Bug#313067: looks like the same bug as 251067
At Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:04:10 -0700 (PDT), Andrew Young wrote: The behavior reported here seems very similar to the problems with printing from mozilla, filed under 251067. Take a look and see if these can be combined -- and see if it's possible to decide just *where* in the font-handling system the trouble is coming from. There are so man interacting pieces, it's hard to tell. Perhaps, although I'm not convinced without further investigation. (and I need to read through #251067 in depth when I have a lot more free time..) Can you print to file and capture one of these bogus (postscript) print jobs? Then at least we have something to pull apart and investigate. You might want to make it available somewhere and publish the location until this bug is resolved (since debbugs doesn't really like larger attachments). -- - Gus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:25:38PM +0200, Martin Kos wrote:
sometimes i've got some other strange log entries:
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'by' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'uid=0' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user '(' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(167)
name '' is not a user name: 3
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(167)
name '' is not a user name: 3
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'run-parts' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:03, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user '--report' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'pam_unix' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'session' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'closed' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'for' does not exist
[2005/06/21 12:17:04, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(161)
user 'user' does not exist
Hmm, this suggests that there's a file descriptor problem somewhere, and
some information that's supposed to be sent to syslog is somehow ending up
on the winbind socket... I'm not sure whether this explains the whole
failure you're seeing, though.
On 06/20/2005 11:54 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
Can you try to re-join the ADS domain using the 3.0.14a version of
the tools? It's possible that there was a silent file format change
between 3.0.10 and 3.0.14a that went unnoticed.
net ads join -U administrator
administrator's password:
[2005/06/21 14:23:48, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1405)
ads_add_machine_acct: Host account for srvmp3 already exists -
modifying old account
Using short domain name -- REVOX
Joined 'SRVMP3' to realm 'REVOX.CH'
i think i have had tried that already and it didn't help :-(
Ok.
i'll see if i can try winbind versions between 3.0.10-1 and
3.0.14-a.
Have you tried these? Anything you can report to us? Since I don't
have access to an ADS domain currently, the more information you can
give us, the easier it will be to track down.
3.0.14a-3, 3.0.14a-2, 3.0.14a-1 and 3.0.11-1 didn't work :-(
only 3.0.10-1 works without problems!
If this problem is reproducible with a fresh domain join under
3.0.14a, I think the severity is appropriate. If this bug only
applies when upgrading from previous 3.0 versions, then that would be
an 'important' bug rather than a 'grave' bug.
the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server
but just some of them.
Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server
using their ADS credentials? Or are these pre-ADS clients?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#251184: FTBFS - Please rebuild vflib3 with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev
Hi Hatta-san, I've prepared an NMU for this RC bug and have uploaded it to the DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck. The patch, which is very similar to the one provided by Artur, is attached. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub --- vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub +++ vflib3-3.6.13/config.sub @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ #! /bin/sh # Configuration validation subroutine script. # Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, -# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +# 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -timestamp='2004-01-05' +timestamp='2005-04-22' # This file is (in principle) common to ALL GNU software. # The presence of a machine in this file suggests that SOME GNU software @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ version=\ GNU config.sub ($timestamp) -Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 +Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ -convergent* | -ncr* | -news | -32* | -3600* | -3100* | -hitachi* |\ -c[123]* | -convex* | -sun | -crds | -omron* | -dg | -ultra | -tti* | \ -harris | -dolphin | -highlevel | -gould | -cbm | -ns | -masscomp | \ - -apple | -axis) + -apple | -axis | -knuth | -cray) os= basic_machine=$1 ;; @@ -231,13 +231,14 @@ | alpha64 | alpha64ev[4-8] | alpha64ev56 | alpha64ev6[78] | alpha64pca5[67] \ | am33_2.0 \ | arc | arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2345] | armv[345][lb] | avr \ + | bfin \ | c4x | clipper \ | d10v | d30v | dlx | dsp16xx \ | fr30 | frv \ | h8300 | h8500 | hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | hppa64 \ | i370 | i860 | i960 | ia64 \ | ip2k | iq2000 \ - | m32r | m68000 | m68k | m88k | mcore \ + | m32r | m32rle | m68000 | m68k | m88k | maxq | mcore \ | mips | mipsbe | mipseb | mipsel | mipsle \ | mips16 \ | mips64 | mips64el \ @@ -262,12 +263,13 @@ | pyramid \ | sh | sh[1234] | sh[23]e | sh[34]eb | shbe | shle | sh[1234]le | sh3ele \ | sh64 | sh64le \ - | sparc | sparc64 | sparc86x | sparclet | sparclite | sparcv9 | sparcv9b \ + | sparc | sparc64 | sparc64b | sparc86x | sparclet | sparclite \ + | sparcv8 | sparcv9 | sparcv9b \ | strongarm \ | tahoe | thumb | tic4x | tic80 | tron \ | v850 | v850e \ | we32k \ - | x86 | xscale | xstormy16 | xtensa \ + | x86 | xscale | xscalee[bl] | xstormy16 | xtensa \ | z8k) basic_machine=$basic_machine-unknown ;; @@ -298,9 +300,9 @@ | alphapca5[67]-* | alpha64pca5[67]-* | arc-* \ | arm-* | armbe-* | armle-* | armeb-* | armv*-* \ | avr-* \ - | bs2000-* \ + | bfin-* | bs2000-* \ | c[123]* | c30-* | [cjt]90-* | c4x-* | c54x-* | c55x-* | c6x-* \ - | clipper-* | cydra-* \ + | clipper-* | craynv-* | cydra-* \ | d10v-* | d30v-* | dlx-* \ | elxsi-* \ | f30[01]-* | f700-* | fr30-* | frv-* | fx80-* \ @@ -308,9 +310,9 @@ | hppa-* | hppa1.[01]-* | hppa2.0-* | hppa2.0[nw]-* | hppa64-* \ | i*86-* | i860-* | i960-* | ia64-* \ | ip2k-* | iq2000-* \ - | m32r-* \ + | m32r-* | m32rle-* \ | m68000-* | m680[012346]0-* | m68360-* | m683?2-* | m68k-* \ - | m88110-* | m88k-* | mcore-* \ + | m88110-* | m88k-* | maxq-* | mcore-* \ | mips-* | mipsbe-* | mipseb-* | mipsel-* | mipsle-* \ | mips16-* \ | mips64-* | mips64el-* \ @@ -326,8 +328,9 @@ | mipsisa64sb1-* | mipsisa64sb1el-* \ | mipsisa64sr71k-* | mipsisa64sr71kel-* \ | mipstx39-* | mipstx39el-* \ + | mmix-* \ | msp430-* \ - | none-* | np1-* | nv1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \ + | none-* | np1-* | ns16k-* | ns32k-* \ | orion-* \ | pdp10-* | pdp11-* | pj-* | pjl-* | pn-* | power-* \ | powerpc-* | powerpc64-* | powerpc64le-* | powerpcle-* | ppcbe-* \ @@ -335,15 +338,16 @@ | romp-* | rs6000-* \ | sh-* | sh[1234]-* | sh[23]e-* | sh[34]eb-* | shbe-* \ | shle-* | sh[1234]le-* | sh3ele-* | sh64-* | sh64le-* \ - | sparc-* | sparc64-* | sparc86x-* | sparclet-* | sparclite-* \ - | sparcv9-* | sparcv9b-* | strongarm-* | sv1-* | sx?-* \ + | sparc-* | sparc64-* | sparc64b-* | sparc86x-* | sparclet-* \ + | sparclite-* \ + | sparcv8-* | sparcv9-* | sparcv9b-* | strongarm-* | sv1-* | sx?-* \ | tahoe-* | thumb-* \ | tic30-* | tic4x-* | tic54x-* | tic55x-* | tic6x-* | tic80-* \ | tron-* \ | v850-* | v850e-* | vax-* \ | we32k-* \ - | x86-* | x86_64-* | xps100-* |
Bug#315532: asterisk: Buffer overflow in command line parser
Package: asterisk Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole An exploitable security problem has been found in Asterisk by Wade Alcorn: | There is a programming error in the function that parses commands in the | Asterisk system. This is used by the manager interface if the user is | allowed to submit CLI commands. The coding error can result in the | overflow of one of the parameters of the calling function. That is, the | command parsing function will return without error. However, the calling | function will cause a segmentation fault. | | If the command string is specifically crafted, is it possible to use | this stack overflow to execute arbitrary code on the Asterisk system. | The resulting execution is (typically) run with root privileges. | | A command consisting of a recurring string of two double quotes followed | by a tab character will induce the segmentation fault within a Call | Manager thread. The full advisory can found at http://www.bindshell.net/voip/advisory-05-013.txt Version 1.0.8 fixes this issue. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315512: libalsaplayer-dev: missing Section in doc-base file
Package: libalsaplayer-dev Version: 0.99.76-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: Setting up libalsaplayer-dev (0.99.76-1) ... error in control file: `Section' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 627, IN line 12. dpkg: error processing libalsaplayer-dev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libalsaplayer-dev depends on: ii libalsaplayer00.99.76-1 PCM player designed for ALSA (inte libalsaplayer-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315510: bittorrent: 3.2.4-4 fails to connect to peers (3.2.4-3sarge0.1 works fine)
Package: bittorrent Version: 3.4.2-3sarge0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading bittorrent to 3.4.2-4 it ceased to work - it will start up fine but wait forever on the 'connecting to peers' prompt. Downgrading to the version on stable fixes this, so it must be a recently introduced change. I'm behind a NAT firewall, so perhaps the changes in port usage are to blame? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages bittorrent depends on: ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315467: missing kill-quagga-prompt when upgrading
Please have a look at how openvpn is upgraded. people like you are the source of instability in the global routing table. Have a nice day. regards Michael Horn ...who switched to lfs or openbgpd instead of debian. p.s. you might want to read up a bit on how the world out there works before building crappy packets and annoying other people with 'em. -- Michael Horn Network Consulting | nibbler.de | I route, therefore you are + Po.Box 810221 | 90247 Nuremberg | GSM: +4916 | FAX: +49162345 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303075: O: nemesi -- standards-compliant multimedia streaming client
reassign 315245 ftp.debian.org retitle 315245 RM: nemesi -- RoQA: orphaned package has never been free of RC bugs thanks This package has obviously never been cared for in Debian, with one upload ever and that upload containing RC-buggy build-dependencies that were reported shortly after the upload. There has been no acknowledgement of this bug after 80 days. Please remove this package from unstable; it can be re-uploaded when someone is prepared to maintain it properly. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#251183: FTBFS - Please rebuild ultrapoint with libt1-dev instead t1lib-dev
Hi Kitame-san, I've uploaded an NMU for this bug to the DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck. The trivial patch is attached. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer diff -u ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog --- ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog +++ ultrapoint-0.4/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +ultrapoint (0.4-9.4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rebuild against libt1-dev, to lose the dependency on the obsolete +t1lib1 package (closes: #251183). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:37:39 -0700 + ultrapoint (0.4-9.3) unstable; urgency=low * Non-Maintainer Upload... Again diff -u ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control --- ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control +++ ultrapoint-0.4/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: misc Priority: optional Maintainer: Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: libhdf4g-dev, t1lib-dev, libttf-dev, debhelper (= 3), vflib3-dev, libkpathsea-dev, libxml-dev, libunicode-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libggi-dev, zlib1g-dev, autotools-dev +Build-Depends: libhdf4g-dev, libt1-dev, libttf-dev, debhelper (= 3), vflib3-dev, libkpathsea-dev, libxml-dev, libunicode-dev, libglib1.2-dev, libggi-dev, zlib1g-dev, autotools-dev Standards-Version: 3.5.2.0 Package: ultrapoint signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315467: missing kill-quagga-prompt when upgrading
Hello On 2005-06-23 Michael Horn wrote: people like you are the source of instability in the global routing table [...] regards Michael Horn ...who switched to lfs or openbgpd instead of debian. (lfs = Linux From Scratch?) The only source of routing table instability is the reconnection that happens when the old daemon is stopped and the new is started. So did you check if you are really able to upgrade the BGP server daemon from OpenBGPd or whichever LFS might use *without* having to reconnect? BGP uses TCP connections and so far I have never seen a daemon that really tries to handover a running TCP connection to another daemon or uses a mini-proxy to keep the real binary behind that (which in both cases would be far beyond Debian packaging but major work for the authors of Quagga). I would be interested in a working example on how somebody was able to do it better to submit it as feature request on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (you might want to start a discussion there yourself) bye, -christian- P.S.: I only focused on the above issue. That servers are generally shutdown immediately when they are upgraded and thus upgrades of critical packages should only happen during maintenance windows, is simply the way Debian works. If you don't like this, I'm sorry that I have to recommend you to another distro then. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315218: marked as done (metar: incorrect use of Architecture: field in source package)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315218: fixed in metar 20050622.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2005 07:55:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 21 00:55:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dkdbs-00065X-00; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 915DDA4469; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:55:52 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: metar: incorrect use of Architecture: field in source package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: metar Version: 20050103.1-2 Severity: serious The metar source package uses Architecture: i386 in debian/control for no apparent reason, wrongly limiting the package to building only on i386. Packages must be supported on as many architectures as is reasonably possible; I have personally tested that this package builds and runs correctly on alpha, and have no reason to believe this wouldn't be true for *all* Debian architectures, so this misuse of the Architecture: field is an RC bug per the release policy for sarge/etch. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCt8gHKN6ufymYLloRArTwAKC//V5fturAtxJ8r7ua9yKiP7hb7ACfZCUs UJL29lW0EFpUiyK6aLXxlSs= =iJSP -END PGP SIGNATURE- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1-- --- Received: (at 315218-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 07:15:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 00:15:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlLvd-0006Ef-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:15:13 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlLj0-0001t0-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400 From: Kees Leune [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315218: fixed in metar 20050622.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:02:10 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: metar Source-Version: 20050622.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of metar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: metar_20050622.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1.diff.gz metar_20050622.1-1.dsc to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1.dsc metar_20050622.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1-1_i386.deb metar_20050622.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/m/metar/metar_20050622.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kees Leune [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated metar package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a
Bug#305065: marked as done ([dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 18:30:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 11:30:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNEXF-Qc-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:21 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DNEXD-0001Yv-9U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200 From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: ruby1.9 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hello, First of all, thanks for packaging ruby1.9. I think it's nice to have it as a Debian package, specially if it's updated regurlarly. Thanks! Second, as I expressed in this debian-ruby post [1], I believe that a development version of Ruby such as 1.9 should not get shipped in a stable release. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2005/04/msg9.html I haven't received any feedback about that mail yet, and I was willing to wait a little more. But since I see that the latest ruby1.9 upload carried urgency=high, I'm preemptively filing this bug now before it enters sarge. A memeber of the release team agreed that it was best to file now, and discuss things after if you disagree. akira, do you think are there any reasons for which ruby1.9 should not be kept out of sarge? Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Enrique Bunbury - Sólo si me perdonas The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -- Oscar Wilde --- Received: (at 305065-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 09:47:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 02:47:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fs.yendot.org [164.46.240.253] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlOIY-0003ms-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:47:02 -0700 Received: from arika.org (rb.vpn.yendot.org [192.168.253.2]) by fs.yendot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FD36D4146; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761D3D4003; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from arika.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (station [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16713-06; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST) Received: from [172.16.1.39] (powerbk.p.arika.org [172.16.1.39]) by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE7F3D4002; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 To: Adeodato SimXX [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at arika.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On 2005/04/18, at 3:30, Adeodato Sim=C3=B3
Bug#313481: marked as done (proftpd: FTBFS)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313481: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 17:01:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 10:01:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from atlrel6.hp.com [156.153.255.205] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DhsJy-0005zO-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:01:58 -0700 Received: from smtp1.fc.hp.com (smtp.fc.hp.com [15.11.136.119]) by atlrel6.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F8B16A78 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com (ldl.fc.hp.com [15.11.146.30]) by smtp1.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160E63859E; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D3A1341DA; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:56 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ldl.fc.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ldl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12498-01; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from krebs (krebs.dannf [10.8.0.7]) by ldl.fc.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13231340D4; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:01:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: by krebs (Postfix, from userid 20800) id 91A4F3B62C2; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: proftpd: FTBFS X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:04:00 -0600 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ldl.fc.hp.com Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-16 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source This version of proftpd fails to autobuild on all architectures. Here's one of the failed build logs: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=proftpdver=1.2.10-16arch=ia64stamp=1118668682file=logas=raw -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-mckinley Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages proftpd depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap1 1:1.10-14support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system pn proftpd-common Not found. ii ucf 1.18 Update Configuration File: preserv --- Received: (at 313481-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 08:51:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 01:51:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlNR6-0001mm-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:51:48 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlNMa-0001Dd-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#313481: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-17 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:47:08 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0
Bug#315463: ncurses: ftbfs [sparc] error: Cannot link with GPM library
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:55:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Last time I suggested this was a problem with your pbuilder. I still think that's likely to be true. What package is missing for gcc -m64 to work Looking into it further (strace has this problem as well) it apears to be a gcc bug. 315502 is the bug number of the bug I just submited. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0)
The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as 313451. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314289: I second this bug..
I second this bug, I've debugged it further to additionally permissions on /var/log/btmp were wrong. Had to change that in logrotate.conf and manually, but even with sshd -d desolation:~# /usr/sbin/sshd -d debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA debug1: private host key: #0 type 1 RSA debug1: read PEM private key done: type DSA debug1: private host key: #1 type 2 DSA debug1: rexec_argv[0]='/usr/sbin/sshd' debug1: rexec_argv[1]='-d' debug1: Bind to port 22 on 127.0.0.1. Server listening on 127.0.0.1 port 22. debug1: Server will not fork when running in debugging mode. debug1: rexec start in 4 out 4 newsock 4 pipe -1 sock 7 debug1: inetd sockets after dupping: 3, 3 Connection from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_4.1p1 Debian-4 debug1: list_hostkey_types: ssh-rsa,ssh-dss debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: client-server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: server-client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST received debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: KEX done debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method nonedebug1: attempt 0 failures 0 Failed none for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method publickey debug1: attempt 1 failures 1 Failed publickey for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method keyboard-interactive debug1: attempt 2 failures 2 Failed keyboard-interactive for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2 debug1: userauth-request for user damm service ssh-connection method password debug1: attempt 3 failures 3 Failed password for damm from 127.0.0.1 port 58459 ssh2 --- sshd_config attached sshd_config Description: Binary data
Bug#76918: Re[3]: hi from Marina Eugenia P.
Hi, Stefan I'm a very young and energetic lady! I have very positive attitude to life and people. I do enjoy new experience life can offer me: to see new interesting places, to meet new people. I do try to enjoy every moment of life and accept everything the way it comes without complaining. Though my life seems to be quite enjoyable there's one important thing missing. It's LOVE! Without my beloved one, my soul mate, my King my life is not completed. I wish i coud find him very soon so that we could share together every momement of the life-time romance! What about you? Could you be my King? If answer is yes - you can find more about me http://wK0xzS5ztedB0x7yxcW9.lokingforaman.org/ talk to you soon! Marina-Eugenia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315361: Bug #315361 - [keyboard shortcuts] Music player shortcuts doesn't work
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 06:28 +0200, Rémy Saissy a écrit : yes it worked before as I said before gnome 2.4. My keyboard layout is pc105-US and on another computer pc105-FR both doesn' t work. The locale is Czech cs_cz. $uname -a Linux Fondcombe 2.6.11-1-686-smp #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 20:18:45 MDT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux so this is an intel processor The debian version is an unstable. thank you. So this is an acme only problem (no ppc and such) I know that the hexadecimal code isn't supported actually, when the hexdecimal code or XF86... is printed as shortcut, the shortcut doesn't work. acme... this software is currently not installed on my computers. acme was the multimedia/special keys manager before 2.4 (2.6 ?). It has been included in gnome afterwards though it does not supported hexadecimals anymore as far as i know. you can reset the keybinding in gconf appsgnome-settings-daemonkeybinding you could also remove all appsacme though i believe they are not used anymore. From my problems with acme/keybindings i would say the hexa breaks all other settings. Removing it and retrying with only X symbols would fix it. I won't go into X symbols yet as it is pretty confusing. If the above does not help or if you already tried it , we 'll go there (and maybe reassign the bug to the package which ship those X symbols). It could be that the problem comes from the X keyboard works that have happened some monthes ago. It fixed all alyout though may have changed the way your XF86AUdio keys where mapped. Cheers Alban PS: you can remove any hexa by remapping the keybindings to other keys or typing backspace. Though to find out i did delete/reset all the bindings in gconf. Thus i may have done more than just removing the hexa. Please tell which fixed the problem if so.
Bug#315433: Bug #315433 - kdelibs-bin: laptop can't wake up when kded was running when i slept it
on Thursday 23 June 2005 02:05, Alban browaeys wrote: Hum i meant to stop dbus before starting kde (and before sleeping) . I disabled dbus monthes ago though kded still starts. I guess that after killing dbus, starting a new kde application should restart kded without dbus (thohg i could not check having dbus disabled :( i've removed dbus from rc scripts, rebooted (who knows :)) and logged in in kde (kded was running) slept and the same problem. It would help to know if the issue bug is in dbus-qt/suspend or in kded/suspend (and redirect to the adhoc maintainer). i think it isn't a dbus issue because with dbus running i start a failsafe or fluxbox session and i can sleep and wake up without problems. -- Jorge Salamero Sanz (bencer) mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] blog: http://bys.cauterized.net/ http: http://www.cauterized.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315361: Bug #315361 - [keyboard shortcuts] Music player shortcuts doesn't work
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 06:28 +0200, Rémy Saissy a écrit :
ok, look at the picture, the is the 0x49 which is F7 and
XF86AudioPause which is F7 too. First bound gave me XF86AudioPrevious,
second one XF86AudioStop... I tried it on a fresh installed system and
on an older one.
Hum i have been through X symbols. XF86AudioStop and such are only
defined in the inet symbols file. This one defines special keys (named
after firsts internet keyboards) for specific keyboard layout . Like
ltcd for Logitech keyboards.
You might have to find out if your keyboard is supported in
gnome-keyboard-properties - layout
or the hard way : /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 , inetkbds variable list
all the supported inet keyboards. (gnome
uses /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86.xml though the previous one is easier
for humans to read).
The available keys for each keyboards are listed
in : /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/inet . Mine only support XF86WWW, XF86Search
and XF86Search for example.
If i want to map Pause in gnome to f7 , F7 is the proper key name
('symbol').
Though if you want the other way round. That F7 fires up an
XF86AudioStop events that even non gnome applications can understand,
you would have to plays with the symbol file.
For example creating your own inet keyboard:
//my keyboard
partial alphanumeric_keys
xkb_symbols my_keyboard {
name[Group1]= My keyboard;
key ### { [ XF86AudioPlay, XF86AudioPause ] };
};
replacing ### by the X internal key name.
To find out which is the key name for F7 :
$ grep F7 /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/*
for my keyboard (french ) there is no mapping defined so it fails back
to the us :
/etc/X11/xkb/symbols/us: key FK07 { [F7 ] };
Thus :
key FK07 { [ XF86AudioPlay, XF86AudioPause ] };
then add my_keyboard to the inetkbds variable
in /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 .
And to /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86.xml (copying from say ltcd example) if
you want it to shows up in your gnome-keyboard-properties keyboard
layout list .
Confusing isn't it ?
It all depends on what you are trying to achieve. Map a key to Pause
in gnome keyboard properties or make F7 fires up an XF86AudioStop X
event ...
Regards
Alban
Bug#315510: bittorrent: 3.2.4-4 fails to connect to peers (3.2.4-3sarge0.1 works fine)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Tim Van Holder wrote: Package: bittorrent Version: 3.4.2-3sarge0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading bittorrent to 3.4.2-4 it ceased to work - it will start up fine but wait forever on the 'connecting to peers' prompt. Downgrading to the version on stable fixes this, so it must be a recently introduced change. I'm behind a NAT firewall, so perhaps the changes in port usage are to blame? Can you give me more information on how the new one doesn't work? I did test it behind a NAT and on a normal connection, so I don't think it is related to that. If you could run a lsof with the program running it may be useful. Also it could be the case that you just did not wait long enough - NATed peers have a startup time which is much slower because other peers cannot connect to them, and there is a certain amount of wait time for a new peer in the swarm. -- Michael Janssen --- Jamuraa --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315381: fsck.jfs segfaults in some situations when replaying journal
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:07:45 +0200 Nico Schottelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: jfsutils Version: 1.1.7-1 Severity: critical Using fsck.jfs on my loopback file caused it multiply to segfault. I could 'fix' it by using --omit_journal_replay. I don't know in which state the filesystem has to be to segfault fsck, but someone should check the log replay source. I just uploaded jfsutils 1.1.8-1. This upstream release is supposed to fix problems with journal replays. Can you please test if your problem still persists ? Bye Racke -- LinuXia Systems = http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP = http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up.
Hi,
1. Please run gphpedit in the console to see if any messages appear.
2. Please provid an strace of the problem ('strace gphpedit 2
/tmp/gphpedit_bugreport').
Manolo Díaz wrote:
Package: gphpedit
Version: 0.9.50-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.1
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages gphpedit depends on:
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D
graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's
audio
ii libbonobo2-0 2.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii libbonoboui2-0 2.8.1-2 The Bonobo UI library
ii libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries
an
ii libesd0 0.2.35-2Enlightened Sound Daemon -
Shared
ii libgail-common 1.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility
Implementation
ii libgail171.8.4-1 GNOME Accessibility
Implementation
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.0-9 GCC support library
ii libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2GNOME configuration database
syste
ii libgcrypt11 1.2.0-11.1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime
libr
ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.4-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome-keyring00.4.2-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii libgnome2-0 2.8.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime
file
ii libgnomecanvas2-02.8.0-1 A powerful object-oriented
display
ii libgnomeui-0 2.8.1-3 The GNOME 2 libraries (User
Interf
ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.8.4-4 The GNOME virtual file-system
libr
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libgpg-error01.0-1 library for common error values
an
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user
interface
ii libgtkhtml2-02.6.3-1 HTML rendering/editing library -
r
ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's
JPEG
ii liborbit21:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA
ORB
ii libpango1.0-01.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of
internatio
ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline
parameters
ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session
Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client
li
ii libxml2 2.6.16-7GNOME XML library
ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Keyboard Extension (XKB)
configu
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
Fails to restart after dialog box. No message is shown.
--
Regards,
Lior Kaplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Guides.co.il
Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)
Bug#313451: missing gcc bug number (was: Re: Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0))
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:35:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as 313451. This message was sent *to* bug 313451. What is the gcc bug number? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#313451: missing gcc bug number (was: Re: Bug#313451: Acknowledgement (strace: ftbfs [sparc] error while loading shared libraries: libfakeroot-sysv.so.0))
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:07:28AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:35:43AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: The pbuilder error seems to be a gcc bug which has been submitted as 313451. This message was sent *to* bug 313451. What is the gcc bug number? Justin Oops. 315502 -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315566: FTBFS: changed architecture strings
Package: ruby1.8 Version: 1.8.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi! ruby1.8 currently FTBFS: # libdbm-ruby (echo usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux-gnu/dbm.so; \ sh debian/greplib.sh 1.8 build-tree/ruby-1.8.2/ext/dbm) \ debian/libdbm-ruby1.8.files dh_movefiles -plibdbm-ruby1.8 dh_movefiles: debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux-gnu/dbm.so not found (supposed to put it in libdbm-ruby1.8) tar: /build/ruby1.8-1.8.2/debian/movelist: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now sh: /build/ruby1.8-1.8.2/debian/movelist: No such file or directory make: *** [install-stamp] Error 1 Indeed there is only a debian/tmp/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i486-linux/dbm.so (no -gnu) directory. That correlates with the new dpkg that now appends a -gnu to the architecture version. -gnu is really right, but I didn't find an obvious way to fix that in the upstream autofoo files or with a configure option. :-( Thanks for investigating, Martin -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ruby1.8 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an pn libruby1.8 Not found. -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: merge duplicate bug emails
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package gphpedit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gphpedit merge 315536 315539 Bug#315536: gphpedit: exits at start up Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up. Merged 315536 315539. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [Fwd: Re: Processed: merge]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package gphpedit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gphpedit merge 315536 315539 Bug#315536: gphpedit: exits at start up Bug#315539: gphpedit: exits at start up. Merged 315536 315539. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: foo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 308705 wishlist Bug#308705: ipfwadm: Shouldn't this package be removed? Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315579: lirc: ftbfs [sparc] md5sum: invalid option -- v
Package: lirc Version: 0.7.1pre2-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source lirc fails to build from source on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder: #/usr/bin/make smode2 -C tools touch build-stamp md5sum: invalid option -- v Try `md5sum --help' for more information. # # The files above have changed: # # Please check that the extraction will be correct # # and remove debian/lirc.config.md5sum # # make: *** [debian/lirc.config] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files
Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Tags: patch The optional CD-burning feature of backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename (/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log) for logging the output of cdrecord. If a malicious (or just unlucky) user makes /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log a symlink to a system file, that file will be overwritten in the next run of backup-manager. A demonstration follows: $ whoami sven $ ls -l /etc/junk; cat /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 Jun 22 21:23 /etc/junk This will soon be overwritten! $ ln -s /etc/junk /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log $ su -c backup-manager Password: unable to mount 0,1,0 on /tmp/bm-mnt $ ls -l /etc/junk; head -n 3 /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1431 Jun 22 21:25 /etc/junk scsidev: '0,1,0' scsibus: 0 target: 1 lun: 0 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25 Replace /etc/junk with /etc/passwd, and the system becomes slightly less usable. :-( A solution is to use mktemp instead of a hardcoded file name, I suggest the following patch: -- diff -u /usr/sbin/backup-manager /home/sven/backup-manager --- /usr/sbin/backup-manager2005-04-04 22:39:22.0 +0200 +++ /home/sven/backup-manager2005-06-22 21:49:17.0 +0200 @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ lockfile=/var/run/backup-manager.pid md5sum=/usr/bin/md5sum bc=/usr/bin/bc -logfile=/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log -mount_point=/tmp/bm-mnt +logfile=$(mktemp /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log.XX) +mount_point=$(mktemp -d /tmp/bm-mnt.XX) # Load the backup-manager's library . $libdir/gettext.sh --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages backup-manager depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii gzip 1.3.5-10 The GNU compression utility -- debconf information: backup-manager/upload-key: * backup-manager/name-format: long backup-manager/upload-hosts: backup-manager/upload-user-ftp: * backup-manager/cron_frequency: daily * backup-manager/blacklist: /home/sven/tmp * backup-manager/time-to-live: 5 * backup-manager/burning-maxsize: 650 backup-manager/upload-user-scp-warning: backup-manager/transfert_mode: scp * backup-manager/dump_symlinks: false backup-manager/upload-user-scp: bmngr * backup-manager/burning-device: 0,1,0 backup-manager/upload-dir: /var/archives/uploads * backup-manager/directories: /etc /home/sven /root * backup-manager/filetype: tar.gz * backup-manager/backup-repository: /var/archives * backup-manager/burning-method: CDR * backup-manager/burning-enabled: true backup-manager/cron_remove_deprecated: false * backup-manager/want_to_upload: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On 06/23/2005 08:18 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server but just some of them. Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server using their ADS credentials? Or are these pre-ADS clients? all clients are WinXP machines. i don't see a difference betweend the clients :-( hmm... are the ads credentials recreated after a reboot? or how long are they valid ? Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: duplicate report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 315582 sarge etch Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Tags were: patch Tags added: sarge, etch reopen 308897 Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration Bug reopened, originator not changed. merge 308897 315582 Bug#308897: backup-manager: insecure default configuration Bug#315582: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Merged 308897 315582. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315512: libalsaplayer-dev: missing Section in doc-base file
Hi Laurent, Thank you for your report. I could indeed reproduce the bug installing doc-base. According to the doc-base changelog [1], Section is a required field since March 2nd 2003. Oops! Fortunately this bug is *not* reproducable on sarge as the file was not properly installed in earlier versions. Obviously the fix is trivial and will be uploaded soonish. Simply adding the following line in /usr/share/doc-base/alsaplayer-documentation will fix it: Section: Apps/Sound Bye, Paul 1. http://changelogs.debian.net/doc-base -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:10:46PM +0200, Martin Kos wrote: On 06/23/2005 08:18 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: the strange thing is that not ALL clients can't connect to the server but just some of them. Meaning that some Windows clients are able to connect to the Samba server using their ADS credentials? Or are these pre-ADS clients? all clients are WinXP machines. i don't see a difference betweend the clients :-( hmm... are the ads credentials recreated after a reboot? or how long are they valid ? ADS user credentials are established at the time of user login. I believe the lifetime of the credentials is configurable, and that Windows automatically renews your credentials for you for desktop logins. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 315094 libslang2 Bug#315094: FTBFS: cfdisk.c fails to build in sid Bug reassigned from package `util-linux' to `libslang2'. severity 315094 normal Bug#315094: FTBFS: cfdisk.c fails to build in sid Severity set to `normal'. title 315094 Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315094: Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux
reassign 315094 libslang2 severity 315094 normal title 315094 Change in slcurses.h breaks util-linux thanks Sorry about the incorrect assignment: I incorrectly had libslang2-dev rather than slang1-utf8-dev installed. The bug is in libslang2-dev, which redefines SLCurses_Window_Type and breaks the inch() macro in slcurses.h Regards Alastair McKinstry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315440: Reopening
Hi! I reopened this bug since it still needs to be dealt with. I talked again with LaMont, he could have a fixed kernel ready in 1 to 2 weeks. Until then I have two options how to circumvent that bug (disable just the thread check, or disable thread-safe libraries completely); LaMont will do a test build for me to determine whether just disabling the configure check works (since paer.debian.org is down ATM I can't test it myself). After the build succeeds, I'll downgrade that to important to track the status of the kernel fix (LaMont asked for that). Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315339: lvm2: Lvm2 not working with v1 - can be fixed by upgrading to v2
Package: lvm2 Version: 2.01.12-1 Followup-For: Bug #315339 I know this seems to be a resolved bug, but an alternate work-around (given that it renders a system unbootable) is to use a boot-disk (like ubuntu live) to upgrade the lvm to version 2. Is there some way of black-listing that version? Or is that already done? Anyway given that I've now recovered my system, and the upgrade process to V2 was painless, and I've read a bit about recovering LVMs, I'm actually quite impressed with the whole LVM system. It was just one of those days for me. //.ichael G. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers hoary APT policy: (500, 'hoary'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11nell Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages lvm2 depends on: ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdevmapper1.012:1.01.03-1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use ii lvm-common 1.5.19 The Logical Volume Manager for Lin lvm2 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: lvm2/snapshots: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314433: CAN-2005-2024
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:33, Joey Hess wrote: Note that CAN-2005-2024 has been assigned to this vulnerability. I've got a couple hours now to look into it. From what I've read, the version I have uploaded is supposed to fix it but testing shows it does not. I'm now looking around to find what I've missed (presumably a patch). Corrin
Bug#315405: Bug #315405 - ncurses-term: share the same file with ncurses-base
Le jeudi 23 juin 2005 à 15:33 +0200, Jörg Sommer a écrit : No, the diversion is made by me to make the package is installable. Maybe there was a cleanup in previous scripts which was removed ... where there a long time switch between the upgrade ? (maybe from woody ...) so my best bet is you had the bug when rxvt-unicode was shipped by both ncurses-term and ncurses-base (maybe i was even the reported , i remind sending such an issue to those packages). The diversion helps you worked around the bug though now it breaks it even if ncurses-term does not ship this file anymore. THe upgrade script did not cleanup the diversion as usual as it was a local change :-/ I guess the bug can be safely closed now that ncurses-term guenine bug (shipping rxvt-unicode) is fixed. Sincerely Alban
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 07:27 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Martin Kos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): hi christian steve OK, let's get Andrew Bartlett's attention on that one first now that we have as much information as possible..:-) http://bugs.debian.org/312513 This one just looks weird. Aside from something that looks like a logfile parser gone bad (I don't buy the socket misdirection answer, as it is on word boundaries), I can't see the actual error. More useful would be trying to 'getent passwd long.realm.name\username' on the user that is failing. Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can reproduce the bug because we don't have access to an AD server..:) Not wishing to be rude, but this sounds like a serious bug in itself. ADS member server operation is a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a bit worried you can't test any of this. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/ Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.http://suse.de Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 10:00:20AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 07:27 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Andrew, if you have an idea to suggest us. Neither Steve nor I can reproduce the bug because we don't have access to an AD server..:) Not wishing to be rude, but this sounds like a serious bug in itself. ADS member server operation is a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a bit worried you can't test any of this. I'll gladly accept offers of access to an ADS domain. I don't have a budget for samba package maintenance and have no need for (or access to) ADS at present, so this is otherwise a wontfix bug. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#301889: preparing new package
In this moment work in new bandersnatch 0.4RC1 debian package. The RC bug of 0.3-2 may be closed with the new upload version. Many thanks, Polkan Garcia -- Debian Hint #3: You can use 'apt-cache search words' to search for words in the descriptions of all available packages. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315492: marked as done (nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of arbitrary code)
Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:15 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of arbitrary code has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2005 23:57:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 22 16:57:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlF5f-00070a-00; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:57:08 -0700 Received: from dsl-084-059-135-149.arcor-ip.net ([84.59.135.149] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1DlF0l-hf-RP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:52:03 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.51) id 1DlF5e-0002dA-3Z; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:06 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of arbitrary code X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:57:06 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.59.135.149 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nanoblogger Version: 3.1-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole From the 3.2.2 changelog: * Fixed bug that could lead to arbitrary execution in a couple of the plugins It seems as if the plugin system was modified for 3.2, so it may very well be possible that this doesn't affect the 3.1 version in Debian. Can you clarify that? Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 315492-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2005 03:08:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 20:08:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl-201-128-61-219.prod-infinitum.com.mx (localhost.localdomain) [201.128.61.219] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DleYe-0005je-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:08:44 -0700 Received: from billy by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.51) id 1Dleey-0002yY-Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:16 -0500 Subject: nanoblogger: Unspecified security problems leading to execution of arbitrary code From: William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:15:15 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: It really does not affect the version 3.1, however already I have updated the package :) Thanks -- William Vera [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315405: ncurses-term: share the same file with ncurses-base
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote: $ for i in ncurses-base_5.4-7_all.deb ncurses-term_5.4-7_all.deb; do \ dpkg --contents $i; done |grep unic lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2005-06-20 04:18:44 ./usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode - /etc/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode -rw-r--r-- root/root 2165 2005-06-20 04:18:16 ./usr/share/terminfo/r/rxvt-unicode Got it... it's the funny Replaces ordering. Will fix soon. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#301889: new packages are imminent
Hi. In this moment, i am completely safe: bandersnatch 0.4RC1 works fine with Debian. I begin the packaging process, fixating the existent bugs in bandersnatch and bandersnatch-frontend. Polkan Garcia -- Debian Hint #13: If you don't like the default options used in a Debian package, you can download the source and build a version which uses the options you prefer. See http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.html (sections 6.13 and 6.14) for more information. However, bear in mind that most options in most packages can be configured at runtime, and do not require recompiling the package. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
