Processed: tagging 384364

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 = pending
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files 
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Tags were: help moreinfo
Tags set to: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

[Peter Eisentraut]

> Good point...retitling. (The explanation is simply that Peter used an 
> ACPI system)

I think quite a lot of systems are ACPI these days.

> I'll paste the error while I'm at it:
> ##
> # ACPI system but acpid not running. #
> # Please install acpid package, then restart powersaved! #
> ##
> invoke-rc.d: initscript powersaved, action "start" failed.

If you don't want to put in a dependency on acpid (why?), then at least 
you need to make sure that the postinst script doesn't fail.

Note, however, that if you install hundreds of packages at once, notices 
that like that fly by and are never seen.  It's not very reliable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Julien Danjou]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Hi Martin,

> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.

I can reproduce it with pbuilder. I'm sending the full buildd log if it
can help right now.

Cheers,
-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: qt-x11-free build fails

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 342545 patch
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384334: jadetex: Suggested changes, NMU prepared

[Norbert Preining]

On Don, 24 Aug 2006, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Please consider the attached changes for an updated package. I attach a
> diff between the current 3.13-6 and 3.13-6.2.

What I forgot. Ready prepared packages are available at
deb http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/
deb-src http://www.tug.org/texlive/Debian/ check/

Best wishes

Norbert

---
Dr. Norbert Preining  Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094  fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
---
NAAS (n.)
The winemaking region of Albania where most of the wine that people
take to bottle-parties comes from.
--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Martin-Éric Racine]

On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:12, Steve Langasek said:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>
>> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
>> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
>> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.
>
> Your package *fails to build*.  Stop being an ass and fix your bug.

Speaking of which, http://lintian.debian.org/reports/mSteve_Langasek.html

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi

Bug#384421: bakery2.4: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'doxygen'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: bakery2.4
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'bakery2.4' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

# build reference documentation
/usr/bin/make -C docs/reference
make[1]: Entering directory `/bakery2.4-2.4.0/docs/reference'
doxygen Doxyfile
make[1]: doxygen: Command not found
make[1]: *** [reference] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/bakery2.4-2.4.0/docs/reference'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'doxygen' to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/bakery2.4-2.4.0/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/bakery2.4-2.4.0/debian/control  2006-08-24 06:14:31.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-08-24 06:14:28.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), libgtkmm-2.4-dev (>> 1:2.8.0), 
libgconfmm-2.6-dev (>= 2.10.0-3), libglademm-2.4-dev (>= 2.6.1-1), 
libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev (>= 2.10.0-1), libxml++2.6-dev (>> 2.8.0), 
libxml-parser-perl
+Build-Depends: debhelper, doxygen, libgtkmm-2.4-dev (>> 1:2.8.0), 
libgconfmm-2.6-dev (>= 2.10.0-3), libglademm-2.4-dev (>= 2.6.1-1), 
libgnome-vfsmm-2.6-dev (>= 2.10.0-1), libxml++2.6-dev (>> 2.8.0), 
libxml-parser-perl
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: libbakery-2.4-dev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

[Steve Langasek]

tags 342545 patch
thanks

Right, here's an off-the-cuff patch, which gets me past the point of the
SIGBUS on paer.

The same bug exists in the handling of Inf and NaN, but I didn't bother
patching for those since those constants should always be defined on Debian
systems and the related code paths never triggered.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
diff -u qt-x11-free-3.3.6/debian/changelog qt-x11-free-3.3.6/debian/changelog
--- qt-x11-free-3.3.6/debian/changelog
+++ qt-x11-free-3.3.6/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+qt-x11-free (3:3.3.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix the bogus assumption in src/tools/qlocale.cpp that a char[] can be
+cast to a double *.  Closes: #342545.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:17:09 -0600
+
 qt-x11-free (3:3.3.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   +++ Changes by Christopher Martin
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- qt-x11-free-3.3.6.orig/src/tools/qlocale.cpp
+++ qt-x11-free-3.3.6/src/tools/qlocale.cpp
@@ -122,13 +122,24 @@
 #endif
 
 // We can't rely on -NAN, since all operations on a NAN should return a NAN.
+static double be_neg_nan; 
+static double le_neg_nan;
 static const unsigned char be_neg_nan_bytes[] = { 0xff, 0xf8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 
};
 static const unsigned char le_neg_nan_bytes[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0xf8, 0xff 
};
+static bool neg_nan_init = false;
+
 static inline double negNan()
 {
+if (!neg_nan_init)
+{
+memcpy(&be_neg_nan,be_neg_nan_bytes,sizeof(be_neg_nan_bytes));
+memcpy(&le_neg_nan,le_neg_nan_bytes,sizeof(le_neg_nan_bytes));
+neg_nan_init = true;
+}
 return (ByteOrder == BigEndian ?
-*((const double *) be_neg_nan_bytes) :
-*((const double *) le_neg_nan_bytes));
+be_neg_nan : 
+le_neg_nan);
+
 }
 
 // Sizes as defined by the ISO C99 standard - fallback


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Martin-Éric Racine]

On Thu, August 24, 2006 9:23, Julien Danjou said:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
>> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
>> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.
>
> I can reproduce it with pbuilder. I'm sending the full buildd log if it
> can help right now.

Found it! Dependencies were indeed correctly upgraded for the transition,
but the planner.install file was still looking for Python 2.3 libraries.
Replaced with a wildcard and pending upload.

Doesn't excuse Steve's attitude at all, though...

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi

Bug#384420: gmailfs: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'docbook-to-man'

[Andreas Jochens]

Package: gmailfs
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'gmailfs' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

dh_installdirs
install -m755 gmailfs.py 
/gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/gmailfs/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
install -m755 mount.gmailfs /gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/gmailfs/usr/bin
install -m644 gmailfs.conf /gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/gmailfs/etc/gmailfs
/usr/bin/docbook-to-man debian/mount.gmailfs.sgml > mount.gmailfs.8
/bin/sh: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory
make: *** [install-stamp] Error 127

Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'docbook-to-man'
to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/gmailfs-0.7.2/debian/control2006-08-24 06:13:50.0 
+
+++ ./debian/control2006-08-24 06:13:46.0 +
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: utils
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Sebastien Delafond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends-Indep: python-all-dev, python (>= 2.3.5-7), python-central (>= 
0.4.10)
+Build-Depends-Indep: docbook-to-man, python-all-dev, python (>= 2.3.5-7), 
python-central (>= 0.4.10)
 Build-Depends: dpatch, debhelper (>= 5.0.37.1)
 XS-Python-Version: all
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384334: jadetex: Suggested changes, NMU prepared

[Norbert Preining]

Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-6
Followup-For: Bug #384334

Dear Ohura-san!

Frank already posted the absolutly minimal changes which would help
fixing the updates problems with tetex/texlive.

Furthermore, I have prepared a package including several changes, here
is the changelog entry with additional comments.

Please consider the attached changes for an updated package. I attach a
diff between the current 3.13-6 and 3.13-6.2.

jadetex (3.13-6.2) unstable; urgency=low

  * NMU
  * change fmtutil line to not load the latex format, but put the loading of
latex.ini into jadetex.ini and pdfjadetex.ini (Closes: #384334)

What happens here Frank already has described.

  * add alternative dependencies on texlive (Closes: #375037)

This is wishlist bug 

   * switch to dh_installtex (Closes: #352845, #335225, #343104)
 - add the respective call to debian/rules
 - remove fmt generation code in postinst
 - remove prerm file

closes several bugs calling fmtutil. Furthermore it adds adherence to
the TeX Policy, ie that files installed into /etc/texmf/fmt.d/ are
listed in /var/lib/tex-common/fmt.d to get the update-fmtutil mechanism
right. The removal of the fmt generation code can be done as
dh_installtex adds the respective code automatically to the resp.
scripts.

   * adjust texmf.d config snippet:
 - add latex in the search path (Closes: #384332)
 - drop useless pdftex path component

This closes bug #384332

   * bump standards version to 3.7.2, no changes necessary
   * move debhelper from build-deps-indep to build-deps

two lintian warnings

   * recommend tipa (Closes: #384206)


Best wishes

Norbert


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-rc4
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15 (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages jadetex depends on:
ii  debianutils2.17  Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  tex-common 0.27  Common infrastructure for using an
ii  texlive-fonts-recommended  2005.dfsg.1-1 TeX Live: Recommended fonts
ii  texlive-latex-base 2005.dfsg.1-1 TeX Live: Basic LaTeX packages
ii  texlive-latex-recommended  2005.dfsg.1-1 TeX Live: LaTeX recommended packag

Versions of packages jadetex recommends:
ii  openjade1.3   1.3.2-9Implementation of the DSSSL langua

-- no debconf information
diff -urN jadetex-3.13-6/debian/changelog jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog
--- jadetex-3.13-6/debian/changelog 2006-08-23 15:24:47.0 +0200
+++ jadetex-3.13/debian/changelog   2006-08-23 18:27:15.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+jadetex (3.13-6.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * NMU
+  * change fmtutil line to not load the latex format, but put the loading of
+latex.ini into jadetex.ini and pdfjadetex.ini (Closes: #384334)
+  * add alternative dependencies on texlive (Closes: #375037)
+  * switch to dh_installtex (Closes: #352845, #335225, #343104)
+- add the respective call to debian/rules
+- remove fmt generation code in postinst
+- remove prerm file
+  * adjust texmf.d config snippet:
+- add latex in the search path (Closes: #384332)
+- drop useless pdftex path component
+  * bump standards version to 3.7.2, no changes necessary
+  * move debhelper from build-deps-indep to build-deps
+  * recommend tipa (Closes: #384206)
+
+ -- Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:20:00 +0200
+
 jadetex (3.13-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Check whether 40jadetex.cnf has been modified when upgrading from the
@@ -58,7 +77,7 @@
  we use etex and pdfetex for jadetex and pdfjadetex. (Closes: #253098)
* This might fix #205922 and #253417 as well.
 
- -- Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:45:08 +0200
+ -- Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:45:08 +0200
 
 jadetex (3.13-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
diff -urN jadetex-3.13-6/debian/control jadetex-3.13/debian/control
--- jadetex-3.13-6/debian/control   2006-08-23 15:24:47.0 +0200
+++ jadetex-3.13/debian/control 2006-08-23 18:25:11.0 +0200
@@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
 Section: tex
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>=4.0.0), tetex-extra, openjade, docbook-xml 
(>= 4.2), docbook-dsssl
+Standards-Version: 3.7.2
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>=4.0.0)
+Build-Depends-Indep: tetex-extra, openjade, docbook-xml (>= 4.2), 
docbook-dsssl, tex-common (>= 0.19)
 
 Package: jadetex
 Architecture: all
-Depends: debianutils (>= 1.7), tetex-bin (>= 2.0.1-1), tetex-extra (>= 2.0.1-2)
+Depends: debianutils (>= 1.7), tetex-bin (>= 2.0.1-1) | texlive-latex-base, 
tetex-extra (>= 2.0.1-2) | texlive-latex-recommended, tetex-extra (>= 2.0.1-2) 
| texlive-fonts-recommended | tex-common (>= 0.19)
 Recommends: openjade1.3 | openjade | jade (>= 1.

Bug#384418: Same problem, new file, FTBFS!

[Ola Lundqvist]

Package: vnc4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef
-fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I. 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include
-I../../../../../../exports/include/X11 -I../../../../../../include/extensions 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared  
-I../../../../../.. -I../../../../../../exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  
-Dlinux -D__sparc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
   -DSHAPE -DXINPUT -DXKB -DLBX -DXAPPGROUP   -DXCSECURITY -DTOGCUP   
-DXF86BIGFONT -DDPMSExtension -DPANORAMIX-DRENDER -DRANDR -DGCCUSESGAS 
-DAVOID_GLYPHBLT -DPIXPRIV -DSINGLEDEPTH 
-DXFreeXDGA -DXvExtension   -DXFree86LOADER  
-DXFree86Server-DXF86VIDMODE
   -DXvMCExtension  
   -DSMART_SCHEDULE-DBUILDDEBUG 
-DXResExtension-DX_BYTE_ORDER=X_BIG_ENDIAN -DNDEBUG 
 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO-DUSESTDRES -DHAVE_SYSV_IPC   lnx_kbd.c
lnx_kbd.c:99:22: error: asm/kbio.h: No such file or directory
lnx_kbd.c: In function 'SetKbdRepeat':
lnx_kbd.c:185: warning: unused variable 'valid_delays'
lnx_kbd.c:179: warning: unused variable 'valid_rates'
lnx_kbd.c:169: warning: unused variable 'value'
lnx_kbd.c:168: warning: unused variable 'timeout'
lnx_kbd.c:167: warning: unused variable 'i'
make[8]: *** [lnx_kbd.o] Error 1
rm -f lnx_KbdMap.o

Make sure to remove the inclusion of that file, and it should
pass. Make a grep to make sure that it is not used anywhere else.
And also make sure that nothing in that file is sparc specific
and point to something in that file.

Regards,

// Ola

-- 
 - Ola Lundqvist ---
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37  \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD  |
|  +46 (0)54-10 14 30  +46 (0)70-332 1551   |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Steve Langasek]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:36:05AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:

> The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
> unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
> transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.

Your package *fails to build*.  Stop being an ass and fix your bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/

Processed: tagging 383336

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
>  # upstream says this just papers over the real issue (nsis needs proper 
> porting)
> tags 383336 - patch
Bug#383336: nsis: FTBFS (amd64): cast from 'char*' to 'DWORD' loses precision
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 384364

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 moreinfo
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files 
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Martin-Éric Racine]

On Thu, August 24, 2006 4:13, Steve Langasek said:
> severity 384364 serious
> quit
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:27:38AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said:
>> > Package: planner
>> > Version: 0.14-9
>> > Severity: serious
>
>> > Hello,
>
>> > There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
>
>> Sorry, it has built just fine on all architectures so far. Additionally,
>> the log you provide doesn't explain what files might be missing. As
>> such,
>> until further details are provided, I'm lowering the severity of this
>> bug.
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=planner&arch=arm&ver=0.14-9&stamp=1156381268&file=log
>
> It built fine on architectures that tried to build it *before* the python
> transition.

The package WAS upgraded for the transition and verified by madcoder, so
unless you can demonstrate that it indeed has anything to do with the
transition, the severity level you have set is NOT justified.

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi

Processed: tagging 384364

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 384364 help
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files 
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags added: help

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails

[Steve Langasek]

Right, so I noticed paer has been re-opened post-compromise, so I had a look
at this:

Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 19108)]
0x40cb2150 in negNan () at tools/qlocale.cpp:131
131 *((const double *) le_neg_nan_bytes));
(gdb) bt
#0  0x40cb2150 in negNan () at tools/qlocale.cpp:131
#1  0x40cbbe80 in qIsNan (d=3) at tools/qlocale.cpp:167
#2  0x40cbe6f4 in QLocalePrivate::doubleToString (this=0x40e48110, d=3, 
precision=6, form=QLocalePrivate::DFSignificantDigits, width=0, flags=0)
at tools/qlocale.cpp:3221
#3  0x40ce3604 in QString::setNum (this=0xc038adc8, n=3, f=103 'g', prec=6)
at tools/qstring.cpp:5282
#4  0x40bb46b4 in QDomElement::setAttribute (this=0xc038acd0, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], value=3) at xml/qdom.cpp:4333
#5  0x0006684c in DomTool::fixDocument ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
at ../shared/domtool.cpp:389
#6  0x0001d420 in main (argc=6, argv=0xc038a528) at main.cpp:298
(gdb) 

I'd say that's pretty clearly not a libgcc bug.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Proposed patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 383823 +patch
Bug#383823: gimp-gap crashes when duplicating images
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383823: Proposed patch

[John Wright]

tags 383823 +patch
thanks

This seems to be fixed in version 2.2.1 upstream.  I've attached a patch
that patches the affected file up to the version in 2.2.1.  It works for
me.

Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff'
--- debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff  1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/patches/gap_thumbnail-free.diff  2006-08-24 02:05:50 +
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+--- gimp-gap-2.2.0/gap/gap_thumbnail.c 2004-04-30 12:08:22.0 -0600
 gimp-gap-2.2.1/gap/gap_thumbnail.c 2006-05-31 03:58:29.0 -0600
+@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
+ #include "config.h"
+ 
+ /* SYSTEM (UNIX) includes */
+-#include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
+@@ -53,6 +52,8 @@
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ 
++#include 
++
+ #ifdef G_OS_WIN32
+ #include 
+ #  ifndef S_ISDIR
+@@ -295,7 +296,7 @@
+);
+   g_object_unref(pixbuf);
+   }
+-  g_free(thumbnail);
++  g_object_unref(thumbnail);
+ }
+   g_free(dst_png_thumb_full);
+ }
+@@ -450,7 +451,7 @@
+ if(gap_lib_file_exists(png_thumb_full) == 1)
+ {
+   if (gap_debug) printf ("gap_thumb_file_delete_thumbnail: 
png_thumb_full: %s\n", png_thumb_full);
+-  remove(png_thumb_full);
++  g_remove(png_thumb_full);
+ }
+ g_free(png_thumb_full);
+   }
+@@ -600,7 +601,7 @@
+   *th_bpp = nchannels;
+ 
+ }
+-g_free(thumbnail);
++g_object_unref(thumbnail);
+   }
+ 
+   return (pixbuf);

Processed: Retitle

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

[Filipus Klutiero]

retitle 384168 does not install on ACPI systems without acpid
thanks

Steve Langasek a écrit :


On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:

 

If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst 
script needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if 
acpid is not installed.  That is the issue that needs to be addressed.
 

It *is not* required...just look at the error message or the init script 
if you're still not convinced.
   



Then explain the failure that Peter says he encountered trying to install
it.  "does not install" is not a wishlist bug, it's a report of an
installation failure.  If you can't explain that failure, please don't
downgrade the bug.

 

Good point...retitling. (The explanation is simply that Peter used an 
ACPI system)

I'll paste the error while I'm at it:
##
# ACPI system but acpid not running. #
# Please install acpid package, then restart powersaved! #
##
invoke-rc.d: initscript powersaved, action "start" failed.

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

[Kyle McMartin]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That would be wonderful if you, or another hppa porter, could track down
> where the bug lies.  libgcc2 is almost certainly the wrong package, since
> nothing should be *using* libgcc2 in a fresh build of qt-x11-free; it may be
> a bug in libgcc4 instead, but I think that's yet to be determined.  In the
> meantime, I think it's best to reassign this back to qt-x11-free.
> 

Agreed, probably the best course of action. I'll kick off a build in my
sid chroot with prctl set to dump core and we'll see what happens.

Cheers,
Kyle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383870: fetchmail: Fetchmail duplicates my SPAM every 10 minutes - ARGH!

[Matthias Andree]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Helge Hafting wrote:

> Still, rejecting on TO address is tricky, mailing list mail is usually not
> addressed to me.

Unfortunately, you haven't shown your configuration file yet.
I suspect you're using a wildcarded multidrop configuration.

- --
Matthias Andree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7PeCvmGDOQUufZURAs01AJ9Ax9kCN59Q4rubF11/FMz6qhcb4wCgunuy
3xWJnpbHy+CPt6h7Q7ookc0=
=hZJE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 384364 serious
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files 
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

[Steve Langasek]

reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
thanks

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:52:48AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:39:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The qt-x11-free package builds fine with a standard Debian setup.
> > Building with prctl --unaligned=signal makes the "bug" reproducible.

> Right. The buildd is set up to deliver SIGBUS on unaligned accesses.
> This is configurable, and not the default kernel behaviour. It is,
> however, a Good Thing(tm). Unaligned accesses are quite costly, so
> catching and fixing them on the buildd is ideal. However, in most cases
> they are nontrivial to fix and should be rebuilt and uploaded and a 
> bug filed with upstream...

> When I initially added prctl for parisc, iirc there were three options
> logging an unaligned access, delivering a SIGBUS, or silently catching
> it and continuing on.

> I have a machine that can be used to do these rebuilds, if need be.

That would be wonderful if you, or another hppa porter, could track down
where the bug lies.  libgcc2 is almost certainly the wrong package, since
nothing should be *using* libgcc2 in a fresh build of qt-x11-free; it may be
a bug in libgcc4 instead, but I think that's yet to be determined.  In the
meantime, I think it's best to reassign this back to qt-x11-free.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#384112: Proposed patch

[John Wright]

tags 384112 +patch
thanks

I have attached a patch that updates freeloader to the new Python
policy, which ought to fix this bug.

Thanks,
John Wright
=== added file 'debian/pycompat'
--- debian/pycompat 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +
+++ debian/pycompat 2006-08-24 00:16:43 +
@@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
+2

=== modified file 'debian/control'
--- debian/control  2006-08-23 23:50:14 +
+++ debian/control  2006-08-24 00:16:43 +
@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@
 Section: net
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 5.0.0), cdbs, findutils (>= 4.1.7), 
imagemagick (>= 6), python (>= 2.3), python-gtk2 (>= 2.6), python-gnome2 (>= 
2.10), bittorrent (>= 3.4), bittorrent (<< 4.0)
+Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2), cdbs, findutils (>= 4.1.7), 
imagemagick (>= 6), python (>= 2.3), python-gtk2 (>= 2.6), python-gnome2 (>= 
2.10), bittorrent (>= 3.4), bittorrent (<< 4.0), python-central (>= 0.5)
 Standards-Version: 3.6.2
+XS-Python-Version: all
 
 Package: freeloader
 Architecture: all
 Depends: ${python:Depends}, python-gtk2 (>= 2.6), python-gnome2 (>= 2.10), 
bittorrent (>= 3.4), bittorrent (<< 4.0), python-glade2 (>= 2.6), librsvg2-2
-Recommends: python-gnome2-extras (>= 2.6), python2.3-gamin
+Recommends: python-gnome2-extras (>= 2.6), python-gamin
 Description: A nice GNOME download manager supporting torrents
  Freeloader is a nice GNOME download manager written in Python
  and supporting torrents. Its main features are:
@@ -21,3 +22,4 @@
   * Support for retrieval from most URLs (ftp, http, etc)
   * Support for hiding in system tray
   * Interruptible downloads
+XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}

=== modified file 'debian/rules'
--- debian/rules2006-08-23 23:50:14 +
+++ debian/rules2006-08-24 00:16:43 +
@@ -8,4 +8,5 @@
convert -density 255 -background none -size 160x160 -resize 32x32 \
$(CURDIR)/share/pixmaps/freeloader_icon.svg \
$(CURDIR)/debian/freeloader/usr/share/pixmaps/freeloader.xpm
+   dh_pycentral
dh_python

Processed: Re: Bug#342545: qt-x11-free FTBFS

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 342545 qt-x11-free
Bug#342545: qt-x11-free build fails
Bug reassigned from package `libgcc2' to `qt-x11-free'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Proposed patch

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tags 384112 +patch
Bug#384112: freeloader: Will not install.  Depends on python < 2.4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:47:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:

> >If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst 
> >script needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if 
> >acpid is not installed.  That is the issue that needs to be addressed.

> It *is not* required...just look at the error message or the init script 
> if you're still not convinced.

Then explain the failure that Peter says he encountered trying to install
it.  "does not install" is not a wishlist bug, it's a report of an
installation failure.  If you can't explain that failure, please don't
downgrade the bug.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#382491: segfaults on startup

[Javier Serrano Polo]

Hi.

Could you provide a full gdb backtrace?

Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 373541 is serious, merging 373541 384290

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 373541 serious
Bug#373541: Python policy transition
Severity set to `serious' from `important'

> merge 373541 384290
Bug#373541: Python policy transition
Bug#384290: python-gtk-1.2: depends on python < 2.4
Merged 373541 384290.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384290: python-gtk-1.2: depends on python < 2.4

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:10:19AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:

> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:

> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >   python-gtk-1.2: Depends: python (< 2.4) but 2.4.3-11 is to be installed
> > E: Broken packages
> > apt-get failed.
> > Package installation failed

I'm having a look at this one now, though I don't promise not to get so
frustrated with python-support+update-alternatives that I remove it from
testing instead.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#384168: does not install without acpid

[Filipus Klutiero]

If, as you say, acpid is not required, then the init script or postinst script 
needs to be fixed so that the package installation does not fail if acpid is 
not installed.  That is the issue that needs to be addressed.
 

It *is not* required...just look at the error message or the init script 
if you're still not convinced.


If a package fails to install completely if a so-called non-required related 
package is not installed, then that's broken.
 

It's not "broken" in the sense of being a bug, but it would be nice to 
avoid, yes.


I won't get involved in the upgrade/downgrade games, but the release managers 
decide what is release-critical or not.


Yeah, and since your message vorlon endorsed serious severity, so unless 
Michael feels like arguing with vorlon, this should be considered RC.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

[Steve Langasek]

severity 384394 important
tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:56:58PM -0400, morph wrote:
> Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with
> the following error: evince: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol:
> bonobo_activation_get_goption_group

Not for the seventy billion other users of testing and unstable.  Please
post the output of ldd /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0 and of dpkg -l libbonobo2-0;
it looks like you probably have a local version of libbonobo installed
that's breaking your apps.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 384394 important
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> tags 384394 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#378291: has this been fixed?

[Luigi Gangitano]

Hi Geoff,
I'm sure Steve's explaination of how debian packages are built is not  
clear to you.


This is not a bug. It may happen (and in fact it happens almost every  
time due to me being in the CET timezone and uploading packages in  
the evening while dinstall is run) that architecture independent  
packages (i.e. '_all' .debs) are installed in the archive while  
architecture specific packages (i.e. '_{i386,sparc,powerpc,mips,etc}'  
debs) are not yet built.


You can fix your systems switching from apt-get to aptitude that will  
not try to upgrade packages until all the pieces are built and  
available. apt-get dist-upgrade is not smart enough.


Regards,

L

Il giorno 23/ago/06, alle ore 22:43, Geoff ha scritto:

It looks like on July 14th you said it was going to be fixed, but I  
just

has this problem again today. I back ported Version: 2.5.9-10sarge2
to get squid up and running temporarily.


--
Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972  C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365196: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365196: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: openswan
Severity: serious

Hi!

It seems your package contains non-free RFC/I-Ds:

usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3947.txt.gz   net/openswan
usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/rfc3948.txt.gz   net/openswan
usr/share/doc/openswan/doc/draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps-09.txt.gz net/openswan

The license on RFCs is not DFSG-free, see:

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=199810
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation

I believe the options are:

1) Remove the file from the package (which may include re-packaging
   the source code).

2) Move the files to a non-free package (which may also include
   re-packaging the source code).

If you disagree with this, because this bug is reported for several
packages at once, it seems better to discuss this on debian-legal, in
this thread:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/25993

The severity is serious, because this violates the Debian policy
.

I'm sorry if this report is filed in error, I went over many packages
looking for suspicious filenames, and there may be false positives.

Thanks,
Simon

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openswan
Source-Version: 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openswan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-patch-openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/linux-patch-openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
openswan-modules-source_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan-modules-source_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.diff.gz
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_i386.deb
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openswan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:06:52 +0100
Source: openswan
Binary: linux-patch-openswan openswan-modules-source openswan
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-patch-openswan - IPSEC Linux kernel support for Openswan
 openswan   - IPSEC utilities for Openswan
 openswan-modules-source - IPSEC kernel modules source for Openswan
Closes: 363375 365196 370752 372917 378415
Changes: 
 openswan (1:2.4.6+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Acknowledge the last 2 NMUs:
 Closes: #370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
 Closes: #363375: kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails 
to compile
 Closes: #365196: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
 Thanks to Steinar for his NMUs!
   * Add a call to debconf-updatepo to the clean target of debian/rules, as 
suggested in
 the bug report.
 Closes: #372917: openswan: debconf-updatepo has not been launched
   * Update the Dutch debconf translation.
 Closes: #378415: [INTL:nl] Updated dutch po-debconf translation
   * Removed the 01-ipcomp_hippi.dpatch again, this has been incorporated 
upstrean.
Files: 
 1670787f51debfa7a97306e0bbb04305 845 net optional openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
 2ce4352beaec85527a0ef515beca41ba 3544999 net optional 
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
 bcd53080a045fff64ba70b85a66448ba 62683 net optional 
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.diff.gz
 16e0ab89c937e40536bfc5d5183953db 524594 net optional 
openswan-modules-source_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
 4e934a02ddb52fededadd423c5b28be0 597190 net optiona

Processed: Re: Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 384394 libgnome2-0
Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup
Warning: Unknown package 'libgnome2'
Bug reassigned from package `libgnome2' to `libgnome2-0'.

> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384242: marked as done (evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:17:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384242: fixed in evolution-exchange 2.6.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.6.2-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of evolution-exchange_2.6.2-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060822-2320
> **
...
> checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... yes
> checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
> checking for dcgettext... yes
> checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
> checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
> checking for catalogs to be installed...  ar az bg bn ca cs cy da de dz el 
> en_CA en_GB es et fa fi fr gl gu hi hu id it ja ko ku lt mk ms nb ne nl nn no 
> pa pl pt pt_BR ro ru rw sk sq sr [EMAIL PROTECTED] sv ta th tr uk vi xh zh_CN 
> zh_HK zh_TW
> checking for Win32... no
> checking whether gcc understands -Wno-sign-compare... yes
> checking what warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Wall 
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare
> checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler... 
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.10.3)
> checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for orbit2-config... /usr/bin/orbit2-config
> checking for ORBit - version >= 2.3.0... yes
> checking for orbit-idl-2... /usr/bin/orbit-idl-2
> checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2
> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema 
> installation
> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for ADDRESSBOOK... configure: error: Package requirements 
> (libedata-book-1.2 camel-provider-1.2) were not met:
> 
> No package 'libedata-book-1.2' found
> 
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> 
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables ADDRESSBOOK_CFLAGS
> and ADDRESSBOOK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> 
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060822-2323
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: evolution-exchange
Source-Version: 2.6.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
evolution-exchange, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-exchange/evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1.diff.gz
evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/e/evolution-exchange/evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1.dsc
evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-exchange/evolution-exchange_2.6.3-1_i386.deb
evolution-exchange_2.6.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-exchange/evolution-exchange_2.6.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated evolution-exchange 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:31:00 +0200
Source: evolution-exchange
Binary: evolution-exchange
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Evolution Maintainers 

Changed-By: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 evolution-exchange - Exchange plugin for the Evolution groupware suite
Closes: 377159 378

Bug#383870: fetchmail: Fetchmail duplicates my SPAM every 10 minutes - ARGH!

[Helge Hafting]

Matthias Andree wrote:

(demoting to serious, tagging upstream, retitling)

Additional info:

fetchmail 6.3.4 and older do NOT log out of the upstream server after
SIGPIPE (I don't know the rationale behind this - it's not in the
comments), which prevents the deletions from happening properly.
Retitling the bug accordingly.
  

Thank you for the response.  I got around the problem temporarily by
reconfiguring exim to accept many more malformed adresses
in a session before hanging up.  (I now allow 100 instead of the
default 3).

I agree that "grave" was exaggregating, given that it was solveable
with a config change.  I was a bit desperate at the moment, worrying that
I might be unable to download email at all for some time.

There is no need to provide a special package just for me, as I
worked around it by relaxing exim.  Please use the time to
work on a fix instead.  My suggestion is to have fetchmail disconnect in
an orderly way, so that the messages actually downloaded are deleted.

This would solve the problem - I would get first 115 messages, then
a hangup.  After 10min, I'd get some more messages until exim trips up,
and after a few more rounds I'd get all my mail. 


Thanks for all the tips on workarounds and configuration, there is
clearly a lot I could do to avoid downloading that spam in the first place.
Still, rejecting on TO address is tricky, mailing list mail is usually not
addressed to me.

Helge Hafting





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 384364 is minor

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384364 minor
Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files 
(debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Martin-Éric Racine]

severity 384364 minor
thanks

On Wed, August 23, 2006 22:01, Julien Danjou said:
> Package: planner
> Version: 0.14-9
> Severity: serious
>
> Hello,
>
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

Sorry, it has built just fine on all architectures so far. Additionally,
the log you provide doesn't explain what files might be missing. As such,
until further details are provided, I'm lowering the severity of this bug.


>> dh_install -pplanner
>> dh_install: planner missing files
>> (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
>> make: *** [binary-install/planner] Error 1

-- 
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi

Bug#363375: marked as done (kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails to compile)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:32:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363375: fixed in openswan 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-patch-openswan
Version: 1:2.4.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I'm sorry to report that the most recent versions of the
kernel-patch-openswan and  linux-source-2.6.16 don't agree:

net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.c:847:2: warning: #warning "Using built-in AES rather than 
CryptoAPI AES"
net/ipsec/ipsec_alg.c:857:2: warning: #warning "Using built-in 3des rather than 
CryptoAPI 3des"
  CC [M]  net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.o
net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.c: In function 'setup_cipher_list':
net/ipsec/ipsec_alg_cryptoapi.c:349: warning: assignment discards qualifiers 
from pointer target type
  CC [M]  net/ipsec/ipcomp.o
net/ipsec/ipcomp.c: In function 'skb_copy_ipcomp':
net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private'
net/ipsec/ipcomp.c:677: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'private'


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-lpc.2.k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-patch-openswan depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.94-1 The GNU core utilities
ii  fileutils 5.94-1 The GNU file management utilities 

Versions of packages kernel-patch-openswan recommends:
ii  kernel-package10.040 A utility for building Linux kerne

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openswan
Source-Version: 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openswan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-patch-openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/linux-patch-openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
openswan-modules-source_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan-modules-source_2.4.6+dfsg-1_all.deb
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.diff.gz
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1_i386.deb
openswan_2.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/o/openswan/openswan_2.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated openswan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:06:52 +0100
Source: openswan
Binary: linux-patch-openswan openswan-modules-source openswan
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.4.6+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Rene Mayrhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 linux-patch-openswan - IPSEC Linux kernel support for Openswan
 openswan   - IPSEC utilities for Openswan
 openswan-modules-source - IPSEC kernel modules source for Openswan
Closes: 363375 365196 370752 372917 378415
Changes: 
 openswan (1:2.4.6+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Acknowledge the last 2 NMUs:
 Closes: #370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
 Closes: #363375: kernel-patch-openswan: Patched linux-source-2.6.16 fails 
to compile
 Closes: #365196: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D
 Thanks to Steinar for his NMUs!
   * Add a call to debconf-updatepo to the clean target of debian/rules, as 
suggested in
 the bug report.
 Closes: #372917: openswan: debconf-updatepo has not been launched
   * Update the Dutch debconf translation.
 Closes: #378415: [INTL:nl] Updated dutch po-debconf translation
   * Removed the 01-ipcomp_hippi.dpatch again, this has been incorporated 
upstrean.
Files: 
 1670787f51debfa7a97306e0bbb04305 845 net optional openswan_2.4.6+dfsg-1.dsc
 2ce4352

Bug#355485: Info: bug probably fixed in latest upstream release

[Marco van Zwetselaar]

I have just built and tested the package using the latest upstream
release (8.28.8).  This seems to fix a substantial number of outstanding
bugs for fglrx-driver. It also adds support for Xorg 7.1.

Flavio, if you need a head start for the upgrade to 8.28.8, I have put
my package up at http://zwets.com/debs.  Most of the work was in
reworking the make.sh and Makefile patches.

Cheers,
Marco



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#382481: marked as done (44bsd-rdist: insecure temporary file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: 44bsd-rdist
Version: 2000-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security

44bsd-rdist creates a temporary file with mktemp(3), and opens it without
using O_EXCL, which makes it vulnerable to symlink attacks.

Thanks,

Matej

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#377109: If you fork, please solve *both* issues

[Francesco Poli]

Whoever takes care of forking cdrtools, please remember to fork from
a version prior to the license "clarifications" by Joerg Schilling, as
well as prior to the CDDL switch.

See this debian-legal subthread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/03/msg00357.html

And, please, try and clarify whether dvdrtools qualifies as a suitable
fork (why is it in non-free? does it share the same non-freenesses as
cdrtools?)



-- 
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend.   -- from _Coming to America_
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4



pgphfNjFs3a4m.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#376428: marked as done (Uninstallable due to dep on linux-image-2.6.16-1-*)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: spca5xx-modules-i386
Severity: serious
Version: 20060501+1

Hi

Your binary packages are not installable as linux-image-2.6.16-1-* is
not available anymore.

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed (superseded by spca5xx-modules).
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#352800: marked as done (coda-client: Missing Build Dependancy)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:59:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: coda-client
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

rvm-tools is required to build

Ben Eastep


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
coda has been removed because it is unmaintained, see #370104.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#381405: marked as done (gcj-4.0: FTBFS: gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:26:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj-4.0 removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcj-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of gcj-4.0_4.0.3-2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060804-0551
> **
> Checking available source versions...
> Fetching source files...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Need to get 33.6MB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main gcj-4.0 4.0.3-2 (dsc) [2225B]
> Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main gcj-4.0 4.0.3-2 (tar) [32.9MB]
> Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main gcj-4.0 4.0.3-2 (diff) [667kB]
> Fetched 33.6MB in 51s (658kB/s)
> Download complete and in download only mode
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.13.9), libc6.1-dev (>= 2.3.6) [alpha ia64] | 
> libc0.3-dev (>= 2.3.6) | libc0.1-dev (>= 2.3.6) | libc12-dev (>= 2.3.6) | 
> libc6-dev (>= 2.3.6), libc6-dev-amd64 [i386], libc6-dev-sparc64 [sparc], 
> libc6-dev-s390x [s390], libc6-dev-i386 [amd64], libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64], 
> libc6-dev-ppc64 [powerpc], lib32gcc1 [amd64 ppc64], lib64gcc1 [i386 powerpc 
> sparc s390], lib64z1-dev [i386 powerpc sparc s390], lib32z1-dev [amd64], 
> libunwind7-dev (>= 0.98.5-6) [ia64], libatomic-ops-dev [ia64], m4, autoconf, 
> automake1.9, libtool, autogen, gawk, dejagnu (>= 1.4.3) [!hurd-i386], 
> expect-tcl8.3 [!hurd-i386], bzip2, binutils (>= 2.16.1cvs20051214) | 
> binutils-multiarch (>= 2.16.1cvs20051214), binutils-hppa64 (>= 
> 2.16.1cvs20051214) [hppa], debhelper (>= 5.0), gperf (>= 3.0.1), bison (>= 
> 1:1.875a-1), flex, gettext, texinfo (>= 4.3), zlib1g-dev, libmpfr-dev [!avr], 
> locales [!hurd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], procps [!hurd-i386], 
> sharutils, libxtst-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libxt-dev 
> [!kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.4.4-2) 
> [!kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libart-2.0-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 
> !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386], libcairo2-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !knetbsd-i386 
> !netbsd-i386], gnat-4.0 [!arm !armeb !m68k !sh3 !sh3eb !sh4 !sh4eb 
> !knetbsd-i386 !netbsd-i386 !hurd-i386], realpath (>= 1.9.12), chrpath, 
> lsb-release, dash [hppa]
> Build-Depends-Indep: doxygen (>= 1.4.2), graphviz (>= 2.2), gsfonts-x11
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> dpkg-dev: already installed (1.13.22 >= 1.13.9 is satisfied)
> libc0.3-dev: missing
> libc0.1-dev: missing
> libc12-dev: missing
> libc6-dev: already installed (2.3.6-16 >= 2.3.6 is satisfied)
> libc6-dev-amd64: missing
> lib64gcc1: missing
> lib64z1-dev: missing
> m4: missing
> autoconf: missing
> automake1.9: missing
> libtool: missing
> autogen: missing
> gawk: missing
> dejagnu: missing
> expect-tcl8.3: missing
> bzip2: already installed (1.0.3-3)
> binutils: already installed (2.17-2 >= 2.16.1cvs20051214 is satisfied)
> debhelper: missing
> gperf: missing
> bison: missing
> flex: missing
> gettext: missing
> texinfo: missing
> zlib1g-dev: missing
> libmpfr-dev: missing
> locales: missing
> procps: already installed (1:3.2.7-2)
> sharutils: missing
> libxtst-dev: missing
> libxt-dev: missing
> libgtk2.0-dev: missing
> libart-2.0-dev: missing
> libcairo2-dev: missing
> gnat-4.0: missing
> realpath: missing
> chrpath: missing
> lsb-release: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> E: Package gnat-4.0 has no installation candidate
> Package gnat-4.0 is not available, but is referred to by another package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping gcj-4.0
> **
> Finished at 20060804-0551
> Build needed 00:06:34, 99432k disk space

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
gcj-4.0 has been removed from 

Bug#361664: marked as done (python-parted_0.11.2(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.2
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:

> In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28,
>  from pyparted.c:25:
> /usr/include/features.h:150:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
> definition
> pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_heads':
> pyparted.c:182: error: 'struct _PedDevice' has no member named 'heads'
> pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_sectors':
> pyparted.c:193: error: 'struct _PedDevice' has no member named 'sectors'
> pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_cylinders':
> pyparted.c:204: error: 'struct _PedDevice' has no member named 'cylinders'
> pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_geom_known':
> pyparted.c:215: error: 'struct _PedDevice' has no member named 'geom_known'
> pyparted.c: In function 'disk_get_type':
> pyparted.c:425: warning: passing argument 2 of 'PyPartedObject_new' discards 
> qualifiers from pointer target type
> error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

A full build log can be found at:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64&pkg=python-parted&ver=0.11.2

Best regards
Frederik Schueler


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#377262: marked as done (FTBFS with libparted1.7-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.2
Severity: serious

building '_partedmodule' extension
gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes 
-fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.3 -c pyparted.c -o 
build/temp.linux-i686-2.3/pyparted.o
In file included from /usr/include/python2.3/Python.h:8,
 from pyparted.c:27:
/usr/include/python2.3/pyconfig.h:834:1: warning: "_GNU_SOURCE" redefined
pyparted.c:23:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
/usr/include/python2.3/pyconfig.h:853:1: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28,
 from pyparted.c:25:
/usr/include/features.h:150:1: warning: this is the location of the previous 
definition
pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_heads':
pyparted.c:182: error: 'PedDevice' has no member named 'heads'
pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_sectors':
pyparted.c:193: error: 'PedDevice' has no member named 'sectors'
pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_cylinders':
pyparted.c:204: error: 'PedDevice' has no member named 'cylinders'
pyparted.c: In function 'device_get_geom_known':
pyparted.c:215: error: 'PedDevice' has no member named 'geom_known'
pyparted.c: In function 'disk_get_type':
pyparted.c:425: warning: passing argument 2 of 'PyPartedObject_new' discards 
qualifiers from pointer target type
error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#374209: marked as done (python-parted: FTBFS: build-dep on non-existent libparted1.6-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.2
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of python-parted_0.11.2 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 20060618-0029
> **
> Checking available source versions...
> Fetching source files...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Need to get 167kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main python-parted 0.11.2 (dsc) [984B]
> Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main python-parted 0.11.2 (tar) [166kB]
> Fetched 167kB in 0s (217kB/s)
> Download complete and in download only mode
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: python-dev (>= 2.3), python-dev (<< 2.4), libparted1.6-dev, 
> uuid-dev, debhelper
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> python-dev: already installed (2.3.5-10 >= 2.3 is satisfied)
> python-dev: already installed (2.3.5-10 << 2.4 is satisfied)
> libparted1.6-dev: missing
> uuid-dev: missing
> debhelper: already installed (5.0.37.1)
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> E: Couldn't find package libparted1.6-dev
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping python-parted
> **
> Finished at 20060618-0029
> Build needed 00:00:31, 488k disk space

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#226317: marked as done (gch: Uses wrong toplevel directory)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gch
Version: 19990519-8.1
Severity: minor

The file list of this package contains the directory "/use", which is
probably a typo and should read "/usr".

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux because 2.4.23-1-686 #1 Sun Nov 30 20:51:10 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages gch depends on:
ii  libasis-3.15p-1 3.15p-4  Ada Semantic Interface Specificati
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgnat-3.15p-1 3.15p-4  The GNU Ada 95 compiler runtime li

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed: abandoned upstream, unmaintained,
superseded by adacontrol, RC-buggy

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

[James Westby]

On (23/08/06 14:31), Steve Langasek wrote:
> reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
> severity 384324 important
> retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and 
> libtasn1-2-bin
> thanks
> 
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > I'm not sure it should be. The source package is Priority: Important,
> > and there is no Priority: for the binary package. Maybe we should change
> > this on the next upload.
> 
> Yes, please do so, but more importantly the override needs to be changed in
> the archive; let's reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.
>

Yes, of course. Thanks. I shall make the change in SVN to match.

> > We ant to request removal ASAP, however, there are 4 packages with
> > binary dependencies, and so require a binNMU. Two of these require a
> > sourceful upload however as they are not binNMU safe.
> 
> Which ones aren't binNMU-safe?
> 

uim-applet-gnome (#383040) and ggz-kde-games (no report as I have found
it just now) I think, as they both use ${source-Version} to depend on
their data.

The binNMU safe ones are evolution-exchange and ggz-kde-client. I am
unsure of how to proceed, as Andreas Metzler has been handling it up to
now. Shall I email -release with a binNMU request for these two?

Also I am have only checked i386 for binary dependencies, is there a way
to ensure the same for all arches?

Thanks,

James

-- 
  James Westby   --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
  seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384324: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

[Steve Langasek]

reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
severity 384324 important
retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and 
libtasn1-2-bin
thanks

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (23/08/06 18:58), Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 04:05:49PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> > > Can I ask how this should have been handled, as the two packages provide
> > > the same files, but a security bug prompted an API change, hence the new
> > > package?

> > Why is this package important at all? It barely fullfills the
> > conditions.

> I'm not sure it should be. The source package is Priority: Important,
> and there is no Priority: for the binary package. Maybe we should change
> this on the next upload.

Yes, please do so, but more importantly the override needs to be changed in
the archive; let's reassign this bug to ftp.debian.org.

> > > Is it satisfactory for this bug to wait and be resolved by the removal
> > > of -2?

> > If you are going to request removal now, it is okay. The problem that
> > debootstrap only supports that as it simply discards it and cdebootstrap
> > choke on it.

> We ant to request removal ASAP, however, there are 4 packages with
> binary dependencies, and so require a binNMU. Two of these require a
> sourceful upload however as they are not binNMU safe.

Which ones aren't binNMU-safe?

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335967: marked as done (BBPFS (experimental): mips-tools doesn't include binary)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: mips-tools
Version: 2.6.12-2
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

When building mips-tools on all architectures that I tested (which were
sparc and i386) it doesn't include any binary:

Automatic build of linux-patch-2.6-mips_2.6.12-2 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
[...]
Build finished at 20051027-0351

chroot-experimental/build/buildd/mips-tools_2.6.12-2_sparc.deb:
 new debian package, version 2.0.
 size 2440 bytes: control archive= 517 bytes.
 326 bytes,11 lines  control  
 216 bytes, 3 lines  md5sums  
 Package: mips-tools
 Version: 2.6.12-2
 Section: devel
 Priority: optional
 Architecture: sparc
 Installed-Size: 12
 Maintainer: Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Source: linux-patch-2.6-mips
 Description: MIPS specific kernel tools
  This package provides tools used on the MIPS architecture to convert
  the kernel into an ECOFF image.

chroot-experimental/build/buildd/mips-tools_2.6.12-2_sparc.deb:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:47 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:43 ./usr/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:45 ./usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:43 ./usr/share/doc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:46 ./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/
-rw-r--r-- root/root   608 2005-07-12 19:24:29 
./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/copyright
-rw-r--r-- root/root   468 2005-10-15 04:25:03 
./usr/share/doc/mips-tools/changelog.Debian.gz
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:45 ./usr/share/man/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-10-27 03:51:46 ./usr/share/man/man8/
-rw-r--r-- root/root   473 2005-07-12 19:24:29 
./usr/share/man/man8/elf2ecoff.8.gz

The full build log is available from
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=linux-patch-2.6-mips&ver=2.6.12-2&arch=sparc&stamp=1130377935&file=log&as=raw

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

[Mike Hommey]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:13:14PM -0500, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> >> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug.
> > 
> > M, sadly, i can't even reproduce the bug. Is the password manager
> > enabled by default ? I see kazehakase has indeed a user profile for the
> > underlying gecko, which means it may not be #376323, but i'd like to at
> > least be able to reproduce the bug...
> 
>  You think that bug is related?  But that's not about http auth?  Though
> I have to admit I don't have a real clue about the things this bug is
> related with, so...

Not being able to reproduce your bug, and the description being not very
precise, I could only relate your bug to issues I knew of, #376323 being
one.

> > Gerfried, could you provide detailed steps to be able to reproduce for a
> > non kazehakase user (meaning with no $HOME/.kazehakase) in the first
> > place ?
> 
>  I am running a current etch system and pulled in kazehakase from
> unstable.  Now that it got reassigned to your package I also pulled in
> the version of xulrunner from unstable.  I have moved aside
> ~/.kazehakase and it still happens to me.

Does it happen with another user ? What exactly do you do to get the bug
? Do you need some special setting ?
Note that the bug is still assigned to kazehakase...

> > Alternatively, it would be nice to have a full backtrace after segfault
> > (preferably install libxul0d-dbg before getting the backtrace). Maybe an
> > strace would be helpful, too.
> 
>  I took a look at that package, but I'm sorry, I can't do you the
> favour: "After unpacking 117MB will be used."
> FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda2 4.3G  4.1G   94M  98% /
> 
>  I will try to take a look if I can get the required space free.
> 
>  But here is the bt without -dbg package:
> #v+
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread -1234786624 (LWP 9961)]
> 0xb7e4cbd1 in GtkPromptService::PromptUsernameAndPassword () from 
> /usr/lib/kazehakase/libkazehakase.so.0
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0xb7e4cbd1 in GtkPromptService::PromptUsernameAndPassword () from 
> /usr/lib/kazehakase/libkazehakase.so.0

It sounds like a kazehakase bug, then, though xulrunner could be at
fault, but without a backtrace with debug symbols, it's hard to tell.
If you could provide a "crashing recipe" so that I could reproduce the
problem, I'd be able to get a full backtrace.

Cheers,

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#205752: marked as done (python-parted: must be updated for python2.3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-16
Severity: grave

This package needs to be rebuilt for python2.3.

Regards,
-- 
 .''`.   Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#383555: [Patch] Don't fail on moving udev from initramfs to real root.

[Daniel Serpell]

This patch fixes the bug 383555, the problem is on:

 /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev

This script moves the /dev directory inside the initramfs to the
real location in the new root.

Currently it fails in the line "nuke /dev/.udev/queue/", because this
directory does not exist.

So, applying the attached patch solves the problem.

After applying, you need to run "/usr/sbin/update-initramfs -u" to
update the initramfs in the running kernel.

Hope this can be integrated soon to the Debian package.

Daniel.

--- /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev.orig	2006-08-17 09:18:24.0 -0400
+++ /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/udev	2006-08-18 17:09:17.0 -0400
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 done
 
 # ignore any failed event because the init script will trigger again all events
-nuke /dev/.udev/queue/
+nuke /dev/.udev/queue/ || true
 
 # Move the real filesystem's /dev to beneath our tmpfs, then move it all
 # to the real filesystem

Bug#384394: libgnome2: any app depending on libgnome-2 fails on startup

[morph]

Package: libgnome2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss

Any app that depends on libgnome-2 (e.g. evince) fails on start-up with
the following error: evince: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0: undefined symbol:
bonobo_activation_get_goption_group


System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-xfs
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384241: marked as done (evolution-jescs: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-cal-1.2')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:32:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384241: fixed in evolution-jescs 2.6.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-jescs
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of evolution-jescs_2.6.4-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060822-2324
> **
...
> checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
> checking for catalogs to be installed...  ca cs de en_CA en_GB es fi fr it ja 
> ko nb nl pl pt pt_BR ru rw sk sq sv uk vi zh_CN zh_HK zh_TW
> checking whether gcc understands -Wno-sign-compare... yes
> checking what warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Wall 
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare
> checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler... 
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.10.3)
> checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for orbit2-config... /usr/bin/orbit2-config
> checking for ORBit - version >= 2.3.0... yes
> checking for orbit-idl-2... /usr/bin/orbit-idl-2
> checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2
> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema 
> installation
> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files
> checking for CALENDAR... configure: error: Package requirements 
> (libedata-cal-1.2 evolution-shell-2.6 libsoup-2.2) were not met:
> 
> No package 'libedata-cal-1.2' found
> 
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> 
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables CALENDAR_CFLAGS
> and CALENDAR_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> 
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060822-2326
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: evolution-jescs
Source-Version: 2.6.4-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
evolution-jescs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/e/evolution-jescs/evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.diff.gz
evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.dsc
  to pool/main/e/evolution-jescs/evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.dsc
evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/e/evolution-jescs/evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated evolution-jescs 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:31:27 +0200
Source: evolution-jescs
Binary: evolution-jescs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Evolution Maintainers 

Changed-By: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 evolution-jescs - Evolution Connector for Sun Java Enterprise System Calendar 
Serve
Closes: 384241
Changes: 
 evolution-jescs (2.6.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Expand build-deps on e-d-s libs (closes: #384241) [debian/control]
Files: 
 d7b96f34a974928e1a3b7e4c96d79cde 1003 gnome optional 
evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.dsc
 df3a07cdf52135011610d62c00bfc4b9 1817 gnome optional 
evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2.diff.gz
 aa7aa6100eb473381209cc0cb5ff1b28 207688 gnome optional 
evolution-jescs_2.6.4-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7Ka14VUX8isJIMARAkDbAJ929F

Bug#351692: marked as done (mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: mips-tools
Version: 2.4.27-11.040815-2
Severity: serious

mips-tools doesn't build on powerpc and hppa; probably a bug in
kernel-package or something -- needs more investigation.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages mips-tools depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.5-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

mips-tools recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384361: Possible bug origin

[Marc . Pantel]

In fact, there was an upgrade of xserver-xorg-core from version 1:1.0.2-9
to 1:1.1.1-3 without any upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-ati.

I got the same problem with fglrx and fbdev.

The bug seems to be related to sloppy version dependencies between the two
packages. This morning upgrade should not have been possible.

A new build of xserver-xorg-video-* and fglrx-server seems to be required
but I do not have the tools to do it and test.

I hope it helps.
Regards.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384312: marked as done (xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384312: fixed in xawtv 3.95-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xawtv
Version: 3.95-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'xawtv' on powerpc/unstable,
I get the following error:

  CC  console/fbtv.o
In file included from console/fbtv.c:31:
./libng/grab-ng.h:28:1: warning: "bool" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/curses.h:161,
 from console/fbtv.c:24:
/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/include/stdbool.h:36:1: warning: this is 
the location of the previous definition
console/fbtv.c: In function 'text_out':
console/fbtv.c:341: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'fs_puts' 
differ in signedness
console/fbtv.c: In function 'text_width':
console/fbtv.c:347: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 2 of 
'fs_textwidth' differ in signedness
console/fbtv.c: In function 'main':
console/fbtv.c:813: warning: pointer targets in assignment differ in signedness
  CC  console/fbtools.o
console/fbtools.c: In function 'fb_init':
console/fbtools.c:427: error: 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this 
function)
console/fbtools.c:427: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
console/fbtools.c:427: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [console/fbtools.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/xawtv-3.95'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c ./console/fbtools.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c2003-02-14 14:14:04.0 
+
+++ ./console/fbtools.c 2006-08-23 10:57:40.0 +
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 
-#include 
-
 #include "fbtools.h"
 
 /*  */
@@ -424,7 +422,7 @@
goto err;
 }
 #endif
-fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & (~PAGE_MASK);
+fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & 
~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)-1);
 fb_mem = mmap(NULL,fb_fix.smem_len+fb_mem_offset,
  PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_SHARED,fb,0);
 if (-1L == (long)fb_mem) {
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/matrox.c ./console/matrox.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/matrox.c 2005-02-03 10:40:41.0 
+
+++ ./console/matrox.c  2006-08-23 11:09:51.0 +
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 
-#include  /* PAGE_SIZE */
 #include 
 
 #include "byteswap.h"
@@ -226,7 +225,7 @@
return -1;
 }
 off = (unsigned long)fb_fix.mmio_start -
-   ((unsigned long)fb_fix.mmio_start & ~(PAGE_SIZE-1));
+   ((unsigned long)fb_fix.mmio_start & ~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)-1));
 bmmio += off;
 mmio = (uint32_t*)bmmio;
 return 0;

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xawtv
Source-Version: 3.95-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xawtv, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

alevtd_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/alevtd_3.95-3_sparc.deb
fbtv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/fbtv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
pia_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/pia_3.95-3_sparc.deb
radio_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/radio_3.95-3_sparc.deb
scantv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/scantv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
streamer_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/streamer_3.95-3_sparc.deb
ttv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/ttv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
v4l-conf_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/v4l-conf_3.95-3_sparc.deb
webcam_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/webcam_3.95-3_sparc.deb
xawtv-plugin-qt_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv-plugin-qt_3.95-3_sparc.deb
xawtv-plugins_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv-plugins_3.95-3_sparc.deb
xawtv-tools_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv-tools_3.95-3_sparc.deb
xawtv_3.95-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv_3.95-3.diff.gz
xawtv_3.95-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv_3.95-3.dsc
xawtv_3.95-3_sparc.deb
  to pool/main/x/xawtv/xawtv_3.95-3_sparc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Aurelien Jarno 

Bug#285090: marked as done (amap: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: amap
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'amap' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

amap.c: In function 'amap_scan':
amap.c:1595: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c: In function 'main':
amap.c:1847: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c:1888: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c:1900: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c:1915: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c:1945: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
amap.c:2031: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 
'amap_printable_banner_string' differ in signedness
make[1]: *** [amap] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/amap-4.7'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'amap' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/amap-4.7/amap.c ./amap.c
--- ../tmp-orig/amap-4.7/amap.c 2004-10-20 10:31:46.0 +0200
+++ ./amap.c2004-12-10 16:37:06.792481168 +0100
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
   f = amap_open_file(filename, "trigger", extension, opt->verbose);
   if (opt->verbose > 1)
 printf("\n");
-  if (((amap_struct_triggers*) triggers = (amap_struct_triggers*) trigger = 
(amap_struct_triggers*) malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggers))) == NULL)
+  if ((triggers = trigger = (amap_struct_triggers*) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggers))) == NULL)
 amap_error("malloc failed");
   memset(trigger, 0, sizeof(amap_struct_triggers));
 
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@
 if ((line[0] != '#') && (index(line, ':') != NULL) && (only_trigger == 
NULL || strncmp(only_trigger, line, strlen(only_trigger)) == 0)) { // weed out 
comment lines
   count_triggers++;
   if (count_triggers > 1) {
-if (((amap_struct_triggers*) trigger->next = (amap_struct_triggers*) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggers))) == NULL)
+if ((trigger->next = (amap_struct_triggers*) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggers))) == NULL)
   amap_error("malloc failed");
 trigger = (amap_struct_triggers*) trigger->next;
 memset(trigger, 0, sizeof(amap_struct_triggers));
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
   f = amap_open_file(filename, "response", extension, opt->verbose);
   if (opt->verbose > 1)
 printf("\n");
-  if (((amap_struct_responses*) responses = (amap_struct_responses*) response 
= (amap_struct_responses*) malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_responses))) == NULL)
+  if ((responses = response = (amap_struct_responses*) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_responses))) == NULL)
 amap_error("malloc failed");
   memset(response, 0, sizeof(amap_struct_responses));
 
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@
 if ((line[0] != '#') && (index(line, ':') != NULL)) { // weed out comment 
lines
   count_responses++;
   if (count_responses > 1) {
-if (((amap_struct_responses*) response->next = 
(amap_struct_responses*) malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_responses))) == NULL)
+if ((response->next = (amap_struct_responses*) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_responses))) == NULL)
   amap_error("malloc failed");
 response = (amap_struct_responses*) response->next;
 memset(response, 0, sizeof(amap_struct_responses));
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
 for (i = 0; i < strlen(triggerptr); i++)
   if (triggerptr[i] == ',')
 count++;
-if (((amap_struct_triggerptr*) triggerptr_tmp = response->triggerptr = 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggerptr))) == NULL)
+if ((triggerptr_tmp = response->triggerptr = 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggerptr))) == NULL)
   amap_error("malloc failed");
 triggerptr_tmp->next = NULL;
 
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
   triggerptr_tmp->trigger = strdup(triggerptr);
   if (i + 1 < count) {
 triggerptr = ptr;
-if (((amap_struct_triggerptr*) triggerptr_tmp->next = 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggerptr))) == NULL)
+if ((triggerptr_tmp->next = 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_triggerptr))) == NULL)
   amap_error("malloc failed");
 triggerptr_tmp = (amap_struct_triggerptr*) triggerptr_tmp->next;
 triggerptr_tmp->next = NULL;
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@
   if (opt->verbose > 1)
 printf("%d/%s ", port_tmp->port, port_tmp->ip_prot == AMAP_PROTO_TCP ? 
"tcp" : "udp");
   if (pto != pfrom) {
-if (((amap_struct_ports *) port_tmp->next = (amap_struct_ports *) 
malloc(sizeof(amap_struct_ports))) == N

Bug#384312: xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)

[Steve Langasek]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 08:39:37PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc.

> > Regards
> > Andreas Jochens
> > 
> > diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c ./console/fbtools.c
> > --- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c2003-02-14 
> > 14:14:04.0 +
> > +++ ./console/fbtools.c 2006-08-23 10:57:40.0 +
> > @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
> >  #include 
> >  #include 
> >  
> > -#include 
> > -
> >  #include "fbtools.h"
> >  
> >  /*  */
> > @@ -424,7 +422,7 @@
> > goto err;
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > -fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & (~PAGE_MASK);
> > +fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & 
> > ~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)-1);
>   
> ^
> Are you
> sure it is correct?

Yes, this is the correct way to detect the kernel page size at runtime,
either _SC_PAGE_SIZE or _SC_PAGESIZE is recognized.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#378728: marked as done (Uninstallable due to unmet dep on gnat (< 3.16))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libxmlada1-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 1.0-3

Hi

Your package is not installable as it depends on gnat (< 3.16). This
version is not available in unstable anymore.

Cheers

Luk

-- 
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint:   D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7   F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed (superseded by libxmlada2, RC-buggy).

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384361: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:37:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI 
version number mismatch - xserver fails to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This seems to of occurred for the first time sometime today, but as the
xserver is starting up it is saying that the ATI driver is reporting the
ABI version as version 0 and it is expecting 1.0.  Of consequence the
driver does not load and the xserver fails to start.

I have a radeon 9200 with the Device Section of xorg.conf configured so:-

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Technologies, Inc. RV280 [Radeon 9200]"
Driver  "ati"
BusID   "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

The log shows the following
...
(II) LoadModule: "ati"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
(II) Module ati: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 6.5.8
Module class: X.Org Video Driver
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8
(EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
(II) UnloadModule: "ati"
(II) Unloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
(EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module requirement mismatch, 0)
(II) LoadModule: "kbd"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so
(II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.0.1
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.5
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
(II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.0.4
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.5
(EE) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-ati depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core1:1.1.1-3   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-ati recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:21:28PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
> This seems to of occurred for the first time sometime today, but as the
> xserver is starting up it is saying that the ATI driver is reporting the
> ABI version as version 0 and it is expecting 1.0.  Of consequence the
> driver does not load and the xserver fails to start.

This was a misupload of xserver-xorg-core to unstable.  Update to 2:1.0.2-10
from unstable to fix.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384242: marked as done (evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:08:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Evolution] Bug#384242: evolution-exchange: FTBFS: missing 
build-dep on 'libedata-book-1.2'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.6.2-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of evolution-exchange_2.6.2-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060822-2320
> **
...
> checking for bind_textdomain_codeset... yes
> checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
> checking for dcgettext... yes
> checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
> checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
> checking for catalogs to be installed...  ar az bg bn ca cs cy da de dz el 
> en_CA en_GB es et fa fi fr gl gu hi hu id it ja ko ku lt mk ms nb ne nl nn no 
> pa pl pt pt_BR ro ru rw sk sq sr [EMAIL PROTECTED] sv ta th tr uk vi xh zh_CN 
> zh_HK zh_TW
> checking for Win32... no
> checking whether gcc understands -Wno-sign-compare... yes
> checking what warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Wall 
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare
> checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler... 
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for GLIB - version >= 2.0.0... yes (version 2.10.3)
> checking for pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for orbit2-config... /usr/bin/orbit2-config
> checking for ORBit - version >= 2.3.0... yes
> checking for orbit-idl-2... /usr/bin/orbit-idl-2
> checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2
> Using config source xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults for schema 
> installation
> Using $(sysconfdir)/gconf/schemas as install directory for schema files
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for ADDRESSBOOK... configure: error: Package requirements 
> (libedata-book-1.2 camel-provider-1.2) were not met:
> 
> No package 'libedata-book-1.2' found
> 
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> 
> Alternatively, you may set the environment variables ADDRESSBOOK_CFLAGS
> and ADDRESSBOOK_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
> See the pkg-config man page for more details.
> 
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060822-2323
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.3-1

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006, Julien Danjou wrote:
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> > checking for ADDRESSBOOK... configure: error: Package requirements 
> > (libedata-book-1.2 camel-provider-1.2) were not met:
> > 
> > No package 'libedata-book-1.2' found

 Was fixed in SVN since a while, but the state of evolution didn't
 permit uploading.

   Bye,
-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- End Message ---

Bug#284081: marked as done (New parted api, and possibility for parted 1.6.x (x>12) in debian/sarge ...)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 01:07:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> The 1.6.12 parted version includes a API change, and thus a bumping of the
> libraries soname. The change came that the old head/sector/cylinder values are
> split into a hw_geometry (as read from disk) and a bios_geometry) structure,
> which then holds the new CHS values. The idea is that hw_geometry is what is
> read from disk, and bios_geometry is what is infered from the bios or existing
> dos/windows partitions.

Here's a patch that updates python-parted to the new libparted API
(written on work time for Canonical):

  http://people.ubuntulinux.org/patches/python-parted.new-libparted.diff

I'd like to include this in Ubuntu rather soon, since our python-parted
package is currently uninstallable. Could you at least let me know
fairly quickly whether you approve of the API changes I've made to
python-parted? Ideally they could be uploaded to Debian experimental
relatively soon.

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384292: marked as done (centericq: FTBFS: @LIBTOOL@: command not found)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:47:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384292: fixed in centericq 4.21.0-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: centericq
Version: 4.21.0-12
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of centericq_4.21.0-12 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060823-0905
> **
...
> rm -f liblibjabber.a
> ar cru liblibjabber.a jid.o log.o jutil.o str.o expat.o hashtable.o genhash.o 
> pproxy.o pool.o rate.o xmlparse.o xstream.o xmltok.o xmlnode.o jconn.o 
> xmlrole.o jpacket.o snprintf.o socket.o sha.o 
> ranlib liblibjabber.a
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libjabber-0.1'
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libjabber-0.1'
> Making all in libmsn-0.1
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1'
> /usr/bin/make  all-recursive
> make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1'
> Making all in msn
> make[5]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1/msn'
> @LIBTOOL@ --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..  @curl_CFLAGS@   
> -Wall -g -O1-c authdata.cpp
> /bin/bash: line 1: @LIBTOOL@: command not found
> make[5]: *** [authdata.lo] Error 127
> make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1/msn'
> make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0/libmsn-0.1'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/centericq-4.21.0'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> **
> Build finished at 20060823-0913
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: centericq
Source-Version: 4.21.0-13

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
centericq, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

centericq-common_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq-common_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
centericq-fribidi_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq-fribidi_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
centericq-utf8_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq-utf8_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
centericq_4.21.0-13.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq_4.21.0-13.diff.gz
centericq_4.21.0-13.dsc
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq_4.21.0-13.dsc
centericq_4.21.0-13_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/centericq/centericq_4.21.0-13_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated centericq package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:17:02 +0200
Source: centericq
Binary: centericq-common centericq-utf8 centericq-fribidi centericq
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.21.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Lemoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 centericq  - A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client
 centericq-common - A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client (data 
files)
 centericq-fribidi - A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client 
(Hebrew)
 centericq-utf8 - A text-mode multi-protocol instan

Processed: Fixed in NMU of evolution-sharp 0.11.1-1.1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 383184 + fixed
Bug#383184: evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libecal1.2-dev, 
libebook1.2-dev'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#370634: marked as done (gch: FTBFS: transition to GNAT 4.1 (waiting for asis))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:37:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: gch
Version: 19990519-8.3
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of gch_19990519-8.3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
> Build started at 20060606-0813
> **
> gpg: Signature made Thu Dec 29 15:20:51 2005 CET using DSA key ID F1BCDB73
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> dpkg-source: extracting gch in gch-19990519
> dpkg-source: unpacking gch_19990519.orig.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: applying /home/buildd/build/gch_19990519-8.3.diff.gz
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gch
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 19990519-8.3
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 19990519-8.3
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> rm -f *.{ali,o} b~* gch-driver gch
> dh_clean
>  debian/rules build
> gnatmake -j2 -Pgch
> gnatgcc -c -o /build/buildd/gch-19990519/./gch-driver.o -gnato -gnatn -O2 
> -gnatVa -gnatA /build/buildd/gch-19990519/./gch-driver.adb
> gch-driver.adb:37:06: file "g-string.ads" not found
> gch-driver.adb:37:06: "Gch.Driver (body)" depends on "Table (body)"
> gch-driver.adb:37:06: "Table (body)" depends on "Opt (spec)"
> gch-driver.adb:37:06: "Opt (spec)" depends on "Gnat.Strings (spec)"
> opt.ads:44:26: "GNAT" is not visible
> opt.ads:44:26: non-visible declaration at gnat.ads:38
> opt.ads:259:24: "String_List_Access" is not visible
> opt.ads:259:24: non-visible declaration at g-os_lib.ads:68
> gnatmake: "gch-driver.adb" compilation error
> make: *** [build] Error 4
> **
> Build finished at 20060606-0813
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --
> Finished at 20060606-0813
> Build needed 00:00:06, 460k disk space

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed: abandoned upstream, unmaintained,
superseded by adacontrol, RC-buggy

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Processed: Re: Bug#384324: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 384324 ftp.debian.org
Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package
Bug reassigned from package `libtasn1-3-bin' to `ftp.debian.org'.

> severity 384324 important
Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

> retitle 384324 please lower the override priority for libtasn1-3-bin and 
> libtasn1-2-bin
Bug#384324: libtasn1-3-bin - important, conflicts against important package
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#215638: marked as done (python-parted: debian/copyright lacks pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.1
Severity: serious


debian/copyright lacks pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses .

BTW: lintian gives an error message for this issue.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

[Pascal LACROIX]

Like Eric, when upgrading experimental, trouble appear fixed for me.

-- 
God is dead.'  -Nietzsche|'Nietzsche is dead.'  -God  
88' _`88'_  `8   | Pascal LACROIX

 http://kikoucalou.chez-alice.fr

La vie est pleine d'une infinité d'absurdités, qui, impudemment, n'ont
même pas besoin de paraître vraisemblables; car elles sont vraies.

Bug#383047: marked as done (amap: Package uninstallable: www.thc.org)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:02:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: amap
Version: 4.8-1.1
Severity: grave


Hi, 

the amap package is uninstallable. When trying to install, postinst
always fails. The reason is, that it calls amap -W, which
automatically tries to update from www.thc.org:


% amap -W
Running Online Update for fingerprints, connecting to www.thc.org/thc-amap
Error: could not resolve host: www.thc.org



BTW, it is inacceptable that the package scripts contact a foreign
machine without user consent. 

regarding to the debian bug page, the package seems to be not
maintained any more. 


Propose to remove the package if not maintained anymore.


regards
Hadmut




-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-andromeda
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages amap depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8b-2   SSL shared libraries

amap recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This application has been removed because of license problems, please
see #346313.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384019: manual-copyright clarification

[Bram Moolenaar]

Stefano -

> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > The name "Open Publication License" is right, the URL was wrong.
> 
> Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
> correct one:
> 
>   http://opencontent.org/openpub/

I have changed it.  The ftp server will soon have the updated files.

> > The book by Steve Oualline uses this license, I used it for the Vim
> > documentation to avoid any trouble.  Otherwise I don't care much what
> > license is used exactly.
> 
> So we have quite a problem in Debian now, regarding the Vim Manual :-(
> The Open Publication License is not a free license according to the
> Debian Free Software Guidelines [1]. This has been discussed on the
> debian-legal mailing list, the conclusion and the discussions are
> available in the Debian wiki [2].
> 
> The bug report Cc-ed is a bug raising this issue [3].
> 
> As the things are now, we will be forced to remove the vim manual from
> the free section of the Debian archive and move it to non-free. Users
> will then be able to install vim with the default debian configuration,
> but wont be able to do it without adding the non-free archives to their
> repository configuration. I fear that this would also mean that vim wont
> be the standard vi-like editor in the debian distribution :-((
> 
> Do you think it is possible to relicense the manual under a different
> license? (The best possible is usually the same that applies to the
> source code of the program itself). How many parts are taken from
> Oualline's book? Is it possible to rewrite them? We are of course
> willing to help in that, but maybe we are luckily enough that no more
> parts took from the book are still in the help ...

It sounds like you are splitting hairs.  As far as I know the OPL is a
free license, since it allows distribution and modification.  What part
of the OPL makes it non-free?

- Bram

-- 
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
214. Your MCI "Circle of Friends" are all Hayes-compatible.

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org///
 \\\help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org///


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#382905: marked as done (vnc4 do not build on sparc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:33:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382905: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-kernel-headers
Severity: serious

My conclusion is that the reason why the build fail is that the asm/kbio.h file 
is missing, needed by
lnx_io.c.

This file must have vanished for the sparc architecture as it have existed in 
the linux-kernel-headers
package in stable on that arch. This file is sparc specific.

From packages.debian.org:
usr/include/asm/kbio.h  
devel/linux-kernel-headers

It also seems to be available in
usr/sparc-uclibc-linux/include/asm/kbio.h   
libdevel/libuclibc-dev
now, but it shouldn't it really be part of the linux-kernel-headers package?

From the build logs:

making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support...
make[7]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/vnc4-4.1.1+X4.3.0/unix/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support'
making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux...
make[8]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/vnc4-4.1.1+X4.3.0/unix/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux'
rm -f lnx_init.o
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef
-fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I. 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include
-I../../../../../../exports/include/X11 -I../../../../../../include/extensions 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared  
-I../../../../../.. -I../../../../../../exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  
-Dlinux -D__sparc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
   -DSHAPE -DXINPUT -DXKB -DLBX -DXAPPGROUP   -DXCSECURITY -DTOGCUP   
-DXF86BIGFONT -DDPMSExtension -DPANORAMIX-DRENDER -DRANDR -DGCCUSESGAS 
-DAVOID_GLYPHBLT -DPIXPRIV -DSINGLEDEPTH 
-DXFreeXDGA -DXvExtension   -DXFree86LOADER  
-DXFree86Server-DXF86VIDMODE
   -DXvMCExtension  
   -DSMART_SCHEDULE-DBUILDDEBUG 
-DXResExtension-DX_BYTE_ORDER=X_BIG_ENDIAN -DNDEBUG 
 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO-DUSESTDRES -DHAVE_SYSV_IPC   lnx_init.c
rm -f lnx_video.o
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef
-fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I. 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include
-I../../../../../../exports/include/X11 -I../../../../../../include/extensions 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared  
-I../../../../../.. -I../../../../../../exports/include -I/usr/X11R6/include  
-Dlinux -D__sparc__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE 
-D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE
   -DSHAPE -DXINPUT -DXKB -DLBX -DXAPPGROUP   -DXCSECURITY -DTOGCUP   
-DXF86BIGFONT -DDPMSExtension -DPANORAMIX-DRENDER -DRANDR -DGCCUSESGAS 
-DAVOID_GLYPHBLT -DPIXPRIV -DSINGLEDEPTH 
-DXFreeXDGA -DXvExtension   -DXFree86LOADER  
-DXFree86Server-DXF86VIDMODE
   -DXvMCExtension  
   -DSMART_SCHEDULE-DBUILDDEBUG 
-DXResExtension-DX_BYTE_ORDER=X_BIG_ENDIAN -DNDEBUG 
 -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO-DUSESTDRES -DHAVE_SYSV_IPC   lnx_video.c
rm -f lnx_io.o
gcc -c -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wundef
-fno-merge-constants -I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support -I. 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/include
-I../../../../../../exports/include/X11 -I../../../../../../include/extensions 
-I../../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared  
-I../../../../../.. -I../../../../../../e

Bug#373334: marked as done (Python policy transition)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-parted
Version: 0.11.2
Severity: important


  Hi, your package has been detected as generating a python
module/extension that may need an upgrade to the new Python Policy[1].

  A wiki page [2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages
to the new Policy. This bug may be a false positive, in that case,
please just close the bug.

  This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be
raised to serious when python will default to python2.4. Please note
that this bug (even not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy.


  [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg9.html
  [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
python-parted has been removed because it no longers works and isn't
maintained.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#382958: Upstream URL

[Margarita Manterola]

This problem was discussed upstream, here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341942

And was fixed with this clean and simple patch to configure.in:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=65572

The patch submitted by James is ok, but adds a lot of noise, because it
adds many other things to the configure script.

I managed to create a much smaller patch by running the old autoconf
instead of the new one.  I'm attaching the cleaned up patch, and I intent
to prepare an NMU with it  (will send another mail with the complete NMU
diff).

-- 
 Bessos,(o_
Marga.  (\)_
--- gnopernicus-untouched/configure 2006-08-23 18:38:34.223147389 -0300
+++ gnopernicus-1.0.5/configure 2006-08-23 18:42:33.13335 -0300
@@ -23891,18 +23891,21 @@
 { (echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors \"\\
  cspi-1.0 >= \$CSPI_REQUIRED \\
  gconf-2.0 >= \$GCONF_REQUIRED \\
- glib-2.0 >= \$GLIB_REQUIRED \"") >&5
+ glib-2.0 >= \$GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= \$GTK_REQUIRED \"") >&5
   ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED ") 2>&5
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED ") 2>&5
   ac_status=$?
   echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
   (exit $ac_status); }; then
   pkg_cv_LIBKE_CFLAGS=`$PKG_CONFIG --cflags "\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED " 2>/dev/null`
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED " 2>/dev/null`
 else
   pkg_failed=yes
 fi
@@ -23914,18 +23917,21 @@
 { (echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors \"\\
  cspi-1.0 >= \$CSPI_REQUIRED \\
  gconf-2.0 >= \$GCONF_REQUIRED \\
- glib-2.0 >= \$GLIB_REQUIRED \"") >&5
+ glib-2.0 >= \$GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= \$GTK_REQUIRED \"") >&5
   ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED ") 2>&5
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED ") 2>&5
   ac_status=$?
   echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
   (exit $ac_status); }; then
   pkg_cv_LIBKE_LIBS=`$PKG_CONFIG --libs "\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED " 2>/dev/null`
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED " 2>/dev/null`
 else
   pkg_failed=yes
 fi
@@ -23937,14 +23943,16 @@
LIBKE_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --errors-to-stdout --print-errors "\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED "`
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED "`
# Put the nasty error message in config.log where it belongs
echo "$LIBKE_PKG_ERRORS" 1>&5
 
{ { echo "$as_me:$LINENO: error: Package requirements (\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED ) were not met.
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED ) were not met.
 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
 installed software in a non-standard prefix.
 
@@ -23954,7 +23962,8 @@
 echo "$as_me: error: Package requirements (\
  cspi-1.0 >= $CSPI_REQUIRED \
  gconf-2.0 >= $GCONF_REQUIRED \
- glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED ) were not met.
+ glib-2.0 >= $GLIB_REQUIRED
+ gdk-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED ) were not met.
 Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
 installed software in a non-standard prefix.
 

Bug#346313: marked as done (amap license is not free)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:01:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: amap
Severity: serious

The license for amap (which is not actually in debian/copyright, 
but rather LICENCE.AMAP in the source) is not free because it adds
additional restrictions to the GPL. The amap authors seem to have no
intention of fixing this. See the following e-mail transcript, in
reverse chronological order:

From: "vh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ari Pollak'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: amap license issues
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:17:46 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi!

hmmm so basically I need to edit the LICENSE.GNU file to remove the
license name as well as to remove the "no further restrictions"
paragraph from it?
ok, I will do that then for the next release ...
I never read the GPL I must say :-)
thanks!

cheers,
vh 

-Original Message-
From: Ari Pollak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Dienstag, 3. Januar 2006 05:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: amap license issues

Hi all,

In the process of helping the author of pbnj (which uses nmap and amap
for scanning) to package his program for Debian, I noticed some issues
with the license of amap that would prevent further inclusion in Debian.
It is my hope that these issues can be resolved, since amap is a very
useful tool.

I noticed that there are two licenses in the amap source tree,
LICENCE.AMAP and LICENSE.GNU. If amap is intended to be licensed under
the terms contained in LICENCE.AMAP, it may be licensed as such, but
without #6. Part of the GPL is that "You may not impose any further
restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein."
Unfortunately, this conflicts with items 1-5 of LICENCE.AMAP.

Most of the .c files in the source (except for amapcrap.c) only contain
the GPL preamble and make no mention of the additional amap license, so
it's not clear what the copyright holders' intentions are with regards
to distribution of amap.

If item #6 is taken out completely and amap is relicensed solely by the
terms in LICENCE.AMAP, #2 should be made slightly less vague to make
sure that both distribution of both binary and source forms of amap are
freely distributable. I have no problems with amap being licensed under
either the GPL or a modified amap-specific license, but putting
additional restrictions on the GPL causes uncertain legal problems for
people who wish to distribute amap.

Thanks for listening. I hope this message cleared some things up, and I
hope I included everything of concern. If you still have any questions
or issues, please reply to me directly.

Thanks,
Ari

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#264276: marked as done (kernel-patch-nfs-swap: no copyright file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:38:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: kernel-patch-nfs-swap
Version: 2.4.25-2
Severity: serious

There's no /usr/share/doc/kernel-patch-nfs-swap/copyright violating
section 2.3. of your policy.


BTW: lintian gives an error for this bug.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--- End Message ---

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

[Eric Wong]

Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1

It happened to me too, installing 1:6.6.1-0 from experimental seems to
have fixed it.  IIRC an xorg-server upload that was targetted at
experimental was accidentally uploaded into unstable recently.

-- 
Eric Wong


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 384168 is serious

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384168 serious
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#383184: marked as done (evolution-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libecal1.2-dev, libebook1.2-dev')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:15:58 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Intent to NMU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: evolution-sharp
Version: 0.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'evolution-sharp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:

checking for gapi2-codegen... /usr/bin/gapi2-codegen
checking for gapi2-fixup... /usr/bin/gapi2-fixup
checking for LIBECAL... configure: error: Package requirements (libecal-1.2 >= 
1.2.0) were not met:

No package 'libecal-1.2' found

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBECAL_CFLAGS
and LIBECAL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1

Please add the missing Build-Depends on libecal1.2-dev and
libebook1.2-dev to debian/control.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control ./debian/control
--- ../tmp-orig/evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control   2006-08-15 
12:14:10.0 +
+++ ./debian/control2006-08-15 12:13:56.0 +
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.0), 
libgnome2.0-cil, gtk-sharp2-gapi, evolution-dev (>= 2.6.0) , 
evolution-data-server-dev (>= 1.6.1), cli-common-dev (>= 0.4.0), mono-mcs (>= 
1.0) | c-sharp-compiler, libmono-dev (>= 1.0), mono-gac
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, libecal1.2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgnome2.0-cil, gtk-sharp2-gapi, evolution-dev (>= 
2.6.0) , evolution-data-server-dev (>= 1.6.1), cli-common-dev (>= 0.4.0), 
mono-mcs (>= 1.0) | c-sharp-compiler, libmono-dev (>= 1.0), mono-gac
 Standards-Version: 3.7.2
 
 Package: libevolution-cil

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!

I have prepared a package that applies the patch by Andreas Jochens.  It's
a very simple patch, and it makes evolution-sharp build alright.

I'm attaching the interdiff output of the NMU.

-- 
Love,
Marga.
diff -u evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control 
evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control
--- evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control
+++ evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/control
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian Mono Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.0), 
libgnome2.0-cil, gtk-sharp2-gapi, evolution-dev (>= 2.6.0) , 
evolution-data-server-dev (>= 1.6.1), cli-common-dev (>= 0.4.0), mono-mcs (>= 
1.0) | c-sharp-compiler, libmono-dev (>= 1.0), mono-gac
-Standards-Version: 3.7.2
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), dpatch, libecal1.2-dev, libebook1.2-dev, 
libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.0.0), libgnome2.0-cil, gtk-sharp2-gapi, evolution-dev (>= 
2.6.0) , evolution-data-server-dev (>= 1.6.1), cli-common-dev (>= 0.4.0), 
mono-mcs (>= 1.0) | c-sharp-compiler, libmono-dev (>= 1.0), mono-gac 
+Standards-Version: 3.7.2 
 
 Package: libevolution-cil
 Architecture: any
diff -u evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/changelog 
evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/changelog
--- evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/changelog
+++ evolution-sharp-0.11.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+evolution-sharp (0.11.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload to fix Failure To Build From Source.
+  * debian/control: added dependencies on libecal1.2-dev and libebook1.2-dev.
+Thanks to Andreas Jochens for the patch. (Closes: #383184)
+
+ -- Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:51:53 -0300
+
 evolution-sharp (0.11.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream version.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#378291: has this been fixed?

[Geoff]

It looks like on July 14th you said it was going to be fixed, but I just
has this problem again today. I back ported Version: 2.5.9-10sarge2
to get squid up and running temporarily.

-- 
Geoff Cummins
IT Administrator
Sno Falls Credit Union
http://www.snofalls.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (425) 888-4004
Fax:   (425) 888-4240



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384361:

[Elisabeth LACROIX]

Same for me,
This occured also today after upgrade


(EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
(EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module requirement mismatch, 0)  


B.Rgds

  
Pascal LACROIX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
23/08/2006



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384381: trac: Python-support is buggy

[Le_Vert]

Package: trac
Version: 0.9.6-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I get a lots of "no module named cache" exceptions on my tracs (when 
browsing online svn ie).

Symlinking trac module to site-packages make trac working again :
ln -s /usr/share/python-support/trac/trac/ /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/trac

It's seems that python-support is not well used, but I don't know it at 
all so I can't found why it fails :/

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages trac depends on:
ii  python2.3.5-11   An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-clearsilver0.10.3-3   python bindings for clearsilver
ii  python-pysqlite2  2.3.2-1python interface to SQLite 3
ii  python-subversion 1.3.2-5Python bindings for Subversion
ii  python-support0.4.1  automated rebuilding support for p
ii  subversion1.3.2-5Advanced version control system

Versions of packages trac recommends:
ii  apache2   2.0.55-4.1 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork [httpd]   2.0.55-4.1 traditional model for Apache2
pn  python-setuptools  (no description available)

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7MJAHNb/igTI5bsRAmkcAJsEph4XnhKFKSIYOxIxrXxn8qA0mACfXyyP
lw5umNBaHHUg/AZTWn4o1Hg=
=WjmF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384051: follow-up, news

[Filippo Rusconi]

Hello, apparently things have gone better. I am not sure that this is
because of the install mentioned in an earlier message.

I have another computer with Debian/Testing installed and tried the
install/configuration of ekiga and notice that on that computer the
configuration of the ALSA sound system was almost immediate, while on
my own laptop it lasts for more than five minutes... but finally detects
the proper sound device.

What's funny is that with the wizard setup, I can go up to the end of
the configuration, but ekiga's main window does not show up and I have
to kill the process and re-execute, which goes again in wizard
configuration mode, which I cancel and at that point I finally have
access to the ekiga's main window.

Anyway, it seems that it works.

Cheers,

Filippo Rusconi

-- 
Filippo Rusconi, PhD - CNRS researcher - key C78F687C @ pgp.mit.edu
Author of ``GNU polyxmass'' at http://www.polyxmass.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-20 09:10]:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>> I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug.
> 
> M, sadly, i can't even reproduce the bug. Is the password manager
> enabled by default ? I see kazehakase has indeed a user profile for the
> underlying gecko, which means it may not be #376323, but i'd like to at
> least be able to reproduce the bug...

 You think that bug is related?  But that's not about http auth?  Though
I have to admit I don't have a real clue about the things this bug is
related with, so...

> Gerfried, could you provide detailed steps to be able to reproduce for a
> non kazehakase user (meaning with no $HOME/.kazehakase) in the first
> place ?

 I am running a current etch system and pulled in kazehakase from
unstable.  Now that it got reassigned to your package I also pulled in
the version of xulrunner from unstable.  I have moved aside
~/.kazehakase and it still happens to me.

> Alternatively, it would be nice to have a full backtrace after segfault
> (preferably install libxul0d-dbg before getting the backtrace). Maybe an
> strace would be helpful, too.

 I took a look at that package, but I'm sorry, I can't do you the
favour: "After unpacking 117MB will be used."
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 4.3G  4.1G   94M  98% /

 I will try to take a look if I can get the required space free.

 But here is the bt without -dbg package:
#v+

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1234786624 (LWP 9961)]
0xb7e4cbd1 in GtkPromptService::PromptUsernameAndPassword () from 
/usr/lib/kazehakase/libkazehakase.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7e4cbd1 in GtkPromptService::PromptUsernameAndPassword () from 
/usr/lib/kazehakase/libkazehakase.so.0
#1  0xb709e6bc in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#2  0xb71e6a22 in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#3  0xb6b5719a in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#4  0xb6b5ef1c in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#5  0xb6b5f34e in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#6  0xb6b5f55a in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#7  0xb6b611b3 in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#8  0xb6b613c0 in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#9  0xb6adfdfd in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#10 0xb6ae0ab8 in NS_RegistryGetFactory () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#11 0xb6a101bc in NS_AsyncCopy () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#12 0xb6a24aa7 in PL_HandleEvent () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#13 0xb6a24db9 in PL_ProcessPendingEvents () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#14 0xb6a26c3e in nsAutoMonitor::NewMonitor () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#15 0xb722bea5 in JSD_DebuggerOnForUser () from /usr/lib/libxul.so.0d
#16 0xb78027df in g_io_channel_unix_get_fd () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 0xb77d9e2c in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 0xb77dd176 in g_main_context_check () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#19 0xb77dd537 in g_main_loop_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#20 0xb7a254e1 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 0x0804b0d6 in ?? ()
#22 0x080698e8 in ?? ()
#23 0x0806a638 in ?? ()
#24 0x0804b6e9 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#25 0x in ?? ()
(gdb) 
#v-

 That's the bt from opening a random http auth page.

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
To err is human, to moo bovine.
-- unknown


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: severity of 384316 is important, severity of 383592 is important, merging 384316 383592

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384316 important
Bug#384316: Segmentation fault in smbd
Severity set to `important' from `normal'

> severity 383592 important
Bug#383592: samba processes crash due to incorrect access of tdbsam
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

> merge 384316 383592
Bug#383592: samba processes crash due to incorrect access of tdbsam
Bug#384316: Segmentation fault in smbd
Merged 383592 384316.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384312: xawtv: FTBFS (powerpc/ppc64): 'PAGE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)

[Aurelien Jarno]

Aurelien Jarno a écrit :

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 02:28:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:

Package: xawtv
Version: 3.95-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

When building 'xawtv' on powerpc/unstable,
I get the following error:



[snip]


With the attached patch 'xawtv' can be compiled on powerpc.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c ./console/fbtools.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xawtv-3.95/console/fbtools.c2003-02-14 14:14:04.0 
+
+++ ./console/fbtools.c 2006-08-23 10:57:40.0 +
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 
-#include 

-
 #include "fbtools.h"
 
 /*  */

@@ -424,7 +422,7 @@
goto err;
 }
 #endif
-fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & (~PAGE_MASK);
+fb_mem_offset = (unsigned long)(fb_fix.smem_start) & 
~(sysconf(_SC_PAGE_SIZE)-1);

  
^
  Are you 
sure it is correct?


I haven't seen the "-1", so this patch is correct. Sorry.

--
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer   | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#380466: #380466 - kazehakase: quits when going to any HTTP AUTH page

[Mike Hommey]

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:53:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:34:47AM +0200, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL 
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Mike, can you take a look? Appears to be related with xulrunner
> > > transition. So maybe you have an idea what the reason might be.
> > 
> > I didn't try to reproduce the bug and see the backtrace to verify my
> > assumptions, but I think it is the same bug as #376323, which I wanted
> > to fix in next upload of xulrunner at the time I wrote to the bug but
> > with the security update of 1.8.0.5, I forgot to apply the patches from
> > the BTS. It will be fixed in 1.8.0.5-2 anyway. I'm just waiting for
> > 1.8.0.5-1 to migrate to testing.
> > 
> > I'll take a look at kazehakase to see if it's the same bug.
> 
> M, sadly, i can't even reproduce the bug. Is the password manager
> enabled by default ? I see kazehakase has indeed a user profile for the
> underlying gecko, which means it may not be #376323, but i'd like to at
> least be able to reproduce the bug...

Note that #376323 has been fixed in xulrunner 1.8.0.5-2. Could you test
with this version to see if it solved your crash ?

If not, could you provide a backtrace (preferably using libxul0d-dbg)

Thanks

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384364: planner: FTBFS: dh_install: planner missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting

[Julien Danjou]

Package: planner
Version: 0.14-9
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of planner_0.14-9 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060823-1819
> **
...
> libtool: link: warning: 
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../..//libORBit-2.la' seems to be moved
> libtool: link: warning: 
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../..//libgmodule-2.0.la' seems to be 
> moved
> libtool: link: warning: 
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../..//libgthread-2.0.la' seems to be 
> moved
> libtool: link: warning: 
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../..//libglib-2.0.la' seems to be moved
> generating symbol list for `plannerui.la'
> /usr/bin/nm -B  .libs/plannerui_la-planneruimodule.o 
> .libs/plannerui_la-plannerui.o  | sed -n -e 's/^.*[  
> ]\([ABCDGIRSTW][ABCDGIRSTW]*\)[ ][  
> ]*\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\)$/\1 \2 \2/p' | /bin/sed 's/.* //' | sort | uniq 
> > .libs/plannerui.exp
> grep -E -e "initplannerui" ".libs/plannerui.exp" > ".libs/plannerui.expT"
> mv -f ".libs/plannerui.expT" ".libs/plannerui.exp"
> echo "{ global:" > .libs/plannerui.ver
>  cat .libs/plannerui.exp | sed -e "s/\(.*\)/\1;/" >> .libs/plannerui.ver
>  echo "local: *; };" >> .libs/plannerui.ver
>  cc -shared  .libs/plannerui_la-planneruimodule.o 
> .libs/plannerui_la-plannerui.o  
> -L/build/buildd/planner-0.14/debian/tmp//usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lgnomeui-2 -lSM 
> -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnome-keyring -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lglade-2.0 
> -lgnomeprintui-2-2 -lgnomeprint-2-2 -lz -lgnomecanvas-2 -lxml2 -lart_lgpl_2 
> -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 
> -lpangocairo-1.0 -lfontconfig -lXext -lXrender -lXinerama -lXi -lXrandr 
> -lXcursor -lXfixes -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lX11 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 
> -lgobject-2.0 -lbonobo-activation -lgconf-2 -lORBit-2 -lm -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl 
> -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lplanner-1 
> -L/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../  -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed 
> -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,plannerui.so 
> -Wl,-version-script -Wl,.libs/plannerui.ver -o .libs/plannerui.so
> /usr/bin/install -c .libs/plannerui.soT 
> /build/buildd/planner-0.14/debian/tmp//usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/plannerui.so
> /usr/bin/install -c .libs/plannerui.lai 
> /build/buildd/planner-0.14/debian/tmp//usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/plannerui.la
> libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish 
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14/python'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14/python'
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14'
> make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14'
> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
> test -z "/usr/lib/pkgconfig" || mkdir -p -- . 
> "/build/buildd/planner-0.14/debian/tmp//usr/lib/pkgconfig"
>  /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'libplanner-1.pc' 
> '/build/buildd/planner-0.14/debian/tmp//usr/lib/pkgconfig/libplanner-1.pc'
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/planner-0.14'
> dh_installdirs -pplanner 
> dh_installdirs -pplanner-dev 
> dh_installdocs -pplanner ./README ./AUTHORS  
> dh_installexamples -pplanner 
> dh_installman -pplanner  
> dh_installinfo -pplanner  
> dh_installmenu -pplanner 
> dh_installcron -pplanner 
> dh_installinit -pplanner   
> dh_installdebconf -pplanner 
> dh_installemacsen -pplanner   
> dh_installcatalogs -pplanner 
> dh_installpam -pplanner 
> dh_installlogrotate -pplanner 
> dh_installlogcheck -pplanner 
> dh_installmime -pplanner 
> dh_installchangelogs -pplanner  ./ChangeLog 
> dh_installudev -pplanner 
> dh_install -pplanner  
> dh_install: planner missing files 
> (debian/tmp/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/*.so), aborting
> make: *** [binary-install/planner] Error 1
> **
> Build finished at 20060823-1828
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
> --

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#384289: marked as done (libwrap0: access control become void)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:47:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384289: fixed in tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libwrap0
Version: 7.6.dbs-10
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss

In function daemon_or_port_match() in hosts_access.c,
variable "port" is not initialized.
Therefore,

if (sscanf(tok, "%u%c", &port, &junk) != 1 && port < 65535)

if "tok" contain a string (e.g. "sshd") and "port" have a number over 65535,
this "if" statement is judged FALSE and access control become void.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.6
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.eucJP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.eucJP (charmap=EUC-JP)

Versions of packages libwrap0 depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries

Versions of packages libwrap0 recommends:
ii  tcpd  7.6.dbs-10 Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilit

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tcp-wrappers
Source-Version: 7.6.dbs-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tcp-wrappers, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libwrap0-dev_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/libwrap0-dev_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
libwrap0_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/libwrap0_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.diff.gz
tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.dsc
tcpd_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/tcp-wrappers/tcpd_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tcp-wrappers package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:31:06 +0200
Source: tcp-wrappers
Binary: libwrap0 tcpd libwrap0-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 7.6.dbs-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 libwrap0   - Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library
 libwrap0-dev - Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers library, development files
 tcpd   - Wietse Venema's TCP wrapper utilities
Closes: 384289
Changes: 
 tcp-wrappers (7.6.dbs-11) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fixed the port number matching. (Closes: #384289)
Files: 
 7106f33297f08427daa2a36ff18085eb 682 net important tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.dsc
 a17c30b9aa399f55738f690aa6a3ce11 51765 net important 
tcp-wrappers_7.6.dbs-11.diff.gz
 738d1ac6b0a1555ff9196d1459eb8d32 77362 net important tcpd_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
 db78bec23b9fa173d7bc9b46c63e8d3e 28714 libs important 
libwrap0_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb
 fb70be622ed73071c4119ba99699b63b 34288 libdevel optional 
libwrap0-dev_7.6.dbs-11_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE7KHQFGfw2OHuP7ERAlscAJoDrSCDO+FJNXi2HdX+UCrkSAoy4QCfXXCN
4VydFdDgRGF6TFWXP1jOybc=
=vQBs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--- End Message ---

Bug#384363: nautilus-python: FTBFS: change build-dep to libnautilus-extension-dev

[Julien Danjou]

Package: nautilus-python
Version: 0.3.0-3
Severity: serious

Hello,

There was a problem while autobuilding your package:

> Automatic build of nautilus-python_0.3.0-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060823-1734
> **
> Checking available source versions...
> Fetching source files...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Need to get 308kB of source archives.
> Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main nautilus-python 0.3.0-3 (dsc) [691B]
> Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main nautilus-python 0.3.0-3 (tar) [306kB]
> Get:3 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main nautilus-python 0.3.0-3 (diff) [1296B]
> Fetched 308kB in 2s (129kB/s)
> Download complete and in download only mode
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), cdbs, python, python-dev, 
> python-gtk2-dev (>= 2.4.0), python-gnome2-dev, libnautilus2-dev (>= 2.6.0)
> Checking for already installed source dependencies...
> debhelper: missing
> cdbs: missing
> python: missing
> python-dev: missing
> python-gtk2-dev: missing
> python-gnome2-dev: missing
> libnautilus2-dev: missing
> Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Package libnautilus2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another 
> package.
> This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
> is only available from another source
> However the following packages replace it:
>   libnautilus-extension-dev
> E: Package libnautilus2-dev has no installation candidate
> apt-get failed.
> Package installation failed
> Trying to reinstall removed packages:
> Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
> Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping nautilus-python
> **
> Finished at 20060823-1734
> Build needed 00:01:02, 3216k disk space

-- 
Julien Danjou
.''`.  Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `'  http://people.debian.org/~acid
  `-   9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#359707: License

[Michael Jennings]

I've just released Eterm 0.9.4 which resolves this issue.  I don't
know why ljlane didn't respond or pass this along to me, but it's
resolved now.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/   Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
---
 "I have failed over and over again in my life.  And that is why I
  succeed."  -- Michael Jordan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#384361: xserver-xorg-video-ati: Driver reporting ABI version number mismatch - xserver fails to start

[Alan Chandler]

Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

This seems to of occurred for the first time sometime today, but as the
xserver is starting up it is saying that the ATI driver is reporting the
ABI version as version 0 and it is expecting 1.0.  Of consequence the
driver does not load and the xserver fails to start.

I have a radeon 9200 with the Device Section of xorg.conf configured so:-

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Technologies, Inc. RV280 [Radeon 9200]"
Driver  "ati"
BusID   "PCI:1:0:0"
EndSection

The log shows the following
...
(II) LoadModule: "ati"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
(II) Module ati: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 6.5.8
Module class: X.Org Video Driver
ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8
(EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1)
(II) UnloadModule: "ati"
(II) Unloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
(EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module requirement mismatch, 0)
(II) LoadModule: "kbd"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/kbd_drv.so
(II) Module kbd: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.0.1
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.5
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/mouse_drv.so
(II) Module mouse: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 7.0.0, module version = 1.0.4
Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 0.5
(EE) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-k7
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-ati depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core1:1.1.1-3   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-ati recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]