Bug#358901: w3c-markup-validator: Any validation fails with Software error
Hi Frederic, What are your plans for getting a new package uploaded to unstable that fixes this bug? Is the 0.7.2 package at http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/experimental/ suitable for upload sponsoring as-is? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#365124: gnucash does not start at all
Package: gnucash Version: 1.8.12-8 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable As in the subject, typing gnucash at the prompt does nothing. It does not crash, it simply hangs. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gnucash depends on: ii bonobo 1.0.22-8The GNOME Bonobo System. ii gdk-imlib11 1.9.14-29 imaging library for use with gtk ii gnucash-common 1.8.12-8A personal finance tracking progra ii guile-1.6-libs 1.6.7-3 Main Guile libraries ii guile-1.6-slib 1.6.7-3 Guile SLIB support ii libart2 1.4.2-32The GNOME canvas widget - runtime ii libaudiofile00.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libbonobo2 1.0.22-8The GNOME Bonobo library. ii libc62.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdate-manip-perl 5.44-2 a perl library for manipulating da ii libdb3 3.2.9-25Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libesd-alsa0 [libesd0] 0.2.36-3Enlightened Sound Daemon (ALSA) - ii libfinance-quote-perl1.11-0.1Perl module for retrieving stock q ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgal23 0.24-6 G App Libs (run time library) ii libgconf11 1.0.9-7.1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 0.22.0-11 The GNOME1 Canvas pixbuf library ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-11 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+ ii libghttp11.0.9-17original GNOME HTTP client library ii libglade-gnome0 1:0.17-5Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglade01:0.17-5Library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-10.1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome32 1.4.2-32The GNOME libraries ii libgnomeprint15 0.37-11 The GNOME Print architecture - run ii libgnomesupport0 1.4.2-32The GNOME libraries (Support libra ii libgnomeui32 1.4.2-32The GNOME libraries (User Interfac ii libgtk1.21.2.10-18 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libgtkhtml1.1-3 1.1.10-9HTML rendering/editing library - r ii libguile-ltdl-1 1.6.7-3 Guile's patched version of libtool ii libguppi16 0.40.3-15 GNOME graph and plot component ii libgwrapguile1 1.3.4-15g-wrap: Tool for exporting C libra ii libice6 1:1.0.0-3 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libltdl3 1.5.22-4A system independent dlopen wrappe ii liboaf0 0.6.10-6The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii libofx2c2a 1:0.8.0-10 library to support Open Financial ii liborbit00.5.17-11.1 Libraries for ORBit - a CORBA ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libqthreads-12 1.6.7-3 QuickThreads library for Guile ii libsm6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-1+b1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.0-5 X11 Input extension library ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-13 GNOME XML library ii libzvt2 1.4.2-32The GNOME zvt (zterm) widget ii oaf 0.6.10-6The GNOME Object Activation Framew ii psfontmgr0.11.8-0.1 PostScript font manager -- part of ii slib 3a3-1 Portable Scheme library ii x-ttcidfont-conf 22 Configure TrueType and CID fonts f ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime gnucash recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359836: vflib2: Fails to install without debconf installed
tags 359836 patch thanks Hi Masato, I've prepared an NMU for this issue, which drops the unneeded reference to debconf in the vflib2 postinst. The patch is attached; the NMU will be uploaded shortly. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u vflib2-2.25.1/debian/postinst vflib2-2.25.1/debian/postinst --- vflib2-2.25.1/debian/postinst +++ vflib2-2.25.1/debian/postinst @@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ set -e -. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule - # summary of how this script can be called: #* postinst `configure' most-recently-configured-version #* old-postinst `abort-upgrade' new version diff -u vflib2-2.25.1/debian/changelog vflib2-2.25.1/debian/changelog --- vflib2-2.25.1/debian/changelog +++ vflib2-2.25.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +vflib2 (2.25.1-18.2) unstable; urgency=high + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Remove spurious reference to debconf in the vflib2 postinst, fixing +an install failure. Closes: #359836. + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:16:41 -0700 + vflib2 (2.25.1-18.1) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: vflib2: Fails to install without debconf installed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 359836 patch Bug#359836: vflib2: Fails to install without debconf installed There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365094: unionfs: 1.1.4+20060417.0541+debian-2
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:35:08AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
your package fails to build on m68k, as well as powerpc, ia64, and hppa with
similar problems.
No, not similar problems.
On hppa, the package FTBFS due to code errors.
On ia64 and powerpc, the used buildd are not capable of building
${arch}64 because the machine used is only ${arch}32, but the package
will build fine if a capable machine is used.
See http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=unionfs
From m68k, I didn't seen any buildlog so far, why isn't here any?
Now there is, sorry.
Ok, reading the log explains why it is not working on m68k. The buildd tries
to execute scripts/basic/fixdep from the linux-headers package. And as
somebody else noted before, this does not run on m68k, since it was
(cross-)built on i386, but only the kernel is cross-built, not the binaries.
So it is either the fault of the linux-2.6 package, which does not properly
cross-compile binaries in its packages, or my fault, since I do not want to
wait a week for the packages to compile natively.
Can we please get this fixed in the kernel-build process? It should be
useful for other arches that cross-compile the kernel, too.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365083: marked as done (firefox-locale-bg: Not compatible with firefox 1.5.0.2)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:52:34 +0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365083: firefox-locale-bg: Not compatible with firefox 1.5.0.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: firefox-locale-bg Version: 1.5.0.1lang20060327-1 Severity: grave This version of the langpack is not compatible with firefox 1.5.0.2, which propagated to testing yesterday. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-486 Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages firefox-locale-bg depends on: ii firefox 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3 lightweight web browser based on M firefox-locale-bg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- At Thu, 27 Apr 2006 23:26:25 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Can you try to close all browser windows and see if that solves it as Firefox doesn't use an update chrome script anymore? If that doesn't work, reinstalling the package should work... Oh, i didn't know that. Only reinstalling the package helped. -- Every non-free program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master. --RMS ---End Message---
Bug#365124: gnucash does not start at all: further info
I managed to start gnucash. The problem seems to be the lock file. When I tried to start it, gnucash warned me that it could not obtain lock for the file I asked to open. When I tell it to Open Anyway, it hung. Then I tried again by creating a new (fake) file and the opening the original one: it worked. Augh! -- Alberto Maurizi [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.augh.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365111: python-support: update-python-modules broken
Le vendredi 28 avril 2006 à 04:07 +0200, Marc Dequènes a écrit : Symlinks for .py files were missing, resulting in import failures. For what modules? Import shouldn't fail if the .pyc is here. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Processed: Fixed in NMU of vflib2 2.25.1-18.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 359836 + fixed Bug#359836: vflib2: Fails to install without debconf installed Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
Package: wmrack Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of wmrack_1.3-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (= 4.0.0) checking for X... no configure: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!! make: *** [stamp-build] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060426-1850 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!!
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:11:59AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev, xutils, debhelper (= 4.0.0) checking for X... no configure: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!! make: *** [stamp-build] Error 1 Aargh, thanks. But--speaking as upstream and debian maintainer-- almost nothing changed between this version and the previous one (which autobuilt just fine). I am seriously confused. Maybe it's related to the newest X packages. I'll ask around. -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico-to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 365124 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 severity 365124 normal Bug#365124: gnucash does not start at all Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: need help w/ new X-related bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package wmrack Ignoring bugs not assigned to: wmrack tag 365126 + help Bug#365126: wmrack - FTBFS: error: WMRack needs X Windows!!! There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365134: wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, The paths to, at least, the xdm and X executables are not set up correctly. Some init scripts or configuration files, including /etc/init.d/xdm or /etc/X11/default-display-manager expect the xdm executable to be in /usr/bin/X11/xdm while the package installs it in /usr/bin. Moreover, the xdm executable (I think) looks for /usr/bin/X while X is to be found, in debian testing, in /usr/X11R6/bin. The same problem occurs for, at least, xrdb which is looked for in /usr/bin but to be found in /usr/X11R6/bin. I suppose this is due to the upgrade of Xorg in debian unstable reaching testing. Best regards, olivier ponsini -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 4:4.0.2-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.72 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libselinux1 1.30-1 SELinux shared libraries ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxau6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Authentication library ii libxaw7 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Athena widget set library ii libxdmcp6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Display Manager Control Protocol ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display ii libxmu6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxpm4 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library ii libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii x11-common6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xbase-clients 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 miscellaneous X clients xdm recommends no packages. -- debconf information: xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm * shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365146: joy2key: FTBFS with new X packages: Bad link line
Package: joy2key Version: 1.6.1-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path ... i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -o joy2key joy2key.o -L -lX11 joy2key.o: In function `argtokey': /tmp/buildd/joy2key-1.6.1/joy2key.c:734: undefined reference to `XStringToKeysym' /tmp/buildd/joy2key-1.6.1/joy2key.c:736: undefined reference to `XKeysymToKeycode' ... collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [joy2key] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/joy2key-1.6.1' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/joy2key-1.6.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365147: xbubble: FTBFS with new X packages: Bad link line
Package: xbubble Version: 0.5.11.1-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for X... libraries , headers in standard search path checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... yes checking whether NLS is requested... yes ... cc -g -O3 -finline-functions -ffast-math -funroll-loops -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment -Wformat -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused-function -Wno-unused-label -Werror -g -o xbubble utils.o rectangle.o cell.o loadpng.o rgba.o init.o sprite.o bubble.o opponent.o board.o timer.o game.o dialog.o screens.o xbubble.o path_generated.o -lX11 -L -lpng -lz -lm loadpng.o: In function `load_png_file': /tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src/loadpng.c:59: undefined reference to `png_check_sig' ... collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [xbubble] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xbubble-0.5.11.1' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365150: enigmail-locales: Uninstallable after mozilla-enigmail - enigmail renaimg
Package: enigmail-locales Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, the mozilla-enigmail package has been renamed to enigmail. Now your package is uninstallable in sid as the enigmail dependencies cannot be satisfied. Regards, Stefan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362476: empty yelp
Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 27 avril 2006 à 21:35 +0100, Julian Gilbey a écrit : This bug has been fixed by a new upload of the scrollkeeper package. If it is still happening on your system, you should just run the scrollkeeper-rebuilddb command. I have 0.3.14-10.1 installed, just ran scrollkeeper-rebuilddb, and the problem still occurs. Could you please try with yelp 2.14? It should enter unstable with tonight's mirror pulse. I just upgraded to yelp 2.14.1-1 and it seems to work fine now. Daniel
Bug#365151: libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl: message splitting breaks
Package: libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl
Version: 1.4002-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Hello,
my program mail-expire uses this module to split mbox files into
individual messages. Sometimes, however, the end of file is reported too
early and data is _lost_ because of that. I did not try to investigate
the issue yet, test data is in:
http://people.debian.org/~blade/debian-user-german.Apr_2006.bz2
and the current version of the script is attached, with debugging output
enabled. If you look at that, it stops splitting the contents at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and returns the rest as one big message.
Regards,
Eduard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl depends on:
ii libfilehandle-unget-perl 0.1621-2 a FileHandle which supports ungett
ii perl 5.8.8-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
# SEE DEBIAN CHANGELOG FOR NEWER ENTRIES
# mail-expire, Version 0.2; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:39:10 +0200
# Copyright: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
# This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
# WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
# General Public License for more details. The full text of GPL can be
# found on http://www.gnu.org or in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL on
# modern Debian systems.
#
# --
# If you make changes to this script, please forward the new
# version to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# --
#
# REQUIRED PACKAGES:
#
# libcompress-zlib-perl - Perl module for creation of gzip files
# libdate-calc-perl - Perl library for accessing dates
#
# Changes by Johannes Kolb:
# * use Date::Calc instead of Date::Manip to increase performance
# * no buffering of whole mailbox-files in memory
#
# Changes by Florian Krohs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# * append old mails to mailbox.month_year.gz
# * added zlib to free some space:]
#
# Changes by Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# * small hack to vary the output filename to prevent overwritting
# * some cosmetics, fixed typos
# * dropped silly size comparison, trust return values of syswrite
use strict;
my $target=./;
sub help {
die Usage: $0 [ options ] DAYS FILES
where
DAYS is an integer specifying the maximum age of a mail in days and
FILES one or more mbox file(s).
Options:
-uchoose different filenames if the target file already exists
--delete drops the old messages. Be warned, no backup will be made!
--dry-run Just print what it would do, no real action
-t DIRnew target directory DIR
;
}
use Getopt::Long qw(:config no_ignore_case bundling pass_through);
my $uoption=0;
my $deloption=0;
my $dry_run=0;
my $help;
my %opts = (
t=s, \$target,
delete, \$deloption,
dry-run, \$dry_run,
help|h, \$help,
u, \$uoption
);
help if !GetOptions(%opts);
help if $help;
my $days=shift(@ARGV);
die Please specify a valid day count!\n if abs($days)1;
die Please specify mbox file names!\n if ! @ARGV;
for(@ARGV) {
die Unable to read $_\n if not -r $_
};
use Date::Calc qw(Parse_Date Today Delta_Days);
use Compress::Zlib ;
use Fcntl;
use Mail::Mbox::MessageParser;
my $c=-1;
my @today = Today();
my $old_all = localtime(time - $days * 86400);
$old_all =~ s/\ +/\ /g;
my @splitdate=split(/\ /,$old_all);
my $olddate=$splitdate[1] . _ . $splitdate[4] . .gz;
JOB:
foreach my $filename (@ARGV) {
my @st;
my @time;
my $c;
my $oldsize = (stat($filename))[7];
if ($oldsize == 0) {
syswrite(STDOUT,Empty file $filename, skipping.);
next JOB;
};
if(-e $filename.new)
{
syswrite(STDOUT,Temporary file $filename.new already exists, skipping
$filename.\n);
next JOB;
};
if(!open(fh,$filename)) {
syswrite(STDOUT,$filename could not be opened, skipping);
next JOB;
};
if(flock(fh,2|4)){
# lock when not locked already by another process
flock(fh,2) || die unexpected trouble on locking $filename;
} else {
# skip file
close(fh);
syswrite(STDOUT,$filename is locked by an other prozess, skipping.);
next JOB;
};
my $file_handle = new
Bug#365156: lineakd: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends
Package: lineakd Version: 1:0.8.4-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CXX i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/lineakd/plugins\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -I. -I. -I.. -I../lineakd -I. -I..-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT xmgr.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmgr.Tpo -c -o xmgr.lo xmgr.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/xmgr.Tpo .deps/xmgr.Plo; else rm -f .deps/xmgr.Tpo; exit 1; fi i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/lineakd/plugins\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -I. -I. -I.. -I../lineakd -I. -I.. -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT xmgr.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmgr.Tpo -c xmgr.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xmgr.o In file included from xmgr.cpp:18: ../lineak/xmgr.h:38:36: error: X11/extensions/XKBfile.h: No such file or directory xmgr.cpp:194: warning: unused parameter 'theDisplay' make[3]: *** [xmgr.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4/lineak' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Adding libxkbfile-dev to the Build-Depends allows the package to build again. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365157: multi-aterm: FTBFS with new X packages: xpm not found in /usr/X11R6
Package: multi-aterm Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... - Installing debhelper libx11-dev libxpm-dev libxt-dev ... checking for X... libraries , headers checking for XOpenDisplay in -lX11... yes checking for /usr/X11R6/include/X11/xpm.h... no ... Graphics: Warning, xpm not found in /usr/X11R6 xpm needed to have colored icons and background image ... i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -O2 -c `test -f pixmap.c || echo './'`pixmap.c pixmap.c: In function 'GetRootDimensions': pixmap.c:330: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 6 of 'XGetGeometry' differ in signedness ... pixmap.c: In function 'f_LoadBGPixmap': pixmap.c:987: error: 'XpmAttributes' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:987: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pixmap.c:987: error: for each function it appears in.) pixmap.c:987: error: syntax error before 'xpmAttr' pixmap.c:1003: error: 'xpmAttr' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1007: error: 'XpmCloseness' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1007: error: 'XpmColormap' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1007: error: 'XpmVisual' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1008: error: 'XpmDepth' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1008: error: 'XpmSize' undeclared (first use in this function) pixmap.c:1008: error: 'XpmReturnPixels' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [pixmap.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/multi-aterm-0.2.1/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/multi-aterm-0.2.1' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/multi-aterm-0.2.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365158: wmcalc: FTBFS with new X packages: Incorrect include path
Package: wmcalc Version: 0.3-2.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/wmcalc-0.3' gcc -O2 -c -Wall -I/usr/X11R6/include/X11 -I/usr/local/include wmcalc.c -o wmcalc.o wmcalc.c:41:20: error: XKBlib.h: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [wmcalc.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/wmcalc-0.3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365160: xgalaga: FTBFS with new X packages: libXpm can't be found
Package: xgalaga Version: 2.0.34-33 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking for X... libraries , headers ... checking for IceConnectionNumber in -lICE... yes checking for main in -lX11... no checking for main in -lXmu... no checking for main in -lXt... no checking for main in -lXext... no checking for main in -lXExExt... no checking for main in -lXpm... no configure: error: libXpm can't be found. Get it from ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/libraries or specify the location with --with-xpm-lib=DIR. make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 According to config.log, these failures are happening because of: configure:1994: checking for main in -lX11 configure:2009: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g conftest.c -lX11 -L 15 gcc: argument to '-L' is missing etc. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365164: screentest: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing libraries for static version
Package: screentest Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o screentest.static -static -s main.o support.o interface.o callbacks.o basic_test.o blink_test.o grid_test.o horizontal_test.o text_test.o vertical_test.o -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -rdynamic -lgmodule -lglib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread ... /usr/lib/libX11.a(ConnDis.o): In function `_X11TransConnectDisplay': (.text+0x967): undefined reference to `XauDisposeAuth' /usr/lib/libX11.a(ConnDis.o): In function `_X11TransConnectDisplay': (.text+0xcab): undefined reference to `XauGetBestAuthByAddr' /usr/lib/libX11.a(ConnDis.o): In function `_X11TransConnectDisplay': (.text+0xee5): undefined reference to `XdmcpWrap' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [screentest.static] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/screentest-1.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365162: libtcltk-ruby1.8: tcltklib fails during initialization
Package: libtcltk-ruby1.8
Version: 1.8.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The following ruby script:
#!/usr/bin/ruby1.8
require 'tk'
root = TkRoot.new { title Test }
TkLabel.new(root) do
text 'Hello, World!'
pack { padx 15 ; pady 15; side 'left' }
end
Tk.mainloop
fails at line 2 (require 'tk') with the message:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102:in `initialize': tcltklib: fail to Tk_Init().
this isn't a Tk applicationunknown color name Black (RuntimeError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102
from ./tst.rb:2
Same problem when doing 'require tk' from irb1.8
If I load the script into vi or vim, the message
'Warning: Color name black is not defined'
is written to stderr (Maybe because vi-ruby-mode is doing some interpretation?).
br.
Christian Surlykke
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libtcltk-ruby1.8 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libruby1.81.8.4-2Libraries necessary to run Ruby 1.
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library
ii tcl8.48.4.12-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii tk8.4 8.4.12-1 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -
libtcltk-ruby1.8 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365163: pload: FTBFS with new X packages: Cannot find -lXaw
Package: pload Version: 0.9.5-3.1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... gcc -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lm pload.o get_stat.o ioctl_stat.o proc_stat.o -o pload /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXaw collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [pload] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/pload-0.9.5' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 If you really want to use libxaw6-dev instead of libxaw7-dev, you need to correct this to -lXaw6. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365165: snake4: FTBFS: Cannot find xpm.h
Package: snake4 Version: 1.0.12-7 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... Setting up libxpm-dev (3.5.4.2-3) ... ... gcc -o board.o -c -Wall -s -O2 -I/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/X11 -I/local/include/X11 -DVERSION=\1.0.12\ -DCOMPILED_DATE=\`date '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S'`\ -DCOMPILED_BY=\`whoami`\ -DSCOREFILE=\/var/games/snake4/snake4.score\ -DXK_MISCELLANY -DXK_LATIN1 board.c board.c:35:17: error: xpm.h: No such file or directory board.c:106: error: syntax error before 'attrInstructions' ... make[1]: *** [board.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/snake4-1.0.12' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365166: libmusclecard: FTBFS: Undefined references to log_msg
Package: libmusclecard Version: 1.3.2-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link i486-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-z,defs -lpthread -o libmusclecard.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 1:0:0 -Wl,-Bsymbolic libmusclecard_la-musclecard.lo libmusclecard_la-tokenfactory.lo libmusclecard_la-tokenparser.lo libmusclecard_la-dyn_hpux.lo libmusclecard_la-dyn_macosx.lo libmusclecard_la-dyn_unix.lo libmusclecard_la-strlcpy.lo libmusclecard_la-strlcat.lo libmusclecard_la-thread_unix.lo -lpcsclite -ldl i486-linux-gnu-gcc -shared .libs/libmusclecard_la-musclecard.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-tokenfactory.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-tokenparser.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-dyn_hpux.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-dyn_macosx.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-dyn_unix.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-strlcpy.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-strlcat.o .libs/libmusclecard_la-thread_unix.o -lpthread /usr/lib/libpcsclite.so -ldl -Wl,-z -Wl,defs -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,-soname -Wl,libmusclecard.so.1 -o .libs/libmusclecard.so.1.0.0 .libs/libmusclecard_la-musclecard.o: In function `MSCReleaseConnection': /tmp/buildd/libmusclecard-1.3.2/src/musclecard.c:571: undefined reference to `log_msg' ... [more undefined references to log_msg] collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libmusclecard.la] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusclecard-1.3.2/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusclecard-1.3.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libmusclecard-1.3.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365168: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: sendpage-common Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC: usr/share/doc/sendpage-common/docs/rfc1861.txt.gz The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the rfc to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364972: marked as done (symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:02:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#364972: fixed in libdvdread 0.9.5-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dvdbackup Version: 0.1.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ dvdbackup -I -i /dev/dvd dvdbackup: symbol lookup error: dvdbackup: undefined symbol: UDFFindFile dvdbackup is unusable because of this. I can't think of any other useful information to supply -- hopefully the reportbug info below provides something useful. -Ted -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages dvdbackup depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdvdread3 0.9.5-2library for reading DVDs dvdbackup recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libdvdread Source-Version: 0.9.5-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libdvdread, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libdvdread-dev_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libd/libdvdread/libdvdread-dev_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb libdvdread3_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/libd/libdvdread/libdvdread3_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb libdvdread_0.9.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/libdvdread/libdvdread_0.9.5-3.diff.gz libdvdread_0.9.5-3.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdvdread/libdvdread_0.9.5-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libdvdread package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2006 15:19:00 +0100 Source: libdvdread Binary: libdvdread-dev libdvdread3 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.9.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libdvdread-dev - library for reading DVDs (development) libdvdread3 - library for reading DVDs Closes: 364972 Changes: libdvdread (0.9.5-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Added patch to export UDFFindFile (Closes: #364972). Files: 5c9fd3a7d926794d357e18aadd725f54 631 graphics optional libdvdread_0.9.5-3.dsc 9e4911e68e51955ccf5e0a441311f91e 19475 graphics optional libdvdread_0.9.5-3.diff.gz 8103ad4264ebcbc7acc6c71fcc70a3b0 59066 libs optional libdvdread3_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb 6ceba6c768fc1afab090ce9e2355806b 78194 libdevel optional libdvdread-dev_0.9.5-3_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUgGexa93SlhRC1oRAq6ZAJ9xT2aTAzefEL+JUzIfXuVGQT8PSACeMJIm luyuu9D8dzFoIydPji7+W+M= =pqBD -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#365179: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: xemacs21-basesupport Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/xemacs21/xemacs-packages/etc/zenirc/RFC1459 editors/xemacs21-basesupport The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365178: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: lksctp-tools-doc Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-sigtran-sctp-mib-10.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-sigtran-signalling-over-sctp-applic-09.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-sigtran-srwnd-sctp-00.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-addip-sctp-13.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpimpguide-16.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-11.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc2960.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc3257.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc3286.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc3309.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc3554.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc usr/share/doc/lksctp-tools-doc/rfc3758.txt.gz doc/lksctp-tools-doc The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365177: open-cobol: FTBFS: __gmp_rand has been dropped from -lgmp
Package: open-cobol Version: 0.32-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... checking gmp.h usability... yes checking gmp.h presence... yes checking for gmp.h... yes checking for __gmp_rand in -lgmp... no configure: error: GMP 3 or later is required make: *** [config.status] Error 1 -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Package: editobj Version: 0.5.7-3 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... - Installing cdbs debhelper quilt patchutils cdbs python-all-dev Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following extra packages will be installed: bzip2 debconf debconf-i18n diffstat file gawk gettext gettext-base html2text intltool-debian libbz2-1.0 liblocale-gettext-perl libmagic1 libncursesw5 libreadline5 libssl0.9.8 libtext-charwidth-perl libtext-iconv-perl libtext-wrapi18n-perl mime-support po-debconf python-all python2.3 python2.3-dev python2.4 python2.4-dev python2.4-minimal readline-common ... # update-config must be last cd . python setup.py build --build-base=/tmp/buildd/editobj-0.5.7/./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 It looks like you also need python-dev in the Build-Depends. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365182: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: gnustep-netclasses Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Documentation/Developer/rfc1459.txt libs/gnustep-netclasses The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365171: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: cl-irc Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC: usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2810.txt.gz usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2811.txt.gz usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2812.txt.gz usr/share/doc/cl-irc/doc/rfc2813.txt.gz The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the rfc to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365181: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: cl-s-http-server Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/s-http-server/rfc2616.txt.gz The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365186: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: fml Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/fml/module/fml-devel/Mail/Bounce/rfc1894.txt The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365175: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: erlang-doc-html Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/erlang-doc-html/html/lib/megaco-3.0.1/doc/standard/rfc3015.txt.gz The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365169: libhtml-widget-perl: FTBFS: Tries and fails to download Class::Data::Accessor
Package: libhtml-widget-perl Version: 1.07-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Cannot determine perl version info from lib/HTML/Widget.pm *** Module::AutoInstall version 1.02 *** Checking for Perl dependencies... [Core Features] - Test::NoWarnings ...loaded. (0.082) - HTML::Element ...loaded. (3.16) - Class::Accessor::Fast ...loaded. (0.25) - Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast ...loaded. (0) - Class::Data::Accessor ...missing. - HTML::Scrubber ...loaded. (0.08) - Storable ...loaded. (2.15) - Module::Pluggable::Fast...loaded. (0.18) - Email::Valid ...loaded. (0.15) - Date::Calc ...loaded. (5.4) - Scalar::Util ...loaded. (1.18) == Auto-install the 1 mandatory module(s) from CPAN? [Y/n] y ... Now we need to know where your favorite CPAN sites are located. Push a few sites onto the array (just in case the first on the array won't work). If you are mirroring CPAN to your local workstation, specify a file: URL. First, pick a nearby continent and country (you can pick several of each, separated by spaces, or none if you just want to keep your existing selections). Then, you will be presented with a list of URLs of CPAN mirrors in the countries you selected, along with previously selected URLs. Select some of those URLs, or just keep the old list. Finally, you will be prompted for any extra URLs -- file:, ftp:, or http: -- that host a CPAN mirror. (1) Africa (2) Asia (3) Central America (4) Europe (5) North America (6) Oceania (7) South America Select your continent (or several nearby continents) [] (1) Africa (2) Asia (3) Central America (4) Europe (5) North America (6) Oceania (7) South America Select your continent (or several nearby continents) [] ... And this repeats infinitely until interrupted manually. -- Daniel Schepler
Bug#365180: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: cl-s-base64 Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc1421.txt.gz interpreters/cl-s-base64 usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc2045.txt.gz interpreters/cl-s-base64 usr/share/doc/s-base64/rfc3548.txt.gz interpreters/cl-s-base64 The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon PS. Even though I'm the author of RFC 3548, I can't release it with a better license, because it incorporate material from earlier RFCs. You may want to reference http://josefsson.org/base-encoding/ instead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365176: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: libpt-doc Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-core-22.txt.gz usr/share/doc/libpt-doc/samples/xmpptest/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-21.txt.gz The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365183: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: libsasl2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-anon-02.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-crammd5-01.txt.gzlibs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-gssapi-00.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-plain-03.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-rfcbis-03.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-rfc2831bis-02.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 usr/share/doc/libsasl2/draft-ietf-sasl-saslprep-04.txt.gz libs/libsasl2 The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365174: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: doc-iana Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-idna-14.txt.gz doc/doc-iana usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-11.txt.gz doc/doc-iana usr/share/doc/doc-iana/cctld/draft-ietf-idn-punycode-03.txt.gz doc/doc-iana The license on I-Ds is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365191: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: dhcp3-common Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc1542.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2131.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2132.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2485.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc2489.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-authentication-14.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-dns-12.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-failover-07.txt.gz net/dhcp3-common The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation Note that your package also contains: usr/share/doc/dhcp3-common/doc/rfc951.txt.gz This is released in the US before 1988 without a copyright notice, and consequently in the public domain, so it is not a problem. I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365196: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: openswan Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3947.txt.gz net/openswan usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3948.txt.gz net/openswan usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-09.txt.gz net/openswan The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365189: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: bidentd Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/bidentd/rfc1413.gznet/bidentd The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365192: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: freeradius Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/draft-sterman-aaa-sip-00.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/pppext-eap-sim-12.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1157.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1227.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1448.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1901.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc1905.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc2058.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc2059.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc2138.txt.gz net/freeradius usr/share/doc/freeradius/rfc/rfc2139.txt.gz net/freeradius The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365188: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: atftpd Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc1350.html net/atftpd usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2090.html net/atftpd usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2347.html net/atftpd usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2348.html net/atftpd usr/share/doc/atftpd/rfc2349.html net/atftpd The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365187: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: messagewall Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2045.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2046.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2554.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2595.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2821.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc2822.txt.gzmail/messagewall usr/share/doc/messagewall/rfc3207.txt.gzmail/messagewall The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365194: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: ircd-irc2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc1459.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2 usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2810.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2 usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2811.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2 usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2812.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2 usr/share/doc/ircd-irc2/rfc2813.txt.gz net/ircd-irc2 The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 365162 is important, tagging 365162
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 severity 365162 important Bug#365162: libtcltk-ruby1.8: tcltklib fails during initialization Severity set to `important'. #I cannot reproduce the problem. tags 365162 + moreinfo Bug#365162: libtcltk-ruby1.8: tcltklib fails during initialization There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365197: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: stunnel Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/stunnel/rfc2246.txt.gznet/stunnel The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365195: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: ircd-ircu Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/ircd-ircu/rfc1413.txt.gz net/ircd-ircu usr/share/doc/ircd-ircu/rfc1459.unet.gz net/ircd-ircu The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365162: libtcltk-ruby1.8: tcltklib fails during initialization
Christian Surlykke wrote:
The following ruby script:
#!/usr/bin/ruby1.8
require 'tk'
root = TkRoot.new { title Test }
TkLabel.new(root) do
text 'Hello, World!'
pack { padx 15 ; pady 15; side 'left' }
end
Tk.mainloop
fails at line 2 (require 'tk') with the message:
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102:in `initialize': tcltklib: fail to Tk_Init().
this isn't a Tk applicationunknown color name Black (RuntimeError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/tk.rb:1102
from ./tst.rb:2
This script works fine on my Debian-box.
Same problem when doing 'require tk' from irb1.8
I could not reproduce the problem.
$ irb1.8
irb(main):001:0 require tk
= true
Please send me another reproduceable code.
--
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365199: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: araneida Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/araneida/doc/rfc2388.txt.gz web/araneida usr/share/doc/araneida/doc/rfc2616.txt.gz web/araneida The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365198: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: zenirc Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/zenirc/RFC1459.gz net/zenirc The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365200: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: cl-aserve Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/cl-aserve/rfc2396.txt.gz web/cl-aserve The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365201: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Package: phpgroupware-calendar Severity: serious Hi! It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds: usr/share/doc/phpgroupware-calendar/rfc2445.txt.gz web/phpgroupware-calendar The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810 http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation I believe the options are: 1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging the source code). 2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include re-packaging the source code). If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993 The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-dfsg. I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives. Thanks, Simon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365156: marked as done (lineakd: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365156: fixed in lineakd 1:0.8.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: lineakd Version: 1:0.8.4-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... if /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CXX i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/lineakd/plugins\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -I. -I. -I.. -I../lineakd -I. -I..-Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT xmgr.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmgr.Tpo -c -o xmgr.lo xmgr.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/xmgr.Tpo .deps/xmgr.Plo; else rm -f .deps/xmgr.Tpo; exit 1; fi i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/lineakd/plugins\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -I. -I. -I.. -I../lineakd -I. -I.. -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -MT xmgr.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmgr.Tpo -c xmgr.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xmgr.o In file included from xmgr.cpp:18: ../lineak/xmgr.h:38:36: error: X11/extensions/XKBfile.h: No such file or directory xmgr.cpp:194: warning: unused parameter 'theDisplay' make[3]: *** [xmgr.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4/lineak' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lineakd-0.8.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Adding libxkbfile-dev to the Build-Depends allows the package to build again. -- Daniel Schepler ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: lineakd Source-Version: 1:0.8.4-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lineakd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: liblineak-dev_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb to pool/main/l/lineakd/liblineak-dev_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb liblineak0_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb to pool/main/l/lineakd/liblineak0_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb lineakd_0.8.4-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lineakd/lineakd_0.8.4-3.diff.gz lineakd_0.8.4-3.dsc to pool/main/l/lineakd/lineakd_0.8.4-3.dsc lineakd_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb to pool/main/l/lineakd/lineakd_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lineakd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:42:00 +0200 Source: lineakd Binary: lineakd liblineak-dev liblineak0 Architecture: source sparc Version: 1:0.8.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: liblineak-dev - LinEAK development files liblineak0 - LinEAK development files lineakd- Linux support for Easy Access and Internet Keyboards Closes: 365156 Changes: lineakd (1:0.8.4-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Added a build-dependency on libxkbfile-dev (closes: bug#365156). Files: 1c809557ac7950e547a7c199786f0abe 767 x11 optional lineakd_0.8.4-3.dsc 03784a35f9face1f24f6aaebd3805f5a 7582 x11 optional lineakd_0.8.4-3.diff.gz a0e3b6fbd810109c6adca15e62c4d053 99154 x11 optional lineakd_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb 5be83496de9b695dcbcac66648faed3a 04 libdevel optional liblineak0_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb 9795f82a15fd102bc50aabf4da5a0f09 176474 libdevel optional liblineak-dev_0.8.4-3_sparc.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUhB/w3ao2vG823MRArzcAJ0TYsdnGu4n6cUCvyGPDCQfkTOHewCfXGn6 zuW/ZbDu4cqbwHRs3LjFtjs= =HKHc -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: foo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 364860 serious Bug#364860: heimdal-docs: Contains non-free documentation Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365205: scorched3d_39.1+cvs20050929-2+b1(unstable/sparc/mrpurply): build-depends on removed xlibmesa-glu-dev
Package: scorched3d Version: 39.1+cvs20050929-2+b1 Severity: serious Please update the build-depends to account for the recent changes in X. | Automatic build of scorched3d_39.1+cvs20050929-2+b1 on mrpurply by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060427-2232 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libsdl-net1.2-dev, libopenal-dev (= 0.2005080600-2), libfreetype6-dev, libwxgtk2.6-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev, dpatch, sharutils [...] | E: Package xlibmesa-glu-dev has no installation candidate A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=scorched3dver=39.1+cvs20050929-2+b1 -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 363059 pending Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 365072 pending Bug#365072: crystalcursors: please restore wrappers for alternatives system There were no tags set. Tags added: pending quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365113: marked as done (kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-9(unstable/sparc/mrpurply): missing build-depends)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:32:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365113: fixed in kdebluetooth 0.99+1.0beta1-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: kdebluetooth Version: 0.99+1.0beta1-9 Severity: serious You appear to be missing a build-depends on autoconf. | Automatic build of kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-9 on mrpurply by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060427-1928 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev (= 3.1.4), libbluetooth1-dev (= 2.6) | libsdp2-dev (= 1.5), kdepim-dev, libopenobex1-dev [...] | ./admin/cvs.sh: line 13: autoconf: command not found | make[2]: *** [configure] Error 1 A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=kdebluetoothver=0.99+1.0beta1-9 -- James ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: kdebluetooth Source-Version: 0.99+1.0beta1-10 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdebluetooth, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kdebluetooth-irmcsync_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/kdebluetooth-irmcsync_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.diff.gz kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.dsc to pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.dsc kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb qobex_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebluetooth/qobex_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kdebluetooth package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:19:39 +0200 Source: kdebluetooth Binary: kdebluetooth-irmcsync qobex kdebluetooth Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.99+1.0beta1-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kdebluetooth - KDE Bluetooth Framework kdebluetooth-irmcsync - IrMCSync Konnector for kitchensync qobex - Swiss army knife for the OBject EXchange (obex) protocol Closes: 365113 Changes: kdebluetooth (0.99+1.0beta1-10) unstable; urgency=low . * Added AM_MAINTAINER_MODE to fix the time-stamp skew problems, closes: #365113 Files: 144e8bcb5b7be023b71bee551d1cc7b6 761 kde optional kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.dsc 431011ed14c90b2932de990b49cf015f 42031 kde optional kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10.diff.gz b83a4d1a313031db078fc789a6c68108 1244954 kde optional kdebluetooth_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb c2af991c67f63fc4b95c2478f7123cc7 138858 net optional qobex_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb 3fc7f13633f477fba314a1bebbd3ce6f 131334 kde optional kdebluetooth-irmcsync_0.99+1.0beta1-10_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUhT/VkEm8inxm9ERAhCBAJ4qxd966T5V+1Jx8JuRmljWZiY+cgCeIIby RmxmzcUs+mWzkVPXvFc6kj0= =YcGm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#365169: marked as done (libhtml-widget-perl: FTBFS: Tries and fails to download Class::Data::Accessor)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:47:36 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365169: fixed in libhtml-widget-perl 1.07-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libhtml-widget-perl Version: 1.07-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... debian/rules build dh_testdir /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Cannot determine perl version info from lib/HTML/Widget.pm *** Module::AutoInstall version 1.02 *** Checking for Perl dependencies... [Core Features] - Test::NoWarnings ...loaded. (0.082) - HTML::Element ...loaded. (3.16) - Class::Accessor::Fast ...loaded. (0.25) - Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast ...loaded. (0) - Class::Data::Accessor ...missing. - HTML::Scrubber ...loaded. (0.08) - Storable ...loaded. (2.15) - Module::Pluggable::Fast...loaded. (0.18) - Email::Valid ...loaded. (0.15) - Date::Calc ...loaded. (5.4) - Scalar::Util ...loaded. (1.18) == Auto-install the 1 mandatory module(s) from CPAN? [Y/n] y ... Now we need to know where your favorite CPAN sites are located. Push a few sites onto the array (just in case the first on the array won't work). If you are mirroring CPAN to your local workstation, specify a file: URL. First, pick a nearby continent and country (you can pick several of each, separated by spaces, or none if you just want to keep your existing selections). Then, you will be presented with a list of URLs of CPAN mirrors in the countries you selected, along with previously selected URLs. Select some of those URLs, or just keep the old list. Finally, you will be prompted for any extra URLs -- file:, ftp:, or http: -- that host a CPAN mirror. (1) Africa (2) Asia (3) Central America (4) Europe (5) North America (6) Oceania (7) South America Select your continent (or several nearby continents) [] (1) Africa (2) Asia (3) Central America (4) Europe (5) North America (6) Oceania (7) South America Select your continent (or several nearby continents) [] ... And this repeats infinitely until interrupted manually. -- Daniel Schepler ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libhtml-widget-perl Source-Version: 1.07-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libhtml-widget-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libh/libhtml-widget-perl/libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.dsc to pool/main/libh/libhtml-widget-perl/libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.dsc libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2_all.deb to pool/main/libh/libhtml-widget-perl/libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libhtml-widget-perl package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:23:18 +0200 Source: libhtml-widget-perl Binary: libhtml-widget-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1.07-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libhtml-widget-perl - HTML Widget And Validation Framework Closes: 365169 Changes: libhtml-widget-perl (1.07-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control: Updated dependencies, libclass-data-accessor-perl added (closes: #365169) Files: 3a28295639cac3acf4aadfe6634fb1b6 1098 perl optional libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.dsc 5a345e16985e5a472f20d2eff478fad1 2129 perl optional libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2.diff.gz fcc956fe0e69c5e829c9b54689e0aabe 134516 perl optional libhtml-widget-perl_1.07-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUhqk+NMfSd6w7DERAv5uAKCHavyUmy/V1yuB+h8zBBgeLziqfQCgvsfc bsEk1VMO35+HyS9cFyI68t4= =Buya -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
clone 365184 -1 reassign -1 python-defaults retitle -1 uncomplete depends for python-all and python-all-dev block 365184 by -1 thanks Coin, Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # update-config must be last cd . python setup.py build --build-base=/tmp/buildd/editobj-0.5.7/./build /bin/sh: python: command not found make: *** [common-build-impl] Error 127 It looks like you also need python-dev in the Build-Depends. Yep, you're right, but i think it would be better if python-all depends on python and python-all-dev on python-dev, as we want ALL. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgp48Y1EyDZFH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability
tags 364810 security thanks * Daniel Leidert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Package: firefox Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.2-3 Severity: grave The following advisory was published recently: http://www.securident.com/vuln/ff.txt [..] Result: Firefox Remote Code Execution and Denial of Service - Vendor contacted, no patch yet. Problem: A handling issue exists in how Firefox handles certain Javascript in js320.dll and xpcom_core.dll regarding iframe.contentWindow.focus(). By manipulating this feature a buffer overflow will occur. [..] I initally set this report to grave. Does this have a CVE # yet? -- Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#364796: quits immediately (Killed) when run
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 364796 normal Bug#364796: quits immediately (Killed) when run Severity set to `normal'. tags 364796 + irreproducible Unknown tag/s: irreproducible. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#364796: quits immediately (Killed) when run There were no tags set. Tags added: thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365217: open-cobol: dependences for install
Package: open-cobol Version: 0.32-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software Hi, I'm installing the open-cobol (in unstable tree) and was necessary to install the following packages for obtain to compile my programs: libltdl3-dev libgmp3-dev Thanks! Andre Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira (si0ux) Orlandia - SP - Brazil -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages open-cobol depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcob1 0.32-1 COBOL compiler - runtime library ii libcob1-dev 0.32-1 COBOL compiler - development files ii libdb4.3 4.3.29-5 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libgmp3c2 4.2.dfsg-1 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libltdl3 1.5.22-4 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libncurses5 5.5-1.1Shared libraries for terminal hand -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 365184 -1 Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Bug 365184 cloned as bug 365219. reassign -1 python-defaults Bug#365219: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Bug reassigned from package `editobj' to `python-defaults'. retitle -1 uncomplete depends for python-all and python-all-dev Bug#365219: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Changed Bug title. block 365184 by -1 Bug number -1 not found. Unknown blocking bug/s: -1. Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363061: Unclear License of AMSLaTeX
hi, frank, et al. please be assured that our intent is simply to ensure that, when one of our authors uses an ams-latex package, s/he can be certain that it is the one that we support, not a modified version. there is no intent to restrict distribution of changed versions as long as the name has been changed and any indication that ams is the source of support has been removed. (this applies as well to ams-tex and amsfonts, which are on ctan, and to specific ams author packages, which are not.) the wording of the copyright is drawn from knuth's original on tex itself, long before latex or any similar license existed. we have used this wording from our very first release of ams-tex, and haven't changed it since then. the latex team has accepted in good faith that our intent coincides with theirs, but with the growing controversy over the wording of licenses, it appears this acceptance is not general. i'm not really familiar with the file pcatcode.dtx. amsrefs has always been in the purview of another person, first michael downes, and now david jones. however, i know that michael was a party to many latex license discussions, and that is perhaps why he chose to cite the artistic license rather than use the usual ams statement. since he's no longer with us, we can't know for sure, although i'm willing to ask frank mittelbach. regarding the usual ams statement, i've started a discussion here about possibly changing the statement to the lppl, or whatever is appropriate that will still ensure the authority of what is in distribution so that we won't be blind-sided by author submissions based on modified versions that we're not aware of, and can't support. it's very important to us that ams-latex has been adopted into standard latex; we hope the entire community benefits -- we certainly do. any change will have to be approved here by higher management, and we are not likely to distribute a new release without also taking into account the bug reports that have surfaced since the last release, so getting something done will take some time. but we will try. Barbara Beeton Technical Support American Mathematical Society Phone: 800-321-4AMS (321-4267) or 401-455-4080 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] p.s. your message to tech-support was trapped by our spam filter, although the copy to tex-live was not. i'm totally confused, and have turned that over to our systems gurus to decipher. do you have any ideas why this might have happened? -- Original message -- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:32:54 +0200 From: [iso-8859-1] Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], TeXLive [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Unclear License of AMSLaTeX Dear AMSLaTeX team, I'm a little confused with regard to the license of amslatex. On CTAN and in the TeX Catalogue, the license information says that it is licensed under the LPPL (LaTeX Project Public License). However, neither on amslatex' homepage, http://www.ams.org/tex/amslatex.html, nor in the files on CTAN is a hint that this is actually true. On the contrary, one of the files in the amsrefs subdirectory, pcatcode.dtx, says that it's licensed under the Artistic license (which is pretty unspecific, there are many versions around), and most other files contain a statement like this: %%% copyright = Copyright 1995 American Mathematical Society, %%%all rights reserved. Copying of this file is %%%authorized only if either: %%%(1) you make absolutely no changes to your copy, %%%including name; OR %%%(2) if you do make changes, you first rename it %%%to some other name., This is clearly not what the LPPL grants and requires, not even older versions: - it does not permit to distribute changed versions, even when renamed, - the current LPPL allows to change the internal identification as an alternative to renaming the file, and - this text doesn't even allow to copy amsclass.dtx to amsclass.dtx.bak I am sure this is not what was originally intended. Therefore I'd like to kindly request that you clarify the license situation, communicate this to distributors, and include the information in the next release. In my opinion, the LPPL is indeed a good choice for a LaTeX extension, and I'd be glad to see amslatex unambiguously LPPL'ed. Anyway, many thanks for providing and maintaining this great LaTeX extension! Kind regards, Frank -- Frank K?ster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Z?rich Debian Developer (teTeX)
Processed: Re: Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 364810 security Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability Tags were: security Tags added: security thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364796: quits immediately (Killed) when run
Philipp Frauenfelder wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# callgrind valgrind: no program specified valgrind: Use --help for more information. Btw, it is the same as I get, when I run valgrind without program: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# valgrind valgrind: no program specified valgrind: Use --help for more information. What happens if you try this? What happens if you try 'valgrind ls' or 'callgrind ls'. Valgrind works; callgrind doesn't. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ valgrind ls ==7332== Memcheck, a memory error detector. [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ callgrind ls Killed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ callgrind Killed This happens for both me and a co-worker of mine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364796: quits immediately (Killed) when run
severity 364796 normal tags 364796 + irreproducible thanks Hi Joe Thanks for the report Am Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:34:25PM -0400 hat Joe Drew getippert: Callgrind always quits immediately on me, no matter what I do. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ callgrind Killed In an up-to-date unstable chroot, I get to following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# callgrind valgrind: no program specified valgrind: Use --help for more information. Btw, it is the same as I get, when I run valgrind without program: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# valgrind valgrind: no program specified valgrind: Use --help for more information. What happens if you try this? What happens if you try 'valgrind ls' or 'callgrind ls'. Regards -- Philipp | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 802 20 00 Frauenfelder | home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +41 1 862 73 14 [PGP]| http://www.frauenfelder-kuerner.ch/ Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux. See http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 358952 serious Bug#358952: Can't compose EMail Severity set to `serious'. merge 358952 357623 Bug#357623: thunderbird: myspell recommends should be depends Bug#358952: Can't compose EMail Merged 357623 358952. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: synfigstudio: 365102: please provide a backtrace
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # hasn't been buildable on amd64 till -2, therefore important severity 365102 important Bug#365102: Segmentation fault Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 364810 [CVE-2006-1993] Firefox Remote Code Execution and DoS Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331612: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] non-free documentation in dokuwiki)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331612: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20050922-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1 The content provided in the data directory--one png image and three text files--are licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License Version 2.0 [1] which is non-free (as a result of prohibiting commercial use). One of the following should be done: 1) ask upstream for relicensing the files 2) remove the files / move to non-free 3) rewrite the files Dokuwiki shouldn't be released before this has been resolved one way or the other. cheers, -Matti [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-386 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages dokuwiki depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy ii php4 4:4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii ucf 1.17Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information excluded ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dokuwiki Source-Version: 0.0.20060309-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dokuwiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dokuwiki package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:14:30 +0300 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20060309-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dokuwiki - a standards compliant simple to use wiki Closes: 331612 340497 343615 346567 347818 350303 350794 351294 356693 357436 Changes: dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Revised dependency list . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Added build-dependency to dpatch . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #356693, #357436) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Select target webserver using debconf instead of unconditionally installing to all available servers. (Closes: #350303) * Check whether apache configuration file needs to be linked. * Fixed permissions for /var/lib/dokuwiki. (Closes: #350794) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Maintainer scripts no longer modify apache configuration files. (Closes: #340497) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Added a patch to remove CC license declaration in the page footer. (Closes: #343615) * Removed unnecessary rewrite rules in Apache configuration and using the supplied .htaccess file instead. * Test whether ucf exists when purging. * Allow use with php5. (Closes: #351294) * New German debconf template (thanks, Erik Schanze; Closes: #346567) * New Swedish debconf template (thanks, Daniel Nylander; Closes: #347818) * Whole source licensed with GPL (Closes: #331612) Files: d138197d9342461fad7464e112f4d62d 620 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc d67c854712347e7c3cdba6b4a951c533 834975 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz 802796c779b17463c2a1bc960c4591ee 30656 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz
Bug#350303: marked as done (unconditionally enables dokuwiki for all apache instances installed)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350303: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dokuwiki Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 Dokuwiki's postinst unconditionally symlinks apache.conf to $srv/conf.d or places an include directive into $srv/httpd.conf. If a local administrator decides to remove that symlink, it is reinstated at the next time of package update, thus not preserving this local change. Additionally, modifying $srv/http.conf might modify another package's conffile, which is verboten as well. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1-zgsrv Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dokuwiki Source-Version: 0.0.20060309-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dokuwiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dokuwiki package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:14:30 +0300 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20060309-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dokuwiki - a standards compliant simple to use wiki Closes: 331612 340497 343615 346567 347818 350303 350794 351294 356693 357436 Changes: dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Revised dependency list . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Added build-dependency to dpatch . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #356693, #357436) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Select target webserver using debconf instead of unconditionally installing to all available servers. (Closes: #350303) * Check whether apache configuration file needs to be linked. * Fixed permissions for /var/lib/dokuwiki. (Closes: #350794) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Maintainer scripts no longer modify apache configuration files. (Closes: #340497) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Added a patch to remove CC license declaration in the page footer. (Closes: #343615) * Removed unnecessary rewrite rules in Apache configuration and using the supplied .htaccess file instead. * Test whether ucf exists when purging. * Allow use with php5. (Closes: #351294) * New German debconf template (thanks, Erik Schanze; Closes: #346567) * New Swedish debconf template (thanks, Daniel Nylander; Closes: #347818) * Whole source licensed with GPL (Closes: #331612) Files: d138197d9342461fad7464e112f4d62d 620 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc d67c854712347e7c3cdba6b4a951c533 834975 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz 802796c779b17463c2a1bc960c4591ee 30656 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz c06597ce7ec6fbb8945c1f3ee82641b8 861704 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUjrrJkMZOMmr+9MRAm8uAKCn7ZgCNA0m0cFHeL7Zaep7paG6UQCfTlMS 1RTbMLPh7a9WyA0DEHCzB80= =+T9S -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: block 365184 with 365219
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16 block 365184 with 365219 Bug#365184: editobj: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends Was not blocked by any bugs. Blocking bugs added: 365219 End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365229: libgnujaxp-java - produces more log output than build output
Package: libgnujaxp-java Version: 1.3-5 Severity: serious The build of libgnujaxp-java produces more than 200k lines of output with about 21MiB. At the same time it produces about 12MiB of build result. Build needed 00:01:56, 12356k disk space This is not longer acceptable as it wastes enormous ammounts of ressources with useless informations. bastian -- No one can guarantee the actions of another. -- Spock, Day of the Dove, stardate unknown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363325: marked as done (wrong dependencies from nunit-console 2.2.7-1 to libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:07:12 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug report invalid has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: nunit-console, nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/code/id/yaz/ztest$ apt-cache show nunit-console Package: nunit-console Priority: optional Section: devel Installed-Size: 116 Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Source: nunit Version: 2.2.7-1 Depends: mono-jit (= 1.0), libmono-corlib1.0-cil (= 1.0), libnunit2.2.6-cil, mono-classlib-1.0 (= 1.0) This dependency should be libnunit2.2.7-1-cil in unstable distribution, as mixing testing libnunit-cil 2.2.6-1 and unstable nunit-console 2.2.7-1 is not the way to go. Cheers, Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-rc5-m30g Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- The package name is intended to contain the last version the current package is compatible with. See the CLI policy for details. The submitter agreed with this in a private email. -- Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://samba.org/~jelmer/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Bug#365230: mcvs - FTBFS: There is no package with name FFI
Package: mcvs Version: 1.0.13-14 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mcvs_1.0.13-14 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ;; Compiling file /build/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/code/unix-bindings/unix.lisp ... *** - SYSTEM::%FIND-PACKAGE: There is no package with name FFI 0 errors, 0 warnings Bye. make[1]: *** [unix.c] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mcvs-1.0.13/code/unix-bindings' linking set failed to build. make: *** [common-install-arch] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060428-1208 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364810: Buffer overflow opens remote code execution and/or DoS vulnerability
retitle 364810 [CVE-2006-1993] Firefox Remote Code Execution and DoS thanks Am Freitag, den 28.04.2006, 10:34 -0400 schrieb Eric Dorland: Does this have a CVE # yet? Seems, http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1993 is the related CVE entry. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#357436: marked as done (CVE-2006-1165: XSS in mediamanager module)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#357436: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dokuwiki Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Quoting from upstream changes: Release 2006-03-05 * XSS security fix for handling EXIF data in the mediamanager This is CVE-2006-1165. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dokuwiki Source-Version: 0.0.20060309-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dokuwiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dokuwiki package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:14:30 +0300 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20060309-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dokuwiki - a standards compliant simple to use wiki Closes: 331612 340497 343615 346567 347818 350303 350794 351294 356693 357436 Changes: dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Revised dependency list . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Added build-dependency to dpatch . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #356693, #357436) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Select target webserver using debconf instead of unconditionally installing to all available servers. (Closes: #350303) * Check whether apache configuration file needs to be linked. * Fixed permissions for /var/lib/dokuwiki. (Closes: #350794) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-6) unstable; urgency=low . * Maintainer scripts no longer modify apache configuration files. (Closes: #340497) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Added a patch to remove CC license declaration in the page footer. (Closes: #343615) * Removed unnecessary rewrite rules in Apache configuration and using the supplied .htaccess file instead. * Test whether ucf exists when purging. * Allow use with php5. (Closes: #351294) * New German debconf template (thanks, Erik Schanze; Closes: #346567) * New Swedish debconf template (thanks, Daniel Nylander; Closes: #347818) * Whole source licensed with GPL (Closes: #331612) Files: d138197d9342461fad7464e112f4d62d 620 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc d67c854712347e7c3cdba6b4a951c533 834975 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz 802796c779b17463c2a1bc960c4591ee 30656 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz c06597ce7ec6fbb8945c1f3ee82641b8 861704 web optional dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUjrrJkMZOMmr+9MRAm8uAKCn7ZgCNA0m0cFHeL7Zaep7paG6UQCfTlMS 1RTbMLPh7a9WyA0DEHCzB80= =+T9S -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#365228: libgnujaxp-java - FTBFS: /usr/bin/gcjh: Command not found
Package: libgnujaxp-java Version: 1.3-5 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of libgnujaxp-java_1.3-5 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.46), cdbs, gcj-4.0, fastjar, docbook-to-man (= 1:2.0.0), libxml2-dev (= 2.6.8), libxslt1-dev (= 1.1.11), gjdoc [...] /usr/bin/fastjar cf org-xml-sax-1.1.jar -C classes org/xml mkdir -p classes/META-INF mkdir -p classes/META-INF/services echo gnu.xml.aelfred2.JAXPFactory classes/META-INF/services/javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory echo gnu.xml.dom.DomDocumentBuilderFactory classes/META-INF/services/javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory echo gnu.xml.transform.TransformerFactoryImpl classes/META-INF/services/javax.xml.parsers.TransformerFactory /usr/bin/fastjar cfm gnujaxp.jar ./manifest.mf -C classes META-INF -C classes gnu -C classes javax -C classes org /usr/bin/gcjh -jni -classpath classes gnu.xml.libxmlj.dom.GnomeDocument make[1]: /usr/bin/gcjh: Command not found make[1]: *** [gnu_xml_libxmlj_dom_GnomeDocument.h] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libgnujaxp-java-1.3' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060428-1153 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340497: marked as done (dokuwiki: uninstall fails and tries to edit config-file)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:02:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340497: fixed in dokuwiki 0.0.20060309-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20050922-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.4, etch_rc_policy/3 hi, I just did this: # dpkg -P dokuwiki (Reading database ... 135732 files and directories currently installed.) Removing dokuwiki ... Reloading apache configuration. invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/apache-ssl not found. dpkg: error processing dokuwiki (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: dokuwiki inspecting dokuwiki.postrm shows that the postrm script assumes if /etc/apache-ssl/httpd.conf exists, that apache-ssl is installed. This is not true. Either because apache-ssl is removed but not purged, or because the admin created this file for some other reason without installing apache-ssl at all. Second: # Remove the Include directive grep -v '^Include /etc/dokuwiki/apache.conf$' /etc/$srv/httpd.conf $tfile mv $tfile /etc/$srv/httpd.conf I doubt that this is an agreed upon API as required by http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt 3. Configuration files ... Packages must not modify other packages' configuration files except by an agreed upon APIs (eg, a /usr/sbin/update-foo command). cu Maurice Massar -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 Versions of packages dokuwiki depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.29 Debian configuration management sy ii php4 4:4.3.8-1 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip ii ucf 1.07 Update Configuration File: preserv -- debconf information: * dokuwiki/system/accessible: global dokuwiki/webservers: apache * dokuwiki/system/documentroot: /wiki dokuwiki/system/localnet: 10.0.0.0/24 * dokuwiki/system/purgepages: false ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dokuwiki Source-Version: 0.0.20060309-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dokuwiki, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.diff.gz dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3.dsc dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309-3_all.deb dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/d/dokuwiki/dokuwiki_0.0.20060309.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dokuwiki package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:14:30 +0300 Source: dokuwiki Binary: dokuwiki Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20060309-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Matti Pöllä [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dokuwiki - a standards compliant simple to use wiki Closes: 331612 340497 343615 346567 347818 350303 350794 351294 356693 357436 Changes: dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Revised dependency list . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Added build-dependency to dpatch . dokuwiki (0.0.20060309-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release (Closes: #356693, #357436) . dokuwiki (0.0.20050922-7) unstable; urgency=low . * Select target webserver using debconf instead of unconditionally installing to all available servers. (Closes: #350303) * Check whether apache configuration file needs to be linked. * Fixed permissions for /var/lib/dokuwiki. (Closes:
Bug#200325: marked as done (user-mode-linux: Source compilation fails with kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-9 (kernel_thread))
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:34:15 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug #200325: user-mode-linux: Source compilation fails with
kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-9 (kernel_thread)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: user-mode-linux
Version: 2.4.18.17um-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The source of user-mode-linux 2.4.18.17um-1 (current stable uml) when
applied to kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-9 (the current stable kernel
source) produces a kernel that can not be compiled:
gcc -D__KERNEL__
-I/root/installs/user-mode-linux-2.4.18.17um/kernel-source-2.4.18/include
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -U__i386__ -Ui386 -DUM_FASTCALL
-D__arch_um__ -DSUBARCH=\i386\ -DNESTING=0 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
-I/root/installs/user-mode-linux-2.4.18.17um/kernel-source-2.4.18/arch/um/include
-Derrno=kernel_errno -c mk_task_kern.c
In file included from mk_task_kern.c:1:
/root/installs/user-mode-linux-2.4.18.17um/kernel-source-2.4.18/include/linux/sched.h:799:
conflicting types for `kernel_thread'
/root/installs/user-mode-linux-2.4.18.17um/kernel-source-2.4.18/include/asm/processor-generic.h:95:
previous declaration of `kernel_thread'
make[1]: *** [mk_task_kern.o] Error 1
...
It seems that as of kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-9 there is a generic
kernel_thread() defined in kernel/fork.c (line 557) and the architecture
speciffic implementation is left for arch_kernel_thread() - function
defined in arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c and declared in
arch/um/include/asm-um/processor-generic.h
Here is a patch that can be applied to uml-patch-2.4.18-13
(compressed in uml-patch-2.4.18-13.gz and part of the source
package):
--- uml-patch-2.4.18-13.originalSun Jul 6 23:53:05 2003
+++ uml-patch-2.4.18-13 Sun Jul 6 23:56:44 2003
@@ -16083,7 +16083,7 @@
+ usr1_pid(getpid());
+}
+
-+int kernel_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void * arg, unsigned long flags)
++int arch_kernel_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void * arg, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ int pid;
+
@@ -25913,7 +25913,7 @@
+#define get_task_struct(tsk) atomic_inc(virt_to_page(tsk)-count)
+
+extern void release_thread(struct task_struct *);
-+extern int kernel_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void * arg, unsigned long
flags);
++extern int arch_kernel_thread(int (*fn)(void *), void * arg, unsigned long
flags);
+
+static inline void release_segments(struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
After appluing this patch I was able to recompile and use uml.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux VKP3500 2.4.18 #3 Fri JUL 4 22:42:29 CST 2003 i686
Versions of packages user-mode-linux depends on:
ii uml-utilities 20020415-3 User-mode Linux (utility
programs)
=
Yet Another Thawte Notary. For a free personal digital certificate visit
www.thawte.com
The text below was appended by the mailbox service provider so I should not be
held responsible for it. Vesselin.
http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile
- Check compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
package user-mode-linux
severity 200325 serious
close 200325
thanks
Dear all,
since 2.4 u-m-l support is no more available in the upcoming releases,
I should say that the bug #200325 can be closed.
Cheers
SteX
--
Stefano Melchior, GPG key = D52DF829 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://etinarcadiaego.dyndns.org-- http://www.stex.name
Skype ID stefanomelchior
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
Bug#318384: marked as done (thailatex: FTBFS: build stops and waits for input)
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:32:29 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#318384: fixed in thailatex 0.3.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: thailatex
Version: 0.3.2
Severity: serious
When trying to build 'thailatex' on unstable,
the build stops with the following message and waits for input:
using config file /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
updmap: The options --enable and --disable work differently on Debian systems!.
updmap: .
updmap: You cannot use them to permanently enable or disable Map files.
Instead,.
updmap: you have to use the mechanism described in.
updmap: /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/README.Debian.gz.
updmap: .
updmap: If you don't know which lines to add to the files in
/etc/texmf/updmap.d/,.
updmap: press ENTER now and take the resulting line from.
updmap: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg.
updmap: .
updmap: Press ENTER to continue anyway, or Ctrl-c to quit..
Regards
Andreas Jochens
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: thailatex
Source-Version: 0.3.7-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
thailatex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
thailatex_0.3.7-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.3.7-1.diff.gz
thailatex_0.3.7-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.3.7-1.dsc
thailatex_0.3.7-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.3.7-1_all.deb
thailatex_0.3.7.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.3.7.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated thailatex
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:13:47 +0700
Source: thailatex
Binary: thailatex
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
thailatex - Thai Latex package
Closes: 318384 338619 344554 357871
Changes:
thailatex (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (Closes:357871)
Thanks to Frank Küster for intensive sponsoring
* New upstream release
- updated fonts
- new Loma font
- new TDS conformance
- addressed some fixes in 0.3.2-0.1 NMU
* Acknowledged NMU, with some fixes addressed upstream
(Closes: #318384, #338619)
* Repackaged as non-native. (Closes: #344554)
* Bumped standards version to 3.6.2.2, with following changes:
- converted changelog to UTF-8
* General changes
+ debian/control:
- put myself as the maintainer
- Build-Depends, rather than Build-Depends-Indep, on debhelper
- added optional dependencies on texlive-base-bin and texlive-latex-base,
thanks to Norbert Preining's suggestion
+ debian/rules:
- used $DESTDIR instead of $prefix when make install. This is the way
upstream has prepared for package building.
- removed unneeded dh_strip
- changed DH_COMPAT to 4
+ debian/conffiles:
- removed, as we moved to debhelper compat level 4
* Used dh_installtex to install fonts
+ debian/control:
- build-depends on tex-common = 0.19 for a working dh_installtex
- added ${misc:Depends} and depended on tetex = 3.0
+ debian/rules:
- installed map config file with dh_installtex
+ debian/10thailatex.cfg:
- renamed to maps, and let dh_installtex handle it
+ debian/dirs:
- removed /etc/texmf/updmap.d, as it's now handled by dh_installtex
+ debian/postinst, debian/postrm:
- removed, as they are now replaced by dh_installtex auto-generated
scripts (Thanks to Norbert Preining for pointing out)
* Do not install thai.map under TEXMFSYSCONFIG
+ debian/rules:
- removed thai.map installation, left it where upstream installed it
+ debian/dirs:
- removed /etc/texmf/dvips, as we wouldn't install thai.map there any
more
+ debian/preinst:
Bug#365234: libtasn1-2: Please patch to fix CVE-2006-0645 security issue
Package: libtasn1-2 Version: 1:0.2.17-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Greetings. I'm filing this bug report to keep track of the following security issue. [DSA 985-1] New libtasn1-2 packages fix arbitrary code execution was released on 6 Mar 2006, in regard to Bugtraq ID 16568 / CVE-2006-0645. It states, in part: For the unstable distribution (sid) these problems will be fixed soon. For the record, the current unstable version, 0.2.17-2, is also the curent testing version. Soon has expired ;) Please patch/repair (there is a patch available for the stable version, 0.2.10-3sarge1 - I don't know if this helps or not). Thanks much, -- Steve Lane System, Network and Security Administrator Doudna Lab Biomolecular Structure and Mechanism Group UC Berkeley -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (800, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-phabrix060 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libtasn1-2 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries Versions of packages libtasn1-2 recommends: ii libtasn1-2-bin1:0.2.17-2 Manage ASN.1 structures (binaries) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358327: marked as done (ess: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'tetex-extra')
Your message dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:47:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#358327: fixed in ess 5.3.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ess Version: 5.2.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'ess' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: (cd refcard ; pdflatex refcard) This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) entering extended mode (./refcard.tex LaTeX2e 2003/12/01 Babel v3.8d and hyphenation patterns for loaded. (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/article.cls Document Class: article 2004/02/16 v1.4f Standard LaTeX document class (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/size10.clo)) (/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/tools/multicol.sty) ! LaTeX Error: File `parskip.sty' not found. Type X to quit or RETURN to proceed, or enter new name. (Default extension: sty) Enter file name: Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'tetex-extra' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ess-5.2.12/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/ess-5.2.12/debian/control 2006-03-22 08:21:55.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-03-22 08:21:46.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4), tetex-base, tetex-bin, texinfo +Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper, tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra, texinfo Package: ess Architecture: all ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: ess Source-Version: 5.3.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ess, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ess_5.3.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/ess/ess_5.3.0-1.diff.gz ess_5.3.0-1.dsc to pool/main/e/ess/ess_5.3.0-1.dsc ess_5.3.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/e/ess/ess_5.3.0-1_all.deb ess_5.3.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/ess/ess_5.3.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ess package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:27:11 + Source: ess Binary: ess Architecture: source all Version: 5.3.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: ess- Emacs statistics mode, supporting R,S and others Closes: 343234 358327 363080 Changes: ess (5.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Add tetex-extra to build-depends, Closes: #363080, Closes: #358327. * Apply xemacs key binding fix, Closes: #343234. * Comment out svn references in refcard.tex, as Debian does not have svn.sty at the moment. * Add ess-intro-graphs.pdf and refcard.pdf to docs Files: 2b68b7c089d205d627946525b63ce604 594 math optional ess_5.3.0-1.dsc e686c400d0bbd1e7f7ad2f940e3bff7c 2575472 math optional ess_5.3.0.orig.tar.gz 476ebd1808611f4a65ce15a14e6bec8b 7362 math optional ess_5.3.0-1.diff.gz ade90abda36b6dda325f2cf67a0f9235 1406014 math optional ess_5.3.0-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEUkP5czG1wFfwRdwRAqfOAJ0TfSlsjDQl4qBDaQ6+85ya9lhzBQCgm/Pd 4mEfbDQUAZNUmTAsms0iY0s= =LEu2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: Bug#363050
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 363050 Bug#363050: libgnomecanvas: Needs rebuild for new libxrender, not binNMU safe. Bug reopened, originator not changed. found 363050 2.14.0-2 Bug#363050: libgnomecanvas: Needs rebuild for new libxrender, not binNMU safe. Bug marked as found in version 2.14.0-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#363050:
reopen 363050 found 363050 2.14.0-2 thanks This bug is not fixed. Bastian -- I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer to any question. -- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#365236: libhtml-widget-perl: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libclass-data-accessor-perl'
Package: libhtml-widget-perl Version: 1.07-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'libhtml-widget-perl' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor Cannot determine perl version info from lib/HTML/Widget.pm *** Module::AutoInstall version 1.02 *** Checking for Perl dependencies... [Core Features] - Test::NoWarnings ...loaded. (0.082) - HTML::Element ...loaded. (3.16) - Class::Accessor::Fast ...loaded. (0.25) - Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast ...loaded. (0) - Class::Data::Accessor ...missing. - HTML::Scrubber ...loaded. (0.08) - Storable ...loaded. (2.15) - Module::Pluggable::Fast...loaded. (0.18) - Email::Valid ...loaded. (0.15) - Date::Calc ...loaded. (5.4) - Scalar::Util ...loaded. (1.18) == Auto-install the 1 mandatory module(s) from CPAN? [y] y /etc/perl/CPAN/Config.pm initialized. [...] Are you ready for manual configuration? [yes] yes Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'libclass-data-accessor-perl' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libhtml-widget-perl-1.07/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libhtml-widget-perl-1.07/debian/control 2006-04-28 11:50:13.0 + +++ ./debian/control2006-04-28 11:50:08.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: perl Priority: optional Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.2) -Build-Depends-Indep: perl (= 5.8.0-7), libmodule-install-perl, libtest-nowarnings-perl, libhtml-tree-perl, libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-accessor-chained-perl, libemail-valid-perl, libdate-calc-perl, libtest-mockobject-perl, libtest-pod-perl, libtest-pod-coverage-perl, libhtml-scrubber-perl, libmodule-pluggable-fast-perl +Build-Depends-Indep: perl (= 5.8.0-7), libclass-data-accessor-perl, libmodule-install-perl, libtest-nowarnings-perl, libhtml-tree-perl, libclass-accessor-perl, libclass-accessor-chained-perl, libemail-valid-perl, libdate-calc-perl, libtest-mockobject-perl, libtest-pod-perl, libtest-pod-coverage-perl, libhtml-scrubber-perl, libmodule-pluggable-fast-perl Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Florian Ragwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED], Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#354075: Does not mount with NFS user server
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 09:33:26PM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: I just did an upgrade on my laptop running Sid and found that I could no longer mount a remote NFS share on my desktop. The NFS server is running Sid as well with the nfs-user-server 2.2beta47-22 package. Research showed that mount had been upgraded today on my client machine. Rolling the mount package back to version 2.12r-6 restored normal operation. Could you grab http://incoming.debian.org/mount_2.12r-8.2nfs4_i386.deb (which will move into the archive - in experimental - in about 90 minutes) and see if that works for you? I it does, I hope to upload that later today. thanks, lamont -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365237: misc3d_0.3-1-4(unstable/sparc/spontini): FTBFS - depends on removed xlibmesa-glu-dev
Package: misc3d Version: 0.3-1-4 Severity: serious Please update your build-depends to take into account the recent X changes. | Automatic build of misc3d_0.3-1-4 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85 | Build started at 20060428-0942 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.1.0), r-base-dev (= 2.0.0), cdbs, xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev, xlibmesa-glu-dev | libglu-dev, libpng12-dev [...] | E: Package xlibmesa-glu-dev has no installation candidate A complete build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=misc3dver=0.3-1-4 -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365194: [NONFREE-DOC] RFC1459, 2810-2813: IRC (Internet Relay Chat).
The RFC's published here all were made by individuals, and were not made by some IETF process. rfc1459 comes from a document that was always part of the irc source package. For instance, in the software released on 1993-04-05: ftp://ftp.irc.org/irc/server/Old/irc2.7/irc2.7.2h.tar.Z irc2.7.2h/doc/Comms says: * IRC - Internet Relay Chat, doc/Comms * Copyright (C) 1990, Jarkko Oikarinen * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 1, or (at your option) * any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */ Author: Jarkko Oikarinen Date: 3 Sep 1988 Last modification: 20 Feb 91 rfc1459 was released in May 1993. Afaik, 2.8 versions don't have the doc/Comms file anymore since it was published as an rfc, but all previous version did. And the document clearly had an GPL license. Note that rfc1459 doesn't have any copyright notice or anything like that in it, unlike 2810-2813. rfc2810-2813 is basicly 1459 split in a few RFCs, with some updates. As part of the copyright statement it says: However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The source to all the rfc's is also available at ftp://ftp.irc.org/irc/docs/draft*.nr, but those don't have any copyright statements either. Do I need to get the copyright holder of the documents to relicense it under the GPL? It seems clear to me that it already is covered by the GPL, but it shouldn't be a problem to get the copyright holder to explicitly state that. Is there something else I can do? Like including those draft*.nr files (in the next upstream release)? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365177: more info needed
Hello Daniel, Please add the cobol source code I can use to reproduce this problem. Thanks, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#360653: python-doc: should Build-Depends: on latex2html, which is non-free
Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Severity: serious [...] Python documentation is written in LaTeX and compiled into HTML with LaTeX2HTML, which is currently non-free. It seems that the HTML is shipped pre-built in the source package. I wanted to look into that bug, but it seems it has been filed against the wrong package: python-doc doesn't contain any html files, nor LaTeX sources. python2.3-doc and its source package do contain both. But I'm reluctant to simply reassign this to python2.3-doc - what about other python versions? Well, then I actually looked into the sources in python2.3, but sorry, I won't fix this. It's quite a complicate setup to build a bunch of LaTeX documents, and since I don't want to learn Python, I won't try to grok the system and adapt it to tex4ht or hevea, sorry. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
Bug#363061: [tex-live] Unclear License of AMSLaTeX
- the current LPPL allows to change the internal identification as an
alternative to renaming the file, and
Indeed, this is the main difference between the Knuth license and the
current LPPL, as I know you know.
- it does not permit to distribute changed versions, even when renamed,
Well, once you have a changed version, further copying of that unchanged
version could perhaps be construed as permitted under clause (1).
- this text doesn't even allow to copy amsclass.dtx to amsclass.dtx.bak
Hmm. Perhaps the name change could be interpreted as part of if you do
make changes, ie, one possible change is changing the name. Imagine
cp amsclass.dtx{,.bak}, changing one byte, then reverting the one byte ...
I am straining to find a way to interpret the clauses non-literally
because I agree with you that the wording here is not ideal. However,
amslatex is not the only issue. plain.tex and other basic TeX system
files written by DEK (and others) are under a similar license.
Furthermore, tex.web and mf.web are under an even more restrictive
license.
I do not believe it is in the overall public interest to ask DEK to
spend one second contemplating these things instead of working on the
Art of Computer Programming. I am also virtually certain (barbara might
chime in) that it would be a waste of time, as he has made his wishes
clear many, many times and would not be inclined to change anything.
The fact that a literal interpretation of his license texts is not
perfectly congruent with his wishes is an unfortunate fact of life.
Needless to say, TeX Live is not ever going to consider TeX as
nonfree :).
karl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
