Bug#377449: marked as done (swapspace: Fails to start with /proc/meminfo parse error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:02:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377449: fixed in swapspace 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: swapspace
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch


Installed the swapspace package but it failed to start, complaining of a
parse error in /proc/meminfo.  After examining the situation, I
discovered that one of the entries in my /proc/meminfo had an embedded
space in the entry name.  The attached patch fixes the problem by
modifying the sscanf call to look for "%[^:]: " instead of "%s " for the
first field in each /proc/meminfo line.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-mm4
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)

Versions of packages swapspace depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries

swapspace recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information
diff -ur swapspace-1.6/src/memory.c swapspace-1.6-patched/src/memory.c
--- swapspace-1.6/src/memory.c	2006-06-15 05:01:50.0 -0400
+++ swapspace-1.6-patched/src/memory.c	2006-07-08 23:32:27.0 -0400
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 
   char fact[20];
   const int x = sscanf(localbuf,
-  "%s %lld %19s",
+  "%[^:]: %lld %19s",
   result->entry,
   &result->value,
   fact);
@@ -212,31 +212,31 @@
   switch (inf->entry[0])
   {
   case 'B':
-if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Buffers:")==0) st->Buffers = inf->value;
+if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Buffers")==0) st->Buffers = inf->value;
 break;
   case 'C':
-if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Cached:")==0)  st->Cached = inf->value;
+if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Cached")==0)  st->Cached = inf->value;
 break;
   case 'D':
-if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Dirty:")==0)   st->Dirty = inf->value;
+if (strcmp(inf->entry, "Dirty")==0)   st->Dirty = inf->value;
 break;
   case 'M':
 if (strncmp(inf->entry,"Mem",3) == 0)
 {
-  if (strcmp(inf->entry+3, "Total:")==0)   st->MemTotal = inf->value;
-  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+3, "Free:")==0)   st->MemFree = inf->value;
+  if (strcmp(inf->entry+3, "Total")==0)   st->MemTotal = inf->value;
+  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+3, "Free")==0)   st->MemFree = inf->value;
 }
 break;
   case 'S':
 if (strncmp(inf->entry,"Swap",4) == 0)
 {
-  if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Total:")==0)   st->SwapTotal = inf->value;
-  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Free:")==0)   st->SwapFree = inf->value;
-  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Cached:")==0) st->SwapCached = inf->value;
+  if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Total")==0)   st->SwapTotal = inf->value;
+  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Free")==0)   st->SwapFree = inf->value;
+  else if (strcmp(inf->entry+4, "Cached")==0) st->SwapCached = inf->value;
 }
 break;
   case 'W':
-if (strcmp(inf->entry,"Writeback:")==0)st->Writeback = inf->value;
+if (strcmp(inf->entry,"Writeback")==0)st->Writeback = inf->value;
 break;
   }
 }
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: swapspace
Source-Version: 1.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
swapspace, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

swapspace_1.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/swapspace/swapspace_1.6-2.diff.gz
swapspace_1.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/swapspace/swapspace_1.6-2.dsc
swapspace_1.6-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/swapspace/swapspace_1.6-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated swapspace 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:26:27 +1000
Source: swapspace
Binary: swapspace
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salaz

Processed: Bug#377449: swapspace: Fails to start with /proc/meminfo parse error

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 377449 serious
Bug#377449: swapspace: Fails to start with /proc/meminfo parse error
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377445: xcal: Packaging not compatible with x.org?

[Mark Whitis]

Package: xcal
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


 apt-get -t unstable install xcal
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  xcal: Depends: libx11-6 but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxaw7 (> 4.1.0) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxext6 but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxmu6 but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxp6 but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

ALL of those dependancies are met:
ii  libx11-6   1.0.0-6X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw74.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxext6   1.0.0-4X11 miscellaneous extension library
ii  libxmu64.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous utility librar
ii  libxp6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System printing extension library

ii  xserver-xorg 7.0.16the 
X.Org X server


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377109: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:00:24PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> I would like to hear FSF position on this matter and somehow I have a
> feeling their interpretation of GPL license is different from what is
> claimed here. Eben Moglen, General Counsel for the Free Software
> Foundation, noted that he always believed that GPLv2 should be
> interpreted in the way GPLv3 now makes explicit.

To my knowledge, Eben Moglen's *beliefs* on how the GPLv2 should be
interpreted are not a binding legal precedent in any jurisdiction; nor is
this post hoc interpretation binding on any copyright holders other than the
FSF.  It may not even be binding on the FSF itself.

Regardless, Joerg Schilling's amply demonstrated animosity towards the
maintainers of the Debian cdrecord package has been such that I no longer
believe the text of the licenses is the principal issue before us.  Anyone
so happy to threaten Debian developers with defamation lawsuits is not what
I consider a good-faith contributor to the Free Software community, and I
think it's unwise for Debian to distribute software of such provenance
regardless of license terms.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Erast Benson]

On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 21:11 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 20:59]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > > > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may 
> > > > be
> > > > distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.
> > >
> > > Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
> > > This is the case here. As Debian provides binaries for anything in main,
> > > and this is not possible with your combination, your package cannot go
> > > to main.
> > 
> > You still seem to prefer to write claims without a proof, so it is obvious 
> > that
> > your claims are wrong.
> 
> You shouldn't think all people follow your strategy to make claims
> without a proof. I still wait for any proof for your claim made in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] about the apache people.
> 
> Actually, if you think any of above is without proof, please point out
> at which place.
> 
> > Could we please have a fact based discussion?
> 
> Oh, when do you start your therapy?

Folks, could you please *try* to avoid this kind of reaction on anything
which is not kosher as you might always believe and, instead, *try* to
understand Joerg's point of view?

I'm a developer, not a lower, but I believe that creators of CDDL and
GPL pursued a bit different goals other than silly and useless dvdrtools
fork only just because somebody "think" (or "guess" or whatever) that
some particular statements could be interpreted in the way that binary
results of two *source* licenses will not be legally redistributable.

Joerg position is clear:

"""It may be the main point that people fear that compiling cdrtools
creates unredistibutable binaries. I see no reason why binaries may
be unredistibutable as I don't see any contradictory requirements
from CDDL/GPL. Both licenses are source licenses and require to make the
source available in case a binary is distributed. This is no
contradiction but just the same requirement."""

I would like to hear FSF position on this matter and somehow I have a
feeling their interpretation of GPL license is different from what is
claimed here. Eben Moglen, General Counsel for the Free Software
Foundation, noted that he always believed that GPLv2 should be
interpreted in the way GPLv3 now makes explicit.

Erast



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376869: marked as done (Uninstallable due to aspell-pt-pt not being available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 9 Jul 2006 01:56:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376869: Uninstallable due to aspell-pt-pt not being 
available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: aspell-pt
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0

Hi

Your package is not installable as one of it's dependencies
(aspell-pt-pt) is not available (anymore).

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-05 17:09]:

> Package: aspell-pt
> Severity: serious
> Version: 1.0
> 
> Your package is not installable as one of it's dependencies
> (aspell-pt-pt) is not available (anymore).

The aspell-pt-pt package is now in unstable:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2006/07/msg00795.html

I am hereby closing this bug report accordingly.
 
-- 
Rafael
--- End Message ---

Bug#356352: libsysfs2 patch

[Filippo Giunchedi]

On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 12:03:50AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Newest upstream is now 13.0. I've taken the patch, forward-ported it to 13.0
> and fixed a few errors (valgrind is very useful for this kind of work, by the
> way). It works without crashing or giving valgrind hits (at least "hwinfo"
> and "hwinfo --pci"), but it has a number of small memory leaks. (I suspect
> the latter is not a consequence of the patch, though.)

thanks!
as stated before I was unable to tell if hwinfo gave me more or less
informations than without the patch, though the patch looks rather easy I
suspect it is working.
Of course the best would be to hear from upstream but I doubt they care enough.

filippo
--
Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net
PGP key: 0x6B79D401
random quote follows:

Gretchen: Donnie Darko? What the hell kind of name is that? It's like
  some sort of superhero or something
Donnie: What makes you think I'm not?
-- from Donnie Darko (2001)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#356352: libsysfs2 patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 356352 + patch
Bug#356352: hwinfo - FTBFS: warning: implicit declaration of function 
'sysfs_read_dir_links'
Tags were: help
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376890: Uninstallable due to dep on libpetsc2.3.0

[Luk Claes]

Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:24:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
 Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
 not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
 libpetsc2.3.1.
> 
>>> Thank you.  I've known about this for some time, but can't seem to get
>>> illuminator into testing because PETSc doesn't build on HPPA.  Which is
>>> odd, because PETSc is in testing without the HPPA build...
> 
>> That was probably at the time hppa was temporary by the testing
>> transition tool not regarded as a release architecture...
> 
> No.  This is the standard requirement that a package not have any *out of
> date* binaries for any architecture.  Not being built for an architecture is
> acceptable and just means the package hasn't been ported to the arch yet,
> but having out-of-date binaries implies that there has been a regression on
> an architecture where this package is supported.  Since in this case the
> regression is caused by an unavailable build dependency, the proper course
> of action is to ask the ftpmasters for removal of the hppa binaries.  This
> is the maintainer's responsibility.

Some notes:

* this bug (#376890) is not architecture specific.
* petsc had binaries on hppa, though not anymore

If I'm right illuminator will only be able to transition to testing when
both this bug is fixed and the hppa issue is fixed (either by having
working binaries for petsc on hppa or by removing the previous hppa
illuminator binaries)...

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#377408: [Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#377408: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gtk2-engines-clearlooks

[Luk Claes]

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Luk Claes]
>> Your package is not installable as it depends on
>> gtk2-engines-clearlooks which is not available in unstable
>> (anymore).
> 
> Anyone know where that package went?  It was present when I wrote the
> dependency.  I find
> http://packages.debian.org/testing/gnome/gtk2-engines-clearlooks>,
> and it points to
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk2-engines.html> where
> gtk2-engines-clearlooks no longer is listed as a binary package.
> 
> Anyone know more?

gtk2-engines (1:2.6.8-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Complete rework of the package.
   * Now build only one binary: gtk2-engines.

This might be the answer...

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#356352: libsysfs2 patch

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

tags 356352 + patch
thanks

On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:06:39PM +0200, Morten Werner Olsen wrote:
> The patch applies fine with 12.33 (newest upstream I found atm), but I
> get this error when running hwinfo (this is the shared libary one -
> similar source package that is in experimental, but with your patch and
> newer upstream release):

Newest upstream is now 13.0. I've taken the patch, forward-ported it to 13.0
and fixed a few errors (valgrind is very useful for this kind of work, by the
way). It works without crashing or giving valgrind hits (at least "hwinfo"
and "hwinfo --pci"), but it has a number of small memory leaks. (I suspect
the latter is not a consequence of the patch, though.)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched: .depend
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched: hwinfo
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched: hwinfo.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: adb.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: bios.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: block.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: braille.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: cpu.o
Only in hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd: .depend
diff -ur hwinfo-13.0/src/hd/edd.c hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd/edd.c
--- hwinfo-13.0/src/hd/edd.c2006-06-29 16:03:37.0 +0200
+++ hwinfo-13.0.patched/src/hd/edd.c2006-07-08 23:47:31.0 +0200
@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@
   bios_info_t *bt;
   edd_info_t *ei;
 
-  struct sysfs_directory *sf_dir;
-  struct sysfs_directory *sf_dir_2;
-  struct sysfs_link *sf_link;
+  struct dlist *sf_dir_list;
+  struct sysfs_attribute *node, *tmpattr;
+  char attrpath[SYSFS_PATH_MAX], linkpath[SYSFS_PATH_MAX];
 
   for(u = 0; u < sizeof hd_data->edd / sizeof *hd_data->edd; u++) {
 free_mem(hd_data->edd[u].sysfs_id);
@@ -63,69 +63,92 @@
 
   memset(hd_data->edd, 0, sizeof hd_data->edd);
 
-  sf_dir = sysfs_open_directory("/sys/firmware/edd");
-
-  if(sf_dir) {
-if(!sysfs_read_all_subdirs(sf_dir)) {
-  if(sf_dir->subdirs) {
-dlist_for_each_data(sf_dir->subdirs, sf_dir_2, struct sysfs_directory) 
{
+  sf_dir_list = sysfs_open_directory_list("/sys/firmware/edd");
+  
+  if(sf_dir_list) {
+dlist_for_each_data(sf_dir_list, node, struct sysfs_attribute) {
 
   if(
-sscanf(sf_dir_2->name, "int13_dev%02x", &u) == 1 &&
+sscanf(node->name, "int13_dev%02x", &u) == 1 &&
 u >= 0x80 &&
 u <= 0xff
   ) {
+
 edd_cnt++;
 
 u -= 0x80;
 
 ei = hd_data->edd + u;
-
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"sectors"), &ul0, 0)) {
+
+sprintf(attrpath, "/sys/firmware/edd/%s/sectors", node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->sectors = ul0;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"default_cylinders"), &ul0, 0)) {
+sprintf(attrpath, "/sys/firmware/edd/%s/default_cylinders", 
node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->edd.cyls = ul0;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"default_heads"), &ul0, 0)) {
+sprintf(attrpath, "/sys/firmware/edd/%s/default_heads", 
node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->edd.heads = ul0;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"default_sectors_per_track"), &ul0, 0)) {
+sprintf(attrpath, 
"/sys/firmware/edd/%s/default_sectors_per_track", node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->edd.sectors = ul0;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"legacy_max_cylinder"), &ul0, 0)) {
+sprintf(attrpath, "/sys/firmware/edd/%s/legacy_max_cylinder", 
node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->legacy.cyls = ul0 + 1;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"legacy_max_head"), &ul0, 0)) {
+sprintf(attrpath, "/sys/firmware/edd/%s/legacy_max_head", 
node->name);
+tmpattr = sysfs_open_attribute(attrpath); 
+if(hd_attr_uint(tmpattr, &ul0, 0)) {
   ei->legacy.heads = ul0 + 1;
 }
+sysfs_close_attribute(tmpattr);
 
-if(hd_attr_uint(sysfs_get_directory_attribute(sf_dir_2, 
"legacy_sectors_per_track")

Bug#319389: acidlab: ACID looks dead should get replaced by BASE

[Jeremy Bouse]

Very good call then and makes sense... Maybe once I've finished moving and have my computers set back up at my new location cross-country I'll get to dealing with stuff that is currently being neglected. Note I'm sending this from my Gmail account as my systems are offline and unavailable till everything is moved.
Regards,Jeremy T. BouseOn 7/8/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
severity 319389 seriousthanks> Analysis Console for Intrusion Databases (ACID) looks very dead but> there's a Fork called BASE  out> there that's alive and kicking. please replace ACIDlab in debian with> BASE.In bug #366774 against this package, I find the following conversation:> Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> > Hi,> >> > "Jeremy T. Bouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (10/05/2006):> >>Being as ACID has lost all upstream development and is replaced by
> >> BASE don't consider anything being done with this package in the near> >> future.> >> > If your package is dead upstream and superseded by a better> > remplacement, why don't you ask for its removal?
>> Because frankly I've been too busy with other things going on in my life> that don't involve Debian to do so.The only reason that there hasn't been a removal request seems to belack of time with the maintainer. This leads me to believe that there's
enough reason to make this bug release-critical to prevent it from beingshipped in etch.Thijs-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQBEr8VtJdKMxZV9WM8RAkecAKCAC6t0RR93MG3MiVugVhEqe/ruRACfUKlK
qC0sbiRSkkF8q1k3cLi6+L8==+lRE-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#377432: pida: Won't start

[randhol]

Package: pida
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


When staring pida all I get is:


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/pida", line 5, in ?
from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
ImportError: No module named pkg_resources


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages pida depends on:
ii  python-gtk2 [python2.4-gt 2.8.6-3Python bindings for the GTK+ widge
ii  python2.4 2.4.3-7An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python2.4-setuptools  0.0.1.041214-1 Python Distutils Enhancements
ii  python2.4-vte 1:0.12.1-1 Python bindings for the VTE widget
ii  vim-gtk [gvim]1:7.0-017+8Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -
ii  vim-python [gvim] 1:7.0-017+8Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -

pida recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376890: Uninstallable due to dep on libpetsc2.3.0

[Steve Langasek]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:24:22PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
> >> not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
> >> libpetsc2.3.1.

> > Thank you.  I've known about this for some time, but can't seem to get
> > illuminator into testing because PETSc doesn't build on HPPA.  Which is
> > odd, because PETSc is in testing without the HPPA build...

> That was probably at the time hppa was temporary by the testing
> transition tool not regarded as a release architecture...

No.  This is the standard requirement that a package not have any *out of
date* binaries for any architecture.  Not being built for an architecture is
acceptable and just means the package hasn't been ported to the arch yet,
but having out-of-date binaries implies that there has been a regression on
an architecture where this package is supported.  Since in this case the
regression is caused by an unavailable build dependency, the proper course
of action is to ask the ftpmasters for removal of the hppa binaries.  This
is the maintainer's responsibility.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377109: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Joerg Schilling]

Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Don,

I see that you again seem to make wrong conclusions from the facts you
mention.

Answering your mail will take a long time in case you like to get
useful quotes for my claims.I will do this later.

For this reason, I like to send you a question that you could answer before
I answer your last mail. The main question seems to be whether resulting 
binaries may be redistributed. You did not give any reason why you believe that 
cdrtools binaries may not be redistributable by Debian.

It would help a lot if you did asume that the GPL allows a GPLd project to use
non-GOL code. I will explain you later why this is legal, but you need to send 
your questions as precise as possible to allow me to answer efficiently.

Now tell me why you believe that Debian dannot redistribute binaries.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Bug#377369: Xvnc4 still cannot find the "fixed" font.

[Ola Lundqvist]

reassign 377369 xfonts-base
thanks

Hi

This package have been able to show that font for ages. It must be the
package that provide that package that is wrong now.

I know that the directory have been changed, but if it breakes when
pointing out a new directory then this must be the fault of the
font package and not xvnc4server.

Regards,

// Ola

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:39:12PM +0200, daniele giacomini wrote:
> Package: vnc4server
> Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-10
> Severity: grave
> 
> 
> 
> Xvnc4 cannot find the "fixed" font. For example with this command:
> 
> $ Xvnc4 -fp /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc :1 [Enter]
> --
> Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'
> 
> Xvnc Free Edition 4.1.1 - built May 15 2006 20:53:26
> Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd.
> See http://www.realvnc.com for information on VNC.
> Underlying X server release 4030, The XFree86 Project, Inc
> 
> 
> Sat Jul  8 16:12:25 2006
>  vncext:  VNC extension running!
>  vncext:  Listening for VNC connections on port 5901
>  vncext:  created VNC server for screen 0
> error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
> 
> Fatal server error:
> could not open default font 'fixed'
> --
> 
> 
> Please note that that /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ contains the "fixed" font,
> as defined by /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias:
> 
> --
> !! fonts.alias -- automatically generated file.  DO NOT EDIT.
> !! To modify, see update-fonts-alias(8).
> !! /etc/X11/fonts/misc/xfonts-base.alias
> ! $Xorg: fonts.alias,v 1.3 2000/08/21 16:42:31 coskrey Exp $
> fixed-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
> variable -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
> ...
> 
> !! /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/misc/xfonts-base.alias
> ! $Xorg: fonts.alias,v 1.3 2000/08/21 16:42:31 coskrey Exp $
> fixed-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
> variable -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
> ...
> --
> 
> 
> $ dpkg -l xfonts-base [Enter]
> --
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
> |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: 
> uppercase=bad)
> ||/ Name   VersionDescription
> +++-==-==-
> ii  xfonts-base1.0.0-3standard fonts for X
> --
> 
> 
> Thank you for your attention.
> daniele giacomini
> 
> 
> 

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377423: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:48:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find 
boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: serious
Justification: 3

Hardware:
ASUS P5WD2
Maxtor SATA 300G
DELL monitor with 4 usb card readers FPW2004

Configuration:
Maxtor hard drive connected to SATA port 1 (sda)
The ATA bus is configured in BIOS to AHCI mode.

Problem:

The kernel randomly swaps the /dev/sda to /dev/sde device and back on boot-up.
The confusion occurs when the kernel spontaneously 
assigns /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd to the USB based card 
readers.
If the kernel selects /dev/sda (SATA IDE) as the boot drive all is good.
If the kernel assigns /dev/sda to one of the USB card readers, than the AHCI 
bus SATA drive gets /dev/sde and the error is"  "Waiting for no boot device"

P.S same thing occurs with   2.6.17-1-em64t-p4-smp

Andrew.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp depends on:
ii  e2fsprogs 1.39-1 ext2 file system utilities and 
lib ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.60   tools for generating an
 initramfs ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing
 Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
 
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-sm
p:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p
4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4
-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-2-em
64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: false
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
 
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-
2-em64t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-2-em
64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-2-em64t-p
4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-sm
p: false
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp:
 true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-2-em64t
-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-
smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-2-em64t
-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-2-em6
4t-p4-smp: true linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:

---

-- 
Andrew

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:10:53PM -0400, Andrew Nady wrote:
> The kernel randomly swaps the /dev/sda to /dev/sde device and back on boot-up.
> The confusion occurs when the kernel spontaneously 
> assigns /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd to the USB based card 
> readers.

The device names are not considered stable. Use udev.

Bastian

-- 
Totally illogical, there was no chance.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#377418: xulrunner - FTBFS: Assumes s390x even if dpkg-architecture reports s390

[Mike Hommey]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:09:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
> > and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I think that shouldn't
> > qualify as RC. What do you think ?
> 
> This is not crosscompiling. The host and the build arch are identical.
> For crosscompiling they are different.
> 
> Also s390x will be the only kernel type for s390 in long time.

Building s390 on s390 is ok. Building s390x on s390x is ok.
I don't how it will be a problem when kernel switch.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#377369: Xvnc4 still cannot find the "fixed" font.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 377369 xfonts-base
Bug#377369: Xvnc4 still cannot find the "fixed" font.
Bug reassigned from package `vnc4server' to `xfonts-base'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377109: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Don Armstrong]

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The GNU GPL only allows this when it is possible to satisfy the
> > conditions of the GPL for the distributed work. For example, this
> > is why it is possible to combine MIT licensed works with GPLed
> > works.
> 
> Your assumption is made on wrong general prerequisites.
> 
> The CDDL definitely does not have any requirements on "other" code
> as it is a clearly file based license. For this rerason, your
> statements (below) on the CDDL are wrong.

Neither license has anything to do with files. The licenses work the
same regardless of whether you have a single file with sections under
multiple licenses or multiple files each under a single license.

> Other claims often made about the GPL when talking about the GPL
> cannot be found in the original GPL text, viloate the law and thus
> are void.

Violate which law(s)? Realize of course, that we're talking about
distribution in multiple countries here, of which Germany is just one.

> The GPL includes no text that is related to GPL projects that
> include/use non-GPLd code. As the GPL in general permits to use the
> code, this is a permitted use.

The direction is irrelevant. It's just as valid to say that you've
taken the "Schilly makefile" project (CDDLed) and added to it GPLed
code. If what you're saying where actually the case, it would make the
GPL meaningless.

> Note that you simply cannot create a license that tries to enforce
> conditions on other people's code because this would be illegal.

You missunderstand what the GPL (and to a lesser extent the CDDL)
does. It doesn't *force* you to satisfy the conditions; it *prohibits*
you from distributing the GPLed code when you cannot.

GPL 2 directly addresses this:

 Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or
 contest your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the
 intent is to exercise the right to control the distribution of
 derivative or collective works based on the Program.
 
> Many people forget about the law and about the original intention of
> the FSF when talking about the GPL. Unless you asume that the FSF is
> acting like Microsoft, it is obvious that the intention of the FSF
> it "only" to prevent the GPLd code from disappearing in CSS projects
> and to keep it free. Both do not apply to code under the CDDL
> because the CDDL is a free license that itself tries to prevent the
> code from being made non-free.

The intention of the GPL is to keep code that is GPLed Free Software
that preserves the Four Freedoms; in order to do this, restrictions
which are not present in the GPL are not allowed to be placed on GPLed
works. This, as a side effect, makes it incompatible with the CDDL.
That the licenses have similar philosophical backgrounds is great, but
doesn't affect whether they are compatible or not.

> See above: The GPL (see GPL § 2b) only requires the whole work to be
> distributed under the GPL in case that a non-GPL project tries to
> use GPL code. The GPL does not contain any text that could cause the
> assumption the GPL tries to enforce restrictions on non-GPL code.

2b does not distinguish between these cases at all.

> > direction. Indeed, I've been told by those involved in the
> > drafting of the CDDL that this was done by design. [See the video
> > of the Solaris discussion at Debconf 6 if you want to see someone
> > talk about it; you can also see me discussing this issue and
> > others as well in the same video.]
> 
> This is of course wrong - sorry. Please stop distributing wrong
> claims.

Nothing that I've said above is incorrect. You may disagree with what
the people who told me have said, but that has nothing to do with me
reporting what I've heard. Contact Danese Cooper if you want to debate
this more completely, as she is the one who said this.
 
> The reason for not using the GPL for OpenSolaris is simple: The GPL
> (if used for OpenSolaris) would not allow Sun to create the "Sun
> Solaris Distribution" from the OpenSolaris sources.

Sun owns the copyright. Nothing keeps them from doual licensing that
code under multitple licenses. Indeed, nothing keeps you from dual
licensing the "Schilly makefiles" either, assuming you actually own
the copyright on them.
 
> I should mention that not all CDDL/GPL combinations are possible and
> that a European Author has the right to create more legal
> combinations than a US Author has. This is a result of the archaic
> US Copyright law. This does however not limit the
> re-distributability of the code as the USA accept the European
> "Urheberrecht" (which is much more than just the US Copyright law)
> if the Author is European and European countries accept the US
> Copyright law if the Author is a US Citizen.

That's the first I've ever heard of that argument; can you provide a
case law citation? In any event, it's quite likely that some of the
authors of code upon which cdrtools is based are (or

Bug#376265: llvm: (i386/unstable) FTBFS: gcc-4.1: ICE Segmentation fault

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:50:40PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> While investigating the possibility of building your package with automake1.9
> I discovered a problem. I then just tried to build with the plain sources from
> unstable in a clean chroot with the default compiler from unstable and it 
> fails with the following error:

When reporting an ICE in gcc, please include at least the version number of
the gcc-4.1 package; I've tried to build llvm with both 4.1.1-5 and 4.1.1-7,
and it builds fine with both for me.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: block 377234 with 377259

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> block 377234 with 377259
Bug#377234: gnome-keyring: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 377259

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xdkcal 0.9d-2.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376402 + fixed
Bug#376402: Uninstallable due to xorg transition
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xcalendar-i18n 4.0.0.i18p1-13.2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 364512 + fixed
Bug#364512: xcalendar-i18n: conflicts with x11-common
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> tag 376403 + fixed
Bug#376403: Uninstallable due to xorg transition
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377423: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp: Fails to find boot device (AHCI ICH7 Family)

[Andrew Nady]

Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: serious
Justification: 3

Hardware:
ASUS P5WD2
Maxtor SATA 300G
DELL monitor with 4 usb card readers FPW2004

Configuration:
Maxtor hard drive connected to SATA port 1 (sda)
The ATA bus is configured in BIOS to AHCI mode.

Problem:

The kernel randomly swaps the /dev/sda to /dev/sde device and back on boot-up.
The confusion occurs when the kernel spontaneously 
assigns /dev/sda, /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd to the USB based card 
readers.
If the kernel selects /dev/sda (SATA IDE) as the boot drive all is good.
If the kernel assigns /dev/sda to one of the USB card readers, than the AHCI 
bus SATA drive gets /dev/sde and the error is"  "Waiting for no boot device"

P.S same thing occurs with   2.6.17-1-em64t-p4-smp

Andrew.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp depends on:
ii  e2fsprogs 1.39-1 ext2 file system utilities and 
lib ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.60   tools for generating an
 initramfs ii  module-init-tools 3.2.2-3tools for managing
 Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
 
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/abort-install-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-sm
p:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p
4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4
-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.16-2-em
64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: false
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
 
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.16-2-em64
t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.16-
2-em64t-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.16-2-em
64t-p4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.16-2-em64t-p
4-smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-sm
p: false
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp:
 true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp
: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.16-2-em64t
-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-
smp:
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.16-2-em64t
-p4-smp: true
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.16-2-em6
4t-p4-smp: true linux-image-2.6.16-2-em64t-p4-smp/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:

---

-- 
Andrew


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377418: xulrunner - FTBFS: Assumes s390x even if dpkg-architecture reports s390

[Bastian Blank]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
> and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I think that shouldn't
> qualify as RC. What do you think ?

This is not crosscompiling. The host and the build arch are identical.
For crosscompiling they are different.

Also s390x will be the only kernel type for s390 in long time.

Bastian

-- 
A woman should have compassion.
-- Kirk, "Catspaw", stardate 3018.2

Bug#332227: fixed in yaboot-installer_1.1.7 ?

[Holger Levsen]

Hi,

yaboot-installer_1.1.7 was uploaded three days ago and fixed #375505 and 
#377098 which look quite similar to these bugs - could you please try again 
with a new daily build from sid and see if the bug still exists?

From the changelog:

   * Only write  magicboot= line on NewWorld PowerMacs (closes: #375505).
   * If ofpath returns nothing, try leaving out the device= line in the hope
 that yaboot will figure it out (it's better than writing an unparseable
 configuration file; see #375505).
   * Write appropriate console=hvc* into append= line if using an HVC virtual
 serial console (closes: #377098).


regards,
Holger


pgpzt1ygC853S.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#376167: marked as done (solfege - FTBFS: Cannot rebuild html docs because we are missing the docbook stylesheet.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 21:45:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376167: solfege - FTBFS: Cannot rebuild html docs because 
we are missing the docbook stylesheet.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: solfege
Version: 3.4.0-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of solfege_3.4.0-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: swig, gettext, python-dev, debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), m4, 
> texinfo, python-gnome2 (>= 1.99.11), python-gnome2-extras-dev (>= 2.10.0), 
> python-gnome2-extras (>= 2.10.0), python-gtk2 (>= 1.99.11), python-gtk2-dev 
> (>= 2.6.1), python-gnome2-dev (>= 2.10.0), librsvg2-bin, txt2man, pkg-config, 
> libglib2.0-dev (>= 2.8.0), python-support (>= 0.3)
[...]
> mkdir -p share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES
> cp po/tr.mo share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/solfege.mo
> *** Cannot rebuild html docs because we are missing the docbook stylesheet.
> *** Try to install the missing software and reconfigure.
> *** Run make as 'make skipmanual=yes' to ignore the problem and don't build 
> the docs
> exit -1
> make[1]: *** [help/C/index.html] Error 255
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/solfege-3.4.0'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060630-1811
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 3.4.0-3

Fixed in solfege 3.4.0-3. Forgot to close this bug in the changelog.
-- 
Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/
GNU Solfege - free ear traininghttp://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/
--- End Message ---

Processed: Making xorg-server FTBFS RC

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 362641 serious
Bug#362641: xorg-server - FTBFS: Uses inline assembler unconditionaly
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Joerg Schilling]

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:32]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
> > > you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm not
> > > doing total mouthfeeding for you now.
> > 
> > As you continue to send irrelevent rants, you are obviously not
> > able or willing to have a fruitful discussion.
> > 
> > Please stay off this discussion unless you have anything relevent
> > to say!
>
> Obviously you seem to totally misinterpret the status. I'm a Debian
> officer, and it is my duty to protect people who use Debian ressources
> from lies. You are a random troll.

You send 5 trollish posts in a row. It is obvious that you are the poor 
troll...

It seems that I need to ignore your fruitless rants until you proove that
you are willing to have a fruitful discussion based on proovable facts.

You could do other people a favor by stopping your useless rants to this
list.

In case you did not get it: this is the End of discussion with _you_
but I am still in hope to talk to people from _Debian_ who are interested
in a fact based discussion.

I know that there are people (e.g. Don Armstrong) who are able to have
a fact based discussion. I did send a long fact based reply to Don Armstrong
today noon and I am still interested in getting a fact based reply on that 
mail. 

To Don Armstrong: 

It may be the main point that people fear that compiling cdrtools
creates unredistibutable binaries. I see no reason why binaries may
be unredistibutable as I don't see any contradictory requirements
from CDDL/GPL. Both licenses are source licenses and require to make the
source available in case a binary is distributed. This is no contradiction
but just the same requirement.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Bug#377418: xulrunner - FTBFS: Assumes s390x even if dpkg-architecture reports s390

[Mike Hommey]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Version: 1.8.0.4-2
> Severity: serious
> 
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:


This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I think that shouldn't
qualify as RC. What do you think ?

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377414: vzquota - FTBFS: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type

[Bastian Blank]

Package: vzquota
Version: 3.0.8-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of vzquota_3.0.8-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> cc -c -pipe -I../include -g -Wall -Werror -Wformat -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 
> -D_LINUX_QUOTA_VERSION=6 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DL2 -DVARDIR=\"/var/lib\"  
> common.c -o common.o
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> common.c: In function 'parse_options':
> common.c:444: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data 
> type
> make[2]: *** [common.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzquota-3.0.8/src'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vzquota-3.0.8'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> ******
> Build finished at 20060708-1956
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377420: mod-bt - FTBFS: Not resolvable build dependencies

[Bastian Blank]

Package: mod-bt
Version: 0.0.18+p4.1178-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of mod-bt_0.0.18+p4.1178-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by 
> sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.2.32), cpio, apache2-prefork-dev, libxml2-dev, 
> libapr1-dev | libapr0-dev, libdb4.4-dev | libdb4.3-dev | libdb4.2-dev, 
> automake1.9, autoconf, perl, libapache2-mod-perl2-dev, php4-dev, php5-dev, 
> php5-cli | php4-cli
[...]
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   apache2-prefork-dev: Depends: libapr0-dev (= 2.0.55-4) but it is not going 
> to be installed
>Depends: libdb4.3-dev but it is not going to be 
> installed
> E: Broken packages

apache2-prefork-dev depends on libapr0-dev which conflicts with
libapr1-dev.

Bastian

-- 
If a man had a child who'd gone anti-social, killed perhaps, he'd still
tend to protect that child.
-- McCoy, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377408: [Pkg-ltsp-devel] Bug#377408: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gtk2-engines-clearlooks

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

[Luk Claes]
> Your package is not installable as it depends on
> gtk2-engines-clearlooks which is not available in unstable
> (anymore).

Anyone know where that package went?  It was present when I wrote the
dependency.  I find
http://packages.debian.org/testing/gnome/gtk2-engines-clearlooks>,
and it points to
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk2-engines.html> where
gtk2-engines-clearlooks no longer is listed as a binary package.

Anyone know more?

Friendly,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 377401 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 377401 serious
Bug#377401: libdnsres: FTBFS: incomplete build-depends
Warning: Unknown package 'libdnsres'
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Andreas Barth]

* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:32]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Please see Don's reply. It contains all useful information. Even though
> > you behave like a Kindergarte would be the right place for you, I'm not
> > doing total mouthfeeding for you now.
> 
> As you continue to send irrelevent rants, you are obviously not
> able or willing to have a fruitful discussion.
> 
> Please stay off this discussion unless you have anything relevent
> to say!

Obviously you seem to totally misinterpret the status. I'm a Debian
officer, and it is my duty to protect people who use Debian ressources
from lies. You are a random troll.

But this answer shows as so many that you really need to
a) get a life, and
b) get some professional help.


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Andreas Barth]

* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 20:59]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> > > distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.
> >
> > Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
> > This is the case here. As Debian provides binaries for anything in main,
> > and this is not possible with your combination, your package cannot go
> > to main.
> 
> You still seem to prefer to write claims without a proof, so it is obvious 
> that
> your claims are wrong.

You shouldn't think all people follow your strategy to make claims
without a proof. I still wait for any proof for your claim made in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] about the apache people.

Actually, if you think any of above is without proof, please point out
at which place.

> Could we please have a fact based discussion?

Oh, when do you start your therapy?


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377418: xulrunner - FTBFS: Assumes s390x even if dpkg-architecture reports s390

[Bastian Blank]

Package: xulrunner
Version: 1.8.0.4-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of xulrunner_1.8.0.4-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> make[8]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> c++ -o xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o -c -fvisibility=hidden -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\" 
> -DOSARCH=\"Linux\" -DBUILD_ID=00 -DEXPORT_XPTC_API   
> -I../../../../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../../../../dist/include 
> -I../../../../../../dist/include/nspr-I../../../../../../dist/sdk/include 
> -I./../..-fPIC   -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion 
> -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth 
> -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -fshort-wchar 
> -pthread -pipe  -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g 
> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-inline -fomit-frame-pointer -mbackchain   
> -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../../../../mozilla-config.h 
> -Wp,-MD,.deps/xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.pp xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp: In function 'nsresult 
> XPTC_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports*, PRUint32, PRUint32, nsXPTCVariant*)':
> xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.cpp:248: error: can't find a register in class 
> 'ADDR_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
> make[8]: *** [xptcinvoke_linux_s390x.o] Error 1
> make[8]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md/unix'
> make[7]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[7]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src/md'
> make[6]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[6]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/src'
> make[5]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[5]: Leaving directory 
> `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect/xptcall'
> make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom/reflect'
> make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4/xpcom'
> make[2]: *** [tier_2] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4'
> make[1]: *** [default] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xulrunner-1.8.0.4'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060708-2029
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377419: tremulous - FTBFS: error: current build architecture s390 does not appear in package's list (i386)

[Bastian Blank]

Package: tremulous
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of tremulous_1.1.0-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> dh_shlibdeps
> dh_gencontrol
> dpkg-gencontrol: error: current build architecture s390 does not appear in 
> package's list (i386)
> dh_gencontrol: command returned error code 65280
> make[1]: *** [binary-common] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/tremulous-1.1.0'
> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2
> ******
> Build finished at 20060708-1845
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 376488 linux-2.6
Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686' to `linux-2.6'.

> forcemerge 368544 376488
Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies
Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#368937: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install
Bug#373610: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-486: dependency unmet
Bug#373616: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: dependency unmet
Bug#373617: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-k7: dependency unmet
Bug#375432: One package is missing
Bug#375562: unsatisfiable Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing 
dependencies
Bug#375859: linux-headers-2.6.17-1: package uninstallable as it depends on the 
package linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#375906: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Not installable on sid: depends on 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist
Bug#376121: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: depends on non-existing package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#376174: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686 depends on nonexistent package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#376290: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: fails to install
Bug#376305: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8: not installable because of 
dependency on "linux-kbuild-2.6.17"
Bug#376792: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7 uninstallable
Bug#377235: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: package uninstallable
Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does 
not exist
Forcibly Merged 368544 368667 368937 373610 373616 373617 375432 375562 375647 
375859 375906 376121 376174 376290 376305 376488 376792 377235 377375.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Joerg Schilling]

Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> > The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> > distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.
>
> Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
> This is the case here. As Debian provides binaries for anything in main,
> and this is not possible with your combination, your package cannot go
> to main.

You still seem to prefer to write claims without a proof, so it is obvious that
your claims are wrong.


Could we please have a fact based discussion?

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

Bug#377109: Bug#350739: #350739: cdrecord status?

[Andreas Barth]

* Joerg Schilling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 12:28]:
> The GPL enforces other contidions under which the resultant binary may be
> distributed but it does not enforce _anything_ on the non-GPL source.

Well, but it might result in the binary being unredistributable at all.
This is the case here. As Debian provides binaries for anything in main,
and this is not possible with your combination, your package cannot go
to main.


Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of sablotron 1.0.2-5.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376166 + fixed
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376586: marked as done (dar: Library not found after upgrade to 2.3.0-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:07:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376586: fixed in dar 2.3.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dar
Version: 2.3.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

After upgrading dar, dar_static, dar_docs & libdar4 from version 2.3.0-2 to 
2.3.0-3 the following error occurs when trying to run dar:

dar: error while loading shared libraries: libdar64.so.4: cannot open shared 
object file: No such file or directory

dar then aborts. Downgrading to version 2.3.0-2 for the above named packages 
clears up the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages dar depends on:
ii  libattr1  2.4.32-1   Extended attribute shared library
ii  libbz2-1.01.0.3-2high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6 2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdar4   2.3.0-3Disk ARchive: Shared library
ii  libgcc1   1:4.1.1-7  GCC support library
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8b-2   SSL shared libraries
ii  libstdc++64.1.1-7The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3-12 compression library - runtime

dar recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dar
Source-Version: 2.3.0-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dar-docs_2.3.0-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/dar/dar-docs_2.3.0-4_all.deb
dar-static_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dar/dar-static_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
dar_2.3.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/dar/dar_2.3.0-4.diff.gz
dar_2.3.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/d/dar/dar_2.3.0-4.dsc
dar_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dar/dar_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
libdar-dev_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dar/libdar-dev_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
libdar64-4_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/dar/libdar64-4_2.3.0-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  8 Jul 2006 17:14:01 +1000
Source: dar
Binary: dar-static libdar-dev dar libdar64-4 dar-docs
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.3.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 dar- Disk ARchive: Backup directory tree and files
 dar-docs   - Disk ARchive: Backup directory tree and files
 dar-static - Disk ARchive: Backup directory tree and files
 libdar-dev - Disk ARchive: Development files for shared library
 libdar64-4 - Disk ARchive: Shared library
Closes: 376586
Changes: 
 dar (2.3.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Replace libdar package with libdar64_4 (closes: #376586).
Files: 
 be8f88361ed3ac1635af8f833d72596c 672 utils optional dar_2.3.0-4.dsc
 f6da24697bdd5697c59873bf7479a75c 5267 utils optional dar_2.3.0-4.diff.gz
 2e68c8d2ed8bbf7c8f388647f0bc6589 778416 doc optional dar-docs_2.3.0-4_all.deb
 c6ffb0b3766c16c0c7694fe7d3a35fff 881638 devel optional 
libdar-dev_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
 125a4710d964a5ce1d4751b2880f7e52 522572 libs optional 
libdar64-4_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
 22ee1909ac83583a7973b25cec76b887 1079694 utils optional 
dar-static_2.3.0-4_i386.deb
 b12d65f5b638c636657f6bd662bda21e 287720 utils optional dar_2.3.0-4_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEr1+TuCinHABTDCQRAhMGAKCabzH8DYH7WA4+epq2/PdIqcPavwCfUZyN
T/qiA0qFLhCA9IFiUSyzZ0g=
=kX4t
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377408: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gtk2-engines-clearlooks

[Luk Claes]

Package: ldm
Severity: serious
Version: 0.87debian2

Hi

Your package is not installable as it depends on gtk2-engines-clearlooks
which is not available in unstable (anymore).

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: #376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 376488 grave
Bug#376488: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: unmet dependencies
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376166 + patch
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks سلام שבת שלום
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references

[Mohammed Adnène Trojette]

tag 376166 + patch
thanks سلام שבת שלום
 
> Everything is not yet clean. I'll rework the patch and send a good one.
> Sorry for the noise.

Here it is. Sorry again.

-- 
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Source: sablotron
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6), debhelper, libxml-parser-perl, cdbs, 
build-essential (>= 11)
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1
+Build-Depends: libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6), debhelper, libxml-parser-perl, cdbs
+Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: sablotron
 Architecture: any
 Section: text
-Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version})
+Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), ${misc:Depends}
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
  XSLT 1.0, DOM Level2 and XPath 1.0.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 Package: libsablot0-dev
 Architecture: any
 Section: libdevel
-Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, 
libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6)
 Replaces: sablotron (<< 1.0.2-1)
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++ [development]
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 Conflicts: libsablot0c102
 Architecture: any
 Section: libs
-Depends: libexpat1 (>= 1.95.6), ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
  XSLT 1.0, DOM Level2 and XPath 1.0.
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+sablotron (1.0.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: 
++ Add explicitly -lexpat in LDFLAGS (Closes: #376166).
++ Specify sabcmd.1 and sablot-config.1 location.
+  * debian/control:
++ Bump Standards-Versions to 3.7.2.
++ Add ${shlib:Depends} and ${misc:Depends} here and there.
+
+ -- Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat,  8 Jul 2006 00:34:29 
+0200
+
 sablotron (1.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * [FTBFS] Add back manual page for sablot-config (Closes: 360720)
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk
 
+DEB_INSTALL_MANPAGES_sablotron := doc/man/sabcmd.1 doc/man/sablot-config.1
+
 CFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT
 CXXFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT
 
@@ -16,2 +18,5 @@
 
+# Link with -lexpat
+LDFLAGS += -lexpat
+
 DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-debugger

Bug#376890: Uninstallable due to dep on libpetsc2.3.0

[Luk Claes]

Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:02 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Package: libluminate7
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 0.10.0-2
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Your package is not installable as it depends on libpetsc2.3.0 which is
>> not available anymore. You might want to update the dependency to
>> libpetsc2.3.1.
> 
> Thank you.  I've known about this for some time, but can't seem to get
> illuminator into testing because PETSc doesn't build on HPPA.  Which is
> odd, because PETSc is in testing without the HPPA build...

That was probably at the time hppa was temporary by the testing
transition tool not regarded as a release architecture...

> I'll try to clear up the PETSc issue, then re-upload illuminator.

Not sure it that's a good idea (the waiting to upload) as it makes
illuminator uninstallable on all arches in unstable ATM...

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#377395: dpkg: FTBFS on mips

[Nicolas François]

Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

Hello,


dpkg currently fails to build from source on mips, which stops its
transition to testing.
The build log is available at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=dpkg&ver=1.13.22&arch=mips&stamp=1150904570&file=log&as=raw

After an investigation with Thiemo Seufer, this issue is caused by perl.
perl also FTBFS on mips, and the mips build daemon uses perl 5.8.8-4 and
perl-modules 5.8.8-6.
With this combination, the Encode::JP::JIS7 module is not installed, which
finaly causes the dpkg build failure.

To fix this bug, I can see the following actions:
 1) wait until #374396 (perl FTBFS on mips) or #377385 (perl-modules
dependencies) is fixed
 2) manually build dpkg on mips with perl-modules 5.8.8-4
 3) adding `|| true' after calling po4a to make sure the generation of the
translated man pages do not stop the build.

Note: the FTBFS in probably also present on hppa (where perl also FTBFS).

Kind Regards,
-- 
Nekral


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377394: python-qt3: arm/3.16-1.2: FTBFS

[Adeodato Simó]

Package: python-qt3
Version: 3.16-1.2
Severity: serious

Hi,

python-qt3 fails to build from source on arm:

sipqtpart0.cpp: In function 'PyObject* func_qUncompress(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
sipqtpart0.cpp:11196: error: invalid conversion from 'QByteArray*' to 'int'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11196: error:   initializing argument 1 of 
'QMemArray::QMemArray(int) [with type = char]'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11198: error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11210: error: invalid conversion from 'QByteArray*' to 'int'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11210: error:   initializing argument 1 of 
'QMemArray::QMemArray(int) [with type = char]'
sipqtpart0.cpp:11214: error: invalid conversion from 'const void*' to 'void*'

A full log can be found here:

  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=python-qt3&ver=3.16-1.2&arch=arm&stamp=1152005539&file=log&as=raw

Thanks,

-- 
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer  adeodato at debian.org
 
Listening to: Alanis Morissette - Head over feet

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 377293 pending
Bug#377293: boson-music: unnecessarily depends on boson.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 373856 to python-central

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 373856 python-central
Bug#373856: python2.4-minimal: Install/Upgrade fails: "TypeError: unindexable 
object"
Bug#373857: Unable to update python2.4-minimal v2.4.3-7 and python2.4 with 
today's apt-get updates (6/15/2006).
Bug#373884: python2.4-minimal: Upgrading package fails
Bug#373922: python2.4-minimal fails to install
Bug reassigned from package `python2.4-minimal' to `python-central'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308200: blackbox-themes copyright file

[Bruno Barrera C.]

On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 11:48 -0400, Andrew Moise wrote:
>   Bruno, would you object if I NMUed a new version of this package, with
> the copyright file I attached earlier in this bug report?

I would prefer if we can discuss the changes in IRC or through Email.

What do you plan to do? I'm interested in to see that it can be done.

Thanks,
-- 
Midway upon the journey of our life,
I found myself within a forest dark,
For the straightforward pathway had been lost.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references

[Mohammed Adnène Trojette]

tag 376166 - patch
thanks سلام שבת שלום

> Here a fixed patch (the first had some superfluous or wrong things in it).

Everything is not yet clean. I'll rework the patch and send a good one.
Sorry for the noise.

-- 
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette

Processed: Re: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376166 - patch
Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

> thanks سلام שבת שלום
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: control

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 377375 linux-2.6
Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does 
not exist
Bug reassigned from package `linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7' to `linux-2.6'.

> forcemerge 368544 377375
Bug#368544: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does 
not exist
Bug#368667: unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#368937: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install
Bug#373610: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-486: dependency unmet
Bug#373616: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: dependency unmet
Bug#373617: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-k7: dependency unmet
Bug#375432: One package is missing
Bug#375562: unsatisfiable Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#375647: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing 
dependencies
Bug#375859: linux-headers-2.6.17-1: package uninstallable as it depends on the 
package linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#375906: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Not installable on sid: depends on 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist
Bug#376121: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: depends on non-existing package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#376174: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686 depends on nonexistent package 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Bug#376290: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: fails to install
Bug#376305: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8: not installable because of 
dependency on "linux-kbuild-2.6.17"
Bug#376792: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7 uninstallable
Bug#377235: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: package uninstallable
Forcibly Merged 368544 368667 368937 373610 373616 373617 375432 375562 375647 
375859 375906 376121 376174 376290 376305 376792 377235 377375.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of spandsp 0.0.2pre25-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376249 + fixed
Bug#376249: spandsp: runaway `extern "C"' in 
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376166: sablotron: FTBFS: Undefined references

[Mohammed Adnène Trojette]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> tag 376166 patch
> thanks سلام שבת שלום
> 
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > /tmp/buildd/sablotron-1.0.2/src/engine/parser.cpp:381: undefined reference 
> > to `XML_SetEncoding'
> > ...
> 
> Here is a patch that fix the FTBFS bug. I also provide a manpage as
> required for any binary in /usr/bin.

Here a fixed patch (the first had some superfluous or wrong things in it).

-- 
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/control
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Source: sablotron
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Ondřej Surý <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6), debhelper, libxml-parser-perl, cdbs, 
build-essential (>= 11)
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1
+Build-Depends: libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6), debhelper, libxml-parser-perl, cdbs
+Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: sablotron
 Architecture: any
 Section: text
-Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version})
+Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), ${misc:Depends}
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
  XSLT 1.0, DOM Level2 and XPath 1.0.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 Package: libsablot0-dev
 Architecture: any
 Section: libdevel
-Depends: libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libsablot0 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, 
libexpat1-dev (>= 1.95.6)
 Replaces: sablotron (<< 1.0.2-1)
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++ [development]
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 Conflicts: libsablot0c102
 Architecture: any
 Section: libs
-Depends: libexpat1 (>= 1.95.6), ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
 Description: an XSL processor fully implemented in C++
  Sablotron is a fast, compact and portable XML toolkit implementing
  XSLT 1.0, DOM Level2 and XPath 1.0.
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+sablotron (1.0.2-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * debian/rules: 
++ Add explicit -lexpat (Closes: #376166).
++ Compile with -fPIC.
++ Specify sabcmd.1 and sablot-config.1 location.
+  * debian/control:
++ Bump Standards-Versions to 3.7.2.
++ Add ${shlib:Depends} and ${misc:Depends} here and there.
+
+ -- Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Sat,  8 Jul 2006 00:34:29 
+0200
+
 sablotron (1.0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * [FTBFS] Add back manual page for sablot-config (Closes: 360720)
diff -u sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
--- sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
+++ sablotron-1.0.2/debian/rules
@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk
 include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk
 
-CFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT
-CXXFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT
+DEB_INSTALL_MANPAGES_sablotron := doc/man/sabcmd.1 doc/man/sablot-config.1
+
+CFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT -fPIC
+CXXFLAGS := -Wall -g -D_REENTRANT -lexpat -fPIC
 
 # Ensure at build time that the library has no dependencies on undefined
 # symbols.

Processed: Re: Bug#357788: fixed in dmapi 2.2.4-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 357788 dmapi
Bug#357788: FTBFS (64 bit): conflicting types for '__s64'
Bug reassigned from package `xfsdump' to `dmapi'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376249: marked as done (spandsp: runaway `extern "C"' in )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 17:23:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of spandsp 0.0.2pre25-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: spandsp
Version: 0.0.2pre25-1
Tags: patch
Severity: serious
Justification: part of the reason yate fails to build (#358131)

debian/patches/nonmmx.dpatch is meant to disable  on
architectures other than i386.  However, due to a combination of
upstream changes, it applies with too much fuzz, and leaves an `extern
"C"' with no closing bracket.  Since one of the upstream changes is an
equivalent check for __i386__, the patch can simply be removed.

Thanks,

Matej

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.0.2pre25-1.1

I've NMUed for this bug (fixing the bug to use versioning instead of the
"fixed" tag, to ease tracking through testing); here's the changelog:

>  spandsp (0.0.2pre25-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
>  .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* Remove "nonmmx" patch, which is superseded by changes in upstream, and
>  causes FTBFS for non-i386 architectures. (Closes: #376249)

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--- End Message ---

Bug#278527: marked as done (pvpgn: depends on external, possibly nondistributable files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:00:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278527: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: pvpgn
Version: 1.6.4+20040826-1
Severity: wishlist

you should probably add files from pvpgn-support-1.0.tar.gz found in 
sourceforge.net, it adds

bnserver-D2DV.ini  icons.bni   matchmaking-war3-default.dat  XMACver1.mpq
bnserver-D2XP.ini  icons_STAR.bni  matchmaking-war3-enUS.dat
bnserver.ini   icons-WAR3.bni  PMACver1.mpq
bnserver-WAR3.ini  IX86ver1.mpqWAR3IX86.mpq

in /var/lib/pvpgn/files, which are needed to start bnetd

you can download them at
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/pvpgn/pvpgn-support-1.0.tar.gz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages pvpgn depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.2-1compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pvpgn
Source-Version: 1.7.9-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pvpgn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pvpgn package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  3 Jul 2006 01:13:25 +0300
Source: pvpgn
Binary: pvpgn
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 pvpgn  - Gaming server that emulates Battle.net(R)
Closes: 278527 373245
Changes: 
 pvpgn (1.7.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Move pvpgn to contrib
   * Added note in README.Debian about the Battle.Net TOS violation
 (closes: #278527)
   * Fix pvpgn removal bug (closes: #373245)
Files: 
 ae5e8d8c23b55d39de6574b57662e135 665 contrib/net optional pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
 bbf5f9a6fa09dde14b606f7b4d873d21 6723 contrib/net optional 
pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
 72a0dee8496d124fc4b1918b817da320 773484 contrib/net optional 
pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEqFWQJkMZOMmr+9MRArRFAJ0ShdPFiRWR2LKc9wfCaQ58MGujfQCeMDy0
cqqek7UoGCyAtjCxyXt23/M=
=lcy2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375677: apt-proxy: patch for fixing the problem

[Daniel 'DaB.' Baur]

Package: apt-proxy
Version: 1.9.33-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #375677


The following patch for the file 

/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py

fixed the problem

Sincerly,
DaB.

8c8
< from twisted.conch import telnet
---
> from twisted.protocols import telnet


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.20
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages apt-proxy depends on:
ii  adduser   3.87   Add and remove users and groups
ii  bzip2 1.0.3-2high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.2  Debian configuration management sy
ii  logrotate 3.7.1-3Log rotation utility
pn  python (no description available)
pn  python-apt (no description available)
ii  python-twisted2.2.0-2Event-based framework for internet
ii  python-twisted-web0.5.0-4.1  An HTTP protocol implementation to

apt-proxy recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  apt-proxy/upgrading-v2:
  apt-proxy/upgrading-v2-result:


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377375: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Requires linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist

[Kristine Daniels]

Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Subject says it all.  This headers package has been out here for over
a week without a corresponding kbuild package.
Kindly provide the kbuild package, or fix the headers package not to require
the kbuild package.

Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#373245: marked as done (Fails to get removed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:00:42 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373245: fixed in pvpgn 1.7.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: pvpgn
Version: 1.7.9-2+b1
Severity: serious

| The following packages will be REMOVED:
|   pvpgn
| 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
| Need to get 0B of archives.
| After unpacking 2114kB disk space will be freed.
| Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
| (Reading database ... 18022 files and directories currently installed.)
| Removing pvpgn ...
| Stopping bnetd daemon: start-stop-daemon: nothing in /proc - not mounted? 
(Success)
| invoke-rc.d: initscript pvpgn, action "stop" failed.
| dpkg: error processing pvpgn (--remove):
|  subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 2
| 
| You are missing the pvpgn support files and daemon will not start without 
them.
| Run pvpgn-support-installer or read /usr/share/doc/pvpgn/README.Debian
| invoke-rc.d: initscript pvpgn, action "start" failed.
| dpkg: error while cleaning up:
|  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
| Errors were encountered while processing:
|  pvpgn
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

This shouldn't happen, pvpgn should let itself being removed if the daemon is
not running at all, and also equally when the support files were not (manually)
added.

--Jeroen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: pvpgn
Source-Version: 1.7.9-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pvpgn, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb
  to pool/contrib/p/pvpgn/pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pvpgn package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  3 Jul 2006 01:13:25 +0300
Source: pvpgn
Binary: pvpgn
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.9-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 pvpgn  - Gaming server that emulates Battle.net(R)
Closes: 278527 373245
Changes: 
 pvpgn (1.7.9-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Move pvpgn to contrib
   * Added note in README.Debian about the Battle.Net TOS violation
 (closes: #278527)
   * Fix pvpgn removal bug (closes: #373245)
Files: 
 ae5e8d8c23b55d39de6574b57662e135 665 contrib/net optional pvpgn_1.7.9-3.dsc
 bbf5f9a6fa09dde14b606f7b4d873d21 6723 contrib/net optional 
pvpgn_1.7.9-3.diff.gz
 72a0dee8496d124fc4b1918b817da320 773484 contrib/net optional 
pvpgn_1.7.9-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEqFWQJkMZOMmr+9MRArRFAJ0ShdPFiRWR2LKc9wfCaQ58MGujfQCeMDy0
cqqek7UoGCyAtjCxyXt23/M=
=lcy2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376792: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7 uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---


Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Version: 2.6.17-2
Severity: grave

This package in unstable cannot be installed because it depends upon a
nonexistent package, linux-kbuild-2.6.17:

# apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not
installable
E: Broken packages




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376174: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686 depends on nonexistent package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-1

<<
% sudo apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.

Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is
  not installable
E: Broken packages
<<

This is on unstable.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#368937: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: fails to install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Installation fails with:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377369: Xvnc4 still cannot find the "fixed" font.

[daniele giacomini]

Package: vnc4server
Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-10
Severity: grave



Xvnc4 cannot find the "fixed" font. For example with this command:

$ Xvnc4 -fp /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc :1 [Enter]
--
Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'

Xvnc Free Edition 4.1.1 - built May 15 2006 20:53:26
Copyright (C) 2002-2005 RealVNC Ltd.
See http://www.realvnc.com for information on VNC.
Underlying X server release 4030, The XFree86 Project, Inc


Sat Jul  8 16:12:25 2006
 vncext:  VNC extension running!
 vncext:  Listening for VNC connections on port 5901
 vncext:  created VNC server for screen 0
error opening security policy file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy

Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
--


Please note that that /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/ contains the "fixed" font,
as defined by /usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias:

--
!! fonts.alias -- automatically generated file.  DO NOT EDIT.
!! To modify, see update-fonts-alias(8).
!! /etc/X11/fonts/misc/xfonts-base.alias
! $Xorg: fonts.alias,v 1.3 2000/08/21 16:42:31 coskrey Exp $
fixed-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
variable -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
...

!! /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/misc/xfonts-base.alias
! $Xorg: fonts.alias,v 1.3 2000/08/21 16:42:31 coskrey Exp $
fixed-misc-fixed-medium-r-semicondensed--13-120-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1
variable -*-helvetica-bold-r-normal-*-*-120-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
...
--


$ dpkg -l xfonts-base [Enter]
--
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name   VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
ii  xfonts-base1.0.0-3standard fonts for X
--


Thank you for your attention.
daniele giacomini



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#375562: marked as done (unsatisfiable Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686
Version: 2.6.17-1

linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686/i386 unsatisfiable Depends:
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 (distribution unstable)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375432: marked as done (One package is missing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---

Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Version: 2.6.17-1

Hello,
I can't install the newest linux-headers, because the package 
linux-kbuild is missing:

Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
 linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Hängt ab: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 ist aber 
nicht installierbar


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#373610: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-486: dependency unmet )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-486
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

this make the package uninstalable and unusable.

The solution is to correct upload the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 or 
correct the dependency.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc3-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#368667: marked as done (unmet dependencies: linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hello,

% apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686 
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is
not installable
E: Broken packages

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
// <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
// Ferns will rule the world.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377362: revelation: FTBFS: IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs/applet.defs'

[Julien Danjou]

Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.7-2
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of revelation_0.4.7-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060708-0053
> **
...
> make[4]: Entering directory 
> `/build/buildd/revelation-0.4.7/src/wrap/gnomemisc'
> /usr/bin/pygtk-codegen-2.0 --prefix gnomemisc \
>   -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" 
> -DPACKAGE=\"revelation\" -DVERSION=\"0.4.7\" -DHAVE_LIBCRACK=1 
> -DHAVE_REQUEST_FOCUS=1  \
>   --register /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs/applet.defs \
>   --register /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs/bonobo-types.defs \
>   --override gnomemisc.override \
>   gnomemisc.defs > gnomemisc.c
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py", line 1261, in ?
> sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
>   File "/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py", line 1224, in main
> p.startParsing()
>   File "//usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/scmexpr.py", line 114, in startParsing
> for statement in statements:
>   File "//usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/scmexpr.py", line 28, in parse
> fp = open(filename, 'r')
> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
> '/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/defs/applet.defs'
> make[4]: *** [gnomemisc.c] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/revelation-0.4.7/src/wrap/gnomemisc'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/revelation-0.4.7/src/wrap'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/revelation-0.4.7/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/revelation-0.4.7'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060708-0056
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#368544: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8: depends on non-existant package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-amd64-k8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This actually effects all the linux-header files for 2.6.17 except the 
base one linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376305: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8: not installable because of dependency on "linux-kbuild-2.6.17")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


linux-image-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 is installable, but the corresponding headers 
package is
not. This means that no modules packages (e.g. fuse) can be built against it 
with any
kind of reasonable ease.

Illustration of the problem:

# aptitude install linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages are BROKEN:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1
0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 3418kB of archives. After unpacking 39.2MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which is a 
virtual package.


(This probably has been around for several days and for multiple mirrors, so 
it's not
just a mirror sync problem.)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-wjl
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376131: marked as done (cogito: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ed')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376131: fixed in cogito 0.17.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: cogito
Version: 0.17.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'cogito' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

merge: warning: conflicts during merge
... Auto-merging stack.c

Conflicts during merge. Do cg-commit after resolving them.
cg-reset will cancel the merge.

./script.sh: line 173: ed: command not found
Unexpected error 127 on line 173
make[3]: *** [test] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/cogito-0.17.3/cogito-0.17.3/Documentation/tutorial-script'

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ed' to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/cogito-0.17.3/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/cogito-0.17.3/debian/control2006-06-30 12:21:47.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-06-30 12:21:45.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: devel
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends-Indep: git-core, rsync, less, bzip2, asciidoc (>> 7.0.2-3), xmlto
+Build-Depends-Indep: git-core, rsync, less, ed, bzip2, asciidoc (>> 7.0.2-3), 
xmlto
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2.0
 
 Package: cogito

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: cogito
Source-Version: 0.17.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cogito, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cogito_0.17.3-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cogito/cogito_0.17.3-2.diff.gz
cogito_0.17.3-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cogito/cogito_0.17.3-2.dsc
cogito_0.17.3-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/cogito/cogito_0.17.3-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated cogito package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  4 Jul 2006 08:15:28 +
Source: cogito
Binary: cogito
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.17.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gerrit Pape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cogito - version control system
Closes: 376131
Changes: 
 cogito (0.17.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/control: Build-Depends-Indep: ed (thx Andreas Jochens, closes:
 #376131).
Files: 
 1684300bee407052b52764450aa1a68b 607 devel optional cogito_0.17.3-2.dsc
 9200bb4743509103c6286e3f8b7c0c4f 7258 devel optional cogito_0.17.3-2.diff.gz
 80b064165f8a8032f483a986e82c07ee 167010 devel optional cogito_0.17.3-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEr7vhGJoyQbxwpv8RAvtbAJ0aaiEuhHGVJeuxb8/4Nyg/fsreRACfYpuj
pXaSKBNlt7nF9Ra7v+Ak6wc=
=r76Z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#373617: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-k7: dependency unmet )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This make the package uninstable and unusable.

The solution is to upload the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 to the 
experimental repository.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc3-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375859: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1: package uninstallable as it depends on the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


This package is currently uninstallable as it depends on the 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17 package, which isn't available.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377365: thewidgetfactory: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM

[Julien Danjou]

Package: thewidgetfactory
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of thewidgetfactory_0.2.1-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060708-0344
> **
...
> /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc  -g -Wall -O2   -o twf  main.o 
> support.o interface.o callbacks.o themes.o -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 
> -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender 
> -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 
> -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0
> mkdir .libs
> cc -g -Wall -O2 -o twf main.o support.o interface.o callbacks.o themes.o  
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so -lXext -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor 
> -lXfixes /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libcairo.so -lSM -lICE -lXrender 
> -lpng12 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so -lz -lfontconfig -lm -lX11 
> /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl 
> /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [twf] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/thewidgetfactory-0.2.1/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/thewidgetfactory-0.2.1'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060708-0346
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#375647: marked as done (linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8 cannot be installed due to missing dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-header-2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Severity: critical



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-amd64-k8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

The package cannot be installed, as the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 is missing 
and it is not in the Debian repository.

Regards

Hans-J. Ullrich

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376290: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: fails to install)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Package fails to install due to unmet dependency:

# apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-1  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686 
linux-image-2.6.17-1-686
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-686: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages


I reported this error already in experimental for package 
linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686,
(Bug#368937) but somehow it made its way to the current package in unstable...


Regards, Rudolf


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#373616: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686: dependency unmet )

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-rc3-686
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This make the package unusable.

The solution is to upload the package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 to the
experimental repository.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc3-k7
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376121: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: depends on non-existing package linux-kbuild-2.6.17)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave

Uninstallable due to dependency on non-existing package linux-kbuild-2.6.17.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#377357: gnomemeeting: FTBFS: checking for PWLib version... configure: error: Sorry but the recommended PWLib version is 1.10.0

[Julien Danjou]

Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 1.2.3-4
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of gnomemeeting_1.2.3-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060707-1805
> **
...
> checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
> checking whether strcasecmp is declared... yes
> checking whether GNOME support must be compiled in... yes
> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema 
> installation
> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GNOMEMEETING_CFLAGS... -pthread -DORBIT2=1 
> -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 
> -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
> -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 
> -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2  
> checking for GNOMEMEETING_LIBS... -pthread -lesd -laudiofile -lgnomeui-2 -lSM 
> -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnome-keyring -lxml2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt 
> -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 
> -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama 
> -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 -lgnomevfs-2 
> -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm 
> -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0  
> checking for EDS_CFLAGS... -DORBIT2=1 -pthread 
> -I/usr/include/evolution-data-server-1.6 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
> -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 
> -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 
> -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
> -I/usr/include/libxml2  
> checking for EDS_LIBS... -pthread -lebook-1.2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt 
> -ledataserver-1.2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lxml2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-2 
> -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 
>  
> checking for scrollkeeper-config... /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-config
> checking whether OS type is supported... yes
> checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... yes
> checking for PWLib includes in /usr/include/... 
> checking for /usr/include/ptlib/pprocess.h... yes
> checking for main in -lpt... yes
> checking for PWLib version... configure: error: Sorry but the recommended 
> PWLib version is 1.10.0
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060707-1808
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: acidlab: ACID looks dead should get replaced by BASE

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 319389 serious
Bug#319389: acidlab: ACID looks dead should get replaced by BASE
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377358: gparted: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM

[Julien Danjou]

Package: gparted
Version: 0.2.5-1.1
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of gparted_0.2.5-1.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.47
> Build started at 20060707-2002
> **
...
>   else rm -f ".deps/xfs.Tpo"; exit 1; \
>   fi
> /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=link i486-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall  -g -O2   -o 
> gparted -lparted -lgthread-2.0  Device.o Dialog_Base_Partition.o 
> Dialog_Disklabel.o Dialog_Partition_Copy.o Dialog_Partition_Info.o 
> Dialog_Partition_New.o Dialog_Partition_Resize_Move.o Dialog_Progress.o 
> DialogFeatures.o DialogManageFlags.o DrawingAreaVisualDisk.o FileSystem.o 
> Frame_Resizer_Base.o Frame_Resizer_Extended.o GParted_Core.o Operation.o 
> OperationCopy.o OperationCreate.o OperationDelete.o OperationFormat.o 
> OperationResizeMove.o Partition.o TreeView_Detail.o Utils.o Win_GParted.o 
> ext2.o ext3.o fat16.o fat32.o hfs.o hfsplus.o jfs.o linux_swap.o main.o 
> ntfs.o reiser4.o reiserfs.o ufs.o xfs.o -lgtkmm-2.4 -lgdkmm-2.4 -latkmm-1.6 
> -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lpangomm-1.4 -lglibmm-2.4 -lsigc-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 
> -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender 
> -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 
> -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0   -lparted -ldl -luuid 
> mkdir .libs
> i486-linux-gnu-g++ -Wall -g -O2 -o gparted Device.o Dialog_Base_Partition.o 
> Dialog_Disklabel.o Dialog_Partition_Copy.o Dialog_Partition_Info.o 
> Dialog_Partition_New.o Dialog_Partition_Resize_Move.o Dialog_Progress.o 
> DialogFeatures.o DialogManageFlags.o DrawingAreaVisualDisk.o FileSystem.o 
> Frame_Resizer_Base.o Frame_Resizer_Extended.o GParted_Core.o Operation.o 
> OperationCopy.o OperationCreate.o OperationDelete.o OperationFormat.o 
> OperationResizeMove.o Partition.o TreeView_Detail.o Utils.o Win_GParted.o 
> ext2.o ext3.o fat16.o fat32.o hfs.o hfsplus.o jfs.o linux_swap.o main.o 
> ntfs.o reiser4.o reiserfs.o ufs.o xfs.o  /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so -lpthread 
> /usr/lib/libgtkmm-2.4.so /usr/lib/libgdkmm-2.4.so /usr/lib/libatkmm-1.6.so 
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libpangomm-1.4.so 
> /usr/lib/libglibmm-2.4.so /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so -lXext -lXinerama 
> -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXfixes /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libcairo.so -lSM -lICE -lXrender -lpng12 /usr/lib/libfreetype.so -lz 
> -lfontconfig -lm -lX11 /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so 
> /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so /usr/lib/libparted.so -ldl -luuid
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lSM
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[3]: *** [gparted] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gparted-0.2.5/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gparted-0.2.5'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gparted-0.2.5'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060707-2011
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#377235: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: package uninstallable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


There is a dependancy on this package that renders it uninstallable,
as the required package isn't even in the repositories

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Depends: linux-kbuild-2.6.17 but it is not 
installable
E: Broken packages


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#375906: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7: Not installable on sid: depends on linux-kbuild-2.6.17 which does not exist)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:13:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#368544: fixed in linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.17-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Kernel headers for 2.6.17-1-k7 are not installable because they depend
on linux-kbuild-2.6.17, which does not appear to exist anywhere
(packages.d.o yields no matches, save a kernel-kbuild-2.6.3 which only
exists in the kfreebsd port).



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-kbuild-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kbuild-2.6/linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated linux-kbuild-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  1 Jul 2006 19:10:07 +0200
Source: linux-kbuild-2.6
Binary: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.6.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team 
Changed-By: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6.17 - Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.17
Closes: 368544
Changes: 
 linux-kbuild-2.6 (2.6.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release. (closes: #368544)
Files: 
 751ac4ad9d1821e5bcd99ae8a2d3fa8a 674 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.dsc
 bbe8739afb662e9906a66fc3ce2674d7 237824 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17.orig.tar.gz
 42ae79b77381854e9b962a03fa646039 19894 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6_2.6.17-1.diff.gz
 88e503b1a38503f1d5afd25ec4d4c83b 179294 devel optional 
linux-kbuild-2.6.17_2.6.17-1_powerpc.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSmtaUACgkQLkAIIn9ODhGaNwCgv7RUlafk2VKcBTTR4It2vOLb
QuEAoOC/oy3j0zte6MnXI4pAwmOL9NL5
=qJtO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#376839: Options 'user' and '_netdev' no longer work.

[Stefan Förster]

In addition to the bug reports regarding missing standard options, I'd
like to remark that the option '_netdev' is also no longer recognized -
a mount command returns with the message 'unknown option'. But, most
importantly, 'user' is no longer a valid option.


Kind Regards,

Stefan Förster

-- 
Quote of the Day: Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #42:
What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine too.
The Rules of Netquisition (Internet Competition)
(created at stardate [-29]6037.5190, Sat Jul  8 14:05:29 2006)

Bug#374783: seems to be broken in SSL only

[Wouter Verhelst]

On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:42:56AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> 
> >
> >I'm seeing the same issue; however, while IMAPS does indeed not work,
> >"netstat -tl" shows me that dovecot does properly listen to port 143,
> >i.e., the "regular" IMAP port.
> >
> 
> Hi Johnathan and Wouter,
> 
> Upstream thinks this is fixed in 1.0rc1 which is in unstable.  Can you try 
> it and confirm?

It's working for me too, now. Sorry for the late reply.

-- 
Fun will now commence
  -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#332526: marked as done (siptoolbox_0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 (unstable): build-depends against removed package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#307365: siptoolbox removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: siptoolbox
Version: 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
Severity: serious

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> Automatic build of siptoolbox_0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>> 4.1.0), animal-dev, groff, scilab (>= 
> 2.7), libmagick6-dev | libmagick-dev, bsdmainutils, xsltproc | sablotron, 
> g77, scilab-doc
>  Warning:
>  The following central src deps are (probably) missing:
>   libbz2-dev, libfreetype6-dev (>= 2.1.5-1), libjpeg62-dev, libtiff3g-dev, 
> libxml2-dev (>= 2.6.3), xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g-dev (>= 1:1.2.1)
[...]
> E: Package libmagick6-dev has no installation candidate
> Package libmagick6-dev is not available, but is referred to by another 
> package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping siptoolbox

libmagick6-dev was replaced by libmagick9-dev and removed some days ago.

Bastian

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 7, 2006 12:05 AM
Subject: Bug#307365: fixed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

siptoolbox | 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 | source, i386

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--
http://www.twerner42.de/
--- End Message ---

Bug#341361: marked as done (siptoolbox: libanimal-0.14.0.so.0 no longer availible)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 13:41:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fwd: Bug#307365: siptoolbox removed from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: siptoolbox
Version: 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,
it is compiled agains libanimal-0.14.0.so.0, which is no longer availkible
as animal0 is updated. Pleas recompile.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages siptoolbox depends on:
ii  animal00.14.3-1.1AN IMAging Library written in C
ii  libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-7   high-quality block-sorting file co
ii  libc6  2.3.5-8.1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps16.8.2.dfsg.1-5Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libfreetype6   2.1.10-1  FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libice66.8.2.dfsg.1-5Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjasper-1.701-1  1.701.0-2 The JasPer JPEG-2000 runtime libra
ii  libjpeg62  6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  liblcms1   1.13-1Color management library
ii  libmagick6 6:6.2.3.6-3   Image manipulation library
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5X Window System Session Management
ii  libtiff4   3.7.3-1   Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii  libx11-6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6   6.8.2.dfsg.1-5X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxml22.6.22-2  GNOME XML library
ii  libxt6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  scilab 3.0-14Matrix-based scientific software p
ii  xlibs  6.8.2.dfsg.1-5X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime

siptoolbox recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

-- Forwarded message --
From: Debian Archive Maintenance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 7, 2006 12:05 AM
Subject: Bug#307365: fixed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

siptoolbox | 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2 | source, i386

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are never removed from testing by hand.  Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)


--
http://www.twerner42.de/
--- End Message ---

Bug#375356: marked as done (missing dependency on bwidget)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 08 Jul 2006 04:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375356: fixed in ferret 0.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: ferret
Version: 0.6-1
Severity: important

ferret needs bwidget, but the package does not depend on it.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages ferret depends on:
ii  tk8.3 [wish]  8.3.5-6Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 -
ii  tk8.4 [wish]  8.4.12-1   Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 -

ferret recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
"If sharing a thing in no way diminishes it, it is not
rightly owned if it is not shared." -- St. Augustine
#rm -rf /
http://www.geeksoc.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ferret
Source-Version: 0.6-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ferret, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ferret_0.6-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/f/ferret/ferret_0.6-2.diff.gz
ferret_0.6-2.dsc
  to pool/main/f/ferret/ferret_0.6-2.dsc
ferret_0.6-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/f/ferret/ferret_0.6-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Fernando Ike de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ferret 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:37:16 -0300
Source: ferret
Binary: ferret
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Fernando Ike de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Fernando Ike de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ferret - CASE tool for data model editing
Closes: 375320 375321 375356
Changes: 
 ferret (0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix missing dependency bwidget. (Closes: #375356)
   * Fix long description. (Closes: #375321)
   * Fix grammar in description. (Closes: #375320)
   * Create entrered in the menu.
Files: 
 e0a96c9fb1c188042822614dd1969778 586 misc optional ferret_0.6-2.dsc
 7afa66a3d7ba157e487a0a794399f3bd 9329 misc optional ferret_0.6-2.diff.gz
 fc67ba3c3b0a47039b5579fcfd7884e5 296006 misc optional ferret_0.6-2_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEr5WvLqiZQEml+FURAj/gAKCU5iRDinohLhWyNeKhCGT91dCKCgCcC9if
QeSIm3PWEoP8O78jfwLOBfM=
=7ljS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 376740 pending
Bug#376740: vdrift - FTBFS: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#375931 closed by "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Contents file is empty, where is it gone ?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 375931 minor
Bug#375931: warning message on tail +8, use tail -n +8
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#375931: closed by "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Contents file is empty, where is it gone ?)

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

severity 375931 minor
thanks

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 07:21:34PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> There's one bug that's not addressed; the warning message.

That is surely not RC; downgrading.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376426: libnss-ldap: Can't login even as local user

[Turbo Fredriksson]

Quoting =?UTF-8?B?VmVkcmFuIEZ1cmHEjQ==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Same here, except I can't login[1] even using sash.
>
> If I start nscd, login, and then disable nscd, sash will work (unlike bash
> or zsh).
>
> [1] Authentication is, actually, successful, I see the MOTD, but shell
> isn't started and it brings me back to "login: ".

Maybe the latest libnss-ldap is more picky about exit/return codes OR
messages produced by the shell?

I know that I have problems with ssh/scp if I have a verbose .bashrc!
If my .bashrc is outputting text, and i try to scp a file to that machine
(with the verbose .bashrc), then the scp will fail! Disabling the output,
and all is well...

Maybe something similar with the latest libnss-ldap? Just an idea...
-- 
CIA Rule Psix explosion PLO Khaddafi Legion of Doom Soviet class
struggle Panama ammonium toluene security bomb president KGB
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
[Or http://www.europarl.eu.int/tempcom/echelon/pdf/rapport_echelon_en.pdf]
If neither of these works, try http://www.aclu.org and search for echelon.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#376426: libnss-ldap: Can't login even as local user

[Turbo Fredriksson]

Quoting Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I've also tried sash and that seems to work fine..

If I understand you correctly, you've tried zsh and bash but then you can't
login, but if you try sash, then it works?!

Then maybe you have some faulty .bash{rc,_profile} as well?

> So it still seems like a bug/regression in libnss-ldap (especially since
> downgrading fixes the problem..)

Oki, that's true...
-- 
attack Legion of Doom FSF Panama Ft. Bragg cracking ammonium PLO
toluene Delta Force Saddam Hussein strategic colonel CIA Peking
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]
[Or http://www.europarl.eu.int/tempcom/echelon/pdf/rapport_echelon_en.pdf]
If neither of these works, try http://www.aclu.org and search for echelon.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#377326: eagle-usb-modules-source: fails to compile

[Manolo Díaz]

Package: eagle-usb-modules-source
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (101, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.3
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages eagle-usb-modules-source depends on:
ii  debhelper 5.0.37.2   helper programs for debian/rules
ii  make  3.81-2 The GNU version of the "make" util

Versions of packages eagle-usb-modules-source recommends:
ii  kernel-package10.049 A utility for building Linux kerne
ii  module-assistant  0.10.4 tool to make module package creati

-- debconf-show failed

Hi,
this seems to be the cause:


USE_CMVS=0 make  -C /lib/modules/2.6.17.3/source 
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.17.3'
  CC [M]  /usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.o
In file included from /usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eagle-usb.h:30,
 from /usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:41:
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_types.h:54:5: warning: "USE_CMVS" is not 
defined
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:176: error: unknown field 'owner' 
specified in initializer
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:176: warning: initialization from 
incompatible pointer type
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:253: error: expected ')' before 
string constant
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:255: error: expected ')' before 
string constant
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:1101:5: warning: "USE_CMVS" is not 
defined
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:1336:5: warning: "USE_CMVS" is not 
defined
/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.c:1404:5: warning: "USE_CMVS" is not 
defined
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver/eu_main.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/eagle-usb/driver] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.17.3'
make: *** [eagle-usb.ko] Error 2


The kernel is compiled from the original tarball using kernel-package utility 
and the
compiler is gcc-4.0.4

$ LC_ALL=C cc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v 
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada, treelang --prefix=/usr 
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib 
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls 
--program-suffix= -4.0 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu 
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enabl e-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo 
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-4 .0-1.4.2.0/jre --enable-mpfr 
--disable-werror --enable-checking=release x86_64-l inux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.4 20060507 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.3-3)


Best Regards,
Manolo.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]