Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
Hi, Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images? Why? I am not sure that merely making this go over to debconf is going to change the behaviour -- if a human does not answer some install time questions, kernel-images may not install anyway. I am not sure I understand this use case, really. manoj -- I'm totally DESPONDENT over the LIBYAN situation and the price of CHICKEN ... Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
severity 324470 normal thanks On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Michael R Head wrote: I had prevented myself from upgrading to the latest version of dovecot due to this grave bug. I've upgraded and haven't had a problem with Maildir delivery. Thanks for the report Mike. Olivier, can you confirm if 1.0.alpha3 solves your problem? Because other people have it working I suspect this is a local configuration problem at your end but I don't immediately notice anything in the config you posted that could cause it. Let me know if it still doesn't work and we can investigate further. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder
linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk space available. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321675: marked as done (FTBFS with gcc 4.0)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 20:24:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 13:24:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-2.opaltelecom.net [62.24.128.69]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1VDC-0002p3-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 13:24:06 -0700
Received: from [84.13.17.15] (helo=[192.168.2.104])
by smtp-2.opaltelecom.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 1E1VDA-00084T-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:24:04 +0100
Subject: FTBFS with gcc 4.0
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9gis?= Boudin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-L//SOuMlI1hO7ibc3z9O
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:23:40 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-L//SOuMlI1hO7ibc3z9O
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin ftbfs with gcc 4.0
Attached are a couple of patches :
-fixing gcc 4.0 errors
-updating config.{sub,guess} and disabling building of shared library
and python bindings for libical
-setting 2 variables as static in libical, this could be tried to fix
#300573
HTH
Regards
Regis
--
While a monkey can be a manager, it takes a human to be an engineer
Erik Zapletal
--=-L//SOuMlI1hO7ibc3z9O
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=debian_rules.patch
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=debian_rules.patch; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
diff -urN sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/debian/rules
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/debian/rules
--- sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/debian/rules 2005-07-28
22:47:25.354564872 +0100
+++ sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/debian/rules2005-07-28
23:42:08.724416784 +0100
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@
touch build-stamp
libical-build-install:
- cd $(ICAL) ./configure --prefix=$(CURDIR)/$(ICALINST)
+ cd $(ICAL) ./configure --prefix=$(CURDIR)/$(ICALINST) \
+ --disable-shared --enable-python-bindings=no
cd $(ICAL) $(MAKE)
cd $(ICAL) $(MAKE) install
touch libical-build-install
@@ -54,9 +55,11 @@
-$(MAKE) distclean
ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
+ cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub $(ICAL)/config.sub
endif
ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.guess)
cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess
+ cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.guess $(ICAL)/config.guess
endif
dh_clean
--=-L//SOuMlI1hO7ibc3z9O
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=gcc-4_fix.patch
Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=gcc-4_fix.patch; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
diff -urN
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedparameter.c.in
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedparameter.c.in
---
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedparameter.c.in
2001-04-01 21:08:19.0 +0100
+++
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedparameter.c.in
2005-07-28 22:51:34.874632056 +0100
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
};
-extern struct icalparameter_kind_map parameter_map[];
+static struct icalparameter_kind_map parameter_map[];
const char* icalparameter_kind_to_string(icalparameter_kind kind)
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
};
-extern struct icalparameter_map icalparameter_map[];
+static struct icalparameter_map icalparameter_map[];
const char* icalparameter_enum_to_string(int e)
diff -urN
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedproperty.c.in
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedproperty.c.in
---
sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin-0.9_orig/libical-0.23/src/libical/icalderivedproperty.c.in
Bug#300573: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin: FTBFS on various arches: outdated libtool and PIC issues.)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 14:27:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 06:27:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DD1Og-0007Y6-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:27:18 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B65F7224343
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B97122445C
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 5F1FE26136; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:27:17 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin: FTBFS on various arches: outdated
libtool and PIC issues.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on various arches because the
libical directory is using a very old version of libtool (1.3.4).
Please update that to the latest version.
It's also trying to make a shared library without using -fPIC.
This also causes build failures on other arches and is probably
the result of not using libtool properly. It also linking
staticly to it, so it should probably be easy to work around
that.
Is there a reason that libical isn't a seperate package? Can it
be useful for other programs to link to?
Kurt
---
Received: (at 300573-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 06:11:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 23:11:02 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp.telecable.es [212.89.0.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKV9i-0004v3-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:11:02 -0700
Received: (qmail 6154 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2005 06:10:29 -
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([83.97.217.145])
(envelope-sender [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by mail.telecable.es (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 28 Sep 2005 06:10:29 -
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:10:31 +0200
From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing bugs: package no longer in the archive
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14cvs49 (GTK+ 2.6.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face:
;%Ws3L$.3^vnZGdjc-N\sIaOI1)zEJW{~f!E|WLg0}[]]#'p=~f7uZT=?r!{yZ#g!nVG9?8YC!24qH7(VA}AFiACRfNW5?[XLG3Bx#.BX9A|\yVgr]v:QIn*b,#vUS30QH!*1]:ah(_DioSgsy(K{(Vno,2ED
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
The sylpheed-claws-vcalendar-plugin package has been now removed from
Debian archive [1].
Alternatively you can try sylpheed-claws-gtk-vcalendar-plugin, already in
NEW queue, targeted for the GTK2 version of Sylpheed Claws (package
sylpheed-claws-gtk2).
regards,
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330368
--
Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon
33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd works for me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 324470 normal Bug#324470: dovecot-imapd: Fails to copy new mails from new to cur directory Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330338: marked as done (login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:48:39 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with man-pages in german has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 16:14:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 09:14:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 85-56-35-104.sev2.adsl.uni2.es (deneb) [85.56.35.104] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKI6E-0008NJ-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:14:34 -0700 Received: by deneb (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 788498C8; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Manolo_D=EDaz?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:14:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: login Version: 1:4.0.12-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages login depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime0.76-23Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l login recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed The console message: Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 111449 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace login 1:4.0.3-39 (using .../login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement login ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/es/man1/su.1.gz', which is also in package manpages-es-extra dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done --- Received: (at 330338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 06:16:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 23:16:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKVEe-0005XM-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:16:08 -0700 Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by onera.onera.fr with ESMTP id j8S6G41j025148 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:16:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: by cc-mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71EA440A278; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:48:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:48:39 +0200 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with man-pages in german Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Quoting Benoit Panizzon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: login Version: 1:4.0.3-39 Followup-For: Bug #330338 dpkg: error processing
Bug#330164: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass)
Hi Christian! Debian Bug Tracking System [2005-09-26 11:33 -0700]: - as you stated in your next mail, it doesn't seem that sarge/4.0 is affected. - sarge doesn't carry a 5.0 version - thus all sid versions should be okay too. After checking the advisory I would say that Sean is right, no Debian versions are vulnerable any more as this advisory is really very old. Maybe this was too quick - in the Ubuntu bug [1] the reporter successfully ran the exploit against 4.0.24. Martin [1] https://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16205 -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: worked for me too
This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded the result of that build. -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk space available. Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to do a binary-upload. But if that doesn't pan out, how can we get the build requeued? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: marked as done (linux-2.6: 2.6.12-10 FTBFS on sparc)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:33:02 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line worked for me too has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 15:30:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 08:30:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKHPR-0003jp-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:30:21 -0700 Received: from nadeshiko.lab.ultramonkey.org (unknown [172.16.4.222]) by sv1.valinux.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 41DCB70046; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:29:50 +0900 (JST) Received: (nullmailer pid 8385 invoked by uid 7100); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:29:49 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-2.6: 2.6.12-10 FTBFS on sparc X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:29:49 +0900 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Seems like 2.6.12-10 fails to build on sparc http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.12-10arch=sparcstamp=1127830883file=logas=raw LD sound/usb/usx2y/built-in.o CC net/socket.o CC net/802/p8023.o cc1: No such file or directory: opening dependency file net/802/.p8023.o.d make[6]: *** [net/802/p8023.o] Error 1 make[5]: *** [net/802] Error 2 make[4]: *** [net] Error 2 Curiously -6,-7,-8 and -10 all built on sparc http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.12-10arch=sparcstamp=1127830883file=logas=raw I say curious, because -10 made ia64 and hppa changes Does anyone have any ideas? And if not, is there a box where I can play with building this? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc3 Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP) (ignored: LC_ALL set to ja_JP.eucJP) --- Received: (at 330329-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 06:33:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 23:33:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKVVW-00086U-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:33:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEDF29802F; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:39:37 -0600 (MDT) Received: from colo.lackof.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (colo.lackof.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10515-02; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:39:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF42298026; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:39:35 -0600 (MDT) Subject: worked for me too From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:33:02 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lackof.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 This built fine for me in a fresh sid pbuilder chroot. I've uploaded the result of that build. -- dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk space available. Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to do a binary-upload. But if that doesn't pan out, how can we get the build requeued? -- Horms Ask the buildd administrator to do so. I cced [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my previous message. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ola Lundqvist wrote: I do not have access to a 2.6 kernel patched with vserver but I can check on a patched 2.4 kernel with old style patch. Okay, I have a machine running 2.6 kernel patched with vserver 2.0, so what can I help you on 2.6 kernel patched with vserver? I have tried and successed escape from vserver's guest by using the expolits[2], and failed on the test of testfs.sh script[1], could you please do both tests on your 2.4 kernel patched with old style patch to confirm the is really a security problem. [1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/SCRIPT/testfs.sh-0.09 [2] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/rootesc.c Regards, - -Andrew -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOjx8nQYz4bYlCYURArJNAKC+Z05GtpBdyrvA4g8t8GwM0hbq/wCgjA9N a4LSt5deo0o/oFLB1Ta2hnU= =AX4d -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323514: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323514: fixed in gkdial 1:1.8.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 04:23:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 21:23:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E5FSf-0002t3-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:23:33 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7H4NWBN052551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:23:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E57XF-00012z-Dw for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:55:45 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:55:45 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Cannot find linux/ppp.h Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1027/Tue Aug 16 16:44:00 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gkdial Version: 1.8.0-3 Severity: serious gkdial fails to build because it cannot find linux/ppp.h: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DPREFIX=3D\/usr\ -DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR= =3D\/usr/share\ -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=3D\/usr/share/locale\ -DXTHR= EADS -DORBIT2=3D1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/includ= e -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/u= sr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I= /usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/= usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome= -2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/inc= lude/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-= 2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 = -g -Wall -O2 -c ppp_info.c ppp_info.c:13:23: error: linux/ppp.h: No such file or directory --=20 Matt --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDAkTAfNdgYxVXvBARAmVUAJ0ZHumBgXn2Vc4liq1kLNBSTia4eQCfcOvp qtMFJSA/K01cqk0zkG/KO3s= =mHoi -END PGP SIGNATURE- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- --- Received: (at 323514-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 06:48:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 23:48:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKVU7-0007wF-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:32:07 -0700 From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323514: fixed in gkdial 1:1.8.0-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:32:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gkdial Source-Version: 1:1.8.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gkdial, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gkdial-gnome_1.8.0-4_ia64.deb to pool/main/g/gkdial/gkdial-gnome_1.8.0-4_ia64.deb gkdial_1.8.0-4.diff.gz to
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:48:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images? Why? I am not sure that merely making this go over to debconf is going to change the behaviour -- if a human does not answer some install time questions, kernel-images may not install anyway. They'll _install_ (as far as dpkg is concerned) fine. They may not be in a state to be booted, but you can access all of the modules and binaries, which I think is what the d-i package is trying to do. And this particular use case is during a build in a chroot, where you'll never want to boot the image anyhow. You don't need to switch to debconf to fix this -- you just need to check whether or not you have a tty to actually ask the question on, and default to the answer that allows the package to install, tho it may not be bootable. You can still output warning messages to that effect. If it's any easier, you can also check if DEBIAN_FRONTEND='noninteractive'. Debconf will set this when questions are not to be asked, and the buildd sets it as well, so debconf using packages use their defaults. As for the details of why d-i needs to do this, and whether or not it will do so on other archs in the future, you'll have to ask the d-i team, as I don't know. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329906: Certainly not invalid when I've reported it
Hi, On mer, sep 28, 2005, Seo Sanghyeon wrote: libg*2.0-cil = 2.3.90 *are* in Sid. It seems to FTBFS on buildd, but that's different story... Get your facts straight: libg*2.0-cil were not in unstable when I reported this bug. Muine was uploaded the 19th, with the unsatisfiable deps, gtk2-sharp-unstable was uploaded in version 2.3.91-1 the 25th. This was a grave bug. I'm glad you uploaded exactly the binary packages that the Muine maintainer used to build Muine and that the uninstallability period of Muine is over. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330329: 2.6.12-10 built on my sparc pbuilder
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 23:50 -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:32:29PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: linux-2.6 2.6.12-10 built fine on my sparc pbuilder. I think the build should be requeued, preferably on auric if it has more disk space available. Thanks for that information. I think Dannf was plaining to do a binary-upload. But if that doesn't pan out, how can we get the build requeued? -- Horms Ask the buildd administrator to do so. I cced [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my previous message. I did the binary-upload and it has been ACCEPTED, so the requeue should not be necessary. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330466: does not parse server replies correctly anymore
Package: xchat Version: 2.4.5-1 Severity: grave Justification: Makes the package unusable by most or all users Hi, Since two or three days, I cannot use xchat on my machine anymore. It will start, it will connect to the FreeNode and OFTC network's servers correctly, and it will even join channels; however, it will not correctly parse the server's replies when those joins have been successful (marking them as 'GARBAGE' instead); as a result, xchat will think I'm not in any channel, requiring me to type '/msg #channel something' if I want to say anything to that channel. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages xchat depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.1-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libperl5.85.8.7-5Shared Perl library ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-2 SSL shared libraries ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii python2.3 2.3.5-8An interactive high-level object-o ii tcl8.48.4.11-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8 ii xchat-common 2.4.5-1Common files for X-Chat ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m xchat recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330468: sbcl: Can't start sbcl with kernel 2.4.27-2-686
Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.4.65-1 Severity: grave Hi ! When I try to launch SBCL, I get the following message: , | fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 10204(tid 16384): | This version of sbcl is compiled with threading support, but your kernel is | too old to support this. Please use a more recent kernel or a version of sbcl | without threading support. `- ... which I consider a bug since the Debian package installed just fine, and there don't seem to be an alternative sbcl package usable for me. I don't want to use a 2.6 kernel on my machine. So what should I do ? Thanks ! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages sbcl depends on: ii common-lisp-controller 4.18 This is a Common Lisp source and c ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii sbcl-common 1:0.9.4.65-1 Architecture independent files for Versions of packages sbcl recommends: ii binfmt-support1.2.6 Support for extra binary formats -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#222384: Processed: Not security related
Hi Moritz, Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 222384 - security Bug#222384: mason: Mason does not setup /etc/rc.* links Tags were: patch sarge security Tags removed: security Can you please comment on your decission. Why do you think this is not security related? The bug leaves the user after a reboot without activated firewall. This is clearly a big security risk. Christoph -- Christoph Martin, Leiter der EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany Internet-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49-6131-3926337 Fax: +49-6131-3922856 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#330164: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass)
reopen 330164 reassign 330164 mysql-server found 330164 4.0.24-10 found 330164 3.23.49-8.13 thanks Hello Martin On 2005-09-28 Martin Pitt wrote: Debian Bug Tracking System [2005-09-26 11:33 -0700]: - as you stated in your next mail, it doesn't seem that sarge/4.0 is affected. - sarge doesn't carry a 5.0 version - thus all sid versions should be okay too. After checking the advisory I would say that Sean is right, no Debian versions are vulnerable any more as this advisory is really very old. Maybe this was too quick - in the Ubuntu bug [1] the reporter successfully ran the exploit against 4.0.24. Lucky us that you found this bug, I now believe he is correct. check_scramble_323() probably means password checking for everything compatible with version 3.23 so it the normal check_scramble() function in 4.1. In fact the 4.0 from Sarge and the 3.23 from Woody both contain the offending snipped in sql/password.c line 178: for (pos=scrambled ; *pos ; pos++) *to++=(char) (floor(my_rnd(rand_st)*31)+64); So we have: Woody: 3.23 VULN - -- Sarge: - 4.0 VULN 4.1.11a-4 ok - (testing) - - 4.1.11a-4 ok 5.0.12beta-2 ok Sid:- - 4.1.14-5 ok 5.0.13rc-1 ok Security Team, do you do the rest or should I help you? (Please keep in mind, that there is another open security issue for MySQL, see bug #322133: mysql-dfsg: Buffer overflow in user defined functions) bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#330164: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 330164 Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass Bug reopened, originator not changed. reassign 330164 mysql-server Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass Bug reassigned from package `mysql-server-4.1' to `mysql-server'. found 330164 4.0.24-10 Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass Bug marked as found in version 4.0.24-10. found 330164 3.23.49-8.13 Bug#330164: mysql-server-4.1: Authentication bypass Bug marked as found in version 3.23.49-8.13. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC
tags 320851 patch thanks Attached please find a patch for this bug which forces the use of -fPIC when building all of the .o files used in X11.so. I'm currently in the process of doing a test build with this patch on paer, and will plan to upload an NMU for this bug if it works, if you don't beat me to it. Even though there is another open RC bug against gs-esp, this particular FTBFS bug is preventing other packages from being buildable on hppa. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/debian/changelog gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/debian/changelog --- gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/debian/changelog +++ gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +gs-esp (8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Medium-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Use -fPIC for building all objects which will be linked into the +X11.so DSO. Closes: #320851. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:58:49 -0700 + gs-esp (8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Disabled FAPI. It caused too much headaches - closes: #323430, #322553, #322159, #321436, #321205, #321049 only in patch2: unchanged: --- gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1.orig/src/devs.mak +++ gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/src/devs.mak @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ $(GLCCSHARED) $(XINCLUDE) $(GLO_)gdevx.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevx.c $(GLOBJ)gdevxcmp.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gdevxcmp.c $(GDEVX) $(math__h) - $(GLCC) $(XINCLUDE) $(GLO_)gdevxcmp.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevxcmp.c + $(GLCCSHARED) $(XINCLUDE) $(GLO_)gdevxcmp.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevxcmp.c $(GLOBJ)gdevxini.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gdevxini.c $(GDEVX) $(memory__h)\ $(gserrors_h) $(gsparamx_h) $(gxdevmem_h) $(gdevbbox_h) @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ # const/non-const cast required by the X headers that we can't work around. $(GLOBJ)gdevxres.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gdevxres.c $(std_h) $(x__h)\ $(gsmemory_h) $(gstypes_h) $(gxdevice_h) $(gdevx_h) - $(CC_NO_WARN) $(GLCCFLAGS) $(XINCLUDE) $(GLO_)gdevxres.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevxres.c + $(GLCCSHARED) $(GLCCFLAGS) $(XINCLUDE) $(GLO_)gdevxres.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevxres.c $(GLOBJ)gdevxxf.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gdevxxf.c $(GDEVX) $(math__h) $(memory__h)\ $(gsstruct_h) $(gsutil_h) $(gxxfont_h) only in patch2: unchanged: --- gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1.orig/src/lib.mak +++ gs-esp-8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1/src/lib.mak @@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ $(GLOBJ)gsparamx.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gsparamx.c $(string__h)\ $(gserror_h) $(gserrors_h) $(gsmemory_h) $(gsparam_h) $(gsparamx_h)\ $(gstypes_h) - $(GLCC) $(GLO_)gsparamx.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gsparamx.c + $(GLCCSHARED) $(GLO_)gsparamx.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gsparamx.c # Future replacement for gsparams.c $(GLOBJ)gsparam2.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gsparam2.c $(GXERR) $(memory__h)\ @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ # Provide a mapping between StandardEncoding and ISOLatin1Encoding. $(GLOBJ)gdevemap.$(OBJ) : $(GLSRC)gdevemap.c $(AK) $(std_h) - $(GLCC) $(GLO_)gdevemap.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevemap.c + $(GLCCSHARED) $(GLO_)gdevemap.$(OBJ) $(C_) $(GLSRC)gdevemap.c ## Create a pseudo-feature for the entire graphics library. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#327722: Patch for Gopher bug CAN-2005-2772
Steve Kemp wrote: On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:23:16AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: Attached are the patches that Joey (Schulze) approved. Can you (or Joey) comment: did you use a different patch because you believe mine to be insecure, or for a different reason? (That's an important question, since as you know, my patch was uploaded to unstable and will presumably be in the next stable release.) Your patch looks good. The reason that I used the one I did was because it was created a few weeks ago when there was no other patch publically available. Had I seen yours at the time I would have used it instead, rather than going with something different. I certainly don't think you need do anything drastic like use the one I made in another upload. Although it was a fair question to ask. Probably the same reason by me. An advisory is pending, the packages are being built already - the X advisory didn't exactly help... Regards, Joey -- The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 320851 patch Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream Bug#323688: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#128321: marked as done (icemc_0.2.2-1(unstable/sparc): missing build-depends)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#128321: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jan 2002 17:06:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 08 11:06:09 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cicero.e-mis.co.uk [212.240.194.162] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16NzhQ-0004sF-00; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 11:06:09 -0600 Received: from tacitus.systems ([172.21.77.253] helo=tacitus ident=mail) by cicero.e-mis.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16NzhQ-00081h-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:06:08 + Received: from james by tacitus with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16NzhP-0007RP-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 08 Jan 2002 17:06:07 + To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: icemc_0.2.2-1(unstable/sparc): missing build-depends Mail-Copies-To: never From: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 08 Jan 2002 17:06:07 + Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lines: 27 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: icemc Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: serious You appear to be missing a build-depends on docbook-to-man. | Automatic build of icemc_0.2.2-1 on vore by sbuild/sparc 1.159 | Build started at 20020108-1139 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libqt-dev [...] | /usr/bin/docbook-to-man debian/icemc.sgml icemc.1 | /bin/sh: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory | make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 | ** A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=icemcver=0.2.2-1 -- James --- Received: (at 128321-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 08:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 01:38:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKXMH-0006Rh-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 From: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#128321: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: icemc Source-Version: 0.2.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of icemc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: icemc_0.2.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3.diff.gz icemc_0.2.4-3.dsc to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3.dsc icemc_0.2.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated icemc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:23:33 +0200 Source: icemc Binary: icemc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: icemc - Editor for IceWM menus Closes: 128321 133679 187315 327953 Changes: icemc (0.2.4-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Orphan package * Acknowledge NMUs (Closes: #327953, #128321, #133679, #187315) * Update Standards Version * Remove versioned dependency on debhelper as even oldstable has a high enough version * Add quotes
Bug#327953: marked as done (icemc: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327953: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1w-0003Qu-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:08 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002Rw-8e for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: icemc: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: icemc Version: 0.2.4-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327953-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 08:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 01:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKXMH-0006Rn-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 From: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327953: fixed in icemc 0.2.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: icemc Source-Version: 0.2.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of icemc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: icemc_0.2.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3.diff.gz icemc_0.2.4-3.dsc to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3.dsc icemc_0.2.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/i/icemc/icemc_0.2.4-3_i386.deb
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
Package: postfix Version: 2.2.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ... Setting up postfix (2.2.4-1) ... Adding group `postfix' (102)... Done. Adding system user `postfix'... Adding new user `postfix' (100) with group `postfix'. chage: the shadow password file is not present adduser: `/usr/bin/chage -M 9 postfix' returned error code 15. Aborting. Cleaning up. Removing user `postfix'. dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329870: pydf: Does not start on alpha architecture after installing
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:38:37AM +0200, Adrian Neumaier wrote: Package: pydf Version: 0.9.8.5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing an 'apt-get install pydf' and trying to start it i get the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pydf FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pydf, line 395, in ? display_mp(mp) File /usr/bin/pydf, line 261, in display_mp used_f = myformat(used, sizeformat, fs_blocksize) File /usr/bin/pydf, line 151, in myformat return hfnum(size, 1024) File /usr/bin/pydf, line 117, in hfnum power = int(log(size)/log(base)) ValueError: math domain error ok, as usual :-), send me the output of: stat -f /mnt python -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/mnt)' where /mnt is the mountpoint that is problematic (if you do not have many, could you check them all?) if you see any negative numbers in the last statement, re-run it with different versions of python - and we should file a bug against python (and I'll make some extra checks in pydf so that it is more robust) I checked it on escher.debian.org and could not reproduce the bug. -- --- | Radovan Garabík http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__garabik @ kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk | --- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!
Bug#330474: mutt: opens of same mbox by multiple mutt processes erase message bodies
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.11-1 Severity: critical This is awful. For years I have performed multiple opens of mbox files, using multiple mutt processes. For years it worked. Now it doesn't. Now, if you do this, message bodies will be nuked out of the folder and the Content-Length: header rewritten to zero. The latter appears to be a subtly different issue; the header was rewritten for some but not all messages, and the ones with the nuked bodies were a *subset* of the ones whose Content-Length: headers were written. This is very, very, very, very bad behavior, and I would be deeply furious about it if I hadn't been able to use e2undel on the remote host where my mail spools to recover the ~150MB deleted spool file from a live filesystem and extract the obliterated message bodies from it. I was miraculously lucky. Anybody who spools mail locally, doesn't have root on the host where their mail spools, or who uses ext3 would have been badly screwed. Mutt should either go back to not destroying mailbox contents on multiple opens, should implement a locking mechanism to prevent other copies of itself from opening a given folder for writing at the same time, or (easiest to implement but least useful), refuse to open a mailbox that another Mutt process has open. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-powerpc-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages mutt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.3 4.3.28-3 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libgnutls12 1.2.6-1the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libncursesw5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.6 Authentication abstraction library ii postfix [mail-transport-agent 2.2.4-1A high-performance mail transport Versions of packages mutt recommends: ii locales 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: National Language ( ii mime-support 3.35-1 MIME files 'mime.types' 'mailcap -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
merge 330471 327144 thanks Ok, I've found it is the problem of adduser and shadow package. -- .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:49:22AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: Package: postfix Version: 2.2.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable (Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ... Setting up postfix (2.2.4-1) ... Adding group `postfix' (102)... Done. Adding system user `postfix'... Adding new user `postfix' (100) with group `postfix'. chage: the shadow password file is not present adduser: `/usr/bin/chage -M 9 postfix' returned error code 15. Aborting. Cleaning up. Removing user `postfix'. dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 So don't screw up your system so that /etc/shadow is missing? Doesn't sound like a bug to me. Why would you *want* a system without /etc/shadow? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gs-esp 8+8.15rc4.dfsg.1-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 320851 + fixed Bug#320851: usr/lib/gs-esp/8.15/X11.so: Shared library is not PIC Tags were: patch fixed-upstream upstream Bug#323688: gs-esp: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to build shared lib. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#308897: marked as done (backup-manager: insecure default configuration)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2005 05:07:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 12 22:07:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from www.thaiopensource.org (thaiopensource.org) [61.19.242.42] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DWSOm-hU-00; Thu, 12 May 2005 22:07:44 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by thaiopensource.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7253364063 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 May 2005 12:04:50 +0700 (ICT) Received: from thaiopensource.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (truffle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26965-05 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 13 May 2005 12:04:50 +0700 (ICT) Received: by thaiopensource.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8935E364076; Fri, 13 May 2005 12:04:50 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:04:50 +0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup-manager: secure repository Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeroen Vermeulen) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sipa.or.th Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: wishlist Creating a world-readable repository would be a serious security breach. I may be mistaken, but AFAICS the installation script fails to check this or warn about it. It doesn't enforce it in any case; I just realized I had a world-readable repository in a working setup. Are there any steps that can be taken to encourage secure configuration, e.g. creating the repository at installation time with root-only access rights, or chmod'ing it if it already exists? Or alternatively, create the backups with root-only access rights and/or encrypt them. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages backup-manager depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii gzip 1.3.5-9The GNU compression utility -- debconf information excluded --D8DB857414F.1115959689/localhost.localdomain-- --- Received: (at 308897-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 09:07:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 02:07:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from www.sukria.net [81.56.73.92] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKXuY-0004aB-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:07:34 -0700 Received: by www.sukria.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1638621EF79; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200 From: Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bug closed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.8-powerpc (ppc) X-Uptime: 11:03:33 up 15:29, 9 users, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.00 X-PGP-ID: 1EE5DD34 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Those bugs are closed in sarge now, and they are not open in etch and sid. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315582: marked as done (backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:04:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 17:52:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 10:52:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DlVsB-0002tz-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:52:19 -0700 Received: from [217.251.232.112] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #297) id 1DlVrg-0001Qv-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:51:26 +0200 From: Sven Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: backup-manager: insecure handling of temporary files Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: backup-manager Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: critical Justification: root security hole Tags: patch The optional CD-burning feature of backup-manager uses a hardcoded filename (/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log) for logging the output of cdrecord. If a malicious (or just unlucky) user makes /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log a symlink to a system file, that file will be overwritten in the next run of backup-manager. A demonstration follows: $ whoami sven $ ls -l /etc/junk; cat /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32 Jun 22 21:23 /etc/junk This will soon be overwritten! $ ln -s /etc/junk /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log $ su -c backup-manager Password: unable to mount 0,1,0 on /tmp/bm-mnt $ ls -l /etc/junk; head -n 3 /etc/junk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1431 Jun 22 21:25 /etc/junk scsidev: '0,1,0' scsibus: 0 target: 1 lun: 0 Linux sg driver version: 3.1.25 Replace /etc/junk with /etc/passwd, and the system becomes slightly less usable. :-( A solution is to use mktemp instead of a hardcoded file name, I suggest the following patch: -- diff -u /usr/sbin/backup-manager /home/sven/backup-manager --- /usr/sbin/backup-manager2005-04-04 22:39:22.0 +0200 +++ /home/sven/backup-manager2005-06-22 21:49:17.0 +0200 @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ lockfile=/var/run/backup-manager.pid md5sum=/usr/bin/md5sum bc=/usr/bin/bc -logfile=/tmp/bm-cdrecord.log -mount_point=/tmp/bm-mnt +logfile=$(mktemp /tmp/bm-cdrecord.log.XX) +mount_point=$(mktemp -d /tmp/bm-mnt.XX) # Load the backup-manager's library . $libdir/gettext.sh --- -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages backup-manager depends on: ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii gzip 1.3.5-10 The GNU compression utility -- debconf information: backup-manager/upload-key: * backup-manager/name-format: long backup-manager/upload-hosts: backup-manager/upload-user-ftp: * backup-manager/cron_frequency: daily * backup-manager/blacklist: /home/sven/tmp * backup-manager/time-to-live: 5 * backup-manager/burning-maxsize: 650 backup-manager/upload-user-scp-warning: backup-manager/transfert_mode: scp * backup-manager/dump_symlinks: false backup-manager/upload-user-scp: bmngr * backup-manager/burning-device: 0,1,0 backup-manager/upload-dir: /var/archives/uploads * backup-manager/directories: /etc /home/sven /root * backup-manager/filetype: tar.gz * backup-manager/backup-repository: /var/archives * backup-manager/burning-method: CDR * backup-manager/burning-enabled: true backup-manager/cron_remove_deprecated: false * backup-manager/want_to_upload: false --- Received: (at 315582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
On Wednesday 28 of September 2005 11:15, Steve Langasek wrote: (Reading database ... 11346 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking postfix (from .../postfix_2.2.4-1_i386.deb) ... Setting up postfix (2.2.4-1) ... Adding group `postfix' (102)... Done. Adding system user `postfix'... Adding new user `postfix' (100) with group `postfix'. chage: the shadow password file is not present adduser: `/usr/bin/chage -M 9 postfix' returned error code 15. Aborting. Cleaning up. Removing user `postfix'. dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 So don't screw up your system so that /etc/shadow is missing? Doesn't sound like a bug to me. Why would you *want* a system without /etc/shadow? The system without /etc/shadow is perfectly correct. Especially if it is installed with pbuilder or debootstrap which does not create /etc/shadow. -- .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
reassign 330471 adduser severity 330471 normal close 330471 merge 330471 327144 thanks -- .''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 330471 adduser Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist Bug reassigned from package `postfix' to `adduser'. severity 330471 normal Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist Severity set to `normal'. close 330471 Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 330471 327144 Bug#327144: shadow = 1:4.0.3-37 needed for systems without shadow passwords Bug#330471: postfix: Can't install if /etc/shadow does not exist Merged 327144 330471. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330478: solfege: Solfege did not start
Package: solfege Version: 2.0.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Solfege did not start. From the terminal I obtain the following mesages: ~$ solfege /usr/share/solfege/src/mainwin.py:108: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.TRUE is deprecated, use True instead self.set_resizable(gtk.TRUE) /usr/share/solfege/src/mainwin.py:133: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.mainiteration is deprecated, use gtk.main_iteration instead gtk.mainiteration(0) /usr/share/solfege/src/mainwin.py:126: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.mainiteration is deprecated, use gtk.main_iteration instead gtk.mainiteration(0) /usr/share/solfege/src/tracebackwindow.py:28: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.FALSE is deprecated, use False instead self.vbox.pack_start(label, gtk.FALSE) /usr/share/solfege/src/tracebackwindow.py:30: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.TRUE is deprecated, use True instead label.set_line_wrap(gtk.TRUE) /usr/share/solfege/src/tracebackwindow.py:31: GtkDeprecationWarning: gtk.FALSE is deprecated, use False instead self.vbox.pack_start(label, gtk.FALSE) Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/solfege, line 46, in ? import src.mainwin File /usr/share/solfege/src/mainwin.py, line 167, in ? from htmlwidget import HtmlWidget File /usr/share/solfege/src/htmlwidget.py, line 611, in ? import gtkhtml2 ImportError: No module named gtkhtml2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages solfege depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-2 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gtk2 2.6.2-1Python bindings for the GTK+ widge solfege recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#314698: Patch for NMU 0.35-2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I uploaded to DELAYED-3. If you want to override this NMU, then please upload a fixed version before this upload reaches the archive. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOmL85UTeB5t8Mo0RAuuvAKC3DP6IpYNKI9cJYiVSEsI8A07lHgCgt9BR frlV+a0FGfasTznDvXtHx2k= =0nxq -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -u kxdocker-0.35/debian/changelog kxdocker-0.35/debian/changelog --- kxdocker-0.35/debian/changelog +++ kxdocker-0.35/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +kxdocker (0.35-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition (Closes: #328017, #325635). + * Upstream fixed bug in 0.35 (Closes: #314698). + * Remove xeplugin_dcop_skel.h from Makefile.am (Closes: #296509). + + -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:06:22 +0200 + kxdocker (0.35-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fixed the Qt/KDE transition bug (closes: #328017). only in patch2: unchanged: --- kxdocker-0.35.orig/src/Makefile.am +++ kxdocker-0.35/src/Makefile.am @@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ xeplugin_gatrash.h xeplugin_gepager.h xeplugin_gepillow.h xeplugin_gmounts.h \ xeplugin_mouse.h xeplugin_taskmanager.h xeplugin_xmlconf.h xeroot.h xgdocker.h xgicon.h \ xkbase.h xktray.h xeplugin_dcop.h xeconfiguration.h taskmanager.h xeevents.h \ - xeplugin_configurator.h xeplugin_garp.h xeplugin_glistpluginbase.h xgtaskbar.h \ - xeplugin_dcop_skel.h + xeplugin_configurator.h xeplugin_garp.h xeplugin_glistpluginbase.h xgtaskbar.h # let automoc handle all of the meta source files (moc) METASOURCES = AUTO
Processed: tagging 325635
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 325635 + patch pending Bug#325635: FTBFS: broken build-dependency on libqt3c102-mt There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 327974
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 327974 + patch pending Bug#327974: kexi: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: sid Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323052: pam-pgsql: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory
For me, the package builds perfectly well. Maybe you were using a version of postgresql-dev that was temporarily broken? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327961: marked as done (qtdmm: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327961: fixed in qtdmm 0.8.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:48:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:48:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy21-0003Tr-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:48:13 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002UL-Sr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qtdmm: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qtdmm Version: 0.8.4-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327961-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 09:49:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 02:49:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKYWp-0005lS-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700 From: Steffen Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327961: fixed in qtdmm 0.8.6-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: qtdmm Source-Version: 0.8.6-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qtdmm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qtdmm_0.8.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qtdmm/qtdmm_0.8.6-1.diff.gz qtdmm_0.8.6-1.dsc to pool/main/q/qtdmm/qtdmm_0.8.6-1.dsc qtdmm_0.8.6-1_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qtdmm/qtdmm_0.8.6-1_i386.deb
Bug#323056: php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory
For me, this package builds perfectly well. I think you built the package with a temporarily broken version of postgresql-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324310: marked as done (gmsh: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'Mesh' with no type)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324310: fixed in gmsh 1.60.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 14:22:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 21 07:22:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c158132.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.158.132] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E6qib-000741-00; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 07:22:37 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6qiU-0006I2-Cu; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:22:30 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gmsh: FTBFS: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'Mesh' with no type Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:22:30 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gmsh Version: 1.60.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gmsh' on unstable, I get the following error: x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_GSL -DHAVE_MATH_EVAL -DHAVE_NETGEN -DHAVE_LIBZ -DHAVE_LIBPNG -DHAVE_LIBJPEG -DHAVE_FLTK -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I../Common -Ilibsrc/include -Ilibsrc/interface -DNO_PARALLEL_THREADS -UWIN32 -c libsrc/meshing/global.cpp -o libsrc/meshing/global.o libsrc/include/../gprim/adtree.hpp:40: warning: 'class netgen::ADTreeCriterion' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor libsrc/include/../opti/opti.hpp:19: warning: 'class netgen::MinFunction' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp:441: warning: 'class netgen::Element' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp:965: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'Mesh' with no type The attached patch fixes this. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gmsh-1.60.1/Netgen/libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp ./Netgen/libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp --- ../tmp-orig/gmsh-1.60.1/Netgen/libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp 2004-12-09 06:22:05.0 + +++ ./Netgen/libsrc/meshing/meshtype.hpp2005-08-21 13:53:14.0 + @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ - +class Mesh; // class CSGeometry; extern int GetTimeStamp(); --- Received: (at 324310-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 10:24:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 03:24:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKYzu-0007wd-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:17:10 -0700 From: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#324310: fixed in gmsh 1.60.1-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:17:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gmsh Source-Version: 1.60.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gmsh, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gmsh_1.60.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gmsh/gmsh_1.60.1-2.diff.gz gmsh_1.60.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gmsh/gmsh_1.60.1-2.dsc gmsh_1.60.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gmsh/gmsh_1.60.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gmsh package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:42:54 +0200 Source: gmsh Binary: gmsh Architecture: source i386
Bug#330485: qgo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper'
Package: qgo Version: 1.0.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'qgo' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean perl -w admin/debianrules echodirs debian/debiandirs dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qgo-1.0.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/qgo-1.0.2/debian/control2005-09-28 07:29:48.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-28 07:29:46.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: autotools-dev, libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.3.4-3), libqt3-compat-headers +Build-Depends: debhelper, autotools-dev, libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.3.4-3), libqt3-compat-headers Package: qgo Architecture: any -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330488: dhelp: Version built with gcc-4.0 segfaults on installation
Package: dhelp Severity: serious Version: 0.5.21 As the subject says, if I rebuild dhelp using an up-to-date sid system, then try to install the resulting package (even in a clean pbuilder chroot), I get a segmentation fault: Unpacking dhelp (from .../d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.21_i386.deb) ... Setting up dhelp (0.5.21) ... Building HTML tree .../var/lib/dpkg/info/dhelp.postinst: line 45: 15325 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/dhelp_parse -r dpkg: error processing dhelp (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 Errors were encountered while processing: dhelp E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330005: marked as done (sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6')
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330005: fixed in sctplib 1:1.0.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 05:11:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 22:11:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-60-224-188-178.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [60.224.188.178] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJOn4-0008T2-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:11:07 -0700 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5549A6842DE; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:10:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:10:34 +1000 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7lclw+czRZDHN64H Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --7lclw+czRZDHN64H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Package: sctplib Severity: serious Version: 1:1.0.4-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of sctplib_1:1.0.4-1 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 65 Build started at 20050925-0608 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, bzip2 [...] adaptation.c: In function 'adl_gatherLocalAddresses': adaptation.c:3214: error: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=sctplibver=1%3A1.0.4-1arch=alphastamp=1127621351file=logas=raw Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --7lclw+czRZDHN64H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDNjFKgY5NIXPNpFURAmL6AKCLQbVEhvqwkuN5dXYmSGQDK+WhyQCfUWdG FqGl9BAr1yksCBFKJesb7NA= =Mon3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --7lclw+czRZDHN64H-- --- Received: (at 330005-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 11:39:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 04:39:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKaAT-0004qb-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:32:09 -0700 From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330005: fixed in sctplib 1:1.0.4-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sctplib Source-Version: 1:1.0.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sctplib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sctplib-dev_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib-dev_1.0.4-2_i386.deb sctplib-dev_1.0.4-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib-dev_1.0.4-2_sparc.deb sctplib-doc_1.0.4-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib-doc_1.0.4-2_all.deb sctplib1_1.0.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib1_1.0.4-2_i386.deb sctplib1_1.0.4-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib1_1.0.4-2_sparc.deb sctplib_1.0.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib_1.0.4-2.diff.gz sctplib_1.0.4-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sctplib/sctplib_1.0.4-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the
Bug#330495: php3: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends: libsnmp5-dev
Package: php3 Version: 3:3.0.18-31 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'php3' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package libsnmp5-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for php3: libsnmp5-dev Package libsnmp5-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libsnmp9-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/php3-3.0.18/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/php3-3.0.18/debian/control 2005-09-28 11:21:07.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-28 11:19:46.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: web Priority: extra Maintainer: Adam Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 2.0.40), perl, flex-old, bison, apache-dev (= 1.3.27-1), zlib1g-dev, libgdbm-dev, libmysqlclient12-dev, libc-client-dev, libgd2-xpm-dev, libt1-dev, libxmltok1-dev, libldap2-dev, libsnmp5-dev, libmagick6-dev (= 5:6.0.0.2-1), libbz2-dev, libmhash-dev, libdb4.2-dev, xlibs-dev, libssl-dev, postgresql-dev (= 7.2-4) +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 2.0.40), perl, flex-old, bison, apache-dev (= 1.3.27-1), zlib1g-dev, libgdbm-dev, libmysqlclient12-dev, libc-client-dev, libgd2-xpm-dev, libt1-dev, libxmltok1-dev, libldap2-dev, libsnmp9-dev, libmagick6-dev (= 5:6.0.0.2-1), libbz2-dev, libmhash-dev, libdb4.2-dev, xlibs-dev, libssl-dev, postgresql-dev (= 7.2-4) Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: php3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323056: marked as done (php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:05 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323056: php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 13:01:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 06:01:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d009010.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.9.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4I6w-0002il-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:01:10 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4I6u-0002Hb-8a; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:01:08 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 15:01:08 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: php3 Version: 3:3.0.18-31 Severity: serious When building 'php3' on unstable, I get the following error: cd apache cc -O0 -Wall -g -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -shared -fPIC -DCOMPILE_DL=1 -I.. -I. -I/usr/include/apache-1.3 -I/usr/include/postgresql -o pgsql.so ../functions/pgsql.c -lpq -lc In file included from ../functions/pgsql.c:40: ../functions/php3_pgsql.h:46:22: error: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory ../functions/php3_pgsql.h:47:28: error: libpq/libpq-fs.h: No such file or directory Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 323056-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 12:04:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 05:04:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d082056.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.82.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKafP-0003wt-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:04:07 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKafN-00052y-DU; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:05 +0200 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:05 +0200 To: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#323056: php3: FTBFS: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On 05-Sep-28 11:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote: For me, this package builds perfectly well. I think you built the package with a temporarily broken version of postgresql-dev. Yes, the problem with libpq-fe.h has been fixed by the new version of postgresql-dev, thanks! Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 330291 +patch Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build There were no tags set. Tags added: patch reassign 330291 login Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build Bug reassigned from package `pbuilder' to `login'. severity 330291 serious Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder
retitle 330291 missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package thanks Let us retitle this bugreport, so that is looks more correct. amicablement, junichi -- Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/ 183A 70FC 4732 1B87 57A5 CE82 D837 7D4E E81E 55C1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 330291 missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package Bug#330291: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327319: marked as forwarded (FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:53:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #327319, regarding FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 327319-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 12:54:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 05:54:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gw.gutreu.ch (thinx.tp.ch) [62.12.146.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKbSD-SG-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:54:33 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thinx.tp.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848A93F266; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tux.tp.ch (tux.tp.ch [192.168.0.100]) by thinx.tp.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECADB3EAFD; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:53:58 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Fwd: Bug#327319: FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared] From: Daniel Gubser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:53:58 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hello Pierre What can we do about this error? Daniel Forwarded Message From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug#327319: FTBFS: gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file not declared Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:43:49 -0700 Package: sagasu Version: 2.0.5-1 Severity: serious =20 sagasu fails to build because gnome_window_icon_set_default_from_file is not declared: =20 if i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=3D\sagasu\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=3D\= sagasu\ -DPACKAGE_VERSION=3D\2.0.5\ -DPACKAGE_STRING=3D\sagasu\ 2.0.5\= -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=3D\\ -DPACKAGE=3D\sagasu\ -DVERSION=3D\2.0.5\ -= DSTDC_HEADERS=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLI= B_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_MEMORY_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=3D1 -DHAVE= _INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=3D1= -DHAVE_ALLOCA=3D1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_GETPAGESI= ZE=3D1 -DHAVE_MMAP=3D1 -DINTDIV0_RAISES_SIGFPE=3D1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H_WITH_U= INTMAX=3D1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H_WITH_UINTMAX=3D1 -DHAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG=3D1 -= DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_ARGZ_H=3D1 -DHAVE_LIMITS_H=3D1 -DHAVE_LOCALE_H= =3D1 -DHAVE_NL_TYPES_H=3D1 -DHAVE_MALLOC_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STDDEF_H=3D1 -DHAVE_S= TDLIB_H=3D1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=3D1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=3D1 -DHAVE_SYS_PARAM_H=3D1 = -DHAVE_FEOF_UNLOCKED=3D1 -DHAVE_FGETS_UNLOCKED=3D1 -DHAVE_GETC_UNLOCKED=3D1= -DHAVE_GETCWD=3D1 -DHAVE_GETEGID=3D1 -DHAVE_GETEUID=3D1 -DHAVE_GETGID=3D1 = -DHAVE_GETUID=3D1 -DHAVE_MEMPCPY=3D1 -DHAVE_MUNMAP=3D1 -DHAVE_PUTENV=3D1 -D= HAVE_SETENV=3D1 -DHAVE_SETLOCALE=3D1 -DHAVE_STPCPY=3D1 -DHAVE_STRCASECMP=3D= 1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=3D1 -DHAVE_STRTOUL=3D1 -DHAVE_TSEARCH=3D1 -DHAVE___ARGZ_COU= NT=3D1 -DHAVE___ARGZ_STRINGIFY=3D1 -DHAVE___ARGZ_NEXT=3D1 -DHAVE_ICONV=3D1 = -DICONV_CONST=3D -DHAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET=3D1 -DHAVE_LC_MESSAGES=3D1 -DENABL= E_NLS=3D1 -DHAVE_GETTEXT=3D1 -DHAVE_DCGETTEXT=3D1 -DHAVE_SNPRINTF=3D1 -DHAV= E_VSNPRINTF=3D1 -I. -I.-DLOCALEDIR=3D\/usr/share/locale\ -DDATADIR= =3D\/usr/share\ -DGNOMEICONDIR=3D\/usr/share/pixmaps\ -DG_DISABLE_DEPRE= CATED -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGNOME_DISABLE_DEP= RECATED -I./intl -DPKGDATADIR=3D\/usr/share/sagasu\ -DPIXMAPDIR=3D\/usr/= share/pixmaps\ -DPKGSOUNDDIR=3D\/usr/share/sounds/sagasu\ -DPACKAGE_HOME= _PAGE=3D\http://sarrazip.com/dev/sagasu.html\; -DORBIT2=3D1 -pthread -DXTH= READS -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/incl= ude/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/= usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 = -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbono= bo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr= /include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/free= type2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.= 0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -Wall
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:15:24 -0700, Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:48:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: Sounds to me that the package in question is getting ahead of policy and deciding that the debconf transition is over. Well, is it just powerpc debian installer that build depends on kernel-images? Why? I am not sure that merely making this go over to debconf is going to change the behaviour -- if a human does not answer some install time questions, kernel-images may not install anyway. They'll _install_ (as far as dpkg is concerned) fine. They may not be in a state to be booted, but you can access all of the modules and binaries, which I think is what the d-i package is trying to do. And this particular use case is during a build in a chroot, where you'll never want to boot the image anyhow. You don't need to switch to debconf to fix this -- you just need to check whether or not you have a tty to actually ask the question on, and default to the answer that allows the package to install, tho it may not be bootable. You can still output warning messages to that effect. If it's any easier, you can also check if DEBIAN_FRONTEND='noninteractive'. Debconf will set this when questions are not to be asked, and the buildd sets it as well, so debconf using packages use their defaults. Sorry. The primary use case for the kernel image is for users, perhaps novice users, who have installed the image, and whose machines I do not wish to render unbotable. If they use lilo, a mis-installed kernel image may well be disastrous. So, very likely, DEBIAN_FRONTEND='noninteractive'. would result in a failed install --- though perhaps not for for the initrd question, I'll need to think through the various scenarios. The point is that correct installation shall always trump non-interactive installs as far as kernel images are concerned; so it is not a good idea to install kenrel images in a lights out mode. As for the details of why d-i needs to do this, and whether or not it will do so on other archs in the future, you'll have to ask the d-i team, as I don't know. Well, I think they should have actually tried a build and ensured that it actually worked; and had a dialogue earlier. I would understand it if a change in kernel-package broke a build for some other package; then it would indeed be RC for kernel-package. But changing a build to something that does not work, has never worked, and requires changes in other packages to make it work, well, is a RC bug for the package that made the change in the build system, not in the packages that need to be changed in order for the new build to work. manoj -- You have a deep appreciation of the arts and music. Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package Severity: serious The problem: * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images. * build daemons install packages in noninteractive mode * the kernel images do not install successfully in noninteractive mode: This is not a linux kernel package, but exclusively a kernel-package issue, which provides the postinst and co scripts, and needs to be made debconf aware. Manoj promised some rewrite, modularization and debconfification for post-sarge, but i don't know what the current planes are for this. None of that promises to make kernel images install non-interactively, if installing kernel images may make the system unbootable. The primary concern remains end users who install kernel images. manoj -- love, n.: When you don't want someone too close--because you're very sensitive to pleasure. Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330517: ntop: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends: librrd0-dev
Package: ntop Version: 2:3.2rc1-1 Severity: serious When building 'ntop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package librrd0-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for ntop: librrd0-dev Package librrd0-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source This can probably be solved by Build-Depending on librrd2-dev instead of librrd0-dev. There is also another FTBFS problem on amd64 which seems to be caused by a missing -fPIC in compilations for a shared library: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include -I../myrrd -DLINUX -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g -DMAKE_WITH_IGNORE_SIGPIPE -I/usr/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -DPIC -MT libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.Tpo -c xmldumpPlugin.c -o libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o /dev/null 21 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CC gcc -g -DMAKE_WITH_IGNORE_SIGPIPE -I/usr/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -DPIC -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -o libxmldumpPlugin.la -rpath /usr/lib -shared -release 3.2rc1 libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.lo -lgdome -lxml2 -lglib -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -lcrypt -lc -lssl -lcrypto -lpcap -lgdbm -lgd -lpng -lz gcc -shared .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgdome.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so /usr/lib/libglib.so -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -lcrypt -lc -lssl -lcrypto -lpcap /usr/lib/libgdbm.so /usr/lib/libgd.so -lpng -lz -Wl,-soname -Wl,libxmldumpPlugin-3.2rc1.so -o .libs/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2rc1.so /usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `dumpXML' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libxmldumpPlugin.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/srv/dbuild/tmp/ntop-3.2rc1/plugins' Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder
tags 330291 pending thanks Committed. Thanks for noticying and for the patch. Kind Regards, -- Nekral -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330267: marked as done (Uninstallable on i386: needs rebuild with new gmp)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:54:27 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in 0.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 01:56:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 26 18:56:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EK4hf-ZS-00; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 18:56:19 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-103-176.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.103.176])
by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j8R1uG7Z008679;
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EK4hc-0006ca-6E; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:56:16 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Uninstallable on i386: needs rebuild with new gmp
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:56:16 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: hsffig
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hsffig needs to be rebuilt on i386 against the new
libgmp3c2. It appears to be OK on all other
architectures.
---
Received: (at 330267-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 13:56:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 06:56:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org [69.10.152.57]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKcQT-RD-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:56:49 -0700
Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com ([68.99.114.105]
helo=heinrich.complete.org)
by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps
(with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(TLS peer CN christoph.complete.org, certificate verified)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EKcQV-0005vl-EK; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:56:56 -0500
Received: from jgoerzen by heinrich.complete.org with local
(Exim 4.52)
id 1EKcOB-0005rC-7j; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:54:27 -0500
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:54:27 -0500
From: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 0.1.2-2
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 28 Sep 2005
08:56:56 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Got a typo in the changelog, sigh.
- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
From: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:18:19 -0700
To: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Apache Maintainers debian-apache@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#330276: marked as done ('apache2ctl restart' exits with 0 after
404)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:02:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330276: fixed in hsffig 0.1.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 06:13:24 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 26 23:13:24 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl017-124-007.bna1.dsl.speakeasy.net
Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
On September 27, 2005 15:52, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: kdenetwork Version: 4:3.4.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source kdenetwork failed to build on my sparc pbuilder. The sparc buildd log has not yet made it to buildd.debian.org, so I don't know if if failed there or not. Note the resemblence of this error: /bin/sh: line 1: 26339 Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic -L /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -tr tr2i18n -i usertab.h ...to that reported in #326470: /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic -L /usr/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -impl actest.h actest.ui actest.cpp Segmentation fault ...which was reported against Qt3 3:3.3.4-7, on powerpc, but made mention of the problem being somehow related to the lack of altivec on the reporter's build system. So perhaps Qt3 is being built against certain hardware, and doesn't work properly against hardware which doesn't have all the features of the buildd hardware. For this reason, I would be very curious to see if kdenetwork succeeds on vore, since it has always built there before, as has Qt3, kdelibs, etc. Thanks, Christopher Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330488: marked as done (dhelp: Version built with gcc-4.0 segfaults on installation)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:47:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330488: fixed in dhelp 0.5.22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 11:26:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 04:26:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKa4u-0003bc-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:26:24 -0700 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37050.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.50]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE746B8BF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:25:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKa4O-0004E4-KJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:25:52 +0200 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dhelp: Version built with gcc-4.0 segfaults on installation Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:25:52 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dhelp Severity: serious Version: 0.5.21 As the subject says, if I rebuild dhelp using an up-to-date sid system, then try to install the resulting package (even in a clean pbuilder chroot), I get a segmentation fault: Unpacking dhelp (from .../d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.21_i386.deb) ... Setting up dhelp (0.5.21) ... Building HTML tree .../var/lib/dpkg/info/dhelp.postinst: line 45: 15325 Segmentation fault /usr/sbin/dhelp_parse -r dpkg: error processing dhelp (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 Errors were encountered while processing: dhelp E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 330488-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 14:48:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 07:48:33 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKdDI-0007gN-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:47:16 -0700 From: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330488: fixed in dhelp 0.5.22 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:47:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: dhelp Source-Version: 0.5.22 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dhelp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dhelp_0.5.22.dsc to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.22.dsc dhelp_0.5.22.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.22.tar.gz dhelp_0.5.22_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dhelp/dhelp_0.5.22_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dhelp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:10:52 +0200 Source: dhelp Binary: dhelp Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.22 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Stefan
Bug#321542: gnucash: stil uninstallable on ppc
Harald Welte wrote: When trying to install gnucash on ppc (unstable), I still get: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnucash: Depends: gnucash-common (= 1.8.10-cvs20050127) but it is not Are you sure you're using Debian apt sources and not someone else's repository? No version named 1.8.10-cvs20050127 is in Debian or ever has been. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330336: Patch for NMU 2.0.7-1.2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Attached the patch for the version I uploaded to DELAYED-3. If you want to override this NMU, then please upload a fixed version before this upload reaches the archive. Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDOrOv5UTeB5t8Mo0RAroWAKCJJKSp8C0rxiRy5hodedzYL1DUDgCeOEFU SHa/IFchE6QIA22kbkjHRuQ= =kq6O -END PGP SIGNATURE- diff -u libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/changelog libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/changelog --- libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/changelog +++ libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libfwbuilder (2.0.7-1.2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Rebuild for snmp transition (Closes: #330336). + + -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:02:58 +0200 + libfwbuilder (2.0.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/control libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/control --- libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/control +++ libfwbuilder-2.0.7/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: libs Priority: optional Maintainer: Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), dbs, autoconf, automake, libtool, autotools-dev, zlib1g-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, libxml2-dev (= 2.3.8-0), libxslt1-dev (= 1.0.0-0), libssl-dev, libsnmp5-dev | libsnmp-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), dbs, autoconf, automake, libtool, autotools-dev, zlib1g-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, libxml2-dev (= 2.3.8-0), libxslt1-dev (= 1.0.0-0), libssl-dev, libsnmp9-dev | libsnmp-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: libfwbuilder-dev
Processed: tagging 330336
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 330336 + patch pending Bug#330336: libsnmp5 not available in sid anymore There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 327963
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 327963 + pending patch Bug#327963: fwbuilder: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: pending patch sid Bug#327017: fwbuilder is not installed after upgrade to kde 3.4.2. Tags added: pending, patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330247: Install failed. Trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 330247 -1 Bug#330247: Install failed. Trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de Bug 330247 cloned as bug 330541. reassign -1 manpages-ru Bug#330541: Install failed. Trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de Bug reassigned from package `login' to `manpages-ru'. retitle -1 Please stop providing outdated manpages Bug#330541: Install failed. Trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de Changed Bug title. (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Not RC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 294226 normal Bug#294226: imms: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'errno' was not declared in this scope Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#317882: more info needed
tags 317882 +unreproducible +moreinfo thanks I can't reproduce this problem on either of my amd64 or ia64 test machines. Wondering if perhaps there's a botched diversion involved somehow? Could you please send the output of dpkg-divert --list \*libGL\* and look at whether the directories in question do or don't actually exist? Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: more info needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 317882 +unreproducible +moreinfo Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: more info needed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 317882 +moreinfo Bug#317882: ia32-libs: package fails to install Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323413: libdevmapper1.01: load dm_mod OR warn users to load it
Package: libdevmapper1.01 Version: 2:1.01.03-1 Severity: important hi some time ago (e.g. in sarge), libdevmapper shipped with a file /etc/init.d/libdevmapper1.01 which was linked in /etc/rcS.d and called during boot. In version 2:1.01.03-1 that script was removed, claiming in changelog : * Remove init script, libdevmapper creates the device themself. This was a mistake, because /etc/init.d/libdevmapper1.01 had TWO features: 1) load the module dm-mod 2) create devices and /dev/mapper dir Newer versions of libdevmapper will create the devices, but it will NOT load the module dm-mod. For this reason, all following calls to dmsetup (and cryptsetup etc etc) will fail, and people like me will be cut out of their encrypted filesystems and left with no clue of how to properly boot their system. You should apply any of these solutions: 1) teach libdevmapper to load the module as well 2) put back /etc/init.d/libdevmapper1.01 with just modprobe dm-mod /dev/null 21 in it 3) add a debconf high priority question stating: this new version of libdevmapper does not load the module dm-mod at boot. Without the module, devmapper commands will not work, and you will be cut out of your filesystems (and be left cursing fellow developers). Add 'dm-mod' to /etc/modules ? btw: I think that most people who where biten by bug 323413 where probably biten by this problem. I prefer to open a new bug because the discussion in 323413 is too messy (people reported different problems in it) a. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'stable'), (450, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libdevmapper1.01 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries libdevmapper1.01 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Andrea Mennucc E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330526: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330526: Install failed. Trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz', which is also in package manpages-de
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:02:34PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: merge 330526 330247 thanks IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts with manpages-XX merged in single place. Well, unfortunately, 330247 was for login (which was why I didn't report a dup for login yesterday) and is already fixed, while 330526 is for passwd and is not yet fixed (which is why I did report it today). Anyways - as long as the thing gets fixed, I don't care what you are merging it with :) Mario -- Sex is not the answer. Sex is the question. Yes is the answer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330291: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330291: Authentication problem with pbuilder
Quoting Nicolas François ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): tags 330291 pending thanks Committed. Thanks for noticying and for the patch. I'm building 4.0.12-4 with Junichi's patch. /me slams self for bad use of dh_installpam in his attempts to make debian/rules a little bit less messy..:-| Thanks, Junichi for the quick fix.
Processed: Re: Bug#330338: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330338: login: Same Problem with man-pages in german
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 330338 passwd Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `login' to `passwd'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330563: qtorrent: Can't load a torrent file
Package: qtorrent Version: 2.9.1-2 Severity: serious Hi, No file selector is shown when clicking on Open. Here is the backtrace: $ qtorrent QTorrent starting up.. Please be patient as this might some time.. Note: Psyco not detected, take a peek here: http://psyco.sf.net/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/QtGui/mainwin.py, line 114, in openFileNoAutoSave self.openFile(False) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pyqtorrent3/QtGui/mainwin.py, line 117, in openFile dlg = QFileDialog(self.lastOpen['dir'], None, self, None, True) RuntimeError: cannot pass None as argument 1 in this call -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages qtorrent depends on: ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-qt33.15-3 Qt3 bindings for Python (default v qtorrent recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322133: Provisional patch for mysql authentication bypass
Hi! I ported the two patches to 4.0.24: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/mysql-dfsg.CAN-2004-0627_0628.diff they look straightforward; however, the exploit on http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/mysql-auth-bypass.pl still claims that access is granted. It also claims that with mysql 4.1.12-1 (which has the patch already applied upstream), so I begin to wonder whether it is actually the exploit that is broken, not the patch. Christian, can upstream shed some light on this? Thanks in advance and have a nice day! Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329759: missing depends
reopen 329759 thanks gconftool-2 isn't in libgconf2-4, it's in gconf2, which isn't depended on by libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0, or any of it's dependencies. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329870: pydf: Does not start on alpha architecture after installing
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 10:45 schrieb Radovan Garabik: ok, as usual :-), send me the output of: stat -f /mnt python -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/mnt)' where /mnt is the mountpoint that is problematic (if you do not have many, could you check them all?) if you see any negative numbers in the last statement, re-run it with different versions of python - and we should file a bug against python (and I'll make some extra checks in pydf so that it is more robust) I checked it on escher.debian.org and could not reproduce the bug. Ok i have 2 partitions so i checked for both... stat -f / File: / ID: 0Namelen: 255 Type: ext2/ext3 Blocks: Total: 925025 Free: 419605 Available: 372615 Size: 4096 Inodes: Total: 470496 Free: 360029 stat -f /home File: /home ID: 0Namelen: 255 Type: ext2/ext3 Blocks: Total: 507228 Free: 382055 Available: 356289 Size: 4096 Inodes: Total: 258048 Free: 256548 python2.1 (2.1.3dfsg-2): python2.1 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/)' (4096, 4096, 1802133918588257, 2020764933271418, 1546304191037019, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.1 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/home)' (4096, 4096, 1640913730780508, 1108307721154497, 1101865270110756, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.2 (2.2.3dfsg-4): python2.2 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/)' (4096, 4096, 1802133918588257, 2020764933271418, 1546304191037019, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.2 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/home)' (4096, 4096, 1640913730780508, 1108307721154497, 1101865270110756, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.3 (2.3.5-8): python2.3 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/)' (4096, 4096, 1802133918588257, 2020764933271418, 1546304191037019, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.3 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/home)' (4096, 4096, 1640913730780508, 1108307721154497, 1101865270110756, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.4 (2.4.1+2.4.2rc1-1): python2.4 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/)' (4096, 4096, 1802133918588257, 2020764933271418, 1546304191037019, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) python2.4 -c 'import os; print os.statvfs(/home)' (4096, 4096, 1640913730780508, 1108307721154497, 1101865270110756, 0, 0, 255, 0, 0) With python2.4 pydf prints the same error as with python2.3, with python2.1 and python2.2 i get the following: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/pydf, line 4, in ? from optparse import OptionParser ImportError: No module named optparse My mount table looks like this: /dev/sda1 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) /dev/sdb1 on /home type ext3 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) webby:/export/music on /media/music type nfs (rw,nosuid,soft,nolock,addr=10.0.0.2) webby:/export/home on /shome type nfs (rw,nosuid,soft,nolock,addr=10.0.0.2) Umounting the nfs shares does not help. Greetings Adrian -- GPG Key ID: 42C33D97 | Reg. User #255628 (http://counter.li.org) Fingerprint: 239D 7006 3CF0 8951 9FDA CA63 EF5C C95A 42C3 3D97 pgpG4TFU9HoNE.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#321544: marked as done (imms: uninstallable due to dependency on libtag1)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321544: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 04:45:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 21:45:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1GYQ-0008FY-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:45:02 -0700 Received: from c-24-147-127-19.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.127.19] helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu) by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1E1GYQ-0004mj-5m for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:45:02 -0400 Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E1GYP-0003Po-FU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:45:01 -0400 From: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: imms: uninstallable due to dependency on libtag1 X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:45:01 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: imms Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Please recompile to update dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-cph1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages imms depends on: ii fftw3 3.0.1-11 Library for computing Fast Fourier ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-3GCC support library ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-02.6.6-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libpcre35.0-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libsqlite3-03.2.2-2 SQLite 3 shared library ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-7The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtag1 1.3.1-1 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library ii libx11-66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii xmms1.2.10+cvs20050209-2 Versatile X audio player that look ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-3compression library - runtime Versions of packages imms recommends: ii sox 12.17.7-3 A universal sound sample translato pn sqlitenone (no description available) pn sqlite3 none (no description available) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 321544-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 17:59:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 10:59:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKg1P-WH-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 From: Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321544: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: imms Source-Version: 2.1.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
Bug#323317: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on zlib1g-dev inter alia)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323317: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 01:54:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 18:54:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4qfC-00056c-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:54:50 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7G1snjo012718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:54:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4khQ-00014Z-TA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:32:45 -0700 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:32:44 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on zlib1g-dev inter alia Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1023/Mon Aug 15 13:15:08 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: imms Version: 2.0.3-2 Severity: serious imms fails to build because it does not build-depend on zlib1g-dev and because it cannot create libimmscore.a because it cannot find libXext because /usr/X11R6/lib is not in the library search path: checking zlib.h usability... no checking zlib.h presence... no checking for zlib.h... no configure: error: zlib required and missing. --=20 Matt --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDAO3cfNdgYxVXvBARAqRPAKCGU5BmivYLzNVcppF37g1A5Hd5xACdGbbN 58GtQB0RTiDN/oOu2QHxDJo= =eJPf -END PGP SIGNATURE- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- --- Received: (at 323317-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 17:59:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 10:59:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKg1P-WL-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 From: Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323317: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: imms Source-Version: 2.1.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of imms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: imms_2.1.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/i/imms/imms_2.1.1-1.diff.gz imms_2.1.1-1.dsc to pool/main/i/imms/imms_2.1.1-1.dsc imms_2.1.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/i/imms/imms_2.1.1-1_i386.deb imms_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/i/imms/imms_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated imms package) (This message was generated automatically at their request;
Bug#324220: marked as done (repeatedly segfaults when xmms connects to immsd)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#324220: fixed in imms 2.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2005 05:04:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 20 22:04:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from eastrmmtao06.cox.net [68.230.240.33]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E6i0m-0002vl-00; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:04:49 -0700
Received: from dragon.swatter.net ([68.13.214.75]) by eastrmmtao06.cox.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:04:15 -0400
Received: from brad by dragon.swatter.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E6i0F-0006Hp-NX
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:04:15 -0400
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:04:15 -0400
From: Brad Sawatzky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: repeatedly segfaults when xmms connects to immsd
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: imms
Version: 2.0.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch,sid
Justification: renders package unusable
immsd will repeatedly segfault as soon as XMMS connects to its socket. The
underlying problem is a bug (feature?) with initstate_r() from
libc6(2.3.5). See also a
href=http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323811;Bug
323811/a.
While this is definitely a libc6 bug, there is an easy workaround that
allows imms to work until libc is fixed. See attached patch (which is
technically for 2.1.1 but should apply to any 2.x source).
-- Brad
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages imms depends on:
ii fftw3 3.0.1-13 library for computing Fast Fourier
ii libc6 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-5GCC support library
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10The GLib library of C routines
ii libglib2.0-02.8.0-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libpcre35.0-1.1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libsqlite3-03.2.2-3 SQLite 3 shared library
ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libtag1c2 1.3.1-1.1TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library
ii libx11-66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li
ii libxss1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Screen Saver client-side library
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m
ii xmms1.2.10+cvs20050209-2 Versatile X audio player that look
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-3compression library - runtime
Versions of packages imms recommends:
ii sox 12.17.7-3 A universal sound sample translato
pn sqlitenone (no description available)
ii sqlite3 3.2.2-3A command line interface for SQLit
-- no debconf information
--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=imms_initstate_r.patch
--- imms-2.1.1.orig/immscore/utils.cc
+++ imms-2.1.1/immscore/utils.cc
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
static bool initialized = false;
if (!initialized)
{
+rand_data.state = (int32_t*)rand_state;
initstate_r(time(0),
Bug#330291: marked as done (missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 09:37:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 02:37:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKBti-0008WR-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:37:14 -0700 Received: from tabatha.lab.ultramonkey.org (vagw.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.14]) by sv1.valinux.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AA07004F; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from horms by tabatha.lab.ultramonkey.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EKBt2-Du-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:32 +0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:32 +0900 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pbuilder Version: 0.131 Severity: important Hi, I recently noticed that when runing pbuilder build, it fails as it calls su internally. I tracked this down to su wanting a password, and futher tracked this to pam using nullok_secure, wheras nullok works, I guess we aren't coming from a secure tty. In any case, I found the following hook allows pbuilder build to work, I'm not sure what a good longer term solution is. --- begin E00nullok --- #!/bin/bash #E00nullok cat /etc/pam.d/common-auth __EOF__ # # /etc/pam.d/common-auth - authentication settings common to all services # # This file is included from other service-specific PAM config files, # and should contain a list of the authentication modules that define # the central authentication scheme for use on the system # (e.g., /etc/shadow, LDAP, Kerberos, etc.). The default is to use the # traditional Unix authentication mechanisms. # # nullok_secure does not seem to work when pbuilder calls su #authrequiredpam_unix.so nullok_secure authrequiredpam_unix.so nullok __EOF__ --- end E00nullok --- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP) (ignored: LC_ALL set to ja_JP.eucJP) Versions of packages pbuilder depends on: ii cdebootstrap 0.3.8 Bootstrap a Debian system ii coreutils 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii gcc 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C compiler ii wget 1.10.1-1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages pbuilder recommends: ii devscripts2.9.7 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii fakeroot 1.5.1 Gives a fake root environment ii sudo 1.6.8p9-2 Provide limited super user privile -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 330291-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:11:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:11:01 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKgGA-0004Hp-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#330485: marked as done (qgo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper')
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:23 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330485: fixed in qgo 1.0.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 11:02:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 04:02:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d082056.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.82.56] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKZhV-00053b-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:02:13 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKZhJ-00034c-Ra; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:02:01 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qgo: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:02:01 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qgo Version: 1.0.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'qgo' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean perl -w admin/debianrules echodirs debian/debiandirs dh_testdir make: dh_testdir: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'debhelper' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/qgo-1.0.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/qgo-1.0.2/debian/control2005-09-28 07:29:48.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-28 07:29:46.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: autotools-dev, libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.3.4-3), libqt3-compat-headers +Build-Depends: debhelper, autotools-dev, libqt3-mt-dev (= 3:3.3.4-3), libqt3-compat-headers Package: qgo Architecture: any --- Received: (at 330485-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:08:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:08:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKgG7-0004FQ-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:23 -0700 From: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330485: fixed in qgo 1.0.2-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:23 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qgo Source-Version: 1.0.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qgo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: qgo_1.0.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-4.diff.gz qgo_1.0.2-4.dsc to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-4.dsc qgo_1.0.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/q/qgo/qgo_1.0.2-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated qgo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:04:31 +0200 Source: qgo Binary: qgo Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cyril Chaboisseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: qgo- Go client and full featured SGF editor Closes: 330485 Changes: qgo (1.0.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Update debhelper build dependency (closes: #330485). Files: 7a3b430e01ca4eaedc2db835b76274fa 616 games optional qgo_1.0.2-4.dsc 5811c31150b439144bda7f31a94dff5e
Bug#330338: marked as done (login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330338: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 16:14:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 09:14:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 85-56-35-104.sev2.adsl.uni2.es (deneb) [85.56.35.104] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKI6E-0008NJ-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:14:34 -0700 Received: by deneb (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 788498C8; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:14:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Manolo_D=EDaz?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:14:01 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: login Version: 1:4.0.12-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages login depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpam-modules0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime0.76-23Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l login recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed The console message: Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 111449 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace login 1:4.0.3-39 (using .../login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement login ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/es/man1/su.1.gz', which is also in package manpages-es-extra dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/login_1%3a4.0.12-2_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done --- Received: (at 330338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:08:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:08:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKgGA-0004Ht-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330338: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: shadow Source-Version: 1:4.0.12-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of shadow, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: login_4.0.12-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.12-4_i386.deb passwd_4.0.12-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shadow/passwd_4.0.12-4_i386.deb shadow_4.0.12-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/shadow/shadow_4.0.12-4.diff.gz shadow_4.0.12-4.dsc to pool/main/s/shadow/shadow_4.0.12-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL
Bug#330526: marked as done (Install failed. Trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz', which is also in package manpages-de)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330526: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 14:32:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 07:32:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.4.8] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKcz7-0003Ro-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:32:38 -0700 Received: from gate.22.kls.lan (vpn5.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.172.5]) by piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8SEWZ1v027513 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:32:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.22.1]) by gate.22.kls.lan (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8SEWZaP004224 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:32:35 +0200 Received: from darkside.22.kls.lan ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8SEWY53022708 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:32:34 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by darkside.22.kls.lan (8.13.5/8.13.5) id j8SEWYpY022704 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:32:34 +0200 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:32:34 +0200 From: Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Install failed. Trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz', which is also in package manpages-de Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: passwd Version: 1:4.0.12-3 Severity: grave Tags: l10n Justification: renders package unusable The package tries to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz which is also in the package manpages-de. dpkg-output: Unpacking replacement passwd ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/passwd_1%3a4.0.12-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz', which is also in package manpages-de dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/passwd_1%3a4.0.12-3_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Thanks for your work regards Mario -- who | grep -i blonde | talk; cd; wine; talk; touch; unzip; touch; strip; gasp; finger; gasp; mount; fsck; more; true; gasp; umount; make clean; sleep --- Received: (at 330526-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:08:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:08:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKgGA-0004Hy-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330526: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:02:26 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: shadow Source-Version: 1:4.0.12-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of shadow, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: login_4.0.12-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shadow/login_4.0.12-4_i386.deb passwd_4.0.12-4_i386.deb to pool/main/s/shadow/passwd_4.0.12-4_i386.deb shadow_4.0.12-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/shadow/shadow_4.0.12-4.diff.gz shadow_4.0.12-4.dsc to pool/main/s/shadow/shadow_4.0.12-4.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian
Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
severity 330376 important reassign 330376 qt3-dev-tools merge 330376 326470 stop On September 28, 2005 10:52, Christopher Martin wrote: So perhaps Qt3 is being built against certain hardware, and doesn't work properly against hardware which doesn't have all the features of the buildd hardware. For this reason, I would be very curious to see if kdenetwork succeeds on vore, since it has always built there before, as has Qt3, kdelibs, etc. kdenetwork just built successfully on auric, so this FTBFS must be the result of a more subtle bug, likely in qt-x11-free. I'm merging it with the aforementioned powerpc report. Qt3's build system is dodgy, to say the least. For instance, on the i386 architecture, it must be built on an i686 piece of hardware, or higher, or else the buildkey will change. Perhaps something similar is occuring here - the buildds are building Qt with certain optimizations, which cause segfaults on older hardware. Yet there seems to be no easy way to control this aspect of Qt's build. Anyone able to help? Cheers, Christopher Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330526: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330526: Install failed. Trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/de/man5/passwd.5.gz', which is also in package manpages-de
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:11:17PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:02:34PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: merge 330526 330247 thanks IMHO it's better to have all these grave conflicts with manpages-XX merged in single place. Well, unfortunately, 330247 was for login (which was why I didn't report a dup for login yesterday) and is already fixed, while 330526 is for passwd and is not yet fixed (which is why I did report it today). Yes, you are right, me wrong. Anyway, Cristian fixed this in 4.0.12-4 :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 329759
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 329759 - unreproducible Bug#329759: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0: prerm failure: gconftool-2: command not found Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Evolution] Bug#330561: evolution is not installable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #330561 grave Bug#330561: evolution is not installable Severity set to `grave'. severity #329811 grave Bug#329811: evolution: requires missing libsoup2.2-7 Severity set to `grave'. merge 329811 330561 Bug#329811: evolution: requires missing libsoup2.2-7 Bug#330561: evolution is not installable Merged 329811 330561. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330291: marked as done (missing /etc/pam.d/su from login package)
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:17:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2005 09:37:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 27 02:37:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sv1.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKBti-0008WR-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 02:37:14 -0700 Received: from tabatha.lab.ultramonkey.org (vagw.valinux.co.jp [210.128.90.14]) by sv1.valinux.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AA07004F; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:43 +0900 (JST) Received: from horms by tabatha.lab.ultramonkey.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EKBt2-Du-00; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:32 +0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pam's nullok_secure seems to break pbuilder build X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:36:32 +0900 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pbuilder Version: 0.131 Severity: important Hi, I recently noticed that when runing pbuilder build, it fails as it calls su internally. I tracked this down to su wanting a password, and futher tracked this to pam using nullok_secure, wheras nullok works, I guess we aren't coming from a secure tty. In any case, I found the following hook allows pbuilder build to work, I'm not sure what a good longer term solution is. --- begin E00nullok --- #!/bin/bash #E00nullok cat /etc/pam.d/common-auth __EOF__ # # /etc/pam.d/common-auth - authentication settings common to all services # # This file is included from other service-specific PAM config files, # and should contain a list of the authentication modules that define # the central authentication scheme for use on the system # (e.g., /etc/shadow, LDAP, Kerberos, etc.). The default is to use the # traditional Unix authentication mechanisms. # # nullok_secure does not seem to work when pbuilder calls su #authrequiredpam_unix.so nullok_secure authrequiredpam_unix.so nullok __EOF__ --- end E00nullok --- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP) (ignored: LC_ALL set to ja_JP.eucJP) Versions of packages pbuilder depends on: ii cdebootstrap 0.3.8 Bootstrap a Debian system ii coreutils 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii gcc 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C compiler ii wget 1.10.1-1 retrieves files from the web Versions of packages pbuilder recommends: ii devscripts2.9.7 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii fakeroot 1.5.1 Gives a fake root environment ii sudo 1.6.8p9-2 Provide limited super user privile -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 330291-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 18:18:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 11:18:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKgUj-0002qH-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:17:29 -0700 From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330291: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.12-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:17:29 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Processed: Re: Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 330376 important Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic Severity set to `important'. reassign 330376 qt3-dev-tools Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic Bug reassigned from package `kdenetwork' to `qt3-dev-tools'. merge 330376 326470 Bug#326470: /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic: uic segfaults on powerpc without altivec Bug#330376: kdenetwork: ftbfs [sparc] Segmentation fault /usr/share/qt3/bin/uic Merged 326470 330376. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#330247: Install failed. Trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/de/man1/login.1.gz which is also in manpages-de
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (I forgot the Bcc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the original mail) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reopen 330338 Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 330338 normal Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Severity set to `normal'. submitter 330338 Shadow package maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Changed Bug submitter from Manolo DÃaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Shadow package maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]. clone 330338 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug 330338 cloned as bugs 330571-330580. retitle -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 Please remove outdated man pages which belong to login or passwd packages Bug#330571: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Changed Bug title. reassign -1 manpages-de Bug#330571: -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 Please remove outdated man pages which belong to login or passwd packages Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-de'. reassign -2 manpages-es-extra Bug#330572: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-es-extra'. reassign -3 manpages-hu Bug#330573: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-hu'. reassign -4 manpages-it Bug#330574: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-it'. reassign -5 manpages-ja Bug#330575: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-ja'. reassign -6 manpages-ru Bug#330576: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-ru'. reassign -7 manpages-zh Bug#330577: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-zh'. reassign -8 manpages-fi Bug#330578: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-fi'. reassign -9 manpages-tr Bug#330579: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-tr'. reassign -10 manpages-pt Bug#330580: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is Bug reassigned from package `passwd' to `manpages-pt'. close 330338 Bug#330338: login: can't be installed if manpages-es-extra is 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Shadow package maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330583: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: pdc202xx - system doesn't boot with kernel 2.6.12
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7
Version: 2.6.12-10
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-7 the system doesn't boot
anymore giving the following error messages:
hdh: dma_intr: status = 0x51 { DriveReady SeekCompleteError}
hdh: dma_intr: error = 0x10 { SectorIdNotFound }
pdc202xx_new:
ide: failed opcode was: unknown
The error appears for all of my 4 harddisks. This error comes also on
kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-8,
kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-9 and kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.12-10, but
booting with a 2.6.11-k7 kernel gives no problem. I tried to give the
kernel-parameter ide=nodma, but this has no effekt.
I have a Promise Ultra 133 TX2 (pdc202xx_new) ATA-adapter with 4
harddisks (hde = WDC WD800JB (WindowsXP), hdf = Seagate ST360021A (Data),
hdg = Samsung SP0812N (Linux), hdh = Seagate ST330621A (Media)). My
mainboard is an ASRock K7VT4A Pro (VIA KT400A): hda=DVD-Rom,
hdc=DVD-Writer.
What is the problem? I found no issues googleing the internet.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities
ii initrd-tools 0.1.82 tools to create initrd image for p
ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo
linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324803: removing is not enough
I can reproduce this bug and removing these lines isn't solution. Program should send something on stderr if it thinks something's wrong. Segfault is always a 'Bad Thing(TM)'. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:11:18AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package Severity: serious The problem: * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images. * build daemons install packages in noninteractive mode * the kernel images do not install successfully in noninteractive mode: This is not a linux kernel package, but exclusively a kernel-package issue, which provides the postinst and co scripts, and needs to be made debconf aware. Manoj promised some rewrite, modularization and debconfification for post-sarge, but i don't know what the current planes are for this. None of that promises to make kernel images install non-interactively, if installing kernel images may make the system unbootable. The primary concern remains end users who install kernel images. Ah, you are wrong, if the scripts where using debconf, then you could preseed it, or use the non-interactive mode or whatever. The current questions are mostly worthless (at least on powerpc) anyway, and are just an annoyance that should go away. I believe that the kernel package should work out of the box and not need manual intervention to set the initrd thingy, since the kernel image knows perfectly that it needs an initrd or not, so why have it have the logic to know about it and tell the user instead of just doing the right thing ? I think now is the moment to think about the futur of kernel-package, and what will happen to it for etch. Could you tell us a bit more about what your plans are for that ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330517: ntop: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends: librrd0-dev
Hello On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:36:40PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: Package: ntop Version: 2:3.2rc1-1 Severity: serious When building 'ntop' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package librrd0-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for ntop: librrd0-dev Package librrd0-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source This can probably be solved by Build-Depending on librrd2-dev instead of librrd0-dev. Thanks. I'll check it out when I get my sid build ready. There is also another FTBFS problem on amd64 which seems to be caused by a missing -fPIC in compilations for a shared library: Hmm... Could you write another bug report about this? gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/include -I../myrrd -DLINUX -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -g -DMAKE_WITH_IGNORE_SIGPIPE -I/usr/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -DPIC -MT libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.Tpo -c xmldumpPlugin.c -o libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o /dev/null 21 /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link --tag=CC gcc -g -DMAKE_WITH_IGNORE_SIGPIPE -I/usr/local/include -g -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -fPIC -DPIC -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -o libxmldumpPlugin.la -rpath /usr/lib -shared -release 3.2rc1 libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.lo -lgdome -lxml2 -lglib -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -lcrypt -lc -lssl -lcrypto -lpcap -lgdbm -lgd -lpng -lz gcc -shared .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libgdome.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so /usr/lib/libglib.so -lpthread -lresolv -lnsl -lcrypt -lc -lssl -lcrypto -lpcap /usr/lib/libgdbm.so /usr/lib/libgd.so -lpng -lz -Wl,-soname -Wl,libxmldumpPlugin-3.2rc1.so -o .libs/libxmldumpPlugin-3.2rc1.so /usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `dumpXML' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libxmldumpPlugin.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/srv/dbuild/tmp/ntop-3.2rc1/plugins' Regards, // Ola Regards Andreas Jochens -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330445: do_initrd message fails in noninteractive install
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:15:59 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:11:18AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 06:24:51 +0200, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: reassign 330445 kernel-package thanks On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:22:38PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc,linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6,kernel-package Severity: serious The problem: * linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 build-depends on kernel images. * build daemons install packages in noninteractive mode * the kernel images do not install successfully in noninteractive mode: This is not a linux kernel package, but exclusively a kernel-package issue, which provides the postinst and co scripts, and needs to be made debconf aware. Manoj promised some rewrite, modularization and debconfification for post-sarge, but i don't know what the current planes are for this. None of that promises to make kernel images install non-interactively, if installing kernel images may make the system unbootable. The primary concern remains end users who install kernel images. Ah, you are wrong, if the scripts where using debconf, then you could preseed it, or use the non-interactive mode or whatever. Wrong, eh? Indeed, it is you who have no idea whast is being talked about here. Even if debconf is used, the kernel image can choose to abort install unless a human answers the question, and that is likely to be what shall happen when I code debconf in. The current questions are mostly worthless (at least on powerpc) anyway, and are just an annoyance that should go away. Opinions with no rationale are unlikely to sway me on this. I believe that the kernel package should work out of the box and not need manual intervention to set the initrd thingy, since the kernel image knows perfectly that it needs an initrd or not, so why have it have the logic to know about it and tell the user instead of just doing the right thing ? Again, you seem to be missing the point. Some boot loaders require intervention before they can handle initrd images (indeed, booth grub and lilo do, as far as I can tell). Unfortunately, it is not feasible to know what boot loader is being used (I have both grub and lilo on my machines), nor is it feasible to tell whether the boot loader can handle initrd's -- and no way am I goona add bunches of code to parse every tom dick and harry bootloader config script. As I have said elsewhere in this report, working correctly, and not rendering the system unbootable, trumps non-interactive installs. I think now is the moment to think about the futur of kernel-package, and what will happen to it for etch. Could you tell us a bit more about what your plans are for that ? My plans are not to remove functionality that makes it easy for novices to use packaged kernel images. So, debconf or no debconf, there is no surety that kernel images shall install when debconf frontend is set to non interactive -- unless there is some way to dete t that proceed shal not hose the end user system. manoj -- You can't break eggs without making an omelet. Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/ 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 forwarded 327849 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 Bug#327849: arm: Cannot handle identifiers with '$' character Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111. retitle 327849 [PR 24111] [3.4 4.0 4.1 regression] [arm] cannot handle identifiers with '$' character Bug#327849: arm: Cannot handle identifiers with '$' character Changed Bug title. tags 327849 + upstream Bug#327849: [PR 24111] [3.4 4.0 4.1 regression] [arm] cannot handle identifiers with '$' character There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327849: gcc: submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111
# submitted Debian report #327849 to gcc-gnats as PR 24111 # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 forwarded 327849 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR24111 retitle 327849 [PR 24111] [3.4 4.0 4.1 regression] [arm] cannot handle identifiers with '$' character tags 327849 + upstream thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
