Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Christian Perrier

> > OK, let's get Andrew Bartlett's attention on that one first now that
> > we have as much information as possible..:-)
> > 
> > http://bugs.debian.org/312513
> 
> This one just looks weird. Aside from something that looks like a
> logfile parser gone bad (I don't buy the socket misdirection answer, as
> it is on word boundaries), I can't see the actual error.
> 
> More useful would be trying to 'getent passwd long.realm.name\username'
> on the user that is failing.  

Martin, can you?


> 
> > Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can
> > reproduce the bug because we don't have access to an AD server..:)
> 
> Not wishing to be rude, but this sounds like a serious bug in itself.
> ADS member server operation is a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a
> bit worried you can't test any of this.


Well, see Steve's answer..:-)

Despite my quite strong involvment in Windows systems management, I
still have mnaged to survive *without* ADS, and just still use a good
old flat NT4 domain, which I'm very happy with..:-)

Steve, do you think it's worth for us to post a call for "Debian
developers/contributors with access to an ADS domain anhd willing to
help on Samba" in the Debian ML? Andrew is right that we will have
more and more problmems supporting the samba package if we can't
really work on the ADS features.

Actually, we have one indeed : our bug reporter who opened this
thread...:-)






Bug#301889: new packages are imminent

2005-06-23 Thread pagarcia
Hi.
In this moment, i am completely safe: bandersnatch 0.4RC1 works fine with 
Debian. I begin the packaging process, fixating the existent bugs in
bandersnatch and bandersnatch-frontend.

Polkan Garcia
-- 
Debian Hint #13: If you don't like the default options used in a Debian
package, you can download the source and build a version which uses the
options you prefer. See http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.html
(sections 6.13 and 6.14) for more information.

However, bear in mind that most options in most packages can be configured
at runtime, and do not require recompiling the package.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#315405: ncurses-term: share the same file with ncurses-base

2005-06-23 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> 
> $ for i in ncurses-base_5.4-7_all.deb ncurses-term_5.4-7_all.deb; do \
> dpkg --contents $i; done |grep unic
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-06-20 04:18:44 
> ./usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode -> /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode
> -rw-r--r-- root/root  2165 2005-06-20 04:18:16 
> ./usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode

Got it... it's the funny Replaces ordering.  Will fix soon.


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315492: marked as done (nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of arbitrary code)

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to 
execution of arbitrary code
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 23:57:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 22 16:57:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) 
[193.22.164.111] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlF5f-00070a-00; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:57:08 -0700
Received: from dsl-084-059-135-149.arcor-ip.net ([84.59.135.149] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa 
(TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DlF0l-hf-RP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:52:03 +0200
Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1DlF5e-0002dA-3Z; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of 
arbitrary
 code
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:06 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.59.135.149
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond 
expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: nanoblogger
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

>From the 3.2.2 changelog:
* Fixed bug that could lead to arbitrary execution in a couple of the plugins

It seems as if the plugin system was modified for 3.2, so it may very well
be possible that this doesn't affect the 3.1 version in Debian. Can you
clarify that?

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 315492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2005 03:08:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 20:08:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-201-128-61-219.prod-infinitum.com.mx (localhost.localdomain) 
[201.128.61.219] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DleYe-0005je-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:08:44 -0700
Received: from billy by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1Dleey-0002yY-Ez
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:16 -0500
Subject: nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of
arbitrary code
From: William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:15 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

It really does not affect the version 3.1, however already I have
updated the package :) 
Thanks
-- 
William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4
Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439  4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#301889: preparing new package

2005-06-23 Thread pagarcia
In this moment work in new bandersnatch 0.4RC1 debian package. The RC
bug of 0.3-2 may be closed with the new upload version.

Many thanks,

Polkan Garcia
-- 
Debian Hint #3: You can use 'apt-cache search ' to search for words
in the descriptions of all available packages.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 10:00:20AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 07:27 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can
> > reproduce the bug because we don't have access to an AD server..:)

> Not wishing to be rude, but this sounds like a serious bug in itself.
> ADS member server operation is a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a
> bit worried you can't test any of this.

I'll gladly accept offers of access to an ADS domain.  I don't have a budget
for samba package maintenance and have no need for (or access to) ADS at
present, so this is otherwise a "wontfix" bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 07:27 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > hi christian & steve
> 
> 
> OK, let's get Andrew Bartlett's attention on that one first now that
> we have as much information as possible..:-)
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/312513

This one just looks weird. Aside from something that looks like a
logfile parser gone bad (I don't buy the socket misdirection answer, as
it is on word boundaries), I can't see the actual error.

More useful would be trying to 'getent passwd long.realm.name\username'
on the user that is failing.  

> Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can
> reproduce the bug because we don't have access to an AD server..:)

Not wishing to be rude, but this sounds like a serious bug in itself.
ADS member server operation is a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a
bit worried you can't test any of this.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team   http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College  http://hawkerc.net


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#315405: Bug #315405 - ncurses-term: share the same file with ncurses-base

2005-06-23 Thread Alban browaeys
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 15:33 +0200, Jörg Sommer a écrit :

> No, the diversion is made by me to make the package is installable.
> 
> > Maybe there was a cleanup in previous scripts which was removed ...
> > where there a long time switch between the upgrade ? (maybe from woody
> > ...)

so my best bet is you had the bug when rxvt-unicode was shipped by both
ncurses-term and ncurses-base (maybe i was even the reported , i remind
sending such an issue to those packages). 
The diversion helps you worked around the bug though now it breaks it
even if ncurses-term does not ship this file anymore.
THe upgrade script did not cleanup the diversion as usual as it was a
local change :-/

I guess the bug can be safely closed now that ncurses-term guenine bug
(shipping rxvt-unicode) is fixed.

Sincerely
Alban




Bug#314433: CAN-2005-2024

2005-06-23 Thread Corrin Lakeland
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:33, Joey Hess wrote:
> Note that CAN-2005-2024 has been assigned to this vulnerability.

I've got a couple hours now to look into it.

From what I've read, the version I have uploaded is supposed to fix it but 
testing shows it does not.  I'm now looking around to find what I've missed 
(presumably a patch).

Corrin




Bug#315339: lvm2: Lvm2 not working with v1 - can be fixed by upgrading to v2

2005-06-23 Thread Michael Geddes
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.01.12-1
Followup-For: Bug #315339

I know this seems to be a resolved bug, but an alternate work-around (given that
it renders a system unbootable) is to use a boot-disk (like ubuntu live)
to upgrade the lvm to version 2.

Is there some way of black-listing that version? Or is that already
done?

Anyway given that I've now recovered my system, and the upgrade process to V2 
was
painless, and I've read a bit about recovering LVMs, I'm actually
quite impressed with the whole LVM system.  It was just one of those
days for me.

//.ichael G.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers hoary
  APT policy: (500, 'hoary'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11nell
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages lvm2 depends on:
ii  debconf 1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdevmapper1.012:1.01.03-1  The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  lvm-common  1.5.19   The Logical Volume Manager for Lin

lvm2 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  lvm2/snapshots:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315440: Reopening

2005-06-23 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi!

I reopened this bug since it still needs to be dealt with. I talked
again with LaMont, he could have a fixed kernel ready in 1 to 2 weeks.
Until then I have two options how to circumvent that bug (disable just
the thread check, or disable thread-safe libraries completely); LaMont
will do a test build for me to determine whether just disabling the
configure check works (since paer.debian.org is down ATM I can't test
it myself).

After the build succeeds, I'll downgrade that to important to track
the status of the kernel fix (LaMont asked for that).

Thanks,

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: reopening 315440

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reopen 315440
Bug#315440: postgresql-8.0: FTBFS on hppa: thread problems?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315094: Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux

2005-06-23 Thread Alastair McKinstry
reassign 315094 libslang2
severity 315094 normal
title 315094 Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux
thanks

Sorry about the incorrect assignment: I incorrectly had libslang2-dev
rather than slang1-utf8-dev installed. The bug is in libslang2-dev,
which redefines SLCurses_Window_Type and breaks the inch() macro in
slcurses.h

Regards
Alastair McKinstry




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 315094 libslang2
Bug#315094: FTBFS: cfdisk.c fails to build in sid
Bug reassigned from package `util-linux' to `libslang2'.

> severity 315094 normal
Bug#315094: FTBFS: cfdisk.c fails to build in sid
Severity set to `normal'.

> title 315094 Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:10:46PM +0200, Martin Kos wrote:
> On 06/23/2005 08:18 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >>the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server
> >>but just some of them.

> >Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server
> >using their ADS credentials?  Or are these pre-ADS clients?
> all clients are WinXP machines. i don't see a difference betweend the 
> clients :-( hmm... are the ads credentials "recreated" after a reboot? 
> or how long are they valid ?

ADS user credentials are established at the time of user login.  I believe
the lifetime of the credentials is configurable, and that Windows
automatically renews your credentials for you for desktop logins.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#315512: libalsaplayer-dev: missing Section in doc-base file

2005-06-23 Thread Paul Brossier
Hi Laurent,

Thank you for your report. I could indeed reproduce the bug installing
doc-base. According to the doc-base changelog [1], Section is a required
field since March 2nd 2003. Oops! Fortunately this bug is *not*
reproducable on sarge as the file was not properly installed in earlier
versions.

Obviously the fix is trivial and will be uploaded soonish. Simply adding
the following line in /usr/share/doc-base/alsaplayer-documentation will
fix it:

Section: Apps/Sound

Bye, Paul

  1. http://changelogs.debian.net/doc-base


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: duplicate report

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 315582 sarge etch
Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sarge, etch

> reopen 308897
Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> merge 308897 315582
Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration
Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files
Merged 308897 315582.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Martin Kos

On 06/23/2005 08:18 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:

the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server
but just some of them.


Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server
using their ADS credentials?  Or are these pre-ADS clients?
all clients are WinXP machines. i don't see a difference betweend the 
clients :-( hmm... are the ads credentials "recreated" after a reboot? 
or how long are they valid ?


 Martin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files

2005-06-23 Thread Sven Joachim

Package: backup-manager
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Tags: patch


The optional CD-burning feature of backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename
(/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log) for logging the output of cdrecord. If a 
malicious (or
just unlucky) user makes /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log a symlink to a system 
file, that

file will be overwritten in the next run of backup-manager. A demonstration
follows:

   $ whoami
   sven
   $ ls -l /etc/junk; cat /etc/junk
   -rw-r--r--  1 root root 32 Jun 22 21:23 /etc/junk
   This will soon be overwritten!

   $ ln -s /etc/junk /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log
   $ su -c backup-manager
   Password:
   unable to mount 0,1,0 on /tmp/bm-mnt
   $ ls -l /etc/junk; head -n 3 /etc/junk
   -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1431 Jun 22 21:25 /etc/junk
   scsidev: '0,1,0'
   scsibus: 0 target: 1 lun: 0
   Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25

Replace /etc/junk with /etc/passwd, and the system becomes slightly less
usable. :-(

A solution is to use "mktemp" instead of a hardcoded file name, I
suggest the following patch:

--
diff -u /usr/sbin/backup-manager /home/sven/backup-manager
--- /usr/sbin/backup-manager2005-04-04 22:39:22.0 +0200
+++ /home/sven/backup-manager2005-06-22 21:49:17.0 +0200
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
lockfile="/var/run/backup-manager.pid"
md5sum="/usr/bin/md5sum"
bc="/usr/bin/bc"
-logfile="/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log"
-mount_point="/tmp/bm-mnt"
+logfile="$(mktemp /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log.XX)"
+mount_point="$(mktemp -d /tmp/bm-mnt.XX)"

# Load the backup-manager's library
. $libdir/gettext.sh
---

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
 APT prefers testing
 APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages backup-manager depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.30.13  Debian configuration 
management sy

ii  gzip  1.3.5-10   The GNU compression utility

-- debconf information:
 backup-manager/upload-key:
* backup-manager/name-format: long
 backup-manager/upload-hosts:
 backup-manager/upload-user-ftp:
* backup-manager/cron_frequency: daily
* backup-manager/blacklist: /home/sven/tmp
* backup-manager/time-to-live: 5
* backup-manager/burning-maxsize: 650
 backup-manager/upload-user-scp-warning:
 backup-manager/transfert_mode: scp
* backup-manager/dump_symlinks: false
 backup-manager/upload-user-scp: bmngr
* backup-manager/burning-device: 0,1,0
 backup-manager/upload-dir: /var/archives/uploads
* backup-manager/directories: /etc /home/sven /root
* backup-manager/filetype: tar.gz
* backup-manager/backup-repository: /var/archives
* backup-manager/burning-method: CDR
* backup-manager/burning-enabled: true
 backup-manager/cron_remove_deprecated: false
* backup-manager/want_to_upload: false




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315579: lirc: ftbfs [sparc] md5sum: invalid option -- v

2005-06-23 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: lirc
Version: 0.7.1pre2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source

lirc fails to build from source on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my
sparc pbuilder:



#/usr/bin/make smode2 -C tools
touch build-stamp
md5sum: invalid option -- v
Try `md5sum --help' for more information.
#
# The files above have changed: #
# Please check that the extraction will be correct  #
# and remove debian/lirc.config.md5sum  #
#
make: *** [debian/lirc.config] Error 1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: foo

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 308705 wishlist
Bug#308705: ipfwadm: Shouldn't this package be removed?
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: [Fwd: Re: Processed: merge]

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package gphpedit
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gphpedit

> merge 315536 315539
Bug#315536: gphpedit: exits at start up
Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up.
Merged 315536 315539.

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: merge duplicate bug emails

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package gphpedit
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gphpedit

> merge 315536 315539
Bug#315536: gphpedit: exits at start up
Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up.
Merged 315536 315539.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315566: FTBFS: changed architecture strings

2005-06-23 Thread Martin Pitt
Package: ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi!

ruby1.8 currently FTBFS:

# libdbm-ruby
(echo usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux-gnu/dbm.so; \
 sh debian/greplib.sh 1.8 build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/ext/dbm) \
> debian/libdbm-ruby1.8.files
dh_movefiles -plibdbm-ruby1.8
dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux-gnu/dbm.so not found 
(supposed to put it in libdbm-ruby1.8)
tar: /build/ruby1.8-1.8.2/debian/movelist: Cannot open: No such file or 
directory
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
sh: /build/ruby1.8-1.8.2/debian/movelist: No such file or directory
make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1

Indeed there is only a debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux/dbm.so
(no -gnu) directory. That correlates with the new dpkg that now
appends a -gnu to the architecture version. -gnu is really right, but
I didn't find an obvious way to fix that in the upstream autofoo
files or with a configure option. :-(

Thanks for investigating,

Martin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages ruby1.8 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn  libruby1.8   Not found.

-- 
Martin Pitt  http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#313451: missing gcc bug number (was: Re: Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0))

2005-06-23 Thread Blars Blarson
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:07:28AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:35:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as
> > 313451.
> This message was sent *to* bug 313451.  What is the gcc bug number?
> Justin

Oops.

315502

-- 
Blars Blarson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313451: missing gcc bug number (was: Re: Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0))

2005-06-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:35:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as
> 313451.
This message was sent *to* bug 313451.  What is the gcc bug number?
Justin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up.

2005-06-23 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi,

1. Please run gphpedit in the console to see if any messages appear.
2. Please provid an strace of the problem ('strace gphpedit 2>
/tmp/gphpedit_bugreport').

Manolo Díaz wrote:
> Package: gphpedit
> Version: 0.9.50-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: testing/unstable
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.1
> Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
> 
> Versions of packages gphpedit depends on:
> ii  libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D 
> graphi
> ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit
> ii  libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's 
> audio
> ii  libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
> ii  libbonoboui2-0   2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
> ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
> an
> ii  libesd0  0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon - 
> Shared 
> ii  libgail-common   1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility 
> Implementation
> ii  libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility 
> Implementation
> ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.0-9   GCC support library
> ii  libgconf2-4  2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database 
> syste
> ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.0-11.1  LGPL Crypto library - runtime 
> libr
> ii  libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
> ii  libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
> ii  libgnome2-0  2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime 
> file
> ii  libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented 
> display
> ii  libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User 
> Interf
> ii  libgnomevfs2-0   2.8.4-4 The GNOME virtual file-system 
> libr
> ii  libgnutls11  1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
> ii  libgpg-error01.0-1   library for common error values 
> an
> ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user 
> interface 
> ii  libgtkhtml2-02.6.3-1 HTML rendering/editing library - 
> r
> ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
> ii  libjpeg626b-10   The Independent JPEG Group's 
> JPEG 
> ii  liborbit21:2.12.2-1  libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA 
> ORB
> ii  libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of 
> internatio
> ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline 
> parameters
> ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session 
> Management
> ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-13  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
> ii  libtasn1-2   0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
> ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client 
> li
> ii  libxml2  2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
> ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) 
> configu
> ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compression library - runtime
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> Fails to restart after dialog box. No message is shown.
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Regards,

Lior Kaplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Guides.co.il

Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)




Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal

2005-06-23 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:07:45 +0200
Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: jfsutils
> Version: 1.1.7-1
> Severity: critical
> 
> 
> Using fsck.jfs on my loopback file caused it multiply to segfault.
> I could 'fix' it by using --omit_journal_replay.
> 
> I don't know in which state the filesystem has to be to segfault fsck,
> but someone should check the log replay source.

I just uploaded jfsutils 1.1.8-1. This upstream release is supposed
to fix problems with journal replays. Can you please test if your
problem still persists ?

Bye
Racke

-- 
LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/
Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration
ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/
Interchange Development Team



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315510: bittorrent: 3.2.4-4 fails to connect to peers (3.2.4-3sarge0.1 works fine)

2005-06-23 Thread Michael Janssen
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> Package: bittorrent
> Version: 3.4.2-3sarge0.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> 
> After upgrading bittorrent to 3.4.2-4 it ceased to work - it will
> start up fine but wait forever on the 'connecting to peers' prompt.
> Downgrading to the version on stable fixes this, so it must be
> a recently introduced change.  I'm behind a NAT firewall, so perhaps
> the changes in port usage are to blame?

Can you give me more information on how the new one doesn't work?  I
did test it behind a NAT and on a "normal" connection, so I don't
think it is related to that.  If you could run a lsof with the program
running it may be useful.   Also it could be the case that you just
did not wait long enough - NATed peers have a startup time which is
much slower because other peers cannot connect to them, and there is a
certain amount of wait time for a new peer in the swarm.

-- 
Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315361: Bug #315361 - [keyboard shortcuts] Music player shortcuts doesn't work

2005-06-23 Thread Alban browaeys
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 06:28 +0200, Rémy Saissy a écrit :

> ok, look at the picture, the is the 0x49 which is F7 and
> XF86AudioPause which is F7 too. First bound gave me XF86AudioPrevious,
> second one XF86AudioStop... I tried it on a fresh installed system and
> on an older one.


Hum i have been through X symbols. XF86AudioStop and such are only
defined in the "inet" symbols file. This one defines special keys (named
after firsts internet keyboards) for specific keyboard layout . Like
ltcd for Logitech keyboards. 

You might have to find out if your keyboard is supported in
gnome-keyboard-properties -> layout 

or the hard way : /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 , inetkbds variable list
all the supported "inet" keyboards. (gnome
uses /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86.xml though the previous one is easier
for humans to read).

The available keys for each keyboards are listed
in : /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/inet . Mine only support XF86WWW, XF86Search
and XF86Search for example.

If i want to map "Pause" in gnome to f7 , "F7" is the proper key name
('symbol'). 
Though if you want the other way round. That F7 fires up an
XF86AudioStop events that even non gnome applications can understand,
you would have to plays with the symbol file.

For example creating your own "inet" keyboard:

//my keyboard

partial alphanumeric_keys
xkb_symbols "my_keyboard" {
name[Group1]= "My keyboard";

key <###>   {   [ XF86AudioPlay, XF86AudioPause ] };
};

replacing ### by the X internal key name. 

To find out which is the key name for F7 :
$  grep F7 /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/*

for my keyboard (french ) there is no mapping defined so it fails back
to the us : 
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us: key  { [F7 ]   };

Thus :

key{   [ XF86AudioPlay, XF86AudioPause ] };

then add "my_keyboard" to the inetkbds variable
in /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 .
And to /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86.xml (copying from say ltcd example) if
you want it to shows up in your gnome-keyboard-properties keyboard
layout list .


Confusing isn't it ?

It all depends on what you are trying to achieve. Map a key to "Pause"
in gnome keyboard properties or make F7 fires up an XF86AudioStop X
event ...

Regards
Alban




Bug#315556: sound-juicer: sound-juicer does not start

2005-06-23 Thread Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan
Package: sound-juicer
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: grave

I fetched the sound-juicer and associated program from the unstable this
evening and found that it is not working at all.

When I invoke sound-juicer from menu, it does not start. While executing
from command-line, I got this error message and it exits.

sound-juicer
sound-juicer: relocation error: /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstaudioconvert.so: 
undefined symbol: gst_audio_set_caps_channel_positions_list

It could be that there is some assumed dependency version, which is
not installed on my system. As you can see, I run a dated gnome system.

I will be glad to provide more information if needed for debugging
this issue.

Thanks
Ramakrishnan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux radio 2.6.11 #4 Tue May 3 20:58:55 IST 2005 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages sound-juicer depends on:
ii  gconf22.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste
ii  gnome-media   2.6.2-0.2  Gnome 2 Media Utilities
ii  gstreamer0.8-cdparanoia   0.8.8-3cdparanoia plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-flac 0.8.8-3FLAC plugin for GStreamer
ii  gstreamer0.8-misc 0.8.8-3Collection of various GStreamer pl
ii  gstreamer0.8-vorbis   0.8.8-3Vorbis plugin for GStreamer
ii  libart-2.0-2  2.3.16-5   Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.8.0-4The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libbonobo2-0  2.8.0-3Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libbonoboui2-02.6.1-1The Bonobo UI library
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:3.4.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libgconf2-4   2.8.1-4GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglade2-0   1:2.4.2-2  library to load .glade files at ru
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.2-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnome2-0   2.8.0-6The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  libgnomecanvas2-0 2.6.1.1-2  A powerful object-oriented display
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.8.0-3The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-02.8.4-2The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0   0.8.2-3GConf support for GStreamer
ii  libgstreamer0.8-0 0.8.9-2Core GStreamer libraries, plugins,
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.2-3The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libmusicbrainz4   2.1.1-3Second generation incarnation of t
ii  liborbit2 1:2.10.2-1.1   libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpopt0  1.7-4  lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.5-8  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxml2   2.6.16-3   GNOME XML library
ii  xlibs 4.3.0-2X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.1-3  compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315433: Bug #315433 - kdelibs-bin: laptop can't wake up when kded was running when i slept it

2005-06-23 Thread Jorge Salamero
on Thursday 23 June 2005 02:05, Alban browaeys wrote:
> Hum i meant to stop dbus before starting kde (and before sleeping) . I
> disabled dbus monthes ago though kded still starts.
> I guess that after killing dbus, starting a new kde application should
> restart kded without dbus (thohg i could not check having dbus
> disabled :(

i've removed dbus from rc scripts, rebooted (who knows :)) and logged in in 
kde (kded was running) slept and the same problem.

> It would help to know if the issue bug is in dbus-qt/suspend or in
> kded/suspend (and redirect to the adhoc maintainer).

i think it isn't a dbus issue because with dbus running i start a failsafe or 
fluxbox session and i can sleep and wake up without problems.

-- 
Jorge Salamero Sanz (bencer)
mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
blog: 
http: 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315361: Bug #315361 - [keyboard shortcuts] Music player shortcuts doesn't work

2005-06-23 Thread Alban browaeys
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 06:28 +0200, Rémy Saissy a écrit :
> yes it worked before as I said before gnome 2.4.
> My keyboard layout is pc105-US and on another computer pc105-FR
> both doesn' t work.
> The locale is Czech cs_cz.
> $uname -a
> Linux Fondcombe 2.6.11-1-686-smp #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 20:18:45 MDT 2005
> i686 GNU/Linux
> so this is an intel processor
> The debian version is an unstable.

thank you. So this is an "acme" only problem (no ppc and such)

> I know that the hexadecimal code isn't supported actually,
> when the hexdecimal code or XF86... is printed as shortcut, the shortcut
> doesn't work.
> acme... this software is currently not installed on my computers.

acme was the "multimedia"/special keys manager before 2.4 (2.6 ?). It
has been included in gnome afterwards though it does not supported
hexadecimals anymore as  far as i know.

you can reset  the keybinding in gconf
apps>gnome-settings-daemon>keybinding

you could also remove all apps>acme though i believe they are not used
anymore.

>From my problems with acme/keybindings i would say the hexa breaks all
other settings. Removing it and retrying with only X symbols would fix
it.

I won't go into X symbols yet as it is pretty confusing. If the above
does not help or if you already tried it , we 'll go there (and maybe
reassign the bug to the package which ship those X symbols).
It could be that the problem comes from the X keyboard works that have
happened some monthes ago. It fixed all alyout though may have changed
the way your XF86AUdio keys where mapped.


Cheers
Alban

PS: you can remove any hexa by remapping the keybindings to other keys
or typing backspace. Though to find out i did delete/reset all the
bindings in gconf. Thus i may have done more than just removing the
hexa. Please tell which fixed the problem if so.




Bug#76918: Re[3]: hi from Marina Eugenia P.

2005-06-23 Thread Marya Eugenia
Hi, Stefan

I'm a very young and energetic lady! I have very positive attitude to life and 
people. I do enjoy new experience life can offer me: to see new interesting 
places, to meet new people.
I do try to enjoy every moment of life and accept everything the way it comes 
without complaining.
Though my life seems to be quite enjoyable there's one important thing missing. 
It's LOVE!
Without my beloved one, my soul mate, my King my life is not completed.
I wish i coud find him very soon so that we could share together every momement 
of the life-time romance! 
What about you? Could you be my King? If answer is "yes" - you can find more 
about me 
http://wK0xzS5ztedB0x7yxcW9.lokingforaman.org/

talk to you soon!
Marina-Eugenia




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#314289: I second this bug..

2005-06-23 Thread Scott M. Likens
I second this bug,

I've debugged it further to additionally permissions on /var/log/btmp
were wrong.

Had to change that in logrotate.conf and manually, but even with sshd -d

desolation:~# /usr/sbin/sshd -d
debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4
debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA
debug1: private host key: #0 type 1 RSA
debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA
debug1: private host key: #1 type 2 DSA
debug1: rexec_argv[0]='/usr/sbin/sshd'
debug1: rexec_argv[1]='-d'
debug1: Bind to port 22 on 127.0.0.1.
Server listening on 127.0.0.1 port 22.
debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode.
debug1: rexec start in 4 out 4 newsock 4 pipe -1 sock 7
debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3
Connection from 127.0.0.1 port 58459
debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version
OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 pat
OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4
debug1: list_hostkey_types: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: KEX done
debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method
nonedebug1: attempt 0 failures 0
Failed none for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2
debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method
publickey debug1: attempt 1 failures 1
Failed publickey for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2
debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method
keyboard-interactive debug1: attempt 2 failures 2
Failed keyboard-interactive for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2
debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method
password debug1: attempt 3 failures 3
Failed password for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2

---

sshd_config

attached


 

sshd_config
Description: Binary data


Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0)

2005-06-23 Thread Blars Blarson
The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as
313451.

-- 
Blars Blarson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
With Microsoft, failure is not an option.  It is a standard feature.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315463: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] error: Cannot link with GPM library

2005-06-23 Thread Blars Blarson
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:55:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Last time I suggested this was a problem with your pbuilder.  I still
> think that's likely to be true.  What package is missing for gcc -m64
> to work

Looking into it further (strace has this problem as well) it apears to
be a gcc bug.  315502 is the bug number of the bug I just submited.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#313481: marked as done (proftpd: FTBFS)

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313481: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 17:01:58 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 10:01:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from atlrel6.hp.com [156.153.255.205] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhsJy-0005zO-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:01:58 -0700
Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.11.136.119])
by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F8B16A78
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30])
by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 160E63859E; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D3A1341DA;
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 12498-01; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from krebs (krebs.dannf [10.8.0.7])
by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13231340D4;
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by krebs (Postfix, from userid 20800)
id 91A4F3B62C2; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600 (MDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proftpd: FTBFS
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: proftpd
Version: 1.2.10-16
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures.  Here's one of
the failed build logs:
  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=proftpd&ver=1.2.10-16&arch=ia64&stamp=1118668682&file=log&as=raw

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-mckinley
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages proftpd depends on:
ii  adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf 1.4.51   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libpam0g0.76-22  Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system
pn  proftpd-common   Not found.
ii  ucf 1.18 Update Configuration File: preserv

---
Received: (at 313481-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 08:51:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 01:51:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlNR6-0001mm-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:51:48 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlNMa-0001Dd-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#313481: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-17
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-S

Bug#305065: marked as done ([dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release)

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable 
release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 18:30:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 11:30:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNEXF-Qc-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:21 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50) 
  id 1DNEXD-0001Yv-9U
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ruby1.9
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

Hello,

  First of all, thanks for packaging ruby1.9. I think it's nice to have
  it as a Debian package, specially if it's updated regurlarly. Thanks!

  Second, as I expressed in this debian-ruby post [1], I believe that a
  development version of Ruby such as 1.9 should not get shipped in a
  stable release.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2005/04/msg9.html

  I haven't received any feedback about that mail yet, and I was willing
  to wait a little more. But since I see that the latest ruby1.9 upload
  carried urgency=high, I'm preemptively filing this bug now before it
  enters sarge. A memeber of the release team agreed that it was best to
  file now, and discuss things after if you disagree.

  akira, do you think are there any reasons for which ruby1.9 should not
  be kept out of sarge?

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Enrique Bunbury - Sólo si me perdonas
 
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
-- Oscar Wilde


---
Received: (at 305065-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 09:47:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 02:47:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fs.yendot.org [164.46.240.253] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlOIY-0003ms-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:47:02 -0700
Received: from arika.org (rb.vpn.yendot.org [192.168.253.2])
by fs.yendot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E3FD36D4146; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761D3D4003;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from arika.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (station [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16713-06; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.16.1.39] (powerbk.p.arika.org [172.16.1.39])
by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE7F3D4002;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: akira yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900
To: Adeodato SimXX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at arika.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


On 2005/04/18, at 3:30,

Bug#315218: marked as done (metar: incorrect use of Architecture: field in source package)

2005-06-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315218: fixed in metar 20050622.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 07:55:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 00:55:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dkdbs-00065X-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 915DDA4469; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: metar: incorrect use of Architecture: field in source package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: metar
Version: 20050103.1-2
Severity: serious

The metar source package uses Architecture: i386 in debian/control for no
apparent reason, wrongly limiting the package to building only on i386.
Packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably
possible; I have personally tested that this package builds and runs
correctly on alpha, and have no reason to believe this wouldn't be true for
*all* Debian architectures, so this misuse of the Architecture: field is an
RC bug per the release policy for sarge/etch.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCt8gHKN6ufymYLloRArTwAKC//V5fturAtxJ8r7ua9yKiP7hb7ACfZCUs
UJL29lW0EFpUiyK6aLXxlSs=
=iJSP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--

---
Received: (at 315218-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 07:15:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 00:15:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlLvd-0006Ef-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:15:13 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlLj0-0001t0-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400
From: Kees Leune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315218: fixed in metar 20050622.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: metar
Source-Version: 20050622.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
metar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

metar_20050622.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1.diff.gz
metar_20050622.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1.dsc
metar_20050622.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1_i386.deb
metar_20050622.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Kees Leune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated metar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
be

Bug#315467: missing kill-quagga-prompt when upgrading

2005-06-23 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello

On 2005-06-23 Michael Horn wrote:
> people like you are the source of instability in the global routing table
[...]
> regards Michael Horn
> ...who switched to lfs or openbgpd instead of debian.

(lfs = Linux From Scratch?)

The only source of routing table instability is the reconnection that
happens when the old daemon is stopped and the new is started.

So did you check if you are really able to upgrade the BGP server daemon
from OpenBGPd or whichever LFS might use *without* having to reconnect?

BGP uses TCP connections and so far I have never seen a daemon that really
tries to handover a running TCP connection to another daemon or uses a
mini-proxy to keep the real binary behind that (which in both cases would
be far beyond Debian packaging but major work for the authors of Quagga).

I would be interested in a working example on how somebody was able to
do it better to submit it as feature request on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(you might want to start a discussion there yourself)

bye,

-christian-


P.S.: I only focused on the above issue. That servers are generally shutdown 
immediately
  when they are upgraded and thus upgrades of critical packages should only 
happen
  during maintenance windows, is simply the way Debian works. If you don't 
like this, 
  I'm sorry that I have to recommend you to another distro then.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#251183: FTBFS - Please rebuild ultrapoint with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Kitame-san,

I've uploaded an NMU for this bug to the DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck.  The
trivial patch is attached.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog
--- ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog
+++ ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ultrapoint (0.4-9.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Rebuild against libt1-dev, to lose the dependency on the obsolete
+t1lib1 package (closes: #251183).
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:37:39 -0700
+
 ultrapoint (0.4-9.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-Maintainer Upload... Again
diff -u ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control
--- ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control
+++ ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: misc
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libhdf4g-dev, t1lib-dev, libttf-dev, debhelper (>= 3), 
vflib3-dev, libkpathsea-dev, libxml-dev, libunicode-dev, libglib1.2-dev, 
libggi-dev, zlib1g-dev, autotools-dev
+Build-Depends: libhdf4g-dev, libt1-dev, libttf-dev, debhelper (>= 3), 
vflib3-dev, libkpathsea-dev, libxml-dev, libunicode-dev, libglib1.2-dev, 
libggi-dev, zlib1g-dev, autotools-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2.0
 
 Package: ultrapoint


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#303075: O: nemesi -- standards-compliant multimedia streaming client

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 315245 ftp.debian.org
retitle 315245 RM: nemesi -- RoQA: orphaned package has never been free of RC 
bugs
thanks

This package has obviously never been cared for in Debian, with one upload
ever and that upload containing RC-buggy build-dependencies that were
reported shortly after the upload.  There has been no acknowledgement of
this bug after 80 days.  Please remove this package from unstable; it can be
re-uploaded when someone is prepared to maintain it properly.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#315467: missing kill-quagga-prompt when upgrading

2005-06-23 Thread Michael Horn
Please have a look at how openvpn is upgraded. people like you are the 
source of instability in the global routing table. Have a nice day.


regards Michael Horn
...who switched to lfs or openbgpd instead of debian.

p.s. you might want to read up a bit on how the world out there works 
before building crappy packets and annoying other people with 'em.

--
Michael Horn Network Consulting | nibbler.de | I route, therefore you are
+
Po.Box 810221 | 90247 Nuremberg | GSM: +4916 | FAX: +49162345



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315510: bittorrent: 3.2.4-4 fails to connect to peers (3.2.4-3sarge0.1 works fine)

2005-06-23 Thread Tim Van Holder
Package: bittorrent
Version: 3.4.2-3sarge0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


After upgrading bittorrent to 3.4.2-4 it ceased to work - it will
start up fine but wait forever on the 'connecting to peers' prompt.
Downgrading to the version on stable fixes this, so it must be
a recently introduced change.  I'm behind a NAT firewall, so perhaps
the changes in port usage are to blame?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages bittorrent depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315512: libalsaplayer-dev: missing Section in doc-base file

2005-06-23 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
Package: libalsaplayer-dev
Version: 0.99.76-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

here is the problem:

Setting up libalsaplayer-dev (0.99.76-1) ...
error in control file: `Section' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 627,  line 12.
dpkg: error processing libalsaplayer-dev (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages libalsaplayer-dev depends on:
ii  libalsaplayer00.99.76-1  PCM player designed for ALSA (inte

libalsaplayer-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315532: asterisk: Buffer overflow in command line parser

2005-06-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: asterisk
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

An exploitable security problem has been found in Asterisk by Wade
Alcorn:

| There is a programming error in the function that parses commands in the
| Asterisk system. This is used by the manager interface if the user is
| allowed to submit CLI commands. The coding error can result in the
| overflow of one of the parameters of the calling function. That is, the
| command parsing function will return without error. However, the calling
| function will cause a segmentation fault.
|
| If the command string is specifically crafted, is it possible to use
| this stack overflow to execute arbitrary code on the Asterisk system.
| The resulting execution is (typically) run with root privileges.
|
| A command consisting of a recurring string of two double quotes followed
| by a tab character will induce the segmentation fault within a Call
| Manager thread.

The full advisory can found at 
http://www.bindshell.net/voip/advisory-05-013.txt

Version 1.0.8 fixes this issue.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#251184: FTBFS - Please rebuild vflib3 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Hatta-san,

I've prepared an NMU for this RC bug and have uploaded it to the
DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck.  The patch, which is very similar to the one
provided by Artur, is attached.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub
--- vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub
+++ vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 #! /bin/sh
 # Configuration validation subroutine script.
 #   Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,
-#   2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#   2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
-timestamp='2004-01-05'
+timestamp='2005-04-22'
 
 # This file is (in principle) common to ALL GNU software.
 # The presence of a machine in this file suggests that SOME GNU software
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 version="\
 GNU config.sub ($timestamp)
 
-Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
+Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
-convergent* | -ncr* | -news | -32* | -3600* | -3100* | -hitachi* |\
-c[123]* | -convex* | -sun | -crds | -omron* | -dg | -ultra | -tti* | \
-harris | -dolphin | -highlevel | -gould | -cbm | -ns | -masscomp | \
-   -apple | -axis)
+   -apple | -axis | -knuth | -cray)
os=
basic_machine=$1
;;
@@ -231,13 +231,14 @@
| alpha64 | alpha64ev[4-8] | alpha64ev56 | alpha64ev6[78] | 
alpha64pca5[67] \
| am33_2.0 \
| arc | arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2345] | armv[345][lb] | avr \
+   | bfin \
| c4x | clipper \
| d10v | d30v | dlx | dsp16xx \
| fr30 | frv \
| h8300 | h8500 | hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | hppa64 \
| i370 | i860 | i960 | ia64 \
| ip2k | iq2000 \
-   | m32r | m68000 | m68k | m88k | mcore \
+   | m32r | m32rle | m68000 | m68k | m88k | maxq | mcore \
| mips | mipsbe | mipseb | mipsel | mipsle \
| mips16 \
| mips64 | mips64el \
@@ -262,12 +263,13 @@
| pyramid \
| sh | sh[1234] | sh[23]e | sh[34]eb | shbe | shle | sh[1234]le | 
sh3ele \
| sh64 | sh64le \
-   | sparc | sparc64 | sparc86x | sparclet | sparclite | sparcv9 | 
sparcv9b \
+   | sparc | sparc64 | sparc64b | sparc86x | sparclet | sparclite \
+   | sparcv8 | sparcv9 | sparcv9b \
| strongarm \
| tahoe | thumb | tic4x | tic80 | tron \
| v850 | v850e \
| we32k \
-   | x86 | xscale | xstormy16 | xtensa \
+   | x86 | xscale | xscalee[bl] | xstormy16 | xtensa \
| z8k)
basic_machine=$basic_machine-unknown
;;
@@ -298,9 +300,9 @@
| alphapca5[67]-* | alpha64pca5[67]-* | arc-* \
| arm-*  | armbe-* | armle-* | armeb-* | armv*-* \
| avr-* \
-   | bs2000-* \
+   | bfin-* | bs2000-* \
| c[123]* | c30-* | [cjt]90-* | c4x-* | c54x-* | c55x-* | c6x-* \
-   | clipper-* | cydra-* \
+   | clipper-* | craynv-* | cydra-* \
| d10v-* | d30v-* | dlx-* \
| elxsi-* \
| f30[01]-* | f700-* | fr30-* | frv-* | fx80-* \
@@ -308,9 +310,9 @@
| hppa-* | hppa1.[01]-* | hppa2.0-* | hppa2.0[nw]-* | hppa64-* \
| i*86-* | i860-* | i960-* | ia64-* \
| ip2k-* | iq2000-* \
-   | m32r-* \
+   | m32r-* | m32rle-* \
| m68000-* | m680[012346]0-* | m68360-* | m683?2-* | m68k-* \
-   | m88110-* | m88k-* | mcore-* \
+   | m88110-* | m88k-* | maxq-* | mcore-* \
| mips-* | mipsbe-* | mipseb-* | mipsel-* | mipsle-* \
| mips16-* \
| mips64-* | mips64el-* \
@@ -326,8 +328,9 @@
| mipsisa64sb1-* | mipsisa64sb1el-* \
| mipsisa64sr71k-* | mipsisa64sr71kel-* \
| mipstx39-* | mipstx39el-* \
+   | mmix-* \
| msp430-* \
-   | none-* | np1-* | nv1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \
+   | none-* | np1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \
| orion-* \
| pdp10-* | pdp11-* | pj-* | pjl-* | pn-* | power-* \
| powerpc-* | powerpc64-* | powerpc64le-* | powerpcle-* | ppcbe-* \
@@ -335,15 +338,16 @@
| romp-* | rs6000-* \
| sh-* | sh[1234]-* | sh[23]e-* | sh[34]eb-* | shbe-* \
| shle-* | sh[1234]le-* | sh3ele-* | sh64-* | sh64le-* \
-   | sparc-* | sparc64-* | sparc86x-* | sparclet-* | sparclite-* \
-   | sparcv9-* | sparcv9b-* | strongarm-* | sv1-* | sx?-* \
+   | sparc-* | sparc64-* | sparc64b-* | sparc86x-* | sparclet-* \
+   | sparclite-* \
+   | sparcv8-* | sparcv9-* | sparcv9b-* | strongarm-* | sv1-* | sx?-* \
| tahoe-* | thumb-* \
| tic30-* | tic4x-* | tic54x-* | tic55x-* | tic6x-* | tic80-* \
| tron-* \
| v850-* | v850e-* | vax-* \
| we32k-* \
-   | x86-* | x86_64-* | xps100-* | x

Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server

2005-06-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:25:38PM +0200, Martin Kos wrote:
> sometimes i've got some other strange log entries:
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'by' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'uid=0' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user '(' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(167)
>   name '' is not a user name: 3
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(167)
>   name '' is not a user name: 3
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'run-parts' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user '--report' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'pam_unix' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'session' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'closed' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'for' does not exist
> [2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
>   user 'user' does not exist

Hmm, this suggests that there's a file descriptor problem somewhere, and
some information that's supposed to be sent to syslog is somehow ending up
on the winbind socket... I'm not sure whether this explains the whole
failure you're seeing, though.

> On 06/20/2005 11:54 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Can you try to re-join the ADS domain using the 3.0.14a version of 
> >the tools?  It's possible that there was a silent file format change 
> >between 3.0.10 and 3.0.14a that went unnoticed.
> net ads join -U administrator
> administrator's password:
> [2005/06/21 14:23:48, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1405)
>   ads_add_machine_acct: Host account for srvmp3 already exists -
> modifying old account
> Using short domain name -- REVOX
> Joined 'SRVMP3' to realm 'REVOX.CH'

> i think i have had tried that already and it didn't help :-(

Ok.

> >>i'll see if i can try winbind versions between 3.0.10-1 and 
> >>3.0.14-a.
> >Have you tried these?  Anything you can report to us?  Since I don't 
> >have access to an ADS domain currently, the more information you can 
> >give us, the easier it will be to track down.

> 3.0.14a-3, 3.0.14a-2, 3.0.14a-1 and 3.0.11-1  didn't work :-(
> only 3.0.10-1 works without problems!

> >If this problem is reproducible with a fresh domain join under 
> >3.0.14a, I think the severity is appropriate.  If this bug only 
> >applies when upgrading from previous 3.0 versions, then that would be
> > an 'important' bug rather than a 'grave' bug.

> the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server
> but just some of them.

Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server
using their ADS credentials?  Or are these pre-ADS clients?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#313067: looks like the same bug as 251067

2005-06-23 Thread Angus Lees
At Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Young wrote:
> The behavior reported here seems very similar to the problems with
> printing from mozilla, filed under 251067.  Take a look and see if
> these can be combined -- and see if it's possible to decide just *where*
> in the font-handling system the trouble is coming from.  There are so
> man interacting pieces, it's hard to tell.

Perhaps, although I'm not convinced without further
investigation. (and I need to read through #251067 in depth when I
have a lot more free time..)

Can you "print to file" and capture one of these bogus (postscript)
print jobs?  Then at least we have something to pull apart and
investigate.  You might want to make it available somewhere and
publish the location until this bug is resolved (since debbugs doesn't
really like larger attachments).

-- 
 - Gus


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]