Processed: Review of this bug (and pending upload)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 381726 normal Bug#381726: CVE-2006-2769: HTTP Inspect preprocessor evasion Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382094: marked as done (klic: FTBFS: No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.)
Your message dated Wed, 09 Aug 2006 23:02:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382094: fixed in klic 3.003-gm1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: klic Version: 3.003-gm1-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: # Add here commands to compile the package. cd klic-3.003 /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/klic-3.003-gm1/klic-3.003' make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/klic-3.003-gm1/klic-3.003' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 Kurt ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: klic Source-Version: 3.003-gm1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of klic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: klic-doc_3.003-gm1-4_all.deb to pool/main/k/klic/klic-doc_3.003-gm1-4_all.deb klic_3.003-gm1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/k/klic/klic_3.003-gm1-4.diff.gz klic_3.003-gm1-4.dsc to pool/main/k/klic/klic_3.003-gm1-4.dsc klic_3.003-gm1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/klic/klic_3.003-gm1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated klic package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:18:23 +0900 Source: klic Binary: klic klic-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 3.003-gm1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: klic - KL1 to C compiler system klic-doc - Documentation and sample KL1 files for the KLIC Closes: 382094 Changes: klic (3.003-gm1-4) unstable; urgency=low . * patch4.configure-sh-space: Fix the last extra space before $c, that prevented from compiling with either dash or bash. (Closes: #382094) * debian/configure.expect: Revert the last change. Files: 274e2011c009190beba74a47f1d3f61b 608 devel optional klic_3.003-gm1-4.dsc 4196a51d96b1e5e0cb74b8f9d43443ac 8965 devel optional klic_3.003-gm1-4.diff.gz 2c0c5f1ab5722475f3a5f20a6dea6bda 136834 doc optional klic-doc_3.003-gm1-4_all.deb 007756f3412909ef63762fe46234eb0b 674290 devel optional klic_3.003-gm1-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2roUqIqasIZIJsMRAhpkAJ97BkXYUVzb8EqBnw7r5AIC7G1iUACgnD5R T7aBWg/owZjmuktx/Cb6uVc= =af1a -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#381726: Review of this bug (and pending upload)
severity 381726 normal
thanks
Demarc reported a security vulnerability to Snort through Bugtraq, this
security issue is actually a problem with the HTTP inspector module in
Snort which prevents it from detecting an attack against *Apache* web servers
(not others) because it doesn't take into account that a carriage return
might be included in the request and accepted (even if its not RFC). More
info in the attached text file.
FWI the 2.4.5 changelog of Snort says:
2006-06-05 - Snort 2.4.5 Released
* Fixed potential evasion in URI content buffers
* Fixed potential evasion in Stream4
So, actually, to evasion bugs were fixed in this engine.
I have backported both fixes to the 2.3.3-8 packages and have uploaded
a new snort package. However, I don't think that the 'grave' severity of this
bug stands and I'm downgrading it.
Notice that:
a) it is an evasion issue, not a security vulnerability. That is, it only
affects the ability of Snort to detect attacks (but much in the same way that
an *outdated* ruleset [1] could be considered a security issue)
b) it only affects attacks to Apache web servers
For reference, attached is the 2.4.4 vs. 2.4.5 patch (stripping other info)
which fixes the bug, it is easily backported to the 2.3.3 (there is only one
rejection, easy to solve). [2]
Regards
Javier
[1] Like the one we are providing due to the license change in Snort, post
2.3, with the appearance of the VRT rules
[2] Even if asked to (in #320920) I'm not sure it is reasonable to do
an upgrade to 2.6.0 and provide a Snort package with *no* ruleset (which
means that the Snort service could not be started by default). Since people
now have to download it manually from snort.org as it is not provided
in the GPL package.
diff -Nru snort-2.4.4/doc/README.http_inspect
snort-2.4.5/doc/README.http_inspect
--- snort-2.4.4/doc/README.http_inspect 2005-05-19 17:05:07.0 +0200
+++ snort-2.4.5/doc/README.http_inspect 2006-06-02 21:41:41.0 +0200
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
since some web sites refer to files using directory traversals.
* apache_whitespace [yes/no] *
-This option deals with non-RFC standard of tab for a space delimiter. Apache
+This option deals with non-RFC standard of tab or carriage return for a space
delimiter. Apache
uses this, so if the emulated web server is Apache you need to enable this
option. Alerts on this option may be interesting, but may also be false
positive prone.
diff -Nru snort-2.4.4/src/generators.h snort-2.4.5/src/generators.h
--- snort-2.4.4/src/generators.h2005-10-16 20:55:29.0 +0200
+++ snort-2.4.5/src/generators.h2006-05-24 18:14:33.0 +0200
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
#define STREAM4_ZERO_TIMESTAMP 21
#define STREAM4_OVERLAP_LIMIT 22
#define STREAM4_TCP_NO_ACK 23
+#define STREAM4_EVASIVE_FIN 24
#define GENERATOR_SPP_ARPSPOOF 112
#define ARPSPOOF_UNICAST_ARP_REQUEST 1
@@ -335,6 +336,7 @@
#define STREAM4_ZERO_TIMESTAMP_STR (spp_stream4) TCP Option Timestamp value
of 0
#define STREAM4_OVERLAP_LIMIT_STR (spp_stream4) TCP stream too many
overlapping packets
#define STREAM4_TCP_NO_ACK_STR (spp_stream4) Packet in Established TCP stream
missing ACK
+#define STREAM4_EVASIVE_FIN_STR (spp_stream4) possible EVASIVE FIN detection
/* FRAG3 strings */
#define FRAG3_IPOPTIONS_STR (spp_frag3) Inconsistent IP Options on Fragmented
Packets
diff -Nru snort-2.4.4/src/preprocessors/HttpInspect/client/hi_client.c
snort-2.4.5/src/preprocessors/HttpInspect/client/hi_client.c
--- snort-2.4.4/src/preprocessors/HttpInspect/client/hi_client.c
2005-03-16 22:52:18.0 +0100
+++ snort-2.4.5/src/preprocessors/HttpInspect/client/hi_client.c
2006-06-02 21:41:41.0 +0200
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@
*/
static LOOKUP_FCN lookup_table[256];
static int hex_lookup[256];
+static int NextNonWhiteSpace(HI_SESSION *Session, u_char *start,
+u_char *end, u_char **ptr, URI_PTR *uri_ptr);
/*
** NAME
@@ -455,7 +457,7 @@
return URI_END;
}
-return NO_URI;
+return NextNonWhiteSpace(Session, start, end, ptr, uri_ptr);
}
/*
@@ -677,7 +679,7 @@
(*ptr)++;
continue;
}
-else if((**ptr == '\t'))
+else if((**ptr == '\t') || (**ptr == '\r'))
{
if(ServerConf-apache_whitespace.on)
{
diff -Nru snort-2.4.4/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c
snort-2.4.5/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c
--- snort-2.4.4/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c 2006-01-09 21:38:30.0
+0100
+++ snort-2.4.5/src/preprocessors/spp_stream4.c 2006-05-24 18:14:33.0
+0200
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@
void PreprocCleanExitFunction(int);
static INLINE int isBetween(u_int32_t low, u_int32_t high, u_int32_t cur);
static INLINE int NotForStream4(Packet *p);
-static INLINE int SetFinSent(Packet *p, Session *ssn, int direction);
+static INLINE int SetFinSent(Session *ssn,
Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing
Package: gnome-panel-data Version: 2.14.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Example of error of parsing: /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : error parsing attribute name keylist/key ^ /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : attributes construct error keylist/key ^ and etc. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.9 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages gnome-panel-data depends on: ii gconf22.14.0-2 GNOME configuration database syste ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste Versions of packages gnome-panel-data recommends: pn gnome-panel none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 378831 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 378831 important Bug#378831: mldonkey-server: mldonkey crashes on startup Severity set to `important' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378346: gnucash on alpha
Jim Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To make sure, I restarted gnucash, ran the check repair all utility, and resaved my account file. bug #378346 is still there. Thanks for checking; this is what I suspected would be the case. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing
reassign 382306 gconf2 2.14.0-3 close 382306 2.14.0-4 stop Hi, On Thu, Aug 10, 2006, yves caniou wrote: /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : error parsing attribute name keylist/key ^ /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : attributes construct error keylist/key ^ This was a bug in gconf2 which is fixed in 2.14.0-4. Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 382306 gconf2 2.14.0-3 Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing Bug reassigned from package `gnome-panel-data' to `gconf2'. close 382306 2.14.0-4 Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.14.0-4, send any further explanations to yves caniou [EMAIL PROTECTED] stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006, Yves Caniou wrote: Maybe a dependency on gconf2 and its version has to be added to the package? No, we don't use Depends to workaround buggy versions, nor Build-Depends. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382306: gnome-panel-data: Fails to upgrade from 2.14.2-2 to 2.14.3-1_all: several errors of parsing
Hi, Maybe a dependency on gconf2 and its version has to be added to the package? Best Regards. .Yves. Loïc Minier a écrit : reassign 382306 gconf2 2.14.0-3 close 382306 2.14.0-4 stop Hi, On Thu, Aug 10, 2006, yves caniou wrote: /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : error parsing attribute name keylist/key ^ /tmp/gconf-8keoq3/temp.entries:4: parser error : attributes construct error keylist/key ^ This was a bug in gconf2 which is fixed in 2.14.0-4. Bye,
Bug#381819: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99) and pike7.6-image (= 7.6.75-99))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:17:35 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#381819: fixed in caudium 2:1.4.7-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: caudium Severity: serious Version: 2:1.4.7-14.1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99) and pike7.6-image (= 7.6.75-99) while the current version in unstable is 7.6.87-1. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: caudium Source-Version: 2:1.4.7-15 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of caudium, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: caudium-dev_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium-dev_1.4.7-15_i386.deb caudium-modules_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium-modules_1.4.7-15_i386.deb caudium-perl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium-perl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb caudium-pixsl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium-pixsl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb caudium-ultralog_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium-ultralog_1.4.7-15_i386.deb caudium_1.4.7-15.diff.gz to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium_1.4.7-15.diff.gz caudium_1.4.7-15.dsc to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium_1.4.7-15.dsc caudium_1.4.7-15_i386.deb to pool/main/c/caudium/caudium_1.4.7-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated caudium package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:48:06 +0200 Source: caudium Binary: caudium-ultralog caudium-pixsl caudium-perl caudium caudium-dev caudium-modules Architecture: source i386 Version: 2:1.4.7-15 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: caudium- An extensible WWW server written in Pike caudium-dev - Development files for Caudium caudium-modules - C modules for Caudium caudium-perl - Perl script support for Caudium caudium-pixsl - Pike XSLT module for Caudium caudium-ultralog - Log Parser module for Caudium Closes: 358261 374024 378255 381819 Changes: caudium (2:1.4.7-15) unstable; urgency=low . * New Pike version dependency * Uninstallable due to unmet dep on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99) and pike7.6-image (= 7.6.75-99) (Closes: #381819) * FTBFS with GCC 4.1: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib. (Closes: #358261) * diff for 2:1.4.7-14.1 NMU (Closes: #378255) * [INTL:pt_BR] Please use the attached debconf template translation (Closes: #374024) Files: b5456621b9554bf4d6cef077268a3521 821 web optional caudium_1.4.7-15.dsc 099ac2d3ad113616f1672267c4df97f1 94821 web optional caudium_1.4.7-15.diff.gz 60e0f08b3d0e162617475ee1a51139b6 4528818 web optional caudium_1.4.7-15_i386.deb a0b5530c039b587a1731911c0611b3dd 58910 web optional caudium-modules_1.4.7-15_i386.deb 783bacba7609d8b3b7470ac7f2332ba6 39764 web optional caudium-pixsl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb 03d005be844c91f3a38a9ae50f8c356e 74166 web optional caudium-ultralog_1.4.7-15_i386.deb db714a1aa0ae86369a416a40b5f8da76 24130 devel optional caudium-dev_1.4.7-15_i386.deb 0c89c0c6baecd3014039f2949c86e167 32366 web optional caudium-perl_1.4.7-15_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2wR2q3909GIf5uoRAluFAJ9V+W8EhiC7Gu1OYQM1ZG6lK+lVtgCeMdF4 2QuxEM4iyOyF7L8B5Mo+mog= =sJTW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#382263: temporary fix
A temporary fix is to rm /etc/udev/rules.d/mdadm. This is what 2.5.3-1 does right now, but I think I'll change that even... more to come. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Re: [PATCH] bug 2741: configure.py is not run when using batch mode
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: What about that: mkdir /tmp/tempuserdir lyx -userdir /tmp/tempuserdir -e latex foo.lyx rm -rf /tmp/tempuserdir Yes, I think that's an acceptable workaround. Per The best would be if configure.py was removed completely and Per everything was detected at runtime (or defaults used, or Per whatever). Yes, this is something I would like to see for at least some of the stuff. It is not clear however what the runtime penalty would be. Much stuff in configure.py only have one alternative, so LyX can simply check if the program is available. When it comes to viewers, it could use xdg-open from portland.freedesktop.org which uses the user's preferred viewer (that's what we do in the Debian package). I guess the problem is the LaTeX checking stuff. I don't know what to do about that. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#381622: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Re: [PATCH] bug 2741: configure.py is not run when using batch mode
Per == Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Per Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: What about that: mkdir /tmp/tempuserdir lyx -userdir /tmp/tempuserdir -e latex foo.lyx rm -rf /tmp/tempuserdir Per Yes, I think that's an acceptable workaround. Could you confirm that the patch I sent fits your needs? Per The best would be if configure.py was removed completely and Per everything was detected at runtime (or defaults used, or Per whatever). Yes, this is something I would like to see for at least some of the stuff. It is not clear however what the runtime penalty would be. Per When it comes to viewers, it could use xdg-open from Per portland.freedesktop.org which uses the user's preferred viewer Per (that's what we do in the Debian package). How widespread is this code currently? In particular, I am very interested by the DAPI library. We have os-specific code to use system viewers on windows and osx, it would be nice to do the same on kde/gnome. Per I guess the problem is the LaTeX checking stuff. I don't know Per what to do about that. We could use kpsewhich online. But it requires some work. JMarc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#369628: marked as done (uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369628: fixed in pike-public.network.pcap 1.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles Severity: grave Heya, This package isn't installable, as pike7.6 seems to be too new. Either update the package or ask for removal, please. Thanks, Marc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pike-public.network.pcap Source-Version: 1.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pike-public.network.pcap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pike-public.network.pcap/pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.diff.gz pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.dsc to pool/main/p/pike-public.network.pcap/pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.dsc pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.network.pcap/pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb pike7.6-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.network.pcap/pike7.6-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pike-public.network.pcap package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:18:06 +0200 Source: pike-public.network.pcap Binary: pike-public.network.pcap pike7.6-public.network.pcap Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pike-public.network.pcap - Pike interface module for the pcap library (default) pike7.6-public.network.pcap - Pike interface module for the pcap library Closes: 359247 369628 Changes: pike-public.network.pcap (1.2-4) unstable; urgency=low . * New Pike dependency * uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new) (Closes: #369628) * Pcap.so include rpath to /usr/local/devel/ (Closes: #359247) Files: 6157f9f3e24246cbe76b14ac40cdba45 713 interpreters optional pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.dsc e0bb41a9ca87ebffbad171167a7cd81b 17215 interpreters optional pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4.diff.gz b88db87aa19af0979220cfa206776315 11074 interpreters optional pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb 3d326d5c926c716aeaa767111d9a754f 17998 interpreters optional pike7.6-public.network.pcap_1.2-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2wg0q3909GIf5uoRAg19AJ9Fjp1zkpGqk8erAwN3+7+fcEy1dQCdFo9X 3lKO97bserr4zorR38Znsos= =lkg2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#382322: zeroc-ice-python: FTBFS: missing .so files
Package: zeroc-ice-python Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of zeroc-ice-python_3.1.0-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49 Build started at 20060810-1227 ** ... make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/zeroc-ice-python-3.1.0' dh_installdirs -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installdocs -ppython-zeroc-ice ./README dh_installexamples -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installman -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installinfo -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installmenu -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installcron -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installinit -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installdebconf -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installemacsen -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installcatalogs -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installpam -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installlogrotate -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installlogcheck -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installmime -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_installchangelogs -ppython-zeroc-ice ./CHANGES dh_installudev -ppython-zeroc-ice dh_install -ppython-zeroc-ice --sourcedir=debian/tmp dh_link -ppython-zeroc-ice mkdir -p debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/lib/python2.3 mv debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/python \ debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages dh_pysupport -ppython-zeroc-ice IcePy.so.31: this shared object should not be versioned IcePy.so.3.1.0: this shared object should not be versioned mv debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/share/python-support/python-zeroc-ice/*.so.* \ debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/lib/python-support/python-zeroc-ice/python2.3 mv: cannot stat `debian/python-zeroc-ice/usr/share/python-support/python-zeroc-ice/*.so.*': No such file or directory make: *** [binary-install/python-zeroc-ice] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060810-1229 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#374327: Working on this
Hi. I've already compiled ssmtp with libgnutls-dev, but I'm still testing it. I just wanted to let people know I'm working on this issue. signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Bug#369611: marked as done (uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369611: fixed in pike-public.tools.configfiles 1.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles Severity: grave Heya, This package isn't installable, as pike7.6 seems to be too new. Either update the package or ask for removal, please. Thanks, Marc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pike-public.tools.configfiles Source-Version: 1.0-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pike-public.tools.configfiles, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pike-public.tools.configfiles/pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.diff.gz pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.dsc to pool/main/p/pike-public.tools.configfiles/pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.dsc pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.tools.configfiles/pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.tools.configfiles/pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pike-public.tools.configfiles package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:24:47 +0200 Source: pike-public.tools.configfiles Binary: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles pike-public.tools.configfiles Architecture: source all Version: 1.0-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pike-public.tools.configfiles - Pike module for accessing ini-style configurations (default) pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles - Pike module for accessing ini-style configurations Closes: 369611 Changes: pike-public.tools.configfiles (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=low . * New Pike dependency * uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new) (Closes: #369611) Files: 5ccacf610d4b82bf1a0fb1e10230adb1 721 interpreters optional pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.dsc ea1bf67b428b5f22455ce54eecb6c743 2794 interpreters optional pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4.diff.gz 6540aa3b9a05c42f2452fbdd1960cfa3 2394 interpreters optional pike-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb 67a3c63b6e043710237c5481337b17f2 4042 interpreters optional pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles_1.0-4_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2wm4q3909GIf5uoRAp2JAJ9fIZpRubKAr9ZeJuEnnyj/Rj/cVwCcDHkU WxPHKHiyyQnMO9vaXkAKhKA= =o0hV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#369629: marked as done (uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369629: fixed in pike-public.protocols.syslog 1.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pike7.6-public.tools.configfiles Severity: grave Heya, This package isn't installable, as pike7.6 seems to be too new. Either update the package or ask for removal, please. Thanks, Marc ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pike-public.protocols.syslog Source-Version: 1.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pike-public.protocols.syslog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.dsc to pool/main/p/pike-public.protocols.syslog/pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.dsc pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.tar.gz to pool/main/p/pike-public.protocols.syslog/pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.tar.gz pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.protocols.syslog/pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.protocols.syslog/pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pike-public.protocols.syslog package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:22:33 +0200 Source: pike-public.protocols.syslog Binary: pike-public.protocols.syslog pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog Architecture: source all Version: 1.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pike-public.protocols.syslog - Pike module implementing the Syslog protocol (default) pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog - Pike module implementing the Syslog protocol Closes: 369629 Changes: pike-public.protocols.syslog (1.1-4) unstable; urgency=low . * New Pike dependency * uninstallable in unstable (pike7.6 too new) (Closes: #369629) Files: ddf1876d1b92d39205e480fc9ecb7228 631 interpreters optional pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.dsc 68c74fda565715daa7040efc46f9d5d1 43456 interpreters optional pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4.tar.gz 774fe4d9ca989fd05a33a8595af4f62c 10866 interpreters optional pike-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb 5a0841a6ce69f46aa8371dffe9dd5b72 13086 interpreters optional pike7.6-public.protocols.syslog_1.1-4_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2wlPq3909GIf5uoRAqMPAJ0YMkfL5SuNHWMB4T5a4NFhmJfoWwCgiLr6 VfsBxt8Mz/G03HwLyIA5Kak= =QFH1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#381818: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99))
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 03:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#381818: fixed in pike-public.parser.xml2 1.38-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: pike7.6-public.parser.xml2 Severity: serious Version: 1.38-1 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99) while the current version in unstable is 7.6.87-1. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pike-public.parser.xml2 Source-Version: 1.38-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pike-public.parser.xml2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pike-public.parser.xml2/pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.diff.gz pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.dsc to pool/main/p/pike-public.parser.xml2/pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.dsc pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.parser.xml2/pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb pike7.6-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/pike-public.parser.xml2/pike7.6-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated pike-public.parser.xml2 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:20:04 +0200 Source: pike-public.parser.xml2 Binary: pike-public.parser.xml2 pike7.6-public.parser.xml2 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.38-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marek Habersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: pike-public.parser.xml2 - libxml2-based XML parser module for Pike (default version) pike7.6-public.parser.xml2 - libxml2-based XML parser module for Pike Closes: 359248 381818 Changes: pike-public.parser.xml2 (1.38-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New Pike dependency * Uninstallable due to unmet dep on pike7.6-core (= 7.6.75-99) (Closes: #381818) * XML2.so has rpath to /usr/local/devel (Closes: #359248) Files: 3b5d28f6ec2825b0af1397c3bf2acf43 735 interpreters optional pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.dsc fb0a2e0a1bb196e27a3b92d94fa3b182 11236 interpreters optional pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2.diff.gz a7f2159a7d3432ba1dc4d8b67fba2b52 13136 interpreters optional pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb 52874f73dba20067f7a5596e57bd4d65 65982 interpreters optional pike7.6-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE2wjAq3909GIf5uoRApT/AJ9v9h56jfpg/KXi/ku63M9zWt70ZwCeIwuL eZI5R9KIFDzd63kVvPuBaks= =oydU -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#374327: patch
This is a simple/obvious port from openssl to gnutls and has not been completely tested, that's why I think it should go to experimental. The simple functions of the package work fine with this (this message is being sent with a patched ssmtp as a proof). Regards. Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (revisión: 20) +++ debian/control (copia de trabajo) @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Santiago Ruano Rincón [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: po-debconf, libssl-dev +Build-Depends: po-debconf, libgnutls-dev Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Package: ssmtp Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog(revisión: 20) +++ debian/changelog(copia de trabajo) @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ -ssmtp (2.61-8) UNRELEASED; urgency=low +ssmtp (2.61-8) experimental; urgency=high - * NOT RELEASED YET + [ Alejandro Rios ] + * Initial port from openssl to gnutls (Closes: #374327) -- Santiago Ruano Rincón [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:39:51 -0500 Index: ssmtp.c === --- ssmtp.c (revisión: 20) +++ ssmtp.c (copia de trabajo) @@ -28,11 +28,7 @@ #include ctype.h #include netdb.h #ifdef HAVE_SSL -#include openssl/crypto.h -#include openssl/x509.h -#include openssl/pem.h -#include openssl/ssl.h -#include openssl/err.h +#include gnutls/openssl.h #endif #ifdef MD5AUTH #include md5auth/hmac_md5.h -- Alejandro Ríos Peña Avatar Ltda. Bogotá D.C. (+57) 300 390 4764 signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Processed: tagging 382263
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 382263 - pending Bug#382263: mdadm: Upgrade kills my RAID setup Tags were: pending confirmed Tags removed: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 374327 + confirmed patch Bug#374327: ssmtp: GPL code linked against OpenSSL without exception There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#315038: tomcat5: Tomcat5 doesn't start after installation
* Timo Juhani Lindfors [Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:04:57 +0300]: Package: tomcat5 Version: 5.0.30-10 Followup-For: Bug #315038 This bug seems to still affect tomcat5 5.0.30-10 in unstable. Test for /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/jdb seems to succeed if I apt-get install java-gcj-compat-dev. How about making java-gcj-compat-dev a dependency? Hi, any news on this bug? I wanted to note that it's currently showing in the RC bug list for Etch... Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Los Planetas - Corrientes circulares en el tiempo
Bug#263783: marked as done (Do not include it on testing)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:06:18 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line more closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: debpartial-mirror Version: 0.2.8 Severity: critical This package is not ready for a stable release yet so this bug will keep it out of Sarge. Thanks, Otavio Salvador -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7 Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR Versions of packages debpartial-mirror depends on: ii python2.3.4-1An interactive high-level object-o -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: debpartial-mirror Source-Version: 0.2.92 ---End Message---
Processed: Changin' severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 300251 wishlist Bug#300251: xaw3dg: Need for libXaw3d.so.7 Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' tags 300251 + wontfix Bug#300251: xaw3dg: Need for libXaw3d.so.7 Tags were: patch Tags added: wontfix thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300251: Changin' severity
severity 300251 wishlist tags 300251 + wontfix thanks Sorry but I think scilab needs patching for the following reasons: 1. xaw3d is a fork of Xaw6.1, not a replacement for Xaw7. 2. IF scilab needed a Xaw7 API it should link Xaw7, not Xaw3d which is not basically compatible with that. If not, who cares to link Xaw7 instead of Xaw6 and so Xaw3d? If it is not required, WHY scilab does that kind of check? 3. Xaw3d maintainer is passed away in 2004 unfortunately, so I have no idea if someone will care to update the lib to be plain compatible with Xaw7. Note that I had no time to check how much Xaw7 is different from the previous edition and Xaw3d as well. 4. Changing soname without a specific API/ABI reason is silly and could possibly break programs which link the current solib. For sure it would require a questionable transition for a few programs in debian. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382331: ekiga freezes when I hang up or when I call a sip adress
Package: ekiga Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Each time i'm calling somebody, or each time I hang up, ekiga freezes! I have to kill the process! Running with verbose mode (-d 6) says nothing (for me)! This bug appears when i upgraded last monday (back after 2 weeks in holidays) I'm using a testing distrib (Apt-Default Relase). Best regards Mathieu -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages ekiga depends on: ii evolution-data-server 1.6.2-3 evolution database backend server ii gconf2 2.14.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-01.12.1-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6 Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libavahi-client3 0.6.11-1 Avahi client library ii libavahi-common3 0.6.11-1 Avahi common library ii libavahi-glib1 0.6.11-1 Avahi glib integration library ii libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-0 2.14.0-3 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.2.0-3 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libebook1.2-5 1.6.2-3 Client library for evolution addre ii libedataserver1.2-71.6.2-3 Utility library for evolution data ii libesd00.2.36-3 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig1 2.3.2-7 generic font configuration library ii libgcc11:4.1.1-5 GCC support library ii libgconf2-42.14.0-1 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.10.3-3 The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.9-1 GNOME keyring services library ii libgnome2-02.14.1-2 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.14.1-2 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.14.2-1 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime ii libgtk2.0-02.8.18-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libice61:1.0.0-3 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libopal-2.2.0 2.2.2.dfsg-1 Open Phone Abstraction Library - s ii liborbit2 1:2.14.0-2libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.3-1+b1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.10-2lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libpt-1.10.0 1.10.1.dfsg-1 Portable Windows Library ii libpt-plugins-alsa 1.10.1.dfsg-1 Portable Windows Library Audio Plu ii libpt-plugins-v4l 1.10.1.dfsg-1 Portable Windows Library Video Plu ii libpt-plugins-v4l2 1.10.1.dfsg-1 Portable Windows Library Video Plu ii libsdl1.2debian1.2.10-3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsm6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-7 X11 client-side library ii libxcursor11.1.5.2-5 X cursor management library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxfixes3 1:3.0.1.2-4 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio ii libxi6 1:1.0.0-5 X11 Input extension library ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.1-4 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxml22.6.26.dfsg-3 GNOME XML library ii libxrandr2 2:1.1.0.2-4 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender11:0.9.0.2-4 X Rendering Extension client libra ii yelp 2.14.2-2 Help browser for GNOME 2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13compression library - runtime ekiga recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 382263 to missing dev nodes when RAID brought up before init
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 retitle 382263 missing dev nodes when RAID brought up before init Bug#382263: mdadm: Upgrade kills my RAID setup Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370438: Bug##370438: swfdec0.3: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner
* Mike Hommey [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:16:38 +0200]: Package: swfdec0.3 Severity: wishlist Hi! (This is a mere copy of the reports sent by Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to most of the packages that depend on mozilla-dev and friends) It looks like your package still depends on a mozilla library in testing. Seems like swfdec no longer has a dependency on any mozilla binary? Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Los Planetas - Pesadilla en el parque de atracciones -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382263: temporary fix
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1130 +0100]: A temporary fix is to rm /etc/udev/rules.d/mdadm. This is what 2.5.3-1 does right now, but I think I'll change that even... more to come. Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb Also see #382326 -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Bug#382031: marked as done (Error updating koffice-i18n-es to 1.5.2-1)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:47:27 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382031: fixed in koffice-l10n 1.5.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: koffice-i18n-es Version: 1.5.1-1 Severity: normal I can't upgrade from 1.5.1-1 to 1.5.2-1 look at this: Preparando para reemplazar koffice-i18n-es 1.5.1-1 (usando .../koffice-i18n-es_1.5.2-1_all.deb) ... Desempaquetando el reemplazo de koffice-i18n-es ... dpkg: error al procesar /var/cache/apt/archives/koffice-i18n-es_1.5.2-1_all.deb (--unpack): intentando sobreescribir `/usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/es/api/kfontdialog.png', que está también en el paquete kde-i18n-es dpkg-deb: el subproceso paste fue terminado por la señal (Tubería rota) Se encontraron errores al procesar: /var/cache/apt/archives/koffice-i18n-es_1.5.2-1_all.deb It seems that a file the kfontdialog.png file also belongs to another package (kde-i18n-es). Cheers -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-ck1-p4s Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) koffice-i18n-es depends on no packages. Versions of packages koffice-i18n-es recommends: ii kde-i18n-es 4:3.5.3-1 Spanish (es) internationalized (i1 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: koffice-l10n Source-Version: 1.5.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of koffice-l10n, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: koffice-i18n-af_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-af_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ar_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-bg_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-br_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-br_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-bs_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-bs_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-ca_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ca_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-cs_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-cs_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-cy_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-cy_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-da_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-da_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-de_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-de_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-el_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-el_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-engb_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-engb_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-eo_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-eo_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-es_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-es_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-et_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-et_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-eu_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-eu_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-fi_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-fi_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-fr_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-fr_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-ga_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ga_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-he_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-he_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-hi_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-hi_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-hu_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-hu_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-is_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-is_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-it_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-it_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-ja_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ja_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-lt_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-lt_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-mk_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-mk_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-ms_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-ms_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-nb_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-nb_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-nl_1.5.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/k/koffice-l10n/koffice-i18n-nl_1.5.2-2_all.deb koffice-i18n-nn_1.5.2-2_all.deb to
Processed: emacs21: FTBFS on mips, mipsel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 381452 serious Bug#381452: emacs21: FTBFS on mips, mipsel Severity set to `serious' from `normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: notfound 362952 in 2.3.3-7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 notfound 362952 2.3.3-7 Bug#362952: amavisd-new: fails to purge Bug marked as not found in version 2.3.3-7. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#362952: marked as done (amavisd-new: fails to purge)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:32:35 -0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Closing already fixed bugs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: amavisd-new Version: 2.3.3-7 Severity: serious amavisd fails to purge. This line fails: . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 1:2.3.3-5bpo2 Closing these bugs in the backports.org branch -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh ---End Message---
Bug#380128: marked as done (info: Incorrect (?) (unclear) copyright statement)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:32:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#380128: fixed in texinfo 4.8.dfsg.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: info Version: 4.8.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 The file /usr/share/doc/info/copyright contains: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version. ... On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL' file. However, both the man page for info as well as info clearly state: Copyright C 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. There is NO warranty. You may redistribute this software under the terms of the GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the files named COPYING. and There is NO warranty. You may redistribute this software under the terms of the GNU General Public License. For more information about these matters, see the files named COPYING. Since the file COPYING is not shipped by Debian, I could not check there. So in conclusion, the copyright file for Debian claims version 2 or any later version while both documentation and programm output miss this clause (and hence refer to the original GPL). The original GPL is, however, not included in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL. So looking at the package installed, the licences is clearly wrong and missing on Debian. Given the authorship, I assume this is an (consistent) oversight in the source for both the man page and the programm itself. For clarity, COPYING should be checked. I suggest the following: *Contact upstream and ask to clarify *Patch both the man page and the programm to refer to /usr/share/doc/info/copyright instead of the file COPYING so that the reader is drawn to a file actually shipped in the package (or, alternativly, ship COPYING as well). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.6-grsec-cz03 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages info depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libncurses5 5.5-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand info recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: texinfo Source-Version: 4.8.dfsg.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of texinfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: info_4.8.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/texinfo/info_4.8.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/texinfo/texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2.diff.gz texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2.dsc to pool/main/t/texinfo/texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2.dsc texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/t/texinfo/texinfo_4.8.dfsg.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated texinfo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:16:29 +0200 Source: texinfo Binary: texinfo info Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.8.dfsg.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: info - Standalone GNU Info documentation browser texinfo- Documentation
Processed: found 362952 in 1:2.3.3-5bpo1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 found 362952 1:2.3.3-5bpo1 Bug#362952: amavisd-new: fails to purge Bug marked as found in version 1:2.3.3-5bpo1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: found 362952 in 1:2.3.3-7
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 found 362952 1:2.3.3-7 Bug#362952: amavisd-new: fails to purge Bug marked as found in version 1:2.3.3-7. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382263: temporary fix
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1400 +0100]: Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb I've released 2.5.3-1~unreleased.4. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb It now uses udev again but also adds a script that tries to determine whether /dev/md/X is in use (for each node). If it cannot determine that, it uses /dev/mdX. Awaiting your feedback. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Bug#382364: libghc6-missingpy-dev: not installable (wants missingh 14.4, has missingh14.5)
Package: libghc6-missingpy-dev Version: 0.8.5 Severity: grave -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Log from install: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ :( $ apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libghc6-missingpy-dev (0.8.5) ... Reading package info from stdin ... done. ghc-pkg: dependency MissingH-0.14.4 doesn't exist (use --force to override) dpkg: error processing libghc6-missingpy-dev (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: libghc6-missingpy-dev E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) If I rebuild the package with libghc6-missingh-dev 0.14.5, it installs fine. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libghc6-missingpy-dev depends on: ii ghc6 6.4.2-2GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilat ii libghc6-missingh-dev 0.14.5 Library of utility functions for H ii python-dev2.3.5-11 Header files and a static library libghc6-missingpy-dev recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE20plAud/2YgchcQRAmhcAKDxWmyXhg61+v4VGAOEj28V0Xt2KACfYgHI 6+SPH/uF5B4z7vEP5pVc97o= =wEsg -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382263: temporary fix
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1400 +0100]: Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb I've released 2.5.3-1~unreleased.4. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb It now uses udev again but also adds a script that tries to determine whether /dev/md/X is in use (for each node). If it cannot determine that, it uses /dev/mdX. Awaiting your feedback. Installed but not rebooted yet: dpkg -i mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb (Reading database ... 179282 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 (using mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb) ... Stopping RAID monitoring service: mdadm --monitor. Unpacking replacement mdadm ... Setting up mdadm (2.5.3-1~unreleased.4) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/udev/mdadm.rules ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17-1-686 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.16-2-686 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. Starting RAID monitoring service: mdadm --monitor. Assembling RAID array md0...done (already running). Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382263: temporary fix
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1130 +0100]: A temporary fix is to rm /etc/udev/rules.d/mdadm. This is what 2.5.3-1 does right now, but I think I'll change that even... more to come. Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb Also see #382326 I just did the install but not rebooted: ictoria:/home/amarsh04# dpkg -i mdadm*.deb (Reading database ... 179282 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace mdadm 2.5.2-10 (using mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb) ... Stopping RAID monitoring service: mdadm --monitor. Unpacking replacement mdadm ... Setting up mdadm (2.5.3-1~unreleased.3) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/mdadm ... Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.d/mdadm ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17-1-686 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.17 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.16-2-686 I: mdadm: RAID support installed to mount all RAID arrays during boot. I: mdadm: use `dpkg-reconfigure -plow mdadm` to change this. Starting RAID monitoring service: mdadm --monitor. Assembling RAID array md0...done (already running). Will try next update in a minute. Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382263: temporary fix
martin f krafft wrote: also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1400 +0100]: Could you please try mdadm 2.5.3-1~unreleased.3 ? It adds the udev rules because mdadm seems to create the device nodes even for devices that have already been assembled now. This is not a final fix but I'd like to get confirmation on this behaviour. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.3_i386.deb I've released 2.5.3-1~unreleased.4. http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/source/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4.dsc http://debian.madduck.net/repo/dists/UNRELEASED/main/binary-i386/admin/mdadm_2.5.3-1~unreleased.4_i386.deb It now uses udev again but also adds a script that tries to determine whether /dev/md/X is in use (for each node). If it cannot determine that, it uses /dev/mdX. Awaiting your feedback. Rebooted fine with /dev/md0 created. dmesg|grep md md: md driver 0.90.3 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 md: bitmap version 4.39 md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 md: md0 stopped. md: bindhdb3 md: bindhda3 raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors EXT3 FS on md0, internal journal Arthur. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382385: mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
Package: mozilla Version: 2:1.7.13-0.3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060809-2140 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: binutils (= 2.15-4), libgtk2.0-dev, debhelper (= 4.1.16), zip, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libungif4-dev, libz-dev, autoconf2.13, bzip2, patch, sharutils, docbook-to-man, libfreetype6-dev, libxft-dev (= 2.1-6), libfontconfig1-dev (= 2.1-13), gcc (= 4.0) [!amd64], g++ (= 4.0) [!amd64], libidl-dev (= 0.8), po-debconf, libxp-dev, libxt-dev, libxau-dev [...] mimemult.cpp:55: warning: missing braces around initializer for 'MimeContainerClass' mimemult.cpp:55: warning: missing braces around initializer for 'MimeObjectClass' mimeeobj.h:57: error: previous declaration of 'MimeExternalObjectClass mimeExternalObjectClass' with 'C++' linkage mimemult.cpp:76: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C' linkage make[5]: *** [mimemult.o] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews/mime/src' make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews/mime' make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews' make[2]: *** [tier_97] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla' make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla' make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=mozillaver=2:1.7.13-0.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375077: initrd needs its own, static, nsswitch.conf
Bram Duvigneau wrote: I have 251-5 installed and am still seeing: udevd[PID]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server I had the same problem with 251-5. I used compat ldap in my nsswitch.conf, it will work if you change compat to files. My /etc/nsswitch.conf file already contains files ldap: group: files ldap passwd: files ldap shadow: files ldap -- --- Michael Schultheiss E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379818: marked as done (FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:02:13 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#379818: fixed in konserve 0.10.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: konserve
Version: 0.10.3-2.1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source because it doesn't recognize
Autoconf 2.60. A patch similar to
http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kde-common/admin/cvs.sh?rev=555946r1=543983r2=555946
should fix this problem. For some background, please see the
discussion at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00958.html
Automatic build of konserve_0.10.3-2.1 on usurper by sbuild/amd64 0.46
...
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/konserve-0.10.3'
*** YOU'RE USING autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60.
*** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
make[1]: *** [cvs] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/konserve-0.10.3'
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 2
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: konserve
Source-Version: 0.10.3-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
konserve, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
konserve_0.10.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-3.diff.gz
konserve_0.10.3-3.dsc
to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-3.dsc
konserve_0.10.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/konserve/konserve_0.10.3-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alejandro Exojo Piqueras [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated konserve
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:49:28 +0200
Source: konserve
Binary: konserve
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alejandro Exojo Piqueras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
konserve - KDE system tray application that performs periodic backups
Closes: 344682 379818
Changes:
konserve (0.10.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix the installation directory of the user documentation: force it to be
${datadir}/doc/kde/HTML by exporting kde_htmldir with that value assigned
(Closes: #344682).
* Update 01_admin_update.diff to a diff against branches/KDE/3.5 (up to
revision 569289), to include support for autoconf 2.60 (Closes: #379818).
Make executable the new file included in the diff, because it's a script.
* Raise urgency to medium, because fixes a RC bug.
* Raised Standards-Version to 3.7.2 (no changes required).
* Raise debhelper compatibility level to 5 (no changes required).
* Clarify copyright/license in debian/copyright.
* Copy config.* to admin/, instead of the root directory, and build-depend
on autotools-dev.
* Force C collation in sort invocations of debian/rules.
* Change to lowercase the name of the application in the manpage.
Files:
5cb52128b2a178f57cc04fc4828f91bd 631 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-3.dsc
138e9cd04aee1a45c1102a673103ba4c 105830 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-3.diff.gz
9bbc3c6b50b86cbbb8c9e2b275d6d1d1 501460 kde optional konserve_0.10.3-3_i386.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE21bolAuUx1tI/64RAsu5AJ4kLKeCt6zkcr3GcJIdQMaVxvyY9ACffoXT
HHEFvCvXuYQr2dT3N56WkY4=
=PpjR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Bug#382384: mdk_1.2.2-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: casting errors
Package: mdk Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mdk_1.2.2-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060810-0213 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, libglade2-dev, guile-1.6-dev, flex [...] then mv -f .deps/mix_parser.Tpo .deps/mix_parser.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/mix_parser.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi cc1: warnings being treated as errors mix_parser.c: In function 'add_raw_': mix_parser.c:551: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make[4]: *** [mix_parser.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2/mixlib' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2/mixlib' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=mdkver=1.2.2-2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work
Package: tightvnc Version: 1.2.9-17 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tightvnc_1.2.9-17 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060810-0333 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), lynx, zlib1g-dev, xutils, libjpeg62-dev, libxaw7-dev ( 4.1.0), perl-modules, xfonts-base, xutils-dev, libx11-dev, libxau-dev, libxext-dev, libxi-dev, libxkbfile-dev, libxmu-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev [...] imake -I../..//config/cf -DTOPDIR=../../ -DCURDIR=. In file included from ../..//config/cf/Imake.tmpl:91, from Imakefile.c:40: ../..//config/cf/linux.cf:122: warning: HasGcc redefined Imakefile.c:31: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../..//config/cf/linux.cf:123: warning: HasGcc2 redefined Imakefile.c:32: warning: this is the location of the previous definition make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/imake' gcc -O -ansi -pedantic -I../..//include -I../..//exports/include/X11 -I../../ -I../..//exports/include -Dlinux LinuxMachineDefines -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500L -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO-DCPP_PROGRAM=\/lib/cpp\ -c -o imake.o imake.c gcc: LinuxMachineDefines: No such file or directory imake.c:911: warning: string length '1390' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support make[1]: *** [imake.o] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=tightvncver=1.2.9-17 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382383: debian-edu-artwork_0.0.3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?
Package: debian-edu-artwork Version: 0.0.3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of debian-edu-artwork_0.0.3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060809-1520 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs, libbogl-dev [...] Making install in splash make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. convert debian-edu-splash.png debian-edu-splash.xpm make[4]: convert: Command not found make[4]: *** [debian-edu-splash.xpm.gz] Error 127 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3' make: *** [common-install-impl] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=debian-edu-artworkver=0.0.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380318: Bug confirmed and forwarded
tags 380318 upstream forwarded 380318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you After confirming this issue in another AMD64 machine, tried some quick fixes and asked for help on #debian-amd64, this bug has been forwarded, and you can query its status on [1] Any help would be very welcome. Thank you everyone for your time. Jose [1] http://bugs.xmms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2401 -- José M. Parrella - Debian Sid, k2.6.17.4 Escuela de Ingenieria Electrica Universidad Central de Venezuela - ucvlug.info
Bug#382255: marked as done (Mandatory (unspecified) security update, rails 1.1.5)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:17:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382255: fixed in rails 1.1.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: rails Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole I wish I could give details here, but all I know is from http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2006/8/9/rails-1-1-5-mandatory-security-patch-and-other-tidbits which says that Rails 1.1.5 fixes a serious security concern that's currently undisclosed. As such, I was torn on what severity to report at, but finally settled on grave as it doesn't sound like this is just a minor thing. Please accept my apologies if I'm overreacting based on too little already disclosed information. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages rails depends on: ii libdbi-ruby1.8 0.0.23-3 Database Independent Interface for ii liberb-ruby2.0.4+ruby1.8.2-1 Tiny eRuby ii libmysql-ruby1.8 2.7-1.1 MySQL module for Ruby 1.8 ii libpgsql-ruby1.8 0.7.1-9 PostgreSQL extension library for r ii libredcloth-ruby1.83.0.4-1 Textile module for Ruby 1.8 ii rake 0.7.1-1 a ruby build program ii rdoc 1.8.2-1 Generate documentation from ruby s ii ruby 1.8.2-1 An interpreter of object-oriented ii ruby1.81.8.4-5 Interpreter of object-oriented scr Versions of packages rails recommends: ii irb 1.8.2-1Interactive Ruby (irb) -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: rails Source-Version: 1.1.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rails, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rails_1.1.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rails/rails_1.1.5-1.diff.gz rails_1.1.5-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rails/rails_1.1.5-1.dsc rails_1.1.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/r/rails/rails_1.1.5-1_all.deb rails_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rails/rails_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated rails package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:50:13 -0500 Source: rails Binary: rails Architecture: source all Version: 1.1.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: emergency Maintainer: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: rails - MVC ruby based framework geared for web application development Closes: 382255 Changes: rails (1.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=emergency . * New upstream release + Fixes a remote security hole [Bugtraq 19454] (closes: #382255) Files: 8d794d7e7983d8da4b5bda9f645f05da 607 web optional rails_1.1.5-1.dsc 45b86018f6e9580a1cecc48d3ff70e3f 1217259 web optional rails_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz 8b766e9266466bbe1d625d5c9e33cae4 12204 web optional rails_1.1.5-1.diff.gz 3b9b1d4342412d05693c507e8cda9a16 1775080 web optional rails_1.1.5-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE21gO73/bNdaAYUURAhpXAKDYWrf2kvm3ZWHKPLt07VOUGx31YgCeMYVJ IgHPL64O1qq3NCnqJ6l7w+g= =8sED -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#382392: krb5: setuid() and seteuid() local privilege escalation vulnerabilities
Package: krb5
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200608-15.xml
appies to debian too
2006-001-patch_1.5.txt - is from gentoo, applies to debian krb5 too,
with some hunks succeding in different places
krb5-1.3.6-patch - is the diff between debian stable krb5 1.3.6-2sarge2
and the patched version, this should apply cleanly
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
-- Package Information:
Package: krb5-ftpd
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-Size: 104
Maintainer: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: krb5
Version: 1.3.6-2sarge2
Provides: ftp-server
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libcomerr2 (= 1.33-3), libkrb53 (=
1.3.2), libkrb53 (= 1.3.6-2sarge2), netbase, krb5-config
Conflicts: ftpd
Filename: pool/updates/main/k/krb5/krb5-ftpd_1.3.6-2sarge2_i386.deb
Size: 52186
MD5sum: 00356fdf1a8534d13942ad3d58426da5
SHA1: 92d50e2a319be7e27fcf98c40051495543c8fc7d
SHA256: 25d47a7fb63ee8239c5e0438ef3d0a0a8b04bf9f33e9387840f1a4a41ff07037
Description: Secure FTP server supporting MIT Kerberos
Kerberos is a system for authenticating users and services on a
network.
Kerberos is a trusted third-party service. That means that there is a
third party (the kerberos server) that is trusted by all the entities
on
the network (users and services, usually called principals).
.
This is the MIT reference implementation of Kerberos5.
Index: appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c
===
*** appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c (working copy)
***
*** 1367,1373
goto bad;
sleep(tries);
}
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
#ifdef IP_TOS
#ifdef IPTOS_THROUGHPUT
on = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT;
--- 1367,1375
goto bad;
sleep(tries);
}
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
#ifdef IP_TOS
#ifdef IPTOS_THROUGHPUT
on = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT;
***
*** 1377,1383
#endif
return (fdopen(s, fmode));
bad:
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
(void) close(s);
return (NULL);
}
--- 1379,1387
#endif
return (fdopen(s, fmode));
bad:
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
(void) close(s);
return (NULL);
}
***
*** 2186,2192
(void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
goto pasv_error;
}
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
len = sizeof(pasv_addr);
if (getsockname(pdata, (struct sockaddr *) pasv_addr, len) 0)
goto pasv_error;
--- 2190,2198
(void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
goto pasv_error;
}
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
len = sizeof(pasv_addr);
if (getsockname(pdata, (struct sockaddr *) pasv_addr, len) 0)
goto pasv_error;
Index: appl/bsd/v4rcp.c
===
*** appl/bsd/v4rcp.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/bsd/v4rcp.c (working copy)
***
*** 436,442
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
(void) response();
! (void) setuid(userid);
source(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
--- 436,445
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
(void) response();
! if (setuid(userid)) {
! error(rcp: can't setuid(user)\n);
! exit(1);
! }
source(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
***
*** 452,458
krem = kstream_create_from_fd (rem, 0, 0);
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
! (void) setuid(userid);
sink(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
--- 455,464
krem = kstream_create_from_fd (rem, 0, 0);
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
! if (setuid(userid)) {
! error(rcp: can't setuid(user)\n);
! exit(1);
! }
sink(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
Index: appl/bsd/krcp.c
===
*** appl/bsd/krcp.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/bsd/krcp.c (working copy)
***
*** 620,626
euid = geteuid();
if (euid == 0) {
! (void) setuid(0);
if(krb5_seteuid(userid)) {
perror(rcp seteuid user); errs++; exit(errs);
}
--- 620,628
euid = geteuid();
if (euid == 0) {
! if (setuid(0)) {
! perror(rcp setuid 0); errs++; exit(errs);
! }
if(krb5_seteuid(userid)) {
perror(rcp seteuid user); errs++; exit(errs);
}
***
*** 638,648
continue;
rcmd_stream_init_normal();
#ifdef HAVE_SETREUID
! (void) setreuid(0, userid);
sink(1, argv+argc-1);
! (void) setreuid(userid, 0);
#else
! (void) setuid(0);
if(seteuid(userid))
Bug#382384: marked as done (mdk_1.2.2-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: casting errors)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:38:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382384: mdk_1.2.2-2(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: casting errors has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: mdk Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mdk_1.2.2-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060810-0213 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libgtk2.0-dev, zlib1g-dev, libglade2-dev, guile-1.6-dev, flex [...] then mv -f .deps/mix_parser.Tpo .deps/mix_parser.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/mix_parser.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi cc1: warnings being treated as errors mix_parser.c: In function 'add_raw_': mix_parser.c:551: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make[4]: *** [mix_parser.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2/mixlib' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2/mixlib' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mdk-1.2.2' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=mdkver=1.2.2-2 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Thanks for the bug report. This issue was fixed in 1.2.2-3 which was uploaded a couple hours later. Baruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: mdk Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mdk_1.2.2-2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060810-0213 ---End Message---
Bug#375300: marked as done (tar: wildcard option breaks apt-listchanges, dpkg-buildpackage, linda and lintian)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375956: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tar Version: 1.15.91-1 Severity: critical Justification: makes apt-listchanges unusable When apt-listchanges tries to extract changelogs, it hits new feature of tar 1.15.91 which forbids wildcards in filenames, and so it fails to do anything as it finds no changelog: 12528 execve(/bin/sh, [sh, -c, dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile /var/cache/apt/archives/ttf-dejavu_2.7-2_all.deb |tar xf - -C /tmp/apt-listchangesEKaRJr \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' 2/dev/null], [SHELL=/bin/bash, TERM=linux, HUSHLOGIN=FALSE, USER=root, MAIL=/var/mail/root, PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:., PWD=/tmp, LANG=C, PS1=\\h:\\w\\$ , SHLVL=1, HOME=/root, LOGNAME=root, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ, _=/usr/bin/strace, OLDPWD=/tmp/w]) = 0 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 46) = 46 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 52) = 52 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 43) = 43 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 49) = 49 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 ... Please, if you must introduce some new options, make '--wildcards' default so you do not change behavior in backward incompatible way. Or, if you are absolutely sure that no other program on the world besides apt-listchanges depends on this behavior, feel free to reassign this to apt-listchanges. But I'm absolutely sure that apt-listchanges is not only program which depends on this behavior (as I've written couple of tools which depend on this as well)... Thanks, Petr Vandrovec ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948
Processed: Bug confirmed and forwarded
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 380318 upstream Bug#380318: xmms is missing some libraries There were no tags set. Bug#380115: xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep Bug#380321: XMMS loads no output plugins Tags added: upstream forwarded 380318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#380318: xmms is missing some libraries Bug#380115: xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep Bug#380321: XMMS loads no output plugins Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 339835 to noweb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 reassign 339835 noweb Bug#339835: please do not build-depend on gawk, use awk instead Bug reassigned from package `ifupdown' to `noweb'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370438: Bug##370438: swfdec0.3: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 02:12:48PM +0200, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Mike Hommey [Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:16:38 +0200]: Package: swfdec0.3 Severity: wishlist Hi! (This is a mere copy of the reports sent by Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to most of the packages that depend on mozilla-dev and friends) It looks like your package still depends on a mozilla library in testing. Seems like swfdec no longer has a dependency on any mozilla binary? It has a build dependency on mozilla-dev. That should be switched to libxul-dev, and maybe some scripts may be adapted to find the right include directory. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375953: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not work anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375300: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, Since monday, the 26th, my apt-listchanges does not seem to work anymore. When using apt-get or aptitude, the output show it parses the changelogs but nothing is done by apt-listchanges. I'm pretty sure the bug is not on the apt-listchanges side but I don't know where to report it else. I've purged the apt-listchanges package from my laptop, and reinstalled it again. It didn't change anything to the behaviour. Nothing is done. I can provide any debugging or logs needed to solve the problem Many thanks in advance, Didrik -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_BE, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: did * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to
Bug#375956: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not send mail anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375300: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, apt-listchanges doesn't do it work anymore. I have upgraded some packages, but it didn't send me a mail as usual. I try to dpkg-reconfigure it (with the same settings), but it didn't do anything. Xav -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to Junichi Uekawa (Closes: #318499). + Vietnamese thanks to Clytie Siddall (Closes: #308744). * BTS Patches: + Make more strings translateable thanks to Junichi too (Closes: #318496). + Fix pot file generation (Closes: #318498, 302548). + Fix frontend=none behaviour thanks to Colin
Processed: [bugzilla #329387] new sarge package that fixes CVE-2005-4534
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 329387 + pending Bug#329387: Bugzilla: Unsafe use of temporary files in the syncshadow script Tags were: security patch sarge woody Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#374569: groff-base: groff-base includes non-free material
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 11:08:34AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:54:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On 20 Jun 2006, Colin Watson verbalised: It's dual-licensed upstream; I contacted upstream years ago about this issue (before it became particularly public that Debian had a problem with the licence) and arranged for the following statement to be added to the top-level LICENSES file: All files part of groff are licensed under this version of the GPL (or licenses which are compatible with the GPL). You are free to choose version 2 or any subsequent version of the GPL. Unfortunately, for technical reasons (see bug #196762), it is extremely difficult to upgrade to the new upstream release. If you like, I can simply include a note in the copyright file with similar contents to this e-mail, although I don't know if that's good form. Unfortunately, I think that means we have to take the stance that the old version is non-free, but the future version is freed; unless we can get upstream to release the version in Debian with the new license. I guess in that case I will have to resume efforts to get 1.19 sorted out more urgently. I don't want to embark upon the busy-work of splitting documentation out into a separate package only to put it back in again later ... So, I've done some more investigation, and I'd like advice from debian-release. Background: For those not familiar with groff, it has historically accepted only ISO-8859-1 input; internally, it has always been very much hardwired for single-byte input. The Debian groff package has for a long time contained a highly complex multibyte patch to support EUC-JP (and later other CJK) input; it works, but is not terribly clean, and for one thing causes groff's behaviour to depend on the locale rather than solely the file it's processing and its command-line arguments, which is wrong for a text processor like groff. It also contains support for an ascii8 device which essentially just passes through the encoding of the source text; this is typographically unsound because, for instance, you can't do decent hyphenation that way, but we're relying on this for Czech, Croatian, Hungarian, Polish, Russian, Slovak, and Turkish man pages at the moment. Upstream has long stated an intent never to accept this patch, and instead wants to work on UTF-8 support, with a preprocessor to convert from other encodings as necessary. This has been the state of play for several years now. I've tried to port the Debian multibyte patch forward to groff 1.19 and later releases on more than one occasion, but it's a very complex and intrusive patch and I've hit roadblocks that are extremely hard to surmount. groff 1.19 made a number of internal improvements for the better (notably Unicode composite glyphs), but the changes conflict in a big way with the multibyte patch. The authors of that patch haven't seemed able to help, and upstream is entirely uninterested. I've pretty much been stuck maintaining a package based on 1.18.1.1, with no way to jump forward without breaking the now significant number of users relying on CJK support. Some people have suggested reviving the old jgroff package for this and making man use it where appropriate; I'm very much loath to do this, because it's a non-trivial amount of unrewarding packaging work, and it results in either bloating the base system with two versions of groff or requiring all CJK users to know or be told to install jgroff. On another note, while the GFDL discussion was still bubbling on debian-private and before it came up publicly as an issue, I noted that most of groff's documentation was under the GFDL, and was very concerned about the usability of groff in the event that its documentation had to be removed; I'd have serious trouble writing any non-trivial groff documents without the groff documentation! I contacted groff upstream to ask whether its documentation could be dual-licensed under the GPL. After some discussion, they agreed, resulting in a note in groff's LICENSES file that All files part of groff are licensed under this version of the GPL. Unfortunately, this note was added after groff 1.18.1.1 was released, and Manoj points out that it's not entirely obvious that we can take advantage of it. This prompted me to have another look at the current state of groff upstream with respect to Unicode support. Current situation: Bruno Haible has been working on Unicode support in groff, and CVS groff is now very close to being able to render CJK text on a par with what the Debian patch offers, by means of a preprocessor (preconv) that converts all non-ASCII text into groff escapes according to an encoding specified on the command line. There are a number of other internal improvements in Unicode support too, although input is still fundamentally single-byte; however the escaping preprocessor makes this less important than it used
Bug#375953: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not work anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375956: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, Since monday, the 26th, my apt-listchanges does not seem to work anymore. When using apt-get or aptitude, the output show it parses the changelogs but nothing is done by apt-listchanges. I'm pretty sure the bug is not on the apt-listchanges side but I don't know where to report it else. I've purged the apt-listchanges package from my laptop, and reinstalled it again. It didn't change anything to the behaviour. Nothing is done. I can provide any debugging or logs needed to solve the problem Many thanks in advance, Didrik -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_BE, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: did * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to
Bug#375956: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not send mail anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375956: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, apt-listchanges doesn't do it work anymore. I have upgraded some packages, but it didn't send me a mail as usual. I try to dpkg-reconfigure it (with the same settings), but it didn't do anything. Xav -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to Junichi Uekawa (Closes: #318499). + Vietnamese thanks to Clytie Siddall (Closes: #308744). * BTS Patches: + Make more strings translateable thanks to Junichi too (Closes: #318496). + Fix pot file generation (Closes: #318498, 302548). + Fix frontend=none behaviour thanks to Colin
Bug#382400: ImportError: No module named numarray (return of bug 353043?)
Package: python-matplotlib Version: 0.86.2-6.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Just went to install python-matplotlib on a reasonably clean Debian system, and after all install and updates import pylab fails with the error that it can't find numarray. I see there have been related problems in bug 353043 (marked fixed in an older version than I installed) and bug 353342 (about numpy, marked fixed in a newer version than I have installed). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages python-matplotlib depends on: ii dvipng 1.5-2.1+b1 convert PNG graphics from DVI file ii python 2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-central 0.5.1register and build utility for Pyt ii python-dev 2.3.5-11 Header files and a static library ii python-gd 0.52debian-2 Python module wrapper for libgd ii python-matplotlib-data 0.86.2-6.1 python based plotting system (data ii python-numeric 24.2-5 Numerical (matrix-oriented) Mathem ii python-numeric-ext 24.2-5 Extension modules for Numeric Pyth ii python-tz 2006g-1 Python version of the Olson timezo python-matplotlib recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375953: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not work anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375953: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, Since monday, the 26th, my apt-listchanges does not seem to work anymore. When using apt-get or aptitude, the output show it parses the changelogs but nothing is done by apt-listchanges. I'm pretty sure the bug is not on the apt-listchanges side but I don't know where to report it else. I've purged the apt-listchanges package from my laptop, and reinstalled it again. It didn't change anything to the behaviour. Nothing is done. I can provide any debugging or logs needed to solve the problem Many thanks in advance, Didrik -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_BE, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: did * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to
Processed: severity of 372179 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 372179 important Bug#372179: autoconf: AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM overwrites $@ Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: [bugzilla #329387] new sarge package that fixes CVE-2005-4534
Alexis Sukrieh wrote: tags 329387 + pending thanks Hello, I've packaged a new version of bugzilla for closing a security issue reported on sarge: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329387 This package is 2.16.7-7sarge2 and is available here: http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2_i386.changes http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.diff.gz http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.dsc http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7.orig.tar.gz It only provides the upstream patch (backported from 2.16.11) that closes that security issue : CVE-2005-4534 If an upload is possible to the security archive, that would be great. The distribution should be stable-security instead of testing-proposed-updates. Please also remove all the i18n updates: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/chroots/sarge/home/jmm$ debdiff bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge1.dsc bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.dsc | diffstat debian/changelog| 10 +++ debian/po/ca.po | 144 -- debian/po/cs.po | 140 - debian/po/de.po | 144 -- debian/po/fr.po | 142 -- debian/po/ja.po | 142 -- debian/po/nl.po | 144 -- debian/po/pt_BR.po | 144 -- debian/po/templates.pot | 148 syncshadowdb| 12 ++- The security fix itself is fine. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#339835: please do not build-depend on gawk, use awk instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this bug should be applied to noweb. The ifupdown package only uses the plain awk script, nothing else. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE22S1eBwlBDLsbz4RAjnWAJ9WZAPQeGiytArmdgmD448APWhm+ACfSKoH DAIdQ/9kQeGoMb4ytdqqkxQ= =+IMI -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#375300: marked as done (tar: wildcard option breaks apt-listchanges, dpkg-buildpackage, linda and lintian)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375300: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tar Version: 1.15.91-1 Severity: critical Justification: makes apt-listchanges unusable When apt-listchanges tries to extract changelogs, it hits new feature of tar 1.15.91 which forbids wildcards in filenames, and so it fails to do anything as it finds no changelog: 12528 execve(/bin/sh, [sh, -c, dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile /var/cache/apt/archives/ttf-dejavu_2.7-2_all.deb |tar xf - -C /tmp/apt-listchangesEKaRJr \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' 2/dev/null], [SHELL=/bin/bash, TERM=linux, HUSHLOGIN=FALSE, USER=root, MAIL=/var/mail/root, PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:., PWD=/tmp, LANG=C, PS1=\\h:\\w\\$ , SHLVL=1, HOME=/root, LOGNAME=root, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ, _=/usr/bin/strace, OLDPWD=/tmp/w]) = 0 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 46) = 46 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 52) = 52 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 43) = 43 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 49) = 49 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 ... Please, if you must introduce some new options, make '--wildcards' default so you do not change behavior in backward incompatible way. Or, if you are absolutely sure that no other program on the world besides apt-listchanges depends on this behavior, feel free to reassign this to apt-listchanges. But I'm absolutely sure that apt-listchanges is not only program which depends on this behavior (as I've written couple of tools which depend on this as well)... Thanks, Petr Vandrovec ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948
Bug#382399: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on jaxml (= 2.24)
Package: scannerlog Severity: serious Version: 2.01-3 Hi Your package is not installable as it depends on jaxml (= 2.24) which is not available in unstable anymore. The jaxml package is now a virtual package provided by python-jaxml. A versioned dependency on a virtual package cannot be resolved... Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#378198: libgl1-mesa-dev: missing dependency on libx11-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, if nobody objects, I will prepare an NMU this weekend, since the fix is to just add a dependency on libx11-dev. Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE22PveBwlBDLsbz4RAplAAJ42QQbl5530mjvBhFIsPYLE7U3TawCfZdmE 83+KtSnq4/HRR6KB1Kc82UU= =jcwu -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#375956: marked as done (apt-listchanges: does not send mail anymore)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375953: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: apt-listchanges Version: 2.59-0.2 Severity: important Hi, apt-listchanges doesn't do it work anymore. I have upgraded some packages, but it didn't send me a mail as usual. I try to dpkg-reconfigure it (with the same settings), but it didn't do anything. Xav -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages apt-listchanges depends on: ii apt 0.6.44.2 Advanced front-end for dpkg ii debconf 1.5.2 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.16.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii python2.3.5-11 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-apt0.6.18 Python interface to libapt-pkg ii ucf 2.0012 Update Configuration File: preserv apt-listchanges recommends no packages. -- debconf information: apt-listchanges/confirm: false * apt-listchanges/email-address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * apt-listchanges/which: both * apt-listchanges/frontend: mail * apt-listchanges/save-seen: true ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948 297242 302548 308744 315174 318496 318498 318499 327508 330195 332443 341845 375300 375748 375953 375956 380759 Changes: apt-listchanges (2.60) unstable; urgency=low . * Change of maintainer (and upstream): + put myself as maintainer. + put Matt into Uploaders (thanks for all your work on this package !). + ack NMUs (Closes: #251084, 259171, 260295, 260534, 262603, 280323, 283357, 285440, 292739, 293594, 293594, 294948, 375300, 375953, 375956, 380759) + update debian/copyright accordingly. * Python policy last touch: + do not use dh_python anymore. + .pyc are handled correctly (Closes: #133306). * Bump DH_COMPAT to 5. * Ensure ucf is here before purging in postrm (Closes: #315174). * apt-listchanges new translations: + Traditional Chinese thanks to Kanru Chen (Closes: #297242). + Czech thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: #327508). * apt-listchanges templates po: + Portuguese templates thanks to Miguel Figueiredo (Closes: #330195). + Swedish update thanks to Daniel Nylander (Closes: #332443, 375748). + Japanese update thanks to Junichi Uekawa (Closes: #318499). + Vietnamese thanks to Clytie Siddall (Closes: #308744). * BTS Patches: + Make more strings translateable thanks to Junichi too (Closes: #318496). + Fix pot file generation (Closes: #318498, 302548). + Fix frontend=none behaviour thanks to Colin
Processed: retitle 378198 to libgl1-mesa-dev: missing dependency on libx11-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 retitle 378198 libgl1-mesa-dev: missing dependency on libx11-dev Bug#378198: robotour: FTBFS: error: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382385: mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors
tags 382385 + patch thanks This is due to new the more strict behaviour of current gcc. A patch for this is available in thunderbird package: debian/patches/90_gcc-extern-fix.dpatch maybe it needs backporting On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:00:47AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: mozilla Version: 2:1.7.13-0.3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mozilla_2:1.7.13-0.3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060809-2140 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: binutils (= 2.15-4), libgtk2.0-dev, debhelper (= 4.1.16), zip, libjpeg62-dev | libjpeg-dev, libungif4-dev, libz-dev, autoconf2.13, bzip2, patch, sharutils, docbook-to-man, libfreetype6-dev, libxft-dev (= 2.1-6), libfontconfig1-dev (= 2.1-13), gcc (= 4.0) [!amd64], g++ (= 4.0) [!amd64], libidl-dev (= 0.8), po-debconf, libxp-dev, libxt-dev, libxau-dev [...] mimemult.cpp:55: warning: missing braces around initializer for 'MimeContainerClass' mimemult.cpp:55: warning: missing braces around initializer for 'MimeObjectClass' mimeeobj.h:57: error: previous declaration of 'MimeExternalObjectClass mimeExternalObjectClass' with 'C++' linkage mimemult.cpp:76: error: conflicts with new declaration with 'C' linkage make[5]: *** [mimemult.o] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews/mime/src' make[4]: *** [libs] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews/mime' make[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla/mailnews' make[2]: *** [tier_97] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla' make[1]: *** [default] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mozilla-1.7.13/build-tree/mozilla' make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=mozillaver=2:1.7.13-0.3 - Alexander p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). -- GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal [EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System http://www.asoftsite.org | `-http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#375300: marked as done (tar: wildcard option breaks apt-listchanges, dpkg-buildpackage, linda and lintian)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 09:47:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#375953: fixed in apt-listchanges 2.60 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tar Version: 1.15.91-1 Severity: critical Justification: makes apt-listchanges unusable When apt-listchanges tries to extract changelogs, it hits new feature of tar 1.15.91 which forbids wildcards in filenames, and so it fails to do anything as it finds no changelog: 12528 execve(/bin/sh, [sh, -c, dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile /var/cache/apt/archives/ttf-dejavu_2.7-2_all.deb |tar xf - -C /tmp/apt-listchangesEKaRJr \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.Debian\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog.gz\' \'./usr/doc/*/changelog\' \'./usr/share/doc/*/changelog\' 2/dev/null], [SHELL=/bin/bash, TERM=linux, HUSHLOGIN=FALSE, USER=root, MAIL=/var/mail/root, PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:., PWD=/tmp, LANG=C, PS1=\\h:\\w\\$ , SHLVL=1, HOME=/root, LOGNAME=root, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ, _=/usr/bin/strace, OLDPWD=/tmp/w]) = 0 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 46) = 46 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian.gz: Not found in archive, 52) = 52 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 43) = 43 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 12530 write(2, tar: , 5) = 5 12530 write(2, usr/share/doc/*/NEWS.Debian: Not found in archive, 49) = 49 12530 write(2, \n, 1) = 1 ... Please, if you must introduce some new options, make '--wildcards' default so you do not change behavior in backward incompatible way. Or, if you are absolutely sure that no other program on the world besides apt-listchanges depends on this behavior, feel free to reassign this to apt-listchanges. But I'm absolutely sure that apt-listchanges is not only program which depends on this behavior (as I've written couple of tools which depend on this as well)... Thanks, Petr Vandrovec ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: apt-listchanges Source-Version: 2.60 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of apt-listchanges, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.dsc apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60.tar.gz apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb to pool/main/a/apt-listchanges/apt-listchanges_2.60_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated apt-listchanges package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:25:39 +0200 Source: apt-listchanges Binary: apt-listchanges Architecture: source all Version: 2.60 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: apt-listchanges - Display change history from .deb archives Closes: 133306 251084 259171 260295 260534 262603 280323 283357 285440 292739 293594 293594 294948
Bug#381236: tkfont: tkfont fails to start
On 8/2/06, Angelina Carlton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: , | Error in startup script: sort: Warning: +number syntax is | deprecated, please use -k number | while executing | exec xlsfonts -u -fn * | grep - | sort -t - +2 | uniq What version of coreutils are you using? I've tested with the latest version in unstable, and it does not give this warning. Please send the output of apt-cache policy coreutils Thank you. -- Besos, Marga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329387: [bugzilla #329387] new sarge package that fixes CVE-2005-4534
tags 329387 + pending thanks Hello, I've packaged a new version of bugzilla for closing a security issue reported on sarge: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=329387 This package is 2.16.7-7sarge2 and is available here: http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2_i386.changes http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.diff.gz http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7-7sarge2.dsc http://www.sukria.net/debian/source/bugzilla_2.16.7.orig.tar.gz It only provides the upstream patch (backported from 2.16.11) that closes that security issue : CVE-2005-4534 If an upload is possible to the security archive, that would be great. Thanks. -- Alexis Sukrieh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 382386 + help Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work There were no tags set. Tags added: help tags 381317 + help Bug#381317: tightvnc_1.2.9-15(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: compile errors There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382383: marked as done (debian-edu-artwork_0.0.3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:51:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382383: debian-edu-artwork_0.0.3(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: debian-edu-artwork Version: 0.0.3 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of debian-edu-artwork_0.0.3 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85 Build started at 20060809-1520 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs, libbogl-dev [...] Making install in splash make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. convert debian-edu-splash.png debian-edu-splash.xpm make[4]: convert: Command not found make[4]: *** [debian-edu-splash.xpm.gz] Error 127 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art/splash' make[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3/art' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/debian-edu-artwork-0.0.3' make: *** [common-install-impl] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64pkg=debian-edu-artworkver=0.0.3 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 0.0.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Thanks for the heads-up. I saw it myself, and fixed it in 0.0.4. ---End Message---
Bug#377395: marked as done (dpkg: FTBFS on mips)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:58:24 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#377395: dpkg: FTBFS on mips has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.22 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, dpkg currently fails to build from source on mips, which stops its transition to testing. The build log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=dpkgver=1.13.22arch=mipsstamp=1150904570file=logas=raw After an investigation with Thiemo Seufer, this issue is caused by perl. perl also FTBFS on mips, and the mips build daemon uses perl 5.8.8-4 and perl-modules 5.8.8-6. With this combination, the Encode::JP::JIS7 module is not installed, which finaly causes the dpkg build failure. To fix this bug, I can see the following actions: 1) wait until #374396 (perl FTBFS on mips) or #377385 (perl-modules dependencies) is fixed 2) manually build dpkg on mips with perl-modules 5.8.8-4 3) adding `|| true' after calling po4a to make sure the generation of the translated man pages do not stop the build. Note: the FTBFS in probably also present on hppa (where perl also FTBFS). Kind Regards, -- Nekral ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 06:34:18PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote: Package: dpkg Version: 1.13.22 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Hello, dpkg currently fails to build from source on mips, which stops its transition to testing. [...] To fix this bug, I can see the following actions: 1) wait until #374396 (perl FTBFS on mips) or #377385 (perl-modules dependencies) is fixed #374396 was fixed and dpkg was rebuilt successfully on mips. Kind Regards, -- Nekral ---End Message---
Bug#364379: Intent to NMU
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 12:38:20PM +0800, Emfox Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/8/5, Kanru Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 364379 + patch pending thanks I changed the build-dep to libxul-dev and made some minor fixes. The package builds fine in i386 and is lintian clean now. The interdiff of the NMU is attached. Hello. Acutally, I worked on this bug months ago, when it's reported. but mozilla plugin failed to work after it build depend on libxul-dev instead of mozilla-dev, mozilla (and firefox) failed to dectected the plugin (pcmanx-plugin.so), and I've no idea, so the bug was put off, till now. Because it was linked against libxpcom and libnspr from xulrunner. I'm now on a two-months training out of my home and school, and have no access to my working computer. dear Kanru, If you can make sure that it (the patch) work, feel free to do the NMU, and I'll be happy too that pcmanx ships with Etch. The problem with pcmanx-gtk2 is that is uselessly links against the mozilla libs while all it uses from there are the plugin API include files. The -Wl,--as-needed addition in the NMU patch provided by Kanru Chen removes these useless links, though it would probably even be cleaner to just remove $(MOZILLA_LIBS) in plugin/src/Makefile.am. Anyways, I confirm this patch produces a working plugin. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work
tags 382386 + help tags 381317 + help thanks Hi I think I need help from a porter here. Is it because of the new gcc? Regards, // Ola On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:07:26AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: tightvnc Version: 1.2.9-17 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of tightvnc_1.2.9-17 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85 Build started at 20060810-0333 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), lynx, zlib1g-dev, xutils, libjpeg62-dev, libxaw7-dev ( 4.1.0), perl-modules, xfonts-base, xutils-dev, libx11-dev, libxau-dev, libxext-dev, libxi-dev, libxkbfile-dev, libxmu-dev, libxt-dev, x-dev [...] imake -I../..//config/cf -DTOPDIR=../../ -DCURDIR=. In file included from ../..//config/cf/Imake.tmpl:91, from Imakefile.c:40: ../..//config/cf/linux.cf:122: warning: HasGcc redefined Imakefile.c:31: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../..//config/cf/linux.cf:123: warning: HasGcc2 redefined Imakefile.c:32: warning: this is the location of the previous definition make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/imake' gcc -O -ansi -pedantic -I../..//include -I../..//exports/include/X11 -I../../ -I../..//exports/include -Dlinux LinuxMachineDefines -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500L -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO-DCPP_PROGRAM=\/lib/cpp\ -c -o imake.o imake.c gcc: LinuxMachineDefines: No such file or directory imake.c:911: warning: string length '1390' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support make[1]: *** [imake.o] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=tightvncver=1.2.9-17 -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#351693: guile-1.6 FTBFS on ia64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what is the status of this bug? According to the buildd log[1], the ia64 port of the latest version 1.6.8-4 built without errors. [1] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=guile-1.6ver=1.6.8-4arch=ia64stamp=1153731157file=logas=raw Regards, Bastian - -- ,''`. Bastian Kleineidam : :' :GnuPG Schlüssel `. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E `- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE23V9eBwlBDLsbz4RAkr6AJ90nuQFficqwyJ3RhRW+gm0qbh4nACglUdc bTSlizBbFqP+BQeJjIEB49I= =iH/t -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#380138: marked as done (libdspam7-dev should include auto-config.h and pref.h)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#380138: fixed in dspam 3.6.8-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libdspam7-dev Version: 3.6.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to compile programs against libdspam7-dev, it complains about missing files and causes compilation to fail. gcc -c example.c -ldspam -I/usr/include/dspam -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DCONFIG_DEFAULT=/usr/local/etc/dspam.conf -DLOGDIR=/var/log/dspam In file included from example.c:37: /usr/include/dspam/libdspam.h:28:25: error: auto-config.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/dspam/libdspam.h:37, from example.c:37: /usr/include/dspam/storage_driver.h:32:18: error: pref.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/include/dspam/libdspam.h:37, from example.c:37: /usr/include/dspam/storage_driver.h:160: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '_ds_pref_load' example.c: In function 'main': example.c:172: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be example.c:214: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be example.c:261: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be example.c:324: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-p4-higmem4g Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libdspam7-dev depends on: ii libdspam7 3.6.8-1DSPAM is a scalable and statistica libdspam7-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: dspam Source-Version: 3.6.8-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of dspam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: dspam-doc_3.6.8-2_all.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/dspam-doc_3.6.8-2_all.deb dspam-webfrontend_3.6.8-2_all.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/dspam-webfrontend_3.6.8-2_all.deb dspam_3.6.8-2.diff.gz to pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.6.8-2.diff.gz dspam_3.6.8-2.dsc to pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.6.8-2.dsc dspam_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/dspam_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7-dev_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-dev_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7-drv-db4_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-drv-db4_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7-drv-mysql_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-drv-mysql_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7-drv-pgsql_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-drv-pgsql_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7-drv-sqlite3_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-drv-sqlite3_3.6.8-2_i386.deb libdspam7_3.6.8-2_i386.deb to pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7_3.6.8-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Debian DSPAM Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated dspam package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 10:50:44 -0400 Source: dspam Binary: libdspam7-dev libdspam7-drv-pgsql dspam libdspam7-drv-mysql dspam-webfrontend dspam-doc libdspam7-drv-db4 libdspam7 libdspam7-drv-sqlite3 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 3.6.8-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian DSPAM Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Debian DSPAM Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: dspam - is a scalable, fast and statistical anti-spam filter dspam-doc - Documentation for dspam dspam-webfrontend - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter libdspam7 - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter libdspam7-dev - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter libdspam7-drv-db4 - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter libdspam7-drv-mysql - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter libdspam7-drv-pgsql - DSPAM is a scalable and statistical anti-spam filter
Bug#382412: incomplete dependencies
Package: jabref Version: 2.0.1+2.1b2-6 Severity: serious lapse:~/phd jabref #[353] Exception in thread main java.awt.AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.ImageIcon.init(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.ImageIcon.init(libgcj.so.7) at net.sf.jabref.GUIGlobals.clinit(GUIGlobals.java:205) at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7) at net.sf.jabref.JabRefPreferences.init(JabRefPreferences.java:138) at net.sf.jabref.JabRefPreferences.getInstance(JabRefPreferences.java:82) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.init(JabRef.java:76) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.main(JabRef.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7) at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(libgcj.so.7) ...8 more This is with gij-4.1. Installing libgcj7-awt fixes the problem. Since gij rightfully only suggests the library, jabref might need to depend on/recommend it. ii gij-4.14.1.1-10 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Bug#381236: tkfont: tkfont fails to start
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 14:38:32 -0300 (-0300), Margarita Manterola wrote: On 8/2/06, Angelina Carlton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: , | Error in startup script: sort: Warning: +number syntax is | deprecated, please use -k number | while executing | exec xlsfonts -u -fn * | grep - | sort -t - +2 | uniq What version of coreutils are you using? I've tested with the latest version in unstable, and it does not give this warning. I've seen the warning from sort somewhere before. There is a new version uploaded, but for some reason it's not accepting my GPG signature. I'm still in the keyring so I'm awaiting a reply from the admins - I'll try contacting them through a different route. /usr/share/doc/coreutils/NEWS.Debian.gz says: coreutils (5.96-3) unstable; urgency=low * The POSIX compatability level is now set to POSIX 1003.1-2001, which affects the syntax for several commands. For transition purposes, sort +number and tail +number will be supported for the etch release. Note that these usages are deprecated, and will be removed in etch+1; the recommended usage is sort -k number and tail -n +number. Also, uniq +number should be replaced with uniq -s number and touch number filename should be replaced with touch -t number filename. To revert to the older syntax, set the environment variable _POSIX2_VERSION to 199209. Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#379264: Intent to NMU
Tags 379264 + patch pending
Thanks
Hi!
I have reviewed Arjan's patch, and I have prepared an NMU that applies it.
The diff is exactly the same, only the changelog entry changes. I'm
attaching it anyway.
--
Love,
Marga.
diff -u haskell-hsql-1.6/PostgreSQL/Setup.lhs
haskell-hsql-1.6/PostgreSQL/Setup.lhs
--- haskell-hsql-1.6/PostgreSQL/Setup.lhs
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/PostgreSQL/Setup.lhs
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
preConf args flags = do
try (removeFile PostgreSQL.buildinfo)
return emptyHookedBuildInfo
-postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
-postConf args flags localbuildinfo = do
+postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - PackageDescription -
LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
+postConf args flags _ localbuildinfo = do
mb_bi - pqConfigBuildInfo (configVerbose flags)
writeHookedBuildInfo PostgreSQL.buildinfo (Just (fromMaybe
emptyBuildInfo mb_bi),[])
return ExitSuccess
diff -u haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/control haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/control
--- haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/control
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: VÃctor Pérez Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libpq-dev (= 8.0), libmysqlclient15-dev,
unixodbc-dev, libsqlite-dev, libsqlite3-dev, haskell-devscripts (= 0.5.8),
ghc6 (= 6.4.1), ghc6 ( 6.4.1-999), cpphs, haddock
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libpq-dev (= 8.0), libmysqlclient15-dev,
unixodbc-dev, libsqlite-dev, libsqlite3-dev, haskell-devscripts (= 0.5.8),
ghc6 (= 6.4.2), cpphs, haddock
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Package: libghc6-hsql-dev
diff -u haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/changelog haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/changelog
--- haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/changelog
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+haskell-hsql (1.6-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload, to fix Failure To Build From Source, applying patch
+by Arjan Oosting.
+ * Fixes FTBFS: needs to update for new ghc6 (Closes: #379264)
+- update MySQL/Setup.lhs, PostgresSQL/Setup.lhs, SQLite/Setup.lhs and
+ SQLite3/Setup.lhs for the new Cabal version shipped with ghc 6.4.2.
+- debian/control: Build-Depends on the ghc6 (= 6.4.2) which ships the
+ new Cabal version. Drop the build dependency on ghc6 (6.4.1-999) to
+ make (binary) non-maintainer uploads easier.
+- debian/ghc-pkg: replace the call to /usr/lib/ghc-6.4.1/bin/ghc-pkg
+ with a call to /usr/bin/ghc-pkg6 to make independant of the ghc6
+ version.
+
+ -- Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:27:19 -0300
+
haskell-hsql (1.6-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* New maintainer (closes: #358873)
diff -u haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/ghc-pkg haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/ghc-pkg
--- haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/ghc-pkg
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/debian/ghc-pkg
@@ -6 +6 @@
-exec /usr/lib/ghc-6.4.1/bin/ghc-pkg -f $PKGCFG $@
+exec /usr/bin/ghc-pkg6 -f $PKGCFG $@
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- haskell-hsql-1.6.orig/MySQL/Setup.lhs
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/MySQL/Setup.lhs
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@
preConf args flags = do
try (removeFile MySQL.buildinfo)
return emptyHookedBuildInfo
-postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
-postConf args flags localbuildinfo = do
+postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - PackageDescription -
LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
+postConf args flags _ localbuildinfo = do
mb_bi - mysqlConfigBuildInfo (configVerbose flags)
writeHookedBuildInfo MySQL.buildinfo (Just (fromMaybe
emptyBuildInfo{extraLibs=[mysqlclient]} mb_bi),[])
return ExitSuccess
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- haskell-hsql-1.6.orig/SQLite/Setup.lhs
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/SQLite/Setup.lhs
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
preConf args flags = do
try (removeFile SQLite.buildinfo)
return emptyHookedBuildInfo
-postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
-postConf args flags localbuildinfo = do
+postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - PackageDescription -
LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
+postConf args flags _ localbuildinfo = do
mb_bi - pkgConfigBuildInfo (configVerbose flags) sqlite
let bi = case mb_bi of
Just bi - bi
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- haskell-hsql-1.6.orig/SQLite3/Setup.lhs
+++ haskell-hsql-1.6/SQLite3/Setup.lhs
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
preConf args flags = do
try (removeFile SQLite3.buildinfo)
return emptyHookedBuildInfo
-postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
-postConf args flags localbuildinfo = do
+postConf :: [String] - ConfigFlags - PackageDescription -
LocalBuildInfo - IO ExitCode
+postConf args flags _ localbuildinfo = do
mb_bi - pkgConfigBuildInfo (configVerbose flags) sqlite3
let bi = case mb_bi of
Just bi - bi
Bug#382392: marked as done (krb5: setuid() and seteuid() local privilege escalation vulnerabilities)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:12:33 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382392: krb5: setuid() and seteuid() local privilege
escalation vulnerabilities
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: krb5
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole
http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200608-15.xml
appies to debian too
2006-001-patch_1.5.txt - is from gentoo, applies to debian krb5 too,
with some hunks succeding in different places
krb5-1.3.6-patch - is the diff between debian stable krb5 1.3.6-2sarge2
and the patched version, this should apply cleanly
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
-- Package Information:
Package: krb5-ftpd
Priority: extra
Section: net
Installed-Size: 104
Maintainer: Sam Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: i386
Source: krb5
Version: 1.3.6-2sarge2
Provides: ftp-server
Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libcomerr2 (= 1.33-3), libkrb53 (=
1.3.2), libkrb53 (= 1.3.6-2sarge2), netbase, krb5-config
Conflicts: ftpd
Filename: pool/updates/main/k/krb5/krb5-ftpd_1.3.6-2sarge2_i386.deb
Size: 52186
MD5sum: 00356fdf1a8534d13942ad3d58426da5
SHA1: 92d50e2a319be7e27fcf98c40051495543c8fc7d
SHA256: 25d47a7fb63ee8239c5e0438ef3d0a0a8b04bf9f33e9387840f1a4a41ff07037
Description: Secure FTP server supporting MIT Kerberos
Kerberos is a system for authenticating users and services on a
network.
Kerberos is a trusted third-party service. That means that there is a
third party (the kerberos server) that is trusted by all the entities
on
the network (users and services, usually called principals).
.
This is the MIT reference implementation of Kerberos5.
Index: appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c
===
*** appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/gssftp/ftpd/ftpd.c (working copy)
***
*** 1367,1373
goto bad;
sleep(tries);
}
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
#ifdef IP_TOS
#ifdef IPTOS_THROUGHPUT
on = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT;
--- 1367,1375
goto bad;
sleep(tries);
}
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
#ifdef IP_TOS
#ifdef IPTOS_THROUGHPUT
on = IPTOS_THROUGHPUT;
***
*** 1377,1383
#endif
return (fdopen(s, fmode));
bad:
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
(void) close(s);
return (NULL);
}
--- 1379,1387
#endif
return (fdopen(s, fmode));
bad:
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
(void) close(s);
return (NULL);
}
***
*** 2186,2192
(void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
goto pasv_error;
}
! (void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
len = sizeof(pasv_addr);
if (getsockname(pdata, (struct sockaddr *) pasv_addr, len) 0)
goto pasv_error;
--- 2190,2198
(void) krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid);
goto pasv_error;
}
! if (krb5_seteuid((uid_t)pw-pw_uid)) {
! fatal(seteuid user);
! }
len = sizeof(pasv_addr);
if (getsockname(pdata, (struct sockaddr *) pasv_addr, len) 0)
goto pasv_error;
Index: appl/bsd/v4rcp.c
===
*** appl/bsd/v4rcp.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/bsd/v4rcp.c (working copy)
***
*** 436,442
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
(void) response();
! (void) setuid(userid);
source(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
--- 436,445
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
(void) response();
! if (setuid(userid)) {
! error(rcp: can't setuid(user)\n);
! exit(1);
! }
source(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
***
*** 452,458
krem = kstream_create_from_fd (rem, 0, 0);
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
! (void) setuid(userid);
sink(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
--- 455,464
krem = kstream_create_from_fd (rem, 0, 0);
kstream_set_buffer_mode (krem, 0);
#endif /* KERBEROS !NOENCRYPTION */
! if (setuid(userid)) {
! error(rcp: can't setuid(user)\n);
! exit(1);
! }
sink(--argc, ++argv);
exit(errs);
Index: appl/bsd/krcp.c
===
*** appl/bsd/krcp.c (revision 18419)
--- appl/bsd/krcp.c
Bug#382400: (no subject)
A second update; just after filing my last report, I got pylab to import cleanly from the versions in testing by manually installing four packages: python-cairo python-gtk-1.2 python-gtk2 python-gtk2-dev. I was surprised to see that python-cairo wasn't installed as a dependency along with python-matplotlib! So to summarize, here's how to get matplotlib at least beginning to work on a Debian testing system: install python-matplotlib install python-cairo python-gtk-1.2 python-gtk2 python-gtk2-dev add the following line to ~/.matplotlib/matplotlibrc: numerix : Numeric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382419: vnc4: FTBFS on amd64: # error do_div() does not yet support the C64
Package: vnc4 Version: 4.1.1+X4.3.0-11 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: ../../../../../../config/makedepend/makedepend: warning: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h: non-portable whitespace encountered at line 7 ../../../../../../config/makedepend/makedepend: warning: lnx_video.c (reading /usr/include/asm-generic/div64.h), line 54: # error do_div() does not yet support the C64 make[7]: *** [depend] Floating point exception Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Intent to NMU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tags 379264 + patch pending Bug#379264: FTBFS: needs to update for new ghc6 Tags were: patch Bug#378498: Needs recompilation because of ghci 6.4.2 Tags added: patch, pending Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382412: incomplete dependencies
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:33:46 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Thanks for your bugreport! lapse:~/phd jabref #[353] Exception in thread main java.awt.AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit Looks like you don't use Sun Java (cf. /usr/share/doc/jabref/README.Debian). This is with gij-4.1. Ok ;-) Installing libgcj7-awt fixes the problem. It doesn't for me. After installing libgcj7-awt (and update-alternatives --config java) I get: $ jabref Importing in unknown format: Error opening file '' createDefaultRoot not implemented fireChangedUpdate not implemented Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException at net.sf.jabref.MnemonicAwareAction.putValue(MnemonicAwareAction.java:53) at javax.swing.AbstractAction.init(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.AbstractAction.init(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.AbstractAction.init(libgcj.so.7) at net.sf.jabref.MnemonicAwareAction.init(MnemonicAwareAction.java:48) at net.sf.jabref.imports.OpenDatabaseAction.init(OpenDatabaseAction.java:19) at net.sf.jabref.JabRefFrame.init(JabRefFrame.java:137) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.openWindow(JabRef.java:635) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.init(JabRef.java:128) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.main(JabRef.java:69) In my experience jabref only builds and runs with Sun Java - hence the current dependencies and the hint in README.Debian. As I cannot reproduce your solution, I won't implement it at the moment. But I'm always open to new suggestions. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-NP: Rolling Stones signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#382400: (no subject)
I tried wiping everything about python on my system (all python* packages purged, /usr/lib/python* files manually deleted). This bug still exists. I tried installing python-numarray by hand and get a new error: import pylab Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pylab.py, line 1, in ? from matplotlib.pylab import * File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py, line 195, in ? import cm File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/cm.py, line 5, in ? import colors File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/colors.py, line 33, in ? from numerix import array, arange, take, put, Float, Int, where, \ File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/numerix/__init__.py, line 55, in ? from numarray.convolve import cross_correlate, convolve ImportError: No module named convolve I tried the workaround suggested in bug 353342 by Christopher Swingley: $ cat ~/.matplotlib/matplotlibrc numerix : Numeric The error I get is import pylab Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in ? File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/pylab.py, line 1, in ? from matplotlib.pylab import * File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/pylab.py, line 218, in ? new_figure_manager, draw_if_interactive, show = pylab_setup() File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/__init__.py, line 24, in pylab_setup globals(),locals(),[backend_name]) File /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/matplotlib/backends/backend_gtk.py, line 6, in ? import gobject ImportError: No module named gobject The next thing I will try is switching to versions of things in unstable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 381167
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 381167 + pending Bug#381167: postfix: preinst makes use of start-stop-daemon instead of invoke-rc.d Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380401: FTBFS on arm
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 12:27:34AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: spamasassin FTBFS on arm build log: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=spamassassinver=3.1.3-1arch=armstamp=1149525035file=logas=raw I see no fault related to spamassassin, but something happening with apt-get Cheers, -- Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org dj:triplestereo.com Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.17|Helsinki Finland GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 Look at my fingers: four stones, four crates. Zero stones? ZERO CRATES! --Zorg (The Fifth Element) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path
On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:44, you wrote:
Ok, let's try something else. Can you please dpkg -i the attached
packages and send me the output? They have debugging (sh -ex) enabled
in the preinst/config scripts.
Sure!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ dpkg -i postgresql-c*
(Reading database ... 81797 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace postgresql-client-common 58 (using
postgresql-client-common_59_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement postgresql-client-common ...
Unpacking postgresql-common (from postgresql-common_59_all.deb) ...
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' '' ']'
++ PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1
++ export PERL_DL_NONLAZY
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec /usr/share/debconf/frontend /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst install
55
+ . /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
++ '[' '!' 1 ']'
++ '[' -z '' ']'
++ exec
++ '[' '' ']'
++ exec
++ DEBCONF_REDIR=1
++ export DEBCONF_REDIR
++ dpkg -s postgresql
++ grep '^Version:'
++ cut -f 2- '-d '
+ dpkg --compare-versions 7.4.7-6sarge1 lt-nl 7.5
+ dpkg -s postgresql
+ grep -q '^Status:.*config-files'
+ db_input critical postgresql-common/untransitioned
+ _db_cmd 'INPUT critical' postgresql-common/untransitioned
+ echo 'INPUT critical' postgresql-common/untransitioned
+ IFS='
'
+ read -r _db_internal_line
+ RET='30 question skipped'
+ case ${_db_internal_line%%[ ]*} in
+ return 30
+ true
+ db_go
+ _db_cmd 'GO '
+ echo 'GO '
+ IFS='
'
+ read -r _db_internal_line
+ RET=ok
+ case ${_db_internal_line%%[ ]*} in
+ return 0
+ db_stop
+ echo STOP
+ exit 1
dpkg: error processing postgresql-common_59_all.deb (--install):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Setting up postgresql-client-common (59) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
postgresql-common_59_all.deb
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382412: incomplete dependencies
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:47:59 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: Installing libgcj7-awt fixes the problem. It doesn't for me. After installing libgcj7-awt (and update-alternatives --config java) I get: I said the problem, not all problems. :_) Alright ;-) In my experience jabref only builds and runs with Sun Java - hence the current dependencies and the hint in README.Debian. uh, oops. No problem. But do see #382414 while I close this bug. :) *reading bugreport* Full ack! Cheers, gregor (packaging jabref 2.1-1 at the moment) -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-NP: Blumfeld: Die Diktatur der Angepassten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: rails security bug still in 1.1.15
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package rails Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rails found 382255 1.1.15-1 Bug#382255: Mandatory (unspecified) security update, rails 1.1.5 Bug marked as found in version 1.1.15-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 382134 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 382134 serious Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade path Severity set to `serious' from `normal' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#382412: marked as done (incomplete dependencies)
Your message dated Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:47:59 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#382412: incomplete dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: jabref Version: 2.0.1+2.1b2-6 Severity: serious lapse:~/phd jabref #[353] Exception in thread main java.awt.AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.ImageIcon.init(libgcj.so.7) at javax.swing.ImageIcon.init(libgcj.so.7) at net.sf.jabref.GUIGlobals.clinit(GUIGlobals.java:205) at java.lang.Class.initializeClass(libgcj.so.7) at net.sf.jabref.JabRefPreferences.init(JabRefPreferences.java:138) at net.sf.jabref.JabRefPreferences.getInstance(JabRefPreferences.java:82) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.init(JabRef.java:76) at net.sf.jabref.JabRef.main(JabRef.java:69) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7) at java.lang.Class.forName(libgcj.so.7) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(libgcj.so.7) ...8 more This is with gij-4.1. Installing libgcj7-awt fixes the problem. Since gij rightfully only suggests the library, jabref might need to depend on/recommend it. ii gij-4.14.1.1-10 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- also sprach gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.2018 +0100]: Installing libgcj7-awt fixes the problem. It doesn't for me. After installing libgcj7-awt (and update-alternatives --config java) I get: I said the problem, not all problems. :_) In my experience jabref only builds and runs with Sun Java - hence the current dependencies and the hint in README.Debian. uh, oops. But do see #382414 while I close this bug. :) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP) ---End Message---
