Bug#328534: Reopening
reopen 328534 thanks This bug needs to be reopened in view of the new information. Apparently, our 2.6.12-10 kernel, which includes the backported fix for the dpt_i2o SCSI driver still oopses. Also, it has been reported that 2.6.13 that should include all the upstream fixes hangs during dpt_i2o initialization (see the previous message). Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Reopening
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 328534 Bug#328534: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335837: gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-11(m68k/unstable): missing headers?
Package: gnat-gdb Version: 5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-11 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gnat-gdb_5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-11 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k > 69 > Build started at 20051025-2116 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), libncurses5-dev, bison, texinfo, gettext [...] > gcc -c -g -O2-I. -I../../../gdb -I../../../gdb/config > -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I../../../gdb/../include/opcode -I../../../gdb/../readline/.. -I../bfd > -I../../../gdb/../bfd -I../../../gdb/../include -I../intl > -I../../../gdb/../intl -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DMI_OUT=1 -DUI_OUT=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type > -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c: In function 'getfpregs_supplies': > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:81: error: 'FPI_REGNUM' undeclared (first use in > this function) [...] > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:362: error: 'FPC_REGNUM' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:365: error: 'FPS_REGNUM' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:366: error: 'FPI_REGNUM' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c: In function 'fill_fpregset': > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:384: error: 'FPC_REGNUM' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:384: error: 'FPI_REGNUM' undeclared (first use > in this function) > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c: In function 'fetch_core_registers': > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:567: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'memcpy' > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:567: warning: incompatible implicit declaration > of built-in function 'memcpy' > ../../../gdb/m68klinux-nat.c:577: warning: incompatible implicit declaration > of built-in function 'memcpy' > make[2]: *** [m68klinux-nat.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd/gnat-gdb-5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225/debian/build/gdb' > make[1]: *** [all-gdb] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/buildd/gnat-gdb-5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225/debian/build' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=gnat-gdb&ver=5.3.gnat.0.0.20030225-11 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333052: Bug#333522: possible problem cause: wait4(-1)
On Oct 26, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to clarify, udevd gets a bunch of events and tries to > serialise them into modprobe calls, right? Do you think there There is no serialization, only some throttling (IIRC it tries to run up to 10 child processes in parallel). > is any chance it might be calling modprobe out of order > for some reason. The point is the dependencies are handled by modprobe, so the order in which udevd loads the modules at the top of the dependency tree is not relevant. As Rusty suggested I wrapped /sbin/modprobe in a logger script, but so far I have not been able to reproduce the bug again (which may or may not be related, I need a few more reboots). -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335150: xdebconfigurator: incompatible debconf values for xserver-xorg
Can you try this patch and test if it work? I do not have a etch/sid
machine to test it on myself. :(
I suspect I forgot to adjust some parts of xdebconfigurator to do the
right thing with xorg. The xfree86 stript is used quite a lot all
over the place.
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog(revisjon 4869)
+++ debian/changelog(arbeidskopi)
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
* Rename default monitor and card name to use 'Xdebconfigurator'
instead of just 'Xdevc', to make it clearer what the value mean.
+ * Try to get xdebconfigurator working with Xorg packages. (Closes: #335150)
-- Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:44:00 +0200
Index: xdebconfigurator
===
--- xdebconfigurator(revisjon 4869)
+++ xdebconfigurator(arbeidskopi)
@@ -60,8 +60,21 @@
my $xdriver = "$pkgdir/Xdriver.pl";
# Establish the preliminaries.
-my $THIS_PACKAGE="xserver-xfree86";
-my $THIS_SERVER="/usr/bin/X11/XFree86";
+my $THIS_PACKAGE;
+my $THIS_SERVER;
+my $DEBCONF_OWNER;
+if ( -d "/usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg/" ) {
+$THIS_PACKAGE = "xserver-xorg";
+$THIS_SERVER = "/usr/bin/X11/Xorg";
+$DEBCONF_OWNER = "xserver-xorg";
+} elsif ( -d "/usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86/" ) {
+$THIS_PACKAGE = "xserver-xfree86";
+$THIS_SERVER = "/usr/bin/X11/XFree86";
+$DEBCONF_OWNER = "xserver-xfree86";
+} else {
+warn "No known X server system detected!\n";
+exit 1;
+}
my $hwinfo = "/usr/sbin/hwinfo";
my $ddcprobe = "/usr/sbin/ddcprobe";
@@ -779,7 +792,6 @@
#$ARCH= 'dpkg --print-installation-architecture'; # ex: i386
# uncomment for debconf
-my $owner = "xserver-xfree86";
my $deftype = "string";
$xserver = 'xserver-' . $xserver; # xfree86, svga, ...
@@ -789,11 +801,11 @@
Debconf::Db->load;
-load_answer($owner, 'shared/default-x-server', "select", $xserver);
+load_answer($DEBCONF_OWNER, 'shared/default-x-server', "select", $xserver);
#boolean xserver-link already exists..; let's re-link it
-load_answer($owner, 'shared/clobber_x-server_symlink', "boolean", 'true');
+load_answer($DEBCONF_OWNER, 'shared/clobber_x-server_symlink', "boolean",
'true');
-if($xserver !~ /xserver-xfree86/) {
+if($xserver !~ /xserver-xfree86/ && $xserver !~ /xserver-xorg/ ) {
# does all v3 servers use this? or just svga?
$xserver = 'shared/xfree86v3';
}
@@ -802,7 +814,7 @@
# xserver-xfree86 with xserver shared/xfree86v3/
foreach $key (keys %xdebc_map) {
my $type = $xdebc_type{$key} || $deftype;
-load_answer($owner, $xserver.'/'.$key, $type, $xdebc_map{$key});
+load_answer($DEBCONF_OWNER, $xserver.'/'.$key, $type,
$xdebc_map{$key});
}
Debconf::Db->save;
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335842: hmake: FTBFS: Makefile error in lib/debian/config
Package: hmake Severity: serious Version: 3.10-1 >From my build log: ... touch config-stamp dh_testdir update-haskell-control --check /usr/bin/make all make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/hmake-3.10' cd src/hmake; /usr/bin/make HC=/usr/bin/haskell-compiler BUILDCOMP=ghc all config make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/hmake-3.10/src/hmake' /tmp/buildd/hmake-3.10/lib/debian/config:10: *** missing separator. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hmake-3.10/src/hmake' make[1]: *** [targets/debian/hmake-ghc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/hmake-3.10' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328534: Reopening
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:57:30PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > reopen 328534 > thanks > > This bug needs to be reopened in view of the new information. Apparently, > our 2.6.12-10 kernel, which includes the backported fix for the dpt_i2o > SCSI driver still oopses. Also, it has been reported that 2.6.13 that > should include all the upstream fixes hangs during dpt_i2o initialization > (see the previous message). What about 2.6.14-rc5 ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 335306 4:2.6.2-3 Bug#335306: Yet another local file inclusion vulnerability Bug reopened, originator set to 4:2.6.2-3. > retitle 335306 CVE-2005-3300: Local file inclusion vulnerability Bug#335306: Yet another local file inclusion vulnerability Changed Bug title. > reopen 335513 4:2.6.2-3 Bug#335513: CVE-2005-3301: XSS in left.php, queryframe.php, server_databases.php Bug reopened, originator set to 4:2.6.2-3. > retitle 335513 CVE-2005-3301: Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. Bug#335513: CVE-2005-3301: XSS in left.php, queryframe.php, server_databases.php Changed Bug title. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 335306 4:2.6.4-pl3-1 Bug#335306: CVE-2005-3300: Local file inclusion vulnerability 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 4:2.6.4-pl3-1, send any further explanations to 4:2.6.2-3 > close 335513 4:2.6.4-pl3-1 Bug#335513: CVE-2005-3301: Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 4:2.6.4-pl3-1, send any further explanations to 4:2.6.2-3 > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332461: marked as done (FTBFS: libmagick transition)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:35:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 15:57:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 08:57:54 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.200] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENY82-00020M-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:57:54 -0700 Received: from outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Fvkm3015864 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:57:47 +0200 (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx019.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96FvhC2015827 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:57:43 +0200 (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:57:15 +0200 From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: libmagick transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: tclmagick Severity: serious Version: 0.45-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev instead of libmagick6-dev Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUlb5UTeB5t8Mo0RApvOAJ9lggacQS55hzms0zk4EpJl4q/pjACgzAHo uAwB/IvkEXOkTCb6RWG/hg4= =iPAU -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332461-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 08:44:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 01:44:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp2alice.tin.it (vsmtp2.tin.it) [212.216.176.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUgtn-0006Il-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:44:43 -0700 Received: from salem.casa (82.58.158.80) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 435D2756000D82FA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:44:09 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by salem.casa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1696930C4A7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:35:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:35:25 +0200 From: "David N. Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051011) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed by new version X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Uploaded a new version which depends on the latest libmagick. Ciao, -- David N. Welton - http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Linux, Open Source Consulting - http://www.dedasys.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335849: tightvncserver: Unable to set fontpath in AMD64
Package: tightvncserver Version: 1.2.9-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable tvncserver is unable to start giving the following error: >tightvncserver -depth 16 -geometry 1024x768 Couldn't start Xtightvnc; trying default font path. Please set correct fontPath in the tightvncserver script. Couldn't start Xtightvnc process. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages tightvncserver depends on: ii dpkg 1.13.11package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii perl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii vnc-common3.3.7-7Virtual network computing server s ii xbase-clients 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii xserver-common6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 files and utilities common to all ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages tightvncserver recommends: ii xfonts-base 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 standard fonts for X -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324982: RC bug with patch and no comment for two months?
Hi Jed maintainers, what's up with jed bug #324982? Adding to the FTBFS I notice that jed is also uninstallable in unstable. Do you plan to do something about it? Do you want an NMU or is there a sponsored upload of a fix? I use jed daily and would be glad to see this fixed. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335853: No Lisp files in this lisp package!
Package: araneida Version: 0.9-a3-2 Severity: serious When I install this package, I got nothing in /usr/share/common-lisp/sources/araneida or other dirs, just found some documents in /usr/share/doc/araneida ... When I use 'apt-get source' to get it's source, I DO find all of the lisp files in it, and when I try to build this package myself, I got bug #335627. I think It's too serious, but there's no one submit bug report?! By the way, should this package be named as 'cl-araneida' to mean that this is a Common Lisp package, like ALL other CL-related packages? Thank you very much! -- (setq reply-to (concatenate 'string "Binghe " "")) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335550: Problems with jadetex (and the list)
Hi Paul, thanks for reporting this problem. For whatever reason it didn't reach our mailing list. I only saw it right now in the web interface. We had that recently with another bugreport. Maybe these messages are simply to large for the mailing list software? Anyway, concerning your bug report. You get the error message: This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings: `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex &latex jadetex.ini' failed The error message from tetex.postinst.XXhnN5lJ is: This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by pdfetex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) Here it is tried to build the jadetex format with the TeX engine. Problem is, that it uses the LaTeX format, which was build with the pdfetex engine. What files do you have in '/etc/texmf/fmt.d/'? What's the content of '/etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf'? My guess is, that at some point you refused to update the configuration files for jadetex, because current jadetex packages build all their formats with (pdf)etex. cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of cupsys 1.1.99.b1.r4748-2 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335199 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 335434 pending Bug#335434: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tag 335435 pending Bug#335435: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335868: Cannot compile and load
Package: cl-ironclad Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-1 Severity: serious I use '(clc:clc-require :ironclad)' to compile it, all of them get just errors in cmucl, sbcl and clisp: [cmucl] Type-error in KERNEL::OBJECT-NOT-TYPE-ERROR-HANDLER: NIL is not of type REAL [Condition of type TYPE-ERROR] Restarts: 0: [ABORT] Return to Top-Level. Debug (type H for help) (MAX 1 NIL)[:EXTERNAL] Source: ; File: target:code/numbers.lisp (DEFUN MAX (NUMBER &REST MORE-NUMBERS) "Returns the greatest of its arguments." (DECLARE (OPTIMIZE #) (REAL NUMBER) (DYNAMIC-EXTENT MORE-NUMBERS)) ...) 0] [sbcl] debugger invoked on a TYPE-ERROR in thread #: The value NIL is not of type REAL. Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL. restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name): 0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level. (MAX NIL) 0] ;; Compiling file /usr/share/common-lisp/source/ironclad/sha256.lisp ... *** - SYSTEM::%RPLACD: NIL is not a pair The following restarts are available: USE-VALUE :R1 You may input a value to be used instead. RETRY :R2 Retry performing # on #. ACCEPT :R3 Continue, treating # on # as having been successful. ABORT :R4 ABORT Break 1 CRYPTO[2]> In both cmucl and sbcl, It seems that something about the function 'max', but I just find two line in 'ironclad.asd' which use the function 'max': (defmethod perform :around ((op compile-op) (c ironclad-source-file)) (let ((*readtable* *ironclad-readtable*) (*print-base* 10) ; INTERN'ing FORMAT'd symbols #+sbcl (sb-ext:*inline-expansion-limit* (max sb-ext:*inline-expansion-limit* 1000)) ~~~ here #+sbcl (*features* (cons sb-c:*backend-byte-order* *features*)) #+cmu (ext:*inline-expansion-limit* (max ext:*inline-expansion-limit* 1000)) ~~~ and here #+cmu (*features* (cons (c:backend-byte-order c:*target-backend*) *features*))) (call-next-method))) And clisp seems so buggy, most of cl-* packages in Debian cannot load correctly... I can't point out what's the problem, but this package is so useful, I hope you can fix it... Thank you very much. -- (setq reply-to (concatenate 'string "Binghe " "")) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335874: grep_2.5.1.ds2-2(m68k/unstable/thing2): FTBFS on m68k
Package: grep Version: 2.5.1.ds2-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. grep fails to build from source on m68k. Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. | Automatic build of grep_2.5.1.ds2-2 on thing2 by sbuild/m68k 69 | Build started at 20051026-0550 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: gettext, cdbs (>= 0.4.5.3), debhelper (>= 4.1.0) [...] | Checking correctness of source dependencies... | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-7 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-2 g++-4.0_4.0.2-2 binutils_2.16.1-2 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-2 libstdc++6_4.0.2-2 [...] | cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -I../lib -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\"-g -Wall -O2 -c `test -f search.c || echo './'`search.c | In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:31, | from search.c:28: | /usr/include/bits/types.h:127:3: error: #error | In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:31, | from search.c:28: | /usr/include/bits/types.h:136: error: syntax error before '__dev_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:140: error: syntax error before '__ino64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:142: error: syntax error before '__nlink_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:144: error: syntax error before '__off64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:149: error: syntax error before '__rlim64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:172: error: syntax error before '__blkcnt64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:176: error: syntax error before '__fsblkcnt64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:180: error: syntax error before '__fsfilcnt64_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:182: error: syntax error before '__ssize_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:186: error: syntax error before '__loff_t' | /usr/include/bits/types.h:191: error: syntax error before '__intptr_t' | In file included from search.c:28: | /usr/include/sys/types.h:46: error: syntax error before 'loff_t' | /usr/include/sys/types.h:52: error: syntax error before 'ino_t' [...] A full buildd log is available at <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=grep&ver=2.5.1.ds2-2&arch=m68k> Other buildd logs may be available at <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=grep> -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335881: numerix: FTBFS: Segfaults in tests
Package: numerix Severity: serious Version: 0.21-1 >From my build log: ... exemples/c/\pi-g -test && \ for i in pi shanks simple; do for j in c d s; do \ exemples/c/$i-$j -test; \ done; done exemples/c/pi-g test ok exemples/c/pi-c test ok exemples/c/pi-d test ok /bin/sh: line 1: 5728 Segmentation fault exemples/c/$i-$j -test exemples/c/shanks-c test ok exemples/c/shanks-d test ok /bin/sh: line 1: 5731 Segmentation fault exemples/c/$i-$j -test exemples/c/simple-c test ok exemples/c/simple-d test ok /bin/sh: line 1: 5735 Segmentation fault exemples/c/$i-$j -test make[1]: *** [test_c] Error 139 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/numerix-0.21' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335577: k3b freeze KDE and crashe
Hi Jean, have you tried the latest version of k3b from unstable? The version you are using (from stable since k3b has been temporarily removed from testing) is quite old and unfortunately has quite a few bugs. There isn't much we can do about that version, but if you can reproduce the bug in the latest version, then I will forward the bug to the attention of the upstream developers. Also, you might want to have a look at the following bug on the upstream bug tracker: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108821 If this sounds like your problem (related to 64-bit machines), then feel free to add your own observations. Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
package gedit retitle 335564 libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash under scim environment reassign 335564 libgnomevfs2-common thanks Hello, libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5[1] cause gedit crash under scim environment, see all [2], please rebuild with libstdc++.so.6. I also don't know why this package do not depends on libstdc++5 or libstdc++6. Thanks. [1] $ dpkg -l libgnomevfs2-common | grep ^hi hi libgnomevfs2-common 2.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system library (common files) $ dpkg -L libgnomevfs2-common | grep libfile.so /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so $ ldd /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so | grep stdc libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xb7bb8000) [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323216 -- LI Daobing
Processed: Re: Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package gedit Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gedit > retitle 335564 libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash Bug#335564: gedit: can't start Changed Bug title. > under scim environment Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 335564 libgnomevfs2-common Bug#335564: libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash Bug reassigned from package `gedit' to `libgnomevfs2-common'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 320888 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-6 Bug#320888: aalib transition 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-6, send any further explanations to Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
Hi, Are you using the scim input method? Do you still have the problem without the input method or with another one? Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
On 10/26/05, Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Are you using the scim input method? yes > > Do you still have the problem without the input method or with another > one? I know howto avoid this bug, for example: use `export GTK_IM_MODULE=xim' instead of `export GTK_IM_MODULE=scim', the later one is suggested in the README.Debian in the scim package. Thanks. -- LI Daobing
Bug#328579: pgaccess: depends on removed package libpgtcl
Package: pgaccess Followup-For: Bug #328579 Is there any way to by pass this bug and have pgaccess installed on sid? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335510: marked as done (fails to start)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:24:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Wrong bug number in upload of stunnel4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 11:41:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 04:41:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (deb-off.itanets.com) [213.91.207.67] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EU0hP-0008EA-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:41:07 -0700 Received: (qmail 4547 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Oct 2005 11:41:02 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Delian Krustev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: fails to start X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:41:02 +0300 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: stunnel4 Version: 2:4.110-2 Severity: grave This version of stunnel fails to start on both testing and unstable. Here's what's in the logs: Oct 24 14:29:37 deb-off stunnel[4502]: stunnel 4.11 on i486-pc-linux-gnu PTHREAD+POLL+IPv6+LIBWRAP with OpenSSL 0.9.8a 11 Oct 2005 Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: Snagged 64 random bytes from /root/.rnd Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: Wrote 1024 new random bytes to /root/.rnd Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: RAND_status claims sufficient entropy for the PRNG Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: PRNG seeded successfully Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: Error reading certificate file: /etc/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: error stack: 25070067 : error:25070067:DSO support routines:DSO_load:could not load the shared library Oct 24 14:29:38 deb-off stunnel[4502]: SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file: 25066067: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library The previous version works ok with the same config and certificate file. I've downgraded to it and it still works ok. Here's the config: cert = /etc/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem key = /etc/ssl/certs/stunnel.pem setuid = stunnel4 setgid = stunnel4 pid = /var/run/stunnel4/stunnel.pid socket = l:TCP_NODELAY=1 socket = r:TCP_NODELAY=1 debug = 7 [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 [imaps] accept = 993 connect = 143 [ssmtp] accept = 465 connect = 25 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages stunnel4 depends on: ii adduser 3.73 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii netbase 4.22 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii openssl 0.9.8a-2 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a ii perl-modules 5.8.7-7Core Perl modules stunnel4 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 335510-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 16:24:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 09:24:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from happycoders.org (felicie.happycoders.org) [213.161.203.28] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUo4a-0006sD-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:24:20 -0700 Received: from colombes.speedblue.org ([82.224.227.40] helo=[10.3.3.2]) by felicie.happycoders.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EUo3T-bK-Bc; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:23:11 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 18:24:17 +0200 From: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Debian User-Agent: Debia
Bug#334180: marked as done (dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334180: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.120-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2005 02:59:44 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 19:59:44 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from m206-45.dsl.tsoft.com (orion.lnxpowered.org) [198.144.206.45] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQykS-CE-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:59:44 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.15] (unknown [192.168.1.15]) by orion.lnxpowered.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1D92C8033 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:59:14 -0700 From: Michael Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Windows/20051014) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 On a dist-upgrade this evening this package will not load my ssl certs with the following error: Oct 15 16:53:44 orion dovecot: imap-login: Can't load certificate file /etc/ssl/dovecotcert.pem: error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library I went back to the dovecot-imapd and dovecot-common in testing and I can login and get my certs seen with no problems. Thanks! -- Michael Perry | Do or do not. There is no try --Master Yoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lnxpowered.org --- Received: (at 334180-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 16:18:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 09:18:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUnxf-0005Ae-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 From: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334180: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.120-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: stunnel4 Source-Version: 2:4.120-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of stunnel4, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: stunnel4_4.120-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.120-1.diff.gz stunnel4_4.120-1.dsc to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.120-1.dsc stunnel4_4.120-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.120-1_i386.deb stunnel4_4.120.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/stunnel4/stunnel4_4.120.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated stunnel4 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:53:55 +0200 Source: stunnel4 Binary: stunnel4 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2:4.120-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: stunnel4 - Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons Closes: 334180 Changes: stunnel4 (2:4.120-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Applied patch from Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to fix initialization problem with opens
Bug#335271: marked as done (postfix: TLS library fails to load libz.so (makes certificates unusable))
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334180: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.120-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 01:11:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 18:11:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bucky.theory.org [64.147.163.245] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETUOD-Je-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:11:09 -0700 Received: by bucky.theory.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8544214B7; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: jeremy avnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: postfix: TLS library fails to load libz.so (makes certificates unusable) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:11:08 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: postfix Version: 2.2.4-1.0.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just upgraded my testing system and now postfix can't read certificate files for doing SMTP auth with. Here are the relevant log lines: postfix/smtpd[18162]: warning: cannot get certificate from file /etc/courier/cert.pem postfix/smtpd[18162]: warning: TLS library problem: 18162:error:25066067:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the shared library:dso_dlfcn.c:162:filename(libz.so): libz.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory: postfix/smtpd[18162]: warning: TLS library problem: 18162:error:25070067:DSO support routines:DSO_load:could not load the shared library:dso_lib.c:244: postfix/smtpd[18162]: cannot load RSA certificate and key data It appears there is no libz.so file available: $ dpkg -S libz.so zlib1g: /usr/lib/libz.so.1 zlib1g: /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.3 $ dpkg -l zlib1g | grep zlib1g ii zlib1g 1.2.3-4compression library - runtime A workaround is to make a symlink: $ ln -s /usr/lib/libz.so.1 /usr/lib/libz.so .:. jeremy -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages postfix depends on: ii adduser 3.67.2 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb ii libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2SSL shared libraries ii netbase 4.22Basic TCP/IP networking system Versions of packages postfix recommends: ii mailx [mail-read 1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent ii mutt [mail-reade 1.5.9-2 Text-based mailreader supporting M ii pine [mail-reade 4.64-1 An e-mail reader with MIME and IMA pn resolvconf (no description available) ii xemacs21-mule [m 21.4.17-2 highly customizable text editor -- -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 334180-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 16:18:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 09:18:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUnxf-0005Ae-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 From: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334180: fixed in stunnel4 2:4.120-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:17:11 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
reassign 335564 scim thanks Hi, On Thu, Oct 27, 2005, LI Daobing wrote: > I know howto avoid this bug, for example: use `export > GTK_IM_MODULE=xim' instead of `export GTK_IM_MODULE=scim', the later > one is suggested in the README.Debian in the scim package. Ok, I'm reassigning this bug to the scim package. Please provide the versions of your installed scim packages: dpkg -l scim\* Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
> Ok, I'm reassigning this bug to the scim package. Please provide the > versions of your installed scim packages: dpkg -l scim\* $ dpkg -l scim | grep ^ii ii scim 1.4.1-1Smart Common Input Method platform -- LI Daobing
Processed: Re: Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 335564 scim Bug#335564: libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash Bug reassigned from package `libgnomevfs2-common' to `scim'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Wrong bug number in upload of stunnel4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 335271 Bug#335271: postfix: TLS library fails to load libz.so (makes certificates unusable) Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reopen 334180 Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd does not load shared libraries or ssl certs Bug is already open, cannot reopen. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: util-vserver: Wrong vserver syscall on powerpc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen #328209 Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity #328209 grave Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc Severity set to `grave'. > retitle #328209 util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall Bug#328209: util-vserver: Does not work on powerpc Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328579: pgaccess: depends on removed package libpgtcl
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 18:27 +0200, mperez wrote: > Package: pgaccess > Followup-For: Bug #328579 > > > Is there any way to by pass this bug and have pgaccess installed on > sid? Upstream seem to have abandoned it; I am wondering whether to ask for it to be removed from the distribution, since I don't want to try to take over upstream support. Oliver Elphick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
retitle 335564 needs rebuild against libfam0 severity 335564 serious thanks Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, LI Daobing wrote: > retitle 335564 libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash > under scim environment > $ ldd /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so | grep stdc > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xb7bb8000) Thanks for the hint. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Processed: Re: Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 335564 needs rebuild against libfam0 Bug#335564: libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash Changed Bug title. > severity 335564 serious Bug#335564: needs rebuild against libfam0 Severity set to `serious'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335853: marked as done (No Lisp files in this lisp package!)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335853: fixed in araneida 0.9-a3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 09:43:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 02:43:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUhp2-0003Uo-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:52 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so203250nzp for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LhUGtEcjLQq+hvKOJ9cfjUFeOYZ8QLJwsNsIaMDqRzamdwNC06S8roqmV8x5AErb3FDeWmAhUiUOb+O5zq4NNnX4eDFxo0mIvUmAGD8WmCok3EcqQfUQy1NyGYZY0X0+Y+Gom3m5QNlI5V60WGedaJ0PyCggNRWTn5F4Alz6/r4= Received: by 10.37.13.7 with SMTP id q7mr838658nzi; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.214.1.201? ( [218.108.31.122]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 10sm540457nzo.2005.10.26.02.43.46; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disposition-Notification-To: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:45:51 +0800 From: binghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Zhejiang University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051025 SeaMonkey/1.1a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No Lisp files in this lisp package! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: araneida Version: 0.9-a3-2 Severity: serious When I install this package, I got nothing in /usr/share/common-lisp/sources/araneida or other dirs, just found some documents in /usr/share/doc/araneida ... When I use 'apt-get source' to get it's source, I DO find all of the lisp files in it, and when I try to build this package myself, I got bug #335627. I think It's too serious, but there's no one submit bug report?! By the way, should this package be named as 'cl-araneida' to mean that this is a Common Lisp package, like ALL other CL-related packages? Thank you very much! -- (setq reply-to (concatenate 'string "Binghe " "")) --- Received: (at 335853-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 17:17:48 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 10:17:48 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUotf-0007bj-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#335853: fixed in araneida 0.9-a3-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: araneida Source-Version: 0.9-a3-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of araneida, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: araneida_0.9-a3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.9-a3-3.diff.gz araneida_0.9-a3-3.dsc to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.9-a3-3.dsc araneida_0.9-a3-3_all.deb to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.9-a3-3_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated araneida package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you bel
Bug#334959: , Bug#334497: boost: FTBFS on hppa
Domenico Andreoli wrote: > hi Nathanael, > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:30:22AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >>From >>http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=boost&ver=1.33.0-1&arch=hppa&stamp=1129127511&file=log&as=raw >>we see the following: > > >>usr/bin/ld: >>bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/shared-linkable-true/threading-multi/xml_oarchive.o(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5boost7archive6detail18interface_oarchiveINS0_12xml_oarchiveEElsIKNS0_12version_typeEEERS3_RT_[boost::archive::xml_oarchive& >> >>boost::archive::detail::interface_oarchive::operator<< >> (boost::archive::version_type >>const&)]+0x44): cannot reach >>1f29__ZN5boost7archive18basic_xml_oarchiveINS0_12xml_oarchiveEE13save_overrideERKNS0_12version_typeEi+0, >> recompile with -ffunction-sections >>/usr/bin/ld: >>bin/boost/libs/serialization/build/libboost_serialization.so/gcc/debug/shared-linkable-true/threading-multi/xml_oarchive.o(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN5boost7archive6detail18interface_oarchiveINS0_12xml_oarchiveEElsIKNS0_12version_typeEEERS3_RT_[boost::archive::xml_oarchive& >> >>boost::archive::detail::interface_oarchive::operator<< >> (boost::archive::version_type >>const&)]+0x44): cannot handle R_PARISC_PCREL17F for >>boost::archive::basic_xml_oarchive::save_override(boost::archive::version_type >> const&, int) >>/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value >>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > i'd be very glad to know where the bug is and if i can really solve it. :-/ Wish I could help you more. > few days ago i opened bug #334497 to get some attention. i hope somebody > steps in with the proper knowledge to shed some light on the topic. i > also sent a mail on debian-devel [0], but i've not heard anything > from anybody. Have you tried debian-hppa, the HPPA porters list? They might know more about the state of the toolchain on HPPA. > with the info i currently have, i'm not able to predict when this bug > will be handled. i should try a different liker version, but i'm still > too young in the field of compiler/linker errors. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:51:28PM +0200, Loic Minier wrote: > retitle 335564 needs rebuild against libfam0 > severity 335564 serious > thanks > > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, LI Daobing wrote: > > retitle 335564 libfile.so depends on libstdc++.so.5 cause gedit crash > > under scim environment > > $ ldd /usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libfile.so | grep stdc > > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xb7bb8000) > > Thanks for the hint. Hi Loic, I don't mind having this bug (it can be merged with #323216), but it's definitely not grave. The real problem, as the discussion linked at the end of #323216 indicated, is that gedit trying to dlopen two modules (the libfile.so mentioned above, and scim's GTK IM module) links to different versions of libstdc++. And in despite of libstdc++ getting built with versioned symbol, this is still causing problems (some unversioned symbols get into the library anyway). There is a bug against gcc-4.0 for this, #328421. As eventually all packages should be built with GCC 4.0, rebuilding scim sure won't help. So do the gedit maintainers want this bug back? If not, I'll accept it, downgrade it to normal and merge with #323216. Ming 2005.10.26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tags #328209 Found in version: 0.30.204-5sarge2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags #328209 Found in version: 0.30.204-5sarge2 Unknown tag/s: Found, in, version:, 0.30.204-5sarge2. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#328209: util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall There were no tags set. Tags added: > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: found #328209 0.30.204-5sarge2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found #328209 0.30.204-5sarge2 Bug#328209: util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall Bug marked as found in version 0.30.204-5sarge2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335924: slapd upgrade fails on etch (ssl library problem?)
Package: slapd Version: 2.2.23-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just tried upgrading slapd from 2.2.23-8 to 2.2.26-4.0, and at the same time libldap-2.2.7 from 2.2.23-8 to 2.2.26-4.0 and libssl0.9.7 from 0.9.7e-3 to 0.9.7g-5. The result of this upgrade was that slapd was crashing when trying to read my SSL certificates, making it completely unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages slapd depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities ii debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libiodbc2 3.52.2-4 iODBC Driver Manager ii libldap-2.2-7 2.2.23-8 OpenLDAP libraries ii libltdl3 1.5.20-2 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libperl5.85.8.7-6Shared Perl library ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library ii libslp1 1.2.1-3OpenSLP libraries ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc21.6-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy Versions of packages slapd recommends: ii db4.2-util4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities ii libsasl2-modules 2.1.19-1.5 Pluggable Authentication Modules f -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335927: FTBFS with libsmbclient-dev 3.0.20b-2
Package: gnome-vfs2 Severity: serious gnome-vfs2 FTBFS with libsmbclient-dev 3.0.20b-2: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I.. -I../imported/neon -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -pthread -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"ssh\" -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share\" -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/etc\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"gnome-vfs-modules\" -g -Wall -O2 -c smb-method.c -MT smb-method.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/smb-method.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/smb-method.o smb-method.c: In function 'do_close': smb-method.c:1428: error: 'struct _SMBCCTX' has no member named 'close' make[3]: *** [smb-method.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gnome-vfs2-2.10.1/modules' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/gnome-vfs2-2.10.1' -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
On mar, oct 25, 2005, LI Daobing wrote: > when I start gedit, It open the gedit window and pop up a window. The > window has a title word `The Application "gedit" has quit unexpectedly'. For now, you can solve this by installing libfam0 and removing libfam0c102. This is a bug in the fam package. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "What do we want? BRAINS! When do we want it? BRAINS!"
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
reassign 335564 fam 2.7.0-8 merge 327241 335564 thanks Hi, On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Ming Hua wrote: > I don't mind having this bug (it can be merged with #323216), but it's > definitely not grave. The real problem, as the discussion linked at the > end of #323216 indicated, is that gedit trying to dlopen two modules > (the libfile.so mentioned above, and scim's GTK IM module) links to > different versions of libstdc++. And in despite of libstdc++ getting > built with versioned symbol, this is still causing problems (some > unversioned symbols get into the library anyway). There is a bug > against gcc-4.0 for this, #328421. > > As eventually all packages should be built with GCC 4.0, rebuilding scim > sure won't help. So do the gedit maintainers want this bug back? If > not, I'll accept it, downgrade it to normal and merge with #323216. The real bug is with fam, libfam0c102 is still installed on some etch/sid systems, and shouldn't be. This is #327241 and I'm merging the reports. On my system for example: dpkg -l libfam\* un libfam0 (no description available) ii libfam0c1022.7.0-7client library to control the FAM daemon No gnome-vfs2 rebuild should be necessary. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processed: severity 333959 grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 333959 grave Bug#333959: snownews: segfaults in amd64 when reloading feeds Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 335564 fam 2.7.0-8 Bug#335564: needs rebuild against libfam0 Bug reassigned from package `scim' to `fam'. > merge 327241 335564 Bug#327241: fam: May not be upgraded due to funky circular provides Bug#335564: needs rebuild against libfam0 Merged 327241 335564. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335931: chmlib exploitable buffer overflow
Package: chmlib Version: 0.36-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Advisory: chmlib exploitable buffer overflow Product: chmlib Affected Version: <=0.36 Immune Version: >0.36 OS: Tested on linux 2.4 probably other OS affected as well Date: 26.10.2005 Author: Sven Tantau - http://www.sven-tantau.de/ Vendor-URL: http://morte.jedrea.com/%7Ejedwin/projects/chmlib/ Vendor-Status:informed, vendor released a fixed version Advisory-URL: http://www.sven-tantau.de/public_files/chmlib/chmlib_20051126.txt This issue appears to be different from Debian bug #327431. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334221: Problem
Makefile.am is missing from the upstream source, I have asked there for it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: varia
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 260179 Harald Krippl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#260179: plib 1.8.3 psl Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Harald Krippl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > tags 334221 + confirmed help Bug#334221: gbib: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: Old gettext macro. There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, help > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331256: marked as done (libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:07:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331256: libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 16:35:03 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 09:35:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ns.solske.net (paddan.solske.net) [194.145.250.19] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EM6nn-0001ay-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:35:03 -0700 Received: from brels by paddan.solske.net with local (Exim 4.53) id 1EM6nb-0005Ty-2R; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:34:51 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Lundkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:34:51 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libtorrent5 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: important I get the following error message in rtorrent after a few minutes running with download throttling: > Caught exception: "Connection read fd(626,2,7) > "PeerConnectionBase::down_chunk() less-than zero quota"" Without a limit on download rate it works. As far as I can tell this happened when upgrading to 0.7.4 from 0.7.3. /Micke -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libtorrent5 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-1 GCC support library ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2 2.0.10-3 type-safe Signal Framework for C++ ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-3 SSL shared libraries ii libstdc++64.0.2-1The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 Versions of packages libtorrent5 recommends: ii rtorrent 0.3.4-1ncurses BitTorrent client based on -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 331256-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 21:07:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 14:07:45 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUsUr-00055o-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:07:45 -0700 Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:07:12 +0100 Received: from mayhq.zapto.org ([81.106.106.98]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:07:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 3302 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2005 21:07:10 - Received: from unknown (HELO monkey.zoo.mayhq.org) (10.0.0.3) by tiger.zoo.mayhq.org with SMTP; 26 Oct 2005 21:07:10 - Received: (qmail 4891 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Oct 2005 21:07:09 - Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:07:09 +0100 From: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#331256: libtorrent5: Fails when using download throttling Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: te
Bug#335938: mantis: Mantis "t_core_path" File Inclusion Vulnerability
Package: mantis Version: 0.19.2-4 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Another security problem has been found in mantis. Insufficient input sanitising of the t_core_path parameter may be exploited to perform arbitrary file inclusion. Please see http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2005-46/advisory/ for details. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-vs1.2.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mantis depends on: pn apache | apache-ssl Not found. ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii grep 2.5.1.ds1-4 GNU grep, egrep and fgrep ii mysql-client-4.1 [mysql- 4.1.11a-4sarge2 mysql database client binaries pn php3 | php4 Not found. ii php4-mysql 4:4.3.10-16 MySQL module for php4 pn wwwconfig-common Not found. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327993: NMU diff for this bug
tag 327993 patch thanks I'm about to upload a NMU fixing this bug. The mipsen/libsmokeqt stuff has no associated bug report, but can be considered as cleaning of stuff introduced in the previous NMUs. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621 The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -- Oscar Wilde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327993: NMU diff for this bug
> I'm about to upload a NMU fixing this bug.
Sorry, patch attached now.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
We learned that the Linux load average rolls over at 1024. And we
actually found this out empirically.
-- H. Peter Anvin from kernel.org
diff -u libqt-perl-3.008/debian/changelog libqt-perl-3.008/debian/changelog
--- libqt-perl-3.008/debian/changelog
+++ libqt-perl-3.008/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+libqt-perl (3.008-1.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+
+ * Rebuild against transitioned Qt libraries. (Closes: #327993)
+
+ * Now that libsmokeqt1 is available everywhere, don't use the internal copy
+of the library on mips and mipsel. Changes:
+
++ debian/control:
+ - build-depend on libsmokeqt-dev on all arches
+ - drop build-dependency on chrpath
+ - remove ${mipsen:Conflicts} from libqt-perl's Conflicts line
+
++ debian/rules:
+ - no --enable-smoke for ./configure
+ - no make -C smoke call
+ - no chrpath invocation
+ - no -Vmipsen:Conflicts for dh_gencontrol
+
+ -- Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:42:24 +0200
+
libqt-perl (3.008-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u libqt-perl-3.008/debian/control libqt-perl-3.008/debian/control
--- libqt-perl-3.008/debian/control
+++ libqt-perl-3.008/debian/control
@@ -2,14 +2,13 @@
Section: perl
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Peter Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libqt3-mt-dev, perl (>= 5.8.0),
automake1.7, autoconf, chrpath [mips mipsel], libsmokeqt-dev (>> 4:3.2.3-1)
[!mips !mipsel]
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 3.0.0), libqt3-mt-dev, perl (>= 5.8.0),
automake1.7, autoconf, libsmokeqt-dev (>> 4:3.2.3-1)
Build-Conflicts: libqt-perl
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: libqt-perl
Architecture: any
Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
-Conflicts: ${mipsen:Conflicts}
Description: Perl bindings for the Qt library
This module lets you use the Qt library from Perl.
It provides an object-oriented interface and is easy to use.
diff -u libqt-perl-3.008/debian/rules libqt-perl-3.008/debian/rules
--- libqt-perl-3.008/debian/rules
+++ libqt-perl-3.008/debian/rules
@@ -13,17 +13,6 @@
# from having to guess our platform (since we know it already)
DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
-
-MISSING_LIBSMOKEQT_ARCHES = mips mipsel
-
-ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(MISSING_LIBSMOKEQT_ARCHES)))
- EXTRA_CONFIGURE_ARGS := --enable-smoke
- CONFLICTS := libsmokeqt1, libsmokeqt-dev
-else
- RUN_CHRPATH := /bin/true
-endif
-
CFLAGS = -Wall -g
@@ -42,7 +31,7 @@
aclocal-1.7
automake-1.7
autoconf
- ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
--with-qt-dir=/usr/share/qt3 --disable-rpath $(EXTRA_CONFIGURE_ARGS)
+ ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
--prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
--with-qt-dir=/usr/share/qt3 --disable-rpath
build: build-stamp
@@ -50,13 +39,8 @@
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
-ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(MISSING_LIBSMOKEQT_ARCHES)))
- $(MAKE) -C smoke LD_RUN_PATH= CXXFLAGS=-Wa,-xgot
-endif
$(MAKE) LD_RUN_PATH=
- $(RUN_CHRPATH) chrpath -d smoke/qt/.libs/libsmokeqt.so
-
touch build-stamp
clean:
@@ -138,7 +122,7 @@
dh_installdeb
# dh_perl
dh_shlibdeps
- dh_gencontrol -- "-Vmipsen:Conflicts=$(CONFLICTS)"
+ dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
Processed: NMU diff for this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 327993 patch Bug#327993: libqt-perl: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: sid Bug#327326: libqt-perl: please upgrade to libqt3-mt ! Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335941: gconf2-common: fails to purge because of nonexistant directory /etc/gconf/2
Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-6 Severity: serious Hi, I get the following when trying to purge gconf2-common : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo dpkg --purge gconf2-common (Reading database ... 53094 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gconf2-common ... Purging configuration files for gconf2-common ... rmdir: `/etc/gconf/2': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing gconf2-common (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gconf2-common Cheers, Laurent. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4-blo Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gconf2-common depends on: ii ucf 2.003 Update Configuration File: preserv gconf2-common recommends no packages. -- WE FUCKING WORSHIP SATAN -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332859: NMU patch
I will NMU based on the attached patch momentarily.
--
Henning Makholm "It will be useful even at this
early stage to review briefly the main
features of the universe as they are known today."
diff -u pstoedit-3.42/debian/control pstoedit-3.42/debian/control
--- pstoedit-3.42/debian/control
+++ pstoedit-3.42/debian/control
@@ -13,19 +13,19 @@
Package: libpstoedit-dev
Section: devel
Architecture: any
-Depends: libpstoedit0 (= ${Source-Version}), libmagick++9-dev, libplot-dev (>=
2.4.1-14)
+Depends: libpstoedit0c2 (= ${Source-Version}), libmagick++9-dev, libplot-dev
(>= 2.4.1-14)
Description: PostScript to editable vector graphics library (development files)
pstoedit is a framework for converting Postscript and PDF files to various
editable vector graphic formats.
.
This package contains files to build programs that use libpstoedit.
-Package: libpstoedit0
+Package: libpstoedit0c2
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Conflicts: libpstoedit0c
-Replaces: libpstoedit-dev (<= 3.32-3), libpstoedit0c2
+Conflicts: libpstoedit0
+Replaces: libpstoedit-dev (<= 3.32-3), libpstoedit0
Description: PostScript to editable vector graphics library (runtime files)
pstoedit is a framework for converting Postscript and PDF files to various
editable vector graphic formats.
diff -u pstoedit-3.42/debian/rules pstoedit-3.42/debian/rules
--- pstoedit-3.42/debian/rules
+++ pstoedit-3.42/debian/rules
@@ -156,10 +156,10 @@
dh_compress
dh_buildinfo
dh_fixperms
- dh_makeshlibs -plibpstoedit0 -V 'libpstoedit0 (>= $(upstreamversion))'
+ dh_makeshlibs -plibpstoedit0c2 -V 'libpstoedit0c2 (>=
$(upstreamversion))'
dh_installdeb
# dh_perl
- dh_shlibdeps -Llibpstoedit0 -ldebian/libpstoedit0/usr/lib
+ dh_shlibdeps -Llibpstoedit0c2 -ldebian/libpstoedit0c2/usr/lib
dh_gencontrol
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
diff -u pstoedit-3.42/debian/changelog pstoedit-3.42/debian/changelog
--- pstoedit-3.42/debian/changelog
+++ pstoedit-3.42/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+pstoedit (3.42-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+ * Really do the C++ transition; the library package is again
+libpstoedit0c2. (Closes: #332859)
+
+ -- Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:58:10 +0200
+
pstoedit (3.42-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
reverted:
--- pstoedit-3.42/debian/libpstoedit0.files
+++ pstoedit-3.42.orig/debian/libpstoedit0.files
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-usr/lib/libpstoedit.so.*
-usr/lib/pstoedit/lib*.so.*
-usr/lib/pstoedit/lib*.so
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- pstoedit-3.42.orig/debian/libpstoedit0c2.files
+++ pstoedit-3.42/debian/libpstoedit0c2.files
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+usr/lib/libpstoedit.so.*
+usr/lib/pstoedit/lib*.so.*
+usr/lib/pstoedit/lib*.so
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libqt-perl 3.008-1.4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 327993 + fixed Bug#327993: libqt-perl: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: patch sid Bug#327326: libqt-perl: please upgrade to libqt3-mt ! Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335947: base-install incorrectly formats ReiserFS
Subject: base-install incorrectly formats ReiserFS Package: install Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** While trying to install with 3.1 Testing (net-install), base-install fails severely. An error appears, which says something along the line of "cannot write to this area because it was not formatted properly" All I did was go through the steps avail in the debian-installer program. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.6-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Processed: Fixed in NMU of omnievents 2.6.2.pre2-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 332896 + fixed Bug#332896: libomnievents: uninstallable; needs rebuild for gcc transition Tags were: sid Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgdamm1.3 1.3.6-0.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 328083 + fixed Bug#328083: libgdamm1.3: Please undergo c++ 'c2' transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of bakery2.3 2.3.11-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 282710 + fixed Bug#282710: Please, update the package There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 285528 + fixed Bug#285528: bakery2.3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit specialization of 'void Bakery::Conf::Association::connect_widget(sigc::slot)' must be introduced by 'template <>' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 322368 + fixed Bug#322368: libbakery-2.3-dev is uninstallable There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 332180 + fixed Bug#332180: bakery2.3: [INTL:sv] Swedish PO-template translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of chasen 2.3.3-6.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 333974 + fixed Bug#333974: chasen: Please rebuild with g++-4.0 for C++ 'c2' transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335632: marked as done (hamlib: Please undergo C++ 'c2' ABI transition)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:59:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335632: fixed in hamlib 1.2.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 04:44:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 21:44:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUGfr-BT-00; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:44:35 -0700 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-96-13.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.96.13]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9P4iWFe004902; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUGfo-0002ac-Dx; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:44:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: hamlib: Please undergo C++ 'c2' ABI transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:44:32 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: hamlib Severity: important Details of the transition are at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html --- Received: (at 335632-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 22:13:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 15:13:11 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUtJI-0007GJ-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:59:52 -0700 From: Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#335632: fixed in hamlib 1.2.4-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:59:52 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: hamlib Source-Version: 1.2.4-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hamlib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hamlib++-dev_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib++-dev_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib-dev_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib-dev_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib-doc_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib-doc_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib-utils_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib-utils_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib3++c2_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib3++c2_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib3-perl_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib3-perl_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib3-tcl_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib3-tcl_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib3_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib3_1.2.4-2_i386.deb hamlib_1.2.4-2.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib_1.2.4-2.diff.gz hamlib_1.2.4-2.dsc to pool/main/h/hamlib/hamlib_1.2.4-2.dsc python2.3-hamlib3_1.2.4-2_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hamlib/python2.3-hamlib3_1.2.4-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hamlib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:29:27 +0200 Source: hamlib Binary: hamlib-dev hamlib3++c2 hamlib3-tcl hamlib3-perl hamlib++-dev hamlib-doc hamlib-utils python2.3-hamlib3 hamlib3 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.4-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Ma
Bug#335950: install cannot figure out how to install no cdrom found
Subject: base-install cannot figure out how to install Package: install Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system *** Please type your report below this line *** While trying to install with 3.1 Testing (net-install), base-install fails severely. In attempt to install base-config after partition / format, I get the following error message: "cannot install base system. the installer cannot figure out how to install the base system. no installable cdrom was found and no valid mirror was configured." The strange part is the cdrom was found, as it's a prerequisite for even installing the system or anything else! If you need more information on my system, please contact me at this email. I have saved all the included Debug information provided by the installer. (partman, messages, hardware summary, etc) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) umame -a: Linux mythbox 2.6.12-1-386 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:41:08 JST 2005 i686 unknown discover: ;;;Unknown;Pioneer DVD-ROM ATAPIModel DVD-115 0111;/dev/hda discover: via-rhine;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT6102 [Rhine-II]; discover: sata_via;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller; discover: via82cxxx;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE; discover: ide-scsi;;;Linux;IDE-SCSI emulation layer; discover: usb-uhci;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller; discover: usb-uhci;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller; discover: usb-uhci;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller; discover: usb-uhci;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller; discover: ehci-hcd;;;VIA Technologies, Inc.;USB 2.0; discover: ;;;ATA;HDS722580VLSA80;/dev/sda /proc/pci: cat: /proc/pci: No such file or directory
Processed: reassign 335947 to installation-reports, severity of 335947 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 > reassign 335947 installation-reports Bug#335947: base-install incorrectly formats ReiserFS Bug reassigned from package `install' to `installation-reports'. > severity 335947 normal Bug#335947: base-install incorrectly formats ReiserFS Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293058: marked as done (eclipse not ready for stable release)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:19:42 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#293058: fixed in eclipse 3.1.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2005 21:54:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 13:54:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bob.coplanar.net [209.112.59.2] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CvjUz-0005P3-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:54:21 -0800 Received: from station-1.feedbackplusinc.com ([64.25.11.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by bob.coplanar.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j0VLsGoq010105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:54:17 -0500 Subject: eclipse not ready for stable release From: Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:54:06 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: eclipse Severity: critical Eclipse 2.1 is very old and very unmaintained. Eclipse 3.0 packages have been prepared. This bug is meant to hold Eclipse out of testing in the meantime. -- Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Received: (at 293058-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 22:23:32 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 15:23:32 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUtcU-0004rU-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:19:42 -0700 From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#293058: fixed in eclipse 3.1.1-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:19:42 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16 Source: eclipse Source-Version: 3.1.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of eclipse, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: eclipse-base_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-base_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-ecj-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-ecj-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-ecj_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-ecj_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-efj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-efj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-jdt-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-jdt-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-jdt-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-jdt-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-jdt_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-jdt_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-pde-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-pde-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-pde-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-pde-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-pde_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-pde_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-platform-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-platform-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-platform-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-platform-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-platform_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-platform_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-rcp-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-rcp-common_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-rcp-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-rcp-gcj_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse-sdk_3.1.1-3_all.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-sdk_3.1.1-3_all.deb eclipse-source_3.1.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse-source_3.1.1-3_i386.deb eclipse_3.1.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse_3.1.1-3.diff.gz eclipse_3.1.1-3.dsc to pool/main/e/eclipse/eclipse_3.1.1-3.dsc eclipse_3.1.1.orig.tar.gz t
Bug#335252: gwp: FTBFS: gwp-game-state.c:752: error: invalid storage class for function 'planet_conn'
Hi Kurt, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Your package is failing to build with the following error: > gwp-game-state.c: In function 'gwp_game_state_postinit': > gwp-game-state.c:752: error: invalid storage class for function 'planet_conn' > gwp-game-state.c:752: warning: no previous prototype for 'planet_conn' > gwp-game-state.c:760: error: invalid storage class for function 'ship_conn' > gwp-game-state.c:760: warning: no previous prototype for 'ship_conn' > make[3]: *** [gwp-game-state.o] Error 1 > > > It seems to be using nested functions. Moving those 2 functions > outside of gwp_game_state_postinit() makes that file build without > problems, but next the same problem happens with starchart.c. Yes, the problem is the C compiler change, from gcc 4.x those inline functions don't work anymore, I've replaced them on the CVS version (I'm the maintainer of my own package). I'll see what's more convenient, if making a patch agains 0.4.0 and upload the same version or release 0.4.1 that's coming in a few days. > PS: Is there a reason this package is contrib? The copyright > file doesn't seem to give a clue why it shouldn't be in main. GWP is a game client, this game is called VGA Planets. The problem is that the VGA Planets' hosts programs out there are not free software, not as in freedom (they're free of charge though) > Also, why is it i386 only? I currently don't see any reason why > this should work on other arches. I'll correct this, thanks for you reports! Regards, -- Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LUNIX: Soluciones en GNU/Linux - http://www.lunix.com.ar GnuPG Public Key: http://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6AA54FC9 Key fingerprint = BD3B 08C4 661A 8C3B 1855 740C 8F98 3FCF 6AA5 4FC9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#335564: gedit: can't start
On 10/27/05, Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On mar, oct 25, 2005, LI Daobing wrote: > > when I start gedit, It open the gedit window and pop up a window. The > > window has a title word `The Application "gedit" has quit unexpectedly'. > > For now, you can solve this by installing libfam0 and removing > libfam0c102. This is a bug in the fam package. > it works. Thanks. -- LI Daobing
Bug#335955: unicon: Please undergo g++-4.0 'c2' C++ ABI transition
Package: unicon Severity: serious Details of the transition are at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html This package provides a shared library (libimm_server.so), so it prboably needs the full library treatment, with the 'c2' in the binary package name and all. This prevents (your) package chinput from transitioning. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327315: FTBFS: Unable to find scim-make-table
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:39:19AM -0500, minghua wrote: > Just a head-up to say this RC bug is not forgotten. As I've said, it's > going to be fixed by an upload of new upstream version. The package is > in preparation and I think it should be ready in a week. Update: There is a lincensing problem with the new upstream scim-tables package. Upstream moved the code about table IM engine and scim-make-table binary from scim (LGPL) to scim-tables (GPL), but forgot to change the copyright headers in the source files. This makes the whole package undistributable. I've contacted upstream, and it's fixed in CVS (it was just a oversight). Now need to wait for upstream to have a new release. Ming 2005.10.26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335958: drip segfaults
Package: drip
Version: 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading drip from 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-5 to 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-7 it
segfaults on startup.
Downgrading with dpkg --force-depends -i
/var/cache/apt/archives/drip_0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-5_i386.deb
solves the problem so far. --force-depends is necessary because the
Version 0.8.3.2+0.9.0-rc3-5 of drip depends on libavifile-0.7c102 and
currently installed is libavifile-0.7c2.
strace give the following output
shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 400, IPC_CREAT|0777) = 7045133
shmat(7045133, 0, 0)= 0xb65d1000
write(3, "\222\1\4\0\4\0`\2\r\200k\0\0\377\234\377+\0\1\0", 20) = 20
read(3, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\7\0\310a\217"...,
32) = 32
shmdt(0xb65d1000) = 0
shmctl(7045133, IPC_64|IPC_RMID, 0) = 0
lstat64("/etc/gtk/gtkrc", 0xbfe1c81c) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
lstat64("/home/chris/.gtkrc-1.2-gnome2", 0xbfe1c81c) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
lstat64("/usr/share/gnome/gtkrc", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1713,
}) = 0open("/usr/share/gnome/gtkrc", O_RDONLY) = 4
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
--
Thanks for maintaining the package, Christoph
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-10.2
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to de_DE.UTF-8)
Versions of packages drip depends on:
ii aalib11.4p5-28 ascii art library - transitional p
ii gdk-imlib11.9.14-24 compatibility package for gdk-imli
ii liba52-0.7.4 0.7.4-1Library for decoding ATSC A/52 str
ii libaa1 [aalib 1.4p5-29 ascii art library
ii libart2 1.4.2-25 The GNOME canvas widget - runtime
ii libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library
ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio
pn libavifile-0. (no description available)
ii libbz2-1.01.0.2-10 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb33.2.9-22 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru
ii libdps1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii libdvdread3 0.9.4-5.1 Simple foundation for reading DVDs
ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared
ii libfontconfig 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-3 GCC support library
ii libgdk-pixbuf 0.22.0-10 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+
ii libglib1.21.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome321.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries
ii libgnomesuppo 1.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries (Support libra
ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-25 The GNOME libraries (User Interfac
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjasper-1.7 1.701.0-2 The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii liblcms1 1.13-1 Color management library
ii libmad0 0.15.1b-2.1MPEG audio decoder library
ii libmagick66:6.2.3.6-3Image manipulation library
ii libmpeg2-40.4.0b-2.3 MPEG1 and MPEG2 video decoder libr
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
pi libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-10 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libsvga1 1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries
ii libtiff4 3.7.4-1Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Input extension li
ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library
ii
Bug#335252: gwp: FTBFS: gwp-game-state.c:752: error: invalid storage class for function 'planet_conn'
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:48:05PM -0300, Lucas Di Pentima wrote: > > > PS: Is there a reason this package is contrib? The copyright > > file doesn't seem to give a clue why it shouldn't be in main. > GWP is a game client, this game is called VGA Planets. The problem is > that the VGA Planets' hosts programs out there are not free software, > not as in freedom (they're free of charge though) > > > Also, why is it i386 only? I currently don't see any reason why > > this should work on other arches. > I'll correct this, thanks for you reports! The hosts program does not run on the same host, so it should work for every arch? Or is the host program something you need to download, and only exists for a few arches? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328209: [PATCH] Fix syscall number detection
tags 328209 + patch
found 328209 0.30.208-3
thanks
Hi!
The current way of detecting the syscall number is broken for any build
done without a patched kernel. This doesn't show up on i386 as the
configure script use it as by default.
Attached is a patched which modifies the configure.ac (and required
files) by using the vserver.h found upstream [1]. The buildd should
then be able to detect the correct syscall number.
For clarity, the patch only provides the needed changes to autotools
source files: "autoreconf" needs to be called to regenerated the
configure script and other files.
[1] http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/SYSCALL/vserver.h
Regards,
--
Jérémy
diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/configure.ac util-vserver-0.30.208/configure.ac
--- util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/configure.ac 2005-07-15 22:25:06.0 +0200
+++ util-vserver-0.30.208/configure.ac 2005-10-27 02:08:20.0 +0200
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
dnl ##
-ENSC_SYSCALLNR(vserver,273)
+AC_VSERVER_SYSCALLNR
ENSC_SYSCALL
ENSC_CHECK_EXT2FS_HEADER
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([vserver])
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@
Available APIs: $enable_apis
ext2fs Source: $ensc_cv_test_ext2fs_header
syscall(2) invocation: $with_syscall
- vserver(2) syscall#: $ensc_cv_value_syscall_vserver
+ vserver(2) syscall#: $ac_cv_vserver_syscallnr
Paths:
prefix: $prefix
diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/m4/ensc_syscallnr.m4 util-vserver-0.30.208/m4/ensc_syscallnr.m4
--- util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/m4/ensc_syscallnr.m4 2004-04-07 20:46:10.0 +0200
+++ util-vserver-0.30.208/m4/ensc_syscallnr.m4 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-dnl $Id: ensc_syscallnr.m4,v 1.6 2004/03/08 19:55:28 ensc Exp $
-
-dnl Copyright (C) 2004 Enrico Scholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-dnl
-dnl This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
-dnl it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-dnl the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
-dnl
-dnl This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-dnl but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-dnl MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
-dnl GNU General Public License for more details.
-dnl
-dnl You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-dnl along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
-dnl Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
-
-dnl Usage: ENSC_SYSCALLNR(,)
-
-AC_DEFUN([ENSC_SYSCALLNR],
-[
- AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CPP])
- AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_EGREP])
- AC_REQUIRE([ENSC_KERNEL_HEADERS])
-
- AC_CACHE_CHECK([for number of syscall '$1'], [ensc_cv_value_syscall_$1],
- [
- AC_LANG_PUSH(C)
- AC_LANG_CONFTEST([
-#include
-#ifdef __NR_$1
-ensc_syscall_tmp_nr=__NR_$1;
-ensc_syscall_tmp_src=ENSC_MARK
-#endif
-])
- ensc_syscall_tmp_nr=
- ensc_syscall_tmp_src=
- test "$ensc_syscall_tmp_nr" || \
- eval $($CPP $CPPFLAGS -D ENSC_MARK='glibc' conftest.c | $EGREP '^ensc_syscall_tmp_(nr=[[1-9]][[0-9]]*;|src=.*)$')
- test "$ensc_syscall_tmp_nr" || \
- eval $($CPP $CPPFLAGS -D ENSC_MARK='kernel' -I $ensc_cv_path_kernelheaders conftest.c | $EGREP '^ensc_syscall_tmp_(nr=[[1-9]][[0-9]]*;|src=.*)$')
- test "$ensc_syscall_tmp_nr" || {
- ensc_syscall_tmp_nr=$2
- ensc_syscall_tmp_src=default
- }
-
- if test x"$ensc_syscall_tmp_nr" = x; then
- AC_MSG_ERROR(
-[Can not determine value of __NR_$1; please verify your glibc/kernelheaders, and/or set CPPFLAGS='-D__NR_$1=' environment when calling configure.])
- fi
- AC_LANG_POP
-
- ensc_cv_value_syscall_$1="$ensc_syscall_tmp_nr/$ensc_syscall_tmp_src"
- ])
-
- ensc_syscall_tmp_nr=${ensc_cv_value_syscall_$1%/*}
- ensc_syscall_tmp_src=${ensc_cv_value_syscall_$1#*/}
-
- if test x"$ensc_syscall_tmp_src" != x'glibc'; then
- AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(ENSC_SYSCALL__NR_$1, $ensc_syscall_tmp_nr, [The number of the $1 syscall])
- fi
-])
diff -urN util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/m4/syscallnr.m4 util-vserver-0.30.208/m4/syscallnr.m4
--- util-vserver-0.30.208.orig/m4/syscallnr.m4 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ util-vserver-0.30.208/m4/syscallnr.m4 2005-10-27 02:09:08.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+dnl Copyright (C) 2005 Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+dnl
+dnl This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+dnl it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+dnl the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
+dnl
+dnl This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+dnl but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+dnl MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+dnl GNU General Public License for more details.
+dnl
+dnl You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+dnl along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+dnl Foundation, Inc., 59 Te
Processed: [PATCH] Fix syscall number detection
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 328209 + patch Bug#328209: util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > found 328209 0.30.208-3 Bug#328209: util-vserver: built with wrong vserver syscall Bug marked as found in version 0.30.208-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335817: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#335817: wordpress: SECURITY : Contains an insecure version of class.snoopy]
On 2005-10-26T00:40-0700 Matt Mullenweg wrote: > >I need a Wordpress release with the updated "Snoopy version 1.2.1. ASAP. > Could you confirm this affects WP? We use an older version of Snoopy > that has been modified, and the only calls to it are hard-coded RSS > feeds, so I don't think this would actually be exploitable. I don't have time to check this out. The exploit seems to require snoopy to be subclassed by something and then a direct argument fed to it. It really gets messy if you say you've modified Snoopy for Wordpress. You should perhaps consider marking that in the header of the source and somehow pass these changes upstream. I don't know. Isn't there a chance perhaps that a plugin uses Snoopy? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335252: gwp: FTBFS: gwp-game-state.c:752: error: invalid storage class for function 'planet_conn'
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > The hosts program does not run on the same host, so it should > work for every arch? Or is the host program something you need > to download, and only exists for a few arches? The host program is not free software, is a binary only free of charge program. I didn't understand what you mean about the arches. -- Lucas Di Pentima - Santa Fe, Argentina - Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LUNIX: Soluciones en GNU/Linux - http://www.lunix.com.ar GnuPG Public Key: http://random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6AA54FC9 Key fingerprint = BD3B 08C4 661A 8C3B 1855 740C 8F98 3FCF 6AA5 4FC9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#207756: marked as done (amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2003 15:05:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 10:04:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19sko3-Pw-00; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:04:55 -0500 Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (Bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A1023D4D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:56:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/cf de Bacchus - 13/12/2001) with ESMTP id h7TBuA8T021835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:11 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 4.22) id 19shrO-00036E-Aw; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: amaya Version: 8.1a-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, amaya build-depends on libpng2-dev. Installing this package would force me to uninstalled a lot of other developpement packages: # apt-get install libpng2-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libpng10-dev The following packages will be REMOVED: kdebase-dev kdelibs4-dev kdesdk koffice-dev ksimus-dev kspy libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libautotrace-dev libclanlib-dev libdirectfb-dev libecasound2.2-dev libfltk1.1-dev libgd2-xpm-dev libimlib2-dev libmagick++-dev libmagick-dev libminimagick-dev libmjpegtools-dev libpng12-dev libpng3-dev libpstoedit-dev libqt3-mt-dev libquicktime-dev libqwt-dev libsdl-image1.2-dev libwmf-dev qt3-apps-dev qt3-examples The following NEW packages will be installed: libpng10-dev libpng2-dev So would it be possible to update amaya so that it build-depends on the more recent libpng12-dev ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.21-4-k7 #1 Sun Aug 3 02:34:06 EST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages amaya depends on: ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-13 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libc6 2.3.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-16 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng10-0 1.0.15-4 PNG library, older version - runti ii xlibs 4.3.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 207756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005a9-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#328338: marked as done (amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 21:10:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 14:10:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sakura.malsain.org (arrakis.localnet) [82.241.136.161] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFeWc-0006bd-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:10:38 -0700 Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFeVt-0005uL-L2; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package:Â amaya Version: 8.5-1 This is an automatically generated report. The amaya package depends on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the archive. To achieve that, please install libpng12-dev, and make your package simply build-depend on: * libpng-dev for a binary package, * libpng12-dev for a library package. (The former is a virtual package provided by the latter.) Please don't forget that as soon as libpng 1.0 is removed from the archive (which is due soon), packages using libpng10-0 or libpng2 will be uninstallable. Regards, -- Josselin Mouette --- Received: (at 207756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005a9-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated amaya package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:02:46 +1000 Source: amaya Binary: amaya Architecture: source i386 Version: 9.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: amaya - Web Browser, HTML Editor and Testbed for Draft W3C standards Closes: 207756 262283 300606 328338 329668 331082 335117 Changes: amaya (9.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (thanks Steve for all your efforts) (Closes: #329668) * New upstream releases (Closes: #262283) * Make debian/rule more portable (Closes: #300606) * Rebuild against latest libpng (Closes: #207756, #328338, #331082) * Use a newer automa
Bug#331082: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 14:24:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 07:24:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELiHt-0006ij-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:24:30 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j91EOSXu076072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ELN0Q-00016U-TU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1106/Fri Sep 30 10:17:17 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amaya Version: 8.5-1 Severity: serious amaya fails to build because its build-dependency on libpng2-dev cannot be satisfied: > -> Considering libpng2-dev >-> Trying libpng2-dev >-> Cannot install libpng2-dev; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > E: Package libpng2-dev has no installation candidate > Package libpng2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another packa= ge. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source --=20 Matt --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDPVyNfNdgYxVXvBARAoC1AKCQNn5vppoVJy+jmcCJ/Dk//Jo79ACdHV+h 20wHPeu/voGMKLGOnO5GoTo= =NW7K -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- --- Received: (at 207756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:09 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005a9-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#207756: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintaine
Bug#328338: marked as done (amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 21:10:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 14:10:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sakura.malsain.org (arrakis.localnet) [82.241.136.161] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFeWc-0006bd-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:10:38 -0700 Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFeVt-0005uL-L2; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package:Â amaya Version: 8.5-1 This is an automatically generated report. The amaya package depends on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the archive. To achieve that, please install libpng12-dev, and make your package simply build-depend on: * libpng-dev for a binary package, * libpng12-dev for a library package. (The former is a virtual package provided by the latter.) Please don't forget that as soon as libpng 1.0 is removed from the archive (which is due soon), packages using libpng10-0 or libpng2 will be uninstallable. Regards, -- Josselin Mouette --- Received: (at 328338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aF-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated amaya package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:02:46 +1000 Source: amaya Binary: amaya Architecture: source i386 Version: 9.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: amaya - Web Browser, HTML Editor and Testbed for Draft W3C standards Closes: 207756 262283 300606 328338 329668 331082 335117 Changes: amaya (9.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (thanks Steve for all your efforts) (Closes: #329668) * New upstream releases (Closes: #262283) * Make debian/rule more portable (Closes: #300606) * Rebuild against latest libpng (Closes: #207756, #328338, #331082) * Use a newer automa
Bug#331082: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 14:24:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 07:24:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELiHt-0006ij-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:24:30 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j91EOSXu076072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ELN0Q-00016U-TU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1106/Fri Sep 30 10:17:17 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amaya Version: 8.5-1 Severity: serious amaya fails to build because its build-dependency on libpng2-dev cannot be satisfied: > -> Considering libpng2-dev >-> Trying libpng2-dev >-> Cannot install libpng2-dev; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > E: Package libpng2-dev has no installation candidate > Package libpng2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another packa= ge. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source --=20 Matt --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDPVyNfNdgYxVXvBARAoC1AKCQNn5vppoVJy+jmcCJ/Dk//Jo79ACdHV+h 20wHPeu/voGMKLGOnO5GoTo= =NW7K -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- --- Received: (at 328338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aF-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintaine
Bug#207756: marked as done (amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2003 15:05:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 10:04:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19sko3-Pw-00; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:04:55 -0500 Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (Bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A1023D4D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:56:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/cf de Bacchus - 13/12/2001) with ESMTP id h7TBuA8T021835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:11 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 4.22) id 19shrO-00036E-Aw; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: amaya Version: 8.1a-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, amaya build-depends on libpng2-dev. Installing this package would force me to uninstalled a lot of other developpement packages: # apt-get install libpng2-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libpng10-dev The following packages will be REMOVED: kdebase-dev kdelibs4-dev kdesdk koffice-dev ksimus-dev kspy libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libautotrace-dev libclanlib-dev libdirectfb-dev libecasound2.2-dev libfltk1.1-dev libgd2-xpm-dev libimlib2-dev libmagick++-dev libmagick-dev libminimagick-dev libmjpegtools-dev libpng12-dev libpng3-dev libpstoedit-dev libqt3-mt-dev libquicktime-dev libqwt-dev libsdl-image1.2-dev libwmf-dev qt3-apps-dev qt3-examples The following NEW packages will be installed: libpng10-dev libpng2-dev So would it be possible to update amaya so that it build-depends on the more recent libpng12-dev ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.21-4-k7 #1 Sun Aug 3 02:34:06 EST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages amaya depends on: ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-13 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libc6 2.3.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-16 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng10-0 1.0.15-4 PNG library, older version - runti ii xlibs 4.3.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 328338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aF-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328338: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#207756: marked as done (amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2003 15:05:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 29 10:04:57 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murphy.debian.org [146.82.138.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19sko3-Pw-00; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:04:55 -0500 Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (Bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A1023D4D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:56:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.12.9/8.12.9/cf de Bacchus - 13/12/2001) with ESMTP id h7TBuA8T021835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:11 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 4.22) id 19shrO-00036E-Aw; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: amaya: build-depend on libpng12-dev instead of libpng2-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 2.26.1 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:56:10 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_NJABL,X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: amaya Version: 8.1a-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, amaya build-depends on libpng2-dev. Installing this package would force me to uninstalled a lot of other developpement packages: # apt-get install libpng2-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libpng10-dev The following packages will be REMOVED: kdebase-dev kdelibs4-dev kdesdk koffice-dev ksimus-dev kspy libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libautotrace-dev libclanlib-dev libdirectfb-dev libecasound2.2-dev libfltk1.1-dev libgd2-xpm-dev libimlib2-dev libmagick++-dev libmagick-dev libminimagick-dev libmjpegtools-dev libpng12-dev libpng3-dev libpstoedit-dev libqt3-mt-dev libquicktime-dev libqwt-dev libsdl-image1.2-dev libwmf-dev qt3-apps-dev qt3-examples The following NEW packages will be installed: libpng10-dev libpng2-dev So would it be possible to update amaya so that it build-depends on the more recent libpng12-dev ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.21-4-k7 #1 Sun Aug 3 02:34:06 EST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages amaya depends on: ii gdk-imlib1 1.9.14-13 imaging library for use with gtk ( ii libc6 2.3.2-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-16 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libjpeg62 6b-8 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng10-0 1.0.15-4 PNG library, older version - runti ii xlibs 4.3.0-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-14compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 331082-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:17 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aO-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
Bug#328338: marked as done (amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 21:10:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 14:10:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sakura.malsain.org (arrakis.localnet) [82.241.136.161] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EFeWc-0006bd-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:10:38 -0700 Received: from joss by arrakis.localnet with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EFeVt-0005uL-L2; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amaya: please rebuild against latest libpng From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:09:53 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package:Â amaya Version: 8.5-1 This is an automatically generated report. The amaya package depends on libpng2, libpng10-0 or libpng3. It should be rebuilt against the latest libpng 1.2 packages, so that libpng 1.0 can safely be removed from the archive. To achieve that, please install libpng12-dev, and make your package simply build-depend on: * libpng-dev for a binary package, * libpng12-dev for a library package. (The former is a virtual package provided by the latter.) Please don't forget that as soon as libpng 1.0 is removed from the archive (which is due soon), packages using libpng10-0 or libpng2 will be uninstallable. Regards, -- Josselin Mouette --- Received: (at 331082-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:17 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aO-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated amaya package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:02:46 +1000 Source: amaya Binary: amaya Architecture: source i386 Version: 9.2.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: amaya - Web Browser, HTML Editor and Testbed for Draft W3C standards Closes: 207756 262283 300606 328338 329668 331082 335117 Changes: amaya (9.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (thanks Steve for all your efforts) (Closes: #329668) * New upstream releases (Closes: #262283) * Make debian/rule more portable (Closes: #300606) * Rebuild against latest libpng (Closes: #207756, #328338, #331082) * Use a newer automa
Bug#331082: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Oct 2005 14:24:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 01 07:24:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ELiHt-0006ij-00; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 07:24:30 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j91EOSXu076072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 07:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ELN0Q-00016U-TU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:41:02 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on libpng2-dev Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1106/Fri Sep 30 10:17:17 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amaya Version: 8.5-1 Severity: serious amaya fails to build because its build-dependency on libpng2-dev cannot be satisfied: > -> Considering libpng2-dev >-> Trying libpng2-dev >-> Cannot install libpng2-dev; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... > Building dependency tree... > E: Package libpng2-dev has no installation candidate > Package libpng2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another packa= ge. > This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or > is only available from another source --=20 Matt --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDPVyNfNdgYxVXvBARAoC1AKCQNn5vppoVJy+jmcCJ/Dk//Jo79ACdHV+h 20wHPeu/voGMKLGOnO5GoTo= =NW7K -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- --- Received: (at 331082-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:08:17 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:08:17 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUx5l-0005aO-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331082: fixed in amaya 9.2.1-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: amaya Source-Version: 9.2.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amaya, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.diff.gz amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1.dsc amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1-1_i386.deb amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/a/amaya/amaya_9.2.1.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintaine
Bug#335967: BBPFS (experimental): mips-tools doesn't include binary
Package: mips-tools Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: serious Tags: experimental When building mips-tools on all architectures that I tested (which were sparc and i386) it doesn't include any binary: Automatic build of linux-patch-2.6-mips_2.6.12-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 [...] Build finished at 20051027-0351 chroot-experimental/build/buildd/mips-tools_2.6.12-2_sparc.deb: new debian package, version 2.0. size 2440 bytes: control archive= 517 bytes. 326 bytes,11 lines control 216 bytes, 3 lines md5sums Package: mips-tools Version: 2.6.12-2 Section: devel Priority: optional Architecture: sparc Installed-Size: 12 Maintainer: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Source: linux-patch-2.6-mips Description: MIPS specific kernel tools This package provides tools used on the MIPS architecture to convert the kernel into an ECOFF image. chroot-experimental/build/buildd/mips-tools_2.6.12-2_sparc.deb: drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:47 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:43 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:45 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:43 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:46 ./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 608 2005-07-12 19:24:29 ./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root 468 2005-10-15 04:25:03 ./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/changelog.Debian.gz drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:45 ./usr/share/man/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:46 ./usr/share/man/man8/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 473 2005-07-12 19:24:29 ./usr/share/man/man8/elf2ecoff.8.gz The full build log is available from http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-patch-2.6-mips&ver=2.6.12-2&arch=sparc&stamp=1130377935&file=log&as=raw Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335968: gramps: Segmentation fault
Package: gramps Version: 2.0.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On gdb excution as per #334122 I recieve: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1210210624 (LWP 10033)] 0xb7e49b2b in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 All the import statements work just fine. Other packages mentioned in #334122: ii libgtkspell0 2.0.10-3 a spell-checking addon for GTK's TextView widget ii python-gnome2-extras 2.10.2-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment ii python2.3-gnome2-extras 2.10.2-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desktop environment Since it segfaulted in the i686 libraries I'll include this one too: ii libc6-i686 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gramps depends on: ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-glade2 2.6.3-1GTK+ bindings: Glade support ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-3 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii yelp 2.10.0-3 Help browser for GNOME 2 Versions of packages gramps recommends: ii graphviz2.2.1-1 rich set of graph drawing tools ii python-gnome2-extras2.10.2-1 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-reportlab1.20debian-2 ReportLab library to create PDF do ii ttf-freefont20031008-1.1 Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono True -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#245810: marked as done (scm_5d9-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: test errors)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:52:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line nope, it's fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2004 15:12:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 25 08:12:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BHlIh-0006HI-00; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 08:12:11 -0700 Received: by mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id CC0B217593; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:12:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.48]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016E216E4E for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:12:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E74542391B; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:12:09 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:12:08 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: scm_5d9-3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: test errors Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: scm Version: 5d9-3 Severity: important There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of scm_5d9-3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.170.5 > Build started at 20040423-1609 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: slib (>> 3a1), libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev, texi2html, > texinfo, xlibs-dev [...] > (#list> #()) ==> () > (#vector> (dididit dah)) ==> #(dididit dah) > (#vector> ()) ==> #() > SECTION(6 10 4) > (load (#t #f a () 9739 -3 . #((test) "te \" \" st" "" test #() b c))) ==> > (#t #f a () 9739 -3 . #((test) "te \" \" st" "" test #() b c)) > > Passed all tests > > ;testing continuations; > SECTION(6 9) > make[2]: *** [checklit] Illegal instruction > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scm-5d9' > make[1]: *** [scmlit] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scm-5d9' > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=scm&ver=5d9-3 --- Received: (at 245810-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:52:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:52:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUxsK-0007m1-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:52:20 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUxsJ-0001OK-WE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:52:19 -0700 From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nope, it's fixed X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Zippy-Says: All of a sudden, I want to THROW OVER my promising ACTING CAREER, grow a LONG BLACK BEARD and wear a BASEBALL HAT!! ... Although I don't know WHY!! Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:52:19 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 5.9-5 While some previous versions might not have built properly, this is no longer true; the bug has been fixed on all archs, and I can confirm that it does build correctly now on powerpc too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#282349: marked as done (scm: FTBFS in sarge: Wrong number of args given #
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:50:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closed as per submitter info has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2004 14:51:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 21 06:51:48 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CVt48-0008Sj-00; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:51:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 576733BC1B1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:51:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5775FD9.kabel.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAD53BC17F for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:51:47 +0100 (MET) Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id E5FBA26136; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:51:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:51:46 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: scm: FTBFS in sarge: Wrong number of args given # Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: scm Version: 5d6-3.2 Severity: serious Tags: sarge The version in sarge is failing to build. The following error shows up several times: ./scmlit -l build -e"(make-features-txi)" ERROR: Wrong number of args given #From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:50:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUxqJ-00075O-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:50:15 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EUxqI-0001O7-MS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:50:14 -0700 From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closed as per submitter info X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Tom-Swiftie: "We're going to use decimal notation," Tom said tentatively Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:50:14 -0700 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 5d9-4.1 As per the bug log, this bug has not existed at least since version 5.9-4.1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295074: marked as done (scm: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 's_read' follows non-static declaration)
Your message dated Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295074: fixed in scm 5d9-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 13:30:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 13 05:30:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d027102.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.27.102] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D0Jp3-000114-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 05:30:02 -0800 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D0Jp1-0007UQ-Mb; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:29:59 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: scm: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 's_read' follows non-static declaration Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:29:59 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: scm Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'scm' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: cc -c repl.c -o repl.o repl.c: In function 'wait_for_input': repl.c:498: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size repl.c: At top level: repl.c:852: error: static declaration of 's_read' follows non-static declaration scm.h:687: error: previous declaration of 's_read' was here With the attached patch 'scm' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. The attached patch also changes the Build-Depends from 'libreadline4-dev' to 'libreadline5-dev'. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/repl.c ./repl.c --- ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/repl.c 2003-08-17 19:32:52.0 +0200 +++ ./repl.c2005-02-13 14:17:31.058657128 +0100 @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ /* Top-level readers */ static SCM p_read_numbered, p_read_for_load, p_read; -static char s_read[] = "read"; +char s_read[] = "read"; static char s_read_for_load[] = "read-for-load"; static char s_read_numbered[] = "read-numbered"; SCM scm_read(port) diff -urN ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/scmfig.h ./scmfig.h --- ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/scmfig.h2003-09-22 01:42:46.0 +0200 +++ ./scmfig.h 2005-02-13 14:14:58.246164571 +0100 @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ #ifdef __alpha # define SHORT_INT #endif -#ifdef __ia64 +#if defined __ia64 || defined __powerpc64__ || defined __x86_64__ # define SHORT_INT # define CDR_DOUBLES #endif diff -urN ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/debian/rules ./debian/rules --- ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/debian/rules2005-02-13 14:18:16.626857956 +0100 +++ ./debian/rules 2005-02-13 14:16:15.441258622 +0100 @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ clean: $(checkdir) - -rm -f scm.info* scm.html tmp1 tmp2 scmflags.h scmlit + -rm -f scm.info* scm.html tmp1 tmp2 scmlit -rm -f Xlibscm.info* -rm -f features.txi platform.txi -rm -f *.info diff -urN ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/scm-5d9/debian/control 2005-02-13 14:18:16.626857956 +0100 +++ ./debian/control2005-02-13 14:15:12.381435143 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.1.1 -Build-Depends: slib (>> 3a1), libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev, texi2html, texinfo, xlibs-dev +Build-Depends: slib (>> 3a1), libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev, texi2html, texinfo, xlibs-dev Package: scm Architecture: any --- Received: (at 295074-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Oct 2005 02:47:38 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 19:47:38 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUxnH-0006Py-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:47:07 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#295074: fixed in scm 5d9-5 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60
Bug#335971: FTBFS: t/t30t1font test fails
Package: libimager-perl Version: 0.45-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build libimager-perl in an unstable chroot on i386: > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/t00basicok > t/t01introvertok > t/t020masked..ok > t/t021sixteen.ok > t/t022double..ok > t/t023palette.ok > t/t05errorok > t/t07iolayer..ok > t/t1000files..ok > t/t101jpegok > t/t102png.ok > t/t103raw.ok > t/t104ppm.ok > t/t105gif.ok > t/t106tiffok > t/t107bmp.ok > t/t108tga.ok > t/t15colorok > t/t16matrix...ok > t/t20fill.ok > t/t21draw.ok > t/t30t1font...# Failed test (t/t30t1font.t at line 131) > # Looks like you failed 1 tests of 64. > dubious > Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > DIED. FAILED test 18 > Failed 1/64 tests, 98.44% okay > t/t35ttfont...ok > 62/63 skipped: freetype 1.x unavailable or disabled > t/t36oofont...ok > 10/20 skipped: FT1.x missing or disabled > t/t37w32font..ok > 31/32 skipped: no MS Windows > t/t38ft2font..ok > t/t40scaleok > t/t50basicoo..ok > t/t55transok > 4/5 skipped: # warning transform: expr given and Affix::Infix2Postfix > is not avaliable. > t/t56postfix..ok > t/t57infixok > t/t58trans2...ok > t/t59assemok > t/t60dyntest..ok > t/t61filters..ok > t/t64copyflip.ok > t/t65crop.ok > t/t66pasteok > t/t67convert..ok > t/t68map..ok > t/t69rubthru..ok > t/t70newgif...ok > t/t75polyaa...ok > t/t80texttoolsok > t/t90cc...ok > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > --- > t/t30t1font.t1 256641 1.56% 18 > 107 subtests skipped. > Failed 1/45 test scripts, 97.78% okay. 1/1712 subtests failed, 99.94% okay. > make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libimager-perl-0.45' > make: *** [install] Error 2 -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335973: FTBFS: Tests fail
Package: libjson-perl Version: 1.00-1 Severity: serious pbuilder fails to build libjson-perl in an unstable chroot on i386: > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" > "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/01-use.ok > t/02-baseok > t/03-circleref...ok > t/04-autoconvok > t/05-esc.ok > t/06-comment.ok > t/07-extra_numberok > t/08-pretty..ok > t/09-quote...ok > t/rpc01-use..Base class package "HTTP::Response" is empty. > (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) > at /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350. > Compilation failed in require at (eval 1) line 3. > ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.8/base.pm line 84. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC/Transport/HTTP.pm line 4. > Compilation failed in require at t/rpc01-use.t line 4. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/rpc01-use.t line 4. > dubious > Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200) > DIED. FAILED test 1 > Failed 1/1 tests, 0.00% okay > t/rpc02-queryBase class package "HTTP::Response" is empty. > (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) > at /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350. > Compilation failed in require at (eval 3) line 3. > ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.8/base.pm line 84. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC/Transport/HTTP.pm line 4. > Compilation failed in require at t/rpc02-query.t line 7. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/rpc02-query.t line 7. > # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. > dubious > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-16 > Failed 16/16 tests, 0.00% okay > t/rpc03-query2...Base class package "HTTP::Response" is empty. > (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) > at /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350. > Compilation failed in require at (eval 3) line 3. > ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.8/base.pm line 84. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC/Transport/HTTP.pm line 4. > Compilation failed in require at t/rpc03-query2.t line 8. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/rpc03-query2.t line 8. > # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. > dubious > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-29 > Failed 29/29 tests, 0.00% okay > t/rpc04-json_opt.Base class package "HTTP::Response" is empty. > (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first.) > at /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350 > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC.pm line 350. > Compilation failed in require at (eval 3) line 3. > ...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.8/base.pm line 84. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00/blib/lib/JSONRPC/Transport/HTTP.pm line 4. > Compilation failed in require at t/rpc04-json_opt.t line 7. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at t/rpc04-json_opt.t line 7. > # Looks like your test died before it could output anything. > dubious > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > DIED. FAILED tests 1-11 > Failed 11/11 tests, 0.00% okay > Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > --- > t/rpc01-use.t 2 512 12 200.00% 1 > t/rpc02-query.t 255 6528016 32 200.00% 1-16 > t/rpc03-query2.t255 6528029 58 200.00% 1-29 > t/rpc04-json_opt.t 255 6528011 22 200.00% 1-11 > Failed 4/13 test scripts, 69.23% okay. 57/240 subtests failed, 76.25% okay. > make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libjson-perl-1.00' > make: *** [install-stamp] Error 2 -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335972: FTBFS: Unable to find postgresql header files
Package: libpgsql-ruby Version: 0.7.1-6 Severity: serious Tags: patch pbuilder fails to build libpgsql-ruby in an unstable chroot on i386: > make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1' > gcc -fPIC -Wall -g -O2 -fPIC -I/usr/include/postgresql/8.0 -I. > -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.6/i486-linux -I. -DHAVE_SYS_UN_H -DHAVE_SOCKET > -DHAVE_GETHOSTNAME -DHAVE_PQSETCLIENTENCODING -DHAVE_PG_ENCODING_TO_CHAR > -DHAVE_PQESCAPESTRING -c -o postgres.o postgres.c > postgres.c:18:22: error: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory > postgres.c:19:70: error: libpq/libpq-fs.h: No such file or directory > postgres.c:35: error: syntax error before '*' token ... > make[1]: *** [postgres.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1' > make: *** [build-install-1.6] Error 2 The attached patch fixes this problem. -- Matt only in patch2: unchanged: --- libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1.orig/postgres.c +++ libpgsql-ruby-0.7.1/postgres.c @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ #include "ruby.h" #include "rubyio.h" -#include -#include /* large-object interface */ +#include +#include/* large-object interface */ #include #include #include signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#335968: gramps: Segmentation fault
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 21:33 -0500, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread -1210210624 (LWP 10033)] > 0xb7e49b2b in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 [snip] > Since it segfaulted in the i686 libraries I'll include this one too: > ii libc6-i686 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 > optimized] This does not seem to be GRAMPS bug. Nothing we do from within python should be able to cause segfault. Such things are between Python and the C libs. Have you built your own python? Does the issue go away if you remove libc6-i686 package? -- Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#322644: reopen 322644
reopen 322644 thanks I can still reproduce this problem using pbuilder and an i386 unstable chroot. I've attached the full build log. Please let me know if I can provide further information. -- Matt W: /home/kraai/.pbuilderrc does not exist pbuilder-buildpackage/i386 $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage-funcs,v 1.20 2005/10/03 23:59:06 dancer Exp $ $Id: pbuilder-buildpackage,v 1.114 2005/07/13 22:02:20 dancer Exp $ Current time: Wed Oct 26 04:44:07 PDT 2005 pbuilder-time-stamp: 1130327047 Building the build Environment -> extracting base tarball [/var/cache/pbuilder/base.tgz] -> creating local configuration -> copying local configuration -> mounting /proc filesystem -> mounting /dev/pts filesystem -> policy-rc.d already exists -> created buildresult dir :/tmp/tmpumGUw0 Obtaining the cached apt archive contents Installing the build-deps W: no hooks of type D found -- ignoring -> Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.20 2005/08/17 00:46:54 dancer Exp $ -> Considering debhelper (>= 4.0.2) -> Trying debhelper -> Considering perl (>= 5.8.0-7) -> Trying perl -> Installing debhelper perl Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... perl is already the newest version. The following extra packages will be installed: debconf-utils file gettext html2text intltool-debian libmagic1 po-debconf Suggested packages: dh-make cvs gettext-doc Recommended packages: curl libmail-sendmail-perl libcompress-zlib-perl The following NEW packages will be installed: debconf-utils debhelper file gettext html2text intltool-debian libmagic1 po-debconf 0 upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2807kB of archives. After unpacking 8712kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! libmagic1 file debconf-utils html2text gettext intltool-debian po-debconf debhelper Selecting previously deselected package libmagic1. (Reading database ... 12138 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libmagic1 (from .../libmagic1_4.15-2_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package file. Unpacking file (from .../archives/file_4.15-2_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debconf-utils. Unpacking debconf-utils (from .../debconf-utils_1.4.58_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package html2text. Unpacking html2text (from .../html2text_1.3.2a-3_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package gettext. Unpacking gettext (from .../gettext_0.14.5-2_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package intltool-debian. Unpacking intltool-debian (from .../intltool-debian_0.34.1+20050828_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package po-debconf. Unpacking po-debconf (from .../po-debconf_0.9.0_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package debhelper. Unpacking debhelper (from .../debhelper_4.9.13_all.deb) ... Setting up libmagic1 (4.15-2) ... Setting up file (4.15-2) ... Setting up debconf-utils (1.4.58) ... Setting up html2text (1.3.2a-3) ... Setting up gettext (0.14.5-2) ... Setting up intltool-debian (0.34.1+20050828) ... Setting up po-debconf (0.9.0) ... Setting up debhelper (4.9.13) ... -> Finished parsing the build-deps Copying back the cached apt archive contents grep: /var/cache/pbuilder/build//31959/etc/shadow: No such file or directory Copying source file -> copying [libproc-background-perl_1.08-1.dsc] -> copying [./libproc-background-perl_1.08.orig.tar.gz] -> copying [./libproc-background-perl_1.08-1.diff.gz] Extracting source dpkg-source: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dpkg-source: extracting libproc-background-perl in libproc-background-perl-1.08 dpkg-source: unpacking libproc-background-perl_1.08.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: applying ./libproc-background-perl_1.08-1.diff.gz -> Building the package -BEGIN INSTALLED PACKAGE LIST tcpd 7.6.dbs-8 libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-4 debconf 1.4.58 exim4-config 4.54-1 coreutils 5.2.1-2.1 debianutils 2.15 makedev 2.3.1-78 laptop-detect 0.12.1 telnet 0.17-32 login 1:4.0.13-1 gettext-base 0.14.5-2 man-db 2.4.3-3 libgdbm3 1.8.3-2 libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1 libuuid1 1.38-2 libtasn1-2 0.2.13-1 lsb-base 3.0-10 cpp-4.0 4.0.2-2 procps 1:3.2.5-1 g++-4.0 4.0.2-2 console-tools 1:0.2.3dbs-57 ncurses-base 5.5-1 libpopt0 1.7-5 libpam0g 0.79-3 libgpg-error0 1.1-4 psmisc 21.6-1 perl-modules 5.8.7-7 bsdutils 1:2.12p-8 debhelper 4.9.13 dpkg-dev 1.13.11 libc6-dev 2.3.5-7 libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 console-common 0.7.54 ncurses-bin 5.5-1 perl-base 5.8.7-7 sysv-rc 2.86.ds1-4 apt 0.6.42.1 fdutils 5.5-20050303-2 pciutils 1:2.1.11-15.1 base-config 2.73 netbase 4.23 libmagic1 4.15-2 whiptail 0.51.6-31 libsepol1 1.8-1 dmidecode 2.7-2 libpam-modules 0.79-3 gettext 0.14.5-2 ifupdown 0.6.7 dhcp3-client 3.0.3-5 console-data 2002.12.04dbs-49 tar 1.15.1-2 file 4.15-2 gcc-4.0 4.0.2-2 zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 exim4-daemon-light 4.54-1 adduser 3.77 html2text 1.3.2a-3 manpages 2.02-2 ed 0.2-20
Processed: reopen 322644
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 322644 Bug#322644: FTBFS: Test failure Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335976: /etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel contains bashisms
Package: nvidia-kernel-common Version: 20051025+1 Severity: grave Setting up nvidia-kernel-common (20051025+1) ... /etc/init.d/nvidia-kernel: 19: Syntax error: Bad for loop variable invoke-rc.d: initscript nvidia-kernel, action "start" failed. "for (( expr1 ; expr2 ; expr3 )) ; do list ; done" syntax is a bashism, instead consider: --- nvidia-kernel.orig 2005-10-26 20:58:30.0 -0700 +++ nvidia-kernel 2005-10-26 21:06:26.0 -0700 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ [ -r /etc/default/nvidia-kernel ] && . /etc/default/nvidia-kernel # test if anything is requested -if [ -z "$NVIDIA_CARDS" ] || [ "$NVIDIA_CARDS" = 0 ]; then +if [ -z "$NVIDIA_CARDS" ] || [ "$NVIDIA_CARDS" -lt 1 ]; then # Nothing to do but exit. exit 0 fi @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ mknod -m 0660 /dev/nvidiactl c 195 255 chgrp video /dev/nvidiactl fi - for (( i=0; i < NVIDIA_CARDS && i < 4; i++ )); do -if ! [ -e /dev/nvidia$i ]; then + for i in $(seq 0 $(($NVIDIA_CARDS - 1))); do +if ! [ -e /dev/nvidia$i ]; then mknod -m 0660 /dev/nvidia$i c 195 $i chgrp video /dev/nvidia$i fi -- Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/ "Paranoia is a disease unto itself, and may I add, the person standing next to you may not be who they appear to be, so take precaution." -Sathington Willoughby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335968: gramps: Segmentation fault
Alex Roitman wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 21:33 -0500, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1210210624 (LWP 10033)] 0xb7e49b2b in strlen () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 [snip] Since it segfaulted in the i686 libraries I'll include this one too: ii libc6-i686 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i686 optimized] This does not seem to be GRAMPS bug. Nothing we do from within python should be able to cause segfault. Such things are between Python and the C libs. Have you built your own python? No, this is the Debian Python: ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-oriented language (default version) Does the issue go away if you remove libc6-i686 package? Nope, I still get: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread -1209989440 (LWP 3215)] 0xb7e800cb in strlen () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 I did SUCCESSFULLY install and run gramps on my i686 laptop. Sigh... I must be something specific with my desktop machine. Here's the cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 2800+ stepping: 10 cpu MHz : 1871.978 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx mmxext lm 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips: 3746.86 The cpu is running in 32 bit mode without the 64 bit libraries installed (but the 64 bit libraries installed doesn't change things.) Any clue where to look? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
