Bug#333462: r-base: build times out on hppa

[Steve Langasek]

Hi Dirk,

This bug requires a sourceful upload, because it involves changes to
debian/rules.  Is there any chance of this happening soon?  This bug is the
only thing holding up the lam/mpich transition now.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#334999: marked as done (FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:02:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334999: fixed in monotone 0.23-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 11:54:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 04:54:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESvTm-00060a-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:54:34 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1ESvUO-0008BB-EJ
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:55:12 +0200
Received: from p54a3f9f3.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.249.243] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1ESvTk-0007LL-Rf
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:54:34 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ESvTe-000483-GI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:54:26 +0200
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:54:26 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Subject: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k with ICE, please use gcc-3.4 there
Package: monotone
Version: 0.23-1
Severity: serious

monotone suffers from a very usual GCC 4.0 ICE on arm (and probably
hppa and m68k, but they didn't reach this point yet).
Please try to use gcc-3.4 on these architectures to work around it.

See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html
for more information.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

---
Received: (at 334999-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 06:12:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 23:12:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETvQ2-0003z5-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:02:50 -0700
From: Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334999: fixed in monotone 0.23-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:02:50 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: monotone
Source-Version: 0.23-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
monotone, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

monotone_0.23-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/monotone/monotone_0.23-4.diff.gz
monotone_0.23-4.dsc
  to pool/main/m/monotone/monotone_0.23-4.dsc
monotone_0.23-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/monotone/monotone_0.23-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated monotone package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrato

Bug#334124: aime: Still fails to build

[John Wright]

Strange, it builds fine for me on both ia64 and x86 with this patch.

This looks suspiciously like bug #292953.  I've been working on version
0.60.3-7.1, which includes (most of) a patch submitted to that bug.  For
some reason, although that patch includes the change that I submitted
above, it was left out in the NMU.  Does it not build on other
architectures than x86 and ia64?

John


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 335439 wishlist
Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> tags 335439 + security
Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly
Tags were: security
Tags added: security

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332274: muine and gtk-sharp2 2.3.x

[Dave Beckett]

"When muine jumped the gun on gtk-sharp2 2.3.91, it did so only for
i386; on other architectures, the autobuilders naturally continued to
use 1.9.5. ..."

nope.  It requires gtk-sharp2 1.9.2+ and was uploaded with that
dependency in the build which is recorded in, for example, the i386 deb.
Any 2.3.x series gtk-sharp2 appeared after the last muine was built.  If
this fails to build muine, please report that as a bug explaining it
or update this one.

"... As such, could you please reupload the package, preferably
with updated build-dependencies to be safe?"
You don't say what to update.  require gtk-sharp2 1.9.x?

Also your report was made on amd64 / x86_64 which is not a debian project
architecture.  Please report bugs against an architecture that the project
supports.

I'm likely to close this bug without further information.

Dave



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly

[Ola Lundqvist]

severity 335439 wishlist
tags 335439 + security
thanks

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:11:21AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:19:35PM -0400, Collin E Borrlewyn wrote:
> 
> > vncserver lets me in without supplying the full password.
> > 
> > To reproduce this:
> > start vncserver: vncserver :1
> > whe prompted enter a password of eight or more characters
> > start xvncviewer and connect to :1
> > when prompted enter the first eight characters of the password and hit enter
> > You have been authenticated.
> 
>   This appears to be a known weakness in VNC, for which I can find
>  references going back to 1999.

Yes it is very well known and will not be fixed by upstream as they sell an
other product (for money) with enhanced security.

>   e.g.
> 
>   http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/1999-November/010853.html
> 
> 
>   The source documents this:
> 
>   vnc-3.3.7/vncpasswd/vncpasswd.c
> 
>   "Always ignore anything after 8 characters, since this is what Solaris 
> getpass() does anyway.".
> 
> 
>   As does "man vncpasswd":
> 
>   "The password must be at least six characters long, and only the first eight
> characters are significant"
> 
>   Perhaps a more prominent warning is required, but I consider it unlikely
>  that this will be fixed if upstream is content with the current state

Maybe.

Or that someone provide me a patch with this fixed. On the other hand
it will not be fixed upstream and we will deviate (once more) from
it.

Thanks for your prompt answer.

Regards,

// Ola

> Steve
> --
> 
> 

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

[Ola Lundqvist]

Hello

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 02:53:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> No, these issues are not present in 2.6 (using the debian 2.6.8 and the
> debian kernel-patch-vserver, both from sarge). I am trying to find out if
> this is a kernel problem with the debian 2.4.27 kernel in sarge, or a
> vserver patch problem.

Thanks a lot for the information.

Isn't it so that the 2.4 patches follow the old stable branch of util-vserver
while the 2.6 patches followed the development branch?

Regards,

// Ola

> micah
> 
> > Hello
> >
> > To me it would be good to know if any of these issues are valid
> > if you use 2.6 kernel and patch from sarge?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > // Ola
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dear Micah,
> >>
> >> Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did
> >> the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results.
> >>
> >> > Test #1
> >> > Using all debian sarge componants:
> >> > kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge)
> >> > util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
> >> > kernel-patch: 1.9.5.3 (debian sarge)
> >> >
> >> > 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, not 114 or 124 as your
> >> > tests show.
> >> >
> >> > Conclusion: either the fixes to testfs caused error 114 and 124 to go
> >> > away, or you have a different kernel-source or kernel-patch applied.
> >> > Either try again with testfs.sh-0.11 or install the latest sarge
> >> kernel
> >> > source and kernel-patch-vserver as those versions are all that matter
> >> here.
> >>
> >> I am using all deian sarge componats, all the same version as yours,
> >> and then did the testfs.sh-0.11 by this way(I've setup a loopback file
> >> on /dev/loop0 already), before start the testfs.sh-0.11, I confirmed the
> >> barrier has proper setup(I also did this in my other tests later):
> >> # ls -lda /var/lib/vservers
> >> d-  8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/
> >> # showattr -d /var/lib/vservers/
> >> - ---BU-- /var/lib/vservers/
> >> # lsattr -d /var/lib/vservers
> >> - ---t- /var/lib/vservers
> >>
> >> # ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt
> >> Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
> >> Linux 2.4.27-10vserver-confirm i686/0.30.204
> >> VCI: (unknown)
> >> - ---
> >> testing ext2 filesystem ...
> >> [000]. xattr related tests ...
> >> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
> >> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> >> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
> >>
> >> - ---
> >> testing ext3 filesystem ...
> >> [000]. xattr related tests ...
> >> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
> >> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> >> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
> >>
> >> Same fails as you got, and I guess Bertl forgot to change the version in
> >> the script, so the script is still showing [V0.10].
> >>
> >> I also tested the exploit:
> >>
> >> # ./rootesc
> >> Exploit seems to work. =)
> >> #
> >> And then I can be able to access the host, for example, I can see the
> >> vserver's config file on host:
> >> # ls -ald /etc/vservers /var/lib/vservers/
> >> drwxr-xr-x  4 root root 4096 Sep 22 14:10 /etc/vservers
> >> d-  8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/
> >>
> >> > Test #2
> >> > Using only debian sarge util-vserver:
> >> > kernel-source: 2.4.31 (upstream)
> >> > util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
> >> > kernel-patch: 1.2.10 (upstream)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, the same as failed
> >> using
> >> > all debian sarge componants in test #1.
> >> >
> >> > Conclusion: based on the results from this test, and the previous, it
> >> is
> >> > clear that the debian kernel source and the debian kernel patch dont
> >> > make a difference here
> >>
> >> Same here, I am using the vanilla kernel 2.4.31(from kernel.org)
> >> vserver patch 1.2.10 (upstream)
> >> util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
> >>
> >> ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt
> >> Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
> >> Linux 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 i686/0.30.204
> >> VCI: (unknown)
> >> - ---
> >> testing ext2 filesystem ...
> >> [000]. xattr related tests ...
> >> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
> >> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> >> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
> >>
> >> - ---
> >> testing ext3 filesystem ...
> >> [000]. xattr related tests ...
> >> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
> >> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> >> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
> >>
> >> Same result as you got, seems the testfs #1 and #2 shows no difference,
> >> but the exploit works on #1's setup, not on #2.
> >>
> >> # ./rootesc
> >> cd ..: Permission denied
> >> chmod: Operation not permitted
> >> cd ..: Permission denied
> >> chmod: Operation not

Processed: 333259 is no longer grave

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 333259 normal
Bug#333259: libraptor1-dev: not installable in sid
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#333259: 333259 is no longer grave

[Dave Beckett]

severity 333259 normal
thanks

As of curl 7.15.0-3, libcurl3-dev has been restored so libraptor1-dev is
buildable from source again now (I checked, with a sid pbuilder
build).

This bug is thus not severe anymore, but the dependency can be updated at
next upload to pick one of libcurl3-gnutls or libcurl3-openssl-dev in
the dependencies.  I'm likely to chose openssl as that's what has worked.

Dave


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335262: Crashes on startup

[YANG Shouxun]

I confirm the problem exists. My locale is set to zh_CN.UTF-8.

However, if I set my locale to en_US or C, openoffice.org starts up without 
the problem. Thus that's the work-around so far.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334320: bazaar: IA64 build

[Ian Wienand]

Package: bazaar
Version: 1.4.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #334320

Hi,

I just built 1.4.2-2 on my IA64 machine and it does build OK.

The relevant part where the buildd failed looks like

=== TESTING: id-tagging-defaults ===
Test 1: id-tagging-defaults
Test 1: PASS
baz(30725): unaligned access to 0x6fb7191e, 
ip=0x401095f0
baz(30725): unaligned access to 0x6fb71922, 
ip=0x401095f0
baz(30725): unaligned access to 0x6fb71926, 
ip=0x401095f0
baz(30725): unaligned access to 0x6fb7192a, 
ip=0x401095f0

Having a look 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib/debug/usr/bin$ addr2line - e ./baz  401095f0
/tmp/bazaar-1.4.2/src/hackerlab/hash/sha1.c:370

which dereferences the buffer in a sha1_context struct.
  
I've seen problems with stack alignment and gcc 4 on IA64 and I'd 
suggest this is similar.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22605

The two possible solutions I can see is that you either change 
sha1_process_blocks to not assume the input is aligned or to change 
sha1_process_blocks so it is defined as only taking aligned input.  
Either is messy unfortunatley.

caballero is an Itanium 1 right?  That has stricter alignment 
requirements than Itanium 2.  I'm not sure if this could cause the 
problem on the other architectures too.

-i

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc4-gbb7e257e
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages bazaar depends on:
ii  diff   2.8.1-11  File comparison utilities
ii  gawk   1:3.1.4-2 GNU awk, a pattern scanning and pr
ii  libc6.12.3.5-6   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgpgme11 1.1.0-1   GPGME - GnuPG Made Easy
ii  libneon24  0.24.7.dfsg-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library
ii  libssl0.9.70.9.7g-2  SSL shared libraries
ii  patch  2.5.9-2   Apply a diff file to an original

bazaar recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335449: lessdisks: maintainer scripts modify conffiles

[Vagrant Cascadian]

Package: lessdisks
Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.4

according to policy 10.7.4:

 The maintainer scripts must not alter a `conffile' of _any_ package,
 including the one the scripts belong to.

it appears that the postinst for lessdisks modifies
/etc/lessdisks-install.conf, which is also marked as a conffile.

i believe this is also present in 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16.

in upstream cvs, this is handled with configuration file templates,
similar to what is described in policy 10.7.3.

live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#335448: lessdisks: configuration file values not preserved on upgrade

[Vagrant Cascadian]

Package: lessdisks
Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3

configuration values were obliterated on upgrade from
0.5.3cvs.20040906-16 to 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17, in violation of 10.7.3:

"local changes must be preserved during a package upgrade"

i haven't verified if this is also true of of 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16, or
somehow a regression of the newer 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17.

live well,
  vagrant


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: (no subject)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reopen 335445
Bug#335445: needs to be rebuilt (C++ transition/libsmpeg)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335445: marked as done (needs to be rebuilt (C++ transition/libsmpeg))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335445: fixed in libsdl-sound1.2 1.0.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 01:13:40 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 18:13:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smta06.mail.ozemail.net [203.103.165.100] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETquC-00043m-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:13:40 -0700
Received: from pug.anu.edu.au ([150.203.181.71]) by smta06.mail.ozemail.net
  with ESMTP
  id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
  Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:13:38 +
Received: from drew by pug.anu.edu.au with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ETqu9-0001En-BX; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:13:37 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: needs to be rebuilt (C++ transition/libsmpeg)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:13:37 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libsdl-sound1.2
Version: 1.0.1-8
Severity: grave

libsdl-sound1.2 depends on libsmpeg0c2, which is no longer in the archive.
It needs to be rebuilt with the dependency updated to libsmpeg0.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libsdl-sound1.2 depends on:
ii  libaa11.4p5-29   ascii art library
ii  libartsc0 1.4.2-4aRts sound system C support librar
ii  libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii  libaudio2 1.7-3  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-1   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libflac7  1.1.2-3Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libmikmod23.1.11-a-6 A portable sound library
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libogg0   1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libslang2 2.0.4-7The S-Lang programming library - r
ii  libsmpeg0c2   0.4.5+cvs20030824-1.3  SDL MPEG Player Library - shared l
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libsvga1  1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries
ii  libvorbis0a   1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

libsdl-sound1.2 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 335445-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 02:17:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 19:17:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETrta-0003OO-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:17:06 -0700
From: Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#335445: fixed in libsdl-sound1.2 1.0.1-9
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 19:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-

Processed: RM: xfs-xtt -- RoQA; superseded by X.Org, RC-buggy

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 314882 RM: xfs-xtt -- RoQA; superseded by X.Org, RC-buggy
Bug#314882: O: xfs-xtt -- X-TrueType font server
Changed Bug title.

> reassign 314882 ftp.debian.org
Bug#314882: RM: xfs-xtt -- RoQA; superseded by X.Org, RC-buggy
Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> tag 323884 wontfix
Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect
There were no tags set.
Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt
Tags added: wontfix

> tag 335429 wontfix
Bug#335429: xfs-xtt: Uninstallable - typo in postinst script
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335445: needs to be rebuilt (C++ transition/libsmpeg)

[Ari Pollak]

Erm, smpeg should probably be fixed first:

% cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libsmpeg0.shlibs
libsmpeg-0.4 0 libsmpeg0c2


Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: libsdl-sound1.2
> Version: 1.0.1-8
> Severity: grave
> 
> libsdl-sound1.2 depends on libsmpeg0c2, which is no longer in the archive.
> It needs to be rebuilt with the dependency updated to libsmpeg0.
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334124: aime: Still fails to build

[Ian Wienand]

Package: aime
Version: 0.60.3-7
Followup-For: Bug #334124

The '\n' patch is only part of the problem.  On IA64 with g++ 4.0.2 it
still fails to build with a whole lot of  "undefined reference to
`btree::reset_current()'" type errors in the final link.

As far as I can see it seem to be a problem similar to

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gplusplus/2001-02/msg3.html

Building with g++-4 without the -frepo flag works, or otherwise forcing
the build to use an older g++

--- configure.in2005-10-24 11:02:44.0 +1000
+++ configure.in.old2005-10-24 11:02:35.0 +1000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 AM_CONFIG_HEADER(include/autoconfig.h)

 CFLAGS="-g"
-CXXFLAGS="-g"
+CXXFLAGS="-g -frepo"

 dnl Checks for type of system
 AC_CYGWIN

-i


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc4-gbb7e257e
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329073: crafty: build with libnuma

[Ian Wienand]

Package: crafty
Version: 20.0-1
Followup-For: Bug #329073

Hi,

I think a better solution is to require libnuma, suggested patch below

--- control 2005-10-24 11:12:48.0 +1000
+++ control.old 2005-10-24 11:17:20.0 +1000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Source: crafty
 Section: non-free/games
 Priority: optional
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 2.0.0)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 2.0.0), libnuma-dev
 Maintainer: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Lukas Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2

-i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: ia64
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc4-gbb7e257e
Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335398: Duplicate?

[Filipus Klutiero]

Could you please check whether the workaroud mentionned in 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/09/msg00827.html helps.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly

[Steve Kemp]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:19:35PM -0400, Collin E Borrlewyn wrote:

> vncserver lets me in without supplying the full password.
> 
> To reproduce this:
> start vncserver: vncserver :1
> whe prompted enter a password of eight or more characters
> start xvncviewer and connect to :1
> when prompted enter the first eight characters of the password and hit enter
> You have been authenticated.

  This appears to be a known weakness in VNC, for which I can find
 references going back to 1999.

  e.g.

http://www.realvnc.com/pipermail/vnc-list/1999-November/010853.html


  The source documents this:

vnc-3.3.7/vncpasswd/vncpasswd.c

  "Always ignore anything after 8 characters, since this is what Solaris 
getpass() does anyway.".


  As does "man vncpasswd":

  "The password must be at least six characters long, and only the first eight
characters are significant"

  Perhaps a more prominent warning is required, but I consider it unlikely
 that this will be fixed if upstream is content with the current state

Steve
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd: ssl_cipher_list = ALL:!LOW does not work either

[Steve Langasek]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:01:53AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:

> | > Oct 23 01:34:33 cante dovecot: imap-login: Can't load certificate file /e=
> | tc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:co=
> | uld not load the shared library
> | > Oct 23 01:34:33 cante dovecot: child 22897 (login) returned error 89
> | > Oct 23 01:34:33 cante dovecot: child 22898 (login) returned error 89

> | Can someone please send the output of strace -efile or similar, so we can
> | see what shared library is failing to load?

> Attached below. Thanks for looking into this.

> clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD, 
> child_tidptr=0xb7ceaba8) = 26402
> exit_group(0)   = ?

Hrm, it looks like all the relevant bits are on the other side of this clone
call.  I don't remember if -ff traverses clone calls, but could you try with
strace -ff -efile instead?

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#335445: needs to be rebuilt (C++ transition/libsmpeg)

[Drew Parsons]

Package: libsdl-sound1.2
Version: 1.0.1-8
Severity: grave

libsdl-sound1.2 depends on libsmpeg0c2, which is no longer in the archive.
It needs to be rebuilt with the dependency updated to libsmpeg0.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libsdl-sound1.2 depends on:
ii  libaa11.4p5-29   ascii art library
ii  libartsc0 1.4.2-4aRts sound system C support librar
ii  libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii  libaudio2 1.7-3  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-1   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libflac7  1.1.2-3Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libmikmod23.1.11-a-6 A portable sound library
ii  libncurses5   5.5-1  Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libogg0   1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libslang2 2.0.4-7The S-Lang programming library - r
ii  libsmpeg0c2   0.4.5+cvs20030824-1.3  SDL MPEG Player Library - shared l
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libsvga1  1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries
ii  libvorbis0a   1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisenc2 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libvorbisfile 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m

libsdl-sound1.2 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334055: marked as done (zope2.7: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText functionalities (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334055: fixed in zope2.7 2.7.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 09:13:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 02:13:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQi6v-0006B7-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:13:49 -0700
Received: from [84.59.50.220] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EQi6Q-0006zu-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:18 +0200
Received: from jens by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQi6P-0001wx-Dq
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:17 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jens Nachtigall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: zope2.7: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText 
functionalities
 (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09)
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: zope2.7
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole

Please see:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix_2005-10-09/security_alert

A patch for 2.7 is available there.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8jens01-ifplugd-b44
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 334055-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 00:45:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 17:45:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETpbS-0007t2-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700
From: Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334055: fixed in zope2.7 2.7.8-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: zope2.7
Source-Version: 2.7.8-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zope2.7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

zope2.7-sandbox_2.7.8-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7-sandbox_2.7.8-1_all.deb
zope2.7_2.7.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1.diff.gz
zope2.7_2.7.8-1.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1.dsc
zope2.7_2.7.8-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1_i386.deb
zope2.7_2.7.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated zope2.7 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:16:22 +
Source: zope2.7
Binary: zope2.7 zope2.7-sandbox
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.7.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 zope2.7- Open Source Web Application Server
 zope2.7-sandbox - sandbo

Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly

[Collin E Borrlewyn]

Package: vncserver
Version: 3.3.7-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole


vncserver lets me in without supplying the full password.

To reproduce this:
start vncserver: vncserver :1
whe prompted enter a password of eight or more characters
start xvncviewer and connect to :1
when prompted enter the first eight characters of the password and hit enter
You have been authenticated.

It appears that any characters after the 8th are ignored by vncserver. If 
instead of entering the first 8 chracters and stopping you enter more, random 
characters you will also be authenticated.

This was reported in #debian on freenode by dob1. I checked it and found that 
he was correct.

If this is the expected behavior of vncserver it should be mentioned somewhere 
(prominently!) in the man page.

I've tested this by connecting with xvncviewer, vncviewer and xtightvncviewer 
all from the local machine.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages vncserver depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.10.10Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libice6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.5-5  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  perl  5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  vnc-common3.3.7-7Virtual network computing server s
ii  xbase-clients 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 miscellaneous X clients
ii  xlibs 4.3.0-7X Window System client libraries m
ii  xserver-common6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 files and utilities common to all 
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.1-1  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages vncserver recommends:
ii  xfonts-base   4.2.1-3standard fonts for X

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335438: libsvncpp-dev and libapr0-dev cannot be installed together

[Matthias Klose]

Package: libsvncpp-dev,libapr0-dev
Severity: serious

that means, that pysvn's build-deps cannot be installed
anymore. Please coordinate, if these these packages should depend on
libdb4.2-dev or libdb4.3-dev.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335435: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Package: dctc
Version: 0.85.9-2
Severity: serious

In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
 from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5,
 from main.c:41:
/usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h:15:35: error: cpu-feature-overrides.h: No such 
file or directory
main.c: In function 'do_login_stage':
main.c:662: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'getsockopt' 
differ in signedness
make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

While this might be a bug in l-k-h, the package doesn't really need
the header linux/sem.h anyway, the only thing it seems to use is SEMVMX.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335434: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h

[Frank Lichtenheld]

Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Package: dcgui
Version: 0.80-2
Severity: serious

FTBFS with the following error:
In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26,
 from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5,
 from callbacks.c:33:
/usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h:15:35: error: cpu-feature-overrides.h: No such 
file or directory
callbacks.c: In function 'decode_encoded_name':
callbacks.c:6831: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
'ascii2_to_bin1' differ in signedness
make[3]: *** [callbacks.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

While this might be a bug in l-k-h, the package doesn't really need the
header linux/sem.h anyway, the only thing it seems to use is SEMVMX.

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327610: marked as done (libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 'batch_add')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327610: fixed in libabz 0.6.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 11:27:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 04:27:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEPzb-0001aN-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:27:27 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id C6B8838115
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B73800D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 7B01826136; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to 
external symbol 'batch_add'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libabz
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -Wall -Wno-trigraphs -Os -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fPIC 
-I/usr/local/include -I../include -DGETHOSTBYNAME -DGETSERVBYNAME  -c -o 
iptables.o iptables.c
../include/abz/iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 
'batch_add'
../include/abz/iptables.h:58: error: 'iptables_append' aliased to undefined 
symbol 'batch_append'
../include/abz/iptables.h:64: error: 'iptables_destroy' aliased to undefined 
symbol 'batch_destroy'
make[3]: *** [iptables.o] Error 1


Kurt


---
Received: (at 327610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 23:17:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 16:17:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETp5O-0001o9-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700
From: Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#327610: fixed in libabz 0.6.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: libabz
Source-Version: 0.6.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libabz, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libabz0-dev_0.6.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0-dev_0.6.2_i386.deb
libabz0_0.6.2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0_0.6.2_i386.deb
libabz_0.6.2.dsc
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.6.2.dsc
libabz_0.6.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.6.2.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libabz package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:53:54 +0200
Source: libabz
Binary: libabz0-dev libabz0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ch

Processed: severity of 328333 is serious, merging 328333 335365

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 328333 serious
Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng
Severity set to `serious'.

> merge 328333 335365
Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng
Bug#335365: printbill - build-depends against removed package
Merged 328333 335365.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Well, it's a RC bug, makes package unusable.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 323884 serious
Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect
Severity set to `serious'.

> severity 330340 serious
Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt
Severity set to `serious'.

> merge 330340 323884
Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect
Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt
Merged 323884 330340.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335429: xfs-xtt: Uninstallable - typo in postinst script

[Artur R. Czechowski]

Package: xfs-xtt
Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6
Severity: serious

During installation I noticed following message:
Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ...
chown: `xfntserv:xfntserv': invalid user
dpkg: error processing xfs-xtt (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xfs-xtt
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ...
xfntsrv already exists.

postinst script contains:

if id xfntsrv > /dev/null 2> /dev/null; then
echo 'xfntsrv already exists.'
else
adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home 
/var/log/fontservers --gecos "X font server" --disabled-password 
--disabled-login xfntsrv
if [ ! -e /var/log/fontservers ] ; then
mkdir -p /var/log/fontservers
fi
chown -R xfntserv:xfntserv /var/log/fontservers
fi

Please notice, that existence of xfntsrv is checked and also xfntsrv
user and group are added. Then chown tries to use xfntserv name.

Regards
Artur

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages xfs-xtt depends on:
ii  adduser   3.74   Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf   1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-6  compression library - runtime

xfs-xtt recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335414: pugs - build dependency against non existant package

[Florian Ragwitz]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:50:44PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: pugs
> Version: 6.2.10-3
> Severity: serious
> 
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> > E: Couldn't find package libghc6-plugins-dev

hs-plugins is waiting in NEW to get aproved.

-Flo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does

[micah]

No, these issues are not present in 2.6 (using the debian 2.6.8 and the
debian kernel-patch-vserver, both from sarge). I am trying to find out if
this is a kernel problem with the debian 2.4.27 kernel in sarge, or a
vserver patch problem.

micah

> Hello
>
> To me it would be good to know if any of these issues are valid
> if you use 2.6 kernel and patch from sarge?
>
> Regards,
>
> // Ola
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:00:27PM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dear Micah,
>>
>> Thank you for your tests, I have downloaded the testfs-0.11.sh and did
>> the similar tests as yours to help confirm the results.
>>
>> > Test #1
>> > Using all debian sarge componants:
>> > kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge)
>> > util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
>> > kernel-patch: 1.9.5.3 (debian sarge)
>> >
>> > 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, not 114 or 124 as your
>> > tests show.
>> >
>> > Conclusion: either the fixes to testfs caused error 114 and 124 to go
>> > away, or you have a different kernel-source or kernel-patch applied.
>> > Either try again with testfs.sh-0.11 or install the latest sarge
>> kernel
>> > source and kernel-patch-vserver as those versions are all that matter
>> here.
>>
>> I am using all deian sarge componats, all the same version as yours,
>> and then did the testfs.sh-0.11 by this way(I've setup a loopback file
>> on /dev/loop0 already), before start the testfs.sh-0.11, I confirmed the
>> barrier has proper setup(I also did this in my other tests later):
>> # ls -lda /var/lib/vservers
>> d-  8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/
>> # showattr -d /var/lib/vservers/
>> - ---BU-- /var/lib/vservers/
>> # lsattr -d /var/lib/vservers
>> - ---t- /var/lib/vservers
>>
>> # ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt
>> Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
>> Linux 2.4.27-10vserver-confirm i686/0.30.204
>> VCI: (unknown)
>> - ---
>> testing ext2 filesystem ...
>> [000]. xattr related tests ...
>> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
>> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
>> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
>>
>> - ---
>> testing ext3 filesystem ...
>> [000]. xattr related tests ...
>> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
>> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
>> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
>>
>> Same fails as you got, and I guess Bertl forgot to change the version in
>> the script, so the script is still showing [V0.10].
>>
>> I also tested the exploit:
>>
>> # ./rootesc
>> Exploit seems to work. =)
>> #
>> And then I can be able to access the host, for example, I can see the
>> vserver's config file on host:
>> # ls -ald /etc/vservers /var/lib/vservers/
>> drwxr-xr-x  4 root root 4096 Sep 22 14:10 /etc/vservers
>> d-  8 root root 4096 Oct 13 15:37 /var/lib/vservers/
>>
>> > Test #2
>> > Using only debian sarge util-vserver:
>> > kernel-source: 2.4.31 (upstream)
>> > util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
>> > kernel-patch: 1.2.10 (upstream)
>> >
>> >
>> > 103, 104, 106, 109, 121, 122 all fail on ext2, the same as failed
>> using
>> > all debian sarge componants in test #1.
>> >
>> > Conclusion: based on the results from this test, and the previous, it
>> is
>> > clear that the debian kernel source and the debian kernel patch dont
>> > make a difference here
>>
>> Same here, I am using the vanilla kernel 2.4.31(from kernel.org)
>> vserver patch 1.2.10 (upstream)
>> util-vserver: 0.30-204-5sarge2 (debian sarge)
>>
>> ./testfs.sh-0.11 -l -t -D /dev/loop0 -M /mnt
>> Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.10] Copyright (C) 2005 H.Poetzl
>> Linux 2.4.31-vs1.2.10 i686/0.30.204
>> VCI: (unknown)
>> - ---
>> testing ext2 filesystem ...
>> [000]. xattr related tests ...
>> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
>> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
>> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
>>
>> - ---
>> testing ext3 filesystem ...
>> [000]. xattr related tests ...
>> [101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
>> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
>> [121]* [122]* [123]. [124]. [199].
>>
>> Same result as you got, seems the testfs #1 and #2 shows no difference,
>> but the exploit works on #1's setup, not on #2.
>>
>> # ./rootesc
>> cd ..: Permission denied
>> chmod: Operation not permitted
>> cd ..: Permission denied
>> chmod: Operation not permitted
>> (alternating a few times)
>> then the false:
>> Exploit seems to work. =)
>> (because it always shows this line, actually it failed, but nobody
>> bothered to fix up the exploit bug)
>>
>> > Test #3
>> > Using debian sarge componants with upstream util-vserver:
>> > kernel-source: 2.4.27-10 (debian sarge)
>> > util-vserver: 0.30-208+fix03 (upstream)
>> > kernel-patch: 1.9.5.3 (debian sarge)
>> >
>> > Only test 106 fails... Not 104, 114, 122 or 124.
>> >
>> > Conclusion: either the fixes to testfs cause

Bug#334124: Patch

[John Wright]

Hello,

I've attached a patch that allows aime to build on 64-bit platforms.
I'm not sure how (or if) this actually worked on anything before.  fputc
takes a char, and the original code passed an integer-cast pointer to char.

John
diff -Nur aime-0.60.3-orig/src/editor.cpp aime-0.60.3/src/editor.cpp
--- aime-0.60.3-orig/src/editor.cpp	2001-09-29 06:20:21.0 -0600
+++ aime-0.60.3/src/editor.cpp	2005-10-23 15:32:07.368929533 -0600
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@
 
 while (tmp_lin != NULL)
 {   fputs(tmp_lin->the_line.str_show(),fp);
-fputc((int)"\n",fp);
+fputc('\n',fp);
 tmp_lin = tmp_lin->next_line;
 }
 return 1; 

Bug#335402: penguin-command: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev

[Karl Bartel]

it seems you forgot a build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev, the  
package has

failed to build on six arches so far.


You are right. I removed the old sdl-image code from the penguin- 
command sources, which were included in earlier versions and forgot  
to update the build deps.


Thanks,
Karl


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335414: pugs - build dependency against non existant package

[Bastian Blank]

Package: pugs
Version: 6.2.10-3
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of pugs_6.2.10-3 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, ghc6 (>= 6.4.1) | ghc-cvs (>= 
> 20050331-1), libghc6-plugins-dev, perl, libperl-dev, libwww-perl, 
> libyaml-perl, libtest-tap-model-perl, libtest-tap-htmlmatrix-perl, 
> libcompress-bzip2-perl
[...]
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
>   /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/apt-get --purge $CHROOT_OPTIONS -q -y install 
> debhelper dpatch ghc6 libghc6-plugins-dev libperl-dev libwww-perl 
> libyaml-perl libtest-tap-model-perl libtest-tap-htmlmatrix-perl 
> libcompress-bzip2-perl
> Reading Package Lists...
> Building Dependency Tree...
> E: Couldn't find package libghc6-plugins-dev
> apt-get failed.

Bastian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335220: [Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:24:32PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Perhaps you could move non-free documents to a separate
> doc-linux-text-nonfree package, while you wait for the relicensing
> effort to be completed. Then each document would be able to be moved
> back to doc-linux-text, as soon as it's relicensed in a DFSG-free
> manner...

There is already such a package where most of the non-free HOWTOs
already are located. Things you have found are just oversights
(with exception of the GFDL stuff)

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335409: saving to shfs writes 1 byte long file without complaining

[Tomas Pospisek]

Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: grave

When I save onto a shfs filesystem, oowriter will merrily "save" it, but
in reality leave a file of length 1 without complaining. This looks very
similar to problems with ooo 1.x where ooo was at least complaining that
there were "errors" without it being clear what "errors" these were.

Looks like this:

$ ls -l offene_rechnung_vorlage.odt
-rw-r--r--  1 tpo users 1 Oct 23 21:53 offene_rechnung_vorlage.odt
$ id
uid=1006(tpo) gid=1006(tpo) groups=1006(tpo),100(users)

The fs shown above is a shfs mounted fs. Saving on a "normal" fs works
well.
*t

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-writer depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
hi  libgcc1   1:4.0.2-2  GCC support library
ii  libicu34  3.4-2  International Components for Unico
ii  libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.6c2   4.6.2-3STLport C++ class library
ii  libwpd8c2 0.8.3-1Library for handling WordPerfect d
ii  openoffice.org-core   2.0.0-1OpenOffice.org office suite archit
ii  python-uno2.0.0-1Python interface for OpenOffice.or
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-4  compression library - runtime

Versions of packages openoffice.org-writer recommends:
ii  j2re1.4 [java2-runtime]   1.4.2.02-1 Blackdown Java(TM) 2 Runtime Envir
ii  openoffice.org-java-common2.0.0-1OpenOffice.org office suite Java s

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334759: efax-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: libintl.h:40: error: new declaration 'char* gettext(const char*)'

[Lior Kaplan]

Thanks for letting me know. Seems that the file in the archive is not
the one I created. (was acedently changed at my sponsor).

To address this problem I've created version 3.0.6.1 at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efax-gtk/

Please test it. If it's OK, I'll arrange an upload.

thanks for all the help.

Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:39:10PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> 
>>Please test version 3.0.6-2 at
>>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efax-gtk/
> 
> 
> dpkg-source: error: file efax-gtk_3.0.6.orig.tar.gz has size
> 797348 instead of expected 893306
> 
> It seems the size has changed between those 2 versions.
> 
> 
> Kurt
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 

Lior Kaplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Guides.co.il

Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326784: w3-url-e21: [patch] broken SSL support

[Ben Pfaff]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David D. Smith) writes:

> Package: w3-url-e21
> Version: 2001.11.08-9

> url claims to support SSL transfers but the support is broken since
> the migration of the HTTP handler to emulating synchronous transfers
> with asynchronous transfers (which I believe was around the time of
> emacs 21). This patch should fix it.

I'm not sure how to test whether the bug is fixed.  Can you
supply a test case?

I just uploaded a newer upstream version of w3-url-e21.  It has
the patch against url-https.el already, but not the one against
url-http.el.  Are you sure that the one against url-http.el is
correct and necessary?
-- 
Ben Pfaff 
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://benpfaff.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335403: libgmp3-doc: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] includes non-free documentation

[Francesco Poli]

Package: libgmp3-doc
Version: 4.1.4-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

According to the copyright file (and the texinfo file itself),
the GMP documentation is released under the GFDL license (v1.1
or later) and hence does not comply with the DFSG.
See

  
  

for details on the issues that most debian-legal contributors
see in the GFDL license.

In order to solve this issue, upstream copyright holder
should be contacted and asked for a license change (unlikely,
since the copyright holder is the FSF...)

Otherwise, the package should be moved to the non-free section,
possibly leaving the (L)GPL'd demo code in main (in a separate
libgmp3-examples package)

See

  

for further information about moving non-free docs out of main.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.31
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335220: [Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation

[Francesco Poli]

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:23:40 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote:

[...]
> Thanks for this analysis. I will go through it before preparing the
> next upload.

You're welcome.

> 
> Some small comments:
> 
> I don't yet plan to remove the GFDL stuff, will do
> that later in the release cycle... It's just too much documents and
> so I will only remove them when I feel it is really necessary.

IMHO, you should begin contacting upstream authors ASAP, so that you
have enough time to persuade them to relicense before we are close to
etch release...
Perhaps you could move non-free documents to a separate
doc-linux-text-nonfree package, while you wait for the relicensing
effort to be completed. Then each document would be able to be moved
back to doc-linux-text, as soon as it's relicensed in a DFSG-free
manner...

> 
> I see the LDPL license as free unless there will emerge a real
> consensus in the project regarding the "identify contributors" clauses
> in various licenses.

I understand your point of view.
I personally believe that the right to distribute anonymous
modifications should be granted by a DFSG-free work, but I admit there's
not (yet) a strong consensus on this...

-- 
:-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
..
  Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgp8bnWlY1zmr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#335402: penguin-command: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev

[Christian T. Steigies]

Package: penguin-command
Version: 1.6.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi Karl,
it seems you forgot a build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev, the package has
failed to build on six arches so far.

Automatic build of penguin-command_1.6.9-1 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 69
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper, libpng12-dev, libsdl1.2-dev (>= 1.2.2-3.1), 
libjpeg62-dev, libsdl-mixer1.2-dev (>= 1.2.0-1.1), zlib1g-dev, automake, 
autoconf
[...]
checking for main in -lSDL_mixer... yes
checking for main in -lSDL_image... no
configure: error: Your system is missing libSDL_image!
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1


http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=penguin-command

Christian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335398: nvidia-kernel-source: fails to create /dev nodes with udev and >= 2.6.13

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 1.0.7174-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Since I upgraded to 2.6.13, nothing seems to create /dev/nvidia* entries
for me, with the result that X dies on startup with the message "failed
to initialize NVIDIA kernel module!".

The postinst generates files in /dev using mknod; this does not help
after a reboot.

I've talked to the udev maintainer, and his stance is that a) mknod in
postinst is against policy (at the very least, MAKEDEV should be used
instead), and b) the kernel module should have a dev entry in /sys ("find
/sys -name dev | grep nvidia" returns nothing on my system), or install
an init script to create the device at every boot.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335284: marked as done (lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335284: fixed in lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 03:41:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 20:41:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.easystreet.com [69.30.22.10] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETWjP-0003Zp-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:11 -0700
Received: from waitron.freegeek.org (209-162-205-26.dq1mn.easystreet.com 
[209.162.205.26])
by smtp.easystreet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779323640B4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (waitron [127.0.0.1])
by waitron.freegeek.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C0063CF4
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waitron.freegeek.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.freegeek.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 14870-10 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (pcp05158478pcs.montbl01.nm.comcast.net 
[68.35.116.136])
by waitron.freegeek.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDFC63CE7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 39AB893394; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600
From: Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Op27XXJsWz80g3oF"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at freegeek.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8"
Content-Disposition: inline


--jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: lessdisks-xterminal
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16

lessdisks-xterminal has no mechanism to configure or run xserver-xorg.

many of the scripts assume xserver-xfree86 or one of the older v3 X
servers and corresponding configuration files.

i have committed some code to handle xserver-xorg in cvs (both the 0.6.x
branch and HEAD).

attached should be a patch adding crude xserver-xorg support for
0.5.3cvs.20040906-16

live well,
  vagrant

--jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="crude-xorg-support.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

--- xbase/x_config_ltsp.orig2005-10-22 21:07:08.474936032 -0600
+++ xbase/x_config_ltsp 2005-10-22 21:08:44.534332784 -0600
@@ -171,8 +171,12 @@
  esac
  ;;
 =20
-*)   XBINARY=3D"XFree86"
+*)   if [ -x /usr/bin/X11/Xorg ]; then
+   XBINARY=3D"Xorg"
+ else
+   XBINARY=3D"XFree86"
+ fi
  XOPTS=3D""
- make_x_link XFree86 $X_LINK
+ make_x_link $XBINARY $X_LINK
  ;;
 esac

--jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8--

--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDWwZOlPc63BPWGpkRArLSAJ0d6Rly2rDe+Fvq8Nhnc8I2Ud/AdQCfQYxl
PabtSZuw+5GhoP5J2WwRjio=
=tbf+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Op27XXJsWz80g3oF--

---
Received: (at 335284-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:47:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:47:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjw6-0002no-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700
From: Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T

Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error

[Florent Rougon]

Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am
> wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 ->
> 3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available
> in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these files are moved somehwere save on
> instalation.

Hmm. Normally, in sarge, you have:

  % dpkg -S dvips35.map pdftex35.map dvipdfm35.map
  tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map
  tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map
  tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvipdfm35.map

but tetex-base/README.Debian.gz (from sarge) says:

,
| 
| 2. Changes in handling of map files (unneeded files in /etc/texmf/dvips)
| ---
| 
| Font map files previously were installed as conffiles (i.e.,
| configuration files managed by dpkg) in older versions of tetex-base
| and tetex-extra (e.g. in woody) in /etc/texmf/dvips. Since it is in
| fact not necessary to change them, they are now treated as ordinary
| files and installed below /usr/share/texmf/dvips. Because of Debian
| Policy (and the way dpkg handles conffiles), the copies in
| /etc/texmf/dvips will not be removed when you upgrade, although they
| are useless. You can quite safely delete them (but then you won't be
| able to downgrade any more unless you purge the packages). Any changes
| you made previously in these files will no longer have any effect.
| 
| It is usually a good idea to remove those files if you have not
| changed them. You can use the script
| /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/remove-oldmaps to do this. The list of files
| is: 
| 
| antp.cfg antt.cfg pl.cfg
| config.qf 
| ar-ext-adobe-bi.map ar-ext-adobe-kb.map ar-ext-urw-kb.map
| ar-ext-urw-urw.map ar-std-adobe-bi.map ar-std-adobe-kb.map
| ar-std-urw-kb.map ar-std-urw-urw.map bakoma-extra.map
| bsr.map bsr-interpolated.map
| lw35extra-adobe-bi.map lw35extra-adobe-kb.map lw35extra-urw-kb.map
| lw35extra-urw-urw.map mathpple-ext.map mtsupp-ext-adobe-bi.map
| mtsupp-ext-adobe-kb.map mtsupp-ext-urw-kb.map mtsupp-ext-urw-urw.map
| mtsupp-std-adobe-bi.map mtsupp-std-adobe-kb.map mtsupp-std-urw-kb.map
| mtsupp-std-urw-urw.map raw-ar-ext-adobe-bi.map raw-ar-ext-adobe-kb.map
| raw-ar-ext-urw-kb.map raw-ar-ext-urw-urw.map raw-ar-std-adobe-bi.map
| raw-ar-std-adobe-kb.map raw-ar-std-urw-kb.map raw-ar-std-urw-urw.map
| raw-lw35extra-adobe-bi.map raw-lw35extra-adobe-kb.map
| raw-lw35extra-urw-kb.map raw-lw35extra-urw-urw.map utopia.map
| 
| Some intermediate versions of tetex deleted those files in maintainer
| scripts (which was a bug). Therefore, if you used testing, unstable or
| some backports after woody's release, they might not exist on your
| system. 
| 
| Do NOT delete other files in the directory, they are still required.
`

However, the preceding list doesn't contain dvips35.map nor
pdftex35.map. Is it incomplete?...

Second observation: if you look at the updmap-sys error messages posted
by Sébastien, you'll see they are generated by 'mapWarn badLocation' for
the first two and by 'mapWarn notFound' for the last one.

This means that we were in the main 'else' clause of locateMapMigrate().
IOW, the new files were not found at all. I wouldn't be surprised to
learn that Sébastien has .dpkg-new files in /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/.

-- 
Florent

Bug#334521: marked as done (deboostrap should enable apt archive checking)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334521: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 14:02:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 07:02:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERs3G-0002rg-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:02:50 -0700
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ERs3C-0007i3-C1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:46 +0200
Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27])
by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ERs39-00012X-7z; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200
Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1ERs39-0005hV-7D; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: deboostrap should enable apt archive checking
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.296, required 12,
autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.70, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


Package:  deboostrap
Version:  0.3.1.7

When building a new etch chroot, the generated environment is unable
to install new packages using APT.  This is because of the new apt
version entering etch.  After applying a workaround for #334506
(--exclude=libsigc++-1.2-5c102), I run into this problem:

  # debootstrap --resolve-deps --exclude=libsigc++-1.2-5c102 etch \
/tmp/chroot-etch http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian && \
echo "deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian etch main" > 
/tmp/chroot-etch/etc/apt/sources.list && \
chroot /tmp/chroot-etch apt-get update &&
chroot /tmp/chroot-etch apt-get -y install deborphan
  I: Validating Packages
  I: Resolving dependencies of required packages...
  I: Resolving dependencies of base packages...
  [...]
  Get:3 http://ftp.no.debian.org etch/main Packages [3464kB]
  Fetched 3500kB in 1s (2696kB/s)
  Reading package lists... Done
  W: GPG error: http://ftp.no.debian.org etch Release: Could not execute 
/usr/bin/gpgv to verify signature (is gnupg installed?)
  W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  The following extra packages will be installed:
dialog
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
deborphan dialog
  0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
  Need to get 250kB of archives.
  After unpacking 987kB of additional disk space will be used.
  WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
dialog deborphan
  E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes
  #

A workaround is to install gnupg in the chroot (--include=gnupg to
debootstrap), and then run 'apt-key add
/usr/share/apt/debian-archive.gpg' in the chroot to get apt to
recognize the mirror signature key.q

I suggest this or similar code is made part of the default debootstrap
rule for etch.  An alternative is to get apt to not complain about the
lack of mirror verification when running apt-get, but that kind of
defeats the purpose of adding the mirror checking. :)

I've been told that ubunto solved this problem by installing gnupg on
all installations.  It might be a solution for debian too, though we
might want to make a smaller gnupg package with only the verification
programs, to limit the size increase of the base system.  Installing
gnupg increases the i386 etch chroot from 139MiB to 147MiB.

---
Received: (at 334521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:19:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:19:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjT1-0006Et-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
From: Anthony Towns 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334521: fixed in deboot

Bug#334506: marked as done (debootstrap unable to build etch chroot, looking for non-existing libsigc++-1.2-5c102)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334506: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 12:10:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 05:10:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERqI7-0001e1-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:10:03 -0700
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ERqI3-0002rb-0X
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:09:59 +0200
Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27])
by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1ERqH0-0007yV-IE; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200
Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1ERqH0-00046i-H9; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debootstrap unable to build etch chroot, looking for non-existing 
libsigc++-1.2-5c102
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.225, required 12,
autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.78, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


Package:  debootstrap
Version:  0.3.1.7
Severity: grave

A new version of apt just made it into etch.  This make it impossible
to use debootstrap to generate an etch chroot, as the
libsigc++-1.2-5c102 package is no longer in etch, but it is expected
by debootstrap.

When running debootstrap, this error occurs:

  I: Retrieving Release
  I: Retrieving Packages
  I: Validating Packages
  I: Resolving dependencies of required packages...
  I: Resolving dependencies of base packages...
  I: Found additional required dependencies: gcc-4.0-base libdb4.3 libselinux1 
libsepol1 libslang2 libstdc++6 lsb-base
  I: Found additional base dependencies: libsigc++-1.2-5c2
  I: Checking component main on http://http.us.debian.org/debian...
  E: Couldn't find these debs: libsigc++-1.2-5c102

The list of base packages in /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/etch need to
be trimmed to remove libsigc++-1.2-5c102, and perhaps replace it with
libsigc++-1.2-5c2 or just leave it to the dependency tracking to
handle the library.

Severity grave, as this make debootstrap completely unusable for all
trying to generate a debian/testing environment.

---
Received: (at 334506-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:17:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:17:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjT1-0006Er-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
From: Anthony Towns 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334506: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7

Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 0.3.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the 

Bug#314157: marked as done (does not work in d-i anymore)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314157: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 22:59:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 15:59:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DiKNN-0002zi-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:59:21 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733FE17DE2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:59:17 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0DCE76E12B; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:09 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: does not work in d-i anymore
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: debootstrap
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave

/target/debootstrap # cat debootstrap.log=20
local: 352: apt-utils: bad variable name
/target/debootstrap #=20

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)

Versions of packages debootstrap depends on:
ii  binutils  2.15-6 The GNU assembler, linker and =
bina
ii  wget  1.9.1-12   retrieves files from the web

-- no debconf information

--=20
see shy jo

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCr2E9d8HHehbQuO8RAm+lAKC1d5tCU5149joPIUSdKwlp2RhUDgCg28q0
179jrn7fhzpCkIW6k9Nn2x4=
=pxf0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--

---
Received: (at 314157-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:17:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:17:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjT1-0006E1-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
From: Anthony Towns 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314157: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21

Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 0.3.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb
debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc
debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz
debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them t

Bug#314373: marked as done ([debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314373: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 23:05:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 16:05:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-out4.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.137] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Digwf-0006mu-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:05:17 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out4.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1Digwe-0002LY-C5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: debootstrap-udeb
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave

Two errors in "functions" breaking new installations have been confirmed
testing debootstrap udeb in sid during an emulated S/390 installation.

The following 2 changes will fix them.

=3D=3D=3D
=20
   local totaldebs=3D0
=2D  local leftoverdebs=3D"$*"
+  local leftoverdebs=3D"$@"
   for c in $COMPONENTS; do
 if [ "$countdebs" -ge "$numdebs" ]; then break; fi
=3D=3D=3D
   fi
 done
=2Decho >&3 ${leftover# }
+echo >&5 ${leftover# }
   )
 }
=2D--
   local pkgdest=3D"$TARGET/$($DLDEST pkg $SUITE $c $ARCH $m $path)"
   if [ ! -e "$pkgdest" ]; then continue; fi
=2D  pkgs_to_get=3D"$(download_debs "$m" "$pkgdest" $pkgs_to_get 3>&1 1=
>&4)"
+  pkgs_to_get=3D"$(download_debs "$m" "$pkgdest" $pkgs_to_get 5>&1 1>&=
4)"
   if [ "$pkgs_to_get" =3D "" ]; then break; fi
 done 4>&1
=3D=3D=3D

With these two changes base-installation finishes successfully, with
good progress information on VT1.


There _is_ another error from debootstrap at the very end:
   The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1).

The logs had already been copied and the /target/debootstrap dir was gone.
I have not (yet) been able to trace this bug. At first I thought it could
be caused by the fact that I was running the script "set -x", but the same
errors occurs without "set -x".

The last lines in /target/var/log/bootstrap.log (with "set -x") were:
+ info BASESUCCESS Base system installed successfully.
+ local name=3DBASESUCCESS
+ local fmt=3DBase system installed successfully.
+ shift
+ shift
+ [ yes ]
+ echo I: BASESUCCESS
+ echo IF: Base system installed successfully.

I will try to debug this further tomorrow.

Cheers,
=46JP

--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCsLQ0gm/Kwh6ICoQRAgafAJ927AMeziERf8jyQQ1Vr4U524Gg9wCgzzaw
OourqyheoV5yXucHIDkKedI=
=Ty0z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH--

---
Received: (at 314373-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:19:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:19:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjT1-0006E7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
From: Anthony Towns 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314373: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Sco

Bug#324848: marked as done (avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 12:23:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 05:23:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.imars.net [64.62.144.114] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7uID-0005Qd-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:45 -0700
Received: from toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org 
(modemcable205.170-37-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.37.170.205])
by smtp.imars.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7OCNFaE051977
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: by toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 02A21CFE8; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frederic Briere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: avifile-player
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Now that the C++ ABI transition is over, libqt3c102-mt has been removed
from sid and replaced with libqt3-mt.  avifile-player needs to be
recompiled to be installable again.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-4
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages avifile-player depends on:
ii  libavifile-0. 1:0.7.43.20050224-1shared libraries for AVI read/writ
ii  libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3  Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-9  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m

avifile-player recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

---
Received: (at 327932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-TD-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_

Bug#334034: marked as done (kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1(hppa/unstable):)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334034: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 06:33:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 23:33:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQfbY-0005XA-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:33:27 -0700
Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16])
by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B0916EB1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D68B390770; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1(hppa/unstable):
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kcheckgmail
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 69
> Build started at 20051013-0758

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, 
> libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf

[...]

> /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/basic_string.h:278:
>  warning: cast from 'char*' to 'std::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >::_Rep*' increases required 
> alignment of target type
> kcheckgmailiface_skel.cpp: In member function 'QCStringList 
> KCheckGmailIface::_ZTv0_n36_N16KCheckGmailIface9functionsEv()':
> kcheckgmailiface_skel.cpp:57: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at 
> cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
> see .
> make[3]: *** [kcheckgmailiface_skel.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=kcheckgmail&ver=0.5.4-1

patch for the NMU, based on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html

diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog 
kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog
--- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog  2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 
-0600
+++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog  2005-10-15 00:29:06.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+kcheckgmail (0.5.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * work around gcc-4.0 FTBFS on some architectures
+
+ -- LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:28:30 +
+
 kcheckgmail (0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream version
diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control 
kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control
--- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 
-0600
+++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control2005-10-15 00:29:05.0 -0600
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: kde
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, 
libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, 
libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf, g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: kcheckgmail
diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules
--- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules  2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 
-0600
+++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules  2005-10-15 00:29:05.0 -0600
@@ -15,6 +15,15 @@
 DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE   ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
 DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE 

Bug#320883: marked as done (aalib transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320883: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 01:25:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 18:25:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzlX7-l8-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:25:29 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (68-67-225-150.chvlva.adelphia.net 
[68.67.225.150])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD8317DEE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  2 Aug 2005 01:25:29 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 31CC06E0EF; Mon,  1 Aug 2005 21:25:35 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:25:35 -0400
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:08:02 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aalib transition
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2



--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: libavifile-0.7c102

This package depends on the aalib1 package which has recently been
renamed to libaa1 and which is now a dummy package pending removal.
Please update your packages to build-depend on libaa1-dev and link
against libaa1. This is also an important pare of the slang2 transition.
It will probably be as simple as a recompile.

aalib transition info:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg00295.html
slang2 transition info:=20
http://wiki.debian.net/?EtchSlang2upgrade

--=20
see shy jo

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC7sdyd8HHehbQuO8RAp0rAKDZCtruXZ+sIV5FsLCXqe2si1lZzwCgzDnA
BDc0JNLPTJYqZ116uzAtDIg=
=VyzR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--

---
Received: (at 320883-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T3-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#320883: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-utils_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-utils_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
av

Bug#330012: marked as done (avifile: Need to move to new C++ ABI)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:08 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#330012: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 08:21:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 01:21:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJRlW-0001wx-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:21:42 -0700
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EJRlS-000313-E9
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:38 +0200
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EJRlM-0004Ci-7C; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:32 +0200
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1EJRlL-0006FS-4S; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:31 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: avifile: Need to move to new C++ ABI
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:30 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.695, required 12,
autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 2.12,
UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOMAIN_BODY,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

--=-=-=


Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave

The avifile library need to be renamed and rebuild according to the
C++ transition.  More info on the C++ transition is available from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html>
and http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/>.

Ubuntu already applied patches to do this, as well as getting the
library to build with gcc4.  I attach the patch from ubuntu.

Applying this patch and rebuilding will close #321550, #324848,
#327932, #300179, #318233 and #325435.  I'll consider NMUing the
package if it isn't fixed in a few days.


--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=avifile-ubuntu.diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Patch to move to new C++ abi and gcc 4.

diff -ru avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/changelog avifile-0.7.43.200=
50224-ubuntu/debian/changelog
--- avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/changelog 2005-02-24 13:25:02.000=
00 +0100
+++ avifile-0.7.43.20050224-ubuntu/debian/changelog 2005-08-25 14:37:06.000=
00 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,41 @@
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu6) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * Fixed the conflicts...
+
+ -- Sebastian Dr=C3=B6ge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:21:54 +=
0200
+
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu5) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * Rebuild for slang2 transition
+
+ -- Sebastian Dr=C3=B6ge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:28:36 +=
0200
+
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu4) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * Rebuild for CXX Transition=20
+
+ -- Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 31 May 2005 13:02:55 +
+
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu3) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * Make conflicts unconditional
+
+ -- Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 19 May 2005 13:49:02 +
+
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu2) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * CXX transition:
+- Renamed libavifile-0.7c102 to libavifile-0.7
+  * Fixed build-deps: depend on new C++ ABI libraries=20=20
+
+ -- Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 18 May 2005 13:05:35 +
+
+avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=3Dlow
+
+  * Applied gcc-4.0 FTBFS patch from Andreas Jochens
+
+ -- Charles Majola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon,  9 May 2005 15:54:47 +0200
+
 avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
   * updated to latest ffmpeg
   * fix packaging (Closes: 252982, 259417, 295486)
diff -ru avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/control avifile-0.7.43.20050=
224-ubuntu/debian/control
--- avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/control   2005-02-24 
13:46:22.0=
 +0100
+++ avifile-0.7.43.20050224-ubuntu/debian/control   2005-08-25 
14:37:0

Bug#321550: marked as done (libavifile-0.7c102: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321550: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 04:52:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 21:52:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1Gfc-xs-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:52:28 -0700
Received: from c-24-147-127-19.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.127.19] 
helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu)
by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1E1Gfc-0007Nz-7V
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:28 -0400
Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E1Gfb-0003Rz-OA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:27 -0400
From: Chris Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libavifile-0.7c102: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1
X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libavifile-0.7c102
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Please recompile with libslang1-dev to update dependency.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-cph1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libavifile-0.7c102 depends on:
ii  aalib11.4p5-28   ascii art library - transitional p
ii  libaa1 [aalib 1.4p5-28   ascii art library
ii  libartsc0 1.3.2-4aRts Sound system C support librar
ii  libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii  libaudio2 1.7-2  The Network Audio System (NAS). (s
ii  libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
ii  libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libesd0   0.2.36-1   Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared 
ii  libfontconfig 2.3.2-1generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6  2.1.10-1   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-3  GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.6.6-1The GLib library of C routines
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-7  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libsvga1  1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2   2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxrender1   1:0.9.0-2  X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System video extension li
ii  slang11.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-3  compression library - runtime

libavifile-0.7c102 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 321550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T5-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTE

Bug#300179: marked as done (avifile: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300179: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 08:54:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 00:54:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCDFd-0002ha-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:54:37 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCDFc-0003Ua-Bm; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:54:36 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:54:36 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOMAIN_BODY,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: avifile
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'avifile' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

 x86_64-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -DHAVE_AV_CONFIG_H 
-I./../libavcodec -I./.. -Wall -Wno-unused -I../../include -O2 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -pipe -c 4xm.c  -fPIC 
-DPIC -o .libs/4xm.o
In file included from ./../libavcodec/avcodec.h:14,
 from avformat.h:16,
 from 4xm.c:28:
./../libavcodec/common.h:61: error: array type has incomplete element type
./../libavcodec/common.h:63: error: array type has incomplete element type
make[3]: *** [4xm.lo] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavformat'

With the attached patch 'avifile' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/avcodec.h 
./ffmpeg/libavcodec/avcodec.h
--- ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/avcodec.h 
2005-02-24 12:31:10.0 +0100
+++ ./ffmpeg/libavcodec/avcodec.h   2005-03-18 09:29:44.849987503 +0100
@@ -1813,6 +1813,14 @@
 #define FF_OPT_MAX_DEPTH 10
 } AVOption;
 
+#ifdef HAVE_MMX
+extern const struct AVOption avoptions_common[3 + 5];
+#else
+extern const struct AVOption avoptions_common[3];
+#endif
+extern const struct AVOption avoptions_workaround_bug[11];
+
+
 /**
  * Parse option(s) and sets fields in passed structure
  * @param strctstructure where the parsed results will be written
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/common.h 
./ffmpeg/libavcodec/common.h
--- ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/common.h  
2005-02-15 13:33:33.0 +0100
+++ ./ffmpeg/libavcodec/common.h2005-03-18 09:34:02.595215479 +0100
@@ -53,15 +53,6 @@
 { name, help, offsetof(AVCodecContext, field), FF_OPT_TYPE_RCOVERRIDE, 
.defval = 0, .defstr = NULL }
 #define AVOPTION_SUB(ptr) { .name = NULL, .help = (const char*)ptr }
 #define AVOPTION_END() AVOPTION_SUB(NULL)
-
-struct AVOption;
-#ifdef HAVE_MMX
-extern const struct AVOption avoptions_common[3 + 5];
-#else
-extern const struct AVOption avoptions_common[3];
-#endif
-extern const struct AVOption avoptions_workaround_bug[11];
-
 #endif /* HAVE_AV_CONFIG_H */
 
 /* Suppress restrict if it was not defined in config.h.  */
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/dsputil.h 
./ffmpeg/libavcodec/dsputil.h
--- ../tmp-orig/avifile-0.7.43.20050224/ffmpeg/libavcodec/dsputil.h 
2005-02-15 13:33:34.0 +0100
+++ ./ffmpeg/libavcodec/dsputil.h   2005-03-18 09:24:45.732740888 +0100
@@ -604,33 +604,6 @@
 return score;\
 }
 
-#ifndef HAVE_LRINTF
-/* XXX: add ISOC specific test to avoid specific BSD testing. */
-/* better than nothing implementation. */
-/* btw, rintf() is existing on fbsd too -- alex */
-static always_inline long int lrintf(float x)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_WIN32
-#  ifdef ARCH_X86
-int32_t i;
-asm volatile(
-"fistpl %0\n\t"
-: "=m" (i) : "t" (x) : "st"
-);
-return i;
-#  else
-/* XXX: incorrect, but make it compile */
-return (int)(x + (x < 0 ? -0.5 : 0.5));
-#  endif
-#else
-return (int)(rint(x));
-#endif
-}

Bug#324848: marked as done (avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 12:23:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 05:23:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.imars.net [64.62.144.114] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7uID-0005Qd-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:45 -0700
Received: from toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org 
(modemcable205.170-37-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.37.170.205])
by smtp.imars.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7OCNFaE051977
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: by toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 02A21CFE8; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frederic Briere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: avifile-player
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Now that the C++ ABI transition is over, libqt3c102-mt has been removed
from sid and replaced with libqt3-mt.  avifile-player needs to be
recompiled to be installable again.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-4
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages avifile-player depends on:
ii  libavifile-0. 1:0.7.43.20050224-1shared libraries for AVI read/writ
ii  libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1   1:4.0.1-6  GCC support library
ii  libice6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3  Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii  libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii  libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++51:3.3.6-9  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m

avifile-player recommends no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

---
Received: (at 324848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_

Bug#327932: marked as done (avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy1c-0003Qj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:48 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1Z-0002RN-Sb
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 327932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-TD-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.

Bug#324970: marked as done (avifile: Does not document the copyright of source code properly)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324970: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2005 08:12:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 01:12:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (javifsp.no-ip.org) 
[213.96.98.148] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E8CqV-mA-00; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:12:24 -0700
Received: from jfs by javifsp.no-ip.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E8CqT-0005Ff-Oe
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:12:21 +0200
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:12:21 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: avifile: Does not document the copyright of source code properly
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Priority: serious
Justification: Section 2.3 "Copyright considerations"

The only copyright statement in the debian/copyright file says:

Copyright: GPL (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL)
and LGPL (see /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL)

That's plain wrong, those above are not copyright statements,
they are licenses. The package fails to acknowledge who is=20
the upstream author (and holds (c)) for the source code it
contains, which is a policy violation. Thus the severity


There's plenty of copyright statements in the source code that
are not acknowledged in the debian/copyright file, for example,

- ffmpeg is: Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Fabrice Bellard et al.
- ffmpeg/libavcodec/ppc/dsputil_altivec.c says
 * Copyright (c) 2002 Brian Foley
 * Copyright (c) 2002 Dieter Shirley
 * Copyright (c) 2003-2004 Romain Dolbeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- ffmpeg/libavcodec/ppc/mpegvideo_ppc.c is:
 * Copyright (c) 2002 Dieter Shirley

 And so on, the debian/copyright file has to acknowledge and document
 _all_ of these copyright statements.=20

 Regards

 Javier





--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDDX1lsandgtyBSwkRAhyhAJ9RuPGtTu81BV5DqsycgcDdn57itACfTGVF
oFUBx2T56Cg7sZ21rwvChGg=
=7HNu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv--

---
Received: (at 324970-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T9-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324970: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plu

Bug#327932: marked as done (avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EEy1c-0003Qj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:48 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) 
  id 1EEy1Z-0002RN-Sb
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: avifile
Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1
Severity: grave
Tags: sid

Hello,

  This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on
  libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package
  uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this
  library has moved to the libqt3-mt package.

  Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix
  this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts
  build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for
  all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package
  in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies
  are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate
  the Qt/KDE transition to testing.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html

  Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If
  that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it
  may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the
  correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's
  CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm,
  m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail.

  Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not
  be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will
  read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay
  their upload.

  Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking!
  

  P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for
  this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the
  bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the
  opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I
  apologize for the inconvenience.


---
Received: (at 324848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.

Bug#318233: marked as done (avifile: FTBFS: please rebuild against latest libsdl1.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318233: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 09:12:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 02:12:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx1.fakembox.net (mailftr1.telerete.it) [217.148.122.41] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dszlm-0004z4-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:12:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (mailftr1.telerete.it [127.0.0.1])
by mailftr1.telerete.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E0A38268
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mailftr1.telerete.it ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mailftr1.telerete.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 26099-03 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bracetown.ildana.net (unknown [83.137.60.126])
by mailftr1.telerete.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0280038213
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by bracetown.ildana.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF86C4C2B7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from bracetown.ildana.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bracetown [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 26906-09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [192.168.1.129] (unknown [192.168.1.129])
by bracetown.ildana.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D59D4C2B6
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST)
Subject: avifile: FTBFS: please rebuild against latest libsdl1.2
From: Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Debian
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:13:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ildana.net
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at telerete.it
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: avifile
Severity: serious

Please rebuild avifile against the latest libsdl1.2 (1.2.7
+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1 ). 
This has changed significantly due to the libslang2, aalib and xorg
transitions, and drip will currently fail to build from source.
rebuilding should fix this and drop unnecessary dependencies on slang.
(due to aalib changes).

Regards
Alastair McKinstry



---
Received: (at 318233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETieh-T1-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
From: Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#318233: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: avifile
Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
avifile-uti

Bug#220056: marked as done (libavifile-0.7c102: Libraries contain undefined symbols)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220056: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2003 22:29:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 16:28:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJKWm-0002u1-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:28:56 -0600
Received: from 24-136-9-34.na.21stcentury.net ([24.136.9.34] helo=localhost)
by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 1AJKWl-0001oz-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:28:55 -0500
Received: from robin by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJKV7-0005fK-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:27:13 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robin Verduijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libavifile-0.7c102: Libraries contain undefined symbols
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:27:12 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Robin Verduijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libavifile-0.7c102
Version: 1:0.7.38.20030710-1
Severity: normal

The libraries libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38 and libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38
contain undefined symbols. This is probably caused by not being linked against
all of the libraries they depend on.

The output of 
LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_BIND_NOW=1 LD_TRACE_PRELINKING=t 
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 \
/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38
shows the following symbols could not be found:
undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE 
(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0 (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_pure_virtual (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE 
(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv121__vmi_class_type_infoE 
(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _Znaj (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_rethrow (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _ZdlPv(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_end_catch   (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _Unwind_Resume(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_throw   (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _ZdaPv(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_begin_catch (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: __cxa_allocate_exception 
(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: _Znwj (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38)

For /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38 the output is as follows:
undefined symbol: mjpeg_encoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: mjpeg_decoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_init (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: av_realloc (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_close (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: av_strdup (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_string (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_find_decoder 
(/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_find_encoder 
(/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: av_free   (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_decode_audio 
(/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_decode_video 
(/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: flush_put_bits (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avcodec_get_context_defaults 
(/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: av_mallocz (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38)
undefined symbol: avpicture_fill (/usr

Bug#335364: gfpoken - tries to put files in home directory

[Bas Wijnen]

Hello,

Thank you for reporting this bug.  I had noticed that on several platforms the
source failed to build.  However, this seems to be a problem with blender.
For details see bug #330920.

I had noticed that it tried (and failed) to create some config files in the
home directory, but that wasn't what caused the build failure.  However, I
didn't think of it as a problem, but of course it is.

I fixed this by creating a temporary directory as $HOME, and removing it
afterward.  Looking at strace's output, it doesn't touch the real home
directory anymore.  I think it should really be fixed in blender, and I saw
you filed a bug there already.  Thanks.

The new package is currently awaiting upload by my sponsor.

Thank you for reporting this issue,
Bas Wijnen

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#300176: marked as done (basket: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300176: fixed in basket 0.5.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 08:44:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 00:44:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCD5v-00086E-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:44:35 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCD5t-0008Qu-Mk; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:44:33 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: basket: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses 
precision
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:44:33 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
REMOVE_IN_QUOTES autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: basket
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'basket' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

item.cpp: In member function 'void Item::setSelected(bool)':
item.cpp:425: error: cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision
item.cpp:426: error: cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision
/usr/include/kde/keditlistbox.h: At global scope:
/usr/include/kde/keditlistbox.h:49: warning: 'class KEditListBox::CustomEditor' 
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
make[3]: *** [basket.all_cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/basket-0.5.0/src'

With the attached patch 'basket' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/basket-0.5.0/src/item.cpp ./src/item.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/basket-0.5.0/src/item.cpp   2005-03-09 18:38:27.0 
+0100
+++ ./src/item.cpp  2005-03-18 09:27:19.831988575 +0100
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@
if (selected == m_isSelected)
return;
 
-   DEBUG_WIN << QString(selected ? "Add" : "Remove") + " selected item " + 
QString::number((int)this) +
-"; b.lastIn=" + 
QString::number((int)(parentBasket()->lastInsertedItem()));
+   DEBUG_WIN << QString(selected ? "Add" : "Remove") + " selected item " + 
QString::number((long)this) +
+"; b.lastIn=" + 
QString::number((long)(parentBasket()->lastInsertedItem()));
 
m_isSelected = selected;
if (selected) {

---
Received: (at 300176-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:18:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:18:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETiWu-0007VZ-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
From: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300176: fixed in basket 0.5.0-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: basket
Source-Version: 0.5.0-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
basket, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

basket_0.5.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4.diff.gz
basket_0.5.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4.dsc
basket_0.5.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated basket package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators

Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error

[Ralf Stubner]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
> as suspected by Ralf.

Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still
used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am
wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 ->
3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available
in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these files are moved somehwere save on
instalation.

cheerio
ralf



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335340: marked as done (urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335340: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 11:49:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 04:49:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETeM2-EY-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:49:34 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1ETeM0-0004NN-Vs; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ETeM0-0002Aa-Ru; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: urlgrabber
Version: 2.9.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

>From my build log:

> Automatic build of urlgrabber_2.9.6-1 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5

[...]

> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), python2.3-dev

[...]

>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> #-/usr/bin/make clean
> python setup.py clean
> make: python: Command not found
> make: *** [clean] Error 127
> **
> Build finished at 20051023-1345
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/urlgrabber-2.9.6
> --


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 335340-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 15:25:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 08:25:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au [138.25.6.6] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EThig-0007Ut-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:25:10 -0700
Received: from wildfire by succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EThic-0003zG-G9; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000
To: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#335340: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au); SAEximRunCond expanded 
to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: urlgrabber
Version: 2.9.6-2

Fixed in 2.9.6-2 already uploaded and installed.

Thanks, though, for your bug report.

Regards,
Anand

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: urlgrabber
> Version: 2.9.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
> 
>

Bug#335285: marked as done (kicker: uninstallable on ia64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335285: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 03:45:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 20:45:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETWnr-0004Bb-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:45:47 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-105-238.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.105.238])
by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j9N3ji7Z015018;
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ETWnp-000241-5R; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:45 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kicker: uninstallable on ia64
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:45 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kicker
Version: 4:3.4.2-3.0.1
Severity: serious


On ia64, kicker has a binNMU, with an unsatisfiable exact
same-version dependency on the architecture: all package kdebase-data.

This prevents various packages like amarok from being built, since the
buildds can't install stuff.

The version dependency needs to be weakened/corrected.  I'm not sure what
the best way to do that is, since rebuilding all of kdebase on all
architectures is kind of annoying.  You might ask debian-release whether
a sourceful binNMU should be done, or a total upload.

---
Received: (at 335285-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 15:20:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 08:20:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EThaz-0005lG-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700
From: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#335285: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: kdebase
Source-Version: 4:3.4.2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kdebase, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kappfinder_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kappfinder_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kate_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kate_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kcontrol_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kcontrol_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdebase-bin_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-bin_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdebase-data_3.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-data_3.4.2-4_all.deb
kdebase-dev_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-dev_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdebase-doc-html_3.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-doc-html_3.4.2-4_all.deb
kdebase-doc_3.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-doc_3.4.2-4_all.deb
kdebase-kio-plugins_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-kio-plugins_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdebase_3.4.2-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4.diff.gz
kdebase_3.4.2-4.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4.dsc
kdebase_3.4.2-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4_all.deb
kdepasswd_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdepasswd_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdeprint_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdeprint_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdesktop_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdesktop_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kdm_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdm_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
kfind_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kdebase/kfind_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
khelpcenter_3.4.2-4_i386.deb

Processed: prestimel 1.0-3.1 uploaded to delayed queue.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 332462 + pending
Bug#332462: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332462: prestimel 1.0-3.1 uploaded to delayed queue.

[Daniel Kobras]

tag 332462 + pending
thanks

Moi!

I have now stuffed prestimel 1.0-3.1 as proposed earlier, into the
delayed queue on gluck with a delay of two days.

Regards,

Daniel.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334467: marked as done (/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334467: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 06:05:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 23:05:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from jcd.fdn.fr (orcal.delepine.info) [80.67.176.3] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERkba-0003UZ-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:05:46 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by orcal.delepine.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF8E1BA8E;
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:46:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orcal.delepine.info ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (orcal [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 31194-07; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.80.137.43])
by orcal.delepine.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8381BA89;
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:45:50 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Jean_Charles_Del=E9pine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:05:06 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at delepine.info
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.31
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hello,

poucet:/home/jcd# mkinitramfs -k -o /boot/initramfs.img-2.6.14-rc4-git4
2.6.14-rc4-git4
Working files in /tmp/mkinitramfs_R9QJFq and overlay in 
/tmp/mkinitramfs-OL_mPaz0q
poucet:/home/jcd# cp -rL /tmp/mkinitramfs_R9QJFq/ initramfs
poucet:/home/jcd# chroot initramfs/ /bin/sh
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory

poucet:/home/jcd# ldd initramfs/bin/busybox 
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xe000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7eb9000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7e8b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d53000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7eed000)

poucet:/home/jcd# ls -ld initramfs/lib/tls
ls: initramfs/lib/tls: No such file or directory

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on:
ii  busybox   1:1.01-3   Tiny utilities for small and embed
ii  cpio  2.6-6  GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  klibc-utils   1.1.1-2small statically-linked utilities 
ii  lvm2  2.01.14-3  The Linux Logical Volume Manager
ii  mdadm 1.12.0-1   tool to administer Linux md device
ii  udev  0.070-5/dev/ and hotplug management daemo

initramfs-tools recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334467-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:18:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:18:06 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgem-00018J-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334467: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: initramfs-tools
Source-Version: 0.32

W

Bug#333856: marked as done (initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333856: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 06:44:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 23:44:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQJIu-0001oB-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:44:32 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0712.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AF40E1C000A0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-25-57.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[82.126.215.57])
by mwinf0712.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 814011C000BB
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EQJ7w-AU-2y; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:12 +0200
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:06 +0200
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: initramfs-tools
Severity: Serious

Hello, ...

This is the second step in the linux-2.6 >=2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution
process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool
cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools,
to make things nice and all, a proposal was sent to all of you and on
debian-kernel, but only Simon Horman commented :

  http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/10/msg00232.html

So, i am now asking that all ramdisk-tool packages which the kernel team will
support implement the two following things :

  1) Provide the linux-ramdisk-tool virtual package.

  2) implement in their mkinitrd-compatible wrapper the two following options :

--supported-host-version : will return 0 if the version passed as argument
(for example 2.6.12-1-powerpc) can be used to generate a ramdisk, and 1
otherwise. This will mostly generally be 1 always for initramfs and
initrd -tools, not sure about the 2.2 kernel case and such though, and
some kind of 2.6 version for yaird.

--supported-target-version : will return 0 if the tool know how to generate
a ramdisk for the version passed as argument (for example 2.6.13-1-powerpc),
and 1 otherwise. This will be >=2.6.8 for yaird, >=2.6.12 for
initramfs-tools, and <2.6.13 for initrd-tools.

Note, i mark those bugs as RC, since this is of primordial importance to get
implemented quickly so that we may move 2.6.13 and beyond to sid in a timely
fashion.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


---
Received: (at 333856-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:17:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:17:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgem-00018H-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#333856: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: initramfs-tools
Source-Version: 0.32

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
initramfs-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

initramfs-tools_0.32.dsc
  to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.32.dsc
initramfs-tools_0.32.tar.gz
  

Bug#333780: marked as done (Uninstallable due to C++ ABI transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333780: fixed in libicq2000 0.3.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 17:24:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 10:24:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.235] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EQ6oO-0006pD-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:24:12 -0700
Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with 
ESMTP id j9DHO7hB031845
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:24:07 +0200
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (68-173.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.173.68])
by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with 
ESMTP id j9DHO4Tn031811
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:24:04 +0200
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:22:39 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051010)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Uninstallable due to C++ ABI transition
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: libicq2000
Severity: grave
Version: 0.3.2-3

Hi

libicq2000 is uninstallable due to libsigc++0c102 not being available
anymore. Note that it is *not* enough to rebuild your package to fix
this bug! You should also rename libicq2000 to libicq2000c2 and conflict
and replace libicq2000.

Cheers

Luk

- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDTpff5UTeB5t8Mo0RAg92AJ0Tb30GqLjdKJ85iFHQ37CNHXDbvgCfeMl7
EE4/RUHtp/OOJhAxIPjf0Bc=
=i9c9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 333780-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:23:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:23:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETghF-000205-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700
From: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#333780: fixed in libicq2000 0.3.2-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: libicq2000
Source-Version: 0.3.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libicq2000, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libicq2000-dev_0.3.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000-dev_0.3.2-5_i386.deb
libicq2000-doc_0.3.2-5_all.deb
  to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000-doc_0.3.2-5_all.deb
libicq2000_0.3.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000_0.3.2-5.diff.gz
libicq2000_0.3.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000_0.3.2-5.dsc
libicq2000c2_0.3.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000c2_0.3.2-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libicq2000 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem w

Bug#303705: marked as done (Incorrect libpng build-dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303705: fixed in penguin-command 1.6.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 08:22:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 08 01:22:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heavensgate.debian.net [213.41.173.23] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJol9-0003nu-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:22:35 -0700
Received: from silicium.ccc.cea.fr ([132.165.91.101])
by heavensgate.debian.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1DJoj3-0003p7-LF
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:20:25 +0200
Subject: Incorrect libpng build-dependencies
From: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:25:00 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: penguin-command

Currently, penguin-command build-depends on libpng2-dev | libpng3-dev |
libpng12-0-dev. On i386, it was built against libpng12, but on other
architectures it makes it build against libpng10. This is wrong, as SDL
uses libpng12. In some cases, it can make some partial upgrades from
woody fail.

Thus, please make the package build-depend on libpng12-dev only;
libpng2-dev and libpng3-dev will be removed post-sarge anyway.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom


---
Received: (at 303705-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:08:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:08:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgQL-0001Du-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700
From: Karl Bartel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#303705: fixed in penguin-command 1.6.9-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: penguin-command
Source-Version: 1.6.9-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
penguin-command, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

penguin-command_1.6.9-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1.diff.gz
penguin-command_1.6.9-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1.dsc
penguin-command_1.6.9-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1_i386.deb
penguin-command_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Karl Bartel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated penguin-command package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:26:37 +0200
Source: penguin-command
Binary: penguin-command
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Karl Bartel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Karl Bartel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 penguin-command - a missile command clone
Closes: 182669 242353 273450 303705
Changes: 
 penguin-command (1.6.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream rel

Bug#334938: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#334938: nmu patch

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:59:18PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> --- crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs   2003-05-27 23:55:02.0 -0700
> +++ x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2005-10-22 23:57:45.0 -0700
> @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@
>   static int bNotFirstTime;
>   char buf[1024];
>  int rand_bytes_read;
> + 
> + SSL_library_init();
>  
>   if(!bNotFirstTime) {
> SSLeay_add_all_algorithms();


I think it would be better to do this inside the
if(!bNotFirstTime) {


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd: temporary solution

[juan]

Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1
Followup-For: Bug #334180

If you need a working dovecot revert to version 1.0.alpha3-1 (26-Sep-2005)

http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-vs1.2.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dovecot-imapd depends on:
ii  dovecot-common  1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 secure mail server that supports m
ii  libc6   2.3.5-6  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 SSL shared libraries

dovecot-imapd recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335317: marked as done (k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 10:29:07 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 03:29:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETd6B-0001hu-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:07 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so525459wri
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;

b=cV+KEhfyLVJAJf0w/pUltQYt7SHg1Xb5JRSzRgRmcujvyS9CZvH3MBkX+w+UOHDvEnAt41olN3ydyDirUq87QY8iAFONkYA+ANnecilprWNNO5gJJFW0ss/F5dkpBBXuyI7Tn5iHpwcdhiuahbYi8Y5mdJmEgmkBUH8v8srN0sM=
Received: by 10.54.118.5 with SMTP id q5mr2684493wrc;
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [80.136.156.164])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 43sm1843261wri.2005.10.23.03.29.04;
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:29:18 +0200
From: Jeremias Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Subject: k3b-i18n: k3b fails
Package: k3b-i18n
Version: 0.12.4a-2
Severity: serious
Justification: must

*** Please type your report below this line ***
The Package k3b is missed, but k3b-i18n is on the servers yet.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
   APT prefers testing
   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 335317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:58:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:58:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx1.magmacom.com [206.191.0.217] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgMt-0008Hj-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:58:35 -0700
Received: from mail2.magma.ca (mail2.magma.ca [206.191.0.214])
by mx1.magmacom.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9NDwYn3021803
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:35 -0400
Received: from reykjavik (ottawa-hs-209-217-93-214.d-ip.magma.ca 
[209.217.93.214])
by mail2.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9NDwMNM027732
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:33 -0400
Received: from fmarier by reykjavik with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ETgMD-RM-Dv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:21 -0400
Received: by reykjavik (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000);
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400
From: Francois Marier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Request-PGP: http://people.debian.org/~francois/public_key.asc
X-Hashcash: 1:26:051023:[EMAIL PROTECTED]::UHf7skILabsIiu7T:00
0001Hvqa
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hi Jeremias,

It appears tha

Bug#334935: marked as done (using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailfarm.berkeley.edu (calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu) [128.32.61.106] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESjlY-0005Lu-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:08 -0700
Received: from [169.229.99.128] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO 
localhost.localdomain)
  by calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 113512159; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:38 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BACD5C5380; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libcrypt-ssleay-perl
Version: 0.51-4
Severity: important

This is blah.pl:

#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;

use LWP::UserAgent;
use Crypt::SSLeay;

my $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new();

$ua->get("https://www.verisign.com";);

When running this simple test program, perl dumps core.

(gdb) bt
#0  0x2b8a4d09 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
#1  0x2b7632ba in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new ()
   from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so
#2  0x2ac59655 in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#3  0x2ac51b3e in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#4  0x2abf9ddb in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#5  0x0040180c in main ()

It coredumps similarly on i386. I believe this is a result of switching
to libssl0.9.8.

The test suite in the Crypt::SSLeay source also fails.

Thanks,
Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages libcrypt-ssleay-perl depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8a-2   SSL shared libraries
ii  liburi-perl   1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-7The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

libcrypt-ssleay-perl recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgBp-0005cy-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: crypt-ssleay
Source-Version: 0.51-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
libcryp

Bug#334938: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 00:00:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 17:00:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mylar.outflux.net [69.93.193.226] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESkKo-0001xc-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:34 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (serenity-end.outflux.net [10.2.0.2])
by mylar.outflux.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j9L00R1r002409
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:32 -0700
Received: from nemesis by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ESkV8-0002Q8-FG; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MIMEDefang-Filter: outflux$Revision: 1.218 $
X-HELO: localhost.localdomain
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 10.2.0.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libssl0.9.8
Version: 0.9.8a-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


There is a seg fault when using Perl LWP to access https sites:

#0  0xb7dc3942 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8
#1  0xb7de07de in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new ()
   from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so
#2  0x080c0ad0 in Perl_pp_entersub ()
#3  0x080b95ba in Perl_runops_standard ()
#4  0x08064e43 in perl_run ()
#5  0x0805fd4f in main ()

For example:

$ perl -MHTTP::Request -MLWP::UserAgent -e '
$agent = LWP::UserAgent->new();
$request  = HTTP::Request->new("GET" => "https://www.osdl.org/";);
$response = $agent->request($request);
'
Segmentation fault


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libssl0.9.8 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

libssl0.9.8 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  libssl0.9.8/restart-services:

---
Received: (at 334938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgBp-0005cy-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: crypt-ssleay
Source-Version: 0.51-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.

Bug#334938: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 00:00:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 17:00:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mylar.outflux.net [69.93.193.226] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESkKo-0001xc-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:34 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (serenity-end.outflux.net [10.2.0.2])
by mylar.outflux.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j9L00R1r002409
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:32 -0700
Received: from nemesis by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ESkV8-0002Q8-FG; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MIMEDefang-Filter: outflux$Revision: 1.218 $
X-HELO: localhost.localdomain
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 10.2.0.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libssl0.9.8
Version: 0.9.8a-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


There is a seg fault when using Perl LWP to access https sites:

#0  0xb7dc3942 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8
#1  0xb7de07de in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new ()
   from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so
#2  0x080c0ad0 in Perl_pp_entersub ()
#3  0x080b95ba in Perl_runops_standard ()
#4  0x08064e43 in perl_run ()
#5  0x0805fd4f in main ()

For example:

$ perl -MHTTP::Request -MLWP::UserAgent -e '
$agent = LWP::UserAgent->new();
$request  = HTTP::Request->new("GET" => "https://www.osdl.org/";);
$response = $agent->request($request);
'
Segmentation fault


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libssl0.9.8 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

libssl0.9.8 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  libssl0.9.8/restart-services:

---
Received: (at 334935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgBp-0005cw-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: crypt-ssleay
Source-Version: 0.51-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further com

Bug#334935: marked as done (using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailfarm.berkeley.edu (calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu) [128.32.61.106] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESjlY-0005Lu-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:08 -0700
Received: from [169.229.99.128] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO 
localhost.localdomain)
  by calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 113512159; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:38 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BACD5C5380; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libcrypt-ssleay-perl
Version: 0.51-4
Severity: important

This is blah.pl:

#!/usr/bin/perl

use strict;

use LWP::UserAgent;
use Crypt::SSLeay;

my $ua = LWP::UserAgent->new();

$ua->get("https://www.verisign.com";);

When running this simple test program, perl dumps core.

(gdb) bt
#0  0x2b8a4d09 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
#1  0x2b7632ba in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new ()
   from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so
#2  0x2ac59655 in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#3  0x2ac51b3e in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#4  0x2abf9ddb in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8
#5  0x0040180c in main ()

It coredumps similarly on i386. I believe this is a result of switching
to libssl0.9.8.

The test suite in the Crypt::SSLeay source also fails.

Thanks,
Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages libcrypt-ssleay-perl depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8a-2   SSL shared libraries
ii  liburi-perl   1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin
ii  perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-7The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis

libcrypt-ssleay-perl recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 334935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETgBp-0005cw-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: crypt-ssleay
Source-Version: 0.51-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz
crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
  to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386

Bug#303705: penguin-command now uninstallable on non-i386

[Karl Bartel]

Thanks! I'll fix this in the next upload.


I guess it is about time for that next upload.


Absolutely.


  Hope you're OK, Karl.


I'm OK, but sometimes a grave bug is needed to bring my attention  
back to my old games. I just uploaded a new version.


Thanks for the heads up and sorry that it took me so long,
Karl


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335368: anon-proxy FTBFS with current openssl

[Petr Salinger]

Package: anon-proxy
Version: 00.02.39-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

Hi,

I tried to rebuild anon-proxy on i386, it fails.
Please find attached patch to fix that. 

Regards

Petr


diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.cpp anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.cpp   2003-11-05 17:47:09.0 
+
+++ anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.cpp2005-10-23 12:33:49.0 +
@@ -91,12 +91,12 @@
return NULL;
}
 
-CACertificate* CACertificate::decode(UINT8* buff,UINT32 bufflen,UINT32 
type,char* passwd)
+CACertificate* CACertificate::decode(const UINT8* buff,UINT32 bufflen,UINT32 
type,char* passwd)
{
if(buff==NULL)
return NULL;
X509* tmpCert=NULL;
-   UINT8* tmp;
+   const UINT8* tmp;
PKCS12* tmpPKCS12;
switch(type)
{
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.hpp anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.hpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.hpp   2002-08-06 15:02:55.0 
+
+++ anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.hpp2005-10-23 12:34:03.0 +
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
return tmp;
}

-   static CACertificate* decode(UINT8* buff,UINT32 
bufflen,UINT32 type,char* passwd=NULL);
+   static CACertificate* decode(const UINT8* buff,UINT32 
bufflen,UINT32 type,char* passwd=NULL);
static CACertificate* decode(const DOM_Node&node,UINT32 
type,char* passwd=NULL);
SINT32 encode(UINT8* buff,UINT32* bufflen,UINT32 type);
SINT32 encode(DOM_DocumentFragment& 
docFrag,DOM_Document& doc);
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CAIPList.cpp anon-proxy.new/CAIPList.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CAIPList.cpp2003-08-19 18:26:07.0 +
+++ anon-proxy.new/CAIPList.cpp 2005-10-23 12:36:37.0 +
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
 #include "CAIPList.hpp"
 #include "CAMsg.hpp"
 #include "CAUtil.hpp"
+#include 
 /** Constructs an empty CAIPList. 
* The default number #MAXIP_CONNECTIONS of allowed insertions is used*/ 
 CAIPList::CAIPList()
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CASignature.cpp anon-proxy.new/CASignature.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CASignature.cpp 2003-12-01 17:15:43.0 +
+++ anon-proxy.new/CASignature.cpp  2005-10-23 12:37:23.0 +
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
return parseSignKeyXML(buff,len);
 
case SIGKEY_PKCS12:
-   PKCS12* 
tmpPKCS12=d2i_PKCS12(NULL,(UINT8**)&buff,len);  
+   PKCS12* 
tmpPKCS12=d2i_PKCS12(NULL,&buff,len);   
EVP_PKEY* key=NULL;
 // X509* cert=NULL;

if(PKCS12_parse(tmpPKCS12,passwd,&key,NULL,NULL)!=1)

Bug#335365: printbill - build-depends against removed package

[Bastian Blank]

Package: printbill
Version: 4.1.2-1.0.1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of printbill_4.1.2-1.0.1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper, libpng2-dev | libpng3-dev | libpng12-dev
[...]
> E: Package libpng2-dev has no installation candidate
> Package libpng2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping printbill
> **
> Finished at 20051023-1054
> Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space

Bastian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335364: gfpoken - tries to put files in the home directory

[Bastian Blank]

Package: gfpoken
Version: 0.27-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of gfpoken_0.27-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/locale': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/.Blanguages': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/.bfont.ttf': No such file or directory
> cp: cannot create directory `/home/buildd/.blender': No such file or directory
> cp: cannot create regular file `/home/buildd/.blender': No such file or 
> directory
> install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied
> install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied
> install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied
> ln: when making multiple links, last argument must be a directory
> cat: /home/buildd/.blender/VERSION: No such file or directory
> /usr/bin/blender: line 29: [: !=: unary operator expected
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//Apply_def.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/Apply_def.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//Axiscopy.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/Axiscopy.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//DirectX8Exporter.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/DirectX8Exporter.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//DirectXExporter.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/DirectXExporter.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//UVpaint05.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/UVpaint05.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//ac3d_export.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/ac3d_export.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//ac3d_import.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/ac3d_import.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//armature_symetry.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/armature_symetry.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//batch_name_edit.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/batch_name_edit.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bevel_center.py' 
> to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bevel_center.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//blender2cal3d.py' 
> to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/blender2cal3d.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts/' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bpydata': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts/' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bpymodules': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh2arm.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh2arm.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh_export.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh_export.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh_import.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh_import.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//camera_changer.py' 
> to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/camera_changer.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//clean_mesh.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/clean_mesh.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//config.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/config.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//console.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/console.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//discombobulator.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/discombobulator.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//disp_paint.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/disp_paint.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//doc_browser.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/doc_browser.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//envelope_assignment.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/envelope_assignment.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating symbolic link 
> `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//envelope_symmetry.py' to 
> `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/envelope_symmetry.py': No such file or directory
> ln: creating sy

Processed: severity of 335298 is normal

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
> severity 335298 normal
Bug#335298: zvbi: strict arch:any->arch:all dependencies break binNMUs 
(uninstallable on sparc)
Severity set to `normal'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335284: lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600
Vagrant Cascadian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> attached should be a patch adding crude xserver-xorg support for
> 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16

Thanks alot!


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDW45Qn7DbMsAkQLgRAuMuAJ4vqmL3Eu8IAM87W3jtpOicPigDtwCfZ3GH
5Vtll+Kqe6DJrMWt5OPWVaE=
=dmQb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#335363: libdjvulibre15: Unable to install libdjvulibre15

[Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan]

Package: libdjvulibre15
Severity: critical

While trying to install the PDF viewer Evince, which depends on
libdjvulibre15, I noticed that libdjvulibre15 is uninstallable
and hence breaks evince also. Here is the output of apt-get.

radio:/home/rkrishnan# apt-get install evince
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libdjvulibre15 libpoppler0c2 libpoppler0c2-glib
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libpoppler0 libpoppler0-glib
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  evince libdjvulibre15 libpoppler0c2 libpoppler0c2-glib
0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 2 to remove and 584 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/2038kB of archives.
After unpacking 5132kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
(Reading database ... 129844 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing libpoppler0-glib ...
Removing libpoppler0 ...
(Reading database ... 129825 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libdjvulibre15 (from .../libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/share/djvu/osi/de/libdjvu++.xml', which is also in 
package libdjvulibre1
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Selecting previously deselected package libpoppler0c2.
Unpacking libpoppler0c2 (from .../libpoppler0c2_0.4.2-1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package libpoppler0c2-glib.
Unpacking libpoppler0c2-glib (from .../libpoppler0c2-glib_0.4.2-1_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package evince.
Unpacking evince (from .../evince_0.4.0-1_i386.deb) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334835: marked as done (kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected class-name before '{' token)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:12:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334835: kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected 
class-name before '{' token
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 04:56:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:56:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESSU3-0002qc-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:56:55 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j9K4uorS023603
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:56:51 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
j9K4oFxP031912;
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j9K4oFr7031910;
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected class-name before '{' token
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: kdewebdev
Version: 4:3.4.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

kdewebdev failed to build on a sparc buildd, but did build on my sparc
pbuilder.  Perhaps a build dependancy is insufficiently versioned.



creating kmdr_editor.all_cpp.cpp ...
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/editor 
-I../..  -I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/widget 
-I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/widgets 
-I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/factory -I/usr/include/kde 
-I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.  -Ishared -Iinterfaces -Ipics -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT  
-D_REENTRANT -DKOMMANDER -DDESIGNER -DQT_NO_SQL -DHAVE_KDE  -Wnon-virtual-dtor 
-Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align 
-Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wno-non-virtual-dtor 
-DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wformat-security 
-Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common 
-DENABLE_CVSSERVICE  -MT kmdr_editor.all_cpp.o -MD -MP -MF 
".deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo" -c -o kmdr_editor.all_cpp.o 
kmdr_editor.all_cpp.cpp; \
then mv -f ".deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo" ".deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Po"; else 
rm -f ".deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
/usr/share/qt3/include/qnetworkprotocol.h:58: warning: 'class 
QNetworkProtocolFactoryBase' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/qfiledialog.h:78: warning: 'class QFilePreview' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:69: warning: 'struct QUBuffer' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:77: warning: 'struct QUType' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:104: warning: 'struct QUType_Null' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:287: warning: 'struct QUType_enum' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:307: warning: 'struct QUType_ptr' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:326: warning: 'struct QUType_iface' 
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:345: warning: 'struct QUType_idisp' 
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:364: warning: 'struct QUType_bool' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:383: warning: 'struct QUType_int' has 
virtual functions but non-virtual dest

Processed: Not yet fixed

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> found 334999 0.23-3
Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
Bug marked as found in version 0.23-3.

> tag 334999 patch
Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334999: Not yet fixed

[Frank Lichtenheld]

found 334999 0.23-3
tag 334999 patch
thanks

Sorry, but you made a little mistake again. While your code in
debian/rules is mostly correct it misses the fact that
DEB_HOST_ARCH is no predefined variable, you have to set it yourself.
So please add something like
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)

Also your build-dependency on g++ isn't necessary, g++ is
build-essential. Just adding the build-dependency for g++-3.4 on
the mentioned architectures is enough.

Attached is an alternate patch for debian/rules that is a little more
elegant. It's a modified version of the one suggested in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html
Just adding the line suggested above would suffice though, you don't
have to use the patch.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
diff -Naur monotone_0.23-3/debian/control monotone-0.23/debian/control
--- monotone_0.23-3/debian/control  2005-10-23 14:54:28.0 +0200
+++ monotone-0.23/debian/control2005-10-23 15:03:51.0 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.28), debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev,
  libboost-date-time-dev, libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-regex-dev,
  libboost-test-dev, libboost-dev, texinfo, libz-dev,
- g++ [!arm !hppa !m68k], g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k]
+ g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k]
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: monotone
diff -Naur monotone_0.23-3/debian/rules monotone-0.23/debian/rules
--- monotone_0.23-3/debian/rules2005-10-23 14:54:28.0 +0200
+++ monotone-0.23/debian/rules  2005-10-23 15:03:42.0 +0200
@@ -5,12 +5,9 @@
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
 #include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 
-ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,arm)
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4
-endif
-ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,hppa)
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4
-endif
-ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,m68k)
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4
+GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa
+DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
+
+ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE)))
+   DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4
 endif

Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.

[Matthias Klose]

Kenshi Muto writes:
> Hi,
> 
> At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200,
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: cupsys
> > Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: experimental
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
> > error:
> > Linking libcups.so.2...
> > /usr/bin/ld: array.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `cupsArrayCurrent' 
> > can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
> > 
> > The build log does not show the actual commands used to compile,
> > but it probably didn't use -fPIC to make array.o and the other .o
> > files.  To make a shared library you need to be using -fPIC.  For
> > a static library you shouldn't be using it.
> 
> I confirmed on my AMD64 but the problem isn't of -fPIC.
> 
> Here is "make -n" result.
> 
> echo Compiling array.c...
> cc -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -O2 -fpie -I..-g -Wall 
> -O2
> -fpie -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -c array.c
> echo Linking libcups.so.2...
> cc -Wl,-soname,libcups.so.2 -shared -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k 
> -fPI
> C -O2 -fpie -o libcups.so.2 array.o attr.o auth.o backchannel.o dest.o dir.o 
> emi
> t.o encode.o file.o getputfile.o globals.o http.o http-addr.o http-support.o 
> ipp
> .o ipp-support.o langprintf.o language.o mark.o md5.o md5passwd.o normalize.o 
> op
> tions.o page.o ppd.o snprintf.o string.o tempfile.o transcode.o usersys.o 
> util.o
>  -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -lpthread  -lz
> 
> I searched a similar problem, but all of I can find is only old
> resolved binutils + pragma issue.
> 
> Dear gcc team, could you help me?

   -fpie
   -fPIE
   These options are similar to -fpic and -fPIC, but generated posi-
   tion independent code can be only linked into executables. Usually
   these options are used when -pie GCC option will be used during
   linking.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328875: install -f doesn't fix but kernel install depends on udev install

[Jeff Abrahamson]

Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Followup-For: Bug #328875


Perhaps I'm missing something, but I seem to be in an infinite loop.
I can't finish the udev upgrade without kernel >= 2.6.12, but I can't
upgrade my kernel until the udev problem is fixed.

astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  udev
The following packages will be upgraded:
  udev
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 156 not upgraded.
53 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/300kB of archives.
After unpacking 242kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 151258 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using 
.../archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb) ...
udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  hal: Depends: udev (>= 0.063) but 0.056-3 is to be installed
  kernel-image-2.6-686: Depends: linux-image-2.6-686 but it is not going to 
be installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or 
specify a solution).
astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# uname -a
Linux astra 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info#



-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 20 2005-07-21 23:02 020_permissions.rules -> 
../permissions.rules
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 12 2005-10-22 18:29 050_hal-plugdev.rules -> 
../hal.rules
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 19 2005-07-21 23:02 cd-aliases.rules -> 
../cd-aliases.rules
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 13 2005-07-21 23:02 udev.rules -> ../udev.rules

-- /sys/:
/sys/block/hda/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda1/dev
/sys/block/hda/hda2/dev
/sys/block/hdb/dev
/sys/block/hdb/hdb1/dev
/sys/block/hdc/dev
/sys/block/ram0/dev
/sys/block/ram10/dev
/sys/block/ram11/dev
/sys/block/ram12/dev
/sys/block/ram13/dev
/sys/block/ram14/dev
/sys/block/ram15/dev
/sys/block/ram1/dev
/sys/block/ram2/dev
/sys/block/ram3/dev
/sys/block/ram4/dev
/sys/block/ram5/dev
/sys/block/ram6/dev
/sys/block/ram7/dev
/sys/block/ram8/dev
/sys/block/ram9/dev
/sys/block/sda/dev
/sys/block/sdb/dev
/sys/class/input/event0/dev
/sys/class/input/event1/dev
/sys/class/input/event2/dev
/sys/class/input/mice/dev
/sys/class/input/mouse0/dev
/sys/class/input/ts0/dev
/sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev
/sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev
/sys/class/misc/psaux/dev
/sys/class/misc/rtc/dev
/sys/class/sound/adsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/audio/dev
/sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev
/sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev
/sys/class/sound/dsp/dev
/sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev
/sys/class/sound/midi/dev
/sys/class/sound/mixer/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev
/sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev
/sys/class/sound/timer/dev

-- Kernel configuration:


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii  hotplug  0.0.20040329-25 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii  initscripts  2.86.ds1-4  Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii  libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  makedev  2.3.1-78creates device files in /dev
ii  sed  4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor

udev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335344: marked as done (/usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:41:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335344: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, 
dependencies issue
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 12:16:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 05:16:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETem5-NH-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:16:29 -0700
Received: from 062016211130.customer.alfanett.no (localhost.localdomain) 
[62.16.211.130] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ETem3-0002Wc-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:16:27 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:57:31 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
Justification: renders package unusable


When trying to install the package libgtk2.0-dev, apt stops at this
errormessage:

# apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.4.0-3) but it is not
  going to be installed
   Depends: libx11-dev but it is not going to be
installed or
xlibs-dev but it is not
going to be installed
E: Broken packages
 
How to solve this problem?

-- Package-specific info:

-- apt-config dump --

APT "";
APT::Architecture "i386";
APT::Build-Essential "";
APT::Build-Essential:: "build-essential";
Dir "/";
Dir::State "var/lib/apt/";
Dir::State::lists "lists/";
Dir::State::cdroms "cdroms.list";
Dir::State::userstatus "status.user";
Dir::State::status "/var/lib/dpkg/status";
Dir::Cache "var/cache/apt/";
Dir::Cache::archives "archives/";
Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache "srcpkgcache.bin";
Dir::Cache::pkgcache "pkgcache.bin";
Dir::Etc "etc/apt/";
Dir::Etc::sourcelist "sources.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorlist "vendors.list";
Dir::Etc::vendorparts "vendors.list.d";
Dir::Etc::main "apt.conf";
Dir::Etc::parts "apt.conf.d";
Dir::Etc::preferences "preferences";
Dir::Bin "";
Dir::Bin::methods "/usr/lib/apt/methods";
Dir::Bin::dpkg "/usr/bin/dpkg";
DPkg "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs "";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok 
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; 
echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 1>&2 
; read a < /dev/tty ); fi";
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: "/usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true";

-- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) --


-- /etc/apt/sources.list --

#deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main

deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main
deb-src http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main

# Sikkerhetsoppdateringer
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main

# Mplayer - maa hete testing/stable ikke sarge
deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ stable  main

# Mplayer plugin mozilla
# deb http://marillat.free.fr/ sarge main

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686
Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  l

Processed: Re: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 334898 grave
Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Severity set to `grave'.

> retitle 334898 tcl8.4: tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to 
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign #334001 pygtk 2.6.3-1
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Bug reassigned from package `python-vte' to `pygtk'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error

[Ralf Stubner]

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
> 
> I think from 3.0-10.

Where there any problems with version 3.0-10? 
 
> > What is
> > the output of 'ls /etc/texmf/updmap.d/'? Did you (maybe automatically)
> > decline some offered updates of configuration files?
> 
> $ ls -l /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
> total 16
> -rw---  1 root root 2789 2005-10-22 18:11 00updmap.cfg
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2787 2005-10-22 18:17 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 2623 2005-10-19 16:10 10tetex-base.cfg
> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 1314 2005-10-19 16:11 20tetex-extra.cfg.dpkg-new
> 
> If I answered to some questions about files update, I think I answered
> yes (to overwrite), but not sure.

Hmm, what's the difference between /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg and
/etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist? 
 
> > This looks like a variant of #335210. Does that link
> > 
> > $ ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips
> > lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 20 2005-10-20 18:59 
> > /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips -> /etc/texmf/map/dvips
> > 
> > exist on your system? 
> 
> Yes this link exists.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:49 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
> $ dpkg -S dvips35.map
> tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map
[...]
> $ dpkg -S pdftex35.map
> tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map
[...]
> $ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map
> total 4
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root   22 2005-10-22 18:08 dvipdfm ->
> /etc/texmf/map/dvipdfm
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root   20 2005-10-22 18:08 dvips ->
> /etc/texmf/map/dvips
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 fontname
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root root   21 2005-10-22 18:08 pdftex ->
> /etc/texmf/map/pdftex

Ok, all that looks correct. Maybe the search path for mapfiles is
incorrect. What's the output of 'ls -l /etc/texmf/texmf.d' and
'grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf'?

cheerio
ralf




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#334001: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk

[Loic Minier]

forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454
thanks

Hi,

 This is a python 2.3/2.4 issue, rebuilding python-vte with python 2.4
 permits using python-vte with python 2.4.  I'm discussing this with
 pygtk's upsream for now.

   Cheers,
-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#298709: chrony: just segfaults on amd64

[John Hasler]

Thank you for your report.  I expect to soon upload a version with a
slightly different patch.
-- 
John Hasler 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Elmwood, WI USA


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]