Bug#334374: python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?)
Hi, Sorry for the delayed answer, I was on vacation and somehow failed to see your mail when I came back last week. I shall investigate the issue this week and try to see what is wrong. Thanks for your report. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337909: ghc6: regression in Cabal
Package: ghc6 Version: 6.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: causes an FTBFS for haskelldb, washngo Tags: upstream patch The following upstream change in 6.4.1 breaks packages that build executables with HS-Source-Dir: --- ghc6-6.4/libraries/Cabal/Distribution/Simple/Install.hs +++ ghc6-6.4.1/libraries/Cabal/Distribution/Simple/Install.hs @@ -107,8 +107,9 @@ - PackageDescription - IO () installExeGhc verbose pref buildPref pkg_descr = do createDirectoryIfMissing True pref - withExe pkg_descr $ \ (Executable e _ b) - - copyFileVerbose verbose (buildPref `joinFileName` (hsSourceDir b) `joinFileName` e) (pref `joinFileName` e) + withExe pkg_descr $ \ (Executable e _ b) - do + let exeName = e `joinFileExt` exeExtension + copyFileVerbose verbose (buildPref `joinFileName` exeName) (pref `joinFileName` exeName) -- |Install for ghc, .hi and .a installLibGHC :: Int -- ^verbose The new code looks for executables in dist/build/exeName rather than dist/build/HS-Source-Dir/exeName where they are built, and the installation phase breaks. Patch attached. Thanks, Matej --- ghc6-6.4.1.dist/libraries/Cabal/Distribution/Simple/Install.hs +++ ghc6-6.4.1/libraries/Cabal/Distribution/Simple/Install.hs @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ = do createDirectoryIfMissing True pref withExe pkg_descr $ \ (Executable e _ b) - do let exeName = e `joinFileExt` exeExtension - copyFileVerbose verbose (buildPref `joinFileName` exeName) (pref `joinFileName` exeName) + copyFileVerbose verbose (buildPref `joinFileName` (hsSourceDir b) `joinFileName` exeName) (pref `joinFileName` exeName) -- |Install for ghc, .hi and .a installLibGHC :: Int -- ^verbose
Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision
close 303156 thanks Le mercredi 19 octobre 2005 à 21:00 +1000, Rob Weir a écrit : Hi Alexis, this bug seems to be fixed in your recent uploads to sid; perhaps it should be closed? -rob -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333795: This is an FTBFS bug
tag 333795 +pending thanks On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: package python-scipy severity 333795 serious thanks This bug should be RC since it makes the package unbuildable. Thanks for the notice. I'll upload an updated package fixing the problem shortly. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik
tag 337443 +pending thanks On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:12:02PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: python2.1-logilab-common Severity: grave Version: 0.12.0-2 Hi python2.1-logilab-common is not installable in sid anymore as python2.1-optik is unavailable. Maybe python2.1-logilab-common can be dropped? I will probably drop python2.1-logilab-common in the next upload of the package. Thanks for the notice. -- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337881: udev postinstall fails because udevd is running
On Nov 07, Emilio Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The udev package dont isntall properly because udevd is running. I have Can you see any obvious reason about why it's not being stopped? prerm just uses: start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd --oknodo --quiet || true -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 303156 Bug#303156: tecnoballz: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'ecran_hard*' to 'Sint32' loses precision 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 337443 +pending Bug#337443: python2.1-logilab-common: Uninstallable due to unavailable python2.1-optik There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#333795: This is an FTBFS bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 333795 +pending Bug#333795: libwxgtk2.4-1-python - python-wxgtk2.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.
Package: apt-get Severity: serious Justification: segfaults. apt-get source php-myadmin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Speicherzugriffsfehler (segfault) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.1411.11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337258: cmucl: FTBFS with new tetex-bin: Cannot find src/docs/interface/toolkit.dvi
Le Samedi 05 Novembre 2005 10:18, Peter Van Eynde a écrit : Hello, On Thursday 03 November 2005 16:13, Daniel Schepler wrote: This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode (./internals.tex ... Output written on toolkit.pdf (8 pages, 102048 bytes). ... With what version of latex-bin is this? I get: 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fakeroot/repository/cmucl/src/docs/interface :) $ latex internals.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode [snip] Output written on internals.dvi (7 pages, 23200 bytes). Transcript written on internals.log. Groetjes, Peter Sorry, I guess I should have made this clearer: internals.tex builds fine. It's toolkit.tex that always outputs PDF. -- Daniel Schepler
Processed: Blocked by #337909
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: block 337275 by 337909 Bug#337275: libghc6-haskelldb-dev: Uninstallable, FTBFS with current GHC Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 337909 block 337603 by 337909 Bug#337603: washngo - FTBFS Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 337909 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
Package: udev Version: 0.072-2 Followup-For: Bug #337881 I'm seeing the same thing. start-stop-daemon doesn't work the dpkg preinst fails. After killing udevd by hand and issuing a dpkg --pending --configure start-stop-daemon can stop udevd with no problems! cheers, Phil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.
reassign 337910 apt severity 337910 important thanks * Wilfried Goesgens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-07 09:40]: Package: apt-get Severity: serious Justification: segfaults. apt-get source php-myadmin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Speicherzugriffsfehler (segfault) This doesn't happen here. Can you please provide some more information? 1744:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] apt-get source php-myadmin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Unable to find a source package for php-myadmin zsh: exit 100 apt-get source php-myadmin -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 337910 apt Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there. Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get' Bug reassigned from package `apt-get' to `apt'. severity 337910 important Bug#337910: segfaults with apt-get source if package not there. Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Change submitter address
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 337439 Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#337439: php-pager: FTBFS: Can't rm -*/package.xml Changed Bug submitter from Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337907: marked as done (unnecessary and broken depends on libqt3c102-mt)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:47:11 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337907: fixed in vym 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 07:19:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 23:19:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ1IG-0005Lw-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:19:53 -0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p50896689.dip.t-dialin.net [80.137.102.137]) by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0052E32CBA; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:19:50 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: unnecessary and broken depends on libqt3c102-mt X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:19:46 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vym Version: 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-2 Severity: grave Hi There is a dependency on libqt3c102-mt which makes vym uninstallable on i386 . I think a rebuild is necessary. Greetings Steffen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages vym depends on: ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-3 GCC support library pn libqt3c102-mtnone (no description available) ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii unzip5.52-3 De-archiver for .zip files ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii xsltproc 1.1.15-1XSLT command line processor ii zip 2.31-3 Archiver for .zip files vym recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 337907-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 08:51:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 00:51:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ2el-00078j-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:47:11 -0800 From: Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337907: fixed in vym 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:47:11 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vym Source-Version: 1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vym, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vym/vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3.diff.gz vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3.dsc to pool/main/v/vym/vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3.dsc vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/v/vym/vym_1.7.0+cvs1.7.4-3_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated vym package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. By the way, what would be a suitable Depends version: 3.0-10 or just 3.0 or anything else? If you do not use fmtutil-sys, you don't need a specific versioned Depends - the bug was already a bug with tetex-2.0.2, but then its impact was only minor. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#332290: marked as done (horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332290: fixed in horde3 3.0.4-4sarge1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 17:18:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 10:18:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl254-118-016.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [216.254.118.16] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENCu7-00041c-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:18:07 -0700 Received: from stew by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ENCtd-00025Q-4d; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:17:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:17:37 -0400 From: Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole As part of the installation procedure in README.Debian, you are told to configure horde3 via a web interface. This is done using an Administrator account which requires no password. In the time that the application is in this state, anyone who goes to the website is automatically logged in as Administrator with no password. The Administrative account is granted access to 3 tools that look extremely dangerous: cmdshell.php sqlshell.php and phpshell.php. I didn't determine what phpshell.php does. However when i used the cmdshell.php I was able to execute arbitrary commands as the www-user. For instance I was able to successfully execute cat /etc/passwd. This is horribly unacceptable. I would recommend that cmdshell.php and sqlshell.php be removed. They are a much bigger security hole than they are worth. I don't know what phpshell.php does, but I wouldn't be suprised if it were in this same category. I also would recommend that a password be required do use the Administration interface. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 332290-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 09:07:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 01:06:59 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ2tD-0003QG-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:02:07 -0800 From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332290: fixed in horde3 3.0.4-4sarge1 Message-Id:
Bug#323687: diveintopython: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1] does not comply with DFSG
Upstream has been contacted about this, when he replies I shall either upload a new release under a new license, or move it to non-free. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's significantly different in the conf files such that choosing to keep my old one is a problem? Yes, the old conffiles will never work. If you choose to keep them upon upgrade, you have to go through the differences and merge the important changes - especially the setting of the TEXMF variable in texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf and the variables that form its parts. As for the conffiles in /etc/texmf/updmap.d, there are some map files that have been renamed, so the files referenced in the old conffiles are no longer available, and updmap will fail. BTW it's new in teTeX-3.0 that updmap fails when map files are missing, previously this was just a warning. Hmm. I see in the tetex files under /tmp that the map files have changed locations, and that I shouldn't touch anything as it's a Debian-installed package. How can I fix this? map files at the old locations, if from a Debian package, should not be a problem - just wait for the Debian package to be fixed. If there's not just a warning, but an error that causes the postinst to fail, you have local changes in your conffiles and should merge them. More than this information I cannot give - we need the specific error messages you get (and of course the commands that caused them). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#337797: I'm sure it's not only a nvidia-driver bug
El domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2005 16:42, Manolo Díaz escribió: Package: xbase-clients Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hello, Manolo. Your concept of it breaks the whole system is nice. Sorry, it only hangs my system, I can reset it. What is the correct tag?. I am to close your bug just because you use official nvidia non-free, tainting, closed-source driver: [...] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. ACPI: PCI Interrupt :05:00.0[A] - Link [APC3] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 66 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :05:00.0 to 64 NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86_64 NVIDIA Kernel Module 1.0-7174 Tue Mar 22 06:45:40 PST 2005 After inserting it, your system becomes untrustable. Please, the next time you report a bug, explain clearly (not with a simple Subject line) your problem, how to reproduce, your configuration, and any other information. Please. If you can reproduce the problem with the open driver, shipped by X.Org, called 'nv', we will try to deal with it. As I've told I tried both nv (xorg) and nvidia (propietary) drivers. Well. Another machine (very similar): --- 1. dmesg output (as you can see this time linux kernel in not tainted). Bootdata ok (command line is root=/dev/sda13 video=nvidiafb:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux version 2.6.14 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc versión 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)) #1 Fri Oct 28 08:38:33 CEST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009f800 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009f800 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 3fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 3fff - 3fff3000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: 3fff3000 - 4000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: fec0 - fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fee0 - fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: - 0001 (reserved) ACPI: RSDP (v000 Nvidia) @ 0x000f6860 ACPI: RSDT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x01010101) @ 0x3fff3000 ACPI: FADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x01010101) @ 0x3fff3040 ACPI: MADT (v001 Nvidia AWRDACPI 0x42302e31 AWRD 0x01010101) @ 0x3fff7900 ACPI: DSDT (v001 NVIDIA AWRDACPI 0x1000 MSFT 0x010c) @ 0x On node 0 totalpages: 262031 DMA zone: 3999 pages, LIFO batch:1 Normal zone: 258032 pages, LIFO batch:31 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 Nvidia board detected. Ignoring ACPI timer override. ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x1008 ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee0 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:12 APIC version 16 ACPI: LAPIC_NMI (acpi_id[0x00] dfl dfl lint[0x1]) ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] gsi_base[0]) IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 17, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: BIOS IRQ0 pin2 override ignored. ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 14 global_irq 14 high edge) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 15 global_irq 15 high edge) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override. ACPI: IRQ14 used by override. ACPI: IRQ15 used by override. Setting APIC routing to flat Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Allocating PCI resources starting at 5000 (gap: 4000:bec0) Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda13 video=nvidiafb:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 4096 (order: 12, 131072 bytes) time.c: Using 3.579545 MHz PM timer. time.c: Detected 2080.204 MHz processor. time.c: Using PIT/TSC based timekeeping. Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 262144 (order: 9, 2097152 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 131072 (order: 8, 1048576 bytes) Memory: 1026980k/1048512k available (2004k kernel code, 20836k reserved, 752k data, 144k init) Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 4163.78 BogoMIPS (lpj=20818910)Mount-cache hash table entries: 256 CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ stepping 00 Using local APIC timer interrupts. Detected 13.001 MHz APIC timer. softlockup thread 0 started up. testing NMI watchdog ... OK. NET: Registered protocol family 16 ACPI: bus type pci registered PCI: Using configuration type 1 ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050902 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) Boot video device is :01:00.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.HUB0._PRT] ACPI: Power Resource [ISAV] (on) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.AGPB._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link
Bug#337881:
Same problem here on powerpc (udev version 0.072-1) (It seems that udevd was stopped.). I downloaded the package and dpkg -i it. Best regards, Bin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:09:55AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing the same thing. start-stop-daemon doesn't work the dpkg preinst fails. After killing udevd by hand and issuing a Are you using a 2.6.12 kernel you too? 2.6.13 (Debian kernel): trigger:~# uname -a Linux trigger 2.6.13-1-686 #1 Fri Oct 7 00:31:22 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Does start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd work from the command line? Nope. I tried that: trigger:/home/phil# dpkg --configure -a Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: udev trigger:/home/phil# start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd --oknodo No /sbin/udevd found running; none killed. After killing udevd by hand, everything goes smoothly start-stop-daemon then works perfectly after dpkg had finished. -- http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd work from the command line? Nope. I tried that: trigger:/home/phil# dpkg --configure -a Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: udev trigger:/home/phil# start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd --oknodo No /sbin/udevd found running; none killed. Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#336751: marked as done (openvpn: Format string vulnerability in config parsing code)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:02:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336751: fixed in openvpn 2.0.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2005 09:09:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 01 01:09:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from inutil.org (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EWs94-0005TB-00; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 01:09:30 -0800 Received: from wlan-client-003.informatik.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.116.4] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EWs91-0001G5-Jm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:09:27 +0100 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EWs8y-0001VU-2J; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:09:24 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: openvpn: Format string vulnerability in config parsing code X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 10:09:23 +0100 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 134.102.116.4 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: openvpn Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole A format string vulnerability has been found in openvpn's option parsing code, which indirectly may be exploited remotely as well. Please see http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/bugtraq/2005/10/msg00393.html for more information. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 336751-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 10:07:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 02:07:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ3pJ-0007U7-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:02:09 -0800 From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#336751: fixed in openvpn 2.0.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:02:09 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: openvpn Source-Version: 2.0.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openvpn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: openvpn_2.0.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.5-1.diff.gz openvpn_2.0.5-1.dsc to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.5-1.dsc openvpn_2.0.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.5-1_i386.deb openvpn_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/openvpn/openvpn_2.0.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated openvpn package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:13:55
Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start
reassign 337853 openoffice.org tag 337853 + moreinfo severity 337853 important thanks Am Sonntag, 6. November 2005 22:59 schrieb Paulo Jorge Jesus Silva: Package: openoffice.org-common Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Uh, you talk about that the binaries segfault. and the binaries are *not* in -common... -core does contain soffice.bin. so that would be the right package (or openoffice.org, although that's a metapackage but it's the source package too, so..) Starting any openoffice.org program fails: ~$ oowriter /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17544 Segmentation fault $sd_prog/$sd_binary $@ ~$ ooffice /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17561 Segmentation fault $sd_prog/$sd_binary $@ ~$ oocalc /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 224: 17574 Segmentation fault $sd_prog/$sd_binary $@ Anyway, this doesn't help anybody. You would have to give more infos... like strace and gdb backtrace from running soffice.bin... Anyway, it works here and on dozen other systems so it isn't RC... Regards, Rene -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Nov 07, Philip Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd work from the command line? Nope. I tried that: trigger:/home/phil# dpkg --configure -a Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: udev trigger:/home/phil# start-stop-daemon --stop --exec /sbin/udevd --oknodo No /sbin/udevd found running; none killed. Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. Yes, prelink is installed. cheers, Phil -- http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 337853 openoffice.org Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-common' to `openoffice.org'. tag 337853 + moreinfo Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo severity 337853 important Bug#337853: openoffice.org-common: openoffice.org programs don't start Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in upload of ekg2 20051106+1657-1 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 275384 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#275384: No manpage There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332842 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332842: ekg2: FTBFS: ls: libltdl/*: No such file or directory Tags were: experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tags 328749 patch thanks Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from experimental installed: Now that teTeX 3.0 is in unstable, this bug is RC. Here is a patch, for explanations please see the Debian TeX Policy in the tex-common package, or ask on debian-tetex-maint. Will you be able to do the upload soon? I can NMU this package - or rather I will NMU it; with a 3-day delay if you don't answer, and without delay if you give me your okay. I'll use the patch already supplied, just the changelog entry will be adjusted and close #33, too. By the way, what would be a suitable Depends version: 3.0-10 or just 3.0 or anything else? If you do not use fmtutil-sys, you don't need a specific versioned Depends - the bug was already a bug with tetex-2.0.2, but then its impact was only minor. Gotcha. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Gotcha. I've got some more questions regarding xmltex and the way it's packaged for Debian, but I'll get back to you with those later. Have you read the Debian TeX Policy draft, which is included in the tex-common package? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Gotcha. I've got some more questions regarding xmltex and the way it's packaged for Debian, but I'll get back to you with those later. Thanks for all the help! Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328749: marked as done (package installation fails with teTeX 3.0)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 08:13:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 01:13:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGXop-00041v-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:13:07 -0700
Received: from [213.6.170.216] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EGXoJ-00040b-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:36 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 17 Sep 2005
10:12:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:33 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-teTeX-maint debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian-teTeX-maint debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnzgLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+UP!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-10) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.Yt8T9q for details
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
xmltex
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
The cause is your code, which checks if the formats have been
created. It assumes (pdf)TeX to generate a file called
(pdf)xmltex.efmt if the e-TeX engine is used. That was changed in
teTeX 3.0 and there exists only (pdf)xmltex.fmt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# ls -l *xml*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019449 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root2266 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019314 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root2248 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.log
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# grep TeX pdfxmltex.log
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (format=pdflatex
2005. 9.11) 16 SEP 2005 20:24
This bug will become RC as soon as teTeX 3.0 hits unstable. The
upload will be done as soon as the RMs allow the next big
transition[TM].
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
---
Received: (at 328749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:36:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:36:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ5EO-0008Tv-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#334736: marked as done (xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing))
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 15:31:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 08:31:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.127.101] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESFug-00036F-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:31:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166]) by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9JFVW7J015231 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:32 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESFud-0001IB-Pd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:32 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing) X-Debbugs-CC: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:26 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmltex Version: 1.9-10 Severity: serious From the bug log of #334613, while upgrading sid to tetex-bin_3.0-9 with xmltex installed: Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-9) ... Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... Error: `tex -ini -jobname=3Dxmltex -progname=3Dxmltex latex xmltex.ini' f= ailed ###= fmtutil-sys: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully. Visit the log files in directory /var/lib/texmf/web2c for details. ###= The format creation fails because tetex now uses pdfetex as the engine to create the latex format, and formats that load latex.fmt as xmltex does must do the same. I didn't investigate this, but I would be surprised if this works with tetex-bin_2.0.2-31 in testing, because there we use etex, not tex, and I think this needs a different pool file, too, and therefore leads to incompatible formats. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) --=20 Frank K=FCster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich Debian Developer --- Received: (at 328749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:36:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:36:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ5EO-0008Tv-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328749: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmltex Source-Version: 1.9-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz xmltex_1.9-11.dsc to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.dsc xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#328749: marked as done (package installation fails with teTeX 3.0)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2005 08:13:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 17 01:13:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp05.web.de [217.72.192.209]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EGXop-00041v-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:13:07 -0700
Received: from [213.6.170.216] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp05.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.105 #317)
id 1EGXoJ-00040b-00; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:36 +0200
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 17 Sep 2005
10:12:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:12:33 +0200
From: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian-teTeX-maint debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail-Followup-To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Debian-teTeX-maint debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.18(0.132/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnzgLhn}UMwv}4/j{X..
2E+UP!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: Hilmar Preusse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xmltex
Version: 1.9-10
Severity: normal
Hi,
Your package fails to install, when one has teTeX 3.0 from
experimental installed:
Setting up xmltex (1.9-10) ...
Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
texhash: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
texhash: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
texhash: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
texhash: Done.
Checking for TeX format files we depend on ... done.
Creating xmltex format files...
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
Trying fmtutil --all
ERROR: XMLTeX memory dump (xmltex.efmt) cannot be found
ERROR: PDFXMLTeX memory dump (pdfxmltex.efmt) cannot be found
*** ERROR: can't make xmltex fmt files, bailing
*** see /tmp/xmltex-postinst.Yt8T9q for details
dpkg: error processing xmltex (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
xmltex
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
The cause is your code, which checks if the formats have been
created. It assumes (pdf)TeX to generate a file called
(pdf)xmltex.efmt if the e-TeX engine is used. That was changed in
teTeX 3.0 and there exists only (pdf)xmltex.fmt.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# ls -l *xml*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019449 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root2266 Sep 16 20:24 pdfxmltex.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2019314 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.fmt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root2248 Sep 16 20:24 xmltex.log
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/texmf/web2c# grep TeX pdfxmltex.log
This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (format=pdflatex
2005. 9.11) 16 SEP 2005 20:24
This bug will become RC as soon as teTeX 3.0 hits unstable. The
upload will be done as soon as the RMs allow the next big
transition[TM].
Regards,
Hilmar
--
sigmentation fault
---
Received: (at 334736-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:37:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:37:10 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ5EO-0008Ty-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#334736: marked as done (xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing))
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Oct 2005 15:31:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 08:31:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from idmailgate2.unizh.ch [130.60.127.101] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESFug-00036F-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:31:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([130.60.169.166]) by idmailgate2.unizh.ch (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id j9JFVW7J015231 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:32 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain ident=frank) by localhost.localdomain with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESFud-0001IB-Pd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:32 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmltex: Fails to install in unstable (and probably testing) X-Debbugs-CC: teTeX maintainers debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:31:26 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmltex Version: 1.9-10 Severity: serious From the bug log of #334613, while upgrading sid to tetex-bin_3.0-9 with xmltex installed: Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-9) ... Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... Error: `tex -ini -jobname=3Dxmltex -progname=3Dxmltex latex xmltex.ini' f= ailed ###= fmtutil-sys: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully. Visit the log files in directory /var/lib/texmf/web2c for details. ###= The format creation fails because tetex now uses pdfetex as the engine to create the latex format, and formats that load latex.fmt as xmltex does must do the same. I didn't investigate this, but I would be surprised if this works with tetex-bin_2.0.2-31 in testing, because there we use etex, not tex, and I think this needs a different pool file, too, and therefore leads to incompatible formats. Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) --=20 Frank K=FCster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich Debian Developer --- Received: (at 334736-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:37:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:37:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ5EO-0008Ty-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334736: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmltex Source-Version: 1.9-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz xmltex_1.9-11.dsc to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.dsc xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#336666: marked as done (xmltex: unmet dependencies in sid)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#33: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2005 19:50:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 11:50:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shop.atmark-techno.com (mail2.atmark-techno.com) [210.191.215.173] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EWffZ-0002Ld-00; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:50:13 -0800 Received: from smtp.local-network (dns1.atmark-techno.com [210.191.215.170]) by mail2.atmark-techno.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCF07AA; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:50:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from wat.atmark-techno.com (unknown [192.168.10.81]) by smtp.local-network (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87119B61F; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:50:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 04:50:05 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Yasushi SHOJI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmltex: unmet dependencies in sid User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - Maruoka) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xmltex Severity: grave Version: 1.9-10 Tags: sid Hello, It seems to me that xmltex is uninstallable in sid right now, or am I missign something? $ sudo apt-get install xmltex : The following packages have unmet dependencies: xmltex: Depends: tetex-bin (= 1.0.7+20011202-5.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: tetex-extra but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages $ dpkg -l tetex-bin tetex-extra : ii tetex-bin 3.0-10.1 The teTeX binary files ii tetex-extra3.0-10 Additional library files of teTeX -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 33-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 11:37:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 03:37:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ5EO-0008U0-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 From: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#33: fixed in xmltex 1.9-11 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 03:32:08 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmltex Source-Version: 1.9-11 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmltex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.diff.gz xmltex_1.9-11.dsc to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11.dsc xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb to pool/main/x/xmltex/xmltex_1.9-11_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xmltex package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 05:18:27 -0600 Source: xmltex Binary: xmltex Architecture: source all Version: 1.9-11 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:
Bug#328749: [xml/sgml-pkgs] Bug#328749: package installation fails with teTeX 3.0
Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank K??ster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm done with all the fixes but when installing I'm getting the following message: Warning: fmtutil is being run as root; fmtutil-sys should probably be used instead. If this is done by a Debian package upon installation, upgrade, or removal, please file a bug against that package. How do we handle this? This is exactly the warning about the backward compatibility hack that we introduced. Just ignore it for the time being, but keep in mind that as soon as tetex-3.0 enters testing, you should switch from fmtutil to fmtutil-sys. Gotcha. I've got some more questions regarding xmltex and the way it's packaged for Debian, but I'll get back to you with those later. Have you read the Debian TeX Policy draft, which is included in the tex-common package? Not yet, but I'll definitely do that. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij Debian XML/SGML Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~ardo/ http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337872: marked as forwarded (FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:31:20 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #337872,
regarding FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---
Received: (at 337872-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 12:31:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 04:31:25 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cheddar.halon.org.uk [193.201.200.139] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ69k-00081k-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:31:24 -0800
Received: from maulkin by cheddar.halon.org.uk with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EZ69g-00040j-R7; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:31:20 +
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:31:20 +
From: Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Drivel - Fails to build from source (alpha): invalid va_list* usage
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Neil McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi Todd,
It looks like Drivel fails to build on alpha. Any ideas if va_list* is
needed?
Cheers,
Neil
(Please preserve the CC on reply)
- Forwarded message from Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:44:20 +0100
=46rom: Falk Hueffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#337872: FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage
Package: drivel
Version: 2.0.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
drivel fails to build on Alpha:
[...]
if alpha-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=3D\=
/usr/share/locale\ -DDRIVEL_GLADE_DIR=3D\/usr/share/drivel/glade\ -DDR=
IVEL_GLADE_FILE=3D\drivel.glade\ -DDRIVEL_LANGUAGES_DIR=3D\/usr/share/dr=
ivel/languages\ -DDATADIR=3D\/usr/share\ -DPREFIX=3D\/usr\ -DLIBDI=
R=3D\/usr/lib\ -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=3D\Drivel\ -DSYSCONFDIR=3D\/usr/etc\=
-DPIXMAPDIR=3D\/usr/share/pixmaps\ -I.. -I../src/libegg -Wall -Wmissi=
ng-prototypes -I/usr/include -DXTHREADS -DORBIT2=3D1 -pthread -I/usr/inclu=
de/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/g=
tk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/p=
ango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orb=
it-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr=
/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/=
libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.=
0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/l=
ibxml2 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-1.0 -I/usr/=
include/libgnomeprint-2.2 -I/usr/include/gtkspell-2.0-std=3Dc89 -g -O2 =
-MT xmlrpc.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmlrpc.Tpo \
-c -o xmlrpc.o `test -f 'xmlrpc.c' || echo './'`xmlrpc.c; \
then mv -f .deps/xmlrpc.Tpo .deps/xmlrpc.Po; \
else rm -f .deps/xmlrpc.Tpo; exit 1; \
fi
xmlrpc.c: In function 'parse_parameter_types':
xmlrpc.c:44: error: used struct type value where scalar is required
xmlrpc.c:52: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'xmlNewChild=
' differ in signedness
[...]
make[4]: *** [xmlrpc.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/drivel-2.0.2/src'
[...]
The problem is:
static void
parse_parameter_types (va_list *args, xmlNodePtr node)
{
xmlNodePtr xml_param, xml_value;
gchar *value;
gint type, value_int;
gdouble value_double;
GTimeVal value_time;
=09
g_return_if_fail (node);
g_return_if_fail (*args); // - here
Dereferencing a va_list* makes no sense at all, I have no idea what it
is supposed to do, probably it can simply be removed.
Full log at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=3Ddrivelver=3D2.0.2-4arch=3Dalpha=
stamp=3D1129027124file=3Dlogas=3Draw
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=3DC, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15)
- End forwarded message -
--=20
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key -
Bug#334374: marked as done (python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?))
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:47:24 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334374: fixed in psyco 1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2005 15:05:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 08:05:08 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERWXz-0004y0-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:05:08 -0700 Received: from (jonaskoelker.homeunix.org) [84.238.15.6] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ERWXz-0003TX-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:05:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonas Koelker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.4-psyco: raises ImportError: undefined symbol PyFPE_jbuf (version mismatch?) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:04:42 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: python2.4-psyco Version: 1.4-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable python2.4-psyco fail to import, here's a transcript: $ python2.4 -c 'import psyco' Traceback (most recent call last): File string, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/__init__.py, line 45, in ? raise ImportError, str(e) + extramsg ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/_psyco.so: undefined symbol: PyFPE_jbuf (check that the compiled extension '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/psyco/_psyco.so' is for the correct Python version; this is Python 2.4.2) $ I wouldn't know how to check for version mismatches between _psyco.so and python, but I don't think the error is caused by bad runtime config ^_^ (IOW, I guess that it's a miscompile). Another user has had the same error message appear. Depending on how the program using psyco handles ImportErrors, they may or may not crash. But at least psyco itsealf is unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages python2.4-psyco depends on: ii python2.4 2.4.2-1An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages python2.4-psyco recommends: ii python-psyco-doc 1.4-2 python specializing compiler docum -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 334374-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 12:51:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 04:51:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ6PE-0002z3-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:47:24 -0800 From: Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334374: fixed in psyco 1.4-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:47:24 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: psyco Source-Version: 1.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of psyco, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: psyco_1.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/p/psyco/psyco_1.4-3.diff.gz psyco_1.4-3.dsc to pool/main/p/psyco/psyco_1.4-3.dsc python-psyco-doc_1.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/psyco/python-psyco-doc_1.4-3_i386.deb python-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/psyco/python-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb python2.1-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/psyco/python2.1-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb python2.2-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb to pool/main/p/psyco/python2.2-psyco_1.4-3_i386.deb
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails
clone 337881 -1 reassign -1 dpkg retitle -1 dpkg: s-s-d --stop --exec is an unreliable misfeature thanks Ultimately, the issue here is that start-stop-daemon --stop --exec is a misfeature that's too unreliable to be allowed to survive. Given that we include tools in the distro such as prelink which *will* change an executable on-disk after it's been started, and given that there are maintainers who fail to understand the semantics of --exec at all and try to use it after a new version of the package has been unpacked, I'm convinced that the right course of action here is to neuter the --stop --exec check so that it does *not* cause such failure scenarios. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337440: marked as done (php-radius: FTBFS: php4: No such file or directory)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337440: fixed in php-radius 1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 12:10:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 04:10:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EY0Ok-0006UA-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 04:10:22 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37033.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.33]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76E3B887 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:09:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EY0OF-00083b-LM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:09:51 +0100 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: php-radius: FTBFS: php4: No such file or directory Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:09:51 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: php-radius Severity: serious Version: 1.2-1 From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir find . -type f \( -name '*.php' -o -name '*.inc' \) -print0 | \ xargs -r0 -l1 php4 -l xargs: php4: No such file or directory make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 337440-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 13:21:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 05:21:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ6ry-e8-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:17:06 -0800 From: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337440: fixed in php-radius 1.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:17:06 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: php-radius Source-Version: 1.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of php-radius, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: php-radius_1.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/php-radius/php-radius_1.2-2.diff.gz php-radius_1.2-2.dsc to pool/main/p/php-radius/php-radius_1.2-2.dsc php-radius_1.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/p/php-radius/php-radius_1.2-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated php-radius package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:15:07 +0100 Source: php-radius Binary: php-radius Architecture: source all Version: 1.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: php-radius - Radius protocol implementation in PHP Closes: 337440 Changes: php-radius (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Depend on php4-cli instead of php4-cgi. (Closes: #337440) * Upgraded to standards 3.6.2 (no changes). Files: a2afc5fc9e332be6c1be897b0ad0bbca 595 web optional
Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. This appears to be the same problem as bug #256790. If the running daemon's on disk binary has changed, the /proc/pid/exe will look something like: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/udevd (deleted) instead of lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/udevd Could this be the source of the problem? I believe s-s-d is using /proc/pid/exe to see if the argument given is actually a running program. Would it be sensible to get s-s-d to match on the strings postfixed with (deleted) in order to avoid this problem? I don't know how kernel dependant that postfix string is though... It does make s-s-d completely unreliable in the presence of things like prelink at the moment. Perhaps prelink should be leaving the old binaries around (dotted-versions in the same directory perhaps?). Then /proc/pid/exe could look something like lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/.udevd.original and perhaps s-s-d, prelink and anything else that likes to alter binaries could agree on a renaming scheme to match on. Then programs like prelink could simply check for running instances by rootling through /proc/pid/exe and leave a renamed binary around if they find one. s-s-d and co would then check for this renaming if they fail to find the requested running binary. cheers, Phil -- http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337942: Bug#337881: udev post-inst fails: extra info
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:50:51AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: Are you using prelink or something else which could cause /sbin/udevd to change? I do not understand why s-s-d is failing to find the process. This appears to be the same problem as bug #256790. If the running daemon's on disk binary has changed, the /proc/pid/exe will look something like: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/udevd (deleted) instead of lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/udevd Could this be the source of the problem? I believe s-s-d is using /proc/pid/exe to see if the argument given is actually a running program. Would it be sensible to get s-s-d to match on the strings postfixed with (deleted) in order to avoid this problem? I don't know how kernel dependant that postfix string is though... It does make s-s-d completely unreliable in the presence of things like prelink at the moment. Perhaps prelink should be leaving the old binaries around (dotted-versions in the same directory perhaps?). Then /proc/pid/exe could look something like lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2005-11-07 13:22 exe - /sbin/.udevd.original and perhaps s-s-d, prelink and anything else that likes to alter binaries could agree on a renaming scheme to match on. Then programs like prelink could simply check for running instances by rootling through /proc/pid/exe and leave a renamed binary around if they find one. s-s-d and co would then check for this renaming if they fail to find the requested running binary. cheers, Phil -- http://www.kantaka.co.uk/ .oOo. public key: http://www.kantaka.co.uk/gpg.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#294377: ttt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option -fwritable-strings
Hi,
NMU patch below.
debdiff ttt_1.7-3.dsc /srv/pbuilder/result/ttt_1.7-3.1.dsc
configure|2 +-
configure.in |2 +-
net_names.c |5 +++--
ttt-1.7/debian/changelog |8
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -u ttt-1.7/debian/changelog ttt-1.7/debian/changelog
--- ttt-1.7/debian/changelog
+++ ttt-1.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ttt (1.7-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Apply patches by Andreas Jochens to fix FTBFS with gcc-4.0
+(Closes: #294377, #262758).
+
+ -- Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:32:35 +0100
+
ttt (1.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Changed rules to check config.guess/config.sub in the 'cf' subdirectory
(closes: #217974)
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- ttt-1.7.orig/net_names.c
+++ ttt-1.7/net_names.c
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@
return NULL;
}
+static char *inet6_ntoa(uint32_t *addr); /* should be replaced
+ by addr2ascii */
+
char *net_getname(long type, long *id)
{
char *buf, *name;
@@ -258,8 +261,6 @@
case YPE_IPV6HOST:
{
u_long tmp[4];
- static char *inet6_ntoa(u_long *addr); /* should be replaced
- by addr2ascii */
if ((buf = malloc(sizeof(:::::::)))
== NULL)
fatal_error(get_protoname: no memory\n);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- ttt-1.7.orig/configure.in
+++ ttt-1.7/configure.in
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
fi
if test ${tttHaveGcc} = yes ; then
- GCCFLAGS=-Wwrite-strings -fwritable-strings
+ GCCFLAGS=
else
GCCFLAGS=
fi
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- ttt-1.7.orig/configure
+++ ttt-1.7/configure
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@
fi
if test ${tttHaveGcc} = yes ; then
- GCCFLAGS=-Wwrite-strings -fwritable-strings
+ GCCFLAGS=
else
GCCFLAGS=
fi
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fmtutil-sys: running `tex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex latex jadetex.This is TeX, Version 3.141592 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) ---! /var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex.fmt was written by pdfetex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) The other formats build fine. Full postinst log is attached. It tries to build jadetex with the tex engine, but the latex format (which is loaded by jadetex) was generated with pdfetex - this is the default since 3.0. You must have old configuration files and refused the updates; but in fact they must be very old, because even in sarge jadetex fails with tex (it must use etex). What's the output of the following commands, please: ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ grep jadetex /etc/texmf/fmt.d/* grep jadetex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ttt 1.7-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 262758 + fixed Bug#262758: ttt: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: conflicting types for 'inet6_ntoa' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 294377 + fixed Bug#294377: ttt: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): unrecognized command line option -fwritable-strings Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst
Hi Frank! You wrote: It tries to build jadetex with the tex engine, but the latex format (which is loaded by jadetex) was generated with pdfetex - this is the default since 3.0. You must have old configuration files and refused the updates; but in fact they must be very old, because even in sarge jadetex fails with tex (it must use etex). Hmm, weird. dpkg only prompted me about one file, which I let it replace: Setting up tex-common (0.9) ... Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/45TeXinputs.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/55Fonts.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/65BibTeX.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/75DviPS.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/85Misc.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version chgrp: invalid group name `cachegroup' Setting up tetex-base (3.0-10) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/texsys.cfg ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/color.cfg ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/latex/graphics.cfg ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/context/texexec.ini ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/context/cont-usr.tex ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/modes.mf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ps ... Configuration file `/etc/texmf/dvips/config.antt' == File on system created by you or by a script. == File also in package provided by package maintainer. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** config.antt (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? y Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.antt ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/dvips/config.pdf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat ... Using obsolete pdftex.cfg to generate pdftexconfig.tex ... done. Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/latex/latex.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyrtex.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyrtxinf.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/cyrplain/cyramstx.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/etex/etex.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/platex/platex.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-de.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-en.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-it.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-nl.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-ro.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-uk.ini Removing obsolete, unchanged conffile /etc/texmf/context/cont-cz.ini Replacing config file /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf with new version Replacing config file /etc/texmf/dvipdfm/config with new version Replacing config file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc with new version Setting up libkpathsea4 (3.0-10.1) ... Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/texmf/xdvi.cfg ... Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... [etc] ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ grep jadetex /etc/texmf/fmt.d/* grep jadetex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -l /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ total 20K -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.4K 2005-10-31 13:12 00tex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3.1K 2005-11-07 14:36 01tetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 269 2004-06-29 18:58 40jadetex.cnf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 565 2005-10-31 13:40 50cyrtexinfo.cnf [EMAIL PROTECTED] grep jadetex /etc/texmf/fmt.d/* /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf:jadetex tex language.datlatex jadetex.ini /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf:pdfjadetex pdftex language.dat pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist:jadetexetex language.datlatex jadetex.ini /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist:pdfjadetex pdfetex language.dat pdflatex pdfjadetex.ini [EMAIL PROTECTED] grep jadetex /var/lib/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf ### From file: /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf jadetex tex language.datlatex jadetex.ini pdfjadetex pdftex language.datpdflatex pdfjadetex.ini ### End of file: /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key:
Processed: Re: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity #283296 serious Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules Severity set to `serious'. merge #283296 #300174 Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules Bug#300174: annoyance-filter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): there are no arguments to 'begin' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'begin' must be available Merged 283296 300174. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300174: annoyance-filter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): there are no arguments to 'begin' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'begin' must be available
Hi,
NMU patch is attached.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
debdiff annoyance-filter_1.0.0b-4.dsc annoyance-filter_1.0.0b-4.1.dsc
annoyance-filter-1.0.0b/debian/changelog |9 +++
annoyance-filter-1.0.0b/debian/rules |4 -
annoyance-filter.cc | 79 ++-
statlib.cc | 42
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
reverted:
--- annoyance-filter-1.0.0b/annoyance-filter.cc
+++ annoyance-filter-1.0.0b.orig/annoyance-filter.cc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*254:*/
+#line 9898 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9901 annoyance-filter.w
#define REVDATE 2003-09-24
#define Xfile string(X-Annoyance-Filter) \
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
#define Annotate(c) (annotations.test(c) ) \
+#line 9899 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9902 annoyance-filter.w
/*232:*/
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
#include config.h
/*238:*/
+#line 9153 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9156 annoyance-filter.w
#ifdef WIN32
#undef HAVE_MMAP
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
/*233:*/
+#line 9043 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9045 annoyance-filter.w
#include iostream
#include iomanip
@@ -78,9 +78,8 @@
#line 9019 annoyance-filter.w
/*234:*/
+#line 9075 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9077 annoyance-filter.w
-#include alloc.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include fcntl.h
@@ -91,10 +90,8 @@
/*:234*/
#line 9020 annoyance-filter.w
-#include cassert
-
/*235:*/
+#line 9089 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9092 annoyance-filter.w
#ifdef HAVE_STAT
#include sys/stat.h
@@ -110,7 +107,7 @@
#endif
/*:235*/
+#line 9021 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9023 annoyance-filter.w
#ifdef WIN32
@@ -121,7 +118,7 @@
#include statlib.h
/*237:*/
+#line 9131 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9134 annoyance-filter.w
#if defined(HAVE_GNUPLOT) defined(HAVE_NETPBM) defined(HAVE_SYSTEM)
#define HAVE_PLOT_UTILITIES
@@ -136,11 +133,11 @@
#endif
/*:237*/
+#line 9030 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9032 annoyance-filter.w
/*236:*/
+#line 9109 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9112 annoyance-filter.w
#if defined(HAVE_SOCKET) defined(HAVE_SIGNAL)
#define POP3_PROXY_SERVER
@@ -157,11 +154,11 @@
#endif
/*:236*/
+#line 9032 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9034 annoyance-filter.w
/*:232*/
+#line 9901 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9904 annoyance-filter.w
/*226:*/
#line 8874 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -172,7 +169,7 @@
static bool saveParserDiagnostics= false;
/*:226*//*241:*/
+#line 9192 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9195 annoyance-filter.w
static bool verbose= false;
#ifdef TYPE_LOG
@@ -190,7 +187,7 @@
static bool popProxyTrace= false;
/*:241*//*250:*/
+#line 9832 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9835 annoyance-filter.w
#define ISOch(x) (static_castunsigned char ((x) 0xFF))
@@ -207,7 +204,7 @@
: (x))
/*:250*//*251:*/
+#line 9851 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9854 annoyance-filter.w
const unsigned char isoalpha[32]= {
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,127,255,255,224,127,255,255,224,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,255,255,
@@ -225,7 +222,7 @@
};
/*:251*/
+#line 9902 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9905 annoyance-filter.w
/*10:*/
#line 1250 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -2179,10 +2176,10 @@
#endif
/*:194*/
+#line 9903 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9906 annoyance-filter.w
/*239:*/
+#line 9165 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9168 annoyance-filter.w
static double mailBias= 2.0;
static unsigned int minOccurrences= 5;
@@ -2199,12 +2196,12 @@
static bool bsdFolder= false;
/*:239*//*240:*/
+#line 9184 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9187 annoyance-filter.w
static unsigned int nTested= 0;
/*:240*/
+#line 9904 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9907 annoyance-filter.w
/*11:*/
#line 1352 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -6594,7 +6591,7 @@
#endif
/*:215*/
+#line 9905 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9908 annoyance-filter.w
/*225:*/
#line 8869 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -6603,13 +6600,13 @@
static fastDictionary fDict;
/*:225*//*249:*/
+#line 9822 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9825 annoyance-filter.w
static tokenDefinition isoToken;
static tokenDefinition asciiToken;
/*:249*/
+#line 9906 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9909 annoyance-filter.w
/*184:*/
#line 7748 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -6679,7 +6676,7 @@
}
/*:231*//*242:*/
+#line 9213 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9216 annoyance-filter.w
static void usage(void)
{
@@ -6738,7 +6735,7 @@
}
/*:242*/
+#line 9907 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9910 annoyance-filter.w
/*219:*/
#line 8718 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -6887,7 +6884,7 @@
}
/*:227*//*246:*/
+#line 9772 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9775 annoyance-filter.w
static unsigned int nOptionalCaps= 0;
@@ -6901,14 +6898,14 @@
}
/*:246*/
+#line 9908 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9911 annoyance-filter.w
/*223:*/
#line 8834 annoyance-filter.w
/*253:*/
+#line 9883 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9886 annoyance-filter.w
#ifdef Jig
#endif
@@ -6933,7 +6930,7 @@
;
/*243:*/
+#line 9278 annoyance-filter.w
-#line 9281 annoyance-filter.w
@@ -7140,13 +7137,13 @@
case 206:
{
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's significantly different in the conf files such that choosing to keep my old one is a problem? Yes, the old conffiles will never work. If you choose to keep them upon upgrade, you have to go through the differences and merge the important changes - especially the setting of the TEXMF variable in texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf and the variables that form its parts. I am not sure what differences there are, if any. I'm a user/hobbyist... :-( It would seem appropriate to have a big splash screen explaining what's going on, and some kind of script which could manage changing those parts known to it (with a list of unknown parts being generated). With such a warning, I'd always choose use the new conf files instead of the default keep the old ones. Hmm. I see in the tetex files under /tmp that the map files have changed locations, and that I shouldn't touch anything as it's a Debian-installed package. How can I fix this? map files at the old locations, if from a Debian package, should not be a problem - just wait for the Debian package to be fixed. If there's not just a warning, but an error that causes the postinst to fail, you have local changes in your conffiles and should merge them. I can't address this last possibility as I don't know what in those files could be changed. Where are they? I'll certainly send them along. More than this information I cannot give - we need the specific error messages you get (and of course the commands that caused them). Regards, Frank Thanks Frank. I scripted a dpkg session after the initial aptitude failure, and copied in the contents of the tetex.updmap.XXX files as well. This is attached. Is there something else I could get? Kenward -- In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be _teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less, because passing civilization along from one generation to the next ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone could have. - Lee Iacocca Script started on Mon 07 Nov 2005 06:19:20 AM PST [1] DoneHISTIGNORE= hpotter:/home/daddy# exitdpkg --configure --pending Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ... Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... kpathsea: Running mktexfmt latex.fmt fmtutil-sys: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex -translate-file=cp227.tcx *latex.ini' ... This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) (INITEX) (/usr/share/texmf/web2c/cp227.tcx) entering extended mode (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/config/latex.ini (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/pdftexconfig.tex) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/texsys.cfg) ./texsys.aux found [EMAIL PROTECTED] set to: ./. Assuming \openin and \input have the same search path. Defining UNIX/DOS style filename parser. catcodes, registers, compatibility for TeX 2, parameters, LaTeX2e 2003/12/01 hacks, control, par, spacing, files, font encodings, lengths, Local config file fonttext.cfg used (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/fonttext.cfg (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/fonttext.ltx === Don't modify this file, use a .cfg file instead === (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omlenc.def) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ot1enc.def) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omsenc.def) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/t1cmr.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ot1cmr.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ot1cmss.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ot1cmtt.fd))) Local config file fontmath.cfg used (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/fontmath.cfg (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/fontmath.ltx === Don't modify this file, use a .cfg file instead === (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omlcmm.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omscmsy.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/omxcmex.fd) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/ucmr.fd))) Local config file preload.cfg used = (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/preload.cfg (/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/preload.ltx)) page nos., x-ref, environments, center, verbatim, math definitions, boxes, title, sectioning, contents, floats, footnotes, index, bibliography, output, === Local configuration file hyphen.cfg used === (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/babel/hyphen.cfg (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/hyphen.tex) (/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/hyphen/frhyph.tex
Bug#337865: marked as done (udev - udevd fails to timeout events if the kernel have no inotify)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337865: fixed in udev 0.073-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2005 23:07:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 15:07:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EYtbO-0007C2-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:07:07 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DD2E73C01F; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:07:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:07:03 +0100
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: udev - udevd fails to timeout events if the kernel have no inotify
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Disposition: inline
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: udev
Version: 0.72-2
Severity: grave
udevd fails to timeout events if it runs on a kernel without inotify.
The attached patch fixes the select call.
Bastian
--=20
Actual war is a very messy business. Very, very messy business.
-- Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon, stardate 3193.0
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=diff
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
diff -urN udev-072.orig/udevd.c udev-072/udevd.c
--- udev-072.orig/udevd.c 2005-11-05 22:05:35.0 +0100
+++ udev-072/udevd.c2005-11-07 00:01:32.0 +0100
@@ -996,12 +996,17 @@
=20
FD_ZERO(readfds);
FD_SET(signal_pipe[READ_END], readfds);
+ fdcount =3D signal_pipe[READ_END];
FD_SET(udevd_sock, readfds);
+ fdcount =3D UDEV_MAX(fdcount, udevd_sock);
FD_SET(uevent_netlink_sock, readfds);
- if (inotify_fd 0)
+ fdcount =3D UDEV_MAX(fdcount, uevent_netlink_sock);
+ if (inotify_fd 0) {
FD_SET(inotify_fd, readfds);
+ fdcount =3D UDEV_MAX(fdcount, inotify_fd);
+ }
=20
- fdcount =3D select(UDEV_MAX(uevent_netlink_sock, inotify_fd)+1,
readfds=
, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ fdcount =3D select(fdcount+1, readfds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (fdcount 0) {
if (errno !=3D EINTR)
dbg(error in select: %s, strerror(errno));
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--
--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkNujJcACgkQnw66O/MvCNEfAQCfV+ZemwwcXFDyfsN0m6n5dzir
pc4An0enqxbZsix6n1NcsJl6V8lluGQC
=OIWC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--b5gNqxB1S1yM7hjW--
---
Received: (at 337865-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 14:51:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 06:51:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ8HG-0001vI-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800
From: Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#337865: fixed in udev 0.073-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: udev
Source-Version: 0.073-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in
Bug#337881: marked as done (udev post-inst fails)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:47:18 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337881: fixed in udev 0.073-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 01:21:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 06 17:21:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from student29.mssm.org (bd-home-comp.no-ip.org) [209.222.194.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYvh4-0007AR-00; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 17:21:07 -0800 Received: by bd-home-comp.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0584FD038A6; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 20:21:03 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bryan Donlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: udev post-inst fails X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:21:03 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: udev Version: 0.072-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When upgrading to 0.072-2, the following occured: Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/udev-mtab ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/udev ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/udev.conf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/links.conf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/permissions.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/udev.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/hotplugd.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/devfs.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/hotplug.rules ... dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: udev E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up udev (0.072-2) ... dpkg: error processing udev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: udev -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/rules.d/: total 4 -rw-r--r--1 root root 83 2005-09-06 20:49 001_usbkey.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 2005-06-07 14:30 020_permissions.rules - ../permissions.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19 2005-11-04 14:00 025_libgphoto2.rules - ../libgphoto2.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 2005-11-04 14:01 025_libsane.rules - ../libsane.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 2005-10-17 21:12 050_hal-plugdev.rules - ../hal.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19 2005-06-07 14:30 cd-aliases.rules - ../cd-aliases.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 13 2005-06-07 14:30 udev.rules - ../udev.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19 2005-08-14 18:53 z20_persistent.rules - ../persistent.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 2005-07-23 21:22 z50_run.rules - ../run.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 2005-10-18 20:02 z55_hotplug.rules - ../hotplug.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 19 2005-08-02 20:15 z60_alsa-utils.rules - ../alsa-utils.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 2005-09-19 21:38 z60_hdparm.rules - ../hdparm.rules lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 17 2005-07-23 21:22 z70_hotplugd.rules - ../hotplugd.rules -- /sys/: /sys/block/hda/dev /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev /sys/block/hda/hda2/dev /sys/block/hda/hda3/dev /sys/block/hda/hda4/dev /sys/block/hda/hda5/dev /sys/block/hda/hda6/dev /sys/block/hdb/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb1/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb2/dev /sys/block/hdc/dev /sys/block/hdd/dev /sys/block/ram0/dev /sys/block/ram10/dev /sys/block/ram11/dev /sys/block/ram12/dev /sys/block/ram13/dev /sys/block/ram14/dev /sys/block/ram15/dev /sys/block/ram1/dev /sys/block/ram2/dev /sys/block/ram3/dev /sys/block/ram4/dev /sys/block/ram5/dev /sys/block/ram6/dev /sys/block/ram7/dev /sys/block/ram8/dev /sys/block/ram9/dev /sys/class/input/event0/dev /sys/class/input/event1/dev /sys/class/input/mice/dev
Bug#337957: evolution-exchange: unable to setup exchange account
Package: evolution-exchange Version: 2.2.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (60, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-p2-mppe Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) When trying to setup new exchange account with ximian-connector-setup-2.2, get an error message: Could not configure Exchange account because an unknown error ocured. And on stderr: ** (ximian-connector-setup-2.2:3187): CRITICAL **: e2k_properties_get_prop: assertion `props != NULL' failed It's also impossible to setup an account with exchange setup plugin, it quits with the same error message as above. On stderr: ** (evolution:3256): CRITICAL **: e2k_properties_get_prop: assertion `props != NULL' failed Versions of packages evolution-exchange depends on: ii evolution 2.2.3-4The groupware suite ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.10.1-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcamel1.2-0 1.2.3-2The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library ii libdb4.1 4.1.25-18 Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries [ ii libebook1.2-3 1.2.3-2Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-2 1.2.3-8Client library for evolution calen ii libedata-book1.2-21.2.3-2Backend library for evolution addr ii libedata-cal1.2-1 1.2.3-2Backend library for evolution cale ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.2.3-8Utily library for evolution data s ii libedataserverui1.2-4 1.2.3-2GUI utily library for evolution da ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal2.4-0 2.4.3-1.1 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.5-1GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.10.3-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.10.2-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-14 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.1-4 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries ii liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management ii libsoup2.2-7 2.2.3-2an HTTP library implementation in ii libtasn1-20.2.13-1 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime evolution-exchange recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture
Package: libsane-extras Version: 1.0.16.9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I have a Epson RX600 (scanner, printer and card reader). epson is commented in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf and I use the epkowa driver from libsane-extras. When I ask for a preview with xsane or when I try to scan (xsane or scanimage) : 1. the senor scans the page at the same pace as before (when it did work) 2. after a long while xsane receives a chunk of about 30 kb of junk data, stucks for 2 more minutes and then acts as if the transfer was finished (probably a timeout). 3. the scanner keeps displaying Scanning for a handfull of minutes (it is configured in french and the exact text is « Numérisation en cours ») My kernel is a 2.6.12-1-k7 and I get my packages from testing. The behaviour described above is still present with the latest uploads of libsane (1.0.16-5) and libsane-extras (1.0.16.9). The only abnormal traces I found are the following logs which appear at the very start of xsane (before choosing a device) : Nov 4 00:01:56 origan kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: interface 1 claimed while 'xsane' sets config #1 Nov 4 00:01:56 origan kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: interface 2 claimed while 'xsane' sets config #1 Nov 4 00:02:00 origan kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: interface 1 claimed while 'xsane' sets config #1 Nov 4 00:02:00 origan kernel: usb 3-1: usbfs: interface 2 claimed while 'xsane' sets config #1 I may get ride of those messages by unloading usblp and usb_storage but I still can't scan. I'll gladely help to track this problem. The last time I used my scanner was some days before mid-september ; I can't tell which version of libsane was installed at the time though. Antoine -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (33, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libsane-extras depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgphoto2-22.1.6-5.2gphoto2 digital camera library ii libgphoto2-port02.1.6-5.2gphoto2 digital camera port librar ii libieee1284-3 0.2.10-1 cross-platform library for paralle ii libjpeg62 6b-10The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libltdl31.5.20-2 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libsane 1.0.16-5 API library for scanners ii libusb-0.1-42:0.1.10a-21 userspace USB programming library Versions of packages libsane-extras recommends: ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-25 Linux Hotplug Scripts ii udev 0.070-2 /dev/ management daemon -- no debconf information
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 10:29:25AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 I haven't upgraded Sid in several weeks--is it possible that something's significantly different in the conf files such that choosing to keep my old one is a problem? Yes, the old conffiles will never work. If you choose to keep them upon upgrade, you have to go through the differences and merge the important changes - especially the setting of the TEXMF variable in texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf and the variables that form its parts. I am not sure what differences there are, if any. I'm a user/hobbyist... :-( It would seem appropriate to have a big splash screen explaining what's going on, and some kind of script which could manage changing those parts known to it (with a list of unknown parts being generated). With such a warning, I'd always choose use the new conf files instead of the default keep the old ones. keep the old ones is only the default if the conffiles have been changed on the system. And if they are, we assume that the local admin had some idea why he did it, and can judge whether he still needs the changes, and merge them if needed. If you didn't change the file and still get the question, it's a bug somewhere. A list of files with extension dpkg-dist or dpkg-old below /etc/texmf would help to give some substance to this discussion. Hmm. I see in the tetex files under /tmp that the map files have changed locations, and that I shouldn't touch anything as it's a Debian-installed package. How can I fix this? map files at the old locations, if from a Debian package, should not be a problem - just wait for the Debian package to be fixed. If there's not just a warning, but an error that causes the postinst to fail, you have local changes in your conffiles and should merge them. I can't address this last possibility as I don't know what in those files could be changed. Where are they? I'll certainly send them along. Let's look at the script you attached. updmap failed. Output has been stored in. /tmp/tetex.updmap.XX9gEZvh. Please include this file if you report a bug.. [...] hpotter:/home/daddy# cat /tmp/tetex.updmap.XX9gEZvh. updmap-sys: This is updmap-sys, version 1107552857-debian. updmap-sys: using transcript file `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap-sys.log'. . updmap is creating new map files using the following configuration:. . config file: `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'. dvips output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap'. pdftex output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap'. dvipdfm output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap'. . prefer outlines: `true'. texhash enabled: `true'. download standard fonts (dvips): `false'. download standard fonts (pdftex): `false'. download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false'. . updmap-sys: Scanning for LW35 support files. . !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been. changed for this release and the map file `dvips35.map' has. not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete. location. /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/dvips35.map. instead.. It doesn't hurt if the file is still at the old place, but the one at the new place must be there, too, and should be found before it. What's the output of ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips # without trailing / ls /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map kpsewhich --show-path map . !!! ERROR! The map file `vnr.map' has not been found at all.. . Either put this file into the right place or remove the. reference from the configuration file. An automatic way. to disable unavailable map files is to call. updmap-sys --syncwithtrees. . For manual editing, call. updmap-sys --edit. It looks as if tetex-base wasn't configured correctly, although the dpkg output says it is. Are there any files in /etc/texmf with extension dpkg-new? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#337854: tar: FTBFS; Failed tests
severity 337854 normal thanks Hi, this only happens when I run pbuilder in a tmpfs chroot. It turned out that the respective test (pipe.at) compares file lists. Under tmpfs, the file order in the archive file2 file1 is different from the one expected by tar xfz: file1 file2 I.e. the files may well end up unordered in the archive. Therefore, the test should be adjusted to this case (e.g., sorting the file list). bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tar: FTBFS; Failed tests
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 337854 normal Bug#337854: tar: FTBFS: Failed tests Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336114: Forwarded upstream
tags 336114 +upstream forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712 thanks Forwarded upstream as GCC bug number 24712. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make sure your vote will count. http://www.verifiedvoting.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of annoyance-filter 1.0.0b-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 300174 + fixed Bug#300174: annoyance-filter: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): there are no arguments to 'begin' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'begin' must be available Tags were: patch Bug#283296: annoyance-filter: FTBFS with g++-3.4: due to new template lookup rules Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem still exists
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 16:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: prefer outlines: `true'. texhash enabled: `true'. download standard fonts (dvips): `false'. download standard fonts (pdftex): `false'. download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false'. [...] ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips # without trailing / ls /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map kpsewhich --show-path map One further question, in addition to the ones Frank posted: The 'download standard fonts' settings above are those from teTeX 2. Hence please post the output of ls -l /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ cheerio ralf
Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue
Package: evolution-data-server Version: 1.2.3-8 Followup-For: Bug #337018 Hi guys, Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. I tried running the 2 helpers provided in the previous bug reports without any success. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-kwyxz Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages evolution-data-server depends on: ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcamel1.2-0 1.2.3-8The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-20 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libebook1.2-3 1.2.3-8Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-2 1.2.3-8Client library for evolution calen ii libedata-book1.2-21.2.3-8Backend library for evolution addr ii libedata-cal1.2-1 1.2.3-8Backend library for evolution cale ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.2.3-8Utily library for evolution data s ii libegroupwise1.2-51.2.3-8Client library for accessing group ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-14 GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.1-4 library for common error values an ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries ii liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsoup2.2-8 2.2.6-1an HTTP library implementation in ii libtasn1-20.2.13-1 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime) ii libxml2 2.6.22-2 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime Versions of packages evolution-data-server recommends: ii evolution 2.2.3-5The groupware suite -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334936: marked as done (francine: Uninstallable in unstable: please build-depend on libslang1-dev or libslang2-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:17:44 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Done in version 0.99.8orig-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:46 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESjm9-0005ht-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:46 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-147.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.147])
by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j9KNOhDK002898;
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1ESjm7-00079v-Ar; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: francine: Uninstallable in unstable: please build-depend on
libslang1-dev or
libslang2-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:24:43 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: francine
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks to a slang transition, 'francine' is uninstallable in unstable
(and so will never be in another Debian release unless this is fixed).
Either it should be patched for slang2 (bug #315230), or if there's
a problem with that, it should Build-Depend on libslang1-dev. slang1-dev
is gone.
---
Received: (at 334936-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 15:42:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 07:42:54 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 213-133-100-49.clients.your-server.de (mail.biedermanns.com)
[213.133.100.49]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EZ994-0002s1-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 07:42:54 -0800
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193]
helo=tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at)
by mail.biedermanns.com with esmtpsa
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian))
id 1EZ99g-0003Oj-C3
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:43:34 +0100
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald.gwendoline.at with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1EZ990-0006CQ-Ef
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:42:50 +0100
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:42:50 +0100
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:17:44 +0100
From: Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Done in version 0.99.8orig-6
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved http://www.vim.org/
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/
X-Face: `Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{QppJ8.RP*P9{{6$8%_~*:6c{);e:s
!:C2%IH-5:GT,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{3w}E7d}+GN|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1JLu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 16:42:50 +0100
X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 0.99.8orig-6
Hi!
As you might know I've uploaded this already. Just forgot to close
your bugreport. But it helped me to find out how to work with version
tracking. ;)
So long,
Alfie
--=20
* Forgot a Depends on lsb-base last time. Duh.
-- Stephen Gran, changelog.Debian for clamav (0.86.2-3)
* Really, I mean it this time, add the depends on lsb-base.
-- Stephen Gran, changelog.Debian for clamav (0.86.2-4)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Bug#337964: gnucash: Uninstallable
Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.10-19 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable gnucash is currently not installable due to dependency issues with slib and guile-1.6-slib -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-inotifyy Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gnucash depends on: ii bonobo 1.0.22-5The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-25 imaging library for use with gtk pn gnucash-common none (no description available) ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-1.1 Main Guile libraries pn guile-1.6-slib none (no description available) ii libart2 1.4.2-25The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2 1.0.22-5The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdate-manip-perl 5.44-2 a perl library for manipulating da ii libdb3 3.2.9-23Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.36-1Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfinance-quote-perl1.08-1 Perl module for retrieving stock q ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal23 0.24-4 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgconf11 1.0.9-7.1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 0.22.0-10 The GNOME1 Canvas pixbuf library ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-10 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+ ii libghttp11.0.9-16original GNOME HTTP client library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-4Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade01:0.17-4Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome32 1.4.2-25The GNOME libraries ii libgnomeprint15 0.37-10 The GNOME Print architecture - run ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-25The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-25The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.21.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libgtkhtml1.1-3 1.1.10-8HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-1.1 Guile's patched version of libtool ii libguppi16 0.40.3-15 GNOME graph and plot component pn libgwrapguile1 none (no description available) ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libltdl3 1.5.20-2A system independent dlopen wrappe ii liboaf0 0.6.10-5The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii libofx2 1:0.8.0-3 library to support Open Financial ii liborbit00.5.17-11.1 Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libqthreads-12 1.6.7-1.1 QuickThreads library for Guile ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-3 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-10 GNOME XML library ii libzvt2 1.4.2-25The GNOME zvt (zterm) widget ii oaf 0.6.10-5The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii psfontmgr0.11.8-0.1 PostScript font manager -- part of pn slib none (no description available) ii x-ttcidfont-conf 20 Configure TrueType and CID fonts f ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime gnucash recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337965: wine crashes on startup, can't run any applications
Package: wine Version: 0.9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable asus:~ wine Wine called with no arguments. Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin ... wine: creating configuration directory '/home/andersa/.wine'... *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x7ecb57fc *** wine: Unhandled exception (thread 0009), starting debugger... I then exit with ctrl-c and get this error: err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Unhandled exception code c13a flags 0 addr 0xb7f3e1b9 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages wine depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libwine 0.9-1 Windows API Implementation (Librar ii xbase-clients6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 miscellaneous X clients wine recommends no packages. -- debconf information: wine/del_wine_conf: true wine/install_type: Autodetect -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337602: marked as done (lcrash - FTBFS: error: static declaration of 'cache_tail' follows non-static declaration)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:02:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337602: fixed in lcrash 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2005 09:20:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 05 01:20:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EYKEC-0002Bf-00; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:20:48 -0800 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C16F183B4; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:19:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:19:30 +0100 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lcrash - FTBFS: error: static declaration of 'cache_tail' follows non-static declaration Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: lcrash Version: 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-4 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-4 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] gcc -I/build/buildd/lcrash-7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322/dwarf/libdwarf -Wall -O2 -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DARCH=s390 -Iinclude -I../liballoc -I../libutil -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/libelf -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -DDUMP_ARCH_S390 -c -o kl_cmp.o kl_cmp.c kl_cmp.c:38: error: static declaration of 'cache_head' follows non-static declaration include/kl_cmp.h:85: error: previous declaration of 'cache_head' was here kl_cmp.c:38: error: static declaration of 'cache_tail' follows non-static declaration include/kl_cmp.h:86: error: previous declaration of 'cache_tail' was here kl_cmp.c: In function 'kl_compress_gzip': kl_cmp.c:1353: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'compress' differ in signedness kl_cmp.c:1353: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 3 of 'compress' differ in signedness make[3]: *** [kl_cmp.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lcrash-7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322/lib/libklib' make[2]: *** [subdirs_make] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lcrash-7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322/lib' make[1]: *** [subdirs_make] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/lcrash-7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051104-1119 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 337602-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 16:06:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 08:06:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZ9Ri-0003R4-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:02:10 -0800 From: Troy Heber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337602: fixed in lcrash 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 08:02:10 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lcrash Source-Version: 7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lcrash, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lcrash-dev_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lcrash/lcrash-dev_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5_i386.deb lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lcrash/lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5.diff.gz lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5.dsc to pool/main/l/lcrash/lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5.dsc lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lcrash/lcrash_7.0.0.pre.cvs.20050322-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this
Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. Did you kill evolution-data-server processes? -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!
Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst
Hi Frank! You wrote: Hmm, weird. dpkg only prompted me about one file, which I let it replace: It's a jadetex conffile, therefore the question must have been asked much earlier. ah, I see: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist After copying that one over the 40jadetex.cnf, tetex installs fine. Still, I'm hesitant about closing the bug. Couldn't tetex-bin just emit a warning about the jadetex thing, but otherwise install fine? Or even check for the outdated jadetex file (or maybe jadetex should do that itself)? -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 337797 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 severity 337797 important Bug#337797: xbase-clients: [beforelight] beforelight hangs my system Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 05:24:50PM +0100, Loic Minier wrote : On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: Unfortunately upgrading the package did not fix the issue. I am still experiencing it, my contact list looks empty even though it's not. Did you kill evolution-data-server processes? You were right, I did not kill it and the bug is now fixed. I am about to shoot myself in the head now and die of shame. Could we expect the package to stop/start the process automatically in the future, by any chance ? Are there some technical aspects that prevent from doing it ? Sorry for the annoyance, -- lool, t'es mon héros.
Bug#337018: [Evolution] Bug#337018: evolution-data-server: Upgrade did not fix issue
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Benjamin FRANCOIS wrote: Could we expect the package to stop/start the process automatically in the future, by any chance ? Are there some technical aspects that prevent from doing it ? evolution should already kill it, I think even --force-shutdown doesn't succeed in shutting it down. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do we want? BRAINS!When do we want it? BRAINS!
Bug#337972: libungif4g: buffer overflows and NULL dereference
Package: libungif4g Version: 4.1.3-2 Severity: critical Tags: security patch Hi! Chris Evans discovered several buffer overflows (CVE-2005-3350) and a NULL dereference (CVE-2005-2974), which were fixed upstream in 4.1.4. Here is the Ubuntu patch which only contains the security relevant bits: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/libungif4.CVE-2005-2974_3350.diff Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Version: 2.6.12-10 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Kernel hangs at boot after failing to init iop0: ... iop0: get status timeout iop0: reset rejected trying to clear iop0: unable to clear (status=0xbe) i2o controller probe failed err -110 [hang] The very same system boots fine under 2.6.8, where it uses dpti instead of iop. The dpti driver on 2.6.12 looks like it issues the same messages as it does under 2.6.8 (suggests that it is working properly), but apparently iop steps in shortly thereafter and tries (unsuccessfully) to take over. My dmesg from 2.6.8: ... Loading Adaptec I2O RAID: Version 2.4 Build 5go Detecting Adaptec I2O RAID controllers... ACPI: PCI interrupt :00:0b.1[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 185 Adaptec I2O RAID controller 0 at f887f000 size=10 irq=185 dpti: If you have a lot of devices this could take a few minutes. dpti0: Reading the hardware resource table. TID 008 Vendor: ADAPTEC Device: AIC-7899 Rev: 0001 TID 009 Vendor: ADAPTEC Device: AIC-7899 Rev: 0001 TID 010 Vendor: ADAPTEC Device: AIC-7899 Rev: 0001 TID 011 Vendor: ADAPTEC Device: AIC-7899 Rev: 0001 TID 518 Vendor: IBM Device: DDYS-T18350N Rev: SA2A TID 523 Vendor: ADAPTEC Device: RAID-5 Rev: 370F scsi2 : Vendor: Adaptec Model: 3410SFW:370F Vendor: IBM Model: DDYS-T18350N Rev: SA2A Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 Vendor: ADAPTEC Model: RAID-5Rev: 370F Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 A grep for iop0 in my 2.6.8 dmesg produces no results. I don't have a dmesg for 2.6.12, since the system won't boot. :) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2.1 The GNU core utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.84 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337945: format fails to build in postinst
Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Frank! You wrote: Hmm, weird. dpkg only prompted me about one file, which I let it replace: It's a jadetex conffile, therefore the question must have been asked much earlier. ah, I see: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 271 2005-03-09 14:05 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-dist After copying that one over the 40jadetex.cnf, tetex installs fine. Still, I'm hesitant about closing the bug. Couldn't tetex-bin just emit a warning about the jadetex thing, but otherwise install fine? I don't see how this could be possible. The jadetex format loads the latex format when it is used. During the upgrade from tetex-bin_2.0.2 to tetex-bin_3.0, the executable used to create the latex format has changed (from /usr/bin/etex which was *not* a symlink in 2.0.2 to /usr/bin/pdfetex), and therefore the latex format must be regenerated. Now jadetex (the jadetex format file) won't be able to load the latex format properly - it expects it to be created by the same program as the jadetex format (old etex), but in fact it was pdfetex. The only solution to this is that during the upgrade of teTeX to 3.0, it must recreate all formats that depend on formats that teTeX provides, and jadetex is one of them. Why can't we just ignore this error? Well, if we did, the system would show that tetex-bin is installed and configured, and jadetex is installed and configured. Yet, jadetex cannot be used, and packages that Depend on jadetex because they want to use it cannot do this. Since it is impossible for a postinst script to tell dpkg There was an error, but it comes from package A; please mark package A as not properly configured, the only thing we can do is let tetex-bin's postinst fail. And you wouldn't gain much, anyway: The fact is that you can use latex just fine, but not jadetex, and it doesn't matter whether dpkg gives an error and marks tetex-bin as unconfigured, or also gives an error, but blaims jadetex. Or even check for the outdated jadetex file (or maybe jadetex should do that itself)? We can of course check, but what should we do? We can't overwrite it with the dpkg-dist file without risking to overwrite local changes. We also can't edit it, because it is a conffile which may not be changed by maintainer scripts. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#337972: Test pictures
Hi again! I forgot to mention some demo pictures: http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad1.gif http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad2.gif http://scary.beasts.org/misc/bad3.gif They will mak e. g. gifinfo or feh crash without the patch. Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337978: bse-alsa - FTBFS: wrong build dependencies
Package: bse-alsa Version: 0.6.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of bse-alsa_0.6.6-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), beast, libasound2-dev, pkg-config [...] checking for BSE_CFLAGS... checking for BSE_LIBS... configure: error: Package requirements (bse = 0.6.6) were not met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the BSE_CFLAGS and BSE_LIBS environment variables to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337979: haskell-http - FTBFS: unsuitable build dependency
Package: haskell-http Version: 0.4.20050430-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of haskell-http_0.4.20050430-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), haskell-devscripts (=0.5.6), libghc6-cabal-dev, ghc6 (= 6.4) [alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 m68k powerpc s390 sparc], ghc6 ( 6.4+) [alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 m68k powerpc s390 sparc], haskell-utils (= 1.5), haddock, cpphs [...] After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied: ghc6(inst 6.4.1-1 ! wanted 6.4+) Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337980: slgsl - FTBFS: slsh: command not found
Package: slgsl Version: 0.5.2-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of slgsl_0.5.2-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libslang2-dev (= 2.0.4-6), libgsl0-dev, cdbs [...] cd src; make test make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/slgsl-0.5.2/src' /bin/sh: slsh: command not found /bin/sh: slsh: command not found /bin/sh: slsh: command not found /bin/sh: slsh: command not found make[2]: *** [test] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slgsl-0.5.2/src' make[1]: *** [test] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slgsl-0.5.2' make: *** [common-post-build-impl] Error 2 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337981: slhist - FTBFS: slsh: command not found
Package: slhist Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of slhist_0.3.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libslang2-dev (= 2.0.4-6), cdbs [...] cd src; make test make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/slhist-0.3.1/src' /bin/sh: slsh: command not found make[2]: *** [test] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slhist-0.3.1/src' make[1]: *** [test] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/slhist-0.3.1' make: *** [common-post-build-impl] Error 2 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 337972 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 # doesn't open a hole by installing the package, right? severity 337972 grave Bug#337972: libungif4g: buffer overflows and NULL dereference Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327171: ugly but working!
Hello,
i want to give pype a try and what did i see? yeah, it crashed, again
and again :D
For me pype runs...
Here the diff (it just remove the icon thing - but its better to have no
icons than have no (working) editor...)
so here just the diff..
mfg
403c403
#EXT_TO_IMG = {'python':1}
---
EXT_TO_IMG = {'python':1}
1370c1370
# self.control.SetPageImage(wnum,
EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(fn.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0))
---
self.control.SetPageImage(wnum,
EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(fn.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0))
3320c3320
# which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(text.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0)
---
which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(text.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0)
3322c3322
wxNotebook.AddPage(self, page, text, switch)
---
wxNotebook.AddPage(self, page, text, switch, which)
3328c3328
# which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(text.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0)
---
which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(text.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0)
3330c3330
wxNotebook.InsertPage(self, posn, page, text, switch)
---
wxNotebook.InsertPage(self, posn, page, text, switch, which)
3491,3492c3491,3492
# which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(label.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0),
0)
self.AppendItem(self.rootnode, label)
---
which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(label.split('.')[-1].lower(), 0), 0)
self.AppendItem(self.rootnode, label, which)
3498,3499c3498,3499
# which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(label.split('.')[-1].lower(),
0), 0)
self.InsertItemBefore(self.rootnode, index, label)
---
which = EXT_TO_IMG.get(extns.get(label.split('.')[-1].lower(),
0), 0)
self.InsertItemBefore(self.rootnode, index, label, which)
Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture
severity 337959 normal thanks Antoine Hulin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll gladely help to track this problem. The last time I used my scanner was some days before mid-september ; I can't tell which version of libsane was installed at the time though. sane-backends-extras (1.0.16.6) unstable; urgency=low * New backend: + lexmark * Updated backend: + epkowa -- Julien BLACHE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:09:35 +0200 Can you try to install libsane-extras 1.0.16.6 and see if that helps ? You probably still have the package in the APT cache, under /var/cache/apt/archives. Otherwise, fetch it from http://snapshot.debian.net. As for the USB messages, they are expected for your (multifunction) device, so don't worry about them. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 337959 normal Bug#337959: libsane-extras: Sane does not receive the scanned picture Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337987: gtranslator: Saving po file make program crash
Package: gtranslator Version: 1.1.6-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When I save some po files, the application crashes. It happens with some po files not all, it's certainly due to a encoding problem. Here is the output of gtranslator : (gtranslator:7842): gtranslator-WARNING **: /home/sylvain/Traduction/po-debconf/Todo/ipsec-tools/fr.po:24: line contains invalid UTF-8 (gtranslator:7842): GLib-WARNING **: GError set over the top of a previous GError or uninitialized memory. This indicates a bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is NULL before it's set. The overwriting error message was: Invalid byte sequence in conversion input -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gtranslator depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libaspell15 0.60.4-1GNU Aspell spell-checker runtime l ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.10.1-1The Bonobo UI library ii libc62.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-02.10.2-2A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.10.1-5The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkspell0 2.0.10-3a spell-checking addon for GTK's T ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit21:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-01.8.2-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.22-2GNOME XML library ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime gtranslator recommends no packages. -- no debconf information fr.po Description: application/empty
Bug#337989: rubyfilter: FTBFS: tries to overwrite read-only NEWS file
Package: rubyfilter Version: 0.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package rubyfilter in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] --- bin mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.8/usr/bin/ install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/bin/rsendmail.rb /usr/bin/ install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/bin/rdeliver.rb /usr/bin/ install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/bin/experimental-filter.rb /usr/bin/ install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/bin/experimental-deliver.rb /usr/bin/ --- bin --- lib mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/ --- lib/rfilter mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/lib/rfilter/deliver.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/lib/rfilter/mta.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/lib/rfilter/tagged.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/lib/rfilter/delivery_agent.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter install /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/lib/rfilter/keyed_mailbox.rb /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rfilter --- lib/rfilter --- lib install.rb: install done. mv /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.6/usr/bin/rdeliver.rb \ /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/rdeliver/usr/bin/rdeliver rm -rf /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.6/usr/bin rm -rf /tmp/buildd/rubyfilter-0.12/debian/librfilter-ruby1.8/usr/bin dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_installdocs -A NEWS README THANKS TODO dh_installdocs: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated. cp: cannot create regular file `debian/rdeliver/usr/share/doc/rdeliver/NEWS': Permission denied dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1 = As you can see above, dh_installdocs lists the file to install. Further, debian/docs lists those files, too, so dh_installdocs tries to install them twice, which fails, since they are read-only. You can remove the file debian/docs to fix this. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337404: marked as done (nautilus-sendto: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends)
Your message dated Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337404: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.3-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 10:25:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 02:25:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EXylD-iu-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 02:25:28 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37033.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.33]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9D2B887 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:24:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EXyki-00014i-Lk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:24:56 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nautilus-sendto: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:24:56 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nautilus-sendto Severity: serious Version: 0.3-4 From my pbuilder build log: Installing the build-deps - Attempting to parse the build-deps : pbuilder-satisfydepends,v 1.20 2005/08/17 00:46:54 dancer Exp $ - Considering autotools-dev - Trying autotools-dev - Considering cdbs - Trying cdbs - Considering debhelper (= 4.1) - Trying debhelper - Considering dh-buildinfo - Trying dh-buildinfo - Considering gaim-dev - Trying gaim-dev - Considering gnome-pkg-tools - Trying gnome-pkg-tools - Considering libcamel1.2-dev - Trying libcamel1.2-dev - Considering libdb4.1-dev - Trying libdb4.1-dev - Cannot install libdb4.1-dev; apt errors follow: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libcamel1.2-dev: Depends: libedataserver1.2-dev but it is not going to be installed Depends: libdb4.2-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. E: pbuilder-satisfydepends failed. You should probably just drop the libdb4.1-dev instead of changing it to libdb4.2-dev, since obviously the other Build-Depends already take care of that. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 337404-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 18:21:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 10:21:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZBYZ-0004rd-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 From: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#337404: fixed in nautilus-sendto 0.3-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nautilus-sendto Source-Version: 0.3-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nautilus-sendto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nautilus-sendto_0.3-5.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_0.3-5.diff.gz nautilus-sendto_0.3-5.dsc to pool/main/n/nautilus-sendto/nautilus-sendto_0.3-5.dsc
Bug#337992: acidlab: sarge to sid upgrade mess with conffiles
Package: acidlab Version: 0.9.6b20-13 Severity: serious When upgrading from sarge, acidlab mess with conffiles and triggers the dpkg conffiles handling for the file /etc/acidlab/acid_conf.php while I did not modify it, which is confusing. See the piuparts log at http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/misc/acidlab.piu snip Setting up acidlab (0.9.6b20-13) ... Configuration file `/etc/acidlab/acid_conf.php' == Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. == Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : background this process to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** acid_conf.php (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? D --- /etc/acidlab/acid_conf.php 2005-11-07 18:01:39.0 + +++ /etc/acidlab/acid_conf.php.dpkg-new 2005-11-01 13:44:36.0 + @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ *$foo = c:\tmp[OK] *$foo = c:\tmp\ [WRONG] */ -$DBlib_path = /usr/share/adodb; +$DBlib_path = /usr/share/php/adodb; /* The type of underlying alert database * @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ * PostgresSQL : postgres * MS SQL Server : mssql */ -$DBtype = mysql; +$DBtype = DBTYPE; /* Alert DB connection parameters * - $alert_dbname : MySQL database name of Snort alert DB @@ -29,18 +29,18 @@ * This information can be gleaned from the Snort database * output plugin configuration. */ -$alert_dbname = snort_log; -$alert_host = localhost; -$alert_port = ; -$alert_user = root; -$alert_password = mypassword; +$alert_dbname = ALERT_NAME; +$alert_host = ALERT_HOST; +$alert_port = ALERT_PORT; +$alert_user = ALERT_USER; +$alert_password = ALERT_PASSWORD; /* Archive DB connection parameters */ -$archive_dbname = snort_archive; -$archive_host = localhost; -$archive_port = ; -$archive_user = root; -$archive_password = mypassword; +$archive_dbname = ARCHIVE_NAME; +$archive_host = ARCHIVE_HOST; +$archive_port = ARCHIVE_PORT; +$archive_user = ARCHIVE_USER; +$archive_password = ARCHIVE_PASSWORD; /* Type of DB connection to use * 1 : use a persistant connection (pconnect) @@ -221,22 +221,27 @@ /* Whois query */ $external_whois_link = http://www.samspade.org/t/ipwhois?a=;; //$external_whois_link = http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?targetnic=autoquery=; +// Alternative: +// $external_dns_link = http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=;; /* DNS query */ $external_dns_link = http://www.samspade.org/t/dns?a=;; +// Alternative: +// $external_dns_link = http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?type=Aname=;; /* SamSpade all query */ $external_all_link = http://www.samspade.org/t/lookat?a=;; /* TCP/UDP port database */ -$external_port_link = http://www.snort.org/ports.html?port=;; -//$external_port_link = http://www.portsdb.org/bin/portsdb.cgi?portnumber=;; +// No longer available: +// $external_port_link = http://www.snort.org/ports.html?port=;; +$external_port_link = http://www.portsdb.org/bin/portsdb.cgi?portnumber=;; /* Signature references */ $external_sig_link = array(bugtraq = array(http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/;, ), - snort = array(http://www.snort.org/snort-db/sid.html?sid=;, ), + snort = array(http://www.snort.org/pub-bin/sigs.cgi?sid=;, ), cve = array(http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=;, ), - nessus = array(http://cgi.nessus.org/plugins/dump.php3?id=;, ), + nessus = array(http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=singleid=;, ), arachnids = array(http://www.whitehats.com/info/ids;, ), mcafee= array(http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_;, .htm), icat = array(http://icat.nist.gov/icat.cfm?cvename=;, )); 1 /snip Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337994: sbcl: ftbfs [sparc] /usr/bin/clisp: No such file or directory
Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.6.0-9 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source sbcl failed to build on a sparc buildd and other buildds, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. CFLAGS=-DSBCL_HOME=`pwd`/stage1/ -O2 GNUMAKE=make ./make.sh /usr/bin/clisp -norc -q -L english -E UTF-8 -ansi -M /usr/lib/clisp/full/*.mem //starting build: Sat Nov 5 19:40:18 UTC 2005 //SBCL_XC_HOST=/usr/bin/clisp -norc -q -L english -E UTF-8 -ansi -M /usr/lib/clisp/full/*.mem //entering make-config.sh //ensuring the existence of output/ directory //initializing /build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.6.0/local-target-features.lisp-expr //guessing default target CPU architecture from host architecture //setting up CPU-architecture-dependent information sbcl_arch=sparc //setting up symlink src/compiler/target //setting up symlink src/assembly/target //setting up symlink src/compiler/assembly //setting up OS-dependent information //finishing /build/buildd/sbcl-0.9.6.0/local-target-features.lisp-expr /in canonicalize-whitespace-1 /$*=./contrib/asdf/asdf.lisp ./contrib/asdf-stub.lisp ./contrib/code-extras.lisp ./contrib/compiler-extras.lisp ./contrib/stale-symbols.lisp ./contrib/asdf-install/defpackage.lisp ./contrib/asdf-install/installer.lisp ./contrib/sb-aclrepl/debug.lisp ./contrib/sb-aclrepl/inspect.lisp ./contrib/sb-aclrepl/repl.lisp ./contrib/sb-aclrepl/tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-aclrepl/toplevel.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/constants.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/defpackage.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/doc.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/inet.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/local.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/malloc.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/misc.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/name-service.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/sockets.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/sockopt.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/split.lisp ./contrib/sb-bsd-sockets/tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-cltl2/compiler-let.lisp ./contrib/sb-cltl2/defpackage.lisp ./contrib/sb-cltl2/env.lisp ./contrib/sb-cltl2/macroexpand.lisp ./contrib/sb-cltl2/tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-executable/sb-executable.lisp ./contrib/sb-grovel/def-to-lisp.lisp ./contrib/sb-grovel/defpackage.lisp ./contrib/sb-grovel/example-constants.lisp ./contrib/sb-grovel/foreign-glue.lisp ./contrib/sb-introspect/sb-introspect.lisp ./contrib/sb-introspect/test-driver.lisp ./contrib/sb-introspect/test.lisp ./contrib/sb-md5/md5-tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-md5/md5.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/constants.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/defpackage.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/designator.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/interface.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/macros.lisp ./contrib/sb-posix/posix-tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/compiler.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/package.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/ppc-vm.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/rotate-byte-tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/rotate-byte.lisp ./contrib/sb-rotate-byte/x86-vm.lisp ./contrib/sb-rt/rt.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/classes.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/direct.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/file.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/fndb.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/impl.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/internal.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/iodefs.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/null.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/package.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/simple-stream-tests.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/socket.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/strategy.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/string.lisp ./contrib/sb-simple-streams/terminal.lisp ./contrib/sb-sprof/sb-sprof.lisp ./doc/manual/create-contrib-doc-list.lisp ./doc/manual/docstrings.lisp ./src/assembly/alpha/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/alpha/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/alpha/array.lisp ./src/assembly/alpha/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/alpha/support.lisp ./src/assembly/assemfile.lisp ./src/assembly/hppa/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/hppa/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/hppa/array.lisp ./src/assembly/hppa/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/hppa/support.lisp ./src/assembly/mips/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/mips/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/mips/array.lisp ./src/assembly/mips/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/mips/support.lisp ./src/assembly/ppc/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/ppc/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/ppc/array.lisp ./src/assembly/ppc/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/ppc/support.lisp ./src/assembly/sparc/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/sparc/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/sparc/array.lisp ./src/assembly/sparc/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/sparc/support.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/array.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/bit-bash.lisp ./src/assembly/x86/support.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/alloc.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/arith.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/array.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/assem-rtns.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/bit-bash.lisp ./src/assembly/x86-64/support.lisp ./src/code/alien-type.lisp ./src/code/alloc.lisp ./src/code/alpha-vm.lisp ./src/code/ansi-stream.lisp ./src/code/array.lisp ./src/code/backq.lisp
Bug#337996: FTBFS: xine-lib debian/rules contains a bashism
Package: xine-lib
Version: 1.0.1-1.3
Severity: serious
xine-lib's debian/rules contains the following:
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/xine/{faq,README*} \
debian/libxine1/usr/share/doc/libxine1
This fails with dash as sh, since it doesn't understand {faq,README*}. The
easiest fix would be to move the faq and README* separately, as follows:
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/xine/faq \
debian/libxine1/usr/share/doc/libxine1
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/xine/README* \
debian/libxine1/usr/share/doc/libxine1
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
pgpM747zMxZJ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#318719: tecnoballz: Still does not run (on sarge)
Hello Andreas, did you try running tecnoballz after compiling it in unstable for amd64? I rebuild the latest version (tecnoballz-0.91-cvs20050828) on sarge (I had to override some dependencies, but the build went fine) and it crashed again. The backtrace for this version follows. Alexis: I just saw this bug (#303156) by chance, if you want me to help get tecnoballz running on amd, you should contact me (and not simply post a single note in a different bug report which I ordinarily would not read). And I start to believe, that the code itself has problems, as also with gcc 3.3 tecnoballz does not work, but maybe Andreas can prove me wrong here? Greetings Helge GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as x86_64-linux...Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/games/tecnoballz [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912519040496 (LWP 26720)] configfile::fopen_data(): Warning: Unable to open the file /home/helge/.tlkgames/tecnoballz.conf for read!!! [New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 19260)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 46912519040496 (LWP 26720)] 0x2bab5151 in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt full #0 0x2bab5151 in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x2abee0f1 in SDL_FreeFormat () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x2abefc9e in SDL_FreeSurface () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0040eb31 in GFX_bitmap::GFXLiberat (this=0x6ff2b8) at GFX_bitmap.cc:64 No locals. #4 0x0040eff6 in ~GIF_bitMap (this=0x6fefb0) at GIF_bitMap.cc:41 No locals. #5 0x00419bf2 in ressources::freeSprite (this=0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8) at ressources.cc:339 No locals. #6 0x004168b8 in menu_tecno::first_init (this=0x6fb1a0) at menu_tecno.cc:84 No locals. #7 0x00415bc9 in mentatCode::game_begin () at mentatCode.cc:219 No locals. #8 0x0041572d in main (nbArg=1, ptArg=0x7fffd8d8) at main.cc:51 error = 0 (gdb) quit The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ pgpMzeKG1rvYd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#337974: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7: i2o controller probe failed err -110
* Bill Gatliff wrote: Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 Version: 2.6.12-10 Can you please give 2.6.14-2 a try? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337987: gtranslator: Saving po file make program crash
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 07:08:08PM +0100, Sylvain Archenault wrote: When I save some po files, the application crashes. It happens with some po files not all, it's certainly due to a encoding problem. Here is the output of gtranslator : (gtranslator:7842): gtranslator-WARNING **: /home/sylvain/Traduction/po-debconf/Todo/ipsec-tools/fr.po:24: line contains invalid UTF-8 (gtranslator:7842): GLib-WARNING **: GError set over the top of a previous GError or uninitialized memory. This indicates a bug in someone's code. You must ensure an error is NULL before it's set. The overwriting error message was: Invalid byte sequence in conversion input If this only happens when you have a broken .po file, then I don't think that should be considered grave. Though the .po file you attached seems to be empty, so I can't verify this for myself... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337987: Empty file
I'm sorry about the empty file, it's due to the fact gtranslator empty it and I didn't realize when sending the bug report. Actually, I edited the file and save it with kbabel and now gtranslator didn't crash anymore, It's certainly due to an error in encoding. -- Sylvain Archenault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 336747 is important, tagging 336747
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 severity 336747 important Bug#336747: /usr/lib/gconf2/gconfd-2 missing Severity set to `important'. tags 336747 + unreproducible Bug#336747: /usr/lib/gconf2/gconfd-2 missing Tags were: experimental Tags added: unreproducible End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337999: mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email.
Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Editing a mail, Enter no longer creates a new line. this worked fine, but broke after a recent dist-upgrade (not sure if thunderbird was directly upgraded). Some possibly related info: * I am using xorg 6.8.2. * the following plugins are installed : - typeaheadfind 1.0 - Bidi mail UI 0.61 - New mail icon 1.1 * I am currrently using E17 windows manager, but I saw the same problem with KDE. * here is my xorg.conf keyboard section: Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driverkeyboard OptionCoreKeyboard OptionRules xorg OptionModel pc105 OptionLayout us EndSection -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System printing extension ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird recommends: ii myspell-en-gb [myspell-dictio 20050823-1 English (GB) dictionary for myspel ii myspell-en-us [myspell-dictio 20050823-1 English (US) dictionary for myspel pn xprintnone (no description available) -- debconf information: * mozilla-thunderbird/browser: Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337999: mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:52:57PM +0200, Omry Yadan wrote: Editing a mail, Enter no longer creates a new line. this worked fine, but broke after a recent dist-upgrade (not sure if thunderbird was directly upgraded). Some possibly related info: * I am using xorg 6.8.2. * the following plugins are installed : - typeaheadfind 1.0 - Bidi mail UI 0.61 - New mail icon 1.1 Hi, Please try again with those uninstalled. -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338011: kdeartwork: FTBFS: screensaver ant missing (from xscreensaver)
Package: kdeartwork Version: 4:3.4.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package kdeartwork in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -pkscreensaver ; fi dh_installchangelogs -pkscreensaver dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -pkscreensaver dh_link -pkscreensaver if test -x /usr/bin/dh_desktop; then dh_desktop -pkscreensaver ; fi if test -e debian/kscreensaver.lintian; then \ install -p -D -m644 debian/kscreensaver.lintian \ debian/kscreensaver/usr/share/lintian/overrides/kscreensaver; \ fi dh_installdocs -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installexamples -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installman -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installinfo -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installmenu -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installcron -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installinit -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installdebconf -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installemacsen -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installpam -pkscreensaver-xsavers dh_installlogrotate -pkscreensaver-xsavers if test -x /usr/bin/dh_installlogcheck; then dh_installlogcheck -pkscreensaver-xsavers ; fi dh_installchangelogs -pkscreensaver-xsavers dpkg-parsechangelog: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) debian: warning: no utmp entry available and LOGNAME not defined; using uid of process (0) dh_install -pkscreensaver-xsavers cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/share/applnk/System/ScreenSavers/ant.desktop': No such file or directory dh_install: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-install/kscreensaver-xsavers] Error 1 = This is caused by the new upstream version of xscreensaver (triggered by NEXES in hacks/Makefile.in). He writes about the new version 0.23: Don't install ant by default, since there is some Java tool of that name, which was causing confusion. And also it's boring. So either ignore ant.desktop by removing it from debian/kscreensaver-xsavers.install or reassign this bug to xscreensaver for reintroducing the theme. Thanks for considering. -- DARTS - Debian Archive Regression Test Suite http://darts.alioth.debian.org/ Please note that this report has not been generated fully automatically. DARTS just helped finding the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337999: marked as done (mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email.)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:45:39 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337999: mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2005 18:53:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 07 10:53:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from romy.inter.net.il [192.114.186.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EZC7r-0005Mr-00; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:53:51 -0800 Received: from firefang.net (IGLD-84-228-27-240.inter.net.il [84.228.27.240]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CXO87174 (AUTH omry_y); Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:53:01 +0200 (IST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firefang.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312BC14F62; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:53:04 +0200 (IST) Received: from firefang.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tv.firefang.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06342-03; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:52:55 +0200 (IST) Received: from main.firefang.net (main [10.0.0.1]) by firefang.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BA78AC4; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:52:54 +0200 (IST) Received: from omry by main.firefang.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EZC6z-0007zn-Hf; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:52:57 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Omry Yadan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mozilla-thunderbird: enter does not respond when editing an email. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:52:57 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at firefang.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mozilla-thunderbird Version: 1.0.7-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Editing a mail, Enter no longer creates a new line. this worked fine, but broke after a recent dist-upgrade (not sure if thunderbird was directly upgraded). Some possibly related info: * I am using xorg 6.8.2. * the following plugins are installed : - typeaheadfind 1.0 - Bidi mail UI 0.61 - New mail icon 1.1 * I am currrently using E17 windows manager, but I saw the same problem with KDE. * here is my xorg.conf keyboard section: Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driverkeyboard OptionCoreKeyboard OptionRules xorg OptionModel pc105 OptionLayout us EndSection -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mozilla-thunderbird depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxp66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System printing extension ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xlibs
