Processed: Re: Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'arm specifier' errors
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 343687 help Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'asm specifier' errors There were no tags set. Tags added: help > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343687: firefox_1.5.dfsg-1(m68k/unstable): lots of 'arm specifier' errors
tags 343687 help thanks I'm going to need help with this one Wouter, my m68k assembly was a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Package: firefox > Version: 1.5.dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of firefox_1.5.dfsg-1 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 79 > > Build started at 20051217-0025 > > [...] > > > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), libx11-dev, libxp-dev, libxt-dev, > > libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, liborbit2-dev, libidl-dev (>= 0.8.0), zip, > > libxft-dev, libfreetype6-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libxrender-dev, > > libxinerama-dev, libcairo2-dev, libkrb5-dev, libgnome2-dev, libgconf2-dev, > > libgnomevfs2-dev, libgnomeui-dev, patch, sharutils, m4 > > [...] > > > make[7]: *** [libs] Error 2 > > make[7]: Leaving directory > > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md' > > make[6]: *** [libs] Error 2 > > make[6]: Leaving directory > > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src' > > make[5]: *** [libs] Error 2 > > make[5]: Leaving directory > > `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect/xptcall' > > make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom/reflect' > > make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 > > make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg/xpcom' > > make[2]: *** [tier_2] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg' > > make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/firefox-1.5.dfsg' > > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 > > A full build log can be found at: > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=firefox&ver=1.5.dfsg-1 > > -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#339526: This bug has been fixed in later releases packaged for Etch and Sid.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As subject says (but some BTS interfaces don't show subject so I repeat here), this bug has been fixed in later releases packaged for Etch and Sid. So I have marked this bug as sarge, fixed-upstream and closed in 3.1.0a-1. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDrOSln7DbMsAkQLgRAoKFAJ4hbh9/oUtKb6LU1fQb5nUh9+z0MgCfTrFb wMSmkXJ+w15SkLGFCKFcURE= =VcS7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: closing 339526
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > close 339526 3.1.0a-1 Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass Vulnerability 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.1.0a-1, send any further explanations to Geoff Crompton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 339526
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 339526 fixed-upstream sarge Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass Vulnerability Tags were: security Tags added: fixed-upstream, sarge > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: notfound 339526 in 3.1.0a-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > notfound 339526 3.1.0a-2 Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass Vulnerability Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-2. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: notfound 339526 in 3.1.0a-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > notfound 339526 3.1.0a-1 Bug#339526: spamassassin: CVE-2005-3351: Bus Error Spam Detection Bypass Vulnerability Bug marked as not found in version 3.1.0a-1. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph
tags 344519 unreproducible moreinfo thanks hi epco, i'll need some more information if you would like to have help with resolving this. here are a few questions off the top of my head: - what version of mysql? - remote mysql server or local? - what's in my.cnf? - how many devices (and what kind) are you monitoring? - have you tried the suggestions from the forum report mentioned? - is this problem present with both cactid and cmd.php? - what else is using the database? - does the problem immediately happen after reboot, or only after running for some period of time? i'm tagging this as moreinfo and unreproducible... if i can't find a way to reproduce it within some period of time, i'm going to downgrade the severity too. sean -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342925: missing ide-generic
On Friday 23 December 2005 14:34, maximilian attems wrote: > please try the attached patch, > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: Although my initial report was for Sparc (which I will test tomorrow, I've also tested it on my laptop. ide-generic is loaded, but ide-disk is not, so not quite there yet for me. The laptop (Toshiba Satellite A40) needs piix (which is loaded): :00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM (ICH4) Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 03) Cheers, FJP pgpmQMc5vM18X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#344615: missinglib: ftbfs [sparc] *** [test] Bus error
Package: missinglib Version: 0.4.10.debian-2 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source missinglib failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. Please note that some buggy code that casts structures used to work no longer works due to changes in gcc. ./runtests Ran: 56 tests in: 0.02 seconds. OK ./runtests.opt make[2]: *** [test] Bus error make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian/test' make[1]: *** [test] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/missinglib-0.4.10.debian' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344614: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
Package: ocamlodbc Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably in a dependant package. Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like bug 340103, which should probably be reopened. + grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' > /tmp/camlpp3893ba make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found /usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I ../unixodbc -ccopt " -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 " ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo + gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 -lodbc -lodbc /tmp/camlprimd42d28.c '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2' '-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm' '-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0' '-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun -lm -ldl -lcurses -lpthread /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function `ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val' /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined references to `caml_Double_val' follow collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Error while building custom runtime system make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340850: marked as done (units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 11:45:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 03:45:57 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.74]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfyVA-0001HL-Vs for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:45:57 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 492A7382A7 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334D33826D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id F36E626136; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:45:55 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: units: FTBFS: makeinfo: Command not found Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: units Version: 1.85-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on a few arches with the following error: gcc -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o -lm -lreadline -lncurses ./texi2man units.texinfo > units.man sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1 makeinfo ./units.texinfo make[1]: makeinfo: Command not found make[1]: *** [units.info] Error 127 I'm guessing this is a timestamp skew issues. I suggest you look at /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz about it. Note that since linux 2.6, it keeps sub-second timestamps for files (as long as they're in memory) which triggers more of those bugs. Other buildd's show this instead: gcc -o units units.o parse.tab.o getopt.o getopt1.o -lm -lreadline -lncurses sed [EMAIL PROTECTED]@!/usr/share/misc/units.dat! ./units.man > units.1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/units-1.85' texi2html -monolithic units.texinfo Kurt --- Received: (at 340850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 02:50:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 18:50:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EpzRB-0004fX-RV; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800 From: John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#340850: fixed in units 1.85-3 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:47:13 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: units Source-Version: 1.85-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of units, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: units_1.85-3.diff.gz to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.diff.gz units_1.85-3.dsc to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3.dsc units_1.85-3_i386.deb to pool/main/u/units/units_1.85-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated units package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed
Bug#344612: openswan: pluto has shared library dependency on libkrb5support.so
Package: openswan Version: 1:2.4.4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable the pluto binary will not run, due to a shared library depenency that is not met: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/lib/ipsec/pluto libldap_r.so.2 => /usr/lib/libldap_r.so.2 (0x0ffa2000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x0ff6e000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x0ff44000) libcurl.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 (0x0feea000) libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3 (0x0fe8f000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/tls/libresolv.so.2 (0x0fe6b000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x0fd0a000) liblber.so.2 => /usr/lib/liblber.so.2 (0x0fcdb000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x0fcb8000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x0fc94000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0fc47000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x0fc0e000) libgnutls.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.11 (0x0fb7e000) /lib/ld.so.1 (0x3000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x0fb49000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x0fabc000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0fa7a000) libkrb5support.so.0 => not found libidn.so.11 => /usr/lib/libidn.so.11 (0x0fa29000) libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x0f9c6000) libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0x0f847000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0f812000) libtasn1.so.2 => /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.2 (0x0f7e2000) libgcrypt.so.11 => /usr/lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0x0f76f000) libgpg-error.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x0f74b000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/tls/libnsl.so.1 (0x0f714000) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages openswan depends on: ii bind9-host [host] 1:9.3.1-2.0.1 Version of 'host' bundled with BIN ii bsdmainutils 6.1.2 collection of more utilities from ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils2.15.1Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii iproute20041019-3Professional tools to control the ii ipsec-tools1:0.6.2-2 IPsec tools for Linux ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcomerr2 1.38-2common error description library ii libcurl3 7.15.1-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra ii libgmp3c2 4.1.4-10 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libldap2 2.1.30-12 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam0g 0.79-3Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libssl0.9.80.9.8a-3 SSL shared libraries ii makedev2.3.1-79 creates device files in /dev ii openssl0.9.8a-3 Secure Socket Layer (SSL) binary a openswan recommends no packages. -- debconf information: openswan/existing_x509_key_filename: openswan/x509_state_name: openswan/rsa_key_length: 2048 * openswan/restart: true * openswan/start_level: "after PCMCIA" * openswan/enable-oe: false openswan/existing_x509_certificate: false openswan/existing_x509_certificate_filename: * openswan/create_rsa_key: false openswan/x509_email_address: openswan/x509_country_code: AT openswan/x509_self_signed: true openswan/x509_organizational_unit: openswan/x509_locality_name: openswan/x509_common_name: openswan/rsa_key_type: x509 openswan/x509_organization_name: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341189: marked as done (gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int))
Your message dated Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 04:23:29 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 20:23:29 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Egx1d-0001xI-Kk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:23:29 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT4NR3H029595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:23:27 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT4OdtR021259; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT4Od78021257; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 20:24:39 -0800 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gcc-snapshot Version: 20051124-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gcc-snapshot still fails to buid from source on sparc. Now the error is: checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for int... yes checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int), 77 See `config.log' for more details. make[4]: *** [configure-target-libiberty] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build' make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build' make[2]: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124/build' s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0 make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20051124' make: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 341189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 02:15:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 18:15:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Epyw3-vO-WC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:15:04 -0800 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA02040 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990FAF2B1 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 13463-34 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET) 13974 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:01 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBO2F0nU016227; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:15:00 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: gcc-snapshot: ftbfs [sparc] cannot compute sizeof (int) X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de X-Spam-Checker-Vers
Processed: tag gcc-snapshot report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321449 + sid Bug#321449: gcc-snapshot should stay in unstable Tags were: wontfix Tags added: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343990: marked as done (tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343990: fixed in tix 8.4.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2005 09:11:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 01:11:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr ([129.20.36.164]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EoH3K-000663-Kc for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:11:30 -0800 Received: from frobnitz.homelinux.net (dyn37014.math.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.37.14]) by srv-smtp.math.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A72B8A9 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EoH2p-0005x0-JJ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: tix: FTBFS: Syntax error in configure From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:59 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tix Severity: serious Version: 8.4-2 >From my build log: ... checking for building with threads... yes checking how to build libraries... static checking if 64bit support is enabled... no checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ../configure: line 10786: syntax error near unexpected token `(' ../configure: line 10786: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space) 2>&1` in' make: *** [build-static-stamp] Error 2 This is caused by the following code in configure: ... if test -r /etc/.relid -a "X`uname -n`" = "X`uname -s`" ; then system=MP-RAS-`awk '{print }' /etc/.relid'` fi ... The problem is the extraneous apostrophe after relid on the middle line. If I remove this apostrophe, the package build completes successfully. (Note that the same faulty code is also causing problems in tcl8.* and tk8.*.) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 343990-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 01:41:00 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 17:41:00 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EpyGY-0002oI-1r; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#343990: fixed in tix 8.4.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:32:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tix Source-Version: 8.4.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tix, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tix-dev_8.4.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tix/tix-dev_8.4.0-1_i386.deb tix_8.4.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1.diff.gz tix_8.4.0-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1.dsc tix_8.4.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0-1_i386.deb tix_8.4.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tix/tix_8.4.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tix package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe
Bug#344401: firefox: Can't confirm. Steps to reproduce?
Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #344401 I can't reproduce the problems you experience. I've successfully printed to a CUPS printer, but unfortunately haven't tried any other printer. Printing to file with CUPS-driver or Postscript/Default works fine, however, both with Letter and A4. Maybe you could describe a bit more clearly the steps needed to reproduce any of the errors that happen every time? (preferably without having to actually print every time) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages firefox depends on: ii debianutils 2.15.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii fontconfig 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo21.0.2-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libidl0 0.8.5-1 library for parsing CORBA IDL file ii libjpeg626b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.0.2-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1 X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Input extension li ii libxinerama1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System multi-head display ii libxp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System printing extension ii libxrandr2 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii psmisc 21.8-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime firefox recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326371: NMU to fix both of these bugs in 7 day DELAY queue
I have just made an upload to the 7-day DELAY queue to fix both of these bugs. This NMU can be overridden by a maintainer upload before 7 days have passed, ideally one which fixes the RC bug (#326371). Interdiff for the NMU is attached. Don Armstrong -- Of course, there are ceases where only a rare individual will have the vision to perceive a system which governs many people's lives; a system which had never before even been recognized as a system; then such people often devote their lives to convincing other people that the system really is there and that it aught to be exited from. -- Douglas R. Hofstadter _Gödel Escher Bach. Eternal Golden Braid_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu diff -u es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog --- es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog +++ es-0.90beta1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +es (0.90beta1-10.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU + * Rebuild with libreadline5-dev as a build dependency (Closes: #326371) + * Fix typos in manpage (Closes: #311237) + + -- Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:11:10 -0800 + es (0.90beta1-10) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer (Closes: #215541) diff -u es-0.90beta1/debian/control es-0.90beta1/debian/control --- es-0.90beta1/debian/control +++ es-0.90beta1/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.1 -Build-Depends: bison, libncurses5-dev, libreadline4-dev +Build-Depends: bison, libncurses5-dev, libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev Package: es Architecture: any only in patch2: unchanged: --- es-0.90beta1.orig/es.1 +++ es-0.90beta1/es.1 @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ .Ic var = .De .PP -Multiple variables may be assigned with a single assignment statment. +Multiple variables may be assigned with a single assignment statement. The left hand side of the assignment operation consists of a list of variables which are assigned, one by one, to the values in the list on the right hand side. If there are more variables than values in @@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ child processes. In addition, the signal .Cr sigint -may be preceeded by the prefix +may be preceded by the prefix .Rc ( . ) to indicate that normal shell interrupt processing (i.e., the printing of an extra newline) @@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ .I pid is specified, waits for any child process to exit. .TP -.Cr "whatis \fIprogam ...\fP" +.Cr "whatis \fIprogram ...\fP" For each named .IR program , prints the pathname, primitive, lambda, or code fragment which
Bug#332625: Patch for missing build-depends
Re: Dominic Hargreaves in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, > libsnmp9-dev > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, > libsnmp9-dev, autoconf > Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Hi Matt, I've uploaded Dominic's NMU to delayed/7, patch below. debdiff cpqarrayd_2.2-1.dsc /srv/pbuilder/result/cpqarrayd_2.2-1.1.dsc configure| 30 ++ debian/changelog |7 +++ debian/control |2 +- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/configure cpqarrayd-2.2/configure --- cpqarrayd-2.2/configure +++ cpqarrayd-2.2/configure @@ -4524,18 +4524,24 @@ ac_cv_func_fork_works=cross else cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF -/* By Ruediger Kuhlmann. */ - #include - #if HAVE_UNISTD_H - # include - #endif - /* Some systems only have a dummy stub for fork() */ - int main () - { - if (fork() < 0) - exit (1); - exit (0); - } +/* confdefs.h. */ +_ACEOF +cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext +cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF +/* end confdefs.h. */ +$ac_includes_default +int +main () +{ + + /* By Ruediger Kuhlmann. */ + if (fork() < 0) + exit (1); + exit (0); + + ; + return 0; +} _ACEOF rm -f conftest$ac_exeext if { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$ac_link\"") >&5 diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog --- cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog +++ cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cpqarrayd (2.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload + * Add build-depends for autoconf, closes: #332625 + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:25:00 + + cpqarrayd (2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -u cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control --- cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control +++ cpqarrayd-2.2/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: admin Priority: extra Maintainer: Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, libsnmp9-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), linux-source-2.6.12 | linux-source-2.6, libsnmp9-dev, autoconf Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: cpqarrayd Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: raidutils build failure on sparc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 326922 upstream Bug#326922: raidutils: ftbfs [sparc] struct _I2O_MESSAGE_FRAME' has no member named 'InitiatorAddress' There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326922: raidutils build failure on sparc
tags 326922 upstream thanks Hi, I've tried to investigate the build failure on sparc [0] and came to the conclusion that it is a genuine upstream bug (probably some misplaced sparc #ifdef's). It would be too hard for me to understand what needs to be done, so I'm CC'ing this message to the upstream contact email. There also appears to be a new upstream version (0.0.6) available at [1]. I have tried building it, and at first it failed [2] due to the piece of code in raidutil.command.cpp: #ifdef sparc # define VOLATILE volatile #else # define VOLATILE #endif extern "C" { VOLATILE void exit (int);} After I've removed the 'volatile' keyword, the build continued past that point, but than failed again with the same messages as 0.0.4 [3]. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/326922 [1] http://i2o.shadowconnect.com/ [1] http://www.wooyd.org/debian/raidutils/raidutils-0.0.6-build.log.0.gz [2] http://www.wooyd.org/debian/raidutils/raidutils-0.0.6-build.log.1.gz Thanks and best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343691: marked as done (Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343691: fixed in dbconfig-common 1.8.10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2005 09:31:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 01:31:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.opendreams.net ([69.28.138.178]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EnYPN-00051U-Qa for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:31:17 -0800 Received: from sorrows.opendreams.net ([:::209.250.23.134]) (AUTH: PLAIN sor-mta, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by mail.opendreams.net with esmtp; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:16 -0700 id 00017F29.43A3DAE4.44EC Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by sorrows.opendreams.net with local; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:15 -0700 id 01E6C053.43A3DAE3.0AF3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jesse Molina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Upgrade to 0.8.6g-3 overwrites /etc/cacti/debian.php will null values Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:31:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6g-3 Severity: grave Justification: n After the last upgrade of Cacti, the /etc/cacti/debian.php was replaced with default/null values. This caused polling to stop and data for five days was lost for my install. During the upgrade, I recall being prompted about the new dbconfig-common option. I selected "n" for No. However, the file was cleared, rendering Cacti disfunctional. I didn't notice until today that polling had stopped. I noticed when I saw an error message while trying to review stats for the week. I was able to reproduce the problem, after populating the proper values into the /etc/cacti/debian.php file, I ran dpkg-reconfigure cacti again, and selected no to the question; Configure database for cacti with dbconfig-common? n And, again, it overwrote the file and cleared values. Expected result: Don't touch the config files if user says NO. I didn't see anything obvious in /usr/share/doc/cacti about this issue. Furthermore, the replacement of this vital config file was very silent. That's not very nice. Hopefully I didn't do anything wrong myself. Ask any questions needed to clarify. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.32-2005120801 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages cacti depends on: ii apache1.3.34-1 versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii dbconfig-common 1.8.9 common framework for packaging dat ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.62 Debian configuration management sy ii libphp-adodb 4.64-4 The 'adodb' database abstraction l ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility ii mysql-client-4.1 [virtual-mys 4.1.15-1 mysql database client binaries ii php4 4:4.4.0-4 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli 4:4.4.0-4 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-mysql4:4.4.0-4 MySQL module for php4 ii php4-snmp 4:4.4.0-4 SNMP module for php4 ii rrdtool 1.2.11-0.4 Time-series data storage and displ ii snmp 5.2.1.2-4 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen ii ucf 2.004 Update Configuration File: preserv Versions of packages cacti recommends: pn iputils-ping (no description available) ii mysql-server 4.1.15-1 mysql database server (transitiona ii mysql-server-4.1 [mysql-serve 4.1.15-1 mysql database server binaries -- debconf information: * cacti/username: cacti cacti/db/app-user: cacti/mysql/admin-user: root * cacti/mysql_server: localhost * cacti/webserver: Apache cacti/mysql/method: unix socket cacti/remote/host: cacti/upgrade-error: abort cact
Processed: control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package flashplugin-nonfree Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree > tags 304072 patch Bug#304072: flashplugin-nonfree: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the attached debconf template translation Tags were: l10n Tags added: patch > reassign 340690 flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.25-5 Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download sites Bug reassigned from package `flashplugin-nonfree' to `flashplugin-nonfree'. > severity 340690 grave Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download sites Severity set to `grave'. > merge 340690 321194 Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: download broken Bug#340690: flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download sites Merged 321194 340690. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327307: [PATCH] Building SNES9x again
Fixing this bug appears to be a rather trivial change to debian/control... Apparently, the xlibmesa-dev dependency that has gone missing is now split into two packages, xlibmesa-gl-dev and xlibmesa-glu-dev. Applying the attached patch makes it build again for me. ciao, -- [*Thomas Themel*] Since you obviously haven't lurked enough, [extended contact] we subtly tell lusers to piss off via the words "piss [info provided in] off, luser". [*message header*] - David P. Murphy in the monastery --- snes9x-1.43/debian/control~build-fix2005-12-24 00:01:21.0 +0100 +++ snes9x-1.43/debian/control 2005-12-24 00:02:47.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Source: snes9x Section: non-free/games Priority: optional -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0), nasm [i386], xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, xlibmesa-dev, dpatch (>= 1.19) +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 3.0), nasm [i386], xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev, dpatch (>= 1.19) Maintainer: Alain Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1
Bug#344596: libubit1c2: package contains no libraries
Package: libubit1c2 Version: 3.6.4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable In the last C++ migration, it looks like the package name was changed in debian/control without changing the corresponding install file, and as a result the library package is actually empty. I recommend not fixing this bug, as I'm about to file another bug against ftp.debian.org requesting its removal. No one has noticed the broken package since August, the package is a major revision behind upstream but no one has filed a bug, and it's been orphaned without an adopter since March (with no maintainer upload since February of 2004). But just in case the package sticks around for some reason, it can't be released as it is now. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#237156: marked as done (bonsai: dolog.pl has a syntax error at line 974 (an extra semicolon).)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This was fixed in 1.3+cvs20030317-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2004 02:06:08 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 09 18:06:08 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dilbert.solnet.co.nz (wlcv0) [203.97.83.99] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B0t6j-wK-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:06:05 -0800 Received: from andrewl by wlcv0 with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B0t69-0005f0-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:05:29 +1300 From: Andy Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: bonsai: dolog.pl has a syntax error at line 974 (an extra semicolon). X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:05:29 +1300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Andy Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 X-Spam-Level: Package: bonsai Version: 1.3+cvs20020224-1woody1 Severity: grave Tags: patch patch Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: sparc Kernel: Linux wlcv0 2.4.24 #1 Thu Feb 5 11:12:18 NZDT 2004 sparc64 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages bonsai depends on: ii cvs 1.11.1p1debian-9 Concurrent Versions System ii cvsgraph1.1.2-4 Create a tree of revisions/branche ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy ii exim3.35-1woody2 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii exim [mail-transport-ag 3.35-1woody2 An MTA (Mail Transport Agent) ii libc6 2.2.5-11.5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbd-mysql-perl 1.2216-2 mySQL database interface for Perl ii libmailtools-perl 1.44-1woody2 Manipulate email in perl programs ii libtimedate-perl1.11-1 Time and date functions for perl. ii lxr 0.3-3Linux Cross-Reference ii rcs 5.7-13 The GNU Revision Control System diff -c ~/tmp/globals.pl /usr/share/bonsai/lib/globals.pl *** /home/andrewl/tmp/globals.plWed Mar 10 14:55:53 2004 --- /usr/share/bonsai/lib/globals.plWed Mar 10 14:57:11 2004 *** *** 970,976 my ($password, $encoded) = @_; my $correct = trim(`cat $var_dir/data/passwd`); ! $encoded = crypt($::FORM{'newpassword'}, "aa"); unless ($encoded); unless ($correct eq $encoded) { --- 970,976 my ($password, $encoded) = @_; my $correct = trim(`cat $var_dir/data/passwd`); ! $encoded = crypt($::FORM{'newpassword'}, "aa") unless ($encoded); unless ($correct eq $encoded) { --- Received: (at 237156-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 22:17:10 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 14:17:10 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77] helo=epsilon.donarmstrong.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpvDq-0007ZM-5n for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:10 -0800 Received: from epsilon.donarmstrong.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBNMH9s9002069 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:09 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by epsilon.donarmstrong.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBNMH9C8002068 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:09 -0800 Received: (nullmailer pid 28005 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:17:06 - Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:17:06 -0800 From: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: This was fixed in 1.3+cvs20030317-4 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
Wouter van Heyst wrote: > I only understand the basics of heap-based overflows, I do not yet see > how to use this one. Someone explaining it would be very welcome. The two most common ways to exploit integer problems are a) Integers, which control a memory allocation: By letting this integer wrap-around you create an empty or generally smaller than excepted buffer, which the following write to memory overflows b) Integers which are accidentially signed and for which the programmer didn't implement sanity checks for negative values, which can lead to a whole range of other problems. Blender's problem is an instance of b). Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems
Max Alekseyev wrote: Hi, > > No. It reports: > > upx: util.h:71: int ptr_diff(const T*, const T*) [with T = unsigned > char]: Assertion `(int)d == d' failed. > Aborted Thanks. I tried the command on pergolesi.debian.org (an amd64 machine accessible for Debian developers), but can't reproduce that error. I.e. I can pack the file, unpack it without any problems, but when I try to run the command after packing with upx, it fails with a segmentation fault. It needs more investiations, but I can't do this until the first week of January. Best Regards, robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344575: hula: Build-Depends needs "zlib1g-dev" package.
Package: hula Version: 0.1.0+svn379-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source When building the debian package (apt-get source -b -t unstable hula), the following error is fixed by installing the zlib1g-dev package. It should be added to Build-Depends. gcc -shared .libs/msgapi.o .libs/msgdate.o .libs/msgaddr.o -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/connio/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/hulautil/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/memmgr/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/mdb/.libs -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/xpl/.libs ../connio/.libs/libhulaconnio.so ../hulautil/.libs/libhulautil.so ../memmgr/.libs/libhulamemmgr.so ../mdb/.libs/libhulamdb.so ../xpl/.libs/libhulaxpl.so -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz -Wl,-soname -Wl,libhulamsgapi.so.0 -o .libs/libhulamsgapi.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[5]: *** [libhulamsgapi.la] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs/msgapi' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src/libs' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Build command 'cd hula-0.1.0+svn379 && dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc' failed. E: Child process failed -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.12-xenU Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages hula depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libhula00.1.0+svn379-2.1 integrated mail & calendar system ii libsqlite3-03.2.7-1 SQLite 3 shared library ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-3 SSL shared libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-8compression library - runtime hula recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344571: cheops-ng_0.2.3-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep: flex
Package: cheops-ng Version: 0.2.3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of cheops-ng_0.2.3-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 79 > Build started at 20051218-2304 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: libgtk1.2-dev, xlibs-dev, libwrap0-dev, debhelper (>= 4.0.0), > autotools-dev, libadns1-dev, libssl-dev, imlib11-dev, libxml-dev, > libgnome-dev, libungif4-dev, libgtkxmhtml-dev, libzvt-dev [...] > # Add here commands to configure the package. > CFLAGS="-Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs" ./configure --host=ia64-linux-gnu > --build=ia64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man > --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info > loading cache ./config.cache > checking for gcc... gcc > checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) works... yes > checking whether the C compiler (gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs ) is a > cross-compiler... no > checking whether we are using GNU C... yes > checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes > checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking for ranlib... ranlib > checking host system type... ia64-unknown-linux-gnu > checking for flex... no > checking for lex... no > configure: error: You need to install either flex (preferebly) or lex to > compile cheops-ng > make: *** [config.status] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=cheops-ng&ver=0.2.3-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package flashplugin-nonfree Ignoring bugs not assigned to: flashplugin-nonfree > reassign 321194 flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.25-5 Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: does not install, not matter if tar.gz package location is entered or not Bug reassigned from package `flashplugin-nonfree' to `flashplugin-nonfree'. > retitle 321194 flashplugin-nonfree: download broken Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: does not install, not matter if tar.gz package location is entered or not Changed Bug title. > severity 321194 grave Bug#321194: flashplugin-nonfree: download broken Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:25:28PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0: > You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental. reportedly, unstable (2.3.1-79) "MAKEDEV bluetooth" works as expected. Indeed this still holds as a bug for both bluez-utils and experimental MAKEDEV, but frankly, as long as I report version of packages I'm using, if I'm running experimental and if I'm supposed to, is not your business. filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: Gretchen: You're weird. Donnie: Sorry. Gretchen: No, that was a compliment. -- from Donnie Darko (2001) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
Steve Kemp wrote: > > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential > > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what > > might be missing. > > It looks good to me. I can confirm the patch for CVE-2005-3302 is correct, I've sent a similar patch a few weeks ago. > I've built a package and if nobody has any > objections I'll upload later today. Are you aware of CVE-2005-3151? Real-world exploitability seems quite unlikely, though. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341238: patch for 7.0.61-1
The attached patch should fix the bug in version 7.0.61-1. Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: build-stamp Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: configure-stamp diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/changelog flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/changelog --- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/changelog 2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100 +++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/changelog 2005-12-23 20:08:51.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.61-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload + * Fix file name of local file, and don't do md5 checking with a missing +checksum. (closes: #341238) + * Added a FIXME about the broken md5 checking + + -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:28:54 +0100 + flashplugin-nonfree (7.0.61-1) unstable; urgency=low * check latest version by mirror's html. Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: files Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree.postrm.debhelper Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian: flashplugin-nonfree.substvars diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/postinst flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/postinst --- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/debian/postinst 2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100 +++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/debian/postinst 2005-12-23 19:10:30.0 +0100 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ case "$1" in configure*) db_get flashplugin-nonfree/local -if [ -d "$RET" -a -f "$RET"/flash_linux.tar.gz ]; then +if [ -d "$RET" -a -f "$RET"/install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz ]; then LOCALFILE="-l $RET" INSTALL="true" fi diff -ru flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/update-flashplugin flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/update-flashplugin --- flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61.orig/update-flashplugin 2005-12-23 18:27:04.0 +0100 +++ flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61/update-flashplugin 2005-12-23 20:08:11.0 +0100 @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ require 'getoptlong' require '/etc/update-flashplugin.conf' +# FIXME md5 checking is broken +# There is no longer an md5 checksum on the website +# so downloading both the file and the checksum cannot be done anymore. +# Using hardcoded md5 checksums would limit the use of this script +# to only one version of the Flash player. + module UpdateFlashPlugin include UpdateFlashPluginConf @@ -171,11 +177,13 @@ Dir.chdir(@cur_dir) exit 1 end - if MD5.new(File.open("#{file}", 'r').binmode.read).hexdigest != @tar_sum - $stderr.print "E: md5sum of #{file} does not match with [EMAIL PROTECTED]" - Dir.chdir(@cur_dir) - exit - end + if @tar_sum + if MD5.new(File.open("#{file}", 'r').binmode.read).hexdigest != @tar_sum + $stderr.print "E: md5sum of #{file} does not match with [EMAIL PROTECTED]" + Dir.chdir(@cur_dir) + exit + end + end _print "use existing file: #{file}\n" else file = "install_flash_player_7_linux.tar.gz" Only in flashplugin-nonfree-7.0.61: update-flashplugin.8
Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
On Dec 23, Filippo Giunchedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0: You are supposed to use the real MAKEDEV, not the one in experimental. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#338743: [Pkg-bluetooth-maintainers] Re: Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 07:21:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as > > the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use > > MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago. > If it does not then it would be a MAKEDEV bug, and your package would > need to depend on the fixed version. it does not create devices, at least on powerpc with makedev 3.3.8.2-0: # cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV bluetooth don't know how to make device "bluetooth" I'm CC'ing makedev maintainer, would be the appropriate for bluez-utils to drop "bluetooth" [1] into /etc/makedev.d/ or is this to be done by makedev package? thanks, filippo [1]: something like c 660 root root 10 250 1 1 vhci c 660 root dialout 216 1 1 256 rfcomm%d -- Filippo Giunchedi PGP key: 0x6B79D401 random quote follows: If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a large deposit in my name in a Swiss bank. -- Woody Allen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#344566: sysutils: /usr/bin/memtest also found in package memtester
Package: sysutils Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.1 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/sysutils_2.0.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/memtest', which is also in package memtester -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=bg_BG, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG (charmap=CP1251) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package tktable Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tktable > tag 320551 = patch Bug#320551: 'man tktable' typos: "occuring" and "postion" Tags were: pending patch Tags set to: patch > tag 343138 = patch Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause Tags were: patch Tags set to: patch > tag 324143 moreinfo Bug#324143: tktable: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Broken configure system There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > tag 339056 patch Bug#339056: tktable: Library package nonconforming Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344237: marked as done (readline5: FTBFS on i386, s390, powerpc.)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 5.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2005 02:13:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 18:13:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EotTu-0007vu-Jz for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:13:30 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-102-234.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.102.234]) by ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBL2DRRD016748; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EotTr-0003Ja-Lt; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: readline5: FTBFS on i386, s390, powerpc. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:13:27 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: readline5 Severity: serious >From the buildd logs: checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables The common factor in the three logs is that it dies in the "build64" part of the build, which isn't present for the other architectures. The test which is failing tries to compile and link a C file. Are you perhaps missing some Build-Depends, so that configure can't find the 64-bit GCC/system libraries to link with? This breakage in libreadline5 is beginning to hold up movement of the c2a transition into testing. If you can't get the build64 business working soon I suggest disabling it for now. --- Received: (at 344237-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 19:42:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 11:42:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpsoX-0001L7-0E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:42:53 -0800 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-103-207.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.103.207]) by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBNJgoFe013134 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EpsoU-0001fw-2f for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:42:50 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in 5.1-4 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hooray. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This space intentionally left blank. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 343138 - pending Bug#343138: tktable: FTBFS/unknown cause Tags were: pending patch Tags removed: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 339056 patch Bug#339056: tktable: Library package nonconforming There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343109 important Bug#343109: boa-constructor: Fails to start Severity set to `important'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344333 normal Bug#344333: libextractor-python: fails unit test Severity set to `normal'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343109:
severity 343109 important quit I downgrade this bug to important, because AMD64 was an unofficial architecture for Sarge. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344333: Don't mix diffrent upstream
No surprise if you use parts of libextractor-python 0.5.4 on 0.5.2. Wait until we upgraded to the newever version. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#251159: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Re: Bug#251159: Bug still open?
* Alexis Sukrieh [Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:14:11 +0100]: Hi, > * Christoph Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > > But I must be wrong, sorry for the noise. > > No. Thanks for your work. If you think a real NMU would make the case > > clearer and speed up the inclusion in testing, go ahead. The maintainer > > of cl-tclink is really not responsive. > Ok, then I'll contact my sponsor for NMU'ing this package. > Thanks for your responses. > I do think it's cleaner to have a changelog entry whenever something > changes in the Debian archive. Binary-only NMUs are perfectly ok to solve bugs like this, where only a recompilation is needed. They just need to get scheduled on all arches, but there's nothing "unclean" about them. Do you have any issues with them that you'd like to clear up? :) Incidentally, though, in this _particular_ case the package could use a NMU: not because of the existance of previous binNMUs, but because one of them failed: see #344485. If you feel like it, you could give it a shot; it'd make a nice one for your NM process, IMHO (but TeX is involved, so it may end up being a non-trivial one). Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Guy on cell: Yeah, I mean she's not easy to talk to, because, you know, she'll be like, "What did you do this weekend?" and I'll say, "Nothing", but really I was fucking some other girl. -- http://www.overheardinnewyork.com/archives/003179.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)
Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. > There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1). > > I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which > closes the issue. Umh... I don't have a CVE name to share anymore. Will provide one when I got a new bunch. Do you happen to know about the package in woody? > Can we plan to upload that package to security updates? Yes. I've copied it into the private security archive. Next steps: a) what about woody b) what about sid c) release advisory Regards, Joey -- The MS-DOS filesystem is nice for removable media. -- H. Peter Anvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
On Dec 23, Edd Dumbill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as > the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use > MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago. If it does not then it would be a MAKEDEV bug, and your package would need to depend on the fixed version. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#338743: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
Can you verify the MAKEDEV constructs the appropriate devices exactly as the mknod from the postinst does? This was the reason I didn't use MAKEDEV in the first instance, albeit some time ago. On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:41 +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > tags 338743 + patch > thanks > > * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV bluetooth > > > > less /sbin/MAKEDEV > > Thanks, here is attached a patch for the postinst script. > I plan to make a sponsored NMU for closing this RC bug in bluez-utils' > maintainer does not apply it. > > Best regards, > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344525: [cl-debian] Bug#344525: clisp_1:2.36-2(m68k/unstable): Using wrong compiler/missing b-deps
On Friday 23 December 2005 13:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Actually upstream seems to have problems supporting the m68k architecture and unless they find a solution soonish I will remove it from the architectures list. :-( Groetjes, Peter -- signature -at- pvaneynd.mailworks.org http://www.livejournal.com/users/pvaneynd/ "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr | "God is more forgiving." Dave Aronson| -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: removal of automake1.6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package isdnutils Ignoring bugs not assigned to: isdnutils > severity 335124 grave Bug#335124: removal of automake1.6 Severity set to `grave'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339806: [Help] sgml-speaking person needed to fix cdbs FTBFS
"David C. Weichert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Frank, > > a friend forwarded your Email concerning a bug in db2latex-xsl. I'm not > familiar with the package and what it does, but I've been working with > SGML/XML and XSLT for a couple of years now. Please give me more > information. If possible I would gladly help fixing. Ah, that's great to hear. Are you using Debian, and familiar with our bugtracking system and a little with how source packages are organized? If not, just tell me and I'll give more details. The bug we are talking about is http://bugs.debian.org/339806 Meanwhile, one of the people involved in upstream development has said he hopes to find time to look into it - it's the last message in the bug log, or rather the one before this very mail which will be sorted after it. Maybe it's best if you contact him and offer your help? On the other hand, if it turns out that he won't be able to do the work, maybe you are willing to work independently? Kind Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#335124: removal of automake1.6
package isdnutils severity 335124 grave thanks automake1.6 is removed from the archive therefore isdnutils FTBFS. Because of this, I'm setting the severity to grave. An NMU is needed/pending for this package (see #344200). I'm coordinating with Marco d'Itri to prepare those fixes. Regards, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344482: marked as done (klibc-utils: FTBFS)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344482: fixed in klibc 1.1.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 23:11:53 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 15:11:53 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([213.84.119.166]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpZbE-0005WU-9e for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:11:53 -0800 Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A387F794A0; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:08:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:08:35 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: klibc-utils: FTBFS Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: klibc-utils Version: 1.1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Script started on Thu 22 Dec 2005 05:15:17 PM CET [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1 $ fakeroot debian/rules binary test -x debian/rules test "`id -u`" = 0 dh_clean -k dh_installdirs -A if [ -n "" ]; then \ mkdir -p ""; \ fi if [ -n "" ]; then \ mkdir -p ""; \ fi if [ -n "" ]; then \ mkdir -p ""; \ fi if [ ! -d "." ]; then \ mkdir -p "."; \ fi /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_BUILD_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated variable" /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_CLEAN_MAKE_TARGET is a deprecated variable" /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:116: "DEB_MAKE_TEST_TARGET is a deprecated variable" if [ -z "" ]; then \ if ! test -f debian/compat; then echo 4 > debian/compat; fi; \ fi if [ ! -e linux ]; then \ mkdir -p linux/include;\ for x in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-2/include/*; do \ ln -s $x linux/include;\ done;\ ln -s /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.14-2/include/asm-sparc \ linux/include/asm; \ fi make -C . INSTALLROOT=debian/tmp CC=gcc-3.3 all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1' make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/klibc-1.1.1/klibc' gcc-3.3 -Wp,-MT,vsnprintf.o,-MD,./.vsnprintf.o.d -Os -m64 -mptr64 -D__KLIBC__=1 -D__KLIBC_MINOR__=1 -nostdlib -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../include/arch/sparc64 -I../include/bits64 -I../include -I../linux/include -I../linux/include2 -I../linux/include -I./zlib -I./zlib -DWITH_ERRLIST -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Winline -DDYNAMIC_CRC_TABLE -c -o vsnprintf.o vsnprintf.c In file included from ../include/sys/types.h:15, from ../include/unistd.h:11, from ../include/stdio.h:11, from vsnprintf.c:13: ../linux/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or directory In file included from ../include/unistd.h:11, from ../include/stdio.h:11, from vsnprintf.c:13: ../include/sys/types.h:16:23: asm/types.h: No such file or directory In file included from ../include/unistd.h:11, from ../include/stdio.h:11, from vsnprintf.c:13: ../include/sys/types.h:23: error: syntax error before "ino_t" ../include/sys/types.h:23: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `ino_t' ../include/sys/types.h:23: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/sys/types.h:24: error: syntax error before "mode_t" ../include/sys/types.h:24: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `mode_t' ../include/sys/types.h:24: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/sys/types.h:25: error: syntax error before "nlink_t" ../include/sys/types.h:25: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `nlink_t' ../include/sys/types.h:25: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/sys/types.h:26: error: syntax error before "off_t" ../include/sys/types.h:26: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `off_t' ../include/sys/types.h:26: warning: data definition has no type or storage class ../include/sys/types.h:27: error: syntax error before "loff_t" ../include/s
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 05:56:59PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote: > > It looks good to me. I've built a package and if nobody has any > > objections I'll upload later today. > > No objections from me. Great I already uploaded the package ;) Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:55:07AM +, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > > > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code > > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to > > prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made, > > yet I haven't heard of any such issues (or anything at all, to be > > precise) since then... > > Utterly slipped my mind. :( > > > FWIW, I've put together an update for Sarge's version of the blender > > package based on the upstream change mentioned above, please find > > attached a cumulative interdiff for both CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 > > and this bug so these issues can be resolved for Sarge. > > Great, thanks a lot. > > > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential > > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what > > might be missing. > > It looks good to me. I've built a package and if nobody has any > objections I'll upload later today. No objections from me. Wouter van Heyst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: build problems on sarti (was: Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344538 important Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344538: build problems on sarti (was: Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails)
severity 344538 important thanks Hi Lamont, hi Debian admins, during the last weeks there were a couple of FTBFS cases on sarti, the hppa buildd, which point to severe problems on that machine. The things that happened did only happen on this single buildd, but did in no way look as if they were architecture specific. To me it looks as if there were hardware problems. Previously, the bugs were resolved without notifying the maintainers how this was achieved (or whether maybe nothing was done at all except requeing the FTBFS package), so I can't tell what the real cause was then. See for example this new bug: Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tetex-base > Version: 3.0-11 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute update-language > (from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or configured during a fresh > install. This analysis is not correct. The script that fails is tetex-base's postinst: Setting up tetex-base (3.0-11) ... Removing unchanged obsolete conffiles ... done /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 678: update-language: command not found dpkg: error processing tetex-base (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 so tex-common (on which tetex-base depends) should be already configured and work fine (note that both packages are architecture: all). But the build does not even try to install tex-common, so it seems dpkg thinks that it is already installed: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=planner&ver=0.13-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1135258214&file=log&as=raw > > The cure would be to move tex-comon to Pre-Depends. No, for sure not. In fact this particular command should work even when tex-common is only unpacked, but unconfigured, since update-language is a simple shell script in /usr/sbin. If tex-common is unpacked and the shell works, it should work, too. So it seems something is severely amiss with the debbuild chroot on sarti. Regards, Frank P.S. I'd like to reassign this bug to "buildd.debian.org" or "sarti.debian.org", but such a virtual package doesn't exist... -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#337871: FTBFS (alpha): invalid lvalue in assignment
I lied earlier, we do need the patch Ben submitted (the chroot I was using wasn't updated and didn't show the bug). The problem is there is no "good" way to patch it at the debian level, because the gdb included in crash is shipped as a gzip tarball that gets unpacked at build time. It's much easier to submit the patch upstream and get a fixed versions there, especially because upstream is so responsive. I submitted the patch upstream today, so we should have a new version fairly soon. Thanks, Troy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344535: marked as done (vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 15:24:43 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 07:24:43 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 24.235.97-84.rev.gaoland.net ([84.97.235.24] helo=babasse.is-a-geek.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Epomg-0002JR-Rx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:24:43 -0800 Received: from smimram by babasse.is-a-geek.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1EpomB-0002wm-Et; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:24:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:24:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vim-runtime Version: 1:6.4-004+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, While trying to update vim, the installation failed on Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-common Regards, Samuel. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) vim-runtime depends on no packages. Versions of packages vim-runtime recommends: pn vim | vim-gnome | vim-gtk | v (no description available) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 344535-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 16:04:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 08:04:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sockmel.bononia.it ([194.242.226.39]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EppPC-0007IA-PL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:04:30 -0800 Received: from muletto.takhisis.invalid (85-18-14-42.fastres.net [85.18.14.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Stefano Zacchiroli", Issuer "sockmel.bononia.it" (verified OK)) by sockmel.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35DD56DF8; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:04:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by muletto.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CD2D440BC; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:03:22 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 1:6.4-006+1 On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-co= mmon There was a problem with non-epoched versioned relationships in debian/control. The problem is fixed in the last unstable v
Bug#344524: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
severity 344524 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:44:28PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name > for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd > dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable. The new exo package is in NEW. Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out. Thanks for your concern. -- --( "A lie, Mr. Mulder, is most convincingly hidden )-- --(between two truths" - Deep Throat )-- Simon ( ) Nomis Htag.pl 0.0.22 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344524 normal Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344200: URGENTLY needs support for the latest ppp package
On Dec 20, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please rebuild pppdcapiplugin for ppp 2.4.4b1. > > Expect a NMU if this will not be fixed soon, because it's blocking ppp > > from entering testing. > Go ahead, I'm a bit out of the ISDN stuff at the moment due to > circumstances :-( OK, in the next few days I will work on a new package. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332824: missing ide-generic
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:34 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > please try the attached patch, > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: > patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < > ide-generic.udev.patch > > for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk > out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u > and reboot, > if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually > ide-generic and disc.. > > thanks for your feedback. The patch works for me. -Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344523 normal Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian Severity set to `normal'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 343720, retitle 343720 to libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > tags 343720 + patch Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED] There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > retitle 343720 libdjvulibre-dev: missing dependencies Bug#343720: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342288: NMU for this bug
Hi, since this bug has been open for quite a while, I'm currently preparing an NMU for this bug, using the attached patch. I'm going to upload it without a delay. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/debian/changelog poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/changelog --- poppler-0.4.2/debian/changelog 2005-12-23 16:48:41.997756352 +0100 +++ poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/changelog 2005-12-23 16:48:21.697842408 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,26 @@ +poppler (0.4.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * SECURITY UPDATE: Multiple integer/buffer overflows. + + * NMU to fix RC security bug (closes: #342288) + * Add debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch taken from Ubuntu, +thanks to Martin Pitt: + * poppler/Stream.cc, DCTStream::readBaselineSOF(), +DCTStream::readProgressiveSOF(), DCTStream::readScanInfo(): +- Check numComps for invalid values. +- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=342&type=vulnerabilities +- CVE-2005-3191 + * poppler/Stream.cc, StreamPredictor::StreamPredictor(): +- Check rowBytes for invalid values. +- http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=344&type=vulnerabilities +- CVE-2005-3192 + * poppler/JPXStream.cc, JPXStream::readCodestream(): + - Check img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles for integer overflow. + - http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=345&type=vulnerabilities + - CVE-2005-3193 + + -- Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:36:30 +0100 + poppler (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * GNOME Team upload. diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch --- poppler-0.4.2/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ poppler-0.4.2.new/debian/patches/04_CVE-2005-3191_2_3.patch 2005-12-23 16:15:37.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/poppler/JPXStream.cc poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/JPXStream.cc +--- poppler-0.4.2/poppler/JPXStream.cc 2005-03-03 20:46:03.0 +0100 poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/JPXStream.cc 2005-12-09 17:41:42.0 +0100 +@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ + // + + #include ++#include + + #ifdef USE_GCC_PRAGMAS + #pragma implementation +@@ -666,7 +667,7 @@ + int segType; + GBool haveSIZ, haveCOD, haveQCD, haveSOT; + Guint precinctSize, style; +- Guint segLen, capabilities, comp, i, j, r; ++ Guint segLen, capabilities, nTiles, comp, i, j, r; + + //- main header + haveSIZ = haveCOD = haveQCD = haveSOT = gFalse; +@@ -701,8 +702,18 @@ + / img.xTileSize; + img.nYTiles = (img.ySize - img.yTileOffset + img.yTileSize - 1) + / img.yTileSize; +- img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles * +- sizeof(JPXTile)); ++ // check for overflow before allocating memory ++ if (img.nXTiles <= 0 || img.nYTiles <= 0 || ++ img.nXTiles >= INT_MAX/img.nYTiles) { ++ error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment"); ++ return gFalse; ++ } ++ nTiles = img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles; ++ if (nTiles >= INT_MAX/sizeof(JPXTile)) { ++ error(getPos(), "Bad tile count in JPX SIZ marker segment"); ++ return gFalse; ++ } ++ img.tiles = (JPXTile *)gmalloc(nTiles * sizeof(JPXTile)); + for (i = 0; i < img.nXTiles * img.nYTiles; ++i) { + img.tiles[i].tileComps = (JPXTileComp *)gmalloc(img.nComps * + sizeof(JPXTileComp)); +diff -Nur poppler-0.4.2/poppler/Stream.cc poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/Stream.cc +--- poppler-0.4.2/poppler/Stream.cc 2005-04-27 22:56:18.0 +0200 poppler-0.4.2.new/poppler/Stream.cc 2005-12-09 17:40:53.0 +0100 +@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ + #include + #include + #include ++#include + #ifndef WIN32 + #include + #endif +@@ -420,13 +421,28 @@ + width = widthA; + nComps = nCompsA; + nBits = nBitsA; ++ predLine = NULL; ++ ok = gFalse; + ++ if (width <= 0 || nComps <= 0 || nBits <= 0 || ++ nComps >= INT_MAX/nBits || ++ width >= INT_MAX/nComps/nBits) { ++return; ++ } + nVals = width * nComps; ++ if (nVals * nBits + 7 <= 0) { ++return; ++ } + pixBytes = (nComps * nBits + 7) >> 3; + rowBytes = ((nVals * nBits + 7) >> 3) + pixBytes; ++ if (rowBytes < 0) { ++return; ++ } + predLine = (Guchar *)gmalloc(rowBytes); + memset(predLine, 0, rowBytes); + predIdx = rowBytes; ++ ++ ok = gTrue; + } + + StreamPredictor::~StreamPredictor() { +@@ -1020,6 +1036,10 @@ + FilterStream(strA) { + if (predictor != 1) { + pred = new StreamPredictor(this, predictor, columns, colors, bits); ++if (!pred->isOk()) { ++ delete pred; ++ pred = NULL; ++} + } else { + pred = NULL; + } +@@ -2907,6 +2927,10 @@ + height = read16(); + width = read16(); + numComps = str->getChar(); ++ if (numComps <= 0 || numComps > 4) { ++error(getPos()
Bug#344523: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
severity 344523 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:42:27PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is > not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is > uninstallable in unstable. The new exo package is in NEW. Once it trickles through NEW it'll all work out. Thanks for your concern. Simon. -- * But what if Sarris survives? - Mathesar * | Oh, I don't think so. I gave him both barrels. - Jason| * Galaxy Quest. * Brought to you by the letter Z and the number 20 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 344395 critical Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid Severity set to `critical'. > merge 344395 344424 Bug#344395: Root compromise bug if rssh_chroot_helper is installed suid Bug#344424: rssh: local privilege escalation in versions < 2.3.0 (CVE-2005-3345) Merged 344395 344424. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344538: tetex-base: tex-common to Pre-Depends, otherwise installation fails
Package: tetex-base Version: 3.0-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 texte-base installation fails because it needs to execute update-language (from tex-common), which is not yet unpacked or configured during a fresh install. This in turn breaks installation of jadetex and other TeX bits, which prevents building of packages Build-Depends on TeX components. http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=planner&ver=0.13-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1135258214&file=log&as=raw The cure would be to move tex-comon to Pre-Depends. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDrBq/eXr56x4Muc0RAuXbAJ4nRhpoSN6dzLpfv6xXoDhJFPCdMQCfZL7p XmQTRzVEOUsKpDyNYtPbvZ4= =UkaJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344535: vim-runtime tries to overwrite /usr/bin/vimtutor from vim-common
Package: vim-runtime Version: 1:6.4-004+1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, While trying to update vim, the installation failed on Unpacking replacement vim-runtime ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/vim-runtime_1%3a6.4-004+2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/vimtutor', which is also in package vim-common Regards, Samuel. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) vim-runtime depends on no packages. Versions of packages vim-runtime recommends: pn vim | vim-gnome | vim-gtk | v (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344202: marked as done (gclcvs: ftbfs [sparc] pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344202: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 20:45:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 12:45:56 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EooMu-00021A-7Z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:45:56 -0800 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBKKjnVE012779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:45:51 -0800 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBKKr9sm000693; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBKKr9iG000691; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:09 -0800 From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gclcvs: ftbfs [sparc] pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gclcvs Version: 2.7.0-53 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gclcvs failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. gcc -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -fsigned-char -pipe -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0/o -I../h -I../gcl-tk plt.c In file included from plt.c:36: pltd.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token pltd.h:2: error: syntax error before '.' token pltd.h:3: error: syntax error before '.' token pltd.h:4: error: syntax error before '.' token In file included from plt.c:56: plt.h:1: error: syntax error before '.' token plt.h:3: error: syntax error before '.' token make[2]: *** [plt.o] Error 1 rm symbol.c list.c string.c hash.c character.c sequence.c print.c read.c pathname.c file.c package.c make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0/o' make[1]: *** [unixport/saved_pre_gcl] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gclcvs-2.7.0' make: *** [build-trad-stamp] Error 2 --- Received: (at 344202-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 14:41:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 06:41:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Epny1-0006QK-UC; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344202: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gclcvs Source-Version: 2.7.0-54 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gclcvs package) (This message
Bug#340853: marked as done (FTBFS (alpha): __remq is undefined)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340853: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Nov 2005 12:18:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 26 04:18:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp07.web.de ([217.72.192.225]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Efz0V-0008Qx-JQ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:18:19 -0800 Received: from [84.59.223.201] (helo=juist) by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (WEB.DE 4.105 #333) id 1Efz00-0005S3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:48 +0100 Received: from falk by juist with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Efyzz-0007EX-KL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:47 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FTBFS (alpha): __remq is undefined X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:17:47 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gclcvs Version: 2.7.0-50.1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source gclcvs does not build on Alpha: [...] GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.7.0 CLtL1Oct 15 2005 08:35:10 Source License: LGPL(gcl,gmp), GPL(unexec,bfd) Binary License: GPL due to GPL'ed components: (READLINE BFD UNEXEC) Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL. > Loading ../tkl.o __remq is undefined Error: Cannot get relocated section contents Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging Error signalled by EVAL. [...] Full log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=gclcvs&ver=2.7.0-50.1&arch=alpha&stamp=1129366266&file=log&as=raw This was already discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2005/09/msg00027.html , but without a resolution. Since apparently this isn't reproducible on escher, I can offer an account on my machine if anybody wants to debug this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 340853-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 14:41:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 06:41:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Epny1-0006QI-TO; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#340853: fixed in gclcvs 2.7.0-54 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:32:21 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: gclcvs Source-Version: 2.7.0-54 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gclcvs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs-doc_2.7.0-54_all.deb gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.dsc gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54.tar.gz gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gclcvs/gclcvs_2.7.0-54_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance softw
Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)
* Alexis Sukrieh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. ^^ Of course I was speaking about bugzilla, not backup-manager, sorry! (Hopefully I'm on holydays this evening ;) -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?
* Andreas Jochens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait : > > Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version > > 0.91cvs2005082? > > I can not reproduce the bug with the latest version. So this seems > indeed to be fixed, thanks! Great! Thanks, I'm closing the bug. -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318719: marked as done (tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:52:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 09:03:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 17 02:03:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Du537-0005U6-00; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 02:03:01 -0700 Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242]) by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j6H92swE028669 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.91]) by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCEB1B5F0 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zibal.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237) id 775551A6C7; Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:49 +0200 From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tecnoballz: Segfaults on startup Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2 (mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:02:54 +0200 (MEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tecnoballz Version: 0.91-2 Severity: important On amd64, tecnoballz segfaults on startup. I suspect this is a 64bit issue, as there are 14 warnings about casts from pointer to integer (the first 64bit, the latter 32bit) and another, simmilar warning during compilation. N.B. severity important, since amd64 is not yet part of Etch, once it is, the severity will be raised accordingly Since your debian/rules does not build with -g and does not even support noopt (see #319715), I hacked Makefile.in to use include "-O0 -g" for CXXFLAGS. Next I commented out dh_strip in debian/rules and ran dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b -rfakeroot Next I installed the resulting deb and ran it in gdb, using libc6-dbg. This is the result: GNU gdb 6.3-debian Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-linux"...Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib/debug/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/games/tecnoballz [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 182916947344 (LWP 685)] configfile::fopen_data(): Warning: Unable to open the file "/home/helge/.tlkgames/tecnoballz.conf" for read!!! [New Thread 1082128752 (LWP 688)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 182916947344 (LWP 685)] __libc_free (mem=0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8) at malloc.c:3341 3341malloc.c: No such file or directory. in malloc.c Current language: auto; currently c (gdb) bt full #0 __libc_free (mem=0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8) at malloc.c:3341 ar_ptr = 0x71e270 p = 0xa6d8dcea99c9bfd8 hook = (void (*)(void *, const void *)) 0 #1 0x002a95f060f1 in SDL_FreeFormat () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #2 0x002a95f07c9e in SDL_FreeSurface () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x00416078 in GFX_bitmap::GFXLiberat (this=0x721b98) at src/GFX_bitmap.cc:64 No locals. #4 0x00416841 in ~GIF_bitMap (this=0x721890) at src/GIF_bitMap.cc:41 No locals. #5 0x00423157 in ressources::freeSprite (this=0x598470) at src/ressources.cc:335 No locals. #6 0x0041e00e in menu_tecno::first_init (this=0x71da30)
Bug#337497: missing ide-generic
unmerge 337497 severity 337497 important tags 337497 moreinfo stopped On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so > i fail to understand what i should test ? > indeed your bug report was falsly merged, sorry for not noticing earlier - thus decoupling. anyway the timing bug you experienced in your bug report should be gone since long. please retest on latest udev and initramfs-tools in unstable regarding the pegasos support. thanks -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: bugzilla security update for sarge (2.16.7-7sarge2)
Hi, I'm the maintainer of the backup manager package. There are currently one security issue in our sarge package (0.5.7-7sarge1). I made a package with the patch submitted against the bug #329387 which closes the issue. Can we plan to upload that package to security updates? The package is available on my repository: deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian ./ Changes: http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2_i386.changes Diff.gz: http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.diff.gz Dsc: http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.dsc Regards, -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332824: missing ide-generic
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:34:23PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > please try the attached patch, > should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: > patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < > ide-generic.udev.patch > > for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk > out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u > and reboot, > if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually > ide-generic and disc.. Notice that there is no ide-generic module on powerpc, and never has been, so i fail to understand what i should test ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332824: missing ide-generic
please try the attached patch, should load ide-generic even if udev didn't yet bring it up: patch -p1 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-premount/udev < ide-generic.udev.patch for this trial please remove any ide-generic or ide-disk out of /etc/mkinitramfs/modules, then update-initramfs -u and reboot, if it doesn't work out you still need to modprobe manually ide-generic and disc.. thanks for your feedback. -- maks --- udev-0.076/extra/initramfs.premount 2005-12-23 12:36:04.0 +0100 +++ udev-0.076-ma/extra/initramfs.premount 2005-12-23 12:35:52.0 +0100 @@ -21,6 +21,38 @@ mkdir /dev/.udev/ /dev/.udev/db/ /dev/.u udevd --daemon udevsynthesize + +# Our job now is to make the block device for the root filesystem available. +# This is actually a bit trickier than it first appears because we first need +# to figure out which driver needs it, and to do that, we need to know what +# type of bus it's on. Fortunately we have all that information, this still +# feels like an ungodly hack though. +. /conf/initramfs.conf +. /scripts/functions +case "${BOOT}" in + local) + case "${ROOT}" in + /dev/root) + # An interesting case, this root device was specified as a + # major/minor pair. Fortunately we have that information + case "${major}" in + 3|22|33|34|56|57|88|89|90|91) + # traditional ide + root_type=ide + ;; + 80|81|82|83|84|85|86|87) + # ide on i2o + root_type=ide + ;; + esac + ;; + /dev/hd*) + # Ahh, plain-old traditional ide + root_type=ide + ;; + esac +esac + while [ -d /dev/.udev/queue/ ]; do sleep 1 udevd_timeout=$(($udevd_timeout - 1)) @@ -29,5 +61,13 @@ while [ -d /dev/.udev/queue/ ]; do fi done +# If we're booting from IDE, we may need to load ide-generic. +case "${root_type}" in + ide) + if [ ! -e "${ROOT}" -o "${ROOT}" = "/dev/root" ]; then + modprobe -q ide-generic + fi +esac + # Leave udev running to process events that come in out-of-band (like USB # connections)
Bug#344390: marked as done (Can not load correctly)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344390: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2005 10:39:47 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 02:39:47 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.203]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EpNrP-0001EX-Nr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:47 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so389488nzf for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UQI3dktOx3WTRUZRvfU32nbJTQU///OYB6tEXL/85u1f6Ez9TMcdBAD9rUXxN5OHAL6bdQ8BXmdSRkWE/tmiKZj6CnmY4Uhmik+XMLDcNfOfNAKjXqtJP7tiMahNzUacoQkdf6gRbkjDNaJwqX/ofXfU3aXPQg7NMUDeSninu08= Received: by 10.36.129.6 with SMTP id b6mr315782nzd; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.214.1.201? ( [218.108.31.122]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id m2sm1530853nzf.2005.12.22.02.39.44; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:39:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disposition-Notification-To: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:41:22 +0800 From: "Chun Tian (binghe)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Zhejiang University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20051222 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can not load correctly Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: araneida Version: 0.90.1 Severity: serious I cannot use (clc:clc-require :araneida) to compile and load araneida correctly. I think that's because this file 'doc/new-dispatch-model' in source didn't come with it's deb package. When I copy it to /usr/share/common-lisp/source/araneida/doc ,everything goes well. Thanks. -- GnuPG Key: 0xF7C63B10 --- Received: (at 344390-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Dec 2005 12:51:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 04:51:01 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EpmKA-0005cE-GI; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800 From: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344390: fixed in araneida 0.90.1-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: araneida Source-Version: 0.90.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of araneida, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: araneida_0.90.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2.diff.gz araneida_0.90.1-2.dsc to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2.dsc araneida_0.90.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/araneida/araneida_0.90.1-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated araneida package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:30:28 +0100 Source: araneida Binary: araneida
Bug#339806: [DB2LaTeX-apps] Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput
Hello Frank, Ramon and other readers, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:16:12PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February > this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and > TeXLive 2005 (released this fall): It always produces PDF instead of DVI > files. > > The reason is that these TeX distributions use pdfetex as the engine I am still alive and can look into this within the next couple of days.
Bug#344525: clisp_1:2.36-2(m68k/unstable): Using wrong compiler/missing b-deps
Package: clisp Version: 1:2.36-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of clisp_1:2.36-2 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 79 > Build started at 20051223-1039 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), gettext, bison, libncurses5-dev, groff, > xlibs-dev, xutils, libxt-dev, libsigsegv-dev (>= 2.1), libreadline5-dev | > libreadline-dev, dh-lisp (>= 0.3), gcc-3.3 [sparc] [...] > The following central src deps are (probably) missing: > libreadline4-dev (>= 4.3-1) [...] > rm -rf debian/build > rm src/VERSION || true > rm: cannot remove `src/VERSION': No such file or directory > dh_clean > debian/rules build > dh_testdir > ./configure debian/build --prefix=/usr --fsstnd=debian --without-dynamic-ffi \ > --with-module=clx/mit-clx > executing /build/buildd/clisp-2.36/debian/build/configure > --srcdir=/build/buildd/clisp-2.36/src --prefix=/usr --with-module=clx/mit-clx > --cache-file=config.cache > configure: creating cache config.cache > configure: * checks for UNIX variants that set DEFS > checking for gcc... gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D > NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP > checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C > compiler cannot create executables > See `config.log' for more details. > make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 77 Checking config.log reveals the following: configure:1252: creating cache config.cache configure:1343: * checks for UNIX variants that set DEFS configure:1391: checking for gcc configure:1417: result: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP configure:1661: checking for C compiler version configure:1664: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP --version &5 configure: line 1665: gcc-3.3: command not found configure:1667: $? = 127 configure:1669: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP -v &5 configure: line 1670: gcc-3.3: command not found configure:1672: $? = 127 configure:1674: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAP -V &5 configure: line 1675: gcc-3.3: command not found configure:1677: $? = 127 configure:1700: checking for C compiler default output file name configure:1703: gcc-3.3 -D SAFETY=3 -D NO_MULTIMAP_SHM -D NO_MULTIMAP_FILE -D NO_SINGLEMAP -D NO_TRIVIALMAPconftest.c >&5 configure: line 1704: gcc-3.3: command not found configure:1706: $? = 127 configure: failed program was: [...] A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=m68k&pkg=clisp&ver=1:2.36-2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322644: libproc-background-perl: FTBFS: Test failure
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:15:12AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > I can still reproduce this problem using pbuilder and an i386 unstable > chroot. I've attached the full build log. Please let me know if I > can provide further information. Hi, I can reproduce this with sbuild, but not pbuilder. With sbuild the reason for the failed tests is $SIG{'HUP'} = 'IGNORE'; in /usr/bin/sbuild. Tests 21 and 23 test that the process gets killed if timeout occurs. The actual killing signal is sent in Proc::Background::Unix::_die(), which tries 5 times each of the signals HUP, QUIT, INT, and KILL, sleeping 1 second between each try. Since the tests have a timeout of 4, the _die() function is still trying the HUP signal when ALRM is received. I can't see any reference to HUP in pbuilder, so I have no idea what causes it there. Cheers, -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344524: xfce4-terminal: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Package: xfce4-terminal Version: 0.2.4-3+b1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, xfce4-terminal depends on libexo-0.3-0, which is the wrong package name for libexo in Debian. The package is named libexo0.3-0 (without the 2nd dash). Thus xfce4-terminal is uninstallable. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xfce4-terminal depends on: ii dbus-1 0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst ii dbus-glib-1 0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexo0.3-0 0.3.0-2 Library with extensions for Xfce ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libvte4 1:0.11.15-4 Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxfce4util-1 4.2.3.2-1 Utility functions library for Xfce ii libxfcegui4-34.2.3-1 Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4 ii libxft2 2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages xfce4-terminal recommends: ii dbus-1-utils 0.23.4-8 simple interprocess messaging syst -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344523: xfmedia: Depends on libexo-0.3-0 which is not in Debian
Package: xfmedia Version: 0.9.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, xfmedia depends (and build-depends) on libexo-0.3-0, but that package is not in Debian. The Debian package is called libex0.3-0. Thus xfmedia is uninstallable in unstable. Andreas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.3-cherry+radeon Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xfmedia depends on: ii dbus-1 0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst ii dbus-glib-1 0.23.4-8simple interprocess messaging syst ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc62.3.5-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libexo0.3-0 0.3.0-2 Library with extensions for Xfce ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpango1.0-01.10.1-2Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System Session Management ii libstartup-notification0 0.8-1 library for program launch feedbac ii libtag1c2a 1.4-3 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library ii libtagc0 1.4-3 TagLib Audio Meta-Data Library (C ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxfce4util-1 4.2.3.2-1 Utility functions library for Xfce ii libxfcegui4-34.2.3-1 Basic GUI C functions for Xfce4 ii libxine1 1.0.1-1.4 the xine video/media player librar ii libxtst6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 X Window System event recording an ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime xfmedia recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?
On 05-Dec-23 12:46, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > tags 318719 + moreinfo > thanks > > Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed, > there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support. > > Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version > 0.91cvs2005082? I can not reproduce the bug with the latest version. So this seems indeed to be fixed, thanks! Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344416: retrigger a binNMU build for powerpc with new kernel-package ?
Hi Steve, I wonder if you would be able to trigger a binNMU of the powerpc kernel, which would then build with the kernel-package version Manoj uploaded yesterday, and claims fixes this issue. I have no tested it, nor will i be able to do the binNMU upload myself, but i understand the buildd network has nice support for doing this all by itself, so i think this is the best way for now. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337240: i can repro with f-spot 0.1.5-1
Package: f-spot Version: 0.1.5-1 Followup-For: Bug #337240 Starting new FSpot server Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object in <0x001d4> PhotoStore:Query (System.String query) in <0x005b0> PhotoStore:Query (.Tag[] tags, .DateRange range) in <0x0003c> FSpot.PhotoQuery:.ctor (.PhotoStore store) in <0x00808> MainWindow:.ctor (.Db db) in <0x00040> FSpot.Core:get_MainWindow () in <0x00018> FSpot.Core:Organize () in <0x004c8> Driver:Main (System.String[] args) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Versions of packages f-spot depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdbus-cil 0.23.4-8 CLI binding for D-BUS interprocess ii libexif12 0.6.12-2 library to parse EXIF files ii libgconf2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for GConf 2.6 ii libglade2.0-cil 2.3.92-2 CLI binding for the Glade librarie ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil2.3.92-2 CLI binding for the GLib utility l ii libgnome2.0-cil 2.3.92-2 CLI binding for GNOME 2.0, unstabl ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgphoto2-2 2.1.6-6gphoto2 digital camera library ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-cil 2.3.92-2 CLI binding for the Gtk+ toolkit 2 ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii liblcms1 1.13-1 Color management library ii libmono0 1.1.10-1 libraries for the Mono JIT ii libsqlite02.8.16-1 SQLite shared library ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.10-1 Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-jit 1.1.10-1 fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M f-spot recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344519: Reload cacti graph page generates mysql zombie process for every graph
Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6c-7sarge2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When I do a reload of the cacti graph page, I see that there is a zombie mysql daemon process created for every graph shown. In the end this results in over 1000 zombie processes and mysql server cannot create any threads anymore. A similar problem is described in http://forums.cacti.net/post-37044.html&highlight= Kind regards, Epco -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages cacti depends on: ii apache 1.3.33-6sarge1 versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii libphp-adodb 4.52-1 The 'adodb' database abstraction l ii logrotate3.7-5 Log rotation utility ii mysql-client 4.0.24-10sarge1 mysql database client binaries ii php4 4:4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli 4:4.3.10-16 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-mysql 4:4.3.10-16 MySQL module for php4 ii php4-snmp4:4.3.10-16 SNMP module for php4 di rrdtool 1.0.49-1Time-series data storage and displ ii snmp 5.1.2-6.2 NET SNMP (Simple Network Managemen ii ucf 1.17Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information: * cacti/password: (password omitted) cacti/confirm: (password omitted) cacti/root_password: (password omitted) * cacti/username: cacti * cacti/mysql_server: panoramix * cacti/webserver: Apache cacti/save_rootpw: true cacti/upgrade_warning: cacti/root_mysql: root * cacti/no_automagic: cacti/purge_db: true * cacti/database: cacti cacti/mismatch: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344515: kernel module ip2100 crashes when loading firmware on amd64-system
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 Version: 2.6.14-6 Severity: critical -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 depends on: ii e2fsprogs 1.38+1.39-WIP-2005.12.10-1 ext2 file system utilities and lib ii module-init-t 3.2.2-1tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii yaird [linux- 0.0.12-1 Yet Another mkInitRD linux-image-2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded Desription: On AMD64-Kernel the module "ipw2100" let the system extremly slow down (or crash at startup) whenever the firmware is going to be loaded (the firmware is correctly installed under /usr/lib/hotplug/) This is only on 64-bit-systems. On 32-bit-systems it works fine (tested with lifefilesystem "WHAX 3.0", a Debian based wardrive distribution) I suppose an incompability with the 32-bit-firmware on 64-bit-kernels. This behaviour is the same on older kernels (2.6.8 - 2.6.12), when ipw2100-sources had to be compiled as a additional kernel module (on 64-bit-systems) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318719: [tecnoballz #318719] Bug still open?
tags 318719 + moreinfo thanks Hello, I'd like to know if the last package closed this bug. Indeed, there is a patch applied in the last version for AMD 64 support. Could you tell me if you can reproduce the bug with the package version 0.91cvs2005082? Thanks. -- Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339806: Problems with db2latex and current TeX distributions: \pdfoutput
Dear maintainers of db2latex, db2latex does not work properly with teTeX 3.0 (released in February this year and included in many operating system distributions now) and TeXLive 2005 (released this fall): It always produces PDF instead of DVI files. The reason is that these TeX distributions use pdfetex as the engine behind latex *and* pdflatex, pdfetex can produce DVI and PDF output. But the tests in db2latex that try to detect whether PDF or DVI output were buggy from the beginning (although not invented by you, for sure), and now fail: They test whether \pdfoutput is *defined*, and assume PDF output if yes, while in pdfitex it is always defined, but set to 0 if DVI output is wanted. Even worse, the LaTeX files created by db2latex *set* \pdfoutput to 1 if they find that it is defined, and therefore always produce PDF files. This problem makes db2latex unusable in Debian (and many other distributions), and breaks out automatic building of package documentation in some cases. Therefore we need a fix rather quickly, and would be glad if you would implement this: The maintainers of the package within Debian are very busy currently, and I'm only the teTeX maintainer who doesn't know anything about sgml or xml or whatever language db2latex uses. What I can tell you is how LaTeX files produced by db2latex should look like, there is an easy and a thorough solution: - the easy one is to load ifpdf.sty with \usepackage{ifpdf}, and use the conditional \ifpdf % code for PDF output \else % code for DVI output \fi (the else branch can be left out, \fi is mandatory) - the thorough one would be to check whether such a discrimination is needed at all. For example, such a check is frequently used for hyperref, but in fact this package has output format tests built in and does not need to be called with an output driver option except in very special cases. If you want to go that way, feel free to ask me on debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org which of your checks is necessary. Many thanks in advance, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#344254: oops sorry...
mis-aimed email, ignore :) -- Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bur.st Networking Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344354: ahh...
avahi-utils used to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now -- Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bur.st Networking Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344254: ah...
avahi-utils usd to only contain python stuff, but now we re-wrote some tools in C and are moving to replacing most of them but avahi-discover so avahi-utils really needs to be arch: any now -- Trent Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bur.st Networking Inc. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:10:00AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Steve, btw, any news on CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 (arbitrary code > execution when importing a .bvh file)? Last I heard you were going to > prepare an update unless anybody had an issue with the changes made, > yet I haven't heard of any such issues (or anything at all, to be > precise) since then... Utterly slipped my mind. :( > FWIW, I've put together an update for Sarge's version of the blender > package based on the upstream change mentioned above, please find > attached a cumulative interdiff for both CVE-2005-3302 aka bug#330895 > and this bug so these issues can be resolved for Sarge. Great, thanks a lot. > Please tell whether you deem those patches sufficient for a potential > future security advisory, and if not, please provide pointers at what > might be missing. It looks good to me. I've built a package and if nobody has any objections I'll upload later today. Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344401: firefox: Printing support (CUPS) completely hosed
I can confirm the problem with the CUPS printer. The printer properties are listed there, including my paper setting of iso-A4. But when I try to "print to file" with it, firefox 1.5 complains, saying "There was a problem printing because the paper size you specified is not supported by your printer." The same goes for Postscript/default. The Xprint printers are, however, working for me. That is, I can print to them using iso-A4 paper. I'm not seeing the glibc crash that Henrique reported. I'm on libc6 2.3.5-9 (i386). Drew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: [bluez-utils #338743] More info
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 338743 + patch Bug#338743: must not use mknod in postinst There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]