Bug#347701: nanourl bug
Package: nanourl Version: 0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I noticed apache2 was not running. The error message on trying to restart apache2 led me to Bug#339323: apache2-common: Looking at that bug report and /etc/init.d/apache2 I tried /usr/sbin/apache2ctl which told me there was an error in the nanourl script. (This may be due to the fact that I don't have mysql installed on this machine). I uninstalled nanourl and apache2 started working. Considering this worthy of a bug investigation I reinstalled nanourl. Now /etc/init.d/apache2 gives me: Forcing reload of apache 2.0 web server...grep: /etc/apache2/conf.d/nanourl: No such file or directory ... failed! Removing nanourl allows apache2 to run again. Paul Scott -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages nanourl depends on: ii apache2 2.0.55-3 next generation, scalable, extenda ii apache2-mpm-prefork [apache2] 2.0.55-3 traditional model for Apache2 ii mysql-client 4.1.15-1 mysql database client (transitiona ii mysql-client-4.1 [mysql-clien 4.1.15-1 mysql database client binaries ii php4 4:4.4.0-4 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-mysql4:4.4.0-4 MySQL module for php4 nanourl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347703: Error while Refreshing folder: Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync
Package: evolution Version: 2.4.2.1-1 Severity: grave Yesterday when I did my daily upgrade, I got the new evolution 2.4 package. When I started to start it, it froze. (See #347672: evolution: Evolution 2.4.2.1 freezes on startup) I did not have the time to debug it, so I just downgraded to the testing version (2.2.something), and then the problem was over. Today I decided to give it another try. I upgraded again. This time it did not freeze, but gave this error: Error while Refreshing folder: Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync. In the list of mail, each one seems to be duplicated. If I click on one, it says Unable to retrieve message Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync. ... so it's still unusable. I guess I will have do downgrade again... -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages evolution depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.4.2.1-1 evolution database backend server ii gconf22.12.1-8 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-icon-theme 2.12.1-2 GNOME Desktop icon theme ii gtkhtml3.83.8.1-1HTML rendering/editing library - b ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.10.1-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcairo2 1.0.2-3The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libcamel1.2-6 1.4.2.1-1 The Evolution MIME message handlin ii libcomerr21.37-2sarge1 common error description library ii libcompfaceg1 1989.11.11-24 Compress/decompress images for mai ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libebook1.2-5 1.4.2.1-1 Client library for evolution addre ii libecal1.2-3 1.4.2.1-1 Client library for evolution calen ii libedataserver1.2-4 1.4.2.1-1 Utility library for evolution data ii libedataserverui1.2-6 1.4.2.1-1 GUI utility library for evolution ii libesd0 0.2.36-2 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig12.3.1-2generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgail-common1.8.4-1GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgail17 1.8.4-1GNOME Accessibility Implementation ii libgconf2-4 2.12.1-8 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgcrypt11 1.2.2-1LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.6-2GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome-pilot2 2.0.12-1.2 Support libraries for gnome-pilot ii libgnome2-0 2.12.0.1-4 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.12.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-02.12.1-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.12.1-2 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.12.0-2 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.12.2-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-13.1GNU TLS library - runtime library ii libgpg-error0 1.1-4 library for common error values an ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtkhtml3.8-15 3.8.1-1HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libjpeg62 6b-11 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libkrb53 1.4.3-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap2 2.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries ii libnspr4 2:1.7.12-1 Netscape Portable Runtime Library ii libnss3 2:1.7.12-1 Network Security Service Libraries ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpisock80.11.8-10 Library for communicating with a P ii libpisync00.11.8-10 Synchronization library for PalmOS ii libpng12-0
Bug#346346: fixes for heimdal RC bugs
tags 346346 patch
tags 346680 patch
thanks
Attached is a patch that fixes the two RC bugs in heimdal.
You might want to drop the dozen cruft copies of patches for stale versions
of heimdal, btw. It required obscene contortions to generate this patch,
because interdiff refused to handle a 130,000 line diff. :P
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u heimdal-0.7.1/debian/patches/030_autotools
heimdal-0.7.1/debian/patches/030_autotools
--- heimdal-0.7.1/debian/patches/030_autotools
+++ heimdal-0.7.1/debian/patches/030_autotools
@@ -123739,6 +123739,15 @@
{ (eval echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$ac_try\) 5
(eval $ac_try) 25
ac_status=$?
+@@ -22598,7 +22598,7 @@
+ 2.*)
+ native_pthread_support=yes
+ PTHREADS_CFLAGS=-pthread
+- PTHREADS_LIBS=-pthread
++ PTHREADS_LIBS=-pthread -lpthread
+ ;;
+ esac
+ ;;
@@ -22716,8 +22709,7 @@
cat conftest.err 5
echo $as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status 5
diff -u heimdal-0.7.1/debian/changelog heimdal-0.7.1/debian/changelog
--- heimdal-0.7.1/debian/changelog
+++ heimdal-0.7.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+heimdal (0.7.1-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
+ * Use -pthread -lpthread when linking shared libs, not just -pthread,
+needed for proper linking of libgssapi on mips/mipsel. Closes: #346346.
+ * Build-depend on libx11-dev, libxau-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev instead of the
+obsolete xlibs-dev. Closes: #346680.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:30:44 -0800
+
heimdal (0.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Apply 022_ftp-roken-glob again.
diff -u heimdal-0.7.1/debian/control heimdal-0.7.1/debian/control
--- heimdal-0.7.1/debian/control
+++ heimdal-0.7.1/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
-Build-Depends: libncurses5-dev, bison, flex, debhelper (= 4.1.16), xlibs-dev,
libedit-dev, libdb4.2-dev, libssl-dev (= 0.9.7), dbs, libhesiod-dev,
comerr-dev (= 1.35-1), libldap2-dev, ss-dev
+Build-Depends: libncurses5-dev, bison, flex, debhelper (= 4.1.16),
libx11-dev, libxau-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev, libedit-dev, libdb4.2-dev, libssl-dev
(= 0.9.7), dbs, libhesiod-dev, comerr-dev (= 1.35-1), libldap2-dev, ss-dev
Build-Conflicts: heimdal-dev
Package: heimdal-docs
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- heimdal-0.7.1.orig/debian/patches/025_pthreads
+++ heimdal-0.7.1/debian/patches/025_pthreads
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+diff -Nru3 ./heimdal-0.7.1/cf/pthreads.m4
../build-tree.new/heimdal-0.7.1/cf/pthreads.m4
+--- ./heimdal-0.7.1/cf/pthreads.m4 2005-09-09 05:12:28.0 -0700
../build-tree.new/heimdal-0.7.1/cf/pthreads.m4 2006-01-11
20:11:45.0 -0800
+@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
+ 2.*)
+ native_pthread_support=yes
+ PTHREADS_CFLAGS=-pthread
+- PTHREADS_LIBS=-pthread
++ PTHREADS_LIBS=-pthread -lpthread
+ ;;
+ esac
+ ;;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#347706: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems
Package: gnome-panel Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable When apt-get install-ing gnome-core: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome-panel: Depends: libecal1.2-2 (= 1.2.2) which is a virtual package. Depends: libgnome-menu0 which is a virtual package. Depends: libwnck16 (= 2.9.92.1) which is a virtual package. I can't install panel and therefore no gnome for me :( Let me know if further information is required. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixes for heimdal RC bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 346346 patch Bug#346346: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_acquire_cred... no There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 346680 patch Bug#346680: heimdal: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal
On Do, 12 Jan 2006, Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you using nis ? Yes (I mentioned it after the strace). Volker -- Databases and Distributed Systems Group Computer Science Department, Darmstadt University of Technology Hochschulstrasse 10, Room E118, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany Tel: 06151-166232 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#346591: Intend to NMU links2
tags 346591 pending patch thanks Hi there! I intend to lovingly NMU links2. Patch is attached. Thanks! -- .''`. Männer sind Schweine (All men are pigs) -- Die Ärzte : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com links2_2.1pre20-2.1.diff.gz Description: Binary data Format: 1.0 Source: links2 Version: 2.1pre20-2.1 Binary: links2 Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: any Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libpng12-dev | libpng3-dev, libtiff4-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libx11-dev, libgpmg1-dev [i386 ia64 alpha amd64 arm hppa m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 s390x sh3 sh3eb sh4 sh4eb sparc], type-handling (= 0.2.1), libsvga1-dev [i386 amd64], libdirectfb-dev, libx11-dev, x-dev Files: b16bb778d9c9f6a33dae4e50588d2db9 4252713 links2_2.1pre20.orig.tar.gz fe1a32a13192d4cac10e3851cf35d824 29685 links2_2.1pre20-2.1.diff.gz Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:09:42 +0100 Source: links2 Binary: links2 Architecture: i386 Version: 2.1pre20-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: links2 - Web browser running in both graphics and text mode Closes: 346591 Changes: links2 (2.1pre20-2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * Build depend on libx11-dev and x-dev, in order to xomplete the xlibs-dev transition (closes: #346591). Files: 1f1d5f3b662939ce230e254cbbcdd8c1 2023258 net optional links2_2.1pre20-2.1_i386.deb
Bug#347584: Bug#347585: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
Hi all, On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:47:09AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: So, I hereby propose: 1) close #308812 and #347584 with Version: 3.0.20b-3 Yes, closing 308812 since this dependency has now been added. And also close 347584 which is the samedoing so right now. (I had already closed #347584 which I mistakenly cloned, but that does not really matter anyway) Both #308812 and #347585 still affect sarge, which is currently our official release. Under normal circumstances I don't usually care about bugs being closed if they are in stable but fixed in unstable (and possibly testing). However, both of these simply make the software plain unusable. I'd suggest reopening #308812 and then tagging sarge and fixed, so it stays documented in BTS. And perhaps rebuild for sarge with necessary dependency and upload to proposed-updates, though I'm not sure without checking what qualifications are these days for non-security issues to still get through to stable point releases. 2) lower #347585 to important I don't do it right now because I really want to understand why you cloned the bug. I believe this one should still be left open, and at the present severity. Well, my rationale is that #347585 is not about a missing dependency but about a missing directory, which only affects those people who use winbind without samba. Which is a perfectly fine use case. Winbind is about authenticating (anything) to AD. As I wanted pppd on a VPN gateway to do so, I had no need for samba on this machine, at all. If I want squid to use NTLM auth, I have no need for samba. If I want cyrus to use NTLM auth, ... You can guess it. Heck, even on a workstation where I would want to use NTLM auth I probably would not want to install samba or possibly even a samba client (be it smbmount or smbclient). Additionally, while the ntlm_auth binary complains when it is affected by #308812, winbind just dies with no explanation whatsoever because of #347585 - even when using debuglevel up to 2048. It took an invocation with strace to find it out why. The solution to #347585 is not another dependency but rather /var/run/samba included in winbind so one may argue that, seen this way, the bug is something that has a major effect on the usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to everyone.:-) I'd argue it makes winbind completely unusable in the use case which is according to the description of the package the reason why it exists. Anyway, this is arguing: fixing this give us an opportunity to upload a new version which I was already considering given that the former one has reached testing. Ack :) However, as explained above, just closing (by whatever method) the bugs is IMHO inappropriate given that they both affect stable. Regards, Filip -- /* Amuse the user. */ \|/ \|/ @'/ ,. \`@ /_| \__/ |_\ \__U_/ -- /usr/src/linux-2.4.2/arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c::die_if_kernel() -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347584: Bug#347585: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:01:04AM +0100, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: Hi all, On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:47:09AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: So, I hereby propose: 1) close #308812 and #347584 with Version: 3.0.20b-3 Yes, closing 308812 since this dependency has now been added. And also close 347584 which is the samedoing so right now. (I had already closed #347584 which I mistakenly cloned, but that does not really matter anyway) Both #308812 and #347585 still affect sarge, which is currently our official release. Under normal circumstances I don't usually care about bugs being closed if they are in stable but fixed in unstable (and possibly testing). However, both of these simply make the software plain unusable. I'd suggest reopening #308812 and then tagging sarge and fixed, so it stays documented in BTS. Please see the announcements about version tracking in the Debian BTS that were sent to debian-devel-announce last summer. Closing bugs with Version: headers is the canonical means of marking bugs as being specific to sarge now. And perhaps rebuild for sarge with necessary dependency and upload to proposed-updates, though I'm not sure without checking what qualifications are these days for non-security issues to still get through to stable point releases. I mean to submit an update at some point that fixes the smbpasswd-eating upgrade bug, and can roll this in at the same time. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#347716: [patch] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Package: libgtkextra
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi there!
Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] was so kind as to provide a patch
for this. Find it attached.
I intend to lovingly NMU gtk+extra, fixing this bug, and also packaging
a newer upstream version. I will upload soon to the delayed-5 queue, if
you don't oppose. Patches also attached.
Thanks for your work in Debian!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
.''`. Männer sind Schweine (All men are pigs) -- Die Ärzte
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
gtk+extra_2.1.1-1.1.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.0
Source: gtk+extra
Version: 2.1.1-1.1
Binary: libgtkextra-dev, libgtkextra-2.0
Maintainer: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 3.6.2.0
Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev
Files:
1a933ca1286829383a0554cc2deb9e04 893481 gtk+extra_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz
903d1e54022b8ac7d39379febb85f259 4891 gtk+extra_2.1.1-1.1.diff.gz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxhhVNFDtUT/MKpARAhhdAJ0WxFrv7II+eyMvLXH3i0PNT64oLACgsnG9
Tx6v7060JL51HWXCD2X6Ah0=
=xBe8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:37:48 +0100
Source: gtk+extra
Binary: libgtkextra-2.0 libgtkextra-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
libgtkextra-2.0 - A useful set of widgets for GTK+
libgtkextra-dev - A useful set of widgets for GTK+ (development files)
Closes: 347397
Changes:
gtk+extra (2.1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #347397).
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.6.2.0. No changes needed.
* Updated the postal address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF) in
debian/copyright.
* Got rid of Upstream Author(s) the debian/copyright file.
* manually copy lib to /usr/lib because I suck. Please fix this.
Files:
e54b317be4779695f8ea3b2370bac7dd 609 devel optional gtk+extra_2.1.1-1.1.dsc
903d1e54022b8ac7d39379febb85f259 4891 devel optional
gtk+extra_2.1.1-1.1.diff.gz
3a1cfef718ab054dc6c2192cf805c426 471622 devel optional
libgtkextra-dev_2.1.1-1.1_i386.deb
0b506bbc16c34c133839c4bd6ff67927 313068 libs optional
libgtkextra-2.0_2.1.1-1.1_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDxhhVNFDtUT/MKpARAgutAJ9WGkoeZhajOxeTvk1/r5cTf6soLACfR0CW
ctF+5VoMf3hT06BqRhMmptw=
=S1Jt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
diff -u gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/control gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/control
--- gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/control
+++ gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/control
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bradley Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Standards-Version: 3.6.2.0
-Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev
+Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), autotools-dev, automake1.7, libtool,
autoconf, libgtk2.0-dev
Package: libgtkextra-dev
Architecture: any
diff -u gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/rules gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/rules
--- gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/rules
+++ gtk+extra-2.1.1/debian/rules
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
configure-stamp:
dh_testdir
+ libtoolize -c -f
+ aclocal-1.7
+ autoconf
./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
@@ -44,6 +47,7 @@
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
+ rm -f aclocal.m4 config.guess config.sub configure ltmain.sh
-$(MAKE) distclean
dh_clean
Bug#346632: ITNMU
tags 246632 -help thanks, mate On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:36:22AM +0100, Amaya wrote: tags 346632 help thanks Hi there! `wxWindow::GtkGetPangoX11Context()':window.cpp:(.text+0x144a): undefined reference to `pango_x_get_context' Hmm -- it compiled before, so you seem to have a interesting version of libpango And there's a newer upstream versiona vailable that I am going to give a try, but I don't expect many exciting results. http://www.w3.org/Amaya/Distribution/amaya-fullsrc-9.3.tgz Unless you are a masochist, you don't want to be touching a new upstream. Anand -- `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know, the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, If this goes on -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347706: marked as done (gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:25:05 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347706: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 08:28:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 00:28:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from war.ocf.berkeley.edu ([192.58.221.244] ident=0) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ewxob-0001tc-4V for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:28:13 -0800 Received: from puterbox.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. (c-67-161-2-8.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.161.2.8]) by war.OCF.Berkeley.EDU (8.13.4/8.9.3) with ESMTP id k0C8RMgR012240; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from gpm by puterbox.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1Ewxnl-0003OC-Ns; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:27:21 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:27:21 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnome-panel Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable When apt-get install-ing gnome-core: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gnome-panel: Depends: libecal1.2-2 (= 1.2.2) which is a virtual package. Depends: libgnome-menu0 which is a virtual package. Depends: libwnck16 (= 2.9.92.1) which is a virtual package. I can't install panel and therefore no gnome for me :( Let me know if further information is required. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 347706-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 09:25:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 01:25:43 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mf01.sitadelle.com ([212.94.174.68] helo=smtp.cegetel.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwyiF-0003Lj-It for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:25:43 -0800 Received: from mx0.bpl-group.org (mx0.bpl-group.org [195.115.71.69]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387C59BFA3; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:25:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from bee.dooz.org (lan-48.int.bpl-group.org [192.168.16.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN lminier.people.bpl-group.org, Issuer BPL Group People Certification Authority (verified OK)) by mx0.bpl-group.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF897C523; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:25:06 + (UTC) Received: by bee.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D8111D8002; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:25:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:25:05 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Garrett McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#347706: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hi, On Thu, Jan 12, 2006, Garrett McLean wrote: Package: gnome-panel Severity: grave Tags: sid Justification: renders package unusable Please use the reportbug tool to report bugs. Your report does not have the version of gnome-panel you have installed, nor the versions
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster wrote: I'm currently preparing an upload of tetex-bin linked against libpoppler. I'm attaching the current patch against the version in sarge. Please let me know which version in sid fixes these problems. None: Since the version in sid links against libpoppler, no changes need to be made to it. We just need an up-to-date poppler - and according to its changelog poppler (0.4.3-2) unstable; urgency=high [ Martin Pitt ] * SECURITY UPDATE: Multiple integer/buffer overflows. * Add debian/patches/003-CVE-2005-3624_5_7.patch: [...] * Add debian/patches/004-fix-CVE-2005-3192.patch: [...] poppler (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream release. * New maintainer (Closes: #344738) * CVE-2005-3191 and CAN-2005-2097 fixes merged upstream. it seems everything is okay there. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
Processed: Fixed in upload of gnome-netstatus 2.12.0-4 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 283775 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#283775: Please tell the user the name of the applet Tags were: fixed-in-experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 336442 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#336442: gnome-netstatus_2.12.0-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dependencies Tags were: fixed-in-experimental Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347032: marked as done (nvtv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:32:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347032: fixed in nvtv 0.4.7-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzc-qp-8L for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:41 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz5-0006s5-MA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: nvtv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:07 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: nvtv Version: 0.4.7-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 09:40:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 01:40:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EwyoT-0004Jr-HS; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:32:09 -0800 From: Roberto Lumbreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347032: fixed in nvtv 0.4.7-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:32:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: nvtv Source-Version: 0.4.7-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of nvtv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: nvtv_0.4.7-3.diff.gz to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.7-3.diff.gz nvtv_0.4.7-3.dsc to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.7-3.dsc nvtv_0.4.7-3_i386.deb to pool/main/n/nvtv/nvtv_0.4.7-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please
Processed: reassign 347716 to gtk+extra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 reassign 347716 gtk+extra Bug#347716: [patch] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD Warning: Unknown package 'libgtkextra' Bug reassigned from package `libgtkextra' to `gtk+extra'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal
reassign 347233 libc6 severity 347233 important merge 246288 347233 thanks, On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:22:06AM +0100, Volker Sauer wrote: On Do, 12 Jan 2006, Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you using nis ? Yes (I mentioned it after the strace). Sorry, i indeed missed the NIS comment. This is a known libc6 bug, so reassigning it to libc6. Sjoerd -- The optimist thinks that this is the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist knows it. -- J. Robert Oppenheimer, Bulletin of Atomic Scientists -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 347233 libc6 Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal Bug reassigned from package `dbus-1' to `libc6'. severity 347233 important Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal Severity set to `important'. merge 246288 347233 Bug#246288: getgrouplist causes segfaults when running NIS Bug#347233: dbus-1 on sarge segfaults if a unpriviliged user run lshal Bug#226515: getgrouplist() segfaults for NIS groups; breaks sshd's AllowGroups feature in some situations Bug#305316: dbus-1: segfaults with groups imported from nis Bug#314480: dbus-1 does not start because of segmentation fault Bug#316914: dbus-1: dbus-daemon-1 crash Merged 226515 246288 305316 314480 316914 347233. thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336442: marked as done (gnome-netstatus_2.12.0-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dependencies)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:02:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#336442: fixed in gnome-netstatus 2.12.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 11:15:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 03:15:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EWB9Y-0004wS-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 03:15:08 -0800 Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EWB9V-cU-HS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:15:05 +0100 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 12:15:05 +0100 From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnome-netstatus_2.12.0-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: missing build-dependencies Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnome-netstatus Version: 2.12.0-2 Severity: serious Hi, your package failed to build from source due to missing build dependencies. | Automatic build of gnome-netstatus_2.12.0-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69 | Build started at 20051030-0722 | ** | Checking available source versions... | Fetching source files... | Reading Package Lists... | Building Dependency Tree... | Need to get 664kB of source archives. | Get:1 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main gnome-netstatus 2.12.0-2 (dsc) [1811B] | Get:2 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main gnome-netstatus 2.12.0-2 (tar) [659kB] | Get:3 http://sinclair.farm.ftbfs.de experimental/main gnome-netstatus 2.12.0-2 (diff) [3293B] | Fetched 664kB in 0s (3058kB/s) | Download complete and in download only mode | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), libgnomeui-dev (= 2.6.0), libglade2-dev (= 2.0.0), libpanel-applet2-dev (= 2.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev (= 2.4.0), cdbs, gnome-pkg-tools, libxml-parser-perl, libgnome-keyring-dev, scrollkeeper [...] | Checking correctness of source dependencies... | Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.5-6 linux-kernel-headers_2.6.13+0rc3-2 gcc-4.0_4.0.2-3 g++-4.0_4.0.2-3 binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902-1 libstdc++6-4.0-dev_4.0.2-3 libstdc++6_4.0.2-3 | -- | dpkg-source: extracting gnome-netstatus in gnome-netstatus-2.12.0 | su: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. | (Ignored) | dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gnome-netstatus | dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 2.12.0-2 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture sparc [...] | make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/gnome-netstatus-2.12.0/help' | make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. | make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-netstatus-2.12.0/help' | /bin/sh: xmllint: command not found | xsltproc -o gnome-netstatus-C.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename gnome-netstatus --stringparam db2omf.format 'docbook' --stringparam db2omf.dtd --stringparam db2omf.lang C --stringparam db2omf.omf_dir /usr/share/omf --stringparam db2omf.help_dir /usr/share/gnome/help --stringparam db2omf.omf_in `pwd`/./gnome-netstatus.omf.in `/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable db2omf gnome-doc-utils` C/gnome-netstatus.xml | /bin/sh: xsltproc: command not found | make[3]: *** [gnome-netstatus-C.omf] Error 127 | make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-netstatus-2.12.0/help' | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-netstatus-2.12.0' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gnome-netstatus-2.12.0' | make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 | ** | Build finished at 20051030-0726 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=2.12.0-2pkg=gnome-netstatusarch=sparc Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ---
Bug#344172: marked as done (psmisc 21.9-1 doesn't build on i386)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:02:13 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#344172: fixed in psmisc 22.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2005 16:32:35 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 08:32:35 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from [202.155.139.209] (helo=[192.168.1.84])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EokPg-00025G-P0
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:32:35 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andika Triwidada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: psmisc 21.9-1 doesn't build on i386
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:32:31 +0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: psmisc
Version: 21.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-mb05.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages psmisc depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
psmisc recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
Follow up of pstree -a bug as in this report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338108
that should have been fixed on psmisc_21.9-1,
I can't find i386 deb. So I tried to build from source.
First attempt resulted in error:
-- build log ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/psmisc-21.9$ debian/rules
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
( ... snip ... )
Making all in src
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/psmisc-21.9/src'
gcc -E -dM signames.c |\
tr -s '\t ' ' ' | sort -n -k 3 | sed \
's:#define SIG\([A-Z]\+[0-9]*\) \([0-9]\+\) *\(\|/\*.*\)$:{\
\2,\1 },:p;d' | \
grep -v '[0-9][0-9][0-9]' signames.h || \
{ rm -f signames.h; exit 1; }
grep '^{ 1,HUP },$' signames.h /dev/null || \
{ rm -f signames.h; exit 1; }
make[3]: *** [signames.h] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/psmisc-21.9/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/psmisc-21.9'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/psmisc-21.9'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- end --
Then I tried to modify src/Makefile.in and the problem solved.
I hope this fix is portable to non i386.
-- patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/psmisc-21.9$ diff -urN src/Makefile.in.orig
src/Makefile.in
--- src/Makefile.in.orig2005-12-16 18:55:48 +0700
+++ src/Makefile.in 2005-12-20 23:10:58 +0700
@@ -459,8 +459,7 @@
signames.h: signames.c Makefile
@CPP@ -dM $ |\
tr -s '\t ' ' ' | sort -n -k 3 | sed \
- 's:#define SIG\([A-Z]\+[0-9]*\) \([0-9]\+\) *\(\|/\*.*\)$$:{\
-\2,\1 },:p;d' | \
+ 's:#define SIG\([A-Z]\+[0-9]*\) \([0-9]\+\) *\(\|/\*.*\)$$:{\ \2,\1
},:p;d' | \
grep -v '[0-9][0-9][0-9]' signames.h || \
{ rm -f signames.h; exit 1; }
grep '^{ 1,HUP },$$' signames.h /dev/null || \
-- end --
-- build log ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/psmisc-21.9$ debian/rules
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to compile the package.
../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
( ... snip ... )
Making all in src
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/psmisc-21.9/src'
gcc -E -dM signames.c |\
tr -s '\t ' ' ' | sort -n -k 3 | sed \
Bug#308812: Bug#347585: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
reopen 308812 tags 308812 sarge thanks Both #308812 and #347585 still affect sarge, which is currently our official release. Under normal circumstances I don't usually care about bugs being closed if they are in stable but fixed in unstable (and possibly testing). However, both of these simply make the software plain unusable. Yes. Point taken. And action done. Well, my rationale is that #347585 is not about a missing dependency but about a missing directory, which only affects those people who use winbind without samba. Which is a perfectly fine use case. Winbind is about authenticating (anything) to AD. As I wanted pppd on a VPN gateway to do so, I had no need for samba on this machine, at all. If I want squid to use NTLM auth, I have no need for samba. If I want cyrus to use NTLM auth, ... You can guess it. Yep. That's a fair point and I understand it. But, again, I think that this doesn't deserve a RC bug. Apparently Steve disagrees but anyway this hasn't much importance except by showing that judgements about bug severities may vary. And given that Steve is the release manager, he would anyway have the last word on such issue...:-) Additionally, while the ntlm_auth binary complains when it is affected by #308812, winbind just dies with no explanation whatsoever because of #347585 - even when using debuglevel up to 2048. It took an invocation with strace to find it out why. Wow. Sounds like something we could report upstream. Anyway, this is arguing: fixing this give us an opportunity to upload a new version which I was already considering given that the former one has reached testing. Ack :) Will do ASAP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347716: [patch] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
severity 347716 important thanks On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:29:45AM +0100, Amaya Rodrigo Sastre wrote: Package: libgtkextra Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi there! Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] was so kind as to provide a patch for this. Find it attached. However, GNU/kFreeBSD is not a release architecture; downgrading the bug accordingly. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#347716: [patch] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 347716 important Bug#347716: [patch] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#346632: ITNMU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 346632 -help Bug#346632: amaya: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: help Tags removed: help thanks, mate Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347585: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 308812 Bug#308812: winbind - missing dependency on samba-common Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 308812 sarge Bug#308812: winbind - missing dependency on samba-common There were no tags set. Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347706: marked as done (gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 347706 Bug#347706: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 347706 2.10.2-1 Bug#347706: gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems Bug marked as found in version 2.10.2-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity 347394 grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 347394 grave Bug#347394: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346346: fixes for heimdal RC bugs
Steve == Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve You might want to drop the dozen cruft copies of patches Steve for stale versions of heimdal, btw. It required obscene Steve contortions to generate this patch, because interdiff Steve refused to handle a 130,000 line diff. :P Thanks for this patch. It looks good to me. If no one else uploads it first, I should get a chance tomorrow afternoon (GMT+11 timezone). Deleting the old patch files seems fine to me - I kept them just in case I break something in the latest version, but there isn't really any reason to include them in the Debian diff file. -- Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 347682
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 tags 347682 pending Bug#347682: inkscape_0.43-3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: uses gcc-3.4 but doesn't build-depend it There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347394: marked as done (bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:37:14 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in 0.30-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 14:16:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 10 06:16:59 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tallyho.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.81.166]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwKJ1-0006RG-LU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:16:59 -0800 Received: from esaurito.net ([80.68.93.96]) by tallyho.bytemark.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EwKJ0-00040L-Tu for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:16:58 + Received: by esaurito.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EA04E40465; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:51:14 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bluez-pin: please rebuild against unstable's dbus X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:51:13 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: bluez-pin Severity: wishlist Hi Phil, dbus 0.60 just hitted unstable, could you please rebuild bluez-pin against it? I'm it is possibile to ask for automatic rebuilds (appending +b1 to debian revision) although I don't where to do such a request! filippo -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-bytemark-uml-20040706-1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 347394-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 10:37:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 02:37:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.vif.com ([216.239.64.153] helo=buddha.vif.com) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwzpR-0001rE-GL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:37:13 -0800 Received: from [216.239.85.40] (ip216-239-85-40.vif.net [216.239.85.40]) by buddha.vif.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0CAbAf6068107 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:37:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:37:14 -0500 From: Filipus Klutiero [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in 0.30-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-vif-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-vif-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-vif-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This should have been fixed by an erroneous changelog entry in 0.30-2. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in embedded xpdf copy
Hi Joey! Martin Schulze [2006-01-11 20:50 +0100]: I'm attaching the current patch against the version in sarge. Please let me know which version in sid fixes these problems. BTW, in order to keep a record of these duplicates, I recently created http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies Martin -- Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com Debian Developer http://www.debian.org In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#347585: Bug#308812: winbind should depend on samba (smbclient)?
I'd argue it makes winbind completely unusable in the use case which is according to the description of the package the reason why it exists. Hmmm, I wonder whether this could justify an update for the next sarge update? Steve? Indeed, 308812 should then be RC as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347706: marked as done (gnome-panel: Uninstallable due to dependency problems)
Garrett, On Thu, Jan 12, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: Please use the reportbug tool to report bugs. Your report does not have the version of gnome-panel you have installed, nor the versions of its dependencies. That would be version 2.10.2-1, which is the current version in testing/unstable. The current gnome-panel in unstable is 2.12.2-2 and depends on No, gnome-panel 2.12.2-2 is in experimental. :) I'm afraid I made two mistakes when closing your bug, which has now been reopened, sorry about that. (Please do consider passing the version of the package in your next reports though.) Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current Earth status: NOT DESTROYED
Processed: Fixed in NMU of aee 2.2.15b-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 332300 + fixed Bug#332300: menu entry in wrong location Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed tag 346612 + fixed Bug#346612: aee: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343186: nvidia-kernel-source 8178 Fails to bring up X.org with 2.6.1[45]
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.7676-2 Followup-For: Bug #343186 This is a primary bug report against 8178, even though it says 7676. The same symptoms exist with the new kernel and module. Attempted downgrade: apt-get remove nvidia-kernel-source nvidia-glx nvidia-glx-dev apt-get install nvidia-kernel-source=1.0.7676-2 nvidia-glx-dev=1.0.7676-2 The above commands work just fine, but then running the following module assistant command: m-a a-i nvidia proceeds to download the latest 8178 kernel source instead of using the installed 7676-2 source! This prevents the debian system from being able to check on an older version that worked just fine previously. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source depends on: ii debhelper 5.0.15 helper programs for debian/rules ii dpatch2.0.16 patch maintenance system for Debia ii make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 The GNU version of the make util ii sed 4.1.4-5The GNU sed stream editor Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source recommends: ii devscripts2.9.10 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii kernel-package10.031 A utility for building Linux kerne ii nvidia-glx1.0.7676-2 NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347727: gpe-contacts: not installable in sid because of dbus transition
Package: gpe-contacts Version: 0.36-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install gpe-contacts Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: gpe-contacts: Depends: dbus-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable Depends: dbus-glib-1 (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable E: Broken packages gpe-contacts needs to be updated for newer dbus packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gpe-contacts depends on: pn dbus-1none (no description available) pn dbus-glib-1 none (no description available) ii gpe-icons 0.20-1.1 Common icons used by GPE programs ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdisplaymigration0 0.28-3 display migration support for GTK ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgpepimc0 0.4-1 category management for GPE applic pn libgpevtype0 none (no description available) ii libgpewidget1 0.88-2 GPE Palmtop Environment widget lib ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface pn libmimedir-gnome0 none (no description available) ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsqlite02.8.16-1 SQLite shared library gpe-contacts recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 308812, closing 308812
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 # don't use deprecated distribution tags tags 308812 - sarge Bug#308812: winbind - missing dependency on samba-common Tags were: sarge Tags removed: sarge close 308812 3.0.20b-3 Bug#308812: winbind - missing dependency on samba-common 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.0.20b-3, send any further explanations to Dmitry Bely [EMAIL PROTECTED] End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 347629 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 # overinflated severity for a bug with no information severity 347629 important Bug#347629: yakuake: reference to previous critical bug Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347730: beagle: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libevolution-cil and libgalago-cil)
Package: beagle Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, beagle cannot be installed in sid: # apt-get install beagle Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: beagle: Depends: libevolution-cil (= 0.10.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgalago-cil (= 0.3.2) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libgalago1 but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages and cannot be rebuilt: # apt-get build-dep beagle Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Build-dependencies for beagle could not be satisfied. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages beagle depends on: ii dbus-1-utils 0.60-4 simple interprocess messaging syst ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an pn libevolution-cil none (no description available) ii libexif12 0.6.12-2 library to parse EXIF files pn libgalago-cil none (no description available) pn libgalago1none (no description available) ii libgcc1 1:4.1-0exp6GCC support library ii libgconf2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for GConf 2.6 ii libgecko2.0-cil 0.11-1 CLI binding for the GtkMozEmbed li ii libglade2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for the Glade librarie ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil2.4.0-1CLI binding for the GLib utility l ii libgmime2.1-cil 2.1.17-2 CLI binding for the MIME library, ii libgnome2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for GNOME 2.6 ii libgnomeui-0 2.12.0-2 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.12.2-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for the GTK+ toolkit 2 ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libmono0 1.1.12.1-1 libraries for the Mono JIT ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System Session Management ii libsqlite02.8.16-1 SQLite shared library ii libstdc++64.1-0exp6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol client li ii libxml2 2.6.23-1 GNOME XML library ii libxss1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Screen Saver client-side library ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.12.1-1 Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-jit 1.1.12.1-1 fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime Versions of packages beagle recommends: pn beagle-backend-evolution none (no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#344575: hula: Build-Depends needs zlib1g-dev package.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:02:18PM -0800, jeremy avnet wrote: On Dec 27, 2005, at 2:25 AM, Alex Hudson wrote: Hula doesn't need zlib, so it certainly shouldn't Build-Depend on it. Something, then, is adding in this zlib flag incorrectly - it sounds a bit like bug#337873, but that is fixed as far as I know. Would it be possible for you to have a look at the various .pc files on your system, and see which is requiring -lz? The only .pc file I have on my system is from hula: $ locate -r '\.pc$' /usr/local/src/hula/hula-0.1.0+svn379/hula.pc .:. jeremy I can confirm that hula builds well here in my sid chroot *without* zlib headers. Anyway, I see you have a mixed stable/testing distribution on your system. Maybe this causes all the trouble? - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#345563: yelp: No help index available in gnome (debian etch)
Package: yelp Version: 2.10.0-3 Followup-For: Bug #345563 After performing dist-upgrade from sarge to etch, I have found that the main Help option in Gnome desktop menu renders a blank page (only an icon and no help index). I have tried to run yelp or gnome-help from the console, but it gives the following text error (not visible -obviously- if you click directly on the desktop Help button): I/O warning : failed to load external entity /home/daniel/.gnome2/yelp-bookmarks.xbel *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x0804b868 *** I/O warning : failed to load external entity I have checked my .gnome2 folder and that file yelp-bookmarks.xbel is missing. I have created a new test user, entered corresponding new session, but problem is the same, and file above is also missing (gnome does not create it, nor it is in /etc/skel). Therefore I don't think this problem is due to migration from sarge to etch, it may happen in new debian etch systems as well. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages yelp depends on: ii docbook-xml 4.4-4 standard XML documentation system, ii gconf22.10.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii gnome-doc-utils 0.5.2-1a collection of documentation util ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbz2-1.01.0.2-11 high-quality block-sorting file co ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-6 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglade2-0 1:2.5.1-2 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.4-2The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxml2 2.6.22-2 GNOME XML library ii libxslt1.11.1.15-2 XSLT processing library - runtime ii mozilla-browser 2:1.7.12-1 The Mozilla Internet application s ii xml-core 0.09 XML infrastructure and XML catalog ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime yelp recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347185: marked as done (ossp-uuid: uninstallable in unstable; does incestuous things to debian/control during build)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:32:45 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347185: fixed in ossp-uuid 1.3.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 08:46:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 09 00:46:11 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.86] helo=tennyson.dodds.net) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvsfL-0006u7-He for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:46:11 -0800 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10F6F7002; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:46:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:46:09 -0800 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ossp-uuid: uninstallable in unstable; does incestuous things to debian/control during build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: php5-uuid Version: 1.3.1-1 Severity: grave The php5-uuid package is uninstallable in unstable because it depends on phpapi-20041030. PHP 5.1.1 has just been uploaded, and the API has been bumped. You will need to rebuild your package. In addition, rather than using a variable in debian/control and populating it with the PHP API dependency via substvars like everyone else, you are for some reason editing debian/control in a rule called from debian/rules install. While this is not a release-critical bug, it is a policy violation as it means that debian/rules clean cannot restore the pristine sources.=20 Please use the existing substvars mechanism instead of spoiling the idempotency of debian/rules clean. --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwiLRKN6ufymYLloRArY5AKDJPmEXKXWp+eLkG7vMrJsXtiw1fACgp/pp HRixCriu1GK05jqN4bNSa9s= =cWSR -END PGP SIGNATURE- --Tu8ztk+XgTAiG9Id-- --- Received: (at 347185-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 11:44:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 03:44:46 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex0hB-0003hI-Nv; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:32:45 -0800 From: Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347185: fixed in ossp-uuid 1.3.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:32:45 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ossp-uuid Source-Version: 1.3.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ossp-uuid, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libossp-uuid-dev_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/libossp-uuid-dev_1.3.2-1_i386.deb libossp-uuid-perl_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/libossp-uuid-perl_1.3.2-1_i386.deb libossp-uuid13_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/libossp-uuid13_1.3.2-1_i386.deb ossp-uuid_1.3.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/ossp-uuid_1.3.2-1.diff.gz ossp-uuid_1.3.2-1.dsc to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/ossp-uuid_1.3.2-1.dsc ossp-uuid_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/ossp-uuid_1.3.2.orig.tar.gz php4-uuid_1.3.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ossp-uuid/php4-uuid_1.3.2-1_i386.deb
Bug#342322: 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' fails to build the package
tags 342322 + patch thanks On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote: Invoking 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' fails to build the package: Attached a simple patch. - Alexander -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org --- icon-9.4.2/debian/rules.orig2006-01-12 11:55:11.0 + +++ icon-9.4.2/debian/rules 2006-01-12 11:54:51.0 + @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ (cd src/common make patchstr cp patchstr ../../bin) touch build-iconc -build-ipl: +build-ipl: configure $(checkdir) $(MAKE) Ilib
Processed: Re: Blockers
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 346347 - help + pending Unknown tag/s: +. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev Tags were: help Tags removed: help, pending tags 248931 - help + pending Unknown tag/s: +. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#248931: New upstream release available (0.21.11) Tags were: help Tags removed: help, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' fails to build the package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 342322 + patch Bug#342322: 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' fails to build the package There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347734: muine: build dependencies cannot be satisfied (libdbus-cil)
Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, muine cannot be installed in sid: # apt-get install muine Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: muine: Depends: libdbus-cil (= 0.23.4) but it is not installable E: Broken packages and cannot be rebuilt: # apt-get build-dep muine Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done E: Build-Depends dependency for muine cannot be satisfied because no available versions of package libdbus-cil can satisfy version requirements -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages muine depends on: ii gconf22.12.1-8 GNOME configuration database syste ii gstreamer0.8-gnomevfs 0.8.11-5 Gnome VFS plugin for GStreamer ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an pn libdbus-cil none (no description available) ii libflac7 1.1.2-3+b1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libgconf2-4 2.12.1-8 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgconf2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for GConf 2.6 ii libgdbm3 1.8.3-2GNU dbm database routines (runtime ii libglade2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for the Glade librarie ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.5-1The GLib library of C routines ii libglib2.0-cil2.4.0-1CLI binding for the GLib utility l ii libgnome2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for GNOME 2.6 ii libgnomevfs2-02.12.2-3 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0 0.8.11-5 GConf support for GStreamer ii libgstreamer0.8-0 0.8.11-2 Core GStreamer libraries, plugins, ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.9-2The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-cil 2.4.0-1CLI binding for the GTK+ toolkit 2 ii libid3tag00.15.1b-7 ID3 tag reading library from the M ii libogg0 1.1.2-1Ogg Bitstream Library ii liborbit2 1:2.12.4-1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.2-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libvorbis0a 1.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libvorbisfile31.1.0-1The Vorbis General Audio Compressi ii libxml2 2.6.23-1 GNOME XML library ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.12.1-1 Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-jit 1.1.12.1-1 fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-9 compression library - runtime muine recommends no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347593: Segfaults on upto date amd64 sid install
Frank Gevaerts wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:56:31PM +, Wackojacko wrote: Sorry! Thanks for the files. I just noticed that ttf-freefont also had a new version a few days ago. Could you try installing an older version of it? If that helps, I guess this is a libfreetype bug. Spot on. Rolling back to 'ttf-freefont_20051102-2_all.deb' solved the problem. Doesn't work with 20051206-1 or 20051206-2. HTH Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346612: marked as done (aee: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:02:05 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346612: fixed in aee 2.2.15b-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:02 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlyz-lI-NC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:01 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlyy-0006iA-H5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aee: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:00 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: aee Version: 2.2.15b-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346612-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 12:11:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 04:11:37 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex19Z-0002SS-Si; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:02:05 -0800 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346612: fixed in aee 2.2.15b-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:02:05 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: aee Source-Version: 2.2.15b-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of aee, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: aee_2.2.15b-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2.diff.gz aee_2.2.15b-2.dsc to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2.dsc aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.deb to pool/main/a/aee/aee_2.2.15b-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please
Bug#347741: rss-glx - FTBFS: configure: error: getopt is missing but required.
Package: rss-glx Version: 0.8.0-1+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of rss-glx_0.8.0-1+b1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for getopt... no configure: error: getopt is missing but required. make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060111-1312 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336198: Need help with that one
tags 336198 +help thanks First: Thanks Hans for the report and sorry that I did not respond earlier. Unfortunatly I have problems to work on that bug myself since I do not have access to 64 Bit Hardware. I will ask on the AMD porters list, if someone is able to track this bug down. The mailing list archives of ipw2100 suggest that there have been issues with 64 Bit kernels before, although these seem to be long resolved. Regards, Sebastian -- PGP-Key: http://www.withouthat.org/~sebastian/public.key Fingerprint: A46A 753F AEDC 2C01 BE6E F6DB 97E0 3309 9FD6 E3E6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346891: oroborus - FTBFS: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or directory
reopen 346891 found 346891 2.0.17 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of oroborus_2.0.17 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/oroborus-2.0.17/src' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-g -O2 -DDATADIR=\/usr/share/oroborus\ -Wall -g -O2 -MT client.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/client.Tpo -c -o client.o client.c; \ then mv -f .deps/client.Tpo .deps/client.Po; else rm -f .deps/client.Tpo; exit 1; fi client.c:28:38: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or directory In file included from client.c:39: client.h:119: error: syntax error before 'CARD32' client.h:119: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union client.h:140: error: syntax error before '}' token client.h:175: error: syntax error before 'CARD32' Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346922: wayv - FTBFS: configure: error: Cannot find X11 library
reopen 346922 found 346922 0.3-2 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wayv_0.3-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... no configure: error: Cannot find X11 library make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060111-1318 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346981: wmnut - FTBFS
reopen 346981 found 346981 0.61-2 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wmnut_0.61-2 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] checking for X... no checking for XBell in -lX11... no The XBell extension stuff could not be found in the X client libraries make: *** [config.status] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060111-1319 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] The bug is NOT fixed. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347085: skkinput - FTBFS
reopen 347085 found 347085 1:2.06.4-3 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of skkinput_1:2.06.4-3 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] gcc -o skkinput -g -ggdb -O -Wall -O2 -L/usr/X11R6/lib main.o SeparateWin.o OverWin.o OffWin.o OnWin.o cstyle.o skksoc.o skksvect.o skkldic.o skkldrec.o skkconfig.o parseStr.o keymap.o ctext.o skkel.o skkmarker.o skkmbuf.o draw.o MyDispatch.o MyError.o FontMgr.o Canvas.o WmcloseShell.o HistMgr.o CliMsg.o lispparse.o lispeval.o kanji.o Kinput.o Ximp.o XIMServer.o XIMClient.o XIMInputMethod.o XIMInputContext.o XIMPacket.o -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXmu collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [skkinput] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/skkinput-2.06.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060111-1737 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] The bug is NOT fixed. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: skkinput - FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 347085 Bug#347085: skkinput: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 347085 1:2.06.4-3 Bug#347085: skkinput: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 1:2.06.4-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Need help with that one
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 336198 +help Bug#336198: System hangs, when loading module ipw2100 with firmware There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: wayv - FTBFS: configure: error: Cannot find X11 library
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 346922 Bug#346922: wayv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 346922 0.3-2 Bug#346922: wayv: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 0.3-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: oroborus - FTBFS: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or directory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 346891 Bug#346891: oroborus: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 346891 2.0.17 Bug#346891: oroborus: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 2.0.17. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346101: marked as done (apachetop: crashes with invalid pointer)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346101: fixed in apachetop 0.12.5-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2006 16:58:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 05 08:58:12 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from h062040143223.swe.cm.kabsi.at ([62.40.143.223] helo=bogdan.kmp.or.at) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EuYRH-0005Ef-RE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:58:12 -0800 Received: from root by bogdan.kmp.or.at with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) id 1EuYRA-0005c5-4p; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:58:09 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Klaus Maria Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:58:04 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apachetop: crashes with invalid pointer X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on bogdan.kmp.or.at) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: apachetop Version: 0.12.5-6 Severity: normal apachetop crashes as below: ;=== bogdan:~# apachetop *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0xb7df78c0 *** Aborted bogdan:~# ;=== -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apachetop depends on: ii fam 2.7.0-8File Alteration Monitor ii libadns1 1.1-4 Asynchronous-capable DNS client li ii libc6 2.3.5-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0 2.7.0-8client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-5 GCC support library ii libncurses5 5.5-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.1-5 GNU readline and history libraries ii libstdc++64.0.2-5The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 apachetop recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 346101-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 12:20:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 04:20:32 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex1O6-000894-JQ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800 From: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346101: fixed in apachetop 0.12.5-7 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: apachetop Source-Version: 0.12.5-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apachetop, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apachetop_0.12.5-7.diff.gz to pool/main/a/apachetop/apachetop_0.12.5-7.diff.gz apachetop_0.12.5-7.dsc to pool/main/a/apachetop/apachetop_0.12.5-7.dsc apachetop_0.12.5-7_i386.deb to pool/main/a/apachetop/apachetop_0.12.5-7_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apachetop package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please
Bug#347742: tclmagick - FTBFS: ./configure: line 28114: syntax error near unexpected token
Package: tclmagick
Version: 0.45-2+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of tclmagick_0.45-2+b1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
checking if 64bit Sparc VIS support is requested... no
checking system version (for dynamic loading)... ./configure: line 28114:
syntax error near unexpected token `('
../configure: line 28114: `case `(ac_space=' '; set | grep ac_space)
21` in'
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20060111-1310
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347744: dpkg - FTBFS: undefined reference to `sepol_genbools'
Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.11.1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of dpkg_1.13.11.1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-O1 -o dpkg archives.o cleanup.o configure.o depcon.o enquiry.o errors.o filesdb.o help.o main.o packages.o processarc.o remove.o select.o update.o ../lib/libdpkg.a -Wl,-Bstatic -lz -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,-Bstatic -lbz2 -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,-Bstatic -lselinux -Wl,-Bdynamic processarc.o: In function `process_archive':../../src/processarc.c:47: warning: the use of `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' /usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../lib/libselinux.a(load_policy.o): In function `selinux_mkload_policy':/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_genbools' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policy_kern_vers_min' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_genbools_array' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_genusers' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policydb_free' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policy_file_free' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policydb_to_image' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policydb_set_vers' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policydb_read' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policy_file_set_mem' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policydb_create' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policy_file_create' :/build/buildd/libselinux-1.28/src/load_policy.c:122: undefined reference to `sepol_policy_kern_vers_max' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [dpkg] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dpkg-1.13.11.1/build-tree/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dpkg-1.13.11.1/build-tree' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dpkg-1.13.11.1/build-tree' make: *** [build-tree/build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060112-0938 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347745: xfmedia - FTBFS: build-depends against removed package
Package: xfmedia Version: 0.9.1-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xfmedia_0.9.1-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), libxfcegui4-dev (= 4.2.1-1), libxine-dev, libexo-0.3-dev (= 0.3.0-1), dbus-1-dev (= 0.23), dbus-glib-1-dev (= 0.23), libxml-perl, libstartup-notification0-dev, cdbs, libtagc0-dev [...] Package dbus-1-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libdbus-1-dev E: Package dbus-1-dev has no installation candidate dbus-1-dev was removed from the archive. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343186: nvidia-kernel-source: Confirmed also for 8178 on Toshiba 5100
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.7174-4 Followup-For: Bug #343186 I've tried 8178, either pre-built (from debian archive) or locally built with module-assistant. nvidia-glx was upgraded to proper version (8178). My card is supported by the drivers (GeForce 2Go 440, pci id 0x0174). Attempt to start X with new nvidia.ko results in immediate hard lockup (even before nvidia logo is shown). /var/log/Xorg.0.log does not survive subsequent fsck or not created at all. Attempt to start X from remote machine (over ssh) shows only first 10 or so lines of Xorg log, which does not say anything. I'v tried this: * with all options for Device nvidia in xorg.cong commented out. * with NvAGP set to 0, 1 or 2 * with agpgart/intel_agp loaded or without them Every time the outcome is the same - hard lockup. Apparently, filesystem caches are not flushed properly, since fsck reports a lot of lost/orphaned inodes each time, and sometimes removes xorg.conf to /lost+found. Being afraid for my filesystem integrity, I haven't done any further checks. Could provide you with additional info, if any is required. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-686 Locale: LANG=ru_UA.KOI8-U, LC_CTYPE=ru_UA.KOI8-U (charmap=KOI8-U) Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source depends on: ii debhelper 5.0.15 helper programs for debian/rules ii dpatch2.0.16 patch maintenance system for Debia ii make 3.80+3.81.b4-1 The GNU version of the make util ii sed 4.1.4-5The GNU sed stream editor Versions of packages nvidia-kernel-source recommends: ii devscripts2.9.10 Scripts to make the life of a Debi ii kernel-package10.031 A utility for building Linux kerne ii nvidia-glx1.0.7174-4 NVIDIA binary XFree86 4.x driver -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#347593: Segfaults on upto date amd64 sid install
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 347593 libfreetype6 Bug#347593: Segfaults on upto date amd64 sid install Bug reassigned from package `foobillard' to `libfreetype6'. retitle 347593 segfaults on amd64 on ttf-freefont 20051206 Bug#347593: Segfaults on upto date amd64 sid install Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347593: Segfaults on upto date amd64 sid install
reassign 347593 libfreetype6 retitle 347593 segfaults on amd64 on ttf-freefont 20051206 thanks I guess libfreetype6 is the correct package for this bug, so I'm reassigning it. Frank -- Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. - Brian W. Kernighan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reopening 346981, found 346981 in 0.61-2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 reopen 346981 Bug#346981: wmnut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 346981 0.61-2 Bug#346981: wmnut: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 0.61-2. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347748: audio-cd - FTBFS: Not available build dependency
Package: audio-cd Version: 0.05-4+b1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of audio-cd_0.05-4+b1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper, perl, libcdaudio0-dev [...] Package libcdaudio0-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libcdaudio-dev E: Package libcdaudio0-dev has no installation candidate Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347750: kino: Postinst fails unless udev is installed.
Package: kino Version: 0.80-1 Severity: serious Justification: Breaks upgrades. Upgrading kino to 0.80-1 breaks with a failure in postinst on any system that doesn't have udev installed. It tries to install a symlink in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but this directory only exists when udev is also present. The postinst checks for /etc/udev before trying to create the symlink, but with kino shipping /etc/udev/kino.rules, this check is always true. You can either make kino depend on udev, or refine the check. In the latter case, however, I wonder what happens if udev is installed on a system where kino is already present. Does udev itself create the necessary symlink in this case? Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334766: binutils: ld infinite loops on alpha
Hi, this makes firefox FTBFS. Linking takes about 200 minutes on an 800MHz machine, but the buildd kills it after 150 minutes without output. Maybe the time limit should be raised as a workaround? Interestingly, I couldn't reproduce this with CVS gcc and CVS mozilla. So maybe it will go away all by itself. Unfortunately, I don't really have much time to investigate it... -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346911: tkrplot - FTBFS
reopen 346911 found 346911 0.0.13-2 thanks There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tkrplot_0.0.13-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.1.0), cdbs, r-base-dev (= 2.0.0), xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347639: wmfsm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lX11
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:17:18PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o wmfsm wmfsm.o ../wmgeneral/libwmgeneral.a -LNONE -INONE -lX11 -lXpm -lXext /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 The problem is this during configure: checking for X... no The configure check fails to find the headers and libraries because it checks for something in libxt-dev. You can fix this in a few ways: - Rebuild the configure script with the one from Debian - Add a build dependency on libxt-dev - Use the --x-includes and --x-libraries configure switches Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tkrplot - FTBFS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 346911 Bug#346911: tkrplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 346911 0.0.13-2 Bug#346911: tkrplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 0.0.13-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346911: tkrplot - FTBFS
On 12 January 2006 at 13:51, Bastian Blank wrote: | reopen 346911 | found 346911 0.0.13-2 | thanks | | There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: | | Automatic build of tkrplot_0.0.13-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 79 | [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.1.0), cdbs, r-base-dev (= 2.0.0), xlibs-dev, tcl8.4-dev, tk8.4-dev Ooops. Now really fixed. Strange that it survived my pbuilder even though I forgot to update debian/control. Guess that's apt-proxy for me :-/ Dirk -- Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something. -- Thomas A. Edison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347745: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#347745: xfmedia - FTBFS: build-depends against removed package
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:38:48PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: However the following packages replace it: libdbus-1-dev E: Package dbus-1-dev has no installation candidate dbus-1-dev was removed from the archive. Yeah we have patches for new dbus in SVN but couldn't upload as we'd just FTBFS on the xine packages that were depending on xlibs-dev. We'll upload shortly though, never fear :) -- _[EMAIL PROTECTED] -+*+- fou, con et anglais _ (_) Keybuk grr, where's Kinnison when you need a guinea pig? (_) (_) (_) \______/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347752: wmnd: ftbfs [sparc] X11 library is required
Package: wmnd Version: 0.4.11-3 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source wmnd failed to build on most buildds, duplicate on my sparc pbuilder. checking sys/time.h presence... yes checking for sys/time.h... yes checking for library containing sin... -lm checking for X... no checking for main in -lX11... no configure: error: X11 library is required make: *** [config-wmnd] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334766: binutils: ld infinite loops on alpha
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: this makes firefox FTBFS. Linking takes about 200 minutes on an 800MHz machine, but the buildd kills it after 150 minutes without output. Maybe the time limit should be raised as a workaround? Interestingly, I couldn't reproduce this with CVS gcc and CVS mozilla. So maybe it will go away all by itself. Unfortunately, I don't really have much time to investigate it... Hmm, so it went away with gcc changes only, no binutils changes required? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#347754: ratpoison: 1.4.0-beta4-4 crashes immediately upon launch
Package: ratpoison Version: 1.4.0-beta4-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable hi, usually ratpoison is launched via exec ratpoison in ~/.xsession, however after the recent upgrade to 1.4.0-beta4-4 it immediately terminates. ~/.xsession-errors does not seem to contain useful information. downgrading to 1.3.0-7 immediately fixes the issue. if you have trouble reproducing this, feel free to ask for more information. thanks fabian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (300, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-2-k7 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages ratpoison depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libreadline5 5.1-5 GNU readline and history libraries ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System multi-head display ii libxtst6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-3 X Window System event recording an Versions of packages ratpoison recommends: ii aterm [x-terminal-emulator] 1.0.0-1Afterstep XVT - a VT102 emulator f ii gnome-terminal [x-terminal-em 2.12.0-2 The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl ii kterm [x-terminal-emulator] 6.2.0-45 Multi-lingual terminal emulator fo ii rxvt [x-terminal-emulator]1:2.6.4-10 VT102 terminal emulator for the X ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 208-2 X terminal emulator -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339414: FTBFS: Invalid options to sort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David, Has any progress been made on evaluating the patch to fix this two-month old RC bug? Thanks, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFDxluoVcFcaSW/uEgRAvh+AJ9CIAvRzKobryeY72Dq3iRfWiOODwCgortR YYEClhTDN+WAas5MUou7ogo= =OElO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346981: Fwd: WMNut and XBell()
Hi Bastian,thanks for your report.I've meanwhile asked the X team for info, and got the solution, thanks to David.I'll validate the solution, correct the upstream source and upload the corrected pkg asap... -- Forwarded message --From: David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 12 janv. 2006 12:31 Subject: Re: WMNut and XBell()To: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org El jueves, 12 de enero de 2006 11:28, Arnaud Quette escribió: Hi there, It seems I've made the transition too quickly, and I was too confident. I'm now facing another FTBTS due to the XBell() function not found. checking for XBell in -lX11... no The XBell extension stuff could not be found in the X client libraries make: *** [config.status] Error 1 A complete build log is there: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=wmnutver=0.61-2arch=ia64stamp=1136811182file=logas=raw Have I missed something? Any hints welcomed. Thanks to cc me back as I'm not subscribed to this list.Hello, Arnaud. I think that you need the headers in libxi-dev:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :~/debian/svn/xorg-x11/trunk$ grep XBell xc/ -rxc/include/extensions/XInput.h:} XBellFeedbackState;xc/include/extensions/XInput.h:} XBellFeedbackControl;[...]I guess that you have installed in your system but ignored it in the Build-Depends on your package.Best regards,Arnaud-- Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - RD DptNetwork UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
Processed: Fixed in NMU of jed 0.99.16-6
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 346733 + fixed Bug#346733: jed: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: wmnd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 346887 0.4.11-3 Bug#346887: wmnd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Bug marked as found in version 0.4.11-3. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346911: marked as done (tkrplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:32:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346911: fixed in tkrplot 0.0.13-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:40:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:40:47 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzf-sW-0P for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz8-0006wM-Ls for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tkrplot: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tkrplot Version: 0.0.13-1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346911-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 13:41:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 05:41:36 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex2Yh-e8-OL; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:32:07 -0800 From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346911: fixed in tkrplot 0.0.13-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:32:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tkrplot Source-Version: 0.0.13-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tkrplot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: r-cran-tkrplot_0.0.13-3_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tkrplot/r-cran-tkrplot_0.0.13-3_i386.deb tkrplot_0.0.13-3.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tkrplot/tkrplot_0.0.13-3.diff.gz tkrplot_0.0.13-3.dsc to pool/main/t/tkrplot/tkrplot_0.0.13-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the
Bug#346887: wmnd: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
found 346887 0.4.11-3 thanks Hi, Your package is now failing to build with the following error: checking for X... no checking for main in -lX11... no configure: error: X11 library is required make: *** [config-wmnd] Error 1 The problem is that your configure script checks for something which is in the libxt-dev package. There are a few ways to solve this: - Rebuild the configure script with the autoconf from Debian, which doesn't check for that. - Add a build dependency on libxt-dev - Use the --x-includes and --x-libraries configure switches Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347758: dh_python and current python policy doesn't match
Package: python,debhelper Severity: serious dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until one of the two is updated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347760: libaudio-cd-perl: not installable in sid because of libcdaudio
Package: libaudio-cd-perl Version: 0.05-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install libaudio-cd-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libaudio-cd-perl: Depends: libcdaudio0 but it is not installable E: Broken packages and the package cannot be rebuilt because of obsolete build dependencies: # apt-get build-dep libaudio-cd-perl Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Package libcdaudio0-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libcdaudio-dev E: Package libcdaudio0-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for audio-cd: libcdaudio0-dev -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#342619: Re: Bug#342619: Possible exim retry bug (Re: master mail problems -- help needed)
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:01:52PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: If Debian wants to have this patch earlier, please submit a patch - I don't have time and expertise to fix this myself. Florian has submitted a patch, and I have made it available. The Debian archive has exim4 4.60-2, which has the patch in debian/patches/37_dns_disable_additional_section.dpatch. The patch is not applied though since it needs more testing. http://zg.debian.zugschlus.de/zg/pool/main/exim4 has: exim4 4.60-2+zg1, which has been built against sid with the patch enabled exim4 4.60-2~zg1, which has been built against sarge with the patch enabled and is thus a backport exim4 4.50-8sarge1~pre1, which is exim 4.50-8 from sarge with the patch applied (no changes necessary): This is a possible candidate for sarge-volatile and stable-proposed-updates. Please test at your convenience. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346891: oroborus - FTBFS: error: X11/extensions/xf86vmode.h: No such file or directory
Hi Bastian, Am 12.01.2006 um 13:31 schrieb Bastian Blank: There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ummn, damnit - I should have tested building oroborus on a clean system... I'll upload 2.0.18 soon. bye Stefan -- http://www.dreamind.de/ Oroborus and Debian GNU/Linux Developer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347430: add-shell
severity 347430 important merge 347430 342857 thanks #342855 says it's fixed, hower Bastian recently submitted a new bug report, so what is the issue? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347430: add-shell
severity 347430 serious thanks #342855 says it's fixed, hower Bastian recently submitted a new bug report, so what is the issue? debianutils only installs them on a first time installation, this are several chroots without that file. Bastian -- Witch! Witch! They'll burn ya! -- Hag, Tomorrow is Yesterday, stardate unknown
Bug#347430: add-shell
reassign 347430 debianutils thanks Bastian Blank writes: severity 347430 serious thanks #342855 says it's fixed, hower Bastian recently submitted a new bug report, so what is the issue? debianutils only installs them on a first time installation, this are several chroots without that file. Bastian -- Witch! Witch! They'll burn ya! -- Hag, Tomorrow is Yesterday, stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: add-shell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 347430 important Bug#347430: bash - cat: /etc/shells: No such file or directory Severity set to `important'. merge 347430 342857 Bug#342857: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Bug#347430: bash - cat: /etc/shells: No such file or directory Merged 342857 347430. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Cloning my bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Doing what I should have done in the first place ... clone 346346 -1 Bug#346346: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_acquire_cred... no Bug 346346 cloned as bug 347761. reassign -1 netatalk 2.0.3-3 Bug#347761: netatalk_2.0.3-3 (mips*/unstable): FTBFS: checking for gss_acquire_cred... no Bug reassigned from package `heimdal-dev' to `netatalk'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: add-shell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 347430 serious Bug#347430: bash - cat: /etc/shells: No such file or directory Bug#342857: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: add-shell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 347430 debianutils Bug#347430: bash - cat: /etc/shells: No such file or directory Bug#342857: bash: Fails to install through debootstrap Bug reassigned from package `bash' to `debianutils'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346733: marked as done (jed: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of jed 0.99.16-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:45 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evlzf-pT-Os for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:44 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz3-0006oo-Ez for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:05 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jed: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:05 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: jed Version: 0.99.16-5.1 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 13:48:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 05:48:27 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([192.129.1.23]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex2oU-0002c4-Td for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:48:27 -0800 Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2]) by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex2oS-0005GW-8Z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:24 +0100 Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2) by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 1Ex2oS-0002Tv-00; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:24 +0100 Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ex2oR-0005o1-00; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:48:23 +0100 From: Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of jed 0.99.16-6 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Debian GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#346774: marked as done (wmsetimon: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:09 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#346774: fixed in wmsetimon 0.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:39:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:39:13 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Evm09-0001Qo-Iy for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:39:13 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlzy-00077q-VU for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wmsetimon: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:39:02 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: wmsetimon Version: 0.5-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 346774-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 13:50:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 05:50:33 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex2nF-00029o-MA; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:09 -0800 From: Julien Danjou [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#346774: fixed in wmsetimon 0.5-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:09 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: wmsetimon Source-Version: 0.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of wmsetimon, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: wmsetimon_0.5-3.diff.gz to pool/contrib/w/wmsetimon/wmsetimon_0.5-3.diff.gz wmsetimon_0.5-3.dsc to pool/contrib/w/wmsetimon/wmsetimon_0.5-3.dsc wmsetimon_0.5-3_i386.deb to pool/contrib/w/wmsetimon/wmsetimon_0.5-3_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which
Bug#347051: marked as done (tinywm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:07 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347051: fixed in tinywm 1.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:41:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:41:41 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzU-sS-UG for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:33 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlz8-0006wA-H7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tinywm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: tinywm Version: 1.3-3 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --- Received: (at 347051-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2006 13:50:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 12 05:50:40 2006 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex2nD-00028e-9D; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:07 -0800 From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $ Subject: Bug#347051: fixed in tinywm 1.3-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:47:07 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tinywm Source-Version: 1.3-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tinywm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tinywm_1.3-4.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tinywm/tinywm_1.3-4.diff.gz tinywm_1.3-4.dsc to pool/main/t/tinywm/tinywm_1.3-4.dsc tinywm_1.3-4_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tinywm/tinywm_1.3-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments
Bug#281639: Good news on the sed docs
I am pleased to say that both of the authors of the sed manual have agreed to dual-license it under the GPL. A notice to this effect should be present in the next upstream release of sed. In the meantime you can use these quotes from their emails in reply to the message with the subject Would you consider dual-licensing the sed docs?, which is preserved earlier in the bug trail: (Paolo Bonzini) No problem from me, though I believe that manuals without Invariant Sections are free IMHO. Is there a package that is already dual-licensing, so that I can copy the boilerplate stuff? Paolo (The answer was that I couldn't find one, but I suggested some boilerplate to him.) (Ken Pizzini) You're still willing to license them under the GPL too though? Yes. --Ken Pizzini So, one RC bug nearly done. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322648: FTBFS: Cannot find gettext
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Has any progess been made with this four month old RC bug? I have seen no activity since the original filing, and it's still unfixed. If it's not a bug in your package, why was it not assigned to ruby1.8? I have now filed a new bug against ruby1.8-dev (mkmf.rb), but as the maintainer this should have been your responsibility. Regards, Roger - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iD8DBQFDxmOWVcFcaSW/uEgRAqVHAKC7O3q4HUeutstNhG57uw1amKXXZACfeARp iq7VyGOMC3GYB3T4oCizyJY= =vQMa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#346764: xbubble: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Hi, You wrote: Note that the last one is not really needed by the build, but only by the configury I use as upstream maintainer and that I should probably fix. Any help welcome on this one, too ;) As you probably noticed, configure's AC_PATH_X checks for something in the libxt-dev package (X11/Intrinsic.h and XtMalloc). We've fixed this in the Debian autoconf 2.59a-4 package, and upstream has accepted that patch for 2.60. So if you just rebuild your configure scripts with a newer version of autoconf the build dependency on libxt-dev can probably be dropped. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
