Bug#369722: marked as done (xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369722: fixed in xmlstarlet 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlstarlet
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20060531-0138

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxslt1-dev (>= 1.1.9)

[...]

> checking for i486-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking for LIBXML_CFLAGS... 
> checking for LIBXML_LIBS... 
> configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.  
> Make sure it
> is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
> path to pkg-config.
> 
> Alternatively you may set the LIBXML_CFLAGS and LIBXML_LIBS environment 
> variables
> to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
> more details.
> 
> To get pkg-config, see .
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=i386&pkg=xmlstarlet&ver=1.0.1-1

missing build-depends on at least pkg-config

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlstarlet
Source-Version: 1.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmlstarlet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmlstarlet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:14:16 -0500
Source: xmlstarlet
Binary: xmlstarlet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xmlstarlet - command line XML toolkit
Closes: 369704 369722
Changes: 
 xmlstarlet (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add missing build-depends created by one of the applied patches.  D'oh!
 (closes: #369704, #369722)
Files: 
 8136d837e6282190e8eb1d2d7e8de61d 611 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
 c1a529f3b6e0f7cd0d8a2e37cd9117fe 67376 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
 f957f8277c442fede799abfc89a20f1a 164488 text optional 
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEf9Xjih2Zvw18pwERAtNHAJ9R72sIReTQJ3gD8RrE8Ur+yLhJWQCfTEcD
E4gV9BymaH3NSmpLTJFRp3A=
=zeOu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Bug#369704: marked as done (xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build dependency on pkg-config)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369704: fixed in xmlstarlet 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlstarlet
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

hello,

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxslt1-dev (>= 1.1.9)

A build dependency on pkg-config is missing:

> checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking for LIBXML_CFLAGS... 
> checking for LIBXML_LIBS... 
> configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.  
> Make sure it
> is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
> path to pkg-config.
> 
> Alternatively you may set the LIBXML_CFLAGS and LIBXML_LIBS environment 
> variables
> to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
> more details.
> 
> To get pkg-config, see .
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64&pkg=xmlstarlet&ver=1.0.1-1

Best regards
Frederik Schueler


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlstarlet
Source-Version: 1.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmlstarlet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmlstarlet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:14:16 -0500
Source: xmlstarlet
Binary: xmlstarlet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xmlstarlet - command line XML toolkit
Closes: 369704 369722
Changes: 
 xmlstarlet (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add missing build-depends created by one of the applied patches.  D'oh!
 (closes: #369704, #369722)
Files: 
 8136d837e6282190e8eb1d2d7e8de61d 611 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
 c1a529f3b6e0f7cd0d8a2e37cd9117fe 67376 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
 f957f8277c442fede799abfc89a20f1a 164488 text optional 
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEf9Xjih2Zvw18pwERAtNHAJ9R72sIReTQJ3gD8RrE8Ur+yLhJWQCfTEcD
E4gV9BymaH3NSmpLTJFRp3A=
=zeOu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Bug#369189: marked as done (qc-usb-source: FTBFS due to missing README file)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369189: fixed in qc-usb 0.6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: qc-usb-source
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source


It's actually trivial -- the latest package has a file called README-qce and we 
need a plain README.

There are "Use of uninitialized value" objections in the build but it seems to 
come through fine once that file is renamed.

Dave

make[1]: Entering directory `/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source'
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean binary-modules
make[2]: Entering directory `/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
/usr/bin/make VERSION_CODE=4 clean
make[3]: Entering directory `/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source'
rm -f *.o qcset show *~ .\#* .*.cmd *.mod.c *.ko
rm -rf .tmp_versions
make[3]: Leaving directory `/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source'
rm -rf debian/qc-usb-modules-*
rm -f debian/control.modules
dh_clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
/usr/bin/make RELEASE=2.6.16 LINUX_DIR=/usr/src/linux \

PREFIX=/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/debian/qc-usb-modules-2.6.16/usr \

MODULE_DIR=/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/debian/qc-usb-modules-2.6.16/lib/modules/2.6.16
 \
install
make[3]: Entering directory `/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source'
make -C "/usr/src/linux" SUBDIRS="/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source" modules 
V=1 USER_OPT=""
make[4]: Entering directory `/share/usr/src/linux-2.6.16'
mkdir -p /share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/.tmp_versions
make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source
  gcc -Wp,-MD,/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/.qc-driver.o.d  -nostdinc 
-isystem /share/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include -D__KERNEL__ 
-Iinclude  -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -Os 
-fomit-frame-pointer -march=k8 -m64 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -pipe 
-fno-reorder-blocks-Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables 
-funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -DNOKERNEL   -DMODULE 
-D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(qc_driver)"  
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(quickcam)" -c -o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-driver.o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-driver.c
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-driver.c:2986: warning: initialization 
from incompatible pointer type
  gcc -Wp,-MD,/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/.qc-hdcs.o.d  -nostdinc 
-isystem /share/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include -D__KERNEL__ 
-Iinclude  -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -Os 
-fomit-frame-pointer -march=k8 -m64 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -pipe 
-fno-reorder-blocks  -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables 
-funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -DNOKERNEL   -DMODULE 
-D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(qc_hdcs)"  
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(quickcam)" -c -o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-hdcs.o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-hdcs.c
  gcc -Wp,-MD,/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/.qc-pb0100.o.d  -nostdinc 
-isystem /share/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include -D__KERNEL__ 
-Iinclude  -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding -Os 
-fomit-frame-pointer -march=k8 -m64 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -pipe 
-fno-reorder-blocks-Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables 
-funit-at-a-time -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -DNOKERNEL   -DMODULE 
-D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s" -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(qc_pb0100)"  
-D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(quickcam)" -c -o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-pb0100.o 
/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/qc-pb0100.c
  gcc -Wp,-MD,/share/usr/src/modules/qc-usb-source/.qc-vv6410.o.d  -nostdinc 
-isystem /share/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include -D__KERNEL__ 
-Iinclude  -include include/linux/autoconf.h -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding

Bug#369913: 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 does not "dvdbackup"

2006-06-02 Thread Marc Leeman
Package: dvdbackup
Version: 0.1.1-6
Severity: grave


After upgrading to 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 running 

$ sudo dvdbackup -i /dev/device -I 

just segfaults and when trying to mirror a DVD

$ sudo dvdbackup -i /dev/device -o . -M 

it dumps between 0 and 400 MB of the DVD (depending on the DVD tried,
both DVD-5 and DVD-9). When some data is dumped, most of the files seem
physically present, but are only a couple of kB.

Downgrading dvdbackup to

dvdbackup_0.1.1-5_i386.deb
libdvdread3_0.9.4-5.1_i386.deb

"solves" the problem. Since playing a DVD with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 is
just fine, maybe the sync between the new libdvdread3 and the minor
change in dvdbackup is off (new APIs?).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages dvdbackup depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-9GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdvdread3   0.9.6-1  Simple foundation for reading DVDs

dvdbackup recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369890: silo: build-depends on gcc-2.95, which may be removed for etch

2006-06-02 Thread Jurij Smakov

Ben Collins wrote:


Just change the build-dep, it should be needed anymore. If it's
hardcoded in the makefile, change that too.


I tried building silo with gcc-4.1. It works on sparc64, but hangs on 
sparc32, so the problem is not resolved yet. I did not have time to 
investigate it yet.


Best regards,

Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/   KeyID: C99E03CC


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369704: marked as done (xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build dependency on pkg-config)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369722: fixed in xmlstarlet 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlstarlet
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

hello,

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxslt1-dev (>= 1.1.9)

A build dependency on pkg-config is missing:

> checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking for LIBXML_CFLAGS... 
> checking for LIBXML_LIBS... 
> configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.  
> Make sure it
> is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
> path to pkg-config.
> 
> Alternatively you may set the LIBXML_CFLAGS and LIBXML_LIBS environment 
> variables
> to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
> more details.
> 
> To get pkg-config, see .
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64&pkg=xmlstarlet&ver=1.0.1-1

Best regards
Frederik Schueler


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlstarlet
Source-Version: 1.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmlstarlet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmlstarlet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:14:16 -0500
Source: xmlstarlet
Binary: xmlstarlet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xmlstarlet - command line XML toolkit
Closes: 369704 369722
Changes: 
 xmlstarlet (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add missing build-depends created by one of the applied patches.  D'oh!
 (closes: #369704, #369722)
Files: 
 8136d837e6282190e8eb1d2d7e8de61d 611 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
 c1a529f3b6e0f7cd0d8a2e37cd9117fe 67376 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
 f957f8277c442fede799abfc89a20f1a 164488 text optional 
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEf9Xjih2Zvw18pwERAtNHAJ9R72sIReTQJ3gD8RrE8Ur+yLhJWQCfTEcD
E4gV9BymaH3NSmpLTJFRp3A=
=zeOu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Bug#369722: marked as done (xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369704: fixed in xmlstarlet 1.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xmlstarlet
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 98
> Build started at 20060531-0138

[...]

> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libxslt1-dev (>= 1.1.9)

[...]

> checking for i486-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... no
> checking for LIBXML_CFLAGS... 
> checking for LIBXML_LIBS... 
> configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be found or is too old.  
> Make sure it
> is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
> path to pkg-config.
> 
> Alternatively you may set the LIBXML_CFLAGS and LIBXML_LIBS environment 
> variables
> to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
> more details.
> 
> To get pkg-config, see .
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=i386&pkg=xmlstarlet&ver=1.0.1-1

missing build-depends on at least pkg-config

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xmlstarlet
Source-Version: 1.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmlstarlet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmlstarlet/xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xmlstarlet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 19:14:16 -0500
Source: xmlstarlet
Binary: xmlstarlet
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alex Mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 xmlstarlet - command line XML toolkit
Closes: 369704 369722
Changes: 
 xmlstarlet (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add missing build-depends created by one of the applied patches.  D'oh!
 (closes: #369704, #369722)
Files: 
 8136d837e6282190e8eb1d2d7e8de61d 611 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.dsc
 c1a529f3b6e0f7cd0d8a2e37cd9117fe 67376 text optional xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2.diff.gz
 f957f8277c442fede799abfc89a20f1a 164488 text optional 
xmlstarlet_1.0.1-2_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEf9Xjih2Zvw18pwERAtNHAJ9R72sIReTQJ3gD8RrE8Ur+yLhJWQCfTEcD
E4gV9BymaH3NSmpLTJFRp3A=
=zeOu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: Bug#369906: psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization , throwing 1 bytes away

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 369906 important
Bug#369906: psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization , 
throwing 1 bytes away
Severity set to `important' from `critical'

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#348355: Processed: severity of 348355 is serious ...

2006-06-02 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> reassign 348355 ftp.debian.org
> thanks

retitle 348355 RM: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- RoM; superseded by 
mozilla-firefox-locale-all
severity 348355 normal
merge 348355 364387
thanks


rename that bug properly, merge it with the already existing removal
request.
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#349916: siptoolbox: bad dependency on animal-dev

2006-06-02 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
retitle 349916 RM: siptoolbox -- Scilab image processing toolbox (SIP)
severity 307365 serious
merge 307365 349916
thanks

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:47:21PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> reassign 349916 ftp.debian.org
> retitle 307365 O: siptoolbox -- Scilab image processing toolbox (SIP)
> thanks


> Hello,
> 
> the package is quite buggy. My RFA request is 1 year old and nobody is
> interested in the package. Please remove it from the archive.
> 
> Thanks,
> Torsten

  there is already a removal request for siptoolbox. merge them
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#369906: psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization , throwing 1 bytes away

2006-06-02 Thread maximilian attems
severity 369906 important
stop

On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:17:09PM +0800, Mohamed Sulaiman wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7
> Version: 2.6.16-14
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software

unrelated driver breakage is not critical,
even more as it works for most.
 
 
> Upon upgrading to this new kernel (linux-image-2.6.16-2-k7) as well as
> the previous kernel (linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7) the psmouse failed to
> work.

please post the ouput of:
dpkg -l udev
lsmod
 
> When cat /proc/interrupts; psmouse is not listed; instead IRQ 12 is
> used by IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 
> When lsmod psmouse module used is 0

modprobe mousedev
 

regards
-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Processed: severity of 348355 is serious ...

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > reassign 348355 ftp.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > thanks
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> retitle 348355 RM: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- RoM; superseded by 
> mozilla-firefox-locale-all
Bug#348355: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar needs update for current firefox version
Changed Bug title.

> severity 348355 normal
Bug#348355: RM: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- RoM; superseded by 
mozilla-firefox-locale-all
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> merge 348355 364387
Bug#348355: RM: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- RoM; superseded by 
mozilla-firefox-locale-all
Bug#364387: RM: mozilla-firefox-locale-ar -- RoM; superseded by 
mozilla-firefox-locale-all
Merged 348355 364387.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369849: pdl does not build on amd64 due to missing -fPIC

2006-06-02 Thread Henning Glawe
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:58:49PM -0300, Michel Loos wrote:
> Package: pdl
> Version: 1:2.4.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Even without the BAD2_demo/BAD_demo problem, 
> pdl does not build on AMD64 due to 
> 1) the lack of the -fPIC option while compiling slatec/*.f

how did you try to compile it?
using debian/rules it should work, as there PDLs build-script is tweaked to
use debian/f77conf.pl, which in turn contains the -fPIC.
can you confirm this error occurs though you are using debian/rules to build
PDL?

> 2) a segfault while compiling Slices.xs

can you please send me a build log, so I can get a deeper insight into that
issue?

-- 
c u
henning


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: siptoolbox: bad dependency on animal-dev

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 349916 RM: siptoolbox -- Scilab image processing toolbox (SIP)
Bug#349916: siptoolbox: bad dependency on animal-dev
Changed Bug title.

> severity 307365 serious
Bug#307365: RM: siptoolbox -- RoQA, orphaned, unbuildable
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> merge 307365 349916
Bug#307365: RM: siptoolbox -- RoQA, orphaned, unbuildable
Bug#349916: RM: siptoolbox -- Scilab image processing toolbox (SIP)
Merged 307365 349916.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 369765

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369765 fixed-upstream
Bug#369765: mdadm - FTBFS: implicit declaration of function '__fswab64'
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental patch confirmed
Tags added: fixed-upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 354571

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 354571 - pending
Bug#354571: RM: gngeo -- RoAM; license problems
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369923: cryptsetup: /sbin/luksformat uses /usr/bin/perl

2006-06-02 Thread Bastian Kleineidam
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS violation

Hi,

FHS requires /sbin and /bin tools to work without /usr. I suggest moving
luksformat to /usr/sbin.

Regards,
  Bastian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-treasure17
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages cryptsetup depends on:
ii  dmsetup  2:1.02.05-2 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  libc62.3.6-13GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdevmapper1.02 2:1.02.05-2 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii  libgcrypt11  1.2.2-1 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii  libgpg-error01.2-1   library for common error values an
ii  libpopt0 1.7-5   lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libuuid1 1.39-1  universally unique id library

cryptsetup recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#363127: CVE-2006-1664: Malformed MPEG Stream Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

2006-06-02 Thread Reinhard Tartler
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:17:48PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> I'm going to prepare an NMU (sponsored by Adeodato Simó) which may or may
> not fix this bug (but will fix various others, particularly the build failure
> on sparc, which is due to a missing "-I "). It should also fix the
> "sorry, unimplemented" failures on some other architectures, which is due to
> use of inline functions after declaration but before definition and a couple
> of other bugs, two of which are security-related. (The failure on m68k was
> due to a compiler bug.)

Interesting, I tried to look at the FTBFS on a mips machine, and
succeeded to build it with external ffmpeg. If it turns out that it was
just a missing -I, even better.

> We could stick with 1.1.1 but that won't fix this bug because, basically, I'm
> fairly sure that it's been fixed as a side-effect of an ffmpeg update or,
> possibly, some hacking on the win32 codec support. (Unfortunately, this means
> that we (xine developers) can't sensibly provide a patch for stable at this
> time.)

Btw, is #369876 the same issue as #363127 or is this something else?

> The alternative is a CVS snapshot; most of the patches which I would be
> applying are already in CVS (I'll need to check and possibly apply the inline
> fixups). The two security fixes mentioned above are reported in bug 369876.

Hm. Given security issues being fixed in cvs, I think uploading a CVS
snapshot would be a good option. How about uploading it to experimental
first, and give more ppl the chance of actually testing it?

Gruesse,
Reinhard

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 369765

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369765 fixed-upstream
Bug#369765: mdadm - FTBFS: implicit declaration of function '__fswab64'
Tags were: fixed-upstream fixed-in-experimental patch confirmed
Tags added: fixed-upstream

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: ftp.debian.org: Missing .orig.tar.gz files for dresden-ocl and libbsf-java

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 367267 serious
Bug#367267: ftp.debian.org: Missing .orig.tar.gz files for dresden-ocl and 
libbsf-java
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#367845: marked as done (ftp.debian.org: zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz missing from mirrors)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:25:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ftp.debian.org: zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz missing from mirrors
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1 "must include source code"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz is not available from
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/ or mirrors
ftp.uk.debian.org, mirror.ox.ac.uk, archive.progeny.com.  It is also not
available from security.debian.org.  This breaks 'apt-get source zoo'.

File
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/z/zoo/zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz
has the same md5sum (dca5f2cf71379a51ea1e66b25f1e0294) as listed in
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/zoo_2.10-17.dsc.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEbHL3Aud/2YgchcQRAnK2AKCVd1UIUlEcZUPLlSepz24AiK5VJwCghl+f
nb4tITms66WB5TplZBQ3cXQ=
=+3Sg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 02:13:27PM +0100, Alec Berryman wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.1 "must include source code"
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz is not available from
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/ or mirrors
> ftp.uk.debian.org, mirror.ox.ac.uk, archive.progeny.com.  It is also not
> available from security.debian.org.  This breaks 'apt-get source zoo'.
> 
> File
> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/z/zoo/zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz
> has the same md5sum (dca5f2cf71379a51ea1e66b25f1e0294) as listed in
> ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/zoo_2.10-17.dsc.

  I can see it:

[madcoder mad] HEAD 
'http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/z/zoo/zoo_2.10.orig.tar.gz'
200 OK
Connection: close
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:24:43 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "2100055-2a255-3502f8a1"
Server: Apache/1.3.33 (Debian GNU/Linux)
Content-Encoding: x-gzip
Content-Length: 172629
Content-Type: application/x-tar
Last-Modified: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 19:59:29 GMT
Client-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:24:38 GMT
Client-Peer: 128.101.240.212:80
Client-Response-Num: 1

  closing the bug

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys

2006-06-02 Thread Andrew Maier

Hello,

Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:

On Mon, 29 May 2006, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:


severity 340008 grave
thanks

I have increased the severity of this bug as overwriting the SSL key is
data loss. This affects the recent security upgrade in sarge which makes
it especially visible.


I'd asked the original reporter about the circumstances in which this 
occurs but didn't get a reply.  Actually now I don't even see that 
message in the bug report so he may never have received it.  If so 
Andrew, sorry I've ignored this bug for so long.




No worries, I cannot remember receiving any reply. I normally keep all 
my Debian bugs conversations in a mail folder. So I assume your mail got 
eaten by gremlins.


Is this the same problem as in #337715?  If so it has been dealt with in 
etch and sid but is still an issue in sarge.



It is perhaps worth reissuing this erratum having
fixed this problem. If there is interest in this I am happy to provide
the fix.



Yes please send me any information you have ASAP so we can deal with 
this promptly.  There is another security issue which has to be dealt 
with (#369359) so the chances are very good a fix for this problem will 
be accepted for sarge.




I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different 
name from the self created ones and I think this worked. In any case I 
now get very cautious when upgrading dovecot. I currently use 
1.0.beta8-2 and I things are working now.



regards,

Andrew


--
Andrew Maier
andrew at maier dot name


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369913: 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 does not "dvdbackup"

2006-06-02 Thread Stephen Gran
severity 366092 grave
merge 366092 369913
kthxbye
This one time, at band camp, Marc Leeman said:
> After upgrading to 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 running 
> 
> $ sudo dvdbackup -i /dev/device -I 
> 
> just segfaults and when trying to mirror a DVD
> 
> $ sudo dvdbackup -i /dev/device -o . -M 

Just for the record, adding yourself to the group cdrom (or whatever
group the device is) is probably easier than using sudo - none of the
operations of dvdbackup need anything but read permissions on the device
node.  That is totally irrelevant, I know :)

> it dumps between 0 and 400 MB of the DVD (depending on the DVD tried,
> both DVD-5 and DVD-9). When some data is dumped, most of the files seem
> physically present, but are only a couple of kB.
> 
> Downgrading dvdbackup to
> 
> dvdbackup_0.1.1-5_i386.deb
> libdvdread3_0.9.4-5.1_i386.deb
> 
> "solves" the problem. Since playing a DVD with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 is
> just fine, maybe the sync between the new libdvdread3 and the minor
> change in dvdbackup is off (new APIs?).

You are absolutely correct.  The problem is that libdvdread3 is compiled
with -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, and dvdbackup wasn't in this version.  So
copying from a libdvdread off_t to a dvdbackup off_t had interesting
side effects, like scribbling all over random bits of memory.

There was already a bug report open about it (#366092) but for some reason
I had left it at severity important instead of grave, as it should be,
so maybe you didn't see it.

This is fixed, but stuck in the NEW queue
(http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html).  Ordinarily this has been
processed reasonably quickly, but I think the people handling it are on
vacation right now, so things are moving slowly.

Sorry for the inconvenience.  I am not sure what I can do about this,
but I'll ask around.
-- 
 -
|   ,''`.Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|  `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer |
|`- http://www.debian.org |
 -


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#369265: maybe not RC?

2006-06-02 Thread Henning Sprang

On 6/2/06, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[...]
if fai becomes (mostly) unusable, it's grave:


No doubt. Grave is correct.
But Thomas was talking about "RC" - are they equivalent? RC isn't
mentioned in the posted docs, but the bug is actually on the RC list,
whatever the definition of this is, whoever defines this.


Of course you can work around it, but as this is the "default configuration",
I do think this is pretty critical. But let's not fight^wdiscuss about the
severity, we should rather fix this.


Please don't limit others in voicing their opinion, because _you_
think there's no need to. The Severity of bugs can very well be
discussed if somebody thinks it's not correctly applied.

Henning


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#369913: 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 does not "dvdbackup"

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 366092 grave
Bug#366092: dvdbackup: Segmentation fault - stack corruption?
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

> merge 366092 369913
Bug#366092: dvdbackup: Segmentation fault - stack corruption?
Bug#369913: 0.1.1-6 with libdvdread3 0.9.6-1 does not "dvdbackup"
Merged 366092 369913.

> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 368255 is important

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 368255 important
Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools)
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 369265 is grave

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 369265 grave
Bug#369265: fai-nfsroot: fai install dies with "nfs: RPC call returned error 
101"
Severity set to `grave' from `grave'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#309713: marked as done (asmounter: configuration file should be in /etc)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 02:17:03 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309713: fixed in asmounter 0.3-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: asmounter
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: minor

To function, asmounter needs to be able to find a configuration file
listing the mount points it should display.  One is provided as
asmounter.example; it just needs to be edited as appropriate and put
in place.

The first possible location it can be moved to is ~/.asmounter,
which works, but isn't a very sensible approach on a multi-user
machine.

The second and final place asmounter looks for its configuration
file is /usr/lib/asmounter/sys.asmounter, which contravenes Debian 
packaging policy.  "Any configuration files created or used by your
package must reside in /etc".

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages asmounter depends on:
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libjpeg626b-9The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

-- no debconf information
-- 
JBR
Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing)


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: asmounter
Source-Version: 0.3-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asmounter, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

asmounter_0.3-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/asmounter/asmounter_0.3-4.diff.gz
asmounter_0.3-4.dsc
  to pool/main/a/asmounter/asmounter_0.3-4.dsc
asmounter_0.3-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/asmounter/asmounter_0.3-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated asmounter package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2006 11:07:07 +0200
Source: asmounter
Binary: asmounter
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 asmounter  - monitoring mount points tool
Closes: 309713
Changes: 
 asmounter (0.3-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Change maintainer to QA
   * Move configuration file to /etc (Closes: #309713)
   * Use debhelper >> 4
 - Switch to dh_installman
   * Modify debian/tmp to debian/asmounter in debian/rules
   * Refer to license file in debian/copyright
   * Fix dh_make boilerplate in debian/copyright
Files: 
 f99305017db3850548c59eb1e49f373d 606 x11 optional asmounter_0.3-4.dsc
 e97f79a8b408cb2aabdfa7dc360b3d68 2860 x11 optional asmounter_0.3-4.diff.gz
 a05d5040159f74f338f6e8bc2a89ebec 17882 x11 optional asmounter_0.3-4_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEgADjpGK1HsL+5c0RAsJoAKCzgbau7cvLKGF397ItrjEKtjBP6gCfcWvS
aToI17uontJZ1dL4z6r/9Ng=
=ENEI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Bug#366598: I have fixed this upstream

2006-06-02 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:18:58PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> This is fixed in my branch.

I cannot find upstream version, URL in copyright file is 404.

However, this package is not buildable anymore, because of bazaar which
is not installable and will be removed soon from the archive.
Maybe this package should be asked for removal.

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// Trust me.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnustep-netclasses 0.0.20040112.dfsg-0.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 365182 + fixed
Bug#365182: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of gpass 0.5.0-1.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 340512 + fixed
Bug#340512: package still ships gconf schemas in /etc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369265: fai-nfsroot: fai install dies with "nfs: RPC call returned error 101"

2006-06-02 Thread Henning Sprang

BTW: I don't understand the name of this bug. Why is a bug which
creates problems in nfsroot building filed with the topic that fai
gives an error at install time: "nfs: RPC call returned error 101"

I am not sure because it's a while since I had that, is it possible
that make-fai-nfsroot doesn't "realize" what's happening, and still
finishes successfully, and the problems leading to an error only at
install time?

Then we should also fix nfsroot to better trap errors, if possible.
It's wrong that make-fai-nfsroot ends with success but a broken
nfsroot. But maybe the rror cannot be found out easily.

Henning


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#367316: nvidia-glx: Does not accelerate

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Olschewski
Hi, Benjamin, i had have the same problem. The cause was /usr/lib/libGL.so
that was linked with libGL.so.1.2 out of the package libgl1-mesa-glx.
After manually setting the link to libGL.so.1.0.8762 everything was fine.

Hope that helps

Matthias 
-- 


Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
  Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of teatime 2.4-2.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 340524 + fixed
Bug#340524: package still ships gconf schemas in /etc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of magicdev 1.1.6-2.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 340516 + fixed
Bug#340516: package still ships gconf schemas in /etc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: gbindadmin: Looks in the wrong place for bind9 config files

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 366470 wishlist
Bug#366470: gbindadmin: Looks in the wrong place for bind9 config files
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'

> retitle 366470 Add possibility to take-over old configuration files
Bug#366470: gbindadmin: Looks in the wrong place for bind9 config files
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of ircd-ircu 2.10.11.04.dfsg-0.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 365195 + fixed
Bug#365195: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#366598: I have fixed this upstream

2006-06-02 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 11:18 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:18:58PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > This is fixed in my branch.
> 
> I cannot find upstream version, URL in copyright file is 404.
> 
> However, this package is not buildable anymore, because of bazaar which
> is not installable and will be removed soon from the archive.
> Maybe this package should be asked for removal.
> 
> Cheers,

http://www.robertcollins.net/config-manager/trunk/ is the upstream, and
its definately alive and maintained.

Cheers,
Rob


-- 
GPG key available at: .


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#367036: your mail

2006-06-02 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
severity 367036 important
thanks

On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:57:11PM +0200, Frederik Schwarzer wrote:
> Ok, I see now. I read the errmsg, looked for arts with "aptitude search
> "
> and saw, that it is not installed. 
> ===snip===
> p   arts- sound system from the official KDE release
> ===snip===
> 
> I didn't realize, that libarts1c2a provides "artsd".
> 
> > Could please you try to run arts by hand, by simply typing "artsd" in
> > a console, and look at what happens.
> 
> I ran artsd by hand and kwave started just fine.
> But why was it not able to start artsd by itself?
> 
> Ok, that's another Problem (probably not yours), thanks for help.
> And sorry for inconvenience.

  then it's likely that artsd not beeing launched is a local problem of
your installation. The bug is also not grave, but merely important.

cheers,
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#321688: marked as done (xfonts-thai-ttf: copyright problems)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:49:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321688: fixed in thaifonts-scalable 0.4.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xfonts-thai-ttf
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

According to the copyright file, the fonts in this package are public
domain. However, the DBThaiText fonts contain the following string:
"Typeface (c) The Monotype Corporation plc. Data (c) The Monotype
Corporation plc/Type Solutions Inc. 1990-1992. All Rights Reserved"

The norasi fonts contain the following text:
"This font was developed under National Font Project at NECTEC as to
be a free licensed font for Thai users and developers."
which is much better but still not public domain :)

Fortunately, there are new upstream versions [1], which drop DBThaiText,
clarify that norasi is GPL-licensed, and include a few new fonts.

[1] ftp://linux.thai.net/pub/thailinux/software/thaifonts-scalable/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc3
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: thaifonts-scalable
Source-Version: 0.4.4-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
thaifonts-scalable, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

t1-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/thaifonts-scalable/t1-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3_all.deb
thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4-3.diff.gz
thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/t/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4-3.dsc
thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
ttf-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/thaifonts-scalable/ttf-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated 
thaifonts-scalable package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:06:55 +0700
Source: thaifonts-scalable
Binary: t1-thai-tlwg ttf-thai-tlwg
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 t1-thai-tlwg - Thai fonts in Type1 format
 ttf-thai-tlwg - Thai fonts in TrueType format
Closes: 321688 324240 332156 357869
Changes: 
 thaifonts-scalable (0.4.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * transition to X11R7
 + debian/control:
   - removed build-dep on xutils
   - made t1-thai-tlwg depend on xfonts-utils >> 1:1.0.0
   - build-dep on debhelper >= 5.0.31 for dh_installxfonts that supports
 Xorg 7 directories
 + debian/rules, debian/t1-thai-tlwg.dirs,
   debian/{t1,ttf}-thai-tlwg.install:
   - used dh_install instead of manully installing files
   - removed Type1 fonts installation in /usr/share/fonts/type1,
 as well as symlinks from /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1
   - installed X11 Type1 fonts in /usr/share/fonts/X11
   - moved X11 Type1 fonts.scale to /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1
   - used dh_installxfonts for t1-thai-tlwg package
 + debian/t1-thai-tlwg.scale, debian/ttf-thai-tlwg.scale:
   - created predefined fonts.scale files for both packages
 + debian/t1-thai-tlwg.post{inst,rm}:
   - removed, as the update-fonts* scripts are now automatically done with
 dh_installxfonts
   * debian/rules:
 - removed unneeded dh_strip, dh_shlibdeps, dh_link
   * debian/control:
 - conflicted with xfonts-thai-ttf, for package renaming
   * debian/ttf-thai-tlwg.config:
 - added
   * debian/lintian-overrides:
 - added lintian override for package-depends-on-an-x-font-package,
   as xfonts-utils is not a font p

Bug#367267: ftp.debian.org: Missing .orig.tar.gz files for dresden-ocl and libbsf-java

2006-06-02 Thread Sven Mueller
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote on 02/06/2006 10:33:
> severity 367267 serious
> thanks
> 
> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:49:31PM +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> 
>>http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dresden-ocl/dresden-ocl_1.1.orig.tar.gz
> 
>   this creates a policy violation, and I can confirm that source tarball
> is still missing.

As I found out by now, the source tarball is actually in the archive,
just not at pool/main as expected but at pool/contrib, at least on some
mirrors.
The same is true for libbsf-java_2.3.0+cvs20050308.orig.tar.gz

Looks like the archive was confused by those packages moving from main
to contrib or vice-versa. At least that would be my guess (without
looking at package histories).

cu,
sven


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: Re: your mail

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 367036 important
Bug#367036: kwave: should depend on aRts?
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 369923

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 369923 + pending
Bug#369923: cryptsetup: /sbin/luksformat uses /usr/bin/perl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369877: kaffe FTBFS on ia64

2006-06-02 Thread allomber
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:06:06AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: kaffe
> Version: 2:1.1.7-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> Hello Kaffe maintainers,
> 
> kaffe FTBFS on ia64:
> 
> make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/kaffe-1.1.7/build/jthreads/libraries/javalib/external/classpath/lib'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> 
> The full buildlog is available at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=kaffe&ver=2:1.1.7-2&arch=ia64&stamp=1148911129&file=log

Hello Kaffe maintainers,
while investigating, I found the following:

1) kaffe build-depend on 
Build-Depends: ecj-bootstrap (>= 3.1.2-4), ecj-bootstrap-gcj (>=
3.1.2-4) [alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 powerpc s390 sparc]

2) debian/rules do
CONFFLAGS   += --with-ecj=/usr/bin/ecj

3) /usr/bin/ecj is an alternative provided by both ecj-bootstrap and
ecj-bootstrap-gcj.

4) kaffe build fine on ia64 if /usr/bin/ecj point to ecj-bootstrap,
but FTBFS if it point on ecj-bootstrap-gcj.

5) kaffe build fine on amd64 in both case (even though kaffe does not
build-depend on ecj-bootstrap-gcj onthat plateform).

So at the very least you can fix this bug by forcing the use
of ecj-bootstrap on ia64.

I am not quite sure what 1) is supposed to achieve: what is the point of
requiring two versions of ecj and using only one of them randomly (where
/usr/bin/ecj points to is a local setting) ? It looks like I missed
something.

However, on the face of it, the failure to build this package is a bug in
ecj-bootstrap-gcj on ia64.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#350591: bluez-utils: can not be installed because it needs an

2006-06-02 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
Hi,
unfortunately I don't see any progress on this, see also bug #344788 on makedev.

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

yeah, that would be smart, except that it's not.
-- Josip Rodin


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Brendan O'Dea
reassign 335105 kernel
close 335105 2.6.5
thanks

On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:24:56AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>My bet is that it's this kernel bug:
>
>  I don't know if you've been following, but it was recently discoverd that on
>  smp, if multiple processes read from /dev/urandom at the same time, they can
>  get the same data.  Theodore Tytso posted a patch to fix this for 2.6, and
>  someone else told me this problem has existed all the way back to 1.3.
>
>Fixed in 2.4.29 and 2.6.5. What kernel version have you got there? If
>it's 2.4.27 (sarge) then I think we have our problem found.

Thanks Andrew,

This does appear to be the cause of the problem.

I tracked down the original patch which added the fork/rand test.

The intent of the addition is to test rand (specifically the implicit
srand on first call) rather than fork:  a change in 5.8.1 to randomise
hash ordering was causing an implicit call of srand when perl was
started, causing a behaviour change:

  $ perl -le 'fork; print rand'

was printing the same value twice.

Re-assigning to kernel and closing.

--bod


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 335105 kernel
Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork
Bug reassigned from package `perl' to `kernel'.

> close 335105 2.6.5
Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.6.5, send any further explanations to Thiemo 
Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of thaixfonts 1:1.2.5-1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 357878 + fixed
Bug#357878: ITA: xfonts-thai -- A collection of thai fonts for X
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 357879 + fixed
Bug#357879: ITA: xfonts-thai-etl -- Thai etl fonts for X
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 357880 + fixed
Bug#357880: ITA: xfonts-thai-manop -- Dr.Manop Wongsaisuwan's
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 357881 + fixed
Bug#357881: ITA: xfonts-thai-nectec -- Thai fixed fonts for X from Nectec
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 357882 + fixed
Bug#357882: ITA: xfonts-thai-vor -- Voradesh Yenbut bitmap fonts for X
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> tag 363482 + fixed
Bug#363482: xfonts-thai-nectec.alias is still in old directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369959: amule-utils: missing Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)

2006-06-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: amule-utils
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

in the latest upload, some files were moved from amule-common to
amule-utils, but no Replaces field was introduced. For things to work in
all scenarios, amule-utils _must_ Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1).
See for example:

ii  amule-common  2.1.1-3   common 
files for aMule
ii  amule-utils   2.1.1-3   
utilities for amule

% sudo dpkg --unpack amule-utils_2.1.2-1_i386.deb amule-common_2.1.2-1_all.deb
(Reading database ... 95796 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace amule-utils 2.1.1-3 (using amule-utils_2.1.2-1_i386.deb) 
...
Adding `diversion of /usr/bin/ed2k to /usr/bin/ed2k.xmule by amule'
Leaving `diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz to 
/usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.xmule.1.gz by amule'
Unpacking replacement amule-utils ...
dpkg: error processing amule-utils_2.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/ed2k.amule', which is also in package 
amule-common
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Preparing to replace amule-common 2.1.1-3 (using amule-common_2.1.2-1_all.deb) 
...
Unpacking replacement amule-common ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 amule-utils_2.1.2-1_i386.deb

Note that, even though amule-utils Depends: amule-common (= ${Source-Version}),
this does not guarantee that amule-common will be unpacked before, _only_ that 
amule-common will be configured before amule-utils is configured.

It'd be nice to get this fixed before dinstall, let me know if you'd welcome a
NMU.

Thanks,

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
Listening to: Oasis - Some Might Say




Bug#308200: blackbox-themes copyright file

2006-06-02 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:38:10 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote:

>   Okay, here's a copyright file which I believe to be correct for
> blackbox-themes 0.3.  It would be a little nicer if it included real
> names for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I don't think it's necessary: if those two authors are not willing to
disclose their real names, naming them with their e-mail addresses
should be fine...

> It also carries
> the added bonus that, thanks to Bruno's repackaging, all the styles
> with images are licensed under non-GPL licenses, and everything seems
> legal to distribute and okay for main.

Licenses seem to be OK.

Is source available (and included in the .orig.tar.gz archive) for every
part of the package? If this is the case, then the package is OK for
main.


-- 
:-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
..
  Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4


pgpqknW9HyfG3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#308200: blackbox-themes copyright file

2006-06-02 Thread Andrew Moise
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Is source available (and included in the .orig.tar.gz archive) for every
> part of the package? If this is the case, then the package is OK for
> main.

  The style files are really all "source"; they're just text
configuration files.  The image files don't include anything that
resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn't apply
to images as long as they are being distributed legally and with
permission.  I'm not planning on complaining on that basis, IOW.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 335105

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 335105 - patch
Bug#335105: perl FTBFS in t/op/fork
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369764: marked as done (octaviz - FTBFS: Octave is required. Please install Octave and rerun cmake.)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:17:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369764: fixed in octaviz 0.4.0-27
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: octaviz
Version: 0.4.0-26
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of octaviz_0.4.0-26 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), cmake, libvtk4-dev (>= 4.4.2-9), 
> octave2.1-headers (>= 2.1.72-9), lesstif2-dev, cdbs
[...]
> -- Looking for IceConnectionNumber in ICE
> -- Looking for IceConnectionNumber in ICE - found
> Octave is required.  Please install Octave and rerun cmake.
> -- Configuring done
> make: *** [cmake-stamp] Error 255
> **
> Build finished at 20060531-0537
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: octaviz
Source-Version: 0.4.0-27

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
octaviz, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

octaviz_0.4.0-27.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/octaviz/octaviz_0.4.0-27.diff.gz
octaviz_0.4.0-27.dsc
  to pool/main/o/octaviz/octaviz_0.4.0-27.dsc
octaviz_0.4.0-27_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/octaviz/octaviz_0.4.0-27_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated octaviz package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2006 10:21:14 +0200
Source: octaviz
Binary: octaviz
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.4.0-27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 octaviz- 3D visualization system for Octave
Closes: 369764
Changes: 
 octaviz (0.4.0-27) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Thomas Weber ]
   * Check for dangling symlink on the autobuilder and abort the build, if
 necessary. Print a message for the buildd admin (Closes: #369764).
Files: 
 d3a6cf9a868a98101832b7c22ae761fa 728 math optional octaviz_0.4.0-27.dsc
 b2d79b846f469244ea168c80fefc0b89 7792 math optional octaviz_0.4.0-27.diff.gz
 ed8bcf14a2b7f64dc39ffb6003493d65 10849772 math optional 
octaviz_0.4.0-27_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEgDaxk3oga0pdcv4RAh4cAJoDBuX3FQS408pc4hLuV0H+n8LL2ACfVWUF
/G/XdLcdko8F6AxUjmVVK20=
=xJO7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---


Bug#365228: libgnujaxp-java - FTBFS: /usr/bin/gcjh: Command not found

2006-06-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
tags 365228 + patch
stop

This bug can be fixed by changing the build dependency back from gcj-4.0 to 
gcj (which pulls in gcj-4.x and includes the missing gcjh binary).

The build will then immediately break because of #368967, but that's a 
different issue.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340008: Upgrading dovecot overwrites installed SSL keys

2006-06-02 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas

On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Andrew Maier wrote:

I think I worked around the problem by giving the ssl keys a different name 
from the self created ones and I think this worked.


Do you remember if at the time, the self created one was named imapd.pem 
or dovecot.pem?


--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#360004: marked as done (hylafax: upgrade to 4.2.5-3 breaks mime encoding)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:17:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360004: hylafax: upgrade to 4.2.5-3 breaks mime encoding
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: hylafax
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Upgrading to 4.2.5-3 breaks mime encoding. When emails are sent to users
with binary files attached such as tif or pdf the files are empty.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Richard,
I am closing your bug report since in two months I never got a reply
from you and the problem was related to your configuration.

Bye,
Giuseppe

--- End Message ---


Bug#359745: webalizer RC bug

2006-06-02 Thread Julien Danjou
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:14:48PM -0300, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote:
Hello Jose,

> You are right.
> I will upload webalizer patched today.

Any news ?

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// Don't give up.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#360004: hylafax: upgrade to 4.2.5-3 breaks mime encoding

2006-06-02 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hi Richard,
I am closing your bug report since in two months I never got a reply
from you and the problem was related to your configuration.

Bye,
Giuseppe



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#358994: Pinpointed the problem

2006-06-02 Thread Julien Danjou

tag 358994 patch
thanks buddy

On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:27:10AM -0500, Enrico Zini wrote:
Hello,

> the problem is in the function gbcommon_calc_dir_size in
> src/gbcommon.c
> 
> The function does not seem to have any logic to prevent visiting the
> same directory twice.
> 
> The way to do it and still get accurate directory size results is to
> maintain a set of visited inodes (that one can get from s.st_ino) and
> avoiding calling gbcommon_calc_dir_size on a directory whose inode has
> already been visited.

Or to not follow symlinks.
Patch attached do this.

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// Don't give up.
diff -ru gnomebaker-0.5.1/src/gbcommon.c gnomebaker-0.5.1.jd/src/gbcommon.c
--- gnomebaker-0.5.1/src/gbcommon.c 2006-02-03 23:28:02.0 +0100
+++ gnomebaker-0.5.1.jd/src/gbcommon.c  2006-06-02 16:52:44.0 +0200
@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@
gchar* fullname = g_build_filename(dirname, name, NULL);

GB_DECLARE_STRUCT(struct stat, s);
-   if(stat(fullname, &s) == 0)
+   if(lstat(fullname, &s) == 0)
{
/* see if the name is actually a directory or a 
regular file */
-   if(s.st_mode & S_IFDIR)
+   if(S_ISDIR(s.st_mode))
size += 
gbcommon_calc_dir_size(fullname);
else if(s.st_mode & S_IFREG)
size += (guint64)s.st_size;


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 368967 grave
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369964: ssh: fails to run as daemon if /dev/null is a regular file (daemon() failed: Success)

2006-06-02 Thread Salvador E. Tropea
Package: ssh
Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

The sshd daemon fails to start if /dev/null is a regular file.
You can start sshd in debug mode (sshd -d) but when you try to start it 
normally it fails to go to background.
The program logs the following error:

daemon() failed: Success

This is a missleading report.
I know that /dev/null should be a device and I don't know how it became
a regular file, but the daemon shouldn't be affected or at least
provide a better description of the problem.
I spent hours to solve it and I found that this problem is more or less
common just look for:

sshd daemon failed Success

using Google.
BTW the /etc/init.d/ scripts rely on /dev/null so I think the first 
script should verify that /dev/null is usable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
es_AR)

Versions of packages ssh depends on:
ii  adduser   3.63   Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf   1.4.30.13  Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg  1.10.28Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libpam-modules0.76-22Pluggable Authentication Modules f
ii  libpam-runtime0.76-22Runtime support for the PAM librar
ii  libpam0g  0.76-22Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii  libssl0.9.7   0.9.7e-3sarge1 SSL shared libraries
ii  libwrap0  7.6.dbs-8  Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2  compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369966: kernel-image-2.6: Unusable initrd.img is generated when /dev/null is a regular file

2006-06-02 Thread Salvador E. Tropea
Package: kernel-image-2.6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

When the configuration creates the initrd.img file it seems to copy the 
/dev/null to the cramfs file. But if the system contains a wrong 
/dev/null the generated initrd.img is unusable.

The problem seems to be in the fact that some of the scripts in the 
initrd.img relies on /dev/null and if that isn't a device they fail 
aborting the boot process (kernel panic attempting to kill init or 
something like that).

I know that /dev/null should be a device and I don't know how it became
a regular file, but the initrd.img should be created with a proper 
/dev/null device even when the system have a bogus one. That's because
the system can work (with small glitches) but the kernel won't boot
if the initrd.img contains it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-3-k7
Locale: LANG=es_AR, LC_CTYPE=es_AR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
es_AR)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#365228: libgnujaxp-java - FTBFS: /usr/bin/gcjh: Command not found

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 365228 + patch
Bug#365228: libgnujaxp-java - FTBFS: /usr/bin/gcjh: Command not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369968: Can't locate Gtk2/Ex/Simple/List.pm in @INC

2006-06-02 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Package: libgtk2-ex-podviewer-perl
Version: 0.14-2
Severity: serious

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ podviewer 
Can't locate Gtk2/Ex/Simple/List.pm in @INC (@INC contains: lib/ /etc/perl 
/usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.4 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5 
/usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8 /usr/local/lib/site_perl 
.) at /usr/bin/podviewer line 12.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/podviewer line 12.

I suspect you're missing a versioned depends on libgtk2-perl.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libgtk2-ex-podviewer-perl depends on:
ii  libgtk2-perl   1:1.081-1 Perl interface to the 2.x series o
ii  libio-stringy-perl 2.110-1   Perl5 modules for IO from scalars 
ii  libpod-simple-perl 3.02-2Perl framework for parsing files i
ii  perl   5.8.4-8sarge4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

libgtk2-ex-podviewer-perl recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369964: ssh: fails to run as daemon if /dev/null is a regular file (daemon() failed: Success)

2006-06-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 12:09:05PM -0300, Salvador E. Tropea wrote:
> Package: ssh
> Version: 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4
> Severity: grave

This is severity inflation; I've downgraded it. (It's only unusable on
very broken systems.)

> The sshd daemon fails to start if /dev/null is a regular file.
> You can start sshd in debug mode (sshd -d) but when you try to start it 
> normally it fails to go to background.
> The program logs the following error:
> 
> daemon() failed: Success

The poor error reporting is largely the fault of the C library. See the
daemon(3) man page.

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369508: FTBFS due to gfortran

2006-06-02 Thread Kevin B. McCarty

Hi Dirk,

On 5/31/06, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


deb-science'rs,

Anybody here who could help me with a Fortran problem?

I cannot compil one (old) routine in the source package fmultivar with
gfortran:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/CRAN/fMultivar-221.10065/src$ gfortran -c 
46C-OutlierDetection.f
[...]
 In file 46C-OutlierDetection.f:79

18GOTO (21,22,23,24,25), KSKIP
  2
Error: Label at (1) is not in the same block as the GOTO statement at (2)
 In file 46C-OutlierDetection.f:113

25  SUMK=SUMK+FBL
 1
 In file 46C-OutlierDetection.f:79
[...]

I fudged the original bug (#369003) in debian/rules by compiling this file
only with f2c, but as two other packages depend on fmultivar (binary:
r-cran-fmultivar) I now seem to have hit a FTBFS (#369508) on amd64 for one
of the users of r-cran-fmultivar even though it all works out in pbuilder on
my i386.  Upstream, while notified, has been silent so far ...

Help would be appreciated.


It's possible that the FTBFS is due to the different ABIs of code
created with f2c + gcc (as well as g77) versus gfortran.  As I
understand it, in particular functions that return single-precision
REAL and COMPLEX values are affected.  See the info files for g77 and
gfortran (regarding the -fno-f2c and -ff2c options).  From my
experience, at least the ABI change for REAL-returning functions does
not really cause problems for most architectures, but amd64 is
particularly sensitive to it for some reason - see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15397

Is there a reason it's necessary for you to use gfortran instead of
g77?  IMO it would be best for the project to switch from g77 to
gfortran in a single coordinated transition, as with the g++ ABI
changes, in order to minimize ABI incompatibilities between
FORTRAN-based libraries.  I commented on this at one point,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2005/09/msg00071.html
but my email received relatively little attention.

best regards,

--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of ircd-ircu 2.10.11.04.dfsg1-0.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 365195 + fixed
Bug#365195: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: merging duplication

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 363077 serious
Bug#363077: diff for 1.0-3.1 NMU of hlatex-fonts
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

> merge 359841 3643077
Bug#359841: hlatex-fonts: FTBFS: Cannot find dh_installtexfonts
Bug number 3643077 not found.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Bug#358994: Pinpointed the problem

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 358994 patch
Bug#358994: Hangs in infinite loops (a symlink pointing to its parent)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks buddy
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369491: marked as done (parted - FTBFS: Error 1)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2006 08:17:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369491: fixed in parted 1.7.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: parted
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of parted_1.7.1-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> [ s390 = "i386" ] && /usr/bin/make -C build-deb check-abi
> make: *** [build-deb/build-stamp] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060530-0258
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: parted
Source-Version: 1.7.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
parted, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libparted1.7-1_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-1_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
libparted1.7-dbg_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-dbg_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
libparted1.7-dev_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-dev_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
libparted1.7-i18n_1.7.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-i18n_1.7.1-2_all.deb
libparted1.7-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/parted/libparted1.7-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
parted-doc_1.7.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/parted-doc_1.7.1-2_all.deb
parted-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/parted/parted-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
parted_1.7.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-2.diff.gz
parted_1.7.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-2.dsc
parted_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/parted/parted_1.7.1-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated parted package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 2006 11:17:12 -0300
Source: parted
Binary: libparted1.7-1 libparted1.7-dbg libparted1.7-dev libparted1.7-i18n 
parted-udeb parted-doc parted libparted1.7-udeb
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.7.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Parted Maintainer Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libparted1.7-1 - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library
 libparted1.7-dbg - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library debug development 
files
 libparted1.7-dev - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library development files
 libparted1.7-i18n - The GNU Parted disk partitioning library i18n support
 libparted1.7-udeb - The GNU Parted disk partitioning shared library (udeb)
 parted - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program
 parted-doc - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program documentation
 parted-udeb - The GNU Parted disk partition resizing program (udeb)
Closes: 367965 369491 369580 369780
Changes: 
 parted (1.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Bastian Blank ]
   * Fix s390 patch to not intend to use ibm disklabels on FBA. (Closes: 
#369580)
 .
   [ Otavio Salvador ]
   * Ack NMU. (Closes: #369491)
   * Add Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as uploader.
   * Add libparted changelog in libparted1.7-1 and libparted1.7-dev
 packages. (Closes: #369780)
   * Apply patch from David Härdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to improve lvm
 support to include all kind of device-mapper devices. (Closes: #367965)
   * Fix s390 patch to apply again after lvm support improvement.
Files: 
 7f02b17f669d5905b2f806fcbf951360 1044 admin optional parted_1.7.1-2.dsc
 ad6156c68d111f91c1bd9e00495aaa3c 55729 admin optional parted_1.7.1-2.diff.gz
 aa8cf725eb3af567bb5f61159032fc80 55994 admin optional parted_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
 fa697234de9f7598e1ef6d9037e550d8 24772 debian-installer extra 
parted-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
 026329ef32f6369cad73431b1c1ee309 197952 libs optional 
libparted1.7-1_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
 192140aef33aafcdefb23220ca496602 152688 debian-installer extra 
libparted1.7-udeb_1.7.1-2_i386.udeb
 dda01524d1d5e87738c44e47baebec4e 258916 libdevel optional 
libparted1.7-dev_1.7.1-2_i386.deb
 ccbcb

Processed: severity of 369964 is normal

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 369964 normal
Bug#369964: ssh: fails to run as daemon if /dev/null is a regular file 
(daemon() failed: Success)
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#349718: parted: last partition in EFI GPT overlaps alternate table

2006-06-02 Thread Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
package parted
found 349718 1.7.0-1
found 349718 1.7.1-1.1
quit

Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Please, can you try to reproduce the bug in last version?

The GPT disklabels generated by 1.7.0-1 and 1.7.1-1.1 are
identical to what 1.6.25.1-1 incorrectly produced, except
the random disk GUID and CRC-32s are of course different.


pgpw9XlOBlruU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#349718: parted: last partition in EFI GPT overlaps alternate table

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> package parted
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: parted

> found 349718 1.7.0-1
Bug#349718: parted: last partition in EFI GPT overlaps alternate table
Bug marked as found in version 1.7.0-1.

> found 349718 1.7.1-1.1
Bug#349718: parted: last partition in EFI GPT overlaps alternate table
Bug marked as found in version 1.7.1-1.1.

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#349354: marked as done (initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop)

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2006 18:52:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349354: initramfs-tools - kernel -udev dependency loop
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: initramfs-tools,kernel,udev

Currently:

  - recent linux-image packages depend on 'initramfs-tools | yaird | 
linux-initramfs-tool', so initramfs-tools is the 'default' alternative

  - initramfs-tools depends on recent udev

  - recent udev refuses to install unless recent kernel is running

This loop needs to be broken somehow.

  


pgpMehwYRJa6B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On May 26, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Any more bright ideas?
Tought so. I'm closing this bug, since now we have #369479 which is
correctly tracking the UI improvement request.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---


Bug#369983: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: openvrml-lookat
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369990: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: gtklookat
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369986: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: postgresql-8.0-pljava-gcj
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369979: package depends on old gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev packages

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: gcjwebplugin
Severity: serious

gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1.  The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369984: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: openoffice.org-officebean
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369985: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libswingwt0
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369981: package depends on old gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev packages

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: bigloo
Severity: serious

gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1.  The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369980: package depends on old gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev packages

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libgnucrypto-java
Severity: serious

gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1.  The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369982: package depends on old gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev packages

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libgnujaxp-java
Severity: serious

gcj-4.0/libgcj6-dev will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release;
please build your package using gcj (>= 4:4.1) or gcj-4.1.  The
libgcjX-dev dependency is not needed anymore.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 364550 is normal

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 364550 normal
Bug#364550: adept: crash on startup
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369988: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libgtk-jni
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile

2006-06-02 Thread allomber
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
> mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
> does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
> then I indeed don't have a problem anymore.
> 
> > >> I'd offer to write a patch if you don't want to, or don't have time to
> > >> dig into this.
> > >
> > > If you could take into account all possible situations... then please.
> > > Note that I am in the process of packaging 2.9, and the maintainer
> > > script will be changed a lot (I'm taking out support for upgrading from
> > > before woody, which will simplify things and which should be more than
> > > enough).
> > 
> > Is the new maintainer script available somewhere?
> 
> Not yet.

Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ?
As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369989: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libgnome-jni
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369987: package depends on old libgcj6 library

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: libopenvrml5
Severity: serious

The package depends on libgcj6; please rebuild the package using gcj (>= 4:4.1).
libgcj6 will be removed from sid/etch for the etch release.

[Not checked if a binary NMU would be sufficient]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369995: amule: FTBFS everywhere, bogus debian/rules file

2006-06-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
Package: amule
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

the latest upload of amule failed to build on every buildd, due to a
bogus debian/rules file:

  dpkg-genchanges -B
  dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent 
packages
  dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or 
directory
  **
  Build finished at 20060602-0733
  FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

See http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=amule.

Since I just NMUed, and failed to spot this bug (since my upload included
binary-all, and did not trigger the bug), I'll make a second upload
right away.

Apologies for not spotting this,

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
   Listening to: The Wallflowers - One Headlight




Processed: Re: Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 368967 + wontfix
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

> reassign 368967 ftp.debian.org
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
Bug reassigned from package `libgcj6-dev' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> severity 368967 serious
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
Severity set to `serious' from `grave'

> retitle 368967 RM: gcj-4.0 -- old gcj packages, replaced by gcj-4.1
Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense
Changed Bug title.

> block 368967 by 369983 369990 369986 369979 369982 369984 369985 369980 
> 369988 369981 369989 369987
Bug#368967: RM: gcj-4.0 -- old gcj packages, replaced by gcj-4.1
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 369983, 369990, 369986, 369979, 369982, 369984, 369985, 
369980, 369988, 369981, 369989, 369987

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#369992: libgnomevfs2-0 2.14.2-1 ssh/sftp support missing

2006-06-02 Thread S. Porth
Package: libgnomevfs2-0
Version: 2.14.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Attempting to open a previous ssh/sftp folder causes several terminal windows to
open/close very quickly and then nothing.

Creating a new ssh/sftp connection, a terminal window flashes briefly and
then a popup: 
Nautilus cannot display "ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/var/www"

Opening an existing ssh/sftp folder from within gedit gives the Nautilus
cannot display message.  Same thing when using the Nautilus Open Location
dialog and trying sftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/var/www

SMB and FTP folders work as expected.

Downgrading to 2.14.1-2 packages and all is fine.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-ck11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages libgnomevfs2-0 depends on:
ii  libavahi-client3   0.6.10-1  Avahi client library
ii  libavahi-common3   0.6.10-1  Avahi common library
ii  libavahi-glib1 0.6.10-1  Avahi glib integration library
ii  libbonobo2-0   2.14.0-1  Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii  libc6  2.3.6-13  GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdbus-1-20.61-6simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2   0.61-6simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libgamin0 [libfam0]0.1.7-3   Client library for the gamin file 
ii  libgconf2-42.14.0-1  GNOME configuration database syste
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.10.3-1  The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgnomevfs2-common2.14.2-1  GNOME virtual file-system (common 
ii  libgnutls131.3.5-1.1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii  libhal-storage10.5.7-2   Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii  libhal10.5.7-2   Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii  liborbit2  1:2.14.0-1libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii  libxml22.6.24.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3-11compression library - runtime

Versions of packages libgnomevfs2-0 recommends:
pn  fam(no description available)
pn  libgnomevfs2-extra (no description available)

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#369966: kernel-image-2.6: Unusable initrd.img is generated when /dev/null is a regular file

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 369966 linux-2.6
Bug#369966: kernel-image-2.6: Unusable initrd.img is generated when /dev/null 
is a regular file
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel-image-2.6'
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6' to `linux-2.6'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#368967: libgcj6-dev: placing jni.h in versioned subdirectory makes no sense

2006-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 368967 + wontfix
reassign 368967 ftp.debian.org
severity 368967 serious
retitle 368967 RM: gcj-4.0 -- old gcj packages, replaced by gcj-4.1
block 368967 by 369983 369990 369986 369979 369982 369984 369985 369980 369988 
369981 369989 369987
thanks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: NMU diff for amule 2.1.2-1.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 369959 + patch
Bug#369959: amule-utils: missing Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#364440: Missing depend on libmono-sqlite1.0-cil

2006-06-02 Thread Tobias Stefan Richter
This bug could/should be closed to get f-spot into testing eventually.

tobias


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of amule 2.1.2-1.1

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 369959 + fixed
Bug#369959: amule-utils: missing Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#359745: webalizer RC bug

2006-06-02 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:44 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:14:48PM -0300, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote:
> Hello Jose,
> 
> > You are right.
> > I will upload webalizer patched today.
> 
> Any news ?

I'm also waiting a bit... :) Thanks in advance for your work.


Thijs


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#369959: NMU diff for amule 2.1.2-1.1

2006-06-02 Thread Adeodato Simó
tag 369959 + patch
thanks

Hi,

Attached is the diff for my amule 2.1.2-1.1 NMU.

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher
esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.
-- F. Nietzsche
diff -u amule-2.1.2/debian/changelog amule-2.1.2/debian/changelog
--- amule-2.1.2/debian/changelog
+++ amule-2.1.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+amule (2.1.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU to fix serious bug before dinstall, with maintainer's permission.
+  * Make amule-utils Replace: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1), since ed2k.amule
+and other files moved from there in the last upload. (Closes: #369959)
+
+ -- Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri,  2 Jun 2006 18:13:38 +0200
+
 amule (2.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release, youhou !
diff -u amule-2.1.2/debian/control amule-2.1.2/debian/control
--- amule-2.1.2/debian/control
+++ amule-2.1.2/debian/control
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 Package: amule-utils
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, amule-common (= ${Source-Version})
+Replaces: amule-common (<< 2.1.2-1)
 Description: utilities for amule
  amule-utils is a set of tools to control amule.
  .


Processed: severity of 369013 is critical

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 369013 critical
Bug#369013: evms: install script says 'ln: creating symbolic link... No such 
file or directory'
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: remove blocking

2006-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> unblock 346745 by 346347
Bug#346745: gpsim-logic: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev
Was blocked by: 346347
Blocking bugs removed: 346347

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >