Bug#315914: priority issue
On Luan, 2005-06-27 at 01:42 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: joeyh aj: hmm, debootstrap sid fails now because whiptail depends on libslang2. Wasn't dependency resolution supposed to avoid this kind of problem? aj joeyh: only if you use it? joeyh sid script uses it, doesn't it? aj no aj --resolve-deps aj for sid, the non dep-resolving fix is to get the overrides changed so libslang2 is the same priority as whatever it depends on joeyh hmm, I see. So should d-i start using --resolve-deps to get the added robustness? joeyh (libslang2 is already standard, but whiptail is prio important) aj d-i betas, yeah; pretty much until the point of release candidates joeyh until base is frozen, but not after, because of .. overhead? aj the dependency resolver isn't particularly precise or particularly fast Yes. My upload of libslang2 2.0.4, which was supposed to go into the archive at the same time as libnewt, didn't; it had the changeover to Priority: required. So we need an override to either make whiptail be standard priority, or libslang2 important priority. Uploading now -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315923: Kernel panic after Sarge installation on Dell with SATA drive
Package: install Version: debian-31r0a-i386-binary-1.iso Severity: critical I attempted to install Sarge (2.6.8-2-686) today on a Dell Dimension 8400 desktop. Upon reboot after installation, there was a kernel panic with the following error messages: pivot_root: No such file or directory /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! Just before this, the messages indicate that the kernel has found the hard disk (Serial ATA Maxtor 6Y160M0): scsi0: ata_piix Using anticipatory io scheduler [drive info] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xFFA8 irq 15 and so on (I am typing this by hand, since the machine then crashed and there are no logs). By replacing hda with sda in the following line in /boot/grub/menu.lst, I was able to prevent the panic: kernel/vmlinuz-2.6.8-2-686 root=/dev/hda6 ro The boot then failed when it tried to fsck the swap and remaining ext3 partitions until I made similar replacements of hda with sda in /etc/fstab. This allowed the boot process to finish, but then the kernel would not recognize the cdrom drive. This may be related to bugs #299478 and #285981. Other people have described this problem here: http://www.debianplanet.org/node.php?id=1094 The same problem appears here: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianInstallerBrokenThings without attribution or a bug reference. Everett Lipman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315392: kmail tries to access $HOME/Mail literally, and so fails to start
On Sunday 26 June 2005 15:15, Adeodato Simó wrote: KMail could not create folder '$HOME/Mail'; please make sure that you can view and modify the content of the folder '/home/chris'. Please send us the output of the following command: $ grep /Mail ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc Ok 09:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED],:0.0:~$ grep /Mail ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc folders=$HOME/Mail That isn't the only occurence of $HOME in the config file... 09:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED],:0.0:~$ grep '$HOME' ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc folders=$HOME/Mail Recent Files=$HOME/new-is300-design.pdf, $HOME/work/imst/imst/get-prespvw-working.diff Chris
Processed: severity of 315905 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 315905 important Bug#315905: grisbi: Grisbi crash when trying to enter a new transaction for a payee whose last transation is a breakdown Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315935: crosscompiling: build arch not used during build
Package: ntp-simple Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I tagged the severity lower, but it's upgraded. I am trying to cross compile the ntp-simple package for an embedded target. Based on the debian/rules, I use the following configuration: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ntp-4.2.0a+stable]$ cat autogen.sh #!/bin/sh # fix permissions chmod a+x configure mkdir -p build-simple cd build-simple ../configure --prefix=/usr \ --disable-all-clocks --disable-parse-clocks \ --disable-debugging --enable-LOCAL-CLOCK \ --sysconfdir=/tmp/ntp --cache-file=../config.cache \ --disable-errorcache \ --host=powerpc-linux-uclibc \ --build=i686-linux make -C build-simple The build fails at: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/firmware/mleeman/tmp/ntp-4.2.0a+stable/build-simple/ntpdc' powerpc-linux-uclibc-gcc -E -I. -I../../ntpdc -I.. -I../../include ../../ntpdc/nl_in.c | ./nl.pl nl.c if powerpc-linux-uclibc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../ntpdc -I.. -I../../include-g -O2 -Wall -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -MT ntpdc-layout.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ntpdc-layout.Tpo \ -c -o ntpdc-layout.o `test -f '../../ntpdc/ntpdc-layout.c' || echo '../../ntpdc/'`../../ntpdc/ntpdc-layout.c; \ then mv -f .deps/ntpdc-layout.Tpo .deps/ntpdc-layout.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/ntpdc-layout.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi powerpc-linux-uclibc-gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -o ntpdc-layout ntpdc-layout.o ./ntpdc-layout layout.here /bin/sh: line 1: ./ntpdc-layout: cannot execute binary file As far as I can make out, the ntpdc-layout is a small tool for creating some configuration file. It should be compiled with the host gcc, not the target gcc. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'hoary'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages ntp-simple depends on: ii adduser3.64 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcap11:1.10-14 support for getting/setting POSIX. ii libssl0.9.70.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii ntp-server 1:4.2.0a+stable-8 Network Time Protocol: common serv ntp-simple recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * shared/ntp/update-conf: true * shared/ntp/servers: time.chello.be ntp1.belbone.be shared/ntp/localclock: false -- greetz, marc Man, you guys should see this ugly sticky flesh. Kinda like my Aunt Ruth's special Jello. Crichton - Green-Eyed Monster scorpius 2.6.12 #1 Thu Jun 23 21:32:03 CEST 2005 GNU/Linux signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#315687: marked as done (proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315687: fixed in proftpd 1.2.10-18 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2005 22:14:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 15:14:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from nosferatu.franken.de (noname.franken.de) [194.95.226.50] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlwRu-00042q-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:14:58 -0700 Received: from jupiter.home.junior.sternbauer.de ([192.168.0.2] ident=qmailr) by noname.franken.de with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DlwRr-00049P-AU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:14:55 +0200 Received: (qmail 28588 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jun 2005 22:14:34 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: proftpd: Wrong permissions for ftp server X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:14:34 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: proftpd Version: 1.2.10-17 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole In the most recent (1.2.10-17) version of proftpd, the permissions used by the daemon are somehome mixed up: both anonymous and authenticated connections are mapped to uid 0/gid 0 in the filesystem. New files and directories are created with uid 0/gid 0 (instead of the ftp/nogroup for anon connections resp. the authenticated user). In anon mode, you seem to be trapped in the anon enviroment and can't delete files. With authenticated connections, you also get root access to the whole system (visible to proftpd) and as your access is mapped to root/root, you can delete everything you like (thus the critical severity, as this opens root access to the ftp server's file system. This bug was not reproducable on 1.2.10-16, I had to install 1.2.10-17. The config file wasn't touched during the update to -17. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.26 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages proftpd depends on: ii adduser 3.64 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.51 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam0g0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-1 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap07.6.dbs-8Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.21 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii proftpd-common 1.2.10-17Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP dae ii ucf 1.18 Update Configuration File: preserv proftpd recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * shared/proftpd/anonymous: true shared/proftpd/run_inetd_or_standalone: standalone * shared/proftpd/edit_conffile: false * shared/proftpd/use_debconf: true shared/proftpd/anonymous_access: false * proftpd/edit_conffile: true shared/proftpd/file_changed: shared/proftpd/warning: * shared/proftpd/inetd_or_standalone: inetd * proftpd/run_inetd_or_standalone: inetd shared/proftpd/replace_file_install: false shared/proftpd/sql_statements: * proftpd/anonymous_access: true proftpd/sql_statements: --- Received: (at 315687-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 10:21:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 03:21:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmqkM-0001JF-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:21:46 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dmqfu-0001Ap-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:17:10 -0400 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315770: marked as done (freeradius: FTBFS: credits: No such file or directory.)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:32:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315770: fixed in freeradius 1.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 20:50:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 13:50:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmHbt-RN-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:50:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 27E91441ED for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:50:40 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F61441CF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:50:39 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5264926136; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:50:39 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: freeradius: FTBFS: credits: No such file or directory. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: freeradius Version: 1.0.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: # man pages docs install -g root -m 644 CREDITS /build/buildd/freeradius-1.0.4/debian/freeradius //usr/share/doc/freeradius/credits install: cannot create regular file `/build/buildd/freeradius-1.0.4/debian/free radius//usr/share/doc/freeradius/credits': No such file or directory make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 315770-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 10:38:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 03:38:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dmr0B-do-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:38:07 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmquU-0001UW-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:32:14 -0400 From: Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315770: fixed in freeradius 1.0.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:32:14 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: freeradius Source-Version: 1.0.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freeradius, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freeradius-dialupadmin_1.0.4-2_all.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius-dialupadmin_1.0.4-2_all.deb freeradius-iodbc_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius-iodbc_1.0.4-2_i386.deb freeradius-krb5_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius-krb5_1.0.4-2_i386.deb freeradius-ldap_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius-ldap_1.0.4-2_i386.deb freeradius-mysql_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius-mysql_1.0.4-2_i386.deb freeradius_1.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius_1.0.4-2.diff.gz freeradius_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius_1.0.4-2.dsc freeradius_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freeradius/freeradius_1.0.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated freeradius package)
Processed: Re: Bug#315935: crosscompiling: build arch not used during build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 315935 important Bug#315935: crosscompiling: build arch not used during build Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315935: crosscompiling: build arch not used during build
severity 315935 important thanks On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:03:08PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote: Package: ntp-simple Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-8 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source I tagged the severity lower, but it's upgraded. I am trying to cross compile the ntp-simple package for an embedded target. Based on the debian/rules, I use the following configuration: Wrong severity; cross-build support is not mandated by policy. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315914: marked as done (libslang2 must be equal or greater Priority as whiptail)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:32:27 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315914: fixed in slang2 2.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 04:39:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 26 21:39:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmlOx-0002Lo-00; Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:39:19 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F96017ED2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:39:17 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A9356E0C2; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:39:24 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sid debootstrap fails; whiptail depends on libslang2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debootstrap, whiptail Version: 0.3.1.4 Severity: serious debootstrap can no longer debootstrap sid, it seems it is not able to deal with whiptail's new dependency on libslang2. Hmm, wasn't the new dependency resolving code supposed to solve this class of problems? Setting up base-config (2.65) ... Errors were encountered while processing: whiptail dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of whiptail: whiptail depends on libslang2 (=3D 2.0.1-1); however: Package libslang2 is not installed. dpkg: error processing whiptail (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured --=20 see shy jo --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCv4L8d8HHehbQuO8RAhNcAJ9wEN0sWLUO7Pa1hzNS6Sp1bPix9gCdFzQo N3ddEUL0Jzl0nnMi0mkyLhA= =cWT3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- --- Received: (at 315914-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 12:38:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 05:38:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmssL-0002fv-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:38:09 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dmsmp-fh-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:32:27 -0400 From: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315914: fixed in slang2 2.0.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:32:27 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: slang2 Source-Version: 2.0.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of slang2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libslang2-dev_2.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slang2/libslang2-dev_2.0.4-2_i386.deb libslang2-pic_2.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slang2/libslang2-pic_2.0.4-2_i386.deb libslang2-udeb_2.0.4-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/s/slang2/libslang2-udeb_2.0.4-2_i386.udeb libslang2_2.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/slang2/libslang2_2.0.4-2_i386.deb slang2_2.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/slang2/slang2_2.0.4-2.diff.gz slang2_2.0.4-2.dsc to
Bug#315951: python-wxgui: depends on libwxgtk2.5.3-python which is not available on debian
Package: python-wxgui Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** The subject says everything. Without libwxgtk2.5.3-python python-wxgui is unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-kanotix-11 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#315968: kernel: usb-storage not working, system freeze
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-k7 Version: 2.6.8-16 Severity: critical Under the 2.6.8 kernel my usb memory stick and my usb card reader are not working (I can't mount them). Not only this - if I plug them out the whole system crashes/freezes. Under 2.4.27 when I plug in the memory stick dmesg shows: hub.c: new USB device 00:07.4-2, assigned address 2 usb.c: USB device 2 (vend/prod 0x4e8/0x111) is not claimed by any active driver. Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... usb.c: registered new driver usb-storage scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices Vendor: Model: USB DRIVE Rev: 2.00 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 sda: Unit Not Ready, sense: Current 00:00: sense key Unit Attention Additional sense indicates Not ready to ready change,medium may have changed sda : READ CAPACITY failed. sda : status = 1, message = 00, host = 0, driver = 08 Current sd00:00: sense key Unit Attention Additional sense indicates Not ready to ready change,medium may have changed sda : block size assumed to be 512 bytes, disk size 1GB. /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0 I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0 unable to read partition table WARNING: USB Mass Storage data integrity not assured USB Mass Storage device found at 2 USB Mass Storage support registered. lsmod shows these additional modules: usb-storage54496 0 (unused) sd_mod 10732 0 (autoclean) (unused) vfat8716 0 (autoclean) fat27576 0 (autoclean) [vfat] I than can mount the stick. One more module is loaded (nls_cp437) and dmesg adds: SCSI device sda: 256000 512-byte hdwr sectors (131 MB) sda: Write Protect is off /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Under kernel 2.6.8 I get plugging the memory stick in: ohci_hcd :00:07.4: wakeup usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using address 2 Initializing USB Mass Storage driver... scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices Vendor: Model: USB DRIVE Rev: 2.00 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sda: Unit Not Ready, sense: Current : sense key Unit Attention Additional sense: Not ready to ready change, medium may have changed SCSI device sda: 256000 512-byte hdwr sectors (131 MB) sda: assuming Write Enabled sda: assuming drive cache: write through /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: p1 Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 USB Mass Storage device found at 2 usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage USB Mass Storage support registered. lsmod shows just: usb_storage68800 1 But then trying a mount the mount command hangs and plugging the memory stick out the whole system hangs, mostly without any error message in the logs. A very *few* times I got the error message: debian kernel: usb 1-2: control timeout on ep0in As this seems to be a kernel bug here more info on the system environment: 1. Output of ver_linux Linux debian 2.6.8-2-k7 #1 Thu May 19 18:03:29 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Gnu C 3.3.5 Gnu make 3.80 binutils 2.15 util-linux 2.12p mount 2.12p module-init-tools 3.2-pre1 e2fsprogs 1.37 PPP2.4.3 nfs-utils 1.0.6 Linux C Library2.3.2 Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.3.2 Procps 3.2.1 Net-tools 1.60 Console-tools 0.2.3 Sh-utils 5.2.1 Modules Loaded lp ipv6 ipt_REJECT ipt_LOG ipt_state ipt_pkttype ipt_recent ipt_iprange ipt_physdev ipt_multiport ipt_conntrack iptable_mangle ip_nat_irc ip_nat_tftp ip_nat_ftp iptable_nat ip_conntrack_irc ip_conntrack_tftp ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables parport_pc parport floppy pcspkr rtc pci_hotplug amd_k7_agp ohci_hcd usbcore snd_als4000 snd_sb_common snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_page_alloc snd_opl3_lib snd_timer snd_hwdep gameport snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd soundcore via_rhine mii agpgart tsdev mousedevevdev capability commoncap psmouse ide_cd cdrom ext3 jbd mbcache ide_generic ide_disk amd74xx ide_core sd_mod ata_piix libata scsi_mod unix font vesafb cfbcopyareacfbimgblt cfbfillrect 2. /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 2 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 798.780 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips: 1572.86 3. /proc/modules (after plug in of the usb device): usb_storage 68859 1 - Loading
Bug#314512: marked as done (busybox: FTBFS on !i386: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386))
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:02:13 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314512: fixed in busybox 1:1.00-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 19:29:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 12:29:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dj03q-0001ew-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:29:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B138C22411D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:29:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C0F22403E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:29:57 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 50FCA26136; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:29:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 21:29:57 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: busybox: FTBFS on !i386: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: busybox Version: 1:1.00-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing bo build on all arches other than i386 with the following error: dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture $arch does not appear in package's list (i386) This looks like it's about busybox-floppy-udeb (the only udeb that has that.) so I assume it gets build for those arches, installed, but then fails because it shouldn't have installed it. I'm guessing the following line doesn't work (anymore?) ifneq ($(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(ARCH_FLOPPY_UDEB)),) Kurt --- Received: (at 314512-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 17:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 10:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dmx5W-0004WZ-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:08:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dmwzt-0001Fc-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:02:13 -0400 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#314512: fixed in busybox 1:1.00-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:02:13 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: busybox Source-Version: 1:1.00-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of busybox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: busybox-floppy-udeb_1.00-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-floppy-udeb_1.00-2_i386.udeb busybox-static_1.00-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.00-2_i386.deb busybox-udeb_1.00-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.00-2_i386.udeb busybox_1.00-2.diff.gz to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.00-2.diff.gz busybox_1.00-2.dsc to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.00-2.dsc busybox_1.00-2_i386.deb to pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.00-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated busybox package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please
Processed: retitle 315136 to default regex syntax (temporarily?) changed to POSIX BRE instead of emacs-re. ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 retitle 315136 default regex syntax (temporarily?) changed to POSIX BRE instead of emacs-re. Bug#315136: upgrade to findutils 4.2.22-1 makes isdn unusable Changed Bug title. # I know I am too late ... severity 315136 serious Bug#315136: default regex syntax (temporarily?) changed to POSIX BRE instead of emacs-re. Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315582: marked as done (backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:02:22 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315582: fixed in backup-manager 0.5.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 17:52:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 10:52:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlVsB-0002tz-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:52:19 -0700 Received: from [217.251.232.112] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #297) id 1DlVrg-0001Qv-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:51:26 +0200 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Tags: patch The optional CD-burning feature of backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename (/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log) for logging the output of cdrecord. If a malicious (or just unlucky) user makes /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log a symlink to a system file, that file will be overwritten in the next run of backup-manager. A demonstration follows: $ whoami sven $ ls -l /etc/junk; cat /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 Jun 22 21:23 /etc/junk This will soon be overwritten! $ ln -s /etc/junk /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log $ su -c backup-manager Password: unable to mount 0,1,0 on /tmp/bm-mnt $ ls -l /etc/junk; head -n 3 /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1431 Jun 22 21:25 /etc/junk scsidev: '0,1,0' scsibus: 0 target: 1 lun: 0 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25 Replace /etc/junk with /etc/passwd, and the system becomes slightly less usable. :-( A solution is to use mktemp instead of a hardcoded file name, I suggest the following patch: -- diff -u /usr/sbin/backup-manager /home/sven/backup-manager --- /usr/sbin/backup-manager2005-04-04 22:39:22.0 +0200 +++ /home/sven/backup-manager2005-06-22 21:49:17.0 +0200 @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ lockfile=/var/run/backup-manager.pid md5sum=/usr/bin/md5sum bc=/usr/bin/bc -logfile=/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log -mount_point=/tmp/bm-mnt +logfile=$(mktemp /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log.XX) +mount_point=$(mktemp -d /tmp/bm-mnt.XX) # Load the backup-manager's library . $libdir/gettext.sh --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages backup-manager depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii gzip 1.3.5-10 The GNU compression utility -- debconf information: backup-manager/upload-key: * backup-manager/name-format: long backup-manager/upload-hosts: backup-manager/upload-user-ftp: * backup-manager/cron_frequency: daily * backup-manager/blacklist: /home/sven/tmp * backup-manager/time-to-live: 5 * backup-manager/burning-maxsize: 650 backup-manager/upload-user-scp-warning: backup-manager/transfert_mode: scp * backup-manager/dump_symlinks: false backup-manager/upload-user-scp: bmngr * backup-manager/burning-device: 0,1,0 backup-manager/upload-dir: /var/archives/uploads * backup-manager/directories: /etc /home/sven /root * backup-manager/filetype: tar.gz * backup-manager/backup-repository: /var/archives * backup-manager/burning-method: CDR * backup-manager/burning-enabled: true backup-manager/cron_remove_deprecated: false * backup-manager/want_to_upload: false --- Received: (at 315582-close) by
Bug#315444: test case
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:15:22PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~cat test
set -e
eval false || true
exit 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~busybox sh test
zsh: exit 1 busybox sh test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~sh test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~dash test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~bash test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~zsh test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
Workarond is to enclose the eval statement in parens, so this will work in
debootstrap:
(eval $(eval echo \${EXIT_THING_$n})) 2/dev/null || true
Cloning the bug to busybox, I'm using 1.00 in the test above, though
busybox-cvs must also have the bug.
This is a rather hacky patch against busybox-cvs (but should apply to
busybox without too much trouble) for this.
Unfortunately I had to take the approach of avoiding throwing the
exception in the first place, necessitating a static variable, rather
than catching the exception in evalbltin() if flags EV_TESTED, which I
think would have been much neater. However, when I tried to take the
latter approach, I apparently didn't manage to restore all the
pre-exception state properly or something, because immediately after
evaluating 'eval false || true' the (interactive) shell decided it had
hit EOF on input and exited. Somebody who understands busybox ash better
might want to look into this.
I also haven't run this through a shell test suite to make sure I didn't
break anything else. That really needs to happen before applying this to
the Debian package.
diff -u busybox-cvs-20040623/shell/ash.c busybox-cvs-20040623/shell/ash.c
--- busybox-cvs-20040623/shell/ash.c
+++ busybox-cvs-20040623/shell/ash.c
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@
-static void evalstring(char *);
+static void evalstring(char *, int);
union node; /* BLETCH for ansi C */
static void evaltree(union node *, int);
static void evalbackcmd(union node *, struct backcmd *);
@@ -1229,6 +1229,8 @@
static int skipcount; /* number of levels to skip */
static int funcnest; /* depth of function calls */
+static int bltintested = 0; /* builtin command tested; appease set -e */
+
/* reasons for skipping commands (see comment on breakcmd routine) */
#define SKIPBREAK 1
#define SKIPCONT2
@@ -2692,7 +2694,7 @@
static void expredir(union node *);
static void evalpipe(union node *, int);
static void evalcommand(union node *, int);
-static int evalbltin(const struct builtincmd *, int, char **);
+static int evalbltin(const struct builtincmd *, int, char **, int);
static int evalfun(struct funcnode *, int, char **, int);
static void prehash(union node *);
static int bltincmd(int, char **);
@@ -2732,7 +2734,7 @@
STPUTC('\0', concat);
p = grabstackstr(concat);
}
- evalstring(p);
+ evalstring(p, bltintested ? EV_TESTED : 0);
}
return exitstatus;
}
@@ -2743,7 +2745,7 @@
*/
static void
-evalstring(char *s)
+evalstring(char *s, int flags)
{
union node *n;
struct stackmark smark;
@@ -2752,7 +2754,7 @@
setinputstring(s);
while ((n = parsecmd(0)) != NEOF) {
- evaltree(n, 0);
+ evaltree(n, flags);
popstackmark(smark);
if (evalskip)
break;
@@ -3387,7 +3389,7 @@
}
listsetvar(list, i);
}
- if (evalbltin(cmdentry.u.cmd, argc, argv)) {
+ if (evalbltin(cmdentry.u.cmd, argc, argv, flags)) {
int exit_status;
int i, j;
@@ -3432,9 +3434,10 @@
}
static int
-evalbltin(const struct builtincmd *cmd, int argc, char **argv) {
+evalbltin(const struct builtincmd *cmd, int argc, char **argv, int flags) {
char *volatile savecmdname;
struct jmploc *volatile savehandler;
+ volatile int savebltintested;
struct jmploc jmploc;
int i;
@@ -3446,10 +3449,14 @@
commandname = argv[0];
argptr = argv + 1;
optptr = NULL; /* initialize nextopt */
+ savebltintested = bltintested;
+ if (flags EV_TESTED)
+ bltintested = 1;
exitstatus = (*cmd-builtin)(argc, argv);
flushall();
cmddone:
exitstatus |= ferror(stdout);
+ bltintested = savebltintested;
commandname = savecmdname;
exsig = 0;
handler = savehandler;
@@ -7966,7 +7973,7 @@
state3:
state = 4;
if (minusc)
- evalstring(minusc);
+ evalstring(minusc, 0);
if (sflag || minusc == NULL) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_COMMAND_SAVEHISTORY
@@ -11817,7 +11824,7 @@
p = trap[p - q + 1];
if (!p)
continue;
- evalstring(p);
+ evalstring(p, 0);
exitstatus = savestatus;
}
}
@@ -11910,7 +11917,7 @@
handler = loc;
if ((p =
Bug#312145: problem building spfmilter
Hi, As reported by bug#307086[0], spfmilter fails to build from source. I found that the real reason of the build failure is that there is a header file missing from libspf2-dev, as reported by bug#312145[1]. spf_dns_internal.h is not installed by libspf2-dev, which caused the spfmilter configure script not able to find the spf2 library, which further causes function not declared (when compiling) and not defined (when linking). [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307086 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=312145 I tried to work around the problem by manually installing spf_dns_internal.s to /usr/include/spf2 and other hacks, such as add #include netinet/in.h to spf2/spf.h. Finally, I found that, apparently, support for spf2 version 1.2.x is not added to spfmilter yet. Upstream author acknowledges spfmilter does not work with libspf2 1.2.5[2]. [2] http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ As spfmilter supports both spf and spf2, I think rebuild it with spf should be tried. regards, qingning signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#294953: marked as done (partimage - refuses to restore image on i386 which is created on s390)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:54:57 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed by NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 17:01:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 12 09:01:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D00e9-0003Pl-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:01:30 -0800 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C7E463C014; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:01:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:01:26 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: partimage - refuses to restore image on i386 which is created on s390 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: partimage Version: 0.6.4-10.1 Severity: grave partimage refuses on i386 to restore an image which is created on s390 with the following error: | There was an error while | restoring partition: | CRC64 are differents, the | imagefile was damaged: | Original CRC64:.0 | Current CRC64:..0 Bastian --=20 No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned. -- Kirk, Spock's Brain, stardate 5431.6 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkIONmYACgkQnw66O/MvCNFldQCeO0SE/cj0c2KKLq84mu31Mnao X/wAnimRR5JQiJl4C7R/ruoUl3nLRjlC =d5rv -END PGP SIGNATURE- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- --- Received: (at 294953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 00:55:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 17:55:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn4NR-0001dN-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:55:01 -0700 Received: from teco141pc.teco.edu (teco141pc.teco.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.170.141]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1Dn4NP-00063K-Cz; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:54:59 +0200 Received: from dsl-084-056-238-236.arcor-ip.net ([84.56.238.236] helo=[192.168.2.158]) by teco141pc.teco.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dn4NN-0004S7-Tp for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:54:58 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:54:57 +0200 From: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed by NMU X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=enig821A4F058476AF043FBDB5C7 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig821A4F058476AF043FBDB5C7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fixed by NMU -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.teco.edu/ TecO (Telecooperation Office) Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str.1 University of Karlsruhe 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany --enig821A4F058476AF043FBDB5C7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment;
Bug#292240: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed by NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 20:49:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 12:49:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CtXcX-0002ee-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:49:05 -0800 Received: from pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.30.158]) by pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtXcZ-00023A-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:07 +0100 Received: from brl by pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtXcZ-8L-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:07 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:07 +0100 From: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: partimage Version: 0.6.4-10 Severity: serious The following manpages say they are only distributeable under the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this license: partimage.1.gz This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to debian-devel and debian-legal: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00499.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00262.html Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link --- Received: (at 292240-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 00:56:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 17:56:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn4Oq-00020W-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:56:28 -0700 Received: from teco141pc.teco.edu (teco141pc.teco.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.170.141]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1Dn4Op-0006W1-M6; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:27 +0200 Received: from dsl-084-056-238-236.arcor-ip.net ([84.56.238.236] helo=[192.168.2.158]) by teco141pc.teco.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dn4Ol-0004Sc-Qv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:23 +0200 From: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed by NMU X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=enig9E9F34DC85221C9E1E20A2F5 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig9E9F34DC85221C9E1E20A2F5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fixed by NMU -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.teco.edu/ TecO (Telecooperation Office) Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str.1 University of Karlsruhe 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany --enig9E9F34DC85221C9E1E20A2F5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCwKA3h7PER70FhVQRAnWMAJ49noy6t7f4wIMY6avgSrlsC4m7VQCfXPTq
Bug#292241: marked as done (manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed by NMU has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 20:49:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 12:49:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.150] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CtXcc-0002fF-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:49:10 -0800 Received: from pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.30.158]) by pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtXce-00023C-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:12 +0100 Received: from brl by pcpool08.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CtXce-8X-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:12 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:49:12 +0100 From: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: manpage looks not distributeable, as license not adhered Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: partimage-server Version: 0.6.4-10 Severity: serious The following manpages say they are only distributeable under the GFDL, but do not include the license text required by this license: partimaged.8.gz partimagedusers.5.gz This mass-filing of bugs was announced 2005-01-09 in my mail to debian-devel and debian-legal: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg00499.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00262.html Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link --- Received: (at 292241-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 00:57:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 17:57:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.185.217] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn4PM-0002D4-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 17:57:00 -0700 Received: from teco141pc.teco.edu (teco141pc.teco.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.170.141]) by smtp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1) id 1Dn4PL-0006et-BM; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:59 +0200 Received: from dsl-084-056-238-236.arcor-ip.net ([84.56.238.236] helo=[192.168.2.158]) by teco141pc.teco.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dn4PK-0004Sw-J3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:58 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 02:56:58 +0200 From: Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed by NMU X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=enig5BBCF4DF32A3E47160993948 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enig5BBCF4DF32A3E47160993948 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fixed by NMU -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.teco.edu/ TecO (Telecooperation Office) Vincenz-Priessnitz-Str.1 University of Karlsruhe 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany --enig5BBCF4DF32A3E47160993948 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
Bug#315772: marked as done (directfb: FTBFS: configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:48:20 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315772: fixed in directfb 0.9.22-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 21:04:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 25 14:04:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.60] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmHpT-00041k-00; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:04:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC4B1980E5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:04:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F978198076 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:04:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id ED57126136; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:04:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:04:42 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: directfb: FTBFS: configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: directfb Version: 0.9.22-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is failign to build with the following error: autoreconf -f -i /usr/share/aclocal/aalib.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_AALIB+run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal aclocal:configure.in:81: warning: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library configure.in:60: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.in:81: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PROG_LIBTOOL autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 make: *** [configure] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 315772-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 02:52:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 19:52:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn6DV-0006EX-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:52:53 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn696-0007sH-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:48:20 -0400 From: Guillem Jover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#315772: fixed in directfb 0.9.22-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:48:20 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Source: directfb Source-Version: 0.9.22-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of directfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: directfb_0.9.22-4.diff.gz to pool/main/d/directfb/directfb_0.9.22-4.diff.gz directfb_0.9.22-4.dsc to pool/main/d/directfb/directfb_0.9.22-4.dsc libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb_0.9.22-4_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/directfb/libdirectfb-0.9-22-udeb_0.9.22-4_i386.udeb libdirectfb-0.9-22_0.9.22-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/directfb/libdirectfb-0.9-22_0.9.22-4_i386.deb libdirectfb-bin_0.9.22-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/directfb/libdirectfb-bin_0.9.22-4_i386.deb libdirectfb-dev_0.9.22-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/directfb/libdirectfb-dev_0.9.22-4_i386.deb libdirectfb-extra_0.9.22-4_i386.deb to pool/main/d/directfb/libdirectfb-extra_0.9.22-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#314433: marked as done (crafted emails get razor to segfault)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:53:51 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314433: fixed in razor 2.720-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 08:40:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 01:40:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from spamkiller.syso.ch [213.188.32.179] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dipvm-0008KZ-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:40:58 -0700 Received: from spamkiller.syso.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamkiller.syso.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/ScoutNet-Spam-Virus-Wall) with ESMTP id j5G8ejwO009717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:40:48 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by spamkiller.syso.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j5G8ejq5009716; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:40:45 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Benoit Panizzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: crafted emails get razor to segfault X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:40:44 +0200 X-SNCH-Virus-Status: NO, scantime=0.0053 seconds X-Spam-Checksum: aecbba154787dec947ad7291a180c487 X-SNCH-SpamassassinHits: -0.199 X-SNCH-SpamTests: BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-SNCH-Scantime: 7.3224 seconds X-SNCH-Report: Start der SNCH-SpamAssassin Auswertung -0.1 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.1 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Ende der SNCH-SpamAssassin Auswertung X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 213.188.32.179 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: razor Version: 2.670-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi Razor Maintainer Special crafted emails can be used to DOS razor. Some examples of such emails can be found on: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7244345forum_id=10149 The Problem has been fixed in Razor 2.71: http://razor.sourceforge.net/ Regards -Benoit- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages razor depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdigest-hmac-perl 1.01-3 create standard message integrity pn libdigest-md5-perl Not found. ii libdigest-nilsimsa-perl 0.06-2 Nilsimsa message digest algorithm ii libdigest-sha1-perl 2.10-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith pn libmime-base64-perl Not found. ii libnet-dns-perl 0.48-1 Perform DNS queries from a Perl sc ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii perl [libtime-hires-perl] 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-modules [libtest-simpl 5.8.4-8 Core Perl modules -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 314433-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2005 03:09:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 20:09:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn6U3-0008Oo-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 20:09:59 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dn6ER-0008J6-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:53:51 -0400 From: Corrin Lakeland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#314433: fixed in razor 2.720-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:53:51 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0
Bug#309185: marked as done (tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop.)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:42:54 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-4 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 10:54:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 03:54:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DXGl4-0001oO-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 03:54:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 20FC622419B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 12:54:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08499224056 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 15 May 2005 12:54:05 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id A537726136; Sun, 15 May 2005 12:54:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:54:04 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tetex-bin: FTBFS in experimental: Endless loop. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build in experimental. It seems to be stuck in an endless loop doing this over and over again: eperl -P -o debian/common.functions debian/common.functions.in eperl -P -o debian/rules debian/rules.in test -e ../../tetex-common/common.variables \ test ../../tetex-common/common.variables -nt debian/common.variables \ cp ../../tetex-common/common.variables debian/common.variables || true test -e ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in \ test ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in -nt debian/common.functions.in \ cp ../../tetex-common/common.functions.in debian/common.functions.in || true Kurt --- Received: (at 309185-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 17:42:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 10:42:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.68.106] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DmxdK-0006Wu-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:42:58 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.112]) by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j5RHgtxC020534 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:42:56 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DmxdH-0005ws-EU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:42:55 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in upload of tetex-bin 3.0-4 to experimental X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster's_message_of?= Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:18:43 -0400) References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 19:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Frank K=FCster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tag 309185 + fixed-in-experimental closing because it only existed in experimental. bye, Frank --=20 Frank K=FCster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#306071: (no subject)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Qingning Huo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please find attached patch file to build spfmilter with libspf instead of libspf2. This should fix both bug#307086[0] and bug#306071[1]. Last time I tried, spfmilter didn't build at all with current the libspf version. That was with spfmilter 0.95, though; I'll give it a shot with 0.97, now that it's out. -- Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
