are saved as getty- and uugetty-, respectively. After everything is running smoothly, you can remove these backup files. By default, these binaries are put in /sbin. 5.Create and/or modify the needed config files (/etc/ttytype, /etc/gettydefs, /etc/default/getty.*, /etc/default/uugetty.*, /etc/issue). See examples in the Examples directory; 6.Modify /etc/inittab to use one or more of the new programs (getty for non-modem lines [direct VDT access] and uugetty for modem access, and enable the ports; 7.Check the installation. Or, you may follow these detailed steps to compile and install getty-ps: 1.MAKE A BACKUP COPY OF YOUR EXISTING, WORKING GETTY PROGRAM! I cannot stress this enough. There is a good chance that you will not have things configured correctly the first time around, and may not be able to log into your machine. If you are using getty as your primary getty program (as opposed to agetty or the like), it would probably be a good idea to modify /etc/inittab to use the backup copy you create in this step, and select just one or 2 ports to test the new getty. Then, if all goes well, just change /etc/inittab back the way it was. This is also probably a good time to make one of those bootable rootdisks. In any case, be sure you can boot your system in single user
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 303324 arla Bug#303324: file conflicts in freebsd-sendpr arla Bug reassigned from package `freebsd-sendpr,arla' to `arla'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors
Package: mirrors Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) The Moroccan mirror (something like casa.callbright.com) reports most packages as broken and is *long* out of date. Since it can spoil seriously some people's day and give Debian a bad name, I think it should be removed from the list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package mirrors Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mirrors severity 312472 important Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors Severity set to `important'. retitle 312472 callbright.com mirror out-of-date/stale Bug#312472: Moroccan Debian mirror should be remoived from list of mirrors Changed Bug title. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297055: marked as done (should not enter sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 19:07:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 11:07:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail01.hansenet.de (webmail.hansenet.de) [213.191.73.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D57IB-0005PX-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:07:55 -0800 Received: from smtp.qnetp.net (213.39.196.108) by webmail.hansenet.de (7.2.034.5) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 41BFC24F00A2731C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:07:24 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA70A7E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:07:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from redbull.qnetp.net (unknown [192.168.0.100]) by smtp.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF70379 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:07:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: should not enter sarge From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-jblO9yzGgTg6NUVPwJD7 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:07:21 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at meebey.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-jblO9yzGgTg6NUVPwJD7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: mcs Severity: serious This bug keeps Mono out of sarge. For more information why it should not enter sarge see: http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dgetsearch=3D0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --=-jblO9yzGgTg6NUVPwJD7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQiDI6XEn5avu+UbIAQIqogf/Z3ic699Btt8RL+kgnjbzJGP5xdA6AXnY CnhPAVrEn6SErms8BIphAJ+uYb/9XYV1cR9BmW6yXsh+S0pbulYYbtr4/5a27ucG s2pSlmeUfc1rYOuacR6qQCfbyehqOLNezWA5t8lZzaEPur6P1QSTrKi6lqGq+xNT voK/gdl0sDvQ+dMw92ybWlMZvdZiJzRHY8+jVFLllHYVyyBmOpDFwknYeIw5DvTX R6VUWX9jNsDjcuN9iMupGCILONAoxeaGa/v3l82aBGg0ef7xTE/jJxPRzfs17kXQ mdTwEMroegEv4Q3STNb452wya3sdKCW6GpHSloUURaXDU5WwabDCBw== =0SM5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-jblO9yzGgTg6NUVPwJD7-- --- Received: (at 297055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 11:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 04:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfyu1-0001JP-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:39:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27D82DB2F3; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c219010.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.219.10]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803712DB2F2; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: can enter testing now From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Bug#297054: marked as done (should not enter sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2005 19:07:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 11:07:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail03.hansenet.de (webmail.hansenet.de) [213.191.73.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D57Hf-0005MX-00; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:07:24 -0800 Received: from smtp.qnetp.net (213.39.196.108) by webmail.hansenet.de (7.2.034.5) (authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 41BFCB2500A5E7FD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:06:52 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595C87E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:06:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from redbull.qnetp.net (unknown [192.168.0.100]) by smtp.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC09A79 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:06:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: should not enter sarge From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-vPdJgFO4IR58K7cKXx4A Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:06:47 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at meebey.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-vPdJgFO4IR58K7cKXx4A Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: mono Severity: serious This bug keeps Mono out of sarge. For more information why it should not enter sarge see: http://wiki.debian.net/?MonoDebianPlan --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dgetsearch=3D0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --=-vPdJgFO4IR58K7cKXx4A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQiDIx3En5avu+UbIAQK4VAf9Fs9PGEBbRg1Bo+Ku9DXIEAE6LfypuEHM adgH7N23Uh5l2gjREAzS3n5sduKRMDUOUxN8xGk4bJk1LfSDcdGp3LTVHQX4LVvi 0kk1I0RZkiSZkf1rL05vV4YU1cPPRwdmPQyvoyAOf4sgwJ93P/rIgaCSkQ5GciEo SKN7OCQxyRWO1XBcdJQ7cF1Bh2SuEJBTDocNhiQHAKVHJZhEAXEMqmwrbH5AzYsv 6xUnAUm6VCkACaVo64SbJkawsRv6CB9AeolIcuWklYDXvZgfNiYfNu13dbqkGsqp dsWnz6KrB24brxT/dYhxaknjdhjK7vGj94BU3BzLUBWRAbeIb2JETQ== =HHKi -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-vPdJgFO4IR58K7cKXx4A-- --- Received: (at 297054-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 11:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 04:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfyu1-0001JP-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:39:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27D82DB2F3; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c219010.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.219.10]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803712DB2F2; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: can enter testing now From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Bug#270914: marked as done (libgdiplus build-depends on package not in sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2004 22:59:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 09 15:59:28 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C5Xt2-0002Hg-00; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 15:59:28 -0700 Received: from pd9e390ec.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.144.236] helo=djpig.djpig.de) by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp (Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1) id 1C5Xub-00031E-E0; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:01:05 +0200 Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5XsS-0003pU-00; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:58:52 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS(testing): unsatisfiable build-depends X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:58:52 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgdiplus Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge Justification: fails to build from source libgdiplus build-depends on libmono0 1.0 but only 0.30 is available in testing. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE --- Received: (at 270914-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 11:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 04:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfyu1-0001JP-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:39:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27D82DB2F3; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c219010.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.219.10]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803712DB2F2; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: can enter testing now From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sarge is now released, thus Mono can now enter debian/testing (Etch). --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dgetsearch=3D0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --=-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQqbY5HEn5avu+UbIAQKLUQgAjTek6Dk8eYCLqMLTv0oZpLqhZUkbgChT cvO7b2NT+0c45m5QEgZ5rwZMiZX3umQby4pelxdo9fTdKxc2njziYJN1TdRmU7Xc P1A0mbvRmhpPbakShFlFAna6ShkSKnb1LSKMRfv+mWl2B0WITr7cH260Igf6eI/z EcXYn0j/W3ZLG0mFZJekLHYOvJ2uANkTUsDgmq683pE5d6PRuPMQvbPz7stg+IsB jLAgFS8Qs+TWdWHTdRWquOnzHHcSc64gh8KTH/sq9nAKgvlcxhmY/0xArc2YRf51
Bug#304299: pdftk just segfaults - whatever operation is attempted
Hi, It has been a long time since this bug has been reported. As I am unable to reproduce the problem (and to be honest, I doubt the bug is in pdftk, it works well on all machines I have seen), could you please try again after an upgrade to see if the problem has disappeared? Maybe a library has been changed and now everything is working. Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#272853: marked as done (libgdiplus: can't fulfill the build dependencies on sarge)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line can enter testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2004 11:53:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 22 04:53:08 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CA5gK-bR-00; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:53:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 3740 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 11:53:07 - Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144) by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 11:53:07 - Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1DD6BB74B; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgdiplus: can't fulfill the build dependencies on sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:52:33 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: libgdiplus Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The build dependency on libmono0 ( 1.0) can't be fulfilled in sarge. --- Received: (at 270914-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 11:59:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 04:59:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dfyu1-0001JP-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:39:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27D82DB2F3; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c219010.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.219.10]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803712DB2F2; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:39:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: can enter testing now From: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sarge is now released, thus Mono can now enter debian/testing (Etch). --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dgetsearch=3D0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- --=-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQqbY5HEn5avu+UbIAQKLUQgAjTek6Dk8eYCLqMLTv0oZpLqhZUkbgChT cvO7b2NT+0c45m5QEgZ5rwZMiZX3umQby4pelxdo9fTdKxc2njziYJN1TdRmU7Xc P1A0mbvRmhpPbakShFlFAna6ShkSKnb1LSKMRfv+mWl2B0WITr7cH260Igf6eI/z EcXYn0j/W3ZLG0mFZJekLHYOvJ2uANkTUsDgmq683pE5d6PRuPMQvbPz7stg+IsB jLAgFS8Qs+TWdWHTdRWquOnzHHcSc64gh8KTH/sq9nAKgvlcxhmY/0xArc2YRf51 8PpRSGBdEF/upVixXr0fpuKR+47cSGouZJ8q4/VWoeYwh20assa+pw== =xdf4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-4sxvyopm2YtuA9P+T6De-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296609: really a blocker, duplicate of archived #234787
Quoting Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 296609 serious tags 296609 +sarge thanks This bug (fam: can not unmount floppy) seems to be a duplicate of the archived bug #234787. David, can you confirm that the fam package in unstable fixes this issue? No. I don't have Debian installed any more. Regards, David VOLJADSL. Vec kot samo hitrost. http://adsl.volja.net
Processed: bugs fixed in etch :-)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308391 -etch Bug#308391: crosshurd: Tries to copy a file from sysvinit package even on hurd-i386 Tags were: etch sarge patch Tags removed: etch tags 299623 -etch Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed Tags were: etch sarge patch Tags removed: etch tags 312021 -etch Bug#312021: tinyhoneypot lacks a dependency on adduser Tags were: etch sarge Tags removed: etch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
Package: winbind Version: 3.0.10-1 Severity: grave After upgrading the server to sarge the access from windows clients to the samba server stopped working. all the samba packages have been upgraded from 3.0.10-1 to 3.0.14-a. in the logfile i get [2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(265) make_server_info_from_pw failed! when a user from a windows-client (that is member of the domain, btw samba is configured as member of the domain too - net ads join). i downgraded ONLY the winbind package and after that everything works just fine. i'll see if i can try winbind versions between 3.0.10-1 and 3.0.14-a. greets KoS ps.: i hope thats not a too high severity level? but this version of winbind makes the whole samba server unusable! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages winbind depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.37-2sarge1 common error description library ii libkrb531.3.6-2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap22.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpopt01.7-5lib for parsing cmdline parameters -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312512: cgiemail: sendmail not found
Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, sh: line 1: sendmail not found (the above line is from my memory) If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper set PATH? I built cgiemail on my laptop and it seems as if now '/usr/sbin/sendmail' is included in the binary as sendmail path and the package works. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11.jumper Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cgiemail depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308879: endless loop on startup
This code snippet taken from tinyca 0.7.0 fixes it, too.
Cheers,
T.O.
--- tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-02-20 22:03:03.0 +0100
+++ tinyca-0.6.8/lib/OpenSSL.pm 2005-06-08 15:47:30.0 +0200
@@ -497,7 +497,10 @@
# get revoked certs
$tmp-{'LIST'} = [];
- for($i = 0; $lines[$i] !~ /^[\s\t]*Revoked Certificates:$/i; $i++) {
+ for($i = 0;
+ ($i scalar(@lines))
+ ($lines[$i] !~ /^[\s\t]*Revoked Certificates:$/i);
+ $i++) {
$self-{'CACHE'}-{$file} = $tmp;
return($tmp) if ($lines[$i] =~ /No Revoked Certificates/i);
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312525: xmms-jack depends on xmms-dev
Package: xmms-jack Version: 0.14-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Hi ! I just noticed that there is a missing dependency for xmms-jack, or worse. In fact, I do not know where the problem really is, but as this is with this package I found it, I report here. If xmms-dev is not installed, xmms-jack is not functionnal. Example:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ xmms Message: device: default jack_init:initializing jack_init:unable to dlopen 'libxmms.so' jack_destructor:cleanup Then, I installed xmms-dev in order to compile the plugin, and just before compiling it, I wanted to try with this package (thinking, the maintainer have certainly tested this package on his own computer with xmms-dev installed). I did this:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ sudo apt-get install xmms-dev ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ xmms Message: device: default jack_init:initializing jack_init:Found frequency convertion functions, setting isXmmsFrequencyAvailable to 1 Message: fmt 5, channels: 2 jack_destructor:cleanup And next, to be sure:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ sudo dpkg -r xmms-dev (Reading database ... 120321 files and directories currently installed.) Removing xmms-dev ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp $ xmms Message: device: default jack_init:initializing jack_init:unable to dlopen 'libxmms.so' jack_destructor:cleanup Hum I concluded that in order to run xmms-jack, we have to install xmms-dev. What do you think ? Cheers, Romain. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xmms-jack depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libjack0.80.0-0 0.99.0-6JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312267: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch)
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:19:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:44:18PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote: The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library. This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from Debian. Is there a reason why this shouldn't be scheduled sooner, rather than later? IMHO a bug against ftp.debian.org is appropriate at this point. Done: 312528 I'll close this bug as soon as t1lib-old disappear from etch. Regards Artur -- pienidze jednak to nie wszystko cho na nich twardo stoi wiat liczy si kto, kto jest wci blisko nawet gdy forsy brak /Golec uOrkiestra/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#277074: Useless without 'abuse' or 'abuse-sdl' packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this bug seems to be already fixed: $ apt-cache show abuse-lib Package: abuse-lib [...] Version: 2.00-16 [...] Depends: abuse (= 1:0.7.0-1) I think this bug can be closed. Greetings, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCpxT/eBwlBDLsbz4RAmftAJwMDTHsZKzS2/iSMMwunQtGPHfKSgCfXSbZ xIp2Mg8yDa8AVTChLPK74FA= =M/1I -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#310244: kernel-source-2.6.11: Kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:473
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled in your kernel config? If yes, try to disable it. The preemption stuff is not stable on certain platforms (eg. AMD64). Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCpxZleBwlBDLsbz4RAr8ZAKDN73CzbtsAVoFOq1gwUANMGBQXuQCgh5Ms /Ml9SEsAAj45+aAWpFwfu78= =Bw4o -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279243: marked as done (samba: libsmbclient.a must not be compiled with -fPIC.)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:18:01 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#279243: fixed in samba 3.0.14a-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2004 17:34:23 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 09:34:23 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from du-43-26.ppp.telenordia.se (mulder.hem.za.org) [62.127.43.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COg4S-0003ah-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:34:22 -0800
Received: from skinner.hem.za.org ([192.168.0.2] ident=Debian-exim)
by mulder.hem.za.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1COcUf-0004Pp-Cn; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:45:09 +0100
Received: from mikael by skinner.hem.za.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1COcUe-00078Y-93; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 14:45:08 +0100
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:45:08 +0100
From: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba: libsmbclient.a must not be compiled with -fPIC.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.63
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Mikael Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 10.2
The subject says it all, libsmbclient.a must not be compiled with -fPIC.
(Note that I have created my patch with dpatch, but dpatch is not
required to use it.)
Mikael Magnusson
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-skas-1
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8
Versions of packages samba depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.5 Debian configuration management sy
ii libacl12.2.23-1 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr2 1.35-6The Common Error Description libra
ii libcupsys2-gnutls101.1.20final+rc1-7 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libkrb53 1.3.3-2 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpopt0 1.7-4 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsmbclient 3.0.7-1 shared library that allows applica
ii logrotate 3.7-2 Log rotation utility
ii netbase4.18 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii samba-common 3.0.7-1 Samba common files used by both th
-- debconf information:
samba/nmbd_from_inetd:
* samba/log_files_moved:
* samba/tdbsam: false
* samba/generate_smbpasswd: true
* samba/run_mode: daemons
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=45_nopic.dpatch
#! /bin/sh -e
## 05a_nopic.dpatch by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP: The static version of a library must not be compiled with -fPIC.
## DP: Debian Policy Manual Section 10.2
if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
echo `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument 2
exit 1
fi
[ -f debian/patches/00patch-opts ] . debian/patches/00patch-opts
patch_opts=${patch_opts:--f --no-backup-if-mismatch} ${2:+-d $2}
case $1 in
-patch) patch -p1 ${patch_opts} $0;;
-unpatch) patch -R -p1 ${patch_opts} $0;;
*)
echo `basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument 2
exit 1;;
esac
exit 0
@DPATCH@
diff -urNad /var/local/tmp/samba/samba-3.0.7-1.2/source/Makefile.in
samba-3.0.7-1.2/source/Makefile.in
---
Bug#277074: Useless without 'abuse' or 'abuse-sdl' packages
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:55:43PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote: this bug seems to be already fixed: $ apt-cache show abuse-lib Package: abuse-lib [...] Version: 2.00-16 [...] Depends: abuse (= 1:0.7.0-1) I think this bug can be closed. The claim that it's obsolete still seems to apply? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [2005/06/08 15:24:31, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(265) make_server_info_from_pw failed! when a user from a windows-client (that is member of the domain, btw samba is configured as member of the domain too - net ads join). i downgraded ONLY the winbind package and after that everything works just fine. i'll see if i can try winbind versions between 3.0.10-1 and 3.0.14-a. greets Could you please reproduce this bug with log level set to 10 and send the relevant winbind log excerpt to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What does wbinfo -t output when you're using winbind 3.0.14a? KoS ps.: i hope thats not a too high severity level? but this version of winbind makes the whole samba server unusable! Well, I think that important could be considered enough as, winbind works flawlessly for some users (me included...:-))) when the samba server is member of a NT4 domain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312358: kdm crashes on startup
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: On Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:53, Itai Seggev wrote: Package: kdm Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental Justification: renders package unusable I think the title says it all. :) I've upgraded all my kde packages to 3.4 (experimental) and now kdm crashes on startup. That's false, according to your own report you're still using kdm 3.3.2 ;) Upgrading it should work. Best regards Yes, you're right. It seems the problem was that kdm is only recommend by, and not depended on, by kdebase, so it wasn't upgraded with the rest of kdebase. Is there any particular reason for this behaviour? I would expect that if I installed kdebase, I would get all of it. Thanks, -- Itai Itai Seggev, University of Chicago, Department of Physics In 1997 a group of programmers started writing a desktop environment to fix a travesty they didn't create. Their program promptly found its way onto un*x systems everywhere. Today, still opposed by a software monopolist, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you share their vision, if you know you can help, and if you can connect to internet, maybe you can join... the K-Team. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tag sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package ntpdate Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ntpdate tags 312454 sarge Bug#312454: ntpdate: Bug #294636 needs fixing in sarge There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306193: marked as done (openoffice.org-l10n-de 1.1.4-2 not installable with openoffice.org 1.1.4-2)
Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:04:52 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#306193: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 21:23:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 14:23:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nomeata.de (quimby.ehbuehl.net) [83.133.81.20] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DPoZu-0004lh-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:23:47 -0700 Received: from dsl-084-056-235-064.arcor-ip.net ([84.56.235.64] helo=localhost) by quimby.ehbuehl.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DPoa0-0003ws-Vy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:23:54 +0200 Received: from theo by localhost with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DPoZp-0002BI-50 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:23:41 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Thomas Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openoffice.org-l10n-de 1.1.4-2 not installable with openoffice.org 1.1.4-2 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 23:23:40 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: openoffice.org-l10n-de Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: normal Hi, after upgrading openoffice.org from 1.1.4-1 to 1.1.4-2 (both experimental), the corresponding german (nor the english) languag pack is not installable due to version conflicts. After manually removing the openoffice.org1.1-l10n-de, openoffice.org ( 1.1.4+1.1.5), openoffice.org ( 1.1.4+1.1.5) from the control-file, the package works like intended on openoffice.org 1.1.4-2. The same should be true for openoffice.org-l10n-en. Greetings, thomas -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (20, 'experimental'), (20, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 306193-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 07:08:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 00:08:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfugD-0001lS-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:08:49 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DfucO-0004ub-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:04:52 -0400 From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#306193: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:04:52 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: openoffice.org Source-Version: 1.1.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-kde_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-kde_1.1.4-3_powerpc.deb openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-3_all.deb to
Bug#312552: Obsolete package
Package: unrar-free Version: 1:0.0.1-2 Severity: serious Hi This package should be removed from debian. It is unusable. This unrar use unrarlib from http://www.unrarlib.org Unrar-free is very simple port to use these library. If you see on download http://www.unrarlib.org/download.html then you can see : Attention: current version works only with RAR2.0 archives! Use WinRAR 2.9 or older (NOT WinRAR 3.x!) to create the archive! But sarge, etch and sid have rar 3.x, so...it produce newer archve. Now package is unmaintaned, but I think, that adoption of unrar-free is no sense. Upstream of unrarlib and unrar-free seems to be inactive (dead). -- I greet Wiesiek -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312556: debian-installer partition bugs
Package: debian-installer Severity: grave This concerns a bug in the partition portion of the debian-installer for Debian GNU/Linux 3.1r0. At the bottom of this report are also two feature requests. 1) I start with a single 80 GB hard disk. 2) Clear the partition table. 3) Create a couple 20 GB partitions marked as RAID volumes. 4) Run Configure software RAID to tie the partitions into a RAID device (I happened to pick RAID 0 but I don't think it matters). 5) Now select the master hda hard disk and hit return to clear out the partition table. 6) The RAID0 device still exists, even though its underlying partitions are gone. 7) In particular, one can now partition hda in a usual non-raid way (just swap and a large root partition), yet the installer thinks md0 exists, and continuing the installation leads to a sequence of error messages. (Whether there will be data loss, I don't know. It seems if something tries to write to md0, it will end up writing into some random area of the now-root partition on hda, and this will lead to random data loss.) 8) Attempting to delete the md0 device isn't so easy. First off, it isn't clear that one needs to use Configure software RAID to get rid of it. But trying Configure software RAID leads to an error message that the partition table has changed and one should reboot before continuing. Thank you. Alexander Perlis __ Discover Yahoo! Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/online.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#76918: Software cds $15 and $99 get al software in 1 cd
Photos, drawings, graphics...learn to create them...then share them all... http://dwci.6valr5oh3yovlp6.tapetiec.com There is a fullness of all things, even of sleep and love. When you're through changing, you're through. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312569: electricsheep prevent any X client to connect when launched from xscreensaver
Package: electricsheep Version: 2.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, When launching electricsheep from xscreensaver, Xlib will refuse any connection to the X server until xscreensaver is killed. Removing electricsheep resolve the problem. I'm not sure wether this bug is a electricsheep or xscreensaver one, but anyway, electricsheep is currently unusable (bug #309852). Could you please consider upgrading this package ? Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages electricsheep depends on: ii curl 7.13.2-2Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS, FT ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat11.95.8-3XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg-progs6b-10 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxv1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System video extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xloadimage 4.1-14.2Graphics file viewer under X11 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302643: marked as done (synaptic: FTBFS in experimental)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2005 04:34:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 01 20:34:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from orochi.topstudio.co.jp (mail.topstudio.co.jp) [202.224.239.193] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DHaL8-0007fd-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:34:31 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CCE223024 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:34:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.topstudio.co.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hydra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06702-04 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:34:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unicorn.kmuto.org [192.168.0.15]) by mail.topstudio.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F5222F9F for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:34:28 +0900 (JST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 754772AF442; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:35:52 +0900 (JST) From: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: synaptic: FTBFS in experimental X-Debbugs-CC: Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:35:52 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at topstudio.co.jp X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: synaptic Severity: serious Version: 0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 Tags: experimental arm and some other architectures failed to build. if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/apt-pkg -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DSYNAPTICLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DSYNAPTICSTATEDIR=\/var/lib/synaptic\-g -O2 -MT rpackage.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/rpackage.Tpo \ -c -o rpackage.o `test -f 'rpackage.cc' || echo './'`rpackage.cc; \ then mv -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo .deps/rpackage.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi rpackage.cc: In member function `bool RPackage::isTrusted()': rpackage.cc:697: error: `IsTrusted' undeclared (first use this function) rpackage.cc:697: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [rpackage.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/synaptic-0.55+cvs20050325/common' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/synaptic-0.55+cvs20050325' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/synaptic-0.55+cvs20050325' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 See more detail log at http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?pkg=synapticver=0.55%2Bcvs20050325-1.1arch=armstamp=1112362331file=logas=raw -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 302643-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 20:49:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 13:49:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg7UY-0001lW-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:49:38 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jun 2005 20:49:06 - Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) [62.143.135.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 08 Jun 2005 22:49:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18895133 Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 454946F2D1; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11
Bug#306383: marked as done (synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable)
Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2005 08:23:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 26 01:23:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DQLLp-000663-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:23:25 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E986380AD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from western.grep.be (dD5E0678D.access.telenet.be [213.224.103.141]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DC438143 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [2001:838:37f:20:20d:93ff:fec0:b54a] (helo=country.grep.be) by western.grep.be with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DQLLo-0006HV-2c for [EMAIL PROTECTED] message size 2096; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:23:24 +0200 Received: from wouter by country.grep.be with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DQLKo-0002J9-UI for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:22:22 +0200 Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:22:22 +0200 From: Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: synaptic/experimental/m68k: FTBFS: undeclared variable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Speed: Gates'' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves. Organization: none User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Wouter Verhelst,,, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: synaptic Version: 0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error trying to autobuild your package. From the build log: Automatic build of synaptic_0.55+cvs20050325-1.1 on quickstep by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5 Build started at 20050426-0421 ** [...] if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/apt-pkg -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -DSYNAPTICLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DSYNAPTICSTATEDIR=\/var/lib/synaptic\-g -O2 -MT rpackage.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/rpackage.Tpo \ -c -o rpackage.o `test -f 'rpackage.cc' || echo './'`rpackage.cc; \ then mv -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo .deps/rpackage.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/rpackage.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi rpackage.cc: In member function `bool RPackage::isTrusted()': rpackage.cc:697: error: `IsTrusted' undeclared (first use this function) rpackage.cc:697: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [rpackage.o] Error 1 [...] For your convenience, a full build log can be found through http://experimental.ftbfs.de/ -- The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the pavement is precisely one bananosecond --- Received: (at 302643-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 20:49:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 13:49:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg7UY-0001lW-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:49:38 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jun 2005 20:49:06 - Received: from ip181.135.1511I-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO top.ping.de) [62.143.135.181] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 08 Jun 2005 22:49:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18895133 Received: by top.ping.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 454946F2D1; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:48:11 +0200 From: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Bug#312512: marked as done (cgiemail: sendmail not found)
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line cgiemail + sendmail has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 14:03:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 07:03:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pu.schlittermann.de [212.80.235.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg19D-0002vH-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 07:03:11 -0700 Received: from eth1.tigger.schlittermann.de ([212.80.235.129] helo=localhost) by Exim 4.50 on pu.schlittermann.de with esmtp id 1Dg18s-0003Jd-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:02:50 +0200 Received: from pu.schlittermann.de ([212.80.235.130]) by localhost (tigger [212.80.235.129]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07392-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tigger.schlittermann.de ([212.80.225.206] helo=jumper.schlittermann.de) (verified: C=DE,ST=Saxony,O=schlittermann -- internet unix support,CN=jumper.schlittermann.de) by Exim 4.50 on pu.schlittermann.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) id 1Dg18o-0003JR-EY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:02:46 +0200 Received: from heiko by jumper.schlittermann.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dg17e-0002os-Re for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:01:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cgiemail: sendmail not found X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:01:34 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Heiko Schlittermann,,, [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at schlittermann.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: cgiemail Version: 1.6-26 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, sh: line 1: sendmail not found (the above line is from my memory) If I use `strings /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgiemail` I cannot find any location for sendmail compiled in. Probably you rely on a proper set PATH? I built cgiemail on my laptop and it seems as if now '/usr/sbin/sendmail' is included in the binary as sendmail path and the package works. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11.jumper Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages cgiemail depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an --- Received: (at 312512-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 21:40:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 14:40:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg8Hl-0006KY-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:40:29 -0700 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E8A268497C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:18 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:40:17 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cgiemail + sendmail Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --AaVReJtVIhtsyOXr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:01:34PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: sh: line 1: sendmail not found (the above line is from my memory) If I use
Processed: Re: amd: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308718 serious Bug#308718: amd: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: alsaplayer: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308715 serious Bug#308715: alsaplayer: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308709 serious Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: freetype2: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308708 serious Bug#308708: freetype2: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: rplay: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308703 serious Bug#308703: rplay: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: removing ipfwadm
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308705 serious Bug#308705: ipfwadm: Shouldn't this package be removed? Severity set to `serious'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: mdctl: Dummy package still needed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308702 serious Bug#308702: mdctl: Dummy package still needed? Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed?
Package: raidtools2 Severity: serious As this is a dummy transitional package for Sarge, and upgrades skipping a stable release are not supported, I think this package should be removed from unstable and that way from etch, in order to reduce package bloat. Please do reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org if you agree. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173779: marked as done (RM: gtoaster/woody -- Uninstallable due to removal of cdrtoaster)
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:03:04 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line gtoaster is not installable in Debian 3.0r1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2002 12:33:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 20 06:33:16 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.202.12] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18PML5-0003FH-00; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 06:33:15 -0600 Received: (qmail 11792 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 12:32:09 - Received: from mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de (129.187.202.58) by hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de with QMQP; 20 Dec 2002 12:32:09 - Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:33:09 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gtoaster is not installable in Debian 3.0r1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: gtoaster Version: 0.2002012700+1.0Beta5-2 Severity: grave Tags: woody gtoaster depends on cdrdao. cdrdao was removed from woody in 3.0r1. --- Received: (at 173779-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 23:03:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 16:03:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg9Zi-0007ZS-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:03:06 -0700 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dg9Zh-0003Q8-1c; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:03:05 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:03:04 +0200 To: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gtoaster is not installable in Debian 3.0r1 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 01:33:09PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: Package: gtoaster Version: 0.2002012700+1.0Beta5-2 Severity: grave Tags: woody gtoaster depends on cdrdao. cdrdao was removed from woody in 3.0r1. There will be no more point releases of woody, so this bug will remain unfixed. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152857: marked as done (RM: freeamp/woody -- Trademark issues, obsolete)
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:17:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Severity of trademark problems] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2002 15:07:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 13 10:07:40 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shw42-134.accesscable.net (committee.wasteland.org) [24.138.42.134] (postfix) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17TOUl-0007pO-00; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:07:40 -0500 Received: by committee.wasteland.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 61ED7FE3C5; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:07:38 -0300 (ADT) From: Andrew Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: freeamp: FreeAmp is being superseded by Zinf To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:07:38 -0300 (ADT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: freeamp Version: 1:2.1.1.0-4 Severity: wishlist FreeAmp has been more or less replaced with Zinf 2.2.0. http://www.zinf.org/ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux committee 2.4.18 #4 Sun Jun 30 19:49:47 ADT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages freeamp depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.18.0-1 The GdkPixBuf library. ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-5 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-12 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets for X ii libmusicbrainz 1.0.1.final-2 Second generation incarnation of the CD Inde ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-9 The GNU stdc++ library ii libttf21.4pre.2001102 FreeType 1, The FREE TrueType Font Engine, s ii libvorbis0 1.0rc3-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec ii xlibs 4.2.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1.1.4-1compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 152857-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 23:17:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 16:17:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg9nJ-0001IJ-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:17:09 -0700 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dg9nD-0003W6-P8; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:17:05 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:17:03 +0200 To: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Andrew Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Severity of trademark problems] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 07:15:26PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Martin Schulze wrote: Bug#152857 requests freeamp to be removed from the stable distribution because upstream renamed (had to rename) itself into Zinf, because AMPR is a trademark of PlayMedia Systems. I wonder if we really need to remove freeamp from Debian stable. Has PlayMedia Systems (PMS) sent us a cease and desist? If not, I suggest that we ignore it until that happens. [However, if it does, we will have to move quickly to remove|rename it.] Alternatively, take whatever steps seem appropriate to make a stub package that depends on zinf (zinf is not freeamp?) so people aren't adversely affected by PMS defending their trademark. To the best of my knowledge, no such cease and desist has been incoming for the past 5 years or so, and no more point releases will be made of woody. I'm therefore closing this bug, if ever such a cease and desist is incoming, we'll deal with it then, it has not much use keeping this bug open on it. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#104394: Unable to Contact - Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:18:22 -0600
Financial Update: Client ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily Earned Income: 200$ - 2000$ Since you are apart of our growing Financial Community we have information on how to make 200$ - 2000$ daily. About 80% of our clients succeed with this opportunity. Give me a call anytime to find out how. 1-800-409-1495 Ryan Pierre LifeVest Solutions Phone: 1-800-409-1495 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#258060: marked as done (Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0))
Your message dated Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:38:08 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jul 2004 12:25:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 07 05:25:07 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from muffin.area.ba.cnr.it [150.145.80.101] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BiBU3-0002wG-00; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 05:25:07 -0700 Received: from klecker (klecker.ba.issia.cnr.it [150.145.84.32]) by muffin.area.ba.cnr.it (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id i67CP9Wg014842; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:25:10 +0200 Received: from frankie by klecker with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BiBTz-0005Qm-I5; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:25:03 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0) X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 14:25:03 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious OPL 1.0 violates DFSG. That's unfortunately true for woody, too. http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/dls-005-opl for reference. Today uploads are ok. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 258060-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 23:38:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 16:38:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DgA7i-0005t5-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:38:14 -0700 Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DgA7c-0003bt-RI; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:38:12 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:38:08 +0200 To: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Please move ebook-dev-ggad and ebook-dev-alp in non-free (OPL 1.0) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:25:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: serious OPL 1.0 violates DFSG. That's unfortunately true for woody, too. http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/dls-005-opl for reference. Today uploads are ok. I'm sorry, but there will be no more point releases of woody -- so this bug unfortunately will remain unfixed. I'm closing this report now. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312584: librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages outside unstable
Package: librsvg2-bin Version: 2.8.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Latest unstable librsvg2-bin (2.9.5-3) depends on: - libgnomeprint2.2-0 (= 2.10.2) - libgnomeprintui2.2-0 (= 2.10.0) but latest version of those packages in unstable are: 2.8.2-1 and 2.8.2-2. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11blbl Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages librsvg2-bin depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcroco30.6.0-2 a generic Cascading Style Sheet (C ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.8.2-1 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.8.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgsf-1 1.12.0-1Structured File Library - runtime ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.7-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii librsvg2-2 2.9.5-3 SAX-based renderer library for SVG ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308709: lilypond1.3: Dummy package still needed?
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think etch should really no longer ship this dummy package that's obsolete this long. Please upon next upload of lilypond, stop building this dummy package to get it removed. I agree. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 312584
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 312584 sid Bug#312584: librsvg2-bin: current version of package depends on packages outside unstable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 312292 + security Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang There were no tags set. Tags added: security tags 312292 + sarge Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: security Tags added: sarge tags 312292 + fixed Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: sarge security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 312292 -fixed Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: fixed sarge security Tags removed: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312292: Processed: your mail
tags 312292 -fixed thanks On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:48:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: tags 312292 + sarge Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: security Tags added: sarge tags 312292 + fixed Bug#312292: maradns: Maradns 1.0.28 works around a serious Linux kernel 2.6 bug that causes MaraDNS to hang Tags were: sarge security Tags added: fixed Surely, this last tag was wrong; fixed refers to NMUs, which there hasn't been for this package, and sarge doesn't have version 1.0.28 anyway. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#312292: Processed: your mail
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:56:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: tags 312292 -fixed thanks Surely, this last tag was wrong; fixed refers to NMUs, which there hasn't been for this package, and sarge doesn't have version 1.0.28 anyway. Sorry my mistake. I thought fixed referred to if the problem has a solution. The solution being the recent and available upload of 1.0.28. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309143: xserver-xfree86: xserver does not work
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Followup-For: Bug #309143 -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster: xserver-xfree86 /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-06-08 19:44 /etc/X11/X - /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1746380 2005-06-01 02:03 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster: xserver-xfree86 VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus: :05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation: Unknown device 0140 (rev a2) r/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum. XFree86 X server configuration file status: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3007 2005-06-08 22:04 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4: # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86 # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following commands as root: # # cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom # md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 Section Files FontPathunix/:7100# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1 FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi FontPath/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi EndSection Section Module LoadGLcore Loadbitmap Loaddbe Loadddc Loaddri Loadextmod Loadfreetype Loadglx Loadint10 Loadrecord Loadspeedo Loadtype1 Loadvbe EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driver keyboard Option CoreKeyboard Option XkbRules xfree86 Option XkbModel pc104 Option XkbLayout us EndSection Section InputDevice Identifier Configured Mouse Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Device/dev/input/mice Option Protocol ImPS/2 Option Emulate3Buttons true Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 EndSection Section Device Identifier xFx 6600 GT Driver nv VideoRam131072 EndSection Section Monitor Identifier BENQ FP931 HorizSync 28-49 VertRefresh 43-72 Option DPMS EndSection Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Device xFx 6600 GT Monitor BENQ FP931 DefaultDepth24 SubSection Display Depth 1 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 4 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 8 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 15 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 16 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection SubSection Display Depth 24 Modes 1280x1024 1024x768 800x600 640x480 EndSubSection EndSection Section ServerLayout Identifier Default Layout Screen Default Screen InputDevice Generic Keyboard InputDevice Configured Mouse EndSection Section DRI Mode0666 EndSection XFree86 X server log files on system: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4 2005-06-08 22:06 /var/log/XFree86.0.log Contents of most recent XFree86 X server log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log: XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Processed: subversion Debian ci: r307 - in trunk/debian: . patches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 308777 pending
Bug#308777: python2.3-subversion: leaves byte-compiled files after removal in
/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/{lib,}svn/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311808: marked as done (dpkg in experimental preinst checks for dselect using ps )
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:22:53 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in 1.13.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2005 12:57:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 03 05:57:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 68.105.138.210.bn.2iij.net (viper2.netfort.gr.jp) [210.138.105.68] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DeBjb-0003o7-00; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 05:57:11 -0700 Received: (qmail 3613 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2005 12:57:10 - Received: from unknown (HELO ibookg4.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1) by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 3 Jun 2005 12:57:10 - Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:57:07 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg in experimental preinst checks for dselect using ps User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.4 Tags: experimental Severity: serious Justification: breaks upgrade Hi, dpkg in experimental will break upgrades, if procps package is not installed. (Reading database ... 7481 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace dpkg 1.9.21 (using .../dpkg_1.13.4_powerpc.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 98: ps: command not found dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.4_powerpc.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.13.4_powerpc.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) regards, junichi --- Received: (at 311808-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2005 05:23:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 22:23:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DgFVR-0006PT-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:23:05 -0700 Received: (qmail 11044 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 05:22:53 - Received: from unknown (HELO descent.netsplit.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by populous.netsplit.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 05:22:53 - Subject: Fixed in 1.13.5 From: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-70OaN9Yoye6YmrNhjYAk Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:22:53 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-70OaN9Yoye6YmrNhjYAk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dpkg (1.13.5) experimental; urgency=3Dlow The Flatulent Elm of West Ruislip Release. * Actions and package states are now logged by default in the /var/log/dpkg.log file. This file is rotated monthly and can be disabled by commenting the line in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg. * User decisions about conffiles are now logged. * dpkg-source no longer complains about Enhances field. Closes: #159642, #159745, #159746. * preinst no longer relies on procps being installed. Closes: #311808. * Architecture Support: - Change DEB_*_GNU_CPU from i386 to i486, to reflect reality. DEB_*_ARCH_CPU remains at i386, you should be checking against that. Closes: #310394. - Fixed order ostable is read to prevent Linux becoming the Hurd. Closes: #309603. * Updated Manpage Translations (Christian Perrier): - Syntax error corrected in Swedish man page for dpkg-deb. Closes: #300980. - Syntax error corrected in Spanish man page for
