Processed: merging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 343280 yaird Bug#343280: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: Will not boot due to block device error Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7' to `yaird'. > merge 343280 343042 Bug#343042: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: Boot aborts with message '/bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev: No such file or directory' Bug#343280: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: Will not boot due to block device error Merged 343042 343280. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343042: kernel bug or yaird bug
fyi, I just reassigned/merged a bug here, but messages on debian-kernel lead me to believe this should actually be fixed in linux-2.6. Please reassign if that is the case. -- dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#343279: new cupsys fails to start, claiming can't bind port 631
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343279 important Bug#343279: new cupsys fails to start, claiming can't bind port 631 Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343279: new cupsys fails to start, claiming can't bind port 631
severity 343279 important
thanks
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:19:48PM -0600, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
> Package: cupsys
> Version: 1.1.23-13
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> The latest cupsys update broke the port binding for me:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] { ~ }$ /etc/init.d/cupsys start
> Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd
> cupsd: Child exited with status 98!
> /var/log/cups/error_log:
> E [13/Dec/2005:23:16:09 -0600] StartListening: Unable to bind socket for
> address :631 - Address already in use.
> "lsof | grep 631" shows nothing binded to 631. I have checked and tried
> to open the port myself, and I am sure it's open. I have also rebooted.
This probably means that the port is opened by an NFS-related kernel thread
because portmap (incorrectly) assigns the port there. You can confirm this
by stopping the NFS server (/etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server and
/etc/init.d/nfs-common) and starting cupsys again.
This is not a bug in cupsys, but a systemic problem with portmap's random
port assignment process.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#343185: firefox: Not available on powerpc.
severity 343185 serious merge 341766 343185 thanks * Eugen Dedu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: firefox > Severity: important > > This package is not available on powerpc. It's a direct consequence of #341766. I have it fixed, but I'm waiting for #341918 to be closed before I can upload. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#327855: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions
package sylpheed tags 327855 confirmed fixed-in-experimental thanks On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:40:47 +0200 Robert Spielmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: sylpheed > Version: 2.0.0-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > When I choose "Subscribe to Newsgroup" on a NNTP account: after making > my choices, the entire list of subscribed groups is deleted and replaced > with the new selection. This makes it impossible to add one newsgroup > without selecting all subscribed groups again. According upstream this has been fixed from version 2.1.3, see this thread of the mailing list: http://www.tmtm.org/cgi-bin/w3ml/sylpheed/msg/26540 Currently 2.1.7 is available from experimental (I hope 2.1.8 soon). best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ The three principal virtues of a programmer are Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.man perl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#343185: firefox: Not available on powerpc.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343185 serious Bug#343185: firefox: Not available on powerpc. Severity set to `serious'. > merge 341766 343185 Bug#341766: firefox: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. Bug#343185: firefox: Not available on powerpc. Merged 341766 343185. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#327855: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package sylpheed Ignoring bugs not assigned to: sylpheed > tags 327855 confirmed fixed-in-experimental Bug#327855: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions There were no tags set. Bug#327857: sylpheed: Subscribe to Newsgroups overwrites current subscriptions Tags added: confirmed, fixed-in-experimental > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333711: libmpd is still not uploaded
Hi, Even 2 months after this bug was filed libmpd-0.01-0-dev package, required as a build-dep for gpmc, is not in Debian. Please take appropriate action to make it available, or request the removal of gpmc if there is a problem with that. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343069: marked as done (FTBFS due to timestamp skews)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343069: fixed in make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 12:03:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 04:03:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mf01.sitadelle.com ([212.94.174.68] helo=smtp.cegetel.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ElmOz-0001Fw-2a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:03:33 -0800 Received: from mx0.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AAA59AB9E; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:02:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-79.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lminier.people.bpl-group.org", Issuer "BPL Group People Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by mx0.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79187C5CC; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:02:57 + (UTC) Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 765834F009F; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:02:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:02:39 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FTBFS: undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: make Version: 3.80+3.81.b3-1 Severity: serious Hi, Make FTBFS in my sid chroot, presumably because the snapshot is not completely bootstrapped: [...] config.status: creating po/Makefile config.status: creating build.sh =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D making (creating) build/make =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D test ! -f config/texinfo.tex || rm -f config/texinfo.tex /usr/bin/make CC=3D"cc" CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -g" LDFLAGS=3D"-s" make[1]: Entering directory `/home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3' cd . && /bin/sh /home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3/config/missing = --run a clocal-1.9 -I config /home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3/config/missing: line 52: acloca= l-1.9:=20 command not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.9' is missing on your system. You should only need i= t if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3/config/missing= --run=20 automake-1.9 --gnu=20 /home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3/config/missing: line 52: automa= ke-1.9: command not found WARNING: `automake-1.9' is missing on your system. You should only need = it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3/config/missing = --run a utoconf configure.in:8: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_MAINTAINER_MODE If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allo= w. See the Autoconf documentation. make[1]: *** [configure] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lool/tmp-make-sid/make-3.80+3.81.b3' make: *** [build/make] Error 2 debuild: fatal error at line 768: dpkg-buildpackage failed! Cheers, --=20 Lo=EFc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Received: (at 343069-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 05:41:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 21:41:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmPFG-0008LI-8A; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:32:06 -0800 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#343069: fixed in make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:32:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bug
Bug#343280: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: Will not boot due to block device error
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 Version: 2.6.14-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After upgrading linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 from version 2.6.14-4 to 2.6.14-5, I immediately rebooted the system. Upon boot, the following was received: /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 1 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 2 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 4 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 8 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Waiting 16 seconds for /sys/block/hda/dev to show up /bin/cat: /sys/block/hda/dev: No such file or directory Device /sys/block/hda/dev seems to be down. Debugging opportunity, type ^D to continue. /bin/dash: can't access tty; job control turned off # At this point, typing ^D gives: /bin/mknod: missing operand after 'b' Special files require major and minor device numbers. Try '/bin/mknod --help' for more information. It them proceeds to redisplay the above set of meesages concerning /sys/block/hda/dev. As I am filing this bug report (by running 'reportbug'), reportbug's package integrity verification is displaying the following: Verifying package integrity... There may be a problem with your installation of linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7; the following files appear to be missing or changed: debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.dep debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.pcimap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.usbmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.ieee1394map debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.isapnpmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.inputmap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.seriomap debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.alias debsums: checksum mismatch linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 file /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-k7/modules.symbols I have redownloaded and reinstalled the package twice and the same errors (including reportbug verification error) continue to occur. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-1 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 recommends: pn libc6-i686 (no description available) -- debconf-show failed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343279: new cupsys fails to start, claiming can't bind port 631
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The latest cupsys update broke the port binding for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] { ~ }$ /etc/init.d/cupsys start
Starting Common Unix Printing System: cupsd
cupsd: Child exited with status 98!
/var/log/cups/error_log:
E [13/Dec/2005:23:16:09 -0600] StartListening: Unable to bind socket for
address :631 - Address already in use.
"lsof | grep 631" shows nothing binded to 631. I have checked and tried
to open the port myself, and I am sure it's open. I have also rebooted.
-r
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (350, 'testing'), (300, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-ck6-mt
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages cupsys depends on:
ii adduser 3.80Add and remove users and groups
ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii gs-esp 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr
ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcupsimage21.1.23-13 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libcupsys2 1.1.23-13 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii libgnutls12 1.2.9-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpaper11.1.14-3Library for handling paper charact
ii libslp1 1.2.1-3 OpenSLP libraries
ii patch2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original
ii perl-modules 5.8.7-9 Core Perl modules
ii procps 1:3.2.6-2 /proc file system utilities
ii xpdf-utils 3.01-3 Portable Document Format (PDF) sui
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages cupsys recommends:
ii cupsys-client 1.1.23-13Common UNIX Printing System(tm) -
ii foomatic-filters3.0.2-20050720-1 linuxprinting.org printer support
pn smbclient (no description available)
-- debconf information:
* cupsys/raw-print: true
* cupsys/browse: false
* cupsys/ports: 631
* cupsys/backend: ipp, lpd, parallel, socket, usb
cupsys/portserror:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337435: marked as done (pennmush: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: conflicting types for CONF)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337435: fixed in pennmush 1.8.0p9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2005 11:59:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 04 03:59:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.36.164] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EY0Eh-0008Kh-00; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 03:59:59 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37033.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.33]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019CAB887 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:59:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EY0EB-0005gU-Qy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:59:27 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: pennmush: FTBFS with openssl 0.9.8: conflicting types for CONF Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:59:27 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pennmush Severity: serious Version: 1.8.0p8-1 >From my pbuilder build log: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/pennmush-1.8.0p8/build-pennmush/src' rm -f ../hdrs/buildinf.h gcc -g -O2 -I.. -I../hdrs -D__USE_POSIX -I/usr/local/include -c -o access.o access.c In file included from access.c:75: ../hdrs/conf.h:94: error: conflicting types for 'CONF' /usr/include/openssl/ossl_typ.h:144: error: previous declaration of 'CONF' was here make[2]: *** [access.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/pennmush-1.8.0p8/build-pennmush/src' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/pennmush-1.8.0p8/build-pennmush' make: *** [build-pennmush] Error 2 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 337435-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 04:50:58 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 20:50:58 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmOXj-0005ch-DU; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:47:07 -0800 From: Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#337435: fixed in pennmush 1.8.0p9-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: pennmush Source-Version: 1.8.0p9-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pennmush, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pennmush-common_1.8.0p9-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush-common_1.8.0p9-1_all.deb pennmush-i18n_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush-i18n_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb pennmush-mysql_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush-mysql_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb pennmush_1.8.0p9-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush_1.8.0p9-1.diff.gz pennmush_1.8.0p9-1.dsc to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush_1.8.0p9-1.dsc pennmush_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush_1.8.0p9-1_i386.deb pennmush_1.8.0p9.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/pennmush/pennmush_1.8.0p9.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pennmush package) (This message was gen
Bug#342521: marked as done (gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 09:53:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 01:53:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from socrate.i3s.unice.fr ([134.59.130.1] helo=smtp.i3s.unice.fr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkITD-Fq-2v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:53:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B83278ABAA; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr (pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr
[134.59.133.64])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C25E8ABA8; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ol by pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EkIT8-0005Fb-8o; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Lecarme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gnus
Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The variable message-mark-insert-begin is void. The error occurs as soon
as mm-uu is loaded.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gnus depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii emacs21 21.4a-3The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the "make" util
ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv
gnus recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
gnus/upgrade/pre_5.9.0: false
---
Received: (at 342647-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bj-JJ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if ap
Bug#342647: marked as done (mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 09:06:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 01:06:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkeD4-0002GE-RL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:06:35 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFA43067C2;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9862C811E;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30115-01; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A67D2C811C;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Dec 2005
10:05:45 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: mh-e
Version: 7.85-1
Severity: important
Hi,
when this version of Emacs is installed:
ii emacs-snapshot-bin-com 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's
shared, architecture dependent files
ii emacs-snapshot-common 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's common
infrastructure
ii emacs-snapshot-gtk 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor (with
GTK+ 2.x support)
it fails to configure with this error message:
[...]
Wrote /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/mh-e/multi-prompt.elc
emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/mh-e emacs-snapshot
emacs21 xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28,
line 109.
dpkg: error processing emacs-snapshot-gtk (--configure):
Purging mh-e fixes the problem.
This bug will become grave when Emacs22 becomes the default version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---
Received: (at 342647-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bj-JJ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/
Bug#342326: marked as done (mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin")
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 06:37:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 22:37:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejsw4-0003Ug-0A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:37:52 -0800 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76boSt025937 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76blIj009179; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pornstar ([24.91.135.235]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id jB76bjMu028781; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from cpeikert by pornstar with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EjswK-0002pN-TX; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christopher J Peikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 2.777 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mh-e Version: 7.85-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Having just upgraded a lot of packages, I now get a "Lisp error: (void-variable message-mark-insert-begin)" error when trying to load mh-e from my .emacs file. The full trace has lots of nasty binary data, but the rough trace goes: load mh-e -> mh-utils -> mh-customize -> mh-comp -> mh-gnus -> mm-uu and in mm-uu: (defvar mm-uu-type-alist ... where we run into the void-variable message-mark-insert-begin. Maybe something changed in gnus? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mh-e depends on: ii emacs21 [emacsen] 21.4a-3 The GNU Emacs editor hi nmh1.1-release-4 A set of electronic mail handling Versions of packages mh-e recommends: ii compface 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1 A versatile News and mailing list -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342647-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:15 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmMfg-0007Bj-JJ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342647: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnus Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff
Bug#342521: marked as done (gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 09:53:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 01:53:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from socrate.i3s.unice.fr ([134.59.130.1] helo=smtp.i3s.unice.fr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkITD-Fq-2v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:53:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B83278ABAA; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr (pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr
[134.59.133.64])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C25E8ABA8; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ol by pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EkIT8-0005Fb-8o; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Lecarme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gnus
Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The variable message-mark-insert-begin is void. The error occurs as soon
as mm-uu is loaded.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gnus depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii emacs21 21.4a-3The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the "make" util
ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv
gnus recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
gnus/upgrade/pre_5.9.0: false
---
Received: (at 342521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bh-IX; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if ap
Bug#342647: marked as done (mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 09:06:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 01:06:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkeD4-0002GE-RL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:06:35 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFA43067C2;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9862C811E;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30115-01; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A67D2C811C;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Dec 2005
10:05:45 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: mh-e
Version: 7.85-1
Severity: important
Hi,
when this version of Emacs is installed:
ii emacs-snapshot-bin-com 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's
shared, architecture dependent files
ii emacs-snapshot-common 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's common
infrastructure
ii emacs-snapshot-gtk 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor (with
GTK+ 2.x support)
it fails to configure with this error message:
[...]
Wrote /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/mh-e/multi-prompt.elc
emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/mh-e emacs-snapshot
emacs21 xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28,
line 109.
dpkg: error processing emacs-snapshot-gtk (--configure):
Purging mh-e fixes the problem.
This bug will become grave when Emacs22 becomes the default version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---
Received: (at 342521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bh-IX; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/
Bug#342326: marked as done (mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin")
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 06:37:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 22:37:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejsw4-0003Ug-0A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:37:52 -0800 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76boSt025937 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76blIj009179; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pornstar ([24.91.135.235]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id jB76bjMu028781; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from cpeikert by pornstar with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EjswK-0002pN-TX; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christopher J Peikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 2.777 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mh-e Version: 7.85-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Having just upgraded a lot of packages, I now get a "Lisp error: (void-variable message-mark-insert-begin)" error when trying to load mh-e from my .emacs file. The full trace has lots of nasty binary data, but the rough trace goes: load mh-e -> mh-utils -> mh-customize -> mh-comp -> mh-gnus -> mm-uu and in mm-uu: (defvar mm-uu-type-alist ... where we run into the void-variable message-mark-insert-begin. Maybe something changed in gnus? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mh-e depends on: ii emacs21 [emacsen] 21.4a-3 The GNU Emacs editor hi nmh1.1-release-4 A set of electronic mail handling Versions of packages mh-e recommends: ii compface 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1 A versatile News and mailing list -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:00 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmMfg-0007Bh-IX; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342521: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnus Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff
Bug#342647: marked as done (mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 09:06:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 01:06:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkeD4-0002GE-RL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:06:35 -0800
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17])
by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFA43067C2;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9862C811E;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:06:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 30115-01; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167])
by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A67D2C811C;
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Dec 2005
10:05:45 +0100
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mh-e: does not configure with emacs-snapshot
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:05:45 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: mh-e
Version: 7.85-1
Severity: important
Hi,
when this version of Emacs is installed:
ii emacs-snapshot-bin-com 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's
shared, architecture dependent files
ii emacs-snapshot-common 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor's common
infrastructure
ii emacs-snapshot-gtk 20051207-1 The GNU Emacs editor (with
GTK+ 2.x support)
it fails to configure with this error message:
[...]
Wrote /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/mh-e/multi-prompt.elc
emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/mh-e emacs-snapshot
emacs21 xemacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28,
line 109.
dpkg: error processing emacs-snapshot-gtk (--configure):
Purging mh-e fixes the problem.
This bug will become grave when Emacs22 becomes the default version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
---
Received: (at 342326-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bf-Ho; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/
Bug#342521: marked as done (gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 09:53:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 01:53:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from socrate.i3s.unice.fr ([134.59.130.1] helo=smtp.i3s.unice.fr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EkITD-Fq-2v
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:53:47 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B83278ABAA; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr (pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr
[134.59.133.64])
by smtp.i3s.unice.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C25E8ABA8; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:53:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ol by pierredelune.i3s.unice.fr with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EkIT8-0005Fb-8o; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Lecarme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gnus: immediate failure when loading mm-uu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:53:42 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gnus
Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The variable message-mark-insert-begin is void. The error occurs as soon
as mm-uu is loaded.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages gnus depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii emacs21 21.4a-3The GNU Emacs editor
ii make 3.80-11The GNU version of the "make" util
ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv
gnus recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
gnus/upgrade/pre_5.9.0: false
---
Received: (at 342326-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmMfg-0007Bf-Ho; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnus
Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff.gz
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.dsc
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1_all.deb
gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gnus/gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if ap
Bug#342326: marked as done (mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin")
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2005 06:37:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 06 22:37:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ejsw4-0003Ug-0A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:37:52 -0800 Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76boSt025937 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id jB76blIj009179; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from pornstar ([24.91.135.235]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id jB76bjMu028781; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:37:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from cpeikert by pornstar with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EjswK-0002pN-TX; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Christopher J Peikert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mh-e fails to load, "void-variable message-mark-insert-begin" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 01:38:08 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 2.777 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mh-e Version: 7.85-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Having just upgraded a lot of packages, I now get a "Lisp error: (void-variable message-mark-insert-begin)" error when trying to load mh-e from my .emacs file. The full trace has lots of nasty binary data, but the rough trace goes: load mh-e -> mh-utils -> mh-customize -> mh-comp -> mh-gnus -> mm-uu and in mm-uu: (defvar mm-uu-type-alist ... where we run into the void-variable message-mark-insert-begin. Maybe something changed in gnus? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mh-e depends on: ii emacs21 [emacsen] 21.4a-3 The GNU Emacs editor hi nmh1.1-release-4 A set of electronic mail handling Versions of packages mh-e recommends: ii compface 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051203-1 A versatile News and mailing list -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 342326-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 02:51:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 18:51:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmMfg-0007Bf-Ho; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#342326: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:47:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnus Source-Version: 5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnus, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnus_5.10.6-1.NO.20051213-1.diff
Bug#343264: marked as done ([CVE-2004-0564] attackers can overwrite any files when run with setuid root)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:59:35 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343264: [CVE-2004-0564] attackers can overwrite any files when run with setuid root has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 01:31:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 17:31:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.97]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmLU4-0005vU-Ew for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:31:08 -0800 Received: (qmail 48010 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 01:30:37 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@64.108.215.162 with plain) by smtp108.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 01:30:36 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:30:33 -0600 From: FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CVE-2004-0564] attackers can overwrite any files when run with setuid root Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 package: pppoe severity: grave tags: security Max Vozeler discovered a vulnerability in pppoe, the PPP over Ethernet driver from Roaring Penguin. When the program is running setuid root, an attacker could overwrite any file on the file system. CVE-2004-0564: Roaring Penguin pppoe (rp-ppoe), if installed or configured to run setuid root contrary to its design, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files. NOTE: the developer has publicly disputed the claim that this is a vulnerability because pppoe "is NOT designed to run setuid-root." Therefore this identifier applies *only* to those configurations and installations under which pppoe is run setuid root despite the developer's warnings. This was fixed in Redhat a month ago despite their default configuration not using suid. See [FLSA-2005:152794] In Debian Sarge, both /usr/sbin/pppd and /usr/sbin/pppoe files are "-rwsr-xr-- root dip". --- Received: (at 343264-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2005 01:59:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 17:59:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pianocktail.org ([66.11.160.92]) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmLvt-00042n-59 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:59:53 -0800 Received: (qmail 3457 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2005 01:58:39 - Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.10.2?) (10.0.10.2) by pianocktail.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2005 01:58:39 - Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:59:35 -0500 From: Christian Hudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#343264: [CVE-2004-0564] attackers can overwrite any files when run with setuid root References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 FX wrote: > Max Vozeler discovered a vulnerability in pppoe, the PPP over Ethernet > driver from Roaring Penguin. When the program is running setuid root, > an attacker could overwrite any file on the file system. This is rather old and was fixed more than a year ago in Debian: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:08:20 -0400 Source: rp-pppoe Binary: pppoe Architecture: source i386 Version: 3.5-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Christian Hudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Christian Hudon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: pppoe - PPP over Ethernet driver Changes: rp-pppoe (3.5-4) unstable; urgency=high . * Added patch by Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to ignore -D an
Bug#343264: [CVE-2004-0564] attackers can overwrite any files when run with setuid root
package: pppoe severity: grave tags: security Max Vozeler discovered a vulnerability in pppoe, the PPP over Ethernet driver from Roaring Penguin. When the program is running setuid root, an attacker could overwrite any file on the file system. CVE-2004-0564: Roaring Penguin pppoe (rp-ppoe), if installed or configured to run setuid root contrary to its design, allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files. NOTE: the developer has publicly disputed the claim that this is a vulnerability because pppoe "is NOT designed to run setuid-root." Therefore this identifier applies *only* to those configurations and installations under which pppoe is run setuid root despite the developer's warnings. This was fixed in Redhat a month ago despite their default configuration not using suid. See [FLSA-2005:152794] In Debian Sarge, both /usr/sbin/pppd and /usr/sbin/pppoe files are "-rwsr-xr-- root dip". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335648: deskbar-applet: progress?
Package: deskbar-applet Version: 0.8.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #335648 I was wondering if there was any progress made on this bug. My traceback is identical to the bug submitter. Thanks, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages deskbar-applet depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libebook1.2-3 1.2.3-8Client library for evolution addre ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.2.3-8Utily library for evolution data s ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-3Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.22-2 GNOME XML library ii python2.3.5-3An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.10.0-4 Python bindings for the GNOME desk ii python-gtk2 2.6.3-2Python bindings for the GTK+ widge ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime deskbar-applet recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315060: multisync: Multisync unable to open Evo2 calendar and addressbook
Hi, I have built new multisync packages against current evolution2, if you are still interested, could you please test them and tell me whether they fix this bug so I can upload them? They are located at deb http://people.debian.org/~mbanck/multisync/ ./ thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tag 340070
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 340070 + patch Bug#340070: yate: FTBFS: compile error: invalid conversion There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: space-orbit: doesn't start
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 336840 + patch Bug#336840: space-orbit: doesn't start There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336840: space-orbit: doesn't start
tags 336840 + patch
thanks
Reordering the call to glutInit in orbit.c fixes this error.
John
diff -ur space-orbit-1.01.orig/src/orbit.c space-orbit-1.01/src/orbit.c
--- space-orbit-1.01.orig/src/orbit.c 2005-12-13 18:22:35.0 -0600
+++ space-orbit-1.01/src/orbit.c 2005-12-13 18:22:22.0 -0600
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
/* Set up the player viewpoint, etc */
InitPlayer();
+ /* glutInit is required for InitStuff() */
+ glutInit(&argc, argv);
+
/* Initialize all sorts of other stuff */
InitStuff();
@@ -63,8 +66,10 @@
*/
{
char *p;
-
- glutInit (&argc, argv);
+
+ /* This is being called in main() now */
+ /* glutInit (&argc, argv); */
+
glutInitDisplayMode (GLUT_RGBA | GLUT_DOUBLE | GLUT_DEPTH);
glutInitWindowPosition (0, 0);
Bug#343260: Grub: After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had wrong entries
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 Version: 2.6.14-5 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system After installing linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 grub had only wrong entries. For example Instead of hda(0,8) hda(0,7) was in the grub config file. And also: Instead: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-k7 root=/dev/hda9 ro there was: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-k7 root=/dev/hda8 ro This was for all 3 kernels I have ever installed including this. Only the winxp entry at the end of the menu.lst (the name of my grub conffile) was not affected. Until I corrected this, the system was not bootable so I think that severity: critical, breaks the whole system is the right one, cause until I corrected it, no kernel version was able to boot. The output of my partition table is: Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 4 765 6120765b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda2 766 19457 150143490f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda5 766522735840983+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda65228 1471176180198+ b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda7 14712 1748422274091b W95 FAT32 /dev/hda8 17485 18358 7020373+ 83 Linux /dev/hda9 18359 19209 6835626 83 Linux /dev/hda10 19210 19457 1992028+ 82 Linux swap / You should know, that linux (including the kernel) is installed on hda9, but a few important directorys are chanced with symlinks to hda8 (e.g. home). The kernel itself is on hda9. Another strang bug, is that if winxp is the first entry in grub, than it will removed after an "aptitude install linux" Cheers, Stefan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre9-4 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.11-12 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7 recommends: ii libc6-i6862.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries [i -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.14-2-k7: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/abort-install-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.14-2-k7: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.14-2-k7: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.14-2-k7: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339234: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:45:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339234: fixed in net6 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2005 06:56:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 22:56:49 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EbukL-000768-C4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:56:49 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA25503 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5C9F212 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 18267-32 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) 13922 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:47 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jAF6ukVJ009129 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:46 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 07:56:46 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: net6 Severity: important Please do not take any action before reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html This bug report is filed against the source package which builds a library depending on libstdc++6 and defining or referencing *mt_alloc* symbols. The package has to be rebuilt with either g++-4.0_4.0.2-4 or g++-3.4_3.4.4-10 (or newer). Please rename the library package to a name with a "c2a" suffix, and adjust the build dependencies if dependencies on another renamed library do exist. Do *not* yet upload the package, but wait for a followup mail to this bug report. If this bug report is for some reason invalid, please close it with a short reasoning. --- Received: (at 339234-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 23:52:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 15:52:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmJpX-0008TC-9z; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:45:11 -0800 From: Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#339234: fixed in net6 1.2.2-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:45:11 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: net6 Source-Version: 1.2.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of net6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libnet6-1.2-0_1.2.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/net6/libnet6-1.2-0_1.2.2-1_i386.deb libnet6-1.2-dev_1.2.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/net6/libnet6-1.2-dev_1.2.2-1_i386.deb net6_1.2.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/net6/net6_1.2.2-1.diff.gz net6_1.2.2-1.dsc to pool/main/n/net6/net6_1.2.2-1.dsc net6_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/net6/net6_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution ma
Bug#219482: marked as done (tex4ht: Documentation source file missing)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:28:25 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219482: fixed in tex4ht 20051130-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2003 20:44:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 06 14:44:28 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pd9e7d502.dip.t-dialin.net (stigge.org) [217.231.213.2] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AHqzT-0005wE-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 14:44:27 -0600 Received: (qmail 31331 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 20:44:25 - Received: from unknown (HELO atari.antcom.de) (192.168.1.99) by 192.168.1.98 with SMTP; 6 Nov 2003 20:44:25 - Received: from ernie by atari.antcom.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AHqzR-00070N-00; Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:44:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tex4ht: Documentation source file missing X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:44:25 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: tex4ht Version: 20030426-2 Severity: normal Tags: upstream Hi, I noticed that the documentation for tex4ht is supplied just in HTML format, apparently generated from a source file called "mn.tex", which isn't even included in the documentation file tex4ht-mn.zip which is available on the project website. Maybe we need the source according to our guidelines. While this issue is possibly just wishlist, some could regard it as more "serious" according to the Policy. So feel free to reclassify it. bye, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux atari 2.4.20 #1 Fri Apr 4 11:15:24 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_IE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IE.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_IE.UTF-8) Versions of packages tex4ht depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libkpathsea3 2.0.2-5 path search library for teTeX (run ii tetex-bin2.0.2-5 The teTeX binary files -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 219482-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 23:31:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 15:31:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmJZJ-0001QE-Cs; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:28:25 -0800 From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#219482: fixed in tex4ht 20051130-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:28:25 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tex4ht Source-Version: 20051130-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tex4ht, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tex4ht-common_20051130-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht-common_20051130-1_all.deb tex4ht_20051130-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1.diff.gz tex4ht_20051130-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1.dsc tex4ht_20051130-1_alpha.deb to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1_alpha.deb tex4ht_20051130-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1_i386.deb tex4ht_20051130-1_sparc.deb to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1_sparc.deb tex4ht_20051130.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL
Bug#341401: marked as done (amule: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341401: fixed in amule 2.0.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 13:11:33 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 05:11:33 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhRkD-0007H4-CR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:11:33 -0800 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782F3067CF; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D922C80DA; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21993-09; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr (irancy.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.167]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.Fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 778B32C8120; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by irancy.lis.inpg.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:41 +0100 From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: amule: not installable in sid X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:10:41 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at lis.inpg.fr Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: amule Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, amule needs to be recompiled with a more recent libcrypto++: # apt-get install amule Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: amule: Depends: libcrypto++5.2c2 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 341401-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 23:21:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 15:21:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmJON-0008Es-HO; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:07 -0800 From: Julien Delange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $ Subject: Bug#341401: fixed in amule 2.0.3-4 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: amule Source-Version: 2.0.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of amule, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: amule-common_2.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amule/amule-common_2.0.3-4_i386.deb amule-daemon_2.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amule/amule-daemon_2.0.3-4_i386.deb amule-utils-gui_2.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amule/amule-utils-gui_2.0.3-4_i386.deb amule-utils_2.0.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/amule/amule-utils_2.0.3
Bug#340395: marked as done (amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:17:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340395: fixed in amule 2.0.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Nov 2005 08:02:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 23 00:02:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EepaT-00079V-SK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:02:42 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E871D7005; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:02:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:02:40 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jho1yZJdad60DJr+" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --jho1yZJdad60DJr+ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: amule-utils Version: 2.0.3-3 Severity: grave Hi Julien, The amule-utils package currently depends on libfreetype6, but it does not use it. This dependency is being pulled in via gdlib-config --libs, which works as designed but is *not* a correct tool for getting a list of libs to link against on a GNU system using dynamic linking. Attached is a patch which fixes the amule-utils package build to no longer link against spurious libraries. This patch fixes the binary package dependencies from this: Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.3.5-1), libfontconfig1 (>=3D 2.3.0), libfreetype6 (= >=3D 2.1.5-1), libgcc1 (>=3D 1:4.0.1), libgd2-xpm (>=3D 2.0.33), libjpeg62,= libpng12-0 (>=3D 1.2.8rel), libreadline5, libstdc++6 (>=3D 4.0.2), libwxgt= k2.6-0 (>=3D 2.6.1.2), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxpm4 | xlibs (>> 4.1= =2E0), zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.2.1), amule (>=3D 1.2.6+2.0.0rc3-1) to this: Depends: binutils, libc6 (>=3D 2.3.5-1), libgcc1 (>=3D 1:4.0.2), libgd2-xp= m (>=3D 2.0.33), libreadline5, libstdc++6 (>=3D 4.0.2-4), libwxgtk2.6-0 (>= =3D 2.6.1.2), zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.2.1), amule (>=3D 1.2.6+2.0.0rc3-1) Although libfreetype6 is currently available in unstable, due to bug #314385 it is very likely that this package will have to go through a library transition in the near future. Since amule-utils doesn't use freetype, I'm filing this bug at "grave" severity pre-emptively, to encourage you to get your package free of the transition before it starts. The patch is very straightforward, so I hope you'll be able to apply it quickly. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="amule-trim-libs.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable diff -u amule-2.0.3/debian/changelog amule-2.0.3/debian/changelog --- amule-2.0.3/debian/changelog +++ amule-2.0.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +amule (2.0.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Don't use the garbage output from gdlib-config. + + -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:18:57 -0800 + amule (2.0.3-3) unstable; urgency=3Dlow =20 * amuled is now in amule-daemon package (Closes: #329110, #325145) only in patch2: unchanged: --- amule-2.0.3.orig/configure.in +++ amule-2.0.3/configure.in @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ =20 case "$GDLIBFOUND" in 1) CAS_DEFS=3D"-D__GD__" - GDLIB_LIBS=3D"$GDLIB_LIBS -lgd" + GDLIB_LIBS=3D"-lgd" ;; *)AC_MSG_NOTICE([ WARNING: gd-lib >=3D 2.0.0, or a functional gd.h (from gd-devel) not foun= d. only in patch2: unchanged: --- amule-2.0.3.orig/configure +++ amule-2.0.3/configure @@ -1032,7 +1032
Processed: tagging 339225
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 339225 + fixed Bug#339225: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343110: Wordpress installs but has nothing usable in /etc/wordpress/
On 2005-12-13T19:48+ Kyle Gordon wrote:
> The file /etc/wordpress/wp-config.php hunts for HTTP_HOST in /etc/wordpress/,
> which in turn gets config-www.sharebear.me.uk.php (for my setup anyway). This
> file, taken from /usr/share/wordpress/wp-config-sample.php, has the following
> code at the end
> define('ABSPATH', dirname(__FILE__).'/');
> require_once(ABSPATH.'wp-settings.php');
> My PHP skills aren't the best, but it would appear that this
> searches /etc/wordpress/ for wp-settings.php, which it can't find. This could
> be due to ABSPATH being set to /etc/wordpress/ instead
> of /usr/share/wordpress/
> So, I've edited config-www.sharebear.me.uk.php to define ABSPATH
> as /usr/share/wordpress/ instead of dirname(__FILE__).'/', and it all works
> perfectly!
I think if you in the first place replaced wp-config.php with
config-www.sharebear.me.uk.php everything would have worked for you.
About wp-settings.php. It *should* be in /usr/share/wordpress/
When I release 1.6 I will test the setup again. Though I (think I) can
see where you tripped up. There is little I can do about it except write
very verbose documentation that will probably be soon outdated by
Debian's new "user friendly" Web application system.
Best wishes,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339225: patch for NMU
Package: libxml++
Followup-For: Bug #339225
I did an NMU for this transition. Plese see the attached patch for the
changes.
Gaudenz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc5-pb58
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
diff -Nru libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/changelog
libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/changelog
--- libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/changelog 2005-09-07 21:57:14.0 +0200
+++ libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/changelog 2005-12-13 11:02:05.187447000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+libxml++ (1.0.4-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+ * C++ mt allocator ABI change
+- rename library package to libxml++1.0c2a and
+ conflict/replace libxml++1.0c2
+- move libxml++1.0c2.install to libxml++1.0c2a.install
+
+ -- Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:59:52 +0100
+
libxml++ (1.0.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload
diff -Nru libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/control libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/control
--- libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/control 2005-09-07 21:57:14.0 +0200
+++ libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/control 2005-12-13 10:58:13.959447000 +0100
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Package: libxml++1.0-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Depends: libxml++1.0c2 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libxml2-dev (>=
2.5.1), libstdc++-dev, pkg-config
+Depends: libxml++1.0c2a (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libxml2-dev (>=
2.5.1), libstdc++-dev, pkg-config
Provides: libxml++-dev
Conflicts: libxml++-dev, libxml++0-dev
Replaces: llibxml++-dev, ibxml++0-dev
@@ -23,12 +23,12 @@
Install this package if you with to develop your own programs using this
library.
-Package: libxml++1.0c2
+Package: libxml++1.0c2a
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
-Replaces: libxml++1.0
-Conflicts: libxml++1.0
+Replaces: libxml++1.0, libxml++1.0c2
+Conflicts: libxml++1.0, libxml++1.0c2
Description: A C++ interface to the GNOME XML library (libxml2)
libxml++ is a C++ wrapper for the libxml2 XML parser library (otherwise
known as the GNOME2 XML library).
diff -Nru libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/libxml++1.0c2a.install
libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/libxml++1.0c2a.install
--- libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/libxml++1.0c2a.install1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/libxml++1.0c2a.install2005-09-07
21:57:14.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+debian/tmp/usr/lib/libxml++-1.0.so.*
diff -Nru libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/libxml++1.0c2.install
libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/libxml++1.0c2.install
--- libxml++-1.0.4-1.1/debian/libxml++1.0c2.install 2005-09-07
21:57:14.0 +0200
+++ libxml++-1.0.4-1.2/debian/libxml++1.0c2.install 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-debian/tmp/usr/lib/libxml++-1.0.so.*
Bug#338309: ndiswrapper-source: oops in update_wireless_stats
Just another person with same problem. Patch backported from 1.6
attached.
Adrian
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -*- GPG key available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux - the maintainable distribution -*- www.debian.org
Avoid working with children, animals and Microsoft "operating" systems
--- wrapper.c.orig 2005-12-13 23:22:19.0 +
+++ wrapper.c 2005-12-13 23:26:08.0 +
@@ -1089,6 +1089,7 @@
struct ndis_wireless_stats ndis_stats;
NDIS_STATUS res;
ndis_rssi rssi;
+ unsigned long frag;
TRACEENTER2("");
if (wd->stats_enabled == FALSE || wd->link_status == 0)
@@ -1109,12 +1110,13 @@
(u32)ndis_stats.ack_fail +
(u32)ndis_stats.frame_dup;
- if ((u32)ndis_stats.tx_frag)
+ frag = 6 * (unsigned long)ndis_stats.tx_frag;
+ if (frag)
iw_stats->qual.qual = 100 - 100 *
((u32)ndis_stats.retry +
2 * (u32)ndis_stats.multi_retry +
3 * (u32)ndis_stats.failed) /
- (6 * (u32)ndis_stats.tx_frag);
+ frag;
else
iw_stats->qual.qual = 100;
TRACEEXIT2(return);
Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems
Package: upx-ucl-beta Version: 1:1.94+0.20051022cvs-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable upx is broken on debian-amd64. For example, on "upx -d somefile" it reports upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. Aborted The very same command works fine on debian-i386. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'sarge-unsupported') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.64 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) Versions of packages upx-ucl-beta depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libucl1 1.03-2 Portable compression library - run ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime upx-ucl-beta recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to grub grub-disk grub-doc, tagging 341888
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > package grub grub-disk grub-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grub grub-doc grub-disk > tags 341888 + pending Bug#341888: fails to read stage1 file on cciss raid Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340070: yate: FTBFS: compile error: invalid conversion
tags 340070 + patch thanks pri_set_error and pri_set_message in libpri.h from libpri-dev have changed since this version of yate was released. Updating yate to a newer upstream would likely fix the FTBFS error. Barring that, the attached dpatch gets the yate package compiling again in its current form. I assume the changes will make no difference in the functioning on yate, but I don't use the software and have not tested it. John zapchan.dpatch Description: application/shellscript
Bug#343170: marked as done (kernel-package: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debconf)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343170: fixed in kernel-package 10.018 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 12:28:24 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 04:28:24 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr ([129.20.36.164]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Em9GZ-Ye-W9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:28:24 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37014.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.14]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1B8B8B0 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:27:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Em9G3-0003eW-Bm for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:27:51 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kernel-package: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debconf Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:27:51 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kernel-package Severity: serious Version: 10.017 >From my build log (using pbuilder with a chroot hand-pruned of all non-build-essential packages): == making (creating) check/kernel-package == /usr/bin/make build make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-package-10.017' perl -wc make-kpkg make-kpkg syntax OK perl -wc kernel/pkg/image/preinst Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at kernel/pkg/image/preinst line 20. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at kernel/pkg/image/preinst line 20. make[1]: [check] Error 2 (ignored) ... perl -wc kernel/pkg/image/postrm Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at kernel/pkg/image/postrm line 22. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at kernel/pkg/image/postrm line 22. make[1]: *** [check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-package-10.017' make: *** [check/kernel-package] Error 2 If I add a Build-Depends(-Indep?) on debconf, the build succeeds. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 343170-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 22:12:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 14:12:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmIEb-0007xO-JB; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0800 From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#343170: fixed in kernel-package 10.018 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kernel-package Source-Version: 10.018 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kernel-package, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-package_10.018.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.018.dsc kernel-package_10.018.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.018.tar.gz kernel-package_10.018_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-package/kernel-package_10.018_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previo
Bug#342879: marked as done (make: new version breaks cdbs)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:05 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342879: fixed in make 3.80+3.81.b3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 14:36:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 06:36:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElSIy-00086V-DH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:36:00 -0800
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1ElSIw-0007Eo-Th; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:35:58 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1ElSIw-Ae-OE; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:35:58 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: make: new version breaks cdbs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:35:58 +0100
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: make
Version: 3.80+3.81.b3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: render hundred of packages unbuildable
Hi,
Since version 3.80+3.81.b3-1 of make, all packages using cdbs fail to
build: example of digikam:
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML
rmdir /build/buildd/digikam-0.8.0-1/debian/digikam/usr/share/doc/kde
make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `binary/digikam'. Stop.
**
I don't know if the bug is in make or cdbs, but as it was triggered by a
new version of make, I reported it here. Please feel free to reassign it.
Bye,
Aurelien
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)
cdbs depends on no packages.
Versions of packages cdbs recommends:
ii autotools-dev 20050803.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii debhelper 5.0.10 helper programs for debian/rules
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 342879-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 22:11:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 14:11:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmIEj-0007zp-Gs; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:05 -0800
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#342879: fixed in make 3.80+3.81.b3.1-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:05 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: make
Source-Version: 3.80+3.81.b3.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
make, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
make-doc_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/m/make/make-doc_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1_all.deb
make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/make/make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1.diff.gz
make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/m/make/make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1.dsc
make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/make/make_3.80+3.81.b3.1-1_i386.deb
make_3.80+3.81.b3.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/make/make_3.80+3.81.b3.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for
Bug#339532: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: reproducible segfault in bn_sub_words () at bn_asm.sparc.v8plus.S)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#335912: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 23:04:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 15:04:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asteria.debian.or.at ([86.59.21.34] ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcWKh-0005aN-Eh
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:04:51 -0800
Received: from galaxy.palfrader.org (argos.campus-sbg.at [62.99.152.178])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "galaxy.palfrader.org", Issuer "Peter Palfrader" (verified
OK))
by asteria.debian.or.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505B770CD1D;
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:04:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: by galaxy.palfrader.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 86839400234; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:04:48 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libssl0.9.8: reproducible segfault in bn_sub_words () at
bn_asm.sparc.v8plus.S
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 00:04:48 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libssl0.9.8
Version: 0.9.8a-4
Severity: normal
Hey,
on sparc64 the following snippet causes a segfault after a few
iterations (usually around i = 30).
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int v, char **c)
{
int which=-1, i;
DH *dh;
if (v!=2 || ((which=atoi(c[1]))<1 || which > 2)) {
printf("I want 1 or 2 as an argument.\n");
return 1;
}
printf("Running test %d\n",which);
for (i=0; i < 1; ++i) {
if (!(i%1000)) { printf("...%d\n",i); }
dh = DH_new();
dh->g = BN_new();
dh->p = get_rfc2409_prime_1024(NULL);
BN_set_word(dh->g, 2);
if (which == 2) {
dh->length = 320;
}
DH_generate_key(dh);
DH_free(dh);
}
return 0;
}
| maurice:/tmp/nick# ./a.out 1
| Running test 1
| ...0
| Segmentation fault
| maurice:/tmp/nick# ./a.out 2
| Running test 2
| ...0
| Segmentation fault
(gdb) bt
#0 bn_sub_words () at bn_asm.sparc.v8plus.S:555
#1 0x70228c20 in bn_sub_part_words (r=0x22b18, a=0x22930, b=0x22950, cl=7,
dl=1) at bn_mul.c:87
#2 0x7022981c in bn_mul_recursive (r=0x22c80, a=0x22828, b=0x22930, n2=16,
dna=0, dnb=-1, t=0x22af8) at bn_mul.c:437
#3 0x7022964c in bn_mul_recursive (r=0x22c00, a=0x227e8, b=0x228f0, n2=32,
dna=0, dnb=-1, t=0x229f8) at bn_mul.c:499
#4 0x7022a50c in BN_mul (r=0x21074, a=0x21038, b=0x2104c, ctx=0x20f50) at
bn_mul.c:1037
#5 0x70230a30 in BN_mod_mul_montgomery (r=0x21038, a=0x21038, b=0x2104c,
mont=0x20d38, ctx=0x20f50) at bn_mont.c:89
#6 0x70226cf8 in BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime (rr=0x20f38, a=Variable "a" is not
available.) at bn_exp.c:705
#7 0x7024a4c4 in generate_key (dh=0x21270) at dh_key.c:158
#8 0x7024a28c in DH_generate_key (dh=Variable "dh" is not available.) at
dh_key.c:76
#9 0x000108f4 in main (v=2, c=0xe974) at x.c:24
When rebuilding openssl with the no-asm switch all is fine.
--
Peter
---
Received: (at 335912-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 22:12:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 14:12:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EmIEy-00083R-G5; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:20 -0800
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#335912: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:20 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: openssl
Source-Version: 0.9.8a-5
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
o
Bug#335912: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: openssl upgrade causes segfault on openssh client on sparc64)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:03:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335912: fixed in openssl 0.9.8a-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2005 17:31:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 26 10:31:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (gk2green.dor.state.ma.us) [65.202.25.102] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EUp7g-0001sq-00; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:31:36 -0700 Received: from gatesgsdmz.dor.state.ma.us by gk2green.dor.state.ma.us via smtpd (for spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43]) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:36 -0400 Received: from dorscan2.dor.state.ma.us by gatesgsdmz.dor.state.ma.us via smtpd (for spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43]) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:36 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: curly.dor.state.ma.us: ron set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ron Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libssl0.9.8: openssl upgrade causes segfault on openssh client on sparc64 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:31:03 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libssl0.9.8 Version: 0.9.8a-2 Severity: normal After the libssl upgrade to 0.9.8a-2 yesterday, the ssh client segfaults. Confusingly, it doesn't do it all the time, just most of the time. Usually, I can get it to work by repeating the command until it works. Here's a gdb session, with backtrace: > $ gdb /usr/bin/ssh > GNU gdb 6.3-debian > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and > you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for > details. > This GDB was configured as "sparc-linux"...(no debugging symbols > found) > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". > > (gdb) set args [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (gdb) r > Starting program: /usr/bin/ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > (no debugging symbols found) > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- > 0x700ef194 in bn_sub_words () from /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x700ef194 in bn_sub_words () from /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #1 0x700e8958 in bn_sub_part_words () from > /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #2 0x700e94d4 in bn_mul_recursive () from > /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #3 0x700e9384 in bn_mul_recursive () from > /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #4 0x700ea244 in BN_mul () from /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #5 0x700f0770 in BN_mod_mul_montgomery () from > /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #6 0x700e6a30 in BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime () >from /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #7 0x7010a204 in DH_OpenSSL () from /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #8 0x70109fcc in DH_generate_key () from > /usr/lib/v9/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 > #9 0x00039b4c in error () > #10 0x00037078 in error () > #11 0x00034314 in error () > #12 0x00033ab4 in error () > #13 0x0001ee6c in ?? () > #14 0x0001ee6c in ?? () > Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) > (gdb) q > The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y I tried recompiling openssh, but got the same result. .Ron -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500,
Bug#342879: GNU make 3.81beta4 released today
Hi all. GNU make 3.18beta4 was released this morning. If this bug was fixed in CVS, it's fixed in this update. Manoj should have no problems packaging this. This should fix any other bugs in the 3.81beta3 beta relating to the "second expansion" feature as well: as of this beta that feature is optional and disabled by default. -- --- Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Find some GNU make tips at: http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize, additional information
Thanks to the clear Erik's step by step guide, i've applayed his patch and here is my results. Erik van Konijnenburg wrote: On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:52:34AM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote: Step by step: [...] ** Comment out any work-arounds (MODULE ide-generic) you may have made in /etc/yaird/Default.cfg This is an important bit: you would not want to report success with the patch if actually your edit in Default.cfg is what makes the system boot. Never touched /etc/yaird/Default.cfg. ** reboot into new kernel; report success; undo if you don't like the effect. Your patch seems to have resolved the problem: now i'm writing with the smp kernel (i like your trick of using smp kernel for testing purposes) and dmesg report no errors regarding disk/filesystem. Since i have read other posts regarding problem with DMA (that seems caused by some hand-made configuration), i have also tested that in my system it is regularly enabled: # hdparm -d /dev/hda /dev/hda: using_dma= 1 (on) # Thank you very much Erik. Cesare. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343239: ftbfs [sparc] dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory
Package: ogre Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ogre failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. This is a different error than the other open ftbfs bugs open on ogre, which may have been fixed without being closed. install debian/README.Debian.libogre-dev \ debian/libogre-dev/usr/share/doc/libogre-dev/README.Debian install debian/extras/compileall.sh \ debian/libogre-dev/usr/share/doc/libogre-dev/compileall.sh dh_installman -a dh_link -a dh_strip -a --dbg-package=libogre5c2a dh_compress -plibogre5c2a -plibogre-dev -plibogre5-dbg -pogre-tools dh_compress: Can't cd to debian/libogre5-dbg: No such file or directory make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#341484: jpilot: "File->Restore Handheld" can cause silent data loss
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 341484 normal Bug#341484: jpilot: "File->Restore Handheld" can cause silent data loss Severity set to `normal'. > thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341484: jpilot: "File->Restore Handheld" can cause silent data loss
severity 341484 normal thanks, This bug is not critical so downgrade its level. -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le camembert, L.R. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338715: nvidia-glx is not in Debian
Hi! What's all this fuss about a package that's not even part of Debian? What would happen if instead of nvidia-glx the conflict was with, say, Marillat's mplayer? :) I need -11 for one of my etch systems and it was quite disappointting that it wasn't available because of this. Friendly, -- Robert Millan "it's about trust... i don't trust them. that's all i need to know." (wrt Digital Restriction Management, seen in Slashdot) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize (SOLVED)
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote on Dec, 13: [...] > > > > > > http://arch.debian.org/arch/yaird/[EMAIL > > > > > > PROTECTED]/yaird/yaird--devo/yaird--devo--0.1/patch-131/ > > > > > > Could you give it a try and let me know if it actually works? > > > Bingo ! Flawless boot: all IDE devices recognized. > > > > In haste, I didn't notice: DMA is turned off for all IDE devices. [...] > That's odd. The patch is designed to load piix before ide-generic, > so that you get working DMA. > Perhaps in your test you did not remove 'MODULE ide-generic' from your > /etc/yaird/Default.cfg, so that it gets loaded too early? My sincerest apologies: DMA is indeed enabled. I just don't know what I did wrong in my previous attempt. I recreated now the initrd image with the default config file and the IDE devices are recognized and DMA is enabled for all of them. [...] Thanks again for the speedy patch ! Paulo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342558: marked as done (rtorrent: libsigc++-2.0-0c2 can not be installed (rebuild -> libsigc++-2.0-0c2a))
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:01:59 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line rtorrent: libsigc++-2.0-0c2 can not be installed (rebuild -> libsigc++-2.0-0c2a) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2005 15:39:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 08 07:39:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from proxy.vc-graz.ac.at ([193.171.121.30]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkNrK-00044J-2l for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:39:02 -0800 Received: from grml.vc-graz.ac.at (mika.vc-graz.ac.at [193.171.126.55]) (authenticated bits=0) by proxy.vc-graz.ac.at (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB8FcvZr009588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:38:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by grml.vc-graz.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D0E4270380; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:38:57 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Prokop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: rtorrent: libsigc++-2.0-0c2 can not be installed (rebuild -> libsigc++-2.0-0c2a) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:38:57 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authenticated-Sender: user 10962493 from 193.171.126.55 X-Scanned-By: milter-sender/1.5.882 (proxy.vc-graz.ac.at [193.171.121.30]); Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:38:58 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on proxy.vc-graz.ac.at X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: rtorrent Severity: normal Please rebuild against libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (for the sigc++ transition). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # apt-get install aptitude # to upgrade apt* [...] The following packages will be REMOVED: libsigc++-2.0-0c2 libtorrent5 rtorrent The following NEW packages will be installed: libsigc++-2.0-0c2a The following packages will be upgraded: apt apt-utils aptitude aptsh debtags libapt-pkg-perl python2.3-apt [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # apt-get --reinstall install libsigc++-2.0-0c2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reinstallation of libsigc++-2.0-0c2 is not possible, it cannot be downloaded. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # apt-cache policy libsigc++-2.0-0c2 libsigc++-2.0-0c2: Installed: 2.0.16-1 Candidate: 2.0.16-1 Version table: *** 2.0.16-1 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # regards, -mika- --- Received: (at 342558-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 20:02:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 12:02:34 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmGM5-0006OY-R1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:02:34 -0800 Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:02:02 + Received: from rabbit.zoo.mayhq.org ([80.0.127.38]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:02:02 + Received: (qmail 4267 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Dec 2005 20:02:00 - Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:01:59 + From: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Michael Prokop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: rtorrent: libsigc++-2.0-0c2 can not be installed (rebuild -> libsigc++-2.0-0c2a) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 requ
Bug#343110: Wordpress installs but has nothing usable in /etc/wordpress/
On Tuesday 13 December 2005 00:32, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 2005-12-12T20:50+ Kyle Gordon wrote:
> > After visiting /blog/ on the website, I get repeated 404 errors for
>
> This is where you probably went wrong. The current system only takes
> HTTP_HOST into account.
>
> So yourdomain.com would work (with the multiple blog setup).
>
> Though, yourdomain.com/blog wouldn't.
>
> You could make /blog work with a symlink, though the default
> wp-config.php would have to be replaced. And a multiple blog setup would
> become very difficult.
>
> Consider a subdomain on your domain? blog.yourdomain.com. That would
> work.
>
> I don't consider this a bug, so I'll be closing it shortly.
Hi Kai,
Thanks for the info, and I've now set it up with
VirtualDocumentRoot /usr/share/wordpress/. It's a brand new domain, so I can
break it as much as I like just now :-)
However, it is still failing when looking for /etc/wordpress/wp-settings.php
and /etc/wordpress/wp-includes/
The file /etc/wordpress/wp-config.php hunts for HTTP_HOST in /etc/wordpress/,
which in turn gets config-www.sharebear.me.uk.php (for my setup anyway). This
file, taken from /usr/share/wordpress/wp-config-sample.php, has the following
code at the end
define('ABSPATH', dirname(__FILE__).'/');
require_once(ABSPATH.'wp-settings.php');
My PHP skills aren't the best, but it would appear that this
searches /etc/wordpress/ for wp-settings.php, which it can't find. This could
be due to ABSPATH being set to /etc/wordpress/ instead
of /usr/share/wordpress/
So, I've edited config-www.sharebear.me.uk.php to define ABSPATH
as /usr/share/wordpress/ instead of dirname(__FILE__).'/', and it all works
perfectly!
I'd still consider this to be a bug, but it may come down to a setting I had
wrong somewhere.
Many thanks,
Kyle
--
Kyle Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lodge.glasgownet.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: same proble, kernel fails to load ide drive.. in my case the drive is under /sys/block/hdb/dev
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:44:34PM -0500, Scott James Williamson wrote: > FYI: > > if you use a nvidia nforce 2 based motherboard, to get DMA on your > drives, add the following "MODULE amd74xx" after evdev and before > ide-generic to the /etc/yaird/Default.cfg file: > >MODULE evdev > >MODULE amd74xx > >MODULE ide-generic >MODULE ide-disk Thanks, this is new information. There have been piix users that report non-boot and no DMA with the latest yaird version, but you are the first to report this for an amd74xx motherboard. Just to avoid misunderstandings: did you add the ide-generic to repair a non-booting system, or just by way of prevention? If the amd74xx also fails to boot without ide-generic, I'll need to prepare a modified yaird patch. Regards, Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: change tags and severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 342943 + pending Bug#342943: kronolith: Several Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilities Tags were: security Tags added: pending > tags 342944 + pending Bug#342944: mnemo2: Several XSS vulnerabilities Tags were: security Tags added: pending > tags 342945 + pending Bug#342945: nag2: Several XSS vulnerabilities Tags were: security Tags added: pending > tags 336798 + wontfix upstream Bug#336798: kronolith2: includes a fr_FR.po translation instead of fr.po Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix, upstream > tags 336820 + wontfix upstream Bug#336820: kronolith2: includes a sv_SE.po translation instead of sv.po Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix, upstream > tags 336800 + wontfix upstream Bug#336800: mnemo2: includes a fr_FR.po translation instead of fr.po Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix, upstream > tags 336821 + wontfix upstream Bug#336821: mnemo2: includes a sv_SE.po translation instead of sv.po Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix, upstream > tags 336819 + wontfix upstream Bug#336819: ingo1: includes a sv_SE.po translation instead of sv.po Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix, upstream > tags 256519 + help Bug#256519: xbannerconfig doesn't work There were no tags set. Tags added: help > tags 143578 + help Bug#143578: banner lost after changing to virtual console and back Tags were: confirmed Bug#200263: xbanner: No banner after KDE logout Tags added: help > tags 334235 + help Bug#334235: visualboyadvance: FTBFS: g++ needs lots of RAM. There were no tags set. Bug#334727: visualboyadvance - fails to build Tags added: help > severity 260031 + wishlist Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 311019 + wishlist Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 342481 + normal Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 303469 + minor Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize (patch results, amended)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:48:41PM -0200, Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote: > Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote on Dec, 13: > > > > > http://arch.debian.org/arch/yaird/[EMAIL > > > > > PROTECTED]/yaird/yaird--devo/yaird--devo--0.1/patch-131/ > > > > > Could you give it a try and let me know if it actually works? > > Bingo ! Flawless boot: all IDE devices recognized. > > In haste, I didn't notice: DMA is turned off for all IDE devices. > > I followed the workaround suggested in another thread: explicitly include > pixx > in Default.cfg. That's odd. The patch is designed to load piix before ide-generic, so that you get working DMA. Perhaps in your test you did not remove 'MODULE ide-generic' from your /etc/yaird/Default.cfg, so that it gets loaded too early? If that's not the case, could you post your config files plus the output of yaird -d, so that I can debug further? Thanks, Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize, fails to boot
I had the same problem, I try this patch and it works http://arch.debian.org/arch/yaird/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/yaird/yaird--devo/yaird--devo--0.1/patch-131/ > **Use the patched version to make a new initrd.img. > A quick way to do this is $ sudo apt-get install > linux-image-2.6.14-2-686-smp > but only if you don't actually have an SMP system. This should > leave your normal single-cpu kernel in place and install an smp > kernel, with new initrd.img, next to it. apt-get install --reinstall linux-image-2.6.14-2-686-smp Regards Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#316546: marked as done (tetex-bin: Please use libpoppler instead of a copy of xpdf code)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > notfound 342292 3.0-12 Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy Bug marked as not found in version 3.0-12. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7: same proble, kernel fails to load ide drive.. in my case the drive is under /sys/block/hdb/dev
FYI: if you use a nvidia nforce 2 based motherboard, to get DMA on your drives, add the following "MODULE amd74xx" after evdev and before ide-generic to the /etc/yaird/Default.cfg file: MODULE evdev MODULE amd74xx MODULE ide-generic MODULE ide-disk then run the command "dpkg-reconfig linux-image-2.6.14-2-k7" -- Scott James Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341856: marked as done (sbcl: FTBFS: fatal error encountered in SBCL)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:02:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341856: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.7.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2005 16:49:35 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 03 08:49:35 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.72]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EiaZr-0005gU-53 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 08:49:35 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 014203832B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by hoboe1bl1.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DD938309 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:49:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 47CC026136; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:49:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:49:33 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sbcl: FTBFS: fatal error encountered in SBCL Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sbcl Version: 1:0.9.7.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: //entering make-host-1.sh //building cross-compiler, and doing first genesis fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 29839: can't find core file make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 341856-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 18:11:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 10:11:12 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EmETl-0002vQ-6x; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:02:21 -0800 From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#341856: fixed in sbcl 1:0.9.7.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:02:21 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sbcl Source-Version: 1:0.9.7.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sbcl-common_0.9.7.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl-common_0.9.7.1-2_all.deb sbcl_0.9.7.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.7.1-2.diff.gz sbcl_0.9.7.1-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.7.1-2.dsc sbcl_0.9.7.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sbcl/sbcl_0.9.7.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated sbcl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:58:44 +0100 Source: sbcl Binary: sbcl sbcl-common Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:0.9.7.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: sbcl - A development environment for Common Lisp sbcl-common - Architecture independent files for SBCL Closes: 341856 Changes: sbcl (1:0.9.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Added gcc-3.4 dependency for alpha and mips * Use correct 'use this corefile' s
Bug#343218: Headers are useless because missing file /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu
Package: linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp Version: 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 Severity: grave Tags: experimental module-assistant fails to build all modules i need (nvidia-kernel, openafs and madwifi) with an error like the following: make CC=gcc-4.0 -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv modules make[3]: Entering directory /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp' /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile:38: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu: No such file or directory make[3]: *** No rule to make target /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp' The file /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu is a borken link: $ readlink /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu ../../../linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu $ readlink -f /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu This issue make my system totally unusable with this kernel (no X, no network) Best Regards -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686-smp Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp depends on: ii linux- 2.6.14+2.6.15-rc5-0experimental.1 Common header files for Linux kern linux-headers-2.6.15-rc5-686-smp recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#341827: tetex-bin chokes on install while running fmtutil-sys
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # meanwhile, lowering the severity > severity 341827 normal Bug#341827: tetex-bin chokes on install while running fmtutil-sys Severity set to `normal'. > severity 341922 normal Bug#341922: tetex-bin: Source Package Fails to Compile Severity set to `normal'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 342796 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > severity 342796 normal Bug#342796: gnome-terminal: login screen not functional: no texts displayed, no entry possible Severity set to `normal'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341827: tetex-bin chokes on install while running fmtutil-sys
# meanwhile, lowering the severity severity 341827 normal severity 341922 normal stop Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We really need this information if we want to find the reason. If you > don't submit it within a couple of days, I'll assume that the problem > was a local misconfiguration and has meanwhile been solved, and close > the bug. > > What about the other bug you submitted, the build failure? -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am I correct that the other issues that Florian found are not addressed >> by any patch yet, and have not yet been widely published? Should I >> delay an upload to sid until this can be fixed, too? > > Which issues? *phear* Florian said that the new function gmallocn (used in xpdf >= 3.01 and derivatives, but not in tetex-bin) isn't save, either. I'm currently preparing an upload of tetex-bin linked against libpoppler. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#342879: New patch
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I tested the patch posted by Loic.
> Unfortunately it doesn't fix the cdbs build failures. I still get error
> messages like this:
Indeed, I only prepared the patch, but couldn't actually test it as I
explained, and now that I'm able to try it out, I confirm it doesn't
fix the regression.
However, I've built make from CVS[1], and it is truly fixed in CVS.
Hence, I've searched for the exact version fixing the issue myself, but
that wasn't obvious as the CVS fix is more than 125 days old, I wonder
where the current snapshot comes from.
The attached updated patch fixes make here.
[1] to build make from CVS:
% cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/make co make
% cd make
% AUTOMAKE=automake-1.9 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.9 autoreconf -s -i
% ./configure
% make update
% make
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- make-3.80+3.81.b3/debian/changelog
+++ make-3.80+3.81.b3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+make (3.80+3.81.b3-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * read.c (record_files): Move code that sets stem for static pattern rules
+out of the if (!two_colon) condition so it is also executed for two-colon
+rules. (from upstream CVS, upstream bug Savannah #13881)
+(Closes: #342879)
+ * tests/scripts/features/statipattrules: Add a test for #13881. (from
+upstream CVS, upstream bug Savannah #13881)
+
+ -- Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:56:09 +0100
+
make (3.80+3.81.b3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream pre-release.
--- make-3.80+3.81.b3.orig/read.c
+++ make-3.80+3.81.b3/read.c
@@ -2109,18 +2109,6 @@
if (cmds != 0)
f->updating = 1;
}
-
- /* If this is a static pattern rule, set the file's stem to
-the part of its name that matched the `%' in the pattern,
-so you can use $* in the commands. */
- if (pattern != 0)
- {
- static char *percent = "%";
- char *buffer = variable_expand ("");
- char *o = patsubst_expand (buffer, name, pattern, percent,
-pattern_percent+1, percent+1);
- f->stem = savestring (buffer, o - buffer);
- }
}
else
{
@@ -2146,6 +2134,18 @@
f->cmds = cmds;
}
+ /* If this is a static pattern rule, set the file's stem to
+ the part of its name that matched the `%' in the pattern,
+ so you can use $* in the commands. */
+ if (pattern != 0)
+{
+ static char *percent = "%";
+ char *buffer = variable_expand ("");
+ char *o = patsubst_expand (buffer, name, pattern, percent,
+ pattern_percent+1, percent+1);
+ f->stem = savestring (buffer, o - buffer);
+}
+
/* Free name if not needed further. */
if (f != 0 && name != f->name
&& (name < f->name || name > f->name + strlen (f->name)))
--- make-3.80+3.81.b3.orig/tests/scripts/features/statipattrules
+++ make-3.80+3.81.b3/tests/scripts/features/statipattrules
@@ -73,4 +73,15 @@
'foo.x
');
+
+# TEST #6 -- bug #13881: double colon static pattern rule does not
+#substitute %.
+#
+run_make_test('
+foo.bar:: %.bar: %.baz
+foo.baz: ;@:
+',
+'',
+'');
+
1;
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: same proble, kernel fails to load ide drive.. in my case the drive is under /sys/block/hdb/dev
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 Version: 2.6.14-5 Followup-For: Bug #343048 same problem reported in the first report for this bug.. i only submit my data hoping this may be useful for the manteiner... many thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux-initramfs-tool] 0.0.12-1 Yet Another mkInitRD Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 recommends: pn libc6-i686 (no description available) -- debconf information: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/initrd-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-install-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.14-2-686: false linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.14-2-686: true linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.14-2-686: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.14-2-686: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools
Stephen Gran wrote: >This one time, at band camp, Sumit Madan said: > > >>Hello, >> >>i cannot activate DMA. Its a bit slow here. >> >> > >ide-generic was loaded before piix, making your ide bus a bit sluggish. >Put piix above ide-generic in the modules file, rebuild your initrd, and >reboot. > >Hope that helps, > > Thanks.. Now i have DMA too. I have another question. When a new kernel-image comes out, should i have to edit the /etc/mkinitramfs/modules and remove all modules from the file. I can imagine that there will be no problems when the file has module entries. But whats the best way? Regards, Sumit signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#343192: cupsys: infrastructure for dvi autodetection and printing missing.
Package: cupsys Version: 1.1.23-12 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: dvis can't be printed automagically like that. with some magic cups can be convinced to directly print dvi files. i achieved this with: * adding to mime.convs: application/x-dvi application/postscript 33 dvips * adding to mime.types application/x-dvi dvi contains(0,2048,"TeX output") creating a tiny shellscript in /usr/lib/cups/filters/dvips #!/bin/bash # See if we have a filename on the command-line... if test -z "$6"; then TMPFILE=`mktemp` cat >$TMPFILE ifile="$TMPFILE" else ifile="$6" fi # try to figure out the dpi's... DPI=`cat $PPD |grep -i "resolution " |tail -n 1|sed -e "s;\*Resolution.*dpi/;;" -e "s; DPI.*;;"` ARGS="-D $DPI " if test "$DPI" -gt "400"; then ARGS="$ARGS -Z " fi echo INFO: Starting dvips. 1>&2 echo DEBUG: Running /usr/bin/dvips $ARGS -f \< "$ifile" 1>&2 exec /usr/bin/dvips $ARGS -f <"$ifile" rm -f $TMPFILE -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages cupsys depends on: ii adduser 3.80Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy ii gs-esp 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript interpr ii libc62.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcupsimage21.1.23-12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libcupsys2 1.1.23-12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libgnutls12 1.2.9-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpaper11.1.14-3Library for handling paper charact ii libslp1 1.2.1-3 OpenSLP libraries ii patch2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original ii perl-modules 5.8.7-9 Core Perl modules ii procps 1:3.2.6-2 /proc file system utilities ii xpdf-utils 3.01-3 Portable Document Format (PDF) sui ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime Versions of packages cupsys recommends: ii cupsys-client 1.1.23-12Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii foomatic-filters3.0.2-20050720-1 linuxprinting.org printer support ii smbclient 3.0.20b-3a LanManager-like simple client fo -- debconf information: cupsys/raw-print: true cupsys/backend: ipp, lpd, parallel, socket, usb dvips Description: application/shellscript
Bug#339211: RFA: libmusicbrainz-2.1: Second generation incarnation of the CD Index -- optional
Florian Ernst wrote: Hello Joe, On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:59:30PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 20:25:15 +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: With respect to this new situation I'd prefer to omit the python bindings completely, despite the pending removal of the bindings as shipped with libmusicbrainz-2.0. Any thoughts? Couldn't you email upstream and ask for clarification, rather than just removing them? The Python bindings are very useful, and even recently attracted attention on Planet Debian. Thanks for your input and the valuable pointer. Indeed, I tried to contact upstream about this, but so far only received response that omitting the python bindings from the release tarball wasn't intentional. However, the copyright / licensing issue still needs to be resolved... Well, it seems that my usual understanding of RFA as "the maintainer still wants to get involved" doesn't hold true in this case, so I'll now start not to wait for input from Andreas anymore. Please expect an update soonish... I've unfortunatly been quite busy lately, hence the lack of reponsiveness, but consider libmusicbrainz yours. Cheers, Rotty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340148: marked as done (kronolith2: no installation package available for Sarge)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:57:27 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kronolith2: no installation package available for Sarge has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2005 10:02:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 21 02:02:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [217.72.102.25] (helo=dearchitettura-1.house.uni.it) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ee8VP-0008PE-Jd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:02:36 -0800 Received: from dearchitettura-1.house.uni.it (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dearchitettura-1.house.uni.it (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jALA2WDZ025574 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:02:32 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by dearchitettura-1.house.uni.it (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jALA2WdI025573; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:02:32 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: kronolith2: no installation package available for Sarge X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:02:32 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.84/1180/Sun Nov 20 11:20:28 2005 on dearchitettura-1.house.uni.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kronolith2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable kronolith2 is recomended, but no installable package is present in sarge. myhost:~/HORDE# apt-get install kronolith2 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Package kronolith2 is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package kronolith2 has no installation candidate The available package "kronolith" depends instead on "horde2", that is not what one wants.. horde3 is the wish -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-sekko-monster-plane-1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 340148-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 14:57:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 06:57:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.203]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EmBaq-0003BH-KE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:57:28 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so1273710wxd for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:57:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lEGa3YEmP2aOfjqNPxQyBzvcnBbWgBwYoyHgG0dm05AgS4S9mLr4HrNNLFu+GJzcsDUBEHPw0vO12K5w5UDCZBW92TzmNdgqWtPOcb7gr/fNcu4c8lCmzi2DLcFS3et0WzuHoNt3x9xpcSOA8c5Xbgb2xWnLT5t4agThup4JIuY= Received: by 10.70.34.14 with SMTP id h14mr1665235wxh; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:57:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.30.7 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:57:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:57:27 -0200 From: Jose Carlos Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kronolith2: no installation package available for Sarge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 kronolith2 will be available in Etch release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize (patch results, amended)
Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote on Dec, 13: [...] > > > > http://arch.debian.org/arch/yaird/[EMAIL > > > > PROTECTED]/yaird/yaird--devo/yaird--devo--0.1/patch-131/ > > > > Could you give it a try and let me know if it actually works? [...] > Bingo ! Flawless boot: all IDE devices recognized. In haste, I didn't notice: DMA is turned off for all IDE devices. I followed the workaround suggested in another thread: explicitly include pixx in Default.cfg. Paulo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails
Hi. From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#339541: xemacs21-mule: installation fails Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:42:25 + > > Is there any further information? Or, already fixed? I can't > > reproduce this bug. > > Sorry, I've been busy. Don't worry. > > > 1. Are there any files in /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/gnus? Do > > > you have *.elc files there? > > Yes, 152 elc files. I have no idea where they came from, > though. Should they not be there? Yes. Byte-compiling gnus was done well in your system. But emacs-install script was failed. I don't know why. Please send me the output of the following commands; # /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/gnus xemacs21 # sh -x /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/gnus xemacs21 (The second is a bit long.) > > > 3. How about reinstalling gnus package? > > > > > > # apt-get --reinstall install gnus > > I did this, too, and the xemacs21 install still complains. Would you > like the output again? Yes. Send me again. Thanks. OHURA Makoto: [EMAIL PROTECTED](Debian Project) [EMAIL PROTECTED](LILO/Netfort) GnuPG public key: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/gpg.asc.txt fingerprint: 54F6 D1B1 2EE1 81CD 65E3 A1D3 EEA2 EFA2 77DC E083 http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/ pgpV65fTn4bS2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#343186: nvidia-kernel-source 8174 Fails to load proper with 2.6.1[234]
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.8174-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Upon loading the X Window System (xserver-xorg, specifically), the system becomes unusable and log files are unable to be read/determined. Either X, startx or gdm provides this failure. The problem exists as well with kernels 2.6.12, 2.6.13 and 2.6.14. This bug reoccurs everytime. The system is rendered inoperable at the userland level. System responds to network ping but ssh does not work. Sysrq requests can prevent filesystem damage: SUIESUB. Disabling PAT results in the same problem. The system this occurs on is a Toshiba 5105-S501 Pentium4-based laptop with the following characteristics: output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 04) :00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02) :00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 02) :00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 02) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge (rev 42) :00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801CAM ISA Bridge (LPC) (rev 02) :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 02) :00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) :00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corporation 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 02) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 440 Go] (rev a3) :02:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB43AB22/A IEEE-1394a-2000 Controller (PHY/Link) :02:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller (rev 42) :02:0b.0 CardBus bridge: Toshiba America Info Systems ToPIC100 PCI to Cardbus Bridge with ZV Support (rev 32) :02:0b.1 CardBus bridge: Toshiba America Info Systems ToPIC100 PCI to Cardbus Bridge with ZV Support (rev 32) :02:0c.0 System peripheral: Toshiba America Info Systems TC6371AF SmartMedia Controller (rev 03) :02:0d.0 System peripheral: Toshiba America Info Systems SD TypA Controller (rev 03) output of cat /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.70GHz stepping: 4 cpu MHz : 1694.793 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm bogomips: 3350.52 output of nvidia kernel driver loading: nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKG] -> GSI 5 (level, low) -> IRQ 5 NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 NVIDIA Kernel Module 1.0-8174 Tue Nov 22 17:48:37 PST 2005 NVRM: PAT index 1 already configured for Write-Combining! NVRM: Aborting, due to PAT already being configured -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-toshi.p4 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source depends on: ii debhelper 5.0.10 helper programs for debian/rules ii dpatch2.0.15 patch maintenance system for Debia ii make 3.80+3.81.b3-1 The GNU version of the "make" util ii sed 4.1.4-5The GNU sed stream editor Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source recommends: ii devscripts2.9.10 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii kernel-package10.017 A utility for building Linux kerne ii nvidia-glx1.0.8174-1 NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343182: lilypond-data: libkpathsea-perl is missing from Depends
Package: lilypond-data Version: 2.6.3-9 Severity: serious The maintainer scripts call /usr/bin/kpsewhich which is included in libkpathsea-perl, but libkpathsea-perl iteself is not listed in the Depends (or better Pre-Depends). Cheers, Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: ide fails to initialize (patch results)
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote on Dec, 13: [...] > > > http://arch.debian.org/arch/yaird/[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]/yaird/yaird--devo/yaird--devo--0.1/patch-131/ > > > Could you give it a try and let me know if it actually works? [...] > **Decide if you want to go ahead with this test. > Only try this if you know how to recover from a non-booting kernel > (& if I'm correct you've just done that) It's mine and everybody else's interest to have this solved. > **Save the attached patch. Had already downloaded it from the URL you gave. > **Make backup: > $ cp /usr/lib/yaird/perl/Hardware.pm just-in-case.pm > **Apply patch: > $ sudo patch /usr/lib/yaird/perl/Hardware.pm < > /dat/tmp/Hardware.pm.patch > patching file /usr/lib/yaird/perl/Hardware.pm > Hunk #1 succeeded at 216 (offset -18 lines). > $ > > (the offset is a normal warning in this case) > **Comment out any work-arounds (MODULE ide-generic) you may have made > in /etc/yaird/Default.cfg > This is an important bit: you would not want to report success with > the patch if actually your edit in Default.cfg is what makes the system > boot. > **Use the patched version to make a new initrd.img. > A quick way to do this is $ sudo apt-get install > linux-image-2.6.14-2-686-smp > but only if you don't actually have an SMP system. This should > leave your normal single-cpu kernel in place and install an smp > kernel, with new initrd.img, next to it. It would take a while to download, so I did: sudo yaird -v -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.14-2-686.patched | tee yaird.log and edited grub initrd at boot time. > **reboot into new kernel; report success; undo if you don't like the > effect. Bingo ! Flawless boot: all IDE devices recognized. Thanks a lot for the speedy patch ! Paulo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 342492 Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 342492 serious Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries Severity set to `serious'. > merge 342492 343135 Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries Bug#343135: digikam: Failed to build source packages from unstable. Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `forwarded addr' don't match: #342492 has [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-release@lists.debian.org'; #343135 has `' > block 342492 by 342879 Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342879 > block 343135 by 342879 Bug#343135: digikam: Failed to build source packages from unstable. Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 342879 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341705: marked as done (mysql-server-5.0: Server crashing)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:10:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 11:41:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 03:41:22 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from xwis.net ([195.13.63.187]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ei9I1-0006yj-JE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:41:21 -0800 Received: from olaf by xwis.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Ei9Hz-0004Rw-CX; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:41:19 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: mysql-server-5.0: Server crashing X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:41:19 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: 5.0.13rc-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss Hi, I just upgraded a server from 4.1 to 5.0 and now the MySQL server keeps crashing. The 5.0 version in testing is pre-stable and two months old. I'm aware of the gcc dependency issue and asked vorlon on IRc about it: [12:35] XTF: doing *anything* to try to circumvent the dependencies your package picks up when built in a pristine unstable environment is wrong. If there's a significant RC bug in a package that you're trying to get fixed, testing-proposed-updates is an option, but if it's a C++-related package that won't work either. So would testing-proposed-updates be an option? I think the gcc issue might last a few weeks at least. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages mysql-server-5.0 depends on: ii adduser 3.79Add and remove users and groups ii debconf [debconf 1.4.59 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbi-perl 1.48-2 Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libmysqlclient15 5.0.13rc-1 mysql database client library ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.0-11 GNU readline and history libraries ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii mailx1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent ii mysql-client-5.0 5.0.13rc-1 mysql database client binaries ii mysql-common 5.0.13rc-1 mysql database common files (e.g. ii passwd 1:4.0.13-7 change and administer password and ii perl 5.8.7-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii psmisc 21.8-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime mysql-server-5.0 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: mysql-server-5.0/really_downgrade: false mysql-server-5.0/start_on_boot: true mysql-server-5.0/mysql_update_hints1: mysql-server-5.0/nis_warning: mysql-server-5.0/postrm_remove_databases: false * mysql-server-5.0/mysql_install_db_notes: --- Received: (at 341705-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 13:10:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 05:10:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail3b.westend.com ([212.117.79.78] helo=mail3b1.westend.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Em9v3-ys-4T for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:10:13 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3b1.westend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933CABF32
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools (but piix not loaded)
> > > Yes, I added it to the title after finding out :). Michael Setzer > > > wrote, that adding > > > MODULE ide-generic > > > MODULE ide-disk > > > to /etc/yaird/Default.cfg makes it work. I could boot with that, but > > > DMA was disabled. I found out that manually adding piix reenables DMA > > > for me, so I meant "yes it works, no need to install initramfs-tools, > > > but piix is not loaded and that disables my DMA". > > > > What about addign only piix, and not the others ? Will this work ? > > Unfortunately I do not have time to reboot and test that right now but > yaird output looks promising, thanks for the hint Sven: Now I gave it another try and added MODULE piix MODULE ide-generic MODULE ide-disk to the /etc/yaird/Default.cfg. After reconfiguring the linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 and rebooting I have DMA reenabled. Using only "MODULE piix" in the /etc/yaird/Default.cfg results in an unbootable system. Too bad that this machine is not accessible to me right now, so my testing time is over for now. :) Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327075: marked as done (netapplet: FTBFS: undefined reference to `iw_pr_ether')
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327075: fixed in netapplet 1.0.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2005 12:46:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 07 05:46:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from d020135.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.20.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECzKH-0004aZ-00; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:46:54 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1ECzKG-0006H7-Go; Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:46:52 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netapplet: FTBFS: undefined reference to `iw_pr_ether'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 14:46:52 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: netapplet
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'netapplet' on unstable, I get the following error:
netdaemon.c: In function 'netdaemon_do_get_accesspoints':
netdaemon.c:788: warning: implicit declaration of function 'iw_pr_ether'
netdaemon.c: In function 'netdaemon_do_change_essid_debian':
netdaemon.c:860: warning: unused parameter 'channel'
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o netdaemon netcommon.o netdaemon.o
-lglib-2.0 -liw
netdaemon.o: In function `netdaemon_do_get_accesspoints':
/netapplet-1.0.0/src/netdaemon.c:788: undefined reference to `iw_pr_ether'
netdaemon.o: In function `netdaemon_do_get_wireless':
/netapplet-1.0.0/src/netdaemon.c:1077: undefined reference to `iw_pr_ether'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [netdaemon] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/netapplet-1.0.0/src'
With the attached patch 'netapplet' can be compiled on unstable.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/netapplet-1.0.0/src/netdaemon.c ./src/netdaemon.c
--- ../tmp-orig/netapplet-1.0.0/src/netdaemon.c 2005-09-07 12:31:44.0
+
+++ ./src/netdaemon.c 2005-09-07 12:31:26.0 +
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@
char ap_addr[128];
memset (ap_addr, 0, 128);
- iw_pr_ether (ap_addr, wrq.u.ap_addr.sa_data);
+ iw_ether_ntop (wrq.u.ap_addr.sa_data, ap_addr);
if (!is_valid_ap_address (ap_addr)) {
error = TRUE;
@@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@
char ap_addr[128];
memset (ap_addr, 0, 128);
- iw_pr_ether (ap_addr, wrq.u.ap_addr.sa_data);
+ iw_ether_ntop (wrq.u.ap_addr.sa_data, ap_addr);
if (!is_valid_ap_address (ap_addr)) {
/* This is kind of ugly... */
---
Received: (at 327075-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 12:41:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 04:41:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Em9KU-0002ja-12; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800
From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $
Subject: Bug#327075: fixed in netapplet 1.0.8-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: netapplet
Source-Version: 1.0.8-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netapplet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
netapplet_1.0.8-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1.diff.gz
netapplet_1.0.8-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1.dsc
netapplet_1.0.8-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1_i386.deb
netapplet_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz
A summary of th
Bug#316212: marked as done (netapplet: Please rebuild with latest libiw-dev)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316212: fixed in netapplet 1.0.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 11:11:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 04:11:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 214pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.214] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DnaTD-0003Nq-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:11:07 -0700 Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [10.1.1.2]) by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j5TBB5gu024903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:11:05 +0200 Received: from haplo.sliepen.oi ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j5TBB5Bt005998; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:11:05 +0200 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by haplo.sliepen.oi (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j5TBB5iC005997; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:11:05 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: haplo.sliepen.oi: guus set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: netapplet: Please rebuild with latest libiw-dev X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:11:04 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: netapplet Severity: normal The wireless-tools source package no longer provides libiw27. To ensure your package can be installed, please rebuild it with the latest libiw-dev so it will depend on libiw28. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 316212-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 12:41:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 04:41:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Em9KU-0002jY-0F; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800 From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#316212: fixed in netapplet 1.0.8-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:26 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: netapplet Source-Version: 1.0.8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netapplet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netapplet_1.0.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1.diff.gz netapplet_1.0.8-1.dsc to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1.dsc netapplet_1.0.8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8-1_i386.deb netapplet_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netapplet/netapplet_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netapplet package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:56:53 + Source: netapplet Binary: netapplet Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Matthew
Bug#321326: marked as done (aspell-ru: Package uninstallable.)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318816: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 21:53:28 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 14:53:28 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from kil-sm-1.ucis.dal.ca [129.173.1.130] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E0neZ-0001Ai-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:53:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (Kitchener-HSE-ppp3571858.sympatico.ca [65.93.128.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by KIL-SM-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j74LrPZM010264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:53:26 -0300 Received: from smassy by localhost with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E0neT-zM-F4; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:53:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "S. Massy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: aspell-ru: Package uninstallable. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 17:53:21 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aspell-ru Version: 0.99f9-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable libaspell15 conflicts with aspell6-dictionary aspell-ru provides aspell6-dictionary aspell-ru depends on libaspell15 (>= 0.60) I think it says it all, really... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 318816-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 12:40:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 04:40:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Em9KW-0002kD-H1; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#318816: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: rus-ispell Source-Version: 0.99f9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rus-ispell, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aspell-ru_0.99f9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/aspell-ru_0.99f9-2_i386.deb irussian_0.99f9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/irussian_0.99f9-2_i386.deb myspell-ru_0.99f9-2_all.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/myspell-ru_0.99f9-2_all.deb rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.diff.gz rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Martin-Ãric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rus-ispell package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:38:32 +0200 Source: rus-ispell Binary: irussian myspell-ru aspell-ru Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.99f9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Martin-Ãric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: aspell-ru - Russian di
Bug#318816: marked as done (Needs repackaging for latest aspell)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318816: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 22:27:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 15:27:13 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fep16.inet.fi [194.251.242.241] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DuHbN-0001cI-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:27:13 -0700 Received: from route.intranet ([84.249.18.46]) by fep16.inet.fi with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:27:11 +0300 Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk) by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DuHbK-24-HV; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:27:10 +0300 Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:27:10 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Archive: encrypt Subject: aspell-ru: requires rebuild for libaspell15c2 transition X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 01:27:09 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aspell-ru Version: 0.99f9-1 Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A new aspell 0.60.3 has appeared in Unstable. It provides a libaspell15c2 that conflicts with the older libaspell15 library and thus requires rebuilding all aspell dictionaries. If you don't have time to rebuild it yourself, I could do an NMU and close the 2 current bugs at the same time. Please let me know if you want me to upload it. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-imac Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages aspell-ru depends on: ii libaspell150.60.2+20050121-3 The GNU Aspell spell-checker runti aspell-ru recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC2ts9eXr56x4Muc0RAi+PAKCfRmd9nyZgQQ+3GVnbpHxT22NGBACgjmZM ZBK5BvNVOT1aTM9vaD95Cso= =pMeJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 318816-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 12:40:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 04:40:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Em9KW-0002kD-H1; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.60 $ Subject: Bug#318816: fixed in rus-ispell 0.99f9-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:32:28 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: rus-ispell Source-Version: 0.99f9-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rus-ispell, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aspell-ru_0.99f9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/aspell-ru_0.99f9-2_i386.deb irussian_0.99f9-2_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/irussian_0.99f9-2_i386.deb myspell-ru_0.99f9-2_all.deb to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/myspell-ru_0.99f9-2_all.deb rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.diff.gz rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.dsc to pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99f9-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distributio
Processed: Still there.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 338087 Bug#338087: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-2_m68k: FTBFS: 2 of 117 tests failed Bug reopened, originator not changed. > severity 338087 important Bug#338087: mpfr_2.2.0.dfsg.1-2_m68k: FTBFS: 2 of 117 tests failed Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338087: Still there.
reopen 338087 severity 338087 important thanks According to http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=mpfr&ver=2.2.0.dfsg.1-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1133892937&file=log&as=raw mpfr still fails to build from source on m68k. Which is odd, because I remember the combination of gcc-3.4 and -O0 to result in a succesful manual build in crest's unstable chroot. So, downgraded to non-RC as m68k is apparently still ignorable for release purposes. -- There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#343170: kernel-package: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on debconf
Package: kernel-package Severity: serious Version: 10.017 >From my build log (using pbuilder with a chroot hand-pruned of all non-build-essential packages): == making (creating) check/kernel-package == /usr/bin/make build make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-package-10.017' perl -wc make-kpkg make-kpkg syntax OK perl -wc kernel/pkg/image/preinst Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at kernel/pkg/image/preinst line 20. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at kernel/pkg/image/preinst line 20. make[1]: [check] Error 2 (ignored) ... perl -wc kernel/pkg/image/postrm Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at kernel/pkg/image/postrm line 22. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at kernel/pkg/image/postrm line 22. make[1]: *** [check] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/kernel-package-10.017' make: *** [check/kernel-package] Error 2 If I add a Build-Depends(-Indep?) on debconf, the build succeeds. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342734: marked as done (debtags: glibc invalid pointer)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line debtags: segfault in postinst has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2005 22:14:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 09 14:14:54 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ip-15.net-81-220-246.rev.numericable.fr ([81.220.246.15] helo=bihash) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EkqVx-Ce-Pf for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:14:54 -0800 Received: by bihash (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6A3DE14368D; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:14:52 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ashar Voultoiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debtags: glibc invalid pointer Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:14:52 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_5,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, I am running testing and recently upgraded apt to unstable (to test a bug fix for apt-build). When running apt-get upgrade everything got upgraded but debtag. The output actually is: # apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? YES Setting up debtags (1.5.2+b1) ... Get:1 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz [208kB] Get:2 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/vocabulary.gz [13.9kB] Fetched 222kB in 2s (100.0kB/s) Reading tag data and vocabulary for http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/... Tag data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_tags-current.gz... Voc data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_vocabulary.gz... Writing system vocabulary... Writing merged tag database... *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08599e80 *** /var/lib/dpkg/info/debtags.postinst: line 22: 8138 Aborted debtags update dpkg: error processing debtags (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134 Errors were encountered while processing: debtags E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) # Might be cause the glibc need to be upgraded to unstable version too. I also have libc6-i686 package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages debtags depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.43 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb1 1.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime debtags recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 341945-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 11:40:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 03:40:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Em8Vr-0003wI-Eo for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31A5B7007; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: debtags: segfault in postinst Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0
Bug#341945: marked as done (debtags: segfault in postinst)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line debtags: segfault in postinst has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 11:19:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 04 03:19:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host82-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it ([80.180.126.82] helo=host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eirtb-0005a9-KV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:19:07 -0800 Received: from garfield.casa-tassi ([192.168.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by host85-126.pool80180.interbusiness.it with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Eis0y-0004iG-00; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:26:44 +0100 Received: from tassi by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1Eirt4-0003DU-Rs; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:18:34 +0100 Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:18:34 +0100 From: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debtags: segfault in postinst Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debtags Version: 1.5.2+b1 Severity: important apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up debtags (1.5.2+b1) ... Get:1 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/tags-current.gz [208kB] Get:2 http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/vocabulary.gz [13.9kB] Fetched 222kB in 2s (98.8kB/s) Reading tag data and vocabulary for http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/tags/... Tag data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_tags-current.gz... Voc data: /var/cache/debtags/debtags.alioth.debian.org_tags_vocabulary.gz... Writing system vocabulary... Writing merged tag database... *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00d66f10 *** /var/lib/dpkg/info/debtags.postinst: line 22: 10820 Aborted (core dumped) debtags update dpkg: error processing debtags (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134 Errors were encountered while processing: debtags E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages debtags depends on: ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6-3.1 0.6.43 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii libc6 2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-4 GCC support library ii libstdc++64.0.2-4The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtdb1 1.0.6-13 Trivial Database - shared library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime debtags recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Enrico Tassi --- Received: (at 341945-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2005 11:40:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 03:40:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Em8Vr-0003wI-Eo for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31A5B7007; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:40:07 -0800 From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: debtags: segfault in postinst Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; pr
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools (but piix not loaded)
Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2005, 12:36 +0100 schrieb Sven Luther:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2005, 11:52 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:44:22 +0100
> > > Thomas Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems piix was the critical one.
> > >
> > > Yes - that's why piix is mentioned in the title of this thread...
> >
> > Yes, I added it to the title after finding out :). Michael Setzer
> > wrote, that adding
> > MODULE ide-generic
> > MODULE ide-disk
> > to /etc/yaird/Default.cfg makes it work. I could boot with that, but
> > DMA was disabled. I found out that manually adding piix reenables DMA
> > for me, so I meant "yes it works, no need to install initramfs-tools,
> > but piix is not loaded and that disables my DMA".
>
> What about addign only piix, and not the others ? Will this work ?
Unfortunately I do not have time to reboot and test that right now but
yaird output looks promising, thanks for the hint Sven:
# yaird -v -o /tmp/crap.img 2.6.14-2-686
yaird: goal: template, prologue (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:52)
yaird: action: prologue, {}
yaird: goal: module, fbcon (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:56)
yaird: goal: input, -- (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:73)
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: hardware: completed platform/i8042/serio1
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/usb/core/usbcore.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/usb/input/usbkbd.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/usb/input/usbhid.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: hardware: completed pci:00/:00:1d.0/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.0
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/usb/input/yealink.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: hardware: completed pci:00/:00:1d.0/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.1
yaird: goal: module, mousedev (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:103)
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/input/mousedev.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: goal: module, evdev (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:104)
yaird: action: insmod, /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/input/evdev.ko
{optionList=-- }
yaird: goal: module, piix (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:107)
yaird: action: insmod, /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.ko
{optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod, /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/piix.ko
{optionList=-- }
yaird: goal: mountdir, / (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:149)
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/ide/pci/generic.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod,
/lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-generic.ko {optionList=-- }
yaird: action: insmod, /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-disk.ko
{optionList=-- }
yaird: hardware: completed pci:00/:00:1f.1/ide0/0.0
yaird: action: mkbdev, /dev/hda {sysname=hda }
yaird: action: mkbdev, /dev/hda5 {sysname=hda/hda5 }
yaird: action: insmod, /lib/modules/2.6.14-2-686/kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko
{optionList=-- }
yaird: action: mount, /mnt {device=/dev/hda5 fsType=reiserfs isRoot=1
options=-- }
yaird: goal: template, postlude (/usr/lib/yaird/conf/Default.cfg:162)
yaird: action: postlude, {}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools (but piix not loaded)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Thomas Maier wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2005, 11:52 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:44:22 +0100 > > Thomas Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It seems piix was the critical one. > > > > Yes - that's why piix is mentioned in the title of this thread... > > Yes, I added it to the title after finding out :). Michael Setzer > wrote, that adding > MODULE ide-generic > MODULE ide-disk > to /etc/yaird/Default.cfg makes it work. I could boot with that, but > DMA was disabled. I found out that manually adding piix reenables DMA > for me, so I meant "yes it works, no need to install initramfs-tools, > but piix is not loaded and that disables my DMA". What about addign only piix, and not the others ? Will this work ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343166: mysql-query-browser: needs rebuild because not binNMU-safe
Package: mysql-query-browser
Version: 1.1.17-2
Severity: grave
Like mysql-admin, the mysql-query-browser package has an
(= ${Source-Version}) dependency on an Arch: all package (in this case,
mysql-query-browser-common), which breaks when the package is binNMUed -- as
has just been done for the c2a transition. Please make a sourceful upload
of mysql-query-browser so the package gets rebuilt correctly on all
architectures, and please consider whether relaxing this dependency would be
appropriate.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools (but piix not loaded)
Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2005, 11:52 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:44:22 +0100 > Thomas Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It seems piix was the critical one. > > Yes - that's why piix is mentioned in the title of this thread... Yes, I added it to the title after finding out :). Michael Setzer wrote, that adding MODULE ide-generic MODULE ide-disk to /etc/yaird/Default.cfg makes it work. I could boot with that, but DMA was disabled. I found out that manually adding piix reenables DMA for me, so I meant "yes it works, no need to install initramfs-tools, but piix is not loaded and that disables my DMA". > Sorry it wasn't clear to you and you had to play detective yourself to > get to same conclusion. No need to excuse (but appreciated of course). Any idea though why piix is not loaded? The patch from Erik seems to care for ide-generic only (and assumes that piix is loaded I guess). Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools
This one time, at band camp, Sumit Madan said: > Hello, > > i cannot activate DMA. Its a bit slow here. ide-generic was loaded before piix, making your ide bus a bit sluggish. Put piix above ide-generic in the modules file, rebuild your initrd, and reboot. Hope that helps, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools
> > > These modules are loaded: > > ## > > lsmod |egrep "piix|generic|ide" > > piix 10436 0 [permanent] > > generic 4356 0 [permanent] > > ide_disk 18784 7 > > ide_generic 1216 0 [permanent] > > ide_core 131740 4 piix,generic,ide_disk,ide_generic > > ## > > [...] > > hdparm /dev/hda > > > > /dev/hda: > > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > > using_dma= 0 (off) > > ## > > > > Any ideas? > > Saw that already yesterday. Seems to be an issue with the > linux-image-2-6-14-2-686 (2.6.14-5). I got that error, too. For me, adding the piix module helped (see above). Even with linux-image-2-6-14-2-686 (2.6.14-5) which I have booted right now. But strangely, Sumit has it loaded. Might it be that "piix" has to be loaded earlier? Maybe before "generic"? Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools (but piix not loaded)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:44:22 +0100 Thomas Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems piix was the critical one. Yes - that's why piix is mentioned in the title of this thread... Sorry it wasn't clear to you and you had to play detective yourself to get to same conclusion. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDnqf7n7DbMsAkQLgRApyDAKCQvQb7B+FTqECoTNMj29fVA1nmvACeNEOd 1CosAIUmAPGOCocae5Ed4cA= =TXoC -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#343048: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686: no need to install initramfs-tools
> hdparm /dev/hda > > /dev/hda: > setting using_dma to 1 (on) > HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted > using_dma= 0 (off) > ## > > Any ideas? Saw that already yesterday. Seems to be an issue with the linux-image-2-6-14-2-686 (2.6.14-5). Regards, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#333958: Future of blender maintenance (was: Patch for #333958, Intent to NMU)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:12:22AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello again, > > thanks for your speedy reply. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:58:26PM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote: > > I'm still toying Blender sometimes, so I would like to be involved > > with the maintenance of blender package in some way. You guys may add > > your name to Uploaders: right now -- and I think you are right, we > > should move to the team-maintenance via alioth ASAP. I applied to > > alioth for a project called "pkg-blender", so let's use it when it's > > ready. > Great! I would appreciate having you around, Masayuki. Any idea how long it takes for the pkg-blender project to be created? > Wonderful, let's rock! > > I guess we won't need to check in the full sources, but probably the > debian/ dir will suffice, as long as we use dpatch and separately > apply the patch for #22 / #333958... Every once in a while alioth > is pretty clogged, so I'd like to keep things small... Sounds sensible to me. > Wouter, I see you already have an account larstiq-guest, right? Yup, that's me. Haven't used it in a while, so I'll see what needs to be done to get it active again. Wouter van Heyst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342879: Patch
I tested the patch posted by Loic. Unfortunately it doesn't fix the cdbs build failures. I still get error messages like this: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 './avrdude.1' '/home/michael/debian/build-area/avrdude-5.0/debian/tmp//usr/share/man/man1/avrdude.1' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/michael/debian/build-area/avrdude-5.0' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/michael/debian/build-area/avrdude-5.0' make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/michael/debian/build-area/avrdude-5.0' dh_installdirs -pavrdude-doc make: *** No rule to make target `install', needed by `binary/avrdude-doc'. Stop. I'd be interesting to know if cdbs has to be fixed too, or it is solely a make issue. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: patch closing RC bugs on iripdb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 341341 +patch Bug#341341: iripdb: please rebuild against libid3-3.8.3c2a Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > tag 321545 +patch Bug#321545: iripdb: uninstallable due to dependency on libtag1 Tags were: sid Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
