Processed: control

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 318796   grave
Bug#318796: /usr/bin/gq: exits with segmentation fault when adding or editing 
server
Severity set to `grave'.

 retitle 318796 gq: segfaults when loading the config file, creating a new 
 one, etc
Bug#318796: /usr/bin/gq: exits with segmentation fault when adding or editing 
server
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 319642

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
 tags 319642 + pending
Bug#319642: anjuta: experimental version doesn't depend on experimental 
anjuta-common
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319642: anjuta: experimental version doesn't depend on experimental anjuta-common

2005-07-24 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 06:58:19PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
 Package: anjuta
 Version: 2.0.1-1
 Severity: grave
 Tags: experimental
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 experimental anjuta misses the dependency on anjuta-common from
 experimental, making anjuta come up with an empty window.
 So if you just do an
 # apt-get -t experimental install anjuta
 it is unuseable.

Yup. This bit me too, the new package is ready and i'm just waiting for
ftp-master to be back online to upload it.

Cheers,

Rob
-- 
Rob Bradford - http://robster.org.uk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319543: new kernel-package creates ridiculous symlinks in /boot

2005-07-24 Thread Robert Luberda
Hi,

I also have this problem. After installing the kernel-image created from
linux-tree-2.6.12 with kernel-package 9.003 I noted that /boot/vmlinuz
had pointed to nonexistent file -2.6 . 


Here is the contents of my /etc/kernel-img.conf:

# Do not create symbolic links in /
do_symlinks = yes
link_in_boot = yes
do_bootloader = no
do_bootfloppy = no
postinst_hook = /sbin/update-grub
postrm_hook = /sbin/update-grub

And /etc/kernel-pkg.conf:

maintainer := Robert Luberda
email := [EMAIL PROTECTED]
priority := Low
debian := 9:vox.1.0
kimage := bzImage
image_in_boot := True
config_target := menuconfig
root_cmd := fakeroot
delete_build_link := true
patch_the_kernel := AUTO

The generated  kernel-image.postinst file is mostly the same as that one: 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi/kernel-image-2.6.12.20050722.postinst?bug=319452msg=14att=1
although there're some probably unimportant differences:
25c25
 my $version   = 2.6.12.20050722;
---
 my $version   = 2.6.12;
34,35c34,35
 my $kimage= vmlinux;   # Should be empty, mostly
 my $loader= yaboot; # lilo, silo, quik, palo, vmelilo, nettrom, 
arcboot or delo
---
 my $kimage= bzImage;   # Should be empty, mostly
 my $loader= lilo; # lilo, silo, quik, palo, vmelilo, nettrom, 
 arcboot or delo
54c54
 my $arch  = powerpc; #  should be same as dpkg 
--print-installation-architecture
---
 my $arch  = i386; #  should be same as dpkg 
 --print-installation-architecture


Best Regrards,
robert


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#318261: nedit: looks like it is related to the composite feature

2005-07-24 Thread Arthur de Jong
Subject: nedit: looks like it is related to the composite feature
Followup-For: Bug #318261
Package: nedit
Version: 1:5.5-1

After having some stability problems with the composite feature nedit
suddenly started working when commenting out
  Option  Composite Enable
from the extensions section of /etc/X11/xorg.conf. So this bug has a
workaround.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-spiritus
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages nedit depends on:
ii  lesstif2  1:0.93.94-11.4 OSF/Motif 2.1 implementation relea
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m

-- 
-- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#309317: Processed: severity of 309317 is serious

2005-07-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:33:17PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
 Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
  # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
  severity 309317 serious
 Bug#309317: ocaml FTBFS with gcc-4.0 on i386
 Severity set to `serious'.

Bah, let' s just disable the native code compilation for i386 for now, and
until this problem is solved, i have already forwarded a bug report about this
to upstream, but have gotten zero reply thus far, so maybe this will move them
a bit :)

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 299623

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 299623 + confirmed pending
Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed
Tags were: fixed sarge patch
Tags added: confirmed, pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#318533: ftape-tools: FTBFS: Syntax error before '__FUNCTION__'

2005-07-24 Thread Roger Leigh
The following patch fixes all the GCC 4.0 build errors.  However, it
does need testing by an ftape user (to check old tapes still
read--there were some struct packing issues).

Regards,
Roger


diff -urN ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/debian/changelog 
ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/debian/changelog
--- ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/debian/changelog   2005-07-24 
12:10:54.0 +0100
+++ ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/debian/changelog2005-07-24 
14:13:45.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+ftape-tools (1:1.09.2002.03.21-0.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix several GCC 4.0 incompatibilies (Closes: #318533).
+- src/ftformat/ftfmt-options.c: struct opt_parms.label is a
+  u_int8_t *; add appropriate typecasts.
+- /src/ftformat/ftfmt-tapelib.c:
+  + Replace the use of the non-standard preprocessor macro
+__FUNCTION__ with the C99 __func__.
+  + Include missing stdlib.h.
+- src/ftformat/ftformat.c:
+  + Include missing stdlib.h.
+  + Add char * casts to quell signedness warnings.
+- src/ftformat/ftformat.h, src/vtblc/ftvt.h: __attribute__ ((packed))
+  must come immediately after the end of the struct definition, not
+  after the typedef name.
+- src/vtblc/libftvt.c:
+  + Add char * casts to quell signedness warnings.
+  + Add GET_SINGLE_BITFIELD_VALUE_ACTION and GET_SINGLE_BITFIELD_VALUE
+macros to replace the use of GET_SINGLE_VALUE_ACTION and
+GET_SINGLE_VALUE for bitfield values in structs.  The latter
+use the GCC typeof extension, which does not work with bifields.
+
+ -- Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:13:33 +0100
+
 ftape-tools (1:1.09.2002.03.21-0.3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Uploading with maintainer set to QA group
diff -urN ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftfmt-options.c 
ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftfmt-options.c
--- ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftfmt-options.c   
2000-07-23 14:55:40.0 +0100
+++ ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftfmt-options.c2005-07-24 
12:59:34.0 +0100
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
 #include version.h
 
 struct opt_parms opt = {
-FTAPE_DEF_LABEL,
+(u_int8_t *) FTAPE_DEF_LABEL,
 FTAPE_DEF_TAPE,
 FT_BUFF_SIZE * NR_FTAPE_BUFFERS,
 AUTO,
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
}
break;
case 'L':
-   opt.label = optarg;
+   opt.label = (u_int8_t *) optarg;
break;
case 'M':
opt.dma_size = strtol(optarg, NULL, 0);
diff -urN ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftfmt-tapelib.c 
ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftfmt-tapelib.c
--- ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftfmt-tapelib.c   
2000-07-23 23:47:59.0 +0100
+++ ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftfmt-tapelib.c2005-07-24 
12:18:25.0 +0100
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 #define MAP_FAILED (void *)(-1)
 #endif
 #include stdio.h
+#include stdlib.h
 #include unistd.h
 #include sys/stat.h
 #include fcntl.h
@@ -437,7 +438,7 @@
 
 printf(_(Writing reference bursts ... ));
 if (qic_simple_command(tape_fd, 0, QIC_ENTER_FORMAT_MODE, -1, 0, NULL)) {
-   fprintf(stderr, \n__FUNCTION__  %s, _(failed!\n));
+   fprintf(stderr, \n%s %s, __func__, _(failed!\n));
return -1;
 }
 if (qic_simple_command(tape_fd, 0, QIC_WRITE_REFERENCE_BURST, -1, 940,
@@ -445,7 +446,7 @@
return -1;
 }
 if (!(status  QIC_STATUS_REFERENCED)) {
-   fprintf(stderr, \n__FUNCTION__  %s, _(failed!\n));
+   fprintf(stderr, \n%s %s, __func__, _(failed!\n));
return -1;
 }
 printf(_(done.\n));
@@ -804,7 +805,8 @@
}
if (buf_pos == buf_end) { /* cycle */
msync_offset = 0; /* reset to start of buffer */
-   buf_start = (void*) buf_pos = buf;
+   buf_pos = buf;
+   buf_start = (void*) buf_pos;
}
 }
 /* We only sync after computing enough parameters for an entire page,
@@ -845,7 +847,7 @@
 struct mtftformat_virtual fmtc;
 
 if (qic_simple_command(tape_fd, 0, QIC_ENTER_FORMAT_MODE, -1, 0, NULL)) {
-   fprintf(stderr, __FUNCTION__  %s, _(failed!\n));
+   fprintf(stderr, %s %s, __func__, _(failed!\n)); 
return -1;
 }
 trk = 0;
diff -urN ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftformat.c 
ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftformat.c
--- ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21.original/src/ftformat/ftformat.c
2002-03-21 22:00:14.0 +
+++ ftape-tools-1.09.2002.03.21/src/ftformat/ftformat.c 2005-07-24 
13:00:26.0 +0100
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 
 #include sys/types.h
 #include stdio.h
+#include stdlib.h
 #include unistd.h
 #include string.h
 #include locale.h
@@ -202,7 +203,7 @@
exit (1);
 }
 
-if (compose_header_segment(hseg, opts.label, tpparms)) {
+if (compose_header_segment(hseg, (char *) opts.label, 

Bug#317542: aqsis: FTBFS: undefined reference to `Aqsis::CqPoolableAqsis::CqLath, 512l::m_thePool'

2005-07-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:53:47PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
 On Saturday 09 July 2005 15:27, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 
  Your package is failing to build with the following error:
  /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link i486-linux-gnu-g++  -g -O2  -o aqsis
  aqsis.o ../render/libaqsis.la ../libraytrace/libraytrace.la
  ../libargparse/libargparse.la mkdir .libs
  i486-linux-gnu-g++ -g -O2 -o .libs/aqsis
  aqsis.o  ../render/.libs/libaqsis.so ../libraytrace/.libs/libraytrace.so
  ../libargparse/.libs/libargparse.so ../render/.libs/libaqsis.so: undefined
  reference to
  `Aqsis::CqPoolableAqsis::CqLath, 512l::m_thePool'
  collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 
 Which version of gcc?

This was using the current version in unstable, which was 4.0.0-1
at the time or something.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#253816: marked as done (thttpd: username and line bufoverflow in htpasswd.c)

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:40:27 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 09:38:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 11 02:38:36 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it [212.216.176.118] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BYiUd-0006Is-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 02:38:36 -0700
Received: from npp (82.48.161.216) by vsmtp14.tin.it (7.0.027)
id 40967D65005C27FD for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:38:04 
+0200
Received: from pp by npp with local (masqmail 0.2.11) id 1BYiU4-12W-00
 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:38:00 +0200
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:38:00 +0200
From: Paolo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: thttpd: username and line bufoverflow in htpasswd.c
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: thttpd
Version: 2.21b-11.2
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Tags: patch

hello,

well, the security issue might come from htpasswd use in CGI.
Here are problems found, and hopefully fixed in patch:

* didn't check username length before doing strcpy()
* when getline() reads cpwfile, valid line length may actually be longer than
  MAX_STRING_LEN, 'cauz we have user:cpw in it.
* -c flag didn't check for existing cpwfile (well, at least I like it tell
  me before overwriting...)
* sanity check: cpwfile must be writeable when changing/adding lines

patch follows inline to comply with reportbug warning ;)
WFM

oh, btw, that's actually from 2.23beta1 (latest?), not the one on my pc.

8---[thtpasswd.diff, 2.23beta1]--
--- thtpasswd.orig.cFri Jun 11 09:07:23 2004
+++ thtpasswd.c Fri Jun 11 08:45:15 2004
@@ -21,7 +21,12 @@
 #define LF 10
 #define CR 13
 
+#define CPW_LEN 13
+
+/* ie 'string' + '\0' */
 #define MAX_STRING_LEN 256
+/* ie 'maxstring' + ':' + cpassword */
+#define MAX_LINE_LEN MAX_STRING_LEN+1+CPW_LEN
 
 int tfd;
 char temp_template[] = /tmp/htp.XX;
@@ -137,8 +142,9 @@
 }
 
 static void usage(void) {
-fprintf(stderr,Usage: htpasswd [-c] passwordfile username\n);
-fprintf(stderr,The -c flag creates a new file.\n);
+fprintf(stderr,Usage: htpasswd [-c] passwordfile username\n
+   The -c flag creates a new file.\n
+   Will prompt for password, unless given on stdin.\n);
 exit(1);
 }
 
@@ -151,17 +157,37 @@
 int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
 FILE *tfp,*f;
 char user[MAX_STRING_LEN];
-char line[MAX_STRING_LEN];
-char l[MAX_STRING_LEN];
+char line[MAX_LINE_LEN];
+char l[MAX_LINE_LEN];
 char w[MAX_STRING_LEN];
 char command[MAX_STRING_LEN];
-int found;
+int found,u;
 
 tfd = -1;
+u = 2; /* argv[u] is username, unless...  */
 signal(SIGINT,(void (*)(int))interrupted);
 if(argc == 4) {
+u = 3;
 if(strcmp(argv[1],-c))
 usage();
+if((f=fopen(argv[2],r)) != NULL) {
+  fclose(f);
+ fprintf(stderr,
+Password file %s already exists.\n
+   Delete it first, if you really want to overwrite it.\n,
+   argv[2]);
+ exit(1);
+   }
+} else if(argc != 3) usage();
+/* check uname length; underlying system will take care of pwdfile
+   name too long */
+if (strlen(argv[u]) = MAX_STRING_LEN) {
+  fprintf(stderr,Username too long (max %i): %s\n,
+  MAX_STRING_LEN-1, argv[u]);
+  exit(1);
+}
+
+if(argc == 4) {
 if(!(tfp = fopen(argv[2],w))) {
 fprintf(stderr,Could not open passwd file %s for writing.\n,
 argv[2]);
@@ -172,12 +198,6 @@
 add_password(argv[3],tfp);
 fclose(tfp);
 exit(0);
-} else if(argc != 3) usage();
-
-tfd = mkstemp(temp_template);
-if(!(tfp = fdopen(tfd,w))) {
-fprintf(stderr,Could not open temp file.\n);
-exit(1);
 }

Bug#319754: kernel-source-2.6.11: missing header files + syntax errors

2005-07-24 Thread augh62
Package: kernel-source-2.6.11
Version: 2.6.11-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Here is the output of make menuconfig


  HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:105:23: error: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:106:22: error: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:107:22: error: sys/mman.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/unistd.h:26,
 from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:108:
/usr/include/features.h:295:25: error: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/bits/types.h:31,
 from /usr/include/unistd.h:186,
 from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:108:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.1/include/stddef.h:214: error: syntax error 
before 'typedef'
In file included from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:108:
/usr/include/unistd.h:256: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:286: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:369: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:378: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:398: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:419: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:423: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:429: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:434: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:438: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:448: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:461: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:466: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:469: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:481: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:492: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:496: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:500: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:504: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:509: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:514: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
In file included from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:108:
/usr/include/unistd.h:528: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:531: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:534: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:538: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:543: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:546: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:551: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:561: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:570: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:587: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:605: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:613: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:616: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:619: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:622: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:627: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:638: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:643: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:648: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:655: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:660: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:665: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:690: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:697: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:703: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:707: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:711: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:717: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:722: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:726: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:732: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:736: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:739: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:743: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:746: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
/usr/include/unistd.h:766: error: syntax error before '__THROW'
In file included from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:109:
/usr/include/fcntl.h:29: error: syntax error before '__BEGIN_DECLS'
In file included from /usr/include/fcntl.h:33,
 from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:109:
/usr/include/bits/fcntl.h:136: error: syntax error before 'struct'
In file included from scripts/basic/fixdep.c:110:
/usr/include/string.h:28: error: syntax error before '__BEGIN_DECLS'
In file included from 

Bug#216677: marked as done (thttpd buffer overflow)

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:44:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2003 12:30:41 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 20 07:30:24 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl-217-155-7-193.zen.co.uk (sirius.otherwize.co.uk) 
[217.155.7.193] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ABZB1-0006HM-00; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:30:23 -0500
Received: (qmail 14248 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2003 12:30:15 -
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:30:15 +0100
From: David Leadbeater [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: thttpd buffer overflow
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: thttpd
Version: 2.21b-11
Severity: grave

The following patch was posted on the thttpd mailing list,
however another release of thttpd has not been made for it.
It is quite serious as anyone can crash thttpd (it should
be quite obvious how).

It would be nice to see the patch applied to thttpd in debian:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=thttpdm=106401027904049


---
Received: (at 216677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 15:44:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 08:44:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from panthera-systems.net [213.239.209.134] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DwieO-0008C6-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:44:25 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (217-162-105-182.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.105.182])
by panthera-systems.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E7E2DC012
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:42:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:44:22 +0200
From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Panthera Systems
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Bug fixed since several revisions ago.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 319218

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 319218 pending
Bug#319218: postgresql-8.0: ftbfs [sparc] initializing pg_shadow ... sh: line 
1: 22871 Bus error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319758: pstotext: arbitrary postscript code execution

2005-07-24 Thread Max Vozeler
Package: pstotext
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: remote code execution
Tags: security woody sarge etch sid patch

Hi Ray,

we've already talked about this, I'm just filing it to keep track.
Please refer to message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(sent to maintainer and security team) for all details.

Quick description: pstotext calls the ghostscript interpreter on
untrusted postscript without specifying the -dSAFER option. Not running
under -dSAFER allows postscript code to do file IO and to open pipes to
arbitrary external programs, including /bin/sh. 

I'm filing this as a grave bug since pstotext is listed in mailcap and
used to display postscript by several programs, including for example 
mutt. An attacker who knows that one is using a mail program that uses
mailcap could exploit this bug by sending malicious postscript as email
attachment and tricking the user into viewing it.

This bug affects oldstable, stable, testing and sid (as of 1.9-1). 

cheers,
Max
--- pstotext-1.9/main.c~2005-06-02 15:42:33.754177096 +0200
+++ pstotext-1.9/main.c 2005-06-02 15:45:20.412084016 +0200
@@ -231,9 +231,9 @@
   sprintf(
 gs_cmdline,
 #ifdef VMS
-%s -r72 \-dNODISPLAY\ \-dFIXEDMEDIA\ \-dDELAYBIND\ 
\-dWRITESYSTEMDICT\ %s \-dNOPAUSE\ %s %s %s,
+%s -r72 \-dNODISPLAY\ \-dFIXEDMEDIA\ \-dDELAYBIND\ 
\-dWRITESYSTEMDICT\ %s \-dNOPAUSE\ \-dSAFER\ %s %s %s,
 #else
-%s -r72 -dNODISPLAY -dFIXEDMEDIA -dDELAYBIND -dWRITESYSTEMDICT %s 
-dNOPAUSE %s %s %s,
+%s -r72 -dNODISPLAY -dFIXEDMEDIA -dDELAYBIND -dWRITESYSTEMDICT %s 
-dNOPAUSE -dSAFER %s %s %s,
 #endif
 gs_cmd,
 (debug ?  : -q),


Processed: Re: kernel-source-2.6.11: missing header files + syntax errors

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 319754 normal
Bug#319754: kernel-source-2.6.11: missing header files + syntax errors
Severity set to `normal'.

 tags 319754 moreinfo
Bug#319754: kernel-source-2.6.11: missing header files + syntax errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319754: kernel-source-2.6.11: missing header files + syntax errors

2005-07-24 Thread Jurij Smakov

severity 319754 normal
tags 319754 moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

The missing files come from the libc6-dev package, which should be 
installed as a dependency of build-essential package, providing minimum 
sane development environment. Please install build-essential and retry, 
that should solve the problem.


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#319758: pstotext: arbitrary postscript code execution

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 319758 + upstream
Bug#319758: pstotext: arbitrary postscript code execution
Tags were: etch patch sarge security sid woody
Tags added: upstream

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319560: FTBFS: Invalid casts between pthread_t and long unsigned int

2005-07-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 12:49:21PM +0200, Juergen Salk wrote:
 This is a known problem with gcc/g++ 4.0, which has been fixed in 
 upcoming version 3.5.3-4. The new version has already been uploaded 
 at 21 July but still waits for manual approval by the FTP masters, 
 because of the new -c2 library package (gcc 4 transition). So please 
 be patient for a few days.
...
 PS: I will close this bug, once -4 arrived in the archive.

That's excellent news.  Thanks for the good work.

-- 
Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#317070: FTBFS: Fails upgrade read-only archives test

2005-07-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:07:54PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:04:03PM -0700, Matt Kraai said
  Package: bazaar
  Version: 1.4.2-1
  Severity: serious
  
  The bazaar source package failed to build from source because the
  upgrade read-only archive test failed:
  
   Test 4: upgrade read-only archives
   Upgrading configuration for registered name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Test 4: FAILED: the readonly flag is not set.
   make[3]: *** [tests-timestamp] Error 1
   make[3]: Leaving directory 
  `/tmp/buildd/bazaar-1.4.2/debian/build/baz/tests'
   make[2]: *** [test] Error 2
   make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/bazaar-1.4.2/debian/build/baz'
   make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
   make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/bazaar-1.4.2/debian/build'
   make: *** [debian/build-stamp] Error 2
  
  Here are the contents of
  ~/.arch-params/archives/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   # This ini file controls the configuration for one archive -
   # The archive is named by the same name as the name of this file
   url=/tmp/buildd/bazaar-1.4.2/debian/build/baz/tests/archivedir/foo-archive 
  master
  
  As you can see, it doesn't contain the readonly keyword.
 
 I'm pretty sure I've seen this 'bug' before when using pbuilder...did
 you use sudo to build it?  does it build ok if you use fakeroot instead?

Yes, I used sudo and pbuilder.  I'm not sure how to use fakeroot with
pbuilder.

-- 
Matt


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: version tracking fixups, following a fix to debbugs

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 found 299789 0.5-1
Bug#299789: knockd: please add logrotate script
Bug marked as found in version 0.5-1.

 found 315339 2.01.12-2
Bug#315339: installation of lvm2 renders vg's unusable
Bug marked as found in version 2.01.12-2.

 found 316089 3.65
Bug#316089: exim4-config - fails to install if system uses no shadow
Bug#317944: amavis-ng: Fails to install if shadow passwords not enabled
Bug marked as found in version 3.65.

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: libapache2-request-perl: Upload is broken. Only one upload can be retrieved

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 318290 + pending
Bug#318290: libapache2-request-perl: Upload is broken. Only one upload can be 
retrieved
Tags were: sarge patch
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS

2005-07-24 Thread dann frazier
Package: dx
Version: 1:4.3.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Here's the tail of a failed buildlog produced with pbuilder:

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
-I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
CreateMacroDialog.o `test -f 'CreateMacroDialog.C' || echo 
'./'`CreateMacroDialog.C
CreateMacroDialog.C: In member function 'virtual _WidgetRec* 
CreateMacroDialog::createDialog(_WidgetRec*)':
CreateMacroDialog.C:197: warning: unused variable 'nameLabel'
CreateMacroDialog.C:220: warning: unused variable 'categoryLabel'
CreateMacroDialog.C:245: warning: unused variable 'descriptionLabel'
CreateMacroDialog.C:270: warning: unused variable 'filenameLabel'
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
-I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
DXAnchorWindow.o `test -f 'DXAnchorWindow.C' || echo './'`DXAnchorWindow.C
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
-I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
DXApplication.o `test -f 'DXApplication.C' || echo './'`DXApplication.C
In file included from 
/usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/stream.h:31,
 from DXApplication.C:28:
/usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
 warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated 
header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 
of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h 
header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header 
iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
/usr/include/sys/ucontext.h:49: error: array bound is not an integer constant
DXApplication.C: In member function 'virtual boolean 
DXApplication::initialize(unsigned int*, char**)':
DXApplication.C:2264: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer 
expressions
DXApplication.C:2617: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer 
expressions
make[5]: *** [DXApplication.o] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp/dxuilib'
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp/dxuilib'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-mckinley
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid

2005-07-24 Thread Francois Gurin
Package: sfs-common
Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



SFS packages have a dependency on libgmp3 which is not available on sid.
It has been replaced with libgmp3c2.

--francois


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1999, 'testing'), (991, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages sfs-common depends on:
ii  adduser  3.63Add and remove users and groups
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-22GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-13  GCC support library
ii  libgmp3  4.1.4-6 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libsfs0  1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1 Self-Certifying File System shared
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-13  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  nfs-common   1:1.0.6-3.1 NFS support files common to client

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319346: i386 upload built with experimental's libc6

2005-07-24 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi,

On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 14:26 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
  The 1.36.59-3 version of libsidplay was uploaded for i386 with a libc6
  dep on version 2.3.5-2, currently in experimental.  libsidplay was
  built on all other arches nicely.  I suppose a binary NMU for i386 is
  enough to solve this issue.
 Thanks for noticing it, my mistake. I would like to correct it for some
days now. But as ftp-master is down, I still can not upload my
version. :-( As tomorrow I have to travel away, I do not know if I can
upload meanwhile or not, but I hope so.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS




Processed: tagging 319771

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
 tags 319771 sid
Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#303040: marked as done (cnews: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'bfincache' follows non-static declaration)

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:56:33 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Apr 2005 11:29:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 04 04:29:13 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c214125.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) 
[213.39.214.125] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIPlY-0001vc-00; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:29:12 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DIPlW-0006nJ-T1; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:29:10 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cnews: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'bfincache' 
follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 13:29:10 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cnews
Version: cr.g7-38
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hello,

Thank you for applying the gcc-4.0 related changes.

There is now only one small issue with gcc-4.0 left:

cc  -O2  -DFASTSTRCHR -I../include   -c -o trbatch.o trbatch.c
trbatch.c:26: error: static declaration of 'bfincache' follows non-static 
declaration
../include/trbatch.h:31: error: previous declaration of 'bfincache' was here
trbatch.c:27: error: static declaration of 'bfrclose' follows non-static 
declaration
../include/trbatch.h:30: error: previous declaration of 'bfrclose' was here
trbatch.c: In function 'hfinstall':
trbatch.c:78: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 
'memset'
make[2]: *** [trbatch.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/cnews-cr.g7/explode'

With the attached patch 'cnews' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/cnews-cr.g7/include/trbatch.h ./include/trbatch.h
--- ../tmp-orig/cnews-cr.g7/include/trbatch.h   2005-04-04 13:23:43.952160020 
+0200
+++ ./include/trbatch.h 2005-04-04 13:23:40.897732710 +0200
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
 extern statust bffkclose();
 extern int bfflush();
 /* imports from trbatcomm.c */
-extern statust bfclose(), bfrclose();
-extern struct batchfile *bfincache(), *fakebf();
+extern statust bfclose();
+extern struct batchfile *fakebf();
 
 extern struct batchfile batchfile[];   /* try to keep open always */
 #define lastbf batchfile[NOPENBFS-1]

---
Received: (at 303040-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 20:00:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 13:00:56 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dwmee-00049e-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:00:56 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id 
j6OK0tMu010230
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:00:55 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j6OJuXeM021263
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:56:33 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6OJuX9p021261
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:56:33 -0700
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:56:33 -0700
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bug fixed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Version: cr.g7-39

Typo in changelog prevented closing.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS

2005-07-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:57:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
 Package: dx
 Version: 1:4.3.2-5
 Severity: serious
 Justification: no longer builds from source

 Here's the tail of a failed buildlog produced with pbuilder:

 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
 -I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
 CreateMacroDialog.o `test -f 'CreateMacroDialog.C' || echo 
 './'`CreateMacroDialog.C
 CreateMacroDialog.C: In member function 'virtual _WidgetRec* 
 CreateMacroDialog::createDialog(_WidgetRec*)':
 CreateMacroDialog.C:197: warning: unused variable 'nameLabel'
 CreateMacroDialog.C:220: warning: unused variable 'categoryLabel'
 CreateMacroDialog.C:245: warning: unused variable 'descriptionLabel'
 CreateMacroDialog.C:270: warning: unused variable 'filenameLabel'
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
 -I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
 DXAnchorWindow.o `test -f 'DXAnchorWindow.C' || echo './'`DXAnchorWindow.C
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
 -I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
 DXApplication.o `test -f 'DXApplication.C' || echo './'`DXApplication.C
 In file included from 
 /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/stream.h:31,
  from DXApplication.C:28:
 /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
  warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated 
 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 
 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the 
 X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header 
 iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
 /usr/include/sys/ucontext.h:49: error: array bound is not an integer constant
 DXApplication.C: In member function 'virtual boolean 
 DXApplication::initialize(unsigned int*, char**)':
 DXApplication.C:2264: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer 
 expressions
 DXApplication.C:2617: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer 
 expressions
 make[5]: *** [DXApplication.o] Error 1
 make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp/dxuilib'
 make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp/dxuilib'
 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src/uipp'
 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2/src'
 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dannf/debian/dx-4.3.2'
 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

This is a broken system include file on ia64, not a bug in dx.  Should be
fixed as soon as the new glibc is uploaded to unstable.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319772: dx: FTBFS

2005-07-24 Thread Daniel Kobras
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 11:57:38AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../include -I./../base -I../../../include 
 -I./../dxui -Dlinux  -I/usr/include-Wall -g -fsigned-char -O2  -c -o 
 DXApplication.o `test -f 'DXApplication.C' || echo './'`DXApplication.C
 In file included from 
 /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/stream.h:31,
  from DXApplication.C:28:
 /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../include/c++/4.0.1/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2:
  warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated 
 header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 
 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the 
 X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header 
 iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
 /usr/include/sys/ucontext.h:49: error: array bound is not an integer constant

This is #318429 in libc6.1-dev. It's fixed in glibc in experimental, and
there is a patch for the glibc version in sid. As this bug seems to
affect quite a number of C++ apps, I'd rather not work around it in dx.

Regards,

Daniel.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319791: gconf terribly wastes /etc space

2005-07-24 Thread debbug2
Package: gconf2
Version: 2.10.1-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

gconf terribly wastes disk- and backupspace in /etc with 
default files that definitely do not belong in /etc. On 
my system /etc/gconf became 36 MB large, which is sort of sick. 
Whoever puts 36 MB of default files in /etc didn't understand the unix
file system structure.

These things belong to /usr/share or /usr/lib.

Interestingly the same problem was reported almost two years ago 
(Bug 227726), but completely ignored. 


Please stop dumping megabytes of default files into /etc.

Hadmut


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319527: qemu: FTBFS on i386

2005-07-24 Thread Octavian Cerna
[Reinhard Tartler]
 It got built now on i386 and amd64. It stills FTBFS for ppc, but this
 seems to be an issue with binutils:

[Octavian Cerna]
 For PPC you can try the following patch, already applied to Qemu CVS:
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2005-06/msg4.html

[Sebastian Dröge]
 The patch to the ppc linker script doesn't work for me on my ibook with
 binutils 2.16,etc on breezy. I get the same error as without the patch
 [...]
 /usr/bin/ld: qemu-i386: Not enough room for program headers (allocated
 8, need 9 )
 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value

[Roger Leigh]
 It also fails on Debian/powerpc:
 [...]
 /usr/bin/ld: qemu-i386: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 8, 
 need 9)
 /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value

Thank you for reporting the build failures on PowerPC.

It seems that the patch from qemu-devel is not enough to fix the
problem.

Attached is the second version of my patch, against qemu_0.7.0-2:

 * debian/control (Build-Depends): add missing zlib1g-dev,
   depend on gcc-3.4, depend on binutils-2.16 for the updated
   ppc linker script
 * debian/rules: compile with gcc-3.4
 * debian/patches/02_fix_librt_linkage.patch: link with librt
   for clock_gettime (Reinhard Tartler)
 * debian/patches/34_syscalls_types.patch: new, fix compile error
   with linux-kernel-headers 2.6.12 (it's a hack:
   include linux/types.h before any other glibc header)
 * debian/patches/41_ppc_ldscript.patch: new, update the ppc linker
   script from /usr/lib/ldscripts/elf32ppclinux.x in binutils-2.16

With this patch I was able to build and run qemu on an uptodate Debian
sid emulated by qemu-system-ppc.

Octavian
diff -urN qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/control qemu-0.7.0/debian/control
--- qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/control  2005-07-23 01:13:01.488124413 +0300
+++ qemu-0.7.0/debian/control   2005-07-24 22:58:45.240500629 +0300
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian QEMU Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Uploaders: Guilherme de S. Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillem Jover [EMAIL 
PROTECTED], Elrond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), libx11-dev | xlibs-dev, 
libsdl1.2-dev ( 1.2.1), texi2html, sharutils, libgpmg1-dev [amd64 i386 
powerpc alpha sparc arm s390]
+Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 4.1.0), gcc-3.4, binutils (= 2.16), 
libx11-dev | xlibs-dev, libsdl1.2-dev ( 1.2.1), zlib1g-dev, texi2html, 
sharutils, libgpmg1-dev [amd64 i386 powerpc alpha sparc arm s390]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1.1
 
 Package: qemu
diff -urN qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/02_fix_librt_linkage.patch 
qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/02_fix_librt_linkage.patch
--- qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/02_fix_librt_linkage.patch   1970-01-01 
02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/02_fix_librt_linkage.patch2005-07-24 
21:55:41.816348746 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#DPATCHLEVEL=1
+--- qemu-0.7.0.orig/Makefile.target2005-04-27 20:52:05.0 +
 qemu-0.7.0/Makefile.target 2005-07-23 11:07:19.449003328 +
+@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
+ #
+ 
+ DEFINES+=-D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
+-LIBS+=-lm
++LIBS+=-lm -lrt
+ ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+ LIBS+=-lz
+ endif
diff -urN qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/34_syscalls_types.patch 
qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/34_syscalls_types.patch
--- qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/34_syscalls_types.patch  1970-01-01 
02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/34_syscalls_types.patch   2005-07-24 
21:55:41.817348539 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+#DPATCHLEVEL=0
+--- linux-user/syscall.c.orig  2005-07-23 01:55:22.169404147 +0300
 linux-user/syscall.c   2005-07-23 01:52:31.157924629 +0300
+@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
+  *  along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+  *  Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+  */
++#include linux/types.h
+ #include stdlib.h
+ #include stdio.h
+ #include stdarg.h
diff -urN qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/41_ppc_ldscript.patch 
qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/41_ppc_ldscript.patch
--- qemu-0.7.0-orig/debian/patches/41_ppc_ldscript.patch1970-01-01 
02:00:00.0 +0200
+++ qemu-0.7.0/debian/patches/41_ppc_ldscript.patch 2005-07-24 
21:55:41.817348539 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+#DPATCHLEVEL=0
+--- ppc.ld.old 2005-07-24 01:10:38.705795341 +0300
 ppc.ld 2005-07-24 01:01:45.0 +0300
+@@ -1,106 +1,190 @@
+-/* ld script to make i386 Linux kernel
+- * Written by Martin Mares [EMAIL PROTECTED];
+- */
+-OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf32-powerpc, elf32-powerpc, elf32-powerpc)
+-OUTPUT_ARCH(powerpc)
+-SEARCH_DIR(/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/local/lib); 
SEARCH_DIR(/usr/alpha-unknown-linux-gnu/lib);
++/* Default linker script, for normal executables */
++OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf32-powerpc, elf32-powerpc,
++elf32-powerpc)
++OUTPUT_ARCH(powerpc:common)
+ ENTRY(_start)
++SEARCH_DIR(/usr/powerpc-linux-gnu/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/local/lib); 
SEARCH_DIR(/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib);

Bug#319790: gconf terribly wastes /etc space

2005-07-24 Thread debbug2
Package: gconf
Version: 1.0.9-7
Severity: serious

Hi,

gconf terribly wastes disk- and backupspace in /etc with 
default files that definitely do not belong in /etc. On 
my system /etc/gconf became 36 MB large, which is sort of sick. 
Whoever puts 36 MB of default files in /etc didn't understand the unix
file system structure.

These things belong to /usr/share or /usr/lib.

Interestingly the same problem was reported almost two years ago 
(Bug 227726), but completely ignored. 


Please stop dumping megabytes of default files into /etc.

Hadmut


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#315703: marked as done (cacti: remote vulnerabilities (CAN 2005-{1524,1525,1526}))

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line security fixes available in all releases now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2005 05:00:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 22:00:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net) 
[66.92.235.113] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dm2mO-00066n-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:00:32 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8316715844; Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:59:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 00:59:58 -0400
From: seanius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cacti: vulnerable to remote exploit
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6d-1
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge
Justification: root security hole

Multiple Vendor Cacti Remote File Inclusion Vulnerability:
 http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=265type=vulnerabilities

Multiple Vendor Cacti config_settings.php Remote Code Execution Vulnerability:
 http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=266type=vulnerabilities

Multiple Vendor Cacti Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities:
 http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=267type=vulnerabilities

note that these can not by themselves gain root access on a system,
though they have been reported to be used to leverage root on sarge
systems.

an update has been sitting on my p.d.o site since last friday, but
there has not yet been a security upload.  i'll send the latest i mailed
to folks as an update to this bug.


sean

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii  apache   1.3.33-6versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache-ssl   1.3.33-6versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  debconf  1.4.50  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libphp-adodb 4.52-1  The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii  logrotate3.7-5   Log rotation utility
ii  mysql-client-4.1 [mysql-clie 4.1.11a-4   mysql database client binaries
ii  php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql   4:4.3.10-15 MySQL module for php4
ii  php4-snmp4:4.3.10-15 SNMP module for php4
ii  rrdtool  1.0.49-1Time-series data storage and displ
ii  snmp 5.1.2-6.1   NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  ucf  1.18Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information excluded


---
Received: (at 315703-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 21:23:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 14:23:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net) 
[66.92.235.113] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DwnwG-0006fT-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:23:12 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 22E3115834; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400
From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: security fixes available in all releases now
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 

Bug#317543: arson: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' with no type

2005-07-24 Thread Mike Markley
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 04:44:20PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 /usr/include/kde/kactioncollection.h:242: error: ISO C++ forbids
 declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' with no type
 /usr/include/kde/kactioncollection.h:242: error: expected ';' before '*'
 token
 /usr/include/kde/kactioncollection.h:345: error: expected ',' or '...'
 before '*' token
 /usr/include/kde/kactioncollection.h:345: error: ISO C++ forbids
 declaration of 'KXMLGUIClient' with no type

It may well be, but I honestly don't know how to confirm that. Certainly
KXMLGUIClient appears nowhere in the arson source, so it's either
a kdelibs bug or arson is doing something it shouldn't with the headers.

-- 
Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#316590: marked as done (cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005 052005))

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line security fixes available in all releases now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2005 05:06:47 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 22:06:47 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net) 
[66.92.235.113] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoaDH-0002Aj-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 22:06:47 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3673B15844; Sat,  2 Jul 2005 01:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sean Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cacti: further security vulnerabilities (php-hardened 032005 042005 
052005)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:06:15 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cacti
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

for more information: http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_0_8_6f.php

i will be preparing an update this weekend.

sean

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii  apache1.3.33-2   Versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  apache-ssl1.3.33-2   Versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  debconf   1.4.22 Debian configuration management sy
ii  mysql-client  4.0.24-1   mysql database client binaries
ii  php4-cgi  4:4.3.4-4  A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip
ii  php4-mysql4:4.3.4-4  MySQL module for php4
ii  rrdtool   1.0.49-1   Time-series data storage and displ
ii  snmp  5.1.2-6NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  wwwconfig-common  0.0.41 Debian web auto configuration

- -- debconf information excluded

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCxiDHynjLPm522B0RAlBzAJ0bKFlrQPzYdgbOWJ0zrFEG0Q6MNQCfRuaq
O8kqgUxudFLJdeVQEyXrXqE=
=+/Lu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 316590-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 21:23:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 14:23:12 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (sativa.seanius.net) 
[66.92.235.113] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DwnwG-0006fT-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:23:12 -0700
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 22E3115834; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:22:34 -0400
From: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: security fixes available in all releases now
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

so i'm closing these bugs.

--=20

--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC5AaaynjLPm522B0RAtcrAJ45mQXwszwTUaOaqsj3L1QuzVloQQCcDgfL
NYjMqgsro0VCt0bzhdTWOYs=

Bug#312267: marked as done (t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch))

2005-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:21:43 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line t1lib-old no longer exists
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jun 2005 21:44:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 06 14:44:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blabluga.hell.pl [62.121.102.27] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfPOa-000200-00; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:44:32 -0700
Received: from arturcz by blabluga.hell.pl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DfPON-0001a7-Mv; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:44:19 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Artur R. Czechowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t1lib-old: This package should not be released in next stable (etch)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 23:44:18 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: t1lib-old
Severity: serious
Tags: sid etch

The t1lib 1.3.x is na old and upstream unsupported version of library.
This package will be - sooner or later - scheduled for remove from
Debian.

If you are an admin/user which has locally built any software depending on
t1lib 1.3.1 you should remove the t1lib-dev package, install libt1-dev
instead and rebuild the software. It may or may not require changes
in source code of involved software. Please see the documentation
in /usr/share/doc/libt1-dev directory.

If you are a maintainer of Debian package (see below) that has a
build-dependency on t1lib-dev you should rebuild your package according
to the submitted bugreports.

At the moment of submitting this bug, there are still some packages 
with build-dependency on t1lib-dev. All of them has submitted the
bugreport with attached patches:
 - gfontview, Steve Haslam [EMAIL PROTECTED], #251178
 - tex-guy, Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED], #251181
 - ttf2pt1, Anthony Fok [EMAIL PROTECTED], #251182
 - ultrapoint, Takuo KITAME [EMAIL PROTECTED], #251183
 - vflib3, Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) [EMAIL PROTECTED], #251184

Regards
Artur

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11blbl
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

---
Received: (at 312267-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2005 22:26:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 24 15:26:27 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from s2.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org) [217.158.120.143] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DwovT-0001Op-00; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:26:27 -0700
Received: from localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5145CE6DC3
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:25:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (lucy.ukfsn.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 13958-12 for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:25:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org 
(dsl-80-41-11-182.access.as9105.com [80.41.11.182])
by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EDFE6D9B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:25:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from rleigh by hardknott.home.whinlatter.ukfsn.org with local (Exim 
4.52)
id 1Dwoqt-0006rN-Dq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:21:43 +0100
From: Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t1lib-old no longer exists
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:21:43 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 

Bug#318362: FTBFS: Regression tests fail

2005-07-24 Thread Martin Buck
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
 apcalc fails to build because its regression tests fail:

A bit more information about your build environment would have been useful,
but it seems like this is caused by gcc 4.0. I'll try to find out what
excatly is going wrong and either fix this in apcalc or (more likely)
report a bug against gcc. In the meantime, using gcc 3.4 is a possible
workaround.

Martin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#319833: Please rebuild against new version of fam

2005-07-24 Thread Mike Furr
Package: gnome-vfs2
Severity: serious

libgnomevfs2-common has a dep on libfam0c102.  However, libfam0c102 has
been replaced by libfam0 as part of the C++ transition.  Therefore
gnome-vfs2 and all of its rdeps are uninstallable with the new version
of fam.  Please upload a new version of gnome-vfs2 that has the updated
library in ${shlibs:Depends}. 


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]