Bug#328741: marked as done (asm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch')
Your message dated Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in last upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 06:47:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 23:47:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c225159.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.225.159] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGWUJ-0008Dd-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:47:51 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGWUE-0005ux-1m; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:47:46 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: asm: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: asm Version: 1.5.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'asm' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:13: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asm-1.5.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/asm-1.5.3/debian/control2005-09-17 05:53:00.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-17 05:52:57.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Uploaders: Marcus Crafter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), ant (>= 1.6.5-1), kaffe (>= 2:1.1.5-3), libow-util-ant-tasks-java (>= 1.3-2) +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, dpatch, ant, kaffe (>= 2:1.1.5-3), libow-util-ant-tasks-java (>= 1.3-2) Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 Package: libasm-java --- Received: (at 328741-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 06:43:25 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 23:43:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHFN7-00075M-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:43:25 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 06:42:53 - Received: from unknown (EHLO [131.173.86.161]) [131.173.86.161] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 19 Sep 2005 08:42:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1941950 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:44:28 +0200 From: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050817) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in last upload X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: asm Version: 1.5.3-2 Hi, this is fixed in the last upload - however not closed due to wrong bug closing syntax in the changelog. Regards, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329053: arc: Insecure temporary file handling
Package: arc Version: 5.21l-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi! There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress, similar to the recent advisories about gzip: http://www.zataz.net/adviso/arc-09052005.txt Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet. If this is a real issue, you can ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get one. Thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329052: ncompress: Insecure temporary file handling
Package: ncompress Version: 4.2.4-15 Severity: grave Tags: security Hi! There is a recent report about insecure temporary files in ncompress, similar to the recent advisories about gzip: http://www.zataz.net/adviso/ncompress-09052005.txt Can you please check this? There is no CAN number yet. If this is a real issue, you can ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get one. Thanks! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328808: very old package, should this be removed?
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's very old, seems to have no upstream development anymore, has > not many users and there are some alternatives. The package "zone-file-check" is obsolete, it has been superseded by the utility "named-checkzone" that is included in the "bind9" package. "zone-file-check" was originally written for bind4. It can safely be removed from Debian. -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen - http://fnord.no/sysadmin Computers have feelings too! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328806: very old package, should this be removed?
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > The package doesn't have many users, is upstream dead as far as I can > see (though there is a newer upstream version available, but it's from > 2003). There's also a CDB perl module available that had some releases > in the last months. I think the situation is very similar to freecdb, and both should be removed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325941: marked as done (depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325941: fixed in k3b 0.12.4a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 14:37:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAaH4-0004k8-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:38 -0700 Received: (qmail 38004 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 21:37:08 - Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.126.216.211 with login) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 21:37:07 - Received: by triplehelix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28E732A95CD; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: k3b Severity: serious Hello, If you're receiving this message, you have a package that depends on one of the FLAC libraries (libFLAC, libFLAC++, libOggFLAC, libOggFLAC++.) Once again, the SONAME of the libraries has increased due to an API transition and you must rebuild your packages. Please briefly review the upstream API changelog at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/changelog.html to check if any of the API changes affect your FLAC-depending package. In most cases, a simple rebuild will be sufficient to transition. If you like, you can version the libflac-dev, libflac++-dev, liboggflac-dev, or liboggflac++-dev build-dependency to (>= 1.1.2-1) to ensure that your package is autobuilt against the new versions of the libraries. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the transition. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you. -- Joshua Kwan --- Received: (at 325941-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 05:10:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 22:10:40 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHDn7-0002F0-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:02:09 -0700 From: Francois Marier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#325941: fixed in k3b 0.12.4a-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: k3b Source-Version: 0.12.4a-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of k3b, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: k3b_0.12.4a-1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/k3b/k3b_0.12.4a-1.diff.gz k3b_0.12.4a-1.dsc to pool/main/k/k3b/k3b_0.12.4a-1.dsc k3b_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3b/k3b_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb k3b_0.12.4a.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/k/k3b/k3b_0.12.4a.orig.tar.gz k3blibs-dev_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3b/k3blibs-dev_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb k3blibs_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/k3b/k3blibs_0.12.4a-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francois Marier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated k3b package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:45:44 -0400 Source: k3b Binary: k3blibs k3blibs-dev k3b
Bug#327940: marked as done (noteedit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327940: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1g-0003Tk-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:52 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002TF-T0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: noteedit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327940-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003Nb-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327940: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz n
Bug#302917: marked as done (noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302917: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:04:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:04:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d028095.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.28.95] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBKg-0005Dy-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:04:30 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DIBKh-0007dx-Ru; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:04:31 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:04:31 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: normal When building 'noteedit' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: checking for dcopidl... /usr/bin/dcopidl checking for dcopidl2cpp... /usr/bin/dcopidl2cpp checking for mcopidl... /usr/bin/mcopidl checking for artsc-config... /usr/bin/artsc-config checking for kde-config... /usr/bin/kde-config checking for meinproc... /usr/bin/meinproc Testing compiler version ... 4 Cannot determine g++ version Check your compiler installation or try to find out why "./compvers" doesn't supply "2" or "3"! Please change the configure script to allow building with gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 302917-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NR-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#302917: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated noteedit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:13:49 +0100 Source: noteedit Binary: noteedit noteedit-data Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 2.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noteedit - KDE Music Editor noteedit-data - KDE Music Editor (data files) Closes: 140578 268206 299399 300380 302917 305091 308387 308387 313942 327587 327940 Changes: noteedit (2.8.0-1) unstable; urg
Bug#327002: marked as done (filelight: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 02:12:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 19:12:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECpQP-0008SC-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:12:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 31480 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 02:12:32 - Received: from dsl092-066-059.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO harpua) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 7 Sep 2005 02:12:32 - Received: by harpua (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F6DC1EF27; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ivan Nestlerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: filelight: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:12:33 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Version: 0.6.4.1-1 Severity: normal filelight is currently uninstallable in unstable because it still depends on the kdelibs4 from before the kde/c++ transition. It needs to be rebuilt against the transitioned library. Thanks, -Ivan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 327231-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P5-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated filelight package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:43:42 +0100 Source: filelight Binary: filelight Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99beta6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: filelight
Bug#327951: marked as done (filelight: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1w-0003Qs-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:08 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002RZ-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filelight: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Version: 0.6.4.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327231-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P5-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filel
Bug#327951: marked as done (filelight: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1w-0003Qs-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:08 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002RZ-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filelight: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Version: 0.6.4.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327002-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P3-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filel
Bug#327231: marked as done (Can't install filelight because it depend on an old librairy)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 14:43:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 07:43:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zigualh.com (osiris.zigualh.com) [82.237.231.235] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDNcE-5O-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:43:02 -0700 Received: by osiris.zigualh.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 66E2EBA133; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:42:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: zigualh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Can't install filelight because it depend on an old librairy X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:42:48 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can't install this package because librairies kdelibs4 and libqt3c102-mt are required while kdelibs4c2 and libqt3-mt replace them. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 327231-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P5-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327231: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated filelight package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:43:42 +0100 Source: filelight Binary: filelight Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99beta6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: filelight - show where your diskspace is being used Closes: 265384 304497 327002 327231 Changes: filelight (0.99beta6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream (beta) release. Closes: #304497 * Can delete files with spaces in the filename. Closes: #265384 . * Rebuilt for C++ transition. Closes: #327002, #327231 . * debian/rules (checkdir): update for source reorgani
Bug#327231: marked as done (Can't install filelight because it depend on an old librairy)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2005 14:43:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 08 07:43:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zigualh.com (osiris.zigualh.com) [82.237.231.235] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDNcE-5O-00; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:43:02 -0700 Received: by osiris.zigualh.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 66E2EBA133; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:42:48 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: zigualh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Can't install filelight because it depend on an old librairy X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:42:48 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can't install this package because librairies kdelibs4 and libqt3c102-mt are required while kdelibs4c2 and libqt3-mt replace them. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.4 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 327002-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P3-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated filelight package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:43:42 +0100 Source: filelight Binary: filelight Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99beta6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: filelight - show where your diskspace is being used Closes: 265384 304497 327002 327231 Changes: filelight (0.99beta6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream (beta) release. Closes: #304497 * Can delete files with spaces in the filename. Closes: #265384 . * Rebuilt for C++ transition. Closes: #327002, #327231 . * debian/rules (checkdir): update for source reorgani
Bug#327002: marked as done (filelight: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 02:12:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 19:12:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECpQP-0008SC-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:12:33 -0700 Received: (qmail 31480 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 02:12:32 - Received: from dsl092-066-059.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO harpua) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by mail26.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 7 Sep 2005 02:12:32 - Received: by harpua (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8F6DC1EF27; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ivan Nestlerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: filelight: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:12:33 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: filelight Version: 0.6.4.1-1 Severity: normal filelight is currently uninstallable in unstable because it still depends on the kdelibs4 from before the kde/c++ transition. It needs to be rebuilt against the transitioned library. Thanks, -Ivan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 327002-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:19:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:19:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBDQ-P3-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327002: fixed in filelight 0.99beta6-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:17:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: filelight Source-Version: 0.99beta6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of filelight, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.diff.gz filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1.dsc filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6-1_i386.deb filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/filelight/filelight_0.99beta6.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated filelight package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:43:42 +0100 Source: filelight Binary: filelight Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99beta6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: filelight
Bug#329043: /usr/include/bits/syscall.h incomplete
Package: libc6-dev Version: 2.3.5-6 Severity: serious /usr/include/bits/syscall.h on mips and mipsel only contains definitions for the ABI-specific syscalls. The rest of the syscalls (suchs as SYS_pivot_root) are missing, which is causing other packages to build without support for the syscall, and in some cases, causing them to FTBFS (util-linux) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: mips and mipsel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329041: valgrind: Valgrind is being compiled with SSE instruction set
Package: valgrind Version: 1:3.0.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Whoever is compiling Valgrind for i386 is compiling it with -msse making it incompatible on every machine without SSE support, basically anything before the P3/AXP. I originally reported this bug direct to valgrind team since it affected source package of 3.0.0 from their site too. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110813 They fixed configure putting -msse in the makefile for 3.0.1, I can confirm that using their 3.0.1 source I no longer have issues running it. However, whoever compiled 3.0.1 package for Debian must have used a machine which supports SSE because I'm getting illegal instructions with Debian's version. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (300, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages valgrind depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an Versions of packages valgrind recommends: ii gdb 6.3-6 The GNU Debugger -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328990: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS on m68k due to -O3
Hi, Shouldn't this be a bug against the m68k toolchain? Unless something in wxPython changed that I am not aware of, it has always done this (and not been a problem) previously, no? I'm not wholly against patching this package in the name of pragmatism, especially if a release were otherwise immediately pending, but since it is not, shouldn't we aim this at the real problem first? Please feel free to reassign it if you agree that is the case. Otherwise, someone will need to convince me that this does not have an adverse affect on all the other platforms. (ergo convince me that _I_ should not reassign it ;-) cheers, Ron On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 05:20:01PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > Package: wxwindows2.4 > Version: 2.4.4.1.1 > Severity: serious > > Hello, > > wxwindows2.4 FTBFS on m68k, presumably due to the use of -O3 to > compile wxPython. Lowering the optimization level to -O2 should help. > > This will probably bite wxwidgets2.6. > > Cheers, > > -- > Adeodato Sim?? > EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 > Listening to: Kiko Veneno - Los managers > > The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new > discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..." > -- Isaac Asimov > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: A third try
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 308502 normal #I screwed up and typed the wrong bug number Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > merge 319094 309958 308052 Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Bug#319094: package conflicts blackbox & fluxbox Merged 308052 309958 319094. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329039: mkisofs segfaults when creating isos
Package: mkisofs Version: 2.01+01a03-1 Severity: grave mkisofs segfaults when creating isos. Example: mkisofs -dvd-video -V ISO_`date +"%d-%m-%Y"` -o image.iso image Segmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Merge these
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 319094 serious Bug#319094: package conflicts blackbox & fluxbox Severity set to `serious'. > severity 309958 serious Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Severity set to `serious'. > severity 308502 serious Bug#308502: USB problems installing sarge Severity set to `serious'. > #only one of these wasn't already serious, but since I'm trying again > #after a failed attempt to merge these, I don't remember which one it > #it was > merge 319094 309958 308502 Bug#308502: USB problems installing sarge Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #308502 has `installation-reports'; #309958 has `fluxbox' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: scorched3d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Sorry for this, I only saw the already opened one after > # filing another, as its severity wasn't adequate > merge 319528 329036 Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (libwxgtk2.4 instead of libwxgtk2.4-1) Bug#329036: scorched3d: depends on libwxgtk2.4 Merged 319528 329036. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328742: marked as done (libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-data-inheritable-perl')
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:47:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328742: fixed in libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl 0.12-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 06:53:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 16 23:53:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c225159.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.225.159] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGWZS-lY-00; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:53:10 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGWZQ-0006Tb-Qo; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:53:08 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-data-inheritable-perl' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:53:08 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl Version: 0.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/01use.t line 4. # Compilation failed in require at (eval 3) line 2. # BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 3) line 2. # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 1 Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay t/02podskipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required t/03podcoverageskipped all skipped: Test::Pod::Coverage 1.04 required Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/01use.t 1 256 11 100.00% 1 2 tests skipped. Failed 1/3 test scripts, 66.67% okay. 1/1 subtests failed, 0.00% okay. make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 make[1]: Leaving directory `/libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl-0.12' make: *** [install-stamp] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-data-inheritable-perl' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl-0.12/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl-0.12/debian/control 2005-09-17 06:44:20.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-17 06:44:18.0 + @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl Section: perl Priority: optional -Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= 5.8.0-7), debhelper (>= 4.0.2), libcache-fastmmap-perl, liburi-find-perl +Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= 5.8.0-7), debhelper, libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-data-inheritable-perl, libcache-fastmmap-perl, liburi-find-perl Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.2 --- Received: (at 328742-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 23:48:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 16:48:24 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH8sC-0004TS-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:47:04 -0700 From: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328742: fixed in libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl 0.12-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:47:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl Source-Version: 0.12-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libcatalyst-plugin-session-fastmmap-perl, which is d
Processed: scorched3d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # This makes the package uninstallable, is certainly RC > severity 319528 grave Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (libwxgtk2.4 instead of libwxgtk2.4-1) Severity set to `grave'. > tag 319528 sid Bug#319528: scorched3d: dependency borkage (libwxgtk2.4 instead of libwxgtk2.4-1) There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329036: scorched3d: depends on libwxgtk2.4
Package: scorched3d Severity: grave Tags: sid The subject/title says it all: libwxgtk2.4 has been removed from unstable on July, 13th 2005, making scorched3d uninstallable. -- Guilherme de S. Pastore (fatalerror) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#328837: very old package, should this be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 328837 RM: titrax -- RoM; old, superseded Bug#328837: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > severity 328837 normal Bug#328837: RM: titrax -- RoM; old, superseded Severity set to `normal'. > reassign 328837 ftp.debian.org Bug#328837: RM: titrax -- RoM; old, superseded Bug reassigned from package `titrax' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thankskbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of openmotif 2.2.3-1.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 323798 + fixed Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324796: grave bug(s) in Debian gs-gpl package
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:48:20PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > These grave bugs in gs-gpl are blocking work and causing trouble for > many people. Is there anything I can do to help get them fixed? I'm > happy to do NMUs if that would be helpful. Please advise. I would encourage you to NMU this package if you can confirm that Ian's patch fixes the bug and are satisfied with it. I don't have a powerpc that I can test the fix on, or I would have tried to NMU already. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 308052 + fixed-upstream Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Tags were: sid confirmed Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 309958 + fixed-upstream Bug#309958: fluxbox and blackbox contain same file Tags were: fixed-upstream sid confirmed Bug#308052: Both blackbox and fluxbox seem to provide bsetroot Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 316566 + fixed-upstream Bug#316566: 64 bit issues with XChangeProperty -- fixed in 0.9.14 Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323798: NMU
I uploaded an NMU for this bug: diff -u openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog --- openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog +++ openmotif-2.2.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +openmotif (2.2.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS on s390 (and reportedly sparc) by compiling with +-fno-strict-aliasing, based on a patch by Petr Salinger +(Closes: #323798) + + -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:00:31 +0200 + openmotif (2.2.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=high * NMU. diff -u openmotif-2.2.3/debian/rules openmotif-2.2.3/debian/rules --- openmotif-2.2.3/debian/rules +++ openmotif-2.2.3/debian/rules @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ build-stamp: dh_testdir (cd $(WORK)/$(DIR); set -ex;\ + CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing"\ ./configure \ --prefix=/usr/X11R6 \ --mandir=/usr/X11R6/man;\ Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308052: Fixed upstream in 0.9.14
This is fixed in 0.9.14 upstream, by renaming bsetroot to fbsetroot. From the changelog: *05/07/12: Renaming of 'bsetroot' to 'fbsetroot' (Mathias) blackbox's 'bsetroot' and fluxbox's 'bsetroot' have different syntax nowadays and collide when you install fluxbox and blackbox. hence the renaming updated manpage, helper utils (fbgm, startfluxbox, fbsetbg), nls etc -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: severity of 323798 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > # patch also seems to fix the FTBFS on s390 > severity 323798 serious Bug#323798: [sparc] corrupted double-linked list Severity set to `serious'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324796: grave bug(s) in Debian gs-gpl package
These grave bugs in gs-gpl are blocking work and causing trouble for many people. Is there anything I can do to help get them fixed? I'm happy to do NMUs if that would be helpful. Please advise. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327502: marked as done (qtorrent: Qtorrent does not start)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327502: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2005 15:24:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 10 08:24:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gips.pi.net.pl (mail133.pi.net.pl) [195.116.221.99] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EE7De-0006IZ-00; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 08:24:43 -0700 Received: (qmail 19065 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2005 15:24:40 - Received: from unknown (HELO dom.foo.bar) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 195.205.153.133 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2005 15:24:40 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-2?q?Robert_Gomu=B3ka?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: qtorrent: Qtorrent does not start X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:25:33 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qtorrent Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable qtorrent does not start: $ qtorrent QTorrent starting up.. Please be patient as this might some time.. Note: Psyco not detected, take a peek here: http://psyco.sf.net/ Warning: couldn't load targets Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/qtorrent", line 37, in ? run(VERSION) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/__init__.py", line 5, in run qtorrent3.QTorrent3(version) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/qtorrent3.py", line 37, in __init__ self.mainwin, start_gui = run_gui(self) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/QtGui/__init__.py", line 4, in run_gui from mainwin import USE_KDE, MainWin File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/QtGui/mainwin.py", line 4, in ? from qt import * ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/qt.so: undefined symbol: _ZTI11QMotifStyle -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13RG Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages qtorrent depends on: ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.4 2.4.1-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python2.4-qt3 3.15-3 Qt3 bindings for Python 2.4 qtorrent recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 327502-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 22:44:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 15:44:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH7hg-jS-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley J. Landaker) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327502: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: qtorrent Source-Version: 2.9.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qtorrent, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qtorrent_2.9.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2.diff.gz qtorrent_2.9.1-2.dsc to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2.dsc qtorrent_2.9.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the
Bug#314654: marked as done (qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev')
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314654: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2005 17:29:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 17 10:29:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d027074.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.27.74] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DjKeZ-0007gC-00; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:29:15 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DjKeY-PU-3B; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:29:14 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: qtorrent: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 19:29:14 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: qtorrent Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'qtorrent' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_strip dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_python dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.) make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qtorrent-2.9.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/qtorrent-2.9.1/debian/control 2005-06-17 19:19:27.0 +0200 +++ ./debian/control2005-06-17 19:19:23.0 +0200 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.2), python2.4, python2.4-dev, python2.4-qt3, pyqt-tools +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.2), python-dev, python2.4, python2.4-dev, python2.4-qt3, pyqt-tools Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: qtorrent --- Received: (at 314654-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 22:44:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 15:44:22 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH7hg-jQ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wesley J. Landaker) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#314654: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qtorrent Source-Version: 2.9.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qtorrent, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qtorrent_2.9.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2.diff.gz qtorrent_2.9.1-2.dsc to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2.dsc qtorrent_2.9.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/q/qtorrent/qtorrent_2.9.1-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated qtorrent package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:13:17 -0600 Source: qtorrent Binary: qtorrent Architecture: source all Version: 2.9.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: qtorrent - graphical BitTorrent client using Qt 3.x Closes: 314654 327502 Ch
Bug#328837: very old package, should this be removed?
I no longer use the software either and it is no longer maintained upstream. I agree with removal of the package, What should happen now? On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Package: titrax > Version: 1.98.1-6 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > long time could cover up some QA problems. > > I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose > to remove it. > The package has not many users and there are some alternatives (worklog, > wmwork) available. > > This usually means that your package matched some of the following > criteria: > > [1] Your packages has not had a maintainer upload for more than > three years. > > [2] has one or more RC bugs with no answer from the maintainer (**) > > [3] the state of your packages in general seems to indicate that you > might be MIA > > [4] (if we propose a removal) it shows in popcon as having less than > 100 users with the package installed. > > [5] the package was not released with sarge > > and at least ([1] and ( [2] or [3] or [4] or [5] )) was true. > > (**) The maintainer not answering to RC bugs refers to bugs filed > more than one month before the time the check was performed. > > After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign > this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan it) or > ftp.debian.org (in case we propose to remove it). > > The package will need an upload or an explanation for this action not to > proceed. > > Please do *not* upload a package just to get off this list - it won't > help the package at all. Maintainers should be responsive and feel > responsible for their packages without needing other people to force > them to do work. Sometimes, finding a new maintainer or even removing > the package completly from the archive is better for Debian's users. > > Thanks! > > Marc > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318901: marked as done (Needs repackaging for latest aspell)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318901: fixed in aspell-he 0.9+0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2005 14:18:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 07:18:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mx1.tau.ac.il (tau.ac.il) [132.66.7.201] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DuWS0-0004B7-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 07:18:35 -0700 Received: (PineApp-Mail 7699 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jul 2005 15:53:14 +0300 Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mx1 with PineApp-Mail-SeCure-2.50.050413; 18/07/2005 15:53:10 X-PineApp-Mail-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-PineApp-Mail-Rcpt-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-PineApp-Mail: 2.50.050413 (No viruses found. Processed in 3.518889 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO litshi.luna.local) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mx1 with SMTP; 18 Jul 2005 15:52:59 +0300 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:47:08 +0300 From: Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: aspell-he: doesn't work with the current aspell Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aspell-he Version: 0.6-0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Debian switched from libaspell15 to libaspell15c2 so aspell-he doesn't install and if forced, doesn't work -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=he_IL, LC_CTYPE=he_IL (charmap=ISO-8859-8) +++ This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System at the Tel-Aviv University CC. --- Received: (at 318901-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 22:18:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 15:18:40 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH7T6-0006Cf-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:17:04 -0700 From: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318901: fixed in aspell-he 0.9+0-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: aspell-he Source-Version: 0.9+0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of aspell-he, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aspell-he_0.9+0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/aspell-he/aspell-he_0.9+0-2.diff.gz aspell-he_0.9+0-2.dsc to pool/main/a/aspell-he/aspell-he_0.9+0-2.dsc aspell-he_0.9+0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/aspell-he/aspell-he_0.9+0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated aspell-he package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 16:01:25 +0300 Source: aspell-he Binary: aspell-he Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9+0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Hebrew Packaging Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: aspell-he - Hebrew dictionary for aspell
Bug#327502: qtorrent does not start....
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Lawrence, this bug was due to a change in libqt3-mt 3.3.4-8. The Debian Qt maintainers have been so kind to back out this change in libqt3-mt 3.3.5-1, therefore you can close this bug report. greetings Torsten - -- Torsten Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ID: A244C858 -- FP: 1902 0002 5DFC 856B F146 894C 7CC5 451E A244 C858 Keyserver: subkeys.pgp.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDLdhkfMVFHqJEyFgRAhkZAJ46iiYAChJBvf8pq8DqKd8wyLBc1gCcDKDV D1VzlNu2WndDq4C6+sOKjt4= =GljW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329023: xine-ui: xine-ui segfaults after glibc upgrade
Package: xine-ui Version: 0.99.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading glibc (libc6) xine loads, but dies as soon as you try to do anything with it like right clicking on the video window. I fixed that by just rebuilding xine-ui from source (apt-get source xine-ui -b) and installing the newly built deb. I have since built a deb using the source code from xinehq.de 0.99.4 I would just release this new version as the one in unstable (sid) is nearly 7 months old, has an xmas splash screen and is a bit stale. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xine-ui depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcurl3-gssapi 7.14.0-5 libcurl compiled with GSSAPI suppo ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libreadline5 5.0-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii libslang2 2.0.4-5The S-Lang programming library - r ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-2 SSL shared libraries ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxine1 1.0.1-1.3 the xine video/media player librar ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System multi-head display ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxtst6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System event recording an ii libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System video extension li ii libxxf86vm1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Video Mode selection library ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages xine-ui recommends: ii libaa11.4p5-28 ascii art library -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328938: marked as done (libf2c2: FTBFS: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328938: fixed in libf2c2 20050501-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 10:24:50 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 03:24:49 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwLp-eQ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:24:49 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D186C3809D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:24:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20043808C for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:24:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9A11C26136; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:24:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:24:48 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libf2c2: FTBFS: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libf2c2 Version: 20050501-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: cc -c -DSkip_f2c_Undefs -fPIC -I ../src -DNON_UNIX_STDIO -Df2c F77_aloc.c F77_aloc.c:1:17: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory Kurt --- Received: (at 328938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 20:53:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 13:53:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH64K-0007mD-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:24 -0700 From: Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328938: fixed in libf2c2 20050501-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:24 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libf2c2 Source-Version: 20050501-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libf2c2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libf2c2-dev_20050501-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libf2c2/libf2c2-dev_20050501-2_i386.deb libf2c2_20050501-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libf/libf2c2/libf2c2_20050501-2.diff.gz libf2c2_20050501-2.dsc to pool/main/libf/libf2c2/libf2c2_20050501-2.dsc libf2c2_20050501-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libf/libf2c2/libf2c2_20050501-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libf2c2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:27:40 +0100 Source: libf2c2 Binary: libf2c2-dev libf2c2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 20050501-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Alan Bain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libf2c2- Shared libraries for use with FORTRAN applications libf2c2-dev - Development libraries for use with f2c Closes: 328938 Changes: libf2c2 (20050501-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Previous version erroneously assumed f2c.h was on include path, now fixed (closes: bug#328938) Fil
Bug#327005: marked as done (kxmleditor: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 02:20:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 19:20:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECpYB-0001gf-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:20:35 -0700 Received: (qmail 8504 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2005 02:20:34 - Received: from dsl092-066-059.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO harpua) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 7 Sep 2005 02:20:34 - Received: by harpua (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DC051EF27; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 22:20:36 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ivan Nestlerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kxmleditor: needs to be rebuilt for kde/c++ transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 22:20:36 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kxmleditor Version: 1.1.4-1 Severity: important kxmleditor is currently uninstallable in unstable because it still depends on the kdelibs4 from before the kde/c++ transition. It needs to be rebuilt against the transitioned library. Thanks, -Ivan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 327975-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 20:54:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 13:54:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH64I-0007lj-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 From: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kxmleditor Source-Version: 1.1.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kxmleditor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kxmleditor/kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.diff.gz kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kxmleditor/kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.dsc kxmleditor_1.1.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kxmleditor/kxmleditor_1.1.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kxmleditor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:10:19 +0200 Source: kxmleditor Binary: kxmleditor Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.1.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: kxmleditor - XML Editor for KDE Closes: 314019 327975 Changes: kxml
Bug#327676: marked as done (stardata-common: FTBFS: Missing build dependency)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:40 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327676: fixed in stardata-common 0.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 14:59:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 07:59:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EETIY-sU-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:59:14 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 82F3C38194 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:59:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA2838189 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:59:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3DB3326136; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:59:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:59:13 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: stardata-common: FTBFS: Missing build dependency Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: stardata-common Version: 0.2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 The problem is that you put debhelper in Build-Depends-Indep instead of Build-Depends. Kurt --- Received: (at 327676-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 20:54:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 13:54:26 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH64a-0007us-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:40 -0700 From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327676: fixed in stardata-common 0.3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:40 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: stardata-common Source-Version: 0.3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of stardata-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: stardata-common_0.3.dsc to pool/main/s/stardata-common/stardata-common_0.3.dsc stardata-common_0.3.tar.gz to pool/main/s/stardata-common/stardata-common_0.3.tar.gz stardata-common_0.3_i386.deb to pool/main/s/stardata-common/stardata-common_0.3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated stardata-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:41:45 +0200 Source: stardata-common Binary: stardata-common Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Francisco Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: stardata-common - Common framework to manage astronomy packages Closes: 327676 Changes: stardata-common (0.3) unstable; urgency=low . * Debhelper should
Bug#327975: marked as done (kxmleditor: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy28-0003SX-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:20 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002T4-AW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kxmleditor: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kxmleditor Version: 1.1.4-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327975-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 20:54:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 13:54:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH64I-0007lj-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 From: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327975: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:47:22 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: kxmleditor Source-Version: 1.1.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kxmleditor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kxmleditor/kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.diff.gz kxmleditor_1.1.4-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kxmleditor/kxmledi
Processed: Fixed in NMU of nvidia-settings 1.0+20050525-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 324594 + fixed Bug#324594: nvidia-settings: FTBFS: Missing build dependencies. There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321837: Intent to NMU
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 05:23 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:31:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > As these bugs have been open for a month without a response from the > > maintainers, I plan to NMU these packages in 1 week (or sooner, at the > > maintainers' request). > > feel free, as long as you dont break it. I prepare a new maintainer version, > since it is a nmu anyway, but this might take two weeks. This bug was already fixed in the last NMU - I've merged the reports and marked this one fixed as well. Thanks! -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 328910 328954
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > merge 328910 328954 Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion Merged 328910 328954. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328964: marked as done (libtheora-dev is not sid installable)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:44:33 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328964: libtheora-dev is not sid installable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 13:04:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 06:04:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGyq1-00030W-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:04:09 -0700 Received: from imp3-q.free.fr (imp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D124410891 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp3-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 9A5F949755; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:04:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mon69-3-82-235-39-64.fbx.proxad.net (mon69-3-82-235-39-64.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.39.64]) by imp3-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:04:08 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libtheora-dev is not sid installable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 82.235.39.64 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: libtheora-dev is not sid installable Package: libtheora-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** apt-get install libtheora-dev fails this way with sid : The following packages have unmet dependencies: libtheora-dev: Depends: libtheora0 (=3D 0.0.0.alpha4-1.1) but 1.0alpha3= -0.0 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1-1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 328964-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 18:44:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 11:44:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH49S-0006hT-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:44:34 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 796E47045; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:44:33 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#328964: libtheora-dev is not sid installable Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:04:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > apt-get install libtheora-dev fails this way with sid : > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libtheora-dev: Depends: libtheora0 (=3D 0.0.0.alpha4-1.1) but 1.0alpha3= -0.0 is > to be installed > E: Broken packages Then you have someone else's libtheora0 package installed or in your sources.list. This is not the fault of the Debian package. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --k1lZv
Processed: found 328017 in 0.35-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > found 328017 0.35-2 Bug#328017: kxdocker: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Bug marked as found in version 0.35-2. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328936: libhtml-prototype-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libmodule-build-perl, libhtml-tree-perl'
Hello, the fix for this bug is in SVN now. Due I'm still waiting for my account to be created I need a sponsor to get it uploaded. The package is at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~rafl/Code/Debian/nomeata/ Regards, Flo -- BOFH excuse #386: The Internet is being scanned for viruses. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328948: marked as done (gxmms: FTBFS: No rule to make target `binary-arch'.)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328948: fixed in gxmms 0.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 10:58:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 03:58:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwsX-00036q-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:58:37 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B01423818B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:58:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F903380F2 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:58:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 525BA26136; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:58:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:58:36 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gxmms: FTBFS: No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gxmms Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: serious Hi, Youo package is failing to build with the following error: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch make: *** No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Stop. You need to have a binary-arch target in your rules file. Kurt --- Received: (at 328948-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 16:38:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 09:38:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH25G-0001Kz-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:06 -0700 From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328948: fixed in gxmms 0.3.0-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gxmms Source-Version: 0.3.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gxmms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gxmms-bmp_0.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gxmms/gxmms-bmp_0.3.0-3_i386.deb gxmms-common_0.3.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gxmms/gxmms-common_0.3.0-3_all.deb gxmms-xmms_0.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gxmms/gxmms-xmms_0.3.0-3_i386.deb gxmms_0.3.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gxmms/gxmms_0.3.0-3.diff.gz gxmms_0.3.0-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gxmms/gxmms_0.3.0-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gxmms package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:20:31 -0500 Source: gxmms Binary: gxmms-xmms gxmms-common gxmms-bmp Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.3.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gxmms-bmp - Simple GNOME applet to control the basic functions of BMP gxmms-common - Common files for the gxmms (both XMMS and BMP) GNOME applet gxmms-xmms - Simple GNOME applet to control the basic fu
Bug#327724: marked as done (kazekahaze: links agains openssl without permission)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327724: fixed in kazehakase 0.3.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 18:15:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 11:15:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.bfoeg.at [194.152.181.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEWM4-0003iD-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:15:04 -0700 Received: from localhost (fluffy.office.bernhart-fischer.at [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bfoeg.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EC7C05D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.bfoeg.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fluffy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28126-06 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freedom.vie.wuertele.net (unknown [62.116.122.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freedom.vie.wuertele.net", Issuer "Martin Wuertele" (verified OK)) by mail.bfoeg.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E95C056 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by freedom.vie.wuertele.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A375F071; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:35 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kazekahaze: links agains openssl without permission X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:35 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at bfoeg.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kazekahaze Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: serious The package links against openssl (Build-Depends: (...) libssl-dev) but there is no proof for a permission to link. See http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 and/or http://www.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html as well as http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html for more information. --- Received: (at 327724-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 16:38:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 09:38:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH25J-0001Lb-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:09 -0700 From: Hidetaka Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327724: fixed in kazehakase 0.3.0-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kazehakase Source-Version: 0.3.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kazehakase, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kazehakase_0.3.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kazehakase/kazehakase_0.3.0-3.diff.gz kazehakase_0.3.0-3.dsc to pool/main/k/kazehakase/kazehakase_0.3.0-3.dsc kazehakase_0.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kazehakase/kazehakase_0.3.0-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hidetaka Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated kazehakase package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:48:05 +0900 Source: kazehakase B
Bug#328992: dasd support has been dropped from parted until someone cares enough to fix the patch.
Hello, This is due to : * Removed the s390 patch, which needs a full review with regard to the PedUnit stuff i believe. In particular with regard to the sector size support. Please try to get this one integrated upstream, as it is the last problematic big debian-specific patch remaining. -- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:41:06 +0200 Bastian Blank was looking at the patch, but i am not sure what is happening in this regard, he has SVN access for the repo. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328971: marked as done (FTBFS in unstable pbuilder (and on buildds))
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328971: fixed in vtk 4.4.2-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 14:01:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 07:01:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk [212.23.3.141] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGzj6-0005yJ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:01:04 -0700 Received: from [62.3.98.41] (helo=dynam.mhy.org.uk) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EGzj3-0006P5-HN for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:01:01 + Received: by dynam.mhy.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19A4A1FF284; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:01:00 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:01:00 +0100 From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS in unstable pbuilder (and on buildds) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: None at all User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [62.3.98.41] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: vtk Version: 4.4.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: patch vtk-4.4.2-7 fails to build from source in an unstable pbuilder instance and on most buildds (http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=vtk) due to a bad Build-Dep. The attached patch fixes this and a bug with the maintainer i386 binary upload of libvtk4-dev which depends of libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev instead of xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev. The two things are basically the same problem. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "That's why the good die young; it's because Death can't be bothered to check the paperwork." Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vtk_builddep_fix.diff" diff -Naur vtk-4.4.2/debian/control vtk-4.4.2-mod/debian/control --- vtk-4.4.2/debian/control2005-09-18 14:59:05.0 +0100 +++ vtk-4.4.2-mod/debian/control2005-09-18 13:24:23.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: graphics Priority: optional Maintainer: A. Maitland Bottoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, python-dev, cmake (>> 2.0.4), libexpat1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libpng12-0-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev, libfreetype6-dev, ftgl-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, python-dev, cmake (>> 2.0.4), libexpat1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libpng12-0-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev, libfreetype6-dev, ftgl-dev Build-Depends-Indep: libdigest-md5-perl, doxygen Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Architecture: all Conflicts: libvtk-dev, libvtk32-dev Replaces: libvtk-dev, libvtk32-dev -Depends: libvtk4c2, libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, libc6-dev +Depends: libvtk4c2, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, libc6-dev Suggests: vtk-examples, vtk-doc Section: libdevel Description: VTK header files for building C++ code --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- --- Received: (at 328971-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 16:19:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 09:19:05 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH1qo-0004tS-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:17:10 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A. Maitland Bottoms) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328971: fixed in vtk 4.4.2-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:17:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09
Processed: merging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321837 + fixed Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)] Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > severity 321837 grave Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)] Severity set to `grave'. > merge 321837 322541 Bug#321837: [Fwd: Log for successful build of mmv_1.01b-12.1 (dist=unstable)] Bug#322541: mmv is unusable bacause of constant hangs / segmentation fault Merged 321837 322541. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328797: very old package, should this be removed?
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: powstatd-crypt > Version: 1.5.1-2 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > long time could cover up some QA problems. > > I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose > to remove it. > The package has almost no users, is quite out of date wrt Debian's > policies and there are some alternatives available. This package is also > in the obsolete non-us section. I had held off until the sarge release to do anything about replacing powerstatd with powerstatd-crypt. I have a bug in my new defconf script which hangs the install, and I haven't yet figured it out. But the plan is to remove powstatd-crypt and have it replaced by powstatd. -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~psg GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328992: partconf: [s/390] No longer recognizes dasd partitions
Package: partconf Version: 1.10 Severity: grave Tags: d-i During installation for s/390, partconf no longer recognizes partitions on a dasd. This is probably due to recompilation against libparted 1.6.24. pgpmSfYq3oxbn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#328929: possible gcc version problem
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:53:32AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: > gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc > pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of > the gcc related packages in the pbuilder. Strange it fails in my uptodate pbuilder on i386. Really strange. I'm just investigating this. May some strange dependency is missing. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328990: wxwindows2.4: FTBFS on m68k due to -O3
Package: wxwindows2.4 Version: 2.4.4.1.1 Severity: serious Hello, wxwindows2.4 FTBFS on m68k, presumably due to the use of -O3 to compile wxPython. Lowering the optimization level to -O2 should help. This will probably bite wxwidgets2.6. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Kiko Veneno - Los managers The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny..." -- Isaac Asimov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302553: xnap-snapshot: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'unzip'
Hello Frank! On Saturday 10 September 2005 17:10, you wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Yven Johannes Leist wrote: > > thanks for your patch, I'll upload a fixed package soon. (To be more > > exact: after I return from my holidays, which will be in in two weeks > > approximately.) > > What has happened to that? Good question... Basically XNap development came to a complete halt and this led (among other things) to the shameful neglection of the Debian package as well... The immediate reason for the non-happening of the upload including the proposed patch, was still another one though, namely that shortly before I wanted to actually upload the package, I realized that the last comment to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302554 is of course right, which means that building xnap as a contrib package, seems not easily possible. Do you have any ideas about that? Or do you know how this is handled in general for packages in contrib? Cheers, Yven -- Yven Johannes Leist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sourceforge.net/users/leist/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328811: very old package, should this be removed?
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: powstatd > Version: 1.5.1-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we > decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very > long time could cover up some QA problems. > > I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose > to remove it. > The package has almost no users, is quite out of date wrt Debian's > policies and there are some alternatives available. I disagree. I use it! There will be an upload at some point, some I have figured out a defconf script bug. The powerstatd-crypt package will disappear but the regular powerstatd package will function with encryption (i.e. will have the functionality of powerstatd-crypt). The alternative (simpler for upgrades) would be to remove `powerstatd' and keep `powerstatd-crypt', but since the upstream package is named `powerstatd' it is better in the long-run to keep that name. -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.debian.org/~psg GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328929: possible gcc version problem
gjdoc failed to build on a sparc buildd, but built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I suspect this may be due to using the latest version of the gcc related packages in the pbuilder. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328981: udev: dependencie loop when upgrading kernel 2.6.11 to 2.6.12
Package: udev Version: 0.056-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.6.11 to 2.6.12 when doing so it reports an error about hal in need of udev >= 0.063 . So I try to upgrade udev which in turn need a kernel >= 2.6.12 . Here are the commands: # apt-get upgrade linux-image-2.6-k7 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: hal: Depends: udev (>= 0.063) but 0.056-3 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. # # apt-get upgrade udev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: hal: Depends: udev (>= 0.063) but 0.056-3 is installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. # Trying to use force the install is not helpfull :-/ Would it be possible to make the udev package aware that a kernel 2.6.12 is being installed ? Then one can use: # apt-get upgrade linux-image-2.6-k7 udev -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/rules.d/: total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-04-26 00:09 020_permissions.rules -> ../permissions.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-09-18 00:46 050_hal-plugdev.rules -> ../hal.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2004-12-19 14:38 cd-aliases.rules -> ../cd-aliases.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2004-12-19 14:38 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules -- /sys/: /sys/block/hda/dev /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev /sys/block/hda/hda2/dev /sys/block/hda/hda3/dev /sys/block/hda/hda4/dev /sys/block/hda/hda5/dev /sys/block/hdb/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb1/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb2/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb3/dev /sys/block/hdd/dev /sys/block/ram0/dev /sys/block/ram10/dev /sys/block/ram11/dev /sys/block/ram12/dev /sys/block/ram13/dev /sys/block/ram14/dev /sys/block/ram15/dev /sys/block/ram1/dev /sys/block/ram2/dev /sys/block/ram3/dev /sys/block/ram4/dev /sys/block/ram5/dev /sys/block/ram6/dev /sys/block/ram7/dev /sys/block/ram8/dev /sys/block/ram9/dev /sys/class/graphics/fb0/dev /sys/class/input/event0/dev /sys/class/input/event1/dev /sys/class/input/event2/dev /sys/class/input/mice/dev /sys/class/input/mouse0/dev /sys/class/input/ts0/dev /sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev /sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev /sys/class/misc/hpet/dev /sys/class/misc/psaux/dev /sys/class/misc/rtc/dev /sys/class/sound/audio/dev /sys/class/sound/dsp1/dev /sys/class/sound/dsp/dev /sys/class/sound/dspW/dev /sys/class/sound/midi1/dev /sys/class/sound/midi/dev /sys/class/sound/mixer/dev /sys/class/sound/sequencer2/dev /sys/class/sound/sequencer/dev /sys/class/sound/timer/dev -- Kernel configuration: isapnp_init not present. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages udev depends on: ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-25 Linux Hotplug Scripts ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-1.1Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-78creates device files in /dev ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor udev recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326726: marked as done (xmame: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev')
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326726: fixed in xmame 0.99-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:18:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 04:18:27 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c203105.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECEzb-0007TX-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:18:27 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECEzZ-0002eW-Oa; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:18:25 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmame: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev' Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:18:25 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmame Version: 0.99-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'xmame' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: src/unix/video-drivers/xf86_dga1.c:13:36: error: X11/extensions/xf86dga.h: No such file or directory src/unix/video-drivers/xf86_dga1.c:14:38: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or directory Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xmame-0.99/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/xmame-0.99/debian/control 2005-09-05 07:11:18.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-05 06:02:22.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Bruno Barrera C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Nicos Panayides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libesd0-dev, libasound2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libsvga1-dev [i386] | svgalibg1-dev [i386], xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libxv-dev | xlibs (>> 4.1), libsdl1.2-dev, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libexpat1-dev, nasm [i386], liblircclient-dev +Build-Depends: zlib1g-dev | libz-dev, libesd0-dev, libasound2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libsvga1-dev [i386] | svgalibg1-dev [i386], xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libxv-dev | xlibs (>> 4.1), libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, debhelper (>= 4.1.16), libexpat1-dev, nasm [i386], liblircclient-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: xmame-common --- Received: (at 326726-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 14:08:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 07:08:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGzkE-0006qn-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:02:14 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Barrera C.) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326726: fixed in xmame 0.99-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 07:02:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmame Source-Version: 0.99-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmame, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmame-common_0.99-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-common_0.99-2_all.deb xmame-gl_0.99-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-gl_0.99-2_all.deb xmame-sdl_0.99-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-sdl_0.99-2_i386.deb xmame-svga_0.99-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-svga_0.99-2_i386.deb xmame-tools_0.99-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-tools_0.99-2_i386.deb xmame-x_0.99-2_i386.deb to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame-x_0.99-2_i386.deb xmame_0.99-2.diff.gz to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame_0.99-2.diff.gz xmame_0.99-2.dsc to pool/non-free/x/xmame/xmame_0.99-2.dsc xmess-common_0.99-2_all.deb to pool/non-free/
Processed: block ifrit rebuild on fixed vtk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > block 327937 by 328971 Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Was blocked by: 327595 Blocking bugs added: 328971 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 328910 328954
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 328910 328954 Bug#328910: c2hs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'groff-base' Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion Merged 328910 328954. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328975: libcrypto++: FTBFS on arm, m68k, hppa; use g++-3.4 there
Package: libcrypto++ Version: 5.2.1c2-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hello, libcrypto++ FTBFS on arm, m68k and hppa due to GCC 4 giving an Internal Compiler Error there. Using -O1 or -O0 does not help, so the workaround is to compile with g++-3.4 on those architectures (this is possible because the C++ ABIs of 3.4 and 4.0 are compatible). A patch is attached (build tested on paer). If needed, I can upload myself. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 Listening to: Ana Belén - Peces de ciudad A lie can go round the world before the truth has got its boots on. -- Terry Pratchett diff -u -rua libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/control libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/control --- libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/control 2005-09-18 16:14:31.0 +0200 +++ libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/control 2005-09-18 16:14:16.0 +0200 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Maintainer: Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, dpatch +Build-Depends: g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa], debhelper (>= 4), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool, dpatch Build-Depends-Indep: doxygen Package: libcrypto++5.2c2 diff -u -rua libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/rules libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/rules --- libcrypto++-5.2.1c2.orig/debian/rules 2005-09-18 16:14:31.0 +0200 +++ libcrypto++-5.2.1c2/debian/rules2005-09-18 16:14:13.0 +0200 @@ -36,6 +36,16 @@ cflags += -ffunction-sections endif +# gcc4 ICEs on some arches +GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa +DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU) + +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE))) +export CC=gcc-3.4 +export CPP=cpp-3.4 +export CXX=g++-3.4 +endif + autotools_input := configure.ac Makefile.am config.h.in autoclean:
Bug#328971: FTBFS in unstable pbuilder (and on buildds)
Package: vtk Version: 4.4.2-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: patch vtk-4.4.2-7 fails to build from source in an unstable pbuilder instance and on most buildds (http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=vtk) due to a bad Build-Dep. The attached patch fixes this and a bug with the maintainer i386 binary upload of libvtk4-dev which depends of libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev instead of xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev. The two things are basically the same problem. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "That's why the good die young; it's because Death can't be bothered to check the paperwork." Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game diff -Naur vtk-4.4.2/debian/control vtk-4.4.2-mod/debian/control --- vtk-4.4.2/debian/control2005-09-18 14:59:05.0 +0100 +++ vtk-4.4.2-mod/debian/control2005-09-18 13:24:23.0 +0100 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: graphics Priority: optional Maintainer: A. Maitland Bottoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, python-dev, cmake (>> 2.0.4), libexpat1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libpng12-0-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev, libfreetype6-dev, ftgl-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, python-dev, cmake (>> 2.0.4), libexpat1-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libpng12-0-dev, libtiff4-dev | libtiff-dev, zlib1g-dev, libfreetype6-dev, ftgl-dev Build-Depends-Indep: libdigest-md5-perl, doxygen Standards-Version: 3.6.1.0 @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Architecture: all Conflicts: libvtk-dev, libvtk32-dev Replaces: libvtk-dev, libvtk32-dev -Depends: libvtk4c2, libgl1-mesa-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, libc6-dev +Depends: libvtk4c2, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev, xlibs-dev, libc6-dev Suggests: vtk-examples, vtk-doc Section: libdevel Description: VTK header files for building C++ code
Processed: libdb4.1 is going to be removed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 293187 serious Bug#293187: pkspxy: Please use a newer version of Berkeley DB Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 326927 + confirmed upstream sarge Bug#326927: tcpick: implicitly converted pointers Tags were: patch Tags added: confirmed, upstream, sarge > severity 326927 grave Bug#326927: tcpick: implicitly converted pointers Severity set to `grave'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 327327 grave Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc Severity set to `grave'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328969: please move away from libdb4.1
Package: krb4 Severity: serious Hi, libdb4.1 is soon going to be removed from unstable. Please consider to move your package to a newer version, e.g. libdb4.3. Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326734: marked as done (gnugo: FTBFS: cannot stat `doc/*.html': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326734: fixed in gnugo 3.7.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 11:42:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 04:42:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c203105.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ECFMV-00042m-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:42:07 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECFMT-0005Cr-7g; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:42:05 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gnugo: FTBFS: cannot stat `doc/*.html': No such file or directory Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 13:42:05 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnugo Version: 3.7.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gnugo' on unstable, I get the following error: install -d -m 0755 debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html install-m 0644 doc/*.html doc/*.png debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html install: cannot stat `doc/*.html': No such file or directory make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 With the attached patch 'gnugo' can be compiled on unstable. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gnugo-3.7.4/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/gnugo-3.7.4/debian/rules2005-09-05 11:27:32.0 + +++ ./debian/rules 2005-09-05 11:27:27.0 + @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ install-m 0644 AUTHORS NEWS README THANKS TODO debian/copyright debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo # install-m 0644 doc/gnugo.ps debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo install -d -m 0755 debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html - install-m 0644 doc/*.html doc/*.png debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html + install-m 0644 doc/gnugo/*.html doc/*.png debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html ln -s gnugo.html debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc/gnugo/html/index.html find debian/gnugo/usr/share/doc -type f \( -size +8 -o -name 'changelog*' \) ! -path '*/html/*' -print0 | xargs -0 gzip -9n --- Received: (at 326734-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 13:18:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 06:18:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGz2W-0001qb-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin A. Godisch) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#326734: fixed in gnugo 3.7.4-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gnugo Source-Version: 3.7.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnugo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnugo_3.7.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnugo/gnugo_3.7.4-2.diff.gz gnugo_3.7.4-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnugo/gnugo_3.7.4-2.dsc gnugo_3.7.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnugo/gnugo_3.7.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin A. Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnugo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:59:10 +0200 Source: gnugo Binary: g
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 327327 + upstream sarge Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc Tags were: confirmed patch Tags added: upstream, sarge > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328964: libtheora-dev is not sid installable
Subject: libtheora-dev is not sid installable Package: libtheora-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** apt-get install libtheora-dev fails this way with sid : The following packages have unmet dependencies: libtheora-dev: Depends: libtheora0 (= 0.0.0.alpha4-1.1) but 1.0alpha3-0.0 is to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1-1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 327327 +confirmed +upstream +sarge Unknown tag/s: +upstream, +sarge. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc Tags were: patch Tags added: confirmed > severity 327327 serious Bug#327327: tcpick: does not run on ppc Severity set to `serious'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328925: marked as done (jesred: FTBFS: dh_testdir: Command not found)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:32:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328925: fixed in jesred 1.2pl1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 08:53:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 01:53:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from c203233.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.233] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGuvV-J7-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:53:33 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGuvU-BB-KT; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:53:32 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: jesred: FTBFS: dh_testdir: Command not found Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:53:32 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: jesred Version: 1.2pl1-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'jesred' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dpatch Get:1 http://localhost unstable/main dpatch 2.0.14 [80.9kB] debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Fetched 80.9kB in 0s (0B/s) Selecting previously deselected package dpatch. (Reading database ... 9449 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking dpatch (from .../archives/dpatch_2.0.14_all.deb) ... Setting up dpatch (2.0.14) ... dpkg-buildpackage: source package is jesred dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.2pl1-9 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 debian/rules clean dpatch deapply-all 02_warnings not applied to ./ . 01_extregex not applied to ./ . rm -rf patch-stamp patch-stampT debian/patched dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 This is caused by two different Build-Depends lines in debian/control which irritates 'apt-get build-dep'. There should be only a single occurrence of 'Build-Depends:' in debian control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jesred-1.2pl1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/jesred-1.2pl1/debian/control2005-09-18 08:48:54.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 08:48:52.0 + @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@ Source: jesred -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), sharutils Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, sharutils Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: dpatch Package: jesred Architecture: any --- Received: (at 328925-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 12:40:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 05:40:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGyLE-0002ZX-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:32:20 -0700 From: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328925: fixed in jesred 1.2pl1-10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:32:20 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: jesred Source-Version: 1.2pl1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jesred, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jesred_1.2pl1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jesred/jesred_1.2pl1-10.diff.gz jesred_1.2pl1-10.dsc to pool/main/j/jesred/jesred_1.2pl1-10.dsc jesred_1.2pl1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jesred/jesred_1.2pl1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated jesred package) (T
Bug#328925: jesred: FTBFS: dh_testdir: Command not found
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:53:32 +0200, Andreas Jochens writes: >This is caused by two different Build-Depends lines in debian/control >which irritates 'apt-get build-dep'. There should be only a single >occurrence of 'Build-Depends:' in debian control. *blush* silly me...a fixed package is on the way. thanks az -- + Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291) Unix *is* user-friendly. It is not ignorant-friendly and idiot-friendly. pgpErDg4TR8K2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#323956: doesn't reproduce on my debian box
* Michelle Konzack: >> I tried both examples on >> debian sid x86_64, mutt 1.5.10-1 >> debian sarge x86, mutt 1.5.9-2 >> All four combinations (two mailboxes, two debian systems) >> ran normally, no crashes or any other unusual behavior. >> So this might not apply to debian at all. > > I can confirm this too > It does not affect Debian, but Mandrake and Redhat... :-) How have you determined this? Can you rule out that it's not reproducible with some other charset? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328937: marked as done (plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328937: plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 10:16:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 03:16:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.73] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwDT-0006IW-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 03:16:11 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id AF73C3813F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:16:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe2bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906943813A for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:16:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 155C526136; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:16:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:16:08 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: plplot Version: 5.3.1-5 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: /usr/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o plplot_octave.oct plplot_octave.o -L../../src/.libs -lplplotd -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -lfreetype -lz -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/csa -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/csa/.libs -lcsirocsa -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/nn -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/nn/.libs -lcsironn -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -lqhull -L/usr/lib -lltdl -ldl -lm -L/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71 -loctinterp -loctave -lcruft -s -llapack-3 -lblas-3 -lfftw3 -lreadline -lncurses -ldl -lhdf5 -lz -lm -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib -lhdf5 -lz -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin This could be either a missing build dependency on libgfortran0-dev, or some other package (octave2.1-headers?) having a missing depends on it. Please reassign this bug if you believe that it's in an other package. Kurt --- Received: (at 328937-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 11:52:40 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 04:52:40 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kom.psy.mpg.de (kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de) [192.129.1.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGxiq-Ps-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:52:40 -0700 Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2]) by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EGxin-0005zF-3O; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:37 +0200 Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2) by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 1EGxin-0003Ke-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:37 +0200 Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EGxim-0007QM-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:36 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:52:36 +0200 From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#328937: plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Debian GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debia
Bug#328017: This doesn't seem to be fixed
Hello, unless I missed something this doesn't seem to be fixed with version 0.35-2 of the kxdocker package: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/martin -> LANG=EN ; apt-get install kxdocker/unstable Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Selected version 0.35-2 (Debian:unstable) for kxdocker Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: kxdocker: Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-6.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libqt3c102-mt (>= 3:3.3.4) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages Regards, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328954: c2hs: FTBFS: Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion
Package: c2hs Version: 0.13.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: sgml2html c2hs.sgml Processing file c2hs.sgml sgml2txt c2hs.sgml Please install groff to use LinuxDoc DTD SGML Text Conversion make[2]: *** [c2hs.txt] Error 1 groff is only a suggested package, so it looks like you need to add a build dependency on groff. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328009: marked as done (tellico: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:46:21 +0100 (BST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs closed with the latest upload. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:23 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy2A-0003U2-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:23 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002UT-SW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tellico: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tellico Version: 0.13.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 328009-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 11:46:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 04:46:23 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGxcl-0007W7-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:46:23 -0700 Received: from gateway.imalip.net (fny94-2-81-56-43-158.fbx.proxad.net [81.56.43.158]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CFB24A35; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:46:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.imalip.net (serveur.imalip.net [192.168.1.3]) by gateway.imalip.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F49C003E9; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.201 (SquirrelMail authenticated user regis) by mail.imalip.net with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:46:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:46:21 +0100 (BST) Subject: Bugs closed with the latest upload. From: "Regis Boudin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cont
Bug#324026: marked as done (ffmpeg: FTBFS on amd64: Error: `(%rdi,%esi)' is not a valid base/index expression)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324026: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 21:23:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 14:23:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E6EKw-0005fG-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:23:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 763ED2241D8 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:23:37 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AF822400B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:23:37 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id D85FB26136; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:23:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:23:36 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ffmpeg: FTBFS on amd64: Error: `(%rdi,%esi)' is not a valid base/index expression Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ffmpeg Version: 0.cvs20050811-1 Severity: important Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: /tmp/ccSxX5mf.s:25942: Error: `(%rdi,%esi)' is not a valid base/index expression /tmp/ccSxX5mf.s:25943: Error: `(%rdi,%esi,2)' is not a valid base/index expression [...] For a full log see: http://amd64.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=ffmpeg&ver=0.cvs20050811-1&arch=amd64&stamp=1124407042&file=log&as=raw Kurt --- Received: (at 324026-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 11:39:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 04:39:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGxOv-fJ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 From: Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#324026: fixed in ffmpeg 0.cvs20050918-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: ffmpeg Source-Version: 0.cvs20050918-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ffmpeg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1.diff.gz ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1.dsc to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1.dsc ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_0.cvs20050918.orig.tar.gz libavcodec-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libavcodec-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb libavformat-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libavformat-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb libpostproc-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/ffmpeg/libpostproc-dev_0.cvs20050918-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sam Hocevar (Debian packages) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ffmpeg package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install
On Sunday 18 September 2005 12:31, you wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Grahame wrote: > > Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error: > > dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 > > package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': > > version contains ` ' Reading changelogs... > > dpkg: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 > > package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': > > version contains ` ' > > I'm afraid this points to a corruption problem with your status file, > not a problem with the package. > > You can try restoring from /var/lib/dpkg/status-old; otherwise, you will > probably have to edit the file by hand to correct the error. Yep that worked, thanks :) Grahame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328950: marked as done (libhal-storage0: Fails to install)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:31:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 11:06:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 04:06:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwzo-RJ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:06:08 -0700 Received: from spc1-cosh5-3-0-cust36.cosh.broadband.ntl.com (borgmania.regress.homelinux.org) [81.102.80.36] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EGwzm-00053F-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 06:06:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Grahame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libhal-storage0: Fails to install X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:06:05 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libhal-storage0 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error: dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' Reading changelogs... dpkg: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 328950-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 11:31:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 04:31:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGxNy-Ma-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:31:06 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C32B7038; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:31:05 -0700 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Grahame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Grahame wrote: > Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error: > dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 pa= ckage `libhal-storage0': > `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' > Reading changelogs... > dpkg: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package= `libhal-storage0': > `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' I'm afraid this points to a corruption problem with your status file, not a problem with the package. You can try restoring from /var/lib/dpkg/status-old; otherwise, you will probably have to edit the file by hand to correct the error. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I
Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install
Package: libhal-storage0 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error: dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' Reading changelogs... dpkg: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, reference to `libhal0': version contains ` ' -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:13:31PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without > > one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line > > passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like > > '-finline-functions ... -fno-inline-functions ...'. You could also try > > building with gcc 3.4. > Just a note to add that I don't think building with gcc 3.4 is an > option since the library has been C++ transitionned explicitely to > permit linking with other apps built with gcc 4 and the new C++ ABI. gcc-3.4 is ABI-compatible with gcc-4.0. But in general, I think using gcc-4.0 with reduced optimization levels is a better option. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#328948: gxmms: FTBFS: No rule to make target `binary-arch'.
Package: gxmms Version: 0.3.0-2 Severity: serious Hi, Youo package is failing to build with the following error: fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch make: *** No rule to make target `binary-arch'. Stop. You need to have a binary-arch target in your rules file. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328946: guile-gnome-platform: FTBFS: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
Package: guile-gnome-platform Version: 2.7.99-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: configure.ac:20: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. configure.ac:25: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL make: *** [debian/stamp-autotools-files] Error 1 Both of them are in libtool.m4, so you need to add a build dependency on libtool. You might want to add a DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_LIBTOOL line too. Also, you're using this in your rules file: DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_DEBIAN_CONTROL = true Which is not allow by the release policy. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328942: orsa: FTBFS: doxygen: command not found
Package: orsa Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: touch debian/stamp-makefile-build docbook2x-man debian/manpages/xorsa.xml uudecode debian/examples/inner_solar_system.orsa.uu cd src/liborsa && doxygen Doxyfile /bin/sh: doxygen: command not found make: *** [build/liborsa-doc] Error 127 You have doxygen (and graphviz) in your Build-Depends-Indep but you're also using it in the arch depended part. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328938: libf2c2: FTBFS: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory
Package: libf2c2 Version: 20050501-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: cc -c -DSkip_f2c_Undefs -fPIC -I ../src -DNON_UNIX_STDIO -Df2c F77_aloc.c F77_aloc.c:1:17: error: f2c.h: No such file or directory Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328937: plplot: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin
Package: plplot Version: 5.3.1-5 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: /usr/bin/g++ -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o plplot_octave.oct plplot_octave.o -L../../src/.libs -lplplotd -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -lfreetype -lz -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/csa -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/csa/.libs -lcsirocsa -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/nn -L/build/buildd/plplot-5.3.1/lib/nn/.libs -lcsironn -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -lqhull -L/usr/lib -lltdl -ldl -lm -L/usr/lib/octave-2.1.71 -loctinterp -loctave -lcruft -s -llapack-3 -lblas-3 -lfftw3 -lreadline -lncurses -ldl -lhdf5 -lz -lm -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../.. -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib -lhdf5 -lz -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -lgcc_s /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgfortranbegin This could be either a missing build dependency on libgfortran0-dev, or some other package (octave2.1-headers?) having a missing depends on it. Please reassign this bug if you believe that it's in an other package. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k
Hi, On mar, sep 13, 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > You could try building at a lower optimization level (than -O3), or without > one or more of the fancy -f options used. Incidentally, the options line > passed to GCC is really stupid, containing wonders like > '-finline-functions ... -fno-inline-functions ...'. You could also try > building with gcc 3.4. Just a note to add that I don't think building with gcc 3.4 is an option since the library has been C++ transitionned explicitely to permit linking with other apps built with gcc 4 and the new C++ ABI. If -O3 is used, it really should be removed as this is said to not only ICE on m68k but also cause silent breakage in i386. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#328936: libhtml-prototype-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libmodule-build-perl, libhtml-tree-perl'
Package: libhtml-prototype-perl Version: 1.34-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libhtml-prototype-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_clean arrange-stamp binary-stamp binary-arch-stamp binary-indep-stamp build-stamp config-stamp install-stamp debian/rules build dh_testdir /usr/bin/perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor destdir=/libhtml-prototype-perl-1.34/debian/libhtml-prototype-perl Can't locate Module/Build.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at Build.PL line 2. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Build.PL line 2. make: *** [config-stamp] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libmodule-build-perl, libhtml-tree-perl' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libhtml-prototype-perl-1.34/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libhtml-prototype-perl-1.34/debian/control 2005-09-18 09:17:20.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 09:17:13.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: perl Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.2) -Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= 5.8.0-7), libclass-accessor-perl +Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= 5.8.0-7), libclass-accessor-perl, libmodule-build-perl, libhtml-tree-perl Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uploaders: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328929: gjdoc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev'
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Package: gjdoc > Version: 0.7.5-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, > I get the following error: > > checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes > You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good > checking for uudecode... no > configure: WARNING: I have to compile Test.class from scratch > checking if /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-4.0 works... configure: error: The Java > compiler /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-4.0 failed (see config.log, check the > CLASSPATH?) > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 > > Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev' > to debian/control. No. The build-depends on java-gcj-compat-dev was removed in this release intentionally because java-gcj-compat-dev depends on gjdoc an all archs and gjdoc is not yet available on all of them. So I tried to break this bootstrap circle with depending on java-gcj-compat and the indirect depending on gcj-4.0 but this somehow dont worked. I need to check this later on my powerpc which failed on the autobuilder too. i386 somehow works fine. Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328929: gjdoc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev'
Package: gjdoc Version: 0.7.5-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gjdoc' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes You have no CLASSPATH, I hope it is good checking for uudecode... no configure: WARNING: I have to compile Test.class from scratch checking if /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-4.0 works... configure: error: The Java compiler /usr/bin/gcj-wrapper-4.0 failed (see config.log, check the CLASSPATH?) make: *** [config.status] Error 1 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'java-gcj-compat-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gjdoc-0.7.5/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gjdoc-0.7.5/debian/control 2005-09-18 09:05:02.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 09:04:58.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Uploaders: Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4), cdbs, java-gcj-compat [!m68k !mips !mipsel], sablevm [m68k mips mipsel], antlr (>= 2.7.1), tetex-bin, perl +Build-Depends: debhelper, cdbs, java-gcj-compat-dev [!m68k !mips !mipsel], sablevm [m68k mips mipsel], antlr (>= 2.7.1), tetex-bin, perl Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: gjdoc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328925: jesred: FTBFS: dh_testdir: Command not found
Package: jesred Version: 1.2pl1-9 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'jesred' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dpatch Get:1 http://localhost unstable/main dpatch 2.0.14 [80.9kB] debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed Fetched 80.9kB in 0s (0B/s) Selecting previously deselected package dpatch. (Reading database ... 9449 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking dpatch (from .../archives/dpatch_2.0.14_all.deb) ... Setting up dpatch (2.0.14) ... dpkg-buildpackage: source package is jesred dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.2pl1-9 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 debian/rules clean dpatch deapply-all 02_warnings not applied to ./ . 01_extregex not applied to ./ . rm -rf patch-stamp patch-stampT debian/patched dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 This is caused by two different Build-Depends lines in debian/control which irritates 'apt-get build-dep'. There should be only a single occurrence of 'Build-Depends:' in debian control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jesred-1.2pl1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/jesred-1.2pl1/debian/control2005-09-18 08:48:54.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 08:48:52.0 + @@ -1,10 +1,9 @@ Source: jesred -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0.0), sharutils Section: web Priority: optional Maintainer: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, sharutils Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: dpatch Package: jesred Architecture: any -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328924: silc-toolkit: FTBFS: make: execvp: /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh: Permission denied
Package: silc-toolkit Version: 0.9.12-4.1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'silc-toolkit' on amd64/unstable, I get the following error: # get proper name for shlib package /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/lib/.libs make: execvp: /silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/control.sh: Permission denied make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 With the attached patch 'silc-toolkit' can be compiled. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/silc-toolkit-0.9.12/debian/rules2005-09-18 08:35:45.0 + +++ ./debian/rules 2005-09-18 08:35:43.0 + @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ $(MAKE) # get proper name for shlib package - $(CURDIR)/debian/control.sh $(CURDIR)/debian/control $(CURDIR)/lib/.libs + sh $(CURDIR)/debian/control.sh $(CURDIR)/debian/control $(CURDIR)/lib/.libs touch build-stamp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328923: libpam-opie: GPL/4-clause BSD/RSA license conflict
Package: libpam-opie Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The package links code licensed under the GPL to code which is covered by licenses with advertising clauses, for example: | License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it | is identified as the "RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest | Algorithm" in all material mentioning or referencing this software | or this function. | | License is also granted to make and use derivative works provided | that such works are identified as "derived from the RSA Data | Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm" in all material | mentioning or referencing the derived work. | | RSA Data Security, Inc. makes no representations concerning either | the merchantability of this software or the suitability of this | software for any particular purpose. It is provided "as is" | without express or implied warranty of any kind. | | These notices must be retained in any copies of any part of this | documentation and/or software. Or: | 1. All terms of the UC Berkeley copyright and license must be followed. | 2. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. | 3. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright |notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the |documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. | 4. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software |must display the following acknowledgements: | | This product includes software developed by the University of | California, Berkeley and its contributors. | | This product includes software developed at the Information | Technology Division, US Naval Research Laboratory. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328918: hyperestraier: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby'
Package: hyperestraier Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'hyperestraier' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: cd rubynative && /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/hyperestraier-0.5.7/rubynative' ( cd src && if ! [ -f Makefile ] ; then ruby extconf.rb ; fi ) /bin/sh: ruby: command not found make[1]: *** [all] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/hyperestraier-0.5.7/rubynative' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/hyperestraier-0.5.7/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/hyperestraier-0.5.7/debian/control 2005-09-18 08:32:41.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 08:32:39.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: text Priority: optional Maintainer: Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, libqdbm-dev (>= 1.8.33), libfcgi-dev, ruby1.8, ruby1.8-dev, gcj (>= 3:3.2.2-0) [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], libgcj-dev [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], fastjar [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], sablevm [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386] +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, libqdbm-dev (>= 1.8.33), libfcgi-dev, ruby, ruby1.8, ruby1.8-dev, gcj (>= 3:3.2.2-0) [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], libgcj-dev [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], fastjar [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], sablevm [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: hyperestraier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#328819: very old package, should this be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 328819 normal Bug#328819: very old package, should this be removed? Severity set to `normal'. > retitle 328819 RM: math3d -- RoM; old, unused Bug#328819: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. > reassign 328819 ftp.debian.org Bug#328819: RM: math3d -- RoM; old, unused Bug reassigned from package `math3d' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thankskbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
