Bug#315802: partimage in stable requires libnewt0 which is not available anywhere
Package: partimage Version: 0.6.4-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages partimage depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii libnewt0.51 0.51.6-20Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii slang1a-utf81.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library wit ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information partimage and partimage-server have depencies on libnew0. This is not available in sarge, rendering partimage uninstallable in sarge. libnewt0 appears to have disappeared but partimage in unstable installs fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315803: partimage-server uninstallable in sarge
Package: partimage-server Version: 0.6.4-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages partimage-server depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-13 GCC support library ii libnewt0.51 0.51.6-20Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii openssl 0.9.7e-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii slang1a-utf81.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library wit ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded partimage-server cannot be installed on sarge because it depends on libnewt0 which is not available -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312963: marked as done (netatalk 2.0.2-4 depends on non-existent packages)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312963: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 03:55:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 10 20:55:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dgx5j-0002QA-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:55:27 -0700 Received: from mailhost.moonkingdom.net ([70.179.43.17]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:54:57 -0400 Received: from rei.moonkingdom.net (rei.moonkingdom.net [192.168.0.4]) by mailhost.moonkingdom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F5904AD4D; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rei.moonkingdom.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:54:56 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: netatalk 2.0.2-4 depends on non-existent packages X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:54:56 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: netatalk Version: 2.0.2-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As below: rei $ sudo apt-get install netatalk Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: netatalk: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1) but 2.3.2.ds1-22 is to be installed Depends: libcupsys2 (>= 1.1.99.b1-1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages netatalk depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcupsys2-gnutls10 1.1.23-10Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libdb4.24.2.52-18Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libgssapi1-heimdal 0.6.3-10 Libraries for Heimdal Kerberos ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libslp1 1.0.11a-2OpenSLP libraries ii libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii perl5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 312963-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2005 04:08:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 21:08:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmOR7-00059n-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:08:01 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmOLV-0004ye-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -0400 From: Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#312963: fixed in netatalk 2.0.2-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:02:13 -
Bug#315771: perdition: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 11:02:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Package: perdition > Version: 1.17-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid > > Hi, > > Your package is is not using -fPIC to make a shared lib. This > does not work on some arches, and results in your package > failing to build: > make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon' > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../ -I../../../perdition > -I../../../libjain -DPERDITIONDB_BDB_SYSCONFDIR=\"/etc/perdition\"-g -O2 > -c packet.c > rm -f libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a > ar cru libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a packet.o > ranlib libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a > [...] > gcc -shared .libs/perditiondb_daemon.o .libs/unix_socket.o -ldb > -L/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon > -lperditiondb_daemon_packet -Wl,-soname -Wl,libperditiondb_daemon.so.0 -o > .libs/libperditiondb_daemon.so.0.0.0 -ldb > -L/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon -lperditiondb_daemon_packet > /usr/bin/ld: > /build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_da > emon_packet.a(packet.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a > s > hared object; recompile with -fPIC > /build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a: > could not read symbols: Bad value > > Note that the packet.c did not get build using libtool, > while the rest did. libtool correctly set -fPIC to make > the shared version for the other files that are getting > linked in. > > Policy section 10.2 says that shared libs should be build > using -fPIC and static should be build without it. Hi Kurt, This bit of code has been highly problematic forever. Thanks for bringing its still-broken state to my attention. I will have another go at rearanging the code. Any suggestions are more than welcome. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315793: glibc: FTBFS with new dpkg
Package: glibc Severity: serious Version: 2.3.2.ds1-22 >From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot: ... touch /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/glibc-2.3.2.tar.bz2 touch /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/unpack test -d /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched || install -d /tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patched applying patch debian/patches/10_cvs.dpatch... failed. make: *** [/tmp/buildd/glibc-2.3.2.ds1/stamp-dir/patch-stamp] Error 1 I get similar errors trying to build the current version from experimental. On the other hand, if I edit debian/rules to use DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS instead of DEB_HOST_GNU_SYSTEM, the patches apply fine. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) -- Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet." -- Orson Scott Card -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315156
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 315156 sid Bug#315156: aiksaurus build-depends on libstdc++2.10-dev on ia64 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315074: marked as done (ipkungfu: Renders system inaccessible)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:02:28 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315074: fixed in ipkungfu 0.5.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jun 2005 12:55:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 20 05:55:40 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from canyonero.dot.net.au [202.147.68.14] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DkLoS-000139-00; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:55:40 -0700 Received: from [203.129.40.197] (helo=democritus.tekno.house) by canyonero.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DkLnu-0004N7-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:55:06 +1000 Received: from yosamite (yosamite.tekno.house [10.1.75.21]) by democritus.tekno.house (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B84919384 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:55:05 +1000 (EST) Received: by yosamite (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:55:04 +1000 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:55:04 +1000 From: Sam Couter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ipkungfu: Renders system inaccessible Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NtwzykIc2mflq5ck" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 on a i686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: ipkungfu Version: 0.5.2-3 Severity: critical Justification: renders entire system inaccessible Don't do this: # apt-get install ipkungfu Because then you have to do this: - Grab spare monitor and keyboard - Lug spare monitor and keyboard across the room/city/state/country - Crawl into corner where machines are stacked - Plug spare monitor and keyboard in - Shut down (or purge) ipkungfu - Unplug monitor and keyboard - Return monitor and keyboard to their rightful resting places Not happy. At least my spare monitor and keyboard only have to travel a few metres. I'd be *pissed* if I had to drive across town or wake someone local up to fix it. Simplest fix: add /etc/default/ipkungfu with ENABLED=3Dfalse, source the file in the init script and only start if ENABLED is not "false". Side note: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# grep -A3 Include /etc/init.d/ipkungfu # Include ipkungfu defaults if available if [ -f /etc/ipkungfu ] ; then . /etc/ipkungfu fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# file /etc/ipkungfu /etc/ipkungfu: directory [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# --=20 Sam "Eddie" Couter | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian Developer| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCtryohTADrt6Jx1wRAvIKAJkBqV+lVfZfLUaAN1Lh5cSkT6yl4gCdGgB2 dQtPhAVhxLc0XQ2YAf1Y35c= =xhjS -END PGP SIGNATURE- --NtwzykIc2mflq5ck-- --- Received: (at 315074-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2005 01:08:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 18:08:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmLd0-0006NM-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmLXY-0008Rd-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:02:28 -0400 From: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315074: fixed in ipkungfu 0.5.2-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:02:28 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES
Bug#315722: prboom: randomly gets signal 11 after a very very short playing time
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:06:05 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Can you run prboom with catchsegv please or send a backtrace from gdb? > (Preferably with enabled debug symbols) I tried hard to do so, but still no luck... :-( What I did: ___ First test: I used catchsegv on sarge prboom, but I got no special output whatsoever, apart from the one I'm used to get *without* catchsegv. So it seems like prboom does not actually segfault: I'm puzzled... $ catchsegv prboom prboom v2.2.6 (http://prboom.sourceforge.net/) Z_Init : Allocated 8064Kb zone memory found /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad IWAD found: /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad PrBoom (built Mar 13 2005), playing: DOOM 2: Hell on Earth PrBoom is released under the GNU General Public license v2.0. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. It comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. See the file COPYING for details. M_LoadDefaults: Load system defaults. default file: /home/frx/.prboom/prboom.cfg I_SetRes: Using resolution 640x400 V_Init: allocate screens. found /usr/share/games/doom/prboom.wad D_InitNetGame: Checking for network game. W_Init: Init WADfiles. adding /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad adding /usr/share/games/doom/prboom.wad M_Init: Init miscellaneous info. R_Init: Init DOOM refresh daemon - R_LoadTrigTables: Endianness...ok. R_InitData: Textures Flats Sprites R_Init: R_InitPlanes R_InitLightTables R_InitSkyMap R_InitTranslationsTables P_Init: Init Playloop state. I_Init: Setting up machine state. I_InitSound: configured audio device with 1024 samples/slice I_InitSound: sound module ready S_Init: Setting up sound. S_Init: default sfx volume 14 HU_Init: Setting up heads up display. I_InitGraphics: 640x400 I_UpdateVideoMode: 640x400 (fullscreen) I_UpdateVideoMode: 0xe000, SDL buffer, direct access I_InitJoystick : invalid joystick 1 ST_Init: Init status bar. open /dev/sequencer: Device or resource busy Using normal BSP nodes! write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor I_SignalHandler: Exiting on signal: signal 11 I_ShutdownMusic: removing /tmp/prboom-music-XoNlJp I_ShutdownSound: Second test: I ran sarge prboom inside gdb and was astonished. Inside gdb, prboom freezes after some seconds of playing and there seems to be no way to regain control of the X11 session. Mouse and keyboard are ignored, apart from special key combinations. If I switch to a virtual terminal (say tty1: CTRL+ALT+F1), kill gdb, and switch back to my X11 display, then all I see is a frozen gnome2 desktop still at low resolution (the one used by prboom: 640x400): mouse is ignored, while keyboard is not and can be used to type commands inside the focused xterm. The only way out I could find was killing the X server with CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE... Other tests: I recompiled prboom with debug symbols and no stripping. I reran the above described tests. Same results! OK, what did I fail to understand? -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgp9Pp5GOgDTs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#315703: Urgent: cacti CAN-2005-1524 etc. in 0.8.6.d
retitle 315703 cacti: remote vulnerabilities (CAN 2005-{1524,1525,1526})
thanks
hi guillaume,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Guillaume Rischard wrote:
> The Cacti exploit bug just bit me. I got exploited two times, once
> from romania and once from spain:
> Can I please urge you to get the security team to move the new .deb
> to testing and stable as quickly as possible to prevent this from
> happening to other people?
honestly, i don't know what's holding up the process for either of the
versions. wrt stable, the version on my p.d.o site (see the bug
report[1]) is waiting on the security team for upload. wrt testing,
i have absolutely no idea why it hasn't already made it in (it looks
like a general problem with package migration into testing?)
in any case, my best recommendation is to take either the package
on my p.d.o site or start tracking cacti from unstable for the time
being.
sean
ps - thanks for pointing out there are now CAN numbers assigned, i've
retitled the bug report appropriately.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/315703
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Urgent: cacti CAN-2005-1524 etc. in 0.8.6.d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 315703 cacti: remote vulnerabilities (CAN 2005-{1524,1525,1526})
Bug#315703: cacti: vulnerable to remote exploit
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: bandersnatch 301889 301891
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package bandersnatch-frontend Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bandersnatch-frontend > tags 301891 pending Bug#301891: bandersnatch-frontend: config file should be in /etc There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#260508: marked as done (sympa security problem)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:24:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Woody Bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2004 22:01:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 20 15:01:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host29-93.pool80180.interbusiness.it (dedasys.com) [80.180.93.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bn2fp-8C-00; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:01:21 -0700 Received: by dedasys.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9AD974C187; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "David N. Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: sympa security problem X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:59:35 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: sympa Severity: normal This page mentions a vulnerability. I didn't see any mention of it on the security pages... http://www.sympa.org/ -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.6 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US --- Received: (at 260508-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 22:23:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 15:23:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cobolt.net (mustang.cobolt.net) [213.180.160.231] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmJ3u-0002nX-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 15:23:43 -0700 Received: from p5482cabf.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.130.202.191] helo=turtle.linuxia.ch) by mustang.cobolt.net with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DmJ0w-0003r9-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:20:38 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:24:19 +0200 From: Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Woody Bug Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: LinuXia Systems X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng with CLAMD on mustang.cobolt.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Hello, closing bug only present in woody. Thanks Racke -- LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/ Expert Interchange Consulting and System Administration ICDEVGROUP => http://www.icdevgroup.org/ Interchange Development Team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312569: marked as done (electricsheep prevent any X client to connect when launched from xscreensaver)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:55:06 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312569: [electricsheep #312569] Fixed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 20:45:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 08 13:45:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from agrenoble-152-1-53-160.w83-201.abo.wanadoo.fr (shire.homelinux.org) [83.201.82.160] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dg7QC-q2-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:45:09 -0700 Received: from shire.homelinux.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shire.homelinux.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j58KjB9s030969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:45:11 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by shire.homelinux.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j58KjBXx030968; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:45:11 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: shire.homelinux.org: nodens set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Clement Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: electricsheep prevent any X client to connect when launched from xscreensaver X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:45:10 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: electricsheep Version: 2.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, When launching electricsheep from xscreensaver, Xlib will refuse any connection to the X server until xscreensaver is killed. Removing electricsheep resolve the problem. I'm not sure wether this bug is a electricsheep or xscreensaver one, but anyway, electricsheep is currently unusable (bug #309852). Could you please consider upgrading this package ? Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages electricsheep depends on: ii curl 7.13.2-2Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS, FT ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexpat11.95.8-3XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg-progs6b-10 Programs for manipulating JPEG fil ii libjpeg626b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxv1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Window System video extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xloadimage 4.1-14.2Graphics file viewer under X11 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 312569-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 21:55:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 14:55:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from www.sukria.net [81.56.73.92] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmIck-0005Jk-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:55:38 -0700 Received: by www.sukria.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 393934B1; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:55:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:55:06 +0200 From: Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Clement Hermann (nodens)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#312569: [electricsheep #312569] Fixed? Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL
Bug#312569: [electricsheep #312569] Fixed?
> I could not reproduce this bug with the last version. Thanks for > upgrading :) Thanks, I close the bug. -- - Alexis Sukrieh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315781: Depends: doesn't use ${shlibs:Depends}
Package: metar
Version: 20050622.1-1
Severity: serious
metar's control file doesn't use ${shlibs:Depends} in the Depends:
field, which results in a package with incorrect dependencies.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
gram
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312569: [electricsheep #312569] Fixed?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexis Sukrieh a écrit : > tags 312569 + moreinfo > thanks > > Please could you reproduce that bug with the new package we uploaded? > Unstable now provides 2.6.2. > > I'm looking forward to your comments, in order to close that bug if it's > not reproducible with the new upstream release. > I could not reproduce this bug with the last version. Thanks for upgrading :) best regards, - -- Clement Hermann (nodens) - - "L'air pur ? c'est pas en RL, ça ? c'est pas hors charte ?" Jean in L'Histoire des Pingouins, http://tnemeth.free.fr/fmbl/linuxsf/ Vous trouverez ma clef publique sur le serveur public pgp.mit.edu. Please find my public key on the public keyserver pgp.mit.edu. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCvdHV0yQ2guvROZ0RAgq0AJoDuJvNwjXgSKnmwZPMMvgM5CSFswCfcf2x EZRgOFWuet/uetAFE9bIiTU= =+UVO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: bandersnatch 301889 301891
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package bandersnatch Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bandersnatch > tags 301889 pending Bug#301889: bandersnatch requires older version of libnet-jabber-perl There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 301891 pending Bug number 301891 belongs to package bandersnatch-frontend, skipping. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315771: perdition: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
Package: perdition Version: 1.17-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is is not using -fPIC to make a shared lib. This does not work on some arches, and results in your package failing to build: make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../../ -I../../../perdition -I../../../libjain -DPERDITIONDB_BDB_SYSCONFDIR=\"/etc/perdition\"-g -O2 -c packet.c rm -f libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a ar cru libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a packet.o ranlib libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a [...] gcc -shared .libs/perditiondb_daemon.o .libs/unix_socket.o -ldb -L/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon -lperditiondb_daemon_packet -Wl,-soname -Wl,libperditiondb_daemon.so.0 -o .libs/libperditiondb_daemon.so.0.0.0 -ldb -L/build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon -lperditiondb_daemon_packet /usr/bin/ld: /build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_da emon_packet.a(packet.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a s hared object; recompile with -fPIC /build/buildd/perdition-1.17/perdition/db/daemon/libperditiondb_daemon_packet.a: could not read symbols: Bad value Note that the packet.c did not get build using libtool, while the rest did. libtool correctly set -fPIC to make the shared version for the other files that are getting linked in. Policy section 10.2 says that shared libs should be build using -fPIC and static should be build without it. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315772: directfb: FTBFS: configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL
Package: directfb Version: 0.9.22-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failign to build with the following error: autoreconf -f -i /usr/share/aclocal/aalib.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_AALIB+run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal aclocal:configure.in:81: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library configure.in:60: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 make: *** [configure] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315770: freeradius: FTBFS: credits: No such file or directory.
Package: freeradius Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: # man pages & docs install -g root -m 644 CREDITS /build/buildd/freeradius-1.0.4/debian/freeradius //usr/share/doc/freeradius/credits install: cannot create regular file `/build/buildd/freeradius-1.0.4/debian/free radius//usr/share/doc/freeradius/credits': No such file or directory make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#311835: haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Can't satisfly build dependency on ghc6
Hi, Is there any progress on this? Is there a reason you didn't switch to the new ghc6 6.4 yet? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315703: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: updates on cacti package for sarge?]
- Forwarded message from sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:09:33 -0400 From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Fabian Portmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Laurent Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dwayne Rightler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: updates on cacti package for sarge? hey folks, please excuse the group reply, but i've gotten a few of these and would like to address everything in the same mail. yes, the version in cacti (0.8.6c-foo) is vulnerable to the exploit mentioned on cacti's page. i was contacted about this vulnerability about 4 or 5 days before the announcement came out. during this time, i prepared an upload of the latest (and security-patched) version of cacti, as well as a sarge version containing the backported security patches. i sent the sarge update to the security team last friday (three days before the announcement), and since then have been waiting to hear something from them. i know joey is not available to help out with this because he's at linuxtag, and it's my undertstanding that steve is going to be doing the upload. any updates steve? anyway at this point, you have two options: 1 - install the latest version of cacti from unstable 2 - install my patched cacti sarge package, which will be eventually superceced by the DSA if you want to do [2], put the following in your sources.list: deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/cacti ./ the version in my p.d.o repository is 0.8.6c-7sarge0, which will be superceded by 0.8.6c-7sarge1 when the security team does an update. if you want to do [1], there shouldn't be any problems as it doesn't bring in any new dependencies etc. so, at this point i will open a security tagged bug in the BTS to have some way of tracking the problem, as well as cc'ing the security team. sean - - End forwarded message - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
More useful would be trying to 'getent passwd long.realm.name\username' on the user that is failing. Martin, can you? getent passwd "REVOX\labor" labor:x:10042:1:Labor:/home/REVOX/labor:/bin/false works like for all other users too :-( after upgrading to the newer winbind version the client still can access the shared drives, but after rebooting the client it stops working. i don't see a difference between the working and non-working clients. i've tried to remove the clients from the ADS and re-adding them but still the same problem. any other thing that i could try? here is the output of testparm: # Global parameters [global] unix charset = ISO8859-1 display charset = ISO8859-1 workgroup = REVOX realm = REVOX.CH server string = %h server security = ADS password server = srvmain log level = 1 vfs:1 winbind:10 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/host.%I max log size = 1000 dns proxy = No ldap ssl = no panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d idmap uid = 1-2 idmap gid = 1-2 winbind use default domain = Yes invalid users = root [Daten] path = /mnt/daten/Daten read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 vfs objects = recycle recycle:repository = .recycle/.recycle.%u recycle:keeptree = 1 recycle:exclude = *.tmp *.temp ~* ~$* greets Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315761: type-handling doesn't list any linux-gnu system
Package: type-handling Version: 0.2.13 Severity: grave $ type-handling any linux-gnu -> returns nothing There's obviously something going wrong somewhere. You can also have a look at the Provides: field on i386: Provides: i486, linux-gnu, i486-linux-gnu There are a lot missing here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages type-handling depends on: ii dpkg-dev 1.13.9 Package building tools for Debian type-handling recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298736: [patch]: how to look for SCSI modules in /sys
Hi folks, I am not sure whether this bug report is still unresolved, but attached you can find a possible patch. It should work with recent 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 kernels. Regards Harri mkinitrd.patch.298736.gz Description: Unix tar archive signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#315706: libghc6-missingpy-dev: fails to configure, with libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2
By the way, another aspect of this bug has surfaced when I tried to remove the package: $ sudo dpkg --purge --force-all libghc6-missingpy-dev (Reading database ... 215333 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libghc6-missingpy-dev ... ghc-pkg: cannot find package MissingPy dpkg: error processing libghc6-missingpy-dev (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: libghc6-missingpy-dev Because installation failed and left the package half-configured, the .prerm runs and fails this way. This happens for removing, purging, or (judging by the code) upgrading, so every path forward is blocked. Looks like I will need to do a bit of surgery. Will it be safe to comment out the ghc-pkg line in .prerm, and try again? I expect that, on my try at installation, ghc-pkg did not end up doing anything that needs to be undone, but I would like your confirmation first. Or do you have a pointer to a document for ghc-pkg? (Another bug: no man page for ghc-pkg. I'll file one for it.) Regards, Roger Hale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch for #298736 submitted
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 298736 + patch Bug#298736: initrd-tools - mkinitrd does not find scsi driver on 2.6.10 Tags were: sarge-ignore Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315556: sound-juicer: sound-juicer does not start
|| On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:59:11 +0200 || Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: lool> The worse is that you probably have indeed found a missing dependency lool> somewhere (I presume it's libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 which should have lool> stricter shlibs), but it's almost untrackable in such a mess. Thanks for your email. I poked around and found several issues. I need to download loads of software to keep it uptodate with the current unstable. May be you may go ahead and close the bug. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks again Loïc for the tip. I am updating my system. I am on a dialup for the moment, so it may take afew days probably to get everything in shape. Thanks and sorry again for inconvenience. -- Ramakrishnan(http://www.hackGNU.org/) Use Free Software (http://www.gnu.org/)
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:32:47PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > Steve, do you think it's worth for us to post a call for "Debian > > > > developers/contributors with access to an ADS domain anhd willing to > > > > help on Samba" in the Debian ML? > > > > That sounds like a good idea to me. > > > FWIW, I have one AD domain that I have to work with. It is a > > production environment, so I cna't do a huge amount of breaking, btu I > > can test on weekends. > > Well, any help you can render would be appreciated. :) As Christian notes, > most of what needs doing involves breaking Debian machines, not breaking the > ADS realm. :) I'm willing to break it on Saturdays and Sundays, at least :) So, I've gone back and read the bug log, and I can't reproduce any of it. ii winbind 3.0.14a-3 The arrangment at this site is very similar to the OP. We have an ADS server, and a samba server. The samba server is a domain member (net ads join), and handles file shares and print services and so forth. We have been running sarge on this machine since samba early 3.0 (maybe 3.0.5 or 6?) was in sarge, and we haven't had any problems across upgrades. So, now that I have offered to help, I am not sure where to begin :) The first thing that occurs to me is that the output of testparm might be helpful - I don't see anything like that in the bug log. Additionally, the output of 'getent passwd' would be helpful. Or at least if the OP could run it and verify that the user names returned match what is in AD. I am curious about the file descriptor mixup, and why it has a 'run-parts --report' line in it. Is cron writing to smbd to smbd somewhow? His whole problem _may_ be a file descriptor mixup, looking quickly over the bug log. The winbind routines clearly authenticate the user, but then never return that information, and smbd gets EOF reading from the socket, and so fails to auth the user. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315722: prboom: randomly gets signal 11 after a very very short playing time
Francesco Poli wrote: > Package: prboom > Version: 2:2.2.6-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I recently upgraded from woody (oldstable) to sarge (stable) and > now I cannot play freedoom anymore. This seems like a system specific issue, I can't reproduce this problem on my systems. > When launched from a terminal under X11, prboom loads freedoom's > `doom2.wad' and starts the game. I select "New game" and > the difficulty level (I tried "Nightmare!", "Ultra-Violence" and > "Hurt Me Plenty"). I start to play, but after killing two or three > enemies, the game exits on signal 11. Can you run prboom with catchsegv please or send a backtrace from gdb? (Preferably with enabled debug symbols) > Note that the woody version of prboom worked like a charm with > the *same* doom2.wad file (from freedoom v0.3, diff says the two > files are identical). Could you try whether this problem only arises with freedoom or with the non-free doom-wad-shareware as well? Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283380: marked as done (RM: mono:mono-utils [!i386 !powerpc !s390] -- RoM; ANAIS; unsupported upstream)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mono architecture situation changed again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 22:47:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 15:47:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 205-200-74-130.static.mts.net (Zimmer) [205.200.74.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C2dsh-00058h-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:47:07 -0700 Received: from ddaniels by Zimmer with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C2dsg-EH-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500 From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mono won't enter testing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: mono Severity: serious Justification: ftbfs on arm - There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org. The "mono (1.0-4) unstable;" changelog entry says: * Eduard Bloch + disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint there's still "1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]". Why did upstream only request that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha, arm, s390, sparc)? Also: mono hasn't been tried on arm since 20040610-1450 (0.91-1). http://buildd.debian.org/stats/arm-all.txt says: interpreters/mono_1.0.1-1: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-elara [optional:out-of-date] Dependencies: libicu28-dev Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 26 08:45:53 and: devel/monodevelop_0.5-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [optional:uncompiled] Dependencies: gtk-sharp-gapi Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 09 18:23:07 [...] web/mod-mono_1.0-1: Needs-Build [optional:uncompiled] Previous state was Building until 2004 Aug 13 18:10:26 libicu28-dev doesn't exist on arm! Therefore there's a ftbfs on arm. Perhaps there's another icu development package? Also: mono-assemblies-arch (source mcs) is out of date on s390. mcs also requires that s390 builds mono-jay. Also: "easy mono mcs" from debian-release (Release Managers) is needed when the packages are ready? Drew Daniels --- Received: (at 283380-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 12:54:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 05:54:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmABE-0004hN-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:54:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2722DBF19; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c214175.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.214.175]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846262DBD04; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: mono architecture situation changed again From: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 --=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The situation with supported architectures in Mono changed again, the removal requests are becoming very hard to track
Bug#315347: glibc: how to track down the problem
severity 315347 normal thanks On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:18:19PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote: > Package: glibc > Followup-For: Bug #315347 > > > I'm trying to track down what is going wrong with my attempted build of > glibc. linuxthreads seems to be unpacking ok - is there anything further > to check why patch isn't working on the linuxthreads stuff? > > buildd.debian.org did not seem to have a report for glibc-2.3.2ds1_22 on > i386 - where is it? This means that the binary package had been uploaded but not autobuilt. I tested glibc 2.3.2ds1-22 on i386 without any problem, so I downgrade this bug. You can try to run $ env - debuild --no-conf on a freshly unpacked glibc source package, and if this works, check what's wrong with your environment. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283382: marked as done (RM: mono:mono [!i386 !powerpc !s390] -- RoM; ANAIS; unsupported upstream)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line mono architecture situation changed again has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2004 22:47:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 01 15:47:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 205-200-74-130.static.mts.net (Zimmer) [205.200.74.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1C2dsh-00058h-00; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:47:07 -0700 Received: from ddaniels by Zimmer with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C2dsg-EH-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:47:06 -0500 From: Drew Scott Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mono won't enter testing Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: mono Severity: serious Justification: ftbfs on arm - There's no request to remove mono-mint against ftp.debian.org. The "mono (1.0-4) unstable;" changelog entry says: * Eduard Bloch + disabled mono-mint build for i386 and powerpc, upstream wish According to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/interpreters/mono-mint there's still "1.0-3 [i386, powerpc]". Why did upstream only request that a few arch's have mono-mint removed, and not the others (alpha, arm, s390, sparc)? Also: mono hasn't been tried on arm since 20040610-1450 (0.91-1). http://buildd.debian.org/stats/arm-all.txt says: interpreters/mono_1.0.1-1: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-elara [optional:out-of-date] Dependencies: libicu28-dev Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 26 08:45:53 and: devel/monodevelop_0.5-2: Dep-Wait by buildd_arm-europa [optional:uncompiled] Dependencies: gtk-sharp-gapi Previous state was Building until 2004 Jun 09 18:23:07 [...] web/mod-mono_1.0-1: Needs-Build [optional:uncompiled] Previous state was Building until 2004 Aug 13 18:10:26 libicu28-dev doesn't exist on arm! Therefore there's a ftbfs on arm. Perhaps there's another icu development package? Also: mono-assemblies-arch (source mcs) is out of date on s390. mcs also requires that s390 builds mono-jay. Also: "easy mono mcs" from debian-release (Release Managers) is needed when the packages are ready? Drew Daniels --- Received: (at 283382-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 12:54:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 05:54:41 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from booster.qnetp.net [213.239.220.50] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmABE-0004hN-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:54:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2722DBF19; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (c214175.adsl.hansenet.de [213.39.214.175]) by booster.qnetp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846262DBD04; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: mono architecture situation changed again From: Mirco Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5" Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:54:35 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at qnetp.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 --=-qI7pX1C+J/76CpgRE9D5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The situation with supported architectures in Mono changed again, the removal requests are becoming very hard to track
Processed: Re: Bug#315347: glibc: how to track down the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 315347 normal Bug#315347: glibc: debuild fails when applying first patch Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315706: libghc6-missingpy-dev: fails to configure, with libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2
Thanks for the bug report; I will build and upload a new package later today. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 315115 315718
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > merge 315115 315718 Bug#315115: [bugtraq] Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Bug#315718: sudo: Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue. Merged 315115 315718. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315155
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 315155 sid Bug#315155: tuxtype depends on libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 on ia64 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315347: glibc: how to track down the problem
Package: glibc Followup-For: Bug #315347 I'm trying to track down what is going wrong with my attempted build of glibc. linuxthreads seems to be unpacking ok - is there anything further to check why patch isn't working on the linuxthreads stuff? buildd.debian.org did not seem to have a report for glibc-2.3.2ds1_22 on i386 - where is it? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11mmx2 Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315512
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 315512 sid Bug#315512: libalsaplayer-dev: missing Section in doc-base file There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 314758
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 314758 sid Bug#314758: imagemagick: FTBFS on all architectures There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315722: prboom: randomly gets signal 11 after a very very short playing time
Package: prboom Version: 2:2.2.6-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I recently upgraded from woody (oldstable) to sarge (stable) and now I cannot play freedoom anymore. When launched from a terminal under X11, prboom loads freedoom's `doom2.wad' and starts the game. I select "New game" and the difficulty level (I tried "Nightmare!", "Ultra-Violence" and "Hurt Me Plenty"). I start to play, but after killing two or three enemies, the game exits on signal 11. Note that the woody version of prboom worked like a charm with the *same* doom2.wad file (from freedoom v0.3, diff says the two files are identical). Here's the output I get in the terminal: $ prboom prboom v2.2.6 (http://prboom.sourceforge.net/) Z_Init : Allocated 8064Kb zone memory found /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad IWAD found: /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad PrBoom (built Mar 13 2005), playing: DOOM 2: Hell on Earth PrBoom is released under the GNU General Public license v2.0. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. It comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. See the file COPYING for details. M_LoadDefaults: Load system defaults. default file: /home/frx/.prboom/prboom.cfg I_SetRes: Using resolution 640x400 V_Init: allocate screens. found /usr/share/games/doom/prboom.wad D_InitNetGame: Checking for network game. W_Init: Init WADfiles. adding /usr/share/games/doom/doom2.wad adding /usr/share/games/doom/prboom.wad M_Init: Init miscellaneous info. R_Init: Init DOOM refresh daemon - R_LoadTrigTables: Endianness...ok. R_InitData: Textures Flats Sprites R_Init: R_InitPlanes R_InitLightTables R_InitSkyMap R_InitTranslationsTables P_Init: Init Playloop state. I_Init: Setting up machine state. I_InitSound: configured audio device with 1024 samples/slice I_InitSound: sound module ready S_Init: Setting up sound. S_Init: default sfx volume 14 HU_Init: Setting up heads up display. I_InitGraphics: 640x400 I_UpdateVideoMode: 640x400 (fullscreen) I_UpdateVideoMode: 0xe000, SDL buffer, direct access I_InitJoystick : invalid joystick 1 ST_Init: Init status bar. open /dev/sequencer: Device or resource busy Using normal BSP nodes! write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor write /dev/sequencer: Bad file descriptor I_SignalHandler: Exiting on signal: signal 11 I_ShutdownMusic: removing /tmp/prboom-music-zaywSp I_ShutdownSound: Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x300)! My ~/.prboom/prboom.cfg is included below: --8<--8<--8<--8<--8<-- # Doom config file # Format: # variable value # Misc settings default_compatibility_level-1 realtic_clock_rate 100 max_player_corpse32 flashing_hom 0 demo_insurance2 endoom_mode 0x5 level_precache0 # Files wadfile_1 "prboom.wad" wadfile_2 "" dehfile_1 "" dehfile_2 "" # Game settings default_skill 1 weapon_recoil 1 doom_weapon_toggles 1 player_bobbing1 monsters_remember 1 monster_infighting1 monster_backing 1 monster_avoid_hazards 1 monkeys 1 monster_friction 1 help_friends 1 player_helpers0 friend_distance 128 dog_jumping 1 sts_always_red1 sts_pct_always_gray 1 sts_traditional_keys 0 traditional_menu 0 show_messages 1 autorun 1 # Com
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 09:32:47PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Steve, do you think it's worth for us to post a call for "Debian > > > developers/contributors with access to an ADS domain anhd willing to > > > help on Samba" in the Debian ML? > > That sounds like a good idea to me. > FWIW, I have one AD domain that I have to work with. It is a > production environment, so I cna't do a huge amount of breaking, btu I > can test on weekends. Well, any help you can render would be appreciated. :) As Christian notes, most of what needs doing involves breaking Debian machines, not breaking the ADS realm. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315718: sudo: Sudo version 1.6.8p9 now available, fixes security issue.
Package: sudo Version: 1.6.8p7-1.1 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=111928183431376 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-git2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages sudo depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l sudo recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315712
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > tags 315712 sid Bug#315712: gnome-lokkit: depends on unavailable libc6 >= 2.3.5-1 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
tags 315687 pending thanks Ok, Murphy's law in action... Feel free to use my repos: http://people.debian.org/debian/sarge/ ./ http://people.debian.org/debian/sid/ ./ ftp-master is moving so no new uploads until again available. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:09:31AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: > > Package: proftpd > > Version: 1.2.10-17 > > Severity: critical > > Justification: root security hole > > > This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to install 1.2.10-17. > > The config file wasn't touched during the update to -17. > Thanks; this version info is highly useful to developers. I tagged > the bug "sid", since -17 had not yet propogated to testing. Although > this bug is bad news, its good that the new version (uploaded ~24h > ago) didn't get into testing (which is always supposed to be > nearly-releasable). > > Thanks Sigh, use -18 which will be in incoming in a few. The sarge edition is yet available on my repo. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 315687 pending Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server Tags were: sid security Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
tags 315687 sid thanks On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: > Package: proftpd > Version: 1.2.10-17 > Severity: critical > Justification: root security hole > > In the most recent (1.2.10-17) version of proftpd, the permissions used > by the daemon are somehome mixed up: both anonymous and authenticated > connections are mapped to uid 0/gid 0 in the filesystem. New files and > directories are created with uid 0/gid 0 (instead of the ftp/nogroup for > anon connections resp. the authenticated user). > > In anon mode, you seem to be trapped in the anon enviroment and can't > delete files. > > With authenticated connections, you also get root access to the whole > system (visible to proftpd) and as your access is mapped to root/root, > you can delete everything you like (thus the critical severity, as this > opens root access to the ftp server's file system. > > This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to install 1.2.10-17. > The config file wasn't touched during the update to -17. > > Sigh, something definitively messed up things during build on sid. Quite interestingly the same package compiled on sarge does not present that problem :-? deb http://people.debian.org/debian/sarge/ ./ -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315556: sound-juicer: sound-juicer does not start
|| On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:08:32 +0100 || Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ross> On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 00:02 +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote: >> I upgraded all gstreamer packages, still getting the same error. The >> libgstaudioconvert.so file is part of gstreamer-misc which is also >> latest version on my system.. I will keep experimenting and will keep >> you posted. ross> To confirm your versions, can you paste the output of: ross> dpkg -l libgstreamer\* gstreamer\* ross> (make the window wide so that the package names are readable) Here it is.. radio:~$ dpkg -l libgstreamer\* gstreamer\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++--- ii libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 0.8.8-3 GConf support for GStreamer ii libgstreamer-gconf0.8-dev0.8.8-3 Development files for GConf support for GStreamer ii libgstreamer-plugins0.8-00.8.2-3 Various GStreamer libraries and library plugins ii libgstreamer0.6-00.6.4-1 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, and utilities ii libgstreamer0.8-00.8.9-2 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, and utilities ii libgstreamer0.8-dev 0.8.9-2 GStreamer development libraries and headers un gstreamer-alsa (no description available) ii gstreamer-audiofile 0.6.4-2 AudioFile plugin for GStreamer un gstreamer-audiosink (no description available) ii gstreamer-cdparanoia 0.6.4-2 cdparanoia plugin for GStreamer rc gstreamer-core 0.6.0-1 Core element and library plugins for GStreamer rc gstreamer-core-libs 0.6.0-1 Core library plugins for GStreamer ii gstreamer-gconf 0.6.4-2 GConf support for GStreamer ii gstreamer-gnomevfs 0.6.4-2 Gnome VFS plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer-mad0.6.4-2 MAD MPEG audio decoder plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer-misc 0.6.4-2 Collection of various GStreamer plugins ii gstreamer-oss0.6.4-2 OSS plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer-plugin-apps0.6.0-4 Simple GStreamer applications ii gstreamer-plugin-libs0.6.0-4 Various GStreamer library plugins un gstreamer-plugins (no description available) rc gstreamer-runtime0.6.0-1 Binaries needed to manage GStreamer plugin information ii gstreamer-tools 0.6.4-1 Tools for use with GStreamer ii gstreamer-vorbis 0.6.4-2 Vorbis plugin for GStreamer un gstreamer0.8-alsa (no description available) un gstreamer0.8-audiosink (no description available) ii gstreamer0.8-cdparanoia 0.8.8-3 cdparanoia plugin for GStreamer un gstreamer0.8-colorspace (no description available) un gstreamer0.8-doc(no description available) un gstreamer0.8-esd(no description available) ii gstreamer0.8-flac0.8.8-3 FLAC plugin for GStreamer ii gstreamer0.8-misc0.8.8-3 Collection of various GStreamer plugins ii gstreamer0.8-oss 0.8.2-3 OSS plugin for GStreamer un gstreamer0.8-plugins(no description available) un gstreamer0.8-tools (no description available) ii gstreamer0.8-vorbis 0.8.8-3 Vorbis plugin for GStreamer radio:~$ -- Ramakrishnan(http://www.hackGNU.org/) Use Free Software (http://www.gnu.org/) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
Assuming that Stephen is subscribed to the PTS Quoting Stephen Gran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > > > Steve, do you think it's worth for us to post a call for "Debian > > > developers/contributors with access to an ADS domain anhd willing to > > > help on Samba" in the Debian ML? > > > > That sounds like a good idea to me. > > FWIW, I have one AD domain that I have to work with. It is a > production environment, so I cna't do a huge amount of breaking, btu I > can test on weekends. I think that reproducing 312513 does not heavily involves breaking the ADS domain itself, but rather breaking the samba server which is member of this domain. So, if you have a Debian machine you can just try adding to the ADS domain as domain member and not risking breaking *that* machine, that'd be fine. This actually needs you to have admin privileges on the ADS domain to be able to join it...or, of course, get the collaboration of one of your M$ admins. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315711: raidtools2: Missing lsraid raidhotadd raidhotremove etc after stable upgrade
Package: raidtools2 Version: 1.00.4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Raidtools Maintainer I don't know if this problem is related to raidtools2 but I seam to have massive problems since sarge got stable. I don't seam to find all tools needed to manage my raid-sets anymore. I'm not even able to find a packet containing lsraid... Even cronjobs complain that lsraid is missing. Manpages still are present for all those tools. Just te binaries are not there. Where have they gone? -Benoit- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages raidtools2 depends on: ii mdadm 1.9.0-4Manage MD devices aka Linux Softwa -- debconf information: * raidtools2/init: raidtools2/oldraid: raidtools2/nosupport: * raidtools2/autostart: false -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315712: gnome-lokkit: depends on unavailable libc6 >= 2.3.5-1
Package: gnome-lokkit Version: 0.50.22-5 Severity: serious Justification: package in sid depends on experimental libc6 Hi, gnome-lokkit 0.50.22-5 depends on libc6 >= 2.3.5-1 which is only available in the experimental distribution, not in unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315700: marked as done (findimagedupes: Missing dependency: libltdl3)
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:50:30 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315700: findimagedupes: Missing dependency: libltdl3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 01:10:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 18:10:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlzBO-0006y5-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:10:06 -0700 Received: from firiesen.local (c-67-171-100-185.hsd1.pa.comcast.net[67.171.100.185]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005062501093501200hc7i2e>; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:09:35 + Received: by firiesen.local (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 234EE69881A; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: findimagedupes: Missing dependency: libltdl3 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:09:34 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: findimagedupes Version: 0.1.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 This tool requires libltdl3 to run, and does not depend on it: ~/pics % findimagedupes -v Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.so' for module Image::Magick: libltdl.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/DynaLoader.pm line 225. at /usr/bin/findimagedupes line 38 Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/findimagedupes line 38. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/findimagedupes line 38. zsh: 21477 exit 2 findimagedupes -v ~/pics % apt-cache search libltdl libguile-ltdl-1 - Guile's patched version of libtool's libltdl libltdl3 - A system independent dlopen wrapper for GNU libtool libltdl3-dev - A system independent dlopen wrapper for GNU libtool ~/pics % sudo apt-get install libltdl3 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libltdl3 (1.5.6-6) 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 155kB of archives. After unpacking 233kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org sid/main libltdl3 1.5.6-6 [155kB] Fetched 155kB in 0s (179kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package libltdl3. (Reading database ... 63097 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libltdl3 (from .../libltdl3_1.5.6-6_powerpc.deb) ... Setting up libltdl3 (1.5.6-6) ... ~/pics % findimagedupes -v Scanning fingerprints from . into ./imagedupes-db.txt. [0688/0688] 0%..100% Finding duplicates in ., threshold 90%. ./2519.jpg ./8688-1.jpg: seem to be 98.83% similar. ./38c2.jpg ./55da.jpg: seem to be 91.80% similar. [0686/0686] 0%..100% -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages findimagedupes depends on: ii imagemagick 6:6.2.3.0-2 Image manipulation programs ii perl 5.8.7-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perlmagick 6:6.2.3.0-2 A perl interface to the libMagick findimagedupes recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 315700-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 05:50:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 22:50:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dm3Yk-0008CW-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:50:31 -0700 Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52682171E05; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 20
Processed: Re: Bug#315700: findimagedupes: Missing dependency: libltdl3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 315700 imagemagick Bug#315700: findimagedupes: Missing dependency: libltdl3 Bug reassigned from package `findimagedupes' to `imagemagick'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315687
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 315687 security Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server Tags were: sid Tags added: security > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 315687 sid Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server Tags were: security sid Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315706: libghc6-missingpy-dev: fails to configure, with libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2
Subject: libghc6-missingpy-dev: fails to configure, with libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2 Package: libghc6-missingpy-dev Version: 0.2.0 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: experimental This package Depends: on libghc6-missingh-dev (>= 0.11.0), which libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2 satisfies. However, from libghc6-missingpy-dev's postinst, its CONFIGFILE /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/MissingPy-0.2.0/installed-pkg-config has a depends: on MissingH-0.11.0, which -missingh- 0.11.2 fails to satisfy, and ghc-pkg and the postinst fail. Output from aptitude run installing libghc6-missingpy-dev: -- Setting up libghc6-missingpy-dev (0.2.0) ... Reading package info from stdin... done. ghc-pkg: dependency MissingH-0.11.0 doesn't exist dpkg: error processing libghc6-missingpy-dev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 >From apt-cache show libghc6-missingpy-dev: -- Depends: ghc6 (>= 6.4), ghc6 (<< 6.4-999), python-dev (>= 2.3.3), python-dev (<< 2.4), libghc6-missingh-dev (>= 0.11.0) >From /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6/lib/MissingPy-0.2.0/installed-pkg-config: - depends: haskell-src-1.0 MissingH-0.11.0 It looks like several binary files in .../lib/MissingPy-0.2.0 also refer to MissingH-0.11.0, so a simple edit of installed-pkg-config would be insufficient, so I don't have a patch to send in. Should -missingh- get installed as MissingH-0.11 instead of -0.11.x, so a Depends: on (>= 0.11.0), (<< 0.12) could work? Otherwise it seems like every new version of -missingh- would demand a new version of -missingpy-. Admittedly I haven't looked into ghc's package naming scheme, so I don't know what's possible here. It looks like nobody else has tried to install -missingpy- since -missingh- 0.11.1, or they would have run into this problem already... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (100, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libghc6-missingpy-dev depends on: ii ghc6 6.4-4 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilat ii libghc6-missingh-dev 0.11.2 Library of utility functions for H ii python-dev2.3.5-2Header files and a static library -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 315687
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 315687 sid Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315687: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:14:34AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: > Package: proftpd > Version: 1.2.10-17 > Severity: critical > Justification: root security hole > This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to install 1.2.10-17. > The config file wasn't touched during the update to -17. Thanks; this version info is highly useful to developers. I tagged the bug "sid", since -17 had not yet propogated to testing. Although this bug is bad news, its good that the new version (uploaded ~24h ago) didn't get into testing (which is always supposed to be nearly-releasable). Thanks! Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312513: [ANDREW] Re: Bug#312513: winbind 3.0.14a-4 (sarge) breaks samba ADS member server
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 07:20:19AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Steve, do you think it's worth for us to post a call for "Debian > > developers/contributors with access to an ADS domain anhd willing to > > help on Samba" in the Debian ML? > > That sounds like a good idea to me. FWIW, I have one AD domain that I have to work with. It is a production environment, so I cna't do a huge amount of breaking, btu I can test on weekends. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#313218: gtodo: Thanks
Package: gtodo Version: 0.14-4 Followup-For: Bug #313218 Hi Guilherme I have tested out the package you suggested and gtodo now works perfectly. Thanks for the information you provided, much appreciated :) Regards, Barrie -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-bm041127-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages gtodo depends on: ii gconf2 2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-02.8.1-2 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-02.6.5-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxml2 2.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
