Processed: tagging 196590

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 196590 wontfix help
Bug#196590: stable is missing several security updates
Tags were: woody security
Tags added: wontfix, help


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#305971: f2c also broken on Woody i386 after security upgrade

[HartRAO VLBI Operator]

Package: f2c
Version: 20010821-3.2
Followup-For: Bug #305971

The version of f2c now in Woody ie. 3.0r6, segmentation faults on startup
on i386 as well with the same strace as quoted for m68k.  The latest
security patch seems to have broken the executable completely.  I'm
guessing this would have to be fixed via security.debian.org since woody
is now closed for updates.

Regards
  Jonathan Quick

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux phlye 2.4.18-1-386 #1 Wed Apr 14 17:34:59 UTC 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages f2c depends on:
ii  libc6 2.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: adding etch to the list of affect distributions

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 package imagemagick
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: imagemagick

 tags 214623 etch
Bug#214623: Non-free logo included in main
Tags were: sarge-ignore sid sarge woody
Tags added: etch

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#214623: marked as done (Non-free logo included in main)

[browaeys . alban]

This is a followup for :
http://bugs.debian.org/214623


The last step of the fix have been unaswered for a year :

 On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 07:03:06AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
  Debian's imagemagick package includes the ImageMagick logo, which is
  apparently not DFSG free. There are a number of files in the package
  which contain the logo or some part of it.
  
  In /usr/share/doc/imagemagick/Copyright.txt.gz, the following appears:
  
   8)
 The ImageMagick logo is copyright Pineapple USA Inc. It is freely
   distributable, however, modifications to the logo are not 
   permitted.
 [...]
   imagemagick (5:6.0.0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
   .
 * Remove ImageMagick logo image from magick.c.
 * Remove ImageMagick logo files. closes: #214623
 
 While you've removed the offending files from the binary packages,
 you're still distributing non-free material in the source package. The
 only way to fully address this bug is by removing the images from the
 .orig.tar.gz, eg. by creating an imagemagick_6.0.0.7.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
 (cf. the recent xfree upload).

Do you disagree (then tag wontfix) or was it lost ?


Regards
Alban



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314534: my solution

[Thomas CLavier]

I have test this solution :

- add a user lists-archives with home directory in
/var/lib/lists-archives and password disabled
- add user lists-archives in the group list
- in /etc/alias delete this line :
  lists-archives: |/usr/bin/procmail /etc/lists-archives/procmailrc
- in /var/lib/lists-archives add a symlink to the procmailrc file :
  ln -s /etc/lists-archives/procmailrc .procmailrc
- change owner of unfilteredmbox to lists-archives

for me, it's work fine.

-- 
Thomas Clavier  http://www.tcweb.org
Lille Sans Fil  http://www.lillesansfil.org
+33 (0)6 20 81 81 30


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312024: marked as done (proguard: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:47:19 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312024: fixed in proguard 3.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2005 22:52:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 04 15:52:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DehVA-0003ks-00; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:52:24 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j54MqMvQ010254
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:52:22 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j54MqMTA010252;
Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:52:22 -0700
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: proguard: ftbfs [sparc] cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file 
or directory
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:52:22 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: proguard
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

proguard fails to build from source on sparc and all other buildds,
duplicated on sparc pbuilder.


dh_install -pproguard  
cp: cannot stat `./lib/proguard.jar': No such file or directory
dh_install: command returned error code 256
make: *** [binary-install/proguard] Error 1


---
Received: (at 312024-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 13:52:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 06:52:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjHH4-0002Jf-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 06:52:46 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjHBn-0001cZ-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:47:19 -0400
From: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#312024: fixed in proguard 3.2-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:47:19 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: proguard
Source-Version: 3.2-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
proguard, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

proguard_3.2-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-3.diff.gz
proguard_3.2-3.dsc
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-3.dsc
proguard_3.2-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/proguard/proguard_3.2-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated proguard package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:25:24 +0100
Source: proguard
Binary: proguard
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 proguard   - java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator
Closes: 312024
Changes: 
 proguard (3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules: fix FTBFS (Closes: #312024)
   * debian/control: fix FTBFS by added Build-Depend on fastjar
 - Thanks to Regis Boudin 

Bug#207932: Bug #207932 - emacs21: Includes non-free documents

[browaeys . alban]

Followup for :
http://bugs.debian.org/207932

Thanks you for helping debian tracks licencing issues. Though this
bug looks like an extension of the GFDL issue to some non
documentation texts. This have not been agreed upon by
debian-legal (in fact as far as i know licences and such
documents have been explicitely exclude from the need to be DSFG
free ).


Again thank you for taking part in this time consuming task.
Please ask on debian-legal when you encounter new types of
documents not being explicitely stated in previous consensus
(even if closely related).


By the way it is not a bad thing to track those not agreed upon documents 
licence issues. Though please keep the talks about them on
debian-legal. Maintainers do another jobs which is fixing bugs
and making debian easier to use. Most of them don't want to hours
looking after advanced legal issues. That s why debian-legal
exists :)

By the way even if a consensus is reached on debian-legal it
would be helpfull to make a separate listing of those documents
and discuss it with the release team and debian-devel. But please
not the other way around. I would call it  hijacking debian-legal.

I guess this bug can be closed as out of topic for the bts.

Regards
Alban



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314628: libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform

[Bernd Hanisch]

Package: libmagick6
Version: 6:6.2.3.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

the package missing a dependency on libltdl3 on the amd64 platform. i installed 
the lib manually to get around this bug.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
de_DE)

Versions of packages libmagick6 depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.13.9  Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjasper-1.701-11.701.0-2   The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblcms1 1.13-1  Color management library
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii  libtiff4 3.7.2-3 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

libmagick6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libmagick6 is related to:
ii  reportbug 3.13   reports bugs in the Debian distrib
pn  totem-gstreamer   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312106: preconfiguration bug break woody to sarge upgrade

[arnaud . quette]

Salut Bill,

 When trying to upgrade from woody, nut-cgi .config file fails with:
 
 Preconfiguring packages ...
 nut-cgi failed to preconfigure, with exit status 10
 (Reading database ... 65666 files and directories currently installed.)
 Preparing to replace nut-cgi 0.45.5-rel-1 (using 
.../nut-cgi_2.0.1-3_i386.deb) ...
 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nut-cgi_2.0.1-3_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
  subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 10
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  /var/cache/apt/archives/nut-cgi_2.0.1-3_i386.deb
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 
 See bug #312065.

First, thanks for your report and sorry not to have been
able to answer before...

I think I've found the problem (typo error on db_get and
db_fset, calling nut instead of nut-cgi) or at least one problem!

But as I'm not a debconf guru, I still have some doubt! The
problem seems to occur only when the user reply No,
which abort the install/upgrade process with an exit 1...
Note that I've based this upon nut ones that exists for
a long time (more than 3 years) which produce the same
error under the same condition.

Any advices welcomed.

Arnaud


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314639: proguard: FTBFS: jar: Command not found

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: proguard
Version: 3.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'proguard' in a clean chroot on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

 debian/rules binary
mkdir -p build
mkdir -p lib
jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguard -sourcepath src 
src/proguard/ProGuard.java
jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/retrace -sourcepath src 
src/proguard/retrace/ReTrace.java
jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguardgui -cp build/proguard -sourcepath src 
src/proguard/gui/ProGuardGUI.java
jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -cp /usr/lib/java/ant-1.6.jar -d build -sourcepath src 
src/proguard/gui/ProGuardGUI.java
jar cfm lib/proguard.jar proguard.manifest -C build proguard
make: jar: Command not found
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127


Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/proguard-3.2/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/proguard-3.2/debian/control 2005-06-17 17:24:44.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-06-17 17:24:30.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: devel
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, jikes-classpath, libant1.6-java
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), cdbs, kaffe, jikes-classpath, 
libant1.6-java
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: proguard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314639: proguard: FTBFS: jar: Command not found

[Sam Clegg]

Andreas Jochens wrote:
 Package: proguard
 Version: 3.2-2
 Severity: serious
 Tags: patch
 
 When building 'proguard' in a clean chroot on amd64/unstable,
 I get the following error:
 
  debian/rules binary
 mkdir -p build
 mkdir -p lib
 jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguard -sourcepath src 
 src/proguard/ProGuard.java
 jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/retrace -sourcepath src 
 src/proguard/retrace/ReTrace.java
 jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -d build/proguardgui -cp build/proguard -sourcepath 
 src src/proguard/gui/ProGuardGUI.java
 jikes-classpath +E +Z0 -cp /usr/lib/java/ant-1.6.jar -d build -sourcepath src 
 src/proguard/gui/ProGuardGUI.java
 jar cfm lib/proguard.jar proguard.manifest -C build proguard
 make: jar: Command not found
 make: *** [binary-indep] Error 127
 

Thanks for the patch.  I just uploaded a new version that build-depends
on fastjar.  However I was assuming that fastjar provided the 'jar'
command.   Looks like i'll still need anther upload that uses the
fastjar command explicitly.

cheers,
sam
-- 
sam clegg
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369
$superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Greg Webster]

Package: ssh
Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
Severity: critical
File: /usr/sbin/sshd
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole

Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh
determines that the login attempt is for a valid account, attackers can
statistically prove the existence of accounts on a ssh-accessible server
remotely. This cuts down greatly on the difficulty of a brute-force
password-guessing attack. Since user accounts often use worse patterns
than (hopefully) root does, it doesn't take much to pick user accounts
that are other than standard accounts and attempt to break in.

I'd strongly suggest either a randomized delay on responses for login
attempts on non-existent accounts, or a consistent delay between
existing and non-existent accounts, or some other method of hiding this
information.

This attack is already in the wild, as shown in logs:
Jun 16 08:30:14 localhost sshd[30986]: Illegal user jacob from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:16 localhost sshd[30988]: Illegal user michael from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:18 localhost sshd[30990]: Illegal user joshua from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:20 localhost sshd[30992]: Illegal user matthew from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:22 localhost sshd[30994]: Illegal user andrew from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:22 localhost sshd[30996]: Illegal user jacob from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:24 localhost sshd[30998]: Illegal user joseph from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:24 localhost sshd[31000]: Illegal user michael from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:26 localhost sshd[31002]: Illegal user ethan from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:26 localhost sshd[31004]: Illegal user joshua from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:28 localhost sshd[31006]: Illegal user daniel from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:28 localhost sshd[31008]: Illegal user matthew from
211.196.3.60
Jun 16 08:30:30 localhost sshd[31010]: Illegal user christopher from
211.196.3.60

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-20041103
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages ssh depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf 1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg1.10.28  Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-modules  0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime  0.76-22  Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
  ssh/insecure_rshd:
  ssh/privsep_ask: true
  ssh/user_environment_tell:
* ssh/forward_warning:
* ssh/insecure_telnetd:
  ssh/new_config: true
* ssh/use_old_init_script: true
  ssh/SUID_client: true
  ssh/disable_cr_auth: false
* ssh/privsep_tell:
  ssh/ssh2_keys_merged:
  ssh/protocol2_only: true
  ssh/encrypted_host_key_but_no_keygen:
  ssh/run_sshd: true


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312670: marked as done (mtr: debian/copyright doesn't list where the upstream sources were obtained)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:27:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in 0.69-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2005 13:21:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 09 06:21:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DgMxx-0002TU-00; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:21:02 -0700
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (popix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de 
[129.206.119.235])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j59DO2tL015380
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:24:02 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de 
[129.206.100.140])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA4563054
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:20:58 +0200
Received: from live (p54A706B9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.167.6.185])
(authenticated bits=0)
by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 
j59DL6RV029429
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:21:07 +0200
Received: from fernst by live with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DgMxt-00040f-2Z
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:20:57 +0200
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:20:54 +0200
From: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mtr: debian/copyright doesn't list where the upstream sources were 
obtained
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: mtr
Version: 0.69-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5 Copyright information

Hello Robert,

your newly created debian/copright violates a must directive of the
Debian Policy, please see
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs#s-copyrightfile:
| In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
| (if any) were obtained.

Cheers,
Flo

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCqEI2s3U+TVFLPnwRAo7OAKCLTO0SQEmjz6M+h5bKmylrFFB5QwCeOewm
4yA0bKdqxqeVAXgn2gAt5/8=
=Jgm9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--

---
Received: (at 312670-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 16:27:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 09:27:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 206-124-146-40.blarg.net (frantica.lly.org) [206.124.146.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjJge-0008Bl-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:27:20 -0700
Received: by frantica.lly.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9CA7451B2A6; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:27:15 -0700
From: Robert Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in 0.69-2
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

The new copyright file in 0.69-2 in unstable addresses this.
-- 
Robert Woodcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
perl -e '$a-=($_%4-2)*4/$_++while++$_2e6;print$a\n'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity fix

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 314447 critical
Bug#314447: spamassassin: CAN-2005-1266 Denial of Service Vulnerability in 
SpamAssassin 3.0.1-3.0.3, fixed in 3.0.4
Severity set to `critical'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#225539: python-pcgi: removal is an option

[Oleksandr Moskalenko]

Package: python-pcgi
Followup-For: Bug #225539

I've investigated this package when looking at RC bugs before Sarge release.
The upstream of this software has changed drastically and unless this is
heavily used by someone it might be better to start packaging new upstream
from scratch.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc3-20050506-mrb319
Locale: LANG=uk_UA.KOI8-U, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages python-pcgi is related to:
ii  reportbug 3.13   reports bugs in the Debian distrib
pn  totem-gstreamer   none (no description available)

Processed: Re: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install MD5Sum mismatch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 314568 ftp.debian.org
Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install MD5Sum mismatch
Bug reassigned from package `libstdc++6-4.0-dev' to `ftp.debian.org'.

 severity 314568 important
Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install MD5Sum mismatch
Severity set to `important'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314568: libstdc++6-4.0-dev will not install MD5Sum mismatch

[Matthias Klose]

reassign 314568 ftp.debian.org
severity 314568 important
thanks

not a package problem. Please try to get the package from another
mirror.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Greg Webster]

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:51 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
  Package: ssh
  Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
  Severity: critical
  File: /usr/sbin/sshd
  Tags: security
  Justification: root security hole
  
  Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh
  determines that the login attempt is for a valid account, attackers can
  statistically prove the existence of accounts on a ssh-accessible server
  remotely. This cuts down greatly on the difficulty of a brute-force
  password-guessing attack. Since user accounts often use worse patterns
  than (hopefully) root does, it doesn't take much to pick user accounts
  that are other than standard accounts and attempt to break in.
 You're talking about microsecond delays, right?

Nope...human-discernable delays. Give it a shot on your system. I can
easily determine just by mentally counting, if an account is valid.

  I'd strongly suggest either a randomized delay on responses for login
  attempts on non-existent accounts, or a consistent delay between
  existing and non-existent accounts, or some other method of hiding this
  information.
 Didn't this get implemented?  I recall hearing about this some time
 ago (~18 months?), probably on one of the Debian lists.

Don't think so. I've noted this behaviour on 8 internet-facing servers
now, with fully updated ssh packages (the system I sent this from was my
own workstation, which does have the problem, but is behind a few levels
of firewall...I should probably have sent it from one of the affected
machines).

  This attack is already in the wild, as shown in logs:
 This doesn't seem to indicate any particular attack.  I don't know if
 there's any evidence that its doing anything other than sshing to
 $user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Though there is no evidence to support my
 claim, either.  It would be interesting to force the use of password
 authentication, rather than challenge-response, to see what password
 is being used.  Takers?). 

Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what
I've been seeing.

Thanks,

Greg

-- 
Greg Webster  -  System Administrator
-
intouch.ca gastips.com epredictor.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Justin Pryzby]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
 Package: ssh
 Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
 Severity: critical
 File: /usr/sbin/sshd
 Tags: security
 Justification: root security hole
 
 Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh
 determines that the login attempt is for a valid account, attackers can
 statistically prove the existence of accounts on a ssh-accessible server
 remotely. This cuts down greatly on the difficulty of a brute-force
 password-guessing attack. Since user accounts often use worse patterns
 than (hopefully) root does, it doesn't take much to pick user accounts
 that are other than standard accounts and attempt to break in.
You're talking about microsecond delays, right?

 I'd strongly suggest either a randomized delay on responses for login
 attempts on non-existent accounts, or a consistent delay between
 existing and non-existent accounts, or some other method of hiding this
 information.
Didn't this get implemented?  I recall hearing about this some time
ago (~18 months?), probably on one of the Debian lists.

 This attack is already in the wild, as shown in logs:
This doesn't seem to indicate any particular attack.  I don't know if
there's any evidence that its doing anything other than sshing to
$user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Though there is no evidence to support my
claim, either.  It would be interesting to force the use of password
authentication, rather than challenge-response, to see what password
is being used.  Takers?). 

 Jun 16 08:30:14 localhost sshd[30986]: Illegal user jacob from
 211.196.3.60
 Jun 16 08:30:16 localhost sshd[30988]: Illegal user michael from
 211.196.3.60
...

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Justin Pryzby]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:59:45AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
 On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:51 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
  On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
   Package: ssh
   Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
   Severity: critical
   File: /usr/sbin/sshd
   Tags: security
   Justification: root security hole
   
   Due to the delay that is caused by password checking, once ssh
   determines that the login attempt is for a valid account, attackers can
   statistically prove the existence of accounts on a ssh-accessible server
   remotely. This cuts down greatly on the difficulty of a brute-force
   password-guessing attack. Since user accounts often use worse patterns
   than (hopefully) root does, it doesn't take much to pick user accounts
   that are other than standard accounts and attempt to break in.
  You're talking about microsecond delays, right?
 
 Nope...human-discernable delays. Give it a shot on your system. I can
 easily determine just by mentally counting, if an account is valid.
I tested it before I sent the email.  ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (a normal
account, but one without RSA access from my usual account); there is
about a .1 second delay before I see the Password: prompt, and about a
2 second delay between password prompts when I feed the incorrect
password.  ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (an invalid account); also about a .1
second delay before I see the Password: prompt, and another 2 second
delay between prompts when I feed a password (to the invalid account).

   I'd strongly suggest either a randomized delay on responses for login
   attempts on non-existent accounts, or a consistent delay between
   existing and non-existent accounts, or some other method of hiding this
   information.
  Didn't this get implemented?  I recall hearing about this some time
  ago (~18 months?), probably on one of the Debian lists.
 
 Don't think so. I've noted this behaviour on 8 internet-facing servers
 now, with fully updated ssh packages (the system I sent this from was my
 own workstation, which does have the problem, but is behind a few levels
 of firewall...I should probably have sent it from one of the affected
 machines).
 
   This attack is already in the wild, as shown in logs:
  This doesn't seem to indicate any particular attack.  I don't know if
  there's any evidence that its doing anything other than sshing to
  $user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Though there is no evidence to support my
  claim, either.  It would be interesting to force the use of password
  authentication, rather than challenge-response, to see what password
  is being used.  Takers?). 
 
 Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what
 I've been seeing.
I see lots of the same logfile entries; but I have doubts that it is
looking for a valid account, and not just looking for an *opened*
account.

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314653: mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: mh-e
Version: 7.84-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'mh-e' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

echo ;;  (require 'mh-e-autoloads)  mh-e-autoloads.el
echo ;;  mh-e-autoloads.el
echo ;;; Code:  mh-e-autoloads.el
emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte --eval (setq load-path (cons \.\ 
load-path)) -l autoload \
  --eval '(setq generated-autoload-file (expand-file-name 
mh-e-autoloads.el))' \
  --eval '(setq make-backup-files nil)' \
 -f batch-update-autoloads .
/bin/sh: emacs: command not found
make[1]: *** [mh-e-autoloads.el] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mh-e-7.84/src'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mh-e-7.84/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/mh-e-7.84/debian/control2003-11-19 05:46:11.0 
+0100
+++ ./debian/control2005-06-17 19:22:28.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: mail
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 3.0.0), texinfo
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, texinfo, emacs21
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: mh-e


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314654: qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: qtorrent
Version: 2.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'qtorrent' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

dh_strip
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
dh_python
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend 
on python.)
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qtorrent-2.9.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/qtorrent-2.9.1/debian/control   2005-06-17 19:19:27.0 
+0200
+++ ./debian/control2005-06-17 19:19:23.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Lawrence Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Uploaders: Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2), python2.4, python2.4-dev, 
python2.4-qt3, pyqt-tools
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.2), python-dev, python2.4, python2.4-dev, 
python2.4-qt3, pyqt-tools
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
 
 Package: qtorrent


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Greg Webster]

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:13 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
  Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what
  I've been seeing.
 I see lots of the same logfile entries; but I have doubts that it is
 looking for a valid account, and not just looking for an *opened*
 account.

The problem is, I've seen that valid accounts (like my own 'greg') get
tested a lot more often than the others.

May 31 09:14:52 herring sshd[14612]: Failed password for www-data from
65.254.38.138 port 59932 ssh2
May 31 09:14:57 herring sshd[14630]: Failed password for nobody from
65.254.38.138 port 60209 ssh2
May 31 09:15:00 herring sshd[14638]: Failed password for root from
65.254.38.138 port 60357 ssh2
May 31 09:15:02 herring sshd[14648]: Failed password for backup from
65.254.38.138 port 60542 ssh2
May 31 09:15:10 herring sshd[14713]: Failed password for adam from
65.254.38.138 port 60993 ssh2
May 31 09:15:13 herring sshd[14724]: Failed password for richard from
65.254.38.138 port 32972 ssh2
May 31 09:15:17 herring sshd[14734]: Failed password for michael from
65.254.38.138 port 33226 ssh2
May 31 09:15:19 herring sshd[14741]: Failed password for john from
65.254.38.138 port 33392 ssh2
May 31 09:15:24 herring sshd[14772]: Failed password for news from
65.254.38.138 port 33652 ssh2
May 31 09:15:27 herring sshd[14796]: Failed password for games from
65.254.38.138 port 33895 ssh2
May 31 09:15:32 herring sshd[14811]: Failed password for mail from
65.254.38.138 port 34172 ssh2
May 31 09:15:43 herring sshd[14846]: Failed password for root from
65.254.38.138 port 34879 ssh2
May 31 09:15:46 herring sshd[14864]: Failed password for steven from
65.254.38.138 port 35133 ssh2
May 31 09:15:51 herring sshd[14890]: Failed password for robert from
65.254.38.138 port 35470 ssh2
May 31 09:15:55 herring sshd[14901]: Failed password for richard from
65.254.38.138 port 35653 ssh2
May 31 09:15:59 herring sshd[14910]: Failed password for michael from
65.254.38.138 port 36019 ssh2
May 31 09:16:03 herring sshd[14920]: Failed password for mysql from
65.254.38.138 port 36276 ssh2
May 31 09:16:07 herring sshd[14942]: Failed password for operator from
65.254.38.138 port 36531 ssh2
May 31 09:16:14 herring sshd[14978]: Failed password for sshd from
65.254.38.138 port 37063 ssh2
May 31 09:16:20 herring sshd[14999]: Failed password for root from
65.254.38.138 port 37419 ssh2
May 31 09:16:25 herring sshd[15011]: Failed password for michael from
65.254.38.138 port 37737 ssh2
May 31 09:16:30 herring sshd[15043]: Failed password for irc from
65.254.38.138 port 38102 ssh2
May 31 09:17:15 herring sshd[15251]: Failed password for news from
65.254.38.138 port 41293 ssh2
May 31 09:17:17 herring sshd[15263]: Failed password for lp from
65.254.38.138 port 41500 ssh2
May 31 09:17:20 herring sshd[15267]: Failed password for mail from
65.254.38.138 port 41714 ssh2
May 31 09:17:23 herring sshd[15289]: Failed password for bin from
65.254.38.138 port 41961 ssh2
May 31 09:18:02 herring sshd[15470]: Failed password for root from
65.254.38.138 port 44776 ssh2
May 31 09:48:21 herring sshd[19583]: Failed password for root from
72.29.78.199 port 35131 ssh2
May 31 09:48:24 herring sshd[19586]: Failed password for root from
72.29.78.199 port 35306 ssh2
May 31 09:48:27 herring sshd[19597]: Failed password for root from
72.29.78.199 port 35512 ssh2

Here's a sample:
  1 alfred
  1 bob
  1 greg
  1 jim
  1 juliab
  1 michelle
  1 sarah
  1 tim
  2 alexander
  2 ian
  2 joseph
  2 mark
  2 stephanie
  2 sys
  3 bin
  3 bruce
  3 dave
  3 james
  3 lp
  3 miniato
  3 postfix
  3 postgres
  6 games
  6 robert
  6 sshd
  8 steven
  9 backup
  9 www-data
 10 adam
 10 irc
 11 john
 11 news
 11 operator
 12 mail
 12 nobody
 12 richard
 16 michael
 23 mysql
352 root

Created with:  zgrep 'Failed password' auth.log*gz |awk '{print $9}' |
sort| uniq -c |sort -k1 -n|less

Now, none of the people with 1 attempt are valid, but all of those above
10 are. None of the users have a valid shell to access the server via
ssh, yet certain accounts get many more attempts (ignoring 'root'
entirely, since it'd be a known target).

Cheers,

Greg

-- 
Greg Webster  -  System Administrator
-
intouch.ca gastips.com epredictor.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#306280: marked as done (FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:53 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library 
object from `'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2005 13:58:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 25 06:58:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com 
(emea3-mh.id2.novell.com) [195.33.99.129] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQ46F-0002Ei-00; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:58:12 -0700
Received: from localhost
(l4-client.id2.novell.com [149.44.117.251])
by emea3-mh.id2.novell.com; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:57:31 +0100
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 265A4356DD; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:52:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:52:11 +0200
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from 
`'
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gcc-4.0
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

[...]
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/gcc/ -B/usr/powerpc-linux/bin/
-B/usr/powerpc-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/powerpc-linux/include -isystem
/usr/powerpc-linux/sys-include -c -I.
-I/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc   -O2 -g -O2 -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_GCC
-DIN_TARGET_LIBS -fno-strict-aliasing
-I/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc/objc
-I/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc/../gcc
-I/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc/../gcc/config -I../../gcc
-I/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc/../include
/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/src/libobjc/thr-objc.c
libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `'
make[4]: *** [thr-objc.lo] Fehler 1
make[4]: Verlasse Verzeichnis
/home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build/powerpc-linux/libobjc
make[3]: *** [all-target-libobjc] Fehler 2
make[3]: Verlasse Verzeichnis /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build
make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Fehler 2
make[2]: Verlasse Verzeichnis /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0/build
s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis /home/rene/gcc-4.0-4.0.0
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Fehler 2

Gre/Regards,

Ren

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 306280-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 17:32:57 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 10:32:57 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjKi8-000704-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:32:56 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01797
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2770BF2B9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 28294-34 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:54 +0200 (MEST) 14101
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:32:53 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de 

Bug#314656: nano depends on a library in /usr/lib

[Matthias Klose]

Package: nano
Version: 1.3.7-2
Severity: serious

Package: ncurses
Version: 5.4-6
Severity: serious

starting with version 1.3.6-0, nano depends on libncursesw5, making
nano unusable without having /usr mounted. either nano should be fixed
or libncursesw5 be moved to /lib.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: belocs-locales-data
Version: 2.3.4-15
Severity: serious

When building 'belocs-locales-data' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

|--- belocs-locales-data.orig/po/CVS/Entries
|+++ belocs-locales-data/po/CVS/Entries
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file localedata/locales/pa_IN
patching file localedata/locales/sr_CS
patching file locale/iso-4217.def
patching file localedata/ChangeLog
patching file localedata/locales/fa_IR
patching file localedata/charmaps/WINDOWS-31J
patching file localedata/SUPPORTED
patching file po/es.po
patching file po/ru.po
patching file po/tr.po
patching file po/rw.po
patching file po/libc.pot
patching file localedata/locales/mn_MN
Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply (enforce with -f)
make: *** [debian/stamp-patched] Error 1

With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 submitter 279010 Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#279010: gnome-core: should depends on x-windows-system-core
Changed Bug submitter from Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Lior Kaplan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

 tag 313537 patch
Bug#313537: qpopper-drac: Failed to create /var/spool/pop/* with uid **, gid ** 
Change permissions.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 retitle 245826 t-gnus: please fix lintian errors  warnings
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please maintain and update the package
Changed Bug title.

 tag 245826 patch
Bug#245826: t-gnus: please fix lintian errors  warnings
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314671: zynaddsubfx: freezes the system if run as root

[Gustavo Franco]

Package: zynaddsubfx
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge

Hi Eduardo,

I can run zynaddsubfx as non-root, but running as root it freezes the
system in a way that even running under strace userland tool it isn't
generating any output (stdout or files). 

Note that there's a while(1) inside main() but the machine freezes right
after the zynaddsubfx launch, and it doesn't show me the UI, messages in
the stdout, nothing. 


Useful information:
- zynaddsubfx is the latest and the depends are updated
- kernel is 2.6.11-1-686-smp (acpi=off, it's a acpi buggy ibm netvista)
- udev is 0.056-3

Best regards,
Gustavo Franco -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Greg Webster]

On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:46 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:33:49AM -0700, Greg Webster wrote:
  On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:13 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Definitely would be a good test...I'd like to see someone validate what
I've been seeing.
   I see lots of the same logfile entries; but I have doubts that it is
   looking for a valid account, and not just looking for an *opened*
   account.
  
  The problem is, I've seen that valid accounts (like my own 'greg') get
  tested a lot more often than the others.
 
  Here's a sample:
1 alfred
1 bob
1 greg
1 jim
1 juliab
1 michelle
1 sarah
1 tim
2 alexander
2 ian
2 joseph
2 mark
2 stephanie
2 sys
3 bin
3 bruce
3 dave
3 james
3 lp
3 miniato
3 postfix
3 postgres
6 games
6 robert
6 sshd
8 steven
9 backup
9 www-data
   10 adam
   10 irc
   11 john
   11 news
   11 operator
   12 mail
   12 nobody
   12 richard
   16 michael
   23 mysql
  352 root
  
  Created with:  zgrep 'Failed password' auth.log*gz |awk '{print $9}' |
  sort| uniq -c |sort -k1 -n|less
 Makes sense.
 
  Now, none of the people with 1 attempt are valid, but all of those above
  10 are. None of the users have a valid shell to access the server via
  ssh, yet certain accounts get many more attempts (ignoring 'root'
  entirely, since it'd be a known target).
 This is admittedly good evidence.  I don't think I have access to any
 machines with sane-looking usernames, so I can't check for myself.
 What about greg, above, which has 1 attempt?

On that server, my username isn't 'greg', it's 'gwebster' :) None of the
first-initial, lant-name accounts appear to be targeted like this.

Cheers,

Greg

-- 
Greg Webster  -  System Administrator
-
intouch.ca gastips.com epredictor.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314653: mh-e: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'

[Peter S Galbraith]

Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When building 'mh-e' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
 I get the following error:
 
 echo ;;  (require 'mh-e-autoloads)  mh-e-autoloads.el
 echo ;;  mh-e-autoloads.el
 echo ;;; Code:  mh-e-autoloads.el
 emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte --eval (setq load-path (cons \.\ 
 load-path)) -l autoload \
   --eval '(setq generated-autoload-file (expand-file-name 
 mh-e-autoloads.el))' \
   --eval '(setq make-backup-files nil)' \
  -f batch-update-autoloads .
 /bin/sh: emacs: command not found
 make[1]: *** [mh-e-autoloads.el] Error 127
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mh-e-7.84/src'
 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
 
 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'emacs21'
 to debian/control.

Thanks.  Will do.
 
 -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 3.0.0), texinfo
 +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, texinfo, emacs21

Why remove the version number there?

Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

[Justin Pryzby]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
 Package: belocs-locales-data
 Version: 2.3.4-15
 Severity: serious

 With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled
 on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Patch not attached.

Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314480: dbus-1 does not start because of segmentation fault

[Sjoerd Simons]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 04:46:26PM +0200, christian dare wrote:
 Package: dbus-1
 Version: 0.23.4-1
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 I ve just installed the system from the sarge s cd  .( clean disk , no
 upgrade )

Are you using NIS ?

  Sjoerd
-- 
Mathematicians are like Frenchmen:  whatever you say to them they translate
into their own language and forthwith it is something entirely different.
-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: ok

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 312578 ftp.debian.org
Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `raidtools2' to `ftp.debian.org'.

 retitle 312578 RM: raidtools2 -- obsolete dummy package
Bug#312578: Dummy package should be removed?
Changed Bug title.

 severity 312578 normal
Bug#312578: RM: raidtools2 -- obsolete dummy package
Severity set to `normal'.

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300573: config.sub and config.guess

[Regis Boudin]

Hi,

I don't have any of the architectures on which it fails, but I think I
found one of the reasons of the FTBFS. The config.sub and config.guess
files in the libical-0.23 directory are oudated (1999). The attached
patch should at least fix the problem seen on the s390 and parisc
buildds.

Regards,
Regis
diff -urN sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9.or/debian/rules 
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/debian/rules
--- sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9.or/debian/rules 2005-06-17 
18:11:23.245955440 +0100
+++ sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/debian/rules2005-06-17 
18:22:26.390142200 +0100
@@ -54,9 +54,11 @@
-$(MAKE) distclean
 ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub) 
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
+   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub $(ICAL)/config.sub
 endif
 ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess) 
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
+   cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess $(ICAL)/config.guess
 endif
dh_clean 
 

Bug#314657: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply

[Denis Barbier]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 02:34:51PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
  Package: belocs-locales-data
  Version: 2.3.4-15
  Severity: serious
 
  With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled
  on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
 Patch not attached.

Right, but I can guess what it does look like.
Thanks Andreas for your report, a new upload is coming very soon.

Denis
 Justin
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#207932: Statement that all of Debian needs to be Free?

[Glenn Maynard]

On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:04:20PM +0200, Dylan Thurston wrote:
 I'm surprised that someone thinks that there's any controversy on this
 point.  As I understand it, the current situation is that, with the
 release of sarge, everything in Debian should be DFSG free, including
 programs, documentation, and miscellaneous files (as in this case), as
 well as everything else, with the sole exception of license files.  Is
 my summary correct?  The maintainer apparently wants a concensus from
 debian-legal on this (in a separate message to the bug).

You're correct.

FYI, determining which materials are covered by the DFSG isn't a matter
decided by debian-legal (though I don't object to discussing it here),
but by the Social Contract.

 Subject: Bug#207932: Bug #207932 - emacs21: Includes non-free documents
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
 
 Followup for :
 http://bugs.debian.org/207932
 
 Thanks you for helping debian tracks licencing issues. Though this
 bug looks like an extension of the GFDL issue to some non
 documentation texts. This have not been agreed upon by
 debian-legal (in fact as far as i know licences and such
 documents have been explicitely exclude from the need to be DSFG
 free ).

As Dylan mentioned above, the only files which are excluded from the
requirement to be Free are (by necessity) license texts.  Of the
documents listed in the original bug:

 etc/{CENSORSHIP,copying.paper,INTERVIEW,LINUX-GNU,THE-GNU-PROJECT,WHY-FREE}

only copying.paper sounds like a license; the rest are simply documents,
which must be DFSG-free to be in Debian.  This is not a matter of
controversy, or even significant disagreement; SC2004-003 made this
explicitly clear.  Please remove these non-free documents; the grace
period allowed by SC2004-004 expired with the release of sarge.

-- 
Glenn Maynard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#302554: xnap: FTBFS

[Lior Kaplan]

Package: xnap
Followup-For: Bug #302554

Hi,

 The package does not build because 'unzip' is missing from the 
 Build-Depends.

I'm not sure how did you deside on the unzip build dependency. I got unzip 
installed in my system and I still get the same error as you do.

About you patch:
There is now such package j2sdk1.4, so you can't build depend on it. Sorry.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xnap is related to:
ii  reportbug 3.13   reports bugs in the Debian distrib
pn  totem-gstreamer   none (no description available)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314657: marked as done (belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:47:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314657: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 17:42:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 10:42:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from d027074.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.27.74] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjKqv-0006nB-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:42:01 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DjKqu-0003wf-JC; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:42:00 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: belocs-locales-data: FTBFS: Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:42:00 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: belocs-locales-data
Version: 2.3.4-15
Severity: serious

When building 'belocs-locales-data' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:

|--- belocs-locales-data.orig/po/CVS/Entries
|+++ belocs-locales-data/po/CVS/Entries
--
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
patching file localedata/locales/pa_IN
patching file localedata/locales/sr_CS
patching file locale/iso-4217.def
patching file localedata/ChangeLog
patching file localedata/locales/fa_IR
patching file localedata/charmaps/WINDOWS-31J
patching file localedata/SUPPORTED
patching file po/es.po
patching file po/ru.po
patching file po/tr.po
patching file po/rw.po
patching file po/libc.pot
patching file localedata/locales/mn_MN
Patch update_CVS.diff does not apply (enforce with -f)
make: *** [debian/stamp-patched] Error 1

With the attached patch 'belocs-locales-data' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

---
Received: (at 314657-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 20:51:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 13:51:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjNoU-0002l3-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:51:42 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjNk5-0002hT-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:47:09 -0400
From: Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314657: fixed in belocs-locales-data 2.3.4-16
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:47:09 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: belocs-locales-data
Source-Version: 2.3.4-16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
belocs-locales-data, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16.diff.gz
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16.dsc
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16.dsc
belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16_all.deb
  to pool/main/b/belocs-locales-data/belocs-locales-data_2.3.4-16_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated belocs-locales-data 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:28:08 +0200
Source: belocs-locales-data
Binary: 

Bug#314628: marked as done (libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:01:35 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug #314628 - libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on 
amd64 platform
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 14:22:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 07:22:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjHk6-00060g-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:22:46 -0700
Received: from p5495bd4b.dip.t-dialin.net (athlon64.bh.local) [84.149.189.75] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjHk5-00064z-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:22:45 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bernd Hanisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libmagick6: Missing dependency (libltdl3) on amd64 platform
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.13
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:22:43 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libmagick6
Version: 6:6.2.3.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

the package missing a dependency on libltdl3 on the amd64 platform. i installed 
the lib manually to get around this bug.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
de_DE)

Versions of packages libmagick6 depends on:
ii  dpkg 1.13.9  Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libbz2-1.0   1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjasper-1.701-11.701.0-2   The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblcms1 1.13-1  Color management library
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii  libtiff4 3.7.2-3 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime

libmagick6 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libmagick6 is related to:
ii  reportbug 3.13   reports bugs in the Debian distrib
pn  totem-gstreamer   none (no description available)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 314628-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 21:01:39 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 14:01:39 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjNy7-0005WO-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:01:39 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0408.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AEB071C00179
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:01:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from argos.server.maison 
(AToulouse-152-1-71-108.w83-200.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.200.171.108])
by mwinf0408.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5865B1C0018A
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:01:07 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#289856: about wrong license

[Paul Brossier]

Hi,

This bug will soon be half a year old. Is there a reason why this
package hasn't been moved to non-free/contrib yet?

Cheers, piem 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merge to nmu

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 package serpento
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: serpento

 severity 275476 serious
Bug#275476: serpento: 0.4.1 NMU diff
Severity set to `serious'.

 merge 275476 257131
Bug#257131: serpento: installation fails if dictd package is present
Bug#275476: serpento: 0.4.1 NMU diff
Merged 257131 275476.

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 314654

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 314654 sid
Bug#314654: qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 314447 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
  #this does not meet the definition of a critical security hole
 severity 314447 important
Bug#314447: spamassassin: CAN-2005-1266 Denial of Service Vulnerability in 
SpamAssassin 3.0.1-3.0.3, fixed in 3.0.4
Severity set to `important'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#312525: 312525 explaination

[Mike Furr]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Regis Boudin wrote:
 Hi,
Hello,

 To fixes are possible. Either making the dlopen against the library
 soname, 'libxmms.so.1', which is a quick fix (patch attached) but will
 be broken if the soname changes, but I doubt it will for XMMS.
This fix should be sufficient.  I imagine that when XMMS does change its
soname, the changes will be large enough that we'll have a planned
transition.  I'll upload the fix this weekend.

Thanks for the patch,
- -Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCs0g37ZPKKRJLJvMRAl3jAJ9btw2La7MPIUNqtxbBUrxw4mYjnwCfTAH7
2vYuBUKCflQDy4RWooYn0xs=
=34Y2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314484: marked as done (Error on login: 'The Application gnome-panel has quit unexpectedly')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:17 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314484: fixed in gnome-vfs2 2.10.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 15:05:38 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 08:05:38 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from athene.jamux.com [65.222.215.34] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Divw1-0003Jf-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:05:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by athene.jamux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D77C3B8F7
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from athene.jamux.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (athene [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 04533-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by athene.jamux.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A3F6D3B8FE; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: John A. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error on login: 'The Application gnome-panel has quit unexpectedly'
X-Debbugs-CC: John A. Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Attribution: jam
X-Request-PGP: http://www.tux.org/~jam/jam-gpg-keys.html
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5F05 15CF 05D2 E8D3 E7FA  8C6A 504B EFD5 BFE2 5F2F
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:05:26 -0400
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary==-=-=;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gnome-panel
Version: 2.10.1-3
Severity: grave

Login gets: Error: The Application gnome-panel has quit unexpectedly.
Hitting Close on the error window just does the same thing again.
Hitting Restart Application gets Error: I've detected a panel
already running, and will now exit and another 'Error: The
Application gnome-panel has quit unexpectedly.'  'killall
gnome-panel' and similar get the same thing.  Hitting Inform
Developers gets bug-buddy has quit unexpectedly.

A panel appears without decorations and is unresponsive.  Several
applets open windows but are useless.  Iconified windows disappear
without a trace.  There is no menu in response to a right-click on the
root window.

Sawfish seems to work OK.

The Gnome-terminal starts on login and is OK.

Nautilus does the same repetition of has quit unexpectedly.

Is there a clean way to logout under these conditions?

Is there a workaround if a fix is not available soon?

=2D- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k6
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages gnome-panel depends on:
ii  gnome-about  2.10.1-2The GNOME about box
ii  gnome-control-center 1:2.10.1-3  The GNOME Control Center for G=
NOME
ii  gnome-desktop-data   2.10.1-2Common files for GNOME 2 deskt=
op a
ii  gnome-menus  2.10.1-3an implementation of the freed=
eskt
ii  gnome-panel-data 2.10.1-3common files for GNOME 2 panel
ii  gnome-session2.10.0-4The GNOME 2 Session Manager
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D gr=
aphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii  libecal1.2-2 1.2.2-5.1   Client library for evolution c=
alen
ii  libedataserver1.2-4  1.2.2-5.1   Utily library for evolution da=
ta s
ii  libgconf2-4  2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database s=
yste
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.5.1-2   library to load .glade files a=
t ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-desktop-2   

Bug#310300: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS in experimental: Only has Build-Depends-Indep, and changed to arch any package.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#310300: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 22:31:40 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 15:31:40 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZyyy-0005Wn-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 15:31:40 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 975C94400E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 00:31:39 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB464402E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 00:31:36 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 57D5226136; Mon, 23 May 2005 00:31:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:31:36 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ikvm: FTBFS in experimental: Only has Build-Depends-Indep, and changed 
to arch any package.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ikvm
Version: 0.14.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

Your package is now failing to build in experimental because you
do not have any Build-Depends, but do have Build-Depends-Indep.

You need to set Build-Depends to everything needed to build the
arch dependent part, since that it the only thing the buildd's
will install.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 310300-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 22:21:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 15:21:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjPDV-0004wk-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:21:37 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjP9e-00033T-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
From: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#310300: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: ikvm
Source-Version: 0.14.0.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ikvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.diff.gz
ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.dsc
ikvm_0.14.0.1-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4_all.deb
libikvm-native_0.14.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/libikvm-native_0.14.0.1-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ikvm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:36:42 +0100
Source: ikvm
Binary: ikvm libikvm-native
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.14.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 ikvm 

Bug#307100: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS: mono not configured correctly)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#307100: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2005 18:12:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 30 11:12:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DRwRw-0003zc-00; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:12:20 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7B48F47;
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from atari.stigge.org (ppp-82-135-11-242.mnet-online.de 
[82.135.11.242])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C45A7DC53;
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.5.99] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by atari.stigge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05049100442A3;
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roland Stigge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ikvm: FTBFS: mono not configured correctly
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:14 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ikvm
Version: 0.8.0.0-3
Severity: serious

Hi,

building the package ikvm in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:

=
[...]
make: [clean] Error 1 (ignored)
dh_clean 
 dpkg-source -b ikvm-0.8.0.0
dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using 
uid of process (1001)
dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; 
using uid of process (1001)
debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of 
process (1001)
dpkg-source: building ikvm using existing ikvm_0.8.0.0.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: building ikvm in ikvm_0.8.0.0-3.diff.gz
dpkg-source: building ikvm in ikvm_0.8.0.0-3.dsc
 debian/rules build
dh_testdir
mkdir /tmp/buildd/ikvm-0.8.0.0/debian/.wapi
MONO_SHARED_DIR=/tmp/buildd/ikvm-0.8.0.0/debian/.wapi nant -v clean
Compat mode: the request from /usr/share/dotnet/bin/nant/log4net.dll to load 
System was remapped (http://www.go-mono.com/remap.html)
Compat mode: the request from /usr/share/dotnet/bin/nant/log4net.dll to load 
System.Data was remapped (http://www.go-mono.com/remap.html)
Compat mode: the request from /usr/share/dotnet/bin/nant/log4net.dll to load 
System.Web was remapped (http://www.go-mono.com/remap.html)
NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1793.0; rc1; 11/28/2004)
Copyright (C) 2001-2004 Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sourceforge.net


BUILD FAILED

The current runtime framework 'mono-1.0' is not correctly configured in the 
NAnt configuration file.
Unable to locate 'mono' module using pkg-config. Download the Mono 
development packages from http://www.mono-project.com/downloads/.

For more information regarding the cause of the build failure, run the build 
again in debug mode.

Try 'nant -help' for more information
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
=

Thanks for considering.


--
DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite
http://darts.alioth.debian.org/

Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically.
DARTS just helped finding the problem.

---
Received: (at 307100-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 22:21:57 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 15:21:57 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjPDp-0004zV-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:21:57 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjP9e-00033R-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
From: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#307100: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL 

Bug#311182: marked as done (ikvm: FTBFS: Does not make the libikvm-native packages when running binary-arch.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#311182: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2005 16:01:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 29 09:01:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DcQEJ-0007pe-00; Sun, 29 May 2005 09:01:36 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id E69023802F
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:01:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6039838054
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:01:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id E169526136; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:01:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:01:25 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ikvm: FTBFS: Does not make the libikvm-native packages when running 
binary-arch.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ikvm
Version: 0.14.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,

When only building the architecture specific .debs, it fails to
build because binary-arch does nothing.  Just running
dpkg-buildpackage -B has this effect.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 311182-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 22:21:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 15:21:36 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjPDU-0004wY-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:21:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjP9e-00033V-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
From: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#311182: fixed in ikvm 0.14.0.1-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:17:38 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

Source: ikvm
Source-Version: 0.14.0.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ikvm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.diff.gz
ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4.dsc
ikvm_0.14.0.1-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/ikvm_0.14.0.1-4_all.deb
libikvm-native_0.14.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/ikvm/libikvm-native_0.14.0.1-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ikvm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:36:42 +0100
Source: ikvm
Binary: ikvm libikvm-native
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.14.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 ikvm   - Java virtual machine/compiler implemented in .NET (Mono)
 libikvm-native - Native library for IKVM Java virtual machine for 

Bug#313444: marked as done (galeon: uninstallable because of gnome 2.10 in sid)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:36:19 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313444: galeon: uninstallable because of gnome 2.10 in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 18:25:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 11:25:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl-082-083-251-090.arcor-ip.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[82.83.251.90] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhtcj-0002u5-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:25:25 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 709A72B400F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:25:25 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: galeon: uninstallable because of gnome 2.10 in sid
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:25:24 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: galeon
Version: 1.3.21-1+gnome28+1
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable

Hello,

gnome 2.10 is now mostly in sid. galeon in sid depends against
libnautilus2-2 which conflicts with most/basic gnome 2.10 packages.

Please rebuild galeon with gnome 2.10 so it depends on libnautilus-extension1

Thank you.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages galeon depends on:
ii  debconf  1.4.51  Debian configuration management sy
pn  galeon-commonNot found.
ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libeel2-22.10.1-2Eazel Extensions Library (for GNOM
ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2.1  Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libgail-common   1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility Implementation
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.0-9   GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4  2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.0-11.1  LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libglade2-0  1:2.5.1-2   library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii  libgnome2-0  2.10.0-3The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0 2.10.0-2The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.10.1-4The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgnutls11  1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii  libgpg-error01.0-1   library for common error values an
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.7-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
pn  libnautilus2-2   Not found.
ii  liborbit21:2.12.2-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.6-6   The GNU Standard 

Bug#314716: fails to install

[Bas Zoetekouw]

Package: xmule
Version: 1.9.4b-1
Severity: serious

xmule fails to install due to a filename conflixt with amule:

Unpacking xmule (from .../xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz', which is also in package 
amule
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-ac6
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xmule depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.0-9   GCC support library
ii  libglib1.2   1.2.10-10   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.21.2.10-17   The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.6-6   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwxgtk2.4  2.4.3.1 wxWindows Cross-platform C++ GUI t
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Input extension li
ii  wget 1.10-1  retrieves files from the web
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

xmule recommends no packages.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#207932: Statement that all of Debian needs to be Free?

[Michael K. Edwards]

On 6/17/05, Jrme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  etc/{CENSORSHIP,copying.paper,INTERVIEW,LINUX-GNU,THE-GNU-PROJECT,WHY-FREE}
 
  only copying.paper sounds like a license; the rest are simply documents,
  which must be DFSG-free to be in Debian.  This is not a matter of
  controversy, or even significant disagreement; SC2004-003 made this
  explicitly clear.  Please remove these non-free documents; the grace
  period allowed by SC2004-004 expired with the release of sarge.
 
 They are out of the scope of the DFSG. They are neither programs nor
 documentation: they are speeches and articles which are logically
 non modifiable without the consent of their author.
 
 Whether they are around or not is irrelevant to the freeness of Emacs.

IMHO, Jrme is right but for the wrong reasons.  In many
jurisdictions (especially France, but other parts of US law besides
copyright have similar consequences), copyright license does not and
cannot grant authority to misattribute or violate the integrity of an
artistic or polemical work.  These documents are not part of the work
of authorship that is the Emacs program and documentation.  They may
be retained or removed; but they may not be arbitrarily modified.

Personally, I would retain them as a courtesy to upstream; users are
no more and no less free to modify or remove them than Debian is.  The
alternative -- to demand that all content other than license texts and
other legal indicia must be arbitrarily modifiable in order to be
DFSG-free -- is logically consistent but would require the removal of
all remotely artistic or polemical works in the Debian archive.

The GFDL is another story, because under some circumstances it
purports to condition the permission to modify and redistribute the
substance of the document on the retention of unrelated material. 
Personally, my reasons for objecting to the GFDL are different; but I
just want to make the point that a putative debian-legal (or even
Debian-wide) consensus on the DFSG-freeness of the GFDL has no bearing
on whether it is OK to retain LINUX-GNU et al.

Cheers,
- Michael
(IANAL, IANADD)

Bug#314654: Bug #314654 - qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

[browaeys . alban]

What s wrong with qtorrent build depending on python-2.4-dev only ?
Would using dh_python -V 2.4  fix the issue too ?

Please tell me if you cannot test, i ll try to find time to learn
how to make a clean build environemnt (i am not DD )


Regards
Alban



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#310111: marked as done (haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:26:37 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#310111: fixed in haskell-http 0.4.20050430-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 17:37:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 10:37:11 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZXuR-0003vl-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 10:37:11 -0700
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB3D16E82
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:37:11 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 06819906CB; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:37:11 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:37:10 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: outdated build-deps
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: haskell-http
Version: 0.4.20041219-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

 Automatic build of haskell-http_0.4.20041219-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 33
 Build started at 20050521-1830

[...]

 ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), haskell-devscripts (=0.5.6), ghc6 
 (=6.2.2), ghc6 (6.2.3)

[...]


A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=haskell-httpver=0.4.20041219-2

ghc6 version is now 6.4

lamont

---
Received: (at 310111-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 00:38:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 17:38:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjRLs-9S-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:38:24 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjRAT-0006dn-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:26:37 -0400
From: Ganesh Sittampalam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#310111: fixed in haskell-http 0.4.20050430-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:26:37 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: haskell-http
Source-Version: 0.4.20050430-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
haskell-http, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

haskell-http-doc_0.4.20050430-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/haskell-http-doc_0.4.20050430-1_all.deb
haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1.diff.gz
haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1.dsc
haskell-http_0.4.20050430.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/haskell-http_0.4.20050430.orig.tar.gz
libghc6-http-dev_0.4.20050430-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/libghc6-http-dev_0.4.20050430-1_i386.deb
libhugs-http_0.4.20050430-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/haskell-http/libhugs-http_0.4.20050430-1_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ganesh Sittampalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated haskell-http 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL 

Bug#314289: Bug #314289 - ssh: unable to login after upgrade to 4.1p1-3

[browaeys . alban]

Could you do /etc/init.d/rmnologin then retry ? I had a user
which found it it was not run and broke its ssh login for non
root users.

Also could you confirm there where no other upgrade at the same
time that could break the user session : the user shell and the
like 

I cannot reproduce the bug :(

Regards
Alban



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#313454: marked as done (package is empty)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#313454: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 19:10:05 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 12:10:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhuJw-0006jx-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:10:04 -0700
Received: from dsl-082-083-251-216.arcor-ip.net (colt.pezone.net) 
[82.83.251.216] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhuJw-0002xv-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:10:04 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package is empty
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:10:02 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libecpg4
Severity: grave

The package does not contain any files except some documentation.

---
Received: (at 313454-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2005 01:10:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 18:10:21 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjRqn-7m-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:10:21 -0700
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DjRbu-0001CB-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400
From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#313454: fixed in postgresql-8.0 8.0.3-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:54:58 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: postgresql-8.0
Source-Version: 8.0.3-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postgresql-8.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libecpg-compat2_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg-compat2_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
libecpg-dev_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg-dev_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
libecpg5_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libecpg5_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
libpgtypes2_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpgtypes2_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
libpq-dev_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpq-dev_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
libpq4_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/libpq4_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6.diff.gz
postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6.dsc
postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-client-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-client-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-contrib-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-contrib-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-doc-8.0_8.0.3-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-doc-8.0_8.0.3-6_all.deb
postgresql-plperl-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-plperl-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-plpython-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-plpython-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-pltcl-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-pltcl-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
postgresql-server-dev-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postgresql-8.0/postgresql-server-dev-8.0_8.0.3-6_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 

Bug#314716: [pkg-xmule] Bug#314716: fails to install

[Daniel Leidert]

Am Samstag, den 18.06.2005, 00:54 +0200 schrieb Bas Zoetekouw:
 Package: xmule
 Version: 1.9.4b-1
 Severity: serious
 
 xmule fails to install due to a filename conflixt with amule:
 
 Unpacking xmule (from .../xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb) ...
 dpkg: error processing
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz', which is also in 
 package amule
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  /var/cache/apt/archives/xmule_1.10.0b-1_i386.deb
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Hmm. This should not happen. The file conflict should be handled by
amule's preinst script (since amule 1.2.6+rc8-3), which adds a diversion
for /usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz. Which amule version do you have
installed? What's the ouput of:

dpkg-divert --list /usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz
dpkg -S /usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz

Regards, Daniel



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#314645: /usr/sbin/sshd: time delay of password check proves account existence to attackers

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Justin Pryzby said:
 Package: ssh
 Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
 Severity: critical
 File: /usr/sbin/sshd
 Tags: security
 Justification: root security hole

This part seems like panic - it's a user level security hole, if it
exists.

This one time, at band camp, Greg Webster said:
 On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 12:51 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
  You're talking about microsecond delays, right?
 
 Nope...human-discernable delays. Give it a shot on your system. I can
 easily determine just by mentally counting, if an account is valid.

I think I remember seeing a report that in PAM using setups, there was a
noticeable delay introduced by PAM.  I was under the impression it was
addresses, however.  Let me try ... OK, I see no difference on a sarge
machine that isn't probably induced by me (half a second difference
between valid user/invalid password and invalid user/random password,
averaged over 5 tries of each).  The difference is too small for me to
notice it with the eye, at any rate.

   This attack is already in the wild, as shown in logs:

This is a random username attack.  It has been going on for months now,
and does not seem to be slowing down.  It does not coincide with any
vulnerability I am aware of, and has not gotten anyone access to any
machines I run, as far as I can tell.  It appears to just try common
usernames with weak passwords.

This one time, at band camp, Greg Webster said:
 The problem is, I've seen that valid accounts (like my own 'greg') get
 tested a lot more often than the others.
   9 www-data
  10 adam
  10 irc
  11 john
  11 news
  11 operator
  12 mail
  12 nobody
  12 richard
  16 michael
  23 mysql
 352 root
 
 Created with:  zgrep 'Failed password' auth.log*gz |awk '{print $9}' |
 sort| uniq -c |sort -k1 -n|less
 
 Now, none of the people with 1 attempt are valid, but all of those above
 10 are. None of the users have a valid shell to access the server via
 ssh, yet certain accounts get many more attempts (ignoring 'root'
 entirely, since it'd be a known target).

The usernames adam, john, richard, and michael are very common names.
the others are all common system accounts.

Here's my top ten on one system:
 25 uucp
 28 mysql
 28 news
 28 webmaster
 29 daemon
 31 oracle
 32 bin
 38 test
 52 admin
412 root

but look,
  4 richard
  7 adam
  9 greg
  9 john
  9 johnny
  3 michael

are all getting hit as well.  This machine has _no_ valid usernames to
speak of (3 or 4 accounts, and none are normal names).  None of them
appear in the output of your zgrep.  I see similar patterns in the logs
of the half dozen servers I have that unfortunately still have ssh open
to the world.

I think you are conflating an attack on a common username with a guessed
username.  OTOH, the delay that you can see with the naked eye is odd,
and if you can provide some way to reproduce it, that would certainly be
a bug (maybe config file settings?).

Thanks,
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature