Processed: bzip2 303300
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: owner 303300 Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#303300: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953) Owner recorded as Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 237329 is important, tagging 237329
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 237329 important Bug#237329: bad shlibs file entry, needs to tighten deps Severity set to `important'. # the non-RCness is not sarge-specific tags 237329 - sarge-ignore Bug#237329: bad shlibs file entry, needs to tighten deps Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags removed: sarge-ignore End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 100900 is important, tagging 100900
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 100900 important Bug#100900: php4: unmet depends while building source Severity set to `important'. # the non-RCness is not sarge-specific tags 100900 - sarge-ignore Bug#100900: php4: unmet depends while building source Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags removed: sarge-ignore End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303300: marked as done (file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953))
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:53:37 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303300: and woody? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2005 21:56:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 05 14:56:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIw1q-0004Mg-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 14:56:10 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B672E18006 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:56:08 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 762166E28F; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:59:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:59:05 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: file permissions modification race (CAN-2005-0953) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: bzip2 Version: 1.0.2-5 Severity: normal Tags: security According to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraqm=3D111229375217633w=3D2: If a malicious local user has write access to a directory in which a target user is using bzip2 to extract or compress a file to then a TOCTOU bug can be exploited to change the permission of any file belonging to that user. On decompressing bzip2 copies the permissions from the compressed bzip2 file to the uncompressed file. However there is a gap between the uncompressed file being written (and it's file handler being close) and the permissions of the file being changed. During this gap a malicious user can remove the decompressed file and replace it with a hard-link to another file belonging to the user. bzip2 will then change the permissions on the hard-linked file to be the same as that of the bzip2 file. This is a low impact security hole as it requires a local user to exploit a race, and bzip2 must be run in a directory that the attacker can write to (and +t directories probably don't work), and all you can do is change a file permissions.=20 If you fix this hole, please refer to CAN-2005-0953 in your changelog. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages bzip2 depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting fil= e co ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an -- no debconf information --=20 see shy jo --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCUwopd8HHehbQuO8RAhnfAJ4g7Eg/vVwNZ5QglR3Hj0pjCLv2EwCgoHNl n+iQxlNnoMWQaieV69NZ9UU= =/2Yv -END PGP SIGNATURE- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- --- Received: (at 303300-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 06:53:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 23:53:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-138-217-160-143.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [138.217.160.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhMLj-0001Vz-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:53:39 -0700 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58E7F68428F; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:53:37 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:53:37 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL
Processed: tagging 311616
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 # well, not RC for post-sarge, and it's up to Joey whether to ignore it for r1 tags 311616 = sarge Bug#311616: Sarge installation doesn't work, missing files in the init.d/snort file Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags set to: sarge End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312115: SIGSEGVs make libdbi unuseable
Hi Markus, $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. LD_PRELOAD=libefence.so.0 ./dbtest Electric Fence 2.1 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens. ElectricFence Aborting: Allocating 0 bytes, probably a bug. Illegal instruction And what is this dbtest program? Considering that there are no packages in Debian which depend on libdbi0, it's a little difficult to check whether those libraries work for me without writing my own test application; and a segfault could easily be caused by a misuse of the libdbi APIs on your part, rather than by a bug in the library. Perhaps it would be more helpful if you would send *your* test application to the BTS for inspection. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing
Package: apt-get Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: serious Discovered when doing a fresh install: When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list for apt is set up to point to 'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the netsetup for sarge, you still get an RC3 installation. Manual correction of sources.list is required to fix this. This could be an error in base-config or in apt-get, but for all practical purposes it breaks apt. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 313150 to debian-cd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 313150 debian-cd Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `debian-cd'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing
Hi Jan-Jaap, On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 10:15:32AM +0200, Jan-Jaap Fahner wrote: Discovered when doing a fresh install: When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list for apt is set up to point to 'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the netsetup for sarge, you still get an RC3 installation. Manual correction of sources.list is required to fix this. This could be an error in base-config or in apt-get, but for all practical purposes it breaks apt. Which sarge-i386-netinst.iso is this? Can you send us the contents of .disk/info from this CD? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: switching email addresses
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 312058 ! Bug#312058: ttf-larabie-uncommon: upgrade fails due to missing dependency Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 298842 ! Bug#298842: mailman: private archives authentication form redirects to index instead of msg Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 306287 ! Bug#306287: fonttools: ttx does not work with damase.ttf Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 284711 ! Bug#284711: cruft: warning when too many packages are installed Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 226101 ! Bug#226101: dupload: add a default configuration to allow uploading to mentors.debian.net Changed Bug submitter from Pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 240595 ! Bug#240595: dpatches that interact Changed Bug submitter from Pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 240601 ! Bug#240601: ClamScan.py handler Changed Bug submitter from Pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 267243 ! Bug#267243: mailman: site logo patch Changed Bug submitter from Pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 282313 ! Bug#282313: RFP: python-google - A Python Interface to the Google API Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 288165 ! Bug#288165: lincvs should have an option to use a keychain ssh method Changed Bug submitter from pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 290457 ! Bug#290457: debtags: add a non-free/crontrib group of tags? Changed Bug submitter from pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 296114 ! Bug#296114: cgiirc: new upstream version available Changed Bug submitter from pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 296588 ! Bug#296588: rfe: ability to add links to the sidebar Changed Bug submitter from pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 303093 ! Bug#303093: dupload: allow only uploading source files on a per-host basis Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 306290 ! Bug#306290: ITP: ttf-mph-2b-damase -- font with ranges from the latest version of unicode Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 306752 ! Bug#306752: please report differences with Christian Marillarat's ffmpeg package in README.Debian Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 308433 ! Bug#308433: ITP: helpdeco -- decompile Microsoft WinHelp files Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 311535 ! Bug#311535: scite: please apply reverse-path in title patch Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 312288 ! Bug#312288: evolution-plugins: please enable building experimental plugins Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 312289 ! Bug#312289: scons: please package newer upstream version Changed Bug submitter from Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 283958 ! Bug#283958: kworldclock: time for St. Louis in north america wrong Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 297321 ! Bug#297321: mailman: update from monolithic pending.pck to per-list ones is very slow Changed Bug submitter from pabs [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. submitter 267372 ! Bug#267372: cgiirc: make it easier to add new smilies Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. owner 306290 ! Bug#306290: ITP: ttf-mph-2b-damase -- font with ranges from the latest version of unicode Owner changed from paul wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. owner 308433 ! Bug#308433: ITP: helpdeco -- decompile Microsoft WinHelp files Owner changed from paul wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks for deleting my email account, bastards at v3.com Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 309257 important Bug#309257: libpano12: patent problems Severity set to `important'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313206: sox: Does not cope well with running out of disk space
Package: sox Version: 12.17.3-4woody2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I invoke sox in the following way: sox file.au file.wav sox runs out of disk space half-way through the conversion (as confirmed by a subsequent df), but appears to terminate normally: nothing is printed to stdout, and the return code is 0. The target file is definitely truncated, as can be easily discovered by playing it. I feel this indicates a grave problem as the user or a script might then decide to delete the source file file.au, perhaps permanently losing the latter part of the audio data from the file. Of course in theory they should check the contents of the target file, but this isn't always feasible, particularly during mass conversions. This bug is filed on a woody system, but I have checked the changelog in sarge and I can't see any obvious fixes to this problem. I can re-test this problem on sarge in about a week when I have time to upgrade my system, if necessary. Thanks, Andrew. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux laura 2.4.27 #1 Sun Apr 3 16:34:01 BST 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages sox depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ii libvorbis01.0rc3-1 The Vorbis General Audio Compressi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313066: gem: FTBFS: Shared lib links against static non-PIC lib.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:07:31PM +0200, günter geiger wrote: My feeling is that there is no shared library because the upstream authors do not have established shared library versioning, which makes maintaining the package (and those that depend on it harder). Do you mean they do not have a stable API / ABI? Not having a shared library isn't going to make those problems go away. But, is there a reason ffmpeg is not compiled with -fPIC by default ? Yes, it might make things slower on some arches because it requires extra instruction. But most of this can actually be avoided. Kurt
Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.8 makes unstable nautilus 2.10 uninstallable
Package: capplets Version: 1:2.8.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In current Debian unstable, there is nautilus 2.10 which conflicts with libnautilus2-2 and depends on capplets. The version of capplets in unstable is 2.8, and the package depends on libnautilus2-2. aptitude dist-upgrade thus cannot upgrade nautilus and is trying to remove all my gnome packages. Please put capplets 2.10 into unstable (I believe it is in experimental) -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ck1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages capplets depends on: ii capplets-data1:2.8.2-3 configuration applets for GNOME 2 ii gnome-control-center 1:2.8.2-3 The GNOME Control Center for GNOME ii gnome-desktop-data 2.8.3-2 Common files for GNOME 2 desktop a ii gnome-icon-theme 2.8.0-4 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gnome-panel 2.8.3-1 launcher and docking facility for ii gnome-session2.8.1-6 The GNOME 2 Session Manager ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.8.0-4 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libeel2-22.8.2-1 Eazel Extensions Library (for GNOM ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.35-2.1 Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgail-common 1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.8.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.4.2-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-desktop-2 2.8.3-2 Utility library for loading .deskt ii libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-4 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values an ii libgstreamer-plugins0.8- 0.8.8-3 Various GStreamer libraries and li ii libgstreamer0.8-00.8.9-2 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libmetacity0 1:2.8.8-1 Common library of lightweight GTK2 ii libnautilus2-2 2.8.2-2 libraries for nautilus components ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxklavier8 1.03-1 X Keyboard Extension high-level AP ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.8.3-1 X Rendering Extension client libra ii nautilus 2.8.2-2 file manager and graphical shell f ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processed: Pending upload
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 308232 + pending Bug#308232: bugzilla: [FHS] Creates tempfiles on /usr/share. Tags were: pending confirmed sid Tags added: pending tags 308789 + pending Bug#308789: Insecure password handling Tags were: confirmed security sid Tags added: pending tags 309227 + pending Bug#309227: webpath makes bugzilla not work when using virtual hosting Tags were: moreinfo confirmed patch Bug#309236: no good way to host multiple bugzilla sites Tags added: pending tags 309475 + pending Bug#309475: INTL:vi Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 311169 + pending Bug#311169: bugzilla: [INTL:ja] Updated Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 311980 + pending Bug#311980: bugzilla: [INTL:cs] Updated Czech debconf templates translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists
Package: gtodo Version: 0.14-4 Severity: critical Hi After performing a security update this afternoon which also downloaded and installed Gnome 2.10, gtodo totally fails to restart if a single todo item is located on an existing list. It starts perfectly if a configuration cannot be found. However, add a single item, exit and then try to restart it, and you get the following error: Segmentation fault It was working perfectly before I upgraded to Gnome 2.10 today. However, now it refuses to read my backup from yesterday as well as my current copy. I'm almost certain therefore that this bug is an inconsistency in the linkage between gtodo and Gnome 2.10. Could somebody also tell me how to output a package information view like those I see in other posts (sample shown below). I've had a look around, but can't see how it's done anywhere. Thanks -- Sample output -- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-core depends on: ii bug-buddy 2.6.1-4The GNOME Desktop -- End of sample -- Regards, Barrie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file
Package: gedit Version: 2.10.3-1 Severity: critical Hi When attempting to load via any method, Gedit crashes with the following helpful error: The application gedit has crashed unexpectedly. The debugging information for this error is shown at the bottom of this message. Unfortunately it seems most of the symbols have been stripped. From a quick examination, it seems that an error with one of the virtual file system modules may be to blame. I have upgraded all this to the newest unstable versions with no success. The error begun when a weekly security update also downloaded and installed Gnome 2.10. The error is almost certainly related in some way to this since it worked fine before that. Apart from this security update, nothing else has changed in regard to the system configuration. If somebody can tell me how to output a package information view like those I see in other posts (sample shown below), I'll post one of my own. I've had a look around, but can't see how it's done anywhere. Thanks --- Sample Package Output --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gnome-core depends on: ii bug-buddy 2.6.1-4The GNOME Desktop --- End Output --- Debugging information is displayed below: --- Start Debugging Output --- Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gedit' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 11273)] 0x4040cbe8 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #0 0x4040cbe8 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x4019db5c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 #2 0x4015a434 in libgnomeui_module_info_get () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 #3 0x4040b825 in __pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #4 signal handler called #5 0x in ?? () #6 0x0011 in ?? () #7 0x40ef64d0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so #8 0x40ef1660 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so #9 0x0011 in ?? () #10 0x in ?? () #11 0x in ?? () #12 0x in ?? () #13 0x in ?? () #14 0x0002 in ?? () #15 0x40017028 in ?? () #16 0x0007 in ?? () #17 0x0001 in ?? () #18 0x in ?? () #19 0x0001 in ?? () #20 0x in ?? () #21 0xb724 in ?? () #22 0xb744 in ?? () #23 0x40017028 in ?? () #24 0x0007 in ?? () #25 0x0001 in ?? () #26 0x in ?? () #27 0x03e788e5 in ?? () #28 0x401a0790 in ?? () #29 0x407e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #30 0x4026e77c in MAX_AVAILABLE_THREADS () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #31 0x in ?? () #32 0x40276864 in __JCR_LIST__ () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #33 0x081299e0 in ?? () #34 0x4021b6b0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #35 0x401a0790 in ?? () #36 0x40016ca0 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #37 0x in ?? () #38 0x401a0790 in ?? () #39 0xb780 in ?? () #40 0x4000baa3 in _dl_map_object_deps () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #41 0x4023892c in gnome_vfs_open_uri_cancellable (handle=0xb824, uri=0x823a058, open_mode=GNOME_VFS_OPEN_READ, context=0x0) at gnome-vfs-cancellable-ops.c:57 #42 0x40252c13 in gnome_vfs_open_uri (handle=0x4b, uri=0x4b, open_mode=75)at gnome-vfs-ops.c:81 #43 0x40252b8e in gnome_vfs_open (handle=0xb824, text_uri=0x4b Address 0x4b out of bounds, open_mode=75) at gnome-vfs-ops.c:58 #44 0x4025ba23 in gnome_vfs_read_entire_file ( uri=0x4b Address 0x4b out of bounds, file_size=0xb864, file_contents=0xb868) at gnome-vfs-utils.c:1058 #45 0x08069144 in gedit_document_io_error_quark () #46 0x4087dcdc in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #47 0x4087b5c2 in g_main_depth () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #48 0x4087c638 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #49 0x4087c970 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #50 0x4087cf13 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #51 0x40572243 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #52 0x0806071b in main () Thread 1 (Thread 16384 (LWP 11273)): #0 0x4040cbe8 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0x4019db5c in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x4015a434 in libgnomeui_module_info_get () from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x4040b825 in __pthread_sighandler () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 signal handler called No symbol table info available. #5 0x in ?? () No symbol table info available. #6
Bug#308232: Pending upload
tags 308232 + pending tags 308789 + pending tags 309227 + pending tags 309475 + pending tags 311169 + pending tags 311980 + pending thanks Those bugs are pending upload. Fixed in the SVN repository, release: 2.18-7. Cheers. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sukria.net « Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. » Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
Bug#295571: marked as done (ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:02:28 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295571: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 19:06:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 16 11:06:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D1UVK-0004nM-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:06:30 -0800 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8306218064 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:06:29 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 277F86E0EF; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:08:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:08:50 -0500 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ia64 unstable debootstrap fails due to libparted rename Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.7.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debootstrap Version: 0.2.45-0.1 Severity: normal debootstrap fails to bootstrap sid on ia64 now, because libparted1.6-0 is gone, replaced with libparted1.6-12. debootstrap needs an update for this (and will need another update when the new parted reaches sarge). --=20 see shy jo --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCE5pCd8HHehbQuO8RAn/sAJ9+TVfJjoGCUO2GEuUD7ZQzE6iBAwCfUBpJ g8L/TyPADDHRPYEexFycUGE= =GHvB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- --- Received: (at 295571-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 15:10:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 08:10:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhU6c-0003TH-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:10:34 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhTym-0001Im-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:02:28 -0400 From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#295571: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:02:28 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 18 Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 0.3.0 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_0.3.0_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.0_i386.udeb debootstrap_0.3.0.dsc to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.0.dsc debootstrap_0.3.0.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.0.tar.gz debootstrap_0.3.0_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.0_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au (supplier of updated debootstrap package) (This
Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found
Package: bind9-host Version: 1:9.3.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages bind9-host depends on: ii libbind9-0 1:9.3.1-2BIND9 Shared Library used by BIND ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdns201:9.3.1-2DNS Shared Library used by BIND ii libisc9 1:9.3.1-2ISC Shared Library used by BIND ii libisccfg1 1:9.3.1-2Config File Handling Library used ii liblwres1 1:9.3.1-2Lightweight Resolver Library used ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries -- no debconf information The package returns: host: couldn't get address for '': not found when running: host xxx.tld -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#200185: marked as done (ccache: Incorrect symlinks in /usr/lib/ccache)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:32:18 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#200185: fixed in ccache 2.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jul 2003 23:28:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 05 18:28:01 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19YwRl-00019Y-00; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19YwRk-0004Vq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 19:28:01 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19YwRk-0004Ww-6y for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:28:00 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ccache: Incorrect symlinks in /usr/lib/ccache From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:28:00 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: ccache Version: 2.2-2 Severity: normal The symlinks in /usr/lib/ccache are named i386-linux-linux-gcc etc. instead of i386-linux-gcc. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages ccache depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 200185-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 16:38:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 09:38:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhVTT-0003CG-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:38:15 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhVNi-SM-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:32:18 -0400 From: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#200185: fixed in ccache 2.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:32:18 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: ccache Source-Version: 2.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ccache, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ccache_2.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/ccache/ccache_2.4-1.diff.gz ccache_2.4-1.dsc to pool/main/c/ccache/ccache_2.4-1.dsc ccache_2.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/ccache/ccache_2.4-1_i386.deb ccache_2.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/ccache/ccache_2.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ccache package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:05:34 -0400 Source: ccache Binary: ccache Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francois
Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:04:20PM +0100, Barrie Millar wrote: The debugging information for this error is shown at the bottom of this message. Unfortunately it seems most of the symbols have been stripped. All binaries in Debian are stripped, usually with debhelper's dh_strip; (which just calls /usr/bin/strip with appropriate arguments). If you compile the binary yourself, (apt-get -b source gedit) you will get the debugging symbols in the backtrace (depending on the build system, you might have to first do something like DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip). You might also compile the libraries nostrip, and then there will be symbols there, too. If somebody can tell me how to output a package information view like those I see in other posts (sample shown below), I'll post one of my own. I've had a look around, but can't see how it's done anywhere. You can just use the reportbug tool to report bugs. Otherwise, you can dpkg -l gedit, if that is the only packages about which you want information. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 313081 is forwarded to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 313081 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 Bug#313081: find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./ Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?func=detailitemitem_id=13381. severity 313081 serious Bug#313081: find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./ Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 298152 serious Bug#298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64 Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 Summary: infinite loop with -follow. Project: findutils Submitted by: ametzler Submitted on: Son 12.06.2005 um 17:17 Category: find Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: None Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Name: Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: None Fixed Release: None ___ Details: Hello, this was found by Zhangrong Huang in http://bugs.debian.org/313081 mkdir testingfindagain ln -s . testingfindagain/symlink now find testingfindagain -follow will generate an endless loop. (For testing I suggest piping into head -c 200, otherwise you might trigger OOM) This was introduced between 4.2.18 and 4.2.19 (when changing find.c from r1.72 to r1.73). 4.2.x up to 4.2.18 will output this and exit: find: Symbolic link `testingfindagain/symlink' is part of a loop in the directory hierarchy; we have already visited the directory to which it points. testingfindagain testingfindagain/symlink cu andreas ___ Carbon-Copy List: CC Address | Comment +- [EMAIL PROTECTED]| original bugsubmitter ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313014: marked as done (mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:45:34 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 10:00:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 03:00:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dh2mu-0005bT-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B402171E36; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mol-modules-2.6.8 Version: 1:0.9.70+2.6.8+12 Severity: serious The current version of mol-modules-2.6.8 is uninstallable in unstable, because it depends on kernel-image-2.6.8-powerpc (= 2.6.8-12) where the current version in unstable is 2.6.8-16. This strict dependency is a serious problem, and contributed to not being able to get a security-fixed powerpc kernel into testing in time for sarge. The current dependency handling is really quite unmaintainable, IMHO, and I don't believe etch should release with mol-modules in its current condition. This probably requires first fixing the powerpc kernel-image packages to encode a module ABI version in the package name, as is currently being done for most other architectures. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 313014-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 19:45:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 12:45:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from alsvidh.theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de (alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de) [129.187.162.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhYOx-0005qy-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:45:47 -0700 Received: by alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 666) id 95BC15DE52; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:45:34 +0200 (CEST) To: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support Organization: Lehrstuhl fuer vergleichende Astrozoologie X-Mahlzeit: Das ist per Saldo Gemuetlichkeit Reply-To: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jens Schmalzing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:45:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Langasek's message of Sat, 11 Jun 2005 03:00:24 -0700) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hi, Steve Langasek writes: The current version of mol-modules-2.6.8 is uninstallable in unstable, It is also obsolete, so I have asked for it to be removed from the archive. I hope this settles the matter. This strict dependency is a serious problem, and contributed to not being able to get a security-fixed powerpc kernel into testing in time for sarge. I'm sorry for not keeping up, but a bug report, an informal request, or an NMU would all have settled the matter withing a few days. It's not like the upgrade from 2.6.8-12
Bug#313263: r-cran-mnp: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP'
Package: r-cran-mnp Version: 2.3-2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/r-cran-mnp-2.3-2/src' ** R ** data ** moving datasets to lazyload DB ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), keep.source) : there is no package called 'MASS' Execution halted ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP' make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 298152
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 298152 patch Bug#298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313263: marked as done (r-cran-mnp: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP')
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:47:37 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313263: fixed in r-cran-mnp 2.3-2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 20:06:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 13:05:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhYiV-0003dO-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:05:59 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 15ACA382CE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28BC38254 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0657426136; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:56 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: r-cran-mnp: FTBFS: ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: r-cran-mnp Version: 2.3-2-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/r-cran-mnp-2.3-2/src' ** R ** data ** moving datasets to lazyload DB ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), keep.source) : there is no package called 'MASS' Execution halted ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'MNP' make: *** [R_any_arch] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 313263-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 20:53:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 13:53:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhZSI-0002JD-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:53:19 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhZMn-0004QB-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:47:37 -0400 From: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#313263: fixed in r-cran-mnp 2.3-2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:47:37 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: r-cran-mnp Source-Version: 2.3-2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of r-cran-mnp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/r-cran-mnp/r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2.diff.gz r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2.dsc to pool/main/r/r-cran-mnp/r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2.dsc r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/r-cran-mnp/r-cran-mnp_2.3-2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated r-cran-mnp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:31:48 -0500 Source: r-cran-mnp Binary: r-cran-mnp Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.3-2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Chris Lawrence
Bug#298152: #298152: checkinstall: incorrectly sets Arch:x86_64 for .deb under amd64
You should be using something like dpkg --print-architecture or dpkg-architecture instead. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#189698: marked as done (fenris: FTBFS: problems executing gdb)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#189698: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2003 17:49:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 19 12:49:47 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 196wTD-0004JU-00; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 12:49:47 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 196wTD-0004u7-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:49:47 -0400 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 196wTC-hA-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:49:46 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fenris: FTBFS: problems executing gdb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 19 Apr 2003 10:49:45 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 27 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: Package: fenris Version: 1:0.07build3244-2 Severity: serious From my build log: ... [+] GNU libc binary test: stripped? [+] GCC crt code binary test: passed [+] GNU libc linker test: passed [+] Endian and sizeof() checks: passed [+] Library mapping address: problems executing gdb! [-] I need gdb to determine your defaults. Please consult documentation. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 I'm not sure what's causing this, since the build log shows that gdb is getting installed as a build dependency. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 189698-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 21:38:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 14:38:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhaA1-0007Fc-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:38:29 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dha3w-Bd-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 From: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#189698: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: fenris Source-Version: 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fenris, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.diff.gz fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.dsc to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.dsc fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1_i386.deb fenris_0.07-m2+build3245.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated fenris package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP
Bug#230527: marked as done (fenris: FTBFS: Cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#230527: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 16:37:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 31 08:37:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Amy7Z-0006zJ-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:37:25 -0800 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Amy7X-0001et-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 11:37:23 -0500 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Amy7W-0007D0-7n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:37:22 -0800 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fenris: FTBFS: Cannot execute /lib/libc.so.6 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:37:21 -0800 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27 X-Spam-Level: Package: fenris Severity: serious Version: 1:0.07build3244-2.1 From my build log: ... [+] Version (build): 0.07-m (3244) [*] Overriding sanity checks! Yuppi! [+] Operating system check: Linux (supported) [+] Processor check: i686 (supported) [+] GNU C library version: ./build: line 1: /lib/libc.so.6: Permission denied cannot determine libc version! [-] I am affraid I cannot continue. Please consult documentation. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 I think that file was made non-executable because even if it were executable, the dynamic loader would fail with a failed assertion. I guess you'll have to find another method to find the glibc version. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.1 #1 Sun Jan 11 12:58:34 PST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 230527-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 21:38:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 14:38:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dha9r-0007Ev-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:38:19 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dha3w-Bh-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 From: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#230527: fixed in fenris 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:12 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: fenris Source-Version: 1:0.07-m2+build3245-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fenris, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.diff.gz fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.dsc to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1.dsc fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245-1_i386.deb fenris_0.07-m2+build3245.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/fenris/fenris_0.07-m2+build3245.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Processed: severity of 313217 is important, tagging 313217
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 313217 important Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.8 makes unstable nautilus 2.10 uninstallable Severity set to `important'. tags 313217 sid Bug#313217: unstable capplets 2.8 makes unstable nautilus 2.10 uninstallable There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 313219 is grave, tagging 313219
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 313219 grave Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file Severity set to `grave'. tags 313219 sid Bug#313219: gedit: Crashes when attempting to load a file There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 313218 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 313218 grave Bug#313218: gtodo: Program refuses to load if a single todo item exists Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308705: removing ipfwadm
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:47:40PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: There is no consensus that this package should be removed. Since I am still willing to maintain it, I don't believe removal is appropriate at this time. I see, I'm curious how many people actually still use this package, now that 2.2 kernels will get dropped for Etch quite likely, and only 2.4/2.6 remain. But well, as you note, there's at least someone (you) supporting it to remain in Debian, and that has always been enough reason in Debian to keep a package. Thanks, --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 313229 important Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313229: bind9-host: Returns host: couldn't get address for '': not found
severity 313229 important thanks On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 04:32:43PM +0100, Colin Davis wrote: Package: bind9-host Version: 1:9.3.1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The package returns: host: couldn't get address for '': not found when running: host xxx.tld $ host xxx.tld Host xxx.tld not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) $ This doesn't seem to be reproducible here; the program works fine for me. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#272994: marked as done (gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175)
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:03:15 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#272994: gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2004 10:09:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 23 03:09:19 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from elsa.lautre.net (lautre3.lautre.net) [80.67.172.63] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CAQXP-0007wo-00; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 03:09:19 -0700 Received: from mydomain.com (lautre3 [127.0.0.1]) by lautre3.lautre.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 67A0D5B71 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gent33.insa-lyon.fr ([134.214.85.233]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user aurelien_aurel32.net) by mail.jarno.name with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_FAKE_HELO_DOTCOM autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-m68hc1x Version: 1:3.3.4+2.92-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Automatic build of gcc-m68hc1x_1:3.3.4+2.92-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5[...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0), binutils-m68hc1x (= 1:2.15+2.92-1), autoconf2.13, libtool, gawk | awk, bison, flex, gettext, texinfo, zlib1g-dev, bzip2[...] Toolchain package versions: libc6.1-dev_2.3.2.ds1-16 linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.4-11 g++-3.3_1:3.3.4-11 binutils_2.15-2 libstdc++5_1:3.3.4-11 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.4-11[...] /build/buildd/gcc-m68hc1x-3.3.4+2.92/build/gcc/xgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-m68hc1x-3.3.4+2.92/build/gcc/ -B/usr/m68hc11/bin/ -B/usr/m68hc11/lib/ -isystem /usr/m68hc11/include -Os -mrelax -DUSE_GAS -DIN_GCC -g -DIN_LIBGCC2 -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../src/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/config -I../../src/gcc/../include -DFINE_GRAINED_LIBRARIES -DL_unpack_sf -c fp-bit.c -o libgcc/./_unpack_sf.ofp-bit.c: In function `__unpack_f': fp-bit.c:551: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 242 84 85 8 (nil) (set (reg:HI 1 d [69]) (mem/s:HI (plus:HI (mem/f:HI (plus:HI (reg/f:HI 9 *_.frame) (const_int 9 [0x9])) [8 dst+0 S2 A8]) (const_int 2 [0x2])) [3 variable.normal_exp+0 S2 A8])) -1 (nil)(nil)) fp-bit.c:551: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. make[3]: *** [libgcc/./_unpack_sf.o] Error 1 See log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-m68hc1xver=1%3A3.3.4%2B2.92-1arch=ia64stamp=1094935660file=logas=raw Aurelien --- Received: (at 272994-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 22:03:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 15:03:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhaY1-0006Vx-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:03:17 -0700 Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:6439:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DhaXz-00051E-Q1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:03:15 +0200 Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DhaXz-0006VL-FA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:03:15 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:03:15 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#272994: gcc-m68hc1x: [ia64] FTBFS: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0
Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.
Update of bug #13381 (project findutils): Severity: 3 - Normal = 6 - Security Status:None = Fixed Assigned to:None = jay ___ Follow-up Comment #1: NB: THIS BUG IS A SECURITY HOLE (denial of updatedb service by users, possibly denial of service to security checks based on find). Please note the list of affected versions of findutils. The problem was introduced because safely_chdir() in find.c now sometimes avoids needing to stat the destination directory, and so stat_buf was left unpopulated. This problem is fixed by the attached patch, which has been committed into the development code. The scope of the security problem extends only to the indefinite loop, the problem does not result in users being able to persuade find to process parts of the filesystem that should be excluded. Having said this, this bug only occurs if the -L option was used, which normally should not be the case with any security checks - because they should not follow symbolic links, in general. The next release of findutils will include this fix. The NEWS file will outline the severity of the problem. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 313014 Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 313014 mol-modules-2.6.11 Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support Bug reassigned from package `mol-modules-2.6.8' to `mol-modules-2.6.11'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313014: mol-modules tight version bindings make this package uninstallable, thwart security support
reopen 313014 reassign 313014 mol-modules-2.6.11 thanks On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 09:45:34PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: Steve Langasek writes: The current version of mol-modules-2.6.8 is uninstallable in unstable, It is also obsolete, so I have asked for it to be removed from the archive. I hope this settles the matter. Well, the same issue with strict dependencies applies to other versions of mol-modules. This strict dependency is a serious problem, and contributed to not being able to get a security-fixed powerpc kernel into testing in time for sarge. I'm sorry for not keeping up, but a bug report, an informal request, or an NMU would all have settled the matter withing a few days. It's not like the upgrade from 2.6.8-12 to 2.6.8-16 was a last-minute change. Unfortunately, we didn't have a few days for sarge by the time this was noticed. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#313150: marked as done (netinstall for sarge points to testing)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 08:11:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 01:11:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhNZ8-0002JL-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:11:34 -0700 Received: from [192.168.10.101] (janjaap.xs4all.nl [213.84.218.16]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5C8BXkL089722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:11:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:15:32 +0200 From: Jan-Jaap Fahner [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: netinstall for sarge points to testing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: apt-get Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: serious Discovered when doing a fresh install: When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list for apt is set up to point to 'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the netsetup for sarge, you still get an RC3 installation. Manual correction of sources.list is required to fix this. This could be an error in base-config or in apt-get, but for all practical purposes it breaks apt. --- Received: (at 313150-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 23:01:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 16:01:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhbSe-0001fv-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:49 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22274171E36; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jan-Jaap Fahner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:43:34PM +0200, Jan-Jaap Fahner wrote: I just checked. It says: Debian GNU/Linux testing Sarge - Official=20 Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (20050322) which means it *should* point to testing. I downloaded it from http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ though, after the= =20 final release, and the page at that time already said 'stable'. The filename was changed, too. I'm=20 reasonably sure that the rc3 netinst wasn't called sarge-i386-netinst.iso. I've just downloaded the most current version, which, incidentally, has= =20 a different name once again (debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso). That one is fine, and points to stable,= =20 so I suppose this bug should be closed. There's probably no point in investigating any further. Ok, closing the bug. Thanks for the follow-up. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description:
Bug#313219: gedit: Additional Information
Package: gedit Version: 2.10.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #313219 Hi I've included some relevant information based on this bug. I am now also using reportbug as suggested. I'm currently completing a major project and therefore have very little spare time available to me. Unfortunately, I will therefore be unable to do any significant debugging, although I'll do as much as I can to help. Firstly, I am indeed using the 2.4 kernel, specifically a slightly modified version of the 2.4.27 (which is identical to the Debian one with the exception of providing more modules). I tried reproducing the bug with the 2.6.11 kernel, but it seems to work perfectly there. I suspect that the bug you have previously identified as being the most likely is therefore correct. I compiled a new binary by following the provided instructions as well as those provided in this thread. However, oddly enough, the output I originally received from the Gnome bug tracker is still missing the symbols. I ran gdb with gedit to see if that would provide any additional information, but it seems the symbols are still stripped, despite setting the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS to nostrip and re-building. I'm not sure what went wrong here, but given the fact it works on the 2.6 kernel, I suspect that the bug may already of been tracked down. Could you tell me in what package this bug has appeared, I'm interested to see what it says myself. I've attached a copy of the gdb output in case you find it of use to you. This is from the re-built copy of Gedit. Regards, Barrie --- Gdb output --- GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as i386-linux...Using host libthread_db library /lib/ libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) set pagination 0 (gdb) run ./gedit Starting program: /tmp/gedit/gedit-2.10.3/debian/tmp/usr/bin/gedit ../gedit [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 16384 (LWP 14298)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 14298)] 0x in ?? () (gdb) bt #0 0x in ?? () #1 0x0014 in ?? () #2 0x40f104d0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so #3 0x40f0b660 in ?? () from /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so #4 0x0014 in ?? () #5 0x in ?? () #6 0x in ?? () #7 0x in ?? () #8 0x in ?? () #9 0x0002 in ?? () #10 0x40017028 in ?? () #11 0x0007 in ?? () #12 0x0001 in ?? () #13 0x in ?? () #14 0x0001 in ?? () #15 0x in ?? () #16 0xb6a4 in ?? () #17 0xb6c4 in ?? () #18 0x40017028 in ?? () #19 0x0007 in ?? () #20 0x0001 in ?? () #21 0x in ?? () #22 0x03e788e5 in ?? () #23 0x4018e790 in ?? () #24 0x4020c27e in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #25 0x4025877c in MAX_AVAILABLE_THREADS () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #26 0x in ?? () #27 0x40260864 in __JCR_LIST__ () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #28 0x0823a6a0 in ?? () #29 0x402056b0 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 #30 0x4018e790 in ?? () #31 0x40016ca0 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #32 0x in ?? () #33 0x4018e790 in ?? () #34 0xb700 in ?? () #35 0x4000baa3 in _dl_map_object_deps () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #36 0x4022292c in gnome_vfs_open_uri_cancellable (handle=0xb7a4, uri=0x81293 c0, open_mode=GNOME_VFS_OPEN_READ, context=0x0) at gnome-vfs-cancellable-ops.c:5 7 #37 0x4023cc13 in gnome_vfs_open_uri (handle=0x4b, uri=0x4b, open_mode=75) at gn ome-vfs-ops.c:81 #38 0x4023cb8e in gnome_vfs_open (handle=0xb7a4, text_uri=0x4b Address 0x4b out of bounds, open_mode=75) at gnome-vfs-ops.c:58 #39 0x40245a23 in gnome_vfs_read_entire_file (uri=0x4b Address 0x4b out of boun ds, file_size=0xb7e4, file_contents=0xb7e8) at gnome-vfs-utils.c:1058 #40 0x08069144 in load_local (doc=0x823c6f0) at gedit-document.c:1196 #41 0x40866cdc in g_main_context_wakeup () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #42 0x408645c2 in g_main_depth () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #43 0x40865638 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #44 0x40865970 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #45 0x40865f13 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 #46 0x4055b243 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 #47 0x0806071b in main (argc=0, argv=0xba04) at gedit2.c:435 --- End of output --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-bm041127-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gedit depends on: ii gconf2 2.10.0-2
Bug#313081: [bug #13381] infinite loop with -follow.
Update of bug #13381 (project findutils): Open/Closed:Open = Closed Release:None = 4.2.19 Fixed Release:None = 4.2.22 ___ Follow-up Comment #2: You can download a release of findutils in which this problem is fixed from ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/findutils. The releases on alpha.gnu.org are for testing purposes, so please take the time to download the release and verify that your problem has been solved. Once the release has been sufficiently tested, it can be uploaded to ftp.gnu.org for everybody to use it. ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13381 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313316: mozilla-js-debugger: menu option doesn't do anything at all.
Package: mozilla-js-debugger Version: 2:1.7.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I go to Tools - Web Development - JavaScript Debugger ... and nothing happens. Nothing at all. The JavaScript Console shows no errors, and neither does the text console Mozilla is run from. I don't know how long ago it broke, but it used to work. Nick Lewycky -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mozilla-js-debugger depends on: ii mozilla-browser 2:1.7.8-1 The Mozilla Internet application s -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263359: wap-wml-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' and 'libxml-dev
Hi Fernando, Are you still interested in maintaining wap-wml-tools? This RC bug has been open for ten months now, because the source package doesn't comply with current policy. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 313081
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 313081 security Bug#313081: find -follow: infinite loop with symlinks to ./ Tags were: confirmed Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#278675: debget: relies on outdated archive structure
Hi Roderick, Are you still interested in maintaining debget? Is the patch supplied by Alexis to fix this RC bug satisfactory? FWIW, I don't think there's much point to keeping this package in the archive if no one currently finds it useful, just on the chance that someone may fix it later. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#175604: cxx's compaq mangling style not supported by binutils
Hi Adam, Since the cxx package is now unusable with current binutils, is there any reason to keep this package around in the archive? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#313324: hardware-monitor: Not installable on unstable using GNOME 2.10
Package: hardware-monitor Version: 1.2-1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ aptitude install hardware-monitor Lser paketlistor... Frdig Bygger beroendetrd Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Frdig Reading task descriptions... Frdig E: Kunde inte korrigera problemen, du har hllt trasiga paket. E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed E: Unable to resolve some dependencies! Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following packages have unmet dependencies: hardware-monitor: Beror: libgtop2-2 but it is not installable $ aptitude install libgtop2-2 Lser paketlistor... Frdig Bygger beroendetrd Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Frdig Reading task descriptions... Frdig The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED: gnome-backgrounds The following packages will be automatically REMOVED: gnome gnome-applets gnome-applets-data gnome-applets-dbg gnome-applets-dev gnome-core gnome-desktop-environment gnome-office python-gnome2-extras python2.3-gnome2-extras The following NEW packages will be installed: libgtop2-2 The following packages will be REMOVED: gnome gnome-applets gnome-applets-data gnome-applets-dbg gnome-applets-dev gnome-core gnome-desktop-environment gnome-office gnome-system-monitor libgtop2-5 python-gnome2-extras python2.3-gnome2-extras 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 13 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 361kB of archives. After unpacking 53,4MB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] Seems it needs to be updated a bit. /Mikael -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages hardware-monitor depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.0-9 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database syste ii libgconfmm-2.6-1 2.8.1-1 C++ wrappers for GConf (shared lib ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglademm-2.4-1 2.4.1-2 C++ wrappers for libglade2 (shared ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1 2.6.1-1 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( pn libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-1 Not found. ii libgnome2-0 2.10.0-3The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display pn libgnomecanvasmm-2.6-1 Not found. pn libgnomemm-2.6-1 Not found. ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.0-2The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf pn libgnomeuimm-2.6-1 Not found. ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-4The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.7-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkmm-2.4-1 1:2.4.11-2 C++ wrappers for GTK+ 2.4 (shared pn libgtop2-2 Not found. ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpanel-applet2-0 2.10.1-3library for GNOME 2 panel applets ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsensors3 1:2.9.1-2 library to read temperature/voltag ii libsigc++-2.0-0 2.0.10-1type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
