Processed: severity of 367024 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 severity 367024 wishlist Bug#367024: Licences conflict: Ruby under pure GPL with OpenSSL Licence Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368570: xdm : cannot start, looks for daemon in wrong directory
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade xdm does not start. /etc/init.d looks for xdm in /usr/bin/X11/xdm, but there is no xdm in this directory, it is in /usr/bin/xdm -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 4:4.0.2-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam-modules0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime0.79-3.1 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libselinux1 1.30-1 SELinux shared libraries ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxau6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Authentication library ii libxaw8 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Athena widget set library ii libxdmcp6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Display Manager Control Protocol ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display ii libxmu6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxp66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System printing extension ii libxpm4 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library ii libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xbase-clients 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 miscellaneous X clients xdm recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368572: tulip_2.0.4-1(amd64/unstable): error: cast from 'const GraphObserver*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision
Package: tulip Version: 2.0.4-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../library/tulip/src -I../../.. -I../../../../library/tulip/include -I../../../../thirdparty/gzstream -I../../../.. -D_TULIP_LIB_DIR=\/usr/lib/\ -DNDEBUG -O3 -funroll-loops -pipe -MT Bfs.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Bfs.Tpo -c ../../../../library/tulip/src/Bfs.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/Bfs.o ../../../../library/tulip/include/tulip/ObservableGraph.h: In member function 'size_t std::lessGraphObserver*::operator()(const GraphObserver*, const GraphObserver*) const': ../../../../library/tulip/include/tulip/ObservableGraph.h:34: error: cast from 'const GraphObserver*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision ../../../../library/tulip/include/tulip/ObservableGraph.h:34: error: cast from 'const GraphObserver*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision make[5]: *** [Bfs.lo] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/BUILD/library/tulip/src' make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/BUILD/library/tulip' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/BUILD/library' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/BUILD' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/BUILD' make: *** [/build/buildd/tulip-2.0.4/stamps/build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=tulipver=2.0.4-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368571: sigscheme_0.5.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: Missing build dependency
Package: sigscheme Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) apparently the package misses a build dependency on ruby: checking for ruby... no configure: error: please install ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/) make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=sigschemever=0.5.0-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#347010: marked as done (libgd-ruby: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 00:47:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347010: fixed in libgd-ruby 0.7.4.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libgd-ruby Version: 0.7.4.1-2 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg4.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libgd-ruby Source-Version: 0.7.4.1-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgd-ruby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgd-ruby1.8_0.7.4.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgd-ruby/libgd-ruby1.8_0.7.4.1-3_i386.deb libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgd-ruby/libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.diff.gz libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgd-ruby/libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libgd-ruby package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 16:37:41 +0900 Source: libgd-ruby Binary: libgd-ruby1.8 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.4.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: akira yamada [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgd-ruby1.8 - Extension library to use GD graphics library from Ruby 1.8 Closes: 347010 367919 Changes: libgd-ruby (0.7.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=low . * FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev (Closes: #347010) * dropped ruby1.6 support. (Closes: #367919) Files: 1f7e546309b254f10c02f27ca306acad 678 graphics optional libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.dsc 7c497cd2514d8ebac8cf65a3e6c02703 3308 graphics optional libgd-ruby_0.7.4.1-3.diff.gz 4e259b84ee4408863e35deac9d9a1f45 50468 graphics optional libgd-ruby1.8_0.7.4.1-3_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEcrzHXzkxpuIT8aARAvQXAJ9vC0RoKkvLwfkh03vOkcqenRJLewCbBySr NKZXKUFSIPXvOW1LgfxSkQU= =kyB5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#368360: marked as done (courier-authdaemon - fails to remove)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 01:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368360: fixed in courier-authlib 0.58-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: courier-authdaemon Version: 0.58-1.0 Severity: grave | Removing courier-authdaemon ... | Stopping Courier authentication services: /usr/sbin/authdaemond: line 18: /usr/sbin/courierlogger: No such file or directory | /usr/sbin/authdaemond: line 18: exec: /usr/sbin/courierlogger: cannot execute: No such file or directory | invoke-rc.d: initscript courier-authdaemon, action stop failed. | dpkg: error processing courier-authdaemon (--purge): | subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 126 | Starting Courier authentication services: /usr/sbin/authdaemond: line 18: /usr/sbin/courierlogger: No such file or directory | /usr/sbin/authdaemond: line 18: exec: /usr/sbin/courierlogger: cannot execute: No such file or directory | invoke-rc.d: initscript courier-authdaemon, action start failed. | dpkg: error while cleaning up: | subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 126 | Errors were encountered while processing: | courier-authdaemon Bastian -- Intuition, however illogical, is recognized as a command prerogative. -- Kirk, Obsession, stardate 3620.7 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: courier-authlib Source-Version: 0.58-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of courier-authlib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: courier-authdaemon_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authdaemon_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-dev_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-dev_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-ldap_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-ldap_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-mysql_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-mysql_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-pipe_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-pipe_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-postgresql_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-postgresql_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-userdb_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-userdb_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib_0.58-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2.diff.gz courier-authlib_0.58-2.dsc to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2.dsc courier-authlib_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated courier-authlib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:43:15 +0200 Source: courier-authlib Binary: courier-authlib-pipe courier-authlib-mysql courier-authlib-dev courier-authlib-ldap courier-authdaemon courier-authlib courier-authlib-postgresql courier-authlib-userdb Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.58-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: courier-authdaemon - Courier authentication daemon courier-authlib - Courier authentication library courier-authlib-dev - Development libraries for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-ldap - LDAP support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-mysql - MySQL support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-pipe - External authentication support for the Courier authentication li courier-authlib-postgresql - PostgreSQL support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-userdb - userdb support for the Courier authentication library Closes: 368358 368360 Changes: courier-authlib (0.58-2) unstable; urgency=low . * set ownership of /var/run/courier and /var/run/courier/authdaemon to daemon.daemon (Closes: #368358, #368360) Files:
Bug#368358: marked as done (courier-authdaemon - fails to install)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 01:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368358: fixed in courier-authlib 0.58-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: courier-authdaemon Version: 0.58-1.0 Severity: grave | Setting up courier-authdaemon (0.58-1.0) ... | Starting Courier authentication services: /var/run/courier/authdaemon/pid.lock: No such file or directory | ll_daemon_start: Resource temporarily unavailable | invoke-rc.d: initscript courier-authdaemon, action start failed. | dpkg: error processing courier-authdaemon (--configure): | subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 | Errors were encountered while processing: | courier-authdaemon Bastian -- You! What PLANET is this! -- McCoy, The City on the Edge of Forever, stardate 3134.0 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: courier-authlib Source-Version: 0.58-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of courier-authlib, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: courier-authdaemon_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authdaemon_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-dev_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-dev_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-ldap_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-ldap_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-mysql_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-mysql_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-pipe_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-pipe_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-postgresql_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-postgresql_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib-userdb_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib-userdb_0.58-2_i386.deb courier-authlib_0.58-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2.diff.gz courier-authlib_0.58-2.dsc to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2.dsc courier-authlib_0.58-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/courier-authlib/courier-authlib_0.58-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated courier-authlib package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:43:15 +0200 Source: courier-authlib Binary: courier-authlib-pipe courier-authlib-mysql courier-authlib-dev courier-authlib-ldap courier-authdaemon courier-authlib courier-authlib-postgresql courier-authlib-userdb Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.58-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Stefan Hornburg (Racke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: courier-authdaemon - Courier authentication daemon courier-authlib - Courier authentication library courier-authlib-dev - Development libraries for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-ldap - LDAP support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-mysql - MySQL support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-pipe - External authentication support for the Courier authentication li courier-authlib-postgresql - PostgreSQL support for the Courier authentication library courier-authlib-userdb - userdb support for the Courier authentication library Closes: 368358 368360 Changes: courier-authlib (0.58-2) unstable; urgency=low . * set ownership of /var/run/courier and /var/run/courier/authdaemon to daemon.daemon (Closes: #368358, #368360) Files: e25ddab5ca9a3d91a09a9227a3b0d71c 950 mail optional courier-authlib_0.58-2.dsc cc03f5467696507d29e0c89398476d93 34561 mail optional courier-authlib_0.58-2.diff.gz 4c7c785a7792245105c3c17d4a7db67e 76504 mail optional courier-authlib_0.58-2_i386.deb 158a1de9790c6ae924ffb76cbac1e060 6062 mail optional courier-authdaemon_0.58-2_i386.deb 77508bf3018b76fe8cb6fae6d9d31ea0 94284 mail optional courier-authlib-dev_0.58-2_i386.deb 3059a1486dd1e30a158ee194813a8158 33418 mail optional
Processed: tagging 367495
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 367495 + pending Bug#367495: gfpoken: Buttons are missing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368576: r-noncran-lindsey_1.0.20041008-1.1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: Error: Real constant overflows its kind
Package: r-noncran-lindsey Version: 1.0.20041008-1.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: gcc -I/usr/share/R/include -I/usr/share/R/include -fpic -g -O2 -std=gnu99 -c dist.c -o dist.o gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c gettvc.f -o gettvc.o In file gettvc.f:55 tvcov2(n,i)=-1e301 1 Error: Real constant overflows its kind at (1) In file gettvc.f:79 recx=1e301 1 Error: Real constant overflows its kind at (1) In file gettvc.f:84 reck=1e301 1 Error: Real constant overflows its kind at (1) In file gettvc.f:86 if((recx.ge.1e300).and.(reck.ge.1e300)) ldone=.true. 1 Error: Real constant overflows its kind at (1) make[1]: *** [gettvc.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/r-noncran-lindsey-1.0.20041008/build/rmutil/src' ERROR: compilation failed for package 'rmutil' ** Removing '/build/buildd/r-noncran-lindsey-1.0.20041008/debian/r-noncran-lindsey/usr/lib/R/site-library/rmutil' make: *** [install] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=r-noncran-lindseyver=1.0.20041008-1.1 the same error is reproducible on i386, thus the severity. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368301: marked as done (proftpd binary set trapdoor rpath to /users/frankie)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 01:17:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368301: fixed in proftpd 1.3.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: proftpd Version: 1.3.0-7 Severity: grave Tags: security Hello Francesco, proftpd include a trapdoor rpath to /users/frankie/... %chrpath usr/sbin/proftpd usr/sbin/proftpd: RPATH=/users/frankie/debian/mypkgs/proftpd/current/proftpd-1.3.0/debian/tmp/usr/sbin This rpath allows a user with home directory /users/frankie/ to install trojaned libraries and wait for proftpd to start. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: proftpd Source-Version: 1.3.0-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of proftpd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: proftpd-doc_1.3.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd-doc_1.3.0-8_all.deb proftpd-ldap_1.3.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd-ldap_1.3.0-8_all.deb proftpd-mysql_1.3.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd-mysql_1.3.0-8_all.deb proftpd-pgsql_1.3.0-8_all.deb to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd-pgsql_1.3.0-8_all.deb proftpd_1.3.0-8.diff.gz to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd_1.3.0-8.diff.gz proftpd_1.3.0-8.dsc to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd_1.3.0-8.dsc proftpd_1.3.0-8_i386.deb to pool/main/p/proftpd/proftpd_1.3.0-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated proftpd package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:22:51 +0200 Source: proftpd Binary: proftpd proftpd-mysql proftpd-pgsql proftpd-ldap proftpd-doc Architecture: source all i386 Version: 1.3.0-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Francesco Paolo Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: proftpd- Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon proftpd-doc - Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon (Documentation) proftpd-ldap - Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon (dummy transitional package proftpd-mysql - Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon (dummy transitional package proftpd-pgsql - Versatile, virtual-hosting FTP daemon (dummy transitional package Closes: 368301 Changes: proftpd (1.3.0-8) unstable; urgency=medium . * New patch for configure.in/configure (remove_rpath) to remove rpath adding at libtool installation time. (closes: #368301) * Updated patch ipv6_cidr_warn.dpatch to the latest version in CVS. See http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785 Files: 91e93e5692a53d5b0437aecf3716751d 893 net optional proftpd_1.3.0-8.dsc 1f270e9d9807321eb238e7e08ad5ec25 155913 net optional proftpd_1.3.0-8.diff.gz e0d2911f94db44c0a2f7362c07e8f2c7 622130 net optional proftpd_1.3.0-8_i386.deb 6d1f8d28f3f1d4ff7fae094eb0e9bfed 480842 doc optional proftpd-doc_1.3.0-8_all.deb ecefcb1cca2336d08d5e64a730830d47 161182 net optional proftpd-mysql_1.3.0-8_all.deb eaeffbfe20c7f2d379fe8e7295f55b65 161184 net optional proftpd-pgsql_1.3.0-8_all.deb 0a7cb39ff03fc3de63dba87e3093fadf 161178 net optional proftpd-ldap_1.3.0-8_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEcsHmpFNRmenyx0cRAt/8AKCkGJN36fcbfcBY77HrGo2EYwJ+sQCfTXXC S9ysju8gOHAm2Z/RNJeLf0g= =XFC8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: severity of 360992 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 360992 important Bug#360992: exmap: FTBFS (ppc64): syntax error before numeric constant Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of bluez-pin 0.30-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 363425 + fixed Bug#363425: Crashes when used with --dbus Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368580: expect 5.43.0-3 dynamically linked but libexpect missing
Package: expect Version: 5.42.1-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable expect 5.43.0-3 is dynamically linked (unlike 5.43.0-2) but lacks libexpect: % ar xf /home/debian/pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.43.0-3_i386.deb % tar xzf data.tgz % ldd usr/bin/expect libexpect5.43.so = not found ... % ls usr/lib expect5.43 Brian Keck -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages expect depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii tcl8.48.4.12-1 Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8 expect recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368582: hardinfo - FTBFS: error: arch/this/alsa.h: No such file or directory
Package: hardinfo Version: 0.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of hardinfo_0.4-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] [01;34m--- Module: computer.c (computer.so)[00m gcc -fPIC -pipe -O3 -Wall -g -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I. -o computer.so -shared computer.c -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 \ computer.c:63:28: error: arch/this/alsa.h: No such file or directory computer.c:65:31: error: arch/this/loadavg.h: No such file or directory computer.c:66:30: error: arch/this/memory.h: No such file or directory computer.c:67:30: error: arch/this/uptime.h: No such file or directory computer.c:68:33: error: arch/this/processor.h: No such file or directory computer.c:69:26: error: arch/this/os.h: No such file or directory computer.c:70:34: error: arch/this/filesystem.h: No such file or directory computer.c:71:29: error: arch/this/samba.h: No such file or directory computer.c:72:31: error: arch/this/sensors.h: No such file or directory computer.c:73:27: error: arch/this/net.h: No such file or directory Bastian
Processed: severity of 365494 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 365494 important Bug#365494: lcdproc: Missing orig.tar.gz Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of fvwm95 2.0.43ba-24.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 365285 + fixed Bug#365285: fvwm95: please update for X11R7 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368583: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package
Subject: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Eclipse's search for a java runtime environment doesnt look in /usr/lib/jvm/ for sun jre's installed via apt. Workaround: 1 - Edit /etc/eclipse/java_home 2 - Add /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0 for sun-jre5-bin Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages eclipse depends on: ii eclipse-jdt 3.1.2-2Java Development Tools plug-ins fo ii eclipse-pde 3.1.2-2Plug-in Development Environment to ii eclipse-source3.1.2-2Eclipse source code plug-ins eclipse recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
Processed: Fixed in NMU of vtwm 5.4.7-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 365286 + fixed Bug#365286: vtwm: please update for X11R7 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution
tags 365533 pending thanks On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 05:21 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: W.r.t. unstable, I will look into that very soon, we'll need to be upgrading to a new upstream aswell. I'll check whether that can be done in the short term, if not, I'll prepare a patched package. Ok, thanks. Thanks for fixing stable. I've also prepared a fix for sid now. The difference with the previous version in sid is the same patch as for sarge, plus I've added a debconf translation. Problem is that Jeroen announced that he's on a trip through Mexico now, so I'm left without someone to upload. Maybe the (testing) security team or any other DD interested in getting this bug fixed, can take a look and upload? Please find the updated packages here: http://www.a-eskwadraat.nl/~kink/phpbb/ Packages have been tested and work here. thanks, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 365533 pending Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368583: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package
severity 368583 wishlist thanks On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:14:05PM +0200, Daniel Franganillo wrote: Subject: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Eclipse's search for a java runtime environment doesnt look in /usr/lib/jvm/ for sun jre's installed via apt. Workaround: 1 - Edit /etc/eclipse/java_home 2 - Add /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0 for sun-jre5-bin I would call this renders package unusable. I downgrade this to a wishlist bugs as supporting non-free software is not our prime goal. Eclipse works fine with other runtimes. Even with other differently packaged versions of SUNs JDK. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#368583: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 368583 wishlist Bug#368583: eclipse: Does not work with sun-java5-bin package Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.
Package: nscd Version: 2.3.6-7 Severity: serious An invoke-rc.d failure prevents package upgrading. You should manage that case in prerm in order to avoid such a problem, or return 0 in case of failure in the init script, as well. Most servers in debian do the last, AFAIK. Feel free to close this report if already properly managed in -9 scripts. klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd frankie 14797 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd start Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd root 14804 1 0 12:27 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/nscd frankie 14812 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: nscd 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 30 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/136kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done Reading changelogs... Done (Reading database ... 164331 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nscd 2.3.6-7 (using .../archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb) ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages nscd depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries nscd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: 365533 fixed in sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 365533 2.0.13+1-6sarge3 Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.0.13+1-6sarge3, send any further explanations to Stefan Fritsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Removed pending tag. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#348778: #348778: ext2prepare corrupts the file system
tags 348778 + patch
thanks
I got this answer on the ext2resize-devel mailing list:
[Andreas Dilger]
That's because ext2prepare was never updated to support the new
ext3 resize inode format. There was actually a patch posted on
ext2-devel which may fix this from Takashi Sato, but I haven't had
time to look at it yet:
[Ext2-devel] [RFC][17/21]ext2resize fix resize_inode format
I found the diff on
URL:http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.1/1090.html,
and manually applied it to my copy of the source as the HTML version
didn't apply using patch.
Can you test it and let me know if it solve the problem for you? I've
tested it and e2fsck no longer complains when I run it on a fresh file
system.
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 05_ext3newformat.dpatch
##
## DP: Update to use the new resize-inode format. Patch from Takashi
## DP: Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED] found on
## DP: URL:http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.1/1090.html
## DP: and manually applied.
Summary of this patch:
[17/21] fix the bug related to the option resize_inode
- A format of resize-inode in ext2prepare is different from
the one in mke2fs, so ext2prepare fails. Then I adapt
ext2prepare's to mke2fs's.
--- ext2resize-1.1.19.orig/src/ext2.c
+++ ext2resize-1.1.19/src/ext2.c
@@ -286,6 +286,7 @@
}
}
+/* Remind: prototype returns int, but it may return blk_t */
int ext2_block_iterate(struct ext2_fs *fs, struct ext2_inode *inode,
blk_t block, int action)
{
@@ -295,6 +296,9 @@
int count = 0;
int i;
int i512perblock = 1 (fs-logsize - 9);
+ unsigned long long apb;
+
+ apb = fs-u32perblock;
if (block == 0 || inode-i_mode == 0)
return -1;
@@ -313,114 +317,66 @@
}
}
- /* Direct blocks for first 12 blocks */
- for (i = 0, curblock = 0; i EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS; i++, curblock++) {
- if (action == EXT2_ACTION_ADD !inode-i_block[i]) {
- size_t new_size = (curblock + 1) * fs-blocksize;
-
- if (fs-flags FL_DEBUG)
-printf(add %d as direct block\n, curblock);
- inode-i_block[i] = block;
- /* i_blocks is in 512 byte blocks */
- inode-i_blocks += i512perblock;
- if (new_size inode-i_size)
-inode-i_size = new_size;
-
- inode-i_mtime = time(NULL);
- ext2_set_block_state(fs, block, 1,
- !(fs-flags FL_ONLINE));
- return curblock;
- }
- if (inode-i_block[i] == block) {
- if (action == EXT2_ACTION_DELETE) {
-if (fs-flags FL_DEBUG)
- printf(del %d as direct block\n,
- curblock);
-inode-i_block[i] = 0;
-inode-i_blocks -= i512perblock;
-inode-i_mtime = time(NULL);
-if (!(fs-flags FL_ONLINE))
- ext2_set_block_state(fs, block, 0, 1);
- }
- return i;
- }
- if (inode-i_block[i])
- count += i512perblock;
- }
-
- count += inode-i_block[EXT2_IND_BLOCK] ? i512perblock : 0;
- count += inode-i_block[EXT2_DIND_BLOCK] ? i512perblock : 0;
- count += inode-i_block[EXT2_TIND_BLOCK] ? i512perblock : 0;
-
- if (!inode-i_block[EXT2_IND_BLOCK] ||
- (count = inode-i_blocks action != EXT2_ACTION_ADD))
+ if(!inode-i_block[EXT2_DIND_BLOCK] action != EXT2_ACTION_ADD)
return -1;
- bh = ext2_bread(fs, inode-i_block[EXT2_IND_BLOCK]);
- udata = (__u32 *)bh-data;
+ if (!inode-i_block[EXT2_DIND_BLOCK]) {
+ unsigned long long inode_size;
+ blk_t dindblk;
- /* Indirect blocks for next 256/512/1024 blocks (for 1k/2k/4k blocks) */
- for (i = 0; i fs-u32perblock; i++, curblock++) {
- if (action == EXT2_ACTION_ADD !udata[i]) {
- size_t new_size = (curblock + 1) * fs-blocksize;
-
- if (fs-flags FL_DEBUG)
-printf(add %d to ind block %d\n, curblock,
- inode-i_block[EXT2_IND_BLOCK]);
- bh-dirty = 1;
- udata[i] = block;
- inode-i_blocks += i512perblock;
- if (new_size inode-i_size)
-inode-i_size = new_size;
- inode-i_mtime = time(NULL);
- ext2_set_block_state(fs, block, 1,
- !(fs-flags FL_ONLINE));
- ext2_brelse(bh, 0);
- return curblock;
- }
- if (udata[i] == block) {
- if (action == EXT2_ACTION_DELETE) {
-if (fs-flags FL_DEBUG)
- printf(del %d from ind block %d\n,
- curblock,
- inode-i_block[EXT2_IND_BLOCK]);
-bh-dirty = 1;
-udata[i] = 0;
-inode-i_blocks -= i512perblock;
-inode-i_mtime = time(NULL);
-if (!(fs-flags FL_ONLINE))
- ext2_set_block_state(fs, block, 0, 1);
- }
- ext2_brelse(bh, 0);
- return curblock;
- }
- if (udata[i]) {
- count += i512perblock;
- if (count = inode-i_blocks
- action != EXT2_ACTION_ADD)
-return -1;
- }
+ dindblk = ext2_find_free_block(fs);
+ if(!dindblk)
+ return -1;
+ ext2_set_block_state(fs, dindblk, 1, 1);
+ inode_size = apb*apb + apb + EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS;
+ inode_size *= fs-blocksize;
+ inode-i_size = inode_size 0x;
+ inode-i_size_high = (inode_size 32) 0x;
+ if(inode-i_size_high) {
+ fs-sb.s_feature_ro_compat |=
+ EXT2_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE;
+ }
+ inode-i_mtime =
Processed: Re: #348778: ext2prepare corrupts the file system
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 348778 + patch Bug#348778: ext2prepare corrupts the file system There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368451: Bug#368327: udev won't install, no error message
I uploaded a new package to http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/, please check if it works for you. BTW, this bug is a race between postinst and udevd so it may not always manifest even on the same system. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: pending tag removed by closing for sarge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 365533 pending Bug#365533: CVE-2006-1896: Admin command execution Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: expect 5.43.0-3 dynamically linked but libexpect missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 368580 fixed Bug#368580: expect 5.43.0-3 dynamically linked but libexpect missing There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed merge 368580 368364 Bug#368364: atlas3 - FTBFS: error while loading shared libraries: libexpect5.43.so Bug#368580: expect 5.43.0-3 dynamically linked but libexpect missing Bug#367618: libexpect5.43.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Merged 367618 368364 368580. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368580: expect 5.43.0-3 dynamically linked but libexpect missing
tags 368580 fixed merge 368580 368364 quit On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:23:48PM +1000, Brian Keck wrote: expect 5.43.0-3 is dynamically linked (unlike 5.43.0-2) but lacks libexpect: % ar xf /home/debian/pool/main/e/expect/expect_5.43.0-3_i386.deb % tar xzf data.tgz % ldd usr/bin/expect libexpect5.43.so = not found ... % ls usr/lib expect5.43 Hello Brian, This bug is a duplicate of 368364 which was fixed in expect version expect_5.43.0-3.1. Thanks for your bug report, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libgnomeprint2.2-0: GNOME programs crash on print dialog
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 344684 libgnomecups1.0-1 Bug#344684: libgnomeprint2.2-0: GNOME programs crash on print dialog Bug reassigned from package `libgnomeprint2.2-0' to `libgnomecups1.0-1'. severity 344684 serious Bug#344684: libgnomeprint2.2-0: GNOME programs crash on print dialog Severity set to `serious' from `normal' retitle 344684 insufficient shlibs for libgnomecups1.0-1 since 0.2.0 Bug#344684: libgnomeprint2.2-0: GNOME programs crash on print dialog Changed Bug title. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 344684
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 344684 + pending Bug#344684: insufficient shlibs for libgnomecups1.0-1 since 0.2.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368451: Bug#368327: udev won't install, no error message
Here. It seems to leak directories in /tmp/ still (they are not empty because they contain a subdirectory called .udev). I don't know what the syslogd problem is, I get it when trying to install sysklogd as well. Also, the INTERFACE_NEW=eth1 thing is confusing, I have an eth1 interface but it is not up. The install doesn't fail, which is good, but as I said when I installed the stable version and then removed it, after that the unstable version began installing successfully as well, so I think whatever caused my problem is gone. Since you said it was a deadlock thing, I also tried doing the installation at different CPU speeds, still no failure... Also, I made sure that udevd is running. Hope this helps. # dpkg --purge udev (Reading database ... 38940 files and directories currently installed.) Removing udev ... ** * Please reboot your system as soon as possible! * After removing udev the system may not be fully functional. ** Purging configuration files for udev ... dpkg - warning: while removing udev, directory `/etc/udev/rules.d' not empty so not removed. dpkg - warning: while removing udev, directory `/etc/udev' not empty so not removed. # dpkg -i udev_0.092-2_i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package udev. (Reading database ... 38826 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking udev (from udev_0.092-2_i386.deb) ... ** * Please purge the hotplug package! * (/etc/init.d/hotplug has been found on this system) ** Setting up udev (0.092-2) ... INTERFACE_NEW=eth1 Populating the new /dev filesystem temporarily mounted on /tmp/udev.rPMRhq/... rmdir: /tmp/udev.rPMRhq: Directory not empty WARNING: /tmp/udev.rPMRhq is not empty! /tmp/udev.rPMRhq: total 0 Restarting system log daemon.../sbin/syslogd: invalid option -- u usage: syslogd [-drvh] [-l hostlist] [-m markinterval] [-n] [-p path] [-s domainlist] [-f conffile] failed! On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 01:34:36PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: I uploaded a new package to http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/, please check if it works for you. BTW, this bug is a race between postinst and udevd so it may not always manifest even on the same system. -- ciao, Marco -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368104: marked as done (hplip: Printing and Scanning does not work after upgrade of)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 10:11:42 -0300
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368104: hplip: Printing and Scanning does not work after
upgrade of [solved]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: hplip
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
With high probability this is the wrong package.
I have an HP Photosmart 2610 connected per network.
After an apt-get upgrade yesterday (May 18th, 2006) I cannot print and
scan anymore. Since I do not know all packages I have upgraded, here is
a list, which I know were upgrade:
apt-utils
passwd
gnome-utils
libgstreamer0.10-0
tex-common
udev
vim-common
Here are some error messages I get:
%%
hp-toolbox
HP Linux Imaging and Printing System (ver. 0.9.10)
HP Device Manager ver. 6.2
Copyright (c) 2003-6 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, LP
This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
This is free software, and you are welcome to distribute it
under certain conditions. See COPYING file for more details.
[ERROR]: Unable to connect to HPLIP I/O. Check and make sure HPLIP is
running.
[ERROR]: Unable to create client object.
%%
xsane
[1] Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken pipe) xsane
{translation: data transfer interrupted}
%%
sudo /etc/init.d/hplip restart
Stopping HP Linux Printing and Imaging System: hpiod hpssd.
Starting HP Linux Printing and Imaging System: hpiod hpssd failed!
%%
Printing a testpage from localhost:631, it shows the job, but nothing
happens.
Do you have a clue, which package could cause this.
I also remember that gcc was upgrade to version 4.1. But printing worked
after this.
If you need more information, let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Paul Menzel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages hplip depends on:
ii adduser 3.87 Add and remove users and
groups
ii coreutils 5.94-1 The GNU core utilities
ii cupsys1.1.23-15 Common UNIX Printing
System(tm) -
ii hplip-data0.9.10-1 HP Linux Printing and
Imaging - da
ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared
libraries
ii libcupsys21.1.23-15 Common UNIX Printing
System(tm) -
ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-4 GCC support library
ii libsnmp9 5.2.2-3NET SNMP (Simple Network
Managemen
ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8b-2 SSL shared libraries
ii libstdc++64.1.0-4The GNU Standard C++
Library v3
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-2 userspace USB programming
library
ii lsb-base 3.1-5 Linux Standard Base 3.1
init scrip
ii python2.3.5-5An interactive high-level
object-o
ii python-qt33.15-4 Qt3 bindings for Python
(default v
Versions of packages hplip recommends:
ii cupsys-client 1.1.23-15 Common UNIX Printing
System(tm) -
ii hpijs 2.1.9+0.9.10-1 HP Linux Printing and
Imaging - gs
pn python-reportlab none (no description available)
-- no debconf information
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Paul Menzel wrote:
Doing a df, I saw that the /var/ partition was totally full. After
apt-get autoclean and reboot everything works. It looks like the upgrade
some days took the last bits of that partition ;( Now I also know, why
there were shown always the same available upgrades the last two days by
apt.
I am so sorry. Please close this stupid bug-report.
It is not stupid, and now I know to ask about a df when weird things like
that start happening, so no harm done...
I am closing the bug, then.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
---End
Bug#344684: marked as done (insufficient shlibs for libgnomecups1.0-1 since 0.2.0)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 05:17:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#344684: fixed in libgnomecups 0.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libgnomeprint2.2-0 Version: 2.10.3-3 Severity: normal This problem seems to occur in any application using, I assume, the GNOME print dialog. I click on print, and, when the print dialog should appear, the entire application crashes/closes. If run from the command line, then there is an error message: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libgnomeprint/2.10.3/modules/libgnomeprintcups.so: undefined symbol: gnome_cups_printer_get_ppd_async This has happened in gedit, abiword, evolution and gnumeric - presumably any package that uses the GNOME print dialog. I have sent this report to libgnomeprint due to the error message - apologies if this is the wrong package! Michael Williamson -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libgnomeprint2.2-0 depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcupsys21.1.23-14 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libfontconfig12.3.1-2generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnomecups1.0-1 0.1.14-1 GNOME library for CUPS interaction ii libgnomeprint2.2-data 2.10.3-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-8 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libgnomecups Source-Version: 0.2.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgnomecups, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgnomecups1.0-1_0.2.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnomecups/libgnomecups1.0-1_0.2.2-2_i386.deb libgnomecups1.0-dev_0.2.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnomecups/libgnomecups1.0-dev_0.2.2-2_i386.deb libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnomecups/libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.diff.gz libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgnomecups/libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libgnomecups package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 13:52:02 +0200 Source: libgnomecups Binary: libgnomecups1.0-1 libgnomecups1.0-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Loic Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgnomecups1.0-1 - GNOME library for CUPS interaction libgnomecups1.0-dev - GNOME library for CUPS interaction (headers) Closes: 344684 Changes: libgnomecups (0.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Set shlibs to = 0.2.0 which saw the last API additions. (Closes: #344684) [debian/rules] * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.7.2. [debian/control, debian/control.in] Files: 7f8a25684b56d21aab3d96218aea325c 1514 - optional libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.dsc d1e11bbfd6f9ad5d300fa33315df89e2 3800 - optional libgnomecups_0.2.2-2.diff.gz 4317880ede2ce659cdee6252481348b9 65638 libs optional libgnomecups1.0-1_0.2.2-2_i386.deb 8030160998ae407a0103d6143414f281 43006 libdevel optional libgnomecups1.0-dev_0.2.2-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEcvkq4VUX8isJIMARAs3tAJ9ib/F4v1YPQ/zZPb7NJfIgooSLqACfRTep
Bug#358493: tagcoll FTBFS: testsuite failures.
Hi, I don't think depending on gcc 4.1 without really understanding the issue is a good idea. There is a good chance that the bug is not really fixed, but only hidden by circumstances. So it would really be the best way to go to extract a minimal test case, see whether it's gcc's or tagcoll's fault, and then make sure it is really fixed. -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368571: marked as done (sigscheme_0.5.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: Missing build dependency)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 06:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368571: fixed in sigscheme 0.5.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: sigscheme Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0) apparently the package misses a build dependency on ruby: checking for ruby... no configure: error: please install ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/) make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=sigschemever=0.5.0-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: sigscheme Source-Version: 0.5.0-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sigscheme, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: sigscheme_0.5.0-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.5.0-2.diff.gz sigscheme_0.5.0-2.dsc to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.5.0-2.dsc sigscheme_0.5.0-2_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sigscheme/sigscheme_0.5.0-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated sigscheme package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:46:41 +0900 Source: sigscheme Binary: sigscheme Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: NIIBE Yutaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: sigscheme - A Scheme Interpreter Closes: 368571 Changes: sigscheme (0.5.0-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/control (Build-Depends): Added ruby. Thanks to Frederik Schueler. Closes: #368571 * debian/rules (clean): invoke 'distclean' instead of 'clean'. Files: 05d32d46876f243c7479f1d97d90693b 572 interpreters optional sigscheme_0.5.0-2.dsc 055b904afccb49c64dd55b2c86e3929e 3291 interpreters optional sigscheme_0.5.0-2.diff.gz 5e12ec020ced77718dd26f7ee1051f52 145752 interpreters optional sigscheme_0.5.0-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEcwjzBB45r3HV9DoRArlwAJ9Iyi6aE7zKVyMT4qpQPZYWi7dicwCeOYsZ QsJy2Em63xkif1rZ/5esA1w= =U3Yv -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#368556: Unable to reproduce
Hi, I'm unable to reproduce this on a i386 Etch. The versions of kooka and its direct dependencies are identical to yours, except for libc6 2.3.6-7, which unlikely explains the difference. Could you help doing a preliminary triaging to see if this needs immediate investigation? Does this crash reproduce for all users on the affected system? If so, on how many machines did you see it reproduce? If it didn't reproduce on several machines, what makes you think that the package is unusable? Note that a backtrace is always welcome along with a crash report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368506: x2vnc - FTBFS: cannot overwrite directory
Hi Thanks, I'll look at it asap. // Ola On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:37:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: x2vnc Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of x2vnc_1.7.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libvncauth-dev, libxaw7-dev, xutils, libx11-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxss-dev, x-dev make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/x2vnc-1.7.1' mv debian/x2vnc/usr/X11R6/bin debian/x2vnc/usr mv: cannot overwrite directory `debian/x2vnc/usr/bin' make: *** [install] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060522-1421 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Package: partman Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I burned a D-I image for a friend (the latest weekly Debian CD as of Mar 12 15:12) and chose to play with it a bit to see if it was clearly broken in some obvious way or likely okay for out purposes. Once I had verified enough that I thought the build was fine (and It did work for the install), I decided to try out the LVM option in the guided partitioning, since I had never done so before and I wanted to see what how it would arrange the partitions. The guided partitioning page clearly states that you will have a chance to review and undo the guided partitioning, and is correct for regular partitions, but LVM occurs immeditely, it seems, and even gpart was unable to restore my data. I was able to salvage the python programs I had been working on, but nothing else. Since there is almost certainly a reason LVM gets applied immeditely, most likely that cannot be changed, but I am of the opinion that the diolog where you can select it should clearly state that the operation cannot be undone and may well kill working installations. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-eriix Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368229: marked as done (anjuta: Projects cannot be opened, created or imported, plugin cannot be activated.)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 09:17:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368229: fixed in gnome-build 0.1.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: anjuta Version: 2.0.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Existing Anjuta project files created with Anjuta1 are unusable. The import wizard complains that the wrong directory is in use or that Gnome Devel Framework does not exist. This is down to a complete inability to enable the automake / Project Import plugins - presumablu because of build options in the Debian package. Anjuta is useless without being able to open projects. It cannot even USE a project Anjuta2 creates as new - the Project menu is disabled. Anjuta2 should not have replaced anjuta1 in this state. I cannot create a new project for my existing code, I cannot open the existing Anjuta project file in my source trees, I cannot import the existing sources into a Anjuta2 project. This stinks. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages anjuta depends on: ii anjuta-common 2.0.2-2 A GNOME development IDE, for C/C++ ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-01.11.4-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.14.0-2 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.0.4-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libdevhelp-1-0 0.11-4Library providing documentation br ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-5.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.2.1-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgbf-1-0 0.1.3-1 GNOME Development Framework - runt ii libgcc11:4.1.0-4 GCC support library ii libgconf2-42.14.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libgdl-1-0 0.6.1-1 GNOME DevTool libraries - developm ii libglade2-01:2.5.1-2+b1 library to load .glade files at ru ii libglib2.0-0 2.10.2-2 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.9-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-02.14.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.12.1-3 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture - ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.12.1-3 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User ii libgnomeui-0 2.14.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.14.1-2 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime ii libgtk2.0-02.8.17-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice61:1.0.0-3 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses55.5-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii liborbit2 1:2.14.0-1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.1-3 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpcre3 6.4-2 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5.1 PNG library - runtime ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libvte41:0.12.1-1Terminal emulator widget for GTK+ ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.5.2-5 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:3.0.1.2-4 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxft22.1.8.2-7 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi6 1:1.0.0-5 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml2
Bug#368570: marked as done (xdm : cannot start, looks for daemon in wrong directory)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 09:54:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#368570: xdm : cannot start, looks for daemon in wrong directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xdm Version: 1:1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade xdm does not start. /etc/init.d looks for xdm in /usr/bin/X11/xdm, but there is no xdm in this directory, it is in /usr/bin/xdm -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 4:4.0.2-2 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.0 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam-modules0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime0.79-3.1 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libselinux1 1.30-1 SELinux shared libraries ii libsm66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxau6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Authentication library ii libxaw8 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Athena widget set library ii libxdmcp6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Display Manager Control Protocol ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System multi-head display ii libxmu6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxp66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System printing extension ii libxpm4 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X pixmap library ii libxt66.9.0.dfsg.1-6 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xbase-clients 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 miscellaneous X clients xdm recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1:1.0.4-1 On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:48:17AM +0200, Erwan David wrote: Package: xdm Version: 1:1.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrade xdm does not start. /etc/init.d looks for xdm in /usr/bin/X11/xdm, but there is no xdm in this directory, it is in /usr/bin/xdm Already fixed in the version of xdm in unstable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS Release version does not match the current version
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:52:53AM -0500, Norbert Tretkowski wrote: * Martin Michlmayr wrote: kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable. Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch. Well, as the alpha kernel maintainer you're free to request removal of the 2.4 kernel packages any time you think it's ready. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 368362
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 368362 + patch Bug#368362: xmoto: breaks at startup There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366965: marked as done (FTBFS on powerpc: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 07:47:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366965: fixed in vlc 0.8.5.debian-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: vlc Version: 0.8.5-test3.debian-3 Severity: serious After putting in the Altivec casting patch you're now getting a different error: Automatic build of vlc_0.8.5-test3.debian-3 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by sbuild/powerpc 0.44 ... gcc -Wall -I. -O4 -ffast-math -D__X264__ -DHAVE_MALLOC_H -maltivec -mabi=altivec -DARCH_PPC -DSYS_LINUX -s -fomit-frame-pointer -c -o common/ppc/pixel.o common/ppc/pixel.c common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x4_16x16_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:707: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:708: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:709: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:710: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:717: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:718: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:719: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:720: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x3_16x16_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:817: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:818: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:819: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:825: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:826: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:827: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x4_16x8_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:937: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:938: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:939: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:940: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:947: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:948: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:949: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:950: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x3_16x8_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:1047: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1048: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1049: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1055: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1056: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1057: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x4_8x16_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:1168: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1169: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1170: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1171: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1178: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1179: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1180: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1181: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c: In function 'pixel_sad_x3_8x16_altivec': common/ppc/pixel.c:1278: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1279: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1280: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1286: error: invalid parameter combination for AltiVec intrinsic common/ppc/pixel.c:1287: error: invalid parameter combination
Bug#367986: Acknowledgement (sylpheed-gtk1: ..moving mail between folders within Sg1-1.0.6, crashes X.)
On Sun, 21 May 2006 19:34:16 -0700, Steve wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 03:32:14AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 21 May 2006 17:55:12 -0700, Steve wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Any crash in X is not itself a bug in sylpheed-gtk1 either, *unless* sylpheed-gtk1 is allocating an excess of server-side memory and triggering the kernel's OOM killer, which doesn't seem likely. ..ok, how do I help you find out? Running it locally, has it crash X a lot, and get X get sluggish and I see loads around 2 to 6. Running it over ssh, I see nice low loads, around 0.05-0.15. The xrestop program from the package of the same name should tell you whether this is a case of large amounts of memory (or increasing amounts of memory) are being eaten on the server by sylpheed. ..ideas on how to make xrestop survive to capture crash data? I ssh -X it, and xrestop crashes too, and the ssh link is trashed and needs resetting. Neither xrestop nor sylpheed-gtk1 reports its pid to it, and I get at least 6 unknown's showing up. xrestop - Display: 192.168.1.33:0.0 Monitoring 23 clients. XErrors: 42 Pixmaps: 47115K total, Other: 109K total, All: 47225K total res-base Wins GCs Fnts Pxms Misc Pxm mem Other Total PID Identifier 18035 121 23 8324602K 4K 24606K 1261 KDE Desktop 1a0 130 290 206 14519654K 7K 19661K 1285 kicker 260 2141 223 173 90 2204K 55K 2260K 1348 Error while loading http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=ie= 16069 180 118 335 271K 9K281K 1245 kwin 1c0 131 766 79 19 129K 11K140K ? c2i.net - Sylpheed version 1.0.6 22080 253 56 89 121K 7K128K 1340 a20 - Konsole 0a020411 25 44K 2K 46K 1218 kded 2a0 27770 45 10 31K 6K 38K 1351 KMix 1e01040 27 5 15K456B 15K 1302 kbluetoothd 100 780 18 21 12K864B 12K 1226 KDE Keyboard Tool 200 6 70 129 11K528B 11K 1303 KOrganizer Reminder Daemon 2c0 660998K504B 9K 1358 Resize and Rotate 060 760997K528B 8K 1357 Keyboard Switch 040 011000B 1K 1K ? unknown 0c0 31004 0B192B192B 1232 kaccess 300 21004 0B168B168B 1728 knotify 240 21004 0B168B168B 1344 konqueror 140 21004 0B168B168B 1241 ksmserver 2e0 1100 00B 48B 48B ? xrestop 120 1100 00B 48B 48B ? unknown 080 110 000B 48B 48B ? unknown 0e0 010 000B 24B 24B ? unknown 020 01 0000B 24B 24B ? unknown ..sylpheed-gtk1 running locally is waay more sluggish than 140kB warrants. Running remotely, it's quick 'n snappy. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368362: xmoto: breaks at startup
On 5/22/06, Rasmus Neckelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/21/06, Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The new level caching system causes xmoto to break for the second time its run. Some people report that the patch I've attached fixes the problem. I can't verify it myself, so please excuse me if it still won't work. :) -- Regards, Rasmus Neckelmann LevelSrc-amd64fix.patch Description: Binary data
Bug#368645: CVE-2006-2313, CVE-2006-2314: encoding conflicts
Package: postgresql Version: 7.4.7-6sarge1 Tags: security Severity: grave A couple of PostgreSQL issues have been disclosed today: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.52 My analysis so far: * CVE-2006-2313 High impact (because UTF-8 is affected and widely used). Fix is straightforward as far as UTF-8 is concerned, but will break some applications which write certain forms of invalid UTF-8 to the database. If necessary, a dump and reload to switch to SQL_ASCII on the server side will fix this. However, PostgreSQL already rejects some forms of invalid UTF-8. Therefore, a change I don't know the impact on other multibyte encodings; it's probably necessary to ask upstream. * CVE-2006-2314 This is the really interesting one. It's restricted to certain multi-byte encodings (that's why I think this bug is less severe, all things considered). No real fix is possible as long as we preserve the interface. The upstream fix outlawing \' breaks tons of legacy PHP applications, but I have no better idea how to address it. 8-( On the libpq side, I'd use static __thread instead of static for the globals. That way, we gain at least some thread safety. (Unless someone objects, I'm going to clone this for the various PostgreSQL packages.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 368229 to gnome-build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 reassign 368229 gnome-build Bug#368229: anjuta: Projects cannot be opened, created or imported, plugin cannot be activated. Bug reassigned from package `anjuta' to `gnome-build'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364920: /etc/reader.conf.d/libetoken is wrong (DEVICENAME incorrect)
Le Monday 22 May 2006 à 00:49:24, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña a écrit: On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:41:58PM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote: It is removed by postinst now. You could remove the removal and the call to /usr/sbin/update-reader.conf once Debian Etch is out. I also modified the Info.plist file. - Only the first reader was used by pcscd because only one ifdFriendlyName was present. - The file was not valid. I added the DTD URL and corrected an array in /array. You can check the validity using xmllint --valid --noout Info.plist I actually sent a fixed version yesterday to 1-DELAYED. That is going to overwrite your NMU. Please file separate bugs for the other issues. Why do you want a new bug report? - you now know the bug - you have the patch -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Normaliser Unix c'est comme pasteuriser le camembert, L.R. --
Bug#366275: xbase-clients: Missing build dependency
reopen 366275 retitle 366275 don't take b-d recommendations from random submitters without checking them! submitter 366275 ! severity 366275 important quit * Add xprint-utils to build-depends. Thanks anonymous someone. (closes: #366275) This was a wrong fix. The xprint-utils package does not contain any .pc files, so it cannot possibly be relevant for the build failure shown; and xprint-utils is not yet built on all architectures, which means that this build-dep is now causing xbase-clients to FTBFS on release architectures where it previously had no such problem. The proper package to build-depend on is libxprintutil-dev. The xprint-utils package you now build-depend on does *not* pull in libxprintutil-dev as a dependency, which means the status of xbase-clients wrt xprintutils.pc has *not* changed. Since both xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-1 and 1:7.0.1-2 built fine on the autobuilders (build-depends allowing!), this bug does not exist, and the original submitter, in addition to having stupidly misconfigured his email, has also stupidly misconfigured his build environment. Don't commit random and untested changes to debian/control on the say-so of anonymous bug-submitting idiots! The proper fix here is to pass --disable-xprint to the configure script for xbdebizzy, so that the package neither fails to build nor builds with different dependencies in the presence of libxp-dev. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368468: fix pending
tags 368468 pending tags 363059 pending quit Hi Holmgren, both bugs are fixed in the upcoming version, which is waiting for my (usally very fast) sponsor. Meanwhile you can have a look at the package at: http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/ Best regards, Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351693: status of #351693?
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those is the culprit. Unfortunately, the only way I know of to reproduce this problem is to upload a new package for the autobuilders, which isn't a particularly friendly debugging process. guile-1.6 has pleasantly trivial build-dependencies, so you ought to be able to do a test build of 1.6.8 in merulo's unstable chroot without even needing to contact debian-admin. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd frankie 14797 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd start Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd root 14804 1 0 12:27 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/nscd frankie 14812 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: nscd 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 30 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/136kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done Reading changelogs... Done (Reading database ... 164331 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nscd 2.3.6-7 (using .../archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb) ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) If the init script fails to stop the daemon, it is *correct* to fail the upgrade as well. We should not leave old versions of daemons silently running after upgrade, this is a potential security hole. The real question here is why the init script is failing to stop nscd on your system. This may or may not warrant an RC severity; probably not, since it hasn't been reported before now. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368556: Unable to reproduce
Thanks for your prompt reply. I'm eager to help, even if limited to working with the laptop I'm writing you even now -a PowerPC iBook G4 by the way, maybe this can better define the problem. I' ve been doing a few attempt at the issue. I can reproduce it consistently with the submitted configuration, but only under my default user, and even then just when kooka is started with the usb cable already connected and the scanner on (a Hewlett-Packard PSC1110 all-in-one printer, working fine under cups and xscanimage for example). Thus I marked the bug as preventing the package usage. A newly created, empty user is able to launch the program without problems, under the same conditions; I think therefore the cause could be some config validation issue reading files from ./kde, I' ll investigate this as soon as I'll have gdb installed. For now I'm attaching just a strace log. The KDE crash handler report is The application Kooka (kooka) crashed and caused the signal 6 (SIGABRT) So long for now; thank you, -- alberto On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:11:51AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi, I'm unable to reproduce this on a i386 Etch. The versions of kooka and its direct dependencies are identical to yours, except for libc6 2.3.6-7, which unlikely explains the difference. Could you help doing a preliminary triaging to see if this needs immediate investigation? Does this crash reproduce for all users on the affected system? If so, on how many machines did you see it reproduce? If it didn't reproduce on several machines, what makes you think that the package is unusable? Note that a backtrace is always welcome along with a crash report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351693: status of #351693?
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Rob Browning wrote: At this point, my best guess is that this may be a bug in 1.6.7 that has been fixed in 1.6.8. I believe a number of GC and syntax related bugs have been fixed since 1.6.7, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of those is the culprit. Unfortunately, the only way I know of to reproduce this problem is to upload a new package for the autobuilders, which isn't a particularly friendly debugging process. guile-1.6 has pleasantly trivial build-dependencies, so you ought to be able to do a test build of 1.6.8 in merulo's unstable chroot without even needing to contact debian-admin. As is mentioned in the bug log, test builds in merulo's unstable chroot work fine. The bug does not manifest itself under such conditions, and is seen only in the buildd environment. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368645: CVE-2006-2313, CVE-2006-2314: encoding conflicts
Florian Weimer wrote: (Unless someone objects, I'm going to clone this for the various PostgreSQL packages.) Packages are already being uploaded, so don't waste everyone's time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Tags 368633 moreinfo Stop On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:14:55AM -0700, Eric Monson wrote: Package: partman Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I burned a D-I image for a friend (the latest weekly Debian CD as of Mar Please confirm that you mean 'MaY' (and not 'MaRch') 12 15:12) and chose to play with it a bit to see if it was clearly broken in some obvious way or likely okay for out purposes. Once I had verified enough that I thought the build was fine (and It did work for the install), I decided to try out the LVM option in the guided partitioning, since I had never done so before and I wanted to see what how it would arrange the partitions. The guided partitioning page clearly states that you will have a chance to review and undo the guided partitioning, and is correct for regular partitions, but LVM occurs immeditely, Hmmm... it seems, and even gpart was unable to restore my data. I was able to salvage the python programs I had been working on, but nothing else. Since there is almost certainly a reason LVM gets applied immeditely, Mmm again immeditely most likely that cannot be changed, but I am of the opinion that the diolog where you can select it should clearly state that the operation cannot be undone and may well kill working installations. Please tell us more about what you did. My default is to take the complain serious. But I make the addition that if have my doubts about it, so please tell how to reproduce the problem. (right now is the original poster the one with the problem, when he can convince other that the problem concerns others then it more likely he will get help with his problem) Cheers Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368531: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#368531: Debian Xen kernel-image?
On 5/23/06, Stephane Bortzmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is one? I do not find it in either etch or sid (or on Alioth). Do I have to recompile a kernel? $ aptitude search '~nlinux-image.*xen.*' p linux-image-2.6-xen-686 - Linux kernel 2.6 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/ p linux-image-2.6-xen-k7 - Linux kernel 2.6 image on AMD K7 machines p linux-image-2.6-xen-vserver-686 - Linux kernel 2.6 image on PPro/Celeron/PII/ p linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-686 - Linux kernel 2.6.16 image on PPro/Celeron/P p linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-k7 - Linux kernel 2.6.16 image on AMD K7 machine p linux-image-2.6.16-1-xen-vserver - Linux kernel 2.6.16 image on PPro/Celeron/P p linux-image-xen-686 - Linux kernel image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII p linux-image-xen-k7 - Linux kernel image on AMD K7 machines p linux-image-xen-vserver-686 - Linux kernel image on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII Regards, Torsten -- http://www.twerner42.de/
Processed: Re: Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tags 368633 moreinfo Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo Stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:16:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd frankie 14797 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd start Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ ps -fe|grep nscd root 14804 1 0 12:27 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/nscd frankie 14812 4397 0 12:27 pts/17 00:00:00 grep nscd klecker:~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: nscd 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 30 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/136kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... Done Reading changelogs... Done (Reading database ... 164331 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace nscd 2.3.6-7 (using .../archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb) ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/nscd_2.3.6-9_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) If the init script fails to stop the daemon, it is *correct* to fail the upgrade as well. We should not leave old versions of daemons silently running after upgrade, this is a potential security hole. The real question here is why the init script is failing to stop nscd on your system. This may or may not warrant an RC severity; probably not, since it hasn't been reported before now. Sorry, but my point is another: klecker:~$ pgrep start klecker:~$ pgrep nscd 26316 klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ pgrep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ echo $? 1 This is incorrect. If the admin stops the daemon for his own reasons, the upgrade fails as well. Incidentally I think the program has also some random issue with stopping (and eventually starting) the daemon (see #362092 and others). -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: [electricsheep #365110] bug closed in 2.6.6-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 365110 + moreinfo Bug#365110: electricsheep: 2.6.5-1 fails to start in etch There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo tags 365110 + unreproducible Bug#365110: electricsheep: 2.6.5-1 fails to start in etch Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365110: [electricsheep #365110] bug closed in 2.6.6-1
tags 365110 + moreinfo tags 365110 + unreproducible thanks Hello, sorry for being so long to answer that report, I really had a lot to do in real life recently... I just installed a fresh new etch system (in a vserver) and installed xscreensaver and electricsheep. I'm surprised, I cannot reproduce that bug. Everything goes fine on my etch system. Anyway, I know that 2.6.5 (the version in etch) is affected by an upstream bug about memory handling, which has been closed in version 2.6.6. I installed 2.6.6-1 (the package is going to be uploaded soon, hopefully) and checked that evrything is ok on etch with this version. So I suppose that the bug your are experiencing will disappear with 2.6.6-1. I welcome a report though, if you can grab the source package from my repo, build it on your etch system and then test it: deb-src http://www.sukria.net/debian ./ apt-get source electricsheep cd electricsheep-2.6.6 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot Thanks for your report. Regards, Alexis. -- Alexis Sukrieh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0x1EE5DD34 Debian http://www.debian.org Backup Manager http://www.backup-manager.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#358493: tagcoll FTBFS: testsuite failures.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:52:03PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote: I don't think depending on gcc 4.1 without really understanding the issue is a good idea. There is a good chance that the bug is not really fixed, but only hidden by circumstances. So it would really be the best way to go to extract a minimal test case, see whether it's gcc's or tagcoll's fault, and then make sure it is really fixed. Yes, but I don't have neither the time nor the motivation to do it. This is how I see it: - The problem only happens on Alpha while it all works fine on other architectures. - The problem only happens with optimizations turned on, while it all works fine with -O0, also on Alpha. - It takes at least half an hour to build libtagcoll on escher. - I've been working hard on a libtagcoll rewrite, which I'll soon upload to experimental. I would prefer to invest my time in getting the new code into shape, rewriting the central database and trying to streamline tag submission reviews. If you however would like to investigate, the code is still in the sid dchroot on escher, in the directory ~enrico. Let me know if you intend to work on it, so that I won't delete the compilation efforts on escher. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:22:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Sorry, but my point is another: klecker:~$ pgrep start klecker:~$ pgrep nscd 26316 klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ pgrep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ echo $? 1 Ah -- that wasn't supported by the transcript you posted, which showed you explicitly starting the nscd daemon prior to running the upgrade. Yes, if nscd is not running, the /etc/init.d/nscd stop command must not fail. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#368556: Unable to reproduce
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 368556 crashes with SIGABRT on startup with a certain configuration Bug#368556: kooka: Crash on startup Changed Bug title. severity 368556 important Bug#368556: crashes with SIGABRT on startup with a certain configuration Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368556: Unable to reproduce
retitle 368556 crashes with SIGABRT on startup with a certain configuration severity 368556 important thanks Thanks for the additional information. I'm downgrading to important since this doesn't seem to affect several machines. If other people experience this bug, please report. Alberto, is unplugging the cable/turning the scanner off before kooka startup a complete workaround, which lets you use kooka for scanning even with this user? Until you can identify which configuration is problematic, please report if you're able to reproduce this issue with a second user -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365465: marked as done (gaphor: contains zope files already in python2.4-zopeinterface)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 14:17:15 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#365465: fixed in gaphor 0.8.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gaphor Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: serious Gaphor is uninstallable because it contains the following files already in python2.4-zopeinterface without any Replaces: - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/__init__.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/__init__.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/_flatten.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/adapter.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/advice.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/declarations.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/document.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/exceptions.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/interface.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/interfaces.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/ro.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/verify.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/common/__init__.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/common/idatetime.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/common/interfaces.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/common/mapping.py - /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/zope/interface/common/sequence.py Regards. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgpQo02JzGr7d.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gaphor Source-Version: 0.8.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gaphor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gaphor_0.8.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-2.diff.gz gaphor_0.8.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-2.dsc gaphor_0.8.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gaphor/gaphor_0.8.1-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gaphor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 10:08:20 +0200 Source: gaphor Binary: gaphor Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Cédric Delfosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: gaphor - UML modeling tool Closes: 365465 Changes: gaphor (0.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Don't include zope interface stuff in the package, and add to Depends python2.4-zopeinterface (Closes: Bug#365465) * Standard-Version to 3.7.2 Files: a6c4176987928ea6a2041ca1c792c074 732 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-2.dsc 8032fc8ca9c8353ef1d9892ee26dcd4a 6730 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-2.diff.gz fe20efcfb9a809625ea2fc8f883b5a43 280992 devel optional gaphor_0.8.1-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEc21YbmmXPPfovGMRAi0wAJ4sGD6OMzX3y6inIptCrLlRENvdqgCgzFCA P6owytzeYLgRaxPNfjvDw/U= =qwXQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#368587: invoke-rc.d: initscript nscd, action stop failed.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:05:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:22:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: Sorry, but my point is another: klecker:~$ pgrep start klecker:~$ pgrep nscd 26316 klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ pgrep nscd klecker:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/nscd stop Stopping Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd. klecker:~$ echo $? 1 Ah -- that wasn't supported by the transcript you posted, which showed you explicitly starting the nscd daemon prior to running the upgrade. Yes, if nscd is not running, the /etc/init.d/nscd stop command must not fail. Just for note, the failure in stopping nscd in the previous transcript should be due to a persistent cache corruption, see #336310. The daemon dies on assert just after starting, or so... -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fix pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 368468 pending Bug#368468: FTBFS: Forgot to touch patch-stamp? Tags were: patch Tags added: pending tags 363059 pending Bug#363059: crystalcursors: Fails to install, missing dir to create alternatives. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: xbase-clients: Missing build dependency
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 366275 Bug#366275: xbase-clients: Missing build dependency 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. retitle 366275 don't take b-d recommendations from random submitters without checking them! Bug#366275: xbase-clients: Missing build dependency Changed Bug title. submitter 366275 ! Bug#366275: don't take b-d recommendations from random submitters without checking them! Changed Bug submitter from Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]. severity 366275 important Bug#366275: don't take b-d recommendations from random submitters without checking them! Severity set to `important' from `serious' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hello, % apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686 The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not installable E: Broken packages Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Ferns will rule the world. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 368327, tagging 368451, tagging 368540
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 368327 pending Bug#368327: udev won't install, no error message There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 368451 pending Bug#368451: udev: Syntax error reported There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 368540 pending Bug#368540: udev: breaks booting with an initramfs image on Thinkpad T43 that needs special scsi/sata modules There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362757: marked as done (Don't migrate to testing)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 15:32:24 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#362757: fixed in xaralx 0.5r1184-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xaralx Version: 0.4r804-1 Severity: serious XaraLX is not yet usable, and until it is so, it should stay out of the testing distribution. This bug will be closed when saving and printing etc. works and the program can be considered stable. Maybe I won't close it before the pure GPL release, though. Greetings, Joachim -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.otto Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xaralx depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libfreetype62.1.10-3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-1GCC support library ii libglib2.0-02.10.2-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-0 2.8.16-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libjpeg62 6b-12The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5.1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libwxgtk2.6-0 2.6.1.2-0.1 wxWidgets Cross-platform C++ GUI t xaralx recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: xaralx Source-Version: 0.5r1184-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xaralx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xaralx_0.5r1184-1.diff.gz to pool/non-free/x/xaralx/xaralx_0.5r1184-1.diff.gz xaralx_0.5r1184-1.dsc to pool/non-free/x/xaralx/xaralx_0.5r1184-1.dsc xaralx_0.5r1184-1_i386.deb to pool/non-free/x/xaralx/xaralx_0.5r1184-1_i386.deb xaralx_0.5r1184.orig.tar.gz to pool/non-free/x/xaralx/xaralx_0.5r1184.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xaralx package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:38:56 +0200 Source: xaralx Binary: xaralx Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.5r1184-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: xaralx - versatile vector graphic program Closes: 362757 Changes: xaralx (0.5r1184-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Useful now, can migrate to testing (Closes: #362757) * xpm file now shipped by upstream, dropping imagemagick dependency Files: 031b63246c1605bda4ebffce500f3a4c 835 non-free/graphics optional xaralx_0.5r1184-1.dsc 0fec41f91ea032b0beca6063f46065cb 26070008 non-free/graphics optional xaralx_0.5r1184.orig.tar.gz f5eb7aee9f9e2b53740194b9c4c4a71c 1061376 non-free/graphics optional xaralx_0.5r1184-1.diff.gz f24baeec96361abc333ecc7d768dcccb 8633698 non-free/graphics optional xaralx_0.5r1184-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBRHOJcb8Zfhn2SkeXAQJtiQP/T5gJHbJ7W3RcftvrN9kyIy2KryVfSpi8 OOlaEHR+lUlgOcdV6Ohdk2R5X5eOUylpoQq2r+nwaWuAiVF5SDLSVs3OhV010whx /L0KIiyTMC3oWJIcq0yWlSu0b+Idph0eSjHWuwvEMCRJkmX7ndPoN/10qWTjeHvB LTI+/wqDiDE= =RaqZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: anjuta Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. notfound 353057 2.0.2-2 Bug#353057: anjuta: crashes on startup with a SIGSEGV Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.2-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#367954: FTBFS: syntax error near unexpected token `else'
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote: checking whether strerror_r is declared... yes checking for a glibc strerror_r API... yes ../../configure: line 29513: syntax error near unexpected token `else' ../../configure: line 29513: `else' Funnily enough, this bug has been around for quite some time but it seems unstable has a sensitive bash version or something. I could cure the problem with this (silly) patch: diff -u -r1.194 -r1.195 --- configure.ac11 May 2006 21:37:58 - 1.194 +++ configure.ac23 May 2006 22:55:46 - 1.195 @@ -1412,7 +1412,8 @@ AC_MSG_RESULT(no) , dnl not invoked when crosscompiling) -]) + echo hej +) fi else dnl and for crosscompilings -- -=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.haxx.se -=- ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([s\x]\)\([\xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365110: [electricsheep #365110] bug closed in 2.6.6-1
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: I just installed a fresh new etch system (in a vserver) and installed xscreensaver and electricsheep. I'm surprised, I cannot reproduce that bug. Everything goes fine on my etch system. Anyway, I know that 2.6.5 (the version in etch) is affected by an upstream bug about memory handling, which has been closed in version 2.6.6. That's probably it. I'm running a mixed etch/sid system with kernel 2.6.16 from unstable. Thanks! Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#368585: glibc-doc: conflict with manpages-dev package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 368585 serious Bug#368585: glibc-doc: conflict with manpages-dev package Severity set to `serious' from `normal' reassign 368585 manpages-dev Bug#368585: glibc-doc: conflict with manpages-dev package Bug reassigned from package `glibc-doc' to `manpages-dev'. merge 365547 368585 Bug#365547: manpages-dev uninstallable because of conflicting file sem_destroy.3.gz from glibc-doc Bug#368585: glibc-doc: conflict with manpages-dev package Bug#368155: manpages-dev: conflicts with glibc-doc Bug#368160: manpages-dev: conflicts with glibc-doc Bug#368281: manpages-dev: conflicts with glibc-doc Bug#368429: Error processing manpages-dev when upgrading Merged 365547 368155 368160 368281 368429 368585. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368645: CVE-2006-2313, CVE-2006-2314: encoding conflicts
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Florian Weimer wrote: (Unless someone objects, I'm going to clone this for the various PostgreSQL packages.) Packages are already being uploaded, so don't waste everyone's time. Correction: packages have already been uploaded, so we only need to wait for the security team's approval of the stable upload. (Yes, there is a secret club that coordinates these things before the publication of the security issue.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366563: marked as done (Kspread losses data)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 19:31:55 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Should be fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: kspread Version: 1:1.5.0-1+b1 Severity: serious I'm working a small file in Kspread and suddently I noted that it doesn't save all the workshet (only some numbers). This happens when you save data in OASIS formate (KSpread default). In Kspread format (ksp) this problem don't happen. I attached a small example. Try to replicate that problem. Waldo teste.ksp Description: application/kspread ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1:1.5.1-1 This should have been fixed by 1.5.1's upload. Please reopen if you can reproduce. ---End Message---
Bug#368229: There is no existing pre-compiled i386 downgrade
Hi, I really gave anjuta2 a try, even rebuilt gnome-build from source, etc., but in the end, I just don't want to use Anjuta2 until it has at least some basic Project functionality. Problem is, I found no pre-compiled way to downgrade back to my last working version. Seems the current Testing debs in all the mirrors are actually from the non-functional anjuta_1.2.4-1+b1_i386.deb batch, and stable's anjuta_1.2.2-9_i386.deb doesn't work either. I remembered last January when both first went sour, and the precompiled solution was ultimately provided by anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb . Problem: that deb isn't available on any debian mirrors, only the source and patch. Not being in the mood to go through recompiling that again, I just did an FTP search and found exactly one existant copy of anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb -- on an Ubuntu site, ironically enough. Probably is the debian one, certainly works enough to allow me to program again: ftp://140.113.168.127/distributions/ubuntu/package/pool/universe/a/anjuta/anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb I think the guy that said split Anjuta1 and Anjuta2 was right -- to offer both through apt-get would allow people with gigantic Projects that are left dead-in-the-water with Anjuta2 to keep working, and encourage them to try to start new projects with Anjuta2. When Debian's Anjuta2 can actually handle projects, I mean. Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368531: Debian Xen kernel-image?
Could you please try with a Debian kernel image There is one? I do not find it in either etch or sid (or on Alioth). Do I have to recompile a kernel? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#349283: marked as done (tor: Tor security advisory: hidden services can be located quickly)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 14:17:25 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349283: fixed in tor 0.1.1.20-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tor Version: 0.1.0.16-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Source: http://archives.seul.org/or/announce/Jan-2006/msg1.html Basically an attacker who can run a fast Tor server can find the location of a hidden service in a matter of hours, possibly even minutes. This is fixed in 0.1.1.12-alpha, but as this is an alpha release it may contain other bugs. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0s8gqlk5sZw9W7kRArprAKCk6rq93AwexRo3Mnp3ovaPztZTugCfRdZM noaYhcZw50wxwg4MiKZn5H4= =RRVR -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: tor Source-Version: 0.1.1.20-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tor, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tor-dbg_0.1.1.20-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tor/tor-dbg_0.1.1.20-1_i386.deb tor_0.1.1.20-1.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tor/tor_0.1.1.20-1.diff.gz tor_0.1.1.20-1.dsc to pool/main/t/tor/tor_0.1.1.20-1.dsc tor_0.1.1.20-1_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tor/tor_0.1.1.20-1_i386.deb tor_0.1.1.20.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tor/tor_0.1.1.20.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tor package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:16:25 +0200 Source: tor Binary: tor-dbg tor Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.1.20-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tor- anonymizing overlay network for TCP tor-dbg- debugging symbols for Tor Closes: 338797 349283 Changes: tor (0.1.1.20-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream stable release: The 0.1.1.x tree is now the new stable tree. Upload to unstable rather than experimental. . tor (0.1.1.19-rc-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Remove support for my nodoc DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS variable. It clutters stuff and I haven't used it in ages. * Update debian/tor.docs file. . tor (0.1.1.18-rc-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * update debian/tor.doc: - no longer ship INSTALL and README files, they are useless now. - doc/stylesheet.css, doc/tor-doc-server.html, doc/tor-doc-unix.html, doc/tor-hidden-service.html, doc/tor-switchproxy.html got replaced by doc/website/stylesheet.css and doc/website/tor-* which is more or less the same, only taken from the website. Some links are probably broken still, but this should get fixed eventually. . tor (0.1.1.17-rc-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Forward port patches/07_log_to_file_by_default. . tor (0.1.1.16-rc-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. . tor (0.1.1.15-rc-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Apparently passing --host to configure when not cross-compiling is evil now and greatly confuses configure. So don't do it unless it actually differs from --build host. . tor (0.1.1.14-alpha-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Include 0.1.0.17 changelog in experimental tree. * doc/FAQ is no longer shipped, so remove it from debian/tor.docs. . tor (0.1.1.13-alpha-1) experimental; urgency=low . * New upstream version. * Forward port patches/02_add_debian_files_in_manpage. * Forward port patches/03_tor_manpage_in_section_8. * Create /var/run/tor on init script start if
Bug#367316: nvidia-glx: Works for me, though different OpenGL version string
Hi, Ted. Thanks for the reply. I uninstalled everything, and then re-installed nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel-2.6.16-1-k7. They are now versions 1.0.8756-4 and 1.0.8756+1 respectively. I didn't compile these myself. The glxinfo and glxgears output is the same. Any ideas? Sorry for the late reply, I didn't receive the email, I had to look at the web frontend. Thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368362: xmoto: breaks at startup
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 07:26:26PM +0200, Rasmus Neckelmann wrote: Some people report that the patch I've attached fixes the problem. I can't verify it myself, so please excuse me if it still won't work. :) Hi, I got the same error on ppc, and after having rebuilt the package with your patch, and deleted ~/.xmoto/LCache, all is working as before. (In the meanwhile, the workaround about disabling cache was working too.) Thanks, -- Cyril Brulebois signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#368681: cvs: does not flag conflicted copies anymore
Package: cvs Version: 1:1.12.13-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable CVS now cannot detect conflicted merges (C state) anymore, which is bound to cause all sort of broken commits if people doesn't notice it in time. I didn't actually *try* to commit a file with merge conflicts, but cvs update and cvs status both fail to detect the file is full of , and hunks... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.17-debian13+bluesmoke+lm85 Locale: LANG=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages cvs depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.1 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libpam-runtime0.79-3.1 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.79-3.1 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages cvs recommends: ii info [info-browser] 4.8.dfsg.1-1 Standalone GNU Info documentation ii konqueror [info-browser]4:3.5.2-2+b1 KDE's advanced file manager, web b ii netbase 4.25 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii pinfo [info-browser]0.6.9-2 An alternative info-file viewer ii xemacs21-mule [info-browser 21.4.19-1highly customizable text editor -- -- debconf information excluded -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368289: Bug#364629: NMU broke configure script in s390 buildd
ma, 2006-05-22 kello 18:37 -0500, Gunnar Wolf kirjoitti: Thanks for taking care of my poor little package... I'm sure you understand why I haven't looked at it much lately :-( Anyway, it seems the patch you NMUed created some problems - As I'm still stuck with Debconf for a bit, and then have to catch up with at least one month of job I put away, could you take a dive into this again? Yeah, I noticed that. I have no idea what the problem is -- I did build the package with pbuilder before I uploaded it, so it should build cleanly. Unfortunately, I'm travelling for another couple of weeks, so I won't be able to work on this. Hopefully someone else notices the problem and has time to fix things. My apologizes for messing things up. -- There's a reason why release manager is abbreviated rm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368633: partman: LVM automatic partitioning not undoable
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:54 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: Please confirm that you mean 'MaY' (and not 'MaRch') Sorry. Timestamp from the wrong iso. May 14 16:24 is the timestamp from the one in question. Please tell us more about what you did. I played around some in the disc, but the important step for reproduction is simply to choose the LVM option in the guided partitioning -- Erase entire disk and use LVM -- and you will be left with, IIRC, /boot and an LVM partition (activated) that has some drives in it. The point is that it has already committed the changed partition table and saved the LVM data into the space left for LVM. Feel free to try it, but I would advise doing so only on an emulated disc or on a drive that has nothing important (or you have a backup of). (Semi-)Detailed Walkthrough (I'm going along in qemu as I write this): 1: Get to partman (how you get there should be irrelevant) 2: In the guided partitioning, choose Erase entire disk and use LVM 3: Choose any of the partitioning schemes presented (I used seperate home on my laptop, and have now confirmed all in one partition under qemu -- I'm sure the many filesystem option will be similar) 4: Choose whatever name you want for the Volume Group 4a: Partition table is thrashed and LVM partition is activated and set up (data being written even outside the partition table) 5: You can now confirm using fdisk that the partition table has been changed to the new, LVM-equipped one. Since the LVM partition was activated and the VG set up, data in the partition(s) that were where it now is may no longer exist. My default is to take the complain serious. But I make the addition that if have my doubts about it, so please tell how to reproduce the problem. Done, but do be careful if you wish to follow the walkthrough. (right now is the original poster the one with the problem, when he can convince other that the problem concerns others then it more likely he will get help with his problem) Actually, my problem is done and gone. I lost almost everything on my laptop due primarilly to my own inattention. I knew that LVM setup in partman proper requires saving the partition table and should have realized from this that the guided partitioning would have to play by the same rules. I just don't want anyone else in this situation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#340960: marked as done (--delete-input-file ate my data)
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 21:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#340960: fixed in flac 1.1.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: flac Severity: grave $ flac --delete-input-file -V --best 1_orig.wav [...] 1_orig.wav: 46% complete, ratio=0.3691_orig.wav: WARNING: unexpected EOF; expected 536869888 samples, got 246564864 samples 1_orig.wav: 46% complete, ratio=0.369 After this, 1_orig.wav was deleted. The resulting file 1_orig.flac *appears* to be ok, but I have no way to verify it since the old file 1_orig.wav is gone. The docs say --delete-input-file doesn't cause deletion of input file when an error occurs. I would say that unexpected EOF is indeed an error, even though it's only marked as warning. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: flac Source-Version: 1.1.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of flac, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: flac_1.1.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/f/flac/flac_1.1.2-4.diff.gz flac_1.1.2-4.dsc to pool/main/f/flac/flac_1.1.2-4.dsc flac_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/flac_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb libflac++-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/libflac++-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb libflac++5_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/libflac++5_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb libflac-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/libflac-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb libflac-doc_1.1.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/f/flac/libflac-doc_1.1.2-4_all.deb libflac7_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/libflac7_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb liboggflac++-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/liboggflac++-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb liboggflac++2_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/liboggflac++2_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb liboggflac-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/liboggflac-dev_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb liboggflac3_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/liboggflac3_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb xmms-flac_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb to pool/main/f/flac/xmms-flac_1.1.2-4_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated flac package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 21:17:41 -0700 Source: flac Binary: libflac7 libflac++-dev libflac-doc liboggflac-dev liboggflac3 libflac-dev libflac++5 xmms-flac liboggflac++-dev liboggflac++2 flac Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 1.1.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: flac - Free Lossless Audio Codec - command line tools libflac++-dev - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ development library libflac++5 - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ runtime library libflac-dev - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C development library libflac-doc - Free Lossless Audio Codec - library documentation libflac7 - Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime C library liboggflac++-dev - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ development library (ogg) liboggflac++2 - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C++ runtime library (ogg) liboggflac-dev - Free Lossless Audio Codec - C development library (ogg) liboggflac3 - Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtime C library (ogg) xmms-flac - Free Lossless Audio Codec - XMMS and Beep input plugin Closes: 327108 340960 356788 Changes: flac (1.1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Acknowledge NMU, now that it's snugly in testing. closes: #340960 * Fix the watch file. * Make symlinks for /usr/lib/bmp in xmms-flac to 'provide' bmp-flac, since input plugins between the two players are interchangeable. closes: #327108, #356788 * Bump Standards-Version. * Fix a goof in the rules that prevented ldconfig from happening in the postinst of all
Processed: Merge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 368667 grave Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Severity set to `grave' from `serious' tags 368667 - experimental Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Tags were: experimental Tags removed: experimental reassign 368667 linux-2.6 Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686' to `linux-2.6'. reassign 368544 linux-2.6 Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8' to `linux-2.6'. merge 368667 368544 Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Merged 368544 368667. found 368544 2.6.16+2.6.17-rc3-0experimental.1 Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 Bug marked as found in version 2.6.16+2.6.17-rc3-0experimental.1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368310: upstream; to be fixed in 4.2.1
Hi, Just to note: a new upstream version 4.2.1 is at release candidate status. I have alerted upstream about this problem and expect that it will be addressed in the next upstream release. I'll leave it until then. -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
