Processed: Re: Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'arm specifier' errors

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 343687 help
Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'asm specifier' errors
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'arm specifier' errors

[Eric Dorland]

tags 343687 help
thanks

I'm going to need help with this one Wouter, my m68k assembly was a
long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg-1
> Severity: serious
> 
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> 
> > Automatic build of firefox_1.5.dfsg-1 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 79
> > Build started at 20051217-0025
> 
> [...]
> 
> > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), libx11-dev, libxp-dev, libxt-dev, 
> > libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, liborbit2-dev, libidl-dev (>= 0.8.0), zip, 
> > libxft-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libxrender-dev, 
> > libxinerama-dev, libcairo2-dev, libkrb5-dev, libgnome2-dev, libgconf2-dev, 
> > libgnomevfs2-dev, libgnomeui-dev, patch, sharutils, m4
> 
> [...]
> 
> > make[7]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[7]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> > make[6]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[6]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> > make[5]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[5]: Leaving directory 
> > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> > make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect'
> > make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
> > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom'
> > make[2]: *** [tier_2] Error 2
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg'
> > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg'
> > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> 
> A full build log can be found at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=firefox&ver=1.5.dfsg-1
> 
> 

-- 
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#339526: This bug has been fixed in later releases packaged for Etch and Sid.

[Jonas Smedegaard]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

As subject says (but some BTS interfaces don't show subject so I
repeat here), this bug has been fixed in later releases packaged for
Etch and Sid.

So I have marked this bug as sarge, fixed-upstream and closed in
3.1.0a-1.


 - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDrOSln7DbMsAkQLgRAoKFAJ4hbh9/oUtKb6LU1fQb5nUh9+z0MgCfTrFb
wMSmkXJ+w15SkLGFCKFcURE=
=VcS7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Processed: closing 339526

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> close 339526 3.1.0a-1
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass 
Vulnerability
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 3.1.0a-1, send any further explanations to Geoff 
Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 339526

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 339526 fixed-upstream sarge
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass 
Vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed-upstream, sarge

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: notfound 339526 in 3.1.0a-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> notfound 339526 3.1.0a-2
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass 
Vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-2.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: notfound 339526 in 3.1.0a-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> notfound 339526 3.1.0a-1
Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass 
Vulnerability
Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-1.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every 
graph
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph

[sean finney]

tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks

hi epco,

i'll need some more information if you would like to have help with
resolving this.  here are a few questions off the top of my head:

- what version of mysql?
- remote mysql server or local?
- what's in my.cnf?
- how many devices (and what kind) are you monitoring?
- have you tried the suggestions from the forum report mentioned?
- is this problem present with both cactid and cmd.php?
- what else is using the database?
- does the problem immediately happen after reboot, or only after
  running for some period of time?

i'm tagging this as moreinfo and unreproducible... if i can't find a
way to reproduce it within some period of time, i'm going to downgrade
the severity too.


sean

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#342925: missing ide-generic

[Frans Pop]

On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote:
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:

Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've 
also tested it on my laptop.
ide-generic is loaded, but ide-disk is not, so not quite there yet for me.

The laptop (Toshiba Satellite A40) needs piix (which is loaded):
:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage 
Controller (rev 03)

Cheers,
FJP


pgpmQMc5vM18X.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error

[Blars Blarson]

Package: missinglib
Version: 0.4.10.debian-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.  Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used
to work no longer works due to changes in gcc.



./runtests

Ran: 56 tests in: 0.02 seconds.
OK
./runtests.opt
make[2]: *** [test] Bus 
error
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian/test'
make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'

[Blars Blarson]

Package: ocamlodbc
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.  This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably
in a dependant package.

Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like
bug 340103, which should probably be reopened.


+ grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' > /tmp/camlpp3893ba
make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found
/usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I 
../unixodbc -ccopt "  -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 " 
ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma 
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo  biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo 
biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo
+ gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc   
-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2   -lodbc  -lodbc 
/tmp/camlprimd42d28.c  '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2' 
'-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm' 
'-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0' 
'-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun 
-lm  -ldl -lcurses -lpthread
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function 
`ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function 
`ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function 
`ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function 
`ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function 
`ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined 
references to `caml_Double_val' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Error while building custom runtime system
make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#340850: marked as done (units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 11:45:57 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 03:45:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.74])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfyVA-0001HL-Vs
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:45:57 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 492A7382A7
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334D33826D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id F36E626136; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: units
Version: 1.85-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build on a few arches with the
following error:
gcc  -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o  -lm -lreadline -lncurses
./texi2man units.texinfo > units.man
sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1
makeinfo ./units.texinfo
make[1]: makeinfo: Command not found
make[1]: *** [units.info] Error 127

I'm guessing this is a timestamp skew issues.  I suggest you look
at /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz about it.

Note that since linux 2.6, it keeps sub-second timestamps for
files (as long as they're in memory) which triggers more of those
bugs.

Other buildd's show this instead:
gcc  -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o  -lm -lreadline -lncurses
sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/units-1.85'
texi2html -monolithic units.texinfo


Kurt


---
Received: (at 340850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 02:50:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 18:50:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpzRB-0004fX-RV; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: units
Source-Version: 1.85-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
units, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

units_1.85-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.diff.gz
units_1.85-3.dsc
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.dsc
units_1.85-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated units package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed

Bug#344612: openswan: pluto has shared library dependency on libkrb5support.so

[Jay Kline]

Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.4.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


the pluto binary will not run, due to a shared library depenency that is
not met:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/lib/ipsec/pluto
libldap_r.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2 (0x0ffa2000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x0ff6e000)
libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x0ff44000)
libcurl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 (0x0feea000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3 (0x0fe8f000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0x0fe6b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0fd0a000)
liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x0fcdb000)
libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x0fcb8000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x0fc94000)
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0fc47000)
libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x0fc0e000)
libgnutls.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11 (0x0fb7e000)
/lib/ld.so.1 (0x3000)
libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x0fb49000)
libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x0fabc000)
libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0fa7a000)
libkrb5support.so.0 => not found
libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0x0fa29000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x0f9c6000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0x0f847000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0f812000)
libtasn1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2 (0x0f7e2000)
libgcrypt.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0x0f76f000)
libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x0f74b000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0x0f714000)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages openswan depends on:
ii  bind9-host [host]  1:9.3.1-2.0.1 Version of 'host' bundled with BIN
ii  bsdmainutils   6.1.2 collection of more utilities from
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.4.62Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils2.15.1Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  iproute20041019-3Professional tools to control the
ii  ipsec-tools1:0.6.2-2 IPsec tools for Linux
ii  libc6  2.3.5-8   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcomerr2 1.38-2common error description library
ii  libcurl3   7.15.1-1  Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii  libgmp3c2  4.1.4-10  Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii  libldap2   2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libpam0g   0.79-3Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.80.9.8a-3  SSL shared libraries
ii  makedev2.3.1-79  creates device files in /dev
ii  openssl0.9.8a-3  Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a

openswan recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  openswan/existing_x509_key_filename:
  openswan/x509_state_name:
  openswan/rsa_key_length: 2048
* openswan/restart: true
* openswan/start_level: "after PCMCIA"
* openswan/enable-oe: false
  openswan/existing_x509_certificate: false
  openswan/existing_x509_certificate_filename:
* openswan/create_rsa_key: false
  openswan/x509_email_address:
  openswan/x509_country_code: AT
  openswan/x509_self_signed: true
  openswan/x509_organizational_unit:
  openswan/x509_locality_name:
  openswan/x509_common_name:
  openswan/rsa_key_type: x509
  openswan/x509_organization_name:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341189: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int) 
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 04:23:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 20:23:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Egx1d-0001xI-Kk
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:23:29 -0800
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jAT4NR3H029595
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:23:27 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT4OdtR021259;
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT4Od78021257;
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20051124-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

gcc-snapshot still fails to buid from source on sparc.  Now the error is:

checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
checking for int... yes
checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int), 77
See `config.log' for more details.
make[4]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build'
make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build'
s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124'
make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2

---
Received: (at 341189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 02:15:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 18:15:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Epyw3-vO-WC
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:15:04 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA02040
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990FAF2B1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 13463-34 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET) 13974
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBO2F0nU016227;
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int) 
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Vers

Processed: tag gcc-snapshot report

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 321449 + sid
Bug#321449: gcc-snapshot should stay in unstable
Tags were: wontfix
Tags added: sid

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343990: marked as done (tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343990: fixed in tix 8.4.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 09:11:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 01:11:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr ([129.20.36.164])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EoH3K-000663-Kc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:11:30 -0800
Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37014.math.univ-rennes1.fr 
[129.20.37.14])
by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A72B8A9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EoH2p-0005x0-JJ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tix
Severity: serious
Version: 8.4-2

>From my build log:

...
checking for building with threads... yes
checking how to build libraries... static
checking if 64bit support is enabled... no
checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ../configure: line 10786: 
syntax error near unexpected token `('
../configure: line 10786: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` 
in'
make: *** [build-static-stamp] Error 2

This is caused by the following code in configure:

...
if test -r /etc/.relid -a "X`uname -n`" = "X`uname -s`" ; then
system=MP-RAS-`awk '{print }' /etc/.relid'`
fi
...

The problem is the extraneous apostrophe after relid on the middle
line.  If I remove this apostrophe, the package build completes
successfully.

(Note that the same faulty code is also causing problems in tcl8.* and
tk8.*.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 343990-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 01:41:00 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 17:41:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpyGY-0002oI-1r; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#343990: fixed in tix 8.4.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: tix
Source-Version: 8.4.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tix, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tix-dev_8.4.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tix/tix-dev_8.4.0-1_i386.deb
tix_8.4.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1.diff.gz
tix_8.4.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1.dsc
tix_8.4.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1_i386.deb
tix_8.4.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tix package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe

Bug#344401: firefox: Can't confirm. Steps to reproduce?

[Oystein Gisnas]

Package: firefox
Version: 1.5.dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #344401

I can't reproduce the problems you experience. I've successfully printed to a 
CUPS printer, but unfortunately haven't tried any other printer.

Printing to file with CUPS-driver or Postscript/Default works fine, however, 
both with Letter and A4.

Maybe you could describe a bit more clearly the steps needed to reproduce any 
of the errors that happen every time? (preferably without having to actually 
print every time)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages firefox depends on:
ii  debianutils  2.15.2  Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  fontconfig   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libcairo21.0.2-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:4.0.2-5   GCC support library
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libidl0  0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file
ii  libjpeg626b-11   The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-5  PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++6   4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display
ii  libxp6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxrandr2   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.0-2   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  psmisc   21.8-1  Utilities that use the proc filesy
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-9   compression library - runtime

firefox recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326371: NMU to fix both of these bugs in 7 day DELAY queue

[Don Armstrong]

I have just made an upload to the 7-day DELAY queue to fix both of
these bugs.

This NMU can be overridden by a maintainer upload before 7 days have
passed, ideally one which fixes the RC bug (#326371).

Interdiff for the NMU is attached.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Of course, there are ceases where only a rare individual will have the
vision to perceive a system which governs many people's lives; a
system which had never before even been recognized as a system; then
such people often devote their lives to convincing other people that
the system really is there and that it aught to be exited from. 
 -- Douglas R. Hofstadter _Gödel Escher Bach. Eternal Golden Braid_

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu
diff -u es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog
--- es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog
+++ es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+es (0.90beta1-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU
+  * Rebuild with libreadline5-dev as a build dependency (Closes: #326371)
+  * Fix typos in manpage (Closes: #311237)
+
+ -- Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:11:10 -0800
+
 es (0.90beta1-10) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New maintainer (Closes: #215541)
diff -u es-0.90beta1/debian/control es-0.90beta1/debian/control
--- es-0.90beta1/debian/control
+++ es-0.90beta1/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: bison, libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev
+Build-Depends: bison, libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev
 
 Package: es
 Architecture: any
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- es-0.90beta1.orig/es.1
+++ es-0.90beta1/es.1
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
 .Ic var =
 .De
 .PP
-Multiple variables may be assigned with a single assignment statment.
+Multiple variables may be assigned with a single assignment statement.
 The left hand side of the assignment operation consists of a list of
 variables which are assigned, one by one, to the values in the list
 on the right hand side.  If there are more variables than values in
@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@
 child processes.
 In addition, the signal
 .Cr sigint
-may be preceeded by the prefix
+may be preceded by the prefix
 .Rc ( . )
 to indicate that normal shell interrupt processing
 (i.e., the printing of an extra newline)
@@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@
 .I pid
 is specified, waits for any child process to exit.
 .TP
-.Cr "whatis \fIprogam ...\fP"
+.Cr "whatis \fIprogram ...\fP"
 For each named 
 .IR program ,
 prints the pathname, primitive, lambda, or code fragment which

Bug#332625: Patch for missing build-depends

[Christoph Berg]

Re: Dominic Hargreaves in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, 
> libsnmp9-dev
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, 
> libsnmp9-dev, autoconf
>  Standards-Version: 3.6.2

Hi Matt,

I've uploaded Dominic's NMU to delayed/7, patch below.

debdiff cpqarrayd_2.2-1.dsc /srv/pbuilder/result/cpqarrayd_2.2-1.1.dsc
 configure|   30 ++
 debian/changelog |7 +++
 debian/control   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/configure cpqarrayd-2.2/configure
--- cpqarrayd-2.2/configure
+++ cpqarrayd-2.2/configure
@@ -4524,18 +4524,24 @@
   ac_cv_func_fork_works=cross
 else
   cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
-/* By Ruediger Kuhlmann. */
-  #include 
-  #if HAVE_UNISTD_H
-  # include 
-  #endif
-  /* Some systems only have a dummy stub for fork() */
-  int main ()
-  {
-   if (fork() < 0)
- exit (1);
-   exit (0);
-  }
+/* confdefs.h.  */
+_ACEOF
+cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
+cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
+/* end confdefs.h.  */
+$ac_includes_default
+int
+main ()
+{
+
+ /* By Ruediger Kuhlmann. */
+ if (fork() < 0)
+   exit (1);
+ exit (0);
+
+  ;
+  return 0;
+}
 _ACEOF
 rm -f conftest$ac_exeext
 if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5
diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog
--- cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog
+++ cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+cpqarrayd (2.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload
+  * Add build-depends for autoconf, closes: #332625
+
+ -- Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:25:00 +
+
 cpqarrayd (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control
--- cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control
+++ cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: admin
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, 
libsnmp9-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, 
libsnmp9-dev, autoconf
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
 
 Package: cpqarrayd

Christoph
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: raidutils build failure on sparc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 326922 upstream
Bug#326922: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] struct _I2O_MESSAGE_FRAME' has no member 
named 'InitiatorAddress'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#326922: raidutils build failure on sparc

[Jurij Smakov]

tags 326922 upstream
thanks

Hi,

I've tried to investigate the build failure on sparc [0] and came to the 
conclusion that it is a genuine upstream bug (probably some misplaced 
sparc #ifdef's). It would be too hard for me to understand what needs to 
be done, so I'm CC'ing this message to the upstream contact email.


There also appears to be a new upstream version (0.0.6) available at [1].
I have tried building it, and at first it failed [2] due to the piece of 
code in raidutil.command.cpp:


#ifdef sparc
# define VOLATILE volatile
#else
# define VOLATILE
#endif

extern "C" { VOLATILE void exit (int);}

After I've removed the 'volatile' keyword, the build continued past that 
point, but than failed again with the same messages as 0.0.4 [3].


[0] http://bugs.debian.org/326922
[1] http://i2o.shadowconnect.com/ 
[1] http://www.wooyd.org/debian/raidutils/raidutils-0.0.6-build.log.0.gz

[2] http://www.wooyd.org/debian/raidutils/raidutils-0.0.6-build.log.1.gz

Thanks and best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343691: marked as done (Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:17:08 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#343691: fixed in dbconfig-common 1.8.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 09:31:18 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 01:31:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.opendreams.net ([69.28.138.178])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EnYPN-00051U-Qa
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:31:17 -0800
Received: from sorrows.opendreams.net ([:::209.250.23.134])
  (AUTH: PLAIN sor-mta, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA)
  by mail.opendreams.net with esmtp; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:16 -0700
  id 00017F29.43A3DAE4.44EC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 1000)
  by sorrows.opendreams.net with local; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:15 -0700
  id 01E6C053.43A3DAE3.0AF3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jesse Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:15 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6g-3
Severity: grave
Justification: n



After the last upgrade of Cacti, the /etc/cacti/debian.php was replaced
with default/null values.  This caused polling to stop and data for five
days was lost for my install.

During the upgrade, I recall being prompted about the new
dbconfig-common option.  I selected "n" for No.  However, the file was
cleared, rendering Cacti disfunctional.  I didn't notice until today
that polling had stopped.  I noticed when I saw an error message while
trying to review stats for the week.

I was able to reproduce the problem, after populating the proper values
into the /etc/cacti/debian.php file, I ran dpkg-reconfigure cacti again,
and selected no to the question;

Configure database for cacti with dbconfig-common? n

And, again, it overwrote the file and cleared values.

Expected result:  Don't touch the config files if user says NO.

I didn't see anything obvious in /usr/share/doc/cacti about this issue.
Furthermore, the replacement of this vital config file was very silent.
That's not very nice.

Hopefully I didn't do anything wrong myself.  Ask any questions needed
to clarify.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.32-2005120801
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii  apache1.3.34-1   versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  dbconfig-common   1.8.9  common framework for packaging dat
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libphp-adodb  4.64-4 The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii  logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility
ii  mysql-client-4.1 [virtual-mys 4.1.15-1   mysql database client binaries
ii  php4  4:4.4.0-4  server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli  4:4.4.0-4  command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql4:4.4.0-4  MySQL module for php4
ii  php4-snmp 4:4.4.0-4  SNMP module for php4
ii  rrdtool   1.2.11-0.4 Time-series data storage and displ
ii  snmp  5.2.1.2-4  NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  ucf   2.004  Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages cacti recommends:
pn  iputils-ping   (no description available)
ii  mysql-server  4.1.15-1   mysql database server (transitiona
ii  mysql-server-4.1 [mysql-serve 4.1.15-1   mysql database server binaries

-- debconf information:
* cacti/username: cacti
  cacti/db/app-user:
  cacti/mysql/admin-user: root
* cacti/mysql_server: localhost
* cacti/webserver: Apache
  cacti/mysql/method: unix socket
  cacti/remote/host:
  cacti/upgrade-error: abort
  cact

Processed: control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package flashplugin-nonfree
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree

> tags 304072 patch
Bug#304072: flashplugin-nonfree: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the 
attached debconf template translation
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: patch

> reassign 340690 flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.25-5
Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download 
sites
Bug reassigned from package `flashplugin-nonfree' to `flashplugin-nonfree'.

> severity 340690 grave
Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download 
sites
Severity set to `grave'.

> merge 340690 321194
Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: download broken
Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download 
sites
Merged 321194 340690.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327307: [PATCH] Building SNES9x again

[Thomas Themel]

Fixing this bug appears to be a rather trivial change to
debian/control... Apparently, the xlibmesa-dev dependency that has gone
missing is now split into two packages, xlibmesa-gl-dev and
xlibmesa-glu-dev. Applying the attached patch makes it build again for me.

ciao,
-- 
[*Thomas  Themel*]   Since you obviously haven't lurked enough,
[extended contact]   we subtly tell lusers to piss off via the words "piss
[info provided in]   off, luser".
[*message header*]  - David P. Murphy in the monastery
--- snes9x-1.43/debian/control~build-fix2005-12-24 00:01:21.0 
+0100
+++ snes9x-1.43/debian/control  2005-12-24 00:02:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Source: snes9x
 Section: non-free/games
 Priority: optional
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0), nasm [i386], xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
xlibmesa-dev, dpatch (>= 1.19)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0), nasm [i386], xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, 
xlibmesa-gl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev, dpatch (>= 1.19)
 Maintainer: Alain Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
 

Bug#344596: libubit1c2: package contains no libraries

[Russ Allbery]

Package: libubit1c2
Version: 3.6.4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

In the last C++ migration, it looks like the package name was changed in
debian/control without changing the corresponding install file, and as a
result the library package is actually empty.

I recommend not fixing this bug, as I'm about to file another bug against
ftp.debian.org requesting its removal.  No one has noticed the broken
package since August, the package is a major revision behind upstream
but no one has filed a bug, and it's been orphaned without an adopter
since March (with no maintainer upload since February of 2004).

But just in case the package sticks around for some reason, it can't be
released as it is now.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#237156: marked as done (bonsai: dolog.pl has a syntax error at line 974 (an extra semicolon).)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This was fixed in 1.3+cvs20030317-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 02:06:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 09 18:06:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dilbert.solnet.co.nz (wlcv0) [203.97.83.99] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B0t6j-wK-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:06:05 -0800
Received: from andrewl by wlcv0 with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B0t69-0005f0-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:05:29 +1300
From: Andy Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bonsai: dolog.pl has  a syntax error at line 974 (an extra semicolon).
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:05:29 +1300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andy Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: bonsai
Version: 1.3+cvs20020224-1woody1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch patch
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux wlcv0 2.4.24 #1 Thu Feb 5 11:12:18 NZDT 2004 sparc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages bonsai depends on:
ii  cvs 1.11.1p1debian-9 Concurrent Versions System
ii  cvsgraph1.1.2-4  Create a tree of revisions/branche
ii  debconf 1.0.32   Debian configuration management sy
ii  exim3.35-1woody2 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii  exim [mail-transport-ag 3.35-1woody2 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent)
ii  libc6   2.2.5-11.5   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdbd-mysql-perl   1.2216-2 mySQL database interface for Perl
ii  libmailtools-perl   1.44-1woody2 Manipulate email in perl programs
ii  libtimedate-perl1.11-1   Time and date functions for perl.
ii  lxr 0.3-3Linux Cross-Reference
ii  rcs 5.7-13   The GNU Revision Control System

diff -c ~/tmp/globals.pl  /usr/share/bonsai/lib/globals.pl
*** /home/andrewl/tmp/globals.plWed Mar 10 14:55:53 2004
--- /usr/share/bonsai/lib/globals.plWed Mar 10 14:57:11 2004
***
*** 970,976 
   my ($password, $encoded) = @_;
   
   my $correct = trim(`cat $var_dir/data/passwd`);
!  $encoded = crypt($::FORM{'newpassword'}, "aa");
unless ($encoded);
   
   unless ($correct eq $encoded) {
--- 970,976 
   my ($password, $encoded) = @_;
   
   my $correct = trim(`cat $var_dir/data/passwd`);
!  $encoded = crypt($::FORM{'newpassword'}, "aa")
unless ($encoded);
   
   unless ($correct eq $encoded) {



---
Received: (at 237156-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 22:17:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 14:17:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77] helo=epsilon.donarmstrong.com)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpvDq-0007ZM-5n
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:10 -0800
Received: from epsilon.donarmstrong.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jBNMH9s9002069
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:09 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBNMH9C8002068
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:09 -0800
Received: (nullmailer pid 28005 invoked by uid 1000);
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:17:06 -
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800
From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This was fixed in 1.3+cvs20030317-4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> I only understand the basics of heap-based overflows, I do not yet see
> how to use this one. Someone explaining it would be very welcome.

The two most common ways to exploit integer problems are 
a) Integers, which control a memory allocation: By letting this integer
   wrap-around you create an empty or generally smaller than excepted
   buffer, which the following write to memory overflows
b) Integers which are accidentially signed and for which the programmer
   didn't implement sanity checks for negative values, which can lead
   to a whole range of other problems.

Blender's problem is an instance of b).

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

[Robert Luberda]

Max Alekseyev wrote:

Hi,

> 
> No. It reports:
> 
> upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned
> char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed.
> Aborted

Thanks.

I tried the command on pergolesi.debian.org (an amd64 machine accessible
for Debian developers), but can't reproduce that error.
I.e. I can pack the file, unpack it without any problems, but when I try
to run the command after packing with upx, it fails with a segmentation
fault.

It needs more investiations, but I can't do this until the first week of
January.

Best Regards,
robert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344575: hula: Build-Depends needs "zlib1g-dev" package.

[jeremy avnet]

Package: hula
Version: 0.1.0+svn379-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source


When building the debian package (apt-get source -b -t unstable hula),
the following error is fixed by installing the zlib1g-dev package. It
should be added to Build-Depends.

gcc -shared  .libs/msgapi.o .libs/msgdate.o .libs/msgaddr.o  -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/connio/.libs -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/hulautil/.libs -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/memmgr/.libs -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/mdb/.libs -Wl,--rpath 
-Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/xpl/.libs 
../connio/.libs/libhulaconnio.so ../hulautil/.libs/libhulautil.so 
../memmgr/.libs/libhulamemmgr.so ../mdb/.libs/libhulamdb.so 
../xpl/.libs/libhulaxpl.so -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz  -Wl,-soname 
-Wl,libhulamsgapi.so.0 -o .libs/libhulamsgapi.so.0.0.0
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[5]: *** [libhulamsgapi.la] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/msgapi'
make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
Build command 'cd hula-0.1.0+svn379 && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed.
E: Child process failed

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12-xenU
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages hula depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.5-8  GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libhula00.1.0+svn379-2.1 integrated mail & calendar system 
ii  libsqlite3-03.2.7-1  SQLite 3 shared library
ii  libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-3 SSL shared libraries
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.3-8compression library - runtime

hula recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344571: cheops-ng_0.2.3-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep: flex

[lamont]

Package: cheops-ng
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of cheops-ng_0.2.3-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 79
> Build started at 20051218-2304

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, libwrap0-dev, debhelper (>= 4.0.0), 
> autotools-dev, libadns1-dev, libssl-dev, imlib11-dev, libxml-dev, 
> libgnome-dev, libungif4-dev, libgtkxmhtml-dev, libzvt-dev

[...]

> # Add here commands to configure the package.
> CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs" ./configure --host=ia64-linux-gnu 
> --build=ia64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man 
> --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info
> loading cache ./config.cache
> checking for gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) works... yes
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) is a 
> cross-compiler... no
> checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
> checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> checking for ranlib... ranlib
> checking host system type... ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
> checking for flex... no
> checking for lex... no
> configure: error: You need to install either flex (preferebly) or lex to 
> compile cheops-ng
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=cheops-ng&ver=0.2.3-1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package flashplugin-nonfree
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree

> reassign 321194 flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.25-5
Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: does not install, not matter if tar.gz package 
location is entered or not
Bug reassigned from package `flashplugin-nonfree' to `flashplugin-nonfree'.

> retitle 321194 flashplugin-nonfree: download broken
Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: does not install, not matter if tar.gz package 
location is entered or not
Changed Bug title.

> severity 321194 grave
Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: download broken
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Filippo Giunchedi]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0:
> You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental.

reportedly, unstable (2.3.1-79) "MAKEDEV bluetooth" works as expected.

Indeed this still holds as a bug for both bluez-utils and experimental MAKEDEV,
but frankly, as long as I report version of packages I'm using, if I'm running 
experimental and if I'm supposed to, is not your business.

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

Gretchen: You're weird.
Donnie: Sorry.
Gretchen: No, that was a compliment.
-- from Donnie Darko (2001)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

[Moritz Muehlenhoff]

Steve Kemp wrote:
> > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential
> > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what
> > might be missing.
> 
>   It looks good to me. 

I can confirm the patch for CVE-2005-3302 is correct, I've sent a similar
patch a few weeks ago.

> I've built a package and if nobody has any 
>  objections I'll upload later today.

Are you aware of CVE-2005-3151? Real-world exploitability seems quite
unlikely, though.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#341238: patch for 7.0.61-1

[Bart Martens]

The attached patch should fix the bug in version 7.0.61-1.

Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: build-stamp
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: configure-stamp
diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/changelog flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/changelog
--- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/changelog	2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/changelog	2005-12-23 20:08:51.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.61-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload
+  * Fix file name of local file, and don't do md5 checking with a missing
+checksum.  (closes: #341238)
+  * Added a FIXME about the broken md5 checking
+
+ -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:28:54 +0100
+
 flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.61-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * check latest version by mirror's html.
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: files
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree.postrm.debhelper
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree.substvars
diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/postinst flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/postinst
--- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/postinst	2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/postinst	2005-12-23 19:10:30.0 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 case "$1" in
 configure*)
 db_get flashplugin-nonfree/local
-if [ -d "$RET" -a -f "$RET"/flash_linux.tar.gz ]; then
+if [ -d "$RET" -a -f "$RET"/install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz ]; then
 	LOCALFILE="-l $RET"
 	INSTALL="true"
 fi
diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/update-flashplugin flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/update-flashplugin
--- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/update-flashplugin	2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100
+++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/update-flashplugin	2005-12-23 20:08:11.0 +0100
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@
 require 'getoptlong'
 require '/etc/update-flashplugin.conf'
 
+# FIXME md5 checking is broken
+# There is no longer an md5 checksum on the website
+# so downloading both the file and the checksum cannot be done anymore.
+# Using hardcoded md5 checksums would limit the use of this script
+# to only one version of the Flash player.
+
 module UpdateFlashPlugin
 include UpdateFlashPluginConf
 
@@ -171,11 +177,13 @@
 		Dir.chdir(@cur_dir)
 		exit 1
   end
-  if MD5.new(File.open("#{file}", 'r').binmode.read).hexdigest != @tar_sum
-		$stderr.print "E: md5sum of #{file} does not match with [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-		Dir.chdir(@cur_dir)
-		exit
-  end
+	  if @tar_sum
+		if MD5.new(File.open("#{file}", 'r').binmode.read).hexdigest != @tar_sum
+		  $stderr.print "E: md5sum of #{file} does not match with [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+		  Dir.chdir(@cur_dir)
+		  exit
+		end
+	  end
   _print "use existing file: #{file}\n"
 else
   file = "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz"
Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: update-flashplugin.8

Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Marco d'Itri]

On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0:
You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Filippo Giunchedi]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
> > the mknod from the postinst does?  This was the reason I didn't use
> > MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago.
> If it does not then it would be a MAKEDEV bug, and your package would
> need to depend on the fixed version.

it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0:

# cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV bluetooth
don't know how to make device "bluetooth"

I'm CC'ing makedev maintainer, would be the appropriate for bluez-utils to drop
"bluetooth" [1] into /etc/makedev.d/ or is this to be done by makedev package?

thanks,
filippo

[1]: something like

c 660 root root 10 250 1 1 vhci
c 660 root dialout 216 1 1 256 rfcomm%d

--
Filippo Giunchedi
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit
in my name in a Swiss bank.
-- Woody Allen


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#344566: sysutils: /usr/bin/memtest also found in package memtester

[Delian Krustev]

Package: sysutils
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1


dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/sysutils_2.0.0-1_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/memtest', which is also in package memtester

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686
Locale: LANG=bg_BG, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG (charmap=CP1251)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package tktable
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tktable

> tag 320551 = patch
Bug#320551: 'man tktable' typos: "occuring" and "postion"
Tags were: pending patch
Tags set to: patch

> tag 343138 = patch
Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
Tags were: patch
Tags set to: patch

> tag 324143 moreinfo
Bug#324143: tktable: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Broken configure system
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> tag 339056 patch
Bug#339056: tktable: Library package nonconforming
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344237: marked as done (readline5: FTBFS on i386, s390, powerpc.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 5.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 02:13:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 18:13:30 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EotTu-0007vu-Jz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:13:30 -0800
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-234.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.234])
by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jBL2DRRD016748;
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EotTr-0003Ja-Lt; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:27 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: readline5: FTBFS on i386, s390, powerpc.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:27 -0500
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: readline5
Severity: serious


>From the buildd logs:

checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
compiler cannot create executables

The common factor in the three logs is that it dies in the "build64" part
of the build, which isn't present for the other architectures.  The test
which is failing tries to compile and link a C file.  Are you
perhaps missing some Build-Depends, so that configure can't find the 64-bit
GCC/system libraries to link with?

This breakage in libreadline5 is beginning to hold up movement of the c2a
transition into testing.  If you can't get the build64 business working
soon I suggest disabling it for now.

---
Received: (at 344237-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 19:42:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 11:42:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpsoX-0001L7-0E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:42:53 -0800
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-103-207.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.103.207])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
jBNJgoFe013134
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EpsoU-0001fw-2f
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in 5.1-4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hooray.

-- 
Nathanael Nerode  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

This space intentionally left blank.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 343138 - pending
Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause
Tags were: pending patch
Tags removed: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 339056 patch
Bug#339056: tktable: Library package nonconforming
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 343109 important
Bug#343109: boa-constructor: Fails to start
Severity set to `important'.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 344333 normal
Bug#344333: libextractor-python: fails unit test
Severity set to `normal'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#343109:

[Cedric Delfosse]

severity 343109 important
quit

I downgrade this bug to important, because AMD64 was an unofficial
architecture for Sarge.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344333: Don't mix diffrent upstream

[Daniel Baumann]

No surprise if you use parts of libextractor-python 0.5.4 on 0.5.2. Wait
until we upgraded to the newever version.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet:   http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#251159: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Re: Bug#251159: Bug still open?

[Adeodato Simó]

* Alexis Sukrieh [Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:14:11 +0100]:

Hi,

> * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > > But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise.

> > No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case
> > clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The maintainer
> > of cl-tclink is really not responsive.

> Ok, then I'll contact my sponsor for NMU'ing this package.
> Thanks for your responses.

> I do think it's cleaner to have a changelog entry whenever something
> changes in the Debian archive.

  Binary-only NMUs are perfectly ok to solve bugs like this, where only
  a recompilation is needed. They just need to get scheduled on all
  arches, but there's nothing "unclean" about them. Do you have any
  issues with them that you'd like to clear up? :)

  Incidentally, though, in this _particular_ case the package could use
  a NMU: not because of the existance of previous binNMUs, but because
  one of them failed: see #344485. If you feel like it, you could give
  it a shot; it'd make a nice one for your NM process, IMHO (but TeX is
  involved, so it may end up being a non-trivial one).

  Cheers,

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
Guy on cell: Yeah, I mean she's not easy to talk to, because, you know,
she'll be like, "What did you do this weekend?" and I'll say, "Nothing",
but really I was fucking some other girl.
-- http://www.overheardinnewyork.com/archives/003179.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)

[Martin Schulze]

Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. 
> There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1).
> 
> I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which
> closes the issue.

Umh... I don't have a CVE name to share anymore.  Will provide one
when I got a new bunch.

Do you happen to know about the package in woody?

> Can we plan to upload that package to security updates?

Yes.  I've copied it into the private security archive.

Next steps:

 a) what about woody

 b) what about sid

 c) release advisory

Regards,

Joey

-- 
The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media.  -- H. Peter Anvin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Marco d'Itri]

On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
> the mknod from the postinst does?  This was the reason I didn't use
> MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago.
If it does not then it would be a MAKEDEV bug, and your package would
need to depend on the fixed version.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Edd Dumbill]

Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as
the mknod from the postinst does?  This was the reason I didn't use
MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago.

On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:41 +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> tags 338743 + patch
> thanks
> 
> * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV bluetooth
> > 
> > less /sbin/MAKEDEV
> 
> Thanks, here is attached a patch for the postinst script.
> I plan to make a sponsored NMU for closing this RC bug in bluez-utils'
> maintainer does not apply it.
> 
> Best regards,
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344525: [cl-debian] Bug#344525: clisp_1:2.36-2(m68k/unstable): Using wrong compiler/missing b-deps

[Peter Van Eynde]

On Friday 23 December 2005 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

Actually upstream seems to have problems supporting the m68k architecture and 
unless they find a solution soonish I will remove it from the architectures 
list. :-(

Groetjes, Peter

-- 
signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/
"God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: removal of automake1.6

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package isdnutils
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: isdnutils

> severity 335124 grave
Bug#335124: removal of automake1.6
Severity set to `grave'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339806: [Help] sgml-speaking person needed to fix cdbs FTBFS

[Frank Küster]

"David C. Weichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
> a friend forwarded your Email concerning a bug in db2latex-xsl. I'm not
> familiar with the package and what it does, but I've been working with
> SGML/XML and XSLT for a couple of years now. Please give me more
> information. If possible I would gladly help fixing.

Ah, that's great to hear.  Are you using Debian, and familiar with our
bugtracking system and a little with how source packages are organized?
If not, just tell me and I'll give more details.

The bug we are talking about is 

http://bugs.debian.org/339806

Meanwhile, one of the people involved in upstream development has said
he hopes to find time to look into it - it's the last message in the bug
log, or rather the one before this very mail which will be sorted after
it.  Maybe it's best if you contact him and offer your help?

On the other hand, if it turns out that he won't be able to do the work,
maybe you are willing to work independently?

Kind Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Bug#335124: removal of automake1.6

[Faidon Liambotis]

package isdnutils
severity 335124 grave
thanks

automake1.6 is removed from the archive therefore isdnutils FTBFS.
Because of this, I'm setting the severity to grave.
An NMU is needed/pending for this package (see #344200). I'm
coordinating with Marco d'Itri to prepare those fixes.

Regards,
Faidon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344482: marked as done (klibc-utils: FTBFS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:32:07 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344482: fixed in klibc 1.1.1-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 23:11:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 15:11:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([213.84.119.166])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpZbE-0005WU-9e
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:11:53 -0800
Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A387F794A0; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:08:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:08:35 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: klibc-utils: FTBFS
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: klibc-utils
Version: 1.1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



Script started on Thu 22 Dec 2005 05:15:17 PM CET
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1
$ fakeroot debian/rules binary
test -x debian/rules
test "`id -u`" = 0
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs -A 
if [ -n "" ]; then \
  mkdir -p ""; \
fi
if [ -n "" ]; then \
  mkdir -p ""; \
fi
if [ -n "" ]; then \
  mkdir -p ""; \
fi
if [ ! -d "." ]; then \
  mkdir -p "."; \
fi
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a 
deprecated variable"
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_CLEAN_MAKE_TARGET is a 
deprecated variable"
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_MAKE_TEST_TARGET is a deprecated 
variable"
if [ -z "" ]; then \
  if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo 4 > debian/compat; fi; \
fi
if [ ! -e linux ]; then \
mkdir -p linux/include;\
for x in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-2/include/*; do \
ln -s $x linux/include;\
done;\
ln -s /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-2/include/asm-sparc \
linux/include/asm; \
fi
make -C . INSTALLROOT=debian/tmp CC=gcc-3.3 all
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1/klibc'
gcc-3.3 -Wp,-MT,vsnprintf.o,-MD,./.vsnprintf.o.d -Os -m64 -mptr64 -D__KLIBC__=1 
-D__KLIBC_MINOR__=1 -nostdlib -nostdinc -iwithprefix include 
-I../include/arch/sparc64 -I../include/bits64 -I../include -I../linux/include 
-I../linux/include2 -I../linux/include -I./zlib -I./zlib -DWITH_ERRLIST -W 
-Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline 
-DDYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE -c -o vsnprintf.o vsnprintf.c
In file included from ../include/sys/types.h:15,
 from ../include/unistd.h:11,
 from ../include/stdio.h:11,
 from vsnprintf.c:13:
../linux/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or 
directory
In file included from ../include/unistd.h:11,
 from ../include/stdio.h:11,
 from vsnprintf.c:13:
../include/sys/types.h:16:23: asm/types.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ../include/unistd.h:11,
 from ../include/stdio.h:11,
 from vsnprintf.c:13:
../include/sys/types.h:23: error: syntax error before "ino_t"
../include/sys/types.h:23: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`ino_t'
../include/sys/types.h:23: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/sys/types.h:24: error: syntax error before "mode_t"
../include/sys/types.h:24: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`mode_t'
../include/sys/types.h:24: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/sys/types.h:25: error: syntax error before "nlink_t"
../include/sys/types.h:25: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`nlink_t'
../include/sys/types.h:25: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/sys/types.h:26: error: syntax error before "off_t"
../include/sys/types.h:26: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`off_t'
../include/sys/types.h:26: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/sys/types.h:27: error: syntax error before "loff_t"
../include/s

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

[Steve Kemp]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:

> >   It looks good to me.  I've built a package and if nobody has any 
> >  objections I'll upload later today.
> 
> No objections from me.

  Great I already uploaded the package ;)

Steve
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

[Wouter van Heyst]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:55:07AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> 
> > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code
> > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to
> > prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made,
> > yet I haven't heard of any such issues (or anything at all, to be
> > precise) since then...
> 
>   Utterly slipped my mind.  :(
> 
> > FWIW, I've put together an update for Sarge's version of the blender
> > package based on the upstream change mentioned above, please find
> > attached a cumulative interdiff for both CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895
> > and this bug so these issues can be resolved for Sarge.
> 
>   Great, thanks a lot.
> 
> > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential
> > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what
> > might be missing.
> 
>   It looks good to me.  I've built a package and if nobody has any 
>  objections I'll upload later today.

No objections from me.

Wouter van Heyst


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: build problems on sarti (was: Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 344538 important
Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails
Severity set to `important'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344538: build problems on sarti (was: Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails)

[Frank Küster]

severity 344538 important
thanks

Hi Lamont, hi Debian admins,

during the last weeks there were a couple of FTBFS cases on sarti, the
hppa buildd, which point to severe problems on that machine.  The things
that happened did only happen on this single buildd, but did in no way
look as if they were architecture specific.  

To me it looks as if there were hardware problems.  

Previously, the bugs were resolved without notifying the maintainers how
this was achieved (or whether maybe nothing was done at all except
requeing the FTBFS package), so I can't tell what the real cause was then.

See for example this new bug:

Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0-11
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute update-language
> (from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or configured during a fresh 
> install.

This analysis is not correct.  The script that fails is tetex-base's
postinst:

Setting up tetex-base (3.0-11) ...
Removing unchanged obsolete conffiles ... done
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 678: update-language: command not 
found
dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127

so tex-common (on which tetex-base depends) should be already
configured and work fine (note that both packages are architecture:
all).  But the build does not even try to install tex-common, so it
seems dpkg thinks that it is already installed:

> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=planner&ver=0.13-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1135258214&file=log&as=raw
>
> The cure would be to move tex-comon to Pre-Depends.

No, for sure not.  In fact this particular command should work even when
tex-common is only unpacked, but unconfigured, since update-language is
a simple shell script in /usr/sbin.  If tex-common is unpacked and the
shell works, it should work, too.

So it seems something is severely amiss with the debbuild chroot on
sarti. 

Regards, Frank

P.S. I'd like to reassign this bug to "buildd.debian.org" or
"sarti.debian.org", but such a virtual package doesn't exist...
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Bug#337871: FTBFS (alpha): invalid lvalue in assignment

[Troy Heber]

I lied earlier, we do need the patch Ben submitted (the chroot I was
using wasn't updated and didn't show the bug). The problem is there is
no "good" way to patch it at the debian level, because the gdb
included in crash is shipped as a gzip tarball that gets unpacked at
build time. It's much easier to submit the patch upstream and get a
fixed versions there, especially because upstream is so responsive. I
submitted the patch upstream today, so we should have a new version
fairly soon.

Thanks,

Troy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344535: marked as done (vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor 
from vim-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 15:24:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 07:24:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 24.235.97-84.rev.gaoland.net ([84.97.235.24] 
helo=babasse.is-a-geek.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Epomg-0002JR-Rx
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:24:43 -0800
Received: from smimram by babasse.is-a-geek.org with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1EpomB-0002wm-Et; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:24:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:24:10 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: vim-runtime
Version: 1:6.4-004+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

While trying to update vim, the installation failed on

Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-common

Regards,

Samuel.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

vim-runtime depends on no packages.

Versions of packages vim-runtime recommends:
pn  vim | vim-gnome | vim-gtk | v  (no description available)

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 344535-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 16:04:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 08:04:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sockmel.bononia.it ([194.242.226.39])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EppPC-0007IA-PL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:04:30 -0800
Received: from muletto.takhisis.invalid (85-18-14-42.fastres.net [85.18.14.42])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Stefano Zacchiroli", Issuer "sockmel.bononia.it" (verified 
OK))
by sockmel.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35DD56DF8;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:04:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by muletto.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9CD2D440BC; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100
From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from 
vim-common
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version: 1:6.4-006+1

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack):
>  trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-co=
mmon

There was a problem with non-epoched versioned relationships in
debian/control. The problem is fixed in the last unstable v

Bug#344524: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Simon Huggins]

severity 344524 normal
thanks

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:44:28PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name
> for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd
> dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable.

The new exo package is in NEW.

Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out.

Thanks for your concern.

-- 
--( "A lie, Mr. Mulder, is most convincingly hidden  )--
--(between two truths" - Deep Throat )--
Simon (  ) Nomis
 Htag.pl 0.0.22


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 344524 normal
Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344200: URGENTLY needs support for the latest ppp package

[Marco d'Itri]

On Dec 20, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Please rebuild pppdcapiplugin for ppp 2.4.4b1.
> > Expect a NMU if this will not be fixed soon, because it's blocking ppp
> > from entering testing.
> Go ahead, I'm a bit out of the ISDN stuff at the moment due to
> circumstances :-(
OK, in the next few days I will work on a new package.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#332824: missing ide-generic

[Jonathan Brandmeyer]

On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:34 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
> patch -p1  /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < 
> ide-generic.udev.patch
> 
> for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk 
> out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u
> and reboot,
> if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually
> ide-generic and disc..
> 
> thanks for your feedback.

The patch works for me.

-Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 344523 normal
Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Severity set to `normal'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 343720, retitle 343720 to libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10
> tags 343720 + patch
Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> retitle 343720 libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies
Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342288: NMU for this bug

[Frank Küster]

Hi, 

since this bug has been open for quite a while, I'm currently preparing
an NMU for this bug, using the attached patch.  I'm going to upload it
without a delay.

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/debian/changelog poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/changelog
--- poppler-0.4.2/debian/changelog	2005-12-23 16:48:41.997756352 +0100
+++ poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/changelog	2005-12-23 16:48:21.697842408 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+poppler (0.4.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * SECURITY UPDATE: Multiple integer/buffer overflows.
+
+  * NMU to fix RC security bug (closes: #342288)
+  * Add debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch taken from Ubuntu,
+thanks to Martin Pitt:
+  * poppler/Stream.cc, DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(),
+DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), DCTStream::readScanInfo():
+- Check numComps for invalid values.
+- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=342&type=vulnerabilities
+- CVE-2005-3191
+  * poppler/Stream.cc, StreamPredictor::StreamPredictor():
+- Check rowBytes for invalid values.
+- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=344&type=vulnerabilities
+- CVE-2005-3192
+   * poppler/JPXStream.cc, JPXStream::readCodestream():
+ - Check img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles for integer overflow.
+ - http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=345&type=vulnerabilities
+ - CVE-2005-3193
+
+ -- Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:36:30 +0100
+
 poppler (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * GNOME Team upload.
diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch
--- poppler-0.4.2/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch	2005-12-23 16:15:37.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/poppler/JPXStream.cc poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/JPXStream.cc
+--- poppler-0.4.2/poppler/JPXStream.cc	2005-03-03 20:46:03.0 +0100
 poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/JPXStream.cc	2005-12-09 17:41:42.0 +0100
+@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
+ //
+ 
+ #include 
++#include 
+ 
+ #ifdef USE_GCC_PRAGMAS
+ #pragma implementation
+@@ -666,7 +667,7 @@
+   int segType;
+   GBool haveSIZ, haveCOD, haveQCD, haveSOT;
+   Guint precinctSize, style;
+-  Guint segLen, capabilities, comp, i, j, r;
++  Guint segLen, capabilities, nTiles, comp, i, j, r;
+ 
+   //- main header
+   haveSIZ = haveCOD = haveQCD = haveSOT = gFalse;
+@@ -701,8 +702,18 @@
+ 	/ img.xTileSize;
+   img.nYTiles = (img.ySize - img.yTileOffset + img.yTileSize - 1)
+ 	/ img.yTileSize;
+-  img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles *
+- sizeof(JPXTile));
++  // check for overflow before allocating memory
++  if (img.nXTiles <= 0 || img.nYTiles <= 0 ||
++  img.nXTiles >= INT_MAX/img.nYTiles) {
++  error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment");
++  return gFalse;
++  }
++  nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles;
++  if (nTiles >= INT_MAX/sizeof(JPXTile)) {
++   error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment");
++   return gFalse;
++  }
++  img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(nTiles * sizeof(JPXTile));
+   for (i = 0; i < img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles; ++i) {
+ 	img.tiles[i].tileComps = (JPXTileComp *)gmalloc(img.nComps *
+ 			sizeof(JPXTileComp));
+diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/poppler/Stream.cc poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/Stream.cc
+--- poppler-0.4.2/poppler/Stream.cc	2005-04-27 22:56:18.0 +0200
 poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/Stream.cc	2005-12-09 17:40:53.0 +0100
+@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
++#include 
+ #ifndef WIN32
+ #include 
+ #endif
+@@ -420,13 +421,28 @@
+   width = widthA;
+   nComps = nCompsA;
+   nBits = nBitsA;
++  predLine = NULL;
++  ok = gFalse;
+ 
++  if (width <= 0 || nComps <= 0 || nBits <= 0 ||
++  nComps >= INT_MAX/nBits ||
++  width >= INT_MAX/nComps/nBits) {
++return;
++  }
+   nVals = width * nComps;
++  if (nVals * nBits + 7 <= 0) {
++return;
++  }
+   pixBytes = (nComps * nBits + 7) >> 3;
+   rowBytes = ((nVals * nBits + 7) >> 3) + pixBytes;
++  if (rowBytes < 0) {
++return;
++  }
+   predLine = (Guchar *)gmalloc(rowBytes);
+   memset(predLine, 0, rowBytes);
+   predIdx = rowBytes;
++
++  ok = gTrue;
+ }
+ 
+ StreamPredictor::~StreamPredictor() {
+@@ -1020,6 +1036,10 @@
+ FilterStream(strA) {
+   if (predictor != 1) {
+ pred = new StreamPredictor(this, predictor, columns, colors, bits);
++if (!pred->isOk()) {
++  delete pred;
++  pred = NULL;
++}
+   } else {
+ pred = NULL;
+   }
+@@ -2907,6 +2927,10 @@
+   height = read16();
+   width = read16();
+   numComps = str->getChar();
++  if (numComps <= 0 || numComps > 4) {
++error(getPos()

Bug#344523: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Simon Huggins]

severity 344523 normal
thanks

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:42:27PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is
> not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is
> uninstallable in unstable. 

The new exo package is in NEW.

Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out.

Thanks for your concern.

Simon.

-- 
* But what if Sarris survives? - Mathesar   *
| Oh, I don't think so. I gave him both barrels. - Jason|
* Galaxy Quest. *
   Brought to you by the letter Z and the number 20


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merge

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 344395 critical
Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid
Severity set to `critical'.

> merge 344395 344424
Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid
Bug#344424: rssh: local privilege escalation in versions < 2.3.0 (CVE-2005-3345)
Merged 344395 344424.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails

[Martin-Éric Racine]

Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute update-language
(from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or configured during a fresh 
install. This in turn breaks installation of jadetex and other TeX bits,
which prevents building of packages Build-Depends on TeX components.

http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=planner&ver=0.13-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1135258214&file=log&as=raw

The cure would be to move tex-comon to Pre-Depends.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDrBq/eXr56x4Muc0RAuXbAJ4nRhpoSN6dzLpfv6xXoDhJFPCdMQCfZL7p
XmQTRzVEOUsKpDyNYtPbvZ4=
=UkaJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common

[Samuel Mimram]

Package: vim-runtime
Version: 1:6.4-004+1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

While trying to update vim, the installation failed on

Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-common

Regards,

Samuel.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

vim-runtime depends on no packages.

Versions of packages vim-runtime recommends:
pn  vim | vim-gnome | vim-gtk | v  (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344202: marked as done (gclcvs: ftbfs [sparc] pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344202: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 20:45:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 12:45:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EooMu-00021A-7Z
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:45:56 -0800
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
jBKKjnVE012779
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:45:51 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBKKr9sm000693;
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBKKr9iG000691;
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gclcvs: ftbfs [sparc] pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gclcvs
Version: 2.7.0-53
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

gclcvs failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder.

gcc -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -fsigned-char -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
-I/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0/o -I../h -I../gcl-tk plt.c  
In file included from plt.c:36:
pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token
pltd.h:2: error: syntax error before '.' token
pltd.h:3: error: syntax error before '.' token
pltd.h:4: error: syntax error before '.' token
In file included from plt.c:56:
plt.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token
plt.h:3: error: syntax error before '.' token
make[2]: *** [plt.o] Error 1
rm symbol.c list.c string.c hash.c character.c sequence.c print.c read.c 
pathname.c file.c package.c
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0/o'
make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0'
make: *** [build-trad-stamp] Error 2

---
Received: (at 344202-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 14:41:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 06:41:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Epny1-0006QK-UC; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#344202: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gclcvs
Source-Version: 2.7.0-54

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb
gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc
gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz
gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gclcvs package)

(This message 

Bug#340853: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): __remq is undefined)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340853: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 12:18:19 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 04:18:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp07.web.de ([217.72.192.225])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Efz0V-0008Qx-JQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:18:19 -0800
Received: from [84.59.223.201] (helo=juist)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(WEB.DE 4.105 #333)
id 1Efz00-0005S3-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:48 +0100
Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.54)
id 1Efyzz-0007EX-KL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:47 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS (alpha): __remq is undefined
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:47 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: gclcvs
Version: 2.7.0-50.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

gclcvs does not build on Alpha:

[...]
GCL (GNU Common Lisp)  2.7.0 CLtL1Oct 15 2005 08:35:10
Source License: LGPL(gcl,gmp), GPL(unexec,bfd)
Binary License:  GPL due to GPL'ed components: (READLINE BFD UNEXEC)
Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license
Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter

Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL.

>
Loading ../tkl.o
__remq is undefined

Error: Cannot get relocated section contents

Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging
Error signalled by EVAL.
[...]

Full log at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gclcvs&ver=2.7.0-50.1&arch=alpha&stamp=1129366266&file=log&as=raw

This was already discussed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2005/09/msg00027.html , but
without a resolution.

Since apparently this isn't reproducible on escher, I can offer an
account on my machine if anybody wants to debug this.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: alpha
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---
Received: (at 340853-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 14:41:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 06:41:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Epny1-0006QI-TO; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#340853: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: gclcvs
Source-Version: 2.7.0-54

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb
gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc
gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz
gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance softw

Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)

[Alexis Sukrieh]

* Alexis Sukrieh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. 
^^
Of course I was speaking about bugzilla, not backup-manager, sorry! 

(Hopefully I'm on holydays this evening ;)

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?

[Alexis Sukrieh]

* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> > Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
> > 0.91cvs2005082?
> 
> I can not reproduce the bug with the latest version. So this seems
> indeed to be fixed, thanks!

Great! 

Thanks, I'm closing the bug.

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318719: marked as done (tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:52:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 09:03:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 02:03:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Du537-0005U6-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:03:01 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
j6H92swE028669
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de 
[130.75.25.91])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCEB1B5F0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id 775551A6C7; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:49 +0200
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:54 +0200 (MEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tecnoballz
Version: 0.91-2
Severity: important

On amd64, tecnoballz segfaults on startup. I suspect this is a 64bit
issue, as there are 14 warnings about casts from pointer to integer
(the first 64bit, the latter 32bit) and another, simmilar warning
during compilation. 

N.B. severity important, since amd64 is not yet part of Etch, once it
 is, the severity will be raised accordingly

Since your debian/rules does not build with -g and does not even
support noopt (see #319715), I hacked Makefile.in to use include "-O0 -g" for
CXXFLAGS. Next I commented out dh_strip in debian/rules and ran
dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b -rfakeroot

Next I installed the resulting deb and ran it in gdb, using libc6-dbg.
This is the result:

GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux"...Using host libthread_db library 
"/usr/lib/debug/libthread_db.so.1".

(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/games/tecnoballz 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 182916947344 (LWP 685)]
configfile::fopen_data(): Warning: Unable to open the file 
"/home/helge/.tlkgames/tecnoballz.conf" for read!!!
[New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 688)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 182916947344 (LWP 685)]
__libc_free (mem=0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8) at malloc.c:3341
3341malloc.c: No such file or directory.
in malloc.c
Current language:  auto; currently c
(gdb) bt full
#0  __libc_free (mem=0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8) at malloc.c:3341
ar_ptr = 0x71e270
p = 0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8
hook = (void (*)(void *, const void *)) 0
#1  0x002a95f060f1 in SDL_FreeFormat () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#2  0x002a95f07c9e in SDL_FreeSurface () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#3  0x00416078 in GFX_bitmap::GFXLiberat (this=0x721b98)
at src/GFX_bitmap.cc:64
No locals.
#4  0x00416841 in ~GIF_bitMap (this=0x721890) at src/GIF_bitMap.cc:41
No locals.
#5  0x00423157 in ressources::freeSprite (this=0x598470)
at src/ressources.cc:335
No locals.
#6  0x0041e00e in menu_tecno::first_init (this=0x71da30)

Bug#337497: missing ide-generic

[Maximilian Attems]

unmerge 337497
severity 337497 important
tags 337497 moreinfo
stopped

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> 
> Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so
> i fail to understand what i should test ? 
> 

indeed your bug report was falsly merged,
sorry for not noticing earlier - thus decoupling.

anyway the timing bug you experienced in your bug report should be gone
since long. please retest on latest udev and initramfs-tools in
unstable regarding the pegasos support.

thanks

--
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)

[Alexis Sukrieh]

Hi,

I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. 
There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1).

I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which
closes the issue.

Can we plan to upload that package to security updates?

The package is available on my repository:
deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian ./

Changes:
http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2_i386.changes

Diff.gz:
http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.diff.gz

Dsc:
http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.dsc

Regards,

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#332824: missing ide-generic

[Sven Luther]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:34:23PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> 
> please try the attached patch,
> should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
> patch -p1  /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < 
> ide-generic.udev.patch
> 
> for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk 
> out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u
> and reboot,
> if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually
> ide-generic and disc..

Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so
i fail to understand what i should test ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332824: missing ide-generic

[maximilian attems]

please try the attached patch,
should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up:
patch -p1  /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < 
ide-generic.udev.patch

for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk 
out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u
and reboot,
if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually
ide-generic and disc..

thanks for your feedback.

-- 
maks
--- udev-0.076/extra/initramfs.premount 2005-12-23 12:36:04.0 +0100
+++ udev-0.076-ma/extra/initramfs.premount  2005-12-23 12:35:52.0 
+0100
@@ -21,6 +21,38 @@ mkdir /dev/.udev/ /dev/.udev/db/ /dev/.u
 udevd --daemon
 
 udevsynthesize
+
+# Our job now is to make the block device for the root filesystem available.
+# This is actually a bit trickier than it first appears because we first need
+# to figure out which driver needs it, and to do that, we need to know what
+# type of bus it's on.  Fortunately we have all that information, this still
+# feels like an ungodly hack though.
+. /conf/initramfs.conf
+. /scripts/functions
+case "${BOOT}" in
+   local)
+   case "${ROOT}" in
+   /dev/root)
+   # An interesting case, this root device was specified as a
+   # major/minor pair.  Fortunately we have that information
+   case "${major}" in
+   3|22|33|34|56|57|88|89|90|91)
+   # traditional ide
+   root_type=ide
+   ;;
+   80|81|82|83|84|85|86|87)
+   # ide on i2o
+   root_type=ide
+   ;;
+   esac
+   ;;
+   /dev/hd*)
+   # Ahh, plain-old traditional ide
+   root_type=ide
+   ;;
+   esac
+esac
+
 while [ -d /dev/.udev/queue/ ]; do
 sleep 1
 udevd_timeout=$(($udevd_timeout - 1))
@@ -29,5 +61,13 @@ while [ -d /dev/.udev/queue/ ]; do
 fi
 done
 
+# If we're booting from IDE, we may need to load ide-generic.
+case "${root_type}" in
+   ide)
+   if [ ! -e "${ROOT}" -o "${ROOT}" = "/dev/root" ]; then
+   modprobe -q ide-generic
+   fi
+esac
+
 # Leave udev running to process events that come in out-of-band (like USB
 # connections)

Bug#344390: marked as done (Can not load correctly)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#344390: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 10:39:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 02:39:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpNrP-0001EX-Nr
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:47 -0800
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so389488nzf
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:47 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;

h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;

b=UQI3dktOx3WTRUZRvfU32nbJTQU///OYB6tEXL/85u1f6Ez9TMcdBAD9rUXxN5OHAL6bdQ8BXmdSRkWE/tmiKZj6CnmY4Uhmik+XMLDcNfOfNAKjXqtJP7tiMahNzUacoQkdf6gRbkjDNaJwqX/ofXfU3aXPQg7NMUDeSninu08=
Received: by 10.36.129.6 with SMTP id b6mr315782nzd;
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.214.1.201? ( [218.108.31.122])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m2sm1530853nzf.2005.12.22.02.39.44;
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Disposition-Notification-To: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:41:22 +0800
From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Zhejiang University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051222 
SeaMonkey/1.5a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can not load correctly
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: araneida
Version: 0.90.1
Severity: serious

I cannot use (clc:clc-require :araneida) to compile and load araneida 
correctly. I think that's because this file 'doc/new-dispatch-model' in source 
didn't come with it's deb package. When I copy it to 
/usr/share/common-lisp/source/araneida/doc ,everything goes well.

Thanks.

-- 
GnuPG Key: 0xF7C63B10


---
Received: (at 344390-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 12:51:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 04:51:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EpmKA-0005cE-GI; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800
From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#344390: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: araneida
Source-Version: 0.90.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
araneida, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

araneida_0.90.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2.diff.gz
araneida_0.90.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2.dsc
araneida_0.90.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated araneida package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:30:28 +0100
Source: araneida
Binary: araneida

Bug#339806: [DB2LaTeX-apps] Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput

[James Devenish]

Hello Frank, Ramon and other readers,

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:16:12PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February
> this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and
> TeXLive 2005 (released this fall): It always produces PDF instead of DVI
> files. 
> 
> The reason is that these TeX distributions use pdfetex as the engine

I am still alive and can look into this within the next couple of days.

Bug#344525: clisp_1:2.36-2(m68k/unstable): Using wrong compiler/missing b-deps

[wouter]

Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.36-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of clisp_1:2.36-2 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 79
> Build started at 20051223-1039

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), gettext, bison, libncurses5-dev, groff, 
> xlibs-dev, xutils, libxt-dev, libsigsegv-dev (>= 2.1), libreadline5-dev | 
> libreadline-dev, dh-lisp (>= 0.3), gcc-3.3 [sparc]

[...]

>  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
>   libreadline4-dev (>= 4.3-1)

[...]

> rm -rf debian/build
> rm src/VERSION || true
> rm: cannot remove `src/VERSION': No such file or directory
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> ./configure debian/build --prefix=/usr --fsstnd=debian --without-dynamic-ffi \
>   --with-module=clx/mit-clx
> executing /build/buildd/clisp-2.36/debian/build/configure 
> --srcdir=/build/buildd/clisp-2.36/src --prefix=/usr --with-module=clx/mit-clx 
> --cache-file=config.cache
> configure: creating cache config.cache
> configure: * checks for UNIX variants that set DEFS
> checking for gcc... gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D 
> NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C 
> compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 77

Checking config.log reveals the following:

configure:1252: creating cache config.cache
configure:1343: * checks for UNIX variants that set DEFS
configure:1391: checking for gcc
configure:1417: result: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D 
NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP
configure:1661: checking for C compiler version
configure:1664: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D 
NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP --version &5
configure: line 1665: gcc-3.3: command not found
configure:1667: $? = 127
configure:1669: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D 
NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP -v &5
configure: line 1670: gcc-3.3: command not found
configure:1672: $? = 127
configure:1674: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D 
NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP -V &5
configure: line 1675: gcc-3.3: command not found
configure:1677: $? = 127
configure:1700: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:1703: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D 
NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAPconftest.c  >&5
configure: line 1704: gcc-3.3: command not found
configure:1706: $? = 127
configure: failed program was:
[...]

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=clisp&ver=1:2.36-2



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322644: libproc-background-perl: FTBFS: Test failure

[Niko Tyni]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:15:12AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
 
> I can still reproduce this problem using pbuilder and an i386 unstable
> chroot.  I've attached the full build log.  Please let me know if I
> can provide further information.

Hi,

I can reproduce this with sbuild, but not pbuilder. With sbuild the reason
for the failed tests is

$SIG{'HUP'} = 'IGNORE';

in /usr/bin/sbuild.

Tests 21 and 23 test that the process gets killed if timeout occurs.
The actual killing signal is sent in Proc::Background::Unix::_die(),
which tries 5 times each of the signals HUP, QUIT, INT, and KILL,
sleeping 1 second between each try.

Since the tests have a timeout of 4, the _die() function is still
trying the HUP signal when ALRM is received.

I can't see any reference to HUP in pbuilder, so I have no idea
what causes it there.

Cheers,
-- 
Niko Tyni   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Andreas Pakulat]

Package: xfce4-terminal
Version: 0.2.4-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name
for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd
dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable.

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xfce4-terminal depends on:
ii  dbus-1   0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  dbus-glib-1  0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexo0.3-0  0.3.0-2 Library with extensions for Xfce
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.2-1.1   generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-1   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notification0 0.8-1   library for program launch feedbac
ii  libvte4  1:0.11.15-4 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ 
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxfce4util-1   4.2.3.2-1   Utility functions library for Xfce
ii  libxfcegui4-34.2.3-1 Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxrender1  1:0.9.0-2   X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-9   compression library - runtime

Versions of packages xfce4-terminal recommends:
ii  dbus-1-utils  0.23.4-8   simple interprocess messaging syst

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian

[Andreas Pakulat]

Package: xfmedia
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is
not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is
uninstallable in unstable. 

Andreas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xfmedia depends on:
ii  dbus-1   0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  dbus-glib-1  0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libatk1.0-0  1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libexo0.3-0  0.3.0-2 Library with extensions for Xfce
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0  2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6  6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libsm6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstartup-notification0 0.8-1   library for program launch feedbac
ii  libtag1c2a   1.4-3   TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library
ii  libtagc0 1.4-3   TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library (C 
ii  libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxfce4util-1   4.2.3.2-1   Utility functions library for Xfce
ii  libxfcegui4-34.2.3-1 Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4
ii  libxine1 1.0.1-1.4   the xine video/media player librar
ii  libxtst6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System event recording an
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.3-9   compression library - runtime

xfmedia recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?

[Andreas Jochens]

On 05-Dec-23 12:46, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> tags 318719 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed,
> there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support.
> 
> Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
> 0.91cvs2005082?

I can not reproduce the bug with the latest version. So this seems
indeed to be fixed, thanks!

Regards
Andreas Jochens



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344416: retrigger a binNMU build for powerpc with new kernel-package ?

[Sven Luther]

Hi Steve,

I wonder if you would be able to trigger a binNMU of the powerpc kernel, which
would then build with the kernel-package version Manoj uploaded yesterday, and
claims fixes this issue. I have no tested it, nor will i be able to do the
binNMU upload myself, but i understand the buildd network has nice support for
doing this all by itself, so i think this is the best way for now.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337240: i can repro with f-spot 0.1.5-1

[Benoît Dejean]

Package: f-spot
Version: 0.1.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #337240

Starting new FSpot server

Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to 
an instance of an object
in <0x001d4> PhotoStore:Query (System.String query)
in <0x005b0> PhotoStore:Query (.Tag[] tags, .DateRange range)
in <0x0003c> FSpot.PhotoQuery:.ctor (.PhotoStore store)
in <0x00808> MainWindow:.ctor (.Db db)
in <0x00040> FSpot.Core:get_MainWindow ()
in <0x00018> FSpot.Core:Organize ()
in <0x004c8> Driver:Main (System.String[] args)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to fr_FR.UTF-8)

Versions of packages f-spot depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdbus-cil   0.23.4-8   CLI binding for D-BUS interprocess
ii  libexif12 0.6.12-2   library to parse EXIF files
ii  libgconf2.0-cil   2.4.0-1CLI binding for GConf 2.6
ii  libglade2.0-cil   2.3.92-2   CLI binding for the Glade librarie
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines
ii  libglib2.0-cil2.3.92-2   CLI binding for the GLib utility l
ii  libgnome2.0-cil   2.3.92-2   CLI binding for GNOME 2.0, unstabl
ii  libgnomeui-0  2.10.1-1   The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii  libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5   The GNOME virtual file-system libr
ii  libgphoto2-2  2.1.6-6gphoto2 digital camera library
ii  libgtk2.0-0   2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libgtk2.0-cil 2.3.92-2   CLI binding for the Gtk+ toolkit 2
ii  libjpeg62 6b-11  The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblcms1  1.13-1 Color management library
ii  libmono0  1.1.10-1   libraries for the Mono JIT
ii  libsqlite02.8.16-1   SQLite shared library
ii  mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.10-1   Mono class library (1.0)
ii  mono-jit  1.1.10-1   fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M

f-spot recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph

[Epco]

Package: cacti
Version: 0.8.6c-7sarge2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

When I do a reload of the cacti graph page, I see that there is a zombie mysql 
daemon process created for every graph shown.

In the end this results in over 1000 zombie processes and mysql server cannot
create any threads anymore.

A similar problem is described in 
http://forums.cacti.net/post-37044.html&highlight=

Kind regards,

Epco

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages cacti depends on:
ii  apache   1.3.33-6sarge1  versatile, high-performance HTTP s
ii  debconf  1.4.30.13   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libphp-adodb 4.52-1  The 'adodb' database abstraction l
ii  logrotate3.7-5   Log rotation utility
ii  mysql-client 4.0.24-10sarge1 mysql database client binaries
ii  php4 4:4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-cli 4:4.3.10-16 command-line interpreter for the p
ii  php4-mysql   4:4.3.10-16 MySQL module for php4
ii  php4-snmp4:4.3.10-16 SNMP module for php4
di  rrdtool  1.0.49-1Time-series data storage and displ
ii  snmp 5.1.2-6.2   NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen
ii  ucf  1.17Update Configuration File: preserv

-- debconf information:
* cacti/password: (password omitted)
  cacti/confirm: (password omitted)
  cacti/root_password: (password omitted)
* cacti/username: cacti
* cacti/mysql_server: panoramix
* cacti/webserver: Apache
  cacti/save_rootpw: true
  cacti/upgrade_warning:
  cacti/root_mysql: root
* cacti/no_automagic:
  cacti/purge_db: true
* cacti/database: cacti
  cacti/mismatch:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344515: kernel module ip2100 crashes when loading firmware on amd64-system

[Hans]

Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.14-6
Severity: critical



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 depends on:
ii  e2fsprogs 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10-1 ext2 file system utilities and lib
ii  module-init-t 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  yaird [linux- 0.0.12-1   Yet Another mkInitRD

linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

Desription: On AMD64-Kernel the module "ipw2100" let the system extremly slow 
down (or crash at startup)
whenever the firmware is going to be loaded (the firmware is correctly 
installed under /usr/lib/hotplug/)

This is only on 64-bit-systems. On 32-bit-systems it works fine (tested with 
lifefilesystem "WHAX 3.0", 

a Debian based wardrive distribution)

I suppose an incompability with the 32-bit-firmware on 64-bit-kernels. 

This behaviour is the same on older kernels (2.6.8 - 2.6.12), when 
ipw2100-sources had to be compiled as 

a additional kernel module (on 64-bit-systems)

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?

[Alexis Sukrieh]

tags 318719 + moreinfo
thanks

Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed,
there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support.

Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version
0.91cvs2005082?

Thanks.

-- 
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x1EE5DD34
Debian   http://www.debian.org
Backup Manager   http://www.backup-manager.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#339806: Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput

[Frank Küster]

Dear maintainers of db2latex,

db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February
this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and
TeXLive 2005 (released this fall): It always produces PDF instead of DVI
files. 

The reason is that these TeX distributions use pdfetex as the engine
behind latex *and* pdflatex, pdfetex can produce DVI and PDF output.
But the tests in db2latex that try to detect whether PDF or DVI output
were buggy from the beginning (although not invented by you, for sure),
and now fail:  They test whether \pdfoutput is *defined*, and assume PDF
output if yes, while in pdfitex it is always defined, but set to 0 if
DVI output is wanted.  Even worse, the LaTeX files created by db2latex
*set* \pdfoutput to 1 if they find that it is defined, and therefore
always produce PDF files.

This problem makes db2latex unusable in Debian (and many other
distributions), and breaks out automatic building of package
documentation in some cases.  Therefore we need a fix rather quickly,
and would be glad if you would implement this:  The maintainers of the
package within Debian are very busy currently, and I'm only the teTeX
maintainer who doesn't know anything about sgml or xml or whatever
language db2latex uses.  What I can tell you is how LaTeX files produced
by db2latex should look like, there is an easy and a thorough solution:

- the easy one is to load ifpdf.sty with \usepackage{ifpdf}, and use the
  conditional

\ifpdf
  % code for PDF output
\else
  % code for DVI output
\fi

  (the else branch can be left out, \fi is mandatory)

- the thorough one would be to check whether such a discrimination is
  needed at all.  For example, such a check is frequently used for
  hyperref, but in fact this package has output format tests built in
  and does not need to be called with an output driver option except in
  very special cases.

  If you want to go that way, feel free to ask me on
  debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org which of your checks is
  necessary. 
 
Many thanks in advance, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Bug#344254: oops sorry...

[Trent Lloyd]

mis-aimed email, ignore :)

-- 
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344354: ahh...

[Trent Lloyd]

avahi-utils used to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some
tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover

so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now

-- 
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344254: ah...

[Trent Lloyd]

avahi-utils usd to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some
tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover

so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now

-- 
Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bur.st Networking Inc.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import

[Steve Kemp]

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:

> Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code
> execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to
> prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made,
> yet I haven't heard of any such issues (or anything at all, to be
> precise) since then...

  Utterly slipped my mind.  :(

> FWIW, I've put together an update for Sarge's version of the blender
> package based on the upstream change mentioned above, please find
> attached a cumulative interdiff for both CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895
> and this bug so these issues can be resolved for Sarge.

  Great, thanks a lot.

> Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential
> future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what
> might be missing.

  It looks good to me.  I've built a package and if nobody has any 
 objections I'll upload later today.

Steve
--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344401: firefox: Printing support (CUPS) completely hosed

[Drew Parsons]

I can confirm the problem with the CUPS printer.  The printer properties
are listed there, including my paper setting of iso-A4.  But when I try
to "print to file" with it, firefox 1.5 complains, saying "There was a
problem printing because the paper size you specified is not supported
by your printer."   The same goes for Postscript/default.

The Xprint printers are, however, working for me.  That is, I can print
to them using iso-A4 paper.  I'm not seeing the glibc crash that
Henrique reported. I'm on libc6 2.3.5-9 (i386).

Drew





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: [bluez-utils #338743] More info

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 338743 + patch
Bug#338743: must not use mknod in postinst
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]