Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo
Could somebody explain the security implication for me? being able to write arbitrary strings into valid records without overwriting any other data in utmp/wtmp can hardly be classified as a security vulnerability. (Apart from that, I'm only slightly annoyed as I had to learn about this via MITRE / GNOME Bugzilla instead of a mail from the maintainer to the security team?) Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332328: marked as done (gnunet-gtk_0.7.0-1 (unstable): fails to build)
Your message dated Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332328: fixed in gnunet-gtk 0.7.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 21:30:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 14:30:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENGqk-0007bw-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:30:54 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70F411820E; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:30:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:30:46 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnunet-gtk_0.7.0-1 (unstable): fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnunet-gtk Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gnunet-gtk_0.7.0-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: gnunet (= 0.7.0-1), debhelper (= 4.1.16), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.6.0-1), libglade2-dev,libextractor-dev (= 0.5.4-1) [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-1 g++-4.0_4.0.2-1 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-1 libstdc++6_4.0.2-1 [...] mkdir .libs s390-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../intl -I../../src/include -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wall -g -O2 -MT helper.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/helper.Tpo -c helper.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/helper.o /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link s390-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wall -g -O2 -L/usr/lib -o libgnunetgtk_common.la -rpath /usr/lib -export-dynamic -lltdl-lm -lnsl -version-info 0:0:0 helper.lo -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lglade-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lxml2 -lz -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -lgnunetutil -lgthread-2.0 -lm -lnsl s390-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/helper.o -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libltdl.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lz /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgnunetutil.so /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lm -lnsl -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgnunetgtk_common.so.0 -o .libs/libgnunetgtk_common.so.0.0.0 (cd .libs rm -f libgnunetgtk_common.so.0 ln -s libgnunetgtk_common.so.0.0.0 libgnunetgtk_common.so.0) (cd .libs rm -f libgnunetgtk_common.so ln -s libgnunetgtk_common.so.0.0.0 libgnunetgtk_common.so) creating libgnunetgtk_common.la /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgcrypt.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgcrypt.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[4]: *** [libgnunetgtk_common.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnunet-gtk-0.7.0/src/common' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnunet-gtk-0.7.0/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive]
Bug#332564: FTBFS: Could not create a task or type of type junit
Hi Matt, hi Trygve, Matt Kraai wrote: Package: commons-io Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious commons-io fails to build because it cannot create a task or type of type junit: internal-test: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/buildd/commons-io-1.0/target/test-reports BUILD FAILED /tmp/buildd/commons-io-1.0/build.xml:80: Could not create task or type of type: junit. Looking at the diff.gz there is ant-optional missing from build-depends. @Trygve Remember the latest ant reorganization made a clean cut between core and optional tasks - and junit is an optional task. Further I ask me why you have build-deps on classpath and libgcj6 but definitly building the package with kaffe ? Regards, Wolfgang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332434: storebackup: Several security problems (already fixed in sid/testing)
Arthur Korn wrote: Hi 1.19-1 source and binary packages work on stable, and the differences to 1.18.4-2 are all local bugfixes, so I figure it doesn't make any sense to separate bugfixes from bugfixes for a special security fix for stable. Well, we could split out Since the diff between 1.18 and 1.19 is some 1385 lines large, I have some doubts that it only contains security corrections. Hence, using the new upstream version does not look like the way to go. Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
On Thursday 06 October 2005 17:49, Eric Blake wrote: Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14619 (project findutils): I don't think the original poster has discovered any bugs, rather just their misunderstanding of the (admittedly confusing) POSIX requirements. I just read the man-page, where it says: -perm mode File's permission bits are exactly mode (octal or symbolic). Since an exact match is required, if you want to use this form for symbolic modes, you may have to specify a rather complex mode string. For example '-perm g=w' will only match files which have mode 0020 (that is, ones for which group write per- mission is the only permission set). It is more likely that you will want to use the '+' or '-' forms, for example '-perm -g=w', which matches any file with group write permission. See the EXAMPLES section for some illustrative examples. -perm -mode All of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic modes are accepted in this form, and this is usually the way in which would want to use them. You must specify 'u', 'g' or 'o' if you use a symbolic mode.See the EXAMPLES section for some illustra- tive examples. -perm +mode Any of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic modes are accepted in this form. You must specify 'u', 'g' or 'o' if you use a symbolic mode. See the EXAMPLES section for some illustrative exam- ples. And at least for my limited (non-native) understanding of english this ain't the same as the (not clearly written) POSIX-standard. So maybe it's not find, but it's man-page which should be changed? Perhaps having a few examples and a better explanation? Thank you! Regards, Phil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329686: FTBFS: fails to detect libkrb5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329686 libkrb53 Bug#329686: FTBFS: fails to detect libkrb5 Bug reassigned from package `postgresql-8.1' to `libkrb53'. retitle 329686 libkrb53: linker error on powerpc makes depending packages FTBFS Bug#329686: FTBFS: fails to detect libkrb5 Changed Bug title. severity 329686 critical Bug#329686: libkrb53: linker error on powerpc makes depending packages FTBFS Severity set to `critical'. tag 329686 - experimental Bug#329686: libkrb53: linker error on powerpc makes depending packages FTBFS Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332582: qbankmanager: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2
Package: qbankmanager Version: 0.9.29-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On statring qbankmanager I get the error message: qbankmanager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libaqbanking.so.0: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-mywin4lin Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages qbankmanager depends on: ii libaqbanking0c2 1.5.99+1.6.0beta-1 library for online banking applica ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libgwenhywfar17c2 1.18.0-1 OS abstraction layer ii libqbanking1 1.5.99+1.6.0beta-1 QT frontend library for AqBanking ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 qbankmanager recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329384: CAN numbers
Hi! The symlink attack on the xferfax$$ temporary file is CAN-2005-3069. The does not create or verify ownership of the UNIX domain socket vulnerability is CAN-2005-3070. Please mention these numbers in the changelog when you fix this. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332459 + fixed pending Bug#332459: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332588: chromium - fails to build
Package: chromium Version: 0.9.12-10 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of chromium_0.9.12-10 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] g++ -c -pipe `/usr/bin/sdl-config --cflags` -DUSE_SDL `/usr/bin/smpeg-config --cflags` -O2 -DAUDIO_OPENAL -D_REENTRANT -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/share/games/chromium/\ -I/usr/X11R6/include -o AudioOpenAL.o AudioOpenAL.cpp AudioOpenAL.cpp: In member function 'void AudioOpenAL::checkForExtensions()': AudioOpenAL.cpp:314: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'const ALubyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp:314: error: initializing argument 1 of 'void* alGetProcAddress(const ALubyte*)' AudioOpenAL.cpp:322: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'const ALubyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp:322: error: initializing argument 1 of 'void* alGetProcAddress(const ALubyte*)' AudioOpenAL.cpp:324: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'const ALubyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp:324: error: initializing argument 1 of 'void* alGetProcAddress(const ALubyte*)' AudioOpenAL.cpp:332: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'const ALubyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp:332: error: initializing argument 1 of 'void* alGetProcAddress(const ALubyte*)' AudioOpenAL.cpp:335: error: invalid conversion from 'const char*' to 'const ALubyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp:335: error: initializing argument 1 of 'void* alGetProcAddress(const ALubyte*)' AudioOpenAL.cpp: In member function 'void AudioOpenAL::loadSounds()': AudioOpenAL.cpp:486: error: invalid const_cast from type 'const char*' to type 'ALbyte*' AudioOpenAL.cpp: In member function 'bool AudioOpenAL::loadWAV(const char*)': AudioOpenAL.cpp:852: error: invalid const_cast from type 'const char*' to type 'ALbyte*' make[2]: *** [AudioOpenAL.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/chromium-0.9.12/src' make[1]: *** [src] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/chromium-0.9.12' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332434: storebackup: Several security problems (already fixed in sid/testing)
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
1.19-1 source and binary packages work on stable, and the
differences to 1.18.4-2 are all local bugfixes, so I figure it
doesn't make any sense to separate bugfixes from bugfixes for a
special security fix for stable. Well, we could split out
storeBackupSync, though that new script is explicitely marked as
experimental.
Security fixes for stable are typically minimal.
I've extracted the patches from the new upstream version.
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-3146
seems fixed by the newly introduced checkDelSymlink() function,
which was added to ten different places in the code (not all of which
might be security sensitive, but at least two operate directly
on temporary files).
This does not eliminate the vulnerability but only shortens the vulnerable
window. An attacker can still re-create the link between the unlink()
and the open() calls. The proper action would be to use File::Temp
or something similar.
I'm not sure about
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-3148,
which would require some more studying of the code.
It's the chown call.
It seems that the old version executed chown uid gid link which doesn't
work. The new version executes chown -h uid:gid link. My manpage doesn't
document -h though.
Regards,
Joey
--
Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
diff -u -p -Nr --exclude CVS storebackup-1.18.4.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl
storebackup-1.18.4/bin/storeBackup.pl
--- storebackup-1.18.4.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl 2004-07-23 05:58:47.0
+0200
+++ storebackup-1.18.4/bin/storeBackup.pl 2005-10-07 09:32:59.0
+0200
@@ -4819,6 +4819,7 @@ sub new
if ($self-{'debug'} == 0 or $self-{'debug'} == 1)
{
local *FILE;
+ ::checkDelSymLink($self-{'tmpfile'}, $prLog, 0x01);
open(FILE, . $self-{'tmpfile'}) or
$prLog-print('-kind' = 'E',
'-str' =
@@ -4933,6 +4934,7 @@ sub new
my $tmpfile = $self-{'tmpDir'} . /storeBackup-dirs.$$;
$self-{'tmpfile'} = $tmpfile;
local *FILE;
+::checkDelSymLink($tmpfile, $prLog, 0x01);
open(FILE, $tmpfile) or
$prLog-print('-kind' = 'E',
'-str' = [cannot open $tmpfile, exiting],
diff -u -p -Nr --exclude CVS storebackup-1.18.4.orig/lib/fileDir.pl
storebackup-1.18.4/lib/fileDir.pl
--- storebackup-1.18.4.orig/lib/fileDir.pl 2004-07-23 05:58:47.0
+0200
+++ storebackup-1.18.4/lib/fileDir.pl 2005-10-07 09:33:42.0 +0200
@@ -28,6 +28,46 @@ require 'forkProc.pl';
use strict;
+# checks if a file is a symlink and deletes it if wanted
+# return values (if not exiting):
+# 0: no symlink
+# -1: found symlink
+
+sub checkDelSymLink
+{
+my $file = shift; # name of the file
+my $prLog = shift;
+my $delExit = shift;# set bits:
+# bit 0: 0 = do not delete
+# 1 = delete synlink
+# if not possible, exit
+# bit 1: 0 = do not exit (if exists)
+# 1 = exit
+
+return 0 unless -l $file;
+
+if ($delExit 0x02)
+{
+ $prLog-print('-kind' = 'E',
+ '-str' =
+ [found symbolic link at $file, exiting ],
+ '-exit' = 1);
+}
+
+if ($delExit 0x01)
+{
+ $prLog-print('-kind' = 'W',
+ '-str' = [unlinking symbolic link $file]);
+ unlink $file or
+ $prLog-print('-kind' = 'E',
+ '-str' = [cannot unlink $file, exiting],
+ '-exit' = 1);
+}
+
+return -1;
+}
+
+
sub splitFileDir
{
--- storebackup-1.18.4/bin/storeBackup.pl 2004-07-23 05:58:47.0
+0200
+++ storebackup-1.19/bin/storeBackup.pl 2005-08-12 21:11:18.0 +0200
@@ -3164,6 +3183,7 @@
[cannot create $aktDir, exiting],
'-exit' = 1)
unless (mkdir $aktDir);
+chmod 0755, $aktDir;
my $chmodDir = $chmodMD5File;
$chmodDir |= 0100 if $chmodDir 0400;
$chmodDir |= 0010 if $chmodDir 0040;
diff -Nur storebackup-1.18.4.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl
storebackup-1.19.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl
--- storebackup-1.18.4.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl 2004-07-23 05:58:47.0
+0200
+++ storebackup-1.19.orig/bin/storeBackup.pl2005-08-12 21:11:18.0
+0200
@@ -3606,7 +3626,7 @@
# geaendert, sondern die Datei, auf die er verweist.
# (dann muss lchown genommen werden - Inkompatibilitaeten!?)
my $chown = forkProc-new('-exec' = 'chown',
-
Bug#332582: qbankmanager: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2
Hi Elmar, thank you for your interest in qbankmanager and your bug report. Unfortunately, I'm unable to reproduce the problem. To be 100% certain that we're using the same version of libgwenhywfar, I'd like you do some basic checks with me. Elmar Haneke wrote: On statring qbankmanager I get the error message: qbankmanager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libaqbanking.so.0: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 This symbol is provided by /usr/bin/libgwenhywfar.so.17 in package libgwenhywfar17c2. Can you please send me the output of objdump -T /usr/lib/libgwenhywfar.so.17.18.0 md5sum /usr/lib/libgwenhywfar.so.17 Mine contains 00049450 gDF .text 002d Base GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 for the first and the md5sum is b48a0d7191ba842238a2e7727bb01cae Also, I'd be interested in the output of ldd /usr/lib/libaqbanking.so.0 Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, qbankmanager Debian Maintainer, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332591: libsndfile1-dev - laks dependency against libflac-dev
Package: libsndfile1-dev Version: 1.0.12-2 Severity: grave libsndfile1-dev lacks a dependency against libflac-dev to fullfill the availability of /usr/lib/libFLAC.la which is referenced in /usr/lib/libsndfile.la. Bastian -- Virtue is a relative term. -- Spock, Friday's Child, stardate 3499.1 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo
Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: Could somebody explain the security implication for me? You can record in the utmp/wtmp logs something which is wrong, for example that an user is currently connected to a display while he isn't. I'm not the one to argue with though. being able to write arbitrary strings into valid records without overwriting any other data in utmp/wtmp can hardly be classified as a security vulnerability. I have no idea, I'll let you judge of such things. Since gnome-pty-helper seemed to have some special permission to write to utmp (because it is sgid), I took the problem seriously. Whether this issue is to be considered a security vulnerability or not, I couldn't tell for sure, and in doubt I selected security, but I agree that it's a minor issue anyway. (Apart from that, I'm only slightly annoyed as I had to learn about this via MITRE / GNOME Bugzilla instead of a mail from the maintainer to the security team?) For my defense (as I am the one which followed more or less this bug), I'd claim that a/ this was reported against a GNOME 1 package (and it was later discovered that the GNOME 2 package is affected too) which was in the process of being orphaned, b/ this seemed like a very minor issue, c/ I thought you were tracking tags + security bugs, and d/ I didn't want to start bothering the security team for an issue not discussed with upstream and without any patch. Of course, there's also e/ I don't have any security background or training, but that's obvious. My usual way of handling of sec bugs is i/ tag the bug security, connect the relevant CVE ids, upstream bugs, available patches, ii/ talk with upstream, check the affected versions, check the patch causes no regression, check the patch applies everywhere, check the patch fixes the issue iii/ proposed a diff to the security team. I know realize I should have contacted the security team quite immediately, and will do so in the future. I have more important things to track right now that this vulnerability, and I didn't have any response from upstream yet. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332593: libgalago - build-depends against unavailable package
Package: libgalago Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libgalago_0.3.3-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: autotools-dev, autoconf (= 2.53), automake, libtool (= 1.4), gettext (= 0.11.5), libdbus-glib-1-dev (= 0.23.0) | dbus-glib-1-dev (= 0.23.1-1.1), devscripts, debhelper (= 4.0.0), libglib2.0-dev (= 2.2.0) [...] E: Couldn't find package libdbus-glib-1-dev libdbus-glib-1-dev is only available in experimental. % madison libdbus-glib-1-dev libdbus-glib-1-dev | 0.50-1 | experimental | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332434: storebackup: Several security problems (already fixed in sid/testing)
Martin Schulze wrote:
I'm not sure about
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-3148,
which would require some more studying of the code.
It's the chown call.
It seems that the old version executed chown uid gid link which doesn't
work. The new version executes chown -h uid:gid link. My manpage doesn't
document -h though.
Sounds correct, my manpage says:
-h, --no-dereference
affect each symbolic link instead of any referenced file (useful only on
systems that can change the ownership of a symlink)
However, I think that this hunk is missing for CAN-2005-3148:
diff -Naur storebackup-1.18.4/bin/storeBackupRecover.pl
storebackup-1.19/bin/storeBackupRecover.pl
--- storebackup-1.18.4/bin/storeBackupRecover.pl2005-10-06
17:37:09.0 +0200
+++ storebackup-1.19/bin/storeBackupRecover.pl 2005-10-06 17:36:32.0
+0200
@@ -364,7 +371,7 @@
# geaendert, sondern die Datei, auf die er verweist.
# (dann muss lchown genommen werden - Inkompatibilitaeten!?)
my $chown = forkProc-new('-exec' = 'chown',
- '-param' = [$uid, $gid,
+ '-param' = ['-h', $uid:$gid,
$targetFile],
'-outRandom' = $tmpdir/chown-,
'-prLog' = $prLog);
Otherwise permissions might be incorrectly restored.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
Le Mercredi 05 Octobre 2005 23:43, vous avez écrit :
On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote:
According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in
mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a
pbuilder chroot created just today:
There is no mysql-dfsg 4.0 in Debian unstable anymore, it has been
superceeded by mysql-dfsg-4.1 (the existing packages are only left for the
shared library, the server/client packages exist with 4.1 version numbers
from the new package, too).
The results of running apt-cache showsrc mysql-dfsg disagree with you here.
Anyway, my understanding is that having packages in unstable which cannot be
built from source is a serious policy violation and must be fixed. It would
also be good to have a new upload anyway removing the superceded
mysql-{client,server,common} packages from the source package.
By the way, the libmysqlclient12-dev package is still in unstable, too, and
lots of packages still Build-Depend on it. Do you consider that such
packages must be recompiled against newer libraries, or is that only
something that would be nice?
Anyway, I'm not going to play BTS tug-of-war here, but I still disagree with
the bug being closed. I'm CC'ing debian-release to get a more official
opinion on this.
(If this message too ends up showing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the
sender, ignore that and use the address below -- that dynamic DNS entry is
only available 8 hours a day on weekdays. I think I have things set up right
now, but I'm not completely sure.)
--
Daniel Schepler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332531: Bug still not solved
reopen 332531 -- As I can see here: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mediawikiver=1.4.11-1arch=s390stamp=1128652949file=logas=raw This problem still occurs at least during buildd Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 325978
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 325978 + patch pending Bug#325978: FTBFS: orbit2cpp9c2_1.3.9-1.1 (arm/unstable): Internal compiler error Tags were: patch Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 286146, tagging 317195
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 286146 + patch pending Bug#286146: freqtweak: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'FTprocI*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision Tags were: patch Tags added: patch, pending tags 317195 + patch pending Bug#317195: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required Tags were: sid Tags added: patch, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug not solved
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 332531 Bug#332531: mediawiki_1.4.10-1 (unstable): fails to build Bug reopened, originator not changed. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo
Joey, Could somebody explain the security implication for me? being able to write arbitrary strings into valid records without overwriting any other data in utmp/wtmp can hardly be classified as a security vulnerability. It depends on what trust you place in the correctness of utmp/wtmp. Knowing that records are often left behind (not cleaned up or closed), you may have grown to regard them as useless data. However in that case they should be abandoned: getting rid of many setuid/setgid objects, improving security. (Records left behind may be regarded as a security issue: how do you know when all users are off and it is safe to reboot?) Some people would like to rely on utmp/wtmp correctness. If I see user X doing something funny: do I run to office A or office B? Some academics (foolishly?) like to allocate participation marks (attendance records) to students in their tutorial: based on utmp/wtmp, that is surely useless. When allowing users access to USB sticks on their thin client terminals, how do I know if they own (are logged in to) that particular terminal: run xhost and check return status, wasting resources... As I commented elsewhere, I do not think any Debian utilities ever use utmp/wtmp. Are you then at freedom to abandon them? Viewed another way: users are not meant to be able to write fake utmp/wtmp records. But they can. Anything that users can do, without authority, is a security issue. Any unexpected behaviour is a potential security issue. (Apart from that, I'm only slightly annoyed as I had to learn about this via MITRE / GNOME Bugzilla instead of a mail from the maintainer to the security team?) Would I have been allowed to contact the security team directly? Are not all security-tagged bug reports monitored, as a matter of course? (Are they knowledgeable to advise on your questions above?) Cheers, Paul Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/ School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329156: gnome-pty-helper foo
severity 329156 normal thanks dude Loïc Minier wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: Could somebody explain the security implication for me? You can record in the utmp/wtmp logs something which is wrong, for example that an user is currently connected to a display while he isn't. I'm not the one to argue with though. Ok, so unless somebody proves us wrong we don't consider this a security problem. Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
Processed: Re: gnome-pty-helper foo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329156 normal Bug#329156: [CAN-2005-0023] /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper: writes arbitrary utmp records Severity set to `normal'. thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332582: marked as done (qbankmanager: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:42:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Submitter had broken libs in /usr/local has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 07:37:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 00:37:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail2.onit4u.de (linsrv2.onit4u.de) [213.133.112.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENmnK-0003pH-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:37:31 -0700 Received: from sieve (p5088CA96.dip.t-dialin.net [80.136.202.150]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by linsrv2.onit4u.de (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id j977XXb14699 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:33:33 +0200 Received: from elmar ([192.168.1.250] ident=foobar) by sieve with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ENmn2-0004uX-Cl; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:37:12 +0200 Received: from elmar by elmar with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ENmn6-0007FT-BV; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:37:16 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Elmar Haneke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: qbankmanager: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:37:16 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-haneke.de-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-haneke.de-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (Wertung=-2.683, benoetigt 4, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 0.14) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: qbankmanager Version: 0.9.29-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On statring qbankmanager I get the error message: qbankmanager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libaqbanking.so.0: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-mywin4lin Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages qbankmanager depends on: ii libaqbanking0c2 1.5.99+1.6.0beta-1 library for online banking applica ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libgwenhywfar17c2 1.18.0-1 OS abstraction layer ii libqbanking1 1.5.99+1.6.0beta-1 QT frontend library for AqBanking ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.5-1 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 qbankmanager recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 332582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 09:42:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 02:42:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from server.beamnet.de [62.75.155.124] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENok7-g7-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 02:42:19 -0700 Received: from [192.168.178.23] (p54A0A4C5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.160.164.197]) (sasl authenticated) by server.beamnet.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA552316117 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:40:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:42:20 +0200 From: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: beamNet User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Submitter had broken libs in /usr/local X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 0.9.29-1 No bug. Unfortunately the submitter obmitted a CC to the bug in his confirmation that his local
Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
Hello On 2005-10-07 Daniel Schepler wrote: Le Mercredi 05 Octobre 2005 23:43, vous avez écrit : On 2005-10-04 Daniel Schepler wrote: According to the bug log, you thought you'd fixed the FTBFS in mysql-dfsg, but I can still reproduce it in version 4.0.24-10 using a pbuilder chroot created just today: There is no mysql-dfsg 4.0 in Debian unstable anymore, it has been superceeded by mysql-dfsg-4.1 (the existing packages are only left for the shared library, the server/client packages exist with 4.1 version numbers from the new package, too). The results of running apt-cache showsrc mysql-dfsg disagree with you here. For the users' point of view it has been superceeded, from the technical one it is still there as it provides libmysqlclient12. Once mysql-dfsg-4.1 has been installed in testing (needs to be built on sparc) and debian-release has not too much to do with other transitions I will ask the other maintainers to switch to libmysqlclient14 (from 4.1). Anyway, I'm not going to play BTS tug-of-war here, but I still disagree with the bug being closed. I'm CC'ing debian-release to get a more official opinion on this. You could have got that from me, too :) Anyway, as I hopefully have made the situation a bit clearer now, let's just agree that the bug should not be closed now but that I will not spend my time on fixing it, too, as it'll be obsolete soon :-) bye, -christian-
Processed: Fixed in NMU of aime 0.60.3-7.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 292953 + fixed Bug#292953: aime: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit specialization of 'LinkedNodeTYPE::LinkedNode(TYPE*)' must be introduced by 'template ' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 324537 + fixed Bug#324537: aime: wrong link in copyright file There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332446: FTBFS: libmagick transition
Luk Claes wrote: Package: animal Severity: serious Version: 0.14.3-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev instead of libmagick6-dev Cheers Luk I will take care of that after my holidays, NMUs are okay. Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#332522: libavg_0.2.0-1 (unstable): fails to build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 332522 wishlist Bug#332522: libavg_0.2.0-1 (unstable): fails to build Severity set to `wishlist'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332526: siptoolbox_0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 (unstable): build-depends against removed package
Bastian Blank wrote: libmagick6-dev was replaced by libmagick9-dev and removed some days ago. That must wait until after my holidays, but NMUs are okay. Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#173082: Refil Now
Your Discounted ambien Refill is now Available Please confrm http://mwk.cidk.com/p/salescsvmgm Customer #: 629494135 Re-Fill #: 985598 User Name : [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dxx.cidk.com/p/salesaaifpk
Processed: Re: PHP License for PEAR packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 331418 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 Bug#331418: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug 331418 cloned as bugs 332606-332618. reassign -1 php-auth Bug#332606: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-auth'. retitle -1 php-auth: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332606: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -2 php-date Bug#332607: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-date'. retitle -2 php-date: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332607: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -3 php-db Bug#332608: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-db'. retitle -3 php-db: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332608: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -4 php-file Bug#332609: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-file'. retitle -4 php-file: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332609: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -5 php-html-template-it Bug#332610: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-html-template-it'. retitle -5 php-html-template-it: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP Bug#332610: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. License Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign -6 php-http Bug#332611: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-http'. retitle -6 php-http: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332611: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -7 php-imlib Bug#332612: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-imlib'. retitle -7 php-imlib: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332612: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -8 php-mail Bug#332613: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-mail'. retitle -8 php-mail: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332613: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -9 php-net-checkip Bug#332614: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-net-checkip'. retitle -9 php-net-checkip: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP Bug#332614: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. License Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign -10 php-net-smtp Bug#332615: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-net-smtp'. retitle -10 php-net-smtp: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License Bug#332615: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. reassign -11 php-net-socket Bug#332616: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-net-socket'. retitle -11 php-net-socket: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP Bug#332616: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. License Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign -12 php-services-weather Bug#332617: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Bug reassigned from package `php4-pear-log' to `php-services-weather'. retitle -12 php-services-weather: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP Bug#332617: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free The PHP License, version 2.02 Changed Bug title. License Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign -13 php-xml-parser Bug#332618: php4-pear-log: ELICENSE - licensed under non-free
Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
package mysql-dfsg reopen 319042 Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] tag 319042 + wontfix thanks Le Vendredi 07 Octobre 2005 11:45, vous avez écrit : You could have got that from me, too :) Anyway, as I hopefully have made the situation a bit clearer now, let's just agree that the bug should not be closed now but that I will not spend my time on fixing it, too, as it'll be obsolete soon :-) OK, based on this I'm reopening the bug (changing the submitter to myself while I'm at it) and tagging it wontfix. -- Daniel Schepler
Processed: bogus bug. not found
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 332582 0.9.29-1 Bug#332582: qbankmanager: undefined symbol: GWEN_NetTransportSSL_SetAskAddCertFn2 Bug marked as not found in version 0.9.29-1. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#319042: mysql-dfsg still FTBFS for me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package mysql-dfsg Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mysql-dfsg reopen 319042 Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include asm/atomic.h fails from C++ due to function parameter called new Bug reopened, originator set to Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]. tag 319042 + wontfix Bug#319042: linux-kernel-headers: #include asm/atomic.h fails from C++ due to function parameter called new There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
Package: exult Version: 1.2-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of exult_1.2-5 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), dpatch, flex, bison, libsdl1.2-dev (= 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1), libsdl-mixer1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, timidity, libgimp2.0-dev, libglade2-dev, zlib1g-dev, libpng12-dev, autoconf, automake1.4, libtool, libx11-dev Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: libgimp1.2-dev (= 1.2.0), libglade0-dev, libglib1.2-dev (= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2-dev (= 1.2.10-4), libxml-dev (= 1:1.8.14-3) [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2 g++-4.0_4.0.2-2 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-2 libstdc++6_4.0.2-2 -- dpkg-source: extracting exult in exult-1.2 +--+ | sbuild Warning: | | --- | | After unpacking, there exists a file debian/files with the contents: | | | | exult_0.98rc1-1_i386.deb contrib/games extra | | exult-tools_0.98rc1-1_i386.deb contrib/games extra | | | | This should be reported as a bug.| | The file has been removed to avoid dpkg-genchanges errors. | +--+ gcc-3.3 -I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/include/gimp-2.0 -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -o ./u7shp u7shp.c -L/usr/lib -lgimpui-2.0 -lgimpwidgets-2.0 -lgimp-2.0 -lgimpcolor-2.0 -lgimpmath-2.0 -lgimpbase-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 /usr/bin/gimptool-2.0: line 327: exec: gcc-3.3: not found make[3]: *** [u7shp] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/exult-1.2/mapedit' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/exult-1.2' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/exult-1.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Two bugs: - Uses gcc-3.3 without declaring a dependency against it. - clean don't properly clean the sources. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332625: cpqarrayd - fails to build
Package: cpqarrayd Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of cpqarrayd_2.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, libsnmp9-dev touch unpack-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. autoconf make: autoconf: Command not found make: *** [config.status] Error 127 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332630: mozart - fails to build
Package: mozart Version: 1.3.1.20040616-11 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mozart_1.3.1.20040616-11 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] make all \ OZC=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/boot-ozc.sh \ OZENGINE=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/oze.sh \ OZINIT=Init.ozf \ OZ_LIB=. \ OZ_LOAD=root=.:prefix=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib/:prefix=/=/:prefix=./=./:all=.:all=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/platform/emulator/:= make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib' /build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/boot-ozc.sh -z 9 -DSITE_PROPERTY -l Base=/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/Base.ozf -b /build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib/ -c /build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/mozart/share/lib/sp/Error.oz -o Error.ozf *** error while reporting error *** original exception: system(module(notFound load 'x-oz://system/Error.ozf')) *** error while reporting error *** original exception: failure(debug:d(info:[tell(,,,)] stack:[entry(,,,)])) *** error while reporting error *** original exception: error(kernel(noElse '/home/kost/compile/build-1.3.0/updates/mozart/share/lib/ap/Application.oz' 753 'export') debug:d(info:unit stack:[entry(,,,) entry(,,,)])) *** error while reporting error *** original exception: error(kernel(type '.' [P/2 Space.is getInstructionSizes _optimized] 'Record or Chunk' 1 nil) debug:d(info:unit stack:[entry(,,,)])) make[5]: *** [Error.ozf] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib' make[4]: *** [boot-all] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib' make[3]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share/lib' make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD/share' make[1]: *** [bootstrap] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozart-1.3.1.20040616/BUILD' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332631: pppstatus crashes with segfault
Package: pppstatus Version: 0.4.2-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 on my ibook pppconfig segfaults on start with Segmentation fault greetings Wolfgang - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages pppstatus depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand pppstatus recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBQ0ROHx/d62jpf6fsAQIipwf+NM/EwXRR/9e7AupJNvAJozDAcgzdvAzo WzRvdRYIu8hPk9I8ZjSvWm1rll6cCbHJPwatGJM2ZVTMe0W5AgVMeD5B4AwUK07y E6293R0GLsrYoRFeY2PO4/8ztSALtl+3XhOK7vTlSIOU/m9mpv3UVe/YW3cFBUQh bq7jyQRjW9L+sSSxgDYX5aflpehJGDFdP7w6oWFvj+uTLdRCBiA1Pws3xAiW2AcR 7nuT/mN/Xg3KesRNDW/KlknxxApBKNwrVs3u9ue/7kRbbkgXzm05bPPa2IuyrsFb d1sI4TBPMwgY1D9hVEUY3DJK/hM4nRUCgdsdAEeHx7B4lCJRe4jQDg== =xfeo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328440: libc6/NIS broken with bash/ksh/tcsh/sash
I have been following this somewhat closely as it is affecting me as well. One thing I have tried is logging in as a user, unlike Alexander. I get the same error as he is getting: User jka is a member of the netgroup leonard, which has an entry in /etc/passwd. Via su: teuber:~# su - jka -su: nss_nis/nis-netgrp.c:79: _nss_nis_setnetgrent: Assertion `malloc_usable_size (netgrp-data) = len + 1' failed. teuber:~# Via ssh: teuber:~# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Linux teuber 2.6.8-2-686-smp #1 SMP Thu May 19 17:27:55 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Last login: Thu Oct 6 16:08:40 2005 from localhost -bash: nss_nis/nis-netgrp.c:79: _nss_nis_setnetgrent: Assertion `malloc_usable_size (netgrp-data) = len + 1' failed. Connection to localhost closed. teuber:~# In both cases, the shell for user jka is /bin/bash. Debian package versions follow: libc6 2.3.5-6 nis3.14-2 bash 3.0-15 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332531: Bug pending.
tags 332531 pending -- This bug will be fixed in next upload.. Romain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug pending.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332531 pending Bug#332531: mediawiki_1.4.10-1 (unstable): fails to build There were no tags set. Tags added: pending -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#287374: marked as done (lde: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'daylight' follows non-static declaration)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 05:47:11 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#287374: fixed in lde 2.6.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2004 12:21:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 27 04:21:11 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c156115.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.156.115]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cits6-0004LP-00; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 04:21:10 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CitxD-0003cO-4N; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:26:27 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lde: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'daylight' follows
non-static declaration
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:26:27 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lde
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'lde' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
cnews/getdate.y:19: error: static declaration of 'daylight' follows
non-static declaration /usr/include/time.h:287: error: previous
declaration of 'daylight' was here cnews/getdate.y:159: error: static
declaration of 'timeconv' follows non-static declaration
cnews/getdate.y:123: error: previous declaration of 'timeconv' was here
cnews/getdate.y:193: error: static declaration of 'daylcorr' follows
non-static declaration cnews/getdate.y:179: error: previous declaration
of 'daylcorr' was here cnews/getdate.y:427: error: static declaration of
'lookup' follows non-static declaration cnews/getdate.y:238: error:
previous implicit declaration of 'lookup' was here make[3]: ***
[getdate.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/lde-2.6.0/src/swiped'
make[2]: *** [swiped.a] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory
`/lde-2.6.0/src' make[1]: *** [dummy.src] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving
directory `/lde-2.6.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'lde' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/lde-2.6.0/src/swiped/cnews/getdate.y
./src/swiped/cnews/getdate.y
--- ../tmp-orig/lde-2.6.0/src/swiped/cnews/getdate.y2004-12-27
13:17:51.284746320 +0100
+++ ./src/swiped/cnews/getdate.y2004-12-27 13:17:46.808426824 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
static int timeflag, zoneflag, dateflag, dayflag, relflag;
static time_t relsec, relmonth;
- static int hh, mm, ss, merid, daylight;
+ static int hh, mm, ss, merid, daylight_s;
static int dayord, dayreq;
static int month, day, year;
static int ourzone;
@@ -57,19 +57,19 @@
{hh = $1; mm = $3; merid = $4;}
| NUMBER ':' NUMBER NUMBER
{hh = $1; mm = $3; merid = 24;
- daylight = STANDARD; ourzone = $4%100 + 60*$4/100;}
+ daylight_s = STANDARD; ourzone = $4%100 + 60*$4/100;}
| NUMBER ':' NUMBER ':' NUMBER
{hh = $1; mm = $3; ss = $5; merid = 24;}
| NUMBER ':' NUMBER ':' NUMBER MERIDIAN
{hh = $1; mm = $3; ss = $5; merid = $6;}
| NUMBER ':' NUMBER ':' NUMBER NUMBER
{hh = $1; mm = $3; ss = $5; merid = 24;
- daylight = STANDARD; ourzone = $6%100 + 60*$6/100;};
+ daylight_s = STANDARD; ourzone = $6%100 + 60*$6/100;};
zone: ZONE
- {ourzone = $1; daylight = STANDARD;}
+ {ourzone = $1; daylight_s = STANDARD;}
| DAYZONE
- {ourzone = $1; daylight = DAYLIGHT;};
+ {ourzone = $1; daylight_s = DAYLIGHT;};
dyspec:DAY
{dayord = 1; dayreq = $1;}
@@ -114,13 +114,14 @@
extern struct tm *localtime();
+static time_t timeconv();
+
static time_t
dateconv(mm, dd, yy, h, m, s, mer, zone, dayflag)
int mm, dd, yy, h, m, s, mer, zone, dayflag;
{
time_t tod, jdate;
register int i;
- time_t timeconv();
if (yy 0) yy = -yy;
if (yy 70) yy += 2000; else if (yy 100) yy += 1900;
@@ -139,13 +140,14 @@
return (jdate);
}
+static time_t daylcorr();
+
static time_t
dayconv(ord, day, now)
int ord,
Processed: setting package to gnuift gnuift-doc gnuift-perl libgnuift0-dev libgnuift0c2 libmrml1-dev libmrml1c2 ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 package gnuift gnuift-doc gnuift-perl libgnuift0-dev libgnuift0c2 libmrml1-dev libmrml1c2 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libmrml1-dev gnuift-doc gnuift libmrml1c2 gnuift-perl libgnuift0c2 libgnuift0-dev tags 330640 + pending Bug#330640: gnuift needs to be rebuilt on m68k for C++ transition There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 332450 + pending Bug#332450: FTBFS: libmagick transition There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323744: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on mpich)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323744: fixed in netpipe 3.6.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 06:58:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 23:58:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E5eLk-0004jT-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:58:04 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7I6w3WC087892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:58:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E5W6h-0001JK-AY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:09:59 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:09:59 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on mpich Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1030/Wed Aug 17 08:53:46 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: netpipe Version: 3.6.2-1 Severity: serious netpipe fails to build because it build-depends on mpich, which is not available: - Considering mpich - Trying mpich - Cannot install mpich; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... E: Package mpich has no installation candidate Package mpich is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source --=20 Matt --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDA7W2fNdgYxVXvBARAruCAJ48b1UDe3xdPoTNh4ouyAzYMUk59ACgl0Pj COImjsRSGDOmHqp2JCkzjR0= =aJ2d -END PGP SIGNATURE- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- --- Received: (at 323744-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:40:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:40:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENtGX-ya-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323744: fixed in netpipe 3.6.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: netpipe Source-Version: 3.6.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netpipe, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netpipe-lam_3.6.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-lam_3.6.2-2_i386.deb netpipe-mpich_3.6.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-mpich_3.6.2-2_i386.deb netpipe-pvm_3.6.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-pvm_3.6.2-2_i386.deb netpipe-tcp_3.6.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe-tcp_3.6.2-2_i386.deb netpipe_3.6.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe_3.6.2-2.diff.gz netpipe_3.6.2-2.dsc to pool/main/n/netpipe/netpipe_3.6.2-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the
Bug#332450: marked as done (FTBFS: libmagick transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332450: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 15:42:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 08:42:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.200] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENXsr-0006QH-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:42:13 -0700 Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Fg7bW005577 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:42:07 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Fg4xg005432 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:42:05 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:41:37 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: libmagick transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: gnuift Severity: serious Version: 0.1.14-4 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev instead of libmagick6-dev | libmagick5-dev Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUWx5UTeB5t8Mo0RAvsPAJsGpOhVOyTChoOzHY53fCFvKJ5peQCfT1Pu IUKIUpg0fVQJOol5W3/ALRo= =vwjs -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332450-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:18:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:18:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENt1z-0003mL-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332450: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gnuift Source-Version: 0.1.14-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-5_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-5_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libgnuift0c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libmrml1c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnuift package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with
Bug#330640: marked as done (gnuift needs to be rebuilt on m68k for C++ transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330640: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 01:18:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 18:18:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EKn3m-0007Zn-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:18:06 -0700 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-109-167.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.109.167]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8T1I3Fe026838; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EKn3j-0002nD-KI; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:18:03 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnuift needs to be rebuilt on m68k for C++ transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:18:03 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnuift Version: 0.1.14-4 Severity: serious gnuift has accidentally been built with the old version of G++ on m68k, as noted at http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/broken.html. Please rebuild on m68k with G++ 4.0 and binNMU. --- Received: (at 330640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:18:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:18:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENt1z-0003mJ-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#330640: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:17:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnuift Source-Version: 0.1.14-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuift, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-5_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-5_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-5_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libgnuift0c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libgnuift0c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libmrml1-dev_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb libmrml1c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/libmrml1c2_0.1.14-5_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnuift package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:10:36 +0200 Source: gnuift Binary: gnuift-perl libmrml1c2 libgnuift0c2 gnuift-doc gnuift libmrml1-dev libgnuift0-dev Architecture: source all powerpc Version: 0.1.14-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Ph. Marek on 10/7/2005 12:10 AM: On Thursday 06 October 2005 17:49, Eric Blake wrote: Follow-up Comment #4, bug #14619 (project findutils): I don't think the original poster has discovered any bugs, rather just their misunderstanding of the (admittedly confusing) POSIX requirements. I just read the man-page, where it says: The man page in CVS is already more up-to-date than 4.2.25, but could still use some improvement. It states: -perm mode File's permission bits are exactly mode (octal or symbolic). Since an exact match is required, if you want to use this form for symbolic modes, you may have to specify a rather complex mode string. For example '-perm g=w' will only match files which have mode 0020 (that is, ones for which group write per- mission is the only permission set). It is more likely that you will want to use the '+' or '-' forms, for example '-perm -g=w', which matches any file with group write permission. See the EXAMPLES section for some illustrative examples. -perm -mode All of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic modes are accepted in this form, and this is usually the way in which would want to use them. You must specify 'u', 'g' or 'o' if you use a symbolic mode. See the EXAMPLES section for some illustrative examples. -perm /mode Any of the permission bits mode are set for the file. Symbolic modes are accepted in this form. You must specify 'u', 'g' or 'o' if you use a symbolic mode. See the EXAMPLES section for some illustrative examples. The man page no longer documents the obsolete -perm +mode, which, as I stated earlier, really only makes sense for symbolic modes starting with 'a', or for numeric modes. The man page is wrong in stating that you must specify 'u', 'g', or 'o' in symbolic mode. Also, it is unfortunate that there is no syntax for specifying files with a permission bit explicitly off, besides an exact match. It might be nice if there were some sort of permission masking syntax - something like - -perm /pattern/mask. For example, -perm /u+r-x/u+rx would explicitly select files that the user can read but not execute (examining both bits of the mask to see if the file meets the pattern within that mask), while ignoring the u+w,go+rwx bits. - -- Life is short - so eat dessert first! Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDRoQA84KuGfSFAYARAip3AKCEIpUFxv5cG9vRYWtG+IxGEX6S+wCgwBn8 9kzCgOGPUjM+DjgHK/ba7Aw= =uGqV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329487: marked as done (xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 04:29:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 21:29:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu [171.67.16.125] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIIi0-0003Kx-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:20 -0700 Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8M4TJ71028130 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:19 -0700 Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05FDDE7DDB; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmpi: needs rebuild for lam transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:29:18 -0700 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmpi Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Due to C++ libraries in the package, lam had to change shared library package names as part of the C++ transition. rmpi now needs to be rebuilt with the new version of lam so that it can migrate into testing. Please upload a new version of rmpi with a versioned build-depends on: lam4-dev (= 7.1.1-3.2) This is necessary since m68k has not yet built the new lam; otherwise, the new upload may get built against the old lam libraries on that platform. If you can get to this soon, that would be best, as all of lam, hdf5, and mpich are currently caught up in a large transition. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) --- Received: (at 329487-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:39:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:39:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENtGb-00011B-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 From: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329487: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-9 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmpi Source-Version: 2.2.3b8-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmpi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4-dev_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/libxmpi4_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.diff.gz xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9.dsc xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmpi/xmpi_2.2.3b8-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xmpi package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Bug#332562: marked as done (FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable)
Your message dated Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:18:54 +0900 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 04:25:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 21:25:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENjnV-0002PP-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:25:29 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j974PQW5048871 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 21:25:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ENYLY-yF-CR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:11:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:11:52 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1119/Thu Oct 6 11:29:53 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debian-reference Version: 1.08-4 Severity: serious debian-reference fails to build because it cannot find a link in the target hashtable: debiandoc2latexps -l $(echo zh-cn | bin/getlocale) reference.zh-cn.sgml debiandoc2latexps: ERROR: reference.zh-cn.ps could not be generated prope= rly debiandoc2latexps: rerun with the -v option to found out why Here's the end of the output that is generated when I pass -v: dvips: Oh no, link not found in target hashtable dvips: Hfootnote.64 dvips: ! --=20 Matt --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUzHfNdgYxVXvBARAkJIAJ9ljdkzxF+FvQEocnRlGCp5AyvdbwCeMCDg lwF05UmRDVzbGc+mqPDVTgI= =yWnA -END PGP SIGNATURE- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- --- Received: (at 332562-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 14:03:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 07:03:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mtoichi03e.ns.itscom.net (ns.itscom.net) [219.110.2.33] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENspD-0006V6-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 07:03:51 -0700 Received: (qmail 10281 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 23:03:19 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO ns.itscom.net) (192.168.1.131) by mtoichi03e with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 23:03:19 +0900 Received: (qmail 28375 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2005 23:03:18 +0900 Received: from unknown (HELO dumbo.lan.aokiconsulting.com) (219.110.153.26) by mtiichi01e with SMTP; 7 Oct 2005 23:03:18 +0900 Received: from osamu by dumbo.lan.aokiconsulting.com with local (Exim 4.50) id 1ENt3m-00060i-Ip; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:18:54 +0900 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:18:54 +0900 From: Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
Bug#332454: pending upload for nip2 libmagick transition
tags 332454 +pending thanks I have a nip2 upload prepared. I will upload it as soon as vips is built on all architectures or at least has a sufficient head start to reduce the chances of unwanted dep-waits when I upload nip2. vips will be uploaded momentarily. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332471: marked as done (FTBFS: libmagick transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:17:32 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332471: fixed in vips 7.10.14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 16:43:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 09:43:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENYqC-0007I6-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:43:32 -0700 Received: from outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96GW0wt007821 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:32:01 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx021.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96GVvGn007795 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:31:57 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:31:30 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: libmagick transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: vips Severity: serious Version: 7.10.12-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev instead of libmagick6-dev Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRVFi5UTeB5t8Mo0RAqcaAKDCE8chIqaHr2nf2LhfrjFxEMubCACeIdlD QvPNPQD7U3VYEIG9aIKh3lU= =O4HO -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332471-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 16:18:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 09:18:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENuua-000372-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:17:32 -0700 From: Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332471: fixed in vips 7.10.14-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 09:17:32 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vips Source-Version: 7.10.14-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vips, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libvips-doc_7.10.14-1_all.deb to pool/main/v/vips/libvips-doc_7.10.14-1_all.deb libvips-tools_7.10.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vips/libvips-tools_7.10.14-1_i386.deb libvips10-dev_7.10.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vips/libvips10-dev_7.10.14-1_i386.deb libvips10c2_7.10.14-1_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vips/libvips10c2_7.10.14-1_i386.deb vips_7.10.14-1.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vips/vips_7.10.14-1.diff.gz vips_7.10.14-1.dsc to pool/main/v/vips/vips_7.10.14-1.dsc vips_7.10.14.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/v/vips/vips_7.10.14.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jay Berkenbilt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated vips package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:39:14 -0400 Source: vips Binary: libvips-tools libvips-doc libvips10-dev libvips10c2
Bug#332658: selinux-policy-default: Makefile fails to make compatible policy.VERSION
Package: selinux-policy-default Version: 1:1.26-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Kernel is the latest and greatest from Torvalds' archives, unpatched, pristine. No Debian kernel works. policyvers reports 15 (?) so pushed Makefile with POLICYCOMPAT = -c 15 and reran make and make install. Reboot fails with: security: policydb 20 does not match my range (15 -19) Am I missing a patch supplied on some other site than yours? You don't seem to be supplying 'em any more. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (650, 'testing'), (600, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.3dc04 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages selinux-policy-default depends on: ii checkpolicy 1.27.4-1 SELinux policy compiler ii libpam-modules0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries ii m41.4.3-2a macro processing language ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the make util ii policycoreutils 1.26-1 SELinux core policy utilities ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o selinux-policy-default recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Regards, Dave -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:19:45AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: The man page no longer documents the obsolete -perm +mode, which, as I stated earlier, really only makes sense for symbolic modes starting with 'a', or for numeric modes. The man page is wrong in stating that you must specify 'u', 'g', or 'o' in symbolic mode. Noted, thanks. Also, it is unfortunate that there is no syntax for specifying files with a permission bit explicitly off, besides an exact match. That's what \! -perm is for... It might be nice if there were some sort of permission masking syntax - something like - -perm /pattern/mask. For example, -perm /u+r-x/u+rx would explicitly select files that the user can read but not execute (examining both bits of the mask to see if the file meets the pattern within that mask), while ignoring the u+w,go+rwx bits. You're really asking for the functionality of access() not -perm. It's very hard to simulate access via -perm, because you would need to make these checks: 1. If user is the owner of the file, a) succeed if -perm -400 \! -perm -100 b) otherwise fail 2. If the user is a member of the group which owns the file, a) succeed if -perm -040 \! -perm -010 b) otherwise fail 3. Otherwise, a) succeed if -perm -004 \! -perm -001 b) otherwise fail I did try coding an example answer but when I realised that I was using a second level of nested $(...) and was only implementing (2), I gave up because I wouldn't have the time to test it. In any case, the above fails to take into account ACLs or other special properties of the filesystem. Are you really seeking an -access primitive with which one might write -access read -a \! -access execute ? Regards, James. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Either fixed or pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332459 - fixed Bug#332459: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition Tags were: pending fixed Tags removed: fixed thanks bts programm Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323292: marked as done (libmetakit2.4.9.3: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: cast from 'PyRowRef*' to 'int' loses precision)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:17:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323292: fixed in libmetakit2.4.9.3 2.4.9.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 21:43:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 14:43:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4mkE-0006bq-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:43:46 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B9D13BC1A7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:43:45 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FD53BC169 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:43:44 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6B21026136; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:43:43 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libmetakit2.4.9.3: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: cast from 'PyRowRef*' to 'int' loses precision Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libmetakit2.4.9.3 Version: 2.4.9.3-4 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the following error: g++ -c -g -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -O3 -I../unix/../include -I../unix/../python/scxx -I/usr/include/python2.3 ../unix/../python/PyRowRef.cpp -fPIC -DPIC ../unix/../python/PyRowRef.cpp: In function 'int PyRowRef_print(PyRowRef*, FILE *, int)': ../unix/../python/PyRowRef.cpp:27: error: cast from 'PyRowRef*' to 'int' loses precision ../unix/../python/PyRowRef.cpp: In function 'int PyRORowRef_print(PyRowRef*, FILE*, int)': ../unix/../python/PyRowRef.cpp:32: error: cast from 'PyRowRef*' to 'int' loses precision make[1]: *** [PyRowRef.o] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 323292-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 17:18:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 10:18:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENvqK-0005vY-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:17:12 -0700 From: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#323292: fixed in libmetakit2.4.9.3 2.4.9.3-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:17:12 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libmetakit2.4.9.3 Source-Version: 2.4.9.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libmetakit2.4.9.3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libmetakit-tcl_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/libmetakit-tcl_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb libmetakit2.4.9.3-dev_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/libmetakit2.4.9.3-dev_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5.diff.gz libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5.dsc to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5.dsc libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/libmetakit2.4.9.3_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb python-metakit_2.4.9.3-5_all.deb to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/python-metakit_2.4.9.3-5_all.deb python2.3-metakit_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libm/libmetakit2.4.9.3/python2.3-metakit_2.4.9.3-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer
Bug#332661: ghc-cvs - fails to build
Package: ghc-cvs Version: 20050331-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ghc-cvs_20050331-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), libgmp3-dev, xsltproc, alex, libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev, libglut3-dev, time, xutils, devscripts, haddock (= 0.6), happy (= 1.14), ghc6, cpio, jade, docbook-utils, gcc-3.3 (= 1:3.3.4), python (= 1.5), xlibs-dev, netbase, locales, grep-dctrl, autotools-dev, xmltex, docbook-xsl, docbook-xml ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libncurses5-dev (= 5.3.20030510-1), libreadline4-dev (= 4.3-1) [...] Note, selecting libglu1-xorg-dev instead of xlibmesa-glu-dev Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: ghc6: Depends: libreadline4-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages The reason: ghc6 depends against libreadline4-dev, ghc-cvs build-depends against libreadline5-dev which conflicts against each other: | # apt-get install libreadline5-dev libreadline4-dev | Reading Package Lists... Done | Building Dependency Tree... Done | Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have | requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable | distribution that some required packages have not yet been created | or been moved out of Incoming. | The following information may help to resolve the situation: | | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | libreadline4-dev: Conflicts: libreadline-dev | libreadline5-dev: Conflicts: libreadline-dev | E: Broken packages Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#104394: Look at what I've found ;)
Fuck brother You'll never guess what happened to me last wendsday. Basically found hot date site that you can join without paying. So many great folks are there messaging and meeting eachother. And offcourse there is someone (or more than one) for you. Although most of them want one-nighters, there are also those who like it serious. THIS IS AN AUTO-GENERATED MESSAGE - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE ;~) http://www.toptingles.com/extra/greatdating/ PS:no.more? http://www.toptingles.com/extra/greatdating/getmeoff.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#309257: marked as done (libpano12: patent problems)
Your message dated Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:34:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line libpano12: patent problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 23:55:51 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 16:55:51 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wiggis.ethz.ch [129.132.86.197] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXSxa-0005T4-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 16:55:50 -0700
Received: from wiggis2.ethz.ch (wiggis2.ethz.ch [192.168.127.3])
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 19B724052; Mon, 16 May 2005 01:55:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from kermit (80-219-13-28.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.13.28])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4843C4254; Mon, 16 May 2005 01:55:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by kermit (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DFF5E8037; Mon, 16 May 2005 01:55:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 01:55:47 +0200
From: Robert Jordens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: libpano12: patent problems
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1024D/E02FEF11:F01946CCF910B59289E8D6341D28E4BFE02FEF11
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.ethz.ch
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libpano12
Version: 2.7.0.9-1
Severity: serious
As has been pointed out multiple times in the ITP (obviously noone read
it...) for panotools
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D251617), the original
author of panotools/libpano, Helmut Dersch has been forced by patent
lawsuits to abandon the program. Part of the story can be obtained here:
http://vr.albury.net.au/%7Ekathyw/EyePics/ipix.html or by googling
around (panotools patent).
The situation seems to be analogue to the one around the mp3 encoders
(lame see the thread starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/06/msg01213.html)
If that is correct, we can't have panotools/libpano in debian, not even
non-free.
Robert.
--=20
Rincewind formed a mental picture of some strange entity living in a castle
made of teeth. It was the kind of mental picture you tried to forget.
Unsuccessfully.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Light Fantastic
---
Received: (at 309257-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 17:35:01 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 10:35:01 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ENw7Z-0004nP-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:35:01 -0700
Received: from pluton.sarcelle.net (pluton.sarcelle.net [82.240.88.134])
by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3893D294C4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:34:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libpano12: patent problems
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 19:34:44 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
X-Face: SQ)ATU:q{vI1}g/L)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]){=N}-,seezQ!wUv4jz,l7X6N7L94Og3xm[0BwV!'GJz+
/^^c$1?#,jglWQbjs)j,a[7JO_Kj5:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart1166469.saPc1qKVLq;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart1166469.saPc1qKVLq
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Since there is no response to my previous mail, I close this bug for follow=
ing=20
reasons :
- possible existence of
Bug#332677: abiword - build-depends against removed package
Package: abiword Version: 2.2.10-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of abiword_2.2.10-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), dpatch, libaiksaurus-1.2-dev, libaiksaurusgtk-1.2-dev, libenchant-dev (= 1.1.6-1), libfribidi-dev, libgal2.2-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgnome2-dev, libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libgsf-1-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libgucharmap4-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libots-dev, libperl-dev, libpng12-dev, libpsiconv-dev, libpspell-dev (= 0.60.3-3), libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev, librsvg2-dev, libwmf-dev, libwpd8-dev (= 0.8.2-2), python2.3-dev ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libbz2-dev, libexpat1-dev (= 1.95.6), libfreetype6-dev (= 2.1.5-1), libncurses5-dev (= 5.3.20030510-1), libpopt-dev (= 1.7), libreadline4-dev (= 4.3-1), libxml2-dev (= 2.6.3), xlibs-dev ( 4.1.0), zlib1g-dev (= 1:1.2.1) Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: sharutils [...] E: Package libgal2.2-dev has no installation candidate Package libgal2.2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source apt-get failed. Package installation failed libgal2.2-dev is only available in stable. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#319238: marked as done (pwc: ftbfs [sparc] mv: cannot stat `modules/*.deb': No such file or directory)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:52:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 16:36:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 09:36:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvHYT-00049M-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:36:21 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j6KGaIKf013171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:36:18 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j6KGSdIG016567; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:39 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6KGSd82016565; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:39 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:39 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pwc: ftbfs [sparc] mv: cannot stat `modules/*.deb': No such file or directory Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pwc Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source pwc failed to build on all buildds, duplicated on sparc pbuilder: cd modules/pwc; \ sed -e 's/^Source.*$/Source: pwc/' debian/control.modules.in debian/control.modules.new; \ mv debian/control.modules.new debian/control.modules.in ; \ for i in ; do \ debian/rules binary-modules KERNEL_DEPENDS=y MODVERS= KSRC=/usr/src/kernel---$i KVERS=-$i ; \ debian/rules clean KSRC=/usr/src/kernel---$i KVERS=-$i ; \ done mv modules/*.deb . mv: cannot stat `modules/*.deb': No such file or directory make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 --- Received: (at 319238-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 19:52:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 12:52:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from stress.telefonica.net (telesmtp4.mail.isp) [213.4.129.135] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENyGn-00059L-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:52:41 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.200] ([83.43.23.49]) by telesmtp4.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id IO09VQ00.JLB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:52:20 +0200 From: Victor Seva Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: done X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 No more errors on non binary arches. Just there is nothing to build. - -- Victor Seva [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID: 0xDD12F253 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.torreviejawireless.org http://linuxmaniac.homeip.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDRtH0S/DSSd0S8lMRAiHRAJ4kjiWeSBjeFHmJuPt9739iHL7koACfSCBU pRiXhbnOwFEaJ4ArWQt7KyA= =ghpU -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332680: directvnc - fails to build
' rfbproto.h:690: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:691: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:728: error: syntax error before 'CARD8' rfbproto.h:728: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rfbproto.h:729: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:730: error: syntax error before 'pad' rfbproto.h:730: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:731: error: syntax error before 'key' rfbproto.h:731: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:732: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:742: error: syntax error before 'CARD8' rfbproto.h:742: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rfbproto.h:743: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:744: error: syntax error before 'x' rfbproto.h:744: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:745: error: syntax error before 'y' rfbproto.h:745: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:746: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:761: error: syntax error before 'CARD8' rfbproto.h:761: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rfbproto.h:762: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:763: error: syntax error before 'pad2' rfbproto.h:763: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:764: error: syntax error before 'length' rfbproto.h:764: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:766: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:777: error: syntax error before 'CARD8' rfbproto.h:777: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rfbproto.h:778: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:779: error: syntax error before 'fcme' rfbproto.h:779: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:780: error: syntax error before 'se' rfbproto.h:780: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:781: error: syntax error before 'fur' rfbproto.h:781: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:782: error: syntax error before 'ke' rfbproto.h:782: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:783: error: syntax error before 'pe' rfbproto.h:783: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:784: error: syntax error before 'cct' rfbproto.h:784: warning: data definition has no type or storage class rfbproto.h:785: warning: data definition has no type or storage class make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/directvnc-0.7.5/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/directvnc-0.7.5' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/directvnc-0.7.5' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051007-1622 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of directvnc 0.7.5-6.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 314976 + fixed Bug#314976: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: New directfb upstream version, soname change] There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of siege 2.61-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 321816 + fixed Bug#321816: siege: FTBFS: Tries to create files outside source dir. Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 323684 + fixed Bug#323684: siege.config broken There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 329182 + fixed Bug#329182: checking of values unknown to siege programmers Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332682: vnc4 - don't build with gcc 4.0
Package: vnc4
Version: 4.0-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of vnc4_4.0-8 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42
[...]
c++ -I.. -DHAVE_VSNPRINTF -O2 -Wall -DPIC -fPIC -c HTTPServer.cxx
.../rdr/Exception.h:27: warning: 'struct rdr::Exception' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:44: warning: 'struct rdr::SystemException' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:49: warning: 'struct rdr::TimedOut' has virtual functions
but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:53: warning: 'struct rdr::EndOfStream' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'void std::vectorbool,
_Alloc::_M_insert_range(std::_Bit_iterator, _ForwardIterator,
_ForwardIterator, std::forward_iterator_tag)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:542:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'void std::vectorbool,
_Alloc::_M_fill_insert(std::_Bit_iterator, size_t, bool)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:889:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:
In member function 'void std::vector_Tp,
_Alloc::_M_fill_insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iteratortypename
_Alloc::pointer, std::vector_Tp, _Alloc , size_t, const _Tp)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:353:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:
In member function 'void std::vector_Tp,
_Alloc::_M_range_insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iteratortypename
_Alloc::pointer, std::vector_Tp, _Alloc , _ForwardIterator,
_ForwardIterator, std::forward_iterator_tag)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:452:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
.../rfb/ImageGetter.h: At global scope:
.../rfb/ImageGetter.h:24: warning: 'class rfb::ImageGetter' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rfb/ColourMap.h:29: warning: 'class rfb::ColourMap' has virtual functions
but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/FdInStream.h:30: warning: 'class rdr::FdInStreamBlockCallback' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
.../network/Socket.h:69: warning: 'class network::ConnectionFilter' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
.../network/Socket.h:95: warning: 'struct network::SocketException' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
make[2]: *** [HTTPServer.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.0/rfb'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.0'
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20051006-1125
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build
Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20050904-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20050904-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42 [...] /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/s390-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/s390-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/s390-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/s390-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/s390-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/s390-linux-gnu/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/libjava -I./include -I./gcj -I../../../src/libjava -Iinclude -I../../../src/libjava/include -I../../../src/libjava/classpath/include -I../../../src/libjava/classpath/native/fdlibm -I../../../src/libjava/../boehm-gc/include -I../boehm-gc/include -I../../../src/libjava/libltdl -I../../../src/libjava/libltdl -I../../../src/libjava/.././libjava/../gcc -I../../../src/libjava/../libffi/include -I../libffi/include -fno-rtti -fnon-call-exceptions -fdollars-in-identifiers -Wswitch-enum -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wextra -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPREFIX=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib\ -DJAVA_HOME=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/jre\ -DBOOT_CLASS_PATH=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/jre/lib/rt.jar\ -DJAVA_EXT_DIRS=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/share/java/ext\ -DGCJ_ENDORSED_DIRS=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/share/java/gcj-endorsed\ -DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib/gcj-4.1.0/classmap.db\ -DLIBGCJ_DEFAULT_DATABASE_PATH_TAIL=\gcj-4.1.0/classmap.db\ -DTOOLEXECLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/lib\ -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT jni.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/jni.Tpo -c ../../../src/libjava/jni.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/jni.o .../../../src/libjava/jni.cc: In function 'void _Jv_JNI_GetStringUTFRegion(JNIEnv*, java::lang::String*, jsize, jsize, char*)': .../../../src/libjava/jni.cc:1396: internal compiler error: in fixup_eh_region_note, at reload1.c:3808 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. make[5]: *** [jni.lo] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/s390-linux-gnu/libjava' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/s390-linux-gnu/libjava' make[3]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build' make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build' s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0 make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904' make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051006-0830 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian
Bug#332545: Same
I have the same problem, i runned VeribestVhdl, winamp and DiabloII. Now nothing works anymore :( X Error of failed request: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 53 (X_CreatePixmap) Serial number of failed request: 12783 Current serial number in output stream: 12785 Wine failed with return code 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332684: jpilot - fails to build
Package: jpilot Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libpisock-dev (= 0.11.3-2), gettext, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, xlibs-dev (= 4.0.1-1), debhelper (= 3.0.18), libssl-dev, autotools-dev, po-debconf, dpatch, libxml-parser-perl ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libncurses5-dev (= 5.3.20030510-1) Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: libglib1.2-dev (= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2-dev (= 1.2.10-4), libreadline4-dev (= 4.3-1) [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include -o jpilot-dial jpilot-dial.o -lm -L/usr/lib -lpisock -ldl mkdir .libs gcc -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include -o jpilot-dial jpilot-dial.o -lm -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libpisock.so -lncurses -lreadline -ldl /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lreadline collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [jpilot-dial] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11/dialer' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051007-1650 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328440: libc6/NIS broken with bash/ksh/tcsh/sash
retitle 328440 NIS broken with bash, ksh, tcsh and sash thanks On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:51:58PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote: If I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] entry in /etc/passwd, tilde expansion crashes bash: I need to rephrase -- it's rather tilde completion that crashes bash, not tilde expansion, because the latter works for fully/correctly specified NIS name and crashes only for non-existent names. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls ~z bash: nss_nis/nis-netgrp.c:79: _nss_nis_setnetgrent: Assertion `malloc_usable_size (netgrp-data) = len + 1' failed. Aborted (core dumped) although getent works OK: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ getent passwd zhinis zhinis:x:2004:2004:NIS test user Z:/home/zhinis:/bin/zsh4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls ~zhinis ls: /home/zhinis: No such file or directory -- WBR, xrgtn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
Hmm, I've only upgraded my system partially since my last upload. Perhaps I need to do a full system upgrade and do a new build, then, can try that this weekend. But if someone could try to build the packages themselves and see if that works, though, that might be good. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libc6/NIS broken with bash/ksh/tcsh/sash
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 328440 NIS broken with bash, ksh, tcsh and sash Bug#328440: NIS broken with bash Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332684: marked as done (jpilot - fails to build)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:17:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332684: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 20:54:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 13:54:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENzEK-00032c-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 13:54:12 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 88B50183FC; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:53:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:53:56 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jpilot - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: jpilot Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libpisock-dev (= 0.11.3-2), gettext, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, xlibs-dev (= 4.0.1-1), debhelper (= 3.0.18), libssl-dev, autotools-dev, po-debconf, dpatch, libxml-parser-perl ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libncurses5-dev (= 5.3.20030510-1) Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: libglib1.2-dev (= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2-dev (= 1.2.10-4), libreadline4-dev (= 4.3-1) [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include -o jpilot-dial jpilot-dial.o -lm -L/usr/lib -lpisock -ldl mkdir .libs gcc -Wall -g -O2 -I/usr/include -o jpilot-dial jpilot-dial.o -lm -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libpisock.so -lncurses -lreadline -ldl /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lreadline collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [jpilot-dial] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11/dialer' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/jpilot-0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051007-1650 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 332684-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 22:18:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 15:18:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO0WV-0002pc-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:17:03 -0700 From: Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332684: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:17:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: jpilot Source-Version: 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jpilot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jpilot-plugins_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot-plugins_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2_i386.deb jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2.diff.gz jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2.dsc to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2.dsc jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2_i386.deb to pool/main/j/jpilot/jpilot_0.99.7-0.99.8-pre11-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting
Bug#332378: marked as done (libatomic-ops_1.0-2 (unstable): fails to build)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:02:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332378: fixed in libatomic-ops 1.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 05:15:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 22:15:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENO6I-00054t-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 22:15:26 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1677118329; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:14:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:14:30 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libatomic-ops_1.0-2 (unstable): fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libatomic-ops Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libatomic-ops_1.0-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42 [...] Checking correctness of source dependencies... Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-1.1 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2 g++-4.0_4.0.2-2 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-2 libstdc++6_4.0.2-2 [...] make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/libatomic-ops-1.0/src' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -MT atomic_ops.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/atomic_ops.Tpo -c -o atomic_ops.o atomic_ops.c; \ then mv -f .deps/atomic_ops.Tpo .deps/atomic_ops.Po; else rm -f .deps/atomic_ops.Tpo; exit 1; fi In file included from atomic_ops.h:204, from atomic_ops.c:46: atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/s390.h:33:31: error: ordered_except_wr.h: No such file or directory atomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/s390.h:34:43: error: all_aligned_atomic_load_store.h: No such file or directory atomic_ops.c: In function 'AO_spin': atomic_ops.c:91: warning: implicit declaration of function 'AO_load' atomic_ops.c:98: warning: implicit declaration of function 'AO_store' atomic_ops.c: In function 'unlock': atomic_ops.c:132: warning: implicit declaration of function 'AO_store_release' atomic_ops.c: In function 'AO_compare_and_swap_emulation': atomic_ops.c:148: warning: implicit declaration of function 'AO_load_acquire' make[4]: *** [atomic_ops.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libatomic-ops-1.0/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libatomic-ops-1.0/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libatomic-ops-1.0/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libatomic-ops-1.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Bastian --- Received: (at 332378-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 00:13:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 17:13:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO2A9-Vq-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:02:05 -0700 From: Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332378: fixed in libatomic-ops 1.0-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:02:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libatomic-ops Source-Version: 1.0-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libatomic-ops, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libatomic-ops-dev_1.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libatomic-ops/libatomic-ops-dev_1.0-3_i386.deb libatomic-ops_1.0-3.dsc to pool/main/liba/libatomic-ops/libatomic-ops_1.0-3.dsc
Bug#332701: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev
Package: egoboo Version: 2.22-21 Severity: serious egoboo fails to build because its build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev cannot be satisfied: - Considering xlibmesa-dev (= 4.1.0) Tried versions: - Does not satisfy version, not trying E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332702: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on texinfo
Package: dvipng Version: 1.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch dvipng fails to build because it tries to use some files in the texinfo package but does not build-depend upon it: tex \nonstopmode\input dvipng.texi This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.4.5) (./dvipng.texi ! I can't find file `texinfo'. l.1 \input texinfo Please type another input file name ! Emergency stop. l.1 \input texinfo No pages of output. Transcript written on dvipng.log. make[1]: [dvipng.dvi] Error 1 (ignored) texindex dvipng.cp make[1]: texindex: Command not found make[1]: [dvipng.dvi] Error 127 (ignored) tex \nonstopmode\input dvipng.texi This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.4.5) (./dvipng.texi ! I can't find file `texinfo'. l.1 \input texinfo Please type another input file name ! Emergency stop. l.1 \input texinfo No pages of output. Transcript written on dvipng.log. make[1]: [dvipng.dvi] Error 1 (ignored) ... dh_installinfo dvipng.info cp: cannot stat `dvipng.info': No such file or directory dh_installinfo: command returned error code 256 The attached patch fixes this problem. -- Matt diff -u dvipng-1.5/debian/control dvipng-1.5/debian/control --- dvipng-1.5/debian/control +++ dvipng-1.5/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: utils Priority: optional Maintainer: Brian R Furry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), docbook-to-man, libgd2-noxpm-dev, libpng12-dev, libfreetype6-dev, tetex-extra, libkpathsea-dev, libt1-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), docbook-to-man, libgd2-noxpm-dev, libpng12-dev, libfreetype6-dev, tetex-extra, libkpathsea-dev, libt1-dev, texinfo Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: dvipng signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332703: FTBFS: Syntax error before MD5_CTX
Package: cyrus-sasl2 Version: 2.1.19-1.6 Severity: serious cyrus-sasl2 fails to build because there is a syntax error before MD5_CTX: if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../sasldb -I../include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include -Wall -W -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -MT ntlm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ntlm.Tpo \ -c -o ntlm.lo `test -f 'ntlm.c' || echo './'`ntlm.c; \ then mv -f .deps/ntlm.Tpo .deps/ntlm.Plo; \ else rm -f .deps/ntlm.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../lib -I../sasldb -I../include -I/usr/include/mysql -I/usr/include -Wall -W -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -MT ntlm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ntlm.Tpo -c ntlm.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ntlm.o In file included from ../include/saslplug.h:14, from ntlm.c:96: ../include/hmac-md5.h:11: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX' ../include/hmac-md5.h:11: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union ../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' ../include/hmac-md5.h:12: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/hmac-md5.h:36: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/hmac-md5.h:46: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/hmac-md5.h:53: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' In file included from ntlm.c:96: ../include/saslplug.h:73: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:74: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:75: error: syntax error before 'MD5_CTX' ../include/saslplug.h:79: error: syntax error before '*' token ../include/saslplug.h:81: error: syntax error before 'HMAC_MD5_CTX' ../include/saslplug.h:84: error: syntax error before '*' token ntlm.c: In function 'load_buffer': ntlm.c:277: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'P16_lm': ntlm.c:375: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of '__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness ntlm.c:378: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'E' differ in signedness ntlm.c:367: warning: unused parameter 'utils' ntlm.c:368: warning: unused parameter 'buf' ntlm.c:369: warning: unused parameter 'buflen' ntlm.c: In function 'P16_nt': ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:392: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:393: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'MD4' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'V2': ntlm.c:446: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'to_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'HMAC' differ in signedness ntlm.c:448: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 7 of 'HMAC' differ in signedness ntlm.c:454: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'HMAC_Final' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'make_netbios_name': ntlm.c:770: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of '__builtin_strncpy' differ in signedness ntlm.c:771: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'smb_negotiate_protocol': ntlm.c:1034: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c:1116: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'from_unicode' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'smb_session_setup': ntlm.c:1257: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'create_challenge': ntlm.c:1344: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness ntlm.c:1350: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'load_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_new': ntlm.c:1357: warning: unused parameter 'glob_context' ntlm.c:1359: warning: unused parameter 'challenge' ntlm.c:1360: warning: unused parameter 'challen' ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step1': ntlm.c:1399: warning: unused parameter 'oparams' ntlm.c: In function 'ntlm_server_mech_step2': ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1481: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1486: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1492: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1498: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'unload_buffer' differ in signedness ntlm.c:1561: warning: pointer targets
Bug#332704: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on debhelper
Package: crossfire-maps-small Version: 1.5.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch crossfire-maps-small fails to build because it uses dh_clean but does not depend on debhelper: dh_clean make: dh_clean: Command not found -- Matt diff -u crossfire-maps-small-1.5.0/debian/control crossfire-maps-small-1.5.0/debian/control --- crossfire-maps-small-1.5.0/debian/control +++ crossfire-maps-small-1.5.0/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Kari Pahula [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends: cdbs +Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper Package: crossfire-maps-small Architecture: all signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332705: FTBFS: No matching function for call to StreamConnect
Package: eris Version: 1.3.7-3 Severity: serious eris fails to build because it cannot find functions that match calls to StreamConnect and getCodec: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-1.2-g -Wall -O2 -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -ansi -I/usr/include/skstream-0.3 -I/usr/lib/skstream-0.3/include -I/usr/include/Atlas-C++-0.6 -I/usr/include/wfmath-0.3 -c -o BaseConnection.lo BaseConnection.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/lib/sigc++-1.2/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-1.2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -ansi -I/usr/include/skstream-0.3 -I/usr/lib/skstream-0.3/include -I/usr/include/Atlas-C++-0.6 -I/usr/include/wfmath-0.3 -c BaseConnection.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/BaseConnection.o BaseConnection.cpp: In member function 'void Eris::BaseConnection::nonblockingConnect()': BaseConnection.cpp:159: error: no matching function for call to 'Atlas::Net::StreamConnect::StreamConnect(std::string, tcp_socket_stream, Atlas::Bridge)' /usr/include/Atlas-C++-0.6/Atlas/Net/Stream.h:60: note: candidates are: Atlas::Net::StreamConnect::StreamConnect(const std::string, std::iostream) /usr/include/Atlas-C++-0.6/Atlas/Net/Stream.h:57: note: Atlas::Net::StreamConnect::StreamConnect(const Atlas::Net::StreamConnect) BaseConnection.cpp: In member function 'void Eris::BaseConnection::pollNegotiation()': BaseConnection.cpp:177: error: no matching function for call to 'Atlas::Net::StreamConnect::getCodec()' /usr/include/Atlas-C++-0.6/Atlas/Net/Stream.h:67: note: candidates are: virtual Atlas::Codec* Atlas::Net::StreamConnect::getCodec(Atlas::Bridge) -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable
reopen 332562 thanks On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:18:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Hi Matt, Hi. I hope my last upload fixed this issue. Thus closing this bug report. If you are running some auto-checker, please recheck all results on packages depending on debiandoc-sgml. It has to be upgraded to 1.1.89. It fails to build with the same error message when I use debiandoc-sgml 1.1.89, so I'm reopening this bug report. -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 332562 Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331569: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev
severity 330013 serious
merge 331569 330013
thanks
I've uploaded an NMU to fix this bug, as it's been broken in the
archive since it was uploaded 2 and a half weeks ago.
--
James
diff -u evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/control
evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/control
--- evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/control
+++ evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/control
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
Package: libedataserver1.2-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Depends: libedataserver1.2-4 (= ${Source-Version}), libdb4.1-dev, libnspr-dev
+Depends: libedataserver1.2-4 (= ${Source-Version}), libdb4.2-dev, libnspr-dev
Description: Utility library for evolution data servers (development files)
The data server, called Evolution Data Server is responsible for managing
calendar and addressbook information.
diff -u evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/changelog
evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/changelog
--- evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/changelog
+++ evolution-data-server-1.2.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+evolution-data-server (1.2.3-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: fix libedataserver1.2-dev to Depend on libdb4.2-dev
+rather than libdb4.1-dev. Closes: #331569, #330013
+
+ -- James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 8 Oct 2005 01:54:09 +0100
+
evolution-data-server (1.2.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Build with db4.2 (closes: #282770)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 330013 serious Bug#330013: libedataserver1.2-dev: Still depends on libdb4.1-dev package Severity set to `serious'. merge 331569 330013 Bug#330013: libedataserver1.2-dev: Still depends on libdb4.1-dev package Bug#331569: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `blocks' don't match: #330013 has `331384'; #331569 has `' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 330013 + fixed Bug#330013: libedataserver1.2-dev: Still depends on libdb4.1-dev package There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 331569 + fixed Bug#331569: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332327: marked as done (pvpgn - copyright don't mention bsd licensed code)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332327: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 21:21:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 14:21:57 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENGi4-0005e5-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:21:57 -0700 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A7CE3C026; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:21:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:21:55 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pvpgn - copyright don't mention bsd licensed code Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: pvpgn Version: 1.7.7-1 Severity: serious pvpgn contains bsd licensed code (zlib) but don't mention this in the debian/copyright file. Bastian --=20 Killing is wrong. -- Losira, That Which Survives, stardate unknown --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkNEQ/MACgkQnw66O/MvCNHpxwCcDUOy6x1FBDK/0F/pdkxpiQUt tv8Anj08dYwjHXA+HSlG8/tUvJB9f49p =VLWX -END PGP SIGNATURE- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw-- --- Received: (at 332327-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 02:19:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 19:19:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO4HB-0004De-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 From: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332327: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.8-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: pvpgn Source-Version: 1.7.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pvpgn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pvpgn_1.7.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2.diff.gz pvpgn_1.7.8-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2.dsc pvpgn_1.7.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2_i386.deb pvpgn_1.7.8-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2_sparc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pvpgn package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:49:10 +0300 Source: pvpgn Binary: pvpgn Architecture: source i386 sparc Version: 1.7.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pvpgn - Gaming server that emulates Battle.net(R) Closes: 332326 332327 Changes: pvpgn (1.7.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Stop using pvpgn's own zlib (closes: #332326) * Added zlib's
Bug#332326: marked as done (pvpgn - links against own zlib)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332326: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 21:20:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 14:20:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENGh2-0005RI-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:20:52 -0700 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 788ED3C026; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:20:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:20:50 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pvpgn - links against own zlib Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: pvpgn Version: 1.7.7-1 Severity: serious pvpgn links against its own zlib. This is considered as don't do it by the release team. Bastian --=20 You! What PLANET is this! -- McCoy, The City on the Edge of Forever, stardate 3134.0 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkNEQ7IACgkQnw66O/MvCNE7ggCffuFlbm7x72sRlbTn9cKLG35Z fbUAnj6ccfpyh1KIrkZW5YF0RKfo9MQP =RikK -END PGP SIGNATURE- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- --- Received: (at 332326-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 02:18:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 19:18:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO4HB-0004Dc-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 From: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332326: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.8-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:17:29 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: pvpgn Source-Version: 1.7.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pvpgn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pvpgn_1.7.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2.diff.gz pvpgn_1.7.8-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2.dsc pvpgn_1.7.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2_i386.deb pvpgn_1.7.8-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.8-2_sparc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pvpgn package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 22:49:10 +0300 Source: pvpgn Binary: pvpgn Architecture: source i386 sparc Version: 1.7.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Radu Spineanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pvpgn - Gaming server that emulates Battle.net(R) Closes: 332326 332327 Changes: pvpgn (1.7.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Stop using pvpgn's own zlib (closes: #332326) * Added zlib's license to debian/copyright
Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable
tags 332562 unreproducible thanks On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:20:05AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: reopen 332562 thanks Fine but it does not help much. I got them build under sid-pbuilder successfully. So it is unreproducible. On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:18:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: Thus closing this bug report. If you are running some auto-checker, please recheck all results on packages depending on debiandoc-sgml. It has to be upgraded to 1.1.89. It fails to build with the same error message when I use debiandoc-sgml 1.1.89, so I'm reopening this bug report. Question: Please list all the versions of software listed under build-deps. Are you using sid chroot under pbuilder? Is your pbuilder/cdebootstrap one in testing/unstable? Are you using gs-gpl or gs-esp (This depends on gs-esp) Does your file system have enough space? I really can not understand why you are facing problem. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 332562 unreproducible Bug#332562: FTBFS: Link not found in target hashtable There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332458: marked as done (FTBFS: libmagick transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332458: fixed in xastir 1.6.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 15:55:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 08:55:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.235] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENY5O-0001fB-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:55:10 -0700 Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Ft1t8014173 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:55:01 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Fsv3m014121 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:54:57 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:54:30 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: libmagick transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: xastir Severity: serious Version: 1.6.0-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev instead of libmagick6-dev (= 5:6.0.3.5-2) Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUi25UTeB5t8Mo0RAglIAKCla9rzOtNlXOShBv/FxM/Uldc9zgCgtLWD toQ8PKHHjmyyPEggfJwEv/Y= =04CC -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332458-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 04:39:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 21:39:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO6NT-00035X-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:32:07 -0700 From: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332458: fixed in xastir 1.6.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:32:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xastir Source-Version: 1.6.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xastir, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xastir_1.6.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xastir/xastir_1.6.0-2.diff.gz xastir_1.6.0-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xastir/xastir_1.6.0-2.dsc xastir_1.6.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xastir/xastir_1.6.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xastir package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:45:03 +1000 Source: xastir Binary: xastir Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xastir - X Amateur Station Tracking and Information Reporting Closes: 332458 Changes: xastir (1.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Add build-dep for libgdal1-dev back *
Bug#303180: marked as done (mingw32-binutils: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303180: fixed in mingw32-binutils 2.16.91-20050827.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2005 09:49:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 05 02:49:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c146077.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.146.77] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIkgy-0004qw-00; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 02:49:52 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DIkh2-0007ma-Gk; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:49:56 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mingw32-binutils: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:49:56 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: mingw32-binutils Version: 2.15.94-20050118.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'mingw32-binutils' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: make[4]: Leaving directory `/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/gas/po' make[4]: Entering directory `/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/gas' gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas -I../bfd -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/config -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/../include -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/.. -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/../bfd -I/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/../intl -I../intl -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -g -O2 -c /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/app.c In file included from ./targ-cpu.h:1, from /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/config/obj-coff.h:38, from ./obj-format.h:1, from /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/config/te-pe.h:7, from ./targ-env.h:1, from /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/as.h:625, from /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/app.c:30: /mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/config/tc-i386.h:443: error: array type has incomplete element type make[4]: *** [app.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/build_dir/objs/gas' With the attached patch from upstream the 'mingw32-binutils' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/debian/rules 2005-04-05 11:21:22.052172269 +0200 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-04-05 11:14:11.0 +0200 @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ exit 1; \ fi; \ done; + cd $(build_src)/$(binutils); patch -p1 ../../../gcc4-fix.diff touch $@ diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/gcc4-fix.diff ./gcc4-fix.diff --- ../tmp-orig/mingw32-binutils-2.15.94-20050118.1/gcc4-fix.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ ./gcc4-fix.diff 2005-04-05 11:20:56.426976861 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +diff -urN tmp/gas/tc.h binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/tc.h +--- tmp/gas/tc.h 2005-04-05 11:14:18.002679000 +0200 binutils-2.15.94-20050118-1/gas/tc.h 2005-04-05
Bug#332591: marked as done (libsndfile1-dev - laks dependency against libflac-dev)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332591: fixed in libsndfile 1.0.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 08:26:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 01:26:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENnYZ-0002ss-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 01:26:19 -0700 Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA0413C025; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:26:17 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libsndfile1-dev - laks dependency against libflac-dev Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libsndfile1-dev Version: 1.0.12-2 Severity: grave libsndfile1-dev lacks a dependency against libflac-dev to fullfill the availability of /usr/lib/libFLAC.la which is referenced in /usr/lib/libsndfile.la. Bastian --=20 Virtue is a relative term. -- Spock, Friday's Child, stardate 3499.1 --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkNGMSkACgkQnw66O/MvCNFiCACdFGUXcYos4XX1s9/sEBYxyA2C qJYAoJEPG06gJT78ZeZLdcjmOlZMs6vG =DF2e -END PGP SIGNATURE- --aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f-- --- Received: (at 332591-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 05:38:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 22:38:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO7JV-0005IB-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:32:05 -0700 From: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332591: fixed in libsndfile 1.0.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libsndfile Source-Version: 1.0.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libsndfile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsndfile1-dev_1.0.12-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1-dev_1.0.12-3_i386.deb libsndfile1_1.0.12-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile1_1.0.12-3_i386.deb libsndfile_1.0.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile_1.0.12-3.diff.gz libsndfile_1.0.12-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libsndfile/libsndfile_1.0.12-3.dsc sndfile-programs_1.0.12-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libs/libsndfile/sndfile-programs_1.0.12-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libsndfile package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 14:32:56 +1000 Source: libsndfile Binary: libsndfile1 libsndfile1-dev sndfile-programs Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.12-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency:
