Bug#320357: [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable

[Helge Kreutzmann]

Hello Lucas,
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:22:17PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
> Helge Kreutzmann wrote, On 29/07/05 13:30:
> > Well, I don't think so. I read in your changelog:
> >   - new upstream patch because of security issue CAN-2005-2335
> > 
> > There is no mention of a bug in the BTS here (no closes#). The machine
> > I reported from is a woody without fetchmail. But I think you can add
> > the proper version in retrorespect as well?
> 
> I was takling about this:
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg00010.html
> 
> And the original changelog entry is in version 6.2.5-15
> 
> - fixed buffer overrun in pop3 UIDs handling CAN-2005-2335
>   http://fetchmail.berlios.de/fetchmail-SA-2005-01.txt
>   (closes: #212762)
> 
> Upstream made a second (better) patch and we applied it on version
> 6.2.5-16 (the changelog entry you quoted).

Sorry, I did not see the earlier entry. I went reverse in history and
saw that entry without a bug number, hence I assumed that you took the
fix directly from upstream without a Debian BTS entry.

Please handle this bug appropriately (I am not sure exactly what the
proper way is using the version tracking).

Thanks for maintaining fetchmail.

Greetings

   Helge

-- 
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   gpg signed mail preferred 
64bit GNU powered  http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
  Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


pgphRaGmMizx6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#320555: marked as done (gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires /usr/lib/libgcj.spec from non-dependent libgcj6-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320555: gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires 
/usr/lib/libgcj.spec from non-dependent libgcj6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 06:19:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 23:19:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DykhP-0007dJ-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:19:55 -0700
Received: from firiesen.local 
(c-67-171-100-185.hsd1.pa.comcast.net[67.171.100.185])
  by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP
  id <2005073006192401400jdm5je>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:19:24 +
Received: by firiesen.local (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id AEC73D77B; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires /usr/lib/libgcj.spec from non-dependent
 libgcj6-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:19:23 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

gcj-4.0 requires the file /usr/lib/libgcj.spec from libgcj6-dev. Either
this file should be repackaged into libgcj6 or gcj-4.0 should depend on
libgcj6-dev. (I suggest the former.)

Without this file, gcj errors out when run:
gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

---
Received: (at 320555-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 07:14:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 00:14:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DylY9-0008EN-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:14:25 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08007;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:23 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CA0FC3D;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:22 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 03358-48; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:21 +0200 (MEST) 11342
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6U7EK96024939;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:14:20 +0200
To: Ray Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#320555: gcc-defaults: gcj-4.0 requires /usr/lib/libgcj.spec 
from non-dependent libgcj6-dev
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Ray Kohler writes:
> Package: gcc-defaults
> Version: 4.0.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
> 
> gcj-4.0 requires the file /usr/lib/libgcj.spec from libgcj6-dev. Either

Bug#319929: nsis: 2.08-2 better, but some still fail

[Paul Wise]

reopen 319929
found 319929 2.08-2
thanks

On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 01:23 +0200, bholliger wrote:

> InstallOptions.dll is not usable on Windows. The dialog is not coming up.

Hmm, I'll investigate this tomorrow.

> filefunc.exe, logiclib.exe, textfunc.exe and textfunctest.exe produces
> gpf's when compiled with linux-compiled zlib-stub. Windows stub works.

None of these can be compiled using the default install, do you still
have the System.dll from 2.07 installed? Do the other Linux stubs
produce the same result? Any other clues? I'll investigate more
tomorrow.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Paul+Wise&comaint=yes


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#76918: Medical problems

[Arnold Fischer]

Don't be jealous of your friends, enhance your erections now

Feeling great is around the corner!

Enhance your erections http://superchaplevitra.com/?cid-vig_txt01

good bye

Freeman Calhoun
Phone: 711-179-4416
Mobile: 981-817-4259
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



N.V.R http://superchapcialis.com/pleasestop.php


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#320559: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libxinerama-dev

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 320559 important
Bug#320559: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libxinerama-dev
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319381: marked as done (1.0.6 on amd64: where is the gui?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 17:47:33 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 10:47:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dvf8u-0003XW-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:47:33 -0700
Received: from fwd19.aul.t-online.de 
by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
id 1Dvf8t-0003So-04; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:47:31 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fwd19.sul.t-online.de
with esmtp id 1Dvf8i-0PsnQG0; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:47:20 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 19:47:16 +0200
From: Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050611)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 1.0.6 on amd64: where is the gui?
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="enigC16B3253ACC6CF9EAB0D760A"
X-ID: ZSVz9EZ1ge-vBhHGZ6-K5U9QiBi8g5xA8t9v0GjTAyQSq7IMv7e3cG
X-TOI-MSGID: d45785e6-92b7-400c-99c9-44ec717a69c6
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--enigC16B3253ACC6CF9EAB0D760A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.6-1

On amd64:

After the upgrade to version 1.0.6-1 firefox does not work anymore.
It just sits there and does nothing. There is no gui.

Workaround: Move back to 1.0.5-1


Regards

Harri



--enigC16B3253ACC6CF9EAB0D760A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC39+oUTlbRTxpHjcRApZRAJ4iiuk+cMbHOdQ+jBYLD0gASKKOlgCfea4e
0cMC25TFr5vRBVteUUw/jvU=
=UuE9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--enigC16B3253ACC6CF9EAB0D760A--

---
Received: (at 319336-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 07:57:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 00:57:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dym3v-0007S8-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: mozilla-firefox
Source-Version: 1.0.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mozilla-firefox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
mozilla-firefox-gnome-support_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-gnome-support_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2.diff.gz
mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2.dsc
mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox_1.0.6-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer wil

Bug#319336: marked as done (mozilla-firefox: firefox crash when I click on refresh button)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319336: fixed in mozilla-firefox 1.0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 11:11:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 04:11:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvYxS-0006hn-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:11:19 -0700
Received: from 4be54-1-81-56-96-78.fbx.proxad.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[81.56.96.78] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DvYxR-0001WO-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 06:11:17 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: moi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla-firefox: firefox crash when I click on refresh button
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:13:08 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE,OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: normal

The lest version of firefox (1.0.6) crash on any site if I try to reload
the page. (for example www.google.com).
It doen't crash if I am on a black page.
I don't forget to restart firefox after the upgrade.
I don't use macromedia flash but libflash0 (the GPL flash plugin)
I use the default theme.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages mozilla-firefox depends on:
ii  debianutils   2.14.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  fontconfig2.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.1-2   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-2  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libidl0   0.8.5-1library for parsing CORBA IDL file
ii  libjpeg62 6b-10  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libkrb53  1.3.6-4MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++64.0.1-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxinerama1  6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-1  compression library - runtime

mozilla-firefox recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 319336-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 07:57:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 00:57:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dym3v-0007S8-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:47:15 -0700
From: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319

Bug#308252: marked as done (libapache2-mod-perl2: does not remove perl.conf and apache restart fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308252: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 00:23:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 08 17:23:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DUw3J-00037v-00; Sun, 08 May 2005 17:23:17 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50) 
  id 1DUw3H-00063z-L7
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 May 2005 02:23:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 02:23:15 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libapache2-mod-perl2: does not remove perl.conf and apache restart 
fails
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 1.999.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid patch

Hi,

  after upgrading from 1.999.21-1 to 1.999.23-1, apache2 fails to
  restart. The error is:

[Mon May 09 01:27:48 2005] [error] Can't locate Apache2.pm in @INC (@INC 
contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 
/usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 
/usr/local/lib/site_perl . /etc/apache2) at (eval 2) line 3.\n
[Mon May 09 01:27:48 2005] [error] Can't load Perl module Apache2 for server 
chistera.yi.org:0, exiting...

  As a clean install (not upgrade) of 1.999.23-1 works, I traced the
  problem down to /etc/apache2/mods-available/perl.conf: the new version
  does not ship it, and only works when it's not present. As dpkg
  doesn't remove conffiles itself when upgrading, .23 fails to work
  because the perl.conf from .21 is left after the upgrade.

  As the conffile is not present in .23, I assume that the intention is
  to get rid of that file. If so, I suggest the attached shell snippet
  as the new .23 preinst script (tested). It's a bit, uhm, ugly, so
  perhaps providing an empty perl.conf file would be an alternative.

  HTH.

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Johnny Cash - If I Give My Soul
 
Any life, no matter how long and complex it may be, is made up of a
single moment: the moment in which a man finds out, once and for all,
who he is.
-- Jorge Luis Borges

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=preinst

#! /bin/sh -e

FILE="/etc/apache2/mods-available/perl.conf"
LINK="/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/perl.conf"
MD5SUM="75b1a104836ce0eb17655427199e5f59"

[ -f "$FILE" ] || exit 0

if [ "$1" = upgrade ] && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" le "1.999.23-1"
then
if [ "$MD5SUM" = "`md5sum $FILE | awk '{print $1}'`" ]; then
if [ "$FILE" = "`readlink -nf $LINK`" ]; then
rm -f "$LINK"
fi

rm -f "$FILE"
else
sed -i -e 's/^\([[:space:]]*PerlModule[[:space:]]\+Apache2\)/#&/' 
"$FILE"
fi
fi

--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--


---
Received: (at 308252-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 08:53:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 01:53:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dymzo-QB-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#308252: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_200

Bug#320559: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libxinerama-dev

[Steve Langasek]

severity 320559 important
thanks

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:42:29AM -0400, Daniel Bungert wrote:
> Package: ecamegapedal
> Version: 0.4.4
> Severity: serious

> Please add a build-depends on libxinerama-dev.

That doesn't seem appropriate; ecamegapedal only pulls in libxinerama as a
result of qt-x11-free, which is reported as bug #319305.  However, with a
sensible (i.e., a Debian) version of libtool, there should be no reason why
libXinerama is needed at all; and ecamegapedal does build-depend on libtool,
so I *really* don't see why you would get such an error.  That's a bug worth
investigating and fixing, but it's not a serious bug.

If you're going to report FTBFS bugs, btw, it would be helpful if you would
provide a little more detail, such as an error message and a pointer to a
build log, and information about your build environment (architecture,
suite, tools used)...

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#315676: marked as done (libapache2-mod-perl2: perl.conf incorrectly handled)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#315676: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 2005 18:07:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 24 11:07:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu [128.2.129.23] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlsaQ-0007Ay-00; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:07:30 -0700
Received: from berlin.pdl.cmu.edu (BERLIN.PDL.CMU.EDU [128.2.134.111])
by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CE87D86; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cfry by berlin.pdl.cmu.edu with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1DlsaO-xN-GM; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:07:28 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libapache2-mod-perl2: perl.conf incorrectly handled
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:07:28 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

The new libapache2-mod-perl2 (which I thank you for) does not contain a
perl.conf, yet it attempts to install one in rules:

-install -m644 $(CURDIR)/debian/perl.conf
debian/libapache2-mod-perl2/etc/apache2/mods-available

That is a minor issue (I believe), but what is really a problem is that
when upgrading, the old perl.conf is still present, and its contents are:

PerlModule Apache2

which breaks apache (per bug #308503) if that module is enabled.

Either a correct perl.conf should be installed, or the old one removed.

cheers,
Charles

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libapache2-mod-perl2 depends on:
ii  apache2-common  2.0.54-4 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  libapr0 2.0.54-4 the Apache Portable Runtime
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb4.24.2.52-19Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii  libdevel-symdump-perl   2.03-3   Perl module for inspecting perl's 
ii  libexpat1   1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libldap22.1.30-10OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libperl5.8  5.8.7-3  Shared Perl library
ii  liburi-perl 1.35-1   Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  libwww-perl 5.803-4  WWW client/server library for Perl
ii  perl [libmime-base64-perl]  5.8.7-3  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7]   5.8.7-3  The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

libapache2-mod-perl2 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 315676-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 08:53:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 01:53:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dymzo-QD-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#315676: fixed in libapache2-mod-perl2 2.0.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:47:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libapache2-mod-perl2
Source-Version: 2.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libapache2-mod-perl2, 

Bug#317423: JuK Crash

[Kevin]

Hi,

Do you have JuK set to output to aRts? If so, try changing the MediaSystem  
option in your ~/.kde/share/config/jukrc (it's in [Settings]) to 2 and  
then start JuK. If it starts, try using outputting to aKode (or GStreamer)  
instead.


I haven't looked into the problem any further, however, so I can't say  
exactly what the issue between JuK and aRts is. Hope that helps in the  
meantime, though.


Also, I'm currently using the KDE 3.4.1 packages from  
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/ on an otherwise Debian Unstable system.



Kevin


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320568: FTBFS: try to overwrite a file in /usr

[Aurelien Jarno]

Package: ocamlnet
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

>From my build log:

...

Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel_link.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/mimestring.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/cgi.mli
Updated /dev/null
mkdir -p /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring
mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring': Permission 
denied
make[2]: *** [install-netdb] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/src/netstring'
make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/src'
make: *** [install] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050729-2244
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1
--


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-17
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320567: FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs

[Aurelien Jarno]

Package: screem
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

>From my build log:

...

Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_=*=PROVIDED=*= gcc-4.0_4.0.1-2 
g++-4.0_4.0.1-2 binutils_2.16.1-2+kbsd libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.1-2 
libstdc++6_4.0.1-2 libc0.1-dev_2.3-1+kbsd.10
--
dpkg-source: extracting screem in screem-0.14.2
dpkg-source: unpacking screem_0.14.2.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: applying /home/buildd/build/screem_0.14.2-2.diff.gz
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is screem
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.14.2-2
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture kfreebsd-i386
 /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
debian/rules:3: /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk: No such file or directory
debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk: No such file or directory
debian/rules:5: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk: No such file or 
directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools-files.mk'.  
Stop.
**
Build finished at 20050729-0155
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/screem-0.14.2
--

You are probably missing a build-dep on cdbs.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-17
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#317283: Has this bug disappeared?

[Holger Leskien]

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 09:01:18PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:

> So, the only one that's not the same is evolution, and the bug was 
> reported for etch's version... 

So the bug must be still present in etch. And I have no intention to
corrupt my system again by trying to test (mix) the package versions
against each other. 

Holger

-- 
The truth is usually just an excuse for lack of imagination
- Elim Garak in DS9


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#320504: marked as done (liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml dependency problem)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320504: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml 
dependency problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 21:55:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 14:55:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from humanoidz.org (crazy.kos.nx) [82.237.107.242] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dycp8-0002aA-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:55:22 -0700
Received: from thomas by crazy.kos.nx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dycoc-7l-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:54:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml dependency problem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:54:50 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.4.0+2005.06.13-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Hi,

In a fresh, sane, pbuilder environnement, while trying to compile a
software that depends on lablgtk2-ocaml, I ran into the following
problem:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: Depends: liblablgtk2-ocaml (=
2.4.0+2005.06.13-1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

Sincerly,

Thomas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev depends on:
ii  libglade2-dev 1:2.5.1-2  development files for libglade
ii  libgtk2.0-dev 2.6.4-3Development files for the GTK+ lib
ii  libgtkgl2.0-dev   1.99.0-2   Gimp Toolkit OpenGL area widget in
ii  libgtkspell-dev   2.0.10-2   Development files for GtkSpell
ii  liblablgl-ocaml-dev   1.01-4 an OpenGL interface for Objective 
ii  liblablgtk2-ocaml 2.4.0+2005.06.13-1 runtime libraries for OCaml bindin
ii  ocaml [ocaml-3.08.3]  3.08.3-3   ML language implementation with a 

liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 320504-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 08:58:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 01:58:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DynAc-0005Yh-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:14 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5D278171D23; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:58:13 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#320504: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev: liblablgtk2-ocaml dependency 
problem
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 11:54:50PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> Version: 2.4.0+2005.06.13-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable

> In a fresh, sane, pbuilder environnement, while trying to compile a
> software that depends on lablgtk2-ocaml, I ran into the following
> problem:

> The 

Bug#320573: hsftp: doesn't really work

[Yotam Rubin]

Package: hsftp
Version: 1.15-1
Severity: serious


It seems as though hsftp doesn't really work:
'''[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ hsftp -v -p  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Username , remote host <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Command: ssh -p  -x -l matti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'pwd'
 ... hangs indefinitely until ^C ...
Signal: Interrupt - kill ssh subprocess
Password:
Continue (Y/n) ? Y
** ERROR **: Could not get remote home directory.'''

However, 'ssh -p  -x -l matti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'pwd'' works fine - 
'''[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ssh -p  -x -l matti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'pwd'
Password:
/home/yotam'''

Set to serious, because it renders package unuseable

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages hsftp depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libncurses5 5.4-8Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline44.3-15   GNU readline and history libraries
ii  ssh 1:4.1p1-5Secure shell client and server (tr

hsftp recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fwibble

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 320567 0.14.2-2
Bug#320567: FTBFS: missing build-dep on cdbs
Bug marked as found in version 0.14.2-2.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319907: marked as done (libslang1-dev is uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319907: fixed in slang 1.4.9dbs-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2005 15:57:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 25 08:57:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from posti.it.jyu.fi (mailhost.it.jyu.fi) [130.234.160.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dx5KR-0008PQ-00; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:57:20 -0700
Received: from localhost (kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi [130.234.192.228])
by mailhost.it.jyu.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6PFvEie001888;
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:57:17 +0300 (EETDST)
Received: from kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 50C98AC786;
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:57:14 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 19876 invoked by uid 1000);
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:14 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libslang1-dev is uninstallable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:13 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned-By: amavisd-milter at it.jyu.fi
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libslang1-dev
Version: 1.4.9dbs-9
Severity: grave

libslang1-dev depends on slang1 (= 1.4.9dbs-9), which is not available
in unstable.  Yes libslang1 provides slang1, but that works only for
unversioned dependencies.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 319907-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 09:44:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 02:44:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DynhO-00087K-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:32:06 -0700
From: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319907: fixed in slang 1.4.9dbs-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: slang
Source-Version: 1.4.9dbs-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
slang, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libslang1-dev_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-dev_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
libslang1-pic_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-pic_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
libslang1-utf8-dev_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-utf8-dev_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
libslang1-utf8-pic_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-utf8-pic_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
libslang1-utf8-udeb_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-utf8-udeb_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.udeb
libslang1-utf8_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1-utf8_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
libslang1_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/slang/libslang1_1.4.9dbs-10_i386.deb
slang_1.4.9dbs-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/slang/slang_1.4.9dbs-10.diff.gz
slang_1.4.9dbs-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/slang/slang_1.4.9dbs-10.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated slang package)

(This message was ge

Bug#320577: FTBFS: missing build-deps

[Aurelien Jarno]

Package: gtkglextmm
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

>From my build log:

...

** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libgtkglext1-dev (>> 1.0.6), 
libgtkmm-2.4-dev (>= 2.2.12-1.2), libxmu-dev, build-essential (>= 11)

...

checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for gtkglext-1.0 >= 1.0.0 gdkglext-1.0 >= 1.0.0 gtkmm-2.0 >= 2.0.0 
gdkmm-2.0 >= 2.0.0 pangomm-1.0 >= 2.0.0 ... Package gtkmm-2.0 was not found in 
the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing 
`gtkmm-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 
'gtkmm-2.0' found
configure: error: Library requirements (gtkglext-1.0 >= 1.0.0 gdkglext-1.0 >= 
1.0.0 gtkmm-2.0 >= 2.0.0 gdkmm-2.0 >= 2.0.0 pangomm-1.0 >= 2.0.0 ) not met; 
consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries 
are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them.
make: *** [config.status] Error 1
******
Build finished at 20050730-0321
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/gtkglextmm-1.0.1
--

Some build-dependencies are probably missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-17
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320017: Woody and Sarge still missing

[Norbert Tretkowski]

* Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with.

Sorry, my fault... I forgot to reopen it.

Anyway, there will be no official update from the security team, so
I'm going to upload a fixed package to stable-proposed-updates (and
maybe oldstable-proposed-updates) which will make it into 3.1r1.

Regards, Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 not fixed in sid either

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 320357 fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and 
> possibly oldstable
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in stable and possibly oldstable
Changed Bug title.

> tags 320357 + patch
Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and possibly 
oldstable
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 not fixed in sid either

[Michael Fedrowitz]

 Hi,

this isn't fixed in sid either, because debian/rules is fucked up and
only applies the patch after the build. I just noticed this by chance
because I suddenly got bitten by the old fetchsizelimit bug again (for
APOP) and started to investigate... And why is there an old random
unrelated bugfix merged into the security patch anyway?

-Michael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320357: fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 not fixed in sid either

[Michael Fedrowitz]

retitle 320357 fetchmail: CAN-2005-2335 unfixed in unstable, stable and 
possibly oldstable
tags 320357 + patch
thanks

 Hi,

the attached patch seems to fix it. Want me to NMU?

-Michael
--- rules.orig	2005-07-30 11:20:27.0 +0200
+++ rules	2005-07-30 11:42:13.0 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,8 @@
 	-rm -f config.sub config.guess config.status
 	dh_clean -X.orig -X.rej
 
-config.status: configure
+configure: config.status
+config.status: patch-stamp
 	dh_testdir
 	-rm -f config.sub config.guess
 	ln -s /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
@@ -119,8 +120,8 @@
 	./configure $(CONFFLAGS) --prefix=/usr --enable-nls \
 		--disable-fallback $(FETCHCONFOPT)
 
-build: build-stamp patch
-build-stamp: config.status
+build: configure build-stamp
+build-stamp:
 	dh_testdir
 	$(MAKE)
 	sed -e '/fetchmail-5.3.3/ { s/.*/=== file truncated, see source package for complete changelog ===/; q; }' < NEWS > NEWS.truncated

Processed: Re: flac_1.1.1-5.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 319235 patch
Bug#319235: flac_1.1.1-5.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320017: Woody and Sarge still missing

[Norbert Tretkowski]

* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > Please close once woody and sarge are dealt with.
> 
> Sorry, my fault... I forgot to reopen it.
> 
> Anyway, there will be no official update from the security team, so
> I'm going to upload a fixed package to stable-proposed-updates (and
> maybe oldstable-proposed-updates) which will make it into 3.1r1.

An upload to oldstable-proposed-updates is not possible, so we have no
chance to update the woody package, if it's really affected.

Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320581: kdelibs4: kmail crashes on startup with segmentation fault

[Bernhard Sadlowski]

Package: kdelibs4
Version: 4:3.3.2-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Updating kdelibs to 3.3.2-7 breaks kmail on 3 different Linux Systems
with Debian/unstable installed and Kernel 2.6.11-mm1: 
Standard kernel 2.6.11 with patch from 
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11/2.6.11-mm1

Going back to 3.3.2-6 or 3.3.2-6.1 solves the issue.

Thanks,
Bernhard

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-mm1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages kdelibs4 depends on:
hi  kdelibs-bin4:3.3.2-6.1   KDE core binaries
ii  kdelibs-data   4:3.3.2-6.1   KDE core shared data
ii  libart-2.0-2   2.3.17-1  Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libarts1   1.3.2-3   aRts Sound system
ii  libasound2 1.0.9-2   ALSA library
ii  libaspell150.60.2+20050121-3 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti
ii  libaudio2  1.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0  0.2.6-6   Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7   high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6  2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcupsys2-gnutls101.1.23-10 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - 
ii  libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.36-1  Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - 
ii  libfam0c1022.7.0-7   client library to control the FAM 
ii  libgcc11:4.0.0-11GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.6.5-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libice64.3.0.dfsg.1-14   Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libidn11   0.5.13-1.0GNU libidn library, implementation
ii  libjack0.80.0-00.99.0-6  JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari
ii  libjasper-1.701-1  1.701.0-2 The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii  libjpeg62  6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libmad00.15.1b-2.1   MPEG audio decoder library
ii  libogg01.1.2-1   Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libopenexr21.2.2-2   runtime files for the OpenEXR imag
ii  libpcre3   5.0-1.1   Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt  3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libtiff4   3.7.2-3   Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libvorbis0a1.1.0-1   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2  1.1.0-1   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile3 1.1.0-1   The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxml22.6.16-7  GNOME XML library
ii  libxrender11:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxslt1.1 1.1.12-8  XSLT processing library - runtime 
ii  libxt6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xbase-clients  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   miscellaneous X clients
ii  xlibs  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14   X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime

kdelibs4 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319235: flac_1.1.1-5.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

[Steve Langasek]

tags 319235 patch
thanks

Hi Matt,

I've prepared an NMU that sets -fno-inline-functions on m68k to work around
the compiler bug there (-finline-functions is being set in the upstream
configure script).  In the process, I found a couple of other issues in
debian/rules, which I've addressed.  Please find the patch attached.

I'll plan to upload this NMU in the morning if it builds successfully for me
here on i386.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u flac-1.1.1/debian/changelog flac-1.1.1/debian/changelog
--- flac-1.1.1/debian/changelog
+++ flac-1.1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+flac (1.1.1-5.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Negate upstream use of -finline-functions on m68k, to work around a 
+compiler failure there.  Closes: #319235.
+  * Use DEB_HOST_ARCH instead of DEB_BUILD_ARCH for per-arch checks, for
+correctness wrt cross-building
+  * Force -O0 when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=debug is set, because by default
+upstream is using -O3 -- so removing -O2 from CFLAGS was forcing a
+*higher* level of optimization instead.
+  * Set CXXFLAGS as well as CFLAGS, so that C++ sources are also handled
+correctly
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:15:50 -0700
+
 flac (1.1.1-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u flac-1.1.1/debian/rules flac-1.1.1/debian/rules
--- flac-1.1.1/debian/rules
+++ flac-1.1.1/debian/rules
@@ -24,22 +24,29 @@
 
 ifeq "$(findstring debug,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))" ""
 CFLAGS += -O2
+else
+CFLAGS += -O0
 endif
 
-DEB_BUILD_ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
+DEB_HOST_ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
 
-ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),powerpc)
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),powerpc)
 EXTRA_CONFIGURE_ARGS:=--disable-asm-optimizations
 else
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),m68k)
+CFLAGS += -fno-inline-functions
+else
 EXTRA_CONFIGURE_ARGS=
 endif
+endif
 
 configure: configure-stamp
 configure-stamp:
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
 
-   CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" ./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man \
+   CFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" CXXFLAGS="$(CFLAGS)" ./configure --prefix=/usr \
+   --mandir=/usr/share/man \
$(EXTRA_CONFIGURE_ARGS)
touch configure-stamp
 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#320138: nautilus: ftbfs [sparc] configure: error: *** libX11 not found.

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:20:17PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 04:39:58AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > And, what *does* config.log have to say about this?  The build log on
> > buildd.debian.org certainly shows that libx11-6 and libx11-dev were
> > installed, so -lX11 should have been available for linking.  I'm guessing
> > that this is not actually a nautilus bug, but a build env discrepancy due to
> > the current lack of a successful xorg build on sparc; in which case the
> > problem should fix itself in a matter of a week or so, and this bug is
> > therefore redundant.

> Attached.

Aha.

> configure:24808: checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11
> configure:24838: cc -o conftest -g -Wall -O2  -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed 
> conftest.c -lX11  -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11   >&5
> /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../lib/crt1.o:../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/elf/start.S:32:
>  multiple definition of `_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_'
> /usr/bin/ld: Disabling relaxation: it will not work with multiple definitions
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> configure:24844: $? = 1
> configure: failed program was:

[...]

Ok, so this is the bug that's been mentioned on debian-devel, where
-Wl,--as-needed doesn't work on sparc and alpha.  Yes, this is a bug in
nautilus that needs to be fixed.  Thanks for forwarding the build log.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Fixed in NMU of guppi 0.40.3-12

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 286964 + fixed
Bug#286964: guppi: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:18:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-071+1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2005 12:34:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 26 05:34:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail01.pironet-ndh.com (mail.pironet-ndh.com) [194.64.31.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DxOdF-hM-00; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:34:01 -0700
Received: from mail.fbn-dd.de (mail.fbn-dd.de [195.227.105.178])
by mail.pironet-ndh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E5455244F;
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de 
(192-168-0-1.transfer-000.intranet.fbn-dd.de [192.168.0.1])
by mail.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 631492637E; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C42D2010E; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (AvMailGate-2.0.1.16) id 02908-0C583C8E;
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:26 +0200
Received: from localhost.localdomain (10-28-130-200.intranet-28-130.fbn-dd.de 
[10.28.130.200])
by sonne.intranet.fbn-dd.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DD1612010E; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 851793F08; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:33:31 +0200
From: Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.16; AVE: 6.31.1.0; 
VDF: 6.31.1.21; host: sonne)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: vim
Version: 1:6.3-078+1
Severity: grave
Tags: security

Hi!

Georgi Guninski found another modeline vuln in vim:

  http://www.guninski.com/where_do_you_want_billg_to_go_today_5.html=20

I already asked for a CAN number, I'll forward it when I get one.

You can get the Ubuntu debdiff from

  http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/vim.code-modelines.diff

for fixing sarge and possibly woody. For unstable, you should probably
just upgrade to the latest upstream version.

Thanks,

Martin

--=20
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer   http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC5i2bDecnbV4Fd/IRAhcDAKDY1E876wIPsI4EuiH27IzZ/2xbOACg0ny0
tcbxgqgezHDP/8Tk6lg+y6I=
=dvVP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--

---
Received: (at 320017-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 11:29:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 04:29:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DypM2-0006V3-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:18:10 -0700
From: Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320017: fixed in vim 1:6.3-071+1sarge1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:18:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: vim
Source-Version: 1:6.3-071+1sarge1

We bel

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ppxp 0.2001080415-12

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 287924 + fixed
Bug#287924: ppxp: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 
'SigQuit'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320357: (no subject)

[Nico Golde]

Hi,
thanks for reporting this
This will be fixed in -18.
Regards Nico

-- 
Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred


pgpQ1YBYfY5G0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 320017
Bug#320017: vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines)

[Norbert Tretkowski]

reopen 320017
thanks

* Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>  vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
>  .
>* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
>  + 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbitrary shell commands execution by wrapping
>them in glob() or expand() function calls in modelines. (CAN-2005-2368)
>(closes: #320017)

I'm going to close it when 3.1r1 is released.

Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319433: marked as done (FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319433: FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 01:38:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 18:38:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvmUo-00065M-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:38:38 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6M1cbf0099978
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DveKw-xt-4U
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:55:54 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:55:53 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: editex
Version: 0.0.5-6
Severity: serious

editex fails to build because it cannot find libmlgdome2-xslt:

ocamlmklib  -o mlmathml-editor -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/stublibs -lgmetadom_=
gdome_cpp_smart -lgdome -lglib-2.0 -lxml2 -lz -lm   -lgdome_xslt_cpp_smart =
-lgdome -lxslt -lpthread -lglib-2.0 -lxml2 -lz -lm   -lmlgdome2-xslt -lmlgd=
ome -lstdc++ -L../src/.libs/ -leditex .libs/ml_mathml_editor.o .libs/c_math=
ml_editor.o
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmlgdome2-xslt

The library is installed, so I think this is a library path problem.

--=20
Matt

--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC39OZfNdgYxVXvBARAokQAKCwGzbu2q/cZvK8dSsm1WZPcoe7kgCghiP8
lMvz4A6B6R5bCIuLAjPMFrQ=
=17Wr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B--

---
Received: (at 319433-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 11:48:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 04:48:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sockmel.bononia.it [194.242.226.39] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyppL-0003gq-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:48:27 -0700
Received: from muletto.takhisis.invalid (85-18-14-42.fastres.net [85.18.14.42])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Stefano Zacchiroli", Issuer "sockmel.bononia.it" (verified 
OK))
by sockmel.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6698556CF3;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by muletto.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2DAF7E6628; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:48:23 +0200
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#319433: FTBFS: Unable to find libmlgdome2-xslt
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 

Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall

[WaVeR]

Package: xchat
Version: 2.4.3-0.2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss


when i use /unloadall xchat close/quit

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3.1
Locale: LANG=fr_CH, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xchat depends on:
ii  libatk1.0-0   1.10.1-2   The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.5-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libperl5.85.8.7-4Shared Perl library
ii  libssl0.9.7   0.9.7g-1   SSL shared libraries
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  python2.3 2.3.5-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  tcl8.48.4.9-1Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii  xchat-common  2.4.3-0.2  Common files for X-Chat
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m

xchat recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318291: upload

[Micah Anderson]

>That's why I sent you the previous mail.  I 
>will gladly prepare a package of elmo which fixes this bug and 3 minor 
>issues that have been reported.  The question is: who is going to
>upload it because my previous sponsor is not replying to my emails.

If your sponsor is not responding, it is recommended that you find
another one to sponsor your package uploads. Try the debian-mentors
mailing list, or the #debian-mentors IRC channel, they have a more or
less defined process for requesting sponsors (RFS = Request For
Sponsor). If you have a fix to the security problem only, you could
probably get someone from the testing-security team to upload the
package for you, but that would be for that security fix only, you
will still need someone else to upload your package in the future.

micah


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320588: glide: FTBFS [i386/gcc-4.0]: PIC register 'ebx' clobbered in 'asm'

[Daniel Schepler]

Package: glide
Severity: serious
Version: 2002.04.10-9

>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:

...
cc -g -Wall -O6 -mcpu=i486 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
-fexpensive-optimizations -ffast-math -DBIG_OPT -I. 
-I/tmp/buildd/glide-2002.04.10/build-tree/glide2x/swlibs/include 
-I/tmp/buildd/glide-2002.04.10/build-tree/glide2x/cvg/include -DENDB -DX11 
-Wall -fPIC -DPIC -I/tmp/buildd/glide-2002.04.10/build-tree/glide2x/cvg/include 
 -DCVG -DGLIDE_CHIP_BROADCAST=1 -DGLIDE_DEFAULT_GAMMA=1.3 -DGLIDE_BLIT_CLEAR=1 
-DGLIDE_LIB -DGLIDE_PLUG -DGLIDE_SPLASH -DFX_STATIC_BUILD -DUSE_PACKET_FIFO=1 
-DGLIDE_HW_TRI_SETUP=1 -DGLIDE_PACKET3_TRI_SETUP=1   -DHAL_HW=1 
-DGLIDE_TRI_CULLING=0 -DGLIDE_DISPATCH_SETUP=1 -DGLIDE_PACKED_RGB=0 -c 
-o gdraw.o gdraw.c
`-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead.
gdraw.c: In function 'grDrawTriangle':
gdraw.c:720: error: PIC register 'ebx' clobbered in 'asm'
make[4]: *** [gdraw.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [libs] Error 1
make[2]: *** [libs] Error 1
make[1]: *** [libs] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/glide-2002.04.10/build-tree/glide2x'
make: *** [debian/stampdir/build.glide2.cvg] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319431: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libxxf86vm-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:32:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319431: fixed in dvr 3.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2005 01:38:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 18:38:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvmUb-00064l-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:38:25 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6M1cOQW099964
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DvbtV-q8-E2
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:19:25 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:19:25 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libxxf86vm-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DiL7RhKs8rK9YGuF"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--DiL7RhKs8rK9YGuF
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1"
Content-Disposition: inline


--E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: dvr
Version: 3.2-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

dvr fails to build because it cannot find
:

g++ -c -Wall -O2 -I../lib -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DVERSION=3D\"\" -I/usr/inclu=
de/avifile-0.7 -I/usr/include/qt3 vidmode.cpp
vidmode.cpp:19:38: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or direc=
tory
vidmode.cpp: In function 'bool setVidMode(int, int, int, int)':
vidmode.cpp:30: error: 'XF86VidModeModeInfo' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:30: error: 'modes' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:31: error: 'XF86VidModeModeLine' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:31: error: expected `;' before 'current_mode'
vidmode.cpp:35: error: 'XF86VidModeGetAllModeLines' was not declared in thi=
s scope
vidmode.cpp:43: error: 'current_mode' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:43: error: 'XF86VidModeGetModeLine' was not declared in this sc=
ope
vidmode.cpp:47: error: 'XF86VidModeLockModeSwitch' was not declared in this=
 scope
vidmode.cpp:48: error: 'XF86VidModeSwitchToMode' was not declared in this s=
cope
vidmode.cpp:49: error: 'XF86VidModeSetViewPort' was not declared in this sc=
ope
vidmode.cpp: In function 'void restoreOriginalVidMode()':
vidmode.cpp:77: error: 'XF86VidModeModeInfo' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:77: error: 'modes' was not declared in this scope
vidmode.cpp:80: error: 'XF86VidModeGetAllModeLines' was not declared in thi=
s scope
vidmode.cpp:88: error: 'XF86VidModeLockModeSwitch' was not declared in this=
 scope
vidmode.cpp:89: error: 'XF86VidModeSwitchToMode' was not declared in this s=
cope

The attached patch makes it build-depend on libxxf86vm-dev, which
contains this header file.

--=20
Matt

--E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dvr_3.2-5.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u dvr-3.2/debian/control dvr-3.2/debian/control
--- dvr-3.2/debian/control
+++ dvr-3.2/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libqt3-mt-dev, libavifile-0.7-dev,=20
-  sed, flex, libqt3-compat-headers
+  sed, flex, libqt3-compat-headers, libxxf86vm-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.5.2
=20
 Package: dvr

--E/DnYTRukya0zdZ1--

--DiL7RhKs8rK9YGuF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Co

Bug#320594: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable lists closed ones as outstanding

[Arthur Korn]

Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi

Have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
This is what the form at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
came up with when I selected

search for: Paket "devtodo"
Flags: active
Distribution: unstable

now compare that to:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=devtodo
which is perfectly ok AFAICS.

This is probably the reason for the PTS keeping to bitch about patches
and showing an inflated bug count:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/devtodo.html

HTH, 2ri

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 320361

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> tags 320361 + sid
Bug#320361: rt2500-source: can't installed compiles package with 
linux-image-2.6.12
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320608: several security holes in vpopmail

[Joey Hess]

Package: vpopmail-bin
Severity: grave
Tags: security

vpopmail has a couple of security holes:

CAN-2004-2239 a buffer overflow in vsybase.c
Originally reported here:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0226.html
Confirmed by author as fixed in cvs here:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0286.html
Unknown whether this is really exploitable

CAN-2004-2238 format string overflow in vsybase.c
Probably not a real security hole, see
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0264.html
But should be checked.

Finally, the reason this bug is grave, vpopmail's author says that
version 5.4.6 contains fixed for SQL injection vulnerabilities which
"made it possible for a remote attacker to insert additional SQL
commands into data passed into POP/IMAP login, SMTP AUTH, or a
QmailAdmin login."
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2004-08/0286.html

This last hole does not seem to have been assigned a CAN number.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#319235: flac_1.1.1-5.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:36:53AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU that sets -fno-inline-functions on m68k to work around
> the compiler bug there (-finline-functions is being set in the upstream
> configure script).  In the process, I found a couple of other issues in
> debian/rules, which I've addressed.  Please find the patch attached.
> 
> I'll plan to upload this NMU in the morning if it builds successfully for me
> here on i386.

Cool, thanks.




-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#298674: Bug seems to be fixed with gcc 4.0

[Régis Boudin]

Hi,

Apparently, the bug with the libccscript disappeared with the transition
to g++ 4.0, so it should be ok to close this bug when the gcc-4.0 build
package will be uploaded.

However, bayonne FTBFS with g++ 4.0. If you didn't already have them,
patches are attached :
- Fix 1 is for friend classes which must be declared.
- Fix 2 replaces calls to IXDR_*_LONG by IXDR_*_INT32. Calls to
IXDR_GET_INT32 and IXDR_GET_U_INT32 could be cast to long and u_long,
but I suppose it wouldn't change much (most values are not assigned to
'long' variables anyway).

HTH
Regis
-- 
"While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer"
Erik Zapletal
diff -urN bayonne-1.2.14.original/drivers/phonedev/driver.h bayonne-1.2.14/drivers/phonedev/driver.h
--- bayonne-1.2.14.original/drivers/phonedev/driver.h	2002-12-12 03:43:41.0 +
+++ bayonne-1.2.14/drivers/phonedev/driver.h	2005-07-28 19:26:25.636920624 +0100
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
 } cpatone_t;
 
 class PhonedevTrunk;
+class PhonedevService;
 
 typedef union
 {
diff -urN bayonne-1.2.14.original/drivers/zapata/driver.h bayonne-1.2.14/drivers/zapata/driver.h
--- bayonne-1.2.14.original/drivers/zapata/driver.h	2002-12-12 03:48:32.0 +
+++ bayonne-1.2.14/drivers/zapata/driver.h	2005-07-28 19:27:48.575312072 +0100
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #endif
 
 class ZapataTrunk;
+class ZapataService;
 
 typedef bool (ZapataTrunk::*trunkhandler_t)(TrunkEvent *event);
 
diff -urN bayonne-1.2.14.original/modules/auditing/tcpmon.cpp bayonne-1.2.14/modules/auditing/tcpmon.cpp
--- bayonne-1.2.14.original/modules/auditing/tcpmon.cpp	2002-12-11 03:52:24.0 +
+++ bayonne-1.2.14/modules/auditing/tcpmon.cpp	2005-07-28 19:19:20.122608632 +0100
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
 
 #endif
 
+class MonSession;
+
 class TcpMonitor : public TCPSocket, public Monitor, public Server
 {
 private:
iff -urN bayonne-1.2.14.original/server/bayonne.h bayonne-1.2.14/server/bayonne.h
--- bayonne-1.2.14.original/server/bayonne.h	2004-11-02 16:03:30.0 +
+++ bayonne-1.2.14/server/bayonne.h	2005-07-28 19:16:52.704019664 +0100
@@ -2052,6 +2052,8 @@
 	aaImage(aaScript *script);
 };
 
+class Conference;
+
 /**
  * The mixer object is a resource for conferences.
  *
@@ -2270,6 +2272,8 @@
 };
 #endif
 
+class ScriptInterface;
+
 /**
  * We derive a Bayonne server version of ScriptInterp, "Trunk",
  * which holds most common elements of the script engine for Bayonne
diff -urN bayonne-1.2.14.original/modules/sunrpc/bayonne_xdr.c bayonne-1.2.14/modules/sunrpc/bayonne_xdr.c
--- bayonne-1.2.14.original/modules/sunrpc/bayonne_xdr.c	2004-11-11 11:27:49.0 +
+++ bayonne-1.2.14/modules/sunrpc/bayonne_xdr.c	2005-07-28 19:24:58.418179888 +0100
@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@
  return FALSE;
 
 		} else {
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->pol_active);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->max_incoming);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->max_outgoing);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->tot_incoming);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->tot_outgoing);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->pol_members);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->pol_active);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->max_incoming);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->max_outgoing);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->tot_incoming);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->tot_outgoing);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->pol_members);
 		}
 		 if (!xdr_array (xdrs, (char **)&objp->pol_ports.pol_ports_val, (u_int *) &objp->pol_ports.pol_ports_len, ~0,
 			sizeof (int), (xdrproc_t) xdr_int))
@@ -100,12 +100,12 @@
  return FALSE;
 
 		} else {
-		objp->pol_active = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->max_incoming = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->max_outgoing = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->tot_incoming = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->tot_outgoing = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->pol_members = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
+		objp->pol_active = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->max_incoming = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->max_outgoing = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->tot_incoming = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->tot_outgoing = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->pol_members = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
 		}
 		 if (!xdr_array (xdrs, (char **)&objp->pol_ports.pol_ports_val, (u_int *) &objp->pol_ports.pol_ports_len, ~0,
 			sizeof (int), (xdrproc_t) xdr_int))
@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@
  return FALSE;
 
 		} else {
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->mixer_avail);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->mixer_used);
-		IXDR_PUT_LONG(buf, objp->mixer_groups);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->mixer_avail);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->mixer_used);
+		IXDR_PUT_INT32(buf, objp->mixer_groups);
 		}
 		 if (!xdr_array (xdrs, (char **)&objp->mixer_conf.mixer_conf_val, (u_int *) &objp->mixer_conf.mixer_conf_len, ~0,
 			sizeof (bayonne_conf), (xdrproc_t) xdr_bayonne_conf))
@@ -173,9 +173,9 @@
  return FALSE;
 
 		} else {
-		objp->mixer_avail = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->mixer_used = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
-		objp->mixer_groups = IXDR_GET_LONG(buf);
+		objp->mixer_avail = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->mixer_used = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);
+		objp->mixer_groups = IXDR_GET_INT32(buf);

Bug#320520: marked as done (FTBFS: Couldn't find XScreenSaver extension)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320520: fixed in gossip 0.8-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 23:32:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 16:32:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyeKs-0006GB-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:32:14 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6TNWDDK062321
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DyWUk-00010R-MA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:09:54 -0700
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:09:54 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Couldn't find XScreenSaver extension
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gossip
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

gossip fails to build because it cannot find the XScreenSaver
extension:

> checking for XScreenSaverRegister in -lXss... no
> configure: error: Couldn't find XScreenSaver extension.

There are actually two problems: it doesn't build-depend on libxss-dev
which provides this extension and the test for the scrnsaver.h header
file has the success and failure cases switched.  The attached patch
fixes both of these problems.

--=20
Matt

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patch
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u gossip-0.8/debian/control gossip-0.8/debian/control
--- gossip-0.8/debian/control
+++ gossip-0.8/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: gnome
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>=3D 4.1.0), cdbs, gnome-pkg-tools, libxml-parse=
r-perl, libloudmouth1-dev (>=3D 0.17-1), libgnomeui-dev (>=3D 2.6.1.1-4), l=
ibgtk2.0-dev (>=3D 2.4), libglade2-dev, libgnomevfs2-0 (>=3D 2.8.4-2), libx=
slt1-dev, xlibs-static-dev, libxt-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>=3D 4.1.0), cdbs, gnome-pkg-tools, libxml-parse=
r-perl, libloudmouth1-dev (>=3D 0.17-1), libgnomeui-dev (>=3D 2.6.1.1-4), l=
ibgtk2.0-dev (>=3D 2.4), libglade2-dev, libgnomevfs2-0 (>=3D 2.8.4-2), libx=
slt1-dev, xlibs-static-dev, libxt-dev, libxss-dev, autoconf
 Uploaders: Debian GNOME Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bian.org>, Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg>, Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlos Perell=C3=B3 Mar=
=C3=ADn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ed Boraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
bian.org>, Emil Soleyman-Zomalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gustavo Noronha Silva <=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Drew <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
ebian.org>, Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=2Eorg>, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josselin Mouette , Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ond=C5=99ej Sur=C3=BD=
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert McQueen <=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sjoerd Simons <=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
=20
diff -u gossip-0.8/debian/control.in gossip-0.8/debian/control.in
--- goss

Bug#320568: marked as done (FTBFS: try to overwrite a file in /usr)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320568: fixed in ocamlnet 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 08:48:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 01:48:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dyn1P-00011b-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:48:43 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1Dyn1O-0003Jv-Ft; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:48:42 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dyn1T-000NV8-4n; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:48:47 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: try to overwrite a file in /usr
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:48:47 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ocamlnet
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

>From my build log:

...

Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel_link.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/netaccel.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/mimestring.mli
Installed 
/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/debian/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring/cgi.mli
Updated /dev/null
mkdir -p /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring
mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/netstring': Permission 
denied
make[2]: *** [install-netdb] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/src/netstring'
make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1/src'
make: *** [install] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050729-2244
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/ocamlnet-1.1
--


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-17
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 320568-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 15:26:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 08:26:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dyt5L-0004QF-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:11 -0700
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320568: fixed in ocamlnet 1.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:17:11 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ocamlnet
Source-Version: 1.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocamlnet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libocamlnet-ocaml-dev_1.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocamlnet/libocamlnet-ocaml-dev_1.1-3_i386.deb
libocamlnet-ocaml_1.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocamlnet/libocamlnet-ocaml_1.1-3_i386.deb
ocamlnet_1.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocamlnet/ocamlnet_1.1-3.diff.gz
ocamlnet_1.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ocamlnet/ocamlnet_1.1-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you

Bug#320523: marked as done (FTBFS: Conflicting declarations of _variables_export)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:02:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320523: fixed in gtkdialog 1:0.58.11-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 23:32:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 16:32:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyeLJ-0006O5-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:32:41 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6TNWept062334
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:32:40 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DydF6-0001Mj-0O
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:12 -0700
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:22:11 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Conflicting declarations of _variables_export
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh"
Content-Disposition: inline


--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: gtkdialog
Version: 0.58.11-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

gtkdialog fails to build:

> if i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\"gtkdialog\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D=
\"gtkdialog\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=3D\"0.58.11\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\"gtkdialo=
g\ 0.58.11\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -DPACKAGE=3D\"gtk=
dialog\" -DVERSION=3D\"0.58.11\" -DYYTEXT_POINTER=3D1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -D=
HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRIN=
G_H=3D1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHA=
VE_STDINT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_LOCALE_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SETLOCALE=3D=
1  -I. -I.-DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include =
-I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr=
/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-=
Wall -g -O2 -MT variables.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/variables.Tpo" -c -o variabl=
es.o variables.c; \
> then mv -f ".deps/variables.Tpo" ".deps/variables.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/=
variables.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> variables.c: In function 'variables_new':
> variables.c:48: warning: implicit declaration of function '_tree_insert'
> variables.c: In function 'variables_save':
> variables.c:214: warning: implicit declaration of function 'widget_edit_s=
ave'
> variables.c: In function '_tree_insert':
> variables.c:321: warning: too few arguments for format
> variables.c:341: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'els=
e'
> variables.c:349: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'els=
e'
> variables.c: In function '_tree_find':
> variables.c:376: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'els=
e'
> variables.c:382: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'els=
e'
> variables.c: In function '_variables_initialize':
> variables.c:439: warning: implicit declaration of function 'yywarning'
> variables.c: At top level:
> variables.c:449: error: static declaration of '_variables_export' follows=
 non-static declaration
> variables.c:10: error: previous declaration of '_variables_export' was he=
re
> variables.c: In function '_variables_export':
> variables.c:502: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument=
 3 has type 'gpointer'
> variables.c: In function 'print_variables':
> variables.c:567: warning: format '%s' expects type 'char *', but argument=
 2 has type 'gpointer'
> variables.c: In 

Processed: severity of 320582 is grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 320582 grave
Bug#320582: libdjvulibre1: soname of library changed
Severity set to `grave'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320612: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libdb-dev

[Aurelien Jarno]

 error: expected `;' before 'key'
ggcov-webdb.c:1229: error: 'db_create' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1231: error: 'db_strerror' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1235: error: 'DB_HASH' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1235: error: 'DB_CREATE' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1249: error: 'key' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1250: error: 'value' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1252: error: 'DB_NEXT' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c:1253: error: 'DB_NOTFOUND' was not declared in this scope
ggcov-webdb.c: At global scope:
ggcov-webdb.c:213: warning: 'save_file_lines' defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:342: warning: 'gboolean unique_remove_one(const char*, 
list_t*, void*)' defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:536: warning: 'void serialise_ulong_array(php_serializer_t*, 
unsigned int, const long unsigned int*)' defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:550: warning: 'save_one_summary_f' defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:631: warning: 'void add_callnode(cov_callnode_t*, void*)' defined 
but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:639: warning: 'int compare_node_by_name(const cov_callnode_t*, 
const cov_callnode_t*)' defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:732: warning: 'void save_callnode(cov_callnode_t*, void*)' 
defined but not used
ggcov-webdb.c:870: warning: 'ptrarray_t* diagrams()' defined but not 
used
make[4]: *** [ggcov-webdb.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6/src'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggcov-0.6/build-tree/ggcov-0.6'
make: *** [build] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050730-1726
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

NOTE: The package could have used binaries from the following packages
(access time changed) without a source dependency:
  xlibs-dev: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so

--

You are probably missing a build-dependency on libdb-dev


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#300102: marked as done (goo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:47:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300102: fixed in goo 0.155-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 17:05:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 09:05:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DByR9-00058l-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:05:31 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DByR7-0002xg-Ll; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:05:29 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: goo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:05:29 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: goo
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'goo' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

goo/boot.c: In function 'YPPcheck_call_types':
goo/boot.c:7205: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
goo/boot.c:7211: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7219: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7226: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7247: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7263: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7269: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7291: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7301: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c:7311: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
goo/boot.c: In function 'Y___main_8___':
goo/boot.c:7763: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
make[3]: *** [goo/boot.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/goo-0.155/c/g2c'

With the attached patch 'goo' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/goo-0.155/c/g2c/goo/boot.c ./c/g2c/goo/boot.c
--- ../tmp-orig/goo-0.155/c/g2c/goo/boot.c  2003-11-19 20:49:58.0 
+0100
+++ ./c/g2c/goo/boot.c  2005-03-17 17:36:51.0 +0100
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@
   P retF1;
   P T0,T1,T2,T3;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPdef_regs();
+  YPdef_regs();
   T3 = (P)YPsp_reg();
   retF1 = T3;
   T1 = (P)YPsp_reg();
@@ -6761,7 +6761,7 @@
   P nF692;
   P T0,T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6,T7,T8,T9;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPdef_regs();
+  YPdef_regs();
   T9 = (P)YPsp_elt((P)-2);
   nF692 = T9;
   T8 = (P)YPi_((P)-2,nF692);
@@ -6961,7 +6961,7 @@
   P T0,T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6,T7,T8,T9,T10,T11,T12,T13,T14,T15;
   P T16,T17,T18,T19,T20,T21,T22,T23,T24,T25,T26,T27,T28;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPset_regs(regs_);
+  YPset_regs(regs_);
   xF724 = fn_;
   T28 = (P)YPprop_elt(xF724,(P)1);
   xF725 = T28;
@@ -7061,7 +7061,7 @@
   P T0,T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6,T7,T8,T9,T10,T11,T12,T13,T14,T15;
   P T16,T17,T18,T19,T20,T21,T22,T23,T24,T25;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPset_regs(regs_);
+  YPset_regs(regs_);
   if (VARREF(YPclasses_readyQ) != YPfalse) {
 oF747 = res_;
 tF748 = type_;
@@ -7134,7 +7134,7 @@
 INLINE P YPstack_check(P regs_) {
   P T0,T1,T2,T3,T4,T5,T6,T7,T8,T9,T10,T11,T12,T13,T14,T15;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPset_regs(regs_);
+  YPset_regs(regs_);
   T4 = (P)YPmax_stack_len();
   T3 = (P)YPi_(T4,(P)1000);
   T6 = (P)YPsp_reg();
@@ -7202,7 +7202,7 @@
   P T16,T17,T18,T19,T20,T21,T22,T23,T24,T25,T26,T27,T28,T29,T30,T31;
   P T32,T33,T34,T35,T36,T37,T38,T39,T40,T41,T42,T43;
 DEFCREGS();
-  (P)YPset_regs(regs_);
+  YPset_regs(regs_);
   T43 = (P)YPsp_elt((P)-1);
   fnF767 = T43;
   xF768 = fnF767;

---
Received: (at 300102-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 15:55:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 08:55:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DytYO-0001xC-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:47:12 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron M. Ucko)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300102: fixed in goo 0.155-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender

Bug#76918: A wide range of software applications, drivers, and more.

[Archibald]

Want to learn how to build your own website? 
http://vamo.8funbpq15i8x5r8.hjendozoacl.com





All movements go too far.
Subdue your appetites, my dears, and you've conquered human nature.   





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#269152: marked as done (culmus: breaks openoffice.org with Hebrew language pack)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269152: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 02:34:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 19:34:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from turing.cs.hmc.edu [134.173.42.99] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1yTN-0004ZY-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:34:39 -0700
From: Itai Seggev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: culmus: breaks openoffice.org with Hebrew language pack
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:10:46 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
To: "Undisclosed.Recipients": ;
X-Keywords: 
X-UID: 52
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: culmus
Version: 0.100-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Tags: sid

With the upgrade to Culmus 0.100-1, all the Hebrew menu items in
openoffice.org are replaced with blank squares. Switching to English or
downgrading culumus to 0.93 fixes the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8

Versions of packages culmus depends on:
ii  xutils4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 269152-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 16:38:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 09:38:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyuKS-0004to-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#269152: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:52 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openoffice.org
Source-Version: 1.1.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-e

Bug#317762: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: broken dependencies with libmyspell3 and libwpd8)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2005 11:38:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 04:38:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vsmtp2alice.tin.it [212.216.176.142] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DrwcQ-0007Yc-00; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 04:38:39 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (80.180.188.101) by vsmtp2alice.tin.it 
(7.2.060.1)
id 42D231C84A73; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:38:06 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (added by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: husky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org-bin: broken dependencies with libmyspell3 and libwpd8
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:43:06 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org-bin
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 317762-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 16:38:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 09:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyuKV-0004v9-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openoffice.org
Source-Version: 1.1.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-el_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-en_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-es_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-et_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-

Bug#318340: marked as done (openoffice.org: Broken dependency)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 21:49:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 14:49:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtBag-0003yc-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:49:58 -0700
Received: from 62-43-135-173.user.ono.com ([127.0.0.1]) [62.43.135.173] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtBaf-A6-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:49:57 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Sebasti=E0?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org: Broken dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:44 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: openoffice.org
Severity: normal


Trying to install again (I removed openoffice.org when transitioning to
X.org) there are unmet dependencies:
openoffice.org: Depends: openoffice.org-debian-files (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) but it will
not be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-bin (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) but it will not 
be installed

What should I do?
  


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
Received: (at 317762-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 16:38:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 09:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyuKV-0004v9-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openoffice.org
Source-Version: 1.1.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ca_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cs_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-da_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-de_1.1.4-

Bug#320047: marked as done (openoffice.org: Don't install, dependencies problem)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2005 17:08:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 26 10:08:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from colibri.dagami.org [82.226.230.20] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DxSug-0006JZ-00; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:08:18 -0700
Received: from [10.1.1.4] (helo=debian.dagami.org)
by colibri.dagami.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
id 1DxSgH-0008Az-JL; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:53:25 +0200
Received: from root by debian.dagami.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DxSug-0008FB-TJ; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:08:18 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: nb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: openoffice.org: Don't install, dependencies problem
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 19:08:18 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: openoffice.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


At install time, I hyave the following :

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  openoffice.org: Depends: openoffice.org-debian-files (> 1.1.3+1.1.4)
but it is not going to be installed
  Depends: openoffice.org-bin (> 1.1.3+1.1.4) but it is
not going to be installed
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

---
Received: (at 317762-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 16:38:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 09:38:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyuKV-0004v9-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
From: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#317762: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:36:55 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: openoffice.org
Source-Version: 1.1.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openoffice.org, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gnomevfs_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-gtk-gnome_1.1.4-4_i386.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-af_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-l10n-ar_1.1.4-4_all.deb
openoffice.org-l10n

Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning

[sacrificial-spam-address]

Package: libdjvulibre1
Version: 3.5.14-6
Severity: serious

Any number of packages that link to  /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.14
(I hit evince 0.3.0-2 first) break horribly when libdjvulibre.so.15 is
installed ahead.

I'm not sure how this should be handled, but neither the changelog
nor the version number change (3.5.14-5 to 3.5.14-6) gave any warning
of such an important change.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: ocalm
Version: 3.08.3-4
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
if [ -x ./ocamlopt ]; then  \
/usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ opt;\
else\
/usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ all;\
fi
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-3.08.3/ocaml-md5sums'
../ocamlopt -I ../otherlibs/unix -I ../otherlibs/str unix.cmxa str.cmxa -o
+ocaml-md5sums.opt ocaml-md5sums.ml
make[1]: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
make[1]: *** [ocaml-md5sums.opt] Error 127



Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320624: pcre-ocaml: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make a shared library.

[Kurt Roeckx]

Package: pcre-ocaml
Version: 5.10.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
ocamlc -c -cc "cc" -ccopt "-g -Wall -O2 \
-DPIC   \
-o pcre_stubs.o " pcre_stubs.c
ar rcs libpcre_stubs.a  pcre_stubs.o
ocamlc -c pcre.mli
ocamlc -c pcre.ml
ocamlmklib  \
-o pcre_stubs  pcre_stubs.o -lpcre \

/usr/bin/ld: pcre_stubs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can
not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
pcre_stubs.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


It has a -DPIC, but it requires the -fPIC options too.


Here is a patch for it:
--- OCamlMakefile.old   2005-07-30 19:56:03.089321016 +0200
+++ OCamlMakefile   2005-07-30 19:55:43.630279240 +0200
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
   PIC_CFLAGS := -fPIC
 endif
 ifndef PIC_CPPFLAGS
-  PIC_CPPFLAGS := -DPIC
+  PIC_CPPFLAGS := -fPIC -DPIC
 endif
 endif


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320608: several security holes in vpopmail

[Pawel Wiecek]

On Jul 30, 11:22am, Joey Hess wrote:
> Finally, the reason this bug is grave, vpopmail's author says that
> version 5.4.6 contains fixed for SQL injection vulnerabilities which

This one doesn't apply to current Debian package.

 Pawel

-- 
 (___)  | Pawel Wiecek - Coven / Svart - |
< o o > |  http://www.coven.vmh.net/<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GSM: 
+48603240006 |
 \ ^ /  | GPG/PGP info in message headers  *  [ Debian GNU/Linux developer ] |
  (")   | If two people love each other, there can be no happy end to it. -EH|


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319346: marked as done (i386 upload built with experimental's libc6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:53:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with a bin NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 12:28:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 05:28:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mf01.sitadelle.com (smtp.cegetel.net) [212.94.174.68] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dva9h-0006ls-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:28:01 -0700
Received: from bee.dooz.org (unknown [195.115.71.66])
by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195A631818A;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:27:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B22736815558; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:26:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:26:26 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: i386 upload built with experimental's libc6
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libsidplay
Severity: serious

Hi,

 The 1.36.59-3 version of libsidplay was uploaded for i386 with a libc6
 dep on version 2.3.5-2, currently in experimental.  libsidplay was
 built on all other arches nicely.  I suppose a binary NMU for i386 is
 enough to solve this issue.

  Bye,

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)

--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come, your destiny awaits!

---
Received: (at 319346-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 18:50:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 11:50:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-174-227.adsl-fixip.axelero.hu (barcikacomp.hu) 
[195.228.227.174] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DywPY-0003WN-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:50:17 -0700
Received: from localhost (linux [127.0.0.1])
by barcikacomp.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4440E30B11
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:43:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from barcikacomp.hu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (linux.barcikacomp.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 
10024)
with ESMTP id 18286-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:43:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gcs.lsc.hu (client-121-22.kabelszatnet-2002.hu [195.38.121.22])
by barcikacomp.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D4A30B0E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:43:15 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: fixed with a bin NMU
From: Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:53:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at barcikacomp.hu
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi,

 I have uploaded -3.0.1 (bin NMU) for x86, was accepted and now
libsidplay1 is installable.

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 319771 +pending
Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#319771: sfs-common: can't install SFS in sid

[Jaakko Niemi]

tags 319771 +pending
thanks

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005, Francois Gurin wrote:
> Package: sfs-common
> Version: 1:0.8-0+pre20041016.1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> 
> 
> SFS packages have a dependency on libgmp3 which is not available on sid.
> It has been replaced with libgmp3c2.

 Sorry about the delay. I've been working on getting sfs compile
 with gcc4. All problems have been identified, and basically
 things depend on glibc 2.3.5 getting into unstable and #320630.

--j


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: xchat bug #320587

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 320587 important
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
Severity set to `important'.

> tag 320587 moreinfo
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tag 320587 unreproducible
Bug#320587: xchat: Xchat close when i use /unloadall
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: unreproducible

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Not installable => grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 320508 grave
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
Severity set to `grave'.

> tags 320508 + sid
Bug#320508: libopenal0 depends on libsmpeg0 (replaced)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 319319 normal
Bug#319319: xscreensaver: does not start: 'couldn't setgroups ... not permitted'
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#317283: Has this bug disappeared?

[Holger Leskien]

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:

> The bug is still present in testing for me.
> Upgrade->crash
> downgrade->working.

Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.

> Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
> know where exactly the problem lies.

At least there is a bug in the package. If there is an ABI-change in
libgnomecanvas, evolution should depend on the right version.

Greetings,

Holger

-- 
Was man mit Gewalt gewinnt, kann man nur mit Gewalt behalten.
- Mahatma Gandhi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#317283: Has this bug disappeared?

[Ross Boylan]

The bug is still present in testing for me.
Upgrade->crash
downgrade->working.
Here was the upgrade:
Inst libgnomecanvas2-0 [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing) []
Inst libgnomecanvas2-common [2.8.0-1] (2.10.2-2 Debian:testing)

Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
know where exactly the problem lies.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318015: marked as done (xserver-xorg: dies in preinst due to debconf bug)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 16:41:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing. Not an Xorg bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2005 21:28:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 12 14:28:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no [129.241.93.19] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DsSIn-UA-00; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:28:29 -0700
Received: from trofast.ipv6.sesse.net ([2001:700:300:dc03:20e:cff:fe36:a766] 
helo=trofast.sesse.net)
by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DsSIk-000684-FW
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:28:27 +0200
Received: from sesse by trofast.sesse.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DsSIj-TB-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:28:25 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:28:25 +0200
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xserver-xorg: dies in preinst due to debconf bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.11.8 on a i686
X-Message-Flag: Outlook? --> http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious

After first doing "aptitude install xserver-common" and then "aptitude
install xserver-xorg" (just "aptitude dist-upgrade" wanted to remove
~300 packages, including GNOME :-) ), I got:

   xserver-xorg config warning: migrating xserver-xfree86 templates to 
xserver-xorg.
   Can't call method "choices" on an undefined value at
   /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Question.pm line 85,  line 118.

   Received signal.  Aborting xserver-xorg package config script.

Then, it installed some other packages, and tried again, giving
essentially the same error:

   xserver-xorg config warning: migrating xserver-xfree86 templates to 
xserver-xorg.
   Can't call method "choices" on an undefined value at
   /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Question.pm line 85,  line 115.

Some manual debugging with DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer revealed:

[...]
debconf (developer): <-- SET xserver-xorg/autodetect_monitor true
debconf (developer): --> 0 value set
debconf (developer): <-- FSET xserver-xorg/autodetect_monitor seen true
debconf (developer): --> 0 true
debconf (developer): <-- METAGET xserver-xfree86/config/display/modes choices
Can't call method "choices" on an undefined value at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Question.pm line 85,  line 115.

Now, this does indeed exist in debconf:

  Name: xserver-xfree86/config/display/modes
  Template: xserver-xfree86/config/display/modes
  Value: 800x600, 640x480
  Owners: xserver-xfree86

However, there are no choices there, actually... and I can't find
anything in the templates, either. I guess the problem is:

baby:~/xorg> grep -c config/display/modes /var/cache/debconf/templates.dat
0

So, the template in question is kind of half-there, since it has a _value_
but not a template. Now, debconf shouldn't _die_ on this, and that is
probably a bug (I guess I'll kick Joey when I see him later today :-) ),
for in the meantime this breaks X.org installation in these cases...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-3-686
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

---
Received: (at 318015-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 20:41:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 13:41:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dyy96-0007lN-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:41:24 -0700
Received: from squee ([68.160.39.108])
 by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04
 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <[EMA

Bug#267527: Better a2ps wrapper patch for lpr (tested)

[Russ Allbery]

package a2ps
severity 280370 grave
merge 267527 280370
thanks

I'm not completely sure that this bug should be grave, but I can see the
justification since right now a2ps can't print on any system that uses
lpr.  Anyway, since one of these bugs was already marked grave, I'll
change the severity on the other bug so that they can be merged.

The patch attached to 267527 didn't work with the version of getopt that I
have.  Note the output of getopt:

wanderer:~/tmp/a2ps-4.13b/debian> getopt -o d: -- -d foo testing
 -d 'foo' -- 'testing'

The parsing loop therefore has to look for and handle the -- and then stop
parsing options at that point; with the patch in 267527 applied,
a2ps-lpr-wrapper just always produced an error for me.  Here is a fixed
patch:

diff -ruNp a2ps-4.13b-pristine/debian/a2ps-lpr-wrapper 
a2ps-4.13b/debian/a2ps-lpr-wrapper
--- a2ps-4.13b-pristine/debian/a2ps-lpr-wrapper 2005-07-30 13:36:58.909469000 
-0700
+++ a2ps-4.13b/debian/a2ps-lpr-wrapper  2005-07-30 13:56:30.828310568 -0700
@@ -1,12 +1,30 @@
-#!/bin/sh
+#!/bin/bash
 #
 # a2ps-lpr-wrapper - lp/lpr wrapper script for GNU a2ps on Debian
 #
 
+TEMP=`getopt -o d: -n 'a2ps-lpr-wrapper' -- "$@"`
+PRINTER=""
+
+if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo "Terminating..." >&2; exit 1; fi
+
+# Note the quotes around `$TEMP': they are essential!
+eval set -- "$TEMP"
+
+while true ; do
+  case "$1" in
+-d) PRINTER=$2; shift 2 ;;
+--) shift; break ;;
+ *) echo "usage: a2ps-lpr-wrapper -d [printer] [files]"; exit 1 ;;
+  esac
+done
+
 # If /usr/bin/lp (from cupsys-client) exists, just use it.
 if [ -x /usr/bin/lp ]; then
-  /usr/bin/lp $*
+  if [ "x$PRINTER" != "x" ]; then d="-d $PRINTER"; else d=""; fi
+  /usr/bin/lp $d "$@"
 else
   # In case /usr/bin/lp is not available, then fall back /usr/bin/lpr.
-  /usr/bin/lpr $*
+  if [ "x$PRINTER" != "x" ]; then P="-P $PRINTER"; else P=""; fi
+  /usr/bin/lpr $P "$@"
 fi

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 

Bug#317283: Has this bug disappeared?

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Holger Leskien wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:30:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:

> > The bug is still present in testing for me.
> > Upgrade->crash
> > downgrade->working.

> Thank you for testing. I anticipated this.

> > Strictly speaking, this is probably not a bug in evolution, but I don't
> > know where exactly the problem lies.

> At least there is a bug in the package. If there is an ABI-change in
> libgnomecanvas, evolution should depend on the right version.

If there is an ABI change in libgnomecanvas, libgnomecanvas *must* advertise
this in its package name so that it doesn't silently break other packages
that depend on it.

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#320017: marked as done (vim: Arbitrary code execution in modelines)

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> reopen 320017
> thanks

> * Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> >  vim (1:6.3-071+1sarge1) stable; urgency=high
> >  .
> >* New upstream patches (081 and 082), see README.gz for details.
> >  + 6.3.081, 6.3.082: Fix arbitrary shell commands execution by wrapping
> >them in glob() or expand() function calls in modelines. 
> > (CAN-2005-2368)
> >(closes: #320017)

> I'm going to close it when 3.1r1 is released.

Wouldn't it be better to just use the version tracking instead?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Bug#267527: Better a2ps wrapper patch for lpr (tested)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2ps

> severity 280370 grave
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 267527 280370
Bug#267527: a2ps option "-P" does not work 
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Merged 267527 280370.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 320622 to ocaml

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Warning: Unknown package 'ocalm'
Bug reassigned from package `ocalm' to `ocaml'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320638: mysql-dfsg-4.1: uninstallable packages because of versioned dependency on Provided: package

[Adeodato Simó]

Package: libmysqlclient14,mysql-client-4.1,mysql-server-4.1
Version: 4.1.13-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

  in the latest mysql-dfsg-4.1, the dependencies from the above three
  packages have been changed to include "Depends: mysql-common-4.1 (>=
  4.1.12-1)". This makes the packages uninstallable, since albeit
  mysql-common-4.1 Provides: mysql-common, versioned provides don't work
  with the current version of dpkg.

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
 
Let us not be ashamed to speak what we shame not to think.
-- Michel de Montaigne



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318518: libcrypto++: FTBFS: gcc 4 problem

[Jens Peter Secher]

Status report

I am almost done with solving all the problems for libcrypto++ with
respect to the GCC4 transition.  My plan is as follows.  I will upload
to experimental and/or test the build on other architectures than i386.
If everything works smoothly, I will upload to sid.
-- 
Jens Peter Secher
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320624: pcre-ocaml: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make a shared library.

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: pcre-ocaml
> Version: 5.10.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch

> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pcre-ocaml-5.10.0/lib'
> ocamlc -c -cc "cc" -ccopt "-g -Wall -O2 \
> -DPIC   \
> -o pcre_stubs.o " pcre_stubs.c
> ar rcs libpcre_stubs.a  pcre_stubs.o
> ocamlc -c pcre.mli
> ocamlc -c pcre.ml
> ocamlmklib  \
> -o pcre_stubs  pcre_stubs.o -lpcre \

> /usr/bin/ld: pcre_stubs.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can
> not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> pcre_stubs.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

> It has a -DPIC, but it requires the -fPIC options too.

> Here is a patch for it:
> --- OCamlMakefile.old   2005-07-30 19:56:03.089321016 +0200
> +++ OCamlMakefile   2005-07-30 19:55:43.630279240 +0200
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
>PIC_CFLAGS := -fPIC
>  endif
>  ifndef PIC_CPPFLAGS
> -  PIC_CPPFLAGS := -DPIC
> +  PIC_CPPFLAGS := -fPIC -DPIC
>  endif
>  endif

That doesn't make any sense; CPPFLAGS refers to flags for the C
preprocessor, and one can clearly see three lines above that -fPIC is
already being set in the PIC_CFLAGS variable where it belongs.  The fix
belongs elsewhere, wherever PIC_CFLAGS is failing to be included.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#320622: sbuild vs relative paths

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 05:40:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Dear mentors, 
>   the last version of ocaml I uploaded FTBFS on all autobuilders but
> build properly on my unstable and in a pbuilder chroot.
> 
> According to the build logs (e.g. [1]) the FTFBS happened at this point:
> 
>   if [ -x ./ocamlopt ]; then  \
>   /usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ opt;\
>   else\
>   /usr/bin/make -C ocaml-md5sums/ all;\
>   fi
>   make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/ocaml-3.08.3/ocaml-md5sums'
>   ../ocamlopt -I ../otherlibs/unix -I ../otherlibs/str unix.cmxa str.cmxa -o 
> ocaml-md5sums.opt ocaml-md5sums.ml
>   make[1]: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
>   make[1]: *** [ocaml-md5sums.opt] Error 127

The problem is the first line of that file:
#!/usr/bin/ocamlrun

And /usr/bin/ocamlrun does not exist.  I guess you want to run
something like ../boot/ocamlrun ../ocamlopt or something.


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320624: pcre-ocaml: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make a shared library.

[Stefano Zacchiroli]

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 07:57:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:

On which architecture the package FTBFS?
On buildd.debian.org all attempted built have been completed
successfully ...

Before forwarding the patch upstream I would like to have more info to
give him.

Thanks for the report and for the patch.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity
of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: tagging 300699

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 300699 - patch
Bug#300699: alex: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): lexical error in string/character 
literal
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 320621 is grave, merging 320621 320682

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.2
> severity 320621 grave
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 320621 320682
Bug#320621: libdjvulibre1 3.5.14-6 changes soname without warning
Bug number 320682 not found.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: ocaml: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 320622 ocaml
Bug#320622: ocalm: FTBFS: ../ocamlopt: Command not found
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml' to `ocaml'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: a2ps bug updates

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Right, the request server doesn't read past a line starting with two
> # hyphens, so it can't read past MIME boundaries.  Redo the bug changes
> # that were done in messages that also contained patches.
> package a2ps
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: a2ps

> severity 280370 grave
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Bug#267527: a2ps option "-P" does not work 
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 267527 280370
Bug#267527: a2ps option "-P" does not work 
Bug#280370: a2ps using lp broken
Merged 267527 280370.

> tags 193530 patch
Bug#193530: a2ps: misleading -d
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318364: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on aalib1-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318364: fixed in aatv 0.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2005 03:08:37 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 20:08:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtGZ3-0007Rv-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:37 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6F38a5S092102
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dt6pa-00017b-EN
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:45:02 -0700
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:45:02 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on aalib1-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV"
Content-Disposition: inline


--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: aatv
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

aatv fails to build because it build-depends on aalib1-dev, which has
been renamed libaa1-dev:

 -> Considering  aalib1-dev
   -> Trying aalib1-dev
   -> Cannot install aalib1-dev; apt errors follow:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Package aalib1-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
However the following packages replace it:
  libaa1-dev
E: Package aalib1-dev has no installation candidate
E: Could not satisfy build-dependency.
E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed.

The attached patch fixes this error.

--=20
Matt

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="aatv_0.3-1.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u aatv-0.3/debian/control aatv-0.3/debian/control
--- aatv-0.3/debian/control
+++ aatv-0.3/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: graphics
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), aalib1-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libaa1-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.5.6.1
=20
 Package: aatv

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--

--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1paNfNdgYxVXvBARApj8AJ4tF/YVqR+NlLq/yZKiMRLHPnjphwCdHjwS
oR8TM9HP+/msDlqEttM0ZS4=
=zuKh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--

---
Received: (at 318364-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 00:38:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 30 17:38:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dz1kW-0003Hs-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:16 -0700
From: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318364: fixed in aatv 0.3-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:16 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=

Bug#320647: libmusicbrainz-2.1: rebuild needed for C++ ABI transition (NMU patch attached)

[Steve Langasek]

Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi Andreas,

Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an
NMU for libmusicbrainz-2.1, because this library provides C++ interfaces and
must be rebuilt so that a number of other C++-based packages can transition
to g++ 4.0.  The diff for this NMU is attached; the NMU will be uploaded
shortly.  If you see any problems with the patch, let me know so I can have
the package rejected out of NEW.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
diff -u libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/changelog 
libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/changelog
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/changelog
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libmusicbrainz-2.1 (2.1.1-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+  * Rebuild against g++-4.0 for the C++ ABI transition, renaming
+libmusicbrainz4 to libmusicbrainz4c2 and conflicting with
+libmusicbrainz4.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:04:58 -0700
+
 libmusicbrainz-2.1 (2.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules: Use simple-patchsys.mk.
diff -u libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/control 
libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/control
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/control
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/control
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 Package: libmusicbrainz4-dev
 Architecture: any
 Section: libdevel
-Depends: libmusicbrainz4 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev
+Depends: libmusicbrainz4c2 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev
 Provides: libmusicbrainz-dev
 Conflicts: libmusicbrainz-dev
 Description: Second generation incarnation of the CD Index - development
@@ -17,11 +17,12 @@
  .
  This package contains the development files (headers, static library).
 
-Package: libmusicbrainz4
+Package: libmusicbrainz4c2
 Architecture: any
 Section: libs
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Conflicts: libmusicbrainz1
+Conflicts: libmusicbrainz1, libmusicbrainz4
+Replaces: libmusicbrainz4
 Description: Second generation incarnation of the CD Index - library
  MusicBrainz indexes both digital compressed audio (MP3/Vorbis) and 
  digital audio CDs.
reverted:
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/libmusicbrainz4.install
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1.orig/debian/libmusicbrainz4.install
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-debian/tmp/usr/lib/*.so.*
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1.orig/debian/libmusicbrainz4c2.install
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/debian/libmusicbrainz4c2.install
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+debian/tmp/usr/lib/*.so.*


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#320649: evince: evince uninstallable due to missing dependency

[Chris Hanson]

Package: evince
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

I'm currently unable to install evince because it depends on
libcairo1, which isn't available in the archive.  I think it just
needs to be rebuilt against the newer version of libcairo.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-cph1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]