Bug#346002: apt: GPG error when updating
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:28:24AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Michael Vogt wrote: You can run apt-get with --allow-unauthenticated or APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=true in apt.conf Thanx for the hint, but this option just changed the error message. Now I get: W: There are no public key available for the following key IDs: 010908312D230C5F W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems The warning is justified IMHO because the user should be told that there is are signatures on the Release file for that no public key is available. The Debian Release should should still be authenticated now (because it found a valid signature from a trusted key and only a missing signature) and you should get no authenticated packages warnings anymore. Maybe I should reword the warning to make it more clear what it means? Cheers, Michael -- Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#346962: timidity: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 346962 patch Bug#346962: timidity: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347123: marked as done (njplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:47:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347123: fixed in njplot 0.20051109-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:42:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:42:09 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzb-qm-5p for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:48 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz5-0006rx-Je for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: njplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: njplot Version: 0.20041129-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347123-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 07:50:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 23:50:44 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvrkC-0005WP-E5; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:47:08 -0800 From: Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347123: fixed in njplot 0.20051109-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:47:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: njplot Source-Version: 0.20051109-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of njplot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: njplot_0.20051109-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/njplot/njplot_0.20051109-1.diff.gz njplot_0.20051109-1.dsc to pool/main/n/njplot/njplot_0.20051109-1.dsc njplot_0.20051109-1_i386.deb to pool/main/n/njplot/njplot_0.20051109-1_i386.deb njplot_0.20051109.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/njplot/njplot_0.20051109.orig.tar.gz A summary of the
Bug#346962: timidity: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
tags 346962 patch thanks Hi Henrique, On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:04:43AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote: Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. NMUs are welcome, if done using the delayed queue (please use 5 days or more), *AND* if done properly with a patch sent to the BTS, NMU built in a clean chroot, etc. Ok, please find attached a patch for an NMU I've prepared and will shortly be uploading to the DELAYED/5-day queue on gluck. The diff includes one change not directly related to xlibs-dev, but which I noticed in the process of identifying the new build-depends: when I noticed the package build-depends on libxaw8-dev while I still have libxaw7-dev on my system, I was told on IRC that libxaw8-dev is actually going to go away in Xorg 7.0. Apparently the main difference to libxaw7 was xprint support, and xprint as a whole seems to be going away. If you prefer to wait for libxaw8 to be dropped before making this change, let me know and I can amend the NMU; it just seems to me that this will save a reupload once Xorg 7.0 (which is just around the corner) hits unstable. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog --- timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog +++ timidity-2.13.2/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +timidity (2.13.2-7.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Build-depend on libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxmu-dev, libxpm-dev, +libxt-dev, x-dev instead of on the obsolete xlibs-dev (closes: #346962). + * Build-depend on libxaw7-dev instead of libxaw8-dev -- according to the +XSF, libxaw8-dev is expected to be dropped in Xorg 7.0. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:06:19 -0800 + timidity (2.13.2-7) unstable; urgency=low * Update libjack-dev dependencies (closes: #317227) diff -u timidity-2.13.2/debian/control timidity-2.13.2/debian/control --- timidity-2.13.2/debian/control +++ timidity-2.13.2/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: sound Priority: optional Maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), libasound2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, libarts1-dev, libjack0.100.0-dev, libaudio-dev, libvorbis-dev (= 1.0.0-3), libspeex-dev (= 1.0), liboggflac-dev (= 1.1.2-1), libflac-dev (= 1.1.2-1), libncurses-dev, libslang2-dev, xlibs-dev, libxaw8-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, autotools-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), libasound2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libesd0-dev, libarts1-dev, libjack0.100.0-dev, libaudio-dev, libvorbis-dev (= 1.0.0-3), libspeex-dev (= 1.0), liboggflac-dev (= 1.1.2-1), libflac-dev (= 1.1.2-1), libncurses-dev, libslang2-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxmu-dev, libxpm-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev, libxaw7-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, autotools-dev Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: timidity signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#346572: [mipsel] Depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 which cannot be installed.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:06:48PM +1100, skaller wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 00:37 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: qube:~# apt-get install ocaml Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have unmet dependencies: ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.08.3 E: Broken packages I get this from my mirror regularly. It occurs because the package index is downloaded first .. but the packages come later. On Ubuntu I get a flashing thing telling me there are upgrades available .. only when I try to download them they're not there. An hour later .. they're there :) The mirror *should* add new packages, then add the index, then remove any hidden packages but I guess it just uses a generalised filesystem synching program. Still he says he uses stable, and ocaml was not updated in stable since ages, unless there has been a security update we are not aware of, but i seriously doubt that. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347100: marked as done (ucblogo: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:02:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347100: fixed in ucblogo 5.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzg-sk-U1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:47 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz9-0006ww-EH for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ucblogo: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ucblogo Version: 5.3-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347100-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:10:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:10:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evrym-0007fn-3L; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:02:12 -0800 From: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347100: fixed in ucblogo 5.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:02:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ucblogo Source-Version: 5.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ucblogo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ucblogo_5.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/u/ucblogo/ucblogo_5.5-1.diff.gz ucblogo_5.5-1.dsc to pool/main/u/ucblogo/ucblogo_5.5-1.dsc ucblogo_5.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/u/ucblogo/ucblogo_5.5-1_i386.deb ucblogo_5.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/u/ucblogo/ucblogo_5.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank
Bug#347182: php5-json: needs rebuild for new php ABI
Package: php5-json
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: grave
The php5-json package is currently uninstallable in unstable, because it
depends on phpapi-20041030. PHP 5.1.1 has just been uploaded, and the api
has been bumped. You will need to rebuild your package.
Also, please note that it is incorrect to hard-code the dependency on
phpapi-20041030 in debian/control as you have done. Just as with shared
libraries, the dependency should reflect the build environment instead of
hard-coding a particular version. It is suggested that you use a command
such as
echo php:Depends=phpapi-`php-config5 --phpapi`
debian/php5-json.substvars
in debian/rules prior to calling dpkg-gencontrol, and use ${php:Depends} in
debian/control, so that the correct version can be pulled in automatically.
If you make this change (with s/5/4/ for php4-json as well), future PHP ABI
changes can be handled through binNMUs on the autobuilders.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#343989: tcl8.* and tk8.* NMUs for configure errors
Le Samedi 07 Janvier 2006 00:18, Chris Waters a écrit : On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Daniel Schepler wrote: I intend to prepare NMUs for tcl8.[034] and tk8.[34] to fix this bug over the weekend, and upload Monday morning, unless you object or do your own uploads before then. I'll also fix the xlibs-dev dependency of tk8.3 while I'm at it. 8.0 is scheduled for removal -- there was one non-free package still depending on it, but I think that just got fixed recently, so the removal can go ahead, as soon as I update blt. So there's not much point in patching it 8.0. There's a new upstream of 8.4 that I'm currently working on. As for 8.3, I'll have new packages uploaded today (they'd be up already, but I had some problems with one of my HDs). But thanks for the offer. Thanks for the update. As I was working on the packages this weekend, there was one minor thing I noticed in tcl8.3 and tk8.3 (and the 8.0 packages too): if I built using fakeroot, I'd get a message something like strip: couldn't copy file: permission denied, and the resulting package would have unstripped libraries. My fix was simple: move dh_fixperms before dh_strip. This already seemed to be fixed in the 8.4 packages, though. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#347160: libubit-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev
Hi! Please don't bother fixing this bug: the ubit package will be removed from the archive (see #344597). -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346738: marked as done (guile-gtk-1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:20 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346738: fixed in guile-gtk-1.2 0.31-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:46 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzZ-ov-0E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:46 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz2-0006nj-OV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:04 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: guile-gtk-1.2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:04 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: guile-gtk-1.2 Version: 0.31-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346738-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:40:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:40:41 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvsRw-0005kA-Tr; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:20 -0800 From: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346738: fixed in guile-gtk-1.2 0.31-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:20 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: guile-gtk-1.2 Source-Version: 0.31-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of guile-gtk-1.2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4.diff.gz guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4.dsc to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/guile-gtk-1.2_0.31-4.dsc libguilegtk-1.2-0_0.31-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/guile-gtk-1.2/libguilegtk-1.2-0_0.31-4_i386.deb libguilegtk-1.2-dev_0.31-4_i386.deb to
Bug#346696: marked as done (freefem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:15 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346696: fixed in freefem 3.5.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzW-nj-UG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:37 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz1-0006lf-4B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: freefem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: freefem Version: 3.5.7-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346696-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:41:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:41:06 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvsRr-0005iI-IS; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:15 -0800 From: Christophe Prud'homme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346696: fixed in freefem 3.5.7-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:15 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: freefem Source-Version: 3.5.7-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freefem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freefem-doc_3.5.7-4_all.deb to pool/main/f/freefem/freefem-doc_3.5.7-4_all.deb freefem-examples_3.5.7-4_all.deb to pool/main/f/freefem/freefem-examples_3.5.7-4_all.deb freefem_3.5.7-4.dsc to pool/main/f/freefem/freefem_3.5.7-4.dsc freefem_3.5.7-4.tar.gz to pool/main/f/freefem/freefem_3.5.7-4.tar.gz freefem_3.5.7-4_i386.deb to
Bug#347185: ossp-uuid: uninstallable in unstable; does incestuous things to debian/control during build
Package: php5-uuid Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: grave The php5-uuid package is uninstallable in unstable because it depends on phpapi-20041030. PHP 5.1.1 has just been uploaded, and the API has been bumped. You will need to rebuild your package. In addition, rather than using a variable in debian/control and populating it with the PHP API dependency via substvars like everyone else, you are for some reason editing debian/control in a rule called from debian/rules install. While this is not a release-critical bug, it is a policy violation as it means that debian/rules clean cannot restore the pristine sources. Please use the existing substvars mechanism instead of spoiling the idempotency of debian/rules clean. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
severity 346749 minor thanks This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. freesci only had build-depends of the form libx11-6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0) etc. This does not break the X transition afaics, so I'm downgrading this bug. Simó, maybe you should check if this is the case for other packages, too. -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++
Processed: Re: Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346749 minor Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Severity set to `minor'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346614: marked as done (egoboo: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346614: fixed in egoboo 2.22-25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:03 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlz1-nQ-HK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:03 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz0-0006km-FU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: egoboo: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: egoboo Version: 2.22-24 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346614-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:50:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:50:57 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvsgF-0006xa-D5; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:07 -0800 From: Julien Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346614: fixed in egoboo 2.22-25 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: egoboo Source-Version: 2.22-25 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of egoboo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: egoboo_2.22-25.diff.gz to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-25.diff.gz egoboo_2.22-25.dsc to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-25.dsc egoboo_2.22-25_i386.deb to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-25_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#346903: marked as done (osdclock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:16 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346903: fixed in osdclock 0.5-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:46 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzj-r1-Ew for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:48 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz6-0006sg-2O for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: osdclock: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: osdclock Version: 0.5-11 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346903-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:50:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:50:50 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvsgO-00072R-2F; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:16 -0800 From: Julien Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346903: fixed in osdclock 0.5-12 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:47:16 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: osdclock Source-Version: 0.5-12 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of osdclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: osdclock_0.5-12.diff.gz to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-12.diff.gz osdclock_0.5-12.dsc to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-12.dsc osdclock_0.5-12_i386.deb to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-12_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#346764: xbubble: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
tag 346764 patch thanks On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:38:56AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Package: xbubble Version: 0.5.10-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. Hello, I just digged this one, and the list of needed build-deps seems to be: libx11-dev, x-dev, libxt-dev Note that the last one is not really needed by the build, but only by the configury I use as upstream maintainer and that I should probably fix. Any help welcome on this one, too ;) Bye, Mt. -- You should apply this fix which solves the newest Internet Explorer Vulnerability described in MS05-023. It is important that you apply this fix now since we estimate the Buffer Overflow is at a Critical Level. -- Text attached to the WORM_TORVIL.C mail virus. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#346764: xbubble: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346764 patch Bug#346764: xbubble: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of openbox 3.2-8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 347130 + fixed Bug#347130: openbox: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of freetype1 1.4pre.20050518-0.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346485 + fixed Bug#346485: freetype1: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat `ftstring': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 346521 + fixed Bug#346521: freetype1(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346749 serious Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346732: marked as done (geda-gschem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:02:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346732: fixed in geda-gschem 20050820-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzX-o4-5v for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz1-0006mF-J9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: geda-gschem: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: geda-gschem Version: 20050820-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346732-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 09:12:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 01:12:42 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evsuo-PD-LG; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:02:10 -0800 From: Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346732: fixed in geda-gschem 20050820-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:02:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: geda-gschem Source-Version: 20050820-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of geda-gschem, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: geda-gschem_20050820-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/geda-gschem/geda-gschem_20050820-2.diff.gz geda-gschem_20050820-2.dsc to pool/main/g/geda-gschem/geda-gschem_20050820-2.dsc geda-gschem_20050820-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/geda-gschem/geda-gschem_20050820-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and
Bug#346698: gnome-randr-applet: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:38:04AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Package: gnome-randr-applet Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious Hello, Thanks, preparing upload now. (BTW, i wonder if it would have been easily possible to run the xplit-script on those package during the mass-filing, and include directly the output of it in the bug report). Friendly, Sven Luther
Bug#347041: quark: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:38:08AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Package: quark Version: 3.21-3 Severity: serious Hello, Thanks, preparing upload now. (BTW, i wonder if it would have been easily possible to run the xplit-script on those package during the mass-filing, and include directly the output of it in the bug report). Friendly, Sven Luther
Bug#346749: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Hi Steve! You wrote: Version: 0.3.4c-4 Build-Depends: debhelper (=4), xlibs-dev, [...] You seem to be referring to package dependencies, which is *not* what this bug was about. I'm sorry, you're totally right. I'll fix this right away. -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 | || Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 | ++ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346920: marked as done (seyon: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:17:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346920: fixed in seyon 2.20c-20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:48 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzf-rk-0h for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:45 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz7-0006uc-EX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:09 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: seyon: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:09 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: seyon Version: 2.20c-19 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346920-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 09:20:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 01:20:44 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evt9K-0005kL-QW; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:17:10 -0800 From: Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346920: fixed in seyon 2.20c-20 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:17:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: seyon Source-Version: 2.20c-20 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of seyon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: seyon_2.20c-20.diff.gz to pool/main/s/seyon/seyon_2.20c-20.diff.gz seyon_2.20c-20.dsc to pool/main/s/seyon/seyon_2.20c-20.dsc seyon_2.20c-20_i386.deb to pool/main/s/seyon/seyon_2.20c-20_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#346866: xview: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:39:02AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Already fixed locally, upload in a few days. No NMUs please.
Bug#346760: NMU clearance
It's okay to NMU this package, in fact please do it! When doing so, please also eighter adopt the package or set 'Maintainer:' to Debian QA Group! Thank you, -- LÉNÁRT, János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: hi again, On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:03:36PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: I got this error in raggle : /usr/bin/raggle:2937:in `draw_items': undefined method `' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /usr/bin/raggle:2933:in `draw_items' from /usr/bin/raggle:3526:in `populate_feed_win' from /usr/bin/raggle:4268:in `init' from /usr/bin/raggle:5611:in `main' from /usr/bin/raggle:6654 im still unable to reproduce this bug. Can you please send me the list of feeds youre reading (or even better, your ~/.raggle), this would help alot. Thanks. Hi, here is my .raggle Thanks. raggle.tar.gz Description: Binary data
Bug#347182: marked as done (php5-json: needs rebuild for new php ABI)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:47:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#347182: fixed in php-json-ext 1.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:21:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:21:37 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86]
helo=tennyson.dodds.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvsHY-0004nr-P6
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:21:37 -0800
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C54B37002; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:21:35 -0800
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: php5-json: needs rebuild for new php ABI
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: php5-json
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: grave
The php5-json package is currently uninstallable in unstable, because it
depends on phpapi-20041030. PHP 5.1.1 has just been uploaded, and the api
has been bumped. You will need to rebuild your package.
Also, please note that it is incorrect to hard-code the dependency on
phpapi-20041030 in debian/control as you have done. Just as with shared
libraries, the dependency should reflect the build environment instead of
hard-coding a particular version. It is suggested that you use a command
such as
echo php:Depends=3Dphpapi-`php-config5 --phpapi` debian/php5-js=
on.substvars
in debian/rules prior to calling dpkg-gencontrol, and use ${php:Depends} in
debian/control, so that the correct version can be pulled in automatically.
If you make this change (with s/5/4/ for php4-json as well), future PHP ABI
changes can be handled through binNMUs on the autobuilders.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDwh0PKN6ufymYLloRAp1BAJ9YCRZEQChdtxhkLsl9dlnnrlC+aQCgrh2T
LeyWQ8+wxl+/Zfa6VHrl8Og=
=/txM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--54ZiyWcDhi/7bWb8--
---
Received: (at 347182-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 09:50:42 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 01:50:42 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EvtcJ-0004ws-LZ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:47:07 -0800
From: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347182: fixed in php-json-ext 1.1.0-2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:47:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Source: php-json-ext
Source-Version: 1.1.0-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
php-json-ext, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
php-json-ext_1.1.0-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/php-json-ext/php-json-ext_1.1.0-2.diff.gz
php-json-ext_1.1.0-2.dsc
to pool/main/p/php-json-ext/php-json-ext_1.1.0-2.dsc
php4-json_1.1.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/php-json-ext/php4-json_1.1.0-2_i386.deb
php5-json_1.1.0-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/php-json-ext/php5-json_1.1.0-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
Bug#338327: Bug#340076: Patch for several xmltex bugs
Hi Lars! Hi Frank! On Mon, 09 Jan 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Actually, I did the upload, as an NMU. See changelog. Ooops, sorry, I assumed that Frank did it when he came back and didn't check in the changelog. For some reason, when I tested the package, I did not run into this problem. Oops. And sorry. I'll have a look at this after I've slept, unless someone beats me to it. No problem. Every new version still can incorporate this. BTW, do you mind changing the dependencies to Depends: tetex-base | texlive-latex-base, tetex-bin | texlive-pdfetex, tetex-extra | texlive-fonts-recommended or something similar (I don't know what is actually needed from the tetex packages), so I can stop providing modified packages for use with texlive packages (these modified packages only have the deps changed). Best wishes Norbert --- Dr. Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Università di Siena gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- DIBBLE (vb.) To try to remove a sticky something from one hand with the other, thus causing it to get stuck to the other hand and eventually to anything else you try to remove it with. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347190: f-prot-installer: problem on check-updates
Package: f-prot-installer Version: 0.5.20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable invoking check_updates does fail. Due to the fail package configuration does also fail. Here is the console output: # ./check-updates Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./check-updates line 594. Signature file SIGN.DEF not found! Fetching again! Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./check-updates line 596. Signature file SIGN2.DEF not found! Fetching again! Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./check-updates line 598. Signature file MACRO.DEF not found! Fetching again! *** * F-Prot Antivirus Updater* *** There's a new version of: Document/Office/Macro viruses signatures on the web. Starting to download... Download completed. There's a new version of: Application/Script viruses and Trojans signatures on the web. Starting to download... Download completed. Preparing to install Application/Script viruses and Trojans signatures. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./check-updates line 487. Application/Script viruses and Trojans signatures have successfully been installed. Preparing to install Document/Office/Macro viruses signatures. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ./check-updates line 524. mv: Fehlender Zieldatei-Operand hinter ,,/var/tmp/f-prot/MACRO.DEF ,,mv --help gibt weitere Informationen. Error while trying to replace old signature files. Fatal error:. Exiting... at ./check-updates line 525. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-mywin4lin Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages f-prot-installer depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.66 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.15.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libwww-perl 5.803-4WWW client/server library for Perl ii unzip 5.52-6 De-archiver for .zip files ii wget 1.10.2-1 retrieves files from the web f-prot-installer recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * f-prot-installer/reinstall: true * f-prot-installer/update_defs: true f-prot-installer/install_later: * f-prot-installer/action: Download and install * f-prot-installer/configured: false f-prot-installer/note_cron: f-prot-installer/where_are_files: /tmp * f-prot-installer/renamed: * f-prot-installer/failed: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: merge 323027 327893 Bug#323027: fetchmail: lost patch: APOP and default fetchsizelimit Bug#327893: fetchmail: Fetchmail 6.2.5-12sarge1 hast broken APOP. Query status=4 (PROTOCOL) Merged 323027 327893. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346672: marked as done (fidelio: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346672: fixed in fidelio 0.9.6-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzX-na-5s for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:36 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz0-0006lG-Pr for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fidelio: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fidelio Version: 0.9.6-11 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346672-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:11:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:11:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evtqo-0006VT-Q2; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:06 -0800 From: Samuele Giovanni Tonon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346672: fixed in fidelio 0.9.6-12 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: fidelio Source-Version: 0.9.6-12 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fidelio, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fidelio_0.9.6-12.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fidelio/fidelio_0.9.6-12.diff.gz fidelio_0.9.6-12.dsc to pool/main/f/fidelio/fidelio_0.9.6-12.dsc fidelio_0.9.6-12_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fidelio/fidelio_0.9.6-12_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which
Bug#346888: marked as done (w9wm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346888: fixed in w9wm 0.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzl-tV-69 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:49 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1EvlzF-0006xe-JY for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: w9wm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:17 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: w9wm Version: 0.4.2-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346888-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:11:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:11:16 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evtqq-0006XN-Rc; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:08 -0800 From: Benjamin Drieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346888: fixed in w9wm 0.4.2-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:02:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: w9wm Source-Version: 0.4.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of w9wm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: w9wm_0.4.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/w/w9wm/w9wm_0.4.2-4.diff.gz w9wm_0.4.2-4.dsc to pool/main/w/w9wm/w9wm_0.4.2-4.dsc w9wm_0.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/w/w9wm/w9wm_0.4.2-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address
Bug#347023: not fixed in ratpoison 1.3.0-8
reopen 347023 thank you, I would say the bug fix didn't get all the way, based on that building now failes for all architectures on the autobuilders. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=ratpoison ... checking for X... no configure: error: *** Can't find X11 headers and libs make: *** [build] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060109-0953 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ... Probably this ends up in that the configure scripts need some serious updating, more than merely replacing a few files. As I've written on the wiki, I didn't really succeed in fixing them the last time I tried: http://ratpoison.elektrubadur.se/Development -- /Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347023: not fixed in ratpoison 1.3.0-8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 347023 Bug#347023: ratpoison: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. thank you, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346749: marked as done (freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346749: fixed in freesci 0.3.4c-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:51 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlza-nk-NX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:51 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz1-0006ll-7v for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: freesci: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: freesci Version: 0.3.4c-4 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346749-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:20:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:20:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evu5M-0003Gc-14; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:08 -0800 From: Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346749: fixed in freesci 0.3.4c-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:08 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: freesci Source-Version: 0.3.4c-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of freesci, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: freesci-doc_0.3.4c-5_all.deb to pool/main/f/freesci/freesci-doc_0.3.4c-5_all.deb freesci_0.3.4c-5.diff.gz to pool/main/f/freesci/freesci_0.3.4c-5.diff.gz freesci_0.3.4c-5.dsc to pool/main/f/freesci/freesci_0.3.4c-5.dsc freesci_0.3.4c-5_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freesci/freesci_0.3.4c-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version
Bug#346783: marked as done (wmwave: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:36 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346783: fixed in wmwave 0.4-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:23 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0J-0001M0-4D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:23 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzn-00070t-En for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:51 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmwave: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:51 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmwave Version: 0.4-5 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346783-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:20:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:20:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evu5o-0003N2-1K; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:36 -0800 From: Guido Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346783: fixed in wmwave 0.4-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:17:36 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: wmwave Source-Version: 0.4-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmwave, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmwave_0.4-6.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmwave/wmwave_0.4-6.diff.gz wmwave_0.4-6.dsc to pool/main/w/wmwave/wmwave_0.4-6.dsc wmwave_0.4-6_powerpc.deb to pool/main/w/wmwave/wmwave_0.4-6_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:34:50AM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: severity 346229 normal thanks hi, On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:03:36PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: I got this error in raggle : /usr/bin/raggle:2937:in `draw_items': undefined method `' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /usr/bin/raggle:2933:in `draw_items' from /usr/bin/raggle:3526:in `populate_feed_win' from /usr/bin/raggle:4268:in `init' from /usr/bin/raggle:5611:in `main' from /usr/bin/raggle:6654 im still unable to reproduce this bug. Can you please send me the list of feeds youre reading (or even better, your ~/.raggle), this would help alot. Thanks. here is my .raggle thanks. Well, there seems to be something wrong with your feeds.yaml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bug$ grep BinnewZ ../.raggle/feeds.yaml title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups - title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups The last entry[1] in feeds.yaml seems to be the bad one. After deleting it using vi, raggle starts up nicely. I cant really say what exactly is causing raggle to bail out but please be aware that the link does _not_ provide a rss file, it seems like the contents of the site moved (im not French). Im downgrading the bug to normal as i think this is a situation which other people wont be able to reproduce that easily. Hi, thanks for your help. Infact, the link is no more a rss, it says that rss file is no more available. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items
severity 346229 normal thanks hi, On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:55:48PM +0100, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:03:36PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: I got this error in raggle : /usr/bin/raggle:2937:in `draw_items': undefined method `' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from /usr/bin/raggle:2933:in `draw_items' from /usr/bin/raggle:3526:in `populate_feed_win' from /usr/bin/raggle:4268:in `init' from /usr/bin/raggle:5611:in `main' from /usr/bin/raggle:6654 im still unable to reproduce this bug. Can you please send me the list of feeds youre reading (or even better, your ~/.raggle), this would help alot. Thanks. here is my .raggle thanks. Well, there seems to be something wrong with your feeds.yaml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bug$ grep BinnewZ ../.raggle/feeds.yaml title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups - title: R\xC3\xA9f\xC3\xA9rencement BinnewZ France Newsgroups The last entry[1] in feeds.yaml seems to be the bad one. After deleting it using vi, raggle starts up nicely. I cant really say what exactly is causing raggle to bail out but please be aware that the link does _not_ provide a rss file, it seems like the contents of the site moved (im not French). Im downgrading the bug to normal as i think this is a situation which other people wont be able to reproduce that easily. [1] http://www.altbinnewsgroup.com/rss/rss.php?cat_id=7 bye, - michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346229 normal Bug#346229: raggle exits with an undefined method error in draw_items Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327893: marked as done (fetchmail: Fetchmail 6.2.5-12sarge1 hast broken APOP. Query status=4 (PROTOCOL))
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:43:49 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing fixed bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 19:46:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 12:46:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEuGD-00026S-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:46:37 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2005 19:46:04 - Received: from p5496265C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO thorion.karameikos.my) [84.150.38.92] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 12 Sep 2005 21:46:04 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3537782 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost ident=amavis) by thorion.karameikos.my with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EEuFe-0001l7-Kj for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:02 +0200 Received: from thorion.karameikos.my ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (thorion [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03397-02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from claudio by thorion.karameikos.my with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EEuFc-0001l3-VO for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Claudio_Andr=C3=A9_Till_Clemens?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fetchmail: Fetchmail 6.2.5-12sarge1 hast broken APOP. Query status=4 (PROTOCOL) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:00 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at karameikos.my X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fetchmail Version: 6.2.5-12sarge1 Severity: important Hello, I'm having now problems with the security version of fetchmail, 6.2.5-12sarge1. The previous version (6.2.5-12) was working perfectly. The problem seems to come only with APOP as Protocol, and only if there is more than one messages in the pool. When I change to POP3 it works again, but that is not an option. fetchmail claims it is allways a protocol error. Here the output of fetchmail -v: fetchmail: 6.2.5.2 querying pop.gmx.net (protocol APOP) at Mon Sep 12 21:04:42 2005: poll started fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Thawte Consulting cc fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: Thawte Premium Server CA fetchmail: Server CommonName: pop.gmx.net fetchmail: pop.gmx.net key fingerprint: 72:DB:3F:37:00:18:5E:58:91:1B:C5:41:02:2D:98:21 fetchmail: Warning: server certificate verification: unable to get local issuer certificate fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Thawte Consulting cc fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: Thawte Premium Server CA fetchmail: Server CommonName: pop.gmx.net fetchmail: Warning: server certificate verification: certificate not trusted fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Thawte Consulting cc fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: Thawte Premium Server CA fetchmail: Server CommonName: pop.gmx.net fetchmail: Warning: server certificate verification: unable to verify the first certificate fetchmail: POP3 +OK GMX POP3 StreamProxy ready [EMAIL PROTECTED] fetchmail: POP3 APOP *** fetchmail: POP3 +OK mailbox has 11 messages (1319754 octets) fetchmail: POP3 STAT fetchmail: POP3 +OK 11 1319754 11 messages for 3537782 at pop.gmx.net (1319754 octets). fetchmail: cannot get a range of message sizes (1-11). fetchmail: POP3 QUIT fetchmail: POP3 +OK bye fetchmail: client/server protocol error while fetching from pop.gmx.net fetchmail: 6.2.5.2 querying pop.gmx.net (protocol APOP) at Mon Sep 12 21:04:48 2005: poll completed fetchmail: Query status=4 (PROTOCOL) fetchmail: normal termination, status 4 I'll try then the version for sid (6.3.5-18). Maybe there is no problem with unstable :). CU Claudio Clemens -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fetchmail depends on: ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove
Bug#346986: marked as done (vic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:32:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346986: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:38 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzh-st-71 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:46 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz9-0006xJ-PT for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: vic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:11 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: vic Version: 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346986-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:40:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:40:47 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvuJy-0004MB-2o; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:32:14 -0800 From: Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346986: fixed in vic 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:32:14 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: vic Source-Version: 1:2.8ucl1.1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vic/vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8.diff.gz vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/v/vic/vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8.dsc vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vic/vic_2.8ucl1.1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be
Bug#323027: marked as done (fetchmail: lost patch: APOP and default fetchsizelimit)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:43:49 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Closing fixed bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 08:39:07 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 01:39:07 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4E1L-000501-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 01:39:07 -0700
Received: from groumpf (str90-1-82-238-123-182.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.123.182])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA401734B2
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:39:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jekyll ([192.168.1.1] ident=Debian-exim)
by groumpf with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1E4E1J-0007Sl-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:39:05 +0200
Received: from arnaud by jekyll with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E4E1J-0003my-9b
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:39:05 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fetchmail: lost patch: APOP and default fetchsizelimit
X-Debbugs-CC: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Face: yL?ZRfSIk3zaRm*dlb3R4f.8RM~b/h|\wI]pL)}]l$H.Q3Qd3[h!`K6mI=+cWpg-El
B(FEm\EEdLdS{2l7,8\!RQ5aL0ZXlzzPKLxV/OQfrg/t!FGi.K[5isyT2oBNdnvk`~y}vwPYL;R
y)NYo]T8NlX{nmIUEi\a$hozWm#0GCT'e'[EMAIL
PROTECTED][g|I8{By=R8RbDeW7)S0-8:b;ZKo~9K?'
wq!G,MQ\eSt8g`)jeITEuig89NGmN^%1j!*F8~kW(yfF7W[:blRT[`w3x-C
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:39:04 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.2.5-12sarge1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I use APOP authentication to retrieve my mails with fetchmail. Since
last security update, it doesn't work any more when there are several
mails to fetch:
fetchmail: 4 messages for XXX at XXX (3180 octets).
fetchmail: cannot get a range of message sizes (1-4).
fetchmail: client/server protocol error while fetching from XXX
fetchmail: Query status=4 (PROTOCOL)
A workaround is to add fetchsizelimit 1 in the procmailrc
configuration file.
A quick diff between fetchmail-6.2.5-12 and fetchmail-6.2.5-12sarge1
shows that the following patch was lost between the two releases:
diff -Naur fetchmail-6.2.5-12/driver.c fetchmail-6.2.5-12sarge1/driver.c
--- fetchmail-6.2.5-12/driver.c 2005-08-14 00:29:02.0 +0200
+++ fetchmail-6.2.5-12sarge1/driver.c 2005-08-14 00:29:23.0 +0200
@@ -426,11 +426,8 @@
/* for POP3, we can get the size of one mail only! Unfortunately, this
* protocol specific test cannot be done elsewhere as the protocol
* could be auto. */
- switch (ctl-server.protocol)
- {
- case P_POP3: case P_APOP: case P_RPOP:
+ if (ctl-server.protocol == P_POP3)
fetchsizelimit = 1;
- }
/* Time to allocate memory to store the sizes */
xalloca(msgsizes, int *, sizeof(int) * fetchsizelimit);
Regards,
Arnaud
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages fetchmail depends on:
ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii base-files 3.1.2Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii debconf 1.4.30.13Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils 2.8.4Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 327893-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 10:43:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 02:43:56 2006
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [195.219.121.190] (helo=orix.scouts-es.org ident=postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
Processed: 3 RC bugs into 1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 346488 serious Bug#346488: Unsatisfiable dependencies on release candidate architecture Severity set to `serious'. # The invisible patch eh? tags 346488 -patch Bug#346488: Unsatisfiable dependencies on release candidate architecture Tags were: patch Tags removed: patch # Not really just libxine-dev but hey... reassign 337997 libxine-dev Bug#337997: Xine depends/build-depends on xlibs-dev, which is deprecated Bug reassigned from package `xine-lib' to `libxine-dev'. # side-effect severity 345499 serious Bug#345499: libxine-dev: unresolved dependecies on amd64 Severity set to `serious'. # Merge in turn! merge 337997 346488 347162 345499 Bug#337997: Xine depends/build-depends on xlibs-dev, which is deprecated Bug#345499: libxine-dev: unresolved dependecies on amd64 Bug#346488: Unsatisfiable dependencies on release candidate architecture Bug#347162: libxine-dev: uninstallable; depends on removed xlibs-dev Merged 337997 345499 346488 347162. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347004: NMU at will
Thanks for the bug report, I will try to get to it sooner rather than later, but if someone has this NMU-ready, please feel free to upload at will. With the expected patch in a bug-report. Regards, Baruch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346926: marked as done (pdl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:02:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346926: fixed in pdl 1:2.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:48 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzf-r4-0Z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:48 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz6-0006sp-4u for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pdl: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:08 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: pdl Version: 1:2.4.2-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346926-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 11:10:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 03:10:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evumt-00071s-2Y; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:02:07 -0800 From: Henning Glawe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346926: fixed in pdl 1:2.4.2-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:02:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: pdl Source-Version: 1:2.4.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pdl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pdl_2.4.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-4.diff.gz pdl_2.4.2-4.dsc to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-4.dsc pdl_2.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pdl/pdl_2.4.2-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to
Bug#346710: gnokii: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Hello Bradley, George, gnokii now has an RC bug. However, Bradley offered it up for adoption in [EMAIL PROTECTED], and George responded that he would take it, so that's great. This would be a good time for George to make a new upload :) This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. However, since there hasn't been concrete action from George yet, I plan to NMU this package after a week from now. I'll fix this bug, #334070 (dependency on adduser) and #343813 (libmysqlclient transition), to make these two transitions go on and keep gnokii up to date w.r.t. packaging. Please let me know if you object to this. BTW, you really should file an RFA (Bradley) or ITA (George) to more explicitly flag the status of this package. bye, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#347204: alsa-utils: alsa-base should be Depends: not Recommends:
Package: alsa-utils Version: 1.0.10-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The alsa utilities in this package do not work without /dev/snd which alsa-base provides. Therefore, alsa-base should be Depends not Recommends. WM -- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages alsa-utils depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.10-2 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses55.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii linux-sound-base 1.0.10-3 base package for ALSA and OSS soun ii lsb-base 3.0-13Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii modutils 2.4.27.0-3Linux module utilities ii pciutils 1:2.1.11-15.3 Linux PCI Utilities ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o ii whiptail 0.51.6-31 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages alsa-utils recommends: ii alsa-base 1.0.10-3 ALSA driver configuration files -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347004: NMU at will
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 347004 patch Bug#347004: mdk: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346673: gacc: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is Thanks for the bug, I'll fix it tonight. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169
Processed: setting package to blender, tagging 307811, tagging 333958, tagging 344398, tagging 345442 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 package blender Ignoring bugs not assigned to: blender tags 307811 + pending Bug#307811: blender: missing build-dependency There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 333958 + pending Bug#333958: blender - build puts files outside of the build directory Tags were: fixed patch Tags added: pending tags 344398 + pending Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending tags 345442 + pending Bug#345442: blender: new upstream version 2.40 fixes many, many bugs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 346144 + pending Bug#346144: blender: new upstream version available There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346756: marked as done (fookb: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346756: fixed in fookb 3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:56 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzr-nf-EF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:56 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz1-0006lU-0a for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fookb: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:03 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: fookb Version: 3.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346756-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 12:10:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 04:10:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evviw-0003Ha-Jp; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 From: Wartan Hachaturow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346756: fixed in fookb 3.0-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:02:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: fookb Source-Version: 3.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fookb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fookb-plainx_3.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fookb/fookb-plainx_3.0-2_i386.deb fookb-wmaker_3.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fookb/fookb-wmaker_3.0-2_i386.deb fookb_3.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fookb/fookb_3.0-2.diff.gz fookb_3.0-2.dsc to pool/main/f/fookb/fookb_3.0-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you
Bug#347004: NMU at will
tags 347004 patch thanks Hi Baruch, On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:04:30AM +, Baruch Even wrote: Thanks for the bug report, I will try to get to it sooner rather than later, but if someone has this NMU-ready, please feel free to upload at will. With the expected patch in a bug-report. Ok, here's an NMU patch for mdk. The NMU will be uploaded shortly. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u mdk-1.2.1/debian/control mdk-1.2.1/debian/control --- mdk-1.2.1/debian/control +++ mdk-1.2.1/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: otherosfs Priority: optional Maintainer: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, xlibs-dev, zlib1g-dev, libglade2-dev, guile-1.6-dev, flex, tetex-bin, texinfo +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, libglade2-dev, guile-1.6-dev, flex, tetex-bin, texinfo Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: mdk diff -u mdk-1.2.1/debian/changelog mdk-1.2.1/debian/changelog --- mdk-1.2.1/debian/changelog +++ mdk-1.2.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +mdk (1.2.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Drop build-dependency on obsolete xlibs-dev package, which is not needed +at all anyway (closes: #347004). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 9 Jan 2006 03:29:33 -0800 + mdk (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#347205: mesag-dev: libxll-6-dev not in sid
Package: mesag-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable mesag-dev not installable on sid due to libx11-6-dev dependency. There is no libx11-6-dev in sid. libx11-dev is in sid, not libx11-6-dev. WM -- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344124: fontforge: Should no longer Build-Depend on xlibs-dev
tags 344124 fixed thanks Apparently this bug was already fixed in 0.0.20051205-0.1, but the bug was not mentioned in the changelog. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Fixed in NMU of xclip 0.08-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346804 + fixed Bug#346804: xclip: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of mdk 1.2.1-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 347004 + fixed Bug#347004: mdk: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: fontforge: Should no longer Build-Depend on xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 344124 fixed Bug#344124: fontforge: Should no longer Build-Depend on xlibs-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346804: Bug#347004: NMU at will
Thanks! Steve Langasek wrote: tags 34604 patch thanks On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:04:30AM +, Baruch Even wrote: Thanks for the bug report, I will try to get to it sooner rather than later, but if someone has this NMU-ready, please feel free to upload at will. With the expected patch in a bug-report. And here is a patch for xclip; NMU on its way to incoming as well. Cheers, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 339326 to installation-reports
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 reassign 339326 installation-reports Bug#339326: Installation problems Linux Debian Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `installation-reports'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346804: Bug#347004: NMU at will
tags 34604 patch thanks On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:04:30AM +, Baruch Even wrote: Thanks for the bug report, I will try to get to it sooner rather than later, but if someone has this NMU-ready, please feel free to upload at will. With the expected patch in a bug-report. And here is a patch for xclip; NMU on its way to incoming as well. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u xclip-0.08/debian/control xclip-0.08/debian/control --- xclip-0.08/debian/control +++ xclip-0.08/debian/control @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: x11 Priority: optional Maintainer: Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), xlibs-dev, xutils +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libx11-dev, libxmu-dev, x-dev, xutils Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: xclip diff -u xclip-0.08/debian/changelog xclip-0.08/debian/changelog --- xclip-0.08/debian/changelog +++ xclip-0.08/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +xclip (0.08-4.1) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Build-depend on libx11-dev, libxmu-dev, x-dev instead of on the obsolete +xlibs-dev (closes: #346804). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 9 Jan 2006 03:36:15 -0800 + xclip (0.08-4) unstable; urgency=low * Change directory when waiting for X11 events, this allows the user to signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#342178: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-themes-20040929/GurUnix/* fails DFSG #1 and #3)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:10 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342178: fixed in sylpheed-claws-themes 20051217-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 23:29:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 05 15:29:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.netsonic.fi ([194.29.192.26]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EjPm9-0004xG-Su for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:29:42 -0800 Received: from sauna (kulho150.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.193.150]) by smtp.netsonic.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2891F801D; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 01:29:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from sauna.l.org ([192.168.0.99] helo=[192.168.1.32]) by sauna with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1EjPm8-0008Oi-00; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:29:40 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timo Juhani Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sylpheed-claws-themes-20040929/GurUnix/* fails DFSG #1 and #3 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 01:29:40 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sylpheed-claws-themes Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 Files under sylpheed-claws-themes-20040929/GurUnix/ seem to fail DFSG #1 since sylpheed-claws-themes-20040929/GurUnix/README.txt says Rules and regulations and all that good stuff concerning these icons: These icons are free for personal [PERSONAL!!, I don't want any of you big companies stealing from the little guy thinking no one will notice, I don't want to be the next FOOOD (poor guy)] use. You can distribute them for free as long as the sets are intact and unmodified, this text file is included with every zip file in the set, and I'm given proper credit and a link to my site. You may not sell them or use them for profit either individually, or in any sort of collection or CD package. which seems to forbid selling the icons (DFSG #1) and distribution of modified versions (DFSG #3). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.29sauna Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI (charmap=ISO-8859-1) --- Received: (at 342178-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 12:51:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 04:51:16 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwQY-0002fb-2y; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:10 -0800 From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#342178: fixed in sylpheed-claws-themes 20051217-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:10 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sylpheed-claws-themes Source-Version: 20051217-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sylpheed-claws-themes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-themes/sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1.diff.gz sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1.dsc to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-themes/sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1.dsc sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1_all.deb to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-themes/sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217-1_all.deb sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-themes/sylpheed-claws-themes_20051217.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#346916: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-gtk2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346916: fixed in sylpheed-claws-gtk2 1.9.100-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:47 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzf-sG-NC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz8-0006vd-7E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sylpheed-claws-gtk2: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2 Version: 1.9.100-1.1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346916-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 12:50:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 04:50:35 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwQV-0002es-OU; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:07 -0800 From: Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346916: fixed in sylpheed-claws-gtk2 1.9.100-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: sylpheed-claws-gtk2 Source-Version: 1.9.100-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sylpheed-claws-gtk2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libsylpheed-claws-gtk2-dev_1.9.100-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-gtk2/libsylpheed-claws-gtk2-dev_1.9.100-2_i386.deb sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav_1.9.100-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sylpheed-claws-gtk2/sylpheed-claws-gtk2-clamav_1.9.100-2_i386.deb
Bug#346981: marked as done (wmnut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346981: fixed in wmnut 0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0F-0001LM-Rv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:20 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzc-0006zn-I1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:40 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmnut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:40 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmnut Version: 0.61-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346981-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 12:51:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 04:51:09 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwQa-0002g2-Cs; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800 From: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346981: fixed in wmnut 0.61-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:47:12 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: wmnut Source-Version: 0.61-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmnut, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmnut_0.61-2.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmnut/wmnut_0.61-2.diff.gz wmnut_0.61-2.dsc to pool/main/w/wmnut/wmnut_0.61-2.dsc wmnut_0.61-2_i386.deb to pool/main/w/wmnut/wmnut_0.61-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please
Bug#347204: marked as done (alsa-utils: alsa-base should be Depends: not Recommends:)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:00:38 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#347204: alsa-utils: alsa-base should be Depends: not Recommends: has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 11:59:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 03:59:29 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com ([65.24.5.135] helo=ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvvgP-0002Wc-18 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:59:29 -0800 Received: from leibniz (cpe-65-25-141-75.columbus.res.rr.com [65.25.141.75]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k09BxOEo020358; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:59:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:59:55 -0500 From: William Mitchell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: alsa-utils: alsa-base should be Depends: not Recommends: Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: alsa-utils Version: 1.0.10-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The alsa utilities in this package do not work without /dev/snd which alsa-base provides. Therefore, alsa-base should be Depends not Recommends. WM -- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.5 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages alsa-utils depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.10-2 ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses55.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii linux-sound-base 1.0.10-3 base package for ALSA and OSS soun ii lsb-base 3.0-13Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip ii module-init-tools 3.2.2-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo ii modutils 2.4.27.0-3Linux module utilities ii pciutils 1:2.1.11-15.3 Linux PCI Utilities ii python 2.3.5-3 An interactive high-level object-o ii whiptail 0.51.6-31 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages alsa-utils recommends: ii alsa-base 1.0.10-3 ALSA driver configuration files -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 347204-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:00:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:00:39 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp-out0.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.175]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evwdb-0003Xa-Ft for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:00:39 -0800 Received: from [82.171.132.56] (helo=82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl) by smtp-out0.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1Evwda-5H-7D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:00:38 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 82-171-132-56.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571F5BFEA3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:00:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:00:38 +0100 From: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#347204: alsa-utils: alsa-base should be Depends: not Recommends: References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level:
Bug#320720: marked as done (package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps)
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 22:20:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 15:20:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DzMAa-0005gU-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:20:32 -0700 Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04675 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:29 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B754BFC3D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 16468-35 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST) 13914 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1]) by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6VMKR8f018048; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:20:27 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) Jumbo Shrimp XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: htmlgen Version: 1.8.24-1 Severity: serious please build in a current unstable build environment, tighten the build dependency on the libfltk1.1 development package. --- Received: (at 320720-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:06:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:06:19 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evwj5-0006Ny-PZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:06:19 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9A5107002; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:06:18 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: package built in old build-env, needs better build-deps Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since htmldoc 1.8.24-2 is in testing just fine on all archs, with a dependency on the new libfltk1.1c102 everywhere, the reason for a versioned build-dependency is past; I think this bug can just be closed. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --gwtGiOGliFx8mAnm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwl/KKN6ufymYLloRAnxRAKDSen6lzoBqjPb7UjVFzHorkmCrlwCgn3Jw X3/Wg/vcUFgr+F1OPB5Eqqo= =ssCy -END PGP
Bug#347211: fookb: FTBFS: missing build-dependency
Package: fookb Version: 3.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source From my build log: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:19:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Automatic build of fookb_3.0-2 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 79 Build started at 20060109-1318 ** [...] Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), libwings-dev, libsm-dev, libice-dev, libxpm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, wmaker [...] # Add here commands to compile the package. cd plainx ../configure --prefix=/usr --disable-libWUtil --disable-wmaker creating cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for X... no checking for XkbOpenDisplay in -lX11... no configure: error: Fatal: no libX11 or no XkbOpenDisplay() in libX11 make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060109-1319 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/fookb-3.0 -- -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346594: libxml2: 2.6.23-1 breaks xsltproc
Hello everybody, I forwarded the issue upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326295 Have a nice day, Daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#347212: osdclock: FTBFS: missing build-dependency
Package: osdclock Version: 0.5-12 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source From my build log: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:16:42AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Automatic build of osdclock_0.5-12 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 79 Build started at 20060109-1016 ** [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), libxosd-dev (= 2.2.2-2) Checking for already installed source dependencies... [...] dh_testdir /usr/bin/make DCFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5' gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -pipe -I. -DXOSD_VERSION=\\ -I/usr/X11R6/include osd_clock.c -o osd_clock.o osd_clock.c: In function 'main': osd_clock.c:65: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type gcc -o osd_clock osd_clock.o -L. -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lpthread -lXt -lxosd -lXinerama /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXt collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [osd_clock] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060109-1016 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5 -- -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346896: Requesting NMU for toshutils
Greetings, [Please do not reply to this email as my @yahoo.es account is a junk account which I do not check.] Bug #346896 was recently filed against toshutils. I am not able to correct this bug right now and would sincerely appreciate it if someone could NMU it for me. Due to a catastrophic hardware failure last month and now waiting for Internet access to be installed at my new place, there is really no way I can fix this in a reasonable time frame. If you do NMU to fix this bug, please attach a diff of the debian/ directories in the source package to this bug and also CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will not get the email right away, but I will eventually, as Sean Finney has graciously agreed to collect my emails for me until I get Internet access at home (thanks Sean). Regards, -Roberto Sanchez __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y moviles desde 1 centimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347213: freefem: FTBFS: fails to build from source
Package: freefem Version: 3.5.7-4 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source From my build log: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:45:33AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Automatic build of freefem_3.5.7-4 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 79 Build started at 20060109-0942 ** [...] Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autoconf ( 2.50), libtool, libx11-dev, doxygen( 1.2.10), tetex-bin, tetex-extra, hevea, doc-base [...] i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGibbs.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGibbs.Tpo -c femGibbs.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/femGibbs.o i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGibbs.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGibbs.Tpo -c femGibbs.cpp -o femGibbs.o /dev/null 21 if /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGraphicDeviceIndependent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Tpo \ -c -o femGraphicDeviceIndependent.lo `test -f 'femGraphicDeviceIndependent.cpp' || echo './'`femGraphicDeviceIndependent.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Tpo .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Plo; \ else rm -f .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGraphicDeviceIndependent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Tpo -c femGraphicDeviceIndependent.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.o i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGraphicDeviceIndependent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGraphicDeviceIndependent.Tpo -c femGraphicDeviceIndependent.cpp -o femGraphicDeviceIndependent.o /dev/null 21 if /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGraphicX11.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGraphicX11.Tpo \ -c -o femGraphicX11.lo `test -f 'femGraphicX11.cpp' || echo './'`femGraphicX11.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/femGraphicX11.Tpo .deps/femGraphicX11.Plo; \ else rm -f .deps/femGraphicX11.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi i486-kfreebsd-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -g -O2 -MT femGraphicX11.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/femGraphicX11.Tpo -c femGraphicX11.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/femGraphicX11.o femGraphicX11.cpp:48:27: error: X11/Intrinsic.h: No such file or directory femGraphicX11.cpp:49:28: error: X11/StringDefs.h: No such file or directory femGraphicX11.cpp:293: error: expected initializer before '*' token femGraphicX11.cpp:294: error: 'Window' does not name a type femGraphicX11.cpp:295: error: 'XSizeHints' does not name a type femGraphicX11.cpp:296: error: 'GC' does not name a type femGraphicX11.cpp:297: error: expected initializer before '*' token femGraphicX11.cpp: In function 'void fem::rflush()': femGraphicX11.cpp:319: error: 'display' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:319: error: 'XFlush' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp: In function 'void fem::rattente(int, float, float)': femGraphicX11.cpp:326: error: 'XEvent' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:326: error: expected `;' before 'report' femGraphicX11.cpp:331: error: 'display' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:332: error: 'win' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:333: error: 'gc' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:336: error: 'XDrawString' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:353: error: 'display' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:354: error: 'win' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:355: error: 'gc' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:358: error: 'XDrawString' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:359: error: 'report' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:359: error: 'XNextEvent' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:360: error: 'report' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:360: error: 'ButtonPress' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:360: error: 'KeyPress' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:362: error: 'display' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:362: error: 'ButtonPressMask' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:362: error: 'report' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:362: error: 'XCheckMaskEvent' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:363: error: 'ButtonPress' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:364: error: 'Button3' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:376: error: 'XFlush' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp: In function 'void fem::initgraphique()': femGraphicX11.cpp:387: error: 'XEvent' was not declared in this scope femGraphicX11.cpp:387: error: expected `;' before 'report' femGraphicX11.cpp:388
Bug#341729: marked as done (Gem doesn't load)
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:29 +0100 (CET) with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Gem doesn't load has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2005 16:04:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 02 08:04:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shnoll.test.at ([213.239.194.29]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EiDOf-0006Hf-J1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:04:29 -0800 Received: from shnoll.test.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shnoll.test.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jB2G2Oc5026927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:02:24 +0100 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by shnoll.test.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jB2G2O10026924 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:02:24 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: shnoll.test.at: geiger owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:02:24 +0100 (CET) From: geiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Gem doesn't load Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gem Version: 0.90.0-14 Severity: grave Tags: etch When trying to load the Gem library, I get the following: # pd -lib Gem /usr/lib/pd/extra/Gem.pd_linux: undefined symbol: vorbis_info_clear Gem does not work at all. Recompiling the version from unstable helps. Guenter --- Received: (at 341729-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:34:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:34:08 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from shnoll.test.at ([213.239.194.29]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evx9z-0003So-VK for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:34:08 -0800 Received: from shnoll.test.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by shnoll.test.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k09DXTeV021133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:29 +0100 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by shnoll.test.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k09DXTDP021130 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:29 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: shnoll.test.at: geiger owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:29 +0100 (CET) From: geiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Gem doesn't load Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLANK_LINES_70_80 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Fixed by testing transition. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347217: emacs-snapshot don't start
Package: emacs-snapshot Version: 1:20060103-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ emacs-snapshot Undefined color: black [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- Package-specific info: -- Emacs odds and ends: Loading 00debian-vars... Loading 50auctex (source)... Loading 50dictionaries-common (source)... Skipping dictionaries-common setup for emacs-snapshot Loading 50festival (source)... Version is: GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll bars) of 2006-01-03 on pacem, modified by Debian System load-path: (/usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/images /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/ /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/ /etc/emacs-snapshot /etc/emacs /usr/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp/auctex /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/leim /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/url /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/textmodes /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/progmodes /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/play /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/obsolete /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/net /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/mh-e /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/mail /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/language /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/international /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/gnus /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/eshell /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/emulation /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/emacs-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/calendar /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/calc) -- /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/: /usr/share/emacs-snapshot: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 176 2006-01-09 11:38 site-lisp /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp: total 13 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 680 2006-01-09 11:38 auctex -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3041 2006-01-07 00:31 debian-startup.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 106 2006-01-03 17:23 subdirs.el -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3919 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-site.el /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex: total 642 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50652 2006-01-09 11:38 bib-cite.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2949 2006-01-09 11:38 CompilationLog.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41360 2006-01-09 11:38 context.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5045 2006-01-09 11:38 context-en.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5638 2006-01-09 11:38 context-nl.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40317 2006-01-09 11:38 font-latex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 135512 2006-01-09 11:38 latex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2698 2006-01-09 11:38 multi-prompt.elc drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2384 2006-01-09 11:38 style -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8170 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-bar.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59600 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-buf.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 132801 2006-01-09 11:38 tex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19013 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-fold.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3565 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-font.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2179 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-fptex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14399 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-info.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31372 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-jp.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10078 2006-01-09 11:38 texmathp.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1210 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-mik.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 53049 2006-01-09 11:38 toolbar-x.elc /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/style: total 348 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1084 2006-01-09 11:38 alltt.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1703 2006-01-09 11:38 alphanum.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 689 2006-01-09 11:38 amsart.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 692 2006-01-09 11:38 amsbook.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 707 2006-01-09 11:38 amsbsy.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4779 2006-01-09 11:38 amsmath.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 860 2006-01-09 11:38 amsopn.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 730 2006-01-09 11:38 amstex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 675 2006-01-09 11:38 amstext.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1259 2006-01-09 11:38 amsthm.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 703 2006-01-09 11:38 article.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4913 2006-01-09 11:38 beamer.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 694 2006-01-09 11:38 book.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1546 2006-01-09 11:38 booktabs.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 955 2006-01-09 11:38 captcont.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4683 2006-01-09 11:38 csquotes.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 772 2006-01-09 11:38 czech.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 775 2006-01-09 11:38 danish.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3728 2006-01-09 11:38 dinbrief.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 664 2006-01-09 11:38 dk.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2786 2006-01-09 11:38 doc.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 673 2006-01-09 11:38 dutch.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2345 2006-01-09 11:38 emp.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2570 2006-01-09 11:38 epsf.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2843 2006-01-09 11:38 fancyref.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1782 2006-01-09 11:38 foils.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1550 2006-01-09 11:38 german.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 682 2006-01-09 11:38 graphics.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6406 2006-01-09 11:38
Bug#347218: kdelibs-data: file confilict with libdjvulibre1
Package: kdelibs-data Version: 4:3.5.0-3 Severity: grave It seems kdelibs-data has a file conflict with libdjvulibre1: Preparing to replace kdelibs-data 4:3.4.3-2 (using .../kdelibs-data_4%3a3.5.0-3_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement kdelibs-data ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-data_4%3a3.5.0-3_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/mimelnk/image/x-djvu.desktop', which is also in package libdjvulibre1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/kdelibs-data_4%3a3.5.0-3_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Cheers, -- Guido -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages kdelibs-data depends on: ii hicolor-icon-theme0.8-3 default fallback theme for FreeDes kdelibs-data recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254113: ttf-freefont: This problem seems to be back
Package: ttf-freefont Version: 20051206-1 Followup-For: Bug #254113 I just upgraded my system, and seem to have the symptoms described in this bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ttf-freefont depends on: ii defoma0.11.8-0.1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f Versions of packages ttf-freefont recommends: ii x-ttcidfont-conf 21 Configure TrueType and CID fonts f -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#198550: marked as done (xdrawchem: FTBFS: Tries to use g++-3.3 with qt2)
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:08:30 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing NMU bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2003 21:24:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 16:24:56 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19UYo4-0002dm-00; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:24:56 -0500 Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3]) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19UYo5-0002sj-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 17:24:57 -0400 Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20) id 19UYo3-000878-DM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:24:55 -0700 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xdrawchem: FTBFS: Tries to use g++-3.3 with qt2 From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:24:53 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: xdrawchem Version: 1.0-0.1 Severity: serious From my build log: ... g++ -g -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o xdrawchem main.o application.o render= 2d.o render2d_event.o chemdata.o render2d_draw.o drawable.o molecule.o bond= .o render2d_text.o text.o arrow.o bracket.o manual.o chemdata_rw.o render2d= _select.o chemdata_xml.o chemdata_mdl.o chemdata_cml.o chemdata_xdc.o chemd= ata_edit.o ringdialog.o chemdata_cdxml.o render2d_print.o fixeddialog.o sym= bol.o chemdata_tools.o curvearrow.o molecule_tools.o graphdialog.o graphwid= get.o xml_reader.o cdxml_reader.o cdx2cdxml.o namer.o molecule_smiles.o net= dialog.o pagesetupdialog.o netaccess.o netchoosedialog.o bondedit.o xdc_too= lbutton.o previewwidget.o application_ring.o smilesdialog.o chemdata_cdx.o = moc_application.o moc_render2d.o moc_chemdata.o moc_drawable.o moc_molecule= .o moc_bond.o moc_text.o moc_arrow.o moc_bracket.o moc_manual.o moc_ringdia= log.o moc_fixeddialog.o moc_symbol.o moc_curvearrow.o moc_graphdialog.o moc= _graphwidget.o moc_netdialog.o moc_pagesetupdialog.o moc_netaccess.o moc_ne= tchoosedialog.o moc_bondedit.o moc_xdc_toolbutton.o moc_previewwidget.o moc= _smilesdialog.o moc_http.o -lqt -lXext -lX11 -lm main.o(.text+0x23): In function `main': /usr/include/qt/qlist.h:49: undefined reference to `QString::QString[in-cha= rge](char const*)' main.o(.text+0x36): In function `main': /usr/include/qt/qstring.h:644: undefined reference to `QString::QString[in-= charge](char const*)' main.o(.text+0x59):/usr/include/qt/qstring.h:768: undefined reference to `Q= String::right(unsigned) const' main.o(.text+0x71):/usr/include/qt/qstring.h:775: undefined reference to `o= perator!=3D(QString const, QString const)' ... collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [xdrawchem] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xdrawchem-1.0' make: *** [build] Error 2 You have two choices to fix this: 1. (Preferably) compile using Qt3 instead. 2. Build-Depend on and use the appropriate versions of g++. See http://people.debian.org/~rmurray/c++transition.html for details. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC --=20 Daniel Schepler Please don't disillusion me. I [EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet. -- Orson Scott Card --- Received: (at 198550-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 14:09:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 06:09:03 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from server.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.122.133]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evxhn-0001Ea-7r; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:09:03 -0800 Received: by castor.theo.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (Postfix, from userid 557) id 298A21414D; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:08:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:08:30 +0100 From:
Bug#347217: marked as done (emacs-snapshot don't start)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:19:14 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347217: emacs-snapshot don't start has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:54:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:54:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.oi.com.br ([200.222.115.17]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvxTw-0005C6-7L for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:54:45 -0800 Received: from smtp2.oi.com.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.oi.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C909750 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:55:32 -0200 (BRST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (200165192197.user.veloxzone.com.br [200.165.192.197]) by smtp2.oi.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E2870001A0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:54:49 -0200 (BRST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:53:44 -0200 From: Savio Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bugs Debian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: emacs-snapshot don't start Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: emacs-snapshot Version: 1:20060103-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Error message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ emacs-snapshot Undefined color: black [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ -- Package-specific info: -- Emacs odds and ends: Loading 00debian-vars... Loading 50auctex (source)... Loading 50dictionaries-common (source)... Skipping dictionaries-common setup for emacs-snapshot Loading 50festival (source)... Version is: GNU Emacs 22.0.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw3d scroll= bars) of 2006-01-03 on pacem, modified by Debian System load-path: (/usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/images /usr/s= hare/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex/ /us= r/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex/ /etc/emacs-snapshot /etc/emacs /us= r/local/share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp /usr= /share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp/auctex /u= sr/share/emacs/site-lisp /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/leim /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp /usr/share/emac= s/22.0.50/lisp/url /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/textmodes /usr/share/emacs= /22.0.50/lisp/progmodes /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/play /usr/share/emacs= /22.0.50/lisp/obsolete /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/net /usr/share/emacs/2= 2.0.50/lisp/mh-e /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/mail /usr/share/emacs/22.0.5= 0/lisp/language /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/international /usr/share/emac= s/22.0.50/lisp/gnus /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/eshell /usr/share/emacs/2= 2.0.50/lisp/emulation /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/emacs-lisp /usr/share/e= macs/22.0.50/lisp/calendar /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/lisp/calc) -- /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/: /usr/share/emacs-snapshot: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 176 2006-01-09 11:38 site-lisp /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp: total 13 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 680 2006-01-09 11:38 auctex -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3041 2006-01-07 00:31 debian-startup.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 106 2006-01-03 17:23 subdirs.el -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3919 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-site.el /usr/share/emacs-snapshot/site-lisp/auctex: total 642 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 50652 2006-01-09 11:38 bib-cite.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2949 2006-01-09 11:38 CompilationLog.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41360 2006-01-09 11:38 context.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5045 2006-01-09 11:38 context-en.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5638 2006-01-09 11:38 context-nl.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 40317 2006-01-09 11:38 font-latex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 135512 2006-01-09 11:38 latex.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2698 2006-01-09 11:38 multi-prompt.elc drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 2384 2006-01-09 11:38 style -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8170 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-bar.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59600 2006-01-09 11:38 tex-buf.elc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 132801 2006-01-09 11:38 tex.elc
Processed: tagging 346608
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # fixed in svn, will be uploaded as part of the ocaml 3.09.1 transition tags 346608 + pending Bug#346608: advi: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347221: smstools: Format string attack in logging code
Package: smstools
Version: 1.16-1+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
Tags: security
*** Please type your report below this line ***
A DSA has just been released for smstools due to an insecure
usage of syslog in the logging code.
The following patch will correct the issue:
--- smstools-1.14.8.orig/src/logging.c
+++ smstools-1.14.8/src/logging.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
va_end(argp);
if (Filehandle0)
{
-syslog(severity,text);
+syslog(severity,%s,text);
}
else
{
Steve
--
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.6-xen
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages smstools depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libmm14 1.4.0-1Shared memory library - runtime
smstools recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346326: tetex-bin: postinst fails -- dvips35.map not found
Jörg Sommer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-13 Severity: serious Justification: renders package unusable Hi, with this version the packages tetex-extra (3.0-13) and tetex-base (3.0-11) aren't installable anymore. You probably mean tetex-bin (3.0-13), tetex-extra is still at 3.0-11. Their postinst scripts fail, because dvips35.map or bsr-interpolated.map is not found. [...] updmap-sys: Scanning for LW35 support files !!! ERROR! The map file `dvips35.map' has not been found at all. Please send us the output of ls /usr/share/texmf-tetex/fonts/map/dvips/tetex/ dpkg -S dvips35.map kpsewhich --format=map dvips35.map kpsewhich --show-path=map grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf Did you constantly upgrade your system, or what were the previous versions of tetex-bin and tetex-base? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#345604: ConTeXt documentation is non-free
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Ralf Stubner: | All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, | stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any | means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, | without prior written permission of the publisher. (from /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/manual/cont-eni.pdf.gz) This sounds bad, indeed. However, I think that the ConTeXt manual is actually covered by the general ConTeXt license in /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/base/mreadme.pdf.gz and /usr/share/doc/texmf/context/base/LICENSE.teTeX, which is free. But we lack the ConTeXt source code for those PDFs, do we? This means it still has to go into non-free. Obviously, unless we get the source code - will talk to Hans once I find time. Florian, are you on a general search for non-free docs, and looking at more files in tetex-doc? Then please also send a Debbugs-Cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Woeful copyright file). Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Bug#347108: survex: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Just a note to avoid duplication of human and autobuilder effort - I'm preparing a new upstream release this week, so we can slot this change in with that. Cheers, Olly -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346594: Fixed upstream
Problem is fixed upstream in CVS. http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/libxml2/parser.c?r1=1.445r2=1.446diff_format=u signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Bug#254670: marked as done ((no subject))
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#254113: fixed in ttf-freefont 20051206-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2004 09:17:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 16 02:17:45 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from xinix.org (laios.xinix.org) [217.160.223.105] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BaWYC-0007V3-00; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 02:17:45 -0700 Received: from pan.thorns.it (pan.thorns.it [192.168.207.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by laios.xinix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF78A48036 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:17:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabian Thorns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:17:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ttf-freefont Version: 20031008-1 freesans and freeserif seem to be broken. the height of each line printed in these fonts is twice that high as it used to be. this mixed up interfaces, expecialy if you're using freeserif as qt-default-font. freemono doesn't seem to be affected. downgrading to 20030519-1 solves this. regards fabian --- Received: (at 254113-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 14:52:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 06:52:00 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvyJG-0004va-8t; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#254113: fixed in ttf-freefont 20051206-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ttf-freefont Source-Version: 20051206-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ttf-freefont, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ttf-freefont-udeb_20051206-2_all.udeb to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont-udeb_20051206-2_all.udeb ttf-freefont_20051206-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2.diff.gz ttf-freefont_20051206-2.dsc to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2.dsc ttf-freefont_20051206-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ttf-freefont package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:21:22 +0200 Source: ttf-freefont Binary: ttf-freefont-udeb ttf-freefont Architecture: source all Version: 20051206-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ttf-freefont - Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono Truetype fonts ttf-freefont-udeb - Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono Truetype fonts (udeb) Closes: 254113 Changes: ttf-freefont (20051206-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Really fix this bug. (Closes: #254113) Files: 922e7f086c738d0f6ad47b30164aa88d 665 x11 optional ttf-freefont_20051206-2.dsc 9344f45c4d645435de5907321d755ce8
Bug#254113: marked as done (Extra space between lines in new version of ttf-freefont)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#254113: fixed in ttf-freefont 20051206-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2004 00:51:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 12 17:51:21 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from out005pub.verizon.net (out005.verizon.net) [206.46.170.143] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BZJDV-0007Zn-00; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:51:21 -0700 Received: from verizon.net ([4.5.64.250]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 19:51:20 -0500 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:49:15 -0700 From: Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040528 Debian/1.6-7 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Extra space between lines in new version of ttf-freefont X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [4.5.64.250] at Sat, 12 Jun 2004 19:51:20 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: ttf-freefont Version: 20031008-1 When I upgraded to version 20031008-1 of ttf-freefont, all programs using the fonts started showing extra space between lines of text written in the fonts. Downgrading to the previous version, 20030519-1, fixes this spacing problem. A screenshot of the correct rendering with 20030519-1 is available at http://linuxlab.cs.pdx.edu/~tripletj/ttf-freefont-spacing-problem/20030519-1.png , and a screenshot of the incorrect rendering with 20031008-1 is available at http://linuxlab.cs.pdx.edu/~tripletj/ttf-freefont-spacing-problem/20031008-1.png . - Josh Triplett --- Received: (at 254113-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 14:52:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 06:52:00 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvyJG-0004va-8t; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 From: Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#254113: fixed in ttf-freefont 20051206-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:46 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ttf-freefont Source-Version: 20051206-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ttf-freefont, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ttf-freefont-udeb_20051206-2_all.udeb to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont-udeb_20051206-2_all.udeb ttf-freefont_20051206-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2.diff.gz ttf-freefont_20051206-2.dsc to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2.dsc ttf-freefont_20051206-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/ttf-freefont/ttf-freefont_20051206-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Konstantinos Margaritis [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ttf-freefont package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:21:22 +0200 Source: ttf-freefont Binary: ttf-freefont-udeb ttf-freefont Architecture: source all Version:
Bug#346816: marked as done (xgraph: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:52 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346816: fixed in xgraph 12.1-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0R-0001Ol-Ex for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:32 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzv-00073a-MG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:59 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xgraph: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:59 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xgraph Version: 12.1-4 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346816-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 14:51:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 06:51:53 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvyJM-0004yI-V6; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:52 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barak A. Pearlmutter) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346816: fixed in xgraph 12.1-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:47:52 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xgraph Source-Version: 12.1-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xgraph, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xgraph_12.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xgraph/xgraph_12.1-5.diff.gz xgraph_12.1-5.dsc to pool/main/x/xgraph/xgraph_12.1-5.dsc xgraph_12.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xgraph/xgraph_12.1-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#347212: marked as done (osdclock: FTBFS: missing build-dependency)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:32:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347212: fixed in osdclock 0.5-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 13:31:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 05:31:25 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net ([82.232.2.251]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evx7M-00035W-TP for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:31:25 -0800 Received: from aurel32 by farad.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evx7L-0004iW-W2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:31:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:31:23 +0100 From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: osdclock: FTBFS: missing build-dependency Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.9i (2005-03-13) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: osdclock Version: 0.5-12 Severity: serious Justification: Fails to build from source From my build log: On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:16:42AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Automatic build of osdclock_0.5-12 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 79 Build started at 20060109-1016 ** [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), libxosd-dev (= 2.2.2-2) Checking for already installed source dependencies... [...] dh_testdir /usr/bin/make DCFLAGS=-Wall -g -O2 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5' gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -pipe -I. -DXOSD_VERSION=\\ -I/usr/X11R6/include osd_clock.c -o osd_clock.o osd_clock.c: In function 'main': osd_clock.c:65: warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type gcc -o osd_clock osd_clock.o -L. -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11 -lXext -lpthread -lXt -lxosd -lXinerama /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXt collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [osd_clock] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060109-1016 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/osdclock-0.5 -- -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net --- Received: (at 347212-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 14:40:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 06:40:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evy47-0005nm-5H; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:32:07 -0800 From: Julien Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347212: fixed in osdclock 0.5-13 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:32:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: osdclock Source-Version: 0.5-13 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of osdclock, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: osdclock_0.5-13.diff.gz to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-13.diff.gz osdclock_0.5-13.dsc to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-13.dsc osdclock_0.5-13_i386.deb to pool/main/o/osdclock/osdclock_0.5-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have
Bug#347105: openscenegraph: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Adeodato Simó writes: Package: openscenegraph Version: 0.9.9-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. Hi, Thanks for reporting this problem. I'm currently fighting to get openscenegraph 1.0.0 fit in unstable and I ran into this specific problem (in addition to libxine-dev + libgdal-dev being uninstalable ). Cheers, -- Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 8 71 18 43 38 http://www.fsffrance.org/ http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt
Bug#347228: libxt6: Missing dependency on libx11-6.
Package: libxt6 Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 3.5 Moi! libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this dependency is not reflected in the Depends: of the binary package: % ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7ece000) libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb7ec6000) libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb7eaf000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d78000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d74000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000) but: % dpkg -s libxt6 | grep Depends Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libice6, libsm6, debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0 The required dependency on libx11-6 is missing. (libxt-dev correctly depends on libx11-dev, but this bug can still lead to build failures when dependencies in -dev packages are no longer recursively expanded. Eg. build-depend on libaudio-dev, and linking with -laudio will fail due to this problem.) Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345876:
Ah, got it now. Does this look more complete ?
--- ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/image.c.format-string-again 2005-10-22 12:17:39.0 -0400
+++ ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/image.c 2006-01-09 10:09:33.0 -0500
@@ -2861,8 +2861,16 @@
char
format[MaxTextExtent];
+ /* Extract first numeric format specifier */
(void) CopyMagickString(format,p,MaxTextExtent);
+ if (q-p+1 MaxTextExtent)
+ format[q-p+1]='\0';
+ /* Expand format */
(void) FormatMagickString(p,MaxTextExtent,format,image_info-scene);
+ /* Copy rest of string verbatim without further expansion */
+ (void) ConcatenateMagickString(filename,
+ image_info-filename+(q-filename)+1,
+ MaxTextExtent);
break;
}
}
--- ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/blob.c.format-string-again 2005-09-28 15:00:17.0 -0400
+++ ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/blob.c 2006-01-09 10:09:33.0 -0500
@@ -2135,8 +2135,17 @@
char
format[MaxTextExtent];
+ /* Extract first numeric format specifier */
(void) CopyMagickString(format,p,MaxTextExtent);
+ if (q-p+1 MaxTextExtent)
+ format[q-p+1]='\0';
+ /* Expand format */
(void) FormatMagickString(p,MaxTextExtent,format,image-scene);
+ /* Copy rest of string verbatim without further expansion */
+ (void) ConcatenateMagickString(filename,
+ image_info-filename+(q-filename)+1,
+ MaxTextExtent);
+
break;
}
}
--- ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/animate.c.format-string-again 2005-10-23 22:15:16.0 -0400
+++ ImageMagick-6.2.5/magick/animate.c 2006-01-09 10:15:17.0 -0500
@@ -606,8 +606,33 @@
/*
Form filename for multi-part images.
*/
- (void) FormatMagickString(filename,MaxTextExtent,
-image_info-filename,scene);
+ (void) CopyMagickString(filename,image-filename,MaxTextExtent);
+ for (p=strchr(filename,'%'); p != (char *) NULL; p=strchr(p+1,'%'))
+ {
+ char
+ *q;
+
+ q=p+1;
+ if (*q == '0')
+ (void) strtol(q,q,10);
+ if ((*q == '%') || (*q == 'd') || (*q == 'o') || (*q == 'x'))
+ {
+ char
+ format[MaxTextExtent];
+
+ /* Extract first numeric format specifier */
+ (void) CopyMagickString(format,p,MaxTextExtent);
+ if (q-p+1 MaxTextExtent)
+ format[q-p+1]='\0';
+ /* Expand format */
+ (void) FormatMagickString(p,MaxTextExtent,format,image-scene);
+ /* Copy rest of string verbatim without further expansion */
+ (void) ConcatenateMagickString(filename,
+ image_info-filename+(q-filename)+1,
+ MaxTextExtent);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
if (LocaleCompare(filename,image_info-filename) == 0)
(void) FormatMagickString(filename,MaxTextExtent,%s[%lu],
image_info-filename,scene);
Bug#346572: [mipsel] Depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 which cannot be installed.
The following packages have unmet dependencies: ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.08.3 E: Broken packages I get this from my mirror regularly. It occurs because the package index is downloaded first .. but the packages come later. No, this has to be something else, I'm afaraid. Missing packages result in a different error message (a download error). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346572: [mipsel] Depends on ocaml-nox-3.08.3 which cannot be installed.
* Paul Richards: Attempting to install 'ocaml' on current debian stable fails due to broken packages. The following packages have unmet dependencies: ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.08.3 E: Broken packages What does apt-get install ocaml-nox print, or apt-get install ocaml-nox-3.08.3? (The sarge Packages file for mipsel looks fine.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346857: marked as done (xvmount: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:17:21 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346857: fixed in xvmount 3.7-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm0V-0001QJ-W4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:37 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzy-00076t-9M for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xvmount: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xvmount Version: 3.7-12 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346857-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 15:22:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 07:22:16 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evylt-0005K1-Fk; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:17:21 -0800 From: Volker Ossenkopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346857: fixed in xvmount 3.7-13 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:17:21 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xvmount Source-Version: 3.7-13 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xvmount, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xvmount_3.7-13.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xvmount/xvmount_3.7-13.diff.gz xvmount_3.7-13.dsc to pool/main/x/xvmount/xvmount_3.7-13.dsc xvmount_3.7-13_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xvmount/xvmount_3.7-13_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
Bug#346905: marked as done (smb4k: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:32:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346905: fixed in smb4k 0.6.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:47 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzH-rx-Kk for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:19 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz7-0006uo-IM for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:09 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smb4k: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:09 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: smb4k Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346905-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 15:40:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 07:40:51 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Evz0D-0006O4-Im; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:32:09 -0800 From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346905: fixed in smb4k 0.6.5-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:32:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: smb4k Source-Version: 0.6.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of smb4k, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: smb4k_0.6.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/smb4k/smb4k_0.6.5-1.diff.gz smb4k_0.6.5-1.dsc to pool/main/s/smb4k/smb4k_0.6.5-1.dsc smb4k_0.6.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/smb4k/smb4k_0.6.5-1_i386.deb smb4k_0.6.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/smb4k/smb4k_0.6.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous
Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal
Package: dbus-1
Version: 0.23.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Running lshal as root runs fine.
Running lshal as user gives:
lshal version 0.4.7
libhal.c 644 : Error connecting to system bus: No reply within
specified time
error: hal_initialize failed
After this, hald still runs but dbus-daemon-1 is gone.
Here's what /usr/bin/dbus-daemon-1 --system --nofork says when I run
lshal as a non-privilged user:
berlin: ~ 11# /usr/bin/dbus-daemon-1 --system --nofork
Segmentation fault
berlin: ~ 12#
This is the strace of the daemon crashing:
[..]
[{fd=3, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6,
events=POLLIN}], 3, -1) = 1
gettimeofday({1136821879, 967986}, NULL) = 0
accept(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path=«}, [2]) = 7
fcntl64(7, F_GETFD) = 0
fcntl64(7, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
fcntl64(7, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
fcntl64(7, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_IGN}, {SIG_IGN}, 8) = 0
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968379}, NULL) = 0
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968418}, NULL) = 0
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968449}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 4, 28103) = 1
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968512}, NULL) = 0
recvmsg(7, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{\0, 1}], msg_controllen=0,
msg_flags=0}, 0) = 1
getsockopt(7, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEERCRED, \21\10\0\0\36+\0\0\347\3\0\0,
[12]) = 0
read(7, AUTH EXTERNAL 3131303338\r\n, 2048) = 26
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968701}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLOUT, revents=POLLOUT}], 4, 28103) = 1
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968765}, NULL) = 0
write(7, OK\r\n, 4) = 4
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968925}, NULL) = 0
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6,
events=POLLIN}, {fd=7, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 4, 28102) = 1
gettimeofday({1136821879, 968986}, NULL) = 0
read(7, BEGIN\r\nl\1\0\0\200\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\1o\0\0\25\0...,
2048) = 135
socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 8
connect(8, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path=/var/run/.nscd_socket}, 110) = 0
writev(8, [{\2\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\6\0\0\0, 12}, {11038\0, 6}], 2) = 18
read(8, \2\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\7\0\0\0\16\0\0\0\36+\0\0\347\3\0\0 \0..., 36)
= 36
read(8, vsauer\0/ndcT7gL90ShI\0Volker Saue..., 76) = 76
close(8)= 0
open(/etc/group, O_RDONLY)= 8
fcntl64(8, F_GETFD) = 0
fcntl64(8, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
_llseek(8, 0, [0], SEEK_CUR)= 0
fstat64(8, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=723, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 723, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 8, 0) = 0x40018000
_llseek(8, 723, [723], SEEK_SET)= 0
open(/var/yp/binding/dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de.2, O_RDONLY) = 9
readv(9, [{\377\377, 2}, {\1\0\0\0\202S\246\201\3[\0\0, 12}], 2) =
14
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_UDP) = 10
bind(10, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(988),
sin_addr=inet_addr(0.0.0.0)}, 16) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
ioctl(10, FIONBIO, [1]) = 0
setsockopt(10, SOL_IP, IP_RECVERR, [1], 4) = 0
fcntl64(10, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)= 0
close(9)= 0
close(10) = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 9
bind(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(989),
sin_addr=inet_addr(0.0.0.0)}, 16) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(111),
sin_addr=inet_addr(130.83.166.129)}, 16) = 0
write(9, \200\0\0008\4\343\307\355\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\1\206\240\0...,
60) = 60
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 6) = 1
read(9, \200\0\0\34\4\343\307\355\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0...,
400) = 32
close(9)= 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 9
bind(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(990),
sin_addr=inet_addr(0.0.0.0)}, 16) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(863),
sin_addr=inet_addr(130.83.166.129)}, 16) = 0
write(9, \200\0\0\\_p\277\373\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\1\206\244\0\0\0...,
96) = 96
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1
read(9, \0\0\17\234_p\277\373\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0...,
4000) = 2896
poll([{fd=9, events=POLLIN, revents=POLLIN}], 1, 25000) = 1
read(9, n,cilia,fiege,haul,helbaoui,mant..., 4000) = 1268
close(9)= 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
This behaviour occurs in various machines inside our NIS-enviroment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages dbus-1 depends on:
ii adduser 3.63 Add and remove users and groups
ii debianutils 2.8.4
Bug#344739: marked as done (grub: FTBFS: aclocal-1.8: command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:47:03 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344739: fixed in grub 0.97-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 12:26:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 25 04:26:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.75]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqUxm-0001Mw-OW for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:26:58 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BF6538B96 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:26:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B4739010 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:26:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id DEA6026136; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:26:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:26:56 +0100 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grub: FTBFS: aclocal-1.8: command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS,RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: grub Version: 0.97-2 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: touch patch-stamp dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. aclocal-1.8 automake-1.8 autoconf bash: aclocal-1.8: command not found make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 127 Kurt --- Received: (at 344739-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 15:50:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 07:50:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EvzEd-0007m9-Jo; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:47:03 -0800 From: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#344739: fixed in grub 0.97-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:47:03 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: grub Source-Version: 0.97-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of grub, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: grub-disk_0.97-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/grub/grub-disk_0.97-3_all.deb grub-doc_0.97-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/grub/grub-doc_0.97-3_all.deb grub_0.97-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-3.diff.gz grub_0.97-3.dsc to pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-3.dsc grub_0.97-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/grub/grub_0.97-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated grub package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:37:41 -0200 Source: grub Binary: grub-disk grub grub-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.97-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Grub Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: grub - GRand Unified Bootloader grub-disk - GRUB bootable disk image grub-doc - Documentation for GRand Unified Bootloader Closes: 264312 314210 342221 344739 344767 346080 346127 346327 Changes: grub (0.97-3) unstable; urgency=low
Bug#344767: marked as done (grub - grub-install writes to stdout)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:47:03 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344767: fixed in grub 0.97-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 21:56:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 25 13:56:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fe-6c.inet.it ([213.92.5.112]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EqdrL-0006bJ-4r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:56:55 -0800 Received: from 81-174-9-5.f5.ngi.it ([:::81.174.9.5]) by fe-6c.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.2.3-521 id :::81.174.9.5+4qu7L5sP88sVpf; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:56:53 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 22:57:12 +0100 From: Cesare Leonardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lock during kernel 2.6.14 purge Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-image-2.6-386 Version: 2.6.14-6 Trying to purge that package you get the following situation (purge launched from aptitude): -- (Reading database ... 80461 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-image-2.6-386 ... Removing linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.list file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-1-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done The link /vmlinuz is a damaged link Removing symbolic link vmlinuz Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo The link /initrd.img is a damaged link Removing symbolic link initrd.img Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo Purging configuration files for linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.list file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-1-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done -- At that point the purging procedure seems locked (i have waited over a minute) and i have to press CTRL+C. Then the output is: -- dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 (--purge): subprocess post-removal script killed by signal (Interrupt) Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Press return to continue. -- I have verified such behaviour also with linux-image-2.6-686-smp. If i try to remove the package, rather than purge, all seems to work well and this is the output: -- (Reading database ... 80461 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-image-2.6-386 ... Removing linux-image-2.6.14-2-386 ... Searching for GRUB installation directory ... found: /boot/grub Testing for an existing GRUB menu.list file ... found: /boot/grub/menu.lst Searching for splash image ... none found, skipping ... Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-2-686 Found kernel: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.12-1-686 Updating /boot/grub/menu.lst ... done The link /vmlinuz is a damaged link Removing symbolic link vmlinuz Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo The link /initrd.img is a damaged link Removing symbolic link initrd.img Unless you used the optional flag in lilo, you may need to re-run lilo Press return to continue. -- I have seen bug #343093, but doesn't seem the same: here purge return an error instead of a lock. Some information about my system: - Debian Sid - linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 (2.6.14-6) - yaird (0.0.12-1) - initrd-tools (0.1.84) - grub (0.97-2) - libc6 (2.3.5-9) Cesare. ---
Bug#347228: libxt6: Missing dependency on libx11-6.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
libXt from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-2 was linked with libX11, but this dependency is
not reflected in the Depends: of the binary package:
% ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libX11.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0xb7ece000)
libSM.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0xb7ec6000)
libICE.so.6 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0xb7eaf000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d78000)
libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7d74000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x8000)
but:
% dpkg -s libxt6 | grep Depends
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.5-1), libice6, libsm6, debconf (= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
The required dependency on libx11-6 is missing.
This is odd. Why doesn't ${shlibs:Depends} add this automatically like it
should? All these other deps are added correctly. Any clues from anyone?
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
