Processed: Please explain how to reproduce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 330865 normal Bug#330865: webmin wont show cron's from other users, also adding new for root wont work... Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329779: marked as done (sipsak: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libgnutls-dev')
Your message dated Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329779: fixed in sipsak 0.9.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 10:24:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 03:24:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d082155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.82.155] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIkjg-00014Q-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 03:24:56 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EIkjc-0006nN-T4; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:24:52 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sipsak: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libgnutls-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:24:52 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sipsak Version: 0.9.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'sipsak' in a clean 'unstable' amd64 chroot, I get the following error: if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/include -MT md5.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/md5.Tpo -c -o md5.o md5.c; \ then mv -f .deps/md5.Tpo .deps/md5.Po; else rm -f .deps/md5.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from md5.c:33: md5.h:49: error: syntax error before 'UINT4' md5.h:49: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union md5.h:50: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'count' md5.h:50: warning: data definition has no type or storage class md5.h:52: error: syntax error before '}' token md5.h:52: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'MD5_CTX' md5.h:52: warning: data definition has no type or storage class Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libgnutls-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/sipsak-0.9.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/sipsak-0.9.2/debian/control 2005-09-23 10:22:21.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-23 10:21:45.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: net Priority: optional Maintainer: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libruli4-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper, libgnutls-dev, libruli4-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 Package: sipsak --- Received: (at 329779-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 06:09:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 23:09:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMfsO-00046R-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:08 -0700 From: ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329779: fixed in sipsak 0.9.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sipsak Source-Version: 0.9.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sipsak, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sipsak_0.9.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sipsak/sipsak_0.9.2-2.diff.gz sipsak_0.9.2-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sipsak/sipsak_0.9.2-2.dsc sipsak_0.9.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sipsak/sipsak_0.9.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. ARAKI Yasuhiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sipsak package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005
Bug#331608: libgtkimreg-dev: not installable in sid
Package: libgtkimreg-dev Version: 0.1.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, libgtkimreg-dev needs to be rebuilt with gdk-imlib11-dev: # apt-get install libgtkimreg-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtkimreg-dev: Depends: gdk-imlib1-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331607: python-soappy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'
Package: python-soappy Version: 0.11.3-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'python-soappy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: if [ -z ]; then \ if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo 4 debian/compat; fi; \ fi cd . python setup.py build --build-base=./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/python-soappy-0.11.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/python-soappy-0.11.3/debian/control 2005-10-04 06:26:52.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-10-04 06:26:51.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: python Priority: optional Maintainer: Ed Boraas [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.1.67), cdbs, python2.3, python2.3-dev, python2.3-xml, python2.4, python2.4-dev, python2.4-xml +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper ( 4.1.67), cdbs, python-dev, python2.3, python2.3-dev, python2.3-xml, python2.4, python2.4-dev, python2.4-xml Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 Package: python2.3-soappy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331610: mono-tools: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'
Package: mono-tools Version: 1.1.9-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'mono-tools' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:5: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' to debian/control. When this is fixed, I still get the following error: checking for resgen... /usr/bin/resgen checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for nunit-core... Package nunit-core was not found in the pkg-config se arch path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `nunit-core.pc' to th e PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'nunit-core' found configure: error: Library requirements (nunit-core) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mono-tools-1.1.9/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/mono-tools-1.1.9/debian/control 2005-10-04 06:33:08.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-10-04 06:33:06.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Mono Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Mirco Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), cli-common (= 0.2.0), pkg-config, libmono-dev (= 1.0), mono-gac (= 1.0), libnunit-cil (= 2.2.0), libgtk-cil (= 1.0), libgnome-cil (= 1.0), libgconf-cil (= 1.0), libglade-cil (= 1.0), libgecko-cil (= 0.6), monodoc-base (= 1.1.9) +Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, nant, cli-common (= 0.2.0), pkg-config, libmono-dev (= 1.0), mono-gac (= 1.0), libnunit-cil (= 2.2.0), libgtk-cil (= 1.0), libgnome-cil (= 1.0), libgconf-cil (= 1.0), libglade-cil (= 1.0), libgecko-cil (= 0.6), monodoc-base (= 1.1.9) Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 Package: monodoc-browser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331612: [NONFREE-DOC] non-free documentation in dokuwiki
Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20050922-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The content provided in the data directory--one png image and three text files--are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License Version 2.0 [1] which is non-free (as a result of prohibiting commercial use). One of the following should be done: 1) ask upstream for relicensing the files 2) remove the files / move to non-free 3) rewrite the files Dokuwiki shouldn't be released before this has been resolved one way or the other. cheers, -Matti [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages dokuwiki depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii php4 4:4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii ucf 1.17Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331615: galago-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch'
Package: galago-sharp Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'galago-sharp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:14: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/galago-sharp-0.3.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/galago-sharp-0.3.2/debian/control 2005-10-04 07:15:27.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-10-04 07:15:25.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libgalago-dev (= 0.3.2), devscripts, libmono-dev | c-sharp-compiler, mono-utils (= 0.96), pkg-config, mono-gac, autotools-dev, cli-common (= 0.2.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, libgalago-dev (= 0.3.2), devscripts, libmono-dev | c-sharp-compiler, mono-utils (= 0.96), pkg-config, mono-gac, autotools-dev, cli-common (= 0.2.0) Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: libgalago-cil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328350: marked as done (libgdk-pixbuf2: please rebuild against latest libpng)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328350: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 21:10:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 14:10:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sakura.malsain.org (arrakis.localnet) [82.241.136.161] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFeWg-0006bR-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:10:42 -0700 Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFeVs-0005tw-Ff; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:52 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgdk-pixbuf2: please rebuild against latest libpng From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:52 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package:Â libgdk-pixbuf2 Version: 0.22.0-8 This is an automatically generated report. The libgdk-pixbuf2 package depends on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the archive. To achieve that, please install libpng12-dev, and make your package simply build-depend on: * libpng-dev for a binary package, * libpng12-dev for a library package. (The former is a virtual package provided by the latter.) Please don't forget that as soon as libpng 1.0 is removed from the archive (which is due soon), packages using libpng10-0 or libpng2 will be uninstallable. Regards, -- Josselin Mouette --- Received: (at 328350-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 07:38:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 00:38:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMhHT-0007Z4-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:32:07 -0700 From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328350: fixed in gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:32:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gdk-pixbuf Source-Version: 0.22.0-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gdk-pixbuf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gdk-pixbuf_0.22.0-9.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_0.22.0-9.diff.gz gdk-pixbuf_0.22.0-9.dsc to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf_0.22.0-9.dsc libgdk-pixbuf-dev_0.22.0-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-dev_0.22.0-9_i386.deb libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev_0.22.0-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev_0.22.0-9_i386.deb libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2_0.22.0-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2_0.22.0-9_i386.deb libgdk-pixbuf2_0.22.0-9_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdk-pixbuf/libgdk-pixbuf2_0.22.0-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gdk-pixbuf package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 22:48:51 -0700 Source: gdk-pixbuf Binary: libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libgdk-pixbuf2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.22.0-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgdk-pixbuf-dev - The GdkPixBuf
Bug#316593: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQjMs5UTeB5t8Mo0RAjtlAJ0eZfGzLc+XUkOjQXtI9uwsuPZgKgCfQ1z5
20dMsSSo/f/pAkOyNVtY5aI=
=iYud
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u rosegarden4-1.0/debian/changelog rosegarden4-1.0/debian/changelog
--- rosegarden4-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+rosegarden4 (1.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild for the jack transition (Closes: #317217, #316593).
+ * Fix gcc 4.0 compile errors (Closes: #326669, #274494).
+ * German PO file corrections (Closes: #313926).
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 4 Oct 2005 00:32:02 +0200
+
rosegarden4 (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/base/Colour.C
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/base/Colour.C
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
// Generic Colour routines:
Colour
-Rosegarden::getCombinationColour(const Colour input1, const Colour input2)
+getCombinationColour(const Colour input1, const Colour input2)
{
Colour ret((input1.getRed()+input2.getRed())/2,
(input1.getGreen()+input2.getGreen())/2,
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/gui/mmapper.cpp
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/gui/mmapper.cpp
@@ -896,7 +896,7 @@
return QString(%1/segment_%2)
.arg(tmpDirs.last())
-.arg((unsigned int)segment, 0, 16);
+.arg((unsigned long)segment, 0, 16);
}
QString CompositionMmapper::getSegmentFileName(Segment* s)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/gui/qcanvasgroupableitem.h
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/gui/qcanvasgroupableitem.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
#include qcanvas.h
+class QCanvasItemGroup;
+
/**
* This class is meant to be inherited by QCanvasItem children to make
* them groupable.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/gui/segmentcanvas.cpp
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/gui/segmentcanvas.cpp
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
if (e-type() == QEvent::User + 1) {
QCustomEvent *ev = dynamic_castQCustomEvent *(e);
if (ev) {
- int token = (int)ev-data();
+ long token = (int)ev-data();
AudioPreviewThread thread =
m_parent.getDocument()-getAudioPreviewThread();
RG_DEBUG SegmentAudioPreview::token token , my token
m_previewToken endl;
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/gui/segmenttool.h
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/gui/segmenttool.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
class KCommand;
class QCanvasRectangle;
class QPopupMenu; // LDB
+class SegmentToolBox;
namespace Rosegarden { class RulerScale; }
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- rosegarden4-1.0.orig/po/de.po
+++ rosegarden4-1.0/po/de.po
@@ -1818,7 +1818,7 @@
#: dialogs.cpp:4325
msgid Just how big is your hard disk?
-msgstr Wie gross ist denn Ihre Festplatte?
+msgstr Wie groà ist denn Ihre Festplatte?
#: dialogs.cpp:4375 rc.cpp:159
msgid Metronome
@@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@
#: dialogs.cpp:4778
#, fuzzy
msgid Lilypond export options
-msgstr Fontgrösse für Lilypond
+msgstr FontgröÃe für Lilypond
#: dialogs.cpp:4787
msgid Lilypond compatibility level
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@
#: dialogs.cpp:4797
msgid Paper size to use in \\paper block
-msgstr Zu benutzende Papiergrösse im \\paper-Block
+msgstr Zu benutzende PapiergröÃe im \\paper-Block
#: dialogs.cpp:4800
msgid US Letter
@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@
#: dialogs.cpp:4808
msgid Lilypond font size
-msgstr Fontgrösse für Lilypond
+msgstr FontgröÃe für Lilypond
#: dialogs.cpp:4822
msgid Export Document Properties as \\header block
@@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@
#: editcommands.cpp:1526
#, fuzzy
msgid Move Events to Other Segment
-msgstr Event ausserhalb eines Segments
+msgstr Event auÃerhalb eines Segments
#: editcommands.cpp:1759
#, fuzzy
@@ -2771,9 +2771,8 @@
msgstr Bänke importieren von Gerät...
#: importdevicedialog.cpp:79
-#, fuzzy
msgid Cannot open file %1
-msgstr Datei %1 kann nicht geöfnet werden '
+msgstr Datei %1 kann nicht geöffnet werden
#: importdevicedialog.cpp:86
#, fuzzy
@@ -3301,7 +3300,7 @@
#: matrixview.cpp:528
msgid Resize
-msgstr Grösse ändern
+msgstr GröÃe ändern
#: matrixview.cpp:534 notationview.cpp:1542
msgid Chord Insert Mode
@@ -5139,7 +5138,7 @@
#: notestyle.cpp:548
msgid Can't open style file %1
-msgstr Stildatei %1 kann nicht geöffent werden
+msgstr Stildatei %1 kann nicht geöffnet werden
#: notestyle.cpp:583
msgid type is a required attribute of note
@@ -5488,7 +5487,7 @@
msgstr
Rosegarden kann automatische Quantisierung auf aufgenommene oder importierte
MIDI-Daten nur zum Zweck der Notation anwenden. Dies beinfluÃt weder die
-Wiedergabe noch das Ãndern in einer der Sichten ausser bei Notation.
+Wiedergabe noch
Bug#76918: Microsoft Digital Image Suite Pro v10.0 - $19.95
Adobe Creative Suite for MAC - $59.95 http://maintains.okmac.com/ It's not the voting that's democracy, it's the counting. Popularity is neither fame nor greatness. Nothing emboldens sin so much as mercy. If little else, the brain is an educational toy. Et tu, Brute! Delay not; swift the flight of fortune's greatest favours. The most wonderful discovery made by scientists is science itself. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#76918: Discounted software store
Downloadable software http://Galilee.okmac.com/ May no portent of evil be attached to the words I say. Opinions founded on prejudice are always sustained with the greatest of violence. It's not practice that makes perfectbut perfect practice that makes perfect. It's innocence when it charms us, ignorance when it doesn't. I've always found paranoia to be a perfectly defensible position. To someone seeking power, the poorest man is the most useful. Everybody has been young before, but not everybody has been old before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
Package: scim-chinese Version: 0.4.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Scim-chinese is not installable since early October. Would someone out there be kind enough to provide a fix for this? This bug has already been reported but it seems like a fix is a recompile to newer libraries. -- Wilmer Alberto Lau 劉 志 源 liu zhi yuan
Bug#331620: uim: privilege escalation before 0.4.9.1
Package: uim Severity: serious Tags: security All uim releases before 0.4.9.1 have a security bug, which causes privilege escalation if applications linked to libuim is set setuid/setgid. For more detail, please see: http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/uim/2005-September/001346.html Best regards, -- Hidetaka Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp9q0yz7IMEg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#317185: marked as done (libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#317185: fixed in brutefir 1.0f-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 21:02:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 06 14:02:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wiggis.ethz.ch [129.132.86.197] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DqH1v-0004jO-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:02:03 -0700 Received: from wiggis1.ethz.ch (wiggis1.ethz.ch [192.168.127.2]) by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47469421B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:02:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kermit (adsl-62-167-188-151.adslplus.ch [62.167.188.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A894248 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:02:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by kermit (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78DFD8251; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:01:59 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:21:19 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.ethz.ch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9 Package: brutefir Version: unknown Severity: serious Tags: sid Justification: uninstallable in unstable (policy 5.3) Hi! A new release of jack-audio-connection-kit (0.100.0-2) has been uploaded to Debian unstable. The old library libjack0.80.0-0 (and libjack0.80.0-dev) have been removed and replaced with libjack0.100.0-0 and libjack0.100.0-dev since the API changed in some parts. For most packages that means a simple rebuild. Since libjack0.80.0 has been removed from unstable, this is a release-critical issue. A few notes about how to resolve this bug: 1. Please Build-Depend only on libjack0.100.0-dev. Build-Depending on libjack-dev as a virtual alternative allows the autobuilders to build against the old libjack0.80.0 if they find it. (Versioned virtual dependencies probably don't work.) 2. There are some packages (like for example xmms-jackasyn) which accidently obtain a dependency on libjack0.80.0-0 but do not Build-Depend on it. In my opinion this is incorrect. But if you want to maintain that indirect dependency, you will have to coordinate with the package's maintainer whose package you are build-depending on (libjackasyn-dev in the case of xmms-jackasyn) and and only upload your package (xmms-jackasyn; with a suitable _versioned_ build-dependency on the other package, libjackasy-dev) iff the other package has already been uploaded (and built on as many architectures as possible to lighten the pressure of failed builds). =20 =20 3. If this transition collides with the C++ transition for your package (because it may be/contain a C++ library), then please follow the timeline of the C++ transition instead of this one. (Thanks to Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 for these hints). A list of the packages for each maintainer and a list of the affected source packages has been attached. Robert. Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) [EMAIL PROTECTED] hydrogen ladcca-bin ladccad libjackasyn0 meterbridge puredata qjackctl rezound seq24 snd-gtk sooperlooper stk Enrique Robledo Arnuncio [EMAIL PROTECTED] freqtweak rosegarden4 tapiir Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] supercollider xmms-jackasyn Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] konq-plugins kpresenter kscreensaver noatun-plugins Chris Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] spiralsynthmodular Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org akode artsbuilder juk kaboodle kdelibs4 krec kwifimanager libarts1-audiofile libarts1-mpeglib libkonq4 noatun Free Ekanayaka
Bug#320270: marked as done (FTBFS: Invalid lvalues in assignments)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320270: fixed in brutefir 1.0f-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 23:15:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 16:15:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dxv7t-00065n-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:49 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6RNFmi2091173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:15:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1DxnMG-uq-FQ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:58:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:58:08 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Invalid lvalues in assignments Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: brutefir Version: 1.0c-1 Severity: serious brutefir fails to build because it contains invalid lvalues in assignments: gcc -o bfrun.o-c -I/usr/include -Wall -Wlong-long -Wpointer-arith -Wsh= adow -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing= -prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -O2 bfrun.c bfrun.c: In function 'set_delay': bfrun.c:499: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'rti_and_overflow': bfrun.c:604: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:634: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'filter_process': bfrun.c:1327: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:1328: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:1330: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:1397: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'bit_isse= t' differ in signedness bfrun.c:1828: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'bit_isse= t' differ in signedness bfrun.c: In function 'bfrun': bfrun.c:2081: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2082: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2083: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2269: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2270: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2339: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2340: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2385: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2465: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2466: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'bf_reset_peak': bfrun.c:2515: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'bf_register_process': bfrun.c:2614: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2615: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'bf_make_realtime': bfrun.c:2637: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c: In function 'bf_exit': bfrun.c:2682: error: invalid lvalue in assignment bfrun.c:2685: error: invalid lvalue in assignment --=20 Matt --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC56D/fNdgYxVXvBARAuwWAKCKglEBsP1wiKmLV5KkC1//wEzU9QCfZ9HR f6wER9OOwO2D9SIFYtQlpYI= =HwEB -END PGP SIGNATURE- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- --- Received: (at 320270-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 08:09:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 01:09:08 2005
Bug#331050: patch
tags 331050 + patch thanks hi, attached patch fixes this issue, i dont know if its a clean solution, it seems to work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# ruby -ryaml -e 'puts YAML.load(YAML.dump(1234567890))' 1234567890 bye, - michael --- ruby1.8-1.8.3/ruby-1.8.3/lib/yaml/rubytypes.rb 2005-09-20 06:46:45.0 + +++ /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml/rubytypes.rb 2005-10-04 08:28:37.0 + @@ -372,6 +372,10 @@ yaml_as tag:yaml.org,2002:int end +class Bignum +yaml_as tag:yaml.org,2002:int#yes +end + class Float yaml_as tag:yaml.org,2002:float end
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 331050 + patch Bug#331050: libruby 1.8.3 yaml bignum issues Tags were: sid upstream Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331627: python-visual: not installable in sid
Package: python-visual Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install python-visual Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: python-visual: Depends: libboost-python1.32.0 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental'), (98, 'breezy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331050: ..
hi again, please note that the patch does still not prevent raggle from crashing: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# raggle Raggle: Loading config... Raggle: Loading feed list... /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `transfer': allocator undefined for Bignum (TypeError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/yaml.rb:133:in `load' from /usr/bin/raggle:4795:in `load_config' from /usr/bin/raggle:5441:in `main' from /usr/bin/raggle:6461 bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
severity 331540 normal tags 331540 unreproducible thanks On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:14:18AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 04:53:38PM -0500, Carter Wiggins wrote: [...] gives only: DOCUMENT_ROOT=/var/www HTTP_ACCEPT=text/xml,application/xml,application/xhtml+xml,text/html;q=0.9,text/plain;q=0.8,image/png,*/*;q=0.5 HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET=ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7 which is too little and renders my old eperl written pages unusable. Do you mean that this is a regression? Can you please tell which version worked? I cannot reproduce your bug, and eperl did not change for a long time. This is certainly a configuration issue of your web server, so I downgrade its severity for now. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 331540 normal Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode Severity set to `normal'. tags 331540 unreproducible Bug#331540: eperl: fails to work in nph mode There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331620: uim: privilege escalation before 0.4.9.1
tags 331620 patch
thanks
I made the patch from uim-0.4.9 and uim-0.4.9.1. With this patch,
update-uim-config prints some warning messages(Broken Pipe), but this
will fix the security problem.
In Debian, mlterm is installed with setgid, and I'm afraid mlterm is
affected with this bug.
Best regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -urN uim-0.4.9/scm/custom-rt.scm uim-0.4.9.1/scm/custom-rt.scm
--- uim-0.4.9/scm/custom-rt.scm 2005-09-05 23:11:28.0 +0900
+++ uim-0.4.9.1/scm/custom-rt.scm 2005-09-27 06:04:35.0 +0900
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@
(cons filename custom-required-custom-files)))
(let* ((post-groups (custom-list-primary-groups))
(new-groups (list-tail post-groups (length pre-groups
- (if (not (getenv LIBUIM_VANILLA))
+ (if (and (not (getenv LIBUIM_VANILLA))
+(not (is-set-ugid?)))
(for-each custom-load-group-conf
(reverse new-groups)))
diff -urN uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-custom.c uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-custom.c
--- uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-custom.c 2005-08-25 06:09:30.0 +0900
+++ uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-custom.c2005-09-28 19:37:09.0 +0900
@@ -826,7 +826,11 @@
uim_bool
uim_custom_load(void)
{
- return for_each_primary_groups(uim_custom_load_group);
+ if(uim_helper_is_setugid() ==UIM_FALSE) {
+return for_each_primary_groups(uim_custom_load_group);
+ } else {
+return UIM_FALSE;
+ }
}
static uim_bool
@@ -892,7 +896,11 @@
uim_bool
uim_custom_save(void)
{
- return for_each_primary_groups(uim_custom_save_group);
+ if(uim_helper_is_setugid() ==UIM_FALSE) {
+return for_each_primary_groups(uim_custom_save_group);
+ } else {
+return UIM_FALSE;
+ }
}
/**
diff -urN uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-helper.c uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-helper.c
--- uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-helper.c 2005-08-25 05:44:56.0 +0900
+++ uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-helper.c2005-09-28 19:33:24.0 +0900
@@ -209,6 +209,17 @@
return NULL;
}
+/* Interface function for is_setugid. */
+uim_bool
+uim_helper_is_setugid(void)
+{
+ if(is_setugid() != 0) {
+return UIM_TRUE;
+ } else {
+return UIM_FALSE;
+ }
+}
+
int
is_setugid(void)
{
diff -urN uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-helper.h uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-helper.h
--- uim-0.4.9/uim/uim-helper.h 2005-08-25 05:44:56.0 +0900
+++ uim-0.4.9.1/uim/uim-helper.h2005-09-28 19:32:26.0 +0900
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
void uim_helper_buffer_shift(char *buf, int count);
char *uim_helper_buffer_get_message(char *buf);
+uim_bool
+uim_helper_is_setugid(void);
+
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
Processed: Re: Bug#331620: uim: privilege escalation before 0.4.9.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 331620 patch Bug#331620: uim: privilege escalation before 0.4.9.1 Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331630: libsilc-1.0.2: Libraries missing
Package: libsilc-1.0.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Jeesh, the libraries are missing. I rebuilt from source, still no libraries in the built package. Same with libsilc-1.0.2-dev. ---snip--- $ dpkg -L libsilc-1.0-2 /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2 /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2/copyright /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2/changelog.Debian.gz $ dpkg -L libsilc-1.0-2-dev /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/TODO /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/README.gz /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/README.CVS.gz /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/README.Debian /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/copyright /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/CREDITS /usr/share/doc/libsilc-1.0-2-dev/changelog.Debian.gz ---snip--- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331634: Clean upgrade fails
Package: libpt-dev Severity: serious S'està desempaquetant el reemplaçament de libpt-dev ... dpkg: s'ha produït un error en processar /net/mirror/debian/pool/main/p/pwlib/libpt-dev_1.8.7-1_i386.deb (--unpack): s'està intentant sobreescriure «/usr/lib/libpt.so.1», que també està en el paquet libpt-1.8.3c2 Pretty straight forward: it seems a replaces is missing somewhere. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Processed: Re: Bug#331630: libsilc-1.0.2: Libraries missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 331630 libsilc-1.0-2 Bug#331630: libsilc-1.0.2: Libraries missing Warning: Unknown package 'libsilc-1.0.2' Bug reassigned from package `libsilc-1.0.2' to `libsilc-1.0-2'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331565: marked as done (missing build-dependency on fdupes)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:17:51 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331565: fixed in openclipart 0.17+dfsg-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 02:00:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 19:00:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMc6O-0006Gy-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 19:00:21 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2005 01:59:47 - Received: from dslb-084-056-102-163.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO localhost) [84.56.102.163] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2005 03:59:47 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1545045 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AD74114BBD; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 03:36:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 03:36:00 +0200 From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: missing build-dependency on fdupes Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-PGP-Key: 248AEB73 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openclipart Severity: serious iHi, the openclipart build uses fdupes but does not build-depend on it. Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 331565-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 10:18:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 03:18:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMjrr-0004tu-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:17:51 -0700 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331565: fixed in openclipart 0.17+dfsg-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:17:51 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openclipart Source-Version: 0.17+dfsg-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openclipart, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openclipart-openoffice.org_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart-openoffice.org_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb openclipart-png_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart-png_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb openclipart-svg_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart-svg_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3.diff.gz openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3.dsc to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3.dsc openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb to pool/main/o/openclipart/openclipart_0.17+dfsg-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openclipart package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:51:54 +0200 Source: openclipart Binary: openclipart-svg openclipart-openoffice.org
Bug#327963: (no subject)
Hi, I just installed the Debian unstable packages: ii fwbuilder 2.0.7-2Firewall administration tool GUI ii fwbuilder-common 2.0.7-2Firewall administration tool GUI (common fil ii fwbuilder-linux 2.0.7-2Firewall Builder policy compiler(s) for Linu ii libfwbuilder6c2 2.0.7-4Firewall Builder API library After starting I get this error: /usr/bin/fwbuilder: error while loading shared libraries: libfwbuilder.so.6: can not open shared object file: No such file or directory Seems to me that the library hasn't been added to the libfwbuilder6c2 package. Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote: | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by | | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. | | | | This was on i386. | | Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built just | fine? | | I don't know. I'll make sure that I can reproduce the problem | tomorrow and, if I can, send you the list of packages that were used | in the build environment. After sending the mail I realized that it may just be the difference between the previous R [ my logs show I used R 2.1.1 ] whereas you will have gotten a R 2.2.0.beta.* for the R 2.2.0 release due this week. If I get a chance I'll try boot as well here. Thanks, Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-soappy 0.11.3-1.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 331601 + fixed Bug#331601: python-soappy: python 2.4 is not the default in debian's python-defaults yet. please do not depend on python = 2.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 331607 + fixed Bug#331607: python-soappy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#297967: Intention to NMU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I intend to upload. Please respond if
you don't want this NMU to happen, if you are working yourself on a
patch or if you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQmg/5UTeB5t8Mo0RAko6AKCzmNwNkn2r5nst10WstqaDkDD6DwCgy669
Uus3v25uTyCDYowfjOCsL/s=
=OEws
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u tapiir-0.7.1/src/MTD.hxx tapiir-0.7.1/src/MTD.hxx
--- tapiir-0.7.1/src/MTD.hxx
+++ tapiir-0.7.1/src/MTD.hxx
@@ -193,22 +193,22 @@
/** specializations **/
-inline float MTDint,short::FromGain(const int g) const { return
float(g)/256.; }
-inline float MTDint,float::FromGain(const int g) const { return
float(g)/256.; }
+template inline float MTDint,short::FromGain(const int g) const { return
float(g)/256.; }
+template inline float MTDint,float::FromGain(const int g) const { return
float(g)/256.; }
-inline int MTDint,short::ToGain(const float f) const { return
(int)(f*256.); }
-inline int MTDint,float::ToGain(const float f) const { return
(int)(f*256.); }
+template inline int MTDint,short::ToGain(const float f) const { return
(int)(f*256.); }
+template inline int MTDint,float::ToGain(const float f) const { return
(int)(f*256.); }
-inline void MTDfloat,short::Clip( float f) const
+template inline void MTDfloat,short::Clip( float f) const
{ if (f32767.) f = 32767.; else if (f-32767.) f = -32767.; }
-inline void MTDint ,short::Clip( int i) const
+template inline void MTDint ,short::Clip( int i) const
{ if (i32767) i = 32767; else if (i-32767) i = -32767; }
-inline void MTDfloat,float::Clip( float f) const
+template inline void MTDfloat,float::Clip( float f) const
{ if (f1.) f = 1.; else if (f-1.) f = -1.; }
-inline void MTDint,float::MulAdj( int i) const { i=8; }
-inline void MTDint,short::MulAdj( int i) const { i=8; }
+template inline void MTDint,float::MulAdj( int i) const { i=8; }
+template inline void MTDint,short::MulAdj( int i) const { i=8; }
/*/
diff -u tapiir-0.7.1/debian/changelog tapiir-0.7.1/debian/changelog
--- tapiir-0.7.1/debian/changelog
+++ tapiir-0.7.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+tapiir (0.7.1-7.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rebuild for the jack transition (closes: #317226).
+ * Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0 (closes: #297967).
+ * Add Build-Depends on libasound-dev (closes:#326096).
+
+ -- Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:06:42 +0200
+
tapiir (0.7.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Rearranged the source package into a non-native Debian package.
diff -u tapiir-0.7.1/debian/control tapiir-0.7.1/debian/control
--- tapiir-0.7.1/debian/control
+++ tapiir-0.7.1/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: sound
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Enrique Robledo Arnuncio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), automake1.6, libfltk1.1-dev, libjack-dev,
autoconf
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), automake1.6, libfltk1.1-dev, libjack-dev,
autoconf, libasound-dev
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: tapiir
Bug#330603: marked as done (gbatnav: FTBFS: missing automake1.9 dep, GNOME1 currently FUBAR)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:32:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330603: fixed in gbatnav 1.0.4cvs20051004-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2005 21:04:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 14:04:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKj6F-0008V2-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:23 -0700 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j8SL4LoQ004314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:04:21 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8SL0wGU030229; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:00:58 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8SL0wem030227; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:00:58 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:00:58 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gbatnav: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: ../depcomp: No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gbatnav Version: 1.0.4cvs20050924-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gbatnav failed to build on my sparc pbuilder. It failed on a sparc buildd due to temporarily unavilable build dependancies, and also failed on other buildds. Making all in common make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/gbatnav-1.0.4cvs20050924/common' source='common.c' object='common.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -g -O2 -c common.c /bin/sh: ../depcomp: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [common.o] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gbatnav-1.0.4cvs20050924/common' --- Received: (at 330603-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 11:38:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 04:38:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMl1i-0006rI-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:32:06 -0700 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330603: fixed in gbatnav 1.0.4cvs20051004-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 04:32:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gbatnav Source-Version: 1.0.4cvs20051004-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gbatnav, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gbatnav/gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1.diff.gz gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1.dsc to pool/main/g/gbatnav/gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1.dsc gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gbatnav/gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004-1_i386.deb gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gbatnav/gbatnav_1.0.4cvs20051004.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gbatnav package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact
Bug#263209: marked as done (xwit: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc')
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:02:17 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#263209: fixed in xwit 3.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 11:11:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 03 04:11:37 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c173031.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.173.31]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrxCi-000869-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 04:11:37 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BrxCh-00022i-9b; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:11:35 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xwit: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 13:11:35 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xwit
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'xwit' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/xwit-3.4'
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -c -o xwit.o xwit.c
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -c -o dsimple.o dsimple.c
dsimple.c: In function `Malloc':
dsimple.c:69: error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
dsimple.c: In function `Fatal_Error':
dsimple.c:503: warning: implicit declaration of function `exit'
make[1]: *** [dsimple.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xwit-3.4'
make: *** [build] Error 2
With the attached patch 'xwit' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xwit-3.4/dsimple.c ./dsimple.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xwit-3.4/dsimple.c 2004-08-03 11:36:45.118554914 +0200
+++ ./dsimple.c 2004-08-03 11:35:33.388433612 +0200
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
char *Malloc(size)
unsigned size;
{
- char *data, *malloc();
+ char *data;
if (!(data = malloc(size)))
Fatal_Error(Out of memory!);
---
Received: (at 263209-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 12:08:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 05:08:06 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMlUv-0003pr-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:02:17 -0700
From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#263209: fixed in xwit 3.4-7
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xwit
Source-Version: 3.4-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xwit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xwit_3.4-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-7.diff.gz
xwit_3.4-7.dsc
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-7.dsc
xwit_3.4-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xwit/xwit_3.4-7_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xwit package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 21:45:57 +1000
Source: xwit
Binary: xwit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.4-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
xwit - a collection of simple routines to call some X11 functions
Closes: 263209
Changes:
xwit (3.4-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA Group upload orphaning this package
* debian/control: build-depend on dpatch
* debian/rules: add dpatch support
Bug#294392: marked as done (xmcpustate: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function 'update_display')
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#294392: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2005 14:36:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 09 06:36:42 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from d157137.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[80.171.157.137]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CysxO-0007I2-00; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 06:36:42 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CysxL-0001jr-5z; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:36:39 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmcpustate: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid storage class for function
'update_display'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:36:39 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xmcpustate
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'xmcpustate' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include xmcpustate.c
xmcpustate.c: In function 'xmalloc':
xmcpustate.c:146: error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
xmcpustate.c: In function 'main':
xmcpustate.c:180: error: invalid storage class for function 'update_display'
xmcpustate.c:355: error: 'update_display' undeclared (first use in this
function)
xmcpustate.c:355: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
xmcpustate.c:355: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [xmcpustate.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xmcpustate-3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'xmcpustate' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
The attached patch includes a part which was already necessary with gcc-3.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xmcpustate-3/xmcpustate.c ./xmcpustate.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xmcpustate-3/xmcpustate.c 2005-02-09 14:55:49.972045366
+0100
+++ ./xmcpustate.c 2005-02-09 14:55:32.780370159 +0100
@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@
char *
xmalloc(int n)
{
- extern char *malloc();
char *cp = malloc((unsigned) n);
if (cp == NULL) {
(void) fprintf(stderr, Couldn't malloc %d bytes\n, n);
@@ -173,11 +172,12 @@
(XtEventHandler)SetShellSize, NULL);
}
+static void update_display();
+
int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int i = 0, *iptr;
- static void update_display();
Widget topLevel;
Widget form;
Widget frame = NULL, subform = NULL;
---
Received: (at 294392-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 12:41:19 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 05:41:19 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMlxt-0004OK-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#294392: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: xmcpustate
Source-Version: 3-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmcpustate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmcpustate_3-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12.diff.gz
xmcpustate_3-12.dsc
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12.dsc
xmcpustate_3-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock
Bug#260846: marked as done (xmcpustate: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc')
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#260846: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 14:36:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 07:36:50 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c214235.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.214.235]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bnegk-00052l-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:36:50 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BnegT-00037o-C2; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:36:49 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xmcpustate: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc'
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:36:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xmcpustate
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'xmcpustate' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:
gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include xmcpustate.c
xmcpustate.c: In function `xmalloc':
xmcpustate.c:146: error: conflicting types for 'malloc'
xmcpustate.c: At top level:
xmcpustate.c:5: warning: 'rcsid' defined but not used
make[1]: *** [xmcpustate.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xmcpustate-3'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'xmcpustate' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xmcpustate-3/xmcpustate.c ./xmcpustate.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xmcpustate-3/xmcpustate.c 2004-07-22 16:32:00.74661
+0200
+++ ./xmcpustate.c 2004-07-22 16:31:15.461364228 +0200
@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@
char *
xmalloc(int n)
{
- extern char *malloc();
char *cp = malloc((unsigned) n);
if (cp == NULL) {
(void) fprintf(stderr, Couldn't malloc %d bytes\n, n);
---
Received: (at 260846-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 12:41:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 05:41:18 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMlxt-0004OI-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#260846: fixed in xmcpustate 3-12
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 05:32:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xmcpustate
Source-Version: 3-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmcpustate, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xmcpustate_3-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12.diff.gz
xmcpustate_3-12.dsc
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12.dsc
xmcpustate_3-12_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xmcpustate/xmcpustate_3-12_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xmcpustate package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:15:08 +1000
Source: xmcpustate
Binary: xmcpustate
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
xmcpustate - Displays CPU/Swap/Memory/Network load
Closes: 260846 294392
Changes:
xmcpustate (3-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA Group upload orphaning this
Processed: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package mysql-dfsg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mysql-dfsg reopen 319042 Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include asm/atomic.h fails from C++ due to function parameter called new Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 319042 serious Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include asm/atomic.h fails from C++ due to function parameter called new Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
Hello On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote: According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a pbuilder chroot created just today: Please report the exact version you tried and on which architecture (`dpkg-architecture`) you tried to build it. bye, -christian- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331661: extensions/*.jar ship without source code, shipped jar files are installed
Package: docbook-xsl Version: 1.68.1 Severity: serious The extensions contains many jar files, without having the sources in the source package, the problematic files seem to be: saxon644.jar saxon65.jar saxon651.jar saxon652.jar saxon653.jar It looks like the source for saxon643.jar and xalan25.jar is provided, but they are not built during the build process. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325993: NMU and patch
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:29:38AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck. the patch is attached. I doubt it was DELAYED-5 since it's now available in archive. Anyway thanks for fixing it, cause I'm rather busy now. regards fEnIo -- ,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo : :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland `. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user `- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325993: NMU and patch
On 04/10/2005 Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:29:38AM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: i just uploaded a NMU to fix that bug into the DELAYED-5 queue on gluck. the patch is attached. I doubt it was DELAYED-5 since it's now available in archive. Anyway thanks for fixing it, cause I'm rather busy now. you're correct. accidentally i uploaded it to DELAYED-0 instead of DELAYED-5. sorry for that. ... jonas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331669: 1.61.14 should not enter testing
Package: streamripper Severity: serious versions of streamripper, greater than 1.61.11 contain new buffering code and therefore may be too buggy for testing. Lets keep them out until the bugs are fixed. bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does this mean that the twiki (20040902-3) in Debian is not vulnerable
and this bug report can be closed?
Micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
while I think its very reasonable for you to send along these
advisories, and even doing so as a BTS bug wothout testing them
I think its incredibly rude to do so without saying that you have not
tested it out.
please, if you enter a bug report, tell the maintainer what you have or
have not done, that way they can deal more appropriatly with the issue
(in the cases where the core issue has been dealt with (thanks to
Florian!) I'm very busy helping out upstream, and i'm sure this
situation _should_ apply to others (i object to the number of debian
maintainers that are not appropriatly active upstream)
however, other than my rant :) thanks for the notification, its
important (i'm still notifying people now)
Sven
micah wrote:
Sven,
I have not attempted to reproduce this in the debian package, I'm
tracking known vulnerabilities with the testing-security team. When I
see a new CVE id assigned to a package and no bugs filed on that package
regarding that CVE, and no entries in the changelogs noting that it has
been fixed, I tend to believe that it hasn't been because it is a rare
package maintainer who has security issues fixed before they are
discovered or announced.
Additionally, the advisory indicates that the version in debian
(20040902-3) is affected, as the only versions it indicates are safe is
the TWikiRelease01Sep2004 patched with Florian Weimer's
UncoordinatedSecurityAlert23Feb2005 patches. Without any indication in
the BTS or in changelogs, I assume that the package is affected because
the version numbers typically are very good indicators. Admittedly, you
could very well have addressed this issue, and I have a feeling that you
have as Florian is very active in Debian. If so, I'd be happy to know
that, and we can close this bug, so I can note it in the
testing-security database.
Unfortunately, if I had to try every exploit, even those without
published exploits, for every CVE assigned, there would be a net loss. I
understand that this means this is an annoyance to you to get a grave
bug report for something that you may have addressed, however it ends up
being a good thing because then we know for sure, and can better track
vulnerabilities in Debian. It is better to be asked once if this is an
issue and have it properly noted, than for Debian to not pay attention
to anything at all and be riddled with security holes.
micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
excellent.
Micah, did you manage to reproduce this in the debian package at all?
you see, the debian package is significantly more secure than the
upstream version, and as you've marked it as grave, I presume that you
have found a way to make it happen. (as when I had a go, i did not get
the exploit (i got a unhelpful, but correct error message invalid
number argument at /usr/share/perl5/TWiki.pm line 3339.)
could you please either tell me how to reproduce the problem in the
current debian package, or close it?
Cheers
Sven
Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQoQ49n4qXRzy1ioRAq3qAJ0Unv67KRVRhspysHwYVSPMcgREXQCgnErl
dQYbLhUMHN1nVASNCDzWAew=
=Ew1E
-END PGP
Bug#330733: twiki: INCLUDE function allows arbitrary shell command execution
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, defiantly
I have not found any way to exploit the debian package using any thus
far found methods. Florians patch get in the way every time :)
Sven
micah wrote:
Does this mean that the twiki (20040902-3) in Debian is not vulnerable
and this bug report can be closed?
Micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
while I think its very reasonable for you to send along these
advisories, and even doing so as a BTS bug wothout testing them
I think its incredibly rude to do so without saying that you have not
tested it out.
please, if you enter a bug report, tell the maintainer what you have or
have not done, that way they can deal more appropriatly with the issue
(in the cases where the core issue has been dealt with (thanks to
Florian!) I'm very busy helping out upstream, and i'm sure this
situation _should_ apply to others (i object to the number of debian
maintainers that are not appropriatly active upstream)
however, other than my rant :) thanks for the notification, its
important (i'm still notifying people now)
Sven
micah wrote:
Sven,
I have not attempted to reproduce this in the debian package, I'm
tracking known vulnerabilities with the testing-security team. When I
see a new CVE id assigned to a package and no bugs filed on that package
regarding that CVE, and no entries in the changelogs noting that it has
been fixed, I tend to believe that it hasn't been because it is a rare
package maintainer who has security issues fixed before they are
discovered or announced.
Additionally, the advisory indicates that the version in debian
(20040902-3) is affected, as the only versions it indicates are safe is
the TWikiRelease01Sep2004 patched with Florian Weimer's
UncoordinatedSecurityAlert23Feb2005 patches. Without any indication in
the BTS or in changelogs, I assume that the package is affected because
the version numbers typically are very good indicators. Admittedly, you
could very well have addressed this issue, and I have a feeling that you
have as Florian is very active in Debian. If so, I'd be happy to know
that, and we can close this bug, so I can note it in the
testing-security database.
Unfortunately, if I had to try every exploit, even those without
published exploits, for every CVE assigned, there would be a net loss. I
understand that this means this is an annoyance to you to get a grave
bug report for something that you may have addressed, however it ends up
being a good thing because then we know for sure, and can better track
vulnerabilities in Debian. It is better to be asked once if this is an
issue and have it properly noted, than for Debian to not pay attention
to anything at all and be riddled with security holes.
micah
Sven Dowideit wrote:
excellent.
Micah, did you manage to reproduce this in the debian package at all?
you see, the debian package is significantly more secure than the
upstream version, and as you've marked it as grave, I presume that you
have found a way to make it happen. (as when I had a go, i did not get
the exploit (i got a unhelpful, but correct error message invalid
number argument at /usr/share/perl5/TWiki.pm line 3339.)
could you please either tell me how to reproduce the problem in the
current debian package, or close it?
Cheers
Sven
Micah Anderson wrote:
Package: twiki
Version: 20040902-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A new security bug in twiki showed up today:
http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/SecurityAlertExecuteCommandsWithInclude
An attacker is able to execute arbitrary shell commands with the
privileges of the web server process. The TWiki INCLUDE function
enables a malicious user to compose a command line executed by the
Perl backtick (`) operator.
The rev parameter of the INCLUDE variable is not checked properly for
shell metacharacters and is thus vulnerable to revision numbers
containing pipes and shell commands. The exploit is possible on
included topics with two or more revisions.
Example INCLUDE variable exploiting the rev parameter:
%INCLUDE{ Main.TWikiUsers rev=2|less /etc/passwd }%
The same vulnerability is exposed to all Plugins and add-ons that use
TWiki::Func::readTopicText function to read a previous topic revision.
This has been tested on TWiki:Plugins.RevCommentPlugin and
TWiki:Plugins.CompareRevisionsAddon.
If access to TWiki is not restricted by other means, attackers can use
the revision function with or without prior authentication, depending
on the configuration.
The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures project has assigned the name
CAN-2005-3056 to this vulnerability. Please include this number in any
changelogs fixing this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-BEGIN PGP
Bug#330827: IP vetting is weak, allowing targetted DoS via usernames
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:20:23PM -0700, Joshua Rodman wrote:
What was done before was the line was scanned for anything which
resembles an IP address. What I am suggesting is a regex which
specifies where in the line the IP address should be.
how would you specify where? if you are thinking about something like
from IP regex or fixed position, that will not work, because
intruder can provide a login name with from IP regex and log line is
Oct 4 09:41:14 sonyboy sshd[18226]: Invalid user from 10.0.0.1 from 127.0.0.1
Oct 4 09:41:14 sonyboy sshd[18226]: Failed none for invalid user from 10.0.0.1
from 127.0.0.1 port 52417 ssh2
So, as I said, I don't see a generic way around that besides using fully
specified regex'es. May be upstream will have something nice in mind
To say the truth python regexes are not that diificult. May be I should
provide a crash-course on them in 5-10 lines in the config file
describing used by me constructs. Something like
Symbols:
[...] -- set of symbols
\S -- non-space symbol
. -- any symbol
Enumerators:
? -- 0 or 1 occurance of patter
* -- 0 or more occurances of previous regex
{n,m} -- from n to m occurances of the pattern
Grouping:
| -- logical OR -- matching any of the mentioned patterns within a
group
(?:...) -- group which doesn't enter the set of numbered/named groups
(?Pname1...) -- named as name1 group. Curently all named groups are
considered as placeholders of IP addresses
Would it make easier to grasp failregex'es now?
--
.-.
=-- /v\ =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192
Linux User^^-^^[17]
pgpKBtAPnrIr9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#331669: issue in streamripper 1.61.14
Hi Michael, Just wanted to warn you of a new bug in the latest streamripper (1.61.14). The symptom is that they will get an error of SR_ERROR_BUFFER_EMPTY, and then streamripper will exit. This only happens with certain streams, and/or with certain splitpoint settings. The only known fix is to downgrade back to 1.61.11. I will fix this in the next release (about 2-4 week time frame). Thanks, Greg Greg Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
Bug#331669: issue in streamripper 1.61.14
--- Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:22:01AM -0700, Gregory Sharp wrote: Just wanted to warn you of a new bug in the latest streamripper (1.61.14). The symptom is that they will get an error of SR_ERROR_BUFFER_EMPTY, and then streamripper will exit. This only happens with certain streams, and/or with certain splitpoint settings. okey, do you rate this bug as release critical? If so, then i could file a bugreport against the package, so that it doesnt enter the testing distribution and stays in unstable (testing contains 1.61.11 at the moment). Yes, that is a good idea. From 1.61.11 to 1.61.14 contains the new buffering code, and it may have other bugs. Greg Greg Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Yahoo! for Good Donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
Bug#293667: #293667 not fixed by recent update
found 293667 4.41.3-2 found 293667 4.46.2-1 thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed Uhm, how does adding a Depends on debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 resolve the problem of simply not sourcing the debconf library before using a debconf function? (Ref. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293667;msg=12, here the preinst code in question: | case $1 in | install|upgrade) |if [ -n $2 ]; then |if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 4; then |db_get mailscanner/v3_upgrade ^^ Sourcing /usr/share/debconf/confmodule only occurs later in the script. The Woody version still can't be upgraded to the Sarge version, so shouldn't there be an upload to stable-proposed-updates for Joey to consider for the next point release...? Cheers, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: #293667 not fixed by recent update
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 293667 4.41.3-2 Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version Bug marked as found in version 4.41.3-2. found 293667 4.46.2-1 Bug#293667: Mailscanner Wont Upgrade Or Install After Removing Old Version Bug marked as found in version 4.46.2-1. thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCCed Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
merge 324268 331618 tags 324268 pending tags 331618 pending tags 297975 pending thanks On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:08:45AM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote: Scim-chinese is not installable since early October. Would someone out there be kind enough to provide a fix for this? This bug has already been reported but it seems like a fix is a recompile to newer libraries. Since you've seen that this bug is already reported, why don't you follow up the old bug report instead of filing a new one? I said in the reply that I'm working on it, and indeed I have prepared the new package and it's pending upload now. It's okay to ping a bug to see what is the current status, but in my opinion it's not good to intentionally file a duplicated bug. It's not that I am not responsive or anything. Annoying the maintainer gets you nowhere. Ming 2005.10.04 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of egroupware 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2sarge2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 323350 + fixed Bug#323350: egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability Tags were: sid etch sarge security Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 324268 331618 Bug#324268: Uninstallable scim-chinese package Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable Merged 324268 331618. tags 324268 pending Bug#324268: Uninstallable scim-chinese package There were no tags set. Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable Tags added: pending tags 331618 pending Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable Tags were: pending Bug#324268: Uninstallable scim-chinese package Tags added: pending tags 297975 pending Bug#297975: scim-chinese: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Tag bug 324808 pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Forgot 324808 tags 324808 pending Bug#324808: scim-chinese: sicm-chinese uninstallable with scim 1.4.1 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323350: marked as done (egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:59:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Aug 2005 07:51:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 00:51:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4wEf-0007H5-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 00:51:49 -0700 Received: from wlan-client-006.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.116.7] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1E4wEb-0003lt-Jc for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:51:45 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4wF0-0001ZG-PJ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:52:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: egroupware: Another XMLRPC vulnerability X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:52:10 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.116.7 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: egroupware Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, another vulnerability has been found in the XMLRPC code. Please see http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_142005.66.html for more information. egroupware was affected by July's vulnerability, so it might now be affected as well (haven't verified that myself). Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 323350-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 15:59:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 08:59:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMpCs-00052v-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 08:59:54 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Oct 2005 15:59:21 - Received: from dslb-084-063-005-133.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [84.63.5.133] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 04 Oct 2005 17:59:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:59:20 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 1.0.0.007-2.dfsg-2sarge2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327963: (no subject)
This problem is actually caused by a problem with libfwbuilder 2.0.7-4 which is already corrected in 2.0.7-5 which was uploaded last night as part of the fix for Bug#331575. Regards, Jeremy Michael Setzer wrote: Hi, I just installed the Debian unstable packages: ii fwbuilder 2.0.7-2Firewall administration tool GUI ii fwbuilder-common 2.0.7-2Firewall administration tool GUI (common fil ii fwbuilder-linux 2.0.7-2Firewall Builder policy compiler(s) for Linu ii libfwbuilder6c2 2.0.7-4Firewall Builder API library After starting I get this error: /usr/bin/fwbuilder: error while loading shared libraries: libfwbuilder.so.6: can not open shared object file: No such file or directory Seems to me that the library hasn't been added to the libfwbuilder6c2 package. Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331694: qtorrent: Can't save file; is unusable
Package: qtorrent
Version: 2.9.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
The same bugs as in 330563 is also in line 138 of the same file. It doesn't do
anything with respect to asking about where to save, and is therefore quite
unusable.
You can replace the first None in that line with '', or apply the following
patch.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers experimental
APT policy: (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages qtorrent depends on:
ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-qt33.15-3 Qt3 bindings for Python (default v
qtorrent recommends no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQ0K9VOWR/8lWBVPnAQPGZQf9F+HfAq+51bJ/W7owFPEeO1L4yf0YbSyh
RaUR+sZpMh6NRG1JMXsiItTs89nLVaAZIihdZjz25RCH4Zpcc9VgH3du2fYr62xx
/qL8UKSWfWHQUqn3nmZA/eUoPLQn5YVI6djn4Rbcurf/7SfIuHGgv2SbHZDIviel
LYkbUEj5UkCPuaSy902LCOfsm+gip8EGvOcV/pLQGWcd6Jv6R5W2QqV3Lzi1ZQor
HoTJz3Lsd83NdTBiBD7h/NW7StOnI8InDzXsDk7FW73UQOdv2tzd3/KKjQSUfGvD
/TMg6yfBEwz4zPgy/IjskSZvCLnkQ6cbrESrc7mv6ytB/Fiqjl6QAA==
=bgMf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- mainwin.py.orig 2005-10-04 17:33:36.0 +
+++ mainwin.py 2005-10-04 17:33:00.0 +
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
obj = self.getFilenameObj
is_dir = not obj['metainfo']['info'].has_key('length')
- dlg = QFileDialog(self.lastSave['dir'], None, self, None, True)
+ dlg = QFileDialog(self.lastSave['dir'], '', self, None, True)
dlg.setShowHiddenFiles(self.lastSave['showHidden'])
if is_dir:
dlg.setCaption('Save to')
Bug#331696: FTBFS when upx-ucl-beta is installed
Package: dar Version: 2.2.2-1 Severity: serious [...] strip: debian/dar-static/usr/bin/dar_static: File format not recognized dh_strip: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 dar's configure script detects upx is installed and uses it to generate compressed (but broken) executables. You should either Build-Conflict with upx-ucl-beta or use --disable-upx. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages dar depends on: ii libattr12.4.21-1.0.1 Extended attribute shared library ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-8.1high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdar3 2.2.2-1 Disk ARchive: Shared library ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6GCC support library ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-2 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-4compression library - runtime dar recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Forgot to retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 331396 libmysqlclient15: contains libcdbclient.so.* shared library also in libmysqlclient14-dev Bug#331396: mysql-query-browser: package dependencies conflict with mysql-server-5.0 Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#316584: marked as done (libmusicbrainz-2.1: FTBFS with g++-4.0: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#316584: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2005 03:32:34 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 01 20:32:33 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pop03.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.48]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DoYk5-0002JU-00; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:32:33 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop03.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1DoYk4-0002yy-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 23:32:32 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.51)
id 1DoYk4-0007Cp-0X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:32:32 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libmusicbrainz-2.1: FTBFS with g++-4.0: cast from 'char*' to 'int'
loses precision
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:32:31 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-=-=
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-=-=
Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Severity: normal
Version: 2.1.1-3
Tags: patch
From my build log:
...
if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..
-I../include/musicbrainz-g -Wall -O2 -Wall -MT comhttpsocket.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/comhttpsocket.Tpo -c -o comhttpsocket.lo comhttpsocket.cpp; \
then mv -f .deps/comhttpsocket.Tpo .deps/comhttpsocket.Plo; else rm -f
.deps/comhttpsocket.Tpo; exit 1; fi
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include/musicbrainz -g -Wall -O2 -Wall
-MT comhttpsocket.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/comhttpsocket.Tpo -c comhttpsocket.cpp
-fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/comhttpsocket.o
comhttpsocket.cpp: In member function 'int MBCOMHTTPSocket::NBRead(char*, int,
int*, int)':
comhttpsocket.cpp:197: error: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision
comhttpsocket.cpp:197: error: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision
make[3]: *** [comhttpsocket.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/lib'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
I've attached a patch which makes the package build under g++-4.0.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
--
Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
-- Orson Scott Card
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch
Content-Disposition: inline; filename=libmusicbrainz-2.1.diff
diff -urN libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1.old/lib/comhttpsocket.cpp
libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/lib/comhttpsocket.cpp
--- libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1.old/lib/comhttpsocket.cpp 2004-03-16
00:34:22.0 +
+++ libmusicbrainz-2.1-2.1.1/lib/comhttpsocket.cpp 2005-07-02
03:26:56.0 +
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
// advance to the data now, if there is any in this first buffer.
char* pData = strstr(HeaderBuffer, \r\n\r\n);
if (pData) pData += 4;
- int nOffset = (int)pData - (int)HeaderBuffer;
+ int nOffset = (long)pData - (long)HeaderBuffer;
if (nTotal - nOffset = nLen) // case 1: entire requested read is in
header chunk
{
memcpy(pBuffer, pData, nLen);
--=-=-=--
---
Received: (at 316584-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 17:48:08 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 10:48:08 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMqsb-00082f-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700
From: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie:
Bug#319411: marked as done (rebuild for gxx transition)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319411: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 21:36:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 14:36:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pcp0010743271pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net (pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net) [69.243.84.108] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DviiX-0006tL-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:36:33 -0700 Received: from orthrus ([192.168.0.2]) by pcp0010744200pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DviiW-aF-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:36:32 -0400 Received: from furrm by orthrus with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Dvihl-0003vY-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:35:45 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rebuild for gxx transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:35:45 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libmusicbrainz-2.1 Severity: grave This package needs to be built with the new g++ version. I'm preparing an NMU and will upload it to the 0-day queue and post the patch here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 319411-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 17:48:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 10:48:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMqsb-00082h-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700 From: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#319411: fixed in libmusicbrainz-2.1 2.1.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:47:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: libmusicbrainz-2.1 Source-Version: 2.1.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libmusicbrainz-2.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.1-4.diff.gz libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.1-4.dsc to pool/main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz-2.1_2.1.1-4.dsc libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz4-dev_2.1.1-4_i386.deb libmusicbrainz4c2_2.1.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmusicbrainz-2.1/libmusicbrainz4c2_2.1.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libmusicbrainz-2.1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 19:26:34 +0200 Source: libmusicbrainz-2.1 Binary: libmusicbrainz4-dev libmusicbrainz4c2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.1.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andreas Rottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libmusicbrainz4-dev
Bug#331699: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
Package: lasso Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] (About 10 times) My first guess would be that there is a missing include or build dependency. My first guess would go to swig? Atleast having that installed seems to work for me. It's also giving _alot_ of warning of this type: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules You can probably use -fno-strict-aliasing as a workaround for this. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331699: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] (About 10 times) My first guess would be that there is a missing include or build dependency. My first guess would go to swig? Atleast having that installed seems to work for me. It should compile fine without swig, and it actually fails to build a useful binary with swig 1.3.25 so bindings source files are created upstream with 1.3.24. I can reproduce the error on another computer; I'll debug it tomorrow. It's also giving _alot_ of warning of this type: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules You can probably use -fno-strict-aliasing as a workaround for this. Those are from SWIG generated code; it is true that gcc option should be added for cleaner logs. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331699: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
Your package is failing to build with the following error: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] (About 10 times) Fine. Just nailed it. archive is uncompressed and swig/Lasso.i appears newer than php/lasso_wrap.c so a Makefile rule is called. It detects swig is not available but continues nevertheless to the second command, which is to patch the generated swig file. So the file is actually patched twice and compilation fails. I'll upload a workaround tonight. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331699: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:41:09PM +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: It's also giving _alot_ of warning of this type: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules You can probably use -fno-strict-aliasing as a workaround for this. Those are from SWIG generated code; it is true that gcc option should be added for cleaner logs. It's not only a cleaner log, but it also changes the generated code. This can be the difference between something that works or not. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331699: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-'
Kurt Roeckx wrote: It's not only a cleaner log, but it also changes the generated code. This can be the difference between something that works or not. Thanks for the information; I didn't know this. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318723: marked as done (javascript crasher)
Your message dated Tue, 4 Oct 2005 16:16:57 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 09:46:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 02:46:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Du5jB-0005n8-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:46:29 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (kitenet.net [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373DA17FB7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:46:28 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D423C6E873; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:47:19 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:47:18 +0300 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: javascript crasher Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: mozilla-browser Version: 2:1.7.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: security I've successfully crashed this version of mozilla using the proof of concept exploits linked to from http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dbugtraqm=3D112008299210033w=3D2 mozilla-firefox 1.0.5-1 doesn't crash. This is CAN-2005-2114 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages mozilla-browser depends on: ii debconf 1.4.52 Debian configuration managemen= t sy ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration lib= rary ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared= lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.8-1The GTK+ graphical user interf= ace=20 ii libnspr4 2:1.7.8-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Libr= ary ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.1-1Layout and rendering of intern= atio ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 X Window System protocol clien= t li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 X Window System miscellaneous = exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing li= brar ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-2 X Window System printing exten= sion ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client l= ibra ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-2 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc fi= lesy ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 X Window System client librari= es m ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages mozilla-browser recommends: ii mozilla-psm 2:1.7.8-1 The Mozilla Internet applicati= on s pn myspell-en-us | myspell-dicti none (no description available) -- debconf information excluded --=20 see shy jo --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Bug#331699: marked as done (lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-')
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331699: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 18:20:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 11:20:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.75] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMrPA-0004sz-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:20:44 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 82B49383F5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C87380D6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5C4E726136; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:20:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:20:40 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lasso: FTBFS: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lasso Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:4647: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: invalid type argument of '-' lasso_wrap.c:5148: error: syntax error before ')' token [...] (About 10 times) My first guess would be that there is a missing include or build dependency. My first guess would go to swig? Atleast having that installed seems to work for me. It's also giving _alot_ of warning of this type: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules You can probably use -fno-strict-aliasing as a workaround for this. Kurt --- Received: (at 331699-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 20:18:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 13:18:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMtDt-00018r-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:13 -0700 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331699: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:13 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lasso Source-Version: 0.6.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lasso, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lasso_0.6.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.3-2.diff.gz lasso_0.6.3-2.dsc to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.3-2.dsc liblasso3-dev_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3-dev_0.6.3-2_i386.deb liblasso3_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3_0.6.3-2_i386.deb php4-lasso_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/php4-lasso_0.6.3-2_i386.deb python2.3-lasso_0.6.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/python2.3-lasso_0.6.3-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lasso package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Bug#328420: marked as done (ABI breakage through non-versioned shlib dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328420: fixed in gtksourceview 1.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 15:15:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 08:15:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 205-200-64-101.static.mts.net (www.opensky.ca) [205.200.64.101] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEq2F-0003Y1-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:15:55 -0700 Received: from jdhildeb by www.opensky.ca with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EEq1i-0005cX-BG; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:15:22 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason D. Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gobby requires recent libgtksourceview X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:15:21 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jason Hildebrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gobby Version: 0.2.0-2 Severity: normal Thanks for packaging gobby. I recently installed it for the first time, and after an initial issue, was very pleased with it. The problem was that it would crash upon trying to open or create a new file. With the help of strace, I determined that this was a result of my libgtksourceview package being too old. After upgrading to libgtksourceview1.0-0 1.2.0-1 everything worked fine. I believe the previous version I had was either 1.0.x or 1.1.x, but I'm unfortunately unable to determine this anymore. It would be nice to have a tighter dependency to avoid other users encountering this problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux trotzdem 2.6.9 #1 Fri Jun 3 23:12:16 CDT 2005 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages gobby depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-01.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc11:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libglibmm-2.4-1c2 2.6.1-1.2 C++ wrapper for the GLib toolkit ( ii libgmpxx3 4.1.4-10 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.10.3-2 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgtk2.0-02.6.4-3 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkmm-2.4-1c2 1:2.6.2-1.1 C++ wrappers for GTK+ 2.4 (shared ii libgtksourceview1.0-0 1.2.0-1 shared libraries for the GTK+ synt ii libnet6-1.1-0 1.1.0-2 Network access framework for IPv4/ ii libobby-0.2-0 0.2.0-2 Synced document buffers ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2 2.0.10-3 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libstdc++6 4.0.1-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml++2.6-1c22.6.1-2.1 A C++ interface to the GNOME XML l ii libxml22.6.20-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 328420-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 20:19:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 13:19:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMtDr-000186-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:11 -0700 From: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328420: fixed in gtksourceview 1.4.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:17:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
Bug#331710: php4-lasso is uninstallable due to phpapi-20020918 dependency
Package: php4-lasso Severity: grave Depends: phpapi-20020918 phpapi-20020918 isn't provided by anything. phpapi-20050606 is, however. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327327: marked as done (tcpick: does not run on ppc)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#327327: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 07:04:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 00:04:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp01.glenview.famvid.com [66.94.212.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDcwL-0007qU-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:04:49 -0700
Received: from smtp01.glenview.famvid.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost)
by smtp01.glenview.famvid.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1EDcry-00043t-0N; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:00:18 -0500
Received: from smtp01.glenview.famvid.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp01.glenview.famvid.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 29327-09; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 02:00:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dialup-4.252.235.16.dial1.cincinnati1.level3.net ([4.252.235.16]
helo=kosh.currynet)
by smtp01.glenview.famvid.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1EDcrw-00043o-Mu; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:00:17 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alan Curry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tcpick: does not run on ppc
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 02:05:09 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at famvid.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tcpick
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
On the ppc C compiler, char is an unsigned data type. This means that
no variable of type char can ever compare equal to the int value -1. gcc
tries to warn you about this when you compile tcpick, by saying:
args.c:195: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
tcpick therefore never makes it past the getopt loop. The following
patch fixes the problem.
diff -ru tcpick-0.2.1/src/args.c tcpick-0.2.1.pac/src/args.c
--- tcpick-0.2.1/src/args.c 2005-09-09 01:21:07.0 -0500
+++ tcpick-0.2.1.pac/src/args.c 2005-09-09 01:51:35.0 -0500
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
void
parse_args(int argc, char ** argv)
{
- char opt;
+ int opt;
#ifdef HAVE_GETOPT_LONG
static struct option long_options[]=
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages tcpick depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpcap0.8 0.8.3-5 System interface for user-level pa
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 327327-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 21:08:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 14:08:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMtvL-00066g-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
From: =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Delfosse?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327327: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: tcpick
Source-Version: 0.2.1-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tcpick, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tcpick_0.2.1-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tcpick/tcpick_0.2.1-2.diff.gz
tcpick_0.2.1-2.dsc
to pool/main/t/tcpick/tcpick_0.2.1-2.dsc
tcpick_0.2.1-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tcpick/tcpick_0.2.1-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL
Bug#258460: marked as done (asmem: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258460: fixed in asmem 1.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2004 19:58:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 09 12:58:22 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d001252.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [80.171.1.252] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bj1Vm-lA-00; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:58:22 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bj1Vk-0008Ib-TY; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:58:20 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: asmem: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 21:58:20 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: asmem Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'asmem' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: gcc -O2 -c read_mem.c read_mem.c: In function `read_meminfo': read_mem.c:486: error: label at end of compound statement make[1]: *** [read_mem.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/asmem-1.9' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 With the attached patch 'asmem' can be compiled using gcc-3.4. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/asmem-1.9/read_mem.c ./read_mem.c --- ../tmp-orig/asmem-1.9/read_mem.c2001-10-21 21:52:24.0 +0200 +++ ./read_mem.c2004-07-08 20:37:05.348560529 +0200 @@ -482,7 +482,6 @@ case -1 : error_handle(2, read); return -1; - default : } buf[result-1] = 0; result = sscanf(buf, %*[^\n]%*s %ld %ld %ld %ld %ld %ld\n%*s %ld %ld %ld, --- Received: (at 258460-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 21:08:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 14:08:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMtvI-00065K-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:04 -0700 From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#258460: fixed in asmem 1.9-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: asmem Source-Version: 1.9-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of asmem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: asmem_1.9-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/asmem/asmem_1.9-3.diff.gz asmem_1.9-3.dsc to pool/main/a/asmem/asmem_1.9-3.dsc asmem_1.9-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/asmem/asmem_1.9-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated asmem package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 06:24:36 +1000 Source: asmem Binary: asmem Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: asmem - memory utilization monitor with AfterStep look feel Closes: 258460 327466 Changes: asmem (1.9-3) unstable; urgency=low . * QA Group upload orphaning this package * Incorporates previous NMU (closes: #327466) . asmem (1.9-2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * BSP NMU * Fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0 due to label at end of switch
Bug#326927: marked as done (tcpick: implicitly converted pointers)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:02:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326927: fixed in tcpick 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 15:57:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 08:57:26 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from colo.lackof.org [198.49.126.79]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECfp8-0004Dv-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 08:57:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8F6298034;
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:02:56 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from colo.lackof.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (colo.lackof.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 24999-05; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:02:54 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by colo.lackof.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D52929802F;
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:02:54 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: tcpick: implicitly converted pointers
From: dann frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Mosberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:56:43 -0600
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lackof.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tcpick
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Our automated buildd log filter[1] detected a problem[2] that will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is
greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64.
[1]http://people.debian.org/~dannf/check-implicit-pointer-functions
[2]
Function `lookup' implicitly converted to pointer at display.c:91
Function `_l_alloc' implicitly converted to pointer at lookup_query.c:40
Function `_l_get' implicitly converted to pointer at lookup_query.c:58
Function `datalink2str' implicitly converted to pointer at tcpick.c:251
Function `lookup' implicitly converted to pointer at write.c:76
Function `strndup' implicitly converted to pointer at write.c:141
compile tested only patch follows...
diff -urN tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/datalink.h tcpick-0.2.1/src/datalink.h
--- tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/datalink.h1969-12-31 17:00:00.0 -0700
+++ tcpick-0.2.1/src/datalink.h 2005-09-06 09:47:00.0 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/*
+ * datalink.h -- calculates datalink offsets
+ * Part of the tcpick project
+ *
+ * Author: Francesco Stablum duskdruid @ despammed.com
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Francesco Stablum
+ * Licensed under the GPL
+ *
+ */
+
+/*
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
+ * License, or (at you option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
+ * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+ * See the GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111,
+ * USA.
+ */
+
+char *datalink2str(int dl_id);
diff -urN tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/display.c tcpick-0.2.1/src/display.c
--- tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/display.c 2004-12-31 06:53:30.0 -0700
+++ tcpick-0.2.1/src/display.c 2005-09-06 09:43:35.0 -0600
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
/* FIXME: most code is duplicated: find a better solution! */
#include tcpick.h
+#include lookup.h
#include extern.h
char *
diff -urN tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/lookup.h tcpick-0.2.1/src/lookup.h
--- tcpick-0.2.1.orig/src/lookup.h 2004-12-31 06:53:30.0 -0700
+++ tcpick-0.2.1/src/lookup.h 2005-09-06 09:55:00.0 -0600
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
* USA.
*/
+#ifndef _LOOKUP_H
+#define _LOOKUP_H
struct _l_node /* the node/leaf of the tree */
{
@@ -40,3 +42,9 @@
char * name;
struct in_addr ip;
};
+
+char
Bug#331710: marked as done (php4-lasso is uninstallable due to phpapi-20020918 dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331710: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 20:38:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 13:38:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h24-80-164-222.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.80.164.222] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMtYG-0003I9-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:38:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430C2C043; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from straylight.cyberhqz.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (straylight [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15067-01; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ninsei.internal.cyberhqz.com (ninsei.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2]) by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89350A001; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ninsei.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57B59D944202B; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php4-lasso is uninstallable due to phpapi-20020918 dependency X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 13:38:15 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: php4-lasso Severity: grave Depends: phpapi-20020918 phpapi-20020918 isn't provided by anything. phpapi-20050606 is, however. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 331710-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 21:18:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 14:18:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMu9q-Jb-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:06 -0700 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331710: fixed in lasso 0.6.3-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lasso Source-Version: 0.6.3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lasso, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lasso_0.6.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.3-3.diff.gz lasso_0.6.3-3.dsc to pool/main/l/lasso/lasso_0.6.3-3.dsc liblasso3-dev_0.6.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3-dev_0.6.3-3_i386.deb liblasso3_0.6.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/liblasso3_0.6.3-3_i386.deb php4-lasso_0.6.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/php4-lasso_0.6.3-3_i386.deb python2.3-lasso_0.6.3-3_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lasso/python2.3-lasso_0.6.3-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lasso package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 22:59:17 +0200 Source: lasso
Bug#258640: marked as done (elvis-tiny: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc')
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#258640: fixed in elvis-tiny 1.4-19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jul 2004 19:42:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 10 12:42:25 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c147245.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.147.245] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BjNjt-0007IM-00; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:42:25 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BjNjr-00086o-VI; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:42:23 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: elvis-tiny: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'malloc' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:42:23 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: elvis-tiny Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'elvis-tiny' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: In file included from system.c:23: config.h:185: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'malloc' system.c: In function `system': system.c:78: warning: passing arg 2 of `signal' from incompatible pointer type system.c: In function `rpclose': system.c:256: warning: passing arg 2 of `signal' from incompatible pointer type gcc -fsigned-char -O2 -DM_SYSV -DCRUNCH -DNO_MKEXRC -DNO_CURSORSHAPE -DNO_CHARATTR -DNO_SHOWMODE -DNO_MODELINE -DNO_OPTCOLS -DNO_DIGRAPH -DNO_ABBR -DNO_AT -DNO_SENTENCE -DNO_ERRLIST -DUSE_MKSTEMP -DUSE_SNPRINTF -c -o tio.o tio.c In file included from tio.c:13: config.h:185: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'malloc' gcc -fsigned-char -O2 -DM_SYSV -DCRUNCH -DNO_MKEXRC -DNO_CURSORSHAPE -DNO_CHARATTR -DNO_SHOWMODE -DNO_MODELINE -DNO_OPTCOLS -DNO_DIGRAPH -DNO_ABBR -DNO_AT -DNO_SENTENCE -DNO_ERRLIST -DUSE_MKSTEMP -DUSE_SNPRINTF -c -o tmp.o tmp.c In file included from tmp.c:14: config.h:185: warning: conflicting types for built-in function 'malloc' In file included from tmp.c:26: /usr/include/malloc.h:118: error: conflicting types for 'malloc' config.h:185: error: previous declaration of 'malloc' was here /usr/include/malloc.h:118: error: conflicting types for 'malloc' config.h:185: error: previous declaration of 'malloc' was here make[1]: *** [tmp.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/elvis-tiny-1.4' make: *** [build] Error 2 With the attached patch 'elvis-tiny' can be compiled using gcc-3.4. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/elvis-tiny-1.4/config.h ./config.h --- ../tmp-orig/elvis-tiny-1.4/config.h 1991-08-04 23:20:32.0 +0200 +++ ./config.h 2004-07-10 21:39:44.742474908 +0200 @@ -178,13 +178,6 @@ # define uchar unsigned char #endif -/* Some compilers prefer to have malloc declared as returning a (void *) */ -#if BSD -extern void *malloc(); -#else -extern char *malloc(); -#endif - /* Most compilers could benefit from using the register storage class */ #if 1 # define REG register --- Received: (at 258640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 21:18:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 14:18:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMu9o-J0-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:04 -0700 From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#258640: fixed in elvis-tiny 1.4-19 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: elvis-tiny Source-Version: 1.4-19 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of elvis-tiny, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: elvis-tiny_1.4-19.diff.gz to pool/main/e/elvis-tiny/elvis-tiny_1.4-19.diff.gz elvis-tiny_1.4-19.dsc to
Bug#329468: More info
Some more info on the issue: If trying to execute the failing command by hand one gets the following error message: /tmp/chroottest$ sudo chroot /tmp/chroottest/woody dpkg --force-depends --install var/cache/apt/archives/base-files_3.0.2_i386.deb var/cache/apt/archives/base-passwd_3.4.1_i386.deb dpkg: can't mmap package info file `/var/lib/dpkg/available': Invalid argument As cdebootstrap fails with nearly the same error message (s/available/status) one might suspect that it is actually a libc/kernel problem, seems to work flawlessly on my 2.4.x system Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
If I had known the proper 'process', I would have done so. Thanks for informing me now. I won't do so in the future. However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems with Debian's community being somewhat exclusive, not friendly, and welcoming. If you were me, and you received this response, would you continue participating in the Debian community? I don't appreciate your attitude although your recommendation to me file bugs would be correct. It's too bad you're 'annoyed'. wilmer 2005/10/4, Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 324268 331618 tags 324268 pending tags 331618 pending tags 297975 pending thanks On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 01:08:45AM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote: Scim-chinese is not installable since early October. Would someone out there be kind enough to provide a fix for this? This bug has already been reported but it seems like a fix is a recompile to newer libraries. Since you've seen that this bug is already reported, why don't you follow up the old bug report instead of filing a new one? I said in the reply that I'm working on it, and indeed I have prepared the new package and it's pending upload now. It's okay to ping a bug to see what is the current status, but in my opinion it's not good to intentionally file a duplicated bug. It's not that I am not responsive or anything. Annoying the maintainer gets you nowhere. Ming 2005.10.04 -- Wilmer Alberto Lau 劉 志 源 liu zhi yuan
Bug#286478: marked as done (isic: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:32:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286478: fixed in isic 0.05-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2004 13:27:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 20 05:27:11 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c219139.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.219.139]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CgNZ9-00055q-00; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 05:27:11 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CgNdq-0005gS-Sg; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:32:02 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: isic: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:32:02 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: isic
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'isic' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
gcc -o isic isic.c -Wall -W -g -O2 `libnet-config --cflags` -DSTDC_HEADERS=1
-Din_addr_t=u_int32_t `libnet-config --defines` -DVERSION=\0.05\
`libnet-config --libs`
isic.c: In function 'main':
isic.c:76: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'usage' differ in
signedness
isic.c:86: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'libnet_name_resolve' differ in signedness
isic.c:98: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'libnet_name_resolve' differ in signedness
isic.c:138: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'usage' differ in
signedness
isic.c:233: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
isic.c:235: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
isic.c:236: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
isic.c:240: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
isic.c:242: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
isic.c: In function 'usage':
isic.c:321: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'rindex' differ
in signedness
isic.c:323: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'rindex' differ
in signedness
make[1]: *** [isic] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/isic-0.05'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'isic' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/icmpsic.c ./icmpsic.c
--- ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/icmpsic.c 2000-01-25 18:35:25.0 +0100
+++ ./icmpsic.c 2004-12-20 14:29:04.714661648 +0100
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
payload = (short int *)((u_char *) icmp + 4);
for(cx = 0; cx = (payload_s 1); cx+=1)
- (u_short) payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
+ payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
if ( rand() = (RAND_MAX * ICMPCksm) )
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/isic.c ./isic.c
--- ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/isic.c2000-01-30 22:55:25.0 +0100
+++ ./isic.c2004-12-20 14:28:13.952378688 +0100
@@ -232,8 +232,8 @@
payload = (short int *)(buf + IP_H);
for(cx = 0; cx = (payload_s 1); cx+=1)
- (u_int16_t) payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
- (u_int16_t) payload[payload_s] = rand() 0x;
+ payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
+ payload[payload_s] = rand() 0x;
if ( printout ) {
printf(%s -,
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/tcpsic.c ./tcpsic.c
--- ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/tcpsic.c 2000-01-29 20:04:13.0 +0100
+++ ./tcpsic.c 2004-12-20 14:28:36.223992888 +0100
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@
payload = (short int *)((u_char *) tcp + 20);
for(cx = 0; cx = (payload_s 1); cx+=1)
- (u_int16_t) payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
+ payload[cx] = rand() 0x;
if ( rand() = (RAND_MAX * TCPCksm) )
libnet_do_checksum(buf, IPPROTO_TCP, (tcp-th_off 2)
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/isic-0.05/udpsic.c ./udpsic.c
---
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These bug reports are very confusing, I am performing my own tests to
help clarify.
Andrew Lee wrote:
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4 after a reboot.
No, VCI: none (unknown) is fine in 2.4 because 2.4 has no VCI info.
Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
# dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
# losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
The following is the results of my tests:
For all tests the following packages need to be installed:
xfsprogs jfsutils reiserfsprogs reiser4progs util-vserver
(0.30.204-5sarge2 unless otherwise noted)
Procedure is to do:
1. # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=/home/1gb.testfile
2. # losetup /dev/loop4 /home/1gb.testfile
3. # mkdir /mnt2
On 2.6 kernels the following switches were used to test:
4. # ./testfs.sh-0.09 -vv -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt2
Test 1:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian package kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch:
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-4.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
All the tests succeed on ext2/ext3/reiserfs, the following fail:
xfs: 103, 106, 113, 115, 117
jfs: 104, 114, 121, 122, 123, 124
Test 2:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian kernel-patch-vserver (debian
package version: 1.9.5.4 (not in sarge), kernel patch
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-5.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
Exactly the same as the results from Test 1
Test 3:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
ext2/ext3 failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 121, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 118, 119, 121, 122, 124
jfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121,
122, 123, 124
Note: Bertl says this is a failure with the util-vserver tools, so I
perform the test again with util-vserver .208 from unstable:
Test 4:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine. Using
util-vserver tools from unstable (0.30.208-2)
ext2/ext3 failures: 104, 106, 114, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 104, 106, 114, 118, 119, 122, 124
jfs failures: 102, 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119,
121, 122, 123, 124
Micah
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQwmG9n4qXRzy1ioRAsSXAJ9Y8qjKsK/xYDXBcYWWgrh9TC761QCfdo/0
WhPUbXCtnk/DR+RZiCL7vNs=
=39eq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329246: Another patch
Hello, Thank you very much for your message, Andree - you really deserved your vacation ;-) I had seen the bug on mindi, but I had not paid enough attention to it. So, I looked at it again and tried the patch, on both a Sarge system (on which it worked before) and a recent one (on which it didn't). Well, the patch breaks both ; but I changed it to get it to work - more details on #324302, with the new patch. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324302 If others can try and see if it works for them, that would be nice ! Thanks, Thierry -- Thierry Lathuille Annemasse, France -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298714: marked as done (nsmon: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#298714: fixed in nsmon 2.3e-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2005 13:59:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 09 05:59:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D91j2-qh-00; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:59:48 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D92fS-0006Gr-DB; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:00:10 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nsmon: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:00:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: nsmon Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'nsmon' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/nsmon-2.3e' gcc -Wall -O2 -c nsmon.c In file included from run_check.h:9, from nsmon.c:6: config.h:27: error: array type has incomplete element type In file included from run_check.h:9, from nsmon.c:6: config.h:58:7: warning: no newline at end of file In file included from nsmon.c:6: run_check.h:13:7: warning: no newline at end of file In file included from nsmon.c:7: ping_test.h:23:7: warning: no newline at end of file In file included from nsmon.c:9: port_test.h:15:7: warning: no newline at end of file nsmon.c:116:3: warning: no newline at end of file make[1]: *** [nsmon.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/nsmon-2.3e' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 With the attached patch 'nsmon' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/nsmon-2.3e/config.h ./config.h --- ../tmp-orig/nsmon-2.3e/config.h 1999-02-15 00:00:00.0 +0100 +++ ./config.h 2005-03-09 15:51:41.550886118 +0100 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ #define DEFAULT_CONFIG /etc/nsmon.conf #define VERSION 2.3e -struct checkhost hosts[20]; +struct checkhost *hosts; char LOCK_DIR[1024]; inthostnum; // Number of hosts pid_t mainpid; @@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ void read_config (/* char *configfile */); void logit(/* char *s */); -#endif \ No newline at end of file +#endif --- Received: (at 298714-close) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 23:08:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 16:08:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMvnV-0003gQ-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#298714: fixed in nsmon 2.3e-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nsmon Source-Version: 2.3e-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nsmon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nsmon_2.3e-5.dsc to pool/main/n/nsmon/nsmon_2.3e-5.dsc nsmon_2.3e-5.tar.gz to pool/main/n/nsmon/nsmon_2.3e-5.tar.gz nsmon_2.3e-5_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nsmon/nsmon_2.3e-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated nsmon package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote: However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems with Debian's community being somewhat exclusive, not friendly, and welcoming. If you were me, and you received this response, would you continue participating in the Debian community? First, I apologize if you feel my previous Email is offending you. But Debian website [1] gives clear instruction on following up bugs, to quote, under Important things to note before sending: You should check if your bug report has already been filed by someone else before submitting it. Lists of currently outstanding bugs are available on the World Wide Web and elsewhere - see other documents for details. You can submit your comments to an existing bug report #number by sending e-mail to number@bugs.debian.org 1. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting And I suppose everyone who want to participate in Debian project should read some minimal documentation first. I am not unfriendly to every newbie, I am just unfriendly to newbies that don't even bother to read documentations before asking for help. I don't appreciate your attitude Neither do I. Ming 2005.10.04 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331618: scim-chinese still not installable
Fair enough. Case closed. Looking forward to the update. 2005/10/4, Ming Hua [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:33:36PM -0700, Wilmer Lau wrote: However, you don't sound very 'welcoming' to a newbie like me to participate in the Debian process in the future. I've heard problems with Debian's community being somewhat exclusive, not friendly, and welcoming. If you were me, and you received this response, would you continue participating in the Debian community? First, I apologize if you feel my previous Email is offending you. But Debian website [1] gives clear instruction on following up bugs, to quote, under Important things to note before sending: You should check if your bug report has already been filed by someone else before submitting it. Lists of currently outstanding bugs are available on the World Wide Web and elsewhere - see other documents for details. You can submit your comments to an existing bug report #number by sending e-mail to number@bugs.debian.org 1. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting And I suppose everyone who want to participate in Debian project should read some minimal documentation first. I am not unfriendly to every newbie, I am just unfriendly to newbies that don't even bother to read documentations before asking for help. I don't appreciate your attitude Neither do I. Ming 2005.10.04 -- Wilmer Alberto Lau 劉 志 源 liu zhi yuan
Bug#331661: extensions/*.jar ship without source code, shipped jar files are installed
Matthias Klose wrote: Package: docbook-xsl Version: 1.68.1 Severity: serious The extensions contains many jar files, without having the sources in the source package, the problematic files seem to be: saxon644.jar saxon65.jar saxon651.jar saxon652.jar saxon653.jar I don't change what comes in the upstream source package. It looks like the source for saxon643.jar and xalan25.jar is provided, but they are not built during the build process. If docbook-xsl is now going to require a rebuild of the (supposedly) portable jars, then we need to rethink how to package this stuff. I'd hand it over to the java group, but they might not get the xml catalog stuff correct - it's subtle. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian XML/SGML: http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org Home Page:http://linux.duke.edu/~mark/ GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:17:27AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote: | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by | | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. | | | | This was on i386. | | Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built just | fine? | | I don't know. I'll make sure that I can reproduce the problem | tomorrow and, if I can, send you the list of packages that were used | in the build environment. After sending the mail I realized that it may just be the difference between the previous R [ my logs show I used R 2.1.1 ] whereas you will have gotten a R 2.2.0.beta.* for the R 2.2.0 release due this week. If I get a chance I'll try boot as well here. I was able to reproduce the failure. It used version 2.2.0.beta.20050929-1 of both r-base-core and r-base-dev. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#331080: FTBFS: Error checking examples
On 4 October 2005 at 08:23, Matt Kraai wrote: | On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:17:27AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | On 3 October 2005 at 21:59, Matt Kraai wrote: | | | I disabled a few of these tests on other packages formerly provided by | | | r-recommended, and I guess I need to disable it here too. | | | | | | This was on i386. | | | | Odd, so how does that square with my pbuilder logs showing that it built just | | fine? | | | | I don't know. I'll make sure that I can reproduce the problem | | tomorrow and, if I can, send you the list of packages that were used | | in the build environment. | | After sending the mail I realized that it may just be the difference between | the previous R [ my logs show I used R 2.1.1 ] whereas you will have gotten a | R 2.2.0.beta.* for the R 2.2.0 release due this week. If I get a chance I'll | try boot as well here. | | I was able to reproduce the failure. It used version | 2.2.0.beta.20050929-1 of both r-base-core and r-base-dev. Thanks for doing that. I wonder, though, how it then survives the three tests (against R stable, patched and devel -- roughly equivalent to our stable, testing and unstable) on the CRAN tests, but looking at lines 167 and 168 in http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/checkSummary.html reveals that CRAN uses boot 1.2.23 against R-devel and 1.2.22 against R-released (aka 2.1.1) and R-patched (I presume that's the release candidate). So it looks like I am guilty by having inserted boot 1.2.23 too soon. Oh well. Dirk -- Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty. -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312058: marked as done (ttf-larabie-uncommon: upgrade fails due to missing dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312058: fixed in ttf-larabie 1:20011216-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2005 07:40:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 05 00:40:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vscan03.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DepkZ-00056c-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 00:40:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85FCB601C7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:40:18 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan03.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan03.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18679-05-2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:40:18 +0800 (WST) Received: from dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au (dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.168.241]) by vscan03.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF47B60076 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:40:18 +0800 (WST) Subject: ttf-larabie-uncommon: upgrade fails due to missing dependency From: Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 X-Mutt-Fcc: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-UcWvTq1+Y2pdFcf5Dqzm Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:40:17 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --=-UcWvTq1+Y2pdFcf5Dqzm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: ttf-larabie-uncommon Version: 20011216-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When doing an upgrade on a sarge machine, I get this: Setting up ttf-larabie-uncommon (20011216-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ttf-larabie-uncommon.postinst: line 8: update-fonts-scal= e: command not found dpkg: error processing ttf-larabie-uncommon (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: ttf-larabie-uncommon E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Ack! Something bad happened while installing packages. Trying to recover: Setting up ttf-larabie-uncommon (20011216-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ttf-larabie-uncommon.postinst: line 8: update-fonts-scal= e: command not found dpkg: error processing ttf-larabie-uncommon (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: ttf-larabie-uncommon apt-file indicates that this program is located in the xutils package, please add this as a pre?depends. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (charmap=3DANSI_X3.4-1968) -- no debconf information --=20 bye, pabs http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3Dpabs%40zip.tocomaint=3Dyes --=-UcWvTq1+Y2pdFcf5Dqzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCoqxh5Sc9mGvjxCMRAiV0AJ4pU8hMz4fkkbqUHVlavB5V3D6IpQCfQAIj md7neUKIzqH5+A+IE6FuMlk= =6XYG -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-UcWvTq1+Y2pdFcf5Dqzm-- --- Received: (at 312058-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 01:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 18:38:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMy8k-0005wi-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:14 -0700 From: Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#312058: fixed in ttf-larabie 1:20011216-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#331694: marked as done (qtorrent: Can't save file; is unusable)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 18:32:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#331694: fixed in qtorrent 2.9.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 17:35:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 10:35:18 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-eri0.texas.rr.com)
[24.93.47.42]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EMqhC-0004pg-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:35:18 -0700
Received: from crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (cpe-24-160-68-181.houston.res.rr.com
[24.160.68.181])
by ms-smtp-03-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id
j94HZERZ009951
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:35:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from stonewall.crustytoothpaste.ath.cx ([192.168.2.253])
by crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with SMTP id
j94HdBi6030123;
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:39:11 GMT
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by stonewall.crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue,
4 Oct 2005 17:35:16 +
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary1102632409==
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Brian M. Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qtorrent: Can't save file; is unusable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:35:16 +
X-Virus-Scanned-By: crustytoothpaste.ath.cx, using FileScan
X-SMTP-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.2.253] [192.168.2.253]
(stonewall.crustytoothpaste.ath.cx)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 24.160.68.181
X-Scanned-By: crustytoothpaste.ath.cx, using MIMEDefang 2.53 with local filter
17.00
X-Filter-Time: 1 seconds
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===1102632409==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: qtorrent
Version: 2.9.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
The same bugs as in 330563 is also in line 138 of the same file. It doesn't do
anything with respect to asking about where to save, and is therefore quite
unusable.
You can replace the first None in that line with '', or apply the following
patch.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers experimental
APT policy: (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
(ignored: LC_ALL set to C)
Versions of packages qtorrent depends on:
ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-qt33.15-3 Qt3 bindings for Python (default v
qtorrent recommends no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBQ0K9VOWR/8lWBVPnAQPGZQf9F+HfAq+51bJ/W7owFPEeO1L4yf0YbSyh
RaUR+sZpMh6NRG1JMXsiItTs89nLVaAZIihdZjz25RCH4Zpcc9VgH3du2fYr62xx
/qL8UKSWfWHQUqn3nmZA/eUoPLQn5YVI6djn4Rbcurf/7SfIuHGgv2SbHZDIviel
LYkbUEj5UkCPuaSy902LCOfsm+gip8EGvOcV/pLQGWcd6Jv6R5W2QqV3Lzi1ZQor
HoTJz3Lsd83NdTBiBD7h/NW7StOnI8InDzXsDk7FW73UQOdv2tzd3/KKjQSUfGvD
/TMg6yfBEwz4zPgy/IjskSZvCLnkQ6cbrESrc7mv6ytB/Fiqjl6QAA==
=bgMf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--===1102632409==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=mainwin.py.diff
--- mainwin.py.orig 2005-10-04 17:33:36.0 +
+++ mainwin.py 2005-10-04 17:33:00.0 +
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
obj = self.getFilenameObj
is_dir = not obj['metainfo']['info'].has_key('length')
- dlg = QFileDialog(self.lastSave['dir'], None, self, None, True)
+ dlg = QFileDialog(self.lastSave['dir'], '', self, None, True)
dlg.setShowHiddenFiles(self.lastSave['showHidden'])
if is_dir:
Bug#307085: marked as done (davfs2: FTBFS, at least the second time)
Your message dated Tue, 04 Oct 2005 23:13:58 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Has been fixed for ages, but I forgot to close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2005 15:39:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 30 08:39:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.140.224] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DRu43-0005ro-00; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 08:39:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6766E2BC55 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (honk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00978-07 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bogon.sigxcpu.org (xdsl-195-14-220-209.netcologne.de [195.14.220.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191A92BC41 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:37:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by bogon.sigxcpu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E16F24145; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 17:36:52 +0200 From: Guido Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: davfs2: FTBFS, at least the second time Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.11 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: davfs2 Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, davfs2 fails to build from source after the first (successfull) build, to problems: - debian/rules clean calls distclean although the Makefile rule is called clean - config.status if uptodate so ./configure isn't run the second time This fixes it: --- bla/davfs2-0.2.3/debian/rules 2005-04-30 17:30:52.0 +0200 +++ davfs2-0.2.3/debian/rules 2005-04-30 17:29:16.0 +0200 @@ -34,8 +34,9 @@ dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp + rm -f config.status - -$(MAKE) distclean + -$(MAKE) clean ifneq $(wildcard /usr/share/misc/config.sub) cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub endif Cheers, -- Guido -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.6-agx0 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages davfs2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libneon24 0.24.7.dfsg-1 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libssl0.9.70.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libxml22.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 307085-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 02:12:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 19:12:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (usla.org.ar) [200.32.106.149] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMylO-8w-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:12:11 -0700 Received: from [192.168.2.151] (unknown [200.115.196.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hiperhijitus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8E579DD0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 23:21:40 -0300 (ART) Subject: Has been fixed for ages, but I forgot to close From: Luciano Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
Processed: reassigning bugs from imlib+png2 to imlib
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 285025 imlib11 Bug#285025: imlib1: CAN-2004-0817 is not fixed. Bug reassigned from package `imlib1' to `imlib11'. reassign 154690 gdk-imlib11 Bug#154690: gdk-imlib1: does not support PPMs with maxval = 1 Bug reassigned from package `gdk-imlib1' to `gdk-imlib11'. reassign 155016 imlib11 Bug#155016: xzgv: Segmentation fault with debian-logo-sm25i.bmp Bug reassigned from package `imlib1' to `imlib11'. reassign 290164 gdk-imlib11 Bug#290164: Improper copyright file Bug reassigned from package `gdk-imlib1' to `gdk-imlib11'. reassign 264931 imlib Bug#264931: FTBFS on GNU/k*BSD (update libtool) Bug reassigned from package `imlib+png2' to `imlib'. reassign 154688 gdk-imlib11 Bug#154688: gdk-imlib1: all fallbacks failed on a legal PPM Bug reassigned from package `gdk-imlib1' to `gdk-imlib11'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332199: apt-move: fails building Packages file
Package: apt-move Version: 4.2.24-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As of today, apt-move fails to build the packages file. It worked yesterday. There are two packages starting with xfce4-syst but none named that, so it appears something is trunkating a package name. munge:/play/debian# apt-move packages Creating Packages files... Building: unstable dists/unstable/contrib/binary-i386 Packages Building: unstable dists/unstable/contrib/binary-sparc Packages Building: unstable dists/unstable/main/binary-i386 Packages getline failed on .apt-move/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/.index/../../../../../pool/main/x/xfce4-syst Unknown error: dopackages: 1. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages apt-move depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.41 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii ash 0.5.2-7Compatibility package for the Debi ii bc1.06-17The GNU bc arbitrary precision cal ii dash 0.5.2-7The Debian Almquist Shell ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages apt-move recommends: ii apt 0.6.41 Advanced front-end for dpkg -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
